Lawrence v. Texas

123 S.Ct. 2472 Page 1 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472, 156 L.Ed.2d 508, 71 USLW 4574, 03 Cal. Daily Op. Serv.5559, 2003 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7036, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 427 (Cite as: 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472) Justice Thomas dissented and filed opinion. West Headnotes [1] Constitutional Law 92 4509(23) Briefs and Other Related Documents Oral Argument Transcripts with Streaming Media Judges and Attorneys Supreme Court of the United States John Geddes LAWRENCE and Tyron Garner, Petitioners, v. TEXAS. No. 02–102. Argued March 26, 2003. Decided June 26, 2003. Defendants were convicted in the County Criminal Court at Law No. 10, Harris County, Sherman A. Ross, J., of engaging in homosexual conduct. They appealed. On rehearing en banc, the Texas Court of Appeals, Hudson, J., 41 S.W.3d 349, affirmed. Certiorari was granted. The Supreme Court, Justice Kennedy, overruled its prior decision in Bowers v. Hardwick, 478 U.S. 186, 106 S.Ct. 2841, 92 L.Ed.2d 140 (1986), and held that Texas statute making it a crime for two persons of the same sex to engage in certain intimate sexual conduct was unconstitutional, as applied to adult males who had engaged in consensual act of sodomy in privacy of home. Reversed and remanded. Justice O'Connor concurred judgment and filed opinion. in 92 Constitutional Law 92XXVII Due Process 92XXVII(H) Criminal Law 92XXVII(H)2 Nature and Elements of Crime 92k4502 Creation and Definition of Offense 92k4509 Particular Offenses 92k4509(23) k. Sex offenses, incest, and prostitution. Most Cited Cases (Formerly 92k258(5)) Sodomy 357 1 357 Sodomy 357k1 k. Nature and elements of offenses. Most Cited Cases Texas statute making it a crime for two persons of the same sex to engage in certain intimate sexual conduct was unconstitutional, as applied to adult males who had engaged in consensual act of sodomy in privacy of home, as impinging on their exercise of liberty interests protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment; overruling Bowers v. Hardwick, 478 U.S. 186, 106 S.Ct. 2841, 92 L.Ed.2d 140 (1986). U.S.C.A. Const.Amend. 14; V.T.C.A., Penal Code § 21.06(a). [2] Constitutional Law 92 3893 Justice Scalia dissented and filed opinion, in which Chief Justice Rehnquist and Justice Thomas joined. 92 Constitutional Law 92XXVII Due Process 92XXVII(B) Protections Provided © 2014 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. 123 S.Ct. 2472 Page 2 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472, 156 L.Ed.2d 508, 71 USLW 4574, 03 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5559, 2003 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7036, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 427 (Cite as: 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472) and Deprivations Prohibited in General 92k3892 Substantive Due Process in General 92k3893 k. In general. Most Cited Cases (Formerly 92k251.2) History and tradition are the starting point, but not in all cases the ending point, of substantive due process inquiry. U.S.C.A. Const.Amend. 14. [3] Constitutional Law 92 4380 106II Establishment, Organization, and Procedure 106II(G) Rules of Decision 106k88 Previous Decisions as Controlling or as Precedents 106k89 k. In general. Most Cited Cases Although doctrine of stare decisis is essential to the respect accorded to judgments of court and to stability of the law, it is not an inexorable command. [5] Constitutional Law 92 4450 92 Constitutional Law 92XXVII Due Process 92XXVII(G) Particular Issues and Applications 92XXVII(G)18 Families and Children 92k4380 k. In general. Most Cited Cases (Formerly 92k274(5)) Constitutional Law 92 4452 92 Constitutional Law 92XXVII Due Process 92XXVII(G) Particular Issues and Applications 92XXVII(G)22 Privacy and Sexual Matters 92k4451 Abortion, Contraception, and Birth Control 92k4452 k. In general. Most Cited Cases (Formerly 92k274(5)) Fourteenth Amendment accords constitutional protection to personal decisions relating to marriage, procreation, contraception, family relationships, child rearing, and education. U.S.C.A. Const.Amend. 14. [4] Courts 106 106 Courts 89 92 Constitutional Law 92XXVII Due Process 92XXVII(G) Particular Issues and Applications 92XXVII(G)22 Privacy and Sexual Matters 92k4450 k. In general. Most Cited Cases (Formerly 92k274(5)) Homosexuals' right to liberty under the Due Process Clause gives them a right to engage in consensual sexual activity in home without intervention of government. U.S.C.A. Const.Amend. 14. **2473 *558 Syllabus FN* FN* The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U.S. 321, 337, 26 S.Ct. 282, 50 L.Ed. 499. Responding to a reported weapons disturbance in a private residence, Houston police entered petitioner Lawrence's apartment and saw him and another adult man, petitioner Garner, engaging in a private, consensual sexual act. Petitioners © 2014 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. 