UCONVERSON ORDER2011

Four Winds 10 - NewsMATERIAL FROM DOUGLAS DUFF • Home • About Four Winds • Our Mission • Phoenix Archives • Phoenix Journals • Unpublished Journals • The Spectrum Newspapers • The Law of the Creation and the Laws of God • THE LAWS OF GOD AND THE CREATION by Patrick H. Bellringer • Bellringer's Corner • Hello Central • People of the Lie • Vital Articles • Writings • Meditation • Poetry • Songs • Prayers • Anne Bellringer • Nesara • News/Casper Updates • History • Government • Banking • Homeland Security • Fraud • 9/11 • U.S. Gov. • Israel • NWO • U.S. Constitution • War • Judicial • Corporate US • Obama Gov. • Law Enforcement • • • • • Immigration History • Zionism • American • European • World • Middle East • • Asia • Cosmic Health • Aleternative Medicine • Africa • Disease • Vaccinations • Food • Drugs • Crime • Morality • Racism • Prisons • Abuse • Fraud • Mind Control • Safety • More » Spiritual • Inspirational • Hatonn • Sananda • Germain • General Channelings • Earth/Transition • Prayer • Thoughts Environment • Humans • Chemtrails • Nuclear • Pollution • Plants/Animals • Earth Changes • Weather/Climate • Disaster Relief • Agriculture • Business • Economy • Currency • Corp. Fraud • Corp. Growth • Science • Energy/Free Energy • DNA/GMO • Computers • New Technologies/Inventions • Cloning • More • Business • Education • Entertainment • Environment • Media • Peace Freedom • Projects • Religion Cults • Science Technology • Space • Spectrum • Spiritual • Valley Of Radiance • Media • Photo Galleries • Photo Search • Slideshows • Video Galleries þÿ Search Custom Search Select LanguageAfrikaansAlbanianArabicBelarusianBulgarianCatalanChinese (Simplified)Chinese (Traditional)CroatianCzechDanishDutchEstonianFilipinoFinnishFrenchGalicianGermanGreekHaitian CreoleHebrewHindiHungarianIcelandicIndonesianIrishItalianJapaneseKoreanLatvianLithuanianMaced onianMalayMalteseNorwegianPersianPolishPortugueseRomanianRussianSerbianSlovakSlovenianSpan ishSwahiliSwedishThaiTurkishUkrainianVietnameseWelshYiddish CENTRAL!' A FREEMAN ON THE LAND! CASPER OPINION: AUGUST 11. VI – PHOENIX JOURNAL #34 . PART XI: AT A GRAND CROSSROADS 'HELLO. 2011 THE SACRED SPIRIT WITHIN – MITAKUYE OYASIN (for all my relations—which is ALL) –PLEIADES CONNECTION VOL.Report DEATHS OF SEAL TEAM 6 EXPOSED Peter Paul & Mary . Paul & Mary .3 in D flat MONSANTO PREYS ON POPULARITY OF OMEGA-3s BY EVELOPING GMO SOYBEAN THAT PRODUCES FAKE FISH OIL Peter.CHAPTER 3 APPEALS COURT RULES AGAINST OBAMACARE INSURANCE Mark Farago plays Liszt Consolation No.Blowin in the wind A Parasite On The World The Assault on Online Privacy FT: SEC Investigating S&P Employees for Insider Trading Over Downgrade of US Debt Schriever air base space wing gets new commander What's to be Done With the Jews? The moral decay of our society is as bad at the top as the bottom Object 1 .CHAPTER 4 THE SACRED SPIRIT WITHIN – MITAKUYE OYASIN (for all my relations—which is ALL) – PLEIADES CONNECTION SERIES VI – PHOENIX JOURNAL #35 .Powered by Translate MATERIAL FROM DOUGLAS DUFF More Recent Stories • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • A PRAYER FOR AMERICA THE DIVINE PLAN.If I Had A Hammer South Africa is not going to nationalize its mines . PART XII: A TIME OF TRANSITION THE DIVINE PLAN. eBay. Yahoo!. Facebook. MySpace. 2010) The Jewish hand behind Internet . 89 CJS EXHIBIT F – DOCUMENT IN SUPPORT OF CHARGING ORDER EXHIBIT G – PARSON EXHIBIT H – TESTAMENTARY AFFIDAVIT EXHIBIT I – LETTER ROGATORY EXHIBIT J – DIPLOMATIC PROTEST EXHIBIT K – INTERLOCKING DIRECTORATES EXHIBIT L – DEMAND FOR EXCHANGE OF VALUE EXHIBIT M – INLAND EMPIRE UNDER MOYTOY EXHIBIT N – FIRST CORPORATE DIPLOMATIC PROTEST EXHIBIT O – CHRISTIAN APPELLATION EXHIBIT P – UCC 1 SHOWING LIEN CREDITOR EXHIBIT Q1 – BENEFICIARY TO THE ORIGINAL TRUST .Most Emailed • • • • • BAKING SODA AND MAPLE SYRUP CANCER TREATMENT (Updated March 13..Google. Wikipedia. Bush 'Drunk As A Monkey' At the Olympics US Orders Blackout Over North Korean Torpedoing Of Gulf Of Mexico Oil Rig Douglas Duff Object 2 INDEX 01 APPOINTMENT OF NOMINEE 02 NOTICE OF APPOINTMENT OF SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE 03a NOTICE OF INTENT TO DISCOVER DISHONEST ACTS 03b SUMMARY OF INTENDED DIRECTION 04a REVOCATION OF POWER OF ATTORNEY 04b RELEASE OF POWER OF PROPERTY 05 POWERS OF ATTORNEY COVER LETTER I COVER LETTER II EXHIBIT A – COPY OF BIRTH CERTIFICATE EXHIBIT A2 – COPY OF BACK OF BIRTH CERTIFICATE EXHIBIT B – PHOTO COPY OF SS CARD. Photos of George W.. DRIVER LICENSE EXHIBIT C – COPY OF DD 214 (if discharged from military) EXHIBIT D – COPY OF HIGH SCHOOL DIPLOMA (or where it can be validated) EXHIBIT E – TRUST RECEIPTS. therefore.. or those administering for said "person" outside their corporate "body" has the responsibility of acting and reacting within the parameters of "Common Law".) we find that ". government. an invisible incorporeal being. creating a corporation. and etc...where there is a capacity to take and hold. but the obligations for corporate. existing only in contemplation of law. 420 (Pet. Com. PROPRIETORS OF.." Then we find that. This and other franchises are the ligaments which unite a body of men into one. so that the property of the society may pass to successors instead of heirs.. body. Every "person".. "It is the object and effect of the incorporation. 223). STRAIGHT BILL OF LADING ******************************************************************8 EXHIBIT Y – Grantor NOT a Franchise Grantor explicitly denies being a Franchise. not “persons. action.S.. 1 Bl. and regulations. not subject to any fiction of law or corporation.." Please note near the beginning in bold ". rules. or any part of a franchise. Action for neglect to prevent ….” are the State. it states: “Every person who. 2011 .. codes.. ". Termes de la Ley 123. yes. Claimant has no record or evidence that any corporation has a "Right of Soil". to give to the artificial person the same capacity and rights as a natural person can have. a metaphysical person (2 Pet. but having the properties of individuality . for the benefit of any corporate function. privileged "persons" cannot be enforced upon any Private Man." and. 420 (1837) 36 U.EXHIBIT Q2 – GOVERNMENT IS TRUSTEE. Now we have discovered that a Corporation is a person. So with that in mind.where there is a capacity to take and hold. even a natural person. 368-72.S.. agency. having knowledge that any wrongs conspired or to be done… and having power to prevent or aid in preventing … Neglects or refuses so to do … shall be liable to the party injured…” ********************************************************************* DIVERSION ORDER STRAIGHT BILL OF LADING Date: August 15... It is understood that all "persons" are governed by statutes.. the People. the only thing wanting is the franchise of succession. NOT BENEFICIARY EXHIBIT R – CLAIM OF FAMOUS MARK EXHIBIT S – CLAIM OF OWNERSHIP EXHIBIT T – NOTICE OF BIRTHRIGHT EXHIBIT U – NOTICE OF EXPATRIATION/REPATRIATION EXHIBIT V – GRANTOR INJURED BEYOND DAMAGE RECOVERY EXHIBIT W – CLAIM OF POSTLIMINY EXHIBIT X – DEMAND FOR FULL DISCLOSURE EXHIBIT Y – GRANTOR NOT A FRANCHISE EXHIBIT Z – DIVERSION ORDER. except the State Republic chartered. and knit them together as a natural person (4 Co. or other “entitlement” outside of Grantor’s own autonomous Free Inhabitancy.. Wrongful actions by any corporate entity that bring upon Private Man injury shall be recompensed with remedy under Common Law." is a stipulation that only applies to the ability to "take and hold [TITLE]".. remember. Libellees have given the person.they can take and enjoy property to the extent of their franchises as fully as an individual. 65 a). to wit: In PROPRIETORS OF CHARLES RIVER BRIDGE v. knowledge! Under USC Title 42 §1986. which governs the natural Man. And. 36 U. latter is under duty to make fully and truthful disclosure of all material facts and is liable for misrepresentation or concealment.2011 Number: Lien Notice ID 1563097981219/Case Number 000250752 Consignor: IRS AGENTS Consigned to: Little-John: Stewart The undersigned consignor under your straight bill of lading number 000250752. __________ (city).. ____________________________________________ Little-John: Stewart ******************************************************************************** EXHIBIT X – Demand for Full Disclosure Claimant/Grantor does herein order all de facto agencies of the UNITED STATES government and all related and subordinate agencies to disclose the True and Complete Facts and Details of all monetary. ___________ (state). 213. 619 P 2d 485.” Universal Inv. The undersigned will pay all reasonable costs and charges of this diversion on your reasonable request. or have been. OF MONTGOMERY________________ (address). withheld from ready access by Grantor to be released immediately to Grantor.” Stewart v Phoenix Nat. _________ (state). as per: “Concealing a material fact when there is duty to disclose may be actionable fraud. __________ (city). The undersigned shall indemnify and hold you harmless for any loss.To: PRINCE GEORGES COUNTY COURT __________________________________ __________________________________ (address) RECONSIGNMENT OR DIVERSION ORDER Straight Bill of Lading Dated: 12/19. of _______________________ (address). ___________ (county). Co v Sahara Motor Inn. hereby instructs you to disregard the original instructions as to place of delivery and recipient on the bill and to divert and deliver the goods to __________. 49 Ariz. dated 12/19/2011. damage. or expenses in the event the diversion or reconsignment is challenged. at _________ (location). and negotiable instrument investments pertaining to the accounts of Grantor that are being. 127 Ariz. Bank. 34. (Ariz. 64 P 2d 101. (Ariz App 1980) “Where one under duty of trust or confidence exists between two parties so that one places peculiar reliance in trustworthiness of another. covering goods described in the bill of lading as ____________. and warrants its authority to effect this diversion or reconsignment. issued by you to CONTROLLER. and avoid Fraud and Deception. Inc. currency. 1937) EXHIBIT T NOTICE OF BIRTHRIGHT AND RIGHT OF SOIL . _________ (county). surety. or trade material. Fictions. jurisdiction. and are distinguished from legitimate children. or any fiction of character. or right of soil in and to the territory.. 212 (1845).Maryland is therefore entitled to the sovereignty and jurisdiction over all the territory within her limits. Claimant is a Living Man with Standing upon the Land. Therefore. LittleJohn: Stewart. or has. introduced and witnessed. Yahweh.. please take Notice of the following: POLLARD v. the United States have no constitutional capacity to exercise municipal jurisdiction.. EXHIBIT R CLAIM OF “FAMOUS MARK” . the same time had. within the limits of a State or elsewhere. and Corporate Representatives that the Natal Soil of this Child of the Egyptian/Moor Birthright was NOT a "Port of Entry" for any newly berthed "Legal Entity" to be entered into the fictional. but without limited liability. or any other juristic "person". From Bouvier's Law Dictionary. and by way of this Notice of Birthright. ********************************************************************* . chattel. conceived and born. and that the water from his Mother’s womb was the only water whereby Claimant was “born”. brought forward in deceit.. presumption. "We think a proper examination of this subject will show that the United States never held any municipal sovereignty. into the Birthright of Jacob/Israel. given into the hand of a hired liar and deceiver (a fiction). or bastards. legal entity. This Notice of Birthright is offered as Corrective NOTICE that any Certificates of Birth entered into the fictional corporate world of commerce is based in fraud. save Claimant's Master. hereinafter referred to as “Claimant. Claimant being the sixth of eight children. factional or corporate marketplace as bond. or eminent domain..S. stock.” celebrated Claimant’s Nativity on September 09. being of Indigenous Ancient Egyptian Moor and Washtawataa descent and stock. This NOTICE of Birthright is Fair Notice and Warning for any and all Actors. without limits. Claimant explicitly denies any association with the “berthing” of a new vessel in the world of commerce other than Claimant’s own “person”. debtor). subject to the common law. As all jurisdiction flows from Right of Soil. offers testimony before any Juristic Society. and stands as correction of any assumption. be informed. Republic of Maryland. Claimant plainly declares that he was “birthed” of the water from his Mother’s womb upon the dry land of the Nation of Maryland.. propagated in fraud. the only begotten sons. with entry into the Family Bible. under lawful Christian parentage." Claimant reserves the right to amend in order that the truth be ascertained and justly determined. this Claimant. yielding nothing to the assumption that any vessel owned by any legal entity. debtor (dead – deador. in any amount. except in the cases in which it is expressly granted. upon the American terra firma. in the image of his Heavenly Father who is Creator of all that is. or position in any corporate realm to the contrary.. legal fiction. any semblance of association with Claimant. With this knowledge of the Truth. that Claimant is not "bonded or bound" to any. or near. Claimant cannot be induced into any "body politic" contrary with sound Christian Doctrine instilled upon Claimant’s conscience. sovereignty. on Douglas County. or corporate association that may have been created at. and joined in deliberate and malicious trespass upon the conscience and free will of a man bearing the Birthright of Jacob/Israel and Right of Soil. Claimant is NOT a corporation. “THE MOST HIGH ANU”. working in conjunction with the Courts of that day. born a legitimate child. fiction. Counsel of Men. an estimated 2000 years ago. take Notice: The married parents of this living man. NATURAL CHILDREN. legal fiction. . HAGAN. debt. “In the phraseology of the English or American law..[B]ecause. .. Claimant declares full Rights as a Legitimate Child under the Law. who became Claimant's surety by way of Blood Sacrifice at the Price of thirty pieces of silver (a commercial transaction). 1944. 44 U. …” Claimant makes known to the entire world that. futures. within the surveyed geographical boundaries of the organic State of Maryland and in capita holder in due course by Birthright. bearing to this day and forward the Birthright and Promise of Claimant's Creator. of which Alabama or any of the new States were formed. natural children are children born out of wedlock.TO WHOM THESE PRESENTS COME. equity. assures all that Claimant is a living man of substance and surety and able to give credit where Claimant chooses.. but not limited to— (A) the degree of inherent or acquired distinctiveness of the mark. or to cause mistake. (B) the duration and extent of use of the mark in connection with the goods or services with which the mark is used. false descriptions. (E) the channels of trade for the goods or services with which the mark is used. a court may consider factors such as. symbol. and to obtain such other relief as is provided in this subsection. and any such instrumentality. CH 22. services. or (B) in commercial advertising or promotion. The owner. or as to the origin. or approval of his or her goods. . importer. (c) Remedies for dilution of famous marks (1) The owner of a famous mark shall be entitled. name. In determining whether a mark is distinctive and famous. and dilution forbidden Release date: 2011-08-15 (a) Civil action (1) Any person who. qualities. or consignee of goods refused entry at any customhouse under this section may have any recourse by protest or appeal that is given under the customs revenue laws or may have the remedy given by this chapter in cases involving goods refused entry or seized. (3) In a civil action for trade dress infringement [idem sonanse] under this chapter for trade dress not registered on the principal register.Claimant herein declares his Claim of “Famous Mark” to be his own and not the property of any other. or any container for goods. if such use begins after the mark has become famous and causes dilution of the distinctive quality of the mark. SUB CH III § 1125 § 1125. or geographic origin of his or her or another person’s goods. connection. (b) Importation Any goods marked or labeled in contravention of the provisions of this section shall not be imported into the United States or admitted to entry at any customhouse of the United States. or commercial activities. subject to the principles of equity and upon such terms as the court deems reasonable. instrumentality of a State or employee of a State or instrumentality of a State acting in his or her official capacity. on or in connection with any goods or services. False designations of origin. which— (A) is likely to cause confusion. (F) the degree of recognition of the mark in the trading areas and channels of trade used by the marks’ owner and the person against whom the injunction is sought. false or misleading description of fact. shall be liable in a civil action by any person who believes that he or she is or is likely to be damaged by such act. uses in commerce any word. characteristics. to an injunction against another person’s commercial use in commerce of a mark or trade name. or any combination thereof. or device. (D) the geographical extent of the trading area in which the mark is used. or false or misleading representation of fact. or any false designation of origin. (C) the duration and extent of advertising and publicity of the mark. term. sponsorship. or to deceive as to the affiliation. misrepresents the nature. services. Any State. TITLE 15. the person who asserts trade dress protection has the burden of proving that the matter sought to be protected is not functional. (2) As used in this subsection. officer. or association of such person with another person. or commercial activities by another person. the term “any person” includes any State. or employee. shall be subject to the provisions of this chapter in the same manner and to the same extent as any nongovernmental entity. a court may consider factors such as. (B) (i) In determining whether a person has a bad faith intent described under subparagraph (A). the owner of the famous mark shall be entitled only to injunctive relief as set forth in section 1116 of this title unless the person against whom the injunction is sought willfully intended to trade on the owner’s reputation or to cause dilution of the famous mark [NOTE: birth/berth certificate is worth "how much??" [11 million “credits”] on world trade market. (d) Cyberpiracy prevention (1) (A) A person shall be liable in a civil action by the owner of a mark. If such willful intent is proven. or name protected by reason of section706 of title 18 or section220506 of title 36. or form of advertisement. 1905. 1881. subject to the discretion of the court and the principles of equity."goods" have you provided to society?]. and. or the Act of February 20. and (H) whether the mark was registered under the Act of December 11. but not limited to— (I) the trademark or other intellectual property rights of the person. not "in persona"] of a valid registration under the Act of March 3. including a personal name which is protected as a mark under this section. including a personal name which is protected as a mark under this section. (4) The following shall not be actionable under this section: (A) Fair use of a famous mark by another person in comparative commercial advertising or promotion to identify the competing goods or services of the owner of the famous mark. traffics in. or on the principal register shall be a complete bar to an action against that person. is identical or confusingly similar to or dilutive of that mark. is identical or confusingly similar to that mark. (3) The ownership by a person ["personam". or on the principal register.C. or (III) is a trademark. that is brought by another person under the common law or a statute of a State and that seeks to prevent dilution of the distinctiveness of a mark. if. [Berth “registry” is the principal register of the Department of Commerce. in the domain name. if any. 1905. that person— (i) has a bad faith intent to profit from that mark. 1881. label. (C) All forms of news reporting and news commentary. (II) in the case of a famous mark that is famous at the time of registration of the domain name. (II) the extent to which the domain name consists of the legal name of the person or a name that is otherwise commonly used to identify that person. (B) Noncommercial use of a mark. with respect to that mark.] (2) In an action brought under this subsection. word. and (ii) registers.(G) the nature and extent of use of the same or similar marks by third parties. . D. the owner of the famous mark shall also be entitled to the remedies set forth in sections 1117 (a) and 1118 of this title. how many "good works" . Washington. or the Act of February 20. without regard to the goods or services of the parties. or uses a domain name that— (I) in the case of a mark that is distinctive at the time of registration of the domain name. (ii) Bad faith intent described under subparagraph (A) shall not be found in any case in which the court determines that the person believed and had reasonable grounds to believe that the use of the domain name was a fair use or otherwise lawful. (E) As used in this paragraph. or the person’s prior conduct indicating a pattern of such conduct. and (ii) the court finds that the owner— (I) is not able to obtain in personam jurisdiction over a person who would have been a defendant in a civil action under paragraph (1). trafficking. a court may order the forfeiture or cancellation of the domain name or the transfer of the domain name to the owner of the mark. sponsorship. (VI) the person’s offer to transfer. or (II) through due diligence was not able to find a person who would have been a defendant in a civil action under paragraph (1) by— . (2) (A) The owner of a mark may file an in rem civil action against a domain name in the judicial district in which the domain name registrar. or dilutive of famous marks of others that are famous at the time of registration of such domain names. (VIII) the person’s registration or acquisition of multiple domain names which the person knows are identical or confusingly similar to marks of others that are distinctive at the time of registration of such domain names. of the domain name in connection with the bona fide offering of any goods or services. affiliation. (IV) the person’s bona fide noncommercial or fair use of the mark in a site accessible under the domain name. or endorsement of the site. sales. or other domain name authority that registered or assigned the domain name is located if— (i) the domain name violates any right of the owner of a mark registered in the Patent and Trademark Office. (V) the person’s intent to divert consumers from the mark owner’s online location to a site accessible under the domain name that could harm the goodwill represented by the mark. either for commercial gain or with the intent to tarnish or disparage the mark. or having an intent to use. without regard to the goods or services of the parties. pledges. the domain name in the bona fide offering of any goods or services. domain name registry. loans. but are not limited to. or use of a domain name under this paragraph.(III) the person’s prior use. the person’s intentional failure to maintain accurate contact information. (VII) the person’s provision of material and misleading false contact information when applying for the registration of the domain name. or protected under subsection (a) or (c) of this section. if any. by creating a likelihood of confusion as to the source. licenses. (D) A person shall be liable for using a domain name under subparagraph (A) only if that person is the domain name registrant or that registrant’s authorized licensee. and any other transfer for consideration or receipt in exchange for consideration. sell. or otherwise assign the domain name to the mark owner or any third party for financial gain without having used. purchases. the term “traffics in” refers to transactions that include. and (IX) the extent to which the mark incorporated in the person’s domain name registration is or is not distinctive and famous within the meaning of subsection (c)(1) of this section. exchanges of currency. (C) In any civil action involving the registration. or the person’s prior conduct indicating a pattern of such conduct. nor reproduced. (B) The actions under subparagraph (A)(ii) shall constitute service of process. express. nor for any variation in the spelling of.e. any juristic person. whether in rem or in personam. without the prior. nor in any manner whatsoever. nor any variation in the spelling of. or otherwise modify the domain name during the pendency of the action. nor otherwise gives consent for any unauthorized use of LITTLE JOHN STEWART©. except upon order of the court. and any remedy available under either such action. “LITTLE JOHN STEWART” nor for any derivative of. may neither be used. suspend. LITTLE JOHN STEWART©. as well as the agent of said juristic person. an accommodation party.(aa) sending a notice of the alleged violation and intent to proceed under this paragraph to the registrant of the domain name at the postal and e-mail address provided by the registrant to the registrar. for the purported debtor. Said common-law tradename/trade-mark. the domain name registrar.. nor a surety. and is so-indemnified and held harmless by Debtor. hereinafter “Secured Party.” With the Intent of being contractually bound. or other domain name authority shall— (I) expeditiously deposit with the court documents sufficient to establish the court’s control and authority regarding the disposition of the registration and use of the domain name to the court. Secured Party neither grants. stamped copy of a complaint filed by the owner of a mark in a United States district court under this paragraph. any of the common-law trade-name/trade-mark LITTLE JOHN STEWART©. LITTLE JOHN STEWART©—as well as any and all derivatives and variations in the spelling of said tradename/trademark–Common Law Copyright© 1965 upon attainment of age of majority by Little-John: Stewart©. (ii) The domain name registrar or registry or other domain name authority shall not be liable for injunctive or monetary relief under this paragraph except in the case of bad faith or reckless disregard. registry. or other domain name authority that registered or assigned the domain name is located. COPYRIGHT NOTICE OF TRADE-NAME.e. (C) In an in rem action under this paragraph. Upon receipt of written notification of a filed. nor the common-law copyright described herein. shall be in addition to any other civil action or remedy otherwise applicable. domain name registry. (D) (i) The remedies in an in rem action under this paragraph shall be limited to a court order for the forfeiture or cancellation of the domain name or the transfer of the domain name to the owner of the mark. nor for any other juristic person. nor otherwise use in any manner. said name. written consent and acknowledgement of Secured Party. nor implies. and all such unauthorized use is strictly prohibited. written consent and acknowledgement of Little-John: Stewart©. nor has Secured Party ever been. as signified by Secured Party’s signature in blue ink. nor any derivative of. Secured Party is not now. and (bb) publishing notice of the action as the court may direct promptly after filing the action. (UCC1) 0000000181153371. without the prior. TRADE-MARK Copyright Notice: All rights reserved regarding common-law copyright of trade-name/trade-mark. dated the Forth teen . and (II) not transfer. which includes a willful failure to comply with any such court order. neither in whole nor in part. i.. (3) The civil action established under paragraph (1) and the in rem action established under paragraph (2). “LITTLE JOHN STEWART” in Hold-harmless and Indemnity Agreement No. (4) The in rem jurisdiction established under paragraph (2) shall be in addition to any other jurisdiction that otherwise exists. or (ii) documents sufficient to establish control and authority regarding the disposition of the registration and use of the domain name are deposited with the court. express. a domain name shall be deemed to have its situs in the judicial district in which— (i) the domain name registrar. shall display. LITTLE JOHN STEWART©. i. e. liens. legal actions. against any and all claims. and further consents and agrees with Secured Party’s filing of any continuation statement necessary for maintaining Secured Party’s perfected security interest in all of User’s property and interest property pledged as collateral in this Security Agreement and described above in paragraph “(2). Selfexecuting Contract/Security Agreement in Event of Unauthorized use: By this Copyright Notice. commercial tort claims. lawsuits. as Secured Party. as well as otherwise dispose of in any manner that Secured Party. now owned and hereafter acquired. equipment. as described above in paragraph “(2). and without further notice. but not limited by. (2) authenticates this Security Agreement wherein User is debtor and Little-John: Stewart© is Secured Party. and expenses whatsoever. and may not be considered. accounts. and as might be suffered by. investment property. summonses. as set forth above under “Default Terms. (6) consents and agrees that any and all such filings described in paragraphs “(4)” and “(5)” above are not. Terms for Curing Default: Upon event of default. in respect of this “Self-executing Contract/Security Agreement in Event of Unauthorized Use. levies. plus triple damages. as well as for each and every occurrence of use of any and all derivatives of. land.” itemizing said fees. sale at auction at any time following User’s default.” until User’s contractual obligation theretofore incurred has been fully satisfied. (3) consents and agrees with Secured Party’s filing of a UCC Financing Statement in the UCC filing office. effective upon User’s default is irrevocable and coupled with a security interest. Default Terms: In event of non-payment in full of all unauthorized use fees by User within ten (10) days of date invoice is sent. losses. as well as in any county recorder’s office. and (C) User consents and agrees that Secured Party may take possession of. in Secured Party’s sole discretion. inventory. money.” formerly pledged as collateral by User. and signifies that User: (1) grants Secured Party a security interest in all of Users assets. purpose. (5) consents and agrees with Secured Party’s filing of any UCC Financing Statement. instruments. wherein User is debtor and Little-John: Stewart© is Secured Party. in the sum certain amount of $500.00 per each occurrence of use of any of the common-law-copyrighted tradename/trade-mark LITTLE JOHN STEWART©. LITTLE JOHN STEWART©. bogus. liabilities. letter-of-credit rights. fines. all assets. hereinafter jointly and severally “User. and personal property. now existing and hereafter arising.” irrespective of any .” that Secured Party. User further consents and agrees with all of the following additional terms of Self-executing Contract/Security Agreement in Event of Unauthorized Use: Payment Terms: In accordance with fees for unauthorized use of LITTLE JOHN STEWART© as set forth above. orders. as described above in paragraph “(2). both absolute and contingent.” in the UCC filing office. User hereby consents and agrees that User shall pay Secured Party all unauthorized-use fees in full within ten (10) days of the date User is sent Secured Party’s invoice. and cause whatsoever. and wherein User pledges all of User’s property. chattel paper. and all of User’s interest in assets.” immediately becomes. i. costs. and general intangibles. any and all of User’s former property and interest in property. including. again in Secured Party’s sole discretion. letters of credit. as described above in paragraph “(2). both the juristic person and the agent of said juristic person.” consent and agree that any use of LITTLE JOHN STEWART© other than authorized use as set forth above constitutes unauthorized use and counterfeiting of Secured Party’s common-law copyrighted property and contractually binds User and renders this Copyright Notice a Security Agreement wherein User is debtor and Little-John: Stewart© is Secured Party. damages.e. deposit accounts. as collateral for securing User’s contractual obligation in favor of Secured Party for Users unauthorized use of Secured Party’s common-law copyrighted property. and wherever located. depositions.” as well as the filing of any Security Agreement. in Secured Party’s sole discretion deems appropriate. now property of Secured Party. demands. (7) waives all defenses. land. (4) consents and agrees that said UCC Financing Statement described above in paragraph “(3)” is a continuing financing statement. interests.. imposed on. as described above in paragraphs “(3)” and “(4). and all User’s interest in all such foregoing property. effective upon User’s default re User’s contractual obligations in favor of Secured Party as set forth below under “Payment Terms” and “Default Terms.000. plus costs. and incurred by Debtor for any and every reason. warrants.. now existing and as might hereafter arise. penalties. is property of Secured Party. documents. consumer goods farm products. and (8) appoints Secured Party as Authorized Representative for User. deems appropriate. hereinafter “invoice. and variations in the spelling of.Day of the Fifth Month in the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand and Eleven. as well as in any county recorder’s office. as are due and as might become due. (b) Secured Party is appointed User’s Authorized Representative as set forth above in paragraph “(8)”. and User further consents and agrees that this appointment of Secured Party as Authorized Representative for User.” granting Secured Party full authorization and power for engaging in any and all actions on behalf of User. judgments. User shall be deemed in default and: (a) all of User’s property and interest in property pledged as collateral by User. i. deems appropriate. and that User will not claim that any such filing is bogus. land and personal property. ” User may cure User’s default regarding the remainder of User’s former property and interest in property formerly pledged as collateral that is neither in the possession of. paper or electronic data entry that makes reference to the Living Man of the Male Gender herein referred to as Claimant by any Name. which parallel a birth or marriage certificate are: ~1.” Pennsylvania County on Virginia Republic State and Claimant has no “residence. The items included on a warehouse receipt. with all states adopting the practice by 1933. Unauthorized use of any of “Little-John: Stewart©” incurs same unauthorized-use fees as those associated with LITTLE JOHN STEWART© as set forth above in paragraph “(1)” under “Self-executing Contract/Security Agreement in Event of Unauthorized Use. 1959. The signature of the warehouseman. lower right corner. a fictitious Warehouse Receipt stating a “berth-date” of a newly launched “vessel” in commerce on December 11. The date of issue of the receipt…(“Date issued”) Claimants’ Nativity was (according to records in Family Bible) December 11. . as authorized above under “Default Terms. Birth and marriage certificates are a form of securities called “warehouse receipts”. ~4. Number (or. multiple misnomers of “similar sound” were on the face of said document. by Secured Party within twenty (20) days of date of User’s default only by payment in full. All Fictions. ~2. now printed on banknote paper. Secured Party upon expiration of said twenty (20) day default-curing period. Record Owner: Little-John: Stewart© Autograph Common Law Copyright ©1959. ~5. which may be made by his authorized agent… (clerk. Bone and Blood. A description of the goods or of the packages containing them… (Name.” do herein place Claim of Ownership over. DOB. sex. or caused to be issued. aspects. Legal Entities and Vessels in commerce that make any reference to Claimant are herein claimed as “Collateral” and property belonging to Claimant.” *********************************** EXHIBIT S – Claim of Ownership CERTIFICATE . The consecutive number of the receipt…(found on the certificate. ******.and all of User’s former property and interest in property.” The registration of births began in 1915. etc. According to Barron’s Dictionary of Banking Terms. etc. however. 