WISC-V-Tech-Manual-Supplement.pdf

Technical and InterpretiveManual Supplement: Special Group Validity Studies With Other Measures and Additional Tables PsychCorp is an imprint of Pearson Clinical Assessment. Pearson Executive Office 5601 Green Valley Drive Bloomington, MN 55437 800.627.7271 www.PearsonClinical.com Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved. Portions of this work were previously published. Warning: No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the copyright owner. Pearson, the PSI logo, PsychCorp, the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, and WISC are trademarks, in the U.S. and/or other countries, of Pearson Education, Inc. or its affiliate(s). Printed in the United States of America. Product Number: 0150015089 Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement: Special Group Validity Studies With Other Measures and Additional Tables David Wechsler WISC–V Research Directors Susan Engi Raiford, PhD James A. Holdnack, PhD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Brown ADD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 Appendix G. . . . . . . . 1 Brief Descriptions of Other Measures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 Correlations With the BASC–2 PRS . . . 33 Summary . . . 48 Appendix H. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 Correlations With the BASC–2 PRS . . . . . . . . . 13 Correlations With the WIAT–III . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inc. . . . . . 39 Appendix F. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Vineland–II . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Disruptive Behavior . . 84 iii WISC–5 Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . by Age Group . . . 33 Correlations With the BASC–2 PRS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 BASC–2 PRS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 Correlations With the Brown ADD . . Intercorrelations of WISC–V Scores. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Contents Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . WISC–V Stability Coefficients. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . by Age Group . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 Autism Spectrum Disorder With Accompanying Language Impairment . . . . . . . 26 Correlations With the BASC–2 PRS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Correlations Between the WISC–V and the KTEA–3 and WIAT–III. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Results of Special Group Validity Studies With Other Measures . . . . . . . by Age Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Correlations With the WIAT–III . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 WIAT–III . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 Traumatic Brain Injury . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Intellectual Disability . . . . . 4 Correlations With the Vineland–II . 26 Autism Spectrum Disorder Without Accompanying Language Impairment . . . 8 Specific Learning Disorder-Mathematics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Specific Learning Disorder-Reading and Specific Learning Disorder-Reading and Written Expression . . . . . . . . 17 Correlations With the BASC–2 PRS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . All rights reserved. . . . Process. 18 Table 10 Correlations Between the WISC–V and the Brown ADD for the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Group . . . . . . . . . 2 Table 2 Correlations Between the WISC–V and the Vineland–II for the Intellectual Disability Group . . . . 34 Table 19 Correlations Between WISC–V Complementary Scores and the BASC–2 PRS for the Autism Spectrum Disorder Without Language Impairment Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .List of Tables Table 1 Demographic Data for the Validity Studies With Other Measures in Special Groups . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 Table 9 Correlations Between WISC–V Complementary Scores and the BASC–2 PRS for the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 Table 14 Correlations Between the WISC–V and the BASC–2 PRS for the Traumatic Brain Injury Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 Table 18 Correlations Between the WISC–V and the BASC–2 PRS for the Autism Spectrum Disorder Without Language Impairment Group . . . . 23 Table 13 Correlations Between WISC–V Complementary Scores and the BASC–2 PRS for the Disruptive Behavior Group . . . . by Age Group . . . . . 11 Table 6 Correlations Between the WISC–V and the WIAT–III for the Specific Learning Disorder-Mathematics Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 Stability Coefficients of Subtest. . . . 21 Table 12 Correlations Between the WISC–V and the BASC–2 PRS for the Disruptive Behavior Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Table 5 Correlations Between WISC–V Complementary Scores and the WIAT–III for the Specific Learning Disorder-Reading and Reading and Written Expression Groups . . . . . 41 Table F. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Inc. . . . . . . 5 Table 3 Correlations Between WISC–V Complementary Scores and the Vineland–II for the Intellectual Disability Group . . . . . . . . 14 Table 7 Correlations Between WISC–V Complementary Scores and the WIAT–III for the Specific Learning Disorder-Mathematics Group . . . . . . . . . 46 iv WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson. . . . . . by Age Group . . All rights reserved. . 16 Table 8 Correlations Between the WISC–V and the BASC–2 PRS for the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Table 4 Correlations Between the WISC–V and the WIAT–III for the Specific Learning Disorder-Reading and Reading and Written Expression Groups . 27 Table 17 Correlations Between WISC–V Complementary Scores and the BASC–2 PRS for the Autism Spectrum Disorder With Language Impairment Group . 20 Table 11 Correlations Between WISC–V Complementary Scores and the Brown ADD for the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Group . . . . . . . . . . . and Composite Scores. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 Table 16 Correlations Between the WISC–V and the BASC–2 PRS for the Autism Spectrum Disorder With Language Impairment Group . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 Table F. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2 Stability Coefficients of Complementary Subtest and Composite Scores. . . . . . 25 Table 15 Correlations Between WISC–V Complementary Scores and the BASC–2 PRS for the Traumatic Brain Injury Group . . . . . .2 Correlations Between WISC–V Complementary Scores and the KTEA–3. . Process. . . . . Process. .16 Correlations of Complementary Scores With All Subtest. Process. . . and Composite Scores for Age 16 . . . Process. . . . . . 62 Table G. . . . . . . . . . . Process. 68 Table G. . . .2 Correlations of Complementary Scores With All Subtest. . .20 Correlations of Complementary Scores With All Subtest. Process. . . . Process. . 54 Table G. . . 72 Table H. . All rights reserved. . . . . . . . . . . . . . and Composite Scores for Age 9 . . . and Composite Scores for Age 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 Table H. . Inc. . . . . .17 Intercorrelations of Subtest. . . . . . . . . . . . . . by Age Group . . . . . Process. . . .21 Intercorrelations of Subtest. . . . . . . . . . . .3 Correlations Between the WISC–V and the WIAT–III. 82 v WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson.13 Intercorrelations of Subtest. . . . 51 Table G. . . . . . . .6 Correlations of Complementary Scores With All Subtest. . . . . . . .1 Correlations Between the WISC–V and the KTEA–3. . . . . . . . . . . . 64 Table G. . . . and Composite Scores for Age 10 . . . by Age Group . . . . . . 65 Table G. . and Composite Scores for Age 14 . . 56 Table G. . . . . . . . .22 Correlations of Complementary Scores With All Subtest. . . . . . . . . 60 Table G. .10 Correlations of Complementary Scores With All Subtest. and Composite Scores for Age 15 . . . . . . . . . . . and Composite Scores for Age 13 . . . . . . . and Composite Scores for Age 10 . 58 Table G. 53 Table G. . and Composite Scores for Age 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Process.4 Correlations of Complementary Scores With All Subtest. . . .14 Correlations of Complementary Scores With All Subtest. . . .18 Correlations of Complementary Scores With All Subtest. . 55 Table G. . and Composite Scores for Age 8 . . . . 59 Table G. 69 Table G. and Composite Scores for Age 15 . . . . . . . .Table G.9 Intercorrelations of Subtest. . . 50 Table G. . . . . . . 52 Table G. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 Table G. and Composite Scores for Age 8 . and Composite Scores for Age 14 . . . .1 Intercorrelations of Subtest. . 49 Table G. Process. by Age Group . . 67 Table G. .11 Intercorrelations of Subtest. . . . . Process. .3 Intercorrelations of Subtest. 66 Table G. . and Composite Scores for Age 7 . . and Composite Scores for Age 13 . . Process. . . . . . . . . . . and Composite Scores for Age 12 . . . . . . . and Composite Scores for Age 9 . . . Process. . . and Composite Scores for Age 11 . . . . . .19 Intercorrelations of Subtest. . . 61 Table G. . . . . . . . . . . . . . and Composite Scores for Age 11 . and Composite Scores for Age 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . Process. . 76 Table H. Process. . . . Process. . . . . . . . . Process. .4 Correlations Between WISC–V Complementary Scores and the WIAT–III. . . .8 Correlations of Complementary Scores With All Subtest. . . . . . . . . . Process. . . . 78 Table H. and Composite Scores for Age 16 . . . . . . . Process. . Process. . . . . .7 Intercorrelations of Subtest. . . . . . .15 Intercorrelations of Subtest. . . Process. . . and Composite Scores for Age 12 . . by Age Group . . .5 Intercorrelations of Subtest. . . 57 Table G. . . . . . . . . . . Process. . .12 Correlations of Complementary Scores With All Subtest. AttentionDeficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Autism Spectrum Disorder With Accompanying Language Impairments (ASD-L). WISC–V scores in the ID group do not cover full ability range). 1 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson. . Specific Learning Disorder-Mathematics (SLD-M). All rights reserved.. and behavioral regulation. Eight special group studies were targeted for validity studies using the WISC–V in conjunction with other measures. Disruptive Behavior (DB). it is important to consider the range and variability of scores in each clinical group. adaptive functioning. and composite scores. Based on this feedback.Introduction The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Fifth Edition (WISC–V) is often used with other clinical instruments in evaluations of children with various clinical diagnoses. practitioners were asked to identify special groups of children they frequently tested with the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Fourth Edition (WISC–IV. The Tech Manual provides information on the relation between intellectual and cognitive abilities as measured by the WISC–V with other tests in typically developing children. 2003) and other measures they frequently used in conjunction with the WISC–IV. However. the correlation may be attenuated due to range restriction (e. Appendix A of the Tech Manual lists specific inclusion criteria for each special group. Correlations may diverge from those seen in a sample of typically developing children if the distribution of scores is different in the selected special group. Inc. and behavioral issues in children with known neurodevelopmental disorders. process. This supplementary document provides the results of the special group studies with other measures that were collected as part of the WISC–V standardization but not reported in the WISC–V Technical and Interpretative Manual (Tech Manual). and Autism Spectrum Disorder Without Accompanying Language Impairments (ASD-NL). combined Specific Learning Disorder-Reading and Specific Learning Disorder-Reading and Written Expression (SLD-R/RW). as well as percentages of sample representation by sex. In the early stages of WISC–V development. psychosocial development. Table 1 provides sample sizes and demographic data for the WISC–V special group studies with other measures.g. Wechsler. This information illustrates the cognitive skills associated with developing academic skills. For example. The studies reported in this supplement provide some information about the impact of cognitive deficits on aspects of academic performance. a number of the special group samples were administered additional measures in addition to the WISC–V during the scale’s standardization. parent education level. the studies in the Tech Manual do not indicate how impairments in cognitive ability may impact functioning in other psychosocial domains. Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI). When evaluating the correlation between two measures in clinical samples. Chapter 5 of the Tech Manual describes the results of studies comparing the performance of special groups in this supplement to matched control groups from the normative sample. The mean age of each sample is reported. Results from these studies provide practitioners additional information about the construct and ecological validity of the WISC–V subtest. and geographic region. both Mild and Moderate severity). including Intellectual Disability (ID. race/ethnicity. 1 36.7 Midwest Geographic Region 2.0 36.5 Male 1.8 South West 25.9 — 56.0 52.7 63.9 African American Race/Ethnicity 49.2 ≤8 years Parent Education 26.6 19.6 — 4.6 34.3 2.3 28.1 25 WIAT–III SLD-M 13.5 52.4 — 11.0 24.9 3.4 44.7 17.0 12.9 14.4 11.4 47.1 9.0 — 20.1 52. Except for sample size (N ) and age.6 55.0 13.5 61.7 14.5 Female Sex 12.6 — 5.5 27 BASC–2 PRS ASD-L 40.2 13.1 5.2 — 6.2 42.0 18 BASC–2 PRS TBI 18.4 76.9 22.3 Northeast 23.3 46 BASC–2 PRS ADHD 12.8 11.1 2. ASD-L = Autism Spectrum Disorder With Language Impairment.7 19.0 2.5 78.2 2.4 47 Brown ADD 14.4 19.0 58.0 11.3 6.1 9.0 10.8 25.3 61.0 2.3 — 6.9 51.7 60.3 38.7 38.3 30 BASC–2 PRS ASD-NL Note.8 61.8 — 11.2 3. TBI = Traumatic Brain Injury.9 11.2 SD 50.0 32.4 22.7 8.0 4.7 70.0 40.5 11.5 40.3 — 10.1 38.0 3. 3.7 13.6 11.5 — 8. DB = Disruptive Behavior.0 37. ASD-NL = Autism Spectrum Disorder Without Language Impairment.0 19.0 48.7 76.0 70.9 31.2 14.6 29.8 54.9 28.7 23. ADHD = Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.1 61.9 25.2 — — 3.0 22. All rights reserved.7 3.6 10.5 47.8 45.3 42.7 77.8 38.1 2.5 — 8.6 27.9 44.1 38.5 33.2 — 3.0 — 48.0 50.9 45. Special Group abbreviations are: ID = Intellectual Disability.7 10.6 20. SLD-R/RW = Specific Learning Disorder-Reading and Specific Learning Disorder-Reading and Written Expression.2 Asian Hispanic White Other 26.0 24.3 14.6 3.4 2.8 22.0 20.0 13.3 2.0 44.1 51 WIAT–III Vineland–II 93 SLD-R/RW ID Special Group Demographic Data for the Validity Studies With Other Measures in Special Groups Mean Age N Table 1 .1 — 6.2 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson.0 10. SLD-M = Specific Learning Disorder-Mathematics.7 6.4 39.9 2.4 9–11 years 12 years 13–15 years ≥16 years 10.0 32.4 — 11.3 — 9. 4.6 8.0 12. data are reported as percentages. Inc. Total percentage may not add up to 100 due to rounding.6 21 BASC–2 PRS DB 44.3 33. v-scores of 18–20 are classified as elevated and scores of 21–24 are classified as clinically significant. Inc. WIAT–III The WIAT–III is an individually administered diagnostic achievement test designed for students in grades prekindergarten though 12 and adults. The Vineland–II domain scores are scaled on a metric with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation (SD) of 15. the parent rating scale from the Behavior Assessment System for Children–Second Edition (BASC–2 PRS. Reynolds & Kamphaus. therefore. The cognitive strengths and weaknesses of children identified as SLD-R or SLD-RW are reviewed in the Tech Manual as is the relationship between the WISC–V and WIAT–III in nonclinical children. Socialization. All rights reserved. Daily Living Skills. writing. The primary and content scores are scaled on a metric with a mean of 50 and an SD of 10. and other relevant information. Pearson. subdomain and subscale v-scores of 10–12 are classified as moderately low and scores of 9 or below are classified as low. are reverse scored.Brief Descriptions of Other Measures Children in each of the identified special group samples were administered the WISC–V. there is little variability in performance for individuals ages 7 to 50. Cicchetti. multidimensional system for ages 2:0 to 25:11. The Parent/Caregiver Rating Form of the Vineland–II was administered to the caregivers of children in the ID special group study. that is used to facilitate differential diagnosis and educational classification of emotional and behavioral disorders. and the Brown Attention-Deficit Disorder Scales for Children and Adolescents (Brown ADD. It is part of the BASC–2. the subdomains and subscales are on a v-score metric with a mean of 15 and an SD of 3. and scores of 70 or below are classified as low. reading. 2004). with higher scores indicating more behavioral difficulties on most scales. Due to the developmental nature of the skills measured in the Motor Skills domain and subdomains. It also includes a Maladaptive Behavior Domain to measure problem behaviors. Please refer to the published materials of each measure for additional information on appropriate uses. as well as portions or complete versions of the following measures: the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales–Second Edition (Vineland–II. BASC–2 PRS The BASC–2 PRS is used to rate a child’s observable behavior and to provide insight into a child’s behavior and personality. The Maladaptive Behavior Index and its contributing subscales. Vineland–II The Vineland–II is an individually administered measure of adaptive behavior for ages birth through 90. . Although Executive 3 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson. psychometric properties. The following sections provide a brief summary of each measure. Scores of 60–69 indicate “at risk” and scores of 70 or more are classified as clinically significant. The WIAT–III subtests and composite scores are scaled to a standard score metric with a mean of 100 and an SD of 15. Internalizing and Externalizing. and Motor Skills. the Wechsler Individual Achievement Test–Third Edition (WIAT–III. & Balla. or ages 4:0–50:11. but not all subdomain scores are available for ages 6–16. and mathematics skills. 2001). It includes 16 subtests designed to measure listening. speaking. a multimethod. Brown. The WIAT–III was administered to children in the SLD-R/RW and SLD-M special group studies. Domain scores of 71–85 reflect adaptive skill levels that are moderately low. Sparrow. 2005). It measures adaptive behavior in four broad domains: Communication. Similarly. both adaptive and maladaptive. and scores for ages 7–16 are extrapolated from the norms for 6-year-olds. Each domain includes a number of subdomains. 2009). Both special groups demonstrate lower scores on all subtest. SDs.Functioning is a positive trait. The Parent Rating Scale of the BASC–2 was administered to the caregivers of children in the ADHD. process. Scores of 55–59 are considered somewhat atypical. and Action. In children with ID. The Parent/ Caregiver Rating Form of the Brown ADD was administered to the caregivers of children in the ADHD special group study. STI. and corrected correlation coefficients between the WISC–V and the Vineland–II. with a testing interval of 0–44 days and a mean testing interval of 4 days. Emotion. with higher scores indicating more behavior difficulties on most scales. ASD-L. DB. Tables 2 and 3 present the means. and poor executive and behavioral functioning. which results in a restricted range of scores. the Mild ID group had relative cognitive strengths on the PSI. and SRI. High scores on this scale indicate poor attention. aged 6–16. The WISC–V and the Vineland–II were administered to parents or caregivers of 93 children with intellectual disability-mild or -moderate severity. All rights reserved. The ADD Inattention Total and ADD Combined Total scores are also available. 2013). American Psychiatric Association. a high score reflects positive features and low scores suggest possible problems areas. 4 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson. and scores of 70 or more are markedly atypical and considered clinically significant. Brown ADD The Brown ADD is a rating scale that uses an executive functioning model to measure symptoms of attention-deficit disorders. For the Resiliency scale. However. Inc. Effort. 2010. including Activation. Typically developing children do not show impairments in adaptive functioning. Memory. there is little association between cognitive functioning and adaptive behavior. The primary and content scores are scaled on a metric with a mean of 50 and an SD of 10. Chapter 5 in the Tech Manual presents WISC–V data for the ID-Mild and -Moderate special groups and for the relations between the WISC–V and the Vineland–II. Scores of 60–69 are considered moderately atypical. . In typically developing children. NSI. it is expected that range restrictions will also attenuate the correlation between WISC–V scores and adaptive functioning. and the Moderate ID group demonstrate relative strengths on the NSI and STI. The scale yields various cluster scores. A moderate relation between working memory and written communication skills was found. Results of Special Group Validity Studies With Other Measures Intellectual Disability Correlations With the Vineland–II Children identified with Intellectual Disability show global deficits in cognitive functioning and in adaptive functioning (American Association of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. and ASD-NL special group studies. higher scores on this scale indicate poorer executive functioning. Focus. and composite scores than the matched control groups. TBI. 17 .26 .32 .32 .32 .37 .29 .02 –.35 .21 .56 . Inc.37 .32 .16 .28 .6 3.29 .24 .18 –.22 –.16 .45 .45 .53 .48 .21 –.18 .00 Fine 12.40 .05 –.07 –.07 –.8 92 .39 .31 .35 .19 .33 .09 .49 .04 .03 –.45 .09 –.13 Receptive 9.13 .40 .15 .29 .23 .36 .16 .29 .18 .37 .25 .23 .25 .01 Externalizing Behavior .17 .34 .38 .14 Interpersonal Relationships 9.26 .49 .11 .54 .00 –.15 –.21 Community 10.18 .4 3.27 .31 Written 10.21 .27 .54 .11 .08 –.1 70 .21 .20 .25 .7 2.15 .27 .24 .41 .06 .49 .15 –.15 .27 .16 .28 .1 2.25 .46 .40 .0 92 .30 .13 .00 –.06 .02 –.45 .06 .21 –.46 .55 .24 –.18 .15 .04 .24 .34 .7 2.26 .04 –.31 .2 70 .22 .21 .28 .23 .09 –.12 –.24 .23 .21 .14 .09 .53 .29 .07 .08 –.28 .0 93 .33 .16 . Mean SD  n SI VC IN CO BD VP MR FW PC AR DS PS LN CD SS CA VCI VSI FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI Vineland–II WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score Table 2 11.10 –.45 .5 3.25 .9 91 .44 .52 .25 .29 .41 .26 .41 .7 4.08 .35 .39 .01 .18 .25 .22 .26 .08 .41 .25 .45 .41 .19 .23 .21 .5 90 .05 Internalizing 17.16 .25 .25 .23 .18 –.40 .20 –.17 –. All correlations were corrected for the variability of the WISC–V normative sample (Guilford & Fruchter.32 . 9.23 .34 .14 .26 .07 .44 .34 .20 .03 .18 .21 .16 –.20 .30 .31 .0 2.23 .29 .34 .26 .14 –.13 –.20 .19 .22 .43 .01 .33 .35 .3 90 .37 .13 .08 –.31 .31 .29 .07 .38 .19 .11 .27 .16 .9 92 –.28 .23 .24 .07 .24 .44 .38 .33 .27 .7 3.44 .14 .03 –.06 Play and Leisure Time Socialization Vineland–II Subdomain Correlations Between the WISC–V and the Vineland–II for the Intellectual Disability Group Note.29 .03 –.21 .21 .40 .49 .01 .38 .31 .26 .04 .27 .32 .12 .25 Gross Motor Skills 17.36 .21 .20 .37 .43 .18 –.1 92 .13 Coping Skills 12.28 .13 –.6 92 –.05 –.30 .20 .37 .25 .37 . All rights reserved.16 .31 .33 .36 .08 .5 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson.05 .23 .45 .17 .32 .24 .34 .37 .27 .48 .32 .30 .44 .13 –.26 .26 .37 .00 .36 .29 –.06 .25 .24 .13 .12 .02 –.16 .13 –.47 .06 .1 2.36 .33 .30 .12 –.20 .03 –.15 –.06 .19 Personal 10.53 .27 .27 .26 .39 .21 Expressive Communication 9.22 .13 .25 .7 3.33 .39 .07 .36 .34 .41 .28 .15 .19 .24 .18 .37 .09 .35 .45 .18 .08 –.14 .36 .31 .31 .7 92 .12 .08 –.08 .21 .52 .47 . 1978).29 .03 –.17 .9 92 .07 –.07 –.48 .29 .14 Domestic Daily Living Skills 9.7 3.21 –.30 .35 .9 3.14 .08 –.18 .16 .25 .21 –.31 .22 .33 .02 –.25 . 42 .14 –.39 .26 .6 3.35 .02 –.50 .27 .06 –.19 .30 .11 –.19 .9 2.25 .10 .6 16.19 .18 –.00 Maladaptive Behavior Index Note.7 60.3 10.16 .35 .40 .46 .8 65.2 2.45 .37 .0 2.29 .32 .44 . .43 .0 3.0 12.6 12.15 –.1 61.1 3.9 10.6 2.23 –.0 20.31 .39 .6 4.35 . Inc.44 .24 .16 .2 10.30 .6 9.4 91 .35 .01 –.35 .29 .5 10.1 1.59 .1 63.58 .22 .7 SD  WISC–V Correlations Between the WISC–V and the Vineland–II for the Intellectual Disability Group (continued) SI VC IN CO BD VP MR FW PC AR DS PS LN CD SS CA VCI VSI FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI Vineland–II WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score Table 2 n 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 92 93 93 90 92 89 84 82 93 93 93 92 89 80 82 92 87 83 92 78 .30 .36 .51 .0 10.7 5.3 61.23 .35 .22 –.48 .21 .16 –.2 58.0 2.7 11.13 .24 .20 .42 .29 .09 .56 .17 .6 1.17 .46 .03 .26 .32 .16 .9 89 .30 .32 .23 .21 –.35 .37 .39 .2 2. All rights reserved.34 .33 .6 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson.38 .7 90 .31 .7 15.15 –.22 .37 .0 61.3 3.33 .32 .31 .29 Communication Vineland–II Domain 3.18 .36 .9 63.36 .34 .39 .6 13.6 92 .33 .3 2.7 62.09 –.5 3.28 .03 –.0 4.24 .33 .33 .4 4. 1978).07 –.2 92 Mean SD  n 73.21 Daily Living Skills 74.29 .8 62.31 .42 .9 3. 