123 S.Ct. 2472 Page 3 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472, 156 L.Ed.2d 508, 71 USLW 4574, 03 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5559, 2003 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7036, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 427 (Cite as: 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472) were arrested and convicted of deviate sexual intercourse in violation of a Texas statute forbidding two persons of the same sex to engage in certain intimate sexual conduct. In affirming, the State Court of Appeals held, inter alia, that the statute was not unconstitutional under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The court considered Bowers v. Hardwick, 478 U.S. 186, 106 S.Ct. 2841, 92 L.Ed.2d 140, controlling on that point. Held: The Texas statute making it a crime for two persons of the same sex to engage in certain intimate sexual conduct violates the Due Process Clause. Pp. 2476–2484. (a) Resolution of this case depends on whether petitioners were free as adults to engage in private conduct in the exercise of their liberty under the Due Process Clause. For this inquiry the Court deems it necessary to reconsider its Bowers holding. The Bowers Court's initial substantive statement—“The issue presented is whether the Federal Constitution confers a fundamental right upon homosexuals to engage in sodomy ...,” 478 U.S., at 190, 106 S.Ct. 2841 —discloses the Court's failure to appreciate the extent of the liberty at stake. To say that the issue in Bowers was simply the right to engage in certain sexual conduct demeans the claim the individual put forward, just as it would demean a married couple were it said that marriage is just about the right to have sexual intercourse. Although the laws involved in Bowers and here purport to do no more than prohibit a particular sexual act, their penalties and purposes have more far-reaching consequences, touching upon the most private human conduct, sexual behavior, and in the most private of places, the home. They seek to control a personal relationship that, whether or not entitled to formal recognition in the law, is within the liberty of persons to choose without being punished as criminals. The liberty protected by the Constitution allows homosexual persons the right to choose to enter upon relationships in the confines of their homes and their own private lives and still retain their dignity as free persons. Pp. 2476–2478. *559 (b) Having misapprehended the liberty claim presented to it, the Bowers Court stated that proscriptions against sodomy have ancient roots. 478 U.S., at 192, 106 S.Ct. 2841. It should be noted, however, that there is no longstanding history in this country of laws directed at homosexual conduct as a distinct matter. Early American sodomy laws were not directed at homosexuals as such but instead sought to prohibit nonprocreative sexual activity more generally, whether between men and women or men and men. Moreover, early sodomy laws seem not to **2474 have been enforced against consenting adults acting in private. Instead, sodomy prosecutions often involved predatory acts against those who could not or did not consent: relations between men and minor girls or boys, between adults involving force, between adults implicating disparity in status, or between men and animals. The longstanding criminal prohibition of homosexual sodomy upon which Bowers placed such reliance is as consistent with a general condemnation of nonprocreative sex as it is with an established tradition of prosecuting acts because of their homosexual character. Far from possessing “ancient roots,” ibid., American laws targeting same-sex couples did not develop until the last third of the 20th century. Even now, only nine States have singled out same-sex relations for © 2014 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. 123 S.Ct. 2472 Page 4 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472, 156 L.Ed.2d 508, 71 USLW 4574, 03 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5559, 2003 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7036, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 427 (Cite as: 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472) criminal prosecution. Thus, the historical grounds relied upon in Bowers are more complex than the majority opinion and the concurring opinion by Chief Justice Burger there indicated. They are not without doubt and, at the very least, are overstated. The Bowers Court was, of course, making the broader point that for centuries there have been powerful voices to condemn homosexual conduct as immoral, but this Court's obligation is to define the liberty of all, not to mandate its own moral code, Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833, 850, 112 S.Ct. 2791, 120 L.Ed.2d 674. The Nation's laws and traditions in the past half century are most relevant here. They show an emerging awareness that liberty gives substantial protection to adult persons in deciding how to conduct their private lives in matters pertaining to sex. See County of Sacramento v. Lewis, 523 U.S. 833, 857, 118 S.Ct. 1708, 140 L.Ed.2d 1043. Pp. 2478–2481. (c) Bowers' deficiencies became even more apparent in the years following its announcement. The 25 States with laws prohibiting the conduct referenced in Bowers are reduced now to 13, of which 4 enforce their laws only against homosexual conduct. In those States, including Texas, that still proscribe sodomy (whether for same-sex or heterosexual conduct), there is a pattern of nonenforcement with respect to consenting adults acting in private. Casey, supra, at 851, 112 S.Ct. 2791 —which confirmed that the Due Process Clause protects personal decisions relating to marriage, procreation, contraception, family relationships, child rearing, and education—and Romer v. Evans, 517 U.S. 620, 624, 116 S.Ct. 1620, 134 L.Ed.2d 855 —which struck down class-based legislation directed at homosexuals—cast Bowers' *560 holding into even more doubt. The stigma the Texas criminal statute imposes, moreover, is not trivial. Although the offense is but a minor misdemeanor, it remains a criminal offense with all that imports for the dignity of the persons charged, including notation of convictions on their records and on job application forms, and registration as sex offenders under state law. Where a case's foundations have sustained serious