1959. by the Bureau of Census. usually in red) File number 145-59-083068 is found on the “Notification of Birth Registration” that was recorded at the DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE in THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Claimant makes Claim to such collateral. upon and against any.) Claimants’ Christian Appellation was not found on said Warehouse Receipt. Subsequent “copy” of “Birth Certificate” shows State File Number 145-59-083068****** with a “bond” number on the back side. a certificate is a “paper establishing an ownership claim. as well as disposed of by. phases and relations of all actions of Real Existence and True Character signified by a/any piece of parchment. The location of the warehouse where the goods are stored… (residence) Claimant was born of a woman on. Ownership subject to common-law copyright and UCC Financing Statement and Security Agreement filed with the UCC filing office. the law which governs commercial paper and transactions.” but “Lives” within His own carbon based body of Flesh. Secured Party. nor otherwise disposed of. and all. ~3. however. facets. group of numbers) or Assignment other than Claimants’ Christian Appellation. nor otherwise disposed of by. which is not in the possession of. Terms of Strict Foreclosure: Users non-payment in full of all unauthorized-use fees itemized in Invoice within said twenty (20) day period for curing default as set forth above under “Terms for Curing Default” authorizes Secured Party’s immediate non-judicial strict foreclosure on any and all remaining property and interest in property formerly pledged as collateral by User.Claim of Ownership via Warehouse Receipt I. as described at Section 7-202 of the Uniform Commercial Code. place of birth. Informants issued. Title. in the possession of. therefore. not “in. Little-John: Stewart.. One can comprehend that said document is making reference to Claimant through mention of sex. hereinafter known as “Claimant. now property of Secured Party. he is guilty of fraud.” collateral must be “pledged. Humans today are looked upon merely as resources – “human resources.doctor. the government needed an efficient. [1] Furthermore.”] All states started issuing serial-numbered. chattel) continues today with our current system of debt-based currency reliant upon a steady stream of fresh new chattels to back it.S.public ‘officers’ ARE trustees :* *63C Am. the powers delegated to a public officer are held in trust for the people and are to be exercised in behalf of the government or of all citizens who may need the intervention of the officer.S.2d. 168 (7th Cir1985) includes the deliberate concealment of material information in a setting of fiduciary obligation. L. went bankrupt in 1933. in the case of a judge.” Since the U. may be a negotiable instrument and is often used for financing with inventory as security. 372] in the statute. McNally v United States 483 U. that the foregoing is true and correct. Public Officers and Employees. “Birth and marriage certificates now appear to at least qualify as “warehouse receipts” under the Uniform Commercial Code.) J. by___________________________________authorized representative ******************************************************** EXHIBIT Q(2) – Gov. it has been stated that any enterprise undertaken by the public official who tends to weaken public confidence and undermine the sense of security for individual rights is against public policy. without United States.S. Governmental assignment of a dollar value to the heads of humans began on July 14. [2] That is. [3] and owes a fiduciary duty to the public.2d 163.C.” A “Maxim” of Law states that one cannot pledge what it does not “own. In order to catalog its laborers (slaves). methodical system of tracking its property to that end. An indeterminate “person” signed as “Special Agent. Capt. which is considered a document of title. under the laws of the United States of America. Fraud in its elementary common law sense of deceit-and this is one of the meanings that fraud bears [483 U. within whatever branch and whatever level of government. 350 (1987) **************************************************************** . all new money has to be borrowed into existence. [5] Furthermore. 757 F.” that is. including. the view has been expressed that all public officers.. Director of the Census signed on the lower left corner of said document. [4] It has been said that the fiduciary responsibilities of a public officer cannot be less than those of a private individual. 7th ed. 28 USC 1746(1). as Trustee. NOT Beneficiary OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES (of the Public) ARE TRUSTEES Am Juris Prud .Jur. A public official is a fiduciary toward the public. That simply means the American people’s ability to labor and pay back that debt. state registrar. are trustees of the people. and whatever be their private vocations. Dial. “…A warehouse receipt. [In order to “borrow.” According to Black’s Law Dictionary. Bureau of the Census. and accordingly labor under every disability and prohibition imposed by law upon trustees relative to the making of personal financial gain from a discharge of their trusts. The “Full Faith and Credit” of the American people is said to be that which back the nation’s debt. a public officer occupies a fiduciary relationship to the political entity on whose behalf he or she serves.S. when President Lincoln offered 6 percent interest bearing-bonds to states who freed their slaves on a “per head” basis. §247* “As expressed otherwise. certificated “warehouse receipts” for births and marriages in order to pledge a fictional “vessel” they created on paper as collateral against those loans and municipal bonds taken out with the Federal Reserve’s banks. I declare under penalty of perjury. the litigants who appear before him and if he deliberately conceals material information from them. See United States v. etc.” Warehouse receipt. 1862. This practice of valuating humans (cattle. and maintain . I am. Therefore. or regulations against any legislative. or to "pay" any fines. and controlled within the Private realm of a Private corporation. nor utilize any of them outside the Rule of Necessity.S. quasigovernmental agent/agency can obtain parity with me. rules. rules. any corporate administrator says I am. therefore. a United States citizen. this is my political establishment. or regulations against me. nor executive. and I am not a magistrate of any federal foreign fictional government. said "court" fails to obtain "in rem jurisdiction" over me. there is no "federal jurisdiction" over me. so I have no entourage for any "residency". statutes. that being the color of white in the form of a "flag of truce". thus. No fictional. originating well before the establishment of the British Colonies on American soil. a 14th Amendment citizen. can demand that I do the impossible. or what (person). I have no "license" to operate contrary to true law. therefore. nor give cognizance to. no "judicial jurisdiction" is obtainable over me. I have no "permit" to temporarily suspend true law. I have no "residence" within any geographical jurisdiction. therefore. no fictional political jurisdiction is obtainable over me. Since there is no lawful money of exchange available to "pay" any debt. no legislative court or executive agency shall obtain any "legislative or executive jurisdiction" over me. love my neighbor as myself. issued. body can use said copyrighted codes. For this reason such "scribble" is called "cursive writing". fees. I observe only the True Laws brought forward by the Ancient and Holy Writ. image. and body. therefore. soul. no legislative. nor corporate body or agency thereof. and respond only to. Federal Reserve Notes (which are not of substance). maintained. No Private Man. I cannot be a contemnor. My Constitution is the Holy Writ and I claim only one "color". therefore. I am who I say I am. handle. statutes. the Right of Soil. and where absolutely necessary under said ancient rule. as I am in contempt of nothing. nor do I recognize any of their agents. or other "person". By being responsible for my own "person" under True Law. engulfing all established within principles of the Ten Commandments and the later Commandments to love the Lord My God with all my mind. no legislative court or executive agency shall obtain any "substantive jurisdiction" over me. penalties. I recognize the use of Federal Reserve Notes as contraband and gambling tokens. therefore. I exercise my "personal rights" referred to by Thomas Jefferson. which is a Rule of Common Law. no legislative court shall ever obtain "personal jurisdiction" over me. nor is there obtainable any "venue jurisdiction" over me. Little-John: of the Stewart Family. Little-John: Stewart. I do not own. nor a "person". nor in any other manner do I "cite-IZen". maintaining only as a private man can. not alive . I do not "re-side" within any political jurisdiction. etc. I own and maintain my own "person" for purpose of contracting in the realm of commerce in a lawful and upright manner. therefore. If I choose to respond. I keep house within the geographical Maryland Republic. I do not recognize. there is no "state within a state" of federal jurisdiction. Said "signature" (sig=no nature=alive) means no nature. I am in my True Character. licenses. my Christian Appellation. any fictional corporate entity. I offer my "signature" when contracting with fictional entities in commerce. NOT an enemy of the "state" under any fictional corporate charter regulations and no "corporate jurisdiction" is obtainable over me to condemn me to a category of enemy of any "state". therefore. no jurisdiction of agency is obtainable over me.it is a bond offered into debt/death. using only barter. therefore. silver. I am not a U. fiction. nor is there a political overlay of federal area or postal Zone Improvement Plan. or executive. not who.. I cannot use copyrighted codes. body. no "Admiralty jurisdiction" is obtainable over me. therefore. or in whatever Republic I so choose. I exist only in.EXHIBIT O – Christian Appellation Statutory Declaration of True Name and NOTICE and Declaration of Law and Jurisdiction I am recognized and known by my Christian Appellation. I am not aware of the existence of any judicial branch of any level of true Republican government nor is any available to me. As it is impossible to "pay" for anything. making known to all that I have no controversy with any. My word is my bond when dealing with men. I am not a corporation. I am not a reflection. and. and to. court costs. no fictional corporate governmental body can demand that I do the impossible. citizen. therefore. it is only to such Christian Appellation. a Private Man upon the soil. the fiction. cursed communication with the dead. it is security for the promise of distributions from the trust to the People as beneficiaries.my lawful standing. and associated/annexed documents. An Interest in a thing/issue is given a Transferable Value. 5. Beneficiary means Executor. as well as whatever consideration is offered on the instrument that is being transferred to you through the United States citizen you represent. or my "persons". it is a receipt. With an exchange of “Rights” for a binding commitment to extend credit. The President’s oath is consideration sufficient to support the simple contract the President (executive trustee) has with the people (beneficiaries). executive. Grantor is deemed to be the Executor of the Estate. when you “accept” an Oath. made by its citizens. into a Dead “Person’s” Estate and into that of a Debtor. I do not yield "Character jurisdiction" over me.C. Subrogation places a transfer of Rights from the Visible to the Invisible. Exchange for any consideration to support a contract. by _________________________ agent Little-John: Stewart. for all practical purposes. and is evidence of a pledge by a U. The setoff resulting from accepting an instrument for value is a distribution from the trust. SUPPORTING NOTES: Remember. is a “Binding Agreement” to fulfill his Promise as Executive Trustee. My acceptance of Presidential Oath made by the President of the United States of America (Article 2. That is different than an oath. The United States is humbling itself by asking . 4. Certain established parameters of language are: VALUE IS: Present Worth of Future Benefits VALUE IS ACQUIRED: [as per U. the birth certificate would not be evidence of the obligation the United States owes to the people.S. you are accepting the consideration the United States has offered to you as evidence of an obligation it has to you as a beneficiary. Various Treaties between the United States and offshore foreign countries often appoint Emissaries and Ambassadors to represent the “death” of the UNITED STATES. Therefore. Without that one oath. established within the parameters of Trust Doctrine (see EXHIBIT E). 1-201(44)] 1. When you accept for “value”. a contract. By Accepting Delivery to a pre-existing contract for Purchase. On the private side. the birth certificate represents value. He has a constitutional oath. sui juris . It is a receipt for the use of the baby’s physical description that was symbolically delivered by an informant (Mother) to the United States. ******************************************************************** EXHIBIT Q – Beneficiary to the Original Trust (Correcting the Records) Introductory Statement: The lawful Trust. “Value” is anything recognized as a pledge or the result of a pledge. citizen to be a surety for the United States. As Security for Satisfaction of a pre-existing Claim. On the public side. rather than the Beneficiary to the Trust. under unlawful conversion. He does not have an oath of office. Section 1). On the private side. The birth certificate is the Resultant Trust of the President’s oath. On the public side. it is security for the pledge of allegiance to the United States and its statutes. impeccable under law. Debt and Death mean the same. All legislative. you consummate an agreement. 6. and is evidence of a promise made by the President to the people. Under the law. was converted. 3. and judicial officers performing under him in his capacity as Commander in Chief have oaths of office. Respectfully Presented. The “Right” of Authority is through a Birth Certificate issued by the STATE and ACCEPTED FOR VALUE.C. Without that one oath. For purposes of this. the birth certificate would just be evidence of the obligation every Unites States citizen owes to the United States. Debt means Dead. 2. rights are remedies. but you have to pay it immediately. or your body. but.” a Trust Receipt. IF he takes the instrument for value. If you don’t set the terms of that binding contract. because of his Oath. A person (officer in the federal government) gives value (Article VI oath) for rights (to hold an office) as security (promise to support “this” constitution) for satisfaction (performance) of a preexisting claim (people’s beneficial interest in the trust created by the Constitution). it is the holder. A person (President) gives value (Article II oath) for rights (to be Commander in Chief) as security (promise to preserve. and represents an antecedent claim you have against the United States. You can pay it with a check. Did the United States offer a birth certificate to you? Did you receive it? Did you accept it for value and return it as a security? If you do not accept it for value and deposit it as an asset. creating a security interest in the title to the subject property. An order for a judicial court-created security interest is not the type of instrument that a transferee would take for value. It is up to you. It represents the prepaid account you have available to you for setoffs. The birth certificate is a remedy. you can use a distribution from the trust to “pay” the instrument. the United States will. of which. I AM THE BENEFICIARY. Ohio. If you just retain it or argue about the existence or amount of the request.” to wit: 1. It is the holder who acquires a security interest in the instrument. Beneficiary NOTICES Presidential Delegates: DHS (executive) Sec of Treasury (legislative) DOJ (judicial) Sec of State (administrative) ALL is in reference to a “Pre-existing Contract. etc. the presumption is that you intend to pay it. Ohio. an order for an executive court-created security interest is a type of instrument that a transferee would take for value. Parties to a modern commercial transaction need remedies in the event one of them breaches the terms of the agreement. i. United States courts . A person (a state. It is applying for credit on every instrument that is issued or transferred for value. or you will be deemed to be in dishonor. The issuer has the liability. but that is not how it works with an instrument that is issued for value.e. A person (corporate United States) gives value (certificated security = birth certificate) for rights (to create money on the signature of the man = borrow from the people) as security (promise not to deny or disparage rights of the people) for satisfaction (acknowledgement of obligation to people) of a preexisting claim (beneficial interest in the trust created by the Constitution). 2. A person (state citizen [by Mom]) gives value (signature on application for birth certificate) for rights (to be beneficiary on the trust) as security (promise) for satisfaction (distribution from the trust) of a preexisting claim (beneficial interest in the trust created by the Constitution). It is not the issuer who has the security interest. is the ONLY EXECUTIVE TRUSTEE of the Trust. i. etc. 5. 4. Judicial court orders can transfer rights in property. A person (a state... In a purely commercial system. 3.e. I am the HOLDER OF THE NOTE (Birth Certificate).) gives value (office in the federal government) for rights (to be part of the union of American states = federal United States) as security (promise to abide by terms of Constitution) for satisfaction (performance on terms of Constitution) of a preexisting claim (promise to pay creditors of the Confederacy). known as a “Certificate of Live Birth. protect and defend the Constitution) for satisfaction (performance) of a preexisting claim (people’s beneficial interest in the trust created by the Constitution). you will pay it with a check. Acceptance is an agreement and leads to a binding contract. you have voluntarily waived rights to a distribution that is available to you. 6. Make a note of this – The President of the United States of America. It is also evidence of a preexisting contract.you to give it assistance. If you A4V.) gives value (Constitution) for rights (to be recognized internationally) as security (promise to pay creditors of the Confederacy) for satisfaction (acknowledgment of international law) of a preexisting claim (need for a plan to pay international creditors). If you just receive one of these instruments [even a utility “bill”] without accepting it for value and returning it for value. or you can pay it with your prepaid account. tangible property. A promissory note can be written against the bond that is written against the security. he is seeking value. A bond can be given written against the security (bond = birth certificate) he is holding. You have the priority right to it as a security for the obligation the United States has to you. That is done under the premise that a securities intermediary is declared in the commercial code to be a purchaser for value. (b) A securities intermediary is obligated to its entitlement holder for a payment or distribution made by the issuer of a financial asset if the payment or distribution is received by the securities intermediary. i. he is seeking consideration. An instrument is issued or transferred for value if: 3. the issuer’s . The instrument is issued or transferred as payment of. Without the rights of an owner or a purchaser. who can then be the man’s securities intermediary. UCC 8-505. an antecedent claim against any person. When an instrument issued for value is received and retained. the instrument has to be issued for value. from the issuer (State of Maryland) to the Department of Commerce of the United States (the Department of Transportation. and the main defect in an instrument issued for value is that there is no security attached to it. If it were not for the inherent security interest in the instrument itself. The United States uses the certificate until you decide you want to use it. It appears that the birth certificate is not an actual security until it passes to a second holder. it is accepted as though the receiver has given it a blank endorsement. UCC 8-102(a)(8) “Entitlement order ” means a notification communicated to a securities intermediary directing transfer or redemption of a financial asset to which the entitlement holder has a security entitlement. UCC 8-116 Securities Intermediary as Purchaser For Value A securities intermediary that receives a financial asset and establishes a security entitlement to the financial asset in favor of an entitlement holder is a purchaser for value of the financial asset. It gives the transferee (a U. UCC 3-303. The only piece of paper a man has the is proof of the security interest he has is the birth certificate. citizen) a security interest in the instrument. Bureau of the Census). “Giving value” from 1-201 is not the same as “transferring for value” from 3-303. and he wants a new contract on which he or the person he represents is the creditor. It has no value on the private side.” Their orders do not result in security interests through judicial proceedings.e.are not judicial courts.S. the securities intermediary exercises due care in accordance with reasonable commercial standards to attempt to obtain the payment or distribution. the whole project would be fraud. the securities intermediaries must have capacity to act. the securities intermediary would be powerless to act in the intended manner. (a) a securities intermediary shall take action to obtain a payment or distribution made by the issuer of a financial asset. To avoid fraud. After acceptance through a blank endorsement. Value and consideration A. whether or not the claim is due. The transferor (issuer) in 303 usually wants to get a valuable consideration back for an instrument he issues for value. A securities intermediary satisfies the duty if: (1) the securities intermediary acts with respect to the duty as agreed upon by the entitlement holder and the securities intermediary. A blank endorsement waives all the defects. Duty of Securities Intermediary with Respect to Payments and Distributions. but it does on the public side if he deposits with an appropriate banker. The issuer is not giving value. The indirect holding system of the United States would not function as expected if the securities intermediary did not have capacity to act.. This is explained in UCC Article 8 in the 500 series. Such a promissory note would be an order from the entitlement holder to the securities intermediary to use the security he is maintaining for a specific purpose. and the man can be the entitlement holder. they are territorial courts and were created through Article 1 Section 8 Clause 9 by the power granted to the Congress to “constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court. or as security for. These abnormalities can be cured if the transferee gives it a qualified endorsement as a payment and returns the payment for closure of the account. Since securities intermediaries have obligations to entitlement holders. or (2) in the absence of agreement. The issuer is not giving consideration. An Order that a securities intermediary deposit the birth certificate makes it a security. and the transfer of liability has been successful. It was issued to you. and the endorser is liable on the instrument. If an instrument is issued and transferred for value. This bookkeeping cannot be done if the bill is not returned with an appropriate endorsement though. When it is subsequently presented to a third party (banker).S. citizen by the United States. the person who is the transferee can make it the issuer’s note (promise) and the transferee’s draft (order). Whoever has a right to enforce it can negotiate it. When the payee receives a check. it is an order. and would result in a binding contract. If you do not balance that account. If the transferee has no idea what to do with it. He is then obligated on the instrument to make immediate payment. or issues the instrument for value to receive the consideration from the transferee. and the transaction is finished.S. It is based on violation of statutes that were implemented to facilitate collections from U. Ignorance is not stupidity. There is a price for ignorance. Much more could be said.S. and he will enforce it. but for the sake of brevity. or other bill is presented to a U. He can give it a qualified endorsement by accepting it for value. the bookkeeper has an unbalanced account. made negotiable with a proper endorsement. he makes the instrument his promise and also makes the instrument negotiable as a security. it is also issued for consideration. the transferor is the person entitled to enforce the instrument.S. When an instrument is accepted (taken) for value. citizen you represent. The instrument is the check if it is taken as a payment. This puts the endorser in the driver’s seat and makes him the party entitled to enforce the instrument.consideration is presumed. and turned into a draft (issuer’s order). Holder in due course above. to make it a payment. If he does not. he might inadvertently make it a security and commit himself to pay it. Since 1933. it is lack of knowledge. an executive court will do it for you. Under Article 3. it can be treated as either. if an instrument is issued for value. Some say the reason it cannot be paid is because no check to pay it was included with the bill. the transferee must pay it. he is not in default. It is not civil. is available upon request. it can be accepted for value. antecedent claim. When he negotiates it by endorsing it and delivering to a bank. it is an order from the maker to the third party to pay it. ************************************************* . because the money to pay it (promise to back it) has not been created. or preexisting contract behind it. The bill is issued for value. It is his choice. Since it was issued for value. If the transferee makes the instrument negotiable as a security with a blank endorsement. The instrument issued for value becomes the very payment that pays it. When an indictment (true bill).defendant or debtor). If the transferee receives a bill and does not pay it immediately. he is in default. citizens to pay the national debt. All the required bookkeeping entries for an accrual bookkeeping system can be made based on the offer for value and the acceptance for value. A case designed to seize property of a U. it has to be issued for value. and it is not criminal. This puts the issuer or his principal in the driver’s seat and entitles the principal to enforce the instrument. These are not cases. The issuer either gives the consideration through the instrument. an instrument issued for value is not negotiable. an obligation on a preexisting claim against the United States (national debt) is being transferred to the transferee (surety . and transferred for value. On the other hand. If the transferee gives it a blank endorsement (by his silence) and does not return it with his check.S. citizen is called a penal action. All accounts must be closed at the end of the business day in an accrual system. If you are the cause of a payable. If the transferee accepts it for value and returns it to the issuer’s banker (Secretary of the Treasury) as payment to balance the books and close the account. The United States wants the U. If a bill is issued with nothing to secure it. No money is needed if the transferee treats it as a payment and sends it to the issuer’s banker with a qualified endorsement. There is no actual security. A commitment (implied or express) by the transferee (to take on the liability) through a general acceptance would be a valuable consideration on his part. The transferee can be the one entitled to enforce the instrument if he gives it a proper endorsement. The endorser is expected to create the “money. which is actually a libel of information. Libels of information are used to obtain arrest warrants from the clerks of executive courts so the proceeding can be commenced. it can be returned to pay the bill. so your retention of the instrument is deemed to be a blank endorsement. If the bill is not returned. they are proceedings. no money is needed if the transferee treats it as a security by giving it a blank endorsement and keeping (holding) it. An unbalanced account necessitates entries into the accounts payable and accounts receivable ledgers. If you cannot tell on the face of the instrument if it is a promise or an order. you are also responsible for the receivable.” both for the payment and for the security. the only money in circulation is money of account that is created on demand at the time it is needed to satisfy an immediate need. Until someone gives an endorsement. To be a holder in due court. it is a promise. the endorser must take (accept) the instrument for value. citizen to supply the value. See 3-302. That usually results in a statutory penalty being applied against you through the U. The UCC 3-305(a)(1)(iii) affirms.". In De Livio v.. Ed.Lewis v. Anything that involves Federal Reserve Notes is under Maritime Law because FRNs are an insurance premium. 265. 38 Stat. This is FRAUD. as per: On March 3. which is a gambling policy. 266-267. pp. D. Lewis which was injured by a Federal Reserve vehicle and sued the U." As a result. government for damages. commences action into the credit system (which is really a “Debt” System) of the Public National Credit (Federal Reserve) they have involved themselves in a Joint Maritime venture for profit in a Tontine policy of limited liability for the payment of debt. ". nor Public Policy.) assets and the USER of said bank notes by the authority of 38 Stat.S." to accept the status as an obligor/grantor and to hypothecate all "his" assets to the United States and thereby to the Federal Reserve which is merely a private corporation. [Usury equals INTEREST. I could display well over a dozen case cites that explain the use of FRNs is “wagering”. Funds or monetary value represented in digital electronics format (whether or not specially encrypted) and stored or capable of storage on electronic media in such a way as to be retrievable and transferable electronically.. The sender of the first transmittal order in a transmittal of funds. it is also a gamble] The U.A. 6. but insurance premiums on the use of the credit for profit." The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has a collection agreement as a .) are now exempt from damages to goods while involved in “commerce. the federal government could not be held responsible. as a "parole promise. VALUE IS: Present Worth of Future Benefits Claimant has no record or evidence that True and Honest Value and/or related Services has ever been manifested on behalf of Claimant. of Admiralty Jurisdiction..Interlocking Directorates for full explanation). as in reference to a Mr. and not "federal.S..EXHIBIT L – Demand for Exchange of Value 31 CFR B Chapter 1..S. the Living Man.C. not Public Law (see Exhibit K .S. When a “person. The court ruled. 265. The term transmittor includes an originator. property taxes. U. wherein an insurable interest has been created. 1851 Congress passed a law called "The Public Liability Statute. Part 103. one viable defense against such a Beast as herein discussed is to challenge it at every stage of its offense.S. Chapter 6. 