70.34 .25 .14 .28 .03 .20 .39 .35 .8 12.26 Adaptive Behavior Composite 17.40 .26 .0 2.39 .3 2.29 .33 .16 –.8 1.28 .34 .06 .09 –.3 2.12 Socialization 86.21 –.01 –.36 .9 3.10 –.26 .03 .29 .26 .3 12.39 .10 –.5 69. All correlations were corrected for the variability of the WISC–V normative sample (Guilford & Fruchter.20 .34 .3 70 .40 .13 .12 .7 3.33 .2 4.24 .52 .32 .31 .3 4.21 –.9 2.30 .14 .27 .12 Motor Skills 71.03 .11 –.7 3.19 –.4 3.22 .39 .26 .37 .31 .34 .29 .9 2.1 13.24 .30 .35 .46 .6 Mean 2.09 –. 35 .37 .15 . All correlations were corrected for the variability of the WISC–V normative sample (Guilford & Fruchter.6 69.30 .12 .01 –.30 .34 Adaptive Behavior Composite 9.49 .7 2.7 4.39 .08 –.29 .6 70.0 93 .2 70 .7 2.14 .06 .27 .40 .30 .6 92 –.7 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson.43 .15 –.03 –.7 SD  WISC–V Coping Skills n 81 91 79 82 83 93 93 91 12.7 92 .19 .16 .7 90 .49 .40 .19 .07 .52 .20 .42 NSI STI SRI Vineland–II WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score .9 2.38 .14 –.5 70.16 Externalizing Behavior .2 92 NSI STI SRI Vineland–II Mean SD  n 10.15 .9 3.3 12.22 .10 Internalizing 17.7 16.24 .3 70 .34 .24 .7 3.06 –.21 –.5 90 .29 .18 Maladaptive Behavior Index Interpersonal Relationships Note.15 –.48 .28 .39 .30 Socialization Vineland–II Domain 9.38 .1 13.34 .41 .24 –. .6 16.38 . 9.28 Motor Skills 10.56 .33 .1 92 .4 3.33 Receptive Communication Vineland–II Subdomain 72.20 Play and Leisure Time Socialization 17.09 .03 .21 .1 2.37 .0 20.5 69.34 .23 .36 .6 13.06 –.22 9.35 .35 .34 . 1978).31 .26 Expressive 86.6 9.8 13.24 .43 .08 –.7 3.40 .3 90 .39 .17 –.22 .40 .31 .36 .35 Fine 12.29 .25 .24 .37 .9 21.44 .13 –.11 .08 .39 .15 .18 14.05 –.41 .35 .17 .5 Mean 11. All rights reserved.29 .37 .09 .30 .0 92 .9 92 .15 .8 92 –.23 .9 92 Mean SD  n .23 .14 .41 .33 Written Daily Living Skills 9.7 71.39 .36 NSL NSQ IST DST RST Communication .30 .29 Domestic Daily Living Skills 71.11 –.34 Gross Motor Skills Correlations Between WISC–V Complementary Scores and the Vineland–II for the Intellectual Disability Group NSL NSQ IST DST RST WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score Table 3 17.40 .01 –.42 .16 .12 –.7 3. Inc.06 .21 .38 .17 –.10 .00 .42 .5 3.09 .36 .7 16.18 .4 72.9 91 .9 89 .52 70.6 3.32 Community 10.37 .29 74.42 .34 .37 .29 .16 –.17 .25 Personal 73.35 .37 .7 14.0 2.4 75.6 92 –.04 .20 .41 .35 .3 15.39 .10 .4 91 .1 2.17 .1 70 .42 .40 .05 –.40 . All WISC–V index scores have low to moderate correlations with the Vineland–II subdomain and domain scales. Moderate relations are also observed between some WISC–V subtests and the Vineland–II domains and subdomains. coping skills. The QRI correlates most highly with mathematics. verbal knowledge and problem solving. Based on these findings. FRI. the results reported for this study were corrected for the variance of the normative sample. These scores indicate moderately low levels of adaptive behavior functioning. Inc. and overall motor skills. Additionally. total motor ability.g. suggesting minimal relations between overall adaptive and intellectual functioning. working memory. This pattern of correlations indicates that memory functioning and working memory in children with ID relate to their level of adaptive functioning.0 (Motor Skills). and visual-verbal associative learning. The Vineland–II domain means range from 70. and naming speed would also show lower scores on correlated measures of academic performance. 8 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson.. aged 6–16. The WMI and AWMI are moderately correlated with the Vineland–II expressive and written communication skills as well as with aspects of daily living skills (e.9 (VCI) to 69. due to range restriction. and QRI. Tables 4 and 5 present the means. The IST is moderately related to coping skills and gross motor ability. it was expected that children showing more deficits in verbal comprehension. The Adaptive Behavior Composite has low to moderate correlations with all WISC–V primary and ancillary index scores. All rights reserved. and writing abilities. The DST is moderately related to community. therefore. AWMI. and corrected correlation coefficients between the WISC–V and the WIAT–III.2 (PSI). Moderate correlations are observed with the Immediate Symbol Translation and Delayed Symbol Translation subtests. reading. the SLD-RW group has weaknesses on the NSI and SRI. The mean FSIQ is 58. Additionally. The WISC–V and the WIAT–III were administered to 51 children diagnosed with SLD-R or SLD-RW. children rated as having more intact motor skills perform better on the WISC–V visual-spatial subtests. automaticity of naming. children identified as SLD-RW demonstrate cognitive weaknesses on the VCI. in part. The overall correlation between the FSIQ and the Adaptive Behavior Composite is low. quantitative and conceptual reasoning. personal and community). gross. However.8. For children in the matched controls. The VCI and the WMI are moderately to highly correlated with language. the VCI and WMI are the best predictors of overall academic functioning (with the exception of FSIQ).The mean WISC–V primary index scores range from 62. communication. The VSI and GAI correlate moderately with fine. . as measured by the WIAT–III. SDs.1 (Communication) to 86. The pattern of low correlations occurs. The WMI is also associated with parent ratings of better interpersonal relationships and motor skills. WMI. Specific Learning Disorder-Reading and Specific Learning Disorder-Reading and Written Expression Correlations With the WIAT–III In the SLD-R and SLD-RW special group studies reported in the Tech Manual. Correcting for range restriction increases the level of association between the WISC–V and Vineland–II. range restriction affects the relations between variables associated with reading development because there is increased likelihood that most children with reading difficulties will struggle with these skills. with a testing interval of 0–35 days and a mean testing interval of 10 days. and overall adaptive functioning skills. These results indicate difficulties with working memory. 27 MFM a Supplemental scores.13 .46 . WIAT–III subtest abbreviations are: LC = Listening Comprehension.36 .04 .3 13.19 .00 .07 .13 .22 .36 .8 10.6 50 .29 .02 –.18 .26 .66 .71 .42 .33 . Note.44 .26 .37 . ORF = Oral Reading Fluency.60 .48 .67 .20 .40 .24 .24 .31 –.38 .20 .51 .24 .0 11.42 .13 .17 .18 –.21 .07 .56 .46 SC 79.39 .46 .39 .58 .14 .55 .44 .33 .37 .44 .25 .32 .30 .16 .63 .14 .45 .18 .13 .9 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson. 1978).24 .27 .56 .07 .47 .63 .09 .57 .06 .16 .47 .31 .13 .31 .23 .41 .70 .42 .31 LC WIAT–III Subtests Correlations Between the WISC–V and the WIAT–III for the Specific Learning Disorder-Reading and Reading and Written Expression Groups SI VC IN CO BD VP MR FW PC AR DS PS LN CD SS CA VCI VSI FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI WIAT–III WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score Table 4 .6 13.80 .36 .07 .64 .41 .01 –.32 .04 . SC = Sentence Composition.31 .49 .27 .25 .36 .17 .47 .40 .43 .33 .14 .36 .56 .6 51 .45 .19 .31 .44 .27 .9 15 .47 –.69 .6 13.65 .20 . 91.34 .67 .22 .31 .27 .01 .54 .22 .38 .39 .38 .33 .44 .5 51 .29 .51 .31 .37 .31 .01 .37 .6 10.6 51 .46 .31 .49 .32 .37 .64 .07 .62 .39 .68 . .04 .33 .31 .39 .39 .25 .53 .73 .51 .07 .28 .23 .45 .08 .41 .56 .22 –.16 .63 .77 .34 .3 15.54 .45 .39 .30 .9 11.4 17.45 .12 .25 .57 .65 .25 WR 91.23 –.37 –. ORA = Oral Reading Accuracy.77 .2 10.40 .13 .52 .73 .54 .17 .42 .50 .17 .01 .40 .11 .43 .51 .43 .03 .19 .27 .02 .31 .9 11.38 EC-GMa 78.49 .65 .46 .21 .51 .29 .45 .09 .32 .45 MPS 83.0 15.28 .51 .70 .38 –. WR = Word Reading.35 .08 .24 –.8 51 .16 .41 .55 .43 .18 .42 .17 .10 .08 ORAa 83.54 .52 .37 .53 .61 . MFS = Math Fluency–Subtraction.71 .47 .29 .04 .36 .05 .4 40 .48 .55 .39 .08 .46 MFA 85. EC-GM = Essay Composition: Grammar and Mechanics.03 .03 .22 .18 .52 .09 .46 .54 .49 .33 .15 .02 .53 . SP = Spelling.66 . All rights reserved.33 .51 .21 .2 51 .17 .34 .09 –.55 .17 .53 .27 .63 . NO = Numerical Operations.31 –.04 .36 .33 .9 14.32 .6 13.57 .3 51 Mean SD  n 90.62 .36 .71 .5 49 .68 .60 .8 11.00 .40 .40 .47 .32 .01 .2 40 .12 .16 .49 . PD = Pseudoword Decoding.32 .63 .69 .23 .37 .25 .24 .77 .31 .55 EC 90.27 .51 .39 .47 .61 .5 50 .19 85.21 .78 .46 .37 .04 .50 .37 –.45 .28 .20 .29 .26 .48 .55 .16 .17 .13 NO 87.58 .34 .54 .37 .16 .57 .35 .53 .48 .51 .32 –.36 .30 .12 .2 51 .21 .41 .35 .42 .71 .40 .32 .21 .39 .51 .12 –.13 –.36 .15 .63 .30 MFS 89.32 .37 .44 .46 .38 .38 .4 9.35 .28 .15 .33 .07 . RC = Reading Comprehension.06 –.23 .49 .53 OE 80. OE = Oral Expression.43 .25 .0 50 .24 .25 .00 –.18 .66 .09 .27 .34 .37 .05 .28 .0 10.17 .23 .37 .62 .16 .16 .19 .34 .16 .16 . ERS = Early Reading Skills.54 .19 .32 .46 .48 .38 .24 –.66 .02 .28 .56 .43 .13 .26 .57 .40 .36 –.59 .8 51 .52 .56 .29 .59 .26 .26 .35 .29 .45 ORRa SP 82.34 . MFA = Math Fluency–Addition.43 .5 40 .28 .21 .36 .31 .54 .40 .41 .16 .50 .03 .23 .42 .10 .46 .44 .41 .01 –.0 49 .48 .42 .69 .45 .5 12. Inc.37 .15 .48 .09 . MPS = Math Problem Solving.41 .08 .39 ORF 79.11 –.06 .53 .52 . MFM = Math Fluency–Multiplication.17 .26 . All correlations were corrected for the variability of the WISC–V normative sample (Guilford & Fruchter.03 .61 .02 .65 .09 .26 .55 . ORR = Oral Reading Rate.40 .17 .51 .31 .47 .51 .14 –.53 .05 .7 51 .31 .34 .33 .37 .41 . EC = Essay Composition.20 ERS 86.43 RC 87.72 .27 .17 .41 .47 .25 .10 .80 .36 .42 .03 .11 PD 90.47 .31 .40 .21 .40 . 03 .8 3.22 .17 .48 .03 –.8 7. Inc.48 .43 . 88.4 SD  WISC–V 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 50 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 n Correlations Between the WISC–V and the WIAT–III for the Specific Learning Disorder-Reading and Reading and Written Expression Groups (continued) SI VC IN CO BD VP MR FW PC AR DS PS LN CD SS CA VCI VSI FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI WIAT–III WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score Table 4 .59 .4 46 .7 87.22 .43 .23 . .60 .43 .22 .62 .45 .16 .49 .0 15.14 .64 .0 8.20 .71 .56 .58 .46 Oral Language Reading Comprehension and Fluency WIAT–III Composites 87.3 8.05 .37 .55 .31 .46 .69 .8 2.01 .48 .44 .52 .39 .33 .74 .25 .54 .6 49 .27 .74 .3 50 .66 .2 12.2 10.71 .56 .67 .51 Written Expression Note.17 .56 .45 .21 .40 .2 9.1 9.1 12.46 .38 .9 Mean 2.41 .34 –.23 .52 .1 2.75 .18 .54 .6 88.3 2.2 89.67 .80 .40 .9 11.19 .03 .72 .47 .47 .20 Basic Reading 80.57 .7 90.0 2.41 .55 .09 . All rights reserved.52 .32 .27 .52 .58 .9 2.27 .3 10.1 88.14 .27 .5 10.09 .10 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson.05 .33 .58 .82 .6 8.58 .67 .53 .13 .35 .1 2.49 .56 .83 . All correlations were corrected for the variability of the WISC–V normative sample (Guilford & Fruchter.31 .3 88.2 2.2 11.15 .46 .9 9.38 .0 2.5 10.40 –.24 –.46 .30 .32 .6 9.43 .37 .0 9.62 .24 .34 .39 .43 .49 .13 .73 .55 .67 .7 8.45 .21 –.43 .9 87.67 .46 .2 50 .71 .47 .29 .43 .49 .66 .2 12.48 .36 .34 .64 .71 .31 .46 .53 .53 . 1978).1 2.58 .28 .0 7.55 .05 .37 .17 .35 .1 2.06 –.8 11.41 .20 .56 Total Achievement 7.41 .70 .49 83.63 .40 Total Reading 78.72 .35 .54 .35 .36 .36 .71 .73 .51 .25 .5 1.19 .42 .71 .2 9.17 .49 .40 Math Fluency 81.76 .72 .65 .42 .49 .62 .25 .34 .66 .6 47 .7 86.67 .8 11.2 89.5 47 .4 9.0 51 Mean SD  n 78.72 .63 .53 .47 .64 .19 .36 .24 .23 .64 .46 .4 8.76 .31 .39 .3 9.7 51 .2 13.7 3.09 .63 .4 11.63 .40 .70 .17 .61 .0 94.8 3.48 .04 .8 7.9 8.28 .14 .9 92.22 .9 7.56 .18 .13 .51 .06 .38 .55 .8 7.3 3.8 13.36 .45 .32 Mathematics 86.07 .16 . 57 .46 .44 .31 .26 .8 51 .19 .38 .28 .18 . MFM = Math Fluency–Multiplication.31 .9 13.29 .25 .6 9.9 11.39 SP 85. 1978).08 .6 47 .43 .11 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson.45 .54 Reading Comprehension and Fluency 90. WIAT–III subtest abbreviations are: LC = Listening Comprehension.37 EC-GMa 78.48 PD 80.5 51 .0 49 .16 .46 .40 .25 .7 13.28 .8 13.4 46 .4 17.49 .0 10.36 .30 .21 .0 Mean 85.08 .30 .47 .0 11.27 .61 .25 .53 .35 .44 .53 .18 .15 .33 .62 .4 11.6 13.16 .51 .39 .27 .6 8. All correlations were corrected for the variability of the WISC–V normative sample (Guilford & Fruchter.41 .34 .46 .9 14.7 51 .14 NO 83.40 .5 47 88.44 .43 ORF 86.48 .32 .0 51 Total Reading .34 .24 .48 .2 91.5 50 .38 .45 .3 50 . MPS = Math Problem Solving. Inc. RC = Reading Comprehension.56 .29 EC 87.6 50 .39 MFS 16.33 .55 .60 .24 . EC = Essay Composition.30 .38 .47 .52 .33 . SC = Sentence Composition.66 .36 Mathematics 87.30 .45 .43 .19 .49 .27 .28 .6 51 .47 90.37 .39 .45 .43 .34 . OE = Oral Expression.35 .46 .4 40 .55 .30 .38 .37 .3 51 NSL NSQ IST DST RST NSI STI SRI WIAT–III Mean SD  n .41 .33 .8 89.4 12.39 .50 .05 .3 15.45 ORRa 87.53 . ORA = Oral Reading Accuracy.8 11.43 .31 .2 13.27 .52 ERS .54 RC .9 11.36 .42 .38 SC 90.20 .43 .18 .41 .5 40 . EC-GM = Essay Composition: Grammar and Mechanics. NO = Numerical Operations.2 50 .53 .5 49 . 87.8 10.2 51 .39 .28 LC WIAT–III Subtests Correlations Between WISC–V Complementary Scores and the WIAT–III for the Specific Learning Disorder-Reading and Reading and Written Expression Groups NSL NSQ IST DST RST NSI STI SRI WIAT–III Mean SD  n WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score Table 5 .0 9.42 .46 Written Expression WIAT–III Composites 91.6 51 .5 12.37 . 78.50 MPS 79.54 .9 90.57 .25 .25 .47 .46 .17 .49 .34 .2 51 . PD = Pseudoword Decoding.45 .00 .40 .35 .35 .4 9.61 .32 .34 .31 .53 MFM n 49 49 51 51 50 49 50 48 a Supplemental scores.21 .22 .27 .4 89.9 87.7 SD  WISC–V 89.0 50 .19 .30 . ERS = Early Reading Skills.07 .26 .34 .39 .20 .26 .9 11.39 .51 ORAa 82.8 51 .40 .6 49 .22 .33 .27 .9 90.9 15 91. WR = Word Reading.9 9.44 .39 . MFA = Math Fluency–Addition.8 86.23 .2 10.11 .50 .39 .17 .20 .6 10.50 Math Fluency 79.39 .37 .25 .35 .43 .60 Oral Language WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score 86.3 13.36 .58 . All rights reserved.46 .2 40 .36 .45 .55 .10 .27 .35 .33 .40 . SP = Spelling.6 13.16 .57 OE 80.45 .44 . ORR = Oral Reading Rate.35 .50 WR 78.7 12.0 15.17 .11 .28 .4 13.2 12.52 .48 .29 . ORF = Oral Reading Fluency.27 .57 . Note.44 MFA Total Achievement 83.30 . MFS = Math Fluency–Subtraction.56 .07 .54 Basic Reading 83.26 .40 .8 11.30 .6 13.7 51 81.55 .30 .30 .30 .35 . In this sample. All rights reserved. The QRI correlates highly with WIAT–III Total Achievement and correlates highly with most WIAT–III composites. The WMI is moderately correlated with Total Achievement. Inc. The PSI correlates most highly with the WIAT–III Total Achievement and Math Fluency composites. but among children with basic reading impairments. Correlations between the WISC–V primary index scores and WIAT–III composites reflect the relations between general and specific aspects of cognitive ability and academic performance. Basic Reading skills have a low correlation with most WISC–V index scores. The correlations between the NVI and the WIAT–III composites are slightly lower than the correlations of the GAI and the FSIQ with the WIAT–III composites. the relations of the WISC–V and the WIAT–III indicate that a number of cognitive skills show a moderate relation to academic functioning in children with learning difficulties in reading. the SRI has a moderate correlation with all the WIAT–III composites.6 (Total and Basic Reading) to 88. 12 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson. The factors that may predict whether or not a child develops learning difficulties may not be the best predictors of academic ability within groups of children with specific learning disabilities.2 (Oral Language). The relatively high correlation of FSIQ with academic functioning indicates that cognitive weaknesses strongly relate to lower academic scores in children with specific learning disorder-reading and specific learning disorder-reading and written expression.The WISC–V mean primary index scores for this sample are in the low average to average range. Overall. These results suggest that in the SLD-R/RW sample processing speed is related to performance on fluency tests but also to overall academic functioning. these tests scores do not differentiate among children with low basic reading ability. Among the complementary index scores. The AWMI correlates similarly to the WMI with the WIAT–III composites. and Reading Comprehension and Fluency. Oral Language. but the correlations are relatively higher with the AWMI. . This does not mean that these skills are not important in developing basic reading skills. In this sample. Basic Reading is moderately associated with the VCI and WMI. Written Expression. The mean WIAT–III composites are in the very low to low average range from 78. while in the study with nonclinical children reported in the Tech Manual. with the exception of Mathematics. with the exception of Basic Reading and Math Fluency. The STI was most highly correlated with Total Reading and Reading Comprehension and Fluency. The NSI most highly correlates with Total Reading and Math Fluency. The GAI correlations were similar to those seen with the FSIQ. the VCI and FRI show the most consistent relations with academic functioning. but lower. The WISC–V ancillary index scores correlate moderately to highly with the WIAT–III Total Achievement score. These correlations indicate which cognitive skills differentiate academic performance among children with known learning difficulties. aged 9–16. Tables 6 and 7 present the means. and corrected correlation coefficients between the WISC–V and the WIAT–III. and Total Achievement composite scores from the WIAT–III. All rights reserved. Oral Language. . The QRI is moderately correlated with all WIAT–III composites but has the highest association with the Mathematics and Total Achievement composite scores. and quantitative reasoning abilities. For children in the matched control. SDs. These results indicate difficulties with visual spatial.Specific Learning Disorder-Mathematics Correlations With the WIAT–III The cognitive strengths and weaknesses of children identified with specific learning disordermathematics (SLD-M) are reviewed in the Tech Manual. The FRI is moderately correlated with WIAT–III Mathematics and Total Achievement. FRI. and QRI. conceptual. Inc. 13 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson. Based on these findings. Children identified as SLD-M demonstrate cognitive weaknesses on the VSI. with a testing interval of 0–62 days and a mean testing interval of 8 days. it was expected that children showing more deficits in those cognitive domains would also show lower scores on correlated measures of academic performance. The WISC–V and the WIAT–III were administered to 25 children diagnosed with SLD-M. the VSI is moderately correlated with Mathematics. The cognitive weaknesses associated with math difficulties are also related to math functioning in typically developing children. 20 .50 .53 .66 .34 .57 . .33 .25 .0 25 .67 .2 25 .37 .66 .45 NO 92.54 .43 MFM a Supplemental scores.34 .53 .51 .42 .53 .5 25 Mean SD  n 90.44 .37 .57 .6 25 .29 .42 .39 .31 .14 .28 .26 .36 .35 . 94.42 .26 .47 .42 .60 .35 .62 .60 .4 10.43 .41 .53 .22 .61 .26 .51 .33 .50 .54 .17 .06 .38 .35 .55 MFA 78.51 .29 .19 .38 .40 .62 .65 MFS 78.52 .00 .48 .57 .3 14.10 .46 .25 .56 .69 .46 .62 .74 .57 SC 94.57 .02 .1 25 .02 .93 .1 25 .64 .71 .31 .20 .53 .81 .45 .35 .52 .04 .57 .71 .50 . SC = Sentence Composition.02 .34 .56 .56 .87 .46 .29 .23 .38 . All correlations were corrected for the variability of the WISC–V normative sample (Guilford & Fruchter.57 .47 .66 .2 14.74 .60 .51 .54 .42 .5 11.21 .61 .53 .43 .12 –.42 . Note.42 .39 WR 93.33 .47 .76 .46 .24 .74 .56 .27 .49 .26 .69 .33 .28 .23 –.52 .31 .63 .32 .72 .2 14.54 .55 .56 . MFM = Math Fluency–Multiplication.45 .26 –. NO = Numerical Operations.20 .66 .56 .47 .50 .8 14.62 .77 .40 ORAa 96.43 .60 .56 .07 .15 .7 10.09 .56 .33 .30 .61 .56 .28 .50 . MFA = Math Fluency–Addition. Inc.44 .29 .36 .57 .55 .60 .29 .50 .7 11.53 .15 .42 .62 .49 .32 .87 .47 .6 11.74 . WR = Word Reading.23 .57 . ORA = Oral Reading Accuracy.46 . WIAT–III subtest abbreviations are: LC = Listening Comprehension.65 .7 12.8 12.47 .4 24 –.45 .37 .50 .37 .55 .24 .52 .35 .52 .50 .28 .53 .34 .43 .67 .11 .77 .18 .54 EC-GMa 92.45 .66 .2 25 .53 .69 .45 .59 .31 .74 .51 .47 .20 .64 .3 11.11 . EC-GM = Essay Composition: Grammar and Mechanics.79 . ORR = Oral Reading Rate.22 .53 .62 .18 .48 .63 .55 .56 LC WIAT–III Subtests Correlations Between the WISC–V and the WIAT–III for the Specific Learning Disorder-Mathematics Group SI VC IN CO BD VP MR FW PC AR DS PS LN CD SS CA VCI VSI FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI WIAT–III WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score Table 6 .27 .40 .69 .62 . MPS = Math Problem Solving.53 .37 .70 .4 14.53 .0 25 .45 .59 .24 .38 .47 .26 .50 .31 .22 .33 .18 .48 .56 .42 .33 .42 .30 .37 .5 25 .74 .83 .49 .68 .90 .69 .77 .49 .72 .39 .66 .32 .63 .64 .35 .23 .52 .46 .46 .71 .02 –.45 .25 .49 .71 .52 .45 .9 25 .14 .69 .60 .41 82. RC = Reading Comprehension.44 .22 .66 .73 .21 .34 .62 .48 .65 .58 .55 .0 24 .15 .31 .29 EC 88.51 .7 14.65 .19 .67 .62 . EC = Essay Composition.31 .63 .56 .27 .54 . SP = Spelling.55 .46 .49 .46 .64 .63 .57 .38 .23 .47 .07 .56 .18 .36 .37 .62 .81 .23 .14 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson.19 .49 .63 .38 .56 .44 .50 .60 .43 .4 9.30 .63 .12 .25 .13 .55 .68 .49 .26 .41 RC 78.78 .35 .42 .13 .35 .31 .60 ORF 93.57 .48 .0 25 . 1978).53 .31 .53 .28 .10 .52 .31 .28 .49 .52 .59 .26 .63 .50 OE 94.24 .46 .0 14. OE = Oral Expression.06 .37 .44 .47 .36 .54 ORRa SP 91.47 .18 .58 .32 . ORF = Oral Reading Fluency.63 .42 .32 .16 .01 .57 .50 .51 .68 .43 .72 .28 .43 .46 .63 .09 .13 .65 .57 .05 .58 .42 .60 .62 .01 .44 .57 .29 . PD = Pseudoword Decoding.0 25 .28 .52 .54 .24 .3 25 .38 .13 .38 .49 . All rights reserved. MFS = Math Fluency– Subtraction.62 .29 .65 .57 .36 .54 PD 79.49 .60 .56 .26 .51 .57 .78 .5 9.66 .55 .30 .32 .12 .60 .43 .20 .49 .26 .62 .51 .20 –.18 .69 .5 24 .58 .22 MPS 85.38 .07 .43 .46 .32 .15 –.33 .43 .47 .34 .68 .4 24 .55 .40 .32 .58 .68 . 60 .62 .61 .43 .46 .7 11.48 .74 .4 2.48 .54 .66 .57 .72 .7 2.46 .6 8.30 .23 .46 . All correlations were corrected for the variability of the WISC–V normative sample (Guilford & Fruchter.45 .64 .9 88.88 .6 8.15 .51 .60 Math Fluency 86.51 .3 8.2 6.7 84.52 .38 .85 .06 –.57 Written Expression Note.68 .62 .74 .78 .75 .9 11.37 .43 .3 3.70 .5 80.48 .64 .56 .66 .7 12. All rights reserved.7 7.63 .2 8.0 11.07 .47 .67 .4 91.21 .35 .66 .67 .47 .73 .3 8.53 .57 .0 8.59 .69 .63 .5 24 .68 .2 10.2 7.42 .65 .35 .71 .57 .0 7.38 .37 .5 13.54 .49 .74 .60 .3 86.2 81.47 .54 .41 .57 Oral Language Reading Comprehension and Fluency WIAT–III Composites 78.86 .8 6.27 .68 .38 .47 .55 .72 .44 .8 12.79 .62 .42 .59 .86 .58 88.53 .47 .2 12.29 .60 .53 .4 87.36 .51 .62 .54 .5 10.48 .29 .14 .77 .64 .40 .41 .34 .2 2.43 .56 .61 .63 .36 .58 .66 .0 13.72 .60 .64 .59 Total Achievement Correlations Between the WISC–V and the WIAT–III for the Specific Learning Disorder-Mathematics Group (continued) SI VC IN CO BD VP MR FW PC AR DS PS LN CD SS CA VCI VSI FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI WIAT–III WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score Table 6 8.63 .66 .36 .15 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson.66 .2 2.64 .0 2.50 .34 .94 .29 .0 2.20 .0 SD  WISC–V n 25 25 24 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 24 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 24 25 25 25 . 1978).43 . 92.9 24 Mean SD  n 90.03 .69 .78 .9 24 .66 .91 .47 .3 8.48 .3 3.78 .55 .33 Mathematics 78.1 2.14 .81 .31 .67 .5 89.63 .0 Mean 2.35 .6 2.07 .41 .12 .3 7.2 13.72 .51 .55 .77 .37 .4 8.20 .43 .61 .43 .7 2.39 .28 . .21 –.62 .67 .51 .76 .71 .71 .74 .65 .37 .57 .3 14.3 25 .14 –.8 15.63 .75 .63 .1 23 .55 .0 2.7 3.33 .25 .62 .3 8.9 25 .7 25 .57 .7 12.72 .39 –. Inc.65 .68 .76 .5 25 .1 11.4 83.8 3.44 .03 .35 .53 .33 .39 .71 .6 89.57 .39 .44 .66 .68 .3 13.8 12.54 Total Reading 92.60 .39 .64 .46 .73 .49 Basic Reading 90.58 .31 .56 .41 .67 .63 .51 .65 .49 .58 .29 .27 .6 10.09 .53 .4 3.0 82.73 .49 .46 .74 .0 13. Note.3 14.09 .16 .23 .21 .17 .55 .4 93.6 11.46 .51 .27 .0 25 .12 .9 13.16 .37 .43 .16 .5 11.5 14.8 91.60 90.43 . OE = Oral Expression.1 11.41 Reading Comprehension and Fluency 92.1 92.24 PD 79.3 25 .5 24 .47 .38 .13 .58 .35 .7 11.7 12.3 8.5 25 .25 . MFS = Math Fluency–Subtraction.31 EC-GMa 78.60 .34 .1 23 .34 .10 .1 SD  WISC–V n 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 a Supplemental scores.44 .53 .8 93.7 94.38 .30 .26 .34 .21 .32 93.11 .50 .54 . MFA = Math Fluency–Addition.33 .46 .27 .17 .4 10.67 .27 .30 .10 .17 RC .2 10.1 25 .56 Total Achievement 91.26 .09 .49 .35 .0 14.38 MFA 78.54 .25 . SP = Spelling.7 10. All correlations were corrected for the variability of the WISC–V normative sample (Guilford & Fruchter.03 .25 .40 .49 ORRa SP 82.32 . ORA = Oral Reading Accuracy.38 .4 14.54 .43 .29 .37 .5 24 .27 .0 11.65 .47 Written Expression WIAT–III Composites 88.41 .42 . WIAT–III subtest abbreviations are: LC = Listening Comprehension.38 .7 12.4 12.5 25 NSL NSQ IST DST RST NSI STI SRI WIAT–III Mean SD  n .40 .9 25 .49 . SC = Sentence Composition.9 14.35 .39 –.10 .58 .39 .52 .28 .39 MFM 12.28 . 85.05 .2 25 .72 .11 .70 .0 25 . All rights reserved.28 .9 24 .43 . RC = Reading Comprehension.39 . EC-GM = Essay Composition: Grammar and Mechanics.33 .55 .53 .37 .18 .0 14.27 .35 .24 .24 .10 .47 . 1978).41 NO 90.03 –.09 . MPS = Math Problem Solving.0 24 .8 12.26 98.19 .39 .43 .44 .47 .33 .06 –.56 .10 . Inc.22 –.37 .10 .19 .12 .27 .26 .26 .18 . ORF = Oral Reading Fluency.26 .06 .30 .03 .10 .19 .26 .02 .53 .09 .26 .25 .29 –.8 14.7 11.3 25 .22 .53 .40 .9 95.7 14.43 .68 OE 88. PD = Pseudoword Decoding.17 .6 25 94.7 25 .27 .0 25 .2 25 .29 .46 Math Fluency 96.49 .18 .48 .53 MFS 86.32 . 