erosion, criticism from other sources is of greater significance. In the United States, criticism of Bowers has been substantial and continuing, disapproving of its reasoning in all respects, not just as to its historical assumptions. And, to the extent Bowers relied on values shared with a wider civilization, the case's reasoning and holding have been rejected by the European Court of Human Rights, and that other nations have taken action consistent with an affirmation of the protected right of homosexual adults to engage in intimate, consensual conduct. There has been no showing that in this country the governmental interest in circumscribing personal choice is somehow more legitimate or urgent. Stare decisis is not an inexorable command. Payne v. Tennessee, 501 U.S. 808, 828, 111 S.Ct. 2597, 115 L.Ed.2d 720. Bowers ' holding has not induced detrimental reliance of the sort that could counsel against overturning it once there are compelling reasons to do so. Casey, supra, at 855–856, 112 S.Ct. 2791. Bowers causes uncertainty, for the precedents before and after it contradict its central holding. Pp. 2481–2483. **2475 (d) Bowers' rationale does not withstand careful analysis. In his dissenting opinion in Bowers Justice STEVENS concluded that (1) the fact that a State's governing majority has traditionally © 2014 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. 123 S.Ct. 2472 Page 5 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472, 156 L.Ed.2d 508, 71 USLW 4574, 03 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5559, 2003 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7036, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 427 (Cite as: 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472) viewed a particular practice as immoral is not a sufficient reason for upholding a law prohibiting the practice, and (2) individual decisions concerning the intimacies of physical relationships, even when not intended to produce offspring, are a form of “liberty” protected by due process. That analysis should have controlled Bowers, and it controls here. Bowers was not correct when it was decided, is not correct today, and is hereby overruled. This case does not involve minors, persons who might be injured or coerced, those who might not easily refuse consent, or public conduct or prostitution. It does involve two adults who, with full and mutual consent, engaged in sexual practices common to a homosexual lifestyle. Petitioners' right to liberty under the Due Process Clause gives them the full right to engage in private conduct without government intervention. Casey, supra, at 847, 112 S.Ct. 2791. The Texas statute furthers no legitimate state interest which can justify its intrusion into the individual's personal and private life. Pp. 2483–2484. 41 S.W.3d 349, reversed and remanded. *561 KENNEDY, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which STEVENS, SOUTER, GINSBURG, and BREYER, JJ., joined. O'CONNOR, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment, post, p. 2484. SCALIA, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which REHNQUIST, C.J., and THOMAS, J., joined, post, p. 2488. THOMAS, J., filed a dissenting opinion, post, p. 2498. Paul M. Smith, Washington, DC, for petitioners. Charles A. Rosenthal, Jr., Houston, TX, for respondent. Paul M. Smith, William M. Hohengarten, Daniel Mach, David C. Belt, Sharon M. McGowan, Jenner & Block, LLC, Washington, DC, Mitchell Katine, Williams, Birnberg & Andersen, L.L.P., Houston, TX, Ruth E. Harlow, Counsel of Record, Patricia M. Logue, Susan L. Sommer, Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc., New York City, for Petitioners. Charles A. Rosenthal, Jr., Harris County District Attorney, William J. Delmore, III, Scott A. Durfee, Assistant District Attorneys Harris County, Houston, Texas, for Respondent. For U.S. Supreme Court Briefs, See:2003 WL 152352 (Pet.Brief)2003 WL 470184 (Resp.Brief)2003 WL 1098835 (Reply.Brief) *562 Justice KENNEDY delivered the opinion of the Court. Liberty protects the person from unwarranted government intrusions into a dwelling or other private places. In our tradition the State is not omnipresent in the home. And there are other spheres of our lives and existence, outside the home, where the State should not be a dominant presence. Freedom extends beyond spatial bounds. Liberty presumes an autonomy of self that includes freedom of thought, belief, expression, and certain intimate conduct. The instant case involves liberty of the person both in its spatial and in its more transcendent dimensions. I The question before the Court is the validity of a Texas statute making it a crime for two persons of the same sex to engage in certain intimate sexual conduct. In Houston, Texas, officers of the Harris County Police Department were dispatched to a private residence in © 2014 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. 