2 Galliston. and is an "obligor/grantor" to the Federal Reserve Bank created by the authority of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913. United States. and all the other obscenities are about. whereby “we” are responsible for any loss which occurs while involved in maritime commerce. Maritime or Admiralty Law now prevails over the entire country through re-insurance of a credit policy.. Subpart A.C. the shippers are responsible for such goods under maritime law. All the Law and equity has been dismantled and replaced by a wagering policy of insurance under Admiralty Law. 294 U. The Federal Reserve Act of 1913. but for space and brevity I will not provide. 608F 2d 1239 (1982). United States.S. it was held that insurance is a maritime contract. The insurable interest is what the federal income tax. therefore. when that instrument has been deemed to mean for collecting usury or gambling debts. except where the transmittor's financial institution is a financial institution or foreign financial agency other than a bank or foreign bank. This was/is a cunning and despicable plot to re-institute a tontine scheme at the federal level in the name of the Federal Reserve.one of the other defenses is that the instrument is illegal. Federal Case No. All insurance falls under Maritime Law.” now. These are not taxes. 330-381. . 9121. Boit. was an act of Private Law. The joint venture is the use of the communal credit (debt). Congress (having exclusive jurisdiction over that ten mile square territory known as Washington. the United States is located IN Washington. § 103. as defined in 28 USC 3002(15) is bankrupt on the authority of Perry v. Remembering that FRNs are Negotiable Instruments.. right to work taxes.. (vv) Stored value.that since the Federal Reserve System and its twelve branch banks are private corporations. Ch.. Mass. ship (the numbered vessel registered after the “application for a Birth Certificate”) owners (the corporate U. The USER agrees. which is an “insurance” tontine scheme which “wagers” for profit. mentioned above. 3776 (1812).11 (ll) Transmittor.” a vessel that may enter commerce.) agreed in the Federal Reserve Act to give that bank system a paramount and "permanent" (ex-warranto 1913 to 1933) lien on the United States (UCC 9-307(h). 79L. D. 343. it states. make anything but Gold and Silver Coin a tender in payment of debts. federal government employees. i. .] All Administrators. December 17. 6 L. cents or hundredth part of a dollar. Title 31 USC Section 311: "It is declared to be the policy of the United States to continue the use of both gold and silver as standard money." The Congress of the United States of America. to wit: "All recognizance’s. There is no debating the established fact that: Federal Reserve Notes of Debt can be made legal tender for parties of/with a relationship to/with the Federal Government. a foreign state. 105 So." and. The money of account of this state shall be the dollar. 26395. any." and. bail bonds. whereby a party becomes bound to pay money to the State. it must contain an unconditional promise to pay a sum certain in money and be payable on demand or at a definite time (UCC 3-103 (b) (c)). recipient of federal largesse. and all proceedings in courts. shall be collected in the lawful money of the United States only.S. “Money” as it is commonly known." THE COINAGE ACT OF 1792 IS STILL CURRENT AND EXPLICIT AS TO WHAT A DOLLAR IS. by the authority of the Gold Bullion Act of 1985. cent and mill to be money of account. corporate and/or governmental agents/agencies and participating affiliates. That court citing U. Ct. or those who choose to use Federal Reserve Notes. 99 Statutes 1177. and all proceedings in the courts shall be kept and had in conformity to this regulation. neither the bank nor this Affiant is able to comply with the law of money and cannot be held a contemnor. Title 31 USC § 408 prohibits the redemption of any currency into gold and Title 31 USC § 405(a)-3 prohibits the redemption of any United States currency dollar for dollar into gold and silver... NRS 99. and all obligations of debt. Louisiana. for a check to be a negotiable instrument. Currency. all official bonds and undertakings.. in a certain sense. I "SPECIFICALLY OBJECT TO" the use of Federal Reserve Notes as I cannot consent and do not assent to be an obligor/grantor to said Federal Reserve Bank. 1893. dimes or tenths. but states and individuals cannot be compelled to use Federal Reserve Notes. All the accounts in the public offices..Rptr. other public accounts. 4302 Code of Criminal Procedures. "No State shall emit bills of credit. Bank v. shall be kept and had in conformity with this section. Public Law 99-185." and. S. I refuse for good cause shown. NRS 99. is "contraband" at statute!!! Affiant has thoroughly invoked “Rule Of Necessity” for any “mistakes” made by way of usage of Federal Reserve Notes." and. 305. I "SPECIFICALLY OBJECT TO" the use of said bank notes on the authority of MacLeod v. judgments or executions payable in legal money. So.Ed."USER" fee for the USE of said bank notes (see Interlocking Directorates). and undertakings of any kind. has given its intent that all Americans can no longer be forced into an obligor/grantor status to said Federal Reserve Bank Notes. 10 Wheaton 338. Hoover. to induce me to be a tort feasor to the Constitution for The United States of America where at Article 1.030 Obligation. Therefore. and all fines and forfeitures for a pecuniary character. Agents. Bank of Georgia. 1925) No. Nevada. Thus. [I am an Individual and. elected federal office holders. those persons who have a nexus/benefit such as. After February 15. Title 31 USC Section 371: "The money of account of the United States shall be expressed in dollars or units. Section 10. cent and mill.” And. or thought to be. judgments or executions stated in terms of dollars and to be paid in money shall be payable in legal money authorized by the Congress of the United States. and Agencies must take judicial notice of TEXAS CODE (imported under “Equal Footing Doctrine”) Art.010 Dollar. the law itself prohibits Affiant from using any “Lawful Money. either knowingly or unknowingly. and all. Nevada.e. 1985. (June 22. E. Somewhere. Treasury.S.10. 404." Dowdle v.Y. Smith v. 47 Wis. 11 Ohio St. 622.Taxpayer identifying numbers are not required for foreign governments. and.426. with force and violence. 2 ." 12 USC 152. McGhee. And. Boric v. Pa. 536. 366. 1 Ohio St. 3 Conn." Hegeman v. And. State. As international acts concerning the public law succession to sovereignties. And. Klauber v. and with intent to steal or rob. "money" means current metallic coins. providing that any person stealing any money. International Law. And. State. Also. State. for strictly bank bills are not money. 41 Tex. Munk." Turner v. "The term "money" does not include bank notes. And. for money--the indictment charging that the defendant played at a game of faro for money--cannot be sustained by proof that bank notes were bet. 223 N. Corpening.60. cannot be construed to include bank bills. but. and for many purposes are to be considered as money. Lawry v.Y. shall be guilty of larceny. General Counsel. ******************************************************* In the Account of Little-John: Stewart Who may be NOTICED at: C/O 5600 54th Avenue. does not include bank notes. and constitute a part of the circulating medium. therefore an indictment for embezzling "money" is not sustainable by proof of embezzling greenbacks or national currency notes. 620." U. Foquet v. "The term "money" does not include bank notes. 242 (1835). 8 Tex. Nos. 486 & 488. ""Money. 16 Tenn.Also.172. They pass as cash. Headley. the property of another.32 NOTICE OF: DIPLOMATIC PROTEST (To be applied in conjunction with NOTICE OF ADVERSE CLAIM and NOTICE OF EXPATRIATION) Public international law is proper law regarding unilateral international transactions or 'acts' concerning subjects and objects of international law: Note: “Renunciation” as follows means “Expatriation” from de facto oligarchy and “Repatriation” into the de jure Republic. ""Money" does not include treasury notes". they are not included therein. 324. though for many purposes they are treated as such. nonresident aliens not engaged in trade or business within the United States… DEEPER FRAUD: SUPPORTING NOTES "The terms 'lawful money' and 'lawful money' of the United States shall be construed to mean gold or silver coin of the United States. Vol. § 306. "In legal acceptation. 422. 58. Treuhart et al. in the strict sense of the term. nor would such an indictment be sustained by proof that property was bet. Trott. the proper law applicable to such dynastic renunciations and their proper interpretation is public international law concerning subjects of international law rather than the law of the place where the renunciation happens to be signed: A renunciation is an unilateral International transaction subject to public international law as the proper law: See Oppenheim-Lauterpacht. 551 (1879). 462. 481." Hale v." Johnson v. Biggerstaff..325. I. section 13. Moon. 534. and. 30 N. "The term "money. State. 131 N. 5 Phila." Block v. 171. TITLE 31 USC. Maryland Republic Non-Domestic ZIP EXEMPT DMM122. . 32 N." in the statute defining robbery as taking from the person of another any money or personal property of any value whatsoever.C. 487.S. Hence an indictment under a statute making it an offense to play at games. etc. "Both notes and checks are acknowledgments of indebtedness and promise of payment." as used in Crimes Act. "Federal Reserve Notes are not dollars. Latvia . Thus. This facilitated the maintenance of Governments-in-Exile of the Baltic Republics and the maintenance of embassies in Washington.. 666-668. Principles of Public International Law. I. The validity of dynastic renunciations referencing subjects of public international law is subject only to the peremptory norms of international law. 15-19. Such Claimants are de jure Sovereigns and. Oppenheim-Lauterpacht. Oppenheim-Lauterpacht. D. pp. 1887 U." 36 American Journal of International Law (1942). Nos. Nos. The public international law regarding the legal effect of protests against the usurpation of sovereignty applies to republics as well as to monarchies. E. the de jure legal rights to the succession of that monarchy may be kept alive indefinitely through the legal vehicle of making diplomatic protests against the usurpation. Vol. a treaty may properly affect international rights in a manner which might not be recognised for private law rights under the municipal law of the place where that treaty was signed -. International Law. 9-11. pp. and the higher Supreme Court of the People. See also Article 53 of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. F. See Philip Marshall Brown. Such de jure possession of sovereignty continues so long as the de jure ruler or government does not surrender his sovereignty to the usurper.Similar to treaties. Book I. Chapter II. Governments-in-Exile are subjects of public international law.. pp. 100-101. as such. Upon the fall. Accordingly. Article 13 of The Declaration of Rights and Duties of States. matters pertaining to de jure Governments-in-Exile are matters of public international law. Survival of de jure Sovereignty and Governments-in-Exile: Under the doctrines of public international law a ruler who is deprived of the government of his country by either an invader or revolutionaries remains the legitimate de jure Sovereign of that Country while the de facto regime set up by the revolutionaries or the invader is considered an "usurper".. Law of Treaties (1961). Chapter 10. Vol. Oppenheim. Vol. the municipal or domestic law of the place where a renunciation concerning the succession to subjects of public international law is made does not constitute the proper law of that renunciation: See Lord McNair.. the congress.the treaty as an international act concerning subjects and objects of international law being governed by public international law. Foreign Relations 751 at 753. Digest of International Law. Law of Treaties (1961). See also Articles 27. libri Tres. not the local municipal law. See F. and Lithuania. See Whitman. 417. 145-146. . The de jure sovereignty of a state which has been usurped by a foreign conqueror is not extinguished by such usurpation but survives as long as such sovereignty is kept alive by competent diplomatic protests. both constitutionally and internationally. "Governments and Authorities in Exile. Book II. Le Droit des gens. the renunciation of rights to subjects of international law are governed by the canons of construction applicable to treaties and international agreements. E. Head of the Government-in-Exile of their usurped country. senate. See Emerich Vattel. 213-236. "Governments and Authorities in Exile. pp. p. See Hugo Grotius De jure belli ac pacis. No. I. such as a parliament. which are at present suspended due to the conditions arising from a usurpation of sovereignty. 21 &22. dispossession.. 568 at 581-582. and matters relating to them are within the scope of the jurisdiction of public international law as the applicable proper law . Brownlie." 36 American Journal of International Law (1942). "Sovereignty in Exile. 568-595. is deemed to have the implied constitutional power to perform all normal acts of state . 9 June 1949 by the International Law Commission of the United Nations. Exiled Sovereigns and Governments choice of law that of usurped state to govern political and public acts: Under public international law a Government-in-Exile. Synopsis Juris Gentium. The same is true of any treaty: The proper law of that treaty is public international law rather than the municipal (domestic) law of the place where the treaty was signed. monarchical or republican. and 47 of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. C. 921-930. Nos. rather than the law of the place where that Government-in-Exile may be located. See Johann Wolfgang Textor." 35 American Journal of International Law (1941). Oppenheim. including those acts which by its own constitution would require the consent of an organ of government. Chapter 4. or oligarchies: The United States of America refused to recognise the 1939 Soviet usurpation of the three Baltic Republics of Estonia. 46. p. Nos. 144. S. International Law. which persisted through the Cold War Era until these countries managed to recover their independence. or usurpation of a monarchy. democracies. Similar to treaties. I. See Lord McNair. France. United States. S. Yugoslav State before the Hungarian-Yugoslav Mixed Arbitral Tribunal on 6 Sept 1928. Perchman. 85 A. No. In all such cases courts will apply the law of choice as the substantive law governing that contract as the proper law applicable to that contract rather than the law of the place where the contract was signed. Sopron-Koszeg Local Railway Company Case. Mihan Singh v. 69. . 40. Annual Digest.R.L. of necessity. Robison et al. 453 (1895). the Sub-Divisional Canal Officer. Brownsville v. VIII. 228. Advisory Opinion No. State of Uttar Pardesh. 241 (1854). Annual Digest. 51. S. 122 Tex. 1929. Annual Digest. v. this doctrine is also affirmed in the following decisions of the United States Supreme Court in United States v. Mier. Pendery v. 542. Dent v. the United Stated. Case No. within the usurped State the public law of the former sovereign governing constitutional and public institutional matters must. 4 Pert. 331 U. 1 v. 7 Pet. 9 Pet. Thalheimer v.. 117 at 133. 64-66. American Journal of International law. United States 17 How. 171 U. pp. 131. XXIV (1930) pp. Thus. The same doctrine of public international law re complete survival of 'vested' private law rights upon state succession has also been affirmed in the following decision of American State courts in Miller v.. 100 U. Private law rights acquired or 'vesting' under the law of the former sovereign remain valid after state succession and continue to be governed by the law of the former Sovereign applicable at the time when such private law rights originally 'vested' or were acquired . S. 2944). S. Heirs of the Prince Mohammed Selim v. 56 Sw2d 438 at 444. Case No. P. 98 U. Cavazos. 58 U. 6. Annual Digest. 468 at 470 (1937). Given the many separate state successions involved in the formation of the United States between Great Britain. S.J. 49 Sw2d 404. Soulard v. p. 8 Wheat. Such 'vested' private law legal rights must be recognised by the new or usurping sovereign. United States v. 25 L. 37. Vol. at 232. 60. Town of New Haven. Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation District No.. In support of this proposition see the decisions of The Hague "World Court. 451 (Texas. Series B. 1919-1922. Harris et al. 579. 256 (1946) Society for the Propagation of the Gospel v.. or the nationality of the vessel making delivery. Survival of private law rights acquired under former sovereign: The fall. S. Shapleig v. O'Conner. 308 at 312 (1871). Annual Digest. Chavez. Recueil. the Permanent Court of International Justice in the case of the German Settlers in Poland. 1923-1924. 1932). Terrett v. Perot. 1955. the goods were delivered. before the Austrian Supreme Court in Civil Matters decided 13 May 1919. 185 Sw2d 993 (Texas. The general proposition of public international law is that the municipal law of a country is not changed by a change of sovereignty. S. and Hawaii. 299 U. the Heirs of Clarke and Atkinson. seller or the shipper has any 'contact' with the United Kingdom.. Official Journal. Fremont v. Annual Digest. Spain. Annual Digest. 1925-1926. Case No. if a Government-in-Exile located abroad (say the Governments-in-Exile of one of the three Baltic Republics during the Cold War Era) makes a public law act concerning its former State which has been usurped (as were the three Baltic Republics by the Soviet Union). Letzerich. Emmeger. Panhandle Refining Co.In such cases the choice of law by the parties making the renunciation of dynastic rights concerning sovereignties is the public law of that former State rather than the law of the place where the renunciation was signed. Annual Digest 1935-1937. the legal validity of the acts of that Government-in-Exile are governed by the public or constitutional law of that usurped State rather than by the law of the place where the Government-in-Exile happens to be located. the statutory law of the former Sovereign survives to govern private legal rights acquired or 'vested' under such statutory law of the former Sovereign. 86-87 (1830). 164-174. Choice of law is very common in private law commercial law contracts: A grain supplier located in Argentina shipping wheat to a purchaser in Russia upon a Liberian ship will commonly contract that the law relating to the shipment of the wheat will be British law (because British shipping law has been so well interpreted) even though neither the buyer. United States v. Occupation of Crete Case. 213 (1932). United States v. The Government of Palestine. Manry v. United States v. Ed 574 (1879). fall. As 'vested' or acquired private law legal rights.C. State Succession (Notarial Act) Case. 220 at 223. 34.Ely v. Fullard-Leo. However. 1929-1930. 1359. 428 (1879). p. Case no. Southwest Cotton Co. E. Supreme Court of India in Virendra Singh v. such survive the change or succession of sovereign. or usurpation of a former government or state brings into play the international law of state succession to govern resulting legal affairs: Briefly. Lega of Nations. the Republic of Texas. the Greek Court of Cassation. 159 U. p. 169 SW2d 766. 4 P2d 369 (1931). Delassus v. 16 Pet. at 493 (1823). 511 at 512 (1830). Taylor 9 Cranch 43 at 50 (1815). revolution. Case No. 14 Wall.. 39. notwithstanding the fact that the former Sovereign has been de facto replaced. 8. 1927-1928. Case No. 464. 138. United States.I. 1954. The sources shown below may help you to see that it is an established fact. United States 318 US.S. 289 S. 87 S. 232-3. Dist.W. … Executives.. like any other corporation or person is the holder-in-due course* of some contract or commercial agreement between it and the one upon whom the payment and performance are made and are willing to produce said documents and place the same evidence before trying to enforce its demands called statutes". 1 L Ed 440. United States. 147. 2d 357 (Texas 1956) and 324 S.” Gallegos v. Hood." Clearfield Trust Co.." CHISHOLM v.C. 93 "History is clear that the first ten amendments to the Constitution were adopted to secure certain common law rights of the people. GEORGIA (US) 2 Dall 419.2d 71 at 99 (Texas. Hanks. underlining.W. 2d 167 at 176. Balli. Luttes v.S. Supp. are sovereign. 154 (1873) . 387 US 253.Supp. This entity cannot compel performance upon its corporate statute or rules unless it. 3 California 27 at 37-38 (1852). Northern District of New York. as well as a respected and valid concept. 2 U. having taken up their abode with the intention of permanent residence. The following is a compilation of various case cites with objective to make more explicit the meaning of this DIPLOMATIC PROTEST: [bolding. 1945).W. 689 F. [*See footnote – Holder In Due Course Notes] “Federal employees may become personally liable for constitutional deprivation by direct participation. 419. the sovereignty devolved on the people. and as joint tenants in the sovereignty. removes the sovereignty status of the government of "We the People" and reduces it to an entity rather than a government in the area of finance and commerce as a corporation or person. 1961). All strangers are under the protection of the sovereign while they are within his territory and owe a temporary allegiance in return for that protection. 418 US 208.Ct. etc. added] SOVEREIGNS WITHOUT SUBJECTS – ESTABLISHED BY THE TREATY OF PARIS 1884 "As the use of private corporate commercial paper [Federal Reserve notes]. 71 F. 83 U.” Afroyim v Rusk.2d 853 (Texas. 1660. “We tend to overlook the basic political and legal reality that the people." Bell v. 363-371. and members of the Judiciary are inferior in the sense that they are in office only to carry out and execute the constitutional regime.S. and to those who are domiciled therein. 813. 190 S. Schlesinger v Reservists Committee to Stop the War. Valmont Plantations. 816 (1947) U.. and they are truly the sovereigns of the country. State.Vanderslice v. For purposes of suit. "Governments descend to the level of a mere private corporation and take on the characteristics of a mere private citizen.with none to govern but themselves. but they are sovereigns without subjects. (Dall. such corporations and individuals are regarded as entities entirely separate from government. debt currency or securities [checks] is concerned. Haggerty.. "The People of a State are entitled to all rights which formerly belonged to the King by his prerogative. The invocation of the Treaty of Peace with verbiage more understandable at: Chisholm v. Smith. 455 @DALL 1793 pp471-472 "The rights of sovereignty extend to all persons and things not privileged.." Lansing v. that are within the territory.So. not only to those who are naturalized. They extend to all strangers resident therein. “In our country the people are sovereign and the Government cannot sever its relationship to the people by taking away their citizenship.at the Revolution. clearly specifies that “We The People” are not “Subjects”. not the bureaucracy. State v. lawmakers. rather Sovereigns without subjects. 346 S. creation of a policy or custom under which unconstitutional practices occur or gross negligence in managing subordinates who cause violations.” The concept of sovereignty stands on its own. State v. -. v. 4 Wendell 9. State of Georgia. the citizens of America are equal as fellow citizens. CA. 20 (1829) ".W. failure to remedy wrongs after learning about it. Our Constitution governs us and we must never forget that our Constitution limits the Government to those powers specifically granted or those that are necessary and proper to carry out the specifically granted ones.." Carlisle v. but.D. but also to those whose residence is transitory.) 455 (1793). 454. against invasion by the Federal Government. and you yourselves touch not the burdens with one of your fingers. and can only be taken from him by due process of law." This is where the uniform commercial code enters as the . and them that were entering in you hindered. for I: a man called Little-John: of the family of Stewart: holding the office of the people: adhere to the Ten Commandments: with full liability: in and for the judicial-district: Prince Georges: the county. I feel I have displayed a sufficient array for confirmation and clarity of my Claims. are afraid of something. These laws/actions were/are expressly in force and effect on citizens of the federal government. so pervasive. ***************************************************** INTERLOCKING DIRECTORATES A/K/A INTERLOCKING EQUITY TIES to establish parameters of fiduciaries The U. 1985. that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.” Luke 11:46 “Woe unto you also. 88-243 (1963) and P. 630-631. lawyers! For you have taken away the key of knowledge: you entered not in yourselves. “The individual may stand upon his constitutional rights as a Citizen.. so complete.L. it has only one way to go. The “Doctrine Of Contribution” applies explicitly to Affiant. 18 U. Truman: “Once a government is committed to the principle of silencing the voice of opposition. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized. and advancing its noiseless step like a thief over the field of jurisdiction. in the field of commerce and manufacturing. and for other purposes.” President Woodrow Wilson: "Some of the biggest men in the U. 1986. gaining a little today and a little tomorrow. PL 88-243. until it becomes a source of terror to all its citizens and creates a country where everyone lives in fear.C.. so interlocked. an irresponsible body . responsibilities.. He owes nothing to the public so long as he does not trespass upon their rights.” President Theodore Roosevelt 1906: "Behind the ostensible government sits enthroned an invisible government owing no allegiance and acknowledging no responsibility to the people.working like gravity by night and by day.Hale v Henkel. To destroy this invisible government. etc.failure to prevent a deprivation of a constitutionally secured right (42 U. 201 US 243. beyond the protection of his life and property. however. until all shall render powerless the checks of one branch over the other and will become as venal and oppressive as the government from which we separated. and in accordance with the Constitution. 242. country of Maryland Republic: under the authority of the one living deity: “THE MOST HIGH ANU”: Little-John: Stewart . are afraid of somebody.C. and most potent.) is a Criminal Offense? To simplify issues and bring clarity concerning duties. you lawyers. He owes no such duty to the state.Exiled Sovereign. position is: a.” A vast assortment of supportive reference material is available. since he receives nothing therefrom. for you lade men with burdens grievous to be borne.” Oligarchy: Government by a few. S. His rights are such as existed by the Law of the Land long antecedent to the organization of the State.” Luke 11:52 “Woe unto you. to befoul the unholy alliance between corrupt business and corrupt politics is the first task of the statesmanship of today. 241. 88-244 (1963) introduces and "makes law" providing the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) as Private Law enacted for the municipal District of Columbia and the United States (federal government). 77 Stat 630 is "AN ACT To enact the Uniform Commercial Code for the District of Columbia. The first "connection" from the highest. we present the following Interlocking Directorates: 1. so watchful. 77 Stat.S." Harry S. and obligations of the offending corporate STATE OF Maryland officials.L. so subtle. Feral Government (not a typo) is out of control!! Thomas Jefferson said in 1821: “The germ of destruction of our nation is in the power of the judiciary. and that is down the path of increasingly repressive measures.S. P. 1983.S. those making up such a government – lawyers! May I remind you that ." Lenin: "The best way to control the opposition is to lead it. Bidwell. 59. originally incorporated February 21. as opposed to the public or the government (remember. concerning. For sake of simplicity. as exemplified herein. and the laws remain the same. (iv) In this connection. . 5-1-106. control. is Private Law only meant for private corporate citizens.C. 1871. Henkel. 43. (13 NY 378).S. WE THE PEOPLE and the private unenfranchised individual. H. are under "public policy" and are to deal only with other corporations. below. It is in the Vatican (actually. because the people [the sovereigns] presumably assented to the 1878 creation of the government corporation and because we suffer its continued existence. as referenced." and it is all "statutory". also see: Public Law 89-719. (ii) The Private Rights of Private Man is not affected by public law." [SEE also. 60. including governments. or affecting the common unity of the people. and is perpetual. associations. or anything else. may be referred to as Private International Law).R. private law. The United States.S. All private corporations.S. Federal Reserve banks derive their existence and corporate power from the Federal Reserve Act: Armano v. indebted continually to the people. belonging to a particular person or persons. it is an abandonment [delictual fault] of any and all power.e. or participation. (v) The distinction between public and private acts is not always sharply defined when published statutes are printed in their final form: Case v. public policy. b. People." (Emphasis mine) Hale v. (iv) Private means: not available for public use. as long as. (v) "The entire taxing and monetary systems are. Legis. The continued debt owed to the people is discharged only as it continues not to violate our private rights. Public Law was converted to Public Policy in 1938 (policy = political = police). 16 Stat. 201 U. 88-244. "We the people have discharged any debt which may be said to exist or owed to the state/government.J.. not International law (but. [Ratification Doctrine] . P. b. and it is owned by the same people that own public law 88-243 (1968). V. not holding an official or public position. placed under the U. the Federal Reserve Act is private law. Hist. a "Public Law". p. "All that government does and provides legitimately is in pursuit of its duty to provide protection for private rights Wynhammer v.C. the sovereignty reverting to the people whence it came. above and 2. B. 58. C. pgs. it is only about one hundred yards from the "Holy See"). and when government fails in its duty to provide protection-discharge its debt to the people. (i) To properly address "public law". the gubm't becomes no more than any other corporate "person"). The governments are. the Assemblage of Private Man. & 4. 589 F. authority or vestige of sovereignty which it may have otherwise possessed. 419 Chapter 62 Heritage Dictionary: Co·lum·bi·a (k…-l¾m“b¶-…) n.Supp 674 (1979). 1963. which duty is a debt owed to its creator. or corporations": 50 AmJur 12. U..L." The Federal Tax Lien Act of 1966. under the name "District of Columbia"".L. It is all private law.being commercial in nature of admiralty Jurisdiction.S. Private Man does not harm another Private Man. which debt and duty is never extinguished nor discharged. Conrad Pub.28 (ii) A private law can be enforced by a court of competent jurisdiction when statutes for its enforcement are enacted: 20 AmJur 33. not We The People. go back to 1. but Lawful. as a corporation. Res 778. A. 21 (1890). He is not "statutory". Co. (i) "A private law is one which is confined to particular individuals. Federal Reserve Bank 468 F. 182 U. December 10. the unenfranchised individual owes nothing to the government. 77 Stat 775] "It is well settled that "United States" et al is a corporation.If you're still confused.S.2d 949 (1978) . one must understand that it is "Private Corporate Charter" that owns the "P. p." Downes v.implied "law of the land. The UCC was written and is owned by UNIDROIT. 244 (1901). Kelly 133 U. No matter what the de facto government/state provides for us in manner of convenience and safety. hereby. (iii) Statutes creating corporations are private acts: 20 AmJur 35. pg 3722. presumably. (iii) Public means: of. Article III. Sections 105. conquer. July 4. 83. "This is the FUNDAMENTAL CHANGE necessary to effect unification of CIVIL and ADMIRALTY PROCEDURE. 194 U.S. the federal "State" is defined “(also known as). d. Jr. divorce. Declaration of Independence. if extant.C. 17. "The State of xxxxxxx." and in Sec. also The Coquitlam v.. it is the complete subjugation [to bring under control.S. 669.D. 105-113. 1938. (ii) How do "they" turn a bona-fide Republic State of the Union back into a "territory" of the United States? (A) On the political “side“. 52 U. Bennet vs. The Vatican Bank had owned Continental Bank." (Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure.] c. WHETHER THEY BE LOCAL OR GENERAL IN THEIR NATURE. Civil Law is opposed to Common Law. The Buck act affects the actions of all federal departments within the 50 states. (viii) The enumerated. 1776. 14. AND CONGRESS HAS NO POWER TO DECLARE SUBSTANTIVE RULES OF COMMON LAW APPLICABLE IN A STATE. pays $260. and administrative law. pg. Remember. Chicago.The civil law tradition makes a sharp distinction between private and public law. this is how. 1774. the Supreme Court overturned the standing precedents of the prior 150 years concerning "common law. which was once again brought inland. the federal government has created a "Federal area" within the boundaries of the several states. criminal law. f. The International Registry is the private law of UNIDROIT.C. to make subservient. also see. specified and distinct Jurisdictions established by the ordained Constitution (1789). can we all say U. and true identity theft by those known as "persons" of corporate nature. "THERE IS NO FEDERAL COMMON LAW. This area is similar to any territory that the federal government acquires through purchase. Tompkins. United States.Ed. conquest or treaty.