90.34 .7 92.5 13.20 MPS .15 .0 25 .16 .5 9.41 .48 .40 Oral Language WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score 78.2 14.43 LC WIAT–III Subtests Correlations Between WISC–V Complementary Scores and the WIAT–III for the Specific Learning Disorder-Mathematics Group NSL NSQ IST DST RST NSI STI SRI WIAT–III Mean SD  n WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score Table 7 .47 .23 –.6 10.23 .40 .45 EC 92.41 .49 . WR = Word Reading.44 .20 .4 24 .32 .25 .26 –.68 .22 .02 .42 SC 93.20 . EC = Essay Composition.16 .41 WR 92.36 Basic Reading 94.2 14.16 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson.30 .50 ORF 78.39 .7 14.38 .4 9.33 .40 .04 ORAa Mathematics 94.9 24 Total Reading .17 .57 .18 .31 .34 .4 24 .1 25 .31 .34 .45 .08 . NO = Numerical Operations.31 .4 Mean 78. ORR = Oral Reading Rate.5 25 92.53 .6 13. MFM = Math Fluency–Multiplication.34 .3 11.46 .9 25 .29 . The relation between the BASC–2 and the WISC–V evaluates whether measured cognitive difficulties are related to observable behavioral problems. 17 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson. Given that typically developing children do not show significant behavior problems. The FRI and FSIQ have the strongest association with Mathematics. There were many moderate to high correlations observed between cognitive functioning and academic performance in the SLD-M sample.The WISC–V mean primary index scores for this sample range from low average to average. Among the complementary index scores. The mean WIAT–III composite scores range from 78. and among all primary and ancillary index scores. . The FRI and WMI correlations are larger in this sample than those observed in the nonclinical sample reported in the Tech Manual. it has the highest correlation with the Mathematics composite. with the exception of Oral Language. Tables 8 and 9 present the means. the FRI are particularly important in math skills while the WMI and PSI are related to Math Fluency. Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Correlations With the BASC–2 PRS Children diagnosed with ADHD have behavioral symptoms that include attention and executive functioning problems (Delis.3 (Mathematics) to 92. WMI. this finding is not unexpected. In the nonclinical sample reported in the Tech Manual. The QRI is moderately to highly correlated with the WIAT–III composite scores. math skills have moderate correlations with most WISC–V primary index scores. SDs. to a lesser degree. in general. The correlations are not corrected because the range of scores on the WISC–V was not greatly restricted in this study. Overall academic functioning has moderate to high correlations with all primary index scores except the PSI. The relatively high correlation of the FSIQ with academic functioning indicates that cognitive weaknesses strongly relate to lower academic scores in children with specific learning disorder-mathematics.7 (Basic Reading). All rights reserved. These relations indicate which cognitive skills differentiate academic performance among children with known math difficulties. aged 6–16. The GAI correlates with Total Achievement at nearly the same level as the FSIQ. the NSI and SRI correlate moderately with Math Fluency. which would be positively correlated. and correlation coefficients between the WISC–V and selected BASC–2 PRS scales. the BASC–2 and WISC–V were generally unrelated. and FSIQ. Math Fluency is most highly correlated with the WMI and FSIQ. Correlations between the WISC–V primary index scores and WIAT–III composites reflect the relations between general and specific aspects of cognitive ability and academic performance. The QRI and. with a testing interval of 0–14 days and a mean testing interval of 1 day. while children with ADHD will have a higher degree of problems. The WISC–V and the selected scales from the BASC–2 PRS were administered to 46 children diagnosed with ADHD. The WISC–V ancillary index scores correlate in the moderate to high range with the WIAT–III Total Achievement score. and their caregivers. Overall. Similarly. children diagnosed with ADHD show weaknesses on the WISC–V working memory and processing speed measures. It was predicted that. The correlations between the NVI and the WIAT–III composites are slightly lower than the correlations of the GAI and the FSIQ with the WIAT–III composites. 2012) which can be evaluated with the BASC–2. low inverse correlations would be present between the WISC–V and the selected BASC–2 PRS scores. except for the Resiliency scale. Inc. The AWMI is highly correlated with all WIAT–III composites. range restriction may also be observed in this sample. the highest correlations were with the VCI. In this sample. the relations of the WISC–V and the WIAT–III indicate that a number of cognitive skills show a moderate to high correlation with academic functioning in children with math learning difficulties. It is most highly correlated with Total Reading and Reading Comprehension and Fluency. Cognitively. 02 –.1 44 57.11 –.08 –.05 –.9 45 66.5 3.8 94.04 .11 .04 .21 –.01 –.07 –.3 9.6 12.1 93.07 –.29 –.06 –.21 –.9 45 66.09 –.6 11.01 –.11 .22 –.0 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 45 46 45 46 45 46 46 46 46 45 45 45 46 45 46 46 44 Mean SD  n 38.01 .3 2.22 .07 –.9 8. Inc.13 –.06 –.07 –.10 –.17 .9 15.6 10.25 –.6 2.1 99.12 .06 –.3 15.6 16.7 46 63.8 45 45 46 46 46 NSI STI SRI BASC–2 PRS –. All rights reserved.14 –.0 97.7 9.23 –.17 –.05 –.04 –.5 9.13 –.02 .01 .17 –.3 5.8 100.0 15.06 –.3 5.29 –.31 95.07 .13 .15 –.8 95.15 .17 –.10 –.06 .17 –.01 –.5 13.7 98.8 3.04 –.1 8.8 2.13 –.02 –.08 .8 97.6 2.14 –.09 .09 .06 –.01 –.14 –.19 –.08 –.23 –.07 –.13 –.6 9.00 –.8 13.09 .4 45 46 45 Mean SD  n 38.08 .6 9.01 .3 13.7 9.01 –.6 3.11 –.19 –.00 .17 –.01 –.1 15.0 2.6 97.8 14.5 15.01 –.34 –.7 46 63.8 2.4 2.06 .6 10.14 .16 .01 –.26 –.02 .1 13.1 44 57.04 .10 –.9 9.05 –.2 15.9 95.9 9.0 2.17 –.4 11.3 103.20 –.1 100.06 –.08 .00 .02 .32 –.03 –.4 16.9 46 18 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson.Table 8 WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score Correlations Between the WISC–V and the BASC–2 PRS for the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Group BASC–2 PRS Scale WISC–V Resiliency Conduct Problems Executive Functioning Attention Problems Mean SD  n SI VC IN CO BD VP MR FW PC AR DS PS LN CD SS CA VCI VSI FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI BASC–2 PRS –.33 –.15 .06 .05 –.27 –.13 –.01 .10 –.8 13.7 3.0 94.12 .06 –.06 –.12 –.6 9.21 –.7 9.16 –.05 .25 –.24 –.25 –.4 8.16 –.13 –.3 2.7 8.11 .4 94. .9 46 Table 9 WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score Correlations Between WISC–V Complementary Scores and the BASC–2 PRS for the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Group BASC–2 PRS Scale WISC–V Resiliency Conduct Problems Executive Functioning Attention Problems Mean SD  n NSL NSQ IST DST RST .5 9.03 .33 93.02 –.9 94.7 9.01 .02 .18 .0 2.4 13.9 9.17 .20 –.02 .07 –.12 –.5 9.01 .09 –.25 9.5 9.20 –.5 97.14 .1 3.08 –.5 2.10 .06 –.19 –.14 –.21 –.16 .4 95.1 13.06 –.01 –. The selected BASC–2 PRS problem behavior scores range from 38. Correlations With the Brown ADD Children diagnosed with ADHD have behavioral symptoms that include attention and executive functioning problems (Delis. and correlation coefficients between the WISC–V and the Brown ADD. low negative correlations are present between the WISC–V and selected BASC–2 PRS scores. the Symbol Translation subtests. Children with memory problems may be rated by their parents as inattentive. Cognitively. 19 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson. The correlations are not corrected as the range of scores on the WISC–V was not greatly restricted in this study. aged 6–16.6 (Resiliency) to 66. the STI. SDs. The correlations indicate that in a sample of children with observable attention and executive functioning difficulties. the strongest association between behavior and cognition was observed between the WISC–V WMI and the BASC–2 Attention Problems scale. For the nonclinical sample reported in the Tech Manual. cognitive difficulties are not highly related to behavioral difficulties.The mean WISC–V index and subtest scores are in the average range. when assessed using a parent report measure. Of the WISC–V measures. 2012) which can be evaluated with the Brown ADD. In the ADHD sample.3 (Attention Problems). Tables 10 and 11 present the means. the memory tasks have the highest association with observable behavior. with a testing interval of 0–24 days and a mean testing interval of 4 days. . The WISC–V and the Brown ADD were administered to 47 children diagnosed with ADHD. All rights reserved. As expected. children diagnosed with ADHD show weaknesses on the WISC–V working memory and processing speed measures. and the SRI show the largest associations with Attention Problems. These results suggest that cognitive abilities share low levels of association with attention and executive function. Inc. and their caregivers. 4 10.14 –.33 Action Correlations Between the WISC–V and the Brown ADD for the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Group SI VC IN CO BD VP MR FW PC AR DS PS LN CD SS CA WISC–V Subtest/ Process/ Composite Score Table 10 66.4 9.02 –.04 –.17 –.06 –.06 –.14 .34 –.10 .00 –.05 .18 .05 –.0 2.07 –.15 .3 9.5 9.6 Mean 12.16 .5 2.07 –.02 –.6 2.29 .24 –.13 .1 30 .02 .20 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson.18 –.08 –.8 47 .03 –.04 .0 3.01 –.13 –.8 11.07 .45 –.4 9.12 –.07 –.06 66.05 .08 –.13 .09 –.4 2.13 Memory Brown ADD Scores 65.07 .11 .12 –.06 .0 7. All rights reserved.00 –.06 .0 94.01 Effort 60.03 .05 .3 2.1 97.14 –.09 –.18 –.6 9.5 9.2 13.07 –.01 .10 .1 96.06 .00 .5 47 BDn BDp DSf DSb DSs CAr CAs VCI VSI FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI Brown ADD Mean SD  n Activation 67.01 –.27 –.18 –.0 3.12 –.7 2.04 .09 .11 –.14 .03 –.24 –.10 –.7 3.07 .6 9.04 –.06 .14 –.00 .3 5.12 –.02 –.4 94.16 –.06 –.03 .19 .06 –.4 9.21 .09 .08 –.00 –.21 .6 7.02 –.33 –.11 –.14 .2 8.5 7.15 .13 .3 94.04 .11 –.24 –.01 –.02 –.5 9.16 –.08 .38 –.13 .11 .03 .07 .21 .08 .06 .26 –.11 .1 7.2 2.04 ADD Inattention Total 66.21 –.02 .13 –.6 97.8 3.06 –.17 .3 47 .06 –.05 .8 2.7 47 –.05 .02 –.05 –.8 9.08 –.5 3.06 –.05 –.08 –.00 –.13 –.08 .10 .35 –.0 2.13 –.05 .06 –.21 –.03 –. Inc.03 .18 .10 –.06 –.10 .08 .12 .01 –.06 –.16 .01 .3 13.00 .01 .9 9. –.1 95.01 –.13 –.19 .16 .04 .0 8.09 .02 .4 14.3 9.05 –.01 .02 .05 .19 .00 .07 .12 .16 –.11 .24 .3 10.07 .08 Focus 63.05 –.7 94.00 .05 –.12 .11 .05 –.01 .02 –.01 .8 8.04 –.32 –.07 .6 9.01 –.04 –.07 .11 –.05 .19 .05 .13 –.1 13.43 –.14 –.37 –.02 .08 .3 9.15 .01 .01 –.20 .00 .12 .08 –.03 .19 –.07 .12 –.19 –.03 –.03 .05 .01 –.0 11.24 –.3 2.09 –.12 –.04 .1 2.8 95.4 47 .2 2.16 .04 –.4 13.04 –.01 .8 9.04 .06 .02 –.07 .06 .10 –.12 –.05 .11 –.7 96.14 .07 –.3 13.01 ADD Combined Total Score 92.19 .10 .07 .02 .21 .06 .03 .2 30 .04 .5 16.19 –.03 .01 –.6 2.11 –.03 .05 .5 9.14 –.0 8.0 9.02 –.03 .20 .8 8.04 –.24 –.04 –.16 .22 –.04 .00 –.8 2.7 3.14 –.06 –.34 –.1 2.08 –.7 14.11 –.03 .13 –.8 3.07 –.6 SD  WISC–V 45 47 46 47 47 46 47 47 47 47 47 46 46 46 47 46 47 47 47 47 47 47 47 47 47 47 47 47 46 47 46 47 46 47 n .05 Emotion 65.03 –.12 –.0 47 .10 .02 –.05 .06 .05 .7 9.19 .8 2.05 –.6 9.15 .09 .06 –. 0 7.7 93.21 .5 7.04 Effort 60.25 –.6 7.25 .5 47 .02 Activation 67.24 .11 ADD Inattention Total 66.15 .24 .04 .21 .1 15.8 16.1 7.13 .17 .6 96.15 Emotion 65.5 13.5 93.27 .27 .09 .19 .12 .03 .13 –.19 –.07 –.16 –. All rights reserved.06 .17 –.24 .3 47 .27 –.19 –.1 100.28 –.21 .24 –.4 10.8 47 .07 .6 SD  WISC–V Correlations Between WISC–V Complementary Scores and the Brown ADD for the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Group n 46 46 47 47 47 46 47 46 . NSL NSQ IST DST RST NSI STI SRI Brown ADD Mean SD  n WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score Table 11 66.15 –.12 –.17 .2 99.2 16.10 –.21 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson.34 –.13 .3 102.03 Memory Brown ADD Scores 65.00 .6 100.08 ADD Combined Total Score 93.0 47 .02 Focus 63.19 –.5 Mean 16.27 –.2 30 .28 –.26 –.1 15.14 .00 .8 8.34 .07 .3 5.11 –.7 47 .31 –.07 Action 66.4 47 .13 . Inc.17 –.3 16.28 .8 8.28 –.1 30 .23 –.04 .14 .00 .2 15.40 –.22 . 8 (Emotion) to 67.3 (Focus). children with DB did not show specific cognitive weaknesses as measured by the WISC–V compared to matched controls. For the sample reported in the Tech Manual. Disruptive Behavior Correlations With the BASC–2 PRS Children with DB exhibit behavioral symptoms that include conduct problems.The mean WISC–V subtest. and their caregivers. and correlation coefficients between the WISC–V and selected scales of the BASC–2 PRS. in children with ADHD. These results suggest that. behavior. and executive function. SDs. and in some cases. which can be evaluated with the BASC–2 (see Children With Disruptive Behavior in Chapter 5 of the Tech Manual for symptom review). Inc. . As expected. A moderate correlation is observed between NSI and the ADD Inattention Total score. with a testing interval of 0–13 days and a mean testing interval of 1 day. All rights reserved. The correlations are not corrected as the range of scores on the WISC–V was not greatly restricted in this study. aged 6–15. cognitive abilities share low levels of association with attention. The WISC–V and selected scales from the BASC–2 PRS were administered to 21 children diagnosed with DB. 22 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson. and index scores are in the average range. The selected Brown ADD scores range from 60. in general. as assessed using a parent-report measure. low negligible negative correlations are present between the WISC–V and most scales from the Brown ADD Scale Parent Rating Form. attention and executive functioning problems. which would be positively correlated. It was predicted that. process. Tables 12 and 13 present the means. except for the Resiliency scale. low inverse correlations would be present between the WISC–V and the selected BASC–2 PRS scores. Moderate negative correlations are present between the Brown Action scale and the VSI. 17 –.35 –.7 3.0 3.25 –.63 .44 . All rights reserved.11 .9 99.4 3.11 –.30 –.9 21 Conduct Problems –.21 –.2 3.09 –.0 9.6 2.13 –.33 .37 .38 –.3 92.5 93.04 .11 –.19 –.6 94.38 .25 –.7 18.4 12.09 –.32 –.5 9.18 –.5 12.26 .6 21 Table 13 WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score NSL NSQ IST DST RST NSI STI SRI BASC–2 PRS Mean SD  n Correlations Between WISC–V Complementary Scores and the BASC–2 PRS for the Disruptive Behavior Group BASC–2 PRS Scale Resiliency –.15 –.04 .2 100.01 .3 3.Table 12 WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score Correlations Between the WISC–V and the BASC–2 PRS for the Disruptive Behavior Group BASC–2 PRS Scale WISC–V Resiliency Conduct Problems Executive Functioning Attention Problems Mean SD  n SI VC IN CO BD VP MR FW PC AR DS PS LN CD SS CA VCI VSI FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI BASC–2 PRS .31 –.39 .7 8.8 2.23 –.5 9.66 .0 13.8 13.13 –.26 .36 –.28 –.03 –.41 –.8 93.45 .2 13.28 –.16 –.15 .0 102.9 21 82. Inc.37 –.29 –.02 –.23 .48 –.23 –.22 .44 –.19 .12 .2 99.12 –.6 8.7 2.23 –.04 –.3 93.09 –.1 2.25 .18 –.09 –.25 .17 –.24 –.0 9.2 2.37 –.20 .00 –.11 –.06 –.3 2.35 –.7 100.20 .1 92.8 9.04 –.3 9.34 –.4 9.8 3.4 8.11 –.12 .55 .27 –.02 .51 .23 .33 –.33 .8 11.8 13.02 –.7 17.19 .6 3.36 –.06 –.07 –.21 –.07 –.14 –.06 .4 13.50 –.34 –.12 .8 9.65 .10 –.8 94.12 71.44 –.8 11.7 8.0 12.5 9.41 –.4 11.17 –.04 .0 10.8 2.1 94.16 –.33 82.06 –.22 .8 13.10 –.4 9.0 8.30 –.1 12.32 .05 –.9 15.37 .8 21 WISC–V Attention Problems .4 13.5 9.07 –. .07 –.4 95.2 100.3 21 Executive Functioning .15 .11 Mean SD  n 101.3 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 Mean SD  n 36.42 –.31 .21 –.09 .5 100.6 9.0 12.22 .8 21 67.00 –.07 9.21 .46 .0 8.03 .35 –.6 94.11 –.27 .25 –.1 97.2 8.3 9.3 21 71.0 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 21 67.53 .11 –.12 .26 .06 –.0 3.0 14.1 3.40 .40 .44 .25 –.41 .41 .1 10.13 –.35 36.12 –.07 –.6 21 23 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson.6 9.01 –. cognitive abilities share low levels of association with attention and executive function.65) and the FRI (. which can be evaluated with the BASC–2. In contrast to these findings. Conduct Problems. and executive functioning and attention deficits (Donders. All rights reserved. children with DB that have stronger general ability and fluid reasoning skills may appear more resourceful and stress tolerant than children with lower ability. The WISC–V and selected scales from the BASC–2 PRS were administered to 18 children having moderate to severe TBI. 24 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson. and Attention Problems) and the WISC–V composite scores. Of these. the highest correlations are observed with the GAI (. Inc. These results further suggest that.The mean WISC–V composite and subtest scores are in the average range.6 (Resiliency) to 82.g. there were many moderate positive correlations between the WISC–V and the BASC–2 Resiliency scale.8 (Conduct Problems).. those with better general cognitive functioning and in particular.63). Traumatic Brain Injury Correlations With the BASC–2 PRS Children with moderate to severe TBI are at risk for developing multiple neurobehavioral and cognitive symptoms. aged 7–15. The correlations are not corrected as the range of scores on the WISC–V was not greatly restricted in this study. However. and correlation coefficients between the WISC–V and selected scales from the BASC–2 PRS. 2008). The selected BASC–2 PRS scores range from 36. The only moderate correlations with the WISC–V composite scores were between the GAI and the NSI with the Conduct Problems scale. SDs. For the sample reported in the Tech Manual. . as assessed using a parent report measure. including impulsivity. FRI. conceptual reasoning ability may be better able to overcome adversity and cope with stressful situations than those with lower cognitive ability. and WMI compared to matched controls. Tables 14 and 15 present the means. in children with DB. and their caregivers. children with moderate to severe TBI show general cognitive difficulties and specific cognitive weaknesses on the VSI. Executive Functioning. The results indicate a general low negative correlation between the BASC–2 behavior problem scales (e. with a testing interval of 0–15 days and a mean testing interval of 1 day. These findings suggest that in children with behavior problems. 12 41.48 –.30 .11 .02 –.17 8.3 17 WISC–V Attention Problems –.2 83.08 –.8 3.09 –. All rights reserved.8 3.33 –.16 –.20 .25 –.02 .18 .9 88.14 56.20 –.14 .20 –.5 88.2 2.6 18.14 –.7 88.0 3. Inc.18 –.14 –.50 .9 7.06 –.9 8.4 17 25 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson.12 .08 .17 –.9 89.08 .15 –.2 7.07 –.9 18 56.24 –.6 14.7 3.31 .14 –.8 15.30 .08 .6 84.10 –.16 –.29 –.0 18 49.01 –.4 3.8 Mean SD  n 41.21 –.13 –.39 .07 –.13 –.2 7.18 –.4 18.24 –.2 21.03 –.9 7.2 16.00 –.00 .21 .8 13.1 88.27 .36 –.0 7.27 .18 .08 –.35 –.4 8.9 18 Executive Functioning –.7 85.3 17 59.18 –.1 90.18 –.00 –.3 22.07 –.04 –.03 .6 8.4 21.Table 14 WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score Correlations Between the WISC–V and the BASC–2 PRS for the Traumatic Brain Injury Group BASC–2 PRS Scale WISC–V Resiliency Conduct Problems Executive Functioning Attention Problems Mean SI VC IN CO BD VP MR FW PC AR DS PS LN CD SS CA VCI VSI FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI BASC–2 PRS –.04 .1 7.05 –.4 17 Table 15 WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score NSL NSQ IST DST RST NSI STI SRI BASC–2 PRS Mean SD  n SD  n 2.9 3.6 86.16 Mean SD  n 90.2 7.12 –.01 –.08 .9 7.5 85.4 10.9 86.09 .8 7.33 .5 16.11 –.18 .17 –.07 –.0 7.30 –.7 8.05 .15 –.09 –.21 –.9 7.20 –.04 .2 8.11 .29 .04 –.08 –.04 .08 –.7 3.12 –.08 .09 .5 18.08 –.26 –.24 .6 3.27 –.06 .26 –.6 88.13 –.0 14.07 –.23 –.21 –.0 88.40 –.03 –.23 –.18 49.2 2.31 .3 7.7 18.08 –.4 16 17 17 17 16 16 16 14 59.9 2.04 –.07 .2 3.23 –.6 3.12 .7 15 17 18 18 17 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 17 17 17 15 17 18 18 17 15 18 18 17 15 17 Correlations Between WISC–V Complementary Scores and the BASC–2 PRS for the Traumatic Brain Injury Group BASC–2 PRS Scale Resiliency –.9 20.07 .02 –.13 .20 –.14 .39 .4 88.38 –.3 90.06 .2 21.02 –.40 –.03 .28 –.05 .24 –.16 –.2 83.04 –.2 17.18 .04 –.4 10.9 16.02 –.0 18 Conduct Problems .3 7.21 –. .9 89.04 .24 .44 .8 17.24 –.8 11.01 –.0 3.18 –.14 –.5 8.41 –.40 .9 22.8 11.33 .4 3.17 –. and Internalizing Problems. Withdrawal. Negative Emotionality.2 (Attention Problems). Executive Functioning. Behavioral Symptom Index. low negative correlations are present between the WISC–V and selected BASC–2 PRS scores. Tables 16 and 17 present the means. given the large number of correlations and the small sample size. SDs. Aggression.The mean WISC–V composite and subtest scores are in the low average range. Adaptability. these may not be meaningful. For the sample reported in the Tech Manual. Somatization. Activities of Daily Living. Depression. Externalizing Problems. The selected BASC–2 PRS scores range from 41. Developmental Social Disorders. and their caregivers. with a testing interval from 0–33 days and a mean testing interval of 4 days. children in this sample do not show a high degree of behavioral symptoms. Leadership. Resiliency. Autism Spectrum Disorder With Accompanying Language Impairment Correlations With the BASC–2 PRS Children diagnosed with ASD-L have multiple behavioral and cognitive symptoms which can be evaluated with the BASC–2 (see Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder in Chapter 5 of the Tech Manual for symptom review). A few moderate correlations are observed between the two measures. as assessed with a parent rating measure. as rated by their parent. As a group. Functional Communication. and correlation coefficients between the WISC–V and BASC–2 PRS. In the TBI sample. Bullying. 26 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson. The correlations are not corrected as the range of scores on the WISC–V was not greatly restricted in this study. Attention Problems. Adaptive Skills. Conduct Problems. WMI. PSI. observable behavior problems may not relate to severity of cognitive difficulties. All rights reserved. However. cognitive abilities share low levels of association with attention and executive function. The results suggest that among children with TBI. aged 6–16. children diagnosed with ASD-L show general and specific cognitive weaknesses on the VCI.9 (Resiliency) to 59. Anxiety. Inc. Atypicality. and AWMI compared with matched controls. Emotional Self-Control. Anger Control. In general. Social Skills. The BASC–2 PRS scores reported here include: Hyperactivity. The WISC–V and the full BASC–2 PRS were administered to 27 children diagnosed with ASD-L. . 