123 S.Ct. 2472 Page 6 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472, 156 L.Ed.2d 508, 71 USLW 4574, 03 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5559, 2003 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7036, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 427 (Cite as: 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472) response to a reported weapons disturbance. They entered an apartment where one of the petitioners, John Geddes Lawrence, *563 resided. The right of the police to enter does not seem to have been questioned. The officers observed Lawrence and another**2476 man, Tyron Garner, engaging in a sexual act. The two petitioners were arrested, held in custody overnight, and charged and convicted before a Justice of the Peace. The complaints described their crime as “deviate sexual intercourse, namely anal sex, with a member of the same sex (man).” App. to Pet. for Cert. 127a, 139a. The applicable state law is Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 21.06(a) (2003). It provides: “A person commits an offense if he engages in deviate sexual intercourse with another individual of the same sex.” The statute defines “[d]eviate sexual intercourse” as follows: “(A) any contact between any part of the genitals of one person and the mouth or anus of another person; or “(B) the penetration of the genitals or the anus of another person with an object.” § 21.01(1). The petitioners exercised their right to a trial de novo in Harris County Criminal Court. They challenged the statute as a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and of a like provision of the Texas Constitution. Tex. Const., Art. 1, § 3a. Those contentions were rejected. The petitioners, having entered a plea of nolo contendere, were each fined $200 and assessed court costs of $141.25. App. to Pet. for Cert. 107a–110a. The Court of Appeals for the Texas Fourteenth District considered the petitioners' federal constitutional arguments under both the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. After hearing the case en banc the court, in a divided opinion, rejected the constitutional arguments and affirmed the convictions. 41 S.W.3d 349 (2001). The majority opinion indicates that the Court of Appeals considered our decision in Bowers v. Hardwick, 478 U.S. 186, 106 S.Ct. 2841, 92 L.Ed.2d 140 (1986), to be controlling on the federal due process aspect of the case. Bowers then being authoritative, this was proper. *564 We granted certiorari, 537 U.S. 1044, 123 S.Ct. 661, 154 L.Ed.2d 514 (2002), to consider three questions: 1. Whether petitioners' criminal convictions under the Texas ‘Homosexual Conduct’ law—which criminalizes sexual intimacy by same-sex couples, but not identical behavior by different-sex couples—violate the Fourteenth Amendment guarantee of equal protection of the laws. 2. Whether petitioners' criminal convictions for adult consensual sexual intimacy in the home violate their vital interests in liberty and privacy protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. 3. Whether Bowers v. Hardwick, supra, should be overruled. See Pet. for Cert. i. The petitioners were adults at the time of the alleged offense. Their conduct was in private and consensual. II [1] We conclude the case should be resolved by determining whether the petitioners were free as adults to engage in © 2014 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. 123 S.Ct. 2472 Page 7 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472, 156 L.Ed.2d 508, 71 USLW 4574, 03 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5559, 2003 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7036, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 427 (Cite as: 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472) the private conduct in the exercise of their liberty under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution. For this inquiry we deem it necessary to reconsider the Court's holding in Bowers. There are broad statements of the substantive reach of liberty under the Due Process Clause in earlier cases, including Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 U.S. 510, 45 S.Ct. 571, 69 L.Ed. 1070 (1925), and Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 43 S.Ct. 625, 67 L.Ed. 1042 (1923); but the most pertinent beginning point is our decision in Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479, 85 S.Ct. 1678, 14 L.Ed.2d 510 (1965). In Griswold the Court invalidated a state law prohibiting the use of drugs or devices of contraception and counseling or **2477 aiding and abetting the use of contraceptives. The Court described the protected interest as a right to privacy and *565 placed emphasis on the marriage relation and the protected space of the marital bedroom. Id., at 485, 85 S.Ct. 1678. After Griswold it was established that the right to make certain decisions regarding sexual conduct extends beyond the marital relationship. In Eisenstadt v. Baird, 405 U.S. 438, 92 S.Ct. 1029, 31 L.Ed.2d 349 (1972), the Court invalidated a law prohibiting the distribution of contraceptives to unmarried persons. The case was decided under the Equal Protection Clause, id., at 454, 92 S.Ct. 1029; but with respect to unmarried persons, the Court went on to state the fundamental proposition that the law impaired the exercise of their personal rights, ibid. It quoted from the statement of the Court of Appeals finding the law to be in conflict with fundamental human rights, and it followed with this statement of its own: “It is true that in Griswold the right of privacy in question inhered in the marital relationship .... If the right of privacy means anything, it is the right of the individual, married or single, to be free from unwarranted governmental intrusion into matters so fundamentally affecting a person as the decision whether to bear or beget a child.” Id., at 453, 92 S.Ct. 1029. The opinions in Griswold and Eisenstadt were part of the background for the decision in Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, 93 S.Ct. 705, 35 L.Ed.2d 147 (1973). As is well known, the case involved a challenge to the Texas law prohibiting abortions, but the laws of other States were affected as well. Although the Court held the woman's rights were not absolute, her right to elect an abortion did have real and substantial protection as an exercise of her liberty under the Due Process Clause. The Court cited cases that protect spatial freedom and cases that go well beyond it. Roe recognized the right of a woman to make certain fundamental decisions affecting her destiny and confirmed once more that the protection of liberty under the Due Process Clause has a substantive dimension of fundamental significance in defining the rights of the person. *566 In Carey v. Population Services Int'l, 431 U.S. 678, 97 S.Ct. 2010, 52 L.Ed.2d 675 (1977), the Court confronted a New York law forbidding sale or distribution of contraceptive devices to persons under 16 years of age. Although there was no single opinion for the Court, the law was invalidated. Both Eisenstadt and Carey, as well as the holding and rationale in Roe, confirmed that the reasoning of Griswold could not be confined to the protection of rights of married adults. This was the state of the © 2014 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. 