(vi) NOTE: Concerning “private” v. are well hidden and nonaccessible and the Sovereign People are now draped with a blackened cloak of deceit. “public” via “Civil” Law . "…on the authority of the United States Supreme Court. United States. thereby imposing federal territorial law upon the people in this "Federal area. July 6. Vs. Declaration Of Cause And Necessity Of Taking Up Arms. and contractual agreements. Chicago Board of Trade is owned by a Judge. Section 2.S.000 per year to UNIDROIT for the use of the copyrighted UCC. 1982 Ed. Amendment VII. 82 L. BE THEY COMMERCIAL LAW OR A PART OF THE LAW OF TORTS" (See: Erie Railroad Co." The Supreme Court says. Declaration Of Resolves Of The First Continental Congress. 304 U. Butterworth. There is no debate that said States of the Union. 163 U.) [SEE 1 (a) above. [Boys and girls. 346.?] Under the "Buck Act. (vii) On April 25.S. There is no debate that the People obtained the Rights of the King as Sovereigns and Joint Tenants in the Sovereignty. whose sole stockholder was Walter Commings.S. The U." 4 U. 1775. 64. Oct. Private law includes the rules governing civil and commercial relationships such as marriage. the Chief Judge of 7th Circuit Court of Appeals. In many countries with civil law systems. There in 4 U. and under the Bill of Rights (1791). e. legal fictions. Federalist Papers No. Just as the 1938 Rules ABOLISHED THE DISTINCTION between ACTIONS AT LAW and SUITS IN EQUITY. Binns v. 110(d): The term "State" includes any territory or possession of the United States." in the Federal Government. 486. “There has been created a fictional federal "State (of) [name of . Public law consists of matters that concern the government: constitutional law. All courts in the United States (corporate zone) are "for profit" corporations and listed in Dunn and Bradstreet under the heading. 1188). two sets of courts exist—those that hear public law cases and those that address matters of private law. trickery. enslave] of any political unit to the federal government of the United States that makes a subdivision a territory".C Secs.S.S. this change would ABOLISH THE DISTINCTION between CIVIL ACTIONS and SUITS IN ADMIRALTY.S. creatures of pretense in mind only. were hodgepodged and fundamentally changed in 1982 to include Admiralty Jurisdiction. "Also Trades As:" (i) There is no debate that the free States of the Union once existed upon North American soil. Secs. Sinking Fund of Louisville. 686. § 30020(15)]. 192. 465. body of Christians also known as a “state. fable..Church as a Governmental Agency” Gone with the stroke of a pen. the Department of Homeland Security will now utilize our nations non-profit churches as one of the federal government's primary spying agencies." We have numerous references to this. 97 L. and possesses as its property one territory.For the purposes of this subchapter . and Departments and is further evidence that the United States Federal Government exists today in name only. 1621. ss) you may find written or indicated that your “Plaintiff” is the “UNITED STATES OF AMERICA”. This unity of the person and property of the state is expressed by the Common Law maxim. State Compact Act. March 9. 1621 -EXPCITE. how can “they” have access to our everyday functions to obtain control over the innocent maneuvers we must negotiate daily? “But. 33.". Pa.S. being bankrupt and insolvent. 2nd ed.Ed. in fact and in law. 677. Definitions -STATUTE.S.C.” The following is placed directly below to bring clarity to such: The State is a person. such statutes are intended to be applied to those who are here as "residents" in this State under the Interstate Commerce Clause of the Federal Constitution and the so-called Fourteenth Amendment. and constituting it a customs collection district. so its property consists of all the individual property of the citizens. aren’t “they”. this aforementioned Corporation. 617 (1953). 621..S. Howard v. 625. 258. either mediately or immediately. (1947) 67 S. 1. and are therefore holden. Public Law 89-719. so. O'Hara TP School District. [Primary laws extended to Territories] by the United States was the Customs Act of July 27. the Christ]. 4 U. 624.” A vast difference exists between a fiction. our Father. corporation of “some body politic” and the non-fiction. that all lands were originally granted out by the sovereign [Yahweh. this is how. 240. Clarity must be brought to the subject of “State. the feral government. 1993.Ct. 2006. 100 A 2d.R. Buck Act. of 1873-1874. 73rd Congress in session June 5. real and true. March 17. "It is an established fact that the United States Federal Government has been dissolved by the Emergency Banking Act. unicum patrimonium. As this one civil person consists of all the citizens. declared by President Roosevelt. Officers. (E) How is the “United States” usurping their “alleged” authority? In "the Court's" “Statement of Venue” (scilicet. let's look at United States Congressional Record. Though this may appear that this may be an . extending over the Territory the laws of the United States with reference to customs. Rev. corporation.TITLE 22 CHAPTER 21 SUBCHAPTER I -HEAD. in reality “NON EXISTANT”? Absolutely. In apprehension of [Christian and Biblical] law. legal entity.(a) The term 'person' shall include an individual. H. 1933. 330 U. (B) On the religious “side”. 22 USC Sec.J. 1933 Joint Resolution to Suspend the Gold Standard and Abrogate the Gold Clause dissolved the Sovereign Authority of the United States and the official capacities of all United States Governmental Offices. 1954-1976.S. 476. the [Christian] state holds the soil of the whole territory as one estate [in Christ]. as of Mach 07. 375. “EXECUTIVE ORDER 13397 .Sec. 344 U. commerce and navigation. 1868 [15 Stat. or the Government of the United States.state] within a state. 48 stat.Ct. Vol. in fee.C. 440 Yes. 73 S. (D) And.L. partnership. God. Schwarts v. Yahshua. The States are subcorporations of the Fed. [See 1934. the United States is a Corporation [See 28 U. through His Son. It is una persona.” United States v United Mine Workers of America. Under this act important powers of regulation were conferred upon the Secretary of the Treasury. Is any further comment necessary? (C) But. Stat. § 101]. page 342]. The Pope has ordered the genocide and enslavement of millions of people. Georgia 373 US 284 (1964): "Failure to obey the command of a police officer constitutes a traditional form of breach of the peace. 1815 De Lovio vs. so much for “un-biased” police. 402 are expended by a political subdivision. In order to clarify this statement.” Wright v. it is fatally flawed and is. to amplify their powers. 23 CFR PART 1250 . ix.40% TO POLITICAL SUBDIVISION PARTICIPATION IN STATE HIGHWAY SAFETY PROGRAMS 40% Benefit to Local-Reg Part 1250 gives 40 percent benefit to local police action through political subdivision participation in State highway safety programs under 23 U. (Bened. 44). Are “they” managing the herd? You bet they are. Case No. the second part of this indisputable political doctrine. by means of fictions. and it existed . In a landmark.” (iii) Whoever said the “police” are there to protect and to serve? I said that. an attempted enlargement. (the UNITED STATES is a CORPORATION. never disputed. one cannot be punished for failing to obey the command of an officer if the command itself is violative of the constitution. such expenditures are clearly part of the local share. prop 28.S. Obviously. 402 (b)(1)(C). The Pope can abolish any law in the United States.] Well. can be considered only as ingenious subterfuges and devices. 1250. we have taken the liberty of noticing synonyms to those words that may not be easily understood: (Common-Language Clarification) “and its further enlargements (expansions). c. to amplify (exaggerate) their powers. at this time. and still distinguished case we learn: “The proper jurisdiction of the courts of Common Law is of things done within the bodies of counties. it does not require the federal government or the state to provide services. of your non-existent granted powers and authorities. 418. Birmingham Al. (iv) The Constitution is a charter of negative liberties.S. 7 Fed.S.. not a land mass. We are bringing to your attention. XIV.776 (Reaffirmed 78 U.attempt to identify The United States of America. n. 29.1 53-54) h.” Justice Story. they’re here to protect the political establishment from knowledgeable people and to “serve” the public in the same way that a farmer gets his cow “serviced” to produce another calf. k. The Pope claims to own the entire planet through the laws of conquest and discovery. Boit. fact. 686 F2d 616. can be considered only as ingenious (clever) subterfuges (concealments) and devices (schemes). by means of fictions (imaginary/legal assumptions). it tells the state to let people alone .. you can ignore the license and a fee and engage the right with impunity. America is a British Colony. time honored. 2 Gall. 398.4(b) When Federal funds apportioned under 23 U. Cas. 1. Shuttlesworth v.: 373 US 262 (1962): “If the state does convert your right into a privilege and issue a license and a fee for it. by means of fictions. and law. 1 to 396 U." Bowers v Devito. even so elementary a service as maintaining law and order. 4. and its further enlargements.C. j. Prati. The Pope’s laws are obligatory on everyone.S. 215)." g. Dioec. vii. lib. in nature. (Papal Bulls of 1455 and 1493). [Note: previous to this it was stated that the Federal funds dispersed are at least 40%. (Papal Bulls of 1455 and 1493).C. 1844) (Syllabus. however. De Syn.. (Elements of Ecclesiastical Law Vol. i. &c. 5967. By legislative declaration the code is the law.D. general principles even when consistent with the code are merely . 1 Stat. Social Security is not insurance or a contract.S. At that time. nor is there a Trust Fund.the Rothschild banks of France financed the South. l.S. Judges do not enforce Statutes and Codes. FBI. (20 CFR chapter 111. V. (41 Stat. Actually. and if general principles appear inconsistent. o.C. There are no Judicial courts in America and there have not been since 1789. (Blacks Law Dictionary 6th Ed. 113. The King of England financially backed both sides of the Revolutionary war. The new SS5 forms do not state who or what publishes them. Government. December 13.the Rothschild banks of England financed the North. the code must be regarded as supreme. Public Law 94-564. even though the "US Government" held shares of stock in the various Agencies.) u. The Society for Propagating the Gospel. NASA and all of the other alphabet gangs were never part of the United States government. New Haven 8 Wheat 464. According to the GATT you must have a Social Security number. .103 (b) (2)). IRS Publication 6209. (IRS Publication 6209). Section 7(d) & (8). Reorganization Plan No. CIA. v. 1040 form is for tribute paid to Britain. do the “courts” enforce laws. as amended.006. New York City is defined in the Federal Regulations as the United Nations. 26. Social Security Numbers are issued by the UN through the IMF.). The IMF is an Agency of the UN. v. Keller v. 28 USC 3002(15)(A): "United States" means a Federal corporation. US. n. has not had a Treasury since 1921.. m.D. Thurmond). 285-288) y. (20 CFR chapter 111.) at pg. q. GE 281 US 464. the earlier SS5 forms state that they are Department of the Treasury forms. 254 US 491. CV-93-405E-EJE U. Rudolph Gulliani stated on CSpan that "New York City was the capital of the World" and he was correct. Pg. they must be considered displaced under AS 45. even where inconsistency does not exist. according to Tupper Saussey’s archival research. (Diversified Metal Products v. Treasury is now the IMF.] s.A 287 (1979 Ed. see also Public Law 88-243 and 88-244 (December 1963). or codes? Answer: Code is supreme. Sweers 1 Dallas 43. It is to be further observed that the "Agreement" regarding the Headquarters District of the United Nations was NOT agreed to (See: Congressional Record . See also: Bretton Woods Agreement. Mr. Articles of Association October 20.4 pg. (i) And. x. Davis 301 US 619.I. 680 F.S. PE 261 US 428. lock stock and barrel. The Application for a Social Security Number is the SS5 form.C. (Treaty at Versailles July 16. Britain is owned by the Vatican.214 pg. it was the Rothschild banks . Treaty of Peace 8 Stat 80. t. (FRC v. The U. (Presidential Documents Volume 29-No.) Respublica v. (U. 22 U. The IRS is an Agency of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) not the U.05. It should have written on the top left United States Treasury.S. The FCC.C. r. Lewis v. Davis 301 US 548. (Helvering v. The “United States” or District of Columbia is owned by the Vatican Bank. “Where both the code and general principles are available. The Department of the Treasury (IMF) issues the SS5 not the Social Security Administration. (Look at it if you receive one. subpart B 422. 816). Public Law 102-391. Senate Report 94-1148 pg. 1967.Senate. and is illegally in the Country in the first instant.S. subpart B 422. the former should always be considered and applied if applicable.S.). SEE: Agreement Between The United Nations And The United States Of America Regarding The Headquarters Of the United Nations. Strang. 1774.). (Treaty of 1213).before the revolutionary war and the British troops did not leave until 1796.103 (b) (2) (2)). IRS et al.S. Steward Co. Treaty of Peace 8 Stat 80). Treaty of Commerce 8 Stat 116. Executive Administrators enforce Statutes and Codes. p. House Report (103-826) w. The U. Moreover. the King of England was also the King of France. V. 241). Ch. 138-178).2d 1239) ["They are also corportions. Your Social Security check comes directly from the IMF which is an Agency of the UN. 22 U. 654). 1782. You can get a copy of the SS5 you filled out by sending form SSA-L996 to the SS Administration. LeVan. both in the sense that it "fails to give a person of ordinary intelligence fair notice that his contemplated conduct is forbidden by the statute. and law. and the operation in the law is shrouded in mystery.2d 959. the Lawful Capacity. be they high or low. he is inviting a close inspection of his returns. 575 P. 9 UCC Rep. from the Citizens and changed their Lawful Standing to “Legal Status”.2d 1221. the Executive and Legislative.Definitions. the agents were. has no influence over either the sword or the purse. or your local County Clerk for a CERTIFIED COPY of your County Charter in any State. z. No sophisticated person is unaware that even in this commonwealth the Internal Revenue Service has been in possession of facts with respect to public officials which it has presented or shelved in order to serve what can only be called political ends. merely Administrative Agencies and only have the authority conferred by Statute. but merely judgment. a ground for prosecution is anybody's guess. 617. but prescribes the rules by which the duties and rights of every citizen are to be regulated.supplementary“." “When this court found that the Internal Revenue agents had violated the law and that the improperly seized records were to be returned. The Judiciary. Herndon v. In most any issue at hand we might suggest the following: "This ordinance is void for vagueness. reviewing the Act of the 34th Congress. And a judge who knows the score is aware that every time his decisions offend the Internal Revenue Service. There have not been any Judges in America since 1789. 240 F. It may truly be said to have neither force nor will. Supreme Court in 1860. 632 (1978) (ii) But. Kelley. no direction either of the strength or of the wealth of the society.Serv. Prince v. are “judicial” courts necessary? Answer: The particular need for making the judiciary independent was elaborately pointed out by Alexander Hamilton in the Federalist. (ii) Dear Friends: this all leads to domestic terrorism! Please follow: 18 USC 2331. The U. The Reconstruction Acts took away the Lawful Standing. Keller v. the police courts. to REGISTERED VOTERS in a TWO BRANCH GOVERNMENT. Thornhill v. The Legislature not only commands the purse. from which we excerpt the following: "The Executive not only dispenses the honors. 167 (1965).Supp. Every Court.” Lord v. and because it encourages arbitrary and erratic arrests and convictions. 367 (1971). PE 261 US 428 1Stat. 138-178). Harriss. (i) Modes of enforcement are erratic and arbitrary. on the contrary. You will discover that ALL cities and counties in your State have only two branches. Want proof? Go to your local City Clerk and ask for a CERTIFIED COPY of your City Charter in any State.S. There have just been Administrators.S. Alabama. not happy. from top to bottom. and can take no active resolution whatever. but holds the sword of the community. More than once have judges of a court been indirectly reminded that they too are taxpayers. 301 U.S. None of the Court’s of any State are created by the Constitution of their State." WE HAVE NOT HAD THIS BALANCE OF POWER FOR A VERY LONG TIME!! (iii) The “ideal” of checks and balances within government structure have long been a thing of the past. There is no Judicial Branch!! The Judicial Districts were all abolished in 1856 by the Act of the 34th Congress. 486 P. 23 UCC Rep. 242." United States v. Kelly v.Serv. 310 U. 347 U. No. Lowry. to say the least. the district courts and the circuit courts are ALL Statutory Courts created by Statutes which were enacted by the Legislature and in fact. 88. ordered ALL the States in existence at that time to close down all the Court’s of law and all courts complied in 1860.S. the municipal courts. Miller. . (FRC v. As used in this chapter (5) the term "domestic terrorism" means activities that (A) involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the . from ELECTORS in a THREE BRANCH GOVERNMENT as they were in Original Jurisdiction. 612. 78. GE 281 US 464. the justice of the peace courts. United States or of any State; (B) appear to be intended (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; aa. The most powerful court in America is not the United States Supreme Court but, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. (42 Pa.C.S.A. 502). bb. We (as corporate entities) own absolutely nothing not even what we think are our children.(Tillman v. Roberts 108 So. 62, Van Koten v. Van Koten, 154 N.E. 146, Senate Document 43 & 73rd Congress 1st Session, Wynehammer v. People 13 N.Y. REP 378, 481). cc. We are Human capital. (Executive Order 13037). dd. You (as corporate entities) can not use the Constitution to defend yourself because you are not a party to it. Padelford Fay & Co. v. The Mayor and Alderman of City of Savannah, 14 Georgia 438, 520) That's why I rely on YOUR sworn Oath to keep my Rights as "secured by the Constitution". ee. It is not the duty of the police to protect you. Their job is to protect the Corporation and arrest code breakers. Sapp v. Tallahassee, 348 So. 2nd. 363, Reiff v. City of Philadelphia, 477. 1262, Lynch v. N.C. Dept of Justice 376 S.E. 2nd. 247. However, please be mindful that, it is not until you get to Article 10 (PL 88-243, 77 Stat 630) - Construction with other laws that you begin to see that the laws of the Republic were left in place in Section 28:10-104; Laws not repealed. And, remember, in UCC 1-103.6 it clearly states that all is to be done in accordance with the Common Law, so, remedy is available, although hidden. This is how "they" brought in all of the Uniform Laws through D. C. and because all of the states are subdivisions with interlocking directorates, all are simply municipal corporations of D.C., and the D.C. code applies - if you are a corporation. Ahhh, but, how does the “court system” see this? Many illustrations could be included, but, this document does not have room. I will take only the space for one small example: In 1976 our court system (what was left of it) was flushed away. Senate Bill 94-204 deals with the court system and Senate Bill 94-381 deals with Public Law. These solidified changes in all operations of law by utilizing the words "construe and construct". Slight deviations transfer meaning of words to fit their dolus agenda, such as, "in" changed to "at", "at law" v. "in law". Lawyers, judges, and the "court system" are now allowed to change any word they wish to mean any thing they want. The "law" now means whatever they choose it to mean. It is no longer a court of "law", but a court of "construe and construct". Lawyers are the guilty culprits that make these devious changes. Often their answers will reflect such changes. They intentionally misquote past cases, or other issues, as facts by making such changes. Illegal? Not according to the above Senate Bills. So, be aware, "they" can construe "their" copyrighted laws any way they wish to fit the situation for their own betterment; and, you have no say about it. Can you use the same copyrighted codes, laws, statutes, and regulations against them? Not unless you have a license from the BAR. You will be in violation of copyright infringement and punishment is mandatory. Learn this - there is NO LAW in this nation, or the world, for that matter. There is ONLY contract law. And, the only Bill of Rights the "courts" are required to take cognizance of is the 13th, 14th, 15th, and 16th. Fair nuff? Consider the following fact of “law”, which shall be reiterated further in this document: "Judicial Notice" was commanded in the case of Hooven and Allison Co. v. Evatt, 324 U.S. 652, where the Supreme Court ruled that particular case was the last time it would address "official definitions" of the term "United States", affirming that there are two (2) distinctly different United States with two (2) opposite forms of governments, both having the same congress. [“Opposite” means opposing!!] 2. All governments, and every agency thereof, are corporations, obtaining any jurisdictions from their Charters, as per: Government Is Foreclosed from Parity with Real People – Supreme Court of the United States 1795 a. "Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person, an abstraction, and a creature of the mind only, a government can interface only with other artificial persons. The imaginary, having neither actuality nor substance, is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity with the tangible. The legal manifestation of this is that no government, as well as any law, agency, aspect, court, etc. can concern itself with anything other than corporate, artificial persons and the contracts between them." S.C.R. 1795, Penhallow v. Doane’s Administrators 3 U.S. 54; 1 L.Ed. 57; 3 Dall. 54, Supreme Court of the United States 1795 -----; and, b. "the contracts between them" involve U.S. citizens, which are deemed as Corporate Entities (remember, although all government agents and employees are 14th Amendment citizens, this Sovereign is not); (i) The Congressional Record, June 13, 1967, pp. 15641-15646 - "A 'citizen of the United States' is a civilly dead entity operating as a co-trustee and co-beneficiary of the PCT, the private constructive, cestui que trust of US Inc. under the 14th Amendment, which upholds the debt of the USA and US Inc. in Section 4." and, c. Wheeling Steel Corp. v. Fox, 298 U.S. 193, 80 L.Ed. 1143, 56 S.Ct. 773, "Therefore, the U.S. citizens residing in one of the states of the union, are classified as property and franchises of the federal government as an "individual entity"", and, d. "This State" and "this county" and all "municipalities" are controlled by 42 USC IT IS ALL IN TITLE 42, SECTION 3711 THROUGH 3796, This shows that every agency involved in criminal cases receives Feral funds. Find the State code and you should find a State Agency that compares to the Coordinating Council. These are not the only agencies that grant federal funds into the States. This is only the beginning: DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE HAS 4 PARTS: OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE BUREAU OF JUSTICE STATISTICS BUREAU OF JUSTICE ASSISTANCE ALL OF THESE 4 DEPT. ARE HEADED BY AN ASSISTANT U.S. AG. WHO IS APPOINTED BY THE PRESIDENT. HOW IS THAT FOR A MILITARY SET UP? Criminal justice system has ALL OF THE FUNCTIONS OF: (a) State highway patrol, county sheriff, municipal and township police, and all other enforcement agencies. (b) the court of appeals, courts of common pleas, municipal courts, county courts, and mayor’s courts when dealing with criminal cases. (C) prosecuting attorneys, city directors of law, jails and on and on. Title 42 USC sec. 3791(a) States means any State of the US, DC, commonwealth Puerto Rico, Units of Local Government means any city, county, township, parish, village or other general purpose subdivision of a State. Title 42 sec. 3732 reads The State Coordinating Council has a Director appointed by the Governor. His duties are full federal control over the States. Start to understand who you are really up against. Find the flow of money. Title 42 sec. 3732 reads: (a) There is established within the Dept. of Justice, under the general authority of the AG, a Bureau of Justice Statistics (Bureau) (b) The Bureau shall be headed by a Director appointed by the President, and with the advice and consent of the Senate - - - The Director shall have final authority for all grants, cooperative agreements, and contracts awarded by the Bureau. The Director shall report to the AG, through the Asst. AG WOULD THIS NOT LEAD YOU TO ASK SOME QUESTIONS? (1) The name, and address of the Director per Title 42 @ 3732 (2) Certified copy of Oath (3) Certified copy of bond or insurance that covers his actions (4) Copy of contracts awarded that award money to the State (5) The reports the AG made that reflect that money Once you establish that the courts, prosecutors, public defenders, auto registration, are all claiming federal money for their operations then they commit fraud in the procedures they use, it is actionable under FALSE CLAIMS ACT. For some interesting reading get a copy of Title 4 USC and take careful notice of the section "States". Also, Term “state” as used in rules providing when a state may appeal in a criminal case is all inclusive and intended to include not only the state but its political subdivisions, counties and cities. Spokane County v. Gifford, 9 Wash.App. 541, 513 P.2d 301, 302. Federal Government is a “state” bound by all of provisions of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers. Enright v. U. S., D.C.N.Y., 437 F.Supp, 580 581. Foreign State. A foreign country or nation. The several United States are considered “foreign” to each other except as regards their relations as common members of the Union. ... 3. An issue declared, but not rebutted, stands as Truth in Law (thus, this proper rebuttal): a. All "U.S. citizens" were classified as "Enemies of the State" as made more explicit in our "EXHIBIT 063 NOTICE THAT AFFIANT IS NOT A "nom de guerre", in which we demonstrated that, pursuant to Public Law 94-412, 90 Stat. 1255 (1976), the state of national emergency has been officially terminated by the United States Congress, and accordingly, any and all authorities which might have permitted Civil Courts of Summary Jurisdiction ("Star Chambers") to exist in American federal courts were also effectively terminated by said Public Law [See 42 U.S.C. 1986], and explicitly brought forward in EXHIBIT 063 - NOTICE THAT AFFIANT IS NOT A "nom de guerre", with an additional eight (8) Points. For brevity, only one point will be displayed: Point 063 A. Affiant has no record or evidence to indicate that Affiant is a combatant enemy of the State, or that Affiant is a belligerent of the government, as per; article by Chuck Morse, “Is the ‘National Emergency of FDR’ Still In Place?” that: “This was a classic example of sleight of hand. In fact, Congress exempted all laws, based on the emergency of 1933 that were already in place. Rather than being based on the authority of the President under a ‘national emergency’ these federal laws have now been codified as a permanent part of the U.S. Federal Code. Included among the codified laws would be Section 5(b) of the Trading with the Enemy Act, which classifies the American citizen as an enemy of the government.” Therefore, although the “national emergency” technically ended on September 14, 1976, when the 93rd Congress passed H.R. 3884, the National Emergencies Termination Act (50 USC 1601, Public Law 94-412), because the last paragraph said that it didn’t apply to any “authorities under the act of October 6, 1917, as amended,” the classification of a United States citizen still stands as enemy of the government, Affiant has no record or evidence that Affiant should maintain any association with the label, definition, or designation of a US citizen, or any similar appellation. b. Under Act of Congress, May 31, 1878, c. 146, 20 Stat. 87, 31 U.S.C.A. § 404, which enacts that notes of the United States, issued during the war of the Rebellion, under acts of congress declared them to be legal tender in payment of private debts, and since the close of the war redeemed and paid in gold coin at the treasury, shall be reissued and kept in circulation, is constitutional, and notes so reissued are a legal tender. This idea supports that, under emergency - the War of Rebellion (Civil War), the printing of Notes is Constitutional. Of course in the actual theater of war, the Constitution is suspended, and some of the Executive Orders of the War Between the States are still in full force and effect. No. [and. is hereby amended to give to the Secretary of the Treasury exclusive jurisdiction. (See Hepburn & Dundas v. 445 (1805). . and. "A mixed war is one which is made on one side by public authority. onshore.. 1898 (U. and control of the Washington City post office in the Secretary of the Treasury. This notation is to "de-fuse" any assumption/presumption that this Affiant is "subject to". And. 405. Americana of Puerto Rico.C. and conscience of Affiant. 14401.. Acacia Mut. within. Ellzey. Life Ass'n.C. 820 F. U. The Constitution does not say that the District of Columbia must guarantee a Republican form of Government to its own subject citizens within its territories. Kaplus.C. custody. bear in mind that: (1) the "Emergency War Powers Act" is in full force and effect.. 4. Why were the post offices in Washington.R. 925 (1944).S. Supp.S. D..S. and. II CHS. Long v. to be operated by him the same as other public buildings under his custody and control.So. 30 P. it is important to remember that it has full authority to enact legislation as private acts pertaining to its boundaries. control. title 40. and custody of the Washington City post office and the additions thereto.S. in the abbreviation section you will find U. the United States. and. or a "citizen of" any such extension/trespass against the mind. (3) all U. pre 1969.2d 431 (1966). c. will.constitution that created it. Vol.S. 1306 AN ACT To provide for placing the jurisdiction. Cir.] [Public. 1933 [CHAPTER 162] < !--[if !supportLineBreakNewLine]--> < !--[endif]--> March 1. among others). every post office with "zip" codes] Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled. 1987). 160-162 MARCH 1. citizens are declared as "enemies of the government". Glaeser v. That the Act of July 1.] Washington City post office. the Territories. 1933 [H. 285). b. Black's Law Dictionary 5th Ed. sec. 614. page 1420. Jurisdiction. or "Private Man". a "public authority" exercises "Private Law". Inc. and enclaves. We have determined that a "mixed war" is a "Commercial War". District of Columbia. (2) though "notes" are not Lawful Money. 368 F. to the benefit of corporate strategy. or offshore. which is not unlawful if not exercised against a "Private Person". they are declared "legal tender". placed under the Secretary of the Treasury.C. When Congress is operating in its exclusive jurisdiction over the District of Columbia. and it is not a state of the union of States because it exists solely by virtue of the charter compact . and. (4) all "legal tender" (notes of the Federal Reserve) is defined as US currency. located at North Capitol Street and Massachusetts Avenue. and the other by mere private persons. placed under the authority of the Secretary of the Treasury??? 72d Congress Sess. p. the United States. etc. of. the definition of Columbia you will find: Columbia. then in the American Heritage Dictionary.2d 409 (D." a. v. 6 U.C. In Noah Webster's dictionaries. or without. defined as United States of Colombia. 55 F. 1968. different/alternate) union of American STATES. And. HJR-192 which provides for its issuance as “Public Policy” in remedy for discharge of equity interest recovery on that portion of the public debt to its Principals. 1933. And of course includes public law 73-10. The original. Please note the distinct difference and meaning in the two words "of" and "for". pay special attention to the fact that there is a "statutory" pledge and they assumed position as receiver: Title 31 USC 3123 makes a statutory pledge of the United States government to payment of obligations and interest on the public debt. and further states.. Consequently. Congressmen politicians.I apologize whenever I disturb any of the "pajama people". possession) the United States of America". This is the country founded by the Bill of Rights. Title 18 Sect. “the Secretary of the . it was given a "title". 8 defines ''obligation of the United States'' to include……“ all certificates of indebtedness …. “the Secretary of the Treasury shall pay interest due or accrued on the public debt” and further delineates a portion of the total public debt which is held by the public. to support the indebted legal fiction. as in the NAME of a vessel."Constitution of (belonging to. 3002(15)(A). "UNITED STATES". It says. UNITED STATES CODE. how can "they" rightly claim the position of "receivers of the bankruptcy"??) (i) Please observe the "sleight of hand" as the International Bankers slip in to "assume" the position of "Creditor". how did the International Bankers become the "receivers in bankruptcy". and that IN ALL CAPITAL LETTERS..." officials. The U. or someone. law enforcement personnel. but was implicit. When the "constitution" was used as the corporate charter for the Act of February 21. without contributing any money. was what is plainly stated at Title 28. labor. go back to sleep . f. (ii) We must get more specific to unravel the threads of this web of deceit. and Sureties bearing the Obligations of the UNITED STATES. engineering. v. The full "Changing of the Guard" (state name change status) was accomplished in. else . Of means something belongs to something. the only ones put at risk are the ones that turned in their gold to the "Securities Intermediaries! (So. the Preamble was the "title". but first. why is the Secretary of the Treasury also known as the US Governor for the International Monetary Fund? e. and future children of We The People. 