27 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved. –.14 .02 –.17 –.13 –.08 –.22 –.27 –.16 –.27 –.15 –.26 –.38 –.31 –.41 –.08 –.20 –.09 –.20 –.23 –.38 –.24 –.27 –.16 –.31 –.42 –.20 –.33 67.4 12.3 27 LN CD SS CA VCI VSI FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI BASC–2 PRS Mean SD  n Hyperactivity 52.4 8.3 27 .20 –.13 –.05 –.26 .34 .23 .03 .11 –.11 .20 .16 .26 .04 .21 –.02 .27 .41 .35 .21 .21 .27 –.01 .08 .16 .24 .31 –.11 Aggression 53.0 8.5 27 .09 .13 .15 .01 .07 .14 .07 –.02 .24 .09 .01 .14 –.05 .05 .15 .05 .19 .24 .08 .17 .12 .13 .00 –.03 .01 .15 –.15 Conduct Problems 53.0 13.4 27 .29 .18 .22 .20 .38 .37 .35 .26 .23 .36 .38 .41 .20 .34 .21 .35 .48 .40 .45 .28 .44 .23 .43 .23 .26 .36 .11 Anxiety 59.6 11.5 27 .24 .25 .28 .04 .28 .31 .28 .20 .35 .31 .23 .30 .20 .28 .31 .26 .36 .20 .26 .20 .43 .27 .24 .01 .18 .27 .11 Depression 53.6 11.4 27 .16 .38 .16 .05 .16 .34 .27 .13 .31 .31 .19 .23 .26 .26 .19 .09 .26 .15 .15 .29 .34 .25 .26 –.05 .07 .20 .05 Somatization BASC–2 PRS Scale 78.9 19.1 27 –.27 .12 –.12 –.16 –.24 –.09 –.01 –.26 .07 –.13 –.17 –.31 –.07 –.11 –.08 –.31 –.08 –.35 –.13 –.16 .02 .00 –.02 –.47 –.33 –.37 –.07 Atypicality 73.7 14.5 27 –.34 –.05 –.36 –.16 –.28 –.09 –.14 –.22 –.24 –.20 –.24 –.36 –.14 –.19 –.25 –.25 –.24 –.10 –.19 –.04 –.10 –.08 –.17 –.34 –.32 –.35 .00 Withdrawal 64.9 8.8 27 –.31 –.36 .09 –.21 –.08 –.30 –.26 –.45 –.08 –.29 –.26 –.41 –.37 –.19 –.25 –.08 –.12 –.25 –.08 –.19 –.29 –.28 –.21 –.41 –.30 –.47 –.33 Attention Problems Correlations Between the WISC–V and the BASC–2 PRS for the Autism Spectrum Disorder With Language Impairment Group SI VC IN CO BD VP MR FW PC AR DS PS WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score Table 16 33.5 10.5 27 .15 .17 .17 .17 .07 .00 .08 .21 .17 .11 .06 .22 .18 .06 .21 .06 .04 .03 .12 –.09 .02 .07 .10 .22 .05 .20 .13 Adaptability 35.1 10.4 27 .28 –.06 .11 .16 .27 .23 .20 .35 .01 .21 .23 .39 .21 .22 .22 .30 .16 .30 .25 .17 .17 .22 .16 .35 .31 .42 .18 Social Skills 28 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved. .56 .45 .47 .46 .42 .49 .41 .48 .59 .60 .69 .42 .49 .12 .20 .14 .57 .50 .48 .63 .16 .58 .56 .61 .48 .58 .44 32.3 9.6 27 Mean SD  n Leadership 30.7 12.7 27 .15 .12 .30 .23 .39 .49 .37 .38 .44 .37 .47 .51 .42 .23 .00 .15 .13 .53 .40 .55 .06 .38 .39 .47 .56 .35 .33 Activities of Daily Living 27.2 11.3 27 .64 .53 .59 .61 .53 .44 .34 .44 .70 .69 .77 .36 .65 .18 .35 .29 .69 .54 .42 .65 .28 .66 .59 .74 .51 .65 .53 Functional Communication 65.1 8.9 27 .03 .07 .05 .04 .03 –.10 –.28 –.18 –.18 –.06 –.16 –.35 –.11 –.27 –.14 –.20 .07 –.08 –.24 –.29 –.19 –.13 –.11 –.16 –.29 –.09 –.28 Anger Control 57.8 8.3 27 –.10 .13 .04 –.03 –.03 –.13 –.22 –.16 –.20 –.03 –.07 –.32 –.13 –.18 –.21 –.13 –.02 –.15 –.21 –.24 –.19 –.14 –.10 –.13 –.34 –.13 –.23 Bullying BASC–2 PRS Scale 75.8 12.7 27 –.31 –.24 –.32 –.25 –.23 –.25 –.23 –.24 –.57 –.43 –.52 –.29 –.43 –.19 –.16 –.27 –.31 –.29 –.25 –.47 –.14 –.34 –.34 –.50 –.34 –.28 –.32 Developmental Social Disorders 65.4 11.0 27 .03 .21 –.16 .06 .03 .09 –.09 .04 –.16 –.01 –.12 –.16 –.10 –.13 –.05 –.10 .11 .03 –.03 –.16 –.06 –.02 .03 –.10 –.14 .02 –.13 Emotional Self-Control 67.9 8.6 27 –.13 .03 –.16 –.08 –.15 –.20 –.35 –.18 –.29 –.21 –.30 –.40 –.28 –.31 –.15 –.23 –.07 –.24 –.29 –.40 –.22 –.27 –.20 –.30 –.42 –.23 –.35 Executive Functioning 63.8 8.9 27 .25 .17 .05 .09 .12 .25 –.07 .21 .13 .14 –.01 .00 .01 –.22 –.21 –.32 .19 .17 .07 .00 –.23 .07 .20 –.01 –.01 .13 –.17 Negative Emotionality 28.0 10.5 27 .12 .12 .16 .16 .10 .15 .12 .20 .38 .26 .37 .20 .30 .15 .15 .18 .16 .17 .16 .33 .12 .24 .23 .35 .29 .19 .24 Resiliency Correlations Between the WISC–V and the BASC–2 PRS for the Autism Spectrum Disorder With Language Impairment Group (continued) SI VC IN CO BD VP MR FW PC AR DS PS LN CD SS CA VCI VSI FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI BASC–2 PRS WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score Table 16 29 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved. .41 .31 .41 .40 .35 .40 .35 .39 .54 .48 .61 .40 .47 .17 .21 .22 .42 .44 .40 .58 .18 .48 .45 .57 .48 .46 .42 28.7 10.8 27 Mean SD  n Adaptive Skills 70.9 10.8 27 –.15 .03 –.15 –.06 –.05 .01 –.09 –.08 –.40 –.23 –.28 –.18 –.24 –.10 –.10 –.23 –.10 –.06 –.09 –.28 –.05 –.13 –.15 –.26 –.20 –.09 –.16 Behavioral Symptoms Index 58.5 8.5 27 .04 .22 .12 .05 .09 .02 –.11 –.06 –.11 .01 .02 –.31 –.06 –.23 .01 –.20 .10 .02 –.09 –.18 –.07 –.04 –.03 –.02 –.24 –.01 –.12 Externalizing Problems BASC–2 PRS Composite 56.7 13.3 27 .27 .42 .29 .33 .29 .46 .28 .36 .09 .20 .32 .10 .27 .30 .25 .12 .32 .39 .34 .23 .33 .38 .31 .36 .25 .34 .27 Internalizing Problems 6.2 5.6 5.5 4.5 7.0 6.7 7.1 7.4 6.0 5.0 5.2 6.8 4.9 5.2 6.2 6.0 78.2 82.2 84.4 76.9 76.1 75.2 78.0 71.3 79.9 80.6 74.2 Mean 3.4 3.3 3.5 2.9 4.2 4.5 4.3 3.7 4.6 3.4 4.0 4.0 3.7 3.5 3.6 3.4 17.9 23.1 21.2 20.2 18.2 19.6 19.4 22.5 20.8 19.0 18.7 SD  WISC–V Correlations Between the WISC–V and the BASC–2 PRS for the Autism Spectrum Disorder With Language Impairment Group (continued) SI VC IN CO BD VP MR FW PC AR DS PS LN CD SS CA VCI VSI FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI BASC–2 PRS WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score Table 16 n 26 26 26 27 27 26 27 27 26 27 27 27 26 26 23 27 25 26 27 27 23 25 27 26 25 25 23 30 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved. .35 .26 .69 .62 .59 .33 .63 .58 30.7 12.7 27 32.3 9.6 27 Activities of Daily Living 52.4 8.3 27 –.02 .02 .11 .14 .20 –.03 .17 .17 Aggression .53 .49 .58 .49 .62 .55 .58 .71 Leadership WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score NSL NSQ IST DST RST NSI STI SRI BASC–2 PRS Mean SD  n 67.4 12.3 27 –.55 –.42 –.45 –.40 –.40 –.54 –.40 –.51 Hyperactivity 27.2 11.3 27 .67 .53 .48 .39 .53 .67 .46 .67 Functional Communication 53.0 8.5 27 –.24 .00 .16 .18 .21 –.13 .20 .06 Conduct Problems 65.1 8.9 27 –.20 –.12 –.38 –.24 –.23 –.19 –.27 –.28 Anger Control 53.0 13.4 27 .05 .14 .50 .50 .47 .05 .50 .33 Anxiety 57.8 8.3 27 –.39 –.22 –.31 –.22 –.25 –.32 –.24 –.22 Bullying 59.6 11.5 27 .05 .17 .32 .34 .27 .08 .34 .23 Depression 75.8 12.7 27 –.53 –.56 –.48 –.42 –.56 –.62 –.47 –.66 Developmental Social Disorders 65.4 11.0 27 –.31 –.24 –.20 –.21 –.18 –.33 –.17 –.25 Emotional Self-Control 78.9 19.1 27 –.40 –.46 –.17 –.20 –.29 –.52 –.20 –.42 Atypicality BASC–2 PRS Scale 53.6 11.4 27 –.10 –.09 .19 .12 .16 –.12 .16 –.01 Somatization BASC–2 PRS Scale 67.9 8.6 27 –.45 –.35 –.42 –.36 –.40 –.46 –.39 –.49 Executive Functioning 73.7 14.5 27 –.51 –.51 –.17 –.09 –.25 –.55 –.16 –.47 Withdrawal 63.8 8.9 27 –.21 –.17 –.21 –.14 –.17 –.26 –.16 –.26 Negative Emotionality 64.9 8.8 27 –.31 –.37 –.59 –.49 –.59 –.40 –.56 –.66 Attention Problems 28.0 10.5 27 .43 .39 .46 .35 .49 .45 .42 .57 Resiliency 33.5 10.5 27 .41 .32 .44 .32 .46 .40 .39 .50 Adaptability 35.1 10.4 27 .51 .48 .52 .42 .56 .55 .50 .66 Social Skills Correlations Between WISC–V Complementary Scores and the BASC–2 PRS for the Autism Spectrum Disorder With Language Impairment Group NSL NSQ IST DST RST NSI STI SRI BASC–2 PRS Mean SD  n WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score Table 17 31 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved. NSL NSQ IST DST RST NSI STI SRI BASC–2 PRS Mean SD  n WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score Table 17 28.7 10.8 27 .58 .49 .64 .53 .65 .58 .61 .73 Adaptive Skills 70.9 10.8 27 –.46 –.44 –.25 –.20 –.31 –.53 –.23 –.45 Behavioral Symptoms Index 58.5 8.5 27 –.39 –.22 –.15 –.10 –.07 –.34 –.09 –.19 Externalizing Problems BASC–2 PRS Composite 56.7 13.3 27 .00 .09 .39 .37 .35 .01 .39 .22 Internalizing Problems 81.1 75.8 84.9 88.8 88.2 78.8 87.7 82.1 Mean 18.7 20.9 25.1 21.4 23.2 16.2 21.6 16.3 SD  WISC–V 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 23 n Correlations Between WISC–V Complementary Scores and the BASC–2 PRS for the Autism Spectrum Disorder With Language Impairment Group (continued) Unlike other clinical and typically developing samples. The BASC–2 PRS scores range from 27. Attention Problems. Comprehension. automaticity of language. The results for the BASC–2 composite scores (i. Children with better cognitive skills on Vocabulary. and Internalizing Problems) indicate that cognitive skills are more highly related to adaptive functioning than to negative behaviors. The highest correlations occur between WISC–V and Functional Communication. Adaptive Skills. Functional Communication and Leadership are related to a number of cognitive processing index scores including the VCI. Working memory ability is also associated with attention problems. cognitive difficulties are related to observable differences in behavior.2 (Functional Communication) to 78. low scores on language automaticity and memory were associated with more behavioral symptoms in general. Children showing deficits in automaticity of language and memory have more observable symptoms of a developmental disorder and executive functioning deficits.The mean WISC–V composite and subtest scores are in the very low to low average range. and leadership skills. Visual Puzzles. NSI. and Daily Living. social skills and resiliency. cognitive abilities relate to adaptive behaviors such that low ability is associated with observable deficits in communication. resiliency. Externalizing Problems. These results show that in a complex disorder with both cognitive and behavioral impairments.9 (Atypicality). In particular. Figure Weights. . Naming Speed Literacy and the Symbol Translation subtests are most consistently related to both adaptive functioning and behavior symptoms. social skills. Among the WISC–V measures.73). WMI. Language automaticity and memory deficits are more associated with attention and social skills problems. Children with ASD-L who have deficits in language automaticity and memory are also rated as having more problems with attention. the pattern of correlations in the ASD-L group ranges from low to high with positive and negative associations. Behavioral Symptom Index. being creative. and getting work completed. 32 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson. Leadership. Among the composite behavioral symptom scales. All rights reserved. low scores on language automaticity and memory functioning are related to higher scores on the Developmental Social Disorders or Executive Functioning scales. The correlations of the WISC–V with the BASC–2 content scales indicate moderate relations between WISC–V complementary measures and BASC–2 parent ratings. auditory working memory. and SRI. AWMI. and that language automaticity and memory functioning are generally more related to observed behaviors than other cognitive measures (the SRI–Adaptive Skills Index correlation is . Children with deficits in verbal problem solving. and the Symbol Translation subtests appear more anxious than children who have lower scores on those measures. Specifically. and a lack of resiliency. and memory are rated by parents as having difficulty with day to day communication and have difficulty working under pressure. Inc.e.. SDs. and their caregivers. All rights reserved. Tables 18 and 19 present the means. Somatization. Functional Communication. and Internalizing Problems. Inc. Withdrawal. Adaptability. children diagnosed with ASD-NL show weaknesses on the WMI. . For the sample reported in the Tech Manual. The BASC–2 PRS scores reported here include: Hyperactivity. Social Skills. Anxiety. The WISC–V and the full BASC–2 PRS were administered to 30 children diagnosed with ASD-NL. Anger Control. Leadership. The correlations are not corrected as the range of scores on the WISC–V was not greatly restricted in this study. AWMI and NSI compared with matched controls. aged 7–15. Conduct Problems. with a testing interval from 0–35 days and a mean testing interval of 5 days. Externalizing Problems. Attention Problems. Emotional Self-Control. Activities of Daily Living.Autism Spectrum Disorder Without Accompanying Language Impairment Correlations With the BASC–2 PRS Children diagnosed with ASD-NL have multiple behavioral and cognitive symptoms which can be evaluated with the BASC–2 (see Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder in Chapter 5 of the Tech Manual for symptom review). Aggression. Negative Emotionality. Developmental Social Disorders. Bullying. Executive Functioning. Behavioral Symptom Index. Resiliency. Adaptive Skills. and correlation coefficients between the WISC–V and BASC–2 PRS. Atypicality. 33 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson. Depression. 21 –.10 –.11 .07 –.12 –.15 .15 64.22 –.30 –.02 .01 .07 .03 –.09 –.11 .11 Attention Problems 38.01 .12 Depression 52.04 Anxiety 61.10 –.15 –.17 –.15 –.04 .08 Withdrawal 65.03 –.03 –.21 –.32 .09 .21 .14 –.04 –.04 –.36 .04 –.12 –.00 –.05 –.06 –.17 –.22 –.15 –.14 –.23 –.06 –.16 –.39 –.06 –.04 –.16 –.09 .16 –.09 .22 –.24 –.04 –.01 –.07 .38 –.14 .00 .12 –.08 .13 .00 –.07 –.3 11.06 .02 –.06 .03 –.03 –.29 .07 –.07 –.06 .33 .4 12.04 .1 30 –.13 –.10 .11 –.34 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson.12 –.20 .17 –.17 –.20 .06 –.15 –.00 –.05 –.27 . All rights reserved.33 –.22 .12 –.09 –.03 –.33 –.00 –.27 –.11 –.01 .06 .11 –.25 –.03 –.26 .20 –.07 .05 –.08 .04 –.03 –.11 –.16 .09 –.26 .00 . .10 –.18 –.10 Social Skills .02 .0 30 –.05 .7 30 .05 .11 –.02 .06 .17 –.26 –.20 –.7 14.18 –.11 .17 .32 .01 .21 –.04 .27 –.07 –.20 .24 .11 –.16 .03 –.04 .36 –.11 .02 .04 –. Inc.13 –.26 .14 .21 .08 –.07 Aggression 56.15 .01 –.17 .36 –.21 –.18 –.08 .04 .08 –.10 –.20 .09 –.0 30 –.15 .06 –.07 –.17 –.05 –.23 .13 –.04 Adaptability Correlations Between the WISC–V and the BASC–2 PRS for the Autism Spectrum Disorder Without Language Impairment Group SI VC IN CO BD VP MR FW PC AR DS PS WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score Table 18 40.06 –.30 .06 –.15 .04 –.27 –.08 .13 –.13 –.25 –.17 .36 .10 –.0 11.02 .04 –.0 8.02 –.13 –.11 .12 –.05 –.02 –.5 7.13 –.20 –.8 15.13 –.00 –.07 .06 –.05 .09 –.08 .18 –.24 .24 –.18 .7 30 .12 .0 30 –.27 .02 –.13 –.03 .18 .0 14.15 –.29 .04 Conduct Problems 57.17 –.00 .11 –.3 30 LN CD SS CA VCI VSI FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI BASC–2 PRS Mean SD  n Hyperactivity 55.18 .2 30 –.16 .08 –.09 –.28 .13 –.01 –.05 .32 .5 13.13 –.01 –.01 –.12 –.17 .03 –.04 –.11 .06 .9 30 –.01 .14 –.01 –.3 30 .16 –.07 .24 .17 .05 –.32 Somatization BASC–2 PRS Scale 71.41 –.21 .12 .20 .02 –.05 –.01 –.03 –.26 .5 12.25 –.15 –.25 .14 –.10 –.2 30 –.22 .19 –.01 .21 –.31 –.19 –.13 .27 .10 Atypicality 68.15 .04 .11 –.27 –.02 –.10 .3 15.09 .24 –.04 –.38 –.01 –.20 –.03 –.14 –.22 –.20 –.13 .13 –.17 –.08 –.10 –.06 –.09 .02 .15 –.07 –.02 . 12 .02 .14 .31 .21 .19 Emotional Self-Control 64.10 .25 –.11 –.03 –.02 –.10 –.03 –.07 .01 .09 .8 30 .02 –.07 .24 .16 .01 –.13 .07 –. All rights reserved.09 .10 .06 –.11 –.05 –.14 –.06 –.02 –.30 .15 .00 Bullying BASC–2 PRS Scale 70.09 .05 –.8 30 .12 –.22 .01 –.02 .0 30 –.03 –.12 –.10 37.10 .21 .01 .06 .08 .06 .02 .21 .0 7.07 .00 –.4 30 Mean SD  n Leadership 33.07 .19 .03 –.08 .04 Activities of Daily Living 35.19 –.10 .04 .06 –.01 .07 .18 .17 .05 .08 –.4 8.15 .26 .21 .7 30 .10 .07 .08 .20 .03 –.8 30 .11 –.23 .10 –.01 .06 –.25 .06 –.15 .08 .18 .01 .27 .13 .07 –.11 –.13 –.19 .14 –.04 .09 Developmental Social Disorders 60.30 .17 .07 .16 –.03 .13 .04 .1 30 .01 .08 .41 .04 –.00 .26 .03 .01 –.12 .00 –.16 .06 –.04 –.04 –.4 9.07 –.13 –.19 .07 –.05 –.16 .06 .11 .04 –.11 .03 Negative Emotionality 33.15 .28 .05 .04 Functional Communication 63.22 –.00 .07 .06 –.20 .17 .06 .09 .13 .15 .02 –.2 11.3 15.16 –.26 –.08 .05 .10 .9 30 –.23 .05 .08 –.08 .02 –.14 –.35 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson.08 –.27 .03 .26 –.01 .04 –.21 –.20 .21 .17 –.14 .11 .05 .22 .7 11.10 .39 .09 .15 –.02 –. Inc.28 .07 .01 –.00 –.16 .07 .09 –.07 –.12 –.27 .00 .15 –.14 –.16 .03 Resiliency Correlations Between the WISC–V and the BASC–2 PRS for the Autism Spectrum Disorder Without Language Impairment Group (continued) SI VC IN CO BD VP MR FW PC AR DS PS LN CD SS CA VCI VSI FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI BASC–2 PRS WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score Table 18 .24 .01 –.18 –.06 .12 –.6 30 .10 .16 .1 9.10 .26 –.04 .20 .23 .05 –.02 –.30 .15 .07 –.22 .06 Anger Control 58.15 Executive Functioning 57.30 .26 .13 .02 –.10 .6 8.11 .20 .07 .04 .20 .01 –.02 –.20 .14 .00 .11 .15 –.18 .14 .02 –.17 –.05 .12 –.22 . .09 .11 –.01 –.08 –.04 –.05 .15 .02 .15 .22 .27 –.02 .08 –.8 12.04 –.02 –.19 –.09 .23 .00 –.04 –.15 –.04 .17 –.13 .07 .05 –.06 .02 .04 –.9 30 .07 .2 10.16 .08 .09 .11 .10 .21 –.15 .08 –. 03 Externalizing Problems BASC–2 PRS Composite 58.20 –.09 .21 –.10 –.06 –.22 .26 –.6 87.16 –.10 –.08 .05 .01 –.11 –.11 –.9 17.17 –.16 –.3 30 VSI FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI BASC–2 PRS Mean SD  n Adaptive Skills 68.25 .6 10.11 .20 .02 –.30 –.5 10.9 8.8 9.8 30 –.07 –.09 .05 .03 –.0 2.1 3.5 17.01 34.10 –.01 .04 .06 –.0 8.10 –.10 .4 12.02 –.07 –.18 .3 3.09 –.5 2.09 .5 SD  WISC–V 29 30 30 30 29 28 30 30 29 29 29 29 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 29 30 30 n Correlations Between the WISC–V and the BASC–2 PRS for the Autism Spectrum Disorder Without Language Impairment Group (continued) SI VC IN CO BD VP MR FW PC AR DS PS LN CD SS CA VCI WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score Table 18 .9 3. .5 7.20 –.19 –.9 30 .2 9.05 .15 .5 95.4 3.19 –.30 .8 3.09 –.24 .04 .02 .6 96. All rights reserved.06 –.03 .02 .15 .11 .7 9.3 30 –.01 Internalizing Problems 100.27 .7 Mean 15.5 9.28 –.1 18.02 –.5 7.06 –.02 –.08 .4 3.2 92.1 98.1 3.5 10.06 –.33 –.03 –.10 .7 17.09 –.0 17.23 –.04 .3 8.08 .03 –.04 .05 –.13 .09 –.14 .02 –.6 3.7 3.21 –.32 .04 .06 .3 100.3 17.03 .04 –.08 .0 15.15 .12 .06 –.13 Behavioral Symptoms Index 60.08 .4 8.0 3.6 17.0 18.6 9.20 .01 –.08 –.13 .03 –.05 –.19 –.36 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson.21 –.9 3.8 3.20 –.13 .13 .9 8.4 88.12 .6 3.2 15.9 100.6 93.4 99.00 .9 10.33 –. Inc.5 9.03 –.16 .6 3.02 .01 –.16 –.6 10.06 –.14 –.0 17. 26 –.00 .14 –.15 .21 –.1 30 –.3 15.01 –.10 –.06 .23 .28 Developmental Social Disorders 60.0 30 –.38 –.23 .18 –.12 –.23 .25 .08 –.18 –.02 .1 9.33 –.07 .10 .2 30 .27 –.28 –.2 30 –.11 .01 .16 –.1 30 –.24 –.0 14.01 .06 –.07 .00 .16 –.02 –.28 Leadership WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score NSL NSQ IST DST RST NSI STI SRI BASC–2 PRS Mean SD  n 64.06 Attention Problems 33.04 .00 –.10 –.17 .24 .13 .8 30 .11 –.41 –.32 .15 Depression 70.33 .03 Aggression 35.07 –.2 10.04 Adaptability 40.16 –.02 .4 12.07 .13 –.3 30 –.01 .02 .0 7.29 Anxiety 58. All rights reserved.7 30 .2 11.14 –.14 –.22 –.4 30 –.24 –.8 30 .06 –.7 14.24 –.7 11.10 .06 –.05 .25 –.15 Withdrawal 57. 37.06 .05 .15 Activities of Daily Living 55.03 .5 12.21 .12 –.11 –.6 30 –.3 30 .14 –.0 11.17 –.08 –.09 –.8 30 –.27 –.0 30 .04 .9 30 –.00 .02 –.30 –.02 Negative Emotionality 65.09 .14 Conduct Problems 63.9 30 .33 –.45 –.07 .22 .19 –.0 8.04 –.18 .13 .03 Bullying 61.07 –.09 –.09 –.3 11.11 .9 30 .19 –.05 Hyperactivity 33.11 .7 30 –.16 –.16 –.8 15.36 –.10 Functional Communication 56.03 .13 .12 .12 –.0 30 –.14 .04 –.16 –.01 –.02 .33 Somatization BASC–2 PRS Scale 64.02 –.3 15.16 –.10 –.04 . Inc.12 Emotional Self-Control 71.04 .24 –.4 9.12 Executive Functioning 68.07 –.02 –.25 .05 .20 –.09 –.28 –.24 –.17 .00 –.37 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson.6 8.20 Resiliency 38.4 8.24 –.8 12.5 7.15 –.21 .03 –.05 .02 –.38 Social Skills Correlations Between WISC–V Complementary Scores and the BASC–2 PRS for the Autism Spectrum Disorder Without Language Impairment Group NSL NSQ IST DST RST NSI STI SRI BASC–2 PRS Mean SD  n WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score Table 19 .7 30 .22 .21 .07 .13 .25 –.06 .07 Anger Control 57.0 30 –.10 –.23 .09 –.08 –.26 –.07 –.09 .19 .17 .13 .04 –.27 .04 Atypicality BASC–2 PRS Scale 52.09 –.5 13.16 –.09 –.22 .21 . 0 15.13 –.2 17.5 90.00 .15 –.0 Mean 14.01 Behavioral Symptoms Index 60.0 16.03 –. Inc.3 17.14 –.35 –.25 Adaptive Skills 68.27 –.07 –.16 –.11 –.5 7.17 .8 18.4 12.17 –.3 30 .9 97.33 –.02 .06 . NSL NSQ IST DST RST NSI STI SRI BASC–2 PRS Mean SD  n WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score Table 19 34.11 –.8 104.30 Internalizing Problems 93.9 30 .3 103.8 30 –.28 –.07 –.3 16.1 14.38 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson. All rights reserved.08 –.5 19.01 .5 10.3 30 –.01 .37 –.01 –.04 .17 –.06 –.02 .6 SD  WISC–V 30 30 30 30 28 30 28 28 n Correlations Between WISC–V Complementary Scores and the BASC–2 PRS for the Autism Spectrum Disorder Without Language Impairment Group (continued) .8 101.2 91.06 –.06 Externalizing Problems BASC–2 PRS Composite 58.8 102. 39 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson. The results indicate low negative correlations are present between the WISC–V and the BASC–2 PRS problem behavior scores and positive with the adaptive behavior measures. The BASC–2 PRS scores range from 33. In the ASD-NL sample. . the studies illustrate that the WISC–V is correlated with academic performance in children with neurodevelopmental disabilities. the WISC–V is associated with adaptive functioning and behavioral concerns. observable behavior problems may not relate to severity of cognitive difficulties. given the large number of correlations and the small sample size. In general.4 (Atypicality). In particular. In addition. they may not be meaningful. However. there are no strong associations between the WISC–V and the BASC–2 PRS in the ASD-NL group.0 (Activities of Daily Living) to 71. The results are generally consistent with expectations based on previous research and theoretical foundations. there is strong support for the new subtests and composites. It is expected that future investigations utilizing the WISC–V in different clinical settings and populations will provide additional evidence of the scale’s utility when used as part of a comprehensive clinical evaluation for diagnosis and intervention purposes. Summary Results from these correlation studies of other measures with WISC–V in special groups provide additional support for the validity and clinical utility of the WISC–V.The mean WISC–V composite scores are in the low average to average range. as assessed with a parent report measure. These results suggest that for children with ASD-NL. Inc. A few other moderate correlations are observed between the measures. All rights reserved. the new complementary measures are related to both academic and behavioral measures. cognitive abilities share low levels of association with behavioral symptoms and adaptive functioning. In particular. Moderate correlations are observed between the Naming Speed Literacy subtest and the BASC–2 Anxiety and Social Skills scales. The studies also demonstrate that in clinical samples with a high degree of cognitive and behavioral variability. Appendix WISC–V Stability Coefficients. All rights reserved. F . by Age Group 40 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson. Inc. 7 9.7 14.82 .4 10.39 a Correlations were corrected for the variability of the normative sample (Allen & Yen.7 36 .83 . b  he Standard Difference is the difference of the two test means divided by the square root of the pooled variance.5 2.0 36 .83 .73 .6 13.4 3.5 10.7 33 .84 –.7 10.7 37 .58 .69 .00 CD 8.88 .9 10.23 CO 9.80 .87 .3 2.9 12.84 .1 35 .78 .4 3.5 2.0 2.83 .80 .6 10.9 2.60 DSf 9.65 .25 BD 8.8 10.81 .4 10.0 10.35 WMI 98. 41 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson.7 2.77 .3 9. Inc.3 36 .7 102.4 37 .29 BDn 8.8 9.0 10.5 2.16 AWMI 96.87 .4 13.4 2.7 36 .8 2.4.6 14.8 3.5 1.64 FSIQ 93.50 .81 .8 2.5 2.82 .6 32 .4 101.03 NVI 94.78 .76 . computed using Cohen’s (1996) T Formula 10.80 .Table F.4 101.0 37 .52 VSI 94.7 36 .6 34 . and Composite Scores.79 .1 Ages 6–7 Stability Coefficients of Subtest.8 10.2 18.7 10.7 34 .0 35 .1 36 .9 11.8 2.0 34 .69 .25 MR 9.68 .5 2.3 100.7 3.61 .82 .7 36 .6 2. by Age Group First Testing Second Testing Mean SD Mean SD n r 12 Corrected r a Standard Differenceb SI 9.5 36 .8 2.7 97.75 .5 13.77 .7 9.61 QRI 97.4 2.1 9.4 10.84 .70 CA 10.7 33 .7 2.7 2.8 36 .4 37 .9 12.9 2.62 BDp 9.8 37 .0 102.6 3.68 CPI 96.7 10.6 36 .7 35 .6 101.4 12.77 .4 10.84 .76 .82 .62 .9 3.75 FW 9.7 9.4 2.57 VC 9.4 3.82 .77 .8 37 .80 . .4 2.4 35 .8 9.71 .79 .86 .81 –.04 PC 10.0 2. All rights reserved.83 .5 2.04 LN 9.9 2.86 .1 14.78 .70 . Magnusson.85 .79 .7 96.53 GAI 93.75 .2 101. 2002.8 13.23 AR 9.1 33 .2 107.81 .00 DSb 9.0 2.82 .1 99.80 –.68 . 1967).80 .1 2.8 9.78 .82 .7 15.0 2.6 2.8 33 .5 2.2 11.80 .7 2.7 35 .78 .03 CAr 10.68 .6 36 .8 14.78 .58 FRI 95.3 2. Process.1 2.10 DSs 9.59 VP 9.6 14.2 13.80 .34 DS 9.09 PSI 96.74 .4 12.5 34 .48 SS 9.4 2.0 2.37 Subtest/Process/ Composite Score VCI 95.9 2.6 2.5 3.2 37 .0 36 .8 2.20 CAs 9.11 PS 9.3 10.5 11.72 .5 10.80 .25 IN 9.9 36 .9 12.90 .7 11.66 . 4 43 .80 .81 .1 3.80 .3 3.7 41 .1 100.2 2.5 2.0 11.50 BDp 10.0 3. .0 10.8 3.89 .83 .1 102.29 CO 9.73 .74 .92 .80 .5 43 .89 .79 .27 VC 9.74 .75 .8 108.53 .1 2.7 11. 1967).81 .4 3.70 .9 10.8 10.7 13.2 13.1 43 . Process.83 .6 14.7 16.66 .4 2.1 Ages 8–9 Stability Coefficients of Subtest.31 DSf 10.7 14.0 11.7 42 .9 43 .7 43 .95 .6 101.3 40 .6 2.8 13.3 40 .1 2.2 106.3 43 .6 43 . All rights reserved.0 41 .81 .7 2.84 .52 SS 10.3 10.7 2.35 QRI 102.4 3.4 3.9 11.21 DS 10.79 .2 13.3 39 .1 41 .43 a Correlations were corrected for the variability of the normative sample (Allen & Yen.3 2.0 15.07 CD 10.6 11.8 42 .86 .18 BD 9.7 40 .07 DSb 10.77 . 42 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson.78 .6 15.73 .2 42 .3 39 .82 .5 3.3 3.15 PC 10.36 BDn 9.4 2.6 2.9 2.31 AR 10.84 .39 VCI 99.2 11.5 13.0 14. Magnusson.91 .6 106.3 42 . Inc.5 11.56 FSIQ 101.8 2.9 12.73 .6 2.74 .7 13.7 39 .82 .91 .00 DSs 9.85 .56 .0 3.5 10.51 VP 10.4 13.26 FW 10.0 10.6 2.81 .6 10.6 2.8 43 .85 .77 .6 2.9 11.7 3.4 2. and Composite Scores.0 105. by Age Group (continued) First Testing Second Testing Subtest/Process/ Composite Score Mean SD Mean SD n r 12 Corrected r a Standard Differenceb SI 10.86 .22 WMI 100.8 11.1 2.88 .77 .1 11.8 2.49 CA 10.86 .84 .82 .4 42 .5 42 .07 PS 10.7 9.82 .04 LN 10.67 .78 .1 2.0 11.80 .1 105.6 2.83 .42 CAs 10.73 . 2002.0 43 .91 .4.9 43 .9 43 .0 2.93 .47 MR 10.4 42 .79 .79 .18 VSI 101.0 13.3 42 .4 10.6 41 .0 39 .1 11.2 13.83 .81 .Table F.2 3.0 2.82 .56 .22 CAr 10.93 .74 . computed using Cohen’s (1996) T Formula 10.5 10.85 .6 10.3 3.05 NVI 101.6 2.0 108.4 3.7 39 .4 11.48 FRI 102.6 39 .75 .82 .15 AWMI 100.83 .5 14.16 PSI 101.7 108.82 .70 .07 IN 9.4 2.2 13.2 13.7 2.6 2.79 .1 2.7 39 . b  he Standard Difference is the difference of the two test means divided by the square root of the pooled variance.9 2.0 2.7 104.7 13.56 .2 10.3 2.5 42 .54 GAI 101.32 CPI 100. 75 .92 .5 2.2 15.7 2.3 14. 43 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson.71 .5 2.4 10.9 2.81 .4 106.77 .79 .4 40 .2 3.0 2.5 102.3 2.82 .03 BD 9.8 40 .24 DS 9.6 9.5 2.89 .2 2.7 15.84 .0 2.85 .34 MR 9. Inc.7 39 .2 13.2 14.7 2.2 2.03 IN 9.89 .21 VC 9.8 10.7 39 .8 39 . and Composite Scores.86 –.7 13.5 38 .7 40 .29 PC 9.4 11.91 . Magnusson. b  he Standard Difference is the difference of the two test means divided by the square root of the pooled variance.42 Subtest/Process/ Composite Score WMI a Correlations were corrected for the variability of the normative sample (Allen & Yen. 1967).43 FRI 100.6 39 .83 .5 15.81 .5 36 .92 .6 2.73 .79 .83 .31 CPI 98.76 .2 2.86 .00 DSb 9.3 39 .4 2.04 CD 9.79 .4 38 .84 .7 103.0 11.77 .4 38 .87 .1 3.07 NVI 98.3 38 .14 VSI 99.83 .82 .9 2.4 11.6 39 .64 .80 .9 104.4 40 .20 LN 9.3 2.6 40 .4 38 .44 CA 8.84 .92 . 2002.1 2.7 3.0 39 .6 10.9 2.20 AR 9.8 2.2 3.9 2.1 13.78 .4 10.1 40 .57 SS 10.1 15.9 39 .1 15.5 9. .9 2.92 .43 GAI 98.4 2.3 35 .80 .0 10.20 CAr 8.7 9.74 .8 40 .Table F. Process.4.79 .1 Ages 10–11 Stability Coefficients of Subtest.6 15.9 15.0 98.5 36 .90 .1 13.83 .9 3.2 3. computed using Cohen’s (1996) T Formula 10. All rights reserved.83 .9 3.77 .84 .93 .1 2.81 .79 .28 97.93 .2 100.5 10.80 .80 .91 .1 2.26 FW 10.9 108.17 DSf 9.62 .40 VCI 98.9 9.0 36 .91 .5 11.0 2.8 3.8 3.88 .35 QRI 98.39 VP 10.9 38 .84 .82 .7 3.5 2.1 9.4 2.4 39 .0 37 .1 13.3 9.7 102.88 .8 10.6 2.59 BDn 10.3 105.8 3.6 3.86 .78 .7 10.84 .5 2.9 15.6 14.7 2.8 11.3 38 .4 3.11 PSI 100.56 FSIQ 97.9 14.12 CO 9.80 .00 PS 9.9 3.6 2.9 3.81 .34 BDp 10.5 40 .87 .81 .69 .3 37 .1 104.80 .7 10.30 AWMI 97.81 .7 9.0 12.8 38 .00 DSs 9.0 9.83 .78 . by Age Group (continued) First Testing Second Testing Mean SD Mean SD n r 12 Corrected r a Standard Differenceb SI 9.67 CAs 9.6 98.6 13.5 38 .6 14.2 38 .82 .8 39 .8 11.78 .4 14.7 10. 23 CD 10.0 12.87 .7 2.0 103.5 2.1 Ages 12–13 Stability Coefficients of Subtest.39 FSIQ 99.3 2.8 2.26 BDp 9.0 2.1 13.2 13.59 .2 13.88 .6 3.78 .35 CAs 9.0 2.2 41 .5 13.6 42 .2 2.71 .0 10.0 3.82 .5 105.86 .92 .6 2.75 .94 .9 10.1 2.88 . Process.61 .4 38 .24 VC 9.5 3.1 2.4 12.78 .9 11.00 BD 9.Table F.94 .77 .7 15.7 14.8 10.5 42 .5 2.81 .3 10. and Composite Scores.81 .0 12.4 2.77 . All rights reserved.19 CAr 10.19 LN 9.81 .88 .82 .8 3.80 .89 .6 10.80 .84 .9 102.80 .6 15.33 AWMI 98.9 39 .79 .9 2.85 .6 2.2 2.9 2.80 .5 3.0 2.44 QRI 98.78 .6 3.88 .7 102.5 41 .3 41 .1 105.9 11.24 SS 10.9 11.7 2.8 101.84 .3 3.7 2.4 38 .9 42 .32 DSs 9.82 .3 42 .9 40 .9 3.80 .2 2.1 10.80 .92 .5 2. . 44 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson.5 2. 2002.9 2.8 10.19 VSI 98.79 .9 41 .5 42 .3 2.11 DSb 10.3 42 .3 2.7 10.76 .6 41 .71 .5 3.79 .2 39 .9 10.91 .77 .8 42 .34 AR 10.4 11.29 NVI 98.07 DS 9.0 10.88 .49 a Correlations were corrected for the variability of the normative sample (Allen & Yen.41 CPI 100.8 2.6 13.3 3.83 .5 3. computed using Cohen’s (1996) T Formula 10.0 42 .83 . 