ASSIGNMENT / TUGASAN________________________________________________________________________ HBEM2203 HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT / PENGURUSAN SUMBER MANUSIA JANUARY 2016 SEMESTER ________________________________________________________________________ INSTRUCTIONS TO STUDENTS / ARAHAN KEPADA PELAJAR 1. This assignment contains only ONE (1) question that is set in both Malay and English. / Tugasan ini mengandungi SATU (1) soalan sahaja yang disediakan dalam bahasa Melayu dan bahasa Inggeris. 2. Answer in Malay or English. / Jawab dalam bahasa Melayu atau bahasa Inggeris. 3. Learners are to submit assignment only in MS-WORD format unless specified otherwise. Please refrain from converting text/phrases into picture format such as .gif / .jpeg / print screen / etc. / Anda dikehendaki menyerahkan tugasan dalam format MS-WORD melainkan dinyatakan sebaliknya. Anda tidak dibenarkan untuk menukar teks/frasa tugasan tersebut kepada format grafik seperti .jpeg / .gif / print screen / dan lain-lain format berkaitan. 4. Download the language version of the assignment template concerned from the myVLE for preparation and submission of your assignment. Your assignment should be typed using 12 point Times New Roman font and 1.5 line spacing. / Muat turunkan templat tugasan versi bahasa yang berkenaan daripada myVLE untuk penyediaan dan penyerahan tugasan anda. Tugasan anda hendaklah ditaip dengan menggunakan saiz fon 12 Times New Roman dan langkau baris 1.5. 5. Your assignment should be between 2500 to 3000 words excluding references. Do not copy the assignment question and instructions to your answer. Only assignment answer developed within the approximate word limit will be assessed. The number of words should be shown at the end of your assignment. / Tugasan anda hendaklah mengandungi 2500 hingga 3000 patah perkataan tidak termasuk rujukan. Bilangan perkataan hendaklah ditunjukkan di hujung tugasan anda. Jangan menyalin soalan dan arahan tugasan dalam jawapan anda. Pemeriksa tidak akan membaca jawapan tugasan yang melebihi had patah perkataan yang dibenarkan. Jumlah perkataan hendaklah dinyatakan di penghujung tugasan anda. 6. You must submit your assignment ONLINE via the myVLE. Refer to the portal for instructions on the procedures to submit your assignment online. You are advised to keep a copy of your submitted assignment and proof of the submission for personal reference. / Anda dikehendaki menghantar tugasan SECARA ONLINE melalui myVLE. Sila rujuk kepada portal untuk arahan mengenai prosedur penghantaran tugasan secara online. Anda dinasihatkan menyimpan salinan tugasan yang dihantar dan bukti penghantaran untuk rujukan sendiri. 7. You can submit your assignment ONCE only in a SINGLE file. / Anda hanya boleh menghantar tugasan SEKALI sahaja dalam SATU fail. 8. Your assignment must be submitted between 7th – 20th March 2016. Submission after 20th March 2016 will NOT be accepted. / Tugasan anda hendaklah diserahkan antara 7hb – 20hb Mac 2016. Serahan selepas 20hb Mac 2016 TIDAK akan diterima. 1 Your assignment is considered as NOT submitted if you fail to produce the submission receipt in any dispute arises concerning assignment submission. 10. Anda juga dilarang sama sekali memplagiat kerja orang lain sebagai kerja sendiri. Please ensure that you keep the RECEIPT issued upon submisson of your assignment as proof of submission. You should not copy another person’s assignment. Kegagalan mengemukakan resit dalam sebarang isu yang timbul berkaitan penghantaran tugasan akan mengakibatkan tugasan dianggap TIDAK dihantar. Your assignment should be prepared individually.9. / Anda perlu memastikan RESIT yang dikeluarkan bagi penghantaran tugasan disimpan sebagai bukti penghantaran. You should also not plagiarise another person’s work as your own. Please take note that PENALTY will be imposed on late submission of assignment as specified in the Registrar’s Office circular 6/2012 (Refer to Registrar’s Announcement in myVLE). / Tugasan hendaklah disiapkan secara individu. Anda dilarang meniru tugasan orang lain. / Sila ambil maklum tentang PENALTI yang akan dikenakan ke atas penghantaran lewat tugasan seperti yang tertera di pekeliling pejabat Pendaftar 6/2012 (Rujuk Registrar’s Announcement di myVLE). 2 . 11. Similarity Percentage (%) / Kadar Pertindihan (%) 0 – 30 30. / Bil. 2. 4. If plagiarism is detected. PLAGIARISM: MARKS DEDUCTION / PLAGIARISME: POTONGAN MARKAH Warning: The submitted assignment will automatically undergo a similarity check. marks would be deducted as follows: / Amaran: Tugasan yang diserahkan.01 – 50 50. / Tugasan ini menyumbang sehingga 40% daripada jumlah markah kursus berkenaan dan akan dinilai berdasarkan kepada Rubrik atau Skema Jawapan yang dilampirkan. Jika plagiarisme dikesan. 1.01 .EVALUATION / PENILAIAN This assignment accounts for 40% of the total marks for the course and shall be assessed based on the Rubrics or Answer Scheme attached.01 – 70 70. secara automatik. Anda akan diberikan maklum balas tentang tugasan ini sebelum Peperiksaan Akhir Semester bermula.100 Marks Deduction (%) / Potongan Markah (%) 0 5 10 100 3 . 