123 S.Ct. 2472 Page 8 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472, 156 L.Ed.2d 508, 71 USLW 4574, 03 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5559, 2003 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7036, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 427 (Cite as: 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472) law with respect to some of the most relevant cases when the Court considered Bowers v. Hardwick. The facts in Bowers had some similarities to the instant case. A police officer, whose right to enter seems not to have been in question, observed Hardwick, in his own bedroom, engaging in intimate sexual conduct with another adult male. The conduct was in violation of a Georgia statute making it a criminal offense to engage in sodomy. One difference between the two cases is that the Georgia statute prohibited the conduct whether or not the participants were of the same sex, while the Texas statute, as we have seen, applies only to participants of the same sex. Hardwick was not prosecuted, but he brought an action in federal court to declare the state statute invalid. He alleged he was a practicing homosexual and that the criminal prohibition violated rights guaranteed to him by the Constitution. The Court, in an opinion by Justice White, sustained the Georgia law. Chief Justice Burger and Justice Powell joined the opinion of the Court and filed separate, concurring opinions. Four Justices dissented. 478 U.S., at 199, 106 S.Ct. 2841 (opinion of Blackmun, J., joined by Brennan, Marshall, and STEVENS, JJ.); **2478id., at 214, 106 S.Ct. 2841 (opinion of STEVENS, J., joined by Brennan and Marshall, JJ.). The Court began its substantive discussion in Bowers as follows: “The issue presented is whether the Federal Constitution confers a fundamental right upon homosexuals to engage in sodomy and hence invalidates the laws of the many States that still make such conduct illegal and have done so *567 for a very long time.” Id., at 190, 106 S.Ct. 2841. That statement, we now conclude, discloses the Court's own failure to appreciate the extent of the liberty at stake. To say that the issue in Bowers was simply the right to engage in certain sexual conduct demeans the claim the individual put forward, just as it would demean a married couple were it to be said marriage is simply about the right to have sexual intercourse. The laws involved in Bowers and here are, to be sure, statutes that purport to do no more than prohibit a particular sexual act. Their penalties and purposes, though, have more far-reaching consequences, touching upon the most private human conduct, sexual behavior, and in the most private of places, the home. The statutes do seek to control a personal relationship that, whether or not entitled to formal recognition in the law, is within the liberty of persons to choose without being punished as criminals. This, as a general rule, should counsel against attempts by the State, or a court, to define the meaning of the relationship or to set its boundaries absent injury to a person or abuse of an institution the law protects. It suffices for us to acknowledge that adults may choose to enter upon this relationship in the confines of their homes and their own private lives and still retain their dignity as free persons. When sexuality finds overt expression in intimate conduct with another person, the conduct can be but one element in a personal bond that is more enduring. The liberty protected by the Constitution allows homosexual persons the right to make this choice. Having misapprehended the claim of liberty there presented to it, and thus stating the claim to be whether there is a fundamental right to engage in consensual sodomy, the Bowers Court said: “Proscriptions against that conduct have © 2014 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. 123 S.Ct. 2472 Page 9 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472, 156 L.Ed.2d 508, 71 USLW 4574, 03 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5559, 2003 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7036, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 427 (Cite as: 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472) ancient roots.” Id., at 192, 106 S.Ct. 2841. In academic writings, and in many of the scholarly amicus briefs filed to assist the Court in this case, there are fundamental criticisms of the historical premises relied upon by the majority and concurring opinions*568 in Bowers. Brief for Cato Institute as Amicus Curiae 16–17; Brief for American Civil Liberties Union et al. as Amici Curiae 15–21; Brief for Professors of History et al. as Amici Curiae 3–10. We need not enter this debate in the attempt to reach a definitive historical judgment, but the following considerations counsel against adopting the definitive conclusions upon which Bowers placed such reliance. At the outset it should be