1967).1 102.6 10.82 .1 13.79 .92 .4 10.5 14.3 107.6 10.34 Subtest/Process/ Composite Score VCI 99.89 .6 40 .6 40 .78 .79 .1 14.66 .8 42 .5 41 .9 3.5 41 .62 .5 10.4 9.4 13.9 104.80 .4.35 VP 10.33 FRI 98.22 CO 10.5 13.8 12. b  he Standard Difference is the difference of the two test means divided by the square root of the pooled variance.77 . Magnusson.4 109.80 .0 2.9 13.8 13.92 .7 42 .8 10.31 PC 9.22 MR 10.4 2.8 40 .27 PS 9.81 .51 WMI 97.39 FW 9.0 42 .80 .5 10.8 103.2 2.84 .29 DSf 9.34 PSI 103.9 41 .79 .67 .2 40 .0 41 .0 3.55 BDn 9. Inc.6 39 .8 10.82 .7 2.9 41 .4 42 .85 . by Age Group (continued) First Testing Second Testing Mean SD Mean SD n r 12 Corrected r a Standard Differenceb SI 9.49 GAI 98.80 .3 2.6 2.9 11.1 13.9 42 .9 3.57 CA 9.71 .1 15.12 IN 9.89 .5 42 .91 .6 13. 1 11.27 CD 10.30 NVI 98.7 10.45 FRI 96.9 10.83 .9 2.2 3.70 .23 CO 10. Magnusson.5 56 .90 .8 2.6 3.00 BD 9.77 .6 10.75 .81 . All rights reserved.2 51 .92 .85 .85 .5 3.9 56 . Inc.6 2.6 14.3 105.43 WMI 98.9 14.80 .8 16.47 MR 9.48 FW 9.9 2.1 2.82 .9 11.8 103.83 .3 2.83 .52 GAI 98.84 .21 DSs 9.1 11.68 .87 .7 3.8 105.9 56 .9 56 .84 .87 .5 13.9 2.0 2.5 53 .29 LN 10. . and Composite Scores.0 52 .9 2.30 VCI 99.8 105.35 CAs 10.1 3. 45 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson.8 10.66 .47 CA 9.88 .7 55 .25 VSI 99.4 13.9 11.2 2.33 VP 9.5 102.3 56 .88 .91 .3 11.96 .5 51 .8 17.0 56 .4 10.25 DSb 9.1 15.9 2.85 .79 .6 10.4.84 .1 14.8 12. 2002. Process.8 56 .8 55 .2 55 .24 100.84 .7 10.1 104.1 13.1 3.8 12.87 .30 CAr 9. by Age Group (continued) First Testing Second Testing Mean SD Mean SD n r 12 Corrected r a Standard Differenceb SI 9.6 14.92 .9 56 .38 BDp 9.9 3.81 .1 3.1 13.1 13.0 3.94 .90 .9 11.7 10.9 2.8 2.0 54 .0 56 .16 PC 9.2 11.7 56 .8 3.2 10.40 VC 9.1 10.1 2.0 10.1 56 .8 14.35 DSf 10.46 QRI 99.83 .07 DS 9.28 Subtest/Process/ Composite Score PSI 99.4 56 .93 .8 2.7 14.68 .72 .2 2.7 3.43 AWMI a Correlations were corrected for the variability of the normative sample (Allen & Yen.4 10.73 .85 .4 3.74 .92 .86 .5 52 .5 2.68 .9 13. 1967).0 54 .11 IN 9.Table F.9 103.2 2.7 2.89 .0 3.7 2.3 2.6 56 .81 .78 .41 CPI 99.86 .9 3.87 .80 .8 14.70 .0 54 .47 FSIQ 98.81 .2 56 .3 55 .75 .89 .7 2.3 15.72 .92 .88 .1 105.70 .81 .80 .26 PS 9.6 106.1 3.0 13.7 54 .34 SS 9.89 .86 .91 .0 51 .7 51 .6 15.1 55 .9 102.0 10.4 10.82 .70 .0 3.88 .1 13.39 BDn 9.1 56 .0 3.8 10.4 102.6 56 .9 2.80 .91 .3 2.8 2.0 53 .1 Ages 14–16 Stability Coefficients of Subtest.4 2.82 .5 10.2 56 .44 AR 10.9 3.9 2.0 3. computed using Cohen’s (1996) T Formula 10.84 . b  he Standard Difference is the difference of the two test means divided by the square root of the pooled variance. 1 42 .88 .1 Ages 8–9 Subtest/ Composite Score First Testing Mean n Second Testing SD Mean SD NSL 99.8 101.31 NSQ 103.7 16.46 Subtest/ Composite Score DST 95.84 .86 .81 .41 Ages 10–11 First Testing Second Testing Mean SD Mean SD n r 12 Corrected ra Standard Differenceb NSL 94.9 17.Table F.81 .83 .1 14.2 15.93 .5 108.0 14.85 .3 DST 95.7 12.50 18.1 40 .6 39 .0 13.88 .85 .6 15.8 20.79 .91 .79 .86 .66 DST 103.2 37 .1 14.45 NSI 101.7 16.88 .0 14.60 14.2 109.0 36 .5 18.9 96.89 .3 13.79 .2 IST 94.88 .3 17.7 16.85 .5 102.4 RST NSI r 12 Corrected ra Standard Differenceb 37 .2 39 .76 .9 37 .2 16.4 40 .2 112.0 101.39 a Correlations were corrected for the variability of the normative sample (Allen & Yen.9 104.4.1 97.82 .3 102.89 .9 14.52 37 .80 .5 15. .4 16.7 39 .1 12.60 102.09 STI 102.3 14.79 .2 101.7 43 . b  he Standard Difference is the difference of the two test means divided by the square root of the pooled variance.3 11.0 14.86 .80 .15 NSQ 96.6 13.7 98.8 112.0 102.65 RST 102.88 .88 .21 36 .85 .5 102.7 97.3 14.2 15.5 14.22 102.81 .9 17.83 . 2002.7 43 .5 103.9 15.4 14.6 43 .80 .78 . 46 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson.5 112.75 .7 16.4 103.4 15.3 103.1 15.12 36 .0 12.86 .81 .47 SRI 94.1 16.49 n r 12 Corrected ra Standard Differenceb Mean SD 20.4 103.87 .0 15.7 39 . computed using Cohen’s T (1996) Formula 10. 1967).85 .89 .7 39 .81 –.85 .64 SRI 102.5 42 .7 13.1 37 .34 NSI 94. Magnusson.2 Ages 6–7 Subtest/ Composite Score Stability Coefficients of Complementary Subtest and Composite Scores.2 14.78 .1 14. Inc.3 101.5 40 .88 .8 15.06 IST 103.8 14.7 42 .5 37 .7 12. by Age Group First Testing Second Testing Mean SD NSL 96.91 .14 IST 96.92 .3 12.49 RST 96.93 .0 97.87 .21 STI 96.1 40 .7 STI 94.8 100.7 17. All rights reserved.83 .5 NSQ 100.9 SRI 95. 5 15.92 .6 56 .53 SRI 98.87 .7 55 .8 13.78 .82 .6 14.8 14.70 RST 99.4 107.2 107.1 55 .75 .2 Stability Coefficients of Complementary Subtest and Composite Scores.7 41 .1 105.5 16.1 16.89 .82 . 47 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson.2 13. 1967).5 16.1 41 .65 SRI 98.53 a Correlations were corrected for the variability of the normative sample (Allen & Yen.8 15.4 13.19 NSQ 100.7 16.2 13. .5 41 .0 103.0 102.8 14.8 42 .7 16.4 16.84 .8 16.82 .86 . by Age Group (continued) First Testing Ages 12–13 Subtest/ Composite Score Mean Second Testing SD Mean SD n r 12 Corrected ra Standard Differenceb NSL 97.85 .4 104.40 NSI 100.88 .5 15.0 103.0 15. b  he Standard Difference is the difference of the two test means divided by the square root of the pooled variance.3 15.87 .10 STI 98.1 38 .90 .3 15. 2002.78 . All rights reserved.80 .5 100.2 14.83 .4 100.2 13.01 IST 96.76 DST 97.9 107.87 .5 105.85 .0 13.9 100.6 15.4.3 55 .85 .8 52 .0 106.8 14.5 13.84 . computed using Cohen’s (1996) T Formula 10.3 41 .86 .7 12.89 .6 56 .83 .86 .3 41 .26 NSI 98.79 .85 .3 13.86 .0 15.1 13. Magnusson.06 IST 98.88 .10 STI 96.86 .9 106.86 .5 14.5 105.4 55 .19 NSQ 99.9 100.68 RST 99.1 42 .86 .39 n r 12 Corrected ra Standard Differenceb First Testing Ages 14–16 Subtest/ Composite Score Mean Second Testing SD Mean SD NSL 101. Inc.51 DST 97.2 55 .1 14.Table F. by Age Group 48 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson.Appendix Intercorrelations of WISC–V Scores. Inc. All rights reserved. G . 78 .52 .46 .85 .9 3.59 AR .44 SS .18 .9 10.0 10.19 .2 10.07 .39 .21 .0 10.42 .45 .37 CD .53 .36 .43 .20 .31 .57 VP VC BD . uncorrected coefficients appear below the diagonal.74 .86 .49 .29 .43 .23 .08 .33 .03 –.3 5.8 5.56 .41 .44 .35 .42 FW .28 .51 PC . All rights reserved.41 .46 .57 CO SI IN VC Subtest/ Process/ Composite Score SI Intercorrelations of Subtest.0 10.45 .3 .60 .46 . For intercorrelations.03 .35 .19 .33 .45 .56 .71 .48 .0 10.59 .54 .21 .10 .38 .55 .35 .8 5.56 .31 .34 .19 .68 .07 .97 .59 .37 .00 .54 .39 .50 .57 .02 .2 2.2 2.56 .59 .48 .55 .88 .44 .29 .8 3.41 .56 BDn .81 .65 .55 CAs .39 .89 .35 .60 .08 .4 4.15 .20 .28 BDp .60 PC IN FW .61 .56 .39 .40 .82 –.90 DSb .2 10.73 .43 . .54 .1 4.08 .45 .75 .79 .52 .15 .38 .0 70.68 .51 .33 .55 .36 SS .35 .2 9.25 . and Composite Scores for Age 6 Table G.55 .18 .67 .35 .1 .02 –.63 .8 2.48 .68 .50 .58 .74 .32 .58 .26 .52 DS .55 .35 .32 .37 .77 .60 .12 .60 .38 .40 .8 2.41 .50 .09 .42 .8 3.59 .49 .13 .51 .70 .47 AR .04 .52 .42 .49 .3 20.15 .71 .49 .44 .29 .2 10.46 .29 DSs .36 .23 .0 10.22 .1 40.71 .24 .0 9.33 .47 .75 .35 .23 .48 .60 .41 .34 .22 .57 MR .40 .42 .61 .54 .46 .66 .41 .29 .54 .63 . Inc.53 .31 .37 .75 .2 20.00 .79 .0 10.08 –.35 .17 .03 .8 11.77 .71 .27 .49 .47 .48 .32 .84 .05 .0 10.55 .01 .55 WMI .10 .37 .28 .81 .5 50.1 19.49 DS CO .18 .91 .52 .44 .15 .28 .41 CD VP LN BD .36 CAr .07 .37 .58 –.31 CA BDn BDp DSf DSb DSs CAr CAs VCI VSI .39 .7 2.28 .83 .21 .24 .03 . and corrected coefficients appear in the shaded area above the diagonal.39 .41 .77 .58 .64 .36 .55 .43 .33 .57 .57 .40 .22 .18 CA .92 .53 .25 .29 .38 .42 .47 .74 .35 .52 .02 .56 .56 .38 .81 .45 .19 .8 3.62 .36 .41 .23 .1 8.2 2.50 .4 5.85 .45 .59 .06 .23 .23 .60 .56 .94 .64 .07 .23 .54 .39 .50 .49 .33 .53 .56 .55 .82 .23 .09 VSI .74 .52 .0 20.45 .47 .49 .56 .89 .44 .36 .85 .52 .27 .05 .46 .1 3.23 .2 10.1 20.64 .15 .52 .37 .49 .25 .56 .8 10.49 .33 .54 .52 .46 .40 .68 .82 .06 . 9.10 .89 .40 .01 .37 .0 3.69 .46 .56 .72 .88 .0 10.05 .42 .23 .40 .49 .7 3.42 FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI Note.57 .9 10.50 .1 2.66 .78 .06 .29 .39 .1 10.31 .35 .48 .15 .10 .01 .62 .35 .07 .21 .50 .06 –.56 .41 .80 .48 .57 .45 .28 .13 .74 .38 .52 .61 .57 .67 .31 .54 .45 .37 .44 .56 .39 .88 .51 9.0 9.52 .49 .52 .53 .58 .46 .47 .77 .50 .28 .59 .42 .00 .32 .9 2.00 .56 LN .38 .38 .50 .55 .17 .48 .13 .59 .02 .67 .29 . Process.68 .48 .56 .47 .04 .27 .15 .99 .71 .50 .78 .56 .12 .12 .35 .72 .2 14.42 .37 .00 .50 .56 .9 2.43 .41 MR .73 .74 .26 .80 .35 .52 .93 .50 .37 .26 .49 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson.08 .48 .58 .56 .41 .27 .38 .63 .29 .9 11.57 .88 .0 3.75 .0 2.59 .28 .2 19.25 .43 PS .85 .19 .26 .38 .54 .41 .50 .58 .41 .31 .58 .08 .36 .65 .64 .41 .47 .81 .20 .48 .3 2.33 .05 –.68 .04 .93 .41 .05 VCI .71 .61 .3 PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI Mean SD .35 .39 .56 .82 .31 .29 .28 .59 .90 .54 .61 .09 .57 .34 .65 .72 .26 .69 .39 .83 .56 .41 .27 .60 .52 .55 .85 .79 .59 .37 .32 .30 .5 5.56 .01 FRI .36 .53 .35 .18 .56 .51 .0 3.88 .61 .7 2.61 .50 .0 10.08 .55 PS .74 .50 .64 .24 .40 .02 .34 .48 .65 .23 .45 .18 .67 .47 .03 .25 .58 .9 3.58 .73 .01 .32 .44 .61 .41 .08 .49 .47 .37 .15 .07 .41 .03 .01 –.32 .26 .23 .23 .41 .23 DSf .65 .8 20.29 .29 .0 3.10 .25 .57 .36 .51 .41 .01 .82 .04 .35 .47 .06 .66 .43 .20 .81 .38 .9 60.05 .71 .55 .03 .9 10.01 .62 . 44 .34 .0 .0 .0 .15 .49 .44 .9 .33 .28 .27 AR 100.43 NSQ 9.8 15.54 .26 .14 .34 .39 .34 .0 2.44 .40 .43 .15 VP 100.63 .58 .87 .35 .38 .36 .44 .2 .61 . Inc.2 14.1 14.33 .30 DS 99.27 .46 .41 .2 .8 .56 . .30 .51 .47 .45 .49 .0 15.31 .39 CPI 10.29 NVI 10.04 –.63 .49 .0 14.33 .8 .2 .56 .54 .7 .20 FRI 10.58 .63 .53 .43 .0 .26 CD 100.51 NSL 10.48 .40 .44 .42 .11 FW 100.54 .43 .42 .42 .55 .42 .44 .17 .00 .2 2.14 .29 .82 .28 .44 .48 .42 . .2 .41 .48 .26 .33 .0 2.17 .40 .31 .3 43.12 .1 14.40 .30 .38 IST .29 .48 .93 .55 .41 .51 .46 .21 VSI 9.40 .49 .20 CO 99.44 .0 3.8 .33 RST 10.54 . and corrected coefficients appear in the shaded area above the diagonal.8 .40 .55 .46 SRI .27 .08 –. All rights reserved.48 .15 .34 .49 .24 .53 .57 .50 .0 3.48 .31 .39 .1 3.7 .49 .50 .38 .96 .33 .11 DSf 10.4 15.9 3.5 13.44 .3 .30 .45 .43 .1 .48 .30 .28 DSb 9.22 BDn 300.5 13.46 .7 .6 14.22 MR 99.41 .46 .29 .30 .9 .36 FSIQ 10.53 .17 .10 .91 STI 9.5 24.79 .46 .8 3.36 SS 100.0 .29 SRI 10.0 .50 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson.45 .15 CA Note.32 GAI 10.39 RST NSQ .43 .0 .4 .46 .0 3.3 . For intercorrelations.2 2.57 .17 .7 26.33 .42 .47 .07 –.48 .32 IN 100.15 CAr 10.52 .46 .53 .21 PS 100.3 Mean SD DST .40 .0 3.7 .35 PSI 10.14 .9 3.03 .29 .0 .15 CAs .50 .77 .39 .47 .49 .48 .32 NSL Subtest/ Composite Score SI Correlations of Complementary Scores With All Subtest.49 .0 2.02 –.35 .56 .9 14.24 .45 9.35 NSI IST .24 .01 .46 .57 .46 .2 199.42 .45 .49 .35 .2 .84 .78 .8 15.9 .23 .15 .40 .41 .54 .9 2.26 .92 IST 10.63 .23 BD 100.51 NSI 10.8 .22 PC 100.27 .45 .7 16.81 .0 2.0 3.9 . Process.25 QRI 10.57 .5 .05 –.8 .51 99.44 .16 .33 .0 3.02 –.02 .54 .33 AWMI 10.29 NSQ NSL .54 .45 .50 .31 WMI 10.33 DSs 10.30 .48 .06 .53 .7 .30 .48 .43 .43 .0 3.40 .5 14.21 .91 .62 .56 .48 .44 .1 15.2 .44 .35 .35 .32 .46 .78 .32 .42 .2 2.06 –.33 .51 .46 .96 .9 2.7 RST NSI STI SRI Mean SD 100.30 .16 .8 14.08 .53 .43 .46 .1 2.73 .32 .44 .30 .4 .46 .44 .40 STI .31 .58 .30 .02 –.77 .37 .36 .16 .49 .21 BDp 199.56 .37 DST VCI .41 . uncorrected coefficients appear below the diagonal.43 .8 .82 .29 .35 .46 .35 .9 .35 .53 .37 .83 DST 10.5 .32 .46 .18 .42 .28 .41 .31 LN 99.30 .39 .78 .2 2.42 .45 .2 .45 .8 .28 . and Composite Scores for Age 6 Subtest/ Composite Score Table G.24 VC 100.39 .53 .45 .87 .40 .2 2. 42 .51 .29 .12 .74 .67 .40 .23 .14 VSI .24 .42 .13 .0 3.20 .56 .75 .68 .62 .30 .58 .43 CD .16 .51 .78 .23 .31 .36 .32 .31 .1 .45 .10 .46 .24 DS .13 .32 .1 10.45 .45 .70 .19 .54 .34 .12 VCI .76 .5 14.8 2.51 .35 .9 19.31 .03 .36 .31 DSs .23 .16 .68 .90 .35 .72 .77 .30 PS .9 3.51 .51 .42 10.38 .33 .17 .30 . uncorrected coefficients appear below the diagonal.36 .65 .42 .90 .41 SS .27 Note.51 .67 .27 .71 .49 .31 .33 .36 .56 PC .43 .34 .53 .3 49.75 .38 .31 CA BDn BDp DSf DSb DSs CAr CAs VCI VSI .7 3.39 .34 .53 .3 59.47 .38 .1 5.34 .17 .83 .59 .22 .9 10.16 .61 .38 .15 .20 .31 .35 .22 .32 .30 .96 .56 .13 .15 .42 .36 .28 .24 .40 .15 .54 .9 3.7 3.34 .31 .34 .0 5.30 .49 .51 .56 .52 .35 .01 .42 .85 .35 .66 AR .66 .75 .26 .31 .22 .9 3.49 .0 3.61 VP VC BD .50 DS CO .51 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson.9 5.58 .41 .32 .18 .37 .34 .31 .33 .43 .45 .61 MR .51 .41 .55 .21 .54 .38 .79 .30 .46 .42 .2 10.25 .17 .31 .51 .9 10.59 .6 3.19 .8 3.73 .24 .0 10.73 .28 .9 10.55 .43 .09 .8 10.30 .43 .70 .30 .21 .9 .15 .50 .06 .57 .36 SS .0 9.6 40.33 .42 .76 .24 .86 .48 .51 .57 .22 .76 .26 .61 CO SI IN VC Subtest/ Process/ Composite Score SI Intercorrelations of Subtest.45 .50 WMI .71 . All rights reserved.43 .23 .30 .44 .65 .47 .46 CAs .27 .46 .39 .39 .26 .29 .37 .35 .47 .22 .36 .18 .9 19.1 9.45 .24 .11 .56 .42 .26 .41 .51 .23 .33 FW .6 5.50 .48 .36 .48 .88 .34 .56 LN .67 .42 .53 .47 .67 .47 .16 .44 .41 .58 9.41 .2 9.36 .44 .37 .44 9.63 .47 .51 .15 .41 .48 .44 .29 .0 2.36 .23 .34 .37 .40 .40 .45 .37 .59 .23 .20 .45 .42 CD VP LN BD .37 .66 .13 .32 .39 .21 .2 2.22 .71 .1 5.21 .47 9.35 .8 19.58 .58 .39 .55 .54 .20 .6 .35 .38 .0 2.44 .43 .36 .53 .33 .40 .9 20.84 .85 .24 .25 .35 .36 .23 .0 3.43 .53 .84 .46 .9 2.22 .36 .33 .43 .16 .12 .38 .34 .41 .53 .92 .0 2.88 .30 .85 .32 .16 .1 9.23 . and Composite Scores for Age 7 Table G.85 .55 .69 .22 .37 .42 .47 .35 .23 .37 .26 BDp .25 9.50 .80 .31 .33 . .33 .31 .73 .17 .19 .19 .82 .50 .15 .20 .0 9.30 .48 .71 .40 .63 .32 .19 .40 .19 .43 .25 .37 .46 .0 10.41 .59 .59 .33 .72 .42 .46 .34 CAr .54 .17 .0 3.93 .84 .9 3.79 .05 .34 .43 .44 .28 .34 .07 .0 2.48 .71 .32 .27 .16 .30 .46 .36 .49 .30 .69 .27 .46 .47 .2 PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI Mean SD .18 .38 .45 .30 .43 .12 .34 .62 .77 .20 .55 .53 .3 5.79 .57 .38 .86 .57 .22 FRI .33 .13 .62 .42 .54 .55 .56 BDn .35 .48 .45 .47 .49 .24 DSf .20 .49 .2 3.84 .19 .17 .38 .73 .62 .45 .0 69.85 .89 . and corrected coefficients appear in the shaded area above the diagonal.55 .48 .48 .52 .0 20.09 .36 .58 .30 .40 .89 .23 .33 .23 .73 .10 .36 .41 .43 .30 .26 .28 .55 PS .38 .51 .44 FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI 9.70 .24 .18 .55 .20 .71 .43 .43 .59 .34 .25 .58 .38 .15 .56 .34 .44 .12 .23 .66 .40 .91 .30 .29 .16 .31 .61 .22 .43 .52 .09 .58 .24 .37 .48 .42 .30 .19 .37 .55 .19 .30 .37 .43 .8 20.16 .19 .45 .23 .38 .26 .30 .26 .25 .56 .33 .31 .17 .20 .0 10.24 .39 .64 PC IN FW .64 . For intercorrelations.19 .38 .85 .66 .55 .3 .86 .69 .4 11.2 8.33 .29 .43 .74 .37 .35 .48 .0 10.31 .22 .34 .53 .24 .44 .91 DSb .0 3.99 .41 .05 .46 .46 .39 .63 .39 .20 .0 .39 .20 CA .46 .7 19.45 MR .62 .51 .41 .51 .18 .63 .44 AR .13 .37 .66 .90 .71 .0 5.87 .37 .30 .33 .22 .37 .80 .0 3.76 .44 . Inc.0 10.71 . Process.30 .42 .48 .46 .8 .54 .75 .69 .82 .34 .0 10.9 11. .34 .38 .58 .51 .24 .33 .0 2.13 .46 .27 . 0 3.3 28.37 .50 . .44 SRI 10.25 .31 .4 .0 .18 .37 .41 .31 BD 99.36 .1 15.36 .32 .50 .53 .8 15.08 .42 .0 3.17 .25 .30 .19 .46 .44 .34 .39 .12 .50 .35 .33 .49 .16 VP 99. uncorrected coefficients appear below the diagonal.2 .42 .2 RST NSI STI SRI Mean SD 99.09 .33 NSL Subtest/ Composite Score SI Correlations of Complementary Scores With All Subtest.28 .38 .19 .16 .46 .42 .89 .34 .27 .36 .40 .29 .31 GAI 10.9 .0 .33 .42 .29 .75 .16 .34 .36 .32 .9 14.27 .69 .31 .0 Mean SD DST .32 .36 .16 .47 .38 .31 BDn 297.37 .41 .33 .1 .46 .50 .58 NSL 9.46 .35 .35 .40 .05 MR 100.38 .47 .5 14.39 .2 .29 .35 .13 .41 .6 14.0 .53 .19 CAs .42 .43 .46 .9 .31 DS 100.47 .31 . .9 .45 .28 .46 .27 VSI 9.89 .31 QRI 9.31 .18 CA Note.39 . and corrected coefficients appear in the shaded area above the diagonal.34 .43 CPI 10.27 DSs 9.27 .33 .7 .33 PSI 10.33 .5 .14 .34 .29 .0 3.45 DST VCI .20 .17 .31 .30 .1 3.13 .6 .0 .33 .31 .0 .2 .59 .33 .27 .08 .9 2.54 .3 .84 .9 14.27 NSQ NSL .18 .0 2.48 . and Composite Scores for Age 7 Subtest/ Composite Score Table G.42 IST .29 .30 .35 .35 .7 .46 . For intercorrelations.43 .42 NSQ 10.15 FW 99.32 .0 .9 .44 .8 2.15 .52 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson. Process.32 BDp 201.36 AR 99.24 .0 .1 15.27 .25 .25 .31 .45 SRI .18 .41 .81 .9 .47 .51 .21 .47 .34 NVI 9.8 3.4 201.18 .93 IST 10.53 .36 .41 .2 .38 .52 .33 .44 LN 98.53 .28 .20 .43 .80 .8 . Inc.52 .97 .14 .2 14.17 .39 .26 .37 .28 PS 99.76 .31 .58 .35 .31 .51 .10 .34 NSI IST .12 FRI 9.22 .52 .92 STI 10.15 CAr 9.40 .26 SS 99.39 FSIQ 9.89 .43 .48 .39 .53 .3 14.1 25.48 .39 .25 DSb 10.33 .6 3.14 .40 .40 .35 RST NSQ .23 .18 .46 .77 .8 14.43 .40 .42 .48 .49 .46 10.31 IN 99.42 .1 .35 .95 .0 .16 .9 3.30 .0 3.45 .34 .2 15.18 .42 99.38 .35 .31 .24 .31 .29 .45 .39 .5 14.45 .38 .27 .9 .32 .8 15.39 .34 CD 100.78 .27 .15 .1 2.29 .30 .48 .18 .09 .0 .25 .0 .23 . All rights reserved.25 .43 .30 .31 .46 .11 .25 .9 .79 .2 3.2 .22 .36 .40 .38 .11 .25 .33 .43 .46 .30 .58 NSI 10.9 2.33 .7 3.9 2.24 CO 100.20 .47 .40 .37 .31 .43 AWMI 9.21 PC 99.5 .77 DST 10.1 14.38 .15 DSf 10.5 .65 .18 .19 .9 3.24 .1 3.6 .10 .48 .0 3.7 .35 WMI 10.33 .1 .78 .23 .41 .91 .28 RST 9.7 41.51 .46 .0 .9 2.1 14.0 .17 .74 .20 .0 2.51 .6 .43 STI .2 3.55 .46 .5 15.40 .53 .0 3.27 VC 99.26 .42 .21 .8 .40 .36 .29 . 61 9.11 .44 .34 .02 .1 3.66 .64 .63 .25 .07 .28 .61 .54 .23 .35 .01 .63 .50 –.10 .15 .42 .49 .25 .43 DS .26 .51 .87 .55 .24 .37 .9 10.71 .54 .52 PC .62 .89 .33 .30 .1 5.31 .18 .5 40.39 DSf .1 9.42 .61 PC IN FW .62 .16 .65 BDn .14 .51 .31 .44 .39 .54 .49 .27 .29 .01 .56 –.09 .60 .51 .03 –.27 .56 .25 .47 –.30 .78 .56 .10 .85 .66 .15 .01 .31 .60 .36 .61 .38 .28 .46 .64 .2 20.44 .4 3.50 .2 10.35 .60 .52 .39 .16 .41 .1 3.03 .50 .18 .45 .25 .61 .45 .0 10.61 .9 2.05 .89 .27 .42 .9 5.45 .07 .48 .55 .54 .20 .30 .69 AR .62 .45 CD .0 2.12 .33 .16 .58 GAI .39 .27 .83 .81 .42 .43 .96 .6 5.60 .55 .50 .26 .56 .37 .68 .0 10.58 .38 .4 11.58 NVI .04 –.00 .61 .24 .9 10.1 10.17 .28 . uncorrected coefficients appear below the diagonal.39 .09 .48 .0 3.44 .72 .36 PS .8 10. Process.18 .54 .02 .42 .43 .41 .08 .59 .0 10.23 .37 .75 .52 .44 .09 .53 .37 .35 .50 .82 .56 .51 .20 .28 .45 .29 .52 .20 .27 .1 10.37 .42 .61 .85 .24 .34 .25 .82 .1 3.54 .36 .45 .60 .76 .76 .45 .0 2.55 .29 .03 .09 .3 2.03 .51 .52 .31 .84 .24 .53 Mean SD .32 .29 .1 10.27 .70 .44 .86 .42 .42 .53 .25 .44 –.55 .59 .45 .68 .69 .92 .60 .2 20.0 10.71 .50 .87 .55 .6 2.70 .75 .02 .2 5.68 .42 .45 .43 .47 .49 .48 .02 .27 .51 .06 .29 .31 .15 Note.32 .48 . Inc.21 .2 10.53 .31 .93 .28 .8 2.58 LN .30 .76 .67 .65 .30 VSI .16 .3 20.37 .53 .57 .53 .06 .1 20.27 PSI .36 .44 .44 .51 .27 .43 .37 .63 FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI SS .44 .24 .80 .32 .74 –.65 .51 .61 .0 3.1 2.74 .3 5.29 .42 .54 .13 .73 .59 .70 .47 .90 .15 .01 –.27 .53 .39 .43 CAr .39 .64 .29 .10 .0 14.38 .34 .35 .61 .03 .2 12.15 –.21 CAs .07 .22 .42 .55 .30 .33 .29 .4 .49 .72 .68 VP VC BD .47 VCI . .11 .55 .18 –.64 CA .34 .43 .31 .79 .32 DSs .57 .18 .36 .43 .37 .30 .54 .04 .04 .41 .65 .03 .40 .60 BDp .43 .02 .34 .45 .37 .41 .04 .46 .00 .9 3.47 .07 .50 .07 .36 .1 10.2 20.79 .68 MR .41 .88 .71 .0 10.44 SS .92 .31 .83 . All rights reserved.76 .87 .17 WMI .83 .41 .55 .36 .0 10.45 .01 .02 .38 FSIQ .30 .37 .29 .33 CPI .28 .30 .49 .15 .24 .49 .47 .06 .78 .37 .50 . For intercorrelations.08 QRI .60 .5 8.02 .07 .69 .39 .04 –.39 CD VP LN BD .42 .47 .2 10.39 .67 .55 DS CO .56 .27 .29 .28 .11 .51 .37 .56 AWMI .57 .72 .56 .47 .33 .63 .54 .36 .32 .35 .21 .33 .49 .52 .54 .2 5.38 .35 .94 FRI .45 . .53 .26 .47 .50 .67 –.16 .04 .99 .85 .20 .46 .61 .37 .75 .71 .40 .47 .41 .39 .33 .03 .18 .30 .14 .53 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson.32 .44 .08 .0 3.02 .9 3.60 .88 .33 .35 .43 .65 .50 .46 .47 .45 .45 .36 .77 .24 .29 .6 50.31 .85 .03 .48 .56 .57 .08 .41 .35 .0 9.72 .08 .49 –.29 CA BDn BDp DSf DSb DSs CAr CAs VCI VSI .8 3.68 .86 .18 –.0 20.55 .62 .53 .57 .32 .26 .1 10.44 .9 3.02 .51 .47 .29 .00 .44 .30 .1 10.00 .21 .2 70.43 .52 .46 .28 .77 .25 .03 .35 .38 .22 .44 .45 MR .47 .31 .17 .27 .58 .54 . and Composite Scores for Age 8 Table G.69 .1 10.15 .39 .03 –.58 .00 .04 .82 .28 .5 .87 .00 –.63 .31 .44 .91 .25 .44 FW .14 .31 .42 . and corrected coefficients appear in the shaded area above the diagonal.92 .37 .00 .35 .8 2.63 .31 .03 .6 20.0 3.68 CO SI IN VC Subtest/ Process/ Composite Score SI Intercorrelations of Subtest.47 .5 5.30 .1 60.01 .39 .82 .1 2.74 .38 .04 .36 .71 .92 .69 .88 .26 .52 PS .15 .09 .64 .45 .33 .55 .22 .47 .21 .47 .24 .03 .74 .31 DSb .07 .30 .49 .41 .9 2.40 .32 .49 .32 .87 .56 .42 .33 .47 .45 .42 AR .1 10.08 .71 .10 .1 3.74 .24 .49 .03 .41 .46 .19 . 49 .9 RST NSI STI SRI Mean SD 100.46 .0 .1 2.50 .27 .34 .40 .25 BD 100.1 2.92 IST 10.8 .35 .9 .02 .9 .27 .30 .20 .9 Mean SD DST .44 .26 .6 14.15 .38 .4 15.44 .40 .02 .49 .3 .6 14.41 .0 .50 .2 3.39 .1 3.49 .44 .34 .27 .17 .0 .80 .20 CAr 10.19 .0 2.5 15.01 .49 .77 .02 .4 15.25 BDn 305.40 .2 .40 .27 .0 2.40 9. For intercorrelations.8 15.06 .40 .6 .19 .0 .42 .30 AR 100.57 .8 3.82 .13 .0 3.39 .32 .21 .39 .9 .3 .45 .22 .39 .40 .56 .22 CA Note.24 IN 100.9 2.38 STI .10 .6 200.26 .7 26.27 MR 100.46 .17 CO 100.5 14.5 14.18 .21 .6 .8 .2 3.20 .16 –.9 2.15 .24 FRI 10.39 .31 .10 –.28 DSb 10.35 .83 .39 .9 .18 .37 .3 43.0 .81 DST 10.20 NSI IST .51 .24 .45 .34 DS 100.35 .20 .36 RST 10.0 .44 .26 .48 .8 .01 –.42 CPI 10.21 .48 NSI 10.1 .48 .47 .1 14.17 VP 100.9 .38 .13 .1 3.22 BDp 202.38 . uncorrected coefficients appear below the diagonal.53 .39 .33 .1 2.29 .17 .58 .41 .24 .45 .40 .48 .20 . and corrected coefficients appear in the shaded area above the diagonal.54 .26 .43 .26 .24 .45 100.36 RST NSQ .7 15.41 .0 .1 3.23 .20 .18 PC 100.39 .81 .75 .0 .25 .26 .50 .19 .33 DSs 10. All rights reserved.1 15.35 .41 .40 .47 .16 .23 VSI 10.50 .26 .0 3.7 15.40 .40 .46 .27 .1 .03 .36 .47 .48 .35 .22 .53 .38 NSQ 10.0 15.31 .24 .8 15.23 .51 .46 .44 .8 .41 .1 .26 .35 PS 100.1 .43 .37 AWMI 10.45 .77 .36 .27 .06 .40 .43 .2 .24 .37 .46 .48 .18 DSf 9.33 FSIQ 10.22 CAs .21 .37 .34 .9 .04 .36 .26 .40 .25 .44 .42 .32 .24 .86 .39 .38 .50 .34 .46 .1 2.22 .30 .50 .05 .40 .35 .19 NSL Subtest/ Composite Score SI Correlations of Complementary Scores With All Subtest.0 2.0 3.36 .28 .19 .1 .22 .28 PSI 10.23 .17 .86 .25 QRI 10.42 .93 .05 .28 GAI 10.32 SRI 10.33 NVI 10.26 .37 . Process.32 LN 102.37 .0 3.09 .5 .78 .2 3.35 .18 .31 .47 .4 .30 .37 .31 .32 .84 .90 .46 .75 .96 .92 STI 10.40 .4 .37 SRI .96 .14 NSQ NSL .36 .33 .0 .45 .19 CD 101.31 .7 .36 . and Composite Scores for Age 8 Subtest/ Composite Score Table G.23 .32 .14 .33 .40 WMI 9.39 .6 .25 . .1 3.41 .12 .25 .42 .38 .4 14.26 .17 .47 .36 .21 .33 .65 .14 .3 .32 DST VCI .56 .41 .01 .34 .36 .48 NSL 10.01 .3 15.41 .32 .36 .33 .41 .33 .34 .30 SS 101.31 .44 .54 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson. Inc.42 .1 3.40 .51 .18 .33 .34 .49 .31 .21 .18 . .5 25.25 VC 100.31 .14 FW 100.40 IST .39 .31 .8 .42 .0 .0 2.34 .43 .44 .75 .0 .22 .1 . 70 .45 .41 .49 .64 .32 .26 .23 .73 .35 .52 .90 .31 .15 .56 .53 .69 .16 .57 .25 .33 .0 9.5 14.36 .74 .77 AR . .54 LN .44 .37 .9 19.54 .59 .8 .53 .32 .0 10.07 .3 9.39 .18 .15 .30 .39 .19 VSI .6 69.36 .04 .30 .49 .10 .49 .64 .65 .33 .36 .96 .55 .45 .35 .35 .18 .33 .0 3.14 .35 .50 .34 .0 19.13 .76 .40 .9 10.35 .41 .16 .57 WMI .61 .26 .51 .34 9.61 .39 .25 .07 .59 .43 .58 .25 .10 .89 .41 .58 .48 .2 10.18 .42 .36 .36 .51 .60 .17 .54 .56 .2 11.14 .28 .08 .59 .83 .35 .9 .56 .34 .04 .2 PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI Mean SD 9.36 .32 .54 .26 9.08 .37 .69 .30 .31 .73 .11 .21 .14 DSf .37 .24 .50 .54 .05 .33 .59 .70 PC IN FW .7 10.62 .38 .47 .46 AR .62 .39 .12 .06 .91 .41 .23 .44 .26 .67 .11 .68 .31 Note.58 .35 .7 .16 .54 .53 .33 .42 .45 .34 .58 .8 3.80 .47 .80 .27 .32 .25 .14 .38 .37 CA BDn BDp DSf DSb DSs CAr CAs VCI VSI .6 3.15 .11 FRI .45 .13 .34 .1 2.21 .42 .05 .29 .9 5.32 .92 .9 3.30 .92 .99 .81 .43 .76 .20 .29 .57 .40 .13 .67 .34 .25 .44 .34 .61 .9 3.13 .37 .0 2.37 .39 .36 .4 12.28 DS .48 .46 .56 .1 5.48 .62 .31 .40 .10 .12 .48 .1 9.9 3.53 .32 .10 .72 .24 .60 .45 .65 .88 .36 .36 .30 .86 .9 20.34 .31 .56 .40 .35 .8 3.67 .36 .2 .68 .46 .12 .55 .39 .0 10.62 PS .51 .06 .07 .14 .56 .34 .92 .70 .43 .8 10.85 .38 .32 .82 .10 .32 .39 .51 .54 .38 .66 .34 .56 .43 .74 .58 .51 .91 DSb .3 5.56 .40 .38 .41 .42 .52 .47 .33 .78 .47 .58 .31 .65 .33 .92 .29 .54 .14 –.32 .26 .84 .45 .46 .81 .70 .0 3. For intercorrelations.50 .35 .66 .44 9.0 10.47 .75 .24 .0 9.48 .68 .32 .36 .63 .63 .47 .55 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson.14 .31 .1 5.68 MR . All rights reserved.13 .11 .61 .43 .41 .03 .6 5.62 .57 .59 .34 .73 .13 .31 .56 .36 .34 .41 .80 .33 .58 .26 .46 .79 .60 .43 CAs .0 20.01 .40 .46 .06 .66 .62 .15 .93 .40 .54 .50 .9 .84 .40 .0 2.40 .39 PC .30 CA .57 .22 .85 .18 .36 .0 3.36 .52 .60 .29 .23 .69 .30 .43 .52 .42 FW .46 CD .83 .41 .49 .68 .33 .36 .62 .29 .22 .27 .40 .42 .02 .01 .22 .36 .37 .40 .37 CD VP LN BD .12 .54 .37 .76 .10 .82 .04 .29 .03 . uncorrected coefficients appear below the diagonal.32 PS .56 .51 .0 3.37 .53 .77 .71 .29 .46 .23 DSs .39 .10 .52 .41 .23 .53 .46 .25 .26 .12 .22 .22 .37 .27 .28 .1 9.06 .13 .41 .0 10.45 FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI 9.54 .48 .56 .35 .87 .06 .8 3.70 .88 .62 .0 9.4 5.2 5.39 .17 .51 . .14 .43 .13 .28 .55 .29 BDp .39 .21 .36 .1 2.06 .82 .41 .52 .54 .7 10. Inc.46 SS .39 .40 .38 .32 .41 .0 2.28 .71 .27 .05 .68 VP VC BD .38 CAr .78 .63 .30 .34 .35 .32 .45 10.46 .9 2.40 .0 60.42 MR .43 .75 .08 .07 .15 .80 .62 .41 .9 20.61 .55 .89 .38 .54 .33 .2 8.67 .1 50.43 .47 SS .43 .36 .46 .57 .59 .72 .26 .0 39.90 .46 .27 .0 20.68 CO SI IN VC Subtest/ Process/ Composite Score SI Intercorrelations of Subtest.14 –.50 .9 10.1 .52 .82 .06 .73 .29 .30 .30 .25 .27 .12 .38 .53 .84 .0 3.55 .40 .9 3.59 .28 .60 .36 .39 .03 .34 .30 .37 .19 .6 2.12 VCI .11 .47 .07 .33 .23 .50 .79 .43 .73 .30 . Process.36 . and corrected coefficients appear in the shaded area above the diagonal.14 .27 .1 10.55 .02 .42 .71 .47 .61 .43 .0 3.34 .74 .83 .24 .31 .56 .29 . and Composite Scores for Age 9 Table G.52 .84 .51 .35 .07 .70 .34 .46 .04 .52 .11 –.30 .39 .1 3.37 .11 .56 .83 .57 BDn .46 .35 .37 .35 .89 .39 .34 .36 .2 20.57 .57 .48 .30 .45 .33 .9 2.51 .32 .62 DS CO .43 .49 .03 –.39 .73 .34 .71 .16 .47 .23 .71 .30 .48 .29 .88 .35 .57 .45 .46 .33 . 