REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINESCEBU TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY TUBURAN CAMPUS:Tuburan, Cebu url: http://www.ctu.ph/tuburan OJT Form 7C October 2012 Revision: 0 Page 1 of 2 email: [email protected] OJT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM (for BSFi, BSIT and Engineering) Student: CHARLES ALOBA DALOGDOG Major: BSICT-IV Training Period: Instructions: This report is to be completed by the immediate supervisor of the OJT and to be returned to the OJT coordinator. In the space at the left, encircle the rating that describes the OJT most accurately. Total the value for all responses and record in the Total Scores Cooperation section. 1 2 Uncooperative, antagonistic Productivity 3 4 Cooperates reluctantly 1 2 Fails to do an adequate job 5 6 Cooperates willingly when asked 3 4 Does just enough to get by 7 8 Cooperates eagerly and cheerfully 5 6 Maintains constant level of performance 9 10 Always cooperates eagerly and cheerfully 7 8 Very industrious, does more than Ability to Get Along with People required 1 2 Frequently rude and unfriendly 9 10 Superior work production record Ability to Follow 1 2 Unable to 3 4 Needs instructions 5 6 Follows difficulty 7 8 Follows difficulty 9 10 Uses following Initiative 1 2 Always 3 4 Sometimes 5 6 Does 7 8 Does more willingly 9 10 Shows beyond Quality of Work 1 2 Does almost 3 4 Does less satisfactory 3 5 7 9 4 Has some difficulty working with others 6 Usually gets along well with people 8 Is courteous and tactful with people 10 Exceptionally well accepted by peers and supervisors Attendance 1 2 Often absent without good excuse 3 4 Frequently late 5 6 Usually present and on time 7 8 Very prompt and regular in attendance 9 10 Always prompt and regular, volunteers for overtime when asked Appearance 1 2 Untidy or inappropriately groomed 3 4 Sometimes neglected of appearance 5 6 Satisfactory appearance 7 8 Careful about personal appearance 9 10 Exceptionally neat, and appropriately groomed 5 6 Does Overall Performance acceptable 1 2 Unsatisfactory work 3 4 Below average 7 8 Does more 5 6 Average neat, 9 10 Shows 7 8 Very good neat, 9 10 Outstanding accurate Dependability 1 2 Unreliable 3 4 Sometimes .fails in obligations 5 6 Meets obligations under supervision 7 8 Meets obligations under very little supervision 9 10 Instructions follow instructions repeated detailed most Instructions without instructions with no initiative in interpreting and instructions attempts to avoid work attempts to avoid work assigned job willingly than assigned job resourcefulness in going assigned job. no acceptable work than required amount of work normal amount of than required amount of accurate work special attitude for doing work beyond required amount Meets obligations without supervision TOTAL SCORE:________ GRADE EQUIVALENT ___________ (please refer to next page) 3 2.5 1.1 1.5 .1 2.4 3.5 2.1 3.2 3.0 3.4 1.2 SCORE GRADE 49-52 45-48 41-44 37-40 33-36 29-32 25-28 21-24 17-20 12-16 8-11 4-7 0-3 82 81 80 79 78 77 76 75 74 73 72 71 70 7-POINT SCALE 2.7 2.0 2.9 3.6 1.2 1. MIRASOL OJT Supervisor (Printed Name & Signature) Page 2 of 2 Describe the student-trainees areas of strengths: Describe the student-trainees areas that need improvement: OJT Supervisor’s Printed Name Position OJT Supervisor’s Signature Date Cooperating Agency Address TABLE ON NUMERICAL RATING WITH EQUIVALENT POINT GRADES SCORE GRADE 98-100 95-97 92-94 89-91 85-88 81-84 77-80 73-76 69-72 65-68 61-64 57-60 53-56 95 94 93 92 91 90 89 88 87 86 85 84 83 7-POINT SCALE 1.0 1.KEVIN JOSEPH R.6 2.9 2.4 2.8 1.7 1.8 2.3 1.3 3.