3. akan disemak untuk menentukan kadar pertindihan. You would be given feedback on the assignment before the Final Semester Examination commences. markah akan dipotong seperti berikut: No. A few years ago the government announced that the Penilaian Tahap Kecekapan (PTK) or the Assessment of Competency Levels was to be replaced by a new approach of assessing teachers for promotion purposes.ASSIGNMENT QUESTION Topic 5 of the course module discusses job promotions and criteria for promotion in the Malaysian Education Service. Characteristics of the new teacher assessment system adopted in 2015. Undertake a study on the issue at a school of your choice. Students are reminded not to divulge the identity of sites and respondents involved in the study. Refer to the guidelines rubric on the expected assignment content and also the basis for which marks are to be awarded for the report. The study is focused on the following: (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) The teacher assessment system as practiced in 2014. Commentary on the new system. Collect the necessary data by interviewing at least TWO senior teachers and referring to relevant documents and records. This new approach was adopted last year (2015). [Total: 40 marks] SOALAN TUGASAN 4 . Critical evaluation of the system. Ciri sistem penilaian guru baru yang diperkenalkan pada tahun 2015. Pelajar adalah diingatkan supaya tidak mendedahkan identiti sekolah.Topik 5 Modul Kursus membincangkan kenaikan pangkat dalam jawatan dan kriteria kenaikan pangkat dalam Perkhidmatan Pendidikan Malaysia. Kaedah penilaian mula digunakan pada lepas 2015. Kajian ini berfokuskan kepada perkara berikut: (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) Sistem penilaian guru yang diamalkan tahun lepas. [Jumlah: 40 markah] 5 . Beberapa tahun yang lalu pihak Kerajaan telah memaklumkan yang Penilaian Tahap Kecekapan (PTK) akan digantikan dengan satu kaedah penilaian guru yang baru bagi tujuan kenaikan pangkat. Rujuk panduan pada rubrik yang disediakan mengenai kandungan tugasan dan juga kaedah pemberian markah. objek kajian dan responden yang terlibat dalam kajian. Penilaian kritikal terhadap sistem tersebut. Komentar tentang sistem baru. iaitu 2014. Kutip data melalui temuduga sekurang-kurangnya DUA orang guru kanan dan rujukan kepada dokumen dan rekod. Lakukan satu kajian tentang perkara tersebut di sebuah sekolah pilihan anda. Max Marks 4 4 6 6 . interviews conducted. or vice-versa.5 No description provided. Low Fair Above average Excellent 1 The introduction is brief and not focused on the structure and objectives of the paper. 4 The introduction is interesting. interviews and study of documents and records. The analysis on the two teachers’ perceptions presented is poor and lacks focus. It is deemed to exceed expectations. if relevant. Describes in sufficient details the processes and rationale on respondents’ selection. (3) interviews conducted and (4) documents and records studied.5 No evaluation presented. 3 The introduction previews the structure of the paper and its objectives clearly. The main characteristics presented are comprehensive. It previews (1) the structure and (2) objectives of the paper clearly. Description of the 2014 (or previous years) teacher evaluation system 1. The main characteristics presented are comprehensive. Brief description on the processes of identifying respondents and conduct of interviews. Introduction 1 Data Collection Method 1 There is no description on how data is collected. The main strengths and weaknesses of the sytem are discussed. The student adds own commentaries. (3) Important concepts are also clearly defined. Critical evaluation of the 2014 (or previous years) evaluation system 1. The description is rather brief and lacks focus.Assignment Rubrics Criteria Weight Missing Item 0 The introduction is missing. The description provides less than adequate coverage of the main characteristics. 2 The introduction either does not adequately preview the structure of the paper but clearly states its objectives. and documents and records studied. Brief mention of data collection but without adequate focus on respondent selection. The analysis on the two teachers’ perceptions presented is less than adequate. The main strengths and weaknesses of the sytem are discussed. Describes in detail the (1) processes and (2) rationale on respondents’ selection. Low Fair 1 The analysis on the two teachers’ perceptions presented is poor and lacks focus. 2 The analysis on the two teachers’ perceptions presented is less than adequate. It ties up the above THREE elements of the study. Fairly good explanation on the benefits of the new system and the possible drawbacks of the system. The conclusion is recognisable. Details are placed in a logical order and presented effectively. Fairly good explanation on the benefits of the new system. the paper just ends. No commentary provided. but does not tie up the above THREE elements of the study. Organisation 1 Not applicable. Many details are not in logical order. Above average Details are placed in a logical order but presented less effectively. It is deemed to exceed expectations. There is little sense that the writing is organised. Max Marks 6 6 The conclusion is strong. Excellent 4 The main characteristics presented are comprehensive.Criteria Weight Description of the new system. Commentary provided are not focused on the benefits of the new system. The conclusion ties up the above THREE elements of the study.5 Commentary on the new system 1. Well summarised. implemented in 2015 1. Details are not in logical order and distracts the reader. 4 TOTAL MARKS 40 4 .5 Missing Item 0 No description provided. It is rather vague. 3 The analysis on the two teachers’ perceptions is well presented. Conclusion 1 No conclusion presented. There is no clear conclusion. Convincing explanation on the benefits of the new system but also pointed out the possible drawbacks of the system.