03 .35 .0 .48 .78 .51 .7 .27 .53 .37 .36 .32 .7 15.6 .61 NSI 9.8 .31 .3 15.40 .04 .17 .19 .52 .33 .33 .28 CO 99.45 .31 .7 3.31 .0 3.07 BDp 199.1 2.2 .9 .39 .4 .17 .40 .0 3.31 .41 .12 .8 .0 .41 .51 .30 .29 .36 .47 .45 .3 26.2 2.96 .22 .39 .77 DST 9.0 14.28 .40 .34 .1 .40 .8 3.49 .35 NSQ NSL .46 STI . .38 .42 .50 .46 .29 .30 .0 .38 .47 IST .37 .0 . and Composite Scores for Age 9 Subtest/ Composite Score Table G.44 .20 .61 NSL 10.8 14.31 .09 DSf 10.43 .37 .25 .0 .52 .55 .14 CAr 9.42 DST VCI .06 .2 .05 .35 .9 2.08 MR 100.39 .04 .38 .03 .29 .36 .61 .6 27.49 .49 .29 DSb 9.31 .32 .30 .9 15.76 .4 RST NSI STI SRI Mean SD 99.26 PSI 9.31 WMI 9.18 VP 100.21 .13 .72 .8 .39 .26 .35 .29 .45 .03 .0 .0 .34 .15 .22 NSL Subtest/ Composite Score SI Correlations of Complementary Scores With All Subtest.27 .9 .38 . Process.25 IN 100.29 .41 .0 Mean SD DST .24 .41 .16 .47 .40 . For intercorrelations.33 .24 PS 99.50 .30 .36 .10 BD 99.24 .8 199.9 .34 .38 .6 .49 .22 .38 .1 3.44 .69 .23 .29 DS 99.36 .22 .74 .44 .22 CD 99.35 .36 .25 .3 15.6 .0 .43 .90 .17 PC 100.01 .30 AWMI 10.22 .53 .25 .42 .90 .2 . .44 .3 3.16 .1 .4 .22 .21 .33 .12 .24 SS 99.20 .34 .27 . and corrected coefficients appear in the shaded area above the diagonal.40 .31 .29 .0 .25 .47 .39 .15 CA Note.1 2.27 DSs 10.16 FW 100.44 .17 .45 .90 .24 LN 100.43 .36 .80 .42 .45 .03 .16 VSI 9.39 .27 .30 .47 .39 .13 .89 .7 .47 .3 .53 .33 .36 .36 .37 .0 14.80 .26 .22 .28 FSIQ 10.30 .8 15.24 VC 100. All rights reserved. Inc.9 .21 .56 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson.49 99.27 .03 .77 .33 .41 NSQ 10.37 .1 .8 .34 .38 .35 .31 .39 .25 QRI 10.42 .42 .33 .9 .0 3.32 .49 .8 .36 .36 .0 14.29 .38 .2 44.9 3.51 .1 15.95 .41 .19 .05 .0 3.12 .48 .9 3.1 14.41 .46 SRI 10.37 .38 .39 .32 .83 .0 3.31 .5 14.25 AR 99.42 .47 SRI .29 .1 .20 .26 .31 .33 .52 .34 .42 10.34 .0 15.0 15.17 .36 .15 .0 3.30 .38 .30 .49 .05 .49 .23 .7 2.33 .23 .32 NSI IST .9 3.40 .76 .36 .8 .0 3.40 RST NSQ .14 FRI 9.45 .8 3.32 .9 14.17 .24 .36 .8 .24 .37 .47 .27 .18 .51 .36 .84 .6 2.27 .26 .45 .31 .36 RST 10.8 . uncorrected coefficients appear below the diagonal.35 .38 .30 .16 CAs .22 GAI 10.35 CPI 10.42 .25 .20 .35 .91 IST 9.0 .35 .37 .24 NVI 9.42 .28 .42 .32 .10 BDn 299.9 2.88 STI 9.31 .29 .9 2.53 .27 .31 .41 .9 .78 .9 .7 15.26 . 25 .57 9.62 .42 .18 .18 .42 .82 .21 .33 .1 3.87 .12 .9 40.14 .9 19.26 .41 .16 .43 .42 .60 .23 .51 .17 .51 .8 2.23 .50 .19 .38 .44 .48 .26 .37 .47 .9 3.1 3.22 .73 .0 2.50 .9 .26 .9 2.17 .44 .64 .75 .51 .57 .42 .28 .21 .39 .05 .34 .43 .52 .23 .66 .26 .30 .55 .29 .50 .81 .40 .22 .47 .47 .69 .10 –.53 .62 .44 .36 .50 SS .58 .77 CO SI IN VC Subtest/ Process/ Composite Score SI Intercorrelations of Subtest.36 .43 .21 .54 .26 .52 .64 .55 .66 .30 .9 20.07 .57 .22 .1 3.90 .22 .51 .91 .52 .57 .1 9.54 .36 .0 10.49 .76 .62 .22 .14 .43 .21 .48 .68 .37 .72 .24 .43 .46 .58 .1 10.52 .6 8.19 .16 .76 .59 .04 .78 .54 .55 .50 .34 .24 .50 .48 .88 . uncorrected coefficients appear below the diagonal.31 .23 .13 .27 .35 .34 .44 .51 .12 .69 .31 .55 .22 .41 .27 .7 .07 .5 11.22 .41 .23 .79 .41 .24 .57 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson.54 .42 .0 10.63 .9 20.26 .15 .46 .44 .40 .44 .5 5.28 .43 .43 .52 .33 .50 .62 .67 .49 CD VP LN BD .64 .38 .50 .1 19.43 .53 .35 .17 .82 .56 .27 .43 .82 .78 .19 .24 .90 .27 .8 3.06 .0 9.42 .52 .49 .45 .51 .78 .86 .30 .30 .46 .32 9.6 5.74 .05 .1 12.07 .57 .59 .40 .87 .2 5.38 .20 .48 .04 .68 .88 .1 2.75 .48 .2 19.38 .16 .54 .48 .16 .37 .63 .50 .0 2.42 .28 .37 .69 .8 2.24 .23 .79 .32 .07 .26 .53 .44 .16 .28 .0 9.1 9.22 .26 .26 .43 .37 .42 .23 .54 PS .45 .40 .9 3.71 .24 .53 .58 .58 .61 .41 .33 . .1 5.49 .15 .40 .8 3.2 3.89 .25 .79 .87 .57 .23 .36 .58 .31 .51 .45 .50 .56 .04 .44 .73 .75 .21 .53 .52 .26 .27 .33 .2 10.43 DS .28 .59 .35 .70 .43 .50 .23 Note. All rights reserved.77 MR .00 .81 .50 .13 .82 .38 . and Composite Scores for Age 10 Table G.50 .87 .1 9.87 .45 .80 .42 CA BDn BDp DSf DSb DSs CAr CAs VCI VSI .56 .61 .44 .53 .49 .29 .39 .63 .12 .75 .58 .43 . For intercorrelations.58 DS CO .37 .29 .55 .22 .37 .49 .0 2.29 .78 .9 2.66 PC IN FW .32 .48 .78 .1 2.2 69.54 .20 .27 .32 .51 .83 . Process.39 .51 .44 .75 .62 .40 .59 .8 2.42 .52 .36 .39 .37 .36 .66 .31 .68 .45 .57 .8 5.1 10.27 .1 .26 .58 .41 .48 AR .45 .46 .77 AR .68 .47 .16 .25 .93 .52 .0 9.45 .8 20.08 .37 .53 .31 .22 .04 .53 .39 .27 .62 .65 .53 .53 .8 49.81 .8 3.90 .48 .44 .53 .48 .48 .46 .90 .59 .5 5.39 .8 5.90 .19 .32 .17 .32 .14 .57 .21 .94 .52 .07 .15 .53 .01 .24 .28 .41 .56 .4 . and corrected coefficients appear in the shaded area above the diagonal.64 .41 .78 .70 9.59 .34 .18 .34 .48 .29 .50 MR .69 .40 .45 .49 .35 .15 .05 .70 .41 .42 .91 .53 .59 .36 .79 .56 .43 .28 9.29 .45 .06 .77 .41 .50 .25 .52 .46 .15 .61 .54 .22 .22 .40 FW .48 .58 .06 .05 .51 .52 .22 .69 .48 .24 .30 .64 .71 .7 2.29 .1 .21 .94 .71 .42 .73 .37 .57 .16 .59 .25 .48 .26 .23 .47 .02 .9 10.26 .67 .39 .35 .19 .25 .43 .45 .50 .60 .19 .87 .8 3.9 19.17 .53 .73 .32 .77 VP VC BD .8 10.63 .63 .82 .92 .28 .52 .43 .23 .51 .9 10.23 .57 .27 .25 .0 10.66 .48 .42 .53 .49 .45 .40 .44 .91 .8 2.55 .11 .26 .50 .32 .42 .76 .27 .06 .53 .45 .54 .25 .98 .60 .64 .83 .34 .61 .29 .52 .17 .45 .64 .62 .9 3.29 .57 .25 .24 .44 .33 .33 PC .38 .51 .81 .56 .90 .9 59.22 .27 .67 .50 .26 .47 .49 .8 10. Inc.31 .80 .35 .74 .50 .19 .73 .60 .83 .28 .18 .63 .67 .57 .25 .46 10.62 .37 .54 .52 .80 .84 .40 .71 .97 .59 .9 10.47 .7 PS LN CD SS CA BDn BDp DSf DSb DSs CAr CAs VCI VSI FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI Mean SD .36 .51 .36 .60 .27 .37 .47 .50 .87 . .51 .56 .45 FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI 9.47 .31 .2 14.11 .0 . 30 .7 .36 .33 .39 .12 .40 .33 .0 2.14 .82 .31 .38 .34 .26 .27 .33 .26 .1 .38 .95 .36 .95 .31 FSIQ 10.29 .35 .42 .47 .3 13.33 .1 .18 .33 .7 15.27 .40 .1 3.28 .8 .34 .35 .31 .1 2. All rights reserved.19 .5 .44 .37 .0 .40 .35 QRI 9.38 .8 .25 .21 .39 .75 .32 STI .8 13. uncorrected coefficients appear below the diagonal.46 .33 .17 .12 .39 AWMI 10.40 .4 .18 NSI IST .50 .30 .29 .33 .44 .8 15.26 .0 .40 .18 BD 99.7 .24 .26 .37 .35 DS 99.23 FW 99.1 .42 .41 .26 . Inc.9 3.13 .01 .06 –.10 .34 PS 100.23 IN 99.89 .07 .7 41.23 .0 .36 .31 .23 VP 100.14 –.40 .17 VC 99.64 .38 .8 .39 WMI 9.37 .35 .51 .36 .76 DST 10.9 .1 .12 .28 .49 .34 .25 CD 100.38 .38 .05 CA Note.42 .28 .34 .38 .36 .37 .44 .5 16.88 .08 .38 .43 .8 .17 CO 100.8 2.31 .18 .32 IST .37 .51 .9 2.91 .17 .33 .19 .0 24.40 .0 .10 PC 99.36 .82 .51 .22 .34 .74 .47 .34 .10 200.25 .8 14.1 3.9 2. .25 FRI 9. and corrected coefficients appear in the shaded area above the diagonal.32 .48 .27 . .34 .9 2.35 .34 .24 .35 .45 .6 23.53 .02 .22 .3 15.32 .1 .34 .34 .37 .30 .37 .8 .23 .16 .21 .29 .26 .21 .28 .09 CAr 9.30 .28 DSf 10.32 .26 RST NSQ .0 .27 .48 .8 .7 15.0 Mean SD DST .30 .18 .4 .0 .36 .7 .9 3.19 .35 100. and Composite Scores for Age 10 Subtest/ Composite Score Table G.38 .33 .40 .51 .25 DSb 10.0 2.38 .13 .02 .38 .8 15.19 .18 .5 14.89 IST 10.75 .47 .0 3.0 3.36 .16 NSQ NSL .8 .41 .6 .9 3.24 .6 .48 .1 .40 CPI 9.27 .34 .43 .29 .05 .37 .1 14.28 .34 .13 .43 .18 .18 BDp 200.15 .29 .04 CAs .25 .9 2.16 BDn 302.36 . Process.2 .35 10.78 .36 .33 . For intercorrelations.0 2.1 .18 .2 RST NSI STI SRI Mean SD 99.6 14.88 STI 9.26 PSI 9.40 .34 NVI 10.17 .26 .0 .30 .8 3.34 .29 .13 .40 .29 .23 .8 13.16 NSL Subtest/ Composite Score SI Correlations of Complementary Scores With All Subtest.28 .32 .9 .39 .35 .39 .1 3.4 14.11 .29 .38 .35 .19 .77 .38 .38 .38 AR 100.18 .09 .34 .8 2.22 .28 .36 .23 .43 .40 .30 .46 .2 3.20 MR 99.9 .48 SRI 9.40 .84 .36 .23 VSI 10.36 .33 DSs 9.40 .1 .64 NSL 9.42 .9 .34 LN 102.37 NSQ 10.1 .31 .0 .74 .31 DST VCI .30 .23 .34 RST 9.28 .40 .58 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson.37 .47 .1 2.47 .07 .31 .39 .90 .41 .30 .05 .48 .25 .80 .8 .26 .6 16.40 .0 3.29 .64 NSI 10.39 .7 .20 .33 .38 .43 .32 SRI .21 SS 99.7 14.27 .25 GAI 10.26 .30 .80 .42 .38 .33 .01 .8 .70 .8 2.29 .47 .30 .24 . 26 .22 .25 .6 .41 .60 .20 .28 .37 .38 .23 .54 .22 .76 .57 .47 .38 .56 .42 .13 .36 .91 .67 .38 .59 .71 .81 .39 . .57 .26 .52 .40 .34 .50 .36 .34 .80 .63 .12 .31 .43 .1 10.57 .45 .52 .48 .51 .53 .36 .00 .8 2.34 PS PC .38 .62 .9 3.59 .29 .45 .20 .49 .58 .91 .72 AR .48 .53 .84 .39 .15 .27 .32 LN VCI .42 .59 .56 .21 .52 .4 10.42 .78 .0 10.42 .4 20.46 .21 .78 . Inc.20 .22 SS .61 .1 3.32 .53 .0 3.75 .0 2.71 .55 .31 .45 MR DS .72 .11 .32 .71 .29 .68 .01 .1 2.27 .53 .68 .12 .20 .46 .7 50.50 .33 .39 SS .25 .48 .73 .03 .34 .80 .1 60.15 .36 .21 .11 .11 .64 .15 .14 .55 .32 .82 .31 .61 WMI .47 .33 .57 .0 10.23 .68 .72 .2 10.40 .65 .90 .27 .9 3.71 .1 2.35 .11 CAr .62 .23 .1 5.77 .22 .14 .23 .16 CD BDp .0 10.33 .50 .54 .15 .44 .18 .92 .33 .20 .1 10.41 .6 5.39 .48 .45 .52 .27 .42 .80 .26 .47 .45 .8 2.41 .2 10.09 .82 .12 .19 .05 –.31 .70 .47 .53 .47 .41 .33 .75 .30 .35 .66 .0 3.77 .32 .1 3.34 .87 .13 CAs .2 10.64 .98 .68 VP VC BD .65 .92 .42 .0 11.90 .77 .51 .59 .89 .14 .60 .43 .34 .2 5.08 .34 .22 .32 .23 .50 .32 .85 .49 .3 20.16 .49 .37 .08 .28 .01 .47 .14 .22 .35 .29 .39 .80 .35 .33 .58 .35 .30 .34 .23 .54 .0 3.51 .92 .54 .42 .49 .39 .31 .41 .71 .36 .57 CD VSI .70 .0 3.32 .29 .10 .48 .68 MR .39 . For intercorrelations.50 .53 .55 .68 CO SI IN VC Subtest/ Process/ Composite Score SI Intercorrelations of Subtest.65 .38 .61 FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI FRI .33 .36 .50 .7 40.50 .0 10.21 .25 .23 .52 10.42 .64 .52 PS .56 . .43 .9 3.79 .34 .33 .44 .52 .09 .25 .42 .24 .27 .43 .88 .37 .34 .12 .49 .19 .60 .44 .38 .53 .86 .40 .30 .59 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson.2 2.39 .13 .59 .59 .30 .7 20.2 10.28 .48 PSI .38 .92 .71 .58 .79 .33 .46 .18 .50 .60 . uncorrected coefficients appear below the diagonal.52 .40 .22 .45 .19 .60 .10 .53 .12 .87 .11 .75 .47 .29 .18 .57 .19 Note.50 .50 .18 .39 .83 .37 DSs .54 .26 DSf .12 .57 CA BDn BDp DSf DSb DSs CAr CAs VCI VSI .64 .26 .48 .24 .1 3.20 .60 .41 .64 AWMI .45 .18 .43 .44 .45 LN BDn .84 .28 .54 .38 .2 10.39 .03 .0 10.25 .34 .50 .0 10.39 .12 .43 .30 .0 10.65 .1 5.15 .28 .24 .71 .38 .23 .65 .60 .1 10.36 .29 DSb .76 .15 .06 .57 .62 .42 .52 .39 .50 .45 .0 3. Process.17 .42 FW .48 .55 QRI .42 .40 .46 .3 10.58 .43 .76 .07 .63 .47 .51 .33 .02 .45 .2 14.02 .36 .12 .76 .3 10.22 .48 .23 .50 .37 .45 .73 .40 .33 .38 .30 CPI .48 .49 .45 .50 .73 .30 .38 .1 3.40 .41 .76 .06 .72 .25 .2 20.42 .42 .22 .42 .15 .13 .39 .53 .22 .60 .29 .52 .52 .75 .47 .32 VP AR .67 .40 .1 3.44 .45 .93 .77 .36 .84 .13 .25 .23 .2 3.48 . and Composite Scores for Age 11 Table G.44 .9 5.24 .28 .78 .43 .08 .40 .48 NVI .3 4.32 .49 .36 .87 .19 .07 .23 .29 .46 .87 .60 .44 .36 .51 .43 .64 .42 .1 19.3 8.89 .86 . and corrected coefficients appear in the shaded area above the diagonal.48 .37 .45 .2 20.54 .27 .32 .60 .29 .10 .22 .3 20.37 .42 .3 12.10 .50 .46 FSIQ .9 3.52 .64 .44 .44 .36 .2 5.33 .34 GAI .13 .1 2.73 .66 .96 .58 .38 .53 .85 .45 .14 .12 .46 .06 .64 .07 .28 .43 .30 .21 .41 .11 .48 .39 .69 .07 .38 .44 .1 10.92 .26 .06 .64 .53 .32 .25 .14 CA .44 .24 .04 .10 .9 3.50 .56 DS CO .48 .48 .10 .27 .31 .27 .59 .17 –.38 .22 .1 10.34 .70 .36 .19 .10 .44 .32 .46 BD .59 PC IN FW .30 .08 .29 .31 .54 .0 10.51 .63 .31 .24 .48 .19 .54 .19 .08 Mean SD .17 .80 .33 .17 .32 .59 .37 .57 .0 10.44 .44 .40 .9 70. All rights reserved.86 .09 .43 .89 .29 .57 .36 .14 .80 . 88 STI 10.22 .08 .0 .36 WMI 10.49 .0 .35 .76 .0 2.72 .50 .9 14.27 .0 .26 .24 .42 .26 .19 .08 .23 .29 .37 .30 .42 .43 CPI 10.9 14.42 .28 .28 .49 .46 .46 .35 .52 .34 .9 .18 VSI 10.0 3.1 2.33 .29 .22 .95 .46 .44 .80 .16 .20 MR 100.35 .16 FRI 10.54 .31 .5 .33 .44 .22 .67 NSL 10.21 .34 10.38 .23 .29 CO 99.2 14.08 . and corrected coefficients appear in the shaded area above the diagonal.24 .31 .74 .43 .29 .27 .37 .28 .35 RST 10.2 2.1 3.4 14.32 .50 .28 .27 .45 .39 AWMI 10.25 SS 101.32 .25 .69 .34 .23 .39 .38 .35 .19 .30 .30 .7 .1 .36 .37 .38 .38 .39 .16 VP 100.9 14.13 BDp 200.36 .2 .54 .34 .74 . uncorrected coefficients appear below the diagonal.30 .28 .23 NSQ 10.30 .50 .37 .3 .17 . .30 .23 .31 .32 .20 .34 .76 DST 10.21 .40 .37 .30 NVI 10.37 .53 .8 14.30 .47 .21 .0 13.23 .24 .30 .67 .37 .32 .30 .71 .26 CA Note.25 .9 .6 .20 .31 .91 .1 .2 .21 .36 .10 .1 .30 .48 .0 2.07 FW 100.11 .27 .33 .39 .12 198.9 .90 IST 10.17 .1 3.31 .36 .0 2.1 .35 .89 .33 .27 .25 .37 .17 BD 100.25 .31 .0 .9 .23 .28 .22 CAr 10.42 .43 .1 3.43 .0 3.77 .34 .47 .36 PSI 10.34 .32 .44 .8 .73 .57 .35 .59 .34 DS 99.1 3.18 .39 CD 100.48 .4 .41 .18 .24 .35 .67 NSI 10.1 .2 3.80 .50 .44 .24 .35 .30 .30 .23 .35 .37 .0 .31 .95 .92 .38 .41 .24 .30 DSb 10.0 14.17 .6 .41 .2 2.9 14.23 QRI 10.7 .9 .34 .0 2.53 .33 .0 3.24 .25 .39 .36 100.4 3.0 VCI .60 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson.34 AR 100.31 .31 FSIQ 10.44 .18 .18 DSf 10.12 .0 IST DST RST NSI STI SRI Mean SD Subtest/ Composite Score NSL NSQ IST DST RST NSI STI SRI Mean SD 100.21 .43 .23 .20 GAI 10. All rights reserved.35 .54 .1 .34 .14 .41 .34 .23 .06 .9 .3 3.19 .7 .41 .30 .2 40.45 .31 .41 .24 .89 .56 .0 3.43 .36 .26 .4 23.14 .1 .24 IN 100.38 .41 .1 14.35 .47 .24 .27 .6 . Inc.36 .25 .52 .46 . For intercorrelations.41 .52 .8 .42 .30 .2 3.1 14.28 . .05 .75 .2 3. and Composite Scores for Age 11 NSL SI Subtest/ Composite Score Table G.19 .29 PS 99.2 3.28 .20 PC 100.51 .27 .48 .43 .42 .1 .46 .0 .32 .5 .27 .23 .45 .7 .45 .4 26.3 .20 NSQ VC Correlations of Complementary Scores With All Subtest.29 .26 CAs .28 .30 .24 .30 DSs 10.31 .38 .8 14.48 .21 .73 .16 101.7 .13 .26 .04 .13 .5 15.39 .55 .33 .24 .30 .30 .20 .30 .9 14.0 3.30 .1 .43 SRI 10.9 .46 .3 3.51 .36 .21 .46 .16 .3 15.34 . Process.53 .33 .36 LN 102.3 15.16 BDn 304.38 .19 .1 . 62 .31 .74 .79 .56 .79 .40 .90 .84 .42 .33 .53 .56 .12 .39 .45 .59 .62 .35 .65 .71 10. .1 5.52 .52 .78 .48 .5 5.37 .40 .25 .0 3.72 .48 .84 .73 .51 .27 Note.90 .35 .0 3.13 .55 .65 .66 .34 .41 .32 .33 .59 .08 .71 .38 .92 .0 9.37 .48 .50 .7 2.23 .53 .68 .56 .35 .41 .90 .66 .56 .64 .56 .1 3.93 .84 .56 .20 .39 .20 .49 CD VSI .61 .46 .42 .93 .22 .3 20.41 .13 .65 .58 .9 10.15 .39 .97 .37 .70 .23 .0 3.18 .51 .89 .47 .48 .48 .0 10.27 .64 .67 .0 10.57 .69 .54 .71 .64 .43 .88 .47 .58 .56 .16 .65 .72 .61 .56 .40 .48 .0 10.18 .28 .53 CPI .55 .55 .62 .60 .9 10.59 .63 .3 50.3 3.97 .40 .81 .45 .0 2.74 MR .82 .84 .18 .56 FW VP MR .45 .62 .32 .53 .68 .56 .23 .0 10.75 .59 .19 .73 AR CO PC IN FW .93 .21 .77 .58 .54 .87 .0 3.39 .69 .74 .41 .19 .71 .92 .54 .54 .74 VP VC BD .62 .36 .42 .76 .60 .60 .12 .53 .67 .62 .83 .73 .7 5.56 .59 .40 .40 .77 .70 .44 .52 .57 .57 .2 16.41 .15 .52 .28 .51 .23 .34 .66 .50 .17 CAs .41 .79 .62 .64 .90 .64 .61 .73 .25 .69 CA BDn BDp DSf DSb DSs CAr CAs VCI VSI .2 10.91 .10 .48 .1 10.67 .37 .70 .59 .50 .40 .54 .54 DSs .0 10.89 .9 3.17 .07 .2 20.26 .82 .1 20.60 .3 .36 .17 .62 .58 .73 .18 .16 .9 70.62 .76 .46 DSb .59 .61 .34 .32 .81 .28 .16 . and corrected coefficients appear in the shaded area above the diagonal.08 .0 20.29 .68 .69 SS .23 .51 .37 .56 .47 .62 .69 .50 .58 .49 .84 .58 .59 .75 .68 .42 .76 .61 .66 .58 .72 .77 .57 .82 .37 .51 .46 .17 .75 .54 .57 .17 .59 .30 .54 .61 .89 .22 .42 .39 .89 .81 .83 .53 .24 .54 . uncorrected coefficients appear below the diagonal.48 .60 .50 .19 .69 .55 .47 PC LN .16 CAr .61 .1 3. Inc.36 .71 .1 3.60 .11 .39 .43 .0 20.75 .57 .44 .40 .74 CO SI IN VC Subtest/ Process/ Composite Score SI Intercorrelations of Subtest.19 .58 .42 .56 .52 .2 60.0 10.58 .43 .66 .11 .61 .47 .63 .75 .0 10.40 .68 .44 . For intercorrelations.41 .2 3.52 NVI .45 .0 3.65 .49 . Process.44 .81 .47 .61 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson.57 .59 .41 .93 GAI .1 3.32 .56 .2 10.0 9.27 .2 3.0 9.58 .67 .89 .58 .27 .41 .03 .36 .48 .6 5.40 .7 5.67 LN VCI .49 .35 .83 .56 .58 .51 .59 PSI .68 .67 .82 .43 .68 .58 .94 .54 .28 .41 .57 .87 .60 .57 .76 FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI FRI .38 .12 .63 .71 QRI .46 .22 .16 .45 .82 .50 .66 .64 .60 .67 .1 9.63 .65 .17 CA BDn .34 .54 .69 .22 .50 .65 .43 .79 .70 .36 .36 .33 .60 .25 .57 .62 .49 .4 3.79 .17 .58 .83 .65 .79 .64 .7 13.59 .34 .68 .37 .40 .66 .7 9.58 .17 .54 .67 .59 .74 .87 .21 .60 .19 .39 SS .16 .78 .3 40.79 .51 .29 .74 .81 .60 .32 .67 .59 .78 PS .20 .70 .59 .18 .30 .54 .52 .53 .33 .51 .45 .92 .89 .39 .50 AWMI .12 .74 .39 .48 .2 3.2 3.70 DS .42 .61 .56 Mean SD .51 .3 19.47 PS .12 .57 .47 .55 .62 .93 .55 .5 5.58 .08 .43 .71 . All rights reserved.59 .57 .42 .57 AR CD .19 .33 .50 .1 9.71 .48 .34 .61 .85 .42 .35 .40 .1 3.50 .2 3.25 .73 .70 .61 .61 DS .43 .28 .41 .67 .17 .1 3.21 .90 .45 .14 .59 BDp .68 .37 .20 .2 10.81 .70 .67 FSIQ .67 WMI .36 .76 .51 .76 .63 .30 .95 .43 .57 BD .43 .90 .64 .36 .70 .30 .62 .38 .46 .56 .89 .64 .40 .61 .17 .71 .17 .38 .47 .34 .56 .34 .69 .9 10.19 .25 .3 3.64 .37 .46 .21 .34 .2 10.73 .50 .40 .33 .26 .79 .46 .8 10.51 .42 .77 .47 .48 .45 .54 .54 .17 .51 .36 .61 . .62 .22 .9 12.09 .48 .44 .23 .04 .51 DSf .52 .74 .48 .40 .7 5.2 3.89 .70 .27 .22 .63 .81 .16 . and Composite Scores for Age 12 Table G.16 .57 .69 .61 .2 10.80 .87 .43 .53 .82 .44 .40 .9 20. 38 .1 3.62 .1 .52 .62 .53 .67 .1 .38 100.0 VCI .55 .54 .45 NSQ NSI .0 15.73 .63 .51 .59 .41 .54 .59 .57 .0 .0 .37 .2 .42 .21 .0 3.3 16.89 STI 10.1 3.30 .1 .48 .26 .54 .55 .19 .69 .59 .78 .45 DSs 10.30 VSI 10. Process.62 .0 3.44 .35 .58 .3 14.55 .49 FSIQ 10.9 2.76 .44 NVI 9.9 .84 .56 .53 .90 .59 .53 .63 .3 .72 . uncorrected coefficients appear below the diagonal.2 .52 .23 .8 14.65 .0 .15 .68 .39 .71 .13 .40 .48 .56 .45 .53 .76 DST 9.53 SRI 9.54 .30 .0 3.62 .93 .49 .56 .79 .53 . Inc.68 100.5 15.45 .9 3.56 .3 .1 .50 .2 .68 .72 NSI 10.16 PC 100.52 .51 .26 VP 99.44 .48 .57 .2 24.7 16.65 .56 .37 .30 FW 100.41 .39 NSL VC Correlations of Complementary Scores With All Subtest.35 CAs .53 .55 .49 .50 .26 .69 .60 .41 .51 AWMI 10.53 .61 .8 .45 .38 .51 PSI 9.54 .36 .66 .50 .14 198.75 .61 .33 .51 . All rights reserved.45 .0 3.48 DS 100.54 .54 .35 .7 .44 .61 .59 .43 .39 .34 DSf 10.60 .41 GAI 10.39 .49 .47 .4 .33 .19 .59 . and corrected coefficients appear in the shaded area above the diagonal.22 .0 3.63 .43 .46 .56 CPI 10.56 .0 3.60 .80 .29 .67 .96 .57 .42 CO 99.9 3.47 .44 .50 .32 .44 .2 3.60 .51 .0 3.44 .95 .90 .92 IST 10.54 .2 3.54 .2 3.48 .36 .37 .3 16.1 .56 .76 .76 .0 3.62 IST .76 .57 .1 .49 .54 .34 PS 98.52 .54 .3 14.16 .52 .33 .0 .53 .27 BDp 198.39 .72 .4 15.25 .55 .39 .8 27.9 15.40 .41 .60 .65 .41 DSb 10.63 STI .84 .35 .57 .23 .45 SS 99.38 QRI 10.55 .37 .47 .47 WMI 10.5 .36 .37 .22 CAr 9.55 .65 10.54 .47 .7 42. .41 .92 .0 .4 16.57 .37 IN 100.60 .50 .2 .3 16.39 .6 16.47 .55 .18 .35 .57 .16 .59 .57 .52 .33 MR 100.72 NSL 10.39 .34 .36 FRI 10.68 .62 . and Composite Scores for Age 12 RST SI Subtest/ Composite Score Table G.23 .29 BDn 297.57 .54 .35 .6 .58 DST .9 .2 .8 .55 .2 3.49 .44 .19 .54 .63 .34 .54 .61 .61 .62 .49 .53 .39 .49 .9 .49 .55 .58 .27 .44 . For intercorrelations.60 .51 .56 .73 .0 .50 .9 16.49 .62 .53 .32 .43 .41 .37 NSQ 10. .61 .45 .57 .51 .56 .42 RST 10.0 .49 .45 .2 3.9 3.27 .56 .37 .72 .2 .54 .6 .4 .5 15.0 2.45 .46 LN 99.38 .21 .1 .6 .46 .6 .1 3.62 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson.65 .59 .30 .39 AR 100.45 .60 .0 3.29 BD 100.35 .41 .79 .36 .4 .64 .8 .63 .45 .48 .37 .2 .54 .1 .7 .46 .70 .8 3.2 16.60 .46 CD 99.50 .56 .76 .31 CA Note.5 SRI Mean SD Subtest/ Composite Score NSL NSQ IST DST RST NSI STI SRI Mean SD 99. 15 .49 .42 .43 .33 .72 .53 .93 .54 .50 .34 .65 .16 .48 .33 .1 5.42 .48 CD .73 .9 10.07 .84 .10 .22 .0 10.0 10.53 .61 .0 2.61 .23 .60 .59 .49 .0 3.32 .84 .41 .72 MR .68 .12 .53 .62 .78 .76 .56 .16 .57 .55 .56 .73 .60 .44 .55 .19 .83 .47 .63 .40 .46 .15 .18 .53 .34 .32 .56 .34 .4 3.45 .26 .66 .25 .78 .50 .50 .56 .64 BDn .64 .40 .57 .52 .75 .50 .11 .9 10.97 .25 .93 .27 .18 .5 5.2 8.9 3.61 .17 .0 20. and corrected coefficients appear in the shaded area above the diagonal.75 .41 .12 .40 BDp .72 .51 .39 .69 .72 CO SI IN VC Subtest/ Process/ Composite Score SI Intercorrelations of Subtest.48 .37 .89 .2 4.34 FW .2 10.26 .09 .40 .35 .34 .55 .21 .22 .31 .1 5.19 .31 .14 .16 . For intercorrelations.39 .09 .10 .70 .0 10.14 .69 .48 .7 14.45 .35 .90 .36 .31 .49 .67 .48 .28 .51 .37 .86 .11 .25 .30 .42 .2 11.34 .40 .47 .45 PC .1 20.72 VP VC BD .46 .22 .91 .27 .13 . Inc.40 .35 .26 .76 .45 .42 .37 .39 .8 .24 .24 .12 .78 .22 .0 10. .38 .32 . .51 .45 .16 .0 10.30 .19 .15 .49 .44 AR .74 .26 .37 .0 2.34 .23 .35 .44 .70 AR .28 .19 .33 .28 .56 .87 .19 VCI .9 3.22 .44 . and Composite Scores for Age 13 Table G.40 .47 CAs .30 .20 .55 .87 .44 .1 2.83 .41 .55 .39 .2 19.35 .34 .09 .90 .12 .7 20.36 .48 .48 .54 .45 .46 .15 .54 .1 5.16 .92 .71 .32 .26 .1 9.41 FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI 9.25 .13 .72 .01 .73 VSI .30 .46 .44 .79 .51 .8 10.18 .68 .21 .74 .06 Note.57 .45 SS .32 .37 .11 .30 .16 .40 .36 .46 .9 3.2 2.0 10.41 .25 DSs .3 3.38 .78 .45 .9 3.44 .28 .55 FRI .30 .45 .54 .0 3.67 .41 PS .46 .87 .43 .49 .35 .26 .0 2.17 .36 .1 12.45 .0 49.81 .51 .11 .18 –.41 .40 .16 .49 .34 .44 .16 .44 .29 .48 .48 .41 .3 3.70 .26 .12 .37 .87 .26 .43 .39 .1 10.59 .48 . uncorrected coefficients appear below the diagonal.23 .14 .57 .88 .26 .19 .16 .43 MR .24 .0 10.49 .21 .75 .27 .54 .24 .32 .63 .83 .0 2.48 LN .8 3.2 5.8 19.23 .38 .65 .14 .69 .47 .54 .37 .20 .44 DS .47 .31 .1 9.12 .57 .28 .23 .37 CA BDn BDp DSf DSb DSs CAr CAs VCI VSI .41 .36 .50 .60 .1 9.44 .59 .66 .19 .15 .39 .42 .58 .91 .57 WMI .45 .13 .43 .72 .29 .49 .1 10.56 .48 .09 .35 .29 .33 .12 .53 .28 .34 .22 .56 .34 .72 .18 .28 .42 .81 .27 .50 .26 .23 .12 .72 .1 10.68 .38 .88 .57 .25 .33 .90 .13 .62 .0 60.42 .38 .48 .04 –.39 .28 .30 .34 .20 .49 .73 .55 .65 .63 .85 .28 .61 .49 .55 .49 .11 .51 .57 .8 2.22 .9 3.50 .0 2.14 .66 .51 .79 .22 .0 10.51 .83 .26 .24 .51 .8 PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI Mean SD .27 .3 69.36 .24 .29 .11 .44 .94 .35 .46 .23 .44 .81 .86 .41 .55 .31 . All rights reserved.96 .27 .24 .58 .49 .33 .50 .47 .30 .36 .86 .44 .1 20.53 .63 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson.37 .28 .38 .36 .64 .14 .0 3.07 .47 .1 3.43 .12 .24 .55 .1 10.42 .83 .51 .48 .45 .46 .32 .46 .39 .18 .10 .39 .27 .24 .43 .70 .49 .58 .26 .69 .44 .24 .45 PS .14 .25 .49 .49 .29 .37 .29 .8 3.47 SS .36 . Process.54 .45 CD VP LN BD .39 .24 CA .39 .83 .50 .18 .40 .42 .57 .24 .47 .7 20.18 .26 .10 .53 .62 .45 .43 .43 .17 .49 .62 .53 .9 5.40 .50 .70 .0 3.37 .41 10.10 .65 .76 .15 .35 .43 .41 .30 .69 .32 .10 .57 .18 .64 .14 .66 PC IN FW .81 .34 .79 .16 .46 .92 DSb .41 .51 .45 .48 .57 .49 .67 .26 .51 .44 .15 .09 –.68 .27 .40 .33 .55 .29 .55 .37 .54 .64 .45 .43 .62 .58 DS CO .29 .47 .34 .17 .25 .31 .53 .68 .61 .73 .12 .44 .33 .44 .39 .7 40.12 .12 .79 .33 .46 CAr .51 .36 .36 .0 10.21 .21 DSf .63 .29 .41 .38 .1 10.39 .68 .68 .10 .42 .92 .83 .49 . 39 .74 .66 .6 .47 .40 .05 . All rights reserved.16 200.23 BDn 299.26 .33 .75 .45 SRI 10.32 .37 .30 .14 VP 99.40 .0 2. and Composite Scores for Age 13 RST .34 .34 .9 2.23 .25 .72 .35 CPI 10.14 .36 .2 14.42 .28 .89 IST 10.13 .22 .44 .21 .51 .50 .22 .34 .64 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson.2 .44 10.38 .17 .2 .34 .45 .20 –.0 .20 FW 100.23 .8 3.49 .35 .15 .2 13.24 .31 .33 FSIQ 10.28 .09 PC 99.32 .24 .12 .34 .26 .37 .48 .46 .20 SS 99.1 .37 .95 .41 .42 IST .30 .1 2.34 .28 GAI 10.41 .41 .33 .91 .29 .25 .26 .01 .35 .1 2.37 .27 .4 .1 .41 .42 .78 .38 .33 .29 .36 AWMI 9.34 .1 3.48 .34 99.8 .20 CA Note.26 .5 25.35 .2 13.9 .4 14.22 PSI 10.31 .9 .44 .34 .6 .44 .42 .6 39.0 14.36 .1 3.9 16.29 .0 2. .8 .0 .16 .31 .37 .27 .20 –.26 .29 .01 .30 IN 100.28 DSs 10.31 .42 .17 .46 .0 .25 .29 .31 .35 .03 –. Process.37 .02 .28 .1 .34 .16 .0 3.44 .0 .30 .9 .2 14.43 .39 .52 .32 .38 .8 .29 .20 CAr 10.31 .0 3.35 .81 .43 . uncorrected coefficients appear below the diagonal.9 .26 NSL IST SI Subtest/ Composite Score Table G.28 NSI .26 .46 .3 14.21 FRI 10.0 .21 VSI 10.35 .1 .9 3.31 .31 .1 3.39 .34 .9 .30 NVI 10.03 –.33 QRI 9.15 CAs .05 .49 .1 3.17 .41 .37 .3 .36 WMI 9.1 3.0 3.8 .33 .39 .71 .25 .23 .20 .1 3.35 .14 .14 .43 .24 CO 100.25 .32 .66 NSI 10.27 .46 .31 .0 14.29 .19 .38 .22 –.44 .37 .28 .28 .07 .31 PS 100.04 .89 .06 –.17 .7 .25 .25 DST RST NSI STI SRI Mean SD Subtest/ Composite Score NSL NSQ .24 VC Correlations of Complementary Scores With All Subtest.40 .36 .28 .76 .17 .94 .44 .08 .31 DS 100.02 .29 .30 .30 NSQ 10.9 STI SRI Mean SD 100.37 .8 22.15 MR 99.18 .9 14.29 .38 AR 100.0 VCI .12 . .17 .10 .33 LN 100.14 –.43 .0 3.34 .6 .50 .41 .1 2.19 .39 .11 –.15 .72 .19 .6 15.41 .3 .38 .27 . Inc.89 .1 .04 .39 .01 .34 .74 .39 .32 .5 14.22 DSb 9.33 .36 .13 .80 .8 .45 .0 .47 100.76 DST 10.25 NSQ DST .20 CD 100.29 .02 .41 .19 BDp 199.31 .31 .23 BD 99.18 .43 .1 .24 .26 .46 .6 14.24 .6 .34 .02 .46 .33 .3 .26 .26 .28 .41 .21 .27 . For intercorrelations.9 .30 .0 .32 .43 .66 .26 .9 .37 .36 .27 .42 .0 2.3 .14 .21 .38 .35 .26 .41 .0 14.34 .0 2.21 .2 3.3 .24 .34 .17 .37 .03 .3 .39 .23 .0 3.20 .26 .20 .0 13.14 .33 .40 .92 .30 .32 .72 .0 .66 NSL 10.9 3. and corrected coefficients appear in the shaded area above the diagonal.24 DSf 10.86 STI 10.8 14.31 .27 .29 RST 10.32 .43 . 