3002(15) (B) & (C): That all departments of the UNITED STATES CORPORATION are part of the corporation. 1945) the legal fictions called "State of YOUR STATE" confirmed and "pledged" what was not theirs to pledge.drawn upon authorized officers of the United States issued under any Act of Congress. ALL "public servants. and the Secretary of Treasury the "alternate permanent member. So. "22 USC 263(a). Title 28.shall not be questioned. What was not said in 1871.. Attorney General is the "permanent member" to the Secretariat of the Interpol Operation. basically reiterates that the UNITED STATES is a corporation. remember. technology. If you don't want to learn. 1781. . the agents are required to renounce their allegiance to their respective countries and expatriate. as “the net public debt”. And. And. seating of judgment) the United States of America". hence creating a new (and. the sweat.Approved. what difference does it make if they changed one tiny little word? You'd better learn. Canada was part of the original charter). are express agents of the Foreign Principals who have bankrupted and stolen the United States (of America) through the paper money banking swindle and other frauds and treacheries.. March 1. how are all the "States" linked to the Feral Gubm't? (i) All states in the Union were reformed as franchisees or political subdivisions of the corporation known as the UNITED STATES. In the 14th Amendment (which all "public" gubm't employees are party to) it plainly states: The validity of the public debt. [you and me]. attorneys. . (ii) The other united States is the Continental united States. the States and their various agencies. judges. d. The "Corporation" and its' subsidiaries have suffered at least three bankruptcies. the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution for the United States (actually. I think. whatsoever.S." Under Article 30 of the "Constitution and General Regulation of Interpol. organic Constitution had no title. Much later (Conference of Governors.” which of course includes the Secretary of the Treasury.Constitution of the United States of America. "Constitution for (the seating of a Tribunal. and is. there was. we solemnly state: (i) We are NOT Austrian or Hungarian nationals. Austria. TWEA T 50 APPENDIX App. threat of imprisonment.. our information seems to be most current.. Understand this. Therefore. our (non 14th Amendment citizen) debts.house. Next. but no offices are filled. And. the Trading With The Enemies Act. and. and found the most recent edit of Title 50a of the US Code was released by the Law Revision Counsel . never the interest. in particular. it is the accrued interest returning to its' source. you can not pay a debt instrument with a debt instrument (a "bill" with a Federal Reserve Note).shall not be questioned). you can only discharge the debt .Treasury shall pay interest due or accrued on the public debt” and further delineates a portion of the total public debt which is held by the public. b. Maryland State. Irish. as “the NET public debt.000 limitation: "The aggregate amount treated as acquisition indebtedness for any period shall not exceed $1. It was the Private Man under duress. let me state that "money" is the ONLY creation of mankind. [non-14th Amendment citizens].gov/) of the U. [non-14th Amendment citizens]. In the Nature of Declaration.000. (me) as Equity for my losses incurred by supporting the Beast (turning in the Lawful Money . The de facto institutions of government have no "negative" expenses. I must reiterate that it is the 14th Amendment citizen and the Treasury Department that is not to question "The validity of the public debt..” So. The United States of America. and 16 of TWEA in Title 50 APPENDIX App. British. and reducing the public debt in the process. so the debt accrues and climbs to a higher level with each use. (iii) All said Corporations are subject to the Secretary of State. or setoff. or AustriaHungary ancestry. that delivered his gold to the thieves. House of Representative on 2007-02-13 . We have studied. we confirm: (i) We have administered our Claims under Oath.set it off into the future. We have determined that Sections 7. in reference to (ii) above stating that “the Secretary of the Treasury shall pay interest due or accrued on the public debt” and further delineates a portion of the total public debt which is held by the public. The Communal Debt was.000. in depth.(http://uscode.. (iv) The next question that must be addressed is that of "Communal Credit".” when you and I direct the Secretary of the Treasury to discharge. it was not the corporate entities that turned in the gold. there can be no expenses for the same. $1. Now. 5. (iii) The question of "Communal Debt" arises and must be answered to clarify the issues." (vi) I must address the issue of what. of Scottish." (.Gold). (ii) All Claims are ONLY against Corporations. and the "net public debt" is the interest due or accrued. Marylandans. Section 4. coercion.. First. "public debt" is the charges against me by the several and many corporations that "service" me (government and non-government. a.000) limitation on each occurrence that I may make "request for discharge" against the net public debt: Title 26 USC section 163(h)(3)(B)(ii).000.LRC . as they hire only qualified pirates and thieves. no Communal Credit. and.. 9. under said document. in the "form of money" was created to bring about this majestic public debt. and. etc.. Referenced to 14th Amendment. or how much.and most recently processed by the Legal Information Institute on Fri Feb 16 04:33:56 2007. Since the de jure governments are in position. and an indeterminate .S. which is to be returned to the source. please be informed that only the debt money is created.. but all corporate). and is. Hungary. loss of life. (v) I am convinced that there is a one million dollar ($1. as “the NET public debt. the debt of the Corporation(s). governments and the expense of running the same.000 in the case of a married individual filing a separate return). (ii) We ARE Maryland Nationals. We are NOT of Germany. provides us with remedy and recourse.000 ($500. 588. All of our parents were of similar percentage of European and Indian stock. A conusance of exclusive jurisdiction. A domestic corporation does not become a foreign corporation merely by accepting from another state a grant of the right to own property and . 6.S. and has established a relationship with the Comptroller. by express enactment. as per. English law. 2. TWEA states that. We exercise Right of Claim as Remaindermen and heir to all assets belonging to our natural parents. or by his representative. (iii) above. 509 Bac. Pl. In Erie Rail Road –v.Thompkins (1938).J. Foreign Corporations follows in its entirety: 19 C. Cognitio placitorum. which may vary from time to time. a corporation may be deemed a person. They are bonded to do so and they have taken an oath to do so. “All Law is Commerce!” Please see EXHIBIT Commercial Crimes. who has chosen to commence his action out of claimant's court. According to Bouvier's Law Dictionary. and therefore it must be demanded by the party entitled to conusance. b. which is the Highest Crime under International Law. but a claim of conusance may be made by attorney. deemed to be a foreign corporation. or country. (iii) There are three sorts of conusance. without reference to the residence of its stockholders. after one has proper standing. or the place where the business is transacted. CLAIM OF. a corporation. and not by the defendant or his attorney. FOREIGN CORPORATIONS Definition and General Considerations A foreign corporation is one that derives it existence solely from the laws of another state. You have been properly Noticed of: (i) My declaration of citizenship was made known for this last time in Section 5. At common law. as in the case of plea to the jurisdiction. b. and the term is used indiscriminately. the status of a foreign corporation as either foreign or domestic is determined solely by the place of its origin. the U. 5 Vin. 157.S Supreme Court Ruled: “The United States is a Bankrupt Nation in Receivership to this Nation’s Creditors. 3. all court decisions are based on commercial law or business law and has criminal penalties associated with it. c.” And. when the plea is commenced in one court. ibid. a majority of whose stock is held by aliens.percentage of American Cherokee and other American Indians lineage. government. 1. However. demanding judicature in the cause against the plaintiff. that they. Id. Ab. is. Generally. of which conusance belongs to another. which does not oust another court of its jurisdiction." c. 403. (iii) Our declaration of citizenship (pursuant to Trading With Enemy Act. the law of nations and the treaty of nations.J. We are properly seated in Office of We The People. (ii) Notice has been served on the original registrars. TWEA) is upon the land as Marylandans (not within any corporate entity). which guarantees every man the right to make political self determination. Courts. for some purposes. 409. and not between the plaintiff and defendant. (ii) It is a question of jurisdiction between the two courts Fortesc. UCC 1 and UCC 3 filings mentioned previously to effectively function to alleviate the distresses and eliminate the Breach of the Peace. R. being. (iv) Our proper political standing is established in International law. CONUSANCE. Blacks Law Dictionary. Section 883. they are the original fiduciary. Revised 6th Ed (1856): a. 19 C. to designate either a corporation created by or under the laws of another state or a corporation created by or under the laws of a foreign country. and statutes providing that corporations shall be deemed persons include foreign corporations. or incorporators. A plea to the jurisdiction must be pleaded in person. as that no other court shall hold pica. 2 Wilson's R. This is defined: (i) to be an intervention by a third person.S. page 1531 says. &c. 6th Edition. 884 of Chapter XVIII. Abr. 1 Chit. they have a duty to protect me. sometimes in statutes. "In essence. page 541. Hard. Sections 883. but only creates a concurrent one. Tentere placita. XVIII. In the case of Olmstead vs. may not exercise their authority for personal motives. Justice Bandeis eloquently affirmed his condemnation of abuses practiced by Government officials. 564. The higher the number of defendants created. of course the "Fed" makes grants to the States . and liberty alike demand that Government officials shall be subjected to the same rules of conduct that are commands to the Citizen. the judge. 170 P. in the administration of the law. and governmental employees working in concert and collusion. it teaches the whole people by its example. police officers and district attorneys to rope as many people into the court process as possible. it invites every man to become a law unto himself. 2001) "government officials in general.that much. 240 F3d 512 (6th Cir. on its face. 18 USC 31. the corporation can have no existence. it is a numbers game.The term "used for commercial purposes" means the carriage of persons or property for any fare. Crime is contagious. existence of the Government will be imperiled if it fails to observe the law scrupulously. offices. . d. must be clearly defined in the statute before it has subject matter jurisdiction. 575. Surely. or other undertaking intended for profit. with commercial penalties. e. charge. or other consideration. and where that law ceases to operate. the borrower is slave to the lender) (ii) Commercial Vehicle Programs . 48 S. excess of jurisdiction. whether directly or through a court sitting administratively as the hearing officer.Ct. "An action by Department of Motor Vehicles. or lack of all jurisdiction. least of all in a sworn officer of the law.All law is "commerce". Against that pernicious doctrine. security.S. And. To declare that. or property or cargo. A state cannot impose one of its artificial creatures on another sovereignty nor confer on its corporators powers which they can lawfully exercise beyond its jurisdiction." c. acting as Government officials. fee. 277 US 438. due to the usurpation of authority. U. (6) Motor vehicle. because of Interlocking Directorates of many agencies. this Court should resolutely set its face. 177 C. Status A corporation exists only in contemplation of law. 93. and the District Attorney. If the Government becomes a law-breaker. BE INFORMED. "Ignorance of the law does not excuse misconduct in anyone.It all Starts Here: (i) TITLE 49 Sec.--. Federal Corporations A federal corporation operating within a state is considered a domestic corporation rather than a foreign corporation. the higher the payout for the police officer. Like any other commission structure. the end justifies the means would bring a terrible retribution. (iii) "Your" driver license is a commercial permit. and cannot migrate to another sovereignty. implementing statutes actually gives incentives to judges.Grants to States (and. McCurdy v Montgomery County.or should know . 18 USC 31. particularly in response to real or perceived slights to their dignity. Our Government is the potent." d. In a Government of laws. 1100. While. (And. and police officers in particular. who were defendants. and by force of law. For good or for ill. rate. passengers and property. Ohio. as per: a. It invites anarchy. anyone who takes an oath of office knows . Rather. the omnipresent teacher. is the experiencing of major pains and penalties and other crippling injuries. not granted by the Lawful Man. it is only good for "commercial vehicles") 7. The United States government is a foreign corporation with respect to a state. 72 L ED 944 (1928) he declared: "Decency. Section 884.— The term “motor vehicle” means every description of carriage or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used for commercial purposes on the highways in the transportation of passengers. 31102. f. the resultant effect. it must dwell in the place of its creation. it breeds contempt for law. "executive measures" with the red and blue lights may seem to be a way to deter crime. or directly or indirectly in connection with any business. [SEE 1997 Court Funding Act] b." In re McCowan (1917). (10) Used for commercial purposes. .to transact business in such other state. 70 (19 73).S. ch 45. ask yourself how many of your family that you love have been destroyed by an "extra close shave ." Bradley v. Carr. or other notice or demand that simulates any form of court or legal process and that threatens the other person. and directives to: a. 316. paper. "The Fifth Amendment provides that no person shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself. Statute at Large 2005. if you have a cow and you want a calf. 1990). document. duties. Yes. Assure that all related agents/agencies receive verification of this documentation.S. Ramirez & Sandoval.without such jurisdiction of the licensee.13 Wall 335. or causing to be sent or delivered.” Lefkowitz v. failure to verify the signature of the arresting officer on the Uniform Violations Complaint precluded the district court from being vested with subject matter jurisdiction and from being empowered to act. (Text of section effective July 1. § 10. After all the above issues are brought into the light of Truth.2d 427 (Okl. or with the imposition of a counterfeit lien on the real or personal property of the other person is guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. Most pirates are nothing more than “privateers” contracted to the “Crown”. (Just bear in mind that a snake is a snake. 414 U. j. Turley. Harassment by threat of fraudulent proceedings prohibited: Source: Statute at Large 1997. City v Pearson. "A distinction must be here observed between excess of jurisdiction and the clear absence of all jurisdiction over the subject-matter any authority exercised is a usurped authority and for the exercise of such authority. United States (iii) Commissioner of IRS. ch 120." How many of your paychecks have gone to the Beast and how many of your homes have gone to the international bankers thru fraud and deceit?) If you do not comprehend that every “patrol vehicle” is a Pirate Cruiser.NOTICE TO THE PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO THE AGENT. hearing officers. I’m not saying that all pirates are bad. there is but ONE JUDGMENT CALL for those at ground. i. 2006) Harassment by threat of fraudulent legal proceedings or liens prohibited--Misdemeanor--Subsequent violation felony. because of the effect on his records (iv) U. 1392. Lack of belief in the jurisdiction or authority of the state or of the United States is no defense to a prosecution under this section. all acts of the agency. because of the affect on the banking system (ii) Secretary of State. by its employees. g. Cr. h. When in doubt. The Fourth Amendment forbids stopping a vehicle even for limited purposes of questioning its occupants unless the police officer has a founded suspicion of criminal conduct. Any person who harasses any other person by sending or delivering. § 228. monetary fines. The Amendment not only protects the individual against being involuntarily called as a witness against himself in a criminal prosecution but also privileges him not to answer official questions put to him in any other proceeding civil or criminal formal or informal. or penalties. 872 F2d. U. but not limited to: (i) Comptroller of the Bankruptcy.the sheering of the Sheeple. Just remember. then. Many actually believe they are doing a service for the community. you are charged with the responsibilities. notice of intent to bring suit. Attorney General . NOTICE TO THE AGENT IS NOTICE TO THE PRINCIPAL . State. Convert them one by one. Because of Interlocking Directorates and networking computerized files. Therefore. Educate them as best you can. go back and read the above until you do.† 640. grass roots.” Buis v. including. all proceedings in the trial court are rendered void. Most are just not informed. Ct. you call a farmer with a bull to “service” your cow. when the want of jurisdiction is known to the judge. you can starve the corporate beast. are null and void. “As the majority states. 125 US 618. 351. no excuse is permissible. Point clear? 8. 94 S.S. where the answers might incriminate him in future criminal proceedings. level and that is to STOP THE PIRATES AT "CRUISER" LEVEL. A second or subsequent conviction for a violation of this section is a Class 6 felony. directly or indirectly. 352. any letter. with incarceration.Fisher. 792 P. 181 Cal." Doolan v. agents. V. hereinafter “Treasurer” Department of the Treasury 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington.2. it hastens toward the goal. UCC 8-102(a)(15)(iii). Entitlement Order. seated in Office of We The People. 12 CFR 210. and those who collect from you awaken? Indeed. 'Woe to him who increases what is not his -. v. Because you have looted many nations. Treasurer of the United States.S. by way of this communication appoint Rosa Gumataotao Rios in Treasurer’s commercial capacity as Securities Intermediary to process the annexed Entitlement Order under this reduced-to-writing instruction as an effective Payment Order. UCC 3-105(a). custom is Law. UCC 8-501 through 511. For it is yet for the appointed time. U. looking to the highest known Person in venue of the Treasury Department of the United States government. do hereby. Entitlement Holder. you will become plunder for them. UCC 8-102(8). that the one who reads it may run.for how long -. to the town and all its inhabitants. 12 CFR 229. and it will not fail. all the remainder [remnant] of the peoples will loot you -. it will not delay… Behold the proud one. EXHIBIT H MEMORANDUM OF RECORD TESTAMENTARY AFFIDAVIT . AND PAYMENT ORDER This Letter Rogatory. "Biblical Law at "Common Law" supersedes all laws. wait for it. Your assistance is requested to further expedite the desired intent of this package and is deeply appreciated. Though it tarries." ********************************************************** 14. and "Christianity is custom. and notify me if any major changes are necessary.because of human bloodshed and violence done to the land. BOTTOM LINE: A Sovereign Citizen cannot be punished for sincerely held religious convictions. Cheek. I am in hopes that this package will suffice to accomplish the desired goals of bringing equity to this Private Man and assisting the operations of United States government by providing deposits and other support to the administration of said government to diminish the national debt. listed above. Accomplish the task of: (i) Removal of our Christian Appellations. DC 20220 LETTER ROGATORY. UCC 4-105.2. chapter 2 NASV: Then the Lord answered me and said. and say. Little-John: Stewart.(v) Associate U. TO: Rosa Gumataotao Rios.and makes himself rich with loans? Will not your creditors rise up suddenly. 12 USC 1813(1)(A). Hardaway 1790. his soul is not right within him… Will not all of these take up a taunt-song against him. examine the contents of the attached package. Attorney General (vi) Chief Counsel of the Office of Foreign Asset Control pursuant to 40 Stat 411 b. make any minor adjustments to the verbiage that may be necessary keeping the "spirit" of the intent unchanged. from Enemy of the State database (ii) Placing our Diplomatic Standing in National Crime Information System – presented explicitly in the National Crime Information Center. "Record the vision. requesting that Rosa Gumataotao Rios. Black’s 5th page 133. even mockery and insinuations against him. and Payment Order is presented by Little-John: Stewart. for it will certainly come. Habakuk. Rosa Gumataotao Rios. Points and Authorities: UCC 8-102(7). and inscribe it on tablets." Robin v. ENTITLEMENT ORDER. I.S. Rule 902. 1961." and for evidentiary purposes." . to establish "Self-authenticating evidence under Seal.This Testamentary Affidavit is prepared in accordance for use under the authority of and in accordance with the "Convention de la hay. 5 Octobre. Federal and State under the authority of and in accordance with the Rules of Evidence. mis-informed. which would attach to my children. act as settler. I specifically deny that there is any law that can compel me to accept or assign liabilities imposed by the compelled use of a legal personality. my biological property gifted to me by the Creator." “right of exemption. Section 3. wherein that Court affirmed.S. my own commercial vehicles and devices and my own natural amenities from whatever resource derived. heretofore having properly identified Himself to be a native born Natural American Free Inhabitants. depending on the context. I specifically deny that I ever had. bearing true faith and allegiance thereto. Justice Harlan dissented as follows: "The idea prevails with some -. and by virtue of the appertaining thereto. 182 U. that. emphasis added] This theory of a government operating outside the Constitution over its own territory. to wit: I specifically deny that I have granted. as. with all its restrictions. Testamentary Affidavit) Bouvier’s Law Dictionary: Oath Purgatory. EXPLICIT – Corporate and “citizen” denial Due to the convoluted. 3 Wheat. Bidwell. donor or grantor of any res. 16 U. the issues are NOT as to whether there are three different "United States" operating within the same geographical area. or the STATE OF Maryland.VERIFIED OATH PURGATORY (A. a Legitimate Born Child (not a “natural born child” having a/any government for a father)." and all other Rights Unalienable (Rights Not In A Lien-Able Position). the other to be maintained by Congress outside and independently of that instrument. sui juris. assign. by swearing to a fact which is an ample excuse. implied. under 4:3:2. intent to pledge. or grantor of any res to which a trust wherein LITTLE J.” is a beneficiary having a territorial relationship with UNITED STATES. when a man is in contempt for not attending court as a witness. 182 U.” There are three different and distinct forms of the “United States” as revealed by this case law: “The high Court confirmed that the term "United States" can and does mean three completely different things. 92 U. 542 (1876) & United States v. and war-like attributes of Legislated Aggression against Claimant/Grantor and other People upon the Soil of North America. a sovereign elector inhabiting The Maryland Republic. Stewart. resulting. and one "United States" operating outside the Constitution over its own territory (in which it has citizens belonging to said "United States"). 258 U. that the Constitution does not apply outside the limits of the 50 States of the Union. Bidwell. donated or given any legal title to any purported.indeed.S. 298. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.A. by exercising such powers as other nations of the earth are accustomed to exercise. the “Vessel. or STATE OF Maryland.K. 1 and Downes v.S.” To whom these presents shall come. charitable or other trust administered by the UNITED STATES. page 380. Cruikshank. was further confirmed in 1922 by the Supreme Court in Balzac v. as publicly published and thus declared nunc pro tunc. thereby Little-John: surnamed Stewart. Affiant. . when he removes the suspicions which were against him. the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.that we have in this country substantially or practically two national governments. vs. at page 305. is free born upon the soil of the Nation of Maryland. Evatt. I further specifically deny that I ever had or have any intent to create a cestui que trust. Porto Rico. "right of soil. to be maintained under the Constitution. “A purgatory oath is one by which one destroys the presumptions which were against him. quoting Downes supra and De Lima supra. the "United States" was given exclusive power over the territories and the citizens of the "United States" residing therein. and. I specifically claim ownership and right to use of my own properties. 324 U. donor. were settled in 1901 by the Supreme Court in the cases of De Lima v. he may purge himself of the contempt. Clause 2 (4:3:2) of the Constitution. 244. one. jus soli. Bevans. 652 (1945) & United States v. Grantor explicitly denies being a corporation or a citizen of any corporate agency or activity and Grantor vehemently rebuts any presumption/assumption that is part and/or parcel to any confusion of “citizenry. whereby Little-John: surnamed Stewart." "right of preemption. In Downes supra.S. 336 336 (1818) The issues of this instant matter IS that Claimant/Grantor is NOT a “citizen” of any corporate structure. it found expression in arguments at the bar -. for his is then said to purge himself. is settlor." "right of property. distorted.” Hooven & Allison Co. enjoying the.S. BE INFORMED! The undersigned. with citizens of the "United States" belonging thereto under Article 4.S." [Downes supra. as subject to condition precedent. gift. propagated from Lawful Wedlock. or now have. deceptive. [See 1934. Buck Act. so far as they can be made the lawful objects of civil government.S. the United States. united by compact. and it’s under Federal Debt Collection Procedure.(2d) 107. STATE. 342. The present United States Constitution replaced the Articles of Confederation on March 4.. and its satellite corporations sometimes referred to as “STATE OF XXXXXX. A federal government is distinguished from a national government by its being the government of a community of independent and sovereign states. But because these two characters are united in the same legal entity. 1789. As a political institution. since they can represent only one. 2008) at p. The Articles created a loose confederation of sovereign states and a weak central government. along with other Americans clearly understood" the Articles of < < !--[endif]--> Government information (Library of Congress) may be only superficially true. an American national and a belligerent claimant. or by citizens of any Foreign State. American Sovereigns: The People and America’s Constitutional Tradition Before the Civil War (Cambridge University Press. Claimant/Grantor hereby asserts the right of immunity inherent in the 11th amendment: “The judicial power shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity. The Continental Congress adopted the Articles of Confederation as the first constitution* of the United States. the United States is a Corporation [See 28 U. 4 U. and is subject to different liabilities from those which are imposed upon the private corporation. The Library of Congress version of what happened to the Articles of Confederation of November 15. Yes. *Christian G. Bureaus. on November 15. commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by citizens of another state. A national government is the government of the people of a single state or nation. 1777 is the official explanation of why the uninformed populace has no other choice than to be a “citizen” of the United States.S." STRAND v. the municipality occupies a different position. However.. while in the other it is a mere private corporation.” have no jurisdiction over Claimant/Grantor. 1943). Inc. 6 Ohio St. The need for a stronger Federal government soon became apparent and eventually led to the Constitutional Convention in 1787. As the national library for the Confederation "to !--[if be the first federal Constitution. 1777.C. 131 [ISBN 978-0-521-88188-3 (noting that "Madison. ratification of the Articles of Confederation by all thirteen states did not occur until March 1.” Of a subordinate nature adding confusion to conflict there are two (2) separate and distinct national governments and a federal government."In its governmental or public character. 1781. § 30020(15)].") !supportLineBreakNewLine]--> . leaving most of the power with the state governments. The States are sub-corporations of the Federal United States. State Compact Act. it does not follow that the shield which covers the political equally protects the private corporation. 1777 Article IV. as a corporation. Departments. Claim of Status – Free Inhabitant Grantor claims the status of free inhabitant (rather than a superficial “citizen”) of the United States under Articles of Confederation of November 15. § 101]. 116 (January 6. 1856 WL 59 (Ohio) There is a circus of conflicting deceitful codes that act as the operating procedures of the FEDERAL CORPORATION: the United States. and all Courts and their officers have failed to state which United States they represent. 16 Wn. and possessing complete and perfect supremacy over persons and things. united as a community by what is termed the social compact. Fritz.C. it represents the state. All Federal Agents/Agencies. the aforementioned Corporation. Unwritten law applies to everyone. both. He is entitled to carry on his private business in his own way. and in accordance with the Constitution. since he receives nothing therefrom. Maryland. He owes nothing to the public so long as he does not trespass upon their rights. Many say that Federal and State governments would like to see the Articles of Confederation of November 15.. Section 1). which is exercised by the enactment of written law. THE ARTICLES OF CONFEDERATION OF NOVEMBER 15. as evidenced elsewhere within these annexed documents and claims exemption from arrest for. and the immunity of himself and his property from arrest or seizure except under a warrant of the law. . A person (a state. All legislative. Grantor claims the status of free inhabitant. He owes no duty to the state or to his neighbors to divulge his business. so far as it may tend to criminate him. That is different than an oath. is a “Binding Agreement” to fulfill his Promise as Executive Trustee. but not limited to Grantor’s Exchangeable Energy in the form of Currency). as per: "The individual may stand upon his constitutional rights as a citizen. 43 (1906) ********************** EXHIBIT “F” DOCUMENT IN SUPPORT OF CHARGING ORDER TO TREASURER OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA The Presidential Oath made by the President of the United States of America (Article 2.) gives value (Constitution) for rights (to be recognized internationally) as security (promise to pay creditors of the Confederacy) for satisfaction (acknowledgment of international law) of a preexisting claim (need for a plan to pay international creditors). 1777 WERE ONLY REPLACED BY THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES WHERE THE LAND IS OWNED BY THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. the Library of Congress cannot claim the Articles of Confederation of November 15. Among his rights are a refusal to incriminate himself. HENKEL. CONCLUSION Grantor chooses the Law Common as handed down through the generations and documented in the Holy Writ. A person (state citizen [by Mom]) gives value (signature on application for birth certificate) for rights (to be beneficiary on the trust) as security (promise) for satisfaction (distribution from the trust) of a preexisting claim (beneficial interest in the trust created by the Constitution).United States.e. 1777 limited government in America. or to open his doors to an investigation. He has a constitutional oath." HALE v. 201 U. A person (corporate United States) gives value (certificated security = birth certificate) for rights (to create money on the signature of the man = borrow from the people) as security (promise not to deny or disparage rights of the people) for satisfaction (acknowledgement of obligation to people) of a preexisting claim (beneficial interest in the trust created by the Constitution). and judicial officers performing under him in his capacity as Commander in Chief have oaths of office. This supporting document is in reference to a “Pre-existing Contract” known as a “Certificate of Live Birth. The Articles of Confederation of November 15. He owes no such duty to the state. executive. i. I reiterate. 2. and can only be taken from him by due process of law. 3. He does not have an oath of office. 1777 permanently removed from the Organic Laws of the United States of America. but written law only applies to government and its citizens.” to wit: 1. as the Articles of Confederation is the only real source of government power. as there is simply be no documentary evidence of that or the "repealed" word would have been used. etc.S. His rights are such as existed by the law of the land long antecedent to the organization of the state. beyond the protection of his life and property. but it cannot happen. 