noted that there is no longstanding history in this country of laws directed at homosexual conduct as a distinct matter. Beginning in colonial times there were prohibitions of sodomy derived from the English criminal laws passed in the first instance by the Reformation Parliament of 1533. The English prohibition was understood to include relations between men and women as well as relations between men and men. See, e.g., King v. Wiseman, 92 Eng. Rep. 774, 775 (K.B.1718) (interpreting “mankind” in Act of 1533 as including women and girls). Nineteenth-century commentators similarly read American sodomy, buggery, and crime-against-nature statutes as criminalizing certain relations between men and women and between men and men. See, e.g., 2 J. Bishop, Criminal Law § 1028 (1858); 2 J. Chitty, Criminal Law 47–50 (5th Am. ed. 1847); R. Desty, A Compendium of American Criminal Law 143 (1882); J. May, The Law of Crimes § 203 (2d ed. 1893). The absence of legal prohibitions focusing on homosexual conduct may be explained in part by noting that according to some scholars the concept of the homosexual as a distinct category of **2479 person did not emerge until the late 19th century. See, e.g., J. Katz, The Invention of Heterosexuality 10 (1995); J. D'Emilio & E. Freedman, Intimate Matters: A History of Sexuality in America 121 (2d ed. 1997) (“The modern terms homosexuality and heterosexuality do not apply to an era that had not yet articulated these distinctions”). Thus early American sodomy laws were not directed at homosexuals as such but instead sought to prohibit nonprocreative sexual activity more generally. This does not suggest approval of *569 homosexual conduct. It does tend to show that this particular form of conduct was not thought of as a separate category from like conduct between heterosexual persons. Laws prohibiting sodomy do not seem to have been enforced against consenting adults acting in private. A substantial number of sodomy prosecutions and convictions for which there are surviving records were for predatory acts against those who could not or did not consent, as in the case of a minor or the victim of an assault. As to these, one purpose for the prohibitions was to ensure there would be no lack of coverage if a predator committed a sexual assault that did not constitute rape as defined by the criminal law. Thus the model sodomy indictments presented in a 19th-century treatise, see 2 Chitty, supra, at 49, addressed the predatory acts of an adult man against a minor girl or minor boy. Instead of targeting relations between consenting adults in private, 19th-century sodomy prosecutions typically involved relations between men and minor girls or minor boys, relations between adults involving force, relations between adults implicating disparity in status, or relations between © 2014 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. 123 S.Ct. 2472 Page 10 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472, 156 L.Ed.2d 508, 71 USLW 4574, 03 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5559, 2003 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7036, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 427 (Cite as: 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472) men and animals. To the extent that there were any prosecutions for the acts in question, 19th-century evidence rules imposed a burden that would make a conviction more difficult to obtain even taking into account the problems always inherent in prosecuting consensual acts committed in private. Under then-prevailing standards, a man could not be convicted of sodomy based upon testimony of a consenting partner, because the partner was considered an accomplice. A partner's testimony, however, was admissible if he or she had not consented to the act or was a minor, and therefore incapable of consent. See, e.g., F. Wharton, Criminal Law 443 (2d ed. 1852); 1 F. Wharton, Criminal Law 512 (8th ed. 1880). The rule may explain in part the infrequency of these prosecutions. In all events that infrequency makes it difficult to say that society approved of a rigorous and systematic *570 punishment of the consensual acts committed in private and by adults. The longstanding criminal prohibition of homosexual sodomy upon which the Bowers decision placed such reliance is as consistent with a general condemnation of nonprocreative sex as it is with an established tradition of prosecuting acts because of their homosexual character. The policy of punishing consenting adults for private acts was not much discussed in the early legal literature. We can infer that one reason for this was the very private nature of the conduct. Despite the absence of prosecutions, there may have been periods in which there was public criticism of homosexuals as such and an insistence that the criminal laws be enforced to discourage their practices. But far from possessing “ancient roots,” Bowers, 478 U.S., at 192, 106 S.Ct. 2841, American laws targeting same-sex couples did not develop until the last third of the 20th century. The reported decisions concerning the prosecution of consensual, homosexual sodomy between adults for the years 1880–1995 are not always clear in the details, but a significant number involved conduct in a public place. See Brief for American Civil Liberties Union et al. as Amici Curiae 14–15, and n. 18. It was not until the 1970's that any State singled out same-sex relations for criminal prosecution, and only nine States have done so. See 1977 Ark. Gen. Acts no. 828; 1983 Kan. Sess. Laws p. 652; 1974 Ky. **2480 Acts p. 847; 1977 Mo. Laws p. 687; 1973 Mont. Laws p. 1339; 1977 Nev. Stats. p. 1632; 1989 Tenn. Pub. Acts ch. 591; 1973 Tex. Gen. Laws ch. 399; see also