87 .44 .01 .46 .91 .37 .75 .34 .8 3.48 .48 DSs FRI .68 .90 .40 .0 3.0 59.64 .08 .67 .66 .51 .45 DS CA .32 .25 .74 .1 10.87 .63 .28 .48 .6 13.0 5.33 .25 .50 CD .73 .30 .26 .27 .11 .42 BDp VSI .69 .30 .48 .78 .73 .33 .33 .76 .14 .23 .54 .63 .75 .65 .32 .76 .80 .8 2.68 .48 .42 .66 VP VC BD .8 19.67 .13 .2 5.83 .90 .56 .18 .87 .46 .30 .53 .65 .13 .27 .14 .62 .73 .58 .50 .61 .47 .20 .49 .26 .97 .49 .30 .35 .22 .16 .9 10.13 .6 3.64 .27 .77 .37 .54 BD .75 .67 .44 .49 .64 .55 . .84 .55 .1 .08 .45 .49 .34 .92 .72 .51 .4 39.21 .68 .01 .65 PC .52 .49 .31 .15 .38 .55 .75 .52 .35 .58 .65 .48 .42 .8 2.14 .25 .35 .05 .52 .9 .40 .54 .37 .57 .9 3.52 .50 .62 .34 .65 .56 .72 .88 .44 .44 .04 .16 .34 .88 .1 .50 .82 .40 .84 .31 .17 .36 .91 .28 .9 19.17 .58 .30 .56 .80 .56 .40 .52 .53 .65 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson.0 5.23 .42 .33 .80 .65 . Inc. For intercorrelations.41 .0 2.0 2.1 3.02 .26 .1 9.91 .10 .63 .83 .75 .77 .56 AR SS .77 .64 .56 .40 .63 .85 .53 .57 .58 .34 .9 3.18 .07 .69 .63 .07 .47 .12 .10 .43 .62 .63 .41 .39 .49 .1 3.41 .41 .0 11.53 .43 .42 .35 .16 .2 15.71 .86 .60 LN Note.60 .91 9.44 .36 SS .57 .49 .70 .47 .4 49.8 3.28 .7 10.80 .44 .08 .22 .31 .1 .47 .28 .9 .25 –.10 .48 .02 .0 10.71 .07 .26 .36 .24 .26 .90 .30 .7 10.88 .39 .71 .50 .42 .51 .51 9.61 .79 .40 9.43 .38 9.57 .68 .16 .9 3.31 .0 3.52 .31 .58 .25 .9 3.00 .39 .40 .18 .31 .33 .67 .27 .64 .18 .56 FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI 9.86 .71 .8 2.08 .69 .9 .67 .78 .74 .56 .50 .76 .57 .64 .55 MR CD .84 .48 .62 .72 .34 .19 .40 .1 9.07 .36 .35 .42 .09 .63 CA BDn BDp DSf DSb DSs CAr CAs VCI VSI 9.45 .1 3.91 .52 .21 .58 .45 .45 .55 .9 19.20 .35 .50 .65 .87 .42 .71 .60 .20 CAs WMI .36 .93 .66 .46 .64 .38 .31 .9 .20 CAr .48 .22 PS .63 .46 .30 .22 .28 .66 .04 .65 .32 .36 .53 .18 .39 .60 .43 DSb .2 19.50 .5 5.60 .51 .0 3.44 .36 .51 .09 .29 .67 .30 .67 AR CO PC IN FW .8 2.03 .78 .67 DS .48 .32 .10 .69 .33 .51 .90 .14 .79 .66 .0 2. Process.41 .16 .43 .59 .61 .62 9.63 .43 .62 .50 .29 .63 .42 .52 .66 . uncorrected coefficients appear below the diagonal.59 .75 PS .12 .50 .37 .26 .18 .77 .61 .0 9.97 .47 .6 20.35 .23 .43 .84 .6 19.77 .61 .56 .33 .61 9.10 .61 .10 .20 .34 .12 .3 5.49 .52 .66 CO SI IN VC Subtest/ Process/ Composite Score SI Intercorrelations of Subtest.9 2.68 .58 .75 .61 .48 .48 .15 .50 .29 .34 .39 .28 .30 .45 .9 .46 .9 PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI Mean SD .06 .57 .90 .48 .17 .19 .63 .91 .02 .66 .63 .31 .79 .74 .69 .90 .1 2.2 5.38 .28 .47 .78 .82 .38 .08 .08 .74 .19 .39 .50 .55 .76 .26 .44 .67 .72 .48 9.32 .33 .44 FW .51 .61 .47 .85 . All rights reserved.38 .45 .60 .10 .36 .45 .85 .05 .8 20.66 MR .36 .55 .57 .64 .31 . and corrected coefficients appear in the shaded area above the diagonal.62 .37 .46 .48 .60 .43 .57 .05 .20 .54 .73 .47 .53 .37 .54 .09 .13 .56 .14 .43 .58 .40 .70 .59 .63 .44 .54 .64 .18 .45 .7 .47 .50 .45 BDn VCI .44 .28 .07 .19 .39 .19 .94 .48 .26 .54 .45 .9 10.66 .90 .31 .58 .65 .57 .54 VP LN .44 . .38 .22 .30 .51 .07 .73 .55 .48 .47 .40 DSf .79 .54 .45 .18 .30 .36 .64 .9 10.17 .43 .11 .40 .0 69.40 .26 .0 9.74 .41 .04 .4 5.49 .0 9.38 .30 .78 .31 .38 .36 .05 .63 .9 3.57 .69 9.54 .68 .0 10.6 8.29 .26 .63 .51 .37 .57 .36 .48 .43 .48 .51 .92 .43 .29 .61 .07 .45 .32 .76 . and Composite Scores for Age 14 Table G.58 .22 .59 .44 .35 .17 .65 .57 .38 . 19 CAr 9.06 .35 .2 25.53 .44 .44 .45 .39 .50 .01 PC 99.6 14.43 .0 14.7 2.51 .39 .11 FW 99.51 . uncorrected coefficients appear below the diagonal.43 .29 .07 .35 .43 RST RST .9 .04 .36 .9 3.0 3.49 .51 DST DST .43 .23 FSIQ 10.46 .6 .79 .35 .50 .32 .21 .0 .50 .44 .9 15.45 .45 .9 3.2 SRI Mean SD .9 VCI .09 VP 99.5 15.50 .28 .26 AWMI 9.49 .35 .45 .89 STI 9.2 14.45 .25 .0 .25 .28 .23 .73 .79 DST 10.53 .34 .55 .16 .8 2.32 .41 .33 .41 .1 .35 .77 .58 .05 .81 .59 .0 2.48 .29 .38 .0 3.32 .46 99.8 .47 .95 .29 RST 9.9 .8 2.9 15.48 .52 .9 3.0 14.17 CAs .31 SRI 10.1 3.32 .76 .36 .39 .26 .9 .18 DSf 9. 9.50 STI . For intercorrelations.79 .24 AR 99.38 .13 .49 .20 PS 102.40 .39 .71 .21 .53 .39 .56 .49 .37 .58 .44 .5 16.37 .52 .47 .59 .42 .8 3.37 .43 .47 .8 .48 .28 .9 3.16 .3 15.9 14.91 .3 15.8 .21 .44 .38 .27 .74 .45 .05 .40 .40 .40 .17 .17 IN 98.44 .9 .15 .1 .54 .25 .3 .1 3.17 .43 .11 BDn 301.33 .65 .0 .48 .36 .27 .33 .02 .1 .42 .03 .0 3.28 .40 .38 .32 .2 .7 15.42 .40 99.47 .46 .1 .04 .1 .53 .9 .37 .39 .5 15.13 VSI 9.06 .19 . and corrected coefficients appear in the shaded area above the diagonal.51 .51 .34 .18 204.9 .26 .28 . and Composite Scores for Age 14 SI NSQ Subtest/ Composite Score Table G.51 .47 .48 .20 .43 .24 LN 99.9 .35 .35 NSQ 10.48 .26 .41 .20 .38 .80 .0 3.9 .37 .25 DS 102.0 .66 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson.9 3.28 .06 .37 .23 DSs 9.38 .61 .31 .26 WMI 9.90 .37 .43 .1 14.1 .47 .14 FRI 9.35 .59 .34 .52 .42 .19 SS 101.42 .51 Mean SD Subtest/ Composite Score NSL NSQ IST 98.42 .0 .02 .9 .58 .31 .29 NSI .48 .42 .55 .8 2.45 .9 2.55 .48 .2 15.37 .49 .49 .29 CO 100.56 .31 .44 .50 .8 2.21 .54 .35 .51 SRI NSI .25 .27 PSI 9.40 .53 . Process.15 .46 .32 .05 .9 .28 .2 15.17 GAI 10.34 .95 .55 .0 .7 2.1 3.1 .29 .54 .48 IST .22 DSb 10.33 .90 IST 10.25 .9 3.16 .60 .89 .49 .1 .13 BD 99.46 .49 .1 .28 .16 .54 .12 MR 99.19 QRI 10.14 .36 .2 .19 .46 .89 .4 .20 NVI 9.0 .36 .1 .46 .61 NSL 9.4 .36 .54 .41 .03 .11 –.61 NSI 9.48 .44 .55 . All rights reserved.20 CA Note.2 .24 .49 .62 .44 .14 .73 . Inc.11 .51 .31 CPI 9.76 .18 .37 NSL VC Correlations of Complementary Scores With All Subtest.36 .48 .51 .32 .49 .2 42.50 .45 .44 .53 STI .34 .19 .7 . .03 BDp 202.26 CD 100.38 .39 .25 .38 .27 .47 .9 .45 .0 .26 .17 .57 .34 .8 2.5 23.39 .48 . 74 .9 PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI Mean SD .73 .20 .45 .44 .32 .56 .45 .76 .48 .54 .0 9.51 .71 . Process.64 .54 .51 CAs .41 .24 .73 .57 BDp .61 .47 .54 .60 .34 .56 .41 .49 .57 .43 .45 .60 .33 .75 .22 .18 .17 .89 .48 .23 .64 .1 10.91 .67 .47 .46 .38 .57 .53 .36 .75 .45 .22 .39 .41 .44 .5 5.42 .79 .26 .45 .6 49.23 .8 10.42 . uncorrected coefficients appear below the diagonal.0 3.49 .1 5.37 .12 .33 .55 .58 .37 DS .82 .18 . Inc.43 .58 .50 .23 VCI .1 11.25 .63 .2 10.3 10.47 .86 .0 2.56 .43 .12 .11 .15 .60 .36 .51 .53 .53 .55 CD .30 .48 .31 .30 .6 8.52 .77 .54 .38 .61 SS .4 5.44 .60 .54 .18 .78 .5 39.24 .50 .20 .22 .83 .3 14.69 .40 .8 10.67 .0 3.27 .61 .39 .44 .0 3.56 .60 .27 .52 .68 .21 .45 .87 .54 .31 .47 .23 .15 .52 .54 .45 .36 .38 .67 .9 10.45 .24 .58 .87 .35 .41 .67 VP VC BD .51 .69 .34 .52 .56 .34 .43 .53 .1 9.47 9.23 .59 .58 .62 .69 .58 .59 .42 .30 .15 .24 .47 .72 .90 .21 .16 VSI .41 .25 .49 .1 9.0 10. and corrected coefficients appear in the shaded area above the diagonal.15 .29 .39 .8 19.26 .58 .80 .36 .8 10.46 .44 .22 .16 .69 .45 .67 .24 .24 .67 .88 .61 .17 .40 .47 .42 .42 .52 .10 .28 .15 .92 .23 .94 .20 .41 .72 .11 .63 .23 .32 AR .94 .46 .24 .24 .40 .65 .67 .91 .55 .32 .71 .25 DSs .28 .35 .1 2.45 .82 .35 .51 .59 .8 69.54 .36 .51 .70 .19 .13 .42 .63 .44 .25 .28 .43 .8 20.87 .81 .61 .24 .61 .58 .08 .38 .21 .35 .61 .54 .20 .9 3.34 .54 .72 .0 9.76 .51 .54 .47 .22 .67 MR .26 .49 .91 .22 .24 .16 .0 3.45 .44 .21 .49 .38 .9 59.0 3.79 .30 .36 .59 .62 .76 .21 .72 .25 .96 .57 .57 .46 .57 .35 .87 .27 .20 .83 .17 .63 .29 .67 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson.33 .56 CD VP LN BD .30 .80 .23 .67 .35 .56 .66 .45 .50 .2 2.60 .51 .39 .09 .68 .31 .1 2.07 .58 .47 .24 .76 .36 .16 CA .55 .72 .57 .49 .32 .22 .13 .32 .55 . 9.75 . All rights reserved.41 .21 .29 .33 .16 .30 .67 .85 .45 .62 .28 .11 .31 .33 .0 3.0 10. For intercorrelations.33 .47 .23 .43 .48 .63 .43 .50 .36 Note.42 .22 .58 PS .45 .5 12.91 .36 .50 .19 .29 .59 .80 .72 .38 .43 .1 10.17 .47 .38 .78 .73 .16 .28 .41 .21 .19 .36 .20 .30 .64 .8 3.38 .55 .44 .30 .51 .9 2.88 .80 .75 .27 .8 3.0 3.39 .92 .29 FRI .74 .1 5.30 .70 .0 5.10 .87 .28 .58 .0 19.35 .69 .13 .45 .49 .51 .38 .19 .36 .66 .20 .37 .85 .48 .5 5.3 3.37 .54 .65 .24 .14 .15 .29 .46 FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI 9.23 .28 .67 .44 .41 .33 DSf .20 .5 .48 .40 .8 10.49 .53 PS .55 .42 .47 .58 .33 .22 .88 .0 3.50 .47 .62 .28 .37 .9 10.48 .52 .71 .56 .2 5.57 .89 .26 .75 .50 .49 .70 .42 .43 .36 .32 .24 .45 .41 .18 .93 .40 .35 .23 .56 .54 .49 .59 .55 .35 .9 3.19 .84 .85 .36 .33 .0 3.22 .0 10.47 .19 .61 .34 . .0 9.19 .26 .72 .22 .49 .40 .39 .9 3.56 .82 .51 PC .1 .58 DS .69 .44 CAr .45 .58 .30 .21 .73 AR CO PC IN FW .26 .40 .76 .31 .59 .35 .54 . and Composite Scores for Age 15 Table G.58 .24 .44 .63 .21 .67 FW .7 19.16 .49 CA BDn BDp DSf DSb DSs CAr CAs VCI VSI .65 .78 .65 .48 .5 19.46 .57 .62 .16 .28 .48 .50 .8 19.51 .16 .9 3.45 .66 .56 .42 .34 .40 .53 .46 .44 .26 .30 DSb .51 .33 BDn .51 .0 19.29 .63 .43 .67 CO SI IN VC Subtest/ Process/ Composite Score SI Intercorrelations of Subtest.55 SS .48 .40 .46 .73 .79 .55 .81 .64 WMI .48 LN .47 .3 3.74 .88 .17 .49 MR .34 .57 .87 .25 .45 .55 .44 .67 .71 .49 .70 .24 .56 .52 .18 .18 .50 .0 3.8 10.19 .17 .71 .48 .40 .29 .82 .95 .45 .91 .46 .39 .47 .17 .55 .91 .50 .22 .41 .15 .62 .0 9. 21 .25 .41 .0 .49 .9 .0 .60 .45 .35 .79 DST 9.1 15.8 3.46 .31 .52 .20 .59 .39 .18 .47 .48 .39 .59 .0 3.22 .43 .16 VSI 9.39 .29 .24 .58 .49 .19 .15 .44 .29 WMI 10.94 .42 .46 .29 .25 DS 100.20 200.0 .0 3.91 .6 .23 .5 14.21 QRI 10.37 .50 .47 .23 AR 99.69 .47 STI .33 .11 .68 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson.47 .47 .9 16.1 .47 .14 .21 .9 .1 3.58 .12 PC 99.54 .52 .30 .20 .59 VCI Mean SD SRI 9.34 .0 3.94 .1 .0 .0 .5 14.30 PSI 10.30 .6 .09 BDp 199.32 .28 .47 .50 .14 BDn 297.50 .0 .39 .21 SS 99.22 .31 .47 .0 .13 .51 .17 .21 .11 IN 99.35 .42 . and Composite Scores for Age 15 DST .80 .25 .61 .60 .11 VP 99.13 .45 .0 .0 .26 .56 .20 .50 .35 .0 3.49 .4 14.46 DST .32 .37 .28 .9 .33 .18 . uncorrected coefficients appear below the diagonal.25 CAs .1 3.28 CO 99.42 .19 . IST 99.43 .30 .29 .9 2.11 .4 . Inc.3 .23 CA Note.31 .45 .44 .15 .35 .44 .54 .6 14.45 .35 .50 .57 IST RST .24 .15 NSL .08 .2 .54 .77 NSL 10.63 .49 .71 .15 RST .46 .43 .0 2. For intercorrelations.70 .37 .11 .36 .0 .26 .2 15.20 .45 .51 .15 FRI 10.42 .8 .7 .9 .73 .14 .38 .77 .16 BD 99.8 3.0 30. and corrected coefficients appear in the shaded area above the diagonal.14 .9 .11 Subtest/ Composite Score .32 .0 3.4 14.60 .52 .9 3.32 CD 99.8 2.27 RST 10.6 15.6 14.28 LN 98.43 .77 NSI 9.8 3.54 .61 NSQ VC Correlations of Complementary Scores With All Subtest.2 3.11 .67 .42 .1 3.1 .53 .43 .47 .30 .91 IST 10.29 AWMI 9.26 NVI 10.28 .21 .18 NSQ 9.35 .41 .20 .43 .28 .50 .36 .56 .3 .16 .46 .47 .21 .16 NSL SI Subtest/ Composite Score Table G.3 .44 .18 .10 .29 .35 .26 .40 .21 .0 2.20 CAr 10.52 .46 .20 .5 .15 GAI 10.41 .25 .1 .0 .8 3.28 .44 .77 .9 SRI STI .21 .4 24.40 .19 .37 .24 .22 .9 15.0 .35 .36 .35 . All rights reserved.22 .62 .20 .17 .26 .59 .48 .46 .26 PS 99.32 .20 DSs 10.1 .58 .34 .73 . 99.22 .61 .39 .40 .58 NSI NSI .90 .1 3.14 FW 99.45 .37 CPI 10.76 .41 .52 .12 .33 .51 .41 .17 .9 .24 FSIQ 9.0 3.18 DSf 10.39 .33 .44 .9 2.44 .34 .4 .29 .3 3.55 .25 .89 STI 9.27 .28 .49 .39 .40 SRI 10.2 14.39 .43 .2 .6 .18 .58 .30 .26 .34 .8 3.71 .36 .12 MR 99.50 .20 .42 .5 15.20 .21 .53 .28 .51 .20 .9 .17 .3 .53 .9 .52 .78 .19 .95 .56 .49 .11 .41 .26 .8 15.78 .38 .35 .21 .49 .96 .22 .25 DSb 9.5 .43 .13 .8 16.8 44.64 NSQ Mean SD . Process.08 99.7 15.1 .23 .38 .49 .52 .39 .39 .20 .40 .26 . 34 .1 20.52 .94 .60 .55 .25 .25 .78 .33 .53 .21 .63 .47 .31 . Inc.55 .53 .42 .51 .76 .1 20.40 .0 2.57 .08 .30 .63 .39 .50 .2 5.28 .66 .19 .62 .04 .66 .81 .67 .17 –.21 .45 .40 .46 .56 CD .79 .2 9.34 .43 .79 .06 .25 .85 .52 10.54 .39 .75 .13 .51 .38 .54 .3 5.55 .12 .62 BDn .19 .07 .63 .44 .64 .75 CO SI IN VC Subtest/ Process/ Composite Score SI Intercorrelations of Subtest.38 .54 .74 .29 .62 .9 10.81 .46 .0 10.9 3.91 .45 .62 .38 .12 .53 .49 .68 .21 .43 .2 3.46 .12 .88 .55 .62 .56 .38 .0 .79 .1 3.52 .44 .42 DSs .1 10.29 .23 .8 3.65 .68 PC IN FW .32 CA .86 .56 .09 .21 .11 .3 5.13 .11 .76 .47 .89 .76 .97 .90 DSb .1 10.74 .0 3.85 .55 .0 9.32 .49 .30 .45 .14 .06 FRI .59 .66 .09 .91 .17 .33 .10 Note.70 .39 .66 .27 .35 .0 3.14 .1 10.62 WMI .86 .64 .36 .43 .38 .38 .59 .0 3.2 10.66 DS CO .63 .13 .55 .9 3.02 .84 .63 .62 .31 .75 .19 .51 .33 .53 .55 .25 .31 BDp .0 59.78 .70 .33 .20 .12 .54 .66 .04 .35 .47 .21 .5 12.48 .0 70.61 .57 .1 3.0 9.75 .52 .12 .71 AR .51 AR .47 .44 .52 .56 .70 .65 .56 .70 .53 .3 5.35 .64 .78 .55 .56 .43 PS .64 .32 .78 .44 .46 .45 .48 .03 .65 .80 .6 5.58 .27 .2 PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI Mean SD .79 .65 .92 .59 .31 .74 .52 .37 .62 .65 .73 .44 .3 10.0 10.91 .19 .19 .26 .06 .43 .45 .16 .68 .60 .51 .9 3.42 .43 .12 .11 .49 .19 .58 .10 .61 .46 CA BDn BDp DSf DSb DSs CAr CAs VCI VSI .59 .50 .68 .07 .74 .90 .37 .71 .27 .11 .74 .66 .39 .31 .47 .13 .91 .49 .12 .30 .76 .61 .41 .8 20.14 .65 .1 10.65 .53 .46 .75 MR .31 .51 .65 .82 .43 .08 .51 CAs .64 .26 .45 .47 .84 .58 .13 .65 .56 .60 .44 .31 .87 .49 .26 .49 .42 .40 .65 .1 10.29 .68 .03 .61 .77 .57 .07 .27 .30 .81 .29 .38 .42 .61 LN .47 9.2 19.43 .78 .77 .90 .32 .66 .37 .27 .68 .15 .12 .28 .52 .48 .39 .59 .08 .22 .30 .55 .41 .25 .56 .72 .9 12. All rights reserved.46 .0 3.49 .15 .12 .69 .43 .24 .38 FW .71 .78 .45 .91 .59 .4 20.3 .42 .17 VSI .36 .85 .60 .9 20.94 .79 .04 .9 50.42 .72 .67 .0 10.0 2.90 .15 .61 .06 .40 .93 .14 .3 10.26 DS .57 .62 .62 .0 3.63 .61 .47 .40 .55 .30 .10 .56 .41 .42 .14 .45 .23 .46 .48 .9 10.44 .35 .38 .46 . Process.23 .45 .78 .29 .38 .25 .1 9.09 .54 .51 .61 .9 10.18 .29 .50 CD VP LN BD .40 .68 .30 .28 . and corrected coefficients appear in the shaded area above the diagonal.51 .2 2.6 15.43 .2 40.47 . uncorrected coefficients appear below the diagonal.66 .30 .46 .26 .60 .52 .46 .68 .58 .19 .52 .18 .73 .57 .20 .27 .47 .40 .50 MR .85 .40 .36 .50 .40 .36 .65 .83 .08 .40 .16 .89 . .68 .58 FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI 9.25 .94 .0 3.58 .79 .42 .12 DSf .7 5.91 .39 .11 .71 .39 .72 .0 10.59 .61 .59 .36 .44 .85 .49 .33 .42 .63 .19 VCI .69 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson.68 .65 .27 –.54 . .51 PS .37 .53 .59 .29 .42 .38 .64 .40 .65 .56 .88 .55 . and Composite Scores for Age 16 Table G.33 .43 .9 3.55 .53 .14 –.72 .56 .75 VP VC BD .53 .9 3.15 .56 .72 .18 .53 .57 .04 .86 .55 .47 .11 .60 .38 .01 .91 .76 .9 10.56 .0 3.52 CAr .32 .13 .45 .9 2.1 19.32 .61 .52 .14 .13 .11 .77 .39 .38 .86 .33 .33 .42 .82 .43 PC .57 .86 .59 .45 . For intercorrelations.41 .47 .54 .57 .11 .17 .45 .49 .59 .09 .39 .57 .62 .06 .47 .53 .40 .0 9.43 .96 .37 .1 5.15 .47 .93 .51 .1 3.45 .39 .78 .54 .52 .79 .57 .77 .38 .72 .10 .66 .45 .48 .69 .64 .74 .56 .22 .05 .52 .16 .02 .54 .49 SS .57 .65 .60 .54 .0 2.49 .54 .08 .42 .15 .12 .76 .51 .37 .63 .62 .00 .0 3.78 .84 .66 .57 .42 .53 .59 SS . 34 DSb 9. uncorrected coefficients appear below the diagonal.0 .4 24.30 .17 LN 97.3 3.37 .6 14.45 .42 .43 .04 .22 .43 .1 2.10 VC Correlations of Complementary Scores With All Subtest.41 .57 .36 CD 100.53 .38 .40 .14 MR 100.69 .28 .46 .34 SS 99.61 .27 RST 10.0 .18 FRI 10.38 .14 .21 .41 .6 15.51 .48 .95 .32 .43 .37 .52 .0 .39 . .70 .36 DS 99.32 WMI 10.41 .43 .44 . Inc.52 100.23 .40 .8 .37 .1 .11 .0 .31 DSs 9.33 .23 .18 .30 NVI 10.1 3.60 .24 VSI 10.33 .0 3.2 .30 .49 .31 .4 15.40 .24 .42 .39 PSI 10.44 .9 15.14 VP 99.26 .39 .8 .0 .32 .34 .30 .37 .67 .16 .67 .46 .46 RST STI .75 .1 2.44 .48 .06 .71 .30 .4 .23 .51 .48 .25 .33 .49 . All rights reserved.63 .26 .9 3.48 .13 .16 .49 .1 .0 3.41 .79 .28 . and corrected coefficients appear in the shaded area above the diagonal.9 2.1 14.39 .60 .52 .89 .45 .31 .42 .77 .49 .40 .90 .8 .47 .30 BDn 297.70 .29 AWMI 9.10 .1 15.18 .53 99.45 .9 3.70 NSI 10.27 .0 .51 .9 15.18 .9 15.46 .8 15.47 .40 .31 .44 .75 DST 10.22 .5 .50 .47 .45 .33 .11 .29 .28 .33 .6 .22 199.1 2.42 CPI 10.2 3.52 .44 .40 .47 .5 .08 .27 .25 NSL SI Subtest/ Composite Score Table G.9 2.21 .23 .22 .42 .49 .70 NSL 10.13 CAs .32 .50 .17 .27 .9 .63 .45 .1 3.59 .1 .22 VCI Subtest/ Composite Score NSI 10.40 .30 .19 .30 BD 100.44 .77 .11 .54 .55 .33 .48 NSQ IST DST 101.53 .4 .37 .95 .04 .0 3.21 .0 .22 GAI 10.5 42.1 16.51 .16 .31 FSIQ 10.40 .45 .0 3.46 .55 . For intercorrelations.23 .47 .9 .1 3.0 .9 3.14 .29 CO 99.2 .49 .34 .36 .47 .35 .0 .1 Mean SD RST .43 .2 3.25 .92 .33 .0 .10 CA Note.51 .21 .21 AR 100.42 .24 .48 .44 . and Composite Scores for Age 16 STI .39 .25 .25 . .54 .7 .46 .30 .50 .50 .36 .60 .9 .92 .33 .20 .71 .2 15.89 STI 10.52 .2 .37 .29 NSQ 10.29 .26 .51 .25 .45 .53 .3 15.31 .28 .31 .28 .08 .42 .38 .35 .2 .0 15.29 .3 .21 PS 99.40 .34 .9 3.54 .43 .39 .77 .3 Mean SD .36 .32 .25 DSf 10.47 .1 3.27 BDp 198.24 NSI SRI .7 .47 .40 .41 .48 SRI .42 .40 .16 .29 .0 .1 .41 .18 IN 100.47 .16 NSL .59 .42 .53 .14 .01 PC 100.36 .36 SRI 9.44 .22 .18 FW 99.0 .44 . Process.39 .22 .0 .6 .37 .1 15.39 .0 3.08 CAr 10.1 29.34 .48 .46 DST NSQ IST .44 .46 .22 QRI 9.1 15.3 3.73 .20 .41 .45 .3 15.26 .0 .91 IST 9.42 .29 .38 .20 .31 .8 .0 3.23 .51 .9 .26 .25 .43 .59 .48 .44 .53 .46 .0 .39 .09 .07 .45 .55 .70 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson.20 . Inc. H .Appendix Correlations Between the WISC–V and the KTEA–3 and WIAT–III. by Age Group 71 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson. All rights reserved. 49 .26 .00 .52 .30 .41 .45 .44 .25 .49 .56 –.38 .59 .28 .31 .09 .6 80 .01 .42 99.58 .10 .09 –.55 .20 .27 .0 79 .77 .32 .44 .28 .12 –.26 .64 .16 .41 .46 .25 .26 .35 .45 .43 .5 12.19 .41 .23 .16 .34 .47 .53 .17 .47 .42 .27 .38 .10 .25 .51 .27 .27 .59 .65 .09 . ONF = Object Naming Facility.41 .53 .20 .22 –.9 11.06 .31 .15 .51 .1 12.07 .56 .40 .36 .07 . AF = Associational Fluency.24 .24 –.42 .02 .17 .53 .49 .27 .20 .27 .68 .44 .48 .58 .4 68 .57 .15 .46 .24 .40 .38 WRF DF 98.39 .44 .58 .39 .51 .00 –.41 .20 .15 .24 .10 .26 . LNF = Letter Naming Facility.1 11.06 .26 –.15 .46 ONF 95.24 .45 .36 .05 .52 .30 .33 .8 13.31 .56 .24 .9 68 .19 .5 13.08 .36 .44 .18 .52 .08 .41 . OE = Oral Expression.05 .44 .17 .02 .04 .31 .33 .35 .42 .49 .24 .35 .61 .50 LWR KTEA–3 Subtests Correlations Between the WISC–V and the KTEA–3.35 .32 –.21 .38 .42 .7 12.64 .36 .25 .16 .66 LNF Note.31 .25 –.63 . NWD = Nonsense Word Decoding.31 .44 .16 .74 .32 . Inc. WRF = Word Recognition Fluency.27 .5 13.38 . All rights reserved.15 .30 .37 .36 –.47 .23 .32 .48 .13 .40 .02 .68 .27 .23 .13 .39 .28 . PP = Phonological Processing.41 .41 .67 .47 .21 .48 .18 .26 .17 .8 12.8 49 .13 –.27 .64 .16 –.22 96.22 .46 . SRF = Silent Reading Fluency.23 .43 .48 .18 .29 .41 .5 80 .26 .42 MC 95.81 .36 .42 .7 67 .43 .13 –.15 .11 .36 .26 .31 .30 .55 . MC = Math Computation.13 .6 79 .09 .57 .38 .28 .24 .35 .34 .51 .15 .36 .12 .33 .12 .33 –.49 .3 80 .04 .25 .16 .49 .0 68 .18 .03 .56 .53 .57 SRF RV 98.6 80 .16 .24 .42 .12 .42 .41 .61 .43 .35 .16 .10 .31 .0 14.12 –.10 .40 .5 80 .12 .01 .40 .17 .14 .20 .14 –.24 .62 .6 13.43 .41 .41 .14 .52 96.15 .14 .45 .50 .28 .20 .49 .66 .46 .29 .02 –.13 –.29 .47 .13 .12 .52 .43 .43 .47 . 99.17 .07 –.47 .4 13. RV = Reading Vocabulary.51 .60 .45 . by Age Group SI VC IN CO BD VP MR FW PC AR DS PS LN CD SS CA VCI VSI FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI KTEA–3 WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score Ages 6–9 Table H.21 .45 .29 . .53 .22 .43 .00 –.38 .30 .28 .55 .32 .31 WF LC 96.23 –.43 .05 .58 .3 12.57 .21 .48 . WE = Written Expression.32 .64 .31 .35 . All correlations were corrected for the variability of the WISC–V normative sample (Guilford & Fruchter.60 .25 .16 .34 .37 –.24 .53 .31 .38 .26 .34 .35 .57 .30 –.48 .27 .36 .30 .41 OE 95.30 .43 –.32 –.13 –.02 .31 .16 .03 .02 –.68 .57 .26 .64 .27 .41 .39 . LC = Listening Comprehension. MCA = Math Concepts & Applications.25 .1 .28 .38 .10 .50 .24 .21 .32 .13 .72 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson.49 .49 –.41 WE SP 98.36 .46 .42 .23 .31 –. SP = Spelling.28 .70 .18 .12 .50 .50 .36 .42 .39 –.57 .23 –.49 .4 11.27 .16 .40 .58 .55 .52 .17 –.15 .31 .39 .4 12.53 .34 .32 .09 .06 .30 .44 .8 80 .62 . DF = Decoding Fluency. KTEA–3 subtest abbreviations are: LWR = Letter & Word Recognition.49 .28 .55 .3 12.53 . 1978).24 .66 .19 . WF = Writing Fluency.9 80 Mean SD  n RC 99.49 .23 .29 .43 –.8 67 .61 .43 .19 .62 .59 .31 .39 .24 .29 .45 .26 .27 .65 .67 .07 .32 NWD PP 101.43 .61 .55 .18 .31 96.24 .26 .13 .25 .22 .46 MF 97.57 MCA 96.36 .14 .22 .39 .35 .38 .13 .4 31 .26 AF 98.41 –.48 .49 .49 .04 .08 .32 .41 .56 .21 .40 .06 .45 .49 .55 .27 .42 98.27 .43 .55 .14 .62 96.41 .07 .36 .10 .32 .35 .24 . MF = Math Fluency.18 .1 13.55 .43 .44 .07 .4 77 .5 12.13 .40 .37 .36 .07 –.6 78 .12 .36 .43 .29 .6 12.25 .10 .20 .06 .08 .23 .44 .47 .42 .08 .14 .22 .39 .38 .10 .28 .69 .39 . RC = Reading Comprehension.4 79 .54 .55 .01 .23 .37 .37 . 24 .46 .30 .24 .41 .08 .25 .38 .15 .33 .68 .01 .6 2.12 .41 .2 67 .77 .23 .63 .4 9.34 .35 .54 .24 .42 .06 .52 .4 97.46 .52 .71 .15 .17 .47 .63 .30 .32 .46 Reading Fluency 98.61 .52 .39 Decoding 100.31 .57 .43 .45 .46 .64 .1 98.5 11.12 .43 .13 .37 .46 .41 .45 .52 .06 .3 10.52 95.63 .38 .59 .54 .5 31 .07 .52 .32 .05 .39 .30 .50 . All correlations were corrected for the variability of the WISC–V normative sample (Guilford & Fruchter.41 .30 .58 .2 10.45 .47 .30 –.49 .49 .23 .9 2.17 .16 .43 97.38 .54 .38 .03 .42 .30 .29 .8 98.4 12.57 .06 .47 .21 .44 .24 .15 .00 .31 .39 .56 .19 .27 .9 9.09 .24 .7 11.06 .48 .43 .62 .24 .42 .5 2.58 .45 .32 .46 .30 .0 13.63 .37 .38 .70 .70 .14 .5 15.58 .27 .1 97. Inc.2 2.52 .32 .0 10.1 100.55 97.21 .6 14.57 .55 .41 .24 .41 SoundSymbol 97.43 .39 .49 .10 .46 . All rights reserved.28 .06 .34 .3 11.23 .52 .23 .65 .42 .29 .39 96.45 .61 .05 .49 .30 .7 12.44 .22 –.21 .5 9.53 .5 3.42 –.55 .37 .25 .26 .8 9.66 96.07 .42 .01 .32 .59 .56 .59 .24 .7 2.2 13.44 .38 .32 –.05 .47 . 99.9 10.59 .23 .14 .19 .31 .24 .35 –.56 .77 .23 .37 .44 .27 .9 79 Mean SD  n 96.65 .37 .1 97.66 .8 96.51 .36 96.2 12.22 .6 2.50 .02 .62 .9 2.43 .52 Reading Oral Oral Orthographic Academic Understanding Language Fluency Comprehension Expression Processing Fluency Note.16 –.1 12.17 .8 11.29 .20 .48 .6 9.1 9.32 .71 .27 .32 .16 .20 .53 .28 .21 .37 .30 .26 .35 .33 .1 11.24 .53 .7 80 .69 .64 .67 .54 .43 .18 .73 .34 .8 9.46 .35 .54 .34 .45 .12 .30 .37 .28 .25 .22 .63 Academic Skills Battery 98. 1978).36 .7 2.4 9.55 .20 .68 .42 .42 .8 2.45 .49 .13 .74 .02 .49 .22 .55 .0 79 .1 80 .04 .52 .71 .54 .40 .4 Mean 2.24 .40 .1 68 .46 .55 .08 .24 .32 .70 .50 .49 . by Age Group (continued) SI VC IN CO BD VP MR FW PC AR DS PS LN CD SS CA VCI VSI FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI KTEA–3 WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score Ages 6–9 Table H.54 –.4 SD  WISC–V n 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 79 80 80 79 80 80 80 80 80 79 79 78 80 79 79 80 78 .46 .6 12.38 .56 .64 .50 .27 .62 .1 3.31 .42 .32 .08 .56 .30 .52 .45 95.46 .31 .39 .6 9.80 .61 .46 .62 .43 .15 .3 12.11 .61 .73 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson.3 12.59 .25 .37 .49 .44 .35 .9 11.44 .41 .10 .50 .30 .51 .67 .48 .14 .5 98.45 .21 .45 .32 .46 .1 12.20 –.34 .3 67 .47 .46 .46 .47 .19 .35 .45 .4 2.60 .52 .45 .1 76 .0 12.47 .34 .75 .35 –.0 13.21 .09 .9 97.31 .69 .47 .65 .35 .25 .5 12.67 .2 9.7 98.4 12.8 13.31 .58 .19 .9 79 .40 .10 .32 .53 .7 98.9 11.48 .5 2.48 .7 31 .8 76 .49 .2 68 .0 9.18 .57 97.46 .72 .50 .45 .6 10.36 . .17 .8 2.6 3.35 .45 .40 .45 –.65 .00 .1 80 .57 .18 –.34 .00 .68 .56 .16 .51 .03 .33 .50 .45 .40 .51 .1 10.66 .29 .64 .53 Reading Written Math Language KTEA–3 Composites Correlations Between the WISC–V and the KTEA–3.39 . 22 .31 .13 .78 .74 .73 . All rights reserved.49 .36 .51 .29 .17 .4 127 .35 .41 .54 .50 .79 .42 .33 .49 .36 .17 .50 .42 .47 .20 .1 .33 .59 .72 .32 .21 .40 .55 .37 .17 .55 . SP = Spelling.44 .72 .0 125 .44 .56 WRF 100.42 NWD 100.25 .35 .54 .46 . LNF = Letter Naming Facility.63 .24 .39 .31 .43 .51 .25 .37 .5 13.49 .29 .39 .19 .10 .27 .39 .60 .21 .23 .65 .27 .23 . NWD = Nonsense Word Decoding.28 .42 .48 .5 14. SRF = Silent Reading Fluency.44 .38 .19 .56 .8 127 .49 . ONF = Object Naming Facility.15 .50 .25 .51 . WE = Written Expression.61 .51 .49 .71 .49 .53 .16 .17 .57 MCA 100.60 .01 .47 .21 .51 .29 .12 .38 .58 .48 .51 .4 13.14 .19 . by Age Group (continued) SI VC IN CO BD VP MR FW PC AR DS PS LN CD SS CA VCI VSI FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI KTEA–3 WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score Ages 10–16 Table H.49 .38 .25 .67 .23 .11 .34 .52 .29 .62 .48 .38 .26 .43 .2 126 .55 .0 13.48 .46 .19 .40 .43 .13 .68 .55 .39 .37 .37 .24 .19 .32 .38 .55 . AF = Associational Fluency. .10 .47 MF 100.57 .43 .58 .50 .20 .30 .35 .32 .34 .31 .51 .45 .69 .44 .56 .20 .10 .11 .33 .67 . MCA = Math Concepts & Applications.31 .82 .49 .26 .32 .18 .23 .21 . MC = Math Computation.38 .22 .37 .45 .52 .22 .23 .47 .16 .08 .20 .70 .16 .48 .48 .8 13.38 .9 125 .29 .55 .26 .20 .2 127 .36 .46 . KTEA–3 subtest abbreviations are: LWR = Letter & Word Recognition.77 .40 .42 .65 .32 .45 .37 .47 .50 AF 97.30 .78 .13 .47 .25 .48 .49 LWR KTEA–3 Subtests Correlations Between the WISC–V and the KTEA–3.22 .57 .50 .56 .17 .48 .37 .37 .37 .21 .08 .6 13.57 .23 .33 .06 .21 .61 .46 .0 126 .17 .49 .37 .40 .55 .59 .31 .4 124 . RC = Reading Comprehension.30 .59 .31 .31 .29 .41 .61 . LC = Listening Comprehension.47 WF LC 97.29 .11 .72 .61 .46 .16 .45 .70 .29 .0 127 .52 .62 .39 .66 .13 .37 .31 .53 .41 RC 99.63 SRF 99.50 .52 .29 .33 .29 .39 .53 .72 .46 .47 .42 .37 .46 .57 WE 100.8 127 .13 .31 .25 .54 .47 .25 .57 .46 .29 .40 .42 .28 .43 .57 .31 .53 . WF = Writing Fluency.65 .48 .5 13.9 14.33 .40 .42 .46 .46 .39 .7 127 Mean SD  n 100.44 .01 .45 .42 .46 .55 .56 .35 .26 .4 12.27 .69 .66 .31 .25 .18 .35 .39 .48 .35 .19 .26 .51 .64 .53 .31 LNF Note.5 14.14 .6 11.38 .33 .69 .14 .41 OE 99.65 .55 .27 .20 .29 . 98.52 .44 .63 .20 .09 .29 .29 .24 .12 .43 .25 .63 .44 DF 103.41 .47 .50 .17 . OE = Oral Expression.6 127 .50 .53 .31 .37 .38 .51 .1 13.22 .62 .36 .14 .74 .58 .34 .8 127 .42 .21 .50 .47 .49 PP 101.38 .49 .48 .55 .6 13.03 .38 .29 .65 .37 . PP = Phonological Processing.27 .53 . RV = Reading Vocabulary.59 .17 .66 .29 .39 .37 .38 .29 .33 .37 .37 .38 .41 .54 .21 .39 .64 .52 .27 .0 14.48 .06 .32 .79 .71 . 1978). WRF = Word Recognition Fluency.15 .25 .36 .53 .45 .23 .74 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson.22 .47 MC 100.48 .53 .4 127 .49 .9 126 .43 .38 .20 .29 .51 .55 .46 .45 .49 .45 .40 .46 .48 SP 99.60 .78 .66 .49 . All correlations were corrected for the variability of the WISC–V normative sample (Guilford & Fruchter.41 .36 .66 .48 .13 –.37 .30 .42 .39 .34 .22 .26 .58 .47 .53 .66 .49 .32 .9 15.49 .49 .18 .57 .33 .61 . Inc.40 .31 .37 .13 .60 .34 .22 .47 .77 .54 .47 .29 .47 .31 .29 .36 .60 .23 .34 .41 97. DF = Decoding Fluency.66 .41 .52 .49 .46 .49 .55 .25 .20 .42 .29 .39 .35 .43 ONF 99.37 .64 .81 .51 .1 127 .18 .44 .48 .1 15.44 .49 .2 15.44 .57 .40 .09 .48 .40 .51 .45 .0 127 .18 .48 .22 . MF = Math Fluency.44 .5 14.6 127 .32 .49 .49 .30 .48 RV 99.13 .3 14.19 .31 .66 .61 .55 .20 .9 122 . 