1777 have been repealed. The President’s oath is consideration sufficient to support the simple contract that the President (executive trustee) has with the people (beneficiaries). His power to contract is unlimited. Himself and his various properties (including. “We tend to overlook the basic political and legal reality that the people. like any other corporation or person is the holder-in-due course of some contract or commercial agreement between it and the one upon whom the payment and performance are made and are willing to produce said documents and place the same evidence before trying to enforce its demands called statutes".. Supp. GEORGIA (US) 2 Dall 419.So.” And. 232-3. 1 L Ed 440. For purposes of suit. The issuer has the liability.. 816 (1947) U. and Accounting by. protect and defend the Constitution) for satisfaction (performance) of a preexisting claim (people’s beneficial interest in the trust created by the Constitution). as per: Hale v Henkel. but the rights of trustees who are merely public officials exercising public functions or who are naked trustees of a passive trust are not vested.. Smith. as per: Bell v.." And. removes the sovereignty status of the government of "We the People" and reduces it to an entity rather than a government in the area of finance and commerce as a corporation or person. against invasion by the Federal Government.Supp." And. United States 318 US. A person (a state... I AM THE BENEFICIARY. I am the HOLDER OF THE NOTE (Birth Certificate – Certificated Security). “Rights acquired by trustees under a private. He owes no such duty to the state. as per: Schlesinger v Reservists Committee to Stop the War. lawmakers. Further: As per: Clearfield Trust Co. This entity cannot compel performance upon its corporate statute or rules unless it.with none to govern but themselves. Maryland. Haggerty. … Executives. Hood. not the bureaucracy. i.” And. “The individual may stand upon his constitutional rights as a Citizen. but they are sovereigns without subjects. creation of a policy or custom under which unconstitutional practices occur or gross negligence in managing subordinates who cause violations. "History is clear that the first ten amendments to the Constitution were adopted to secure certain common law rights of the people.. 93 “Federal employees may become personally liable for constitutional deprivation by direct participation. CA. the sovereignty devolved on the people. since he receives nothing therefrom. Make a note of this – The President of the United States of America. 455 @DALL 1793 pp471-472 ". debt currency or securities is concerned. such corporations and individuals are regarded as entities entirely separate from government. Northern District of New York. It is the holder who acquires a security interest in the instrument. beyond the protection of his life and . it is the holder. and as joint tenants in the sovereignty. is the ONLY EXECUTIVE TRUSTEE of the Trust. as per: Gallegos v. Dist. It is not the issuer who has the security interest. because of his Oath. 363-371 "As the use of private corporate commercial paper. and members of the Judiciary are inferior in the sense that they are in office only to carry out and execute the constitutional regime." And. A person (President) gives value (Article II oath) for rights (to be Commander in Chief) as security (promise to preserve. I ACCEPT the instrument.e. 6. active trust are vested. 71 F. whereupon. 16 CJS Constitutional Law §229.) gives value (office in the federal government) for rights (to be part of the union of American states = federal United States) as security (promise to abide by terms of Constitution) for satisfaction (performance on terms of Constitution) of a preexisting claim (promise to pay creditors of the Confederacy). v. 20 (1829)"The People of a State are entitled to all rights which formerly belonged to the King by his prerogative. 4 Wendell 9.C. Rights of. "Governments descend to the level of a mere private corporation and take on the characteristics of a mere private citizen.4. as per: Lansing v.” [emphasis added] And. A guardian has no vested right to be governed by the law in force at the time of his appointment and qualification. as per: CHISHOLM v. etc. failure to remedy wrongs after learning about it. 201 US 243.S. are sovereign. 5. A person (officer in the federal government) gives value (Article VI oath) for rights (to hold an office) as security (promise to support “this” constitution) for satisfaction (performance) of a preexisting claim (people’s beneficial interest in the trust created by the Constitution).D. and they are truly the sovereigns of the country." And. Trustees and Guardians. 689 F.at the Revolution. 454. 813. the citizens of America are equal as fellow citizens. 418 US 208. of which. In this sense the king is a sole corporation: so is a bishop: so are some deans." "At the original endowment of parish churches. and his predecessor who lived seven centuries ago. In the beginning as explained by Blackstone. at best. and can only be taken from him by due process of law. and.property. persona. and in accordance with the Constitution. particularly that of perpetuity. By incorporating the parson and his successors a corporation sole. designating the man a corporation sole. it is not simply for the holding of property. any more than the king. A man can possess the rights of a church through the fiction known as "artificial corporate personality" that is. He owes nothing to the public so long as he does not trespass upon their rights." "Corporations sole consist of one person only and his successors. on his death it might descend to his heir. the parson was compensated with the assets of the church which is in essence the vesting in him of the church's property rights. which is an invisible body. and prebendaries. The law therefore has wisely ordained. as a temporal recompense to him for his spiritual care of the inhabitants. since a corporation can't act on its . "all the original rights of the parsonage are preserved entire to the successor: for the present incumbent. persona ecclesiae. As we seen earlier. in order to give them some legal capacities and advantages. were vested in the then parson by the bounty of the donor. in some particular station. and would be liable to his debts and incumbrances: or. Now in order for these property rights to be available for the next parson for compensation. is one that has full possession of all the rights of a parochial church. in order to protect and defend the rights of the church (which he personates) by a perpetual succession. the parsonage house. and with intent that the same emoluments should ever afterwards continue as a recompense for the same care. are in law one and the same person. because by his person the church. the churchyard. But how was this to be effected? The freehold was vested in the parson. are in law one and the same person. and the tithes of the parish. in exchange for the spiritual care of the inhabitants. distinct from their several chapters: and so is every parson and vicar. which in their natural persons they could not have had. is represented. and he is in himself a body corporate. and what was given to the one was given to the other also. He is called parson. the freehold of the church. shall never die. a church is a corporation/legal person and as such it is capable of holding property and entering into contracts. and his predecessor who lived seven centuries ago." Today the use of a corporation sole is slightly different.Parson < !--[if !supportLineBreakNewLine]--> < !--[endif]--> Commentaries on the Laws of England (1765-1769) Sir William Blackstone A PARSON. His rights are such as existed by the Law of the Land long antecedent to the organization of the State. the glebe. the heir might be compellable. the rights could not be vested in the man in his "natural person" capacity for upon his death these rights might descend to his heirs and therefore the rights of the church was vested in him in the capacity of a [corporation sole]. By which means all the original rights of the parsonage are preserved entire to the successor: for the present incumbent. that the parson quatenus parson. and what was given to the one was given to the other also. However. if we supposed it vested in his natural capacity. by making him and his successors a corporation. who are incorporated by law.” ************************** EXHIBIT G . at some trouble and expense. to convey these rights to the succeeding incumbent. [2004] 1 S. The Principles of Modern Company Law (1954) Stevens & Sons. A bishop or parson acting in a corporate capacity and holding property to him and his successor in right of office. which in their natural persons they could not have had. in his dual capacity of artificial person and natural person. But it is not necessary to pursue the comparison into all its details. . for he has no personal property except the rents and proceeds of the corporate estate. for he regulates his own action. . by his own will and judgment.B. growing out of the different modes of constitution and forms of action. so is a bishop. in the case of the corporation sole it is the office (of bishop. Bennett. a company is a corporation aggregate. is striking and obvious. [It is to note however that when a man ACTS in the character of the OFFICE. the personification of the undertaking as opposed to the natural persons operating it from time to time. he requires no particular. his own will alone regulates his acts and he has no occasion for a secretary. for he need not keep a record of his acts. who is incorporated by law in order to give his successors in office some legal capacities and advantages. Gower. David Sears 39 Mass (2Pick) 122 at 128 (1839) "." Professor L.In all these aspects.own it needs a legal personality (agent) to do these things. the idea behind the corporation sole is the same as that underlying the corporation aggregate. END OF: Commentaries on the Laws of England (1765-1769) Sir William Blackstone < !--[if !supportLineBreakNewLine]--> < !--[endif]--> By attaching a body corporate (corporation sole which represents the OFFICE of PARSON and its UNDERTAKINGS) to the body natural of a man. the parson is able to carry out the business of the church in "person" (agent).C. need no treasurer. It should be stressed. dean. even though it may be a one-man company. like any other individual acting in his own right. London. 436. as a bishop...R. by designating the parson as a corporation sole. in order to give him some legal capacities and advantages and especially that of perpetuity. p. and his successors in some particular station. however. 62: . particularly that of perpetuity. he performs all legal acts under his own seal. vicar or the like) which is personified to distinguish it from the individual holder from time to time. the law treats the body natural and the body corporate as being one and the same. In his own name and name of office. that the distinction between the two kinds of corporation has no necessary connection with the number of members. he is able to protect the rights of the church through perpetual succession. In short. A corporation consisting of one person only. and so is every parson and vicar. has no need of a corporate name. and these he takes to his own use when received. the points suggested are sufficient to show the legal distinctions between the two classes of corporations. so are some deans distinct from their several chapters. not sole. the distinction between an aggregate and sole corporation. By-laws are unnecessary. In the case of the corporation aggregate it is the undertaking which is personified to distinguish it from its members. Black’s 1st Law Dictionary CORPORATION SOLE. who is made a body corporate and politic. In this sense the sovereign in England is a sole corporation. A corporation sole consists of a single person. etc. 2004 SCC 17 (CanLII) . John Doe v. The Overseers of the Poor of the City of Boston v. That personality (agent) is the corporation sole.C. 2d 555. ************************************* Trust Receipts – from 89 C. recordation or verification requirements. Trust In trade practice and by the support of the judicial authority. 30 F. It sponsors charitable events. and delivers possession to the dealer. Trust) Thoroughly established. A well-known instrument of commerce. and to whom title goes ultimately when the primary right of the banker has been satisfied. To do these things. The Uniform Trust Receipts Act governs receipt transactions. holding and administration of property is to capture only a portion of the purpose it is intended to serve and to artificially truncate its functions.Y.. The role of the corporation sole as a legal interface between the Church and the community is set forth in the legislation creating it. quite simply. Whether the trust receipt transactions is tripartite type (where the finance company (in New York City) advances the funds for the purchase of the chattel. Inc. The Church is at one and the same time a spiritual presence in the community and a secular actor in the community. a chattel mortgage. Cal. Some of the chief differences are the absence of actual or immediate delivery.A. . S. The Act. 12. 1913. It does not confine itself to the holding of property belonging to the diocese.N. It purchases and sells goods and property. 557. and the same principles govern whether the transaction is domestic or the financing of imports. because of their beneficial features in quick credit transactions and their frequent judicial concern.The purpose for which ecclesiastical corporations sole like St. purchases it and receives title to it from the manufacturer. educational and social activities.Supp. the removal of notice. and it is for the same reason that holders of trust receipts have been allowed to prevail against the ultimate purchaser or his trustee in bankruptcy only where the title of the holder was derived from some one other than the debtor. George's. a trust receipt might equally be used in connection with a domestic transaction as it is used in an importation of merchandise. but is exactly none of these mediums of trade and credit. That personality is the corporation sole. The task of the corporation sole is to provide a bridge between the two spheres for the diocese. C. Trust receipt.C.S.J. On a secular level.—In re Boswell. D. in all its aspects. but his receiver. incorporates the office of bishop. To restrict the purpose of the corporation sole to the acquisition. George's are created is to serve as a point of legal interface between the Roman Catholic Church and the community at the diocesan level. as owner.S. have become thoroughly established and identified in business and law.J. It makes contracts with employees. or change of possession.N. Notes: (Also from 89 C. It is an independent security devise employed in commercial credit transactions. Trust receipts. title to goods passes directly from the manufacturer or seller to the banker or lender who. c. a useful and convenient method of financing commercial transactions. It transports parishioners. who gives his trust receipt (street name) to the finance company) or it is the bipartite type (where the dealer has purchased and received title directly from the manufacturer and gives his receipt to the finance company) matters not at all. Trust receipts have generally been held not subject to recording or filing acts. and it is generally held that rights incident to such title and ownership will be recognized not only as against the one giving the receipt. the Church interacts with members of the diocesan community in a host of ways. It carries on a variety of religious. A trust receipt purports to vest and retain title in the holder of the receipt. the reason being that such statutes are to prevent secret liens on property of persons who have had prior possession and ownership of the property. unless the contract is itself violative of local statutes. it requires a legal personality. and the retention of title in the vendor. trustee in bankruptcy. frequently employed in the importing trade. or a conditional sales contract. By means of the trust receipt. As used in commerce by credit and financial agencies it is regarded as a security instrumentality which resembles a pledge. 20 F. and creditors generally. delivers the goods to the dealer in whose behalf he is acting secondarily. and also in the marketing of automobiles. An Act to Incorporate the Roman Catholic Bishop of St.C.—In re James. [In New York. Duniap Carpet Co.A.Mo.. 643. Northeaster Finance Corp. Bank v. to the enterprise of foreign commerce. 47. Original use Trust receipts were originally employed as a convenient method of financing importations. (2) A merchant who wishes to import goods for which he has not funds to pay obtains credit from a bank to a fixed amount.. 241. whereby he agrees to sell the goods for account of the banker. he agreeing to pay all or part of the proceeds of the sale to the lender. and of business facilities and agencies abroad. 733.. lends his money to the borrower upon the security of the goods.A. three. 255. 171 N..A. and without having possession. As used in the importing trade (1) The term “trust receipt” is applied to an instrument in writing whereby a banker. 20 F. and its later application to domestic transactions.C. Of vital importance in importing trade By the arrangement known as the “trust receipt” plan a banker advances money to an intending importer. The only kind of instrument which we have recognized and called a trust receipt is one where the banker at the request of the importer buys goods directly from the foreign seller and takes title in his own name from the foreign seller and then turns the goods which he has thus bought directly in his own name over to the importer on a trust receipt in order that the latter may carry on his own commercial adventure.C.E. D. of credit. 748.—In re Cattus. N. a trust receipt might equally be used in connection with a domestic transaction as it is used in an importation of merchandise. 30 F. 644.C.Y.E. 106 C.—In re Boswell. two. the title remaining in the banker until the price is paid to him. huh?] (3) It is an instrument whereby the banker advancing the money on an importation takes title directly to himself. 557.—People’s Nat..Cal. 751. 152. 282 F. 45 F. or four months.Pa.. 751 The origin and development of the trust receipt as a convenient means of financing importations. . D. 731. which remains in the borrower. and are still so used. C. delivers possession of the merchandise to the importer on an agreement in writing to hold the merchandise in trust for the banker until he is paid. 46.2d 239. 726.C. C. and as owner delivers the goods to the dealer in whose behalf he is acting secondarily and to whom the title ultimately is to go when the primary right of the banker has been satisfied.2d 912. and thereby lends the aid of capital. C.Y.Y.Supp.2d 555. Method of securing mercantile loans.—In re. having no prior title to the goods upon which the loan is to be given. 734.—In re James. having advanced money for the purchase of imported merchandise and having taken title in his own name and retaining such title. 117 N. –In re Bell Motor Co. Mulholland. 228 Mass. Used in domestic transactions In trade practice and by the support of the judicial authority. which the borrower is privileged to sell clear of the lien. Such ‘trust receipts’ include the long-established method of securing mercantile loans by a transaction in which the lender. who delivers the same to the importer against a receipt called a trust receipt. is exhaustively discussed by the Court of Appeals of the Second Circuit in the case of In re Fountain Inc. The banker accepts the draft payable in one. —Simons v.748.. 730. 913. Inc. 171.2d 19. The essential character of the trust receipts has long been understood by the mercantile and banking community. as the case may be. against which he draws for the price of the goods to the order of the vendor or the vendor draws for the price of the goods to his own order.. 22.’—In re Boswell. N. The draft with the bill of lading indorsed in blank or to the order of the bank is forwarded by the vendor to the banker for acceptance.C. to pay him the proceeds and so put him in funds to take up the acceptance at maturity.C. 271 Mass.N. The documents in which the transactions are expressed are known in the business and banking world as ‘trust receipts..A. 183 F. This practice is of great importance to importers and without it much of our foreign trade would be impossible because the individual importer lacks the necessary capital and foreign credit. Cal. Use extended because of marketing of automobiles The use of trust receipts has become greatly extended in the United States since the automobile has assumed its nationwide and popular proportions in financing and credit requirements for this major industry. forwards the bill of lading indorsed in blank to his agent in New York.. 206 F. 96 F. in a conditional sale. it can be retaken at any time. If he retakes the goods. Not chattel mortgage (1) “Upon examination of the instrument in suit it seems plain enough that there was no obligation imposed on the sales company either to pay or to secure a purchase price. and whether or not the bank. 165 F. which rests upon possession. 30 F. purport to conform to any of these types. 2 Cir. this excess belong to the buyer or importer.. Interstate Securities Co. whereas in a trust receipt.App. Tex. in the case of a trust receipt.2d 722—Chichester v. for a pledge depends upon possession of the parties secured. In the case of a mortgage. The trust receipt does not conform to a pledge. May be a chattel mortgage When the substance of the transaction is considered rather than the form. Other distinguishing features of these various types of security interest under the former law are clearly indicated in the case of In re James. Inc. possession may not ordinarily be retaken until there is a default in the contract. But the trust receipt does not. Possession cannot be retaken until there is a default. pledge or conditional sale. 442.W. conditional sale. Boddecker..App. it may be distinguished from such transactions as s mortgage. 274 S. or his representative. possession may be retaken at any time. 337 Mo.—In re E. In the case of a mortgage.2d 439. whether of chattels or realty. while possession may be given to the mortgagor.. 85 S. (3) In a trust receipt transaction it was held that no element of a conditional sale or chattel mortgage was present. It is not a pledge. v. C.W. and consequently none of the requisites to the validity of such instruments was required. –General Motors Acceptance Corporation v.T.. While the title in the case of a pledge is in the pledgor. or contracts of agency creating bailments. 99 P.App. 30 F. 1018. Title is given to the person.C. or the debtor.2d 1000. 197 S. 1004. 37 Cal. the equity of redemption belongs to him. The holding in this state is that they are contracts creating bailments for sale and not in their nature chattel mortgages. 248. and he consequently cannot convey such title back to the holder of the trust receipt...2d 439.”—C. when possession is lost. whereas. 1016.Civ. and. since in the case of a pledge the security depends upon possession of the goods by the person secured. a lien is given by the mortgagor to the mortgagee in order to secure the latter for the performance of an obligation by the mortgagor who retains possession of the property. the entruster does not have possession of the goods. or in another than the pledge. In the case of a conditional sale. nor did any title pass to the sales company to support a chattel mortgage back. The practice of a conditional sale bears some resemblance to a trust receipt. and not to the third person.A. title has never been in the importer or domestic buyer. Commercial Bank of Patterson. as distinguished from a pledge.Y. the buyer is interested only in such amount as he has paid on account of his contract. Commercial Credit Co. or individual has an intention of selling goods to him. under no circumstances does title revert to the manufacturer or seller. the security is dependent upon the title.N.2d 1083. the holder of the trust receipt does not sell the goods to the importer or domestic trader. The title thus conveyed to the mortgagee is as security for the performance of his obligation. whether they constitute conditional sales contracts.: --In re James. 245. Corporation v. in their nature..App. 558. Inc. finance company. a trust receipt may be nothing but a chattel mortgage on a stock of merchandise daily exposed for sale in parcels at retail. V. Reboulin Fils & Co. 567. on its face or by its name. or mortgage. In any event..2d 555.J. Mo. where the title is intended to remain in the party secured while the possession is intrusted to one who has a certain interest as yet indefinite in the property. chattel mortgagees.2d 555.. (2) “The decisions are not entirely in harmony as to the nature of trust receipts of the character involved in this proceeding. and the property reverts to him upon performance of the obligation by the third person. 1085. If the mortgagor conveys his title to the mortgagee as security for the performance of an obligation to a third person. (2) While the security interest afforded by a trust receipt prior to the enactment of the uniform law was somewhat similar to many other forms of chattel security.Similarly expressed (1) There are various forms of chattel security.”—Globe Securities Co.W. whereas under a trust receipt transaction. Close resemblance to conditional sale . In a trust receipt.2d 561. The holder of the trust receipt is not interested in the sale of the property or its commercial or market value. and. D. 149 P. 64 Cal. it lends him credit and advances the money for the buyer’s account. whereas in the case of a trust receipt.. Gardner Motor Co. or. or their proper interpretation.”—Commercial Credit Co.C. 557. as a pledge.. such is not true in a trust receipt. 177.N. and sells them for an amount in excess of the sum.I. are. so is the security. To avoid trespassing upon the traditional and well defined fields of such common security devices as the pledge..The trust receipt transaction in its historic aspects and fundamental theory more nearly falls under the category of a conditional sale than a chattel mortgage. therefore. conditional sale and chattel mortgage.THE MOST HIGH ANU”. and.N. “The Uniform Trust Receipts Act is a perplexing maze of technical phrases wholly incomprehensible without an extensive study of the background and development of the security device known as the trust receipt.C.W. pirated.”—In re Chappell. . 575 ******************************************* COVER LETTER SUPPORTING DOCUMENT Claimant/Grantor continues to declare Truth in form of affidavit. his receiver. and the rights incident to such title and ownership will be enforced as against the one giving the receipt. and Servant of the Most High Creator. Naptaans. merely giving effect to the express provisions of the trust receipt. as best as Claimant knows it and believes it to be. and annexed/associated documents. 300. 680. C. of the Tribe of Judah of the Lower Branch.N.2d 555. if he derives his security title from a person other than the one responsible for the satisfaction of the obligation which the property secures.” 12 CFR Part 226. C. was grafted into the Higher Branch of Judah with the marriage of . of unmeasured aboriginal American National bloodline of the Tribal Nation Cherokee and Chief Moytoy. I do beckon. when they are given to a lender of money by some one other than the debtor. in most instances. Claimant also claims an unmeasured bloodline of the Tribe of Dan and of the Tribe of Gad. PART VI. in. In such cases only can he deliver the property to the obligor to act as his fiduciary. said Servant being duly and properly Baptized unto His Righteousness and claiming Birthright of the Lineage of Jacob.—In re Otto-Johnson Mercantile Co. request. Similarly expressed Under the ordinary form of trust receipt. 30 F.— In re James Inc. D. Private Attorney General.Or. Moors.A. is not obliged to file his security as is required in the case of a chattel mortgage.Supp... Superior protection to unrecorded chattel mortgage It has been recognized that trust receipts should have superior protection as compared with an unrecorded chattel mortgage. confiscated. Washtaaw. one of which commonly is that the goods are held as the property of the party to whom the receipt is given. Recording not required The holder of a trust receipt.N. Inc. 302.M. or taken for unauthorized use by another) and Rights and compensation of damages for the injuries brought upon me.—In re James. and demand restitution of Claimant’s Property (which may have been stolen.Y. His Higher Kingdom. Purpose of act.A. it is well settled that the title to the property is in the holder of the receipt. 558.2d 678. and for.. 151. and where either the delivery or possession against trust receipts is made to the debtor. The courts in so holding are. and creditors generally. 573. trustee in bankruptcy. this Affiant. 30 F. C.C.Y. by the Authority of the Original Organic Constitution of The United States of America and the Oath of Office of all duly sworn officers and employees of the UNITED STATES and the STATE OF Maryland and every subdivision of said corporate government.2d 555.D. Secured Party. etc.. which included the Nubian s.. 52 F. 200 N. Claimant reserves the right to initiate a Libel of Information to issue an arrest warrant for the bonds of the Governor of the International Monetary Fund or any of his agents (referenced at 28 USC. The object of the Act is to standardize and protect the trust receipt method of financing the acquisition and resale of goods in their journey form producer to retailer.1 If Accord and Satisfaction are not attained.—Walter v.. Little-John: surnamed Stewart..C. and. 557. 226. most of the act is devoted to definition.1 and Truth In Lending Act 31 CFR Sec. and not in the receiptor. limitation and restriction of the arena in which the new device is to play its part in the world of commerce. CHAPTER 163) in order to protect the interest of a Free Inhabitant of The .C. Now. 77 F. Commercial Credit Co. and enumerated in this. This/these Claim(s) is/are authorized to be timely and expeditiously processed under the 72-hour rule as referenced in “The Expeditious Transaction Act. 68 S. ” [Emphasis added] The Congressional Record.C.B5. instituted and established upon attainment of majority of age. 1967. every dollar of the government’s debt is someone's asset. then. 242) is a Criminal Offense. the Living Flesh and Blood Man. 15641-15646 .United States of America.the blood of Claimant’s ancestors that died in the War of Independence (and the risk of Claimant/Grantor’s blood. ************************************ Affidavit and Declaration I. This act/action of the de facto government of the UNITED STATES as mentioned in the last paragraph exemplifies and makes plain the fact that said UNITED STATES corporation. On page four of said circular it plainly states. personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person who appeared before me. However. 1983. and hereditary sibling of The Anointed One. cestui que trust of US Inc. do declare under penalty of perjury to be a Statesman of the Maryland Republic and a Statesman of the Aniyvwiya Nation. 1985. so as to entitle Claimant to relief on the whole merit of Claim. and a “BILL OF REVIVOR AND SUPPLEMENT” to assure that any defects are cured. the Bureau of the Census. 18 U. to the bank it is a debt.S.58489 (Grid Co-ordinates) from the beginning.S. 1966 1968 (see DD 214)). “Debt. 1986. ______________________________ ."A 'citizen of the United States' is a civilly dead entity operating as a co-trustee and co-beneficiary of the PCT. in Section 4. the private constructive. The FEDERAL RESERVE BANK of Chicago published a circular titled “PUBLIC DEBT: PRIVATE ASSET” in January 1999. paid for in the highest premium . for the People of The United States of America and their posterity. at this location 37. the Son of Man. and regulations with protest affirmed. various and sundry Agencies. “…to a consumer a savings account at a bank is an asset. therewith. By Grantor. by Claimant/Grantor protecting the combination of property rights and contract rights that has been placed in custody by the agents of the Treasury. establishing a “Constitutional” precedence and supremacy.” a bill rendered by a creditor to his debtor. the Department of Transportation. Administrative action against Claimant/Grantor is barred by the Anti-Injunction Act. JURAT Maryland state Prince Georges county ____________) Subscribed and affirmed before me on this ______ day of 15th. pp. Little-John: of the Stewart Family. nonmovable. and the International Monetary Fund pursuant to the revenue laws of the corporate United States.C. Category Four (4) [non-treaty] Aboriginal North American Natives.” Several paragraphs later it says. made explicit in Gutenberg Bible for Birth Trust Claims as registered in Repository: Library of Congress “Bible Collection. under the Jurisdiction of Natural Law. and a claim against the assets and earnings of the debtor. under the 14th Amendment. 241. is considered an asset of the creditor.” Illus. ephemeral and desultory codes. whereby failure to prevent a deprivation of a constitutionally secured right (42 U. competent to take control of my own financial affairs as Executor of Estate and able to honor all claims. 2010 CE. without United States. 