Post v. State, 715 P.2d 1105 (Okla.Crim.App.1986) (sodomy law invalidated as applied to different-sex couples). Post- Bowers even some of these States did not adhere to the policy of suppressing homosexual conduct. Over the course of the last decades, States with same-sex prohibitions have moved toward abolishing them. See, e.g., Jegley v. Picado, 349 Ark. 600, 80 S.W.3d 332 (2002); Gryczan v. State, 283 Mont. 433, 942 P.2d 112 (1997); Campbell v. Sundquist, 926 S.W.2d 250 (Tenn.App.1996); *571Commonwealth v. Wasson, 842 S.W.2d 487 (Ky.1992); see also 1993 Nev. Stats. p. 518 (repealing Nev.Rev.Stat. § 201.193). In summary, the historical grounds relied upon in Bowers are more complex than the majority opinion and the concurring opinion by Chief Justice Burger indicate. Their historical premises are not without doubt and, at the very least, are overstated. © 2014 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. 123 S.Ct. 2472 Page 11 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472, 156 L.Ed.2d 508, 71 USLW 4574, 03 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5559, 2003 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7036, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 427 (Cite as: 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472) It must be acknowledged, of course, that the Court in Bowers was making the broader point that for centuries there have been powerful voices to condemn homosexual conduct as immoral. The condemnation has been shaped by religious beliefs, conceptions of right and acceptable behavior, and respect for the traditional family. For many persons these are not trivial concerns but profound and deep convictions accepted as ethical and moral principles to which they aspire and which thus determine the course of their lives. These considerations do not answer the question before us, however. The issue is whether the majority may use the power of the State to enforce these views on the whole society through operation of the criminal law. “Our obligation is to define the liberty of all, not to mandate our own moral code.” Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833, 850, 112 S.Ct. 2791, 120 L.Ed.2d 674 (1992). [2] Chief Justice Burger joined the opinion for the Court in Bowers and further explained his views as follows: “Decisions of individuals relating to homosexual conduct have been subject to state intervention throughout the history of Western civilization. Condemnation of those practices is firmly rooted in Judeao–Christian moral and ethical standards.” 478 U.S., at 196, 106 S.Ct. 2841. As with Justice White's assumptions about history, scholarship casts some doubt on the sweeping nature of the statement by Chief Justice Burger as it pertains to private homosexual conduct between consenting adults. See, e.g., Eskridge, Hardwick and Historiography, 1999 U. Ill. L.Rev. 631, 656. In all events we think that our laws and traditions in the past half century are of *572 most relevance here. These references show an emerging awareness that liberty gives substantial protection to adult persons in deciding how to conduct their private lives in matters pertaining to sex. “[H]istory and tradition are the starting point but not in all cases the ending point of the substantive due process inquiry.” County of Sacramento v. Lewis, 523 U.S. 833, 857, 118 S.Ct. 1708, 140 L.Ed.2d 1043 (1998) (KENNEDY, J., concurring). This emerging recognition should have been apparent when Bowers was decided. In 1955 the American Law Institute promulgated the Model Penal Code and made clear that it did not recommend or provide for “criminal penalties for consensual sexual relations conducted in private.” ALI, Model Penal Code § 213.2, Comment 2, p. 372 (1980). It justified its decision on three grounds: (1) The prohibitions undermined respect for the law by penalizing conduct many people engaged in; (2) the statutes regulated private conduct not harmful to others; and (3) the laws were arbitrarily enforced and thus invited the danger of blackmail. ALI, Model Penal Code, Commentary 277–280 (Tent. Draft No. 4, 1955). In 1961 Illinois changed its laws to conform to the Model Penal Code. **2481 Other States soon followed. Brief for Cato Institute as Amicus Curiae 15–16. In Bowers the Court referred to the fact that before 1961 all 50 States had outlawed sodomy, and that at the time of the Court's decision 24 States and the District of Columbia had sodomy laws. 478 U.S., at 192–193, 106 S.Ct. 2841. Justice Powell pointed out that these prohibitions often were being ignored, however. Georgia, for instance, had not sought to enforce its law for decades. Id., at 197–198, n. 2, 106 S.Ct. © 2014 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. 123 S.Ct. 2472 Page 12 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472, 156 L.Ed.2d 508, 71 USLW 4574, 03 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5559, 2003 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7036, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 427 (Cite as: 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472) 2841 (“The history of nonenforcement suggests the moribund character today of laws criminalizing this type of private, consensual conduct”). The sweeping references by Chief Justice Burger to the history of Western civilization and to Judeo–Christian moral and ethical standards did not take account of other authorities pointing in an opposite direction. A committee advising the British Parliament recommended in 1957 repeal of laws *573 punishing homosexual conduct. The Wolfenden Report: Report of the Committee on Homosexual Offenses and Prostitution (1963). Parliament enacted the substance of those recommendations 10 