47 .56 .7 2.84 .14 .60 .66 .4 99.3 99.29 .58 99.45 .60 .44 .74 .6 127 .41 .44 .56 .53 .41 .34 .68 .40 .0 9.42 .34 .34 .63 .64 Academic Skills Battery 100.18 .7 9.31 .47 .34 .66 .49 97.59 .69 .47 .42 .46 .2 126 .50 .44 .55 .80 .62 .52 .62 .58 .7 13.8 2.14 .5 99.76 .57 .0 2.49 .46 .62 .40 .82 .67 .33 .39 .64 .5 13.64 .57 99.65 Reading Fluency 99.55 .35 .57 .18 .62 Reading Oral Oral Orthographic Academic Understanding Language Fluency Comprehension Expression Processing Fluency Note.31 .56 .61 97.53 .4 14.5 14.58 .45 .0 10.56 .9 9.56 .49 .30 .46 .58 .61 .84 .49 .32 .59 .38 .76 .34 .9 15.70 .57 .72 .74 .51 .72 .0 14.20 .6 2.37 .36 .41 .32 .60 .23 .63 .40 .9 99.61 .1 98.7 2.8 13.29 .56 .57 .49 .60 .61 .43 .34 .55 .54 .63 .26 .62 .78 .60 .61 .46 .28 .37 .9 2.62 .1 99.44 .42 .56 .70 .13 .7 98.46 .48 .48 .60 99.3 13.14 .22 .0 13.43 .60 .38 .52 .53 .35 .4 13.72 .40 .36 .41 .25 .46 .75 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson.53 .54 .74 .1 10.3 14.18 .4 122 Mean SD  n 99.47 99.51 .0 9.6 14.3 127 .59 .10 .48 .64 .58 .51 . .38 .30 .77 .08 .67 .48 .21 .67 .23 .54 .8 14.21 .62 .52 .63 .57 .46 .52 .8 3. All rights reserved.17 .49 .45 .83 .50 .49 .36 .20 .19 .52 .3 14.49 Decoding 101.60 .36 .1 125 .56 100.53 .6 2.39 .37 .4 120 . All correlations were corrected for the variability of the WISC–V normative sample (Guilford & Fruchter.53 .63 .59 .1 2.49 .34 .64 .1 13.67 .4 124 .47 .49 .57 .46 .51 .62 .54 .55 .0 9.13 .55 .71 .63 .73 .32 .18 .67 .73 .49 .42 .69 .32 .7 2.48 .29 .45 .2 14.37 .76 .68 .45 .67 .21 .49 .75 .39 .2 13.45 .3 127 .82 .39 .58 .43 .59 .35 .49 Reading Written Math Language KTEA–3 Composites Correlations Between the WISC–V and the KTEA–3.39 .65 .50 .48 .57 .36 .27 .10 .57 .54 SoundSymbol 98.51 .54 .41 .75 .45 .26 .56 .65 .40 .54 .35 .40 .22 .64 .57 .62 .0 12.47 .58 99.61 .44 .9 10.46 .1 99.9 2.49 .57 .5 121 .29 .43 .58 .8 3.53 .24 .58 .31 .79 .6 Mean 2.53 .7 14.59 .51 .56 .45 .55 .7 123 .37 .6 127 .40 .38 .45 .42 .9 9.32 .8 9.6 10.64 .48 .43 .53 .61 .62 .7 9.7 9.36 .9 2.54 .76 .37 .62 .49 .30 .49 .8 14. 99.18 .3 SD  WISC–V n 127 125 127 127 127 127 127 127 127 127 127 127 127 127 127 127 125 127 127 127 127 125 127 127 127 125 127 . Inc.2 9.25 .58 .82 .75 .78 .69 .0 13.7 2.61 .51 .62 .22 .62 .7 13.61 .76 .45 .44 .8 98.71 .52 . 1978).51 .1 126 .70 .58 .60 .35 .75 .68 .79 .43 .53 .48 .43 .36 .51 .68 .59 .28 .53 .46 .77 .48 .54 .49 .6 14.50 .27 .50 .23 .7 122 .9 14.4 99. by Age Group (continued) SI VC IN CO BD VP MR FW PC AR DS PS LN CD SS CA VCI VSI FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI KTEA–3 WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score Ages 10–16 Table H.49 .9 10.82 .78 .65 .51 .21 .23 .45 .55 .57 .67 .68 .40 .68 .08 .57 .43 .47 .9 13.8 2.57 .34 .60 .45 .7 124 .58 .7 10.32 .58 .41 .46 .79 .2 98.66 . 42 .28 .21 .32 .4 12.20 .23 WE 98.30 RV 98.47 100.33 .32 .22 .6 14.29 .1 12.14 .04 .30 .23 .26 .24 .33 .08 .16 .3 67 .12 .42 .36 96.4 31 .21 .4 11.3 12.23 .32 .33 .1 13. All correlations were corrected for the variability of the WISC–V normative sample (Guilford & Fruchter. MC = Math Computation.37 . LC = Listening Comprehension.28 .7 31 .31 .4 12.14 .08 .18 .42 .46 99.2 10.20 .37 .37 .01 .0 68 .41 95.11 .32 . NSL NSQ IST DST RST NSI STI SRI KTEA–3 Mean SD  n WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score Ages 6–9 NSL NSQ IST DST RST NSI STI SRI KTEA–3 Mean SD  n WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score Ages 6–9 Table H.12 –.33 .14 .3 98.25 .39 . AF = Associational Fluency.15 .26 .30 –. OE = Oral Expression. SP = Spelling.42 MF 97.21 .28 98.27 .19 .2 99. MCA = Math Concepts & Applications.21 .33 .7 67 .37 –.6 80 Reading Oral Oral Orthographic Academic Understanding Language Fluency Comprehension Expression Processing Fluency KTEA–3 Composites Reading Fluency 96.1 11.22 .4 13.33 96.25 .5 11.22 .26 .21 .21 .38 .22 .15 .32 .47 ONF 16.18 .1 12.5 12.0 79 –.41 .1 99.17 . All rights reserved.19 .39 .28 .41 .29 .21 .2 100.23 .26 .21 –.05 .23 .04 .64 LNF n 77 80 80 80 80 77 80 77 Note.0 13.21 98. by Age Group 99.39 SP 96.38 .02 .40 MCA 96.8 13.25 96.16 .26 .27 .5 80 . Inc.0 14.32 .44 .23 .04 .9 68 .16 .37 .25 .23 .15 .44 .39 .48 WRF DF 97.44 Academic Skills Battery 101.33 .23 .32 .14 .2 .31 .2 12.42 SRF KTEA–3 Subtests Correlations Between WISC–V Complementary Scores and the KTEA–3.35 .5 100.27 .41 .9 79 .2 12.29 .7 12.31 OE 95.31 .34 .55 .20 .36 .30 .59 AF .4 68 .9 79 Reading 99.32 .21 .27 .25 .0 14. ONF = Object Naming Facility.48 LWR 97.31 –.15 .8 76 .20 –.36 .8 67 .31 .23 .35 .35 .15 .1 13.5 13. MF = Math Fluency. KTEA–3 subtest abbreviations are: LWR = Letter & Word Recognition.9 11.33 .21 .4 15.8 13.33 .32 95.43 .28 .6 13.03 .20 .35 .31 .4 79 .24 .34 .24 .8 13.18 .28 PP 98. NWD = Nonsense Word Decoding.29 .32 .28 .6 78 .40 .15 .11 .24 .52 .23 .32 .34 SoundSymbol 99.37 NWD 97.37 .32 .22 .23 .23 .1 80 .04 .35 .26 .44 .07 .12 .15 .04 .49 .1 80 .3 80 .42 .25 .35 .4 77 .35 .57 96.25 .8 49 .26 .38 .2 68 .31 .23 –. .32 .8 Mean 96.34 Written Math Language .33 . WF = Writing Fluency.9 80 96.1 76 .50 .35 .22 .5 13.48 .28 .31 .24 .06 .8 SD  WISC–V 95. LNF = Letter Naming Facility.3 12.34 .26 .8 11.45 .42 .1 68 .08 .26 .31 .0 79 .25 .45 .7 12.31 .41 .34 .34 .11 . WRF = Word Recognition Fluency.09 .38 . RV = Reading Vocabulary. 1978).21 .20 MC 95.23 .8 12.18 .41 .10 WF LC 96.5 12.33 .35 .45 .11 . DF = Decoding Fluency.12 .41 Decoding 98. RC = Reading Comprehension.5 12.15 .35 .30 .3 11.31 .00 .5 13.50 .22 .5 80 .3 12.15 .3 12.39 .31 .27 .6 12.33 .55 98.12 .7 80 .6 12. WE = Written Expression.20 .15 .17 .5 31 .34 .2 99.18 .6 79 99.32 .4 99.8 80 .43 .6 80 .09 . SRF = Silent Reading Fluency.76 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson.27 .01 .32 . PP = Phonological Processing.18 .40 RC .19 .58 .08 .08 .48 97.23 .2 67 . 42 .27 LNF 127 127 127 127 127 127 127 127 n Note.08 .5 .49 .36 .4 .53 .57 Academic Skills Battery 11.57 .44 .36 .41 .34 .59 .4 124 97.23 .5 Mean 14.60 .37 . WF = Writing Fluency.45 .63 .61 .6 14.52 .26 15.35 .08 . WRF = Word Recognition Fluency. WE = Written Expression.6 127 99.31 . 1978).3 127 .53 .52 .4 120 .37 .46 .4 127 99.32 .54 .20 .38 .41 OE 99.34 .41 .50 .44 .4 14.39 .10 .44 .5 .3 127 .39 PP 100.7 124 .39 SP 14.12 .41 .51 .2 14.50 .56 .0 SD  WISC–V 13.50 .45 .04 .8 15.35 .9 126 100.7 14.46 .0 125 101.25 .40 .7 99. AF = Associational Fluency. SRF = Silent Reading Fluency.25 .9 –.39 15.4 127 99.3 14.09 .36 .2 127 97.50 97.0 127 97.7 122 .27 .15 .42 .30 .32 .51 .1 Reading Oral Oral Orthographic Academic Understanding Language Fluency Comprehension Expression Processing Fluency .45 .29 .25 .14 –.59 Decoding 12.04 .49 . KTEA–3 subtest abbreviations are: LWR = Letter & Word Recognition.48 .3 .47 .32 .12 .61 .52 .36 .18 .0 .40 99.44 .43 . ONF = Object Naming Facility.53 .53 WE 13.27 .51 .36 AF .24 .47 .28 .4 15. RV = Reading Vocabulary.36 .24 .55 .36 .35 .56 .7 127 NSI STI SRI KTEA–3 Mean SD  n .25 .2 126 100.41 .1 127 99.42 .55 .2 .8 .40 .24 .8 127 99.48 RV KTEA–3 Composites Reading Fluency 13.38 .25 .6 127 .0 12.9 122 100.7 98.40 SRF 99.21 .24 .07 .7 98. DF = Decoding Fluency.43 . .17 .52 Written Math Language 14.18 .47 .56 101.8 14.8 127 99.28 ONF 14.54 Ages 10–16 LWR NSL NSQ IST DST RST KTEA–3 Subtests Correlations Between WISC–V Complementary Scores and the KTEA–3. NWD = Nonsense Word Decoding.48 .43 13.42 .29 .56 .55 .40 .20 .24 .44 .10 .53 .38 .6 . PP = Phonological Processing.55 .40 .29 .36 .29 .5 .28 .47 .11 .31 .0 .47 .4 .43 . MF = Math Fluency.53 NSL NSQ IST DST RST WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score Reading .22 .57 SoundSymbol 14.51 .6 127 .38 99.49 .4 124 .50 .43 .54 .13 MF 14.51 .2 13.42 .17 .13 –.42 99.32 .39 .51 .9 .7 123 15.48 .52 MCA .33 .39 . SP = Spelling.2 126 .4 98.59 .50 .27 .6 100.40 .09 .22 .42 .17 .46 97.47 .06 .44 .14 .30 .21 .00 .45 99.4 14.1 13.47 .51 .6 .53 .48 .43 .57 .36 .01 .06 .37 .57 .1 125 .7 13.52 .27 .11 .0 14.55 .51 .58 .39 .38 .9 15.34 .1 126 .42 .5 121 .50 .56 .31 .38 .2 .59 .13 .31 .48 98.45 .25 .51 . MCA = Math Concepts & Applications.01 .19 .8 13.6 127 100.24 .45 –.9 125 103.46 .27 .51 100.47 . LC = Listening Comprehension.57 NWD 99.5 14.25 .57 .10 .5 .35 .55 99.40 .17 .32 .6 14. RC = Reading Comprehension. Inc.37 . by Age Group (continued) WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score Ages 10–16 Table H.53 .56 .35 .38 WRF DF 98.6 100. All correlations were corrected for the variability of the WISC–V normative sample (Guilford & Fruchter.54 .36 13.52 .8 127 100.2 14.16 .48 .6 13.42 RC 99.40 .13 .49 .3 14.25 .19 .15 . All rights reserved.77 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson.19 . MC = Math Computation.8 100.28 .30 WF LC 14.52 . .16 .19 .35 .4 122 NSI STI SRI KTEA–3 Mean SD  n 13.57 . OE = Oral Expression.59 .26 .3 13.63 .34 .1 .0 126 100.5 .31 .07 . LNF = Letter Naming Facility.40 .22 .41 MC 13.0 127 100. 39 .46 .38 .57 .12 –.19 .47 .60 .63 .28 .5 63 .69 .57 .36 .36 .36 .53 .28 .62 .9 14.13 –.11 .10 .19 .22 .16 .40 .26 .46 .26 .58 .68 .28 .26 .43 .31 .52 .43 .56 .34 .53 SC 99.32 .48 . 99.64 .55 .61 .12 .7 62 .1 62 .21 .53 .52 .28 .16 .34 . NO = Numerical Operations.59 .12 .29 .48 .36 .50 .20 .9 63 .51 .65 .37 .17 –.10 .40 .61 . MFM = Math Fluency–Multiplication.18 .02 .11 .14 .14 .5 66 .57 .46 .69 .56 .46 ERS 100.30 .48 .44 .62 .25 .08 .27 .7 12.10 .43 .45 .27 .41 .42 .12 .55 .39 .42 .61 .09 . ORF = Oral Reading Fluency.8 61 .27 .30 .9 11.53 .26 .33 .2 13.39 EC-GMa 99.04 .17 . All correlations were corrected for the variability of the WISC–V normative sample (Guilford & Fruchter.25 .43 .31 .52 WR 96.6 66 .56 .68 MPS 103.70 .0 62 .38 .61 .64 .6 14.35 .25 .24 .41 .18 .43 NO 99.48 .47 .51 .51 .38 .49 .28 .41 .46 .19 .25 .7 55 .37 .35 –.7 13.9 13.56 .69 .10 .07 .22 .33 –.1 15.43 .56 .57 .28 –.34 .31 .18 .10 .57 .47 .51 RC 99. EC-GM = Essay Composition: Grammar and Mechanics.01 .32 .2 61 .26 –.25 .32 .32 .68 .47 .51 EC 100.42 .23 .18 .26 .24 .62 .27 .56 .60 .65 .52 .70 .47 .57 .32 .58 .51 OE 101.16 .01 .46 .30 .60 .39 .35 .27 .50 .69 .45 .78 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson.31 .37 –.14 .23 .49 .68 .40 .29 .58 .16 –.45 ORAa 101.61 .07 . PD = Pseudoword Decoding.45 .47 ORRa SP 101.49 .33 .4 11.55 .73 .31 .11 .49 .41 .7 31 .1 14.22 –.44 .63 .57 .85 .28 .55 .43 .34 .05 .31 .36 . ORR = Oral Reading Rate.67 .59 . 1978).17 .63 . MFS = Math Fluency– Subtraction.35 .43 .15 .32 .34 .18 .18 .02 .23 .37 . SC = Sentence Composition. ERS = Early Reading Skills.33 .41 .20 .48 .29 .10 .71 .56 .5 14.54 .16 .5 31 .24 .41 .25 .30 .18 .50 MFA 99.22 .12 .32 .35 .52 ORF 100.61 .35 .47 MFM a Supplemental scores.53 .42 .71 .43 .29 .07 .03 .28 .56 .13 . AWF = Alphabet Writing Fluency.35 .27 .39 .31 .3 .38 .38 .51 .5 66 .21 .22 –.36 .24 .25 .28 .06 .40 .65 .40 .50 .35 .31 .12 .72 .31 .59 .23 –. WR = Word Reading.59 .11 .26 . SP = Spelling.18 .9 14.52 .17 .73 .16 .35 .59 .23 .35 .47 .14 .20 . OE = Oral Expression.60 .35 .25 .5 14.45 .28 .19 .30 .58 .26 .50 .4 13.46 .46 .53 LC WIAT–III Subtests Correlations Between the WISC–V and the WIAT–III.66 MFS 107.50 .41 .58 .29 .07 .30 .60 .21 .53 .27 .02 .0 13.36 .31 .36 .12 .08 .53 .53 .05 .39 .37 .21 .26 .42 .49 .34 .47 .09 .51 .34 .47 .26 .36 .38 .66 .39 .24 .37 . RC = Reading Comprehension.66 .50 .35 .16 .51 .01 .3 17.26 .01 .07 –. ORA = Oral Reading Accuracy.61 .21 .58 100.32 .35 .24 .2 66 .57 .51 .63 .45 .39 .67 . WIAT–III subtest abbreviations are: LC = Listening Comprehension.35 .7 31 .61 .37 .52 .70 .8 66 Mean SD  n 100.40 –.45 .43 .22 .41 .45 .71 .39 .39 –.01 .25 .24 .20 .31 .06 .16 .17 .50 .12 .38 .26 .44 .54 .60 .46 .34 .02 .26 .49 .17 .41 .21 .39 .32 .44 .57 .35 .6 61 .57 .24 .14 .39 .31 .39 .40 .9 14.41 .3 55 .54 .35 –.51 .48 .52 .28 .30 .51 .4 12.61 .38 .14 .54 .22 .38 .50 .14 .40 . MPS = Math Problem Solving. EC = Essay Composition.47 .33 .48 .46 .8 13. All rights reserved.71 .47 .48 .39 .55 .34 .21 .20 .34 .20 .32 .34 .72 .58 .06 .31 .03 .19 .23 .21 .11 .51 .77 .54 .47 .25 .51 .57 .22 .44 .46 .45 .53 .14 .28 .24 . Inc.54 .28 .21 . Note.55 .50 .39 .38 .69 .09 . by Age Group SI VC IN CO BD VP MR FW PC AR DS PS LN CD SS CA VCI VSI FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI WIAT–III WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score Ages 6–9 Table H.31 . .34 .32 –.39 .44 PD 99.16 AWF 98.5 61 .30 .33 . MFA = Math Fluency–Addition.53 .60 .46 .13 .49 .50 .34 .54 . 01 .48 .5 99.4 99.51 .63 . All rights reserved.33 .64 .32 .44 .82 .66 Total Achievement 9.42 .70 .53 .62 .47 .48 .21 .38 .47 .72 .5 9.63 .3 10.55 .46 .45 .31 –.8 14.05 .63 .65 .32 .8 9.31 .9 2.32 .38 .22 .56 .56 .9 2.41 .65 .44 .68 .46 .28 .38 .19 .27 –.64 .3 2.63 .54 .72 .65 .68 Math Fluency 100.5 61 .36 .27 .28 .40 .0 60 .49 .7 13.24 .2 66 Mean SD  n 101.34 .1 12.68 .12 .57 .40 .1 12.0 2.3 102.41 . .3 9.64 .1 43 .33 . by Age Group (continued) SI VC IN CO BD VP MR FW PC AR DS PS LN CD SS CA VCI VSI FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI WIAT–III WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score Ages 6–9 Table H.42 .08 .64 Mathematics Note.9 9.18 .57 .52 .39 .2 9.49 .22 .73 .46 .59 .9 11.71 .31 .26 .7 11.1 12.58 .44 .6 13.5 14.30 –.02 .36 .4 10.69 .2 2.64 .4 9.31 .6 9.47 .75 .24 .03 .40 .46 .68 .22 .4 61 .32 .40 .5 100.0 9.45 .32 .13 .66 .9 97. All correlations were corrected for the variability of the WISC–V normative sample (Guilford & Fruchter.39 .51 .25 .63 .9 10.6 99.44 .74 .44 .2 98.48 .36 .44 .56 .55 .66 .38 .02 .1 10.35 .46 .57 Oral Language Reading Comprehension and Fluency WIAT–III Composites Correlations Between the WISC–V and the WIAT–III.43 .9 Mean 2.44 .50 .36 .24 .58 .5 12.41 .61 .0 102.24 .32 .25 .47 .7 3.32 –.23 .54 .53 .35 .72 .6 12.28 .59 .1 100.43 .39 .26 .54 .56 Total Reading 99.41 .49 .9 10.17 .5 2.2 14.62 .0 10.66 .16 .57 .42 .51 . 99.78 .65 .55 .1 12.02 .41 .1 99.5 11.43 .39 .49 .7 3.36 .72 .38 .8 12.40 .29 .59 .44 .50 Basic Reading 102.2 99.29 .2 98.24 .7 2.48 .29 .79 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson.25 .0 13. Inc.60 .55 .0 65 .64 .8 2.67 .24 .38 .7 2.8 2.59 99.3 13.33 .0 14.49 .5 2.71 .62 .59 .32 .59 .59 .67 .52 .67 .65 .09 .42 . 1978).73 .54 .5 2.72 .16 .27 .62 .56 .26 .24 .5 2.51 .38 .52 .9 SD  WISC–V n 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 65 66 66 65 66 66 66 66 66 65 65 64 66 65 65 66 64 .7 59 .19 –.38 .2 13.64 .54 Written Expression 99.12 .9 66 .7 10.32 .24 .56 .46 . 08 –.24 .9 145 .25 .61 . MFM = Math Fluency–Multiplication.18 .47 .23 .40 .15 . ERS = Early Reading Skills.21 .22 .19 .15 .27 .44 .24 .25 .26 .29 .16 .01 .13 .52 .55 .49 MFS 99.12 .1 145 Mean SD  n 102.01 .24 .60 .35 .28 .29 .22 .50 .20 .40 .24 .50 .27 .33 .31 .14 .56 .11 .34 .16 –.6 12.16 .01 .36 .20 .16 .15 .26 .34 .16 .31 .32 .43 .42 .60 .1 145 .36 .13 .51 .44 .45 .21 .40 . WIAT–III subtest abbreviations are: LC = Listening Comprehension.25 .17 .37 .44 MFM Note.39 .47 .36 .30 .23 .34 SC 102.33 .38 .5 145 .4 13.20 .47 .19 . EC-GM = Essay Composition: Grammar and Mechanics.33 .01 .14 .08 .32 .18 .31 EC-GMa 102.43 .57 .31 .27 .13 .14 .18 .46 .32 . ORA = Oral Reading Accuracy.46 .67 .23 .27 .34 .19 .15 .7 16.31 .07 .54 .17 .27 .22 –.35 SI VC IN CO BD VP MR FW PC AR DS PS LN CD SS CA VCI VSI FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI WIAT–III RC PD LC WIAT–III Subtests WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score Correlations Between the WISC–V and the WIAT–III.18 . 1978).56 .48 .23 .26 .38 . .28 .18 .24 .69 .27 .11 .40 .2 16.22 .80 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson.51 .26 .28 101.55 .12 .39 .25 .13 .62 .7 145 .47 .14 .1 11.29 .41 .2 12.46 .25 . All correlations were corrected for the variability of the WISC–V normative sample (Guilford & Fruchter.41 .51 .04 . PD = Pseudoword Decoding.59 .45 .24 .33 .22 .10 .1 144 .33 .51 .63 .06 .34 .33 .09 .35 .33 .04 .0 145 .5 12.54 .22 .8 143 .39 .51 .56 .34 .14 .18 .0 13. OE = Oral Expression.39 .18 .39 .48 .20 .5 12.43 .52 .15 .15 .35 .01 .29 EC 101.07 .37 .55 .48 .06 .37 .20 .22 .51 .14 .22 .35 101.08 .29 .26 .33 .25 .18 .07 . MFS = Math Fluency–Subtraction.22 .30 .32 .52 .37 .39 .40 .12 .46 .43 .43 .3 145 .23 . by Age Group (continued) Ages 10–16 Table H.46 NO 101.44 .18 .42 .25 –.46 .18 .64 .43 .27 .28 .42 .13 .20 .39 .30 . Inc.50 .52 .24 .28 .32 .05 .16 .2 145 .38 .41 MFA 99.23 .37 . WR = Word Reading.8 12.5 9.37 WR 101.50 .01 .37 .37 .05 .23 .42 .8 12.37 .17 .51 .25 .27 .22 .50 .26 .19 .22 .31 .19 .40 .06 .24 .32 .43 .20 .27 .30 .14 .23 .12 .32 .23 .26 .24 .38 .52 .21 .24 .20 .45 .35 .31 .3 12.06 .34 .00 .37 . NO = Numerical Operations.13 .58 .04 .21 .10 .37 .36 .17 .20 .24 .39 .4 145 .42 . EC = Essay Composition.47 .25 .35 MPS 100.32 .39 .46 .57 .55 .3 143 .29 .24 .01 .26 . All rights reserved.34 .21 .51 .10 .46 .31 .30 .41 .57 .20 –.15 .64 .05 .23 .30 .26 .45 .45 .42 . ORR = Oral Reading Rate.19 .34 .00 .35 .10 .13 .51 .26 . SP = Spelling.37 .46 .40 .14 .3 12.50 .40 .21 .44 .39 .50 .00 .38 .51 .28 .35 .42 .07 .4 9.38 ORRa 100.39 . ORF = Oral Reading Fluency.59 .65 .31 .01 .45 .37 .50 .27 .11 .50 SP 100.41 .40 .37 .12 .19 .25 .09 .9 145 a Supplemental scores.12 .3 .22 .24 .56 .25 .68 .31 .39 . MPS = Math Problem Solving.39 .46 .14 .22 .40 .11 .37 .72 .36 .21 .24 .39 .21 .28 .39 ORF 99.39 .08 .31 .45 .63 .44 .2 13.02 .49 .03 .32 .55 .40 .70 .24 ORAa 103.27 .48 .23 .28 .26 .40 .58 .15 .36 .35 OE 104.10 .66 .16 .30 .58 .48 .01 .11 .32 .34 .26 .9 145 .44 .29 .41 .25 .43 .60 .39 .0 145 .45 .21 .54 .51 . AWF = Alphabet Writing Fluency.36 .29 .53 . 104.27 . . MFA = Math Fluency–Addition.24 .38 .33 .7 144 .66 .23 .32 .27 .24 .31 .0 145 .8 13.26 . RC = Reading Comprehension.17 .32 . SC = Sentence Composition.56 .08 . 51 .0 10.24 .25 .39 Basic Reading 103.49 .3 10.3 10.77 .0 13.42 .19 .04 .48 .32 .43 .4 10.48 .49 .64 .51 .24 .60 .60 .26 .25 .7 15.6 2.4 2.06 .49 Math Fluency 102.34 .65 .24 .51 .69 .9 143 .34 .73 .30 .31 .31 .43 .31 .56 .28 .2 100.53 .37 .09 .62 .13 .30 .6 2.38 .1 9.50 .1 10.40 .34 .56 .42 .16 .41 .53 Total Achievement 10.63 .47 .51 .2 100.32 .31 . All correlations were corrected for the variability of the WISC–V normative sample (Guilford & Fruchter.6 11.81 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson.25 .72 .43 .22 . All rights reserved.2 99.55 .42 .30 .0 Mean 2.25 .49 .34 .1 100.40 .57 .42 100.33 .35 . Inc.46 .53 .07 .7 2.49 .54 .69 .16 .5 12.59 .24 .23 .52 .49 .20 .5 99.18 .45 .27 .48 .32 .3 99.54 .0 13.27 .67 .57 .45 .19 . 1978).27 .4 144 .33 .32 .22 .45 . .68 .42 .46 .58 .6 13.46 Mathematics Note.7 13.29 .53 .0 13.2 10.39 .5 100.43 .51 .58 .67 .64 . 103.26 .2 2.46 .9 10.56 .42 .44 .7 2.33 .45 .41 .55 .14 .35 .9 2.22 .5 2.1 10.8 2.36 .14 .0 9.9 12.37 .6 145 .7 13.24 .9 13.5 145 .62 .63 .45 .8 2.58 .35 .60 .7 2.8 12.31 .71 .46 .47 .23 .5 11.19 .44 .19 .32 .72 .19 .16 .10 .62 .5 13.54 .6 141 .08 .30 .4 10.75 .70 .8 100.37 .36 .46 .3 101.31 .54 .21 .45 .44 .56 .4 101.49 .7 2.6 2.0 10.57 .21 .9 SD  WISC–V n 145 145 145 145 145 145 145 144 145 145 145 145 145 145 145 145 145 145 144 145 145 144 144 145 144 144 145 .32 .43 .22 .50 .60 .6 100.40 .58 .34 .46 .47 .50 .32 .25 .35 .11 .43 .33 .53 .51 .61 .6 2.20 .46 Total Reading 102.46 .4 11. by Age Group (continued) SI VC IN CO BD VP MR FW PC AR DS PS LN CD SS CA VCI VSI FRI WMI PSI FSIQ QRI AWMI NVI GAI CPI WIAT–III WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score Ages 10–16 Table H.0 10.74 .4 145 .8 11.03 .3 10.40 .6 144 Mean SD  n 102.55 .80 .47 Written Expression 101.37 .49 .10 .41 .34 .62 .32 .42 .49 .12 .06 .1 100.2 10.63 .56 .39 Oral Language Reading Comprehension and Fluency WIAT–III Composites Correlations Between the WISC–V and the WIAT–III.3 11.31 .4 142 .04 .8 3.47 .52 .0 11.22 .24 .9 10. 3 55 99.21 .22 .9 63 .41 RC .28 .10 .21 .46 .30 . EC-GM = Essay Composition: Grammar and Mechanics.43 .10 .08 .35 .24 .28 .19 .5 63 .0 65 .0 13.21 .18 .5 14.21 .2 13.43 .06 .7 12.82 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson.35 .7 31 .14 .50 .12 .25 .47 .44 ORF 101.7 31 .42 .18 EC 100.2 13.23 MFM a Supplemental scores.47 –.27 . EC = Essay Composition.6 61 .07 .37 .42 .31 .54 .40 .24 .01 .17 .35 .10 .30 .41 .40 SC 99.48 .7 59 99.3 100.38 .22 .22 .26 .44 .49 .19 .21 .11 .3 14.25 .5 14.17 .32 .34 .48 .23 .48 LC 98.21 .35 .40 AWF 96.47 . OE = Oral Expression.1 98.03 .25 .18 .24 .7 13.28 . Inc.30 .08 .42 .5 14.45 Basic Reading 103.23 .7 13. SC = Sentence Composition.30 .46 .33 .8 66 99.2 66 Total Reading 100.25 . MFA = Math Fluency–Addition.9 14.04 –.33 .18 .24 .20 .19 .41 100.17 .8 12.33 .38 101.6 66 .5 14.4 11.36 Written Expression WIAT–III Composites 99.5 98. RC = Reading Comprehension.42 .32 .04 . NSL NSQ IST DST RST NSI STI SRI WIAT–III Mean SD  n WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score Ages 6–9 NSL NSQ IST DST RST NSI STI SRI WIAT–III Mean SD  n WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score Ages 6–9 Table H.8 101.5 61 .30 .02 .13 –. All rights reserved.47 . PD = Pseudoword Decoding.18 .40 .1 12.20 .55 OE Correlations Between WISC–V Complementary Scores and the WIAT–III.9 14.1 SD  WISC–V 99.21 .13 .8 14.6 14.20 . ORA = Oral Reading Accuracy.34 .44 . MFS = Math Fluency– Subtraction.12 .14 EC-GMa 102.26 .39 NO WIAT–III Subtests 99.2 66 . by Age Group 102.21 .36 .38 –.51 Mathematics 99.7 55 .52 MPS .18 .22 .27 . ERS = Early Reading Skills.13 .09 .02 –.19 .32 .14 .9 66 .36 .4 .56 Oral Language .28 .1 15.10 .23 .18 –.9 13.40 .38 .33 ERS .11 .22 .1 43 .39 .21 .06 .10 .53 . MPS = Math Problem Solving.13 . ORF = Oral Reading Fluency.13 –.41 .0 60 .34 ORRa SP 101.32 .38 .5 98.9 14.1 14.23 . Note.8 13.39 .29 MFA 15. WR = Word Reading.54 .19 .18 .20 .26 .8 15.39 .2 61 .9 14.0 62 .5 61 . SP = Spelling.20 .16 .33 .46 ORAa 101.42 .3 17.18 .36 Reading Comprehension and Fluency 99.5 66 .35 .5 31 .5 11.37 .29 –.40 .1 Mean 100.35 .21 .5 66 .21 . NO = Numerical Operations.1 62 .17 .19 .44 PD 99.11 .20 .33 .20 .27 . MFM = Math Fluency–Multiplication.31 –.30 .4 12. ORR = Oral Reading Rate.12 .22 .18 .26 .46 WR 99.23 .28 .4 13.7 62 .19 .22 .41 .0 14.41 .57 .25 .32 MFS 64 66 66 66 66 64 66 64 n 107.8 61 .15 .03 –.9 11.41 Total Achievement 100.31 .12 . AWF = Alphabet Writing Fluency.41 .24 .28 . 100.19 .11 .1 14.6 98.42 .4 61 .37 Math Fluency 101. 1978).23 .53 –.0 13.20 .03 .4 12.26 .21 .4 100. All correlations were corrected for the variability of the WISC–V normative sample (Guilford & Fruchter.41 .45 .18 . WIAT–III subtest abbreviations are: LC = Listening Comprehension. 26 Math Fluency 103.6 97.34 .37 .4 9.33 .21 .45 . MFA = Math Fluency–Addition.28 .26 .13 .20 .26 .2 12.39 .7 100.35 .39 .7 144 .18 .34 . ORF = Oral Reading Fluency.4 144 .23 Basic Reading 102.17 .18 100. WR = Word Reading.5 13.25 . MFM = Math Fluency–Multiplication.33 .19 .22 .28 .14 .14 .1 145 .23 .35 .14 .5 11.8 13.28 .8 11.5 145 .21 .37 .39 .8 143 . Inc.33 . NO = Numerical Operations. 1978).38 .8 14.16 .53 .3 143 .36 Oral Language 104.41 .23 .6 12.27 . MFS = Math Fluency– Subtraction.6 144 NSI STI SRI WIAT–III Mean SD  n 100.02 .3 145 .45 .1 144 .25 . All correlations were corrected for the variability of the WISC–V normative sample (Guilford & Fruchter.05 .15 .12 .28 .4 142 .8 12.38 .21 . SC = Sentence Composition.16 .4 13. Note.30 Total Reading 101.48 .27 .31 .37 .36 103.06 .4 145 .37 .31 .5 12.21 .27 .31 .37 .7 13.3 11.24 . AWF = Alphabet Writing Fluency. ERS = Early Reading Skills.7 16.35 .06 .9 13.39 .02 NSI STI SRI WIAT–III .39 .41 .18 .42 .45 .40 .20 .5 145 .22 .05 .23 .40 99.0 145 .0 145 .35 .0 145 .40 .33 .5 97.08 .24 .13 ORAa Mathematics 104.1 145 NSL NSQ IST DST RST WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score Ages 10–16 Mean SD  n .9 Mean 99.1 11.16 .29 .21 .10 .38 .13 102.6 11.9 145 .4 SD  WISC–V 145 145 145 145 145 145 145 145 n a Supplemental scores. PD = Pseudoword Decoding.14 .03 .39 .83 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson.07 .24 102.3 12.9 143 .13 .8 98.04 .6 13. 102.21 .49 .30 101.4 .29 .08 NO DST RST .47 .30 .39 . SP = Spelling.41 .35 MFA 99.13 .2 16.33 .21 .24 .33 .17 .27 .39 .15 .45 .34 .20 .32 ORF 99.28 .31 .26 .3 10. OE = Oral Expression.42 .19 .28 ORRa 100.38 .5 98.9 145 102.26 .27 .38 .37 .2 13.26 101.14 .49 .37 .5 12.5 9.7 145 .09 .33 .20 .2 145 .3 12.08 EC-GMa IST .35 .9 145 .35 .3 13.35 .29 MFS Total Achievement 100. WIAT–III subtest abbreviations are: LC = Listening Comprehension.14 EC . MPS = Math Problem Solving.8 12.21 SP 100.29 102.29 .20 .32 .08 .40 .9 14.06 .29 Reading Comprehension and Fluency 101.29 .26 .15 .30 .37 .13 .22 .43 .09 .29 .42 .18 .7 13.11 .36 .29 .15 .31 .05 .39 . EC = Essay Composition. RC = Reading Comprehension.23 .32 103.39 .4 145 .8 100. All rights reserved. .28 . by Age Group (continued) Ages 10–16 Table H.0 13.22 OE .39 .6 12.29 .21 .23 .5 97.03 WR NSL NSQ SC PD MPS LC RC WIAT–III Subtests WISC–V Subtest/ Composite Score Correlations Between WISC–V Complementary Scores and the WIAT–III.33 .8 13.32 .18 .31 .31 .26 .25 . EC-GM = Essay Composition: Grammar and Mechanics.32 MFM 14. ORR = Oral Reading Rate.14 .30 101.46 .13 .37 . ORA = Oral Reading Accuracy.6 145 .29 .35 Written Expression WIAT–III Composites 101.6 141 .43 . Guilford. (2008). M.). Minneapolis. Traumatic brain injury of childhood. P. NY: McGraw-Hill. Donders. C. (1978).. All rights reserved. Behavior assessment system for children (2nd ed. Test theory. Reynolds. R. Wechsler individual achievement test (3rd ed. Bloomington. . Intellectual disability: Definition. Arlington. (1996). (2005). Cohen. (2009).). (2002). Inc.. Wechsler intelligence scale for children (4th ed. B. (2013). Brown attention-deficit disorder scales for children and adolescents. D. American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. Cicchetti. Delis rating of executive functioning. A. Ricker (Eds. MN: Pearson. W.. S. H. T. H. D. MN: Pearson. J. & Yen.). Textbook of clinical neuropsychology (pp. & Kamphaus. Reading. Morgan & J. V. (1967). & Fruchter. E. IL: Waveland Press. R. B.). D.. TX: The Psychological Corporation.. Explaining psychological statistics. W. D.). (2001). J. E.). VA: American Psychiatric Association. (2004). Brown. Long Grove. DC: Author. Magnusson. D. MN: Pearson. Vineland adaptive behavior scales (2nd ed. In J. Bloomington. and systems of supports (11th ed. MA: Addison-Wesley. Bloomington. classification. Pacific Grove. Fundamental statistics in psychology and education (6th ed. & Balla. (2003). San Antonio. TX: Author. S.References Allen. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed. New York: Taylor & Francis. (2012). Wechsler. CA: Brooks & Cole. 158–170). Delis. American Psychiatric Association. MN: Pearson. J.). Sparrow. New York. 84 WISC–V Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement • Copyright © 2014 NCS Pearson. San Antonio. Washington. Pearson. M. Introduction to measurement theory. (2010).).