1454. statutes." NOTE: The Living Man chooses NOT to participate in the any act/action of a DEAD (corporate) entity. do on this date: June 10th. 26 USC 7421.11363-92. FRCP – Rule 81 makes reference to rights and safe guards. which upholds the debt of the USA and US Inc. In terms of the national debt. 2011 by the above signatory. a stranger. June 13. in Incun. has usurped “ABATEMENT OF FREEHOLD” under unlawful intervention by seizing and taking possession of property belonging to a Living Man This counter against Abatement of Freehold is deemed a “BILL RENDERED. Executor for the Estate Under duress per minas. agrees to function primarily as a 'transmitting utility'. Stewart©. and for such purpose to act for me in my name and place. Maryland Republic Non-Domestic ZIP EXEMPT DMM122. #219 Somewhere. {who may be Noticed at above location for NOTICE. (B) DEBTOR/GRANTOR LITTLE J. and place items in or remove them from. notes. make withdrawals from. as my attorney in fact. LITTLE JOHN STEWART©. any safety deposit box standing in my name individually. bonds. . being a beneficiary of various trusts by similar sounding names. or certificates of deposits to endorse checks. (C) To deposit funds in. Stewart-JOHN©. Stewart©. manage.Notary Public My commission expires: ___________ (seal) ***************************************** In the Account of Little-John: Stewart Who may be NOTICED at: C/O 5600 54th Avenue. or sign checks or drafts against any account standing in my name individually or jointly in any bank or other depository. with said Christian Appellation. or derivatives thereof. business and legal affairs. or any derivative(s) thereof. to have access to. notes or other documents in my name. and conduct all of my taxing. without limitation on the powers necessary to execute this exclusive attorney in fact as authorized: (A) To take possession of. LITTLE J. to take exclusive charge of. for the Secured Party. all Copyrights. to cash coupons. grant of Exclusive power of attorney to conduct all business. does hereby appoint Little-John: Stewart. and Agent of Authority.Q. and otherwise to conduct bank transactions or business for me in my name. and manage my Real Property or Estate and all other Property. Stewart. complete Power of Attorney in fact. J. Creditor.32 YOUR PICTURE HERE Power of Attorney ACKNOWLEDGMENT: And. and legal affairs of principal person. hold. currency. conducting commercial activity including all receivables being money.. POWER OF ATTORNEY IN FACT 1) In the Matter of the DEBTOR/GRANTOR known as JOHN Stewart©. and/or Property paid or delivered to me from any source for the Secured Party/Creditor and agrees to enter in the 'Chamber Commercial Registry' as said 'transmitting utility' and has assigned the Creditor Little-John: Stewart. security. Little-John: Stewart. Maryland Republic 14084 North State Highway 125 Non-Domestic ZIP EXEMPT DMM122. delete. through the exclusive power of attorney in fact to contract for all business and legal affairs of the principal person. Stewart. casualty. and do all things necessary or appropriate to good husbandry. LITTLE JOHN STEWART. easements. fire. (H) To improve or develop Real Property or Estate. alter. J. The Creditor. prepared this instrument. to plant. (I) To provide for the use. to construct. or storage for any/all my tangible Property or Estate. harvest. /S/ LITTLE J. or change in order that the truth be ascertained and justly determined in any form of contract that Little-John: Stewart. mineral and other rights with respect to Real Property or Estate. lease. sell. one living servant of 'THE MOST HIGH ANU” . bonds or other securities. maintenance. may consider prudent. give options. I. transfer. do hereby accept the fiduciary interest and duty of the herein named Debtor/Grantor and will execute the herein granted powers-of-attorney with due diligence. may consider prudent. or other risks as my attorney in fact Little-John: Stewart. the above named exclusive attorney-in-fact. DEBTOR/GRANTOR known as LITTLE J. may consider prudent. invest. and sell or otherwise dispose of crops and timber. Stewart. to settle boundary lines. (G) To grant. Stewart or any derivative(s) thereof. named on the Filing UCC1 # 0000000181153371 and Commercial Security Agreement filed with the Secretary of State of Maryland Republic is authorized by law to act for and in control of the DEBTOR/GRANTOR being Little J. Somewhere. Creditor / Attorney in fact. Stewart or any derivative(s) thereof. LITTLE JOHN STEWART. Executed and sealed by the voluntary act of my own hand. to join in any reorganization and transfer assessments and/or subscriptions called for in connection with shares or securities. repair.Q. GRANTOR DEBTOR Signature /UCC 3-419 by _________________________________________ Little-John: Stewart. add.S. (F) To give general and special proxies or exercise rights of conversion or rights with respect to shares or securities. this 15th day of August.Q. In addition. (K) To amend. 2010 L. exchange. Little-John: Stewart. or in Real Property or Estate or other Property. or repair building structures and appurtenances or Real Property or Estate. This grant of Exclusive Power is Irrevocable during the lifetime of the Creditor Little-John: Stewart.(D) To pay my just obligations and expenses. (E) To retain any/all equity involving investments. J. or transfer them to protective committees or similar bodies. **************************** In the Account of Little-John: Stewart Who may be NOTICED at: C/O 5600 54th Avenue #219. that may be considered prudent in exercising this exclusive power of attorney in fact. to assign shares or securities with. 2011. and to invest in stock. Stewart.32 . only my attorney in-fact may obligate me in these matters. cultivate. Acceptance: This __ day of ___________. and make contracts concerning Real Property or Estate or other Property for such considerations and on such terms as my Attorney in Fact Little-John: Stewart. The term "exclusive" shall be construed to mean that while these powers of attorney in fact are in force. including reasonable expenses incurred by my attorney in fact Little-John: Stewart. and I forfeit the capacity to obligate myself with regard to same. (J) To purchase and maintain such policies of insurance against liability. all 13th amendment presumed powers of attorney. born a Maryland state Citizen. Section 4 of the Constitution for the united States of America. Supreme Court decision in Hallenbeck v. or. ab initio. and expose “Dishonest Acts” that may have been exercised against me and concealed from me to the detriment of my interests.C. make known my intention to investigate. birth certificates marriage license and all other licenses and/or certificates issued by any/all state and/or Federal governmental/ quasi governmental entities. making My Abode outside the STATE OF Maryland and the U. Trustee ____________________________. do. Previous Codicil pursuant to 26§673 and 26§1341 I. I. 2011 by __________________________authorized representative Little-John: Stewart©. pursue.S. rights. hereby revoke. who is a competent witness and is telling the truth.REVOCATION OF POWER OF ATTORNEY And.S. Little-John: Stewart©. due to use of the various elements of fraud by said agencies to deprive Little-John: Stewart© of My primary Maryland state Citizenship and Privileges and Immunities secured by Article 1V.C. herein. I. who is of lawful age and sound mind. Const. or otherwise. voluntarily relating the following first hand knowledge of the facts and stating that these facts are true and represent the best of my knowledge. YOU HAVE BEEN NOTICED. implied in law. in accordance with Treasury Directive 25-06 and 16-14 that all Confidential Commercial Information in this set of Claims are presented to several affiliated parties and the Treasury Data Integrity Board for their inspection as prescribed. cancel.S. and Rights. and properties. This is Actual and Constructive Notice that. §10 (U. signed either by me or by anyone else in and/or on my behalf.S described in 26 U. otherwise. rescind and make void. as Trustee and in the nature of Private Attorney General. Little-John: Stewart© hereby waive. Done this 15 day of August. Properties. Leimert 295 U S 116 (1935) and under the Erie and Clearfield Doctrines where individuals responsible can be held personally liable. Little-John: of the Stewart Family. as it pertains to an alleged Social Security Number assigned and/or attached to Maryland Driver’s License Number #A1234567. Secured Party ******************************* NOTICE OF INTENT TO DISCOVER DISHONEST ACTS TO: RISK MANAGEMENT AT EVERY LEVEL OF ADMINISTRATION Greetings: BE INFORMED. to protect my Interests. Therefore. Attached and annexed to this document are various Affidavits in support to fully establish my Claims. in fact.NOTICE . repudiate and refuse to knowingly accept any benefit and/or gratuity attached to the above-mentioned items and/or transactions that are not secured by Article 1. §110 (d) and (e). any and all agents may be in violation of the U. [Gift Resulting from Exercise of Special Power of Appointment by Life Beneficiary of Trust to Appoint Corpus to . living in Maryland and not residing "in the state" nor "in this state" within the meaning of any other "federal area" described under Title 4 U.).S. authorized representative ***************************** < !--[if !supportLineBreakNewLine]--> < !--[endif]--> RELEASE of POWER OF APPOINTMENT and DEED OF AGENCY OVER PROPERTY HELD IN TRUST COMES NOW: Little-John: of the Stewart Family hereinafter Affiant. §7701(a)(39) in and not "of" Maryland entitled to Judicial Power Citizenship status due a de jure Maryland state Citizen thereof invoking the Ninth and Tenth Articles in Amendment of the Constitution for the united States of America reserved exclusively to the People. Affiant hereby exercises Powers of “Power Holder” Trustee to Discharge Co-Trustee's Obligation. may. at City of Somewhere. 2011. under the signature of the Man. I declare that the foregoing is the truth in accord with the best of my knowledge and belief. Little-John: Stewart.] Applicable Retained Interest and Qualified Payment Right This is a release of Power Of Appointment and Deed Of Agency over property held in any. Little-John: Stewart is hereby and herein completely released out of the Social Security contract / instrument / maritime insurance policy. the undersigned. the Social Security Card that was issued bearing a name similar to Affiant's Christian Appellation is null and void. Because the supreme Court has determined that fraud vitiates the most solemn contracts and even judgments. and has. intentional mis-representation. a Social Security Card before Affiant could work or otherwise be compensated for labor. made under false directives. who is personally known by me or upon proper identification. Stewart. lawful. or Affiants Trustworthy signet of: LITTLE J. Affiant applied for a Social Security card and was issued the number 231-98-2194 The contract / instrument / maritime insurance policy that resulted in the issuance of the above Social Security Number is invalid because Affiant did not have legal capacity in Affiant's minor years of age for signing a binding contract / instrument / maritime insurance policy. ab initio. Affiant was informed by employees of the federal government that the law required Affiant to obtain. Sui Juris ACKNOWLEDGMENT Little-John: Stewart. the Agency that issued said card. Signed this 15thday of August.Q. appeared before me this day and signed the within instrument in my presence and for the purposes therein stated. J. by Affiant. Chapter 249 (Section 1). because of fraud by the Social Security Administration.Another. According to Black's 1st. July Twenty seventh eighteen sixty eight and serves as notice unto all government employees that the below signed Citizen of Maryland Republic. if requested by compensating agent. __________________________________ Little-John: Stewart. legally and lawfully expatriate(d) out of the jurisdiction of the United States into the jurisdiction of a Sovereign State and claim State Citizenship. and all. The above described Social Security Card bearing the number 231-98-2194 is maintained under custodial care by authorized caregiver and shall be kept safe and reasonably free from harm until just and adequate compensation from Affiant's various Trust Funds is rendered to Affiant. This release of Appointment functions as a NOTICE under 15 Statutes at Large. and expedient. and as such. Affiant shall surrender said card to him/her. et cetera. Stewart. At the point of just and adequate consideration. Prince Georges of Riverdale. Affiants Christian Appellation. "Deed of Agency" is a revocable and voluntary trust for the payment of debts. All “Deeds of Agency” are hereby revoked. You are hereby NOTICED. mis-information. and that Affiant should "have". as if it had never been issued. or several other variations of similitude. At the young age in Affiant's childhood years. or. said release is absolute and upon fulfillment of consideration by the Social Security Trust Fund. all matters legal. said card shall be surrendered to the Social Security Administration. an American Citizen. in toto. Maryland State SEAL _________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires on:_______________________________________ ************************************** . in whole. the Social Security Administration is unconditionally released out of all obligations on behalf of LittleJohn: Stewart without consideration for the Social Security Administration. Before the Almighty Creator and under His statutes. manner of trust under any nomenclature. According to another researcher 6. is to count the "defective.S. everything in the fiction is ass-backwards. which as parens patriae. 1.. must consult its welfare.” See PURINTON v.E. charged factitiously with a parent's rights. which is contrary to our best interests. is forced upon us. See Black's Law Dictionary. 5th ed. 195 Mass. thus. Due to convoluted and distorted “education. the herd of Sheeple is managed until each individual reaches the age of majority.. 2. 925. The doctrine of “Parens Patriae. or that the child is a fatherless [bastard] child (of a truth." the role of the state as sovereign. or fear of corporate Pirates operating under letters of Marquee and Reprisal and Liberate my own commercial character to barter and exchange values that my necessities for body. 4. 187.” [Concerning such owned“children of the state”] "The law secures their parental right only so long as they shall promptly recognize and discharge their corresponding obligations. by law. duties. and emotional enjoyment may be attained by utilizing the assets that have been my own since the age of majority. In a different “branch” or direction of thought. 7. or. Does that sound like a corporate collection of "incompetent persons"? 9. intimidation. of the Treasury) in the amount charged to our account. Our “birth bond” account is accessible upon completion of #9 above and the issuance of a NEGATIVE ( . 11. or inside out. upside down. Food and necessities are provided by welfare. is. instead of a parent. Under “assumption/presumption” we operate and function under the doctrine of "Partus Sequitur Ventrem. and interests in regulating its custody during its minority. JAMROCK.5m USD was transferred into a “slush fund” with each application for a Social Security Card.O..A. 80 N. 8.B. 18 L. wishes.” 5.” many believe what we were taught in the public fool system. comfort. coercion.SUMMARY OF INTENDED DIRECTION This issue is confusing in it most simple form. or other informant) signs the “application” for a birth certificate of the child.” Latin.. most document administrators reporting in.” means “in the place of the parent. To continue the thought (as quoted in the 2000 Census brochure). 10. wards of the Court/State. but the Mother's MAIDEN Name is paramount) and automatically a ward of the court/government. The use of Federal Reserve Notes places users within jurisdiction of private corporate laws. also. this summary. and for. dependent. 6. The doctrine “In Loco Parentis. As such. and desire is to freely travel without harassment. dependent. means "parent of the country. Upon attainment of “age of majority” we are to declare that we are competent to take control of our own financial affairs of estate and able to honor all claims. The past 3 points displays presumptions/assumptions that when the mother (any mother. therefore. and thus. and delinquent classes".) issued to the Treasurer (not the Sec. spirit. education is provided by “ primary education program. 102.” 3. All commerce (outside of bartering) is controlled by PRIVATE business structure and is regulated through private IRS “codes. 5th ed.R." meaning that the offspring is the property of the owner of the mother.” See Black's Law Dictionary.) charging instrument (Promissory Note or I. and delinquent". hospitals. N. the object of the Census. and responsibilities. Virtually everyone counted in the 2000 Census is now presumed to be "defective. the doctrine of Partus Sequitur Ventrem (above) applies and the owner (the STATE) can do with the children as the owner wishes. and why it must function as directed. and declare under penalty of perjury to be a Statesman of the Republic of Maryland. so it is entitled to the protection of that government. the presumption is that she is the black slave that is still owned by the government. forced upon us. As the child owes allegiance to the government of the country of its birth.E. do NOT care that there is a Father's Name on the birth certificate. to explain why this procedure is important. Those funds can be transferred into an account that we can utilize upon the “collapsing” of the SS trust. My will. The usual “witness” to the application for a “Birth Certificate” is normally the “mother. without this admonition. ****************************************** . C. If previous Trustee has initiated any action. Maryland. or office. and such appointment shall constitute a substitution of trustee. I authorize all departments and agencies to send letters pertinent to me to my nominee. Appointment of Nominee precedes Substitution of Successor Trustee. is unwilling to or unable to serve or resigns as trustee or if a trustee was not designated in the deed of trust. B. near [20737-9998] as Nominee. Little-John: of the Stewart Family DECLARATION – NOMINEE I certify that any information I obtain from any applicable department or agency will be kept confidential and will .NOTICE OF APPOINTMENT OF SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE I. or. If a person appointed as trustee fails to qualify. 2011 by the above signatory. Stewart. by endorsement under Oath before a Public Notary. Somewhere. D. unaccountable to the law of Trusts. circulated news media. or position. If previous Trustee has made his person. and Common Law to provide harmony and continuity in commerce. the beneficiary may appoint a successor trustee. Little-John: Stewart. effective date of signing. personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person who appeared before me. 2. In all Issues that may arise. is herein appointed as qualified Successor Trustee in trustee’s capacity as a Transmitting Utility. or regionally. Maryland Republic state Prince Georges county Subscribed and affirmed before me on this ___________ day of August. 4. or. I authorize all applicable departments and agencies to discuss any/all details pertinent to me with my nominee. c/o 5600 54th Avenue. to be properly Noticed. and International Trust Law to appoint a Successor Trustee by authority on one. I understand that I can cancel this appointment at any time by noticing nominee and applicable departments and agencies. International Law. Change and substitution may result from any of several reasons for disqualifications and/or replacements. 3. of the following provisions: A. and such appointment shall constitute a substitution of trustee. of any issue that was not fully disclosed to Beneficiary from the beginning. If previous Trustee is not qualified to discharge debts of Beneficiary. as pre-existing “Beneficiary” do herewith exercise my Right of Claim under International Law. Law of Nations. or by record in the office of the county recorder of each county in which the trust property or some part of the trust property is situated at the time of the substitution. or more. The beneficiary may at any time remove a trustee for any reason or cause and appoint a successor trustee. ______________________________ My commission expires: ___________ (seal) Notary Public *************************************** APPOINTMENT OF NOMINEE I certify that I am voluntarily appointing a nominee. Beneficiary hereby appoints: Nub Ankah Re agent LITTLE J. at any time. A notice of substitution of trustee shall be made public by proper and timely placement of Actions of Record within locally. acknowledged reasons follow: 1. If previous Trustee is not a known person with office. this. I understand that I can cancel this appointment at any time. without reservation. 2010. Grantor does. done so on this date: July 05. from The Beginning. by writing to the applicable departments and agencies." Agency of State is commercial Charter of Maritime jurisdiction. Treasurer of the United States. at this location (GOOGLE EARTH) (Grid Co-ordinates) made certain. non-movable and made known. being a plea by which the defendant avers. through examination and discovery./Mrs. NON-ASSUMPSIT JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT Black’s Law 5th Non-assumpsit. 1454. hereinafter “Treasurer” Department of Treasury 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington. Praedial. in Incun. to wit: DECLARATION OF VENUE AND JURISDICTION The Man. Comptroller of the Maryland Treasury Address TO: Senior Senator of ______ State and all addressees listed on ____________ page. Whoever. last mentioned in this stipulation. I understand that I must inform the applicable departments and agencies of any changes to my address and contact details and changes in the circumstances of the person who has appointed me. Pledge Allegiance to. and/or presumed acts. Nominee and Authorized Representative Nub Ankah Re Maryland Republic state Prince Georges county Subscribed and affirmed before me on this ______ day of ______________________. (see EXHIBIT O). WILL AND TESTAMENT: THIS IS FULL AND COMPLETE STATEMENT of The Man. and Jurisdiction of Natural Law as expressed by the Trust of 1776 known as “The Declaration of Independence. my WILL AND TESTAMENT. DC 20220 TO: Mr. The choice of Venue and Jurisdiction by Grantor is Jurisdiction of Creator Yahweh. and/or contracts allegedly done by Grantor.not be disclosed to any unauthorized person without the permission of the person appointing me.” does ascertain.” each and severally. . nor does said “colorable” venue and jurisdiction of a/any DELAWARE TRUST bankruptcy venue apply to the estate and property of Grantor. that “colorable” venue and jurisdiction of the fiction does NOT apply to Grantor. hereinafter referred to as “Grantor. of America. made explicit in Gutenberg Bible for Birth Trust Claims as registered in Repository: Library of Congress “Bible Collection.” Illus. Grantor herein refutes agency terms of Uniform Commercial Code 3-104 "promise" and rejects "unconditional" actions and impositions as "unconscionable" at UCC 2-302 as it/they apply to implied. and give cognizance to. personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person who appeared before me. actions. "he did not undertake or promise as alleged. The general issue in the action of assumpsit. the “Freely Associated Compact States.B5. 2011 by the above signatory.” and. ______________________________ Notary Public My commission expires: ___________ (seal) ********************************* Private and Confidential TO: Rosa Gumataotao Rios. assumed. by effectively concealing material facts (See “RULE BY OLOGARCHY.... ... as follows: 1. by effectively removing the proper court(s) from ready access to Claimant.... Therefore.. masquerading as “figures of authority” operating under letters of Marque and Reprisal to plunder and steal Prize and Booty from Claimant and Claimant’s account(s) through implementation of “cash register law."committed as follows".. .. the "few" being. The average law school graduate reads and comprehends at a level of 15. firemen. occupation of the land... by effectively placing fictitious and factitious privateers (Inland Pirates)."did unlawfully".On or about... highway patrol... referred to as “Mixed Domestic War” For purposes of this Declaration of Commercial Conflict (WAR) Grantor of the Trust(s) is “Claimant.. See EXHIBIT – ZB for further information concerning “Mixed Domestic War. Claimant does not understand the charges wherein citizens were/are deemed “Enemies of the State” wherein “the State” has Declared War on “We Thee People” by Statutory Act.. See EXHIBIT – ZA for further details concerning “DECLARATION OF WAR." NOTE: An Act of War causes an incidental/non-participant to be.... The universal format for writing a Solemn Recognition of Mixed War..” Solemn Recognition of Mixed Domestic War A solemn recognition of "Mixed War" is an instrument which contains a criminal complaint that includes an "Affidavit of Information".. .. attorneys. an objective method of measuring the readability of English text must be discussed.. Also.." Claimant makes all Claims "without prejudice.” Claimant’s state citizenship is only as a “Citizen of Common Right” and is brought forth along with personam Rights... to wit: On or about Claimant’s attainment of age of majority (stated elsewhere in this set of documents) various minions of the Corporate UNITED STATES did unlawfully deny and deprive Claimant of Claimant’s true inheritance of substantive property and rights to property." Under the guise of “emergency. below) from Claimant in order to maintain a “starvation status” upon Claimant and forcing Claimant into “Involuntary Servitude. at War.. 3.. The average high school graduate reads and understands at a level of 10. Under “emergency powers” there must be an active and visible occupation of the land by armed troops of the entity that declares emergency powers. which do not mingle with statute procedure."date".” and 4.. and county sheriffs have been placed under control of the National Guard. English scholars use a scale known as the "Flesch Index" that measures the level of understanding necessary for an individual to comprehend the written English language.. 2. Claimant does give recognition of “Mixed War” as a direct Criminal Action against Claimant within this AFFIDAVIT OF INFORMATION.DECLARATION OF WAR (COMMERCIAL CONFLICT) Also. the end product of which is mass confusion in the minds of thoughtful and meaningful people with a simple explanation as follows: To show that Congress INTENTIONALLY has made the laws unreadable by the average person.” Claimant does declare that the “State” in every form and echelon has denied Claimant all civilized remedies for Claimant’s distress and said “State” is ordered to SURCEASE: so declared this 5th day of July. Newspapers are written at an average comprehension level of 7.. without doubt. This is called "open and notorious.. is the well-known example of such an instrument known as the Declaration of Independence. armed and hostile.. state marshals. Claimant is “against the wall” and remits this Extra-Ordinary Action to obtain remedy and restitution. also. 2010: as witnessed (See Signature Page)... which was federalized in 1972. by effectively placing “secret liens” on Claimant’s account(s).. making a “Public War” and not a “Civil War” and "due to mistakes in fact and Law. and sworn declaration that the State has denied the party all civilized remedies for his/her problem... is the extreme of democracy.” the police.” RULE BY OLIGARCHY An "oligarchy" is a government run by the few. The Internal Revenue Code ranks on this index at an . and. and Insurance numbers operational under “public” and de facto Letters of Marque and Reprisal. CHARGING ORDER FOR EQUIBLE CONVERSION [This “Charging Order” must first be deemed a “Requisition”] Grantor does herein. Grantor (Grantor/Claimant). association nor does it constitute consent to be governed. assert/usurp will or authority integrated into. with said names claimed and declared as exclusive property of the Living Man (see EXHIBIT R). Since the laws that we are supposed to obey are written at a level that an individual of reasonable intelligence cannot understand. or in any measure of convergence over. 3. sits as Trustee. Self-government or the right of selfgovernment. The “TRUSTEE” to the Trust. 2. Driver Licensing numbers. see EXHIBIT R) and Grantor does take charge of (see EXHIBIT S) the “Corpus” of “Debt/Death” that has been charged to the Vessel – LITTLE JOHN STEWART and all identifying numbers. or attempt to. The “BENEFICIARY” to the Trust is the Flesh and Blood Living Man.Q. Internal Revenue Service numbers. do transfer all interest (alienable/transferable) in foreign situs trust(s). edify. under assumption and presumption. owned In Toto by the Living Man whose Vessel(s) may be named: LITTLE J. even when Grantor makes reference to court cases. use of a notary is for attestation. including. initiate this Extra-Judicial Action and commence this Notice. but not limited to all: Social Security Administration numbers. Congress has effectively removed our access to Justice and Equality under the Law. Rights. the rightful holder in due course under Jurisdiction established in declaration of venue and jurisdiction above. and Property. as “Registries” or “Enrollments. or after. self-determination. Stewart. and Devises to any other. and cestui que trust(s). Also. Stewart. . declare full and complete Autonomy against any/all entity/entities that do.average level of 31. in Grantor’s capacity of Living Man/Spirit. and grants no Gifts. with some specific provisions as high as 55. Bequests. and must not be construed as submission by Grantor to any jurisdiction other than that previously established. quatenus parson —See EXHIBIT G and R) who was. independence. and fortify Grantor's Character of Person and Grantor's Will and Intent of Living Man. Grantor lets NO license to any agent/agency to assert any type of jurisdiction over Grantor. By making the law so difficult to comprehend. is the Commercial Character. Military numbers. by Grantor’s own Will and Oath does. the registry of the “Certificate of Live Birth” and the application for “Social Security Benefits” and various other “applications” for “privileges” to Grantor. herein. Mortician. CLAIM OF AUTONOMY DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE AUTONOMY. whose True Value is that of Steward. And the words that are used in the law have specific legal definitions that are different from the common English definitions. verification and identification purposes only and does not constitute a change in status. and. NON-WITHHOLDING FOREIGN GRANTOR TRUST Grantor of FOREIGN GRANTOR TRUST (see EXHIBIT M and N) and LIEN CREDITOR (see EXHIBIT P) and PARSON (persona ecclesiae. The condition or quality of being autonomous. or any of Grantor’s own persons/personages in present and future (omni) time. LITTLE J. the Beneficiary to the Trust(s) (see EXHIBIT Q1 and Q2). and Undertaking in the Nature of an Undertaker. Grantor. federal or state statutes and codes. Little-John: together with the Spirit of Life that dwells within the vessel of the Man. Stewart. which are for reader’s reference only. relationship.” associated with said vessel name. or any other type of trust(s) established on. or upon. The “NAME” of the Trust is LITTLE JOHN STEWART (See EXHIBIT ZC). J. Action. and. (to protect any interest Grantor may have in Grantor’s Commercial Character. then perhaps we should be highly suspect of the law writer's motives. herein proclaims: 1. and Funeral Director. using such quotes as a "compass rather than a crutch" as intent does not yield jurisdiction by referring and using words of the wisdom expressed by the authority of antiquity to admonish. in conjunction with. or executive orders. but. LITTLE JOHN STEWART. ” continuing in both physical and civil existence.] The “Department of Treasury. but is not limited to. “…to a consumer a savings account at a bank is an asset. “INTESTATE. Pittsavanliya county and forwarded to Vital Statistics at Richmond City. past hunting and fishing licenses (unknown). past Credit Card numbers (unknown). Inverse-Accounts.C.C. or indirect. includes. State File number 145-59-083068. every dollar of government’s debt is someone’s asset.. herein.” in being. factitious. hath taken possession of property belonging to the Living Man. BUREAU OF THE CENSUS.” as “Bank. or having been. Grantor’s Agent is Creditor. However. recorded at Port of Entry. accepts and executes duties as “Customer” of said “bank” (Department of Treasury) and “Consumer” of aggregated funds. etc. Grantor is “IN FULL LIFE. In terms of the national debt. leaving a will) for Grantor is NOT DEAD. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE. [Offers and Stipulations may be verified in U. and registry of the Application for CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH of the living manchild of the male gender. “NOTICE OF EXCLUSIVE CONTROL” Grantor plainly states that Grantor’s Rights of Property are trespassed upon by “IN FRAUDEM CREDITORUM. Secretary of State-Hillary Rodham Clinton. SSN 231-98-2194. “PUBLIC DEBT: PRIVATE ASSET” on page 4 you will find. or . past Mortgage Deed Numbers (unknown). the INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND. any/all Contra-Asset. Deposit Accounts of Original Collateral on behalf of Secured Party and. the entry. is considered an asset of the creditor. Grantor is Secured Party. and registry of the/all vessel(s) derivative of/from the entry. “I AM. Registrant number 145-59083068. and Adverse-Accounts originated upon.” Grantor is a Real Man (organic in nature) and a Living Spirit (inorganic in nature). actually existing. Geithner. and number VS 15B on back of “Birth Certificate” copy.” Grantor is “IN ESSE. that is neither actually dead nor civiliter mortuus. all sub-accounts. file number 145-59-083068. in. to the bank it is a debt. issues “NOTICE OF EXCLUSIVE CONTROL” in effort to cure the defect realized by “default” actuated “IN FRAUDEM CREDITORUM.C.” [Let us not forget who the “debtor” is and where the “debtor” is located – U.. by the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago titled. Creditor takes security interests in.C. IS DIRECTED TO: United States President-Barrack Hussein Obama. to include. then. also. having no right.INTESTATE REBUTTAL Grantor explicitly refutes any status of being. 9-307(h).” meaning in fraud of creditors. that were established in direct relationship to said account(s) originating at. and. Article 9] In a Publication of January 1999. or after. contract.” is the Debtor [See “PUBLIC DEBT: PRIVATE ASSET below]. on behalf of Secured Party. UNITED STATES TREASURY DEPARTMENT. and a claim against the assets and earnings of the debtor. not a fiction. and de facto agents/agencies exercising a direct. Treasurer of the United States-Rosa Gumataotao Rios. expresses prior and superior claim to. contact. and to all fictitious. and. Secretary of the Treasury-Timothy F. to wit: By Grantor’s hand and under Grantor’s Will: Grantor.” Four paragraphs later: “Debt. INJURY OF TRESPASS ADMITTED And. but not limited to. with intent to defraud creditors. or any fiduciary. herein so identified. does herein ordain this Directive as a Requisition and an Order concerning all account(s). recording. etc.” Creditor. neither is Grantor “TESTATE” (having died. Driver License S-363-522-429-942. Virginiae Republic and. Special Drawing Rights. Plainly stated. Grantor demands restitution and revival of all assets that are/was charged to Grantor’s account(s) and orders such assets to be immediately restored “IN FULL. listing “Registrant” as: LITTLE JOHN STEWART.” NOTICE OF ABATEMENT This Action is commenced with the intent to counter the “Abatement of Freehold” where a stranger. recording. or near THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. or with access into all said accounts to Abate the Nuisance and terminate the Trustee-ship (as made specific by usurped “Abatement of Freehold” in the above enumerated accounts) immediately and fully account for 1) the foreign situs trust. being autonomous. and Payment Order” (see EXHIBIT I). and pleasure. and answer be remitted in appropriate kind after particular type and makes these further statements. explained) NOTICE OF INTEREST NOTICE OF INTENT TO PRESERVE INTEREST THIS NOTICE INFORMS ALL PARTIES who may seek to obtain an interest of any kind in the Property. as Trust Interest Executor and Executive Trustee/Steward of the Trust. (See EXHIBIT CC – Capitalized NAMES. over. does have Right of Restoration and Postliminy (see EXHIBIT W). over. and. but not more than thirty (30) days after said Notice and NOTICES all Parties that a Claim is fully established and diminishes any Notice of Adverse Claim by any other possible Claimant. N. and Currency. Sec. and. 894). without Cause. by way of Subrogation.” related “Trust Indentures. under the Title of LITTLE JOHN STEWART. Stewart. Energy. being the Fountain and Source of all related Labor.” established under the Jurisdiction of the VENUE AND JURISDICTION STATEMENT above and under the Jurisdiction of Emperor Moytoy and King George II in 1730 A. in Fact and in Nature [under “Diplomatic Protest”] (see EXHIBIT J). NOTICE OF EXCHANGER AND TRANSFER AGENT Grantor. does explicitly rebut any assumption of being a Franchise (see EXHIBIT Y). and ledger entries to said Estate (as Holder in Due Course of all Remainderman assets) and charge that portion of an account commonly known as the “National Debt. does NOTICE the entire World that Grantor is Injured.custodial. STATEMENT OF INTEREST (Which is now Confidential Commercial Information) BE INFORMED: this STATEMENT OF INTEREST makes known to the entire world that Grantor is the Sole Holder In Due Course of Interest in the Trust and Commercial Legal Entity named LITTLE JOHN STEWART and that this STATEMENT OF INTEREST is initiated after above NOTICE OF INTEREST. and 2) the/a cestui que trust. and. and revert all funds. and of. and believes that none exists. Nominate. by.” and. relationship of. and J) is a political construction where Grantor and Beneficiary are the same entity and makes this Trust active in nature by Grantor’s Pledge of Polity Will (see EXHIBIT U) with capacity to function as “Trustee” of. letting all Interest in the properties to the control and execution of Grantor’s Commercial Character. and by previously published “Testamentary Affidavit” (see EXHIBIT H) and “Letter Rogatory. account balances. herein acknowledges and gives cognizance of Transferable Value and. with Damages NOT RECOVERABLE through conventional “legal” channels (see EXHIBIT V).D. formed after the Application for a Birth Certificate (“Acknowledgement of Paternity”). to wit: WHEREAS Grantor has no record or verified evidence. and above the corporate fiction of all agencies of de facto government of the UNITED STATES as they (said agencies) pertain to the “Vessel. as provider of Extensions of Credit (referenced at Title 18. that sufficiently demonstrates probable cause to believe: . discretion. in the Nature of an Exchanger and Insurance Adjuster. Grantor’s Acceptance of Certificate of Live Birth (see EXHIBIT A) and Presidential Oath (See EXHIBIT F) to bring clarity and balance in an arena whereby “Corporate Personhood propagates Unequal Protection” (see EXHIBIT ZE). are transferred into the Trust named LITTLE JOHN STEWART by Grantor. which may be resultant of the/a Social Security account and the/any exemption account. Entitlement Order. and does Notice the Entire World that this “NON-WITHHOLDING FOREIGN GRANTOR TRUST. or Rights to Property.” and all other charges of “expense” to inure to the benefit of the Estate (estate means equitable state) listed under the “CONCLUSION” section of this document with direct access and supervision of Little-John: for Grantor’s sole use. does demand full and honest disclosure (see EXHIBIT X). does hereby Grant. places a transfer of Value from the Visible (vessel) to the Invisible (ledgered Book Entry Only account wherein Grantor’s Agent is Executive Trustee/Steward and Grantor is Beneficial Owner of account) through. (see EXHIBIT M. and. and Appoint Rosa Gumataotao Rios. the “person” named LITTLE J. response. Treasurer and her successors and assigns with the segregated safekeeping of records under the delivery of and bearing the unique identifier of (Reg Mail) #1111 2222 3333 4444 5555 and commands the action. S.). and. <!--[if !supportLists]-->15) <!--[endif]-->That all resultant “NAME(S)” are not manifestations of placement of “label(s)” onto Trust(s) directly resultant of and connected to Grantor’s Christian Appellation.” and. and. <!--[if !supportLists]-->10) <!--[endif]-->That said transfer did not make Free Inhabitants the Beneficiaries of said Trust(s) through his own Agent. etc. 1933. and. voter registration. nor that Grantor has ever been. . and. and.S. and. and. in restraint of trade illegal. 113 to provide to Free Inhabitants the right of setoff of all debt obligations as the consideration for said transfer. <!--[if !supportLists]-->12) <!--[endif]-->That Grantor is now. and sundry Trusts were not created by the Application for Birth Certificate (or. all property. and. and. 73-10. and. and. who. penalty does not say. as Progenitor. <!--[if !supportLists]-->4) <!--[endif]-->That charges of treason and theft were not filed by Congressman Louis T. Application for Marriage License(s). and Application to multiple and various Agencies (vehicle registration. and. <!--[if !supportLists]-->5) <!--[endif]-->That to mitigate said charges. in restraint of trade or commerce among the several States. Certificate of Live Birth). and. to surrender their personal and private gold reserves under the same Statutes and Regulations imposed upon U. <!--[if !supportLists]-->3) <!--[endif]-->That indistinct and confusing communication and enforcement of Codes. or conspiracy. submission and response to Military Draft. and. <!--[if !supportLists]-->9) <!--[endif]-->That said transfer did not make Free Inhabitants the Grantors of said Trust. <!--[if !supportLists]-->2) <!--[endif]-->That gold was not transferred from U. driver licensing. 1933 concerning said transfer. “Every contract. and Regulations was not imposed. and endowment(s) are to be released to Grantor. under vi et armis and threat of imprisonment. <!--[if !supportLists]-->11) <!--[endif]-->That Grantor is not fully Emancipated and fully released from control of any/all guardian(s). or with foreign nations. a/any threat to a/any Diplomatic or Political Protectee.<!--[if !supportLists]-->1) <!--[endif]-->That a bank emergency was not declared on March 9.” hereinafter referred to as “Free Inhabitants. with unfavorable results effectuating Injuries with resultant Damages. and. <!--[if !supportLists]-->17) <!--[endif]-->That Grantor. Statutes. P. <!--[if !supportLists]-->14) <!--[endif]-->That Grantor’s “Christian Appellation” is not Private Property with exclusive Rights to said Name. 1933. <!--[if !supportLists]-->13) <!--[endif]-->That other. McFadden on May 23. did not begin Grantor’s “WILL” at conception. <!--[if !supportLists]-->6) <!--[endif]-->That said transfer did not create a trust(s).” (See EXHIBIT H) whereby Free Inhabitants were unduly forced. and. <!--[if !supportLists]-->7) <!--[endif]-->That TITLE 15 . <!--[if !supportLists]-->8) <!--[endif]-->That the right of setoff of all debt obligations is not the res of said Trust. citizens to the UNITED STATES by Executive Order 6102 on May 1. 1933 by President Roosevelt because of the insolvency of the United States. <!--[if !supportLists]-->16) <!--[endif]-->That the Office of Parson (See EXHIBIT G) was not established in antiquity on behalf of Grantor. therefore. Application for Social Security Administration coverture. Ch 112. on those “People” commonly referred to as United States of America Citizens and States National Citizens. citizens (see EXHIBIT H). 1. various. are “Free Inhabitants.Sec. and 48 stat 48. etc. Trust(s). Trusts. in reality. is declared to be illegal. hereinafter “Trust” or “Trusts”.L.. Congress did not pass House Joint Resolution 192 on June 5. combination in the form of trust or otherwise. <!--[if !supportLists]-->20) <!--[endif]-->That Grantor does not hold and own “Inherent Rights” by way of “Progeny” (One born of. and judicial officers performing under him in his capacity as Commander in Chief have oaths of office.Sec. He has a Constitutional Oath). <!--[if !supportLists]-->21) <!--[endif]-->That Inherent Rights can devolve to a “body politic” via a corporation (Rights devolve to human beings (body politic) through and by way of a “Trust”). <!--[if !supportLists]-->32) <!--[endif]-->That the President’s oath is consideration sufficient to support the simple contract the President (executive trustee) has with Grantor and the people (He does not have an oath of office. of “Extensions of Credit” as referenced at TITLE 18 . technically. to Grantor’s Loan of Assets under Doctrine of Usufruct and that any UNITED STATES “attachment(s)” to Grantor’s Assets were not. . total and full rights to Trusts Resultant. <!--[if !supportLists]-->30) <!--[endif]-->That the President is not the ONLY Executive Trustee of all Resultant Trusts associated with Grantor’s “Certificate of Live Birth”. to create and establish a Trust with Grantor as Beneficiary. with all Benefits and Accruals of Interest to be reverted back to Grantor. and. or device. and.PART I . <!--[if !supportLists]-->26) <!--[endif]-->That “Rescission of Atfreightment” is not herein fully invoked by Principal “CHARTER-PARTY” (Black’s 1st). and. <!--[if !supportLists]-->33) <!--[endif]-->That the President is Lawfully Seated in full capacity to function as Executive Trustee. Father) were not the ORIGINAL Grantor of an associated Grantor Trust by way of “Application for Registering of Live Birth. That is different than an oath. without necessity of the Guardian of the Court.” which became a “Warehouse Receipt” or “Trust Receipt” (See EXHIBIT E). at mature age of twenty one (21) years. 894. and. and. an offspring or a descendant).<!--[if !supportLists]-->18) <!--[endif]-->That Grantor’s WILL was not fully realized in Birth on (birthday) December 11. or derived from another. begotten by. and. and. <!--[if !supportLists]-->22) <!--[endif]-->That the Certificate of Live Birth Number 145-59-083068 (Annexed as EXHIBIT A) is not evidence of title to property being held by Trustee that is effectively connected to said Trust. Section 1). <!--[if !supportLists]-->27) <!--[endif]-->That Grantor did not acquire. is not a “Binding Agreement” to fulfill his Promise as Executive Trustee.CH 42 . <!--[if !supportLists]-->29) <!--[endif]-->That Transfer of Special Drawing Rights and/or IMF quotas are not directly proportional to and/or directly connected to the Registration of Birth Certificates in/through the Department of Commerce in the City of Washington. and. and. and. <!--[if !supportLists]-->24) <!--[endif]-->That DD form 214 with Service Number US 56 123 456 (Annexed as EXHIBIT C) did not establish a Trust upon “Honorable Discharge”. and. and. <!--[if !supportLists]-->28) <!--[endif]-->That Grantor’s Commercial Character is not the vehicle. upon maturity at age twenty one (21) years. and. All legislative. <!--[if !supportLists]-->19) <!--[endif]-->That Grantor’s Mother (and. <!--[if !supportLists]-->34) <!--[endif]-->That transfers of Agency(ies) did not make the United States Congress. and. wherein [the Master of] the “Vessel” and all principal parts thereof are removed from contract of “merchandising” or conveyance of goods.9800-92. and. <!--[if !supportLists]-->25) <!--[endif]-->That. executive. 1959. at this Location upon the soil: (grid coordinates) 36. that Grantor did not obtain Full and Unalienable Rights. <!--[if !supportLists]-->23) <!--[endif]-->That the Social Security Number 231-98-2194 (Annexed as EXHIBIT B) is not evidence of title to property being held by Trustee that is effectively connected to said Trust. <!--[if !supportLists]-->31) <!--[endif]-->That Grantor’s acceptance of Presidential Oath made by the President of the United States of America (Article 2. and.5978. and. District of Columbia. terminated. hereinafter “Trustee.” the Trustee of said Trusts. and. <!--[if !supportLists]-->8) <!--[endif]-->Transfer Grantor’s portion of the Public Debt as “Special . and. <!--[if !supportLists]-->42) <!--[endif]-->That Grantor cannot. <!--[if !supportLists]-->44) <!--[endif]-->That Grantor does not have the Right to declare “All Bets Are Off!” and remove himself from all Tontine. and return to Grantor a statement of account thereof within twenty (20) calendar days from date of receipt of said command (SEE EXHIBIT “A”). and. and. is not an agent of Trustee. ß 3713 and P. papers and procedures to effect said liquidations. and. and. <!--[if !supportLists]-->41) <!--[endif]-->That said record of failure is not sufficient cause for Grantor to terminate and liquidate said trust(s). <!--[if !supportLists]-->6) <!--[endif]-->Treasurer is herein directed to pay all “Service Claims” accrued when acting as fiduciary to the Trust(s) (SEE 31 U. <!--[if !supportLists]-->40) <!--[endif]-->That said record of failure is not available upon request from IRS or Beneficiary. <!--[if !supportLists]-->7) <!--[endif]-->Provide Grantor with all necessary documents. and. 97-258). Statutory.L. or other de facto jurisdiction. THEREFORE. Maritime. <!--[if !supportLists]-->2) <!--[endif]-->Terminate and liquidate the effectively-connected Trust identified by Social Security Number 231-98-2194 (SEE EXHIBIT “B”) and return to Grantor a statement of account thereof within twenty (20) calendar days from date of receipt of said command. Civil. <!--[if !supportLists]-->5) <!--[endif]-->Make provisions that said liquidations must settle all past and current debt obligations. certificates. and. forms. <!--[if !supportLists]-->38) <!--[endif]-->That the Beneficiary is not a Free Inhabitant. <!--[if !supportLists]-->36) <!--[endif]-->That the failure of IRS to ledger upon receipt the indorsed obligations of any Free Inhabitant as a right of setoff does not constitute a breach of said Trust.<!--[if !supportLists]-->35) <!--[endif]-->That the Internal Revenue Service. secret bonds.C.S. hereinafter “IRS”. and. secret liens. and. and. which is identified as Certificate of Live Birth Number 123-45-678900. BE IT RESOLVED. <!--[if !supportLists]-->37) <!--[endif]-->That there is not a record of the failure. <!--[if !supportLists]-->43) <!--[endif]-->That IRS is not required to cure said breach within twenty (20) calendar days from date of receipt of said command and provide evidence of same to Beneficiary. and notice thereof. and. domestic. local. and. <!--[if !supportLists]-->45) <!--[endif]-->That Grantor does not have the Right to declare and demand “Cash-Out” Doctrine of Law in an immediate and/or timely manner. and. and. state or federal and whether they be in the nature of Admiralty. and. command Treasurer to terminate and liquidate said Trust(s) immediately. that Treasurer is hereby and herein directed by Grantor to accordingly: <!--[if !supportLists]-->1) <!--[endif]-->Terminate and liquidate Trust upon Grantor’s Surrender of Trust Receipt. Criminal. instruments. <!--[if !supportLists]-->39) <!--[endif]-->That said record of failure of proper “ledgering” by IRS is not sufficient prima facie evidence of breach of said Trust(s). and other “wagering” and “gambling” schemes and declare himself “Exempt” from prosecution and harassment by partakers and participants of said wagering and gambling establishments. for said cause. whether foreign. <!--[if !supportLists]-->3) <!--[endif]-->Terminate and liquidate any/all Trust(s) identified by United States Department of Defense form DD 214 (SEE EXHIBIT “C”) with identifying number US 56 123 456. of IRS to ledger upon receipt the indorsed obligations of the Beneficiary as a right of setoff. and Maritime liens associated with said trusts. and. <!--[if !supportLists]-->4) <!--[endif]-->Terminate and liquidate any/all Trust(s) identified by United States Department of Education (see EXHIBIT D). even the “stealing” of such is not punishable by law. into account listed under the “CONCLUSION” section of this document . And. which has been adopted by approximately 46 states as the basis for trade secret law. 894) when Grantor allowed access to Grantor’s Registry of Live Birth. ab initio and nunc pro tunc.Collection of extensions of credit by extortionate means). claims all assets ledgered within any Contra-Asset accounts. § 1832. 1650-1660. and.S. § 1839(3) (A).” referenced as per: State Secret . or may have been.S. criminalizes the theft of trade secrets to benefit foreign powers. U. § 1831(a). and. being a citizen of the United States. Grantor demands Consideration of True. 18 U. commits any murder or robbery. Trade Secret . inverse accounts and other Book Entry Only ledger accounts that are. (B) (1996). GRANTOR WISHES AND INTENDS to function in the Private Realm without intrusion into the Public Sector as much as is reasonably possible. not under color of law as Title 42 USC. on the high seas under color of any commission from any foreign prince. Real. A government matter that would be a threat to the natural defense or diplomatic interests of the United States if revealed. 1652: Whoever. Sec. This law contains two provisions criminalizing two sorts of activity. and all. <!--[if !supportLists]-->10) <!--[endif]-->Notify all subordinate agencies. the usage of such “money” is contraband and taxable as wagering and gambling. Grantor. or other place or location. 1652 is piracy by citizens. and. does Revoke. The Economic Espionage Act of 1996 (18 U. to cease and desist any and all acts and actions against. or against any citizen thereof. adverse accounts.com or 301-302-1189 if further information is needed to carry out these instructions. remaining proceeds and interest from all related usury. and (3) which derives independent economic value from not being publicly known. (2) reasonable measures taken to protect the information.C. has three parts: (1) information. and shall be imprisoned for life]. GRANTOR COMPREHENDS that there MAY be a direct connection between “State Secrets” and “Trade Secrets” and wishes to Honor said Secrets in Harmony within commerce and trade in the nature of a “Protective Order.S. or involving Grantor that might. presumed. and Annul (or. 18 U. or state. The second. information possessed by the government and of a military or diplomatic nature. (Referenced at Point 28 above . of necessity and without recourse. § 1831-1839). there is no real “value” to any amount of said “money” and bank notes (See EXHIBIT L – Demand for Exchange of Value). <!--[if !supportLists]-->9) <!--[endif]-->Charge all Transfer Fees and Administration Fees to said account listed under the “CONCLUSION” section of this document and deduct same to show balance “paid.C.S. operating on letters of marque and reprisal. Sec. in any way. the disclosure of which would be contrary to the public interest. and. criminalizes their theft for commercial or economic purposes. or any act of hostility against the United States. charged to/against Grantor through any source and recorded in New York City. herein and hereby. the first. restrict Grantor’s Right of Safe Passage upon the Common Way and Post Roads of all Territories within The United States of America [INLAND PIRACY DEFINED: The piracy laws are found at: 18 USC. District of Columbia. therefore. Grantor." And.S. Sec. make invalid) any/all assumed. which makes the theft or misappropriation of a trade secret a federal crime. Therefore. and Equal Value in exchange for Grantor’s Extension of Credit (referenced at Title 18. also. Rescind. or on pretense of authority from any person. CONCLUSION There is an underlying and dominant fact that: all “money” of Exchange in circulation is counterfeit and bears no Value. <!--[if !supportLists]-->11) <!--[endif]-->Contact Grantor at nubankahr458@gmail. Travel on Post Roads and the Common Way and un-restricted use of any .Black's 8th. which was “loaned” to the enterprise located within the corporate structure of the DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE and the DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION located within the geographical parameters of the City of Washington. CENSUS BUREAU (the creation of a vessel and device in commerce).Deposit” and any.C. acting as Inland Pirates. This is enacted law. and. implied. as well as treason.The Uniform Trade Secrets Act. and. because “Necessary and Needful” issues of survival have created exigent circumstances upon Grantor causing the immediate and continued use of unlawful “money”. is a pirate. as defined under 18 U.” and.C. but not be limited to. and/or express Powers of Attorney over all acts and actions done by Grantor in the Public Sector. concerning. to include. "A trade secret. you are herein directed to perform all stipulated and enumerated Duties and Obligations as made specific in “NOTICE OF ABATEMENT” above. personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person who appeared before me. Handler(s). Grantor agrees. ______________________________ Notary Public My commission expires: ___________ (seal) Little-John: of the Stewart Family/Clan . to Indemnify and Hold Harmless all former Trustee(s).11). all other pertinent forms. and.Progenitor LIEN CREDITOR. LIEN CLAIMANT c/o 5600 54th Avenue #219 Somewhere. and that Grantor freely exercises his Right to Locomotion and Travel (SEE EXHIBIT “D”). in this Affidavit and Declaration. and regulations with protest affirmed. and Manager(s) for any/all injuries and/or damages done to Grantor in the past. Subpart A. Category Four (4) [non-treaty] Aboriginal North American Natives. by the above signatory. 2011____. to balance your books and ledgers and show Grantor’s portion of the Public Debt as “forgiven” and/or “discharged” and satisfy General Accounting Office requirements. include. as “Transmitter” of “Stored Value” (31 CFR B Chapter 1. without United States. and. without United States. or to be rendered. therefore. Rosa Gumataotao Rios.medium of “currency” imposed upon Grantor. you are CHARGED with these instructions to Liquidate the Enumerated Estates of LITTLE JOHN STEWART. § 103. UPON COMPLETION OF ABOVE COMMANDS. Grantor moves Treasurer to utilize Interlocking Directorates in the nature of fiduciary and administrator and effectuate NOTICE to all related and interrelated agencies that Grantor is NOT an Enemy of the State. do fully accept all charges and allegations placed to/against my account(s) and do declare under penalty of perjury. instituted and established after date of majority and re-affirmed on the first above mentioned date. Grantor agrees and pledges Fidelity to His Commercial Character with intent to never again dishonor the Creator or man by charging for labor or delaying payment for debts. but not limited to form(s) 1099C. file. and in your Official Capacity as Treasurer of the United States of America. 1099A. at His own discretion and pleasure. Maryland [20730-9998]] . ephemeral and desultory codes. By Grantor. further. Part 103. by this pledge. further. or otherwise make provision for internal book(s) and ledger(s) management. to be a Statesman of the Maryland Republic and a Statesman of the Indigenous Washtaaw and Moor Empire. statutes. are authorized as Fiduciary to Grantor’s Account(s) to adjust. further. being competent to take control of my own financial affairs of estate and able to honor all claims. et cetera. Little-John: of the Stewart Family. that said Agency remit to Grantor a statement of acknowledgement thereof within twenty (20) calendar days from date of receipt of said command. and place all assets into “Deposit Account:” 231982194 Rosa Gumataotao Rios. Date/Seal Under duress per minas. JURAT State of Maryland Republic ss County of Prince Georges Subscribed and affirmed before me on this ______ day of ______________________. and Grantor pursues Harmony in commerce that continuity may not be impeded. 1040V or other payment voucher. in your Personal Capacity as an employee that has received remuneration for services rendered. Grantor says: I. your successors and/or assigns. including. therefore. S. an asset that increases their wealth." MacLeod v. but deny him his liberty. of Grantor’s choosing. also. is to still leave him a slave.S. and Directives attributed to the various Parties effected by acts and actions. 105 So. In terms of the national debt. an act of “perfidy” is a deliberate breach of faith and a calculated violation of trust. To give him his liberty. To give a man his life. directs Treasurer to deduct any fees that may be applicable from Grantors Estate and make entry on ledger of such deductions." .George Sutherland. in January 1999. are all willing to loan money to the U.juvat. both here and abroad. demands liquidation and complete transfer of Grantor’s Assets held “In Trust” at/in the various Contra Asset.” [Emphasis added for clarity.duff@gmail. to wit: ACCEPTED: as fact and truth. attached and annexed Documents and Supporting Documents. and TESTAMENT. any derivatives of said name) and any/all vessel(s) with numbered accounts that are derivative of Application for Certificate of Live Birth (Birth Certificate) and/or any/all social security program(s). 1921. Legacy Treasury Direct (routing number) 00610-0014-6. Grantor.M. citizens. *********************************************** SUMMARY OF STATEMENTS AND DIRECTIVES This “Brief” is a Summary of Statements. Inverse. (famous mark) _______________________ Augus 15. that are NOT Federal Reserve Notes. F. herein. by way of “objection. on page four (4) under “Debt as an Asset” it states: “The bank owes us the money that is in our account. herein and forever after. foreign national. Debt. government. made particular to. WILL.” be immediately transferred into Grantor’s Trust Account located at/in FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF PHILADELPHIA. and/or other accounts that are under the regulation and control of the Treasurer of the United States or the Secretary of the Treasury and held in the name of LITTLE JOHN STEWART (or. Adverse. 2011 Douglas Duff: deus. "Federal reserve notes are legal tender in absence of objection thereto. They view the loan as an investment. … for every debt incurred someone acquires a financial asset of equal value. Hoover (1925) 159 La 244. or the lack thereof. and a claim against the assets and earnings of the debtor. Account 231982194 in the form of Treasury Obligations. Claims. as made more specific in Main Document titled “CHARGING ORDER.com • Corporate Law • Go Back Related in this Category • • • • CALIFORNIA: CIS Rips Apart Family The Behind the Scenes When You Record Your Recored of Live Birth The Truth About Driver's License AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION . Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court. is to take from him all that makes his life worth living. Statement from “Public Debt: Private Asset. bond-trading firms. but take from him the property which is the fruit and badge of his liberty. is considered an asset of the creditor. then. Corporations. and U.” Grantor. brokerage houses. End of quote] ACCEPTED: as fact and truth. every dollar of the government’s debt is some-one’s asset. summarized. ACCEPTED: as fact and truth. and within.” published by the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago. it is treachery and the act or an instance of treachery. 305."The three great rights are so bound together as to be essentially one right. Therefore. are you? Michigan must change carry concealed permits to conform to the Michigan Constitution of 1963 Article I. 154 U.S. 447 (1894) 154 U.S. Boit Winston Shourt Videos --Common Law Ammunition for Freemen-on-the-Land How to Step Out of the System COURT RULES SUPERCEDE THE CONSTITUTION BECAUSE THE CONSTITUTION IS A MERE STATUTE WHICH IS NOT THE LAW!!!! – DO YOU REALLY THINK YOU KNOW WHAT THE LAW IS OR ISN’T TODAY IN 2011???? Contracts Against Americans Admiralty Law. Common Law and the Sovereign I am not a 'Person'.• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • DeLovio v. 'S' Peacefully deconstructing the Corporation Nation DUN & BRADSTREET . Section 6 Unequal Protection. 447 SUFFICIENCY OF THE 'EXPLICIT' RESERVATION Sections • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Homepage News Bellringer's Corner Education Entertainment Government Health History Media Nesara Peace & Freedom Phoenix Journals Religion & Cults Science & Technology Space Spiritual Valley of Radiance Services • Advertise on Our Site . Part I: Corporations Take Over THE ARCHIVE OF MR.with Comments by 'S' --SUMMARY-WAR AND EMERGENCY POWERS: SPECIAL REPORT ON THE NATIONAL EMERGENCY IN AMERICA U. Supreme Court INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION v. BRIMSON.S. • Contact Us • RSS • Privacy Policy Other Publications • Phoenix Archives Back to top Copyright 2011.">< img src="//pixel.quantserve.gif" border="0" height="1" width="1" alt="Quantcast"/>< /div> Object 3 . Fourwinds10.com < div style="display:none.com/pixel/p-3fjOMrBPUq7-E. Documents Similar To UCONVERSON ORDER2011Skip carouselcarousel previouscarousel nextBarbri – UCCUCC 1 on File and Uploaded_20170625_0001Notice of Default-State Home Mtg-AtlSecuritization TGIrdm Iridiumprime Mediafactsheet Factsheets Sep201312_Ong vs. Court of Appeals10000002083TCEQ's objection to motion for financing in Exide Technologies bankruptcy caseJames Mendelson v. Maplewood Poultry Company, 684 F.2d 180, 1st Cir. (1982)MyAdvertisingPays vs. VX Gateway Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order.pdfAgriculture LawIN RE VEAL wSecured Financing MollGT Advanced SEC Form 8-KLong v. Storms, Or. App. Ct., 50 Ore. App. 39; 622 P.2d 731; 1981SPCL Case Digests 26-30Casiquin Final PaperBuss Orgii - 11-20Banking Finals Notes_ChaLaw and Economics of Consumer FinanceSagacious Research Patents &amp; Trademark UpdatesThe United States of America, Representing the Secretary of Transportation, for and on Behalf of the Maritime Administration, and Representing At-Sea Incineration, Inc. v. Continental Illinois National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago (Individually and as Agent for the Bank of California, N.A. And Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce), the Bank of California, N.A., and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, 889 F.2d 1248, 2d Cir. (1989)Torres v. Cantine Mezzacorona, 4th Cir. (2004)First Savings Bank v. First Bank System, 10th Cir. (1996)Willie Wilson v. Millard Public School District - Singsation trademark complaint.pdfRNC NEMU MCP18-B Units to OMS.pdfAEAPIAgora v. Rinaldi & Int'l Living2004 Bar ExamGullickson v. Brown, 10th Cir. (1997)More From kariymSkip carouselcarousel previouscarousel next0025 Dd Clark County Affidavit of Distress on Intl Commercial Lien 6-16-121.SECTION1.docAffidavit of Truth and Notice of Status as Secured Party and Creditor Made Simple TemplateWhat is That Nine BallJaNICE HOWARDPALMER Professional Resume -admin.docxcommerciallien.pdfEXHIBIT 001 - NOTICE of Birthright and Right of Soil271898429 ISO Amendment to Country Names June 20152013 Notice Moor No Ssn Required Claim AfidavitEric.walker.res (1)Exhibit 015 - Notice of No Article III Courts20668780 Coram Nobis UL178923885 Executor Letter Doc249172452 Details About the NSA INCENSER Program Top Level Telecommunications133504271 the Foreclosure FlyerEXHIBIT 095 - NOTICE of Deficiency I.R.S..rtf2488794-1966-Carroll-Quigley-Tragedy-and-Hope-A-History-of-t.pdf59362918-The-First-Degree-of-Freemasonry-Watch-Unknown.pdfEXHIBIT 011 - NOTICE of Communication, Facts Established4 Declaration of StatusExhibit 017 - Affid of Void ComplaintUsufruct ImmunityPostmasterExhibit 024 - Notice... ...of Kol NidreDeclaration of Receipt PDFBill of ExchangeDiversion OrderUsufruct LetterCommercial+Affidavit+of+Truth3. Affidavit of Process Chain of CustodyBest Books About Domain NameDNSSEC Mastery: Securing the Domain Name System with BINDby Michael W LucasWealth Management 2.0by Andrei PolgarRegistering A Domain Name For Beginnersby Steve GobinAll That You Need to Know When Buying Domainsby Koushik KDNS Security: Defending the Domain Name Systemby Allan Liska and Geoffrey StoweSuperstar Domain Names: How to Brainstorm, Evaluate and Pick the Right Domain Nameby Joe SyrowikFooter MenuBack To TopAboutAbout ScribdPressOur blogJoin our team!Contact UsJoin todayInvite FriendsGiftsLegalTermsPrivacyCopyrightSupportHelp / FAQAccessibilityPurchase helpAdChoicesPublishersSocial MediaCopyright © 2018 Scribd Inc. .Browse Books.Site Directory.Site Language: English中文EspañolالعربيةPortuguês日本語DeutschFrançaisTurkceРусский языкTiếng việtJęzyk polskiBahasa indonesiaSign up to vote on this titleUsefulNot usefulYou're Reading a Free PreviewDownloadClose DialogAre you sure?This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?CANCELOK