years later. Sexual Offences Act 1967, § 1. Of even more importance, almost five years before Bowers was decided the European Court of Human Rights considered a case with parallels to Bowers and to today's case. An adult male resident in Northern Ireland alleged he was a practicing homosexual who desired to engage in consensual homosexual conduct. The laws of Northern Ireland forbade him that right. He alleged that he had been questioned, his home had been searched, and he feared criminal prosecution. The court held that the laws proscribing the conduct were invalid under the European Convention on Human Rights. Dudgeon v. United Kingdom, 45 Eur. Ct. H.R. (1981) & ¶ 52. Authoritative in all countries that are members of the Council of Europe (21 nations then, 45 nations now), the decision is at odds with the premise in Bowers that the claim put forward was insubstantial in our Western civilization. In our own constitutional system the deficiencies in Bowers became even more apparent in the years following its announcement. The 25 States with laws prohibiting the relevant conduct referenced in the Bowers decision are reduced now to 13, of which 4 enforce their laws only against homosexual conduct. In those States where sodomy is still proscribed, whether for same-sex or heterosexual conduct, there is a pattern of nonenforcement with respect to consenting adults acting in private. The State of Texas admitted in 1994 that as of that date it had not prosecuted anyone under those circumstances. State v. Morales, 869 S.W.2d 941, 943. [3] Two principal cases decided after Bowers cast its holding into even more doubt. In Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833, 112 S.Ct. 2791, 120 L.Ed.2d 674 (1992), the Court reaffirmed the substantive force of the liberty protected by the Due Process Clause. The Casey decision again confirmed *574 that our laws and tradition afford constitutional protection to personal decisions relating to marriage, procreation, contraception, family relationships, child rearing, and education. Id., at 851, 112 S.Ct. 2791. In explaining the respect the Constitution demands for the autonomy of the person in making these choices, we stated as follows: “These matters, involving the most intimate and personal choices a person may make in a lifetime, choices central to personal dignity and autonomy, are central to the liberty protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. At the heart of liberty is the right to define one's own concept of existence, of meaning, of the universe, and of the mystery of human life. Beliefs about these matters could not define the attributes of personhood were they formed under compulsion of the State.” Ibid. © 2014 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. 123 S.Ct. 2472 Page 13 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472, 156 L.Ed.2d 508, 71 USLW 4574, 03 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5559, 2003 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7036, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 427 (Cite as: 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472) **2482 Persons in a homosexual relationship may seek autonomy for these purposes, just as heterosexual persons do. The decision in Bowers would deny them this right. The second post- Bowers case of principal relevance is Romer v. Evans, 517 U.S. 620, 116 S.Ct. 1620, 134 L.Ed.2d 855 (1996). There the Court struck down classbased legislation directed at homosexuals as a violation of the Equal Protection Clause. Romer invalidated an amendment to Colorado's Constitution which named as a solitary class persons who were homosexuals, lesbians, or bisexual either by “orientation, conduct, practices or relationships,” id., at 624, 116 S.Ct. 1620 (internal quotation marks omitted), and deprived them of protection under state antidiscrimination laws. We concluded that the provision was “born of animosity toward the class of persons affected” and further that it had no rational relation to a legitimate governmental purpose. Id., at 634, 116 S.Ct. 1620. As an alternative argument in this case, counsel for the petitioners and some amici contend that Romer provides the basis for declaring the Texas statute invalid under the Equal Protection Clause. That is a tenable argument, but we conclude*575 the instant case requires us to address whether Bowers itself has continuing validity. Were we to hold the statute invalid under the Equal Protection Clause some might question whether a prohibition would be valid if drawn differently, say, to prohibit the conduct both between same-sex and different-sex participants. Equality of treatment and the due process right to demand respect for conduct protected by the substantive guarantee of liberty are linked in important respects, and a decision on the latter point advances both interests. If protected conduct is made criminal and the law which does so remains unexamined for its substantive validity, its stigma might remain even if it were not enforceable as drawn for equal protection reasons. When homosexual conduct is made criminal by the law of the State, that declaration in and of itself is an invitation to subject homosexual persons to discrimination both in the public and in the private spheres. The central holding of Bowers has been brought in question by this case, and it should be addressed. Its continuance as precedent demeans the lives of homosexual persons. The stigma this criminal statute imposes, moreover, is not trivial. The offense, to be sure, is but a class C misdemeanor, a minor offense in the Texas legal system. Still, it remains a criminal offense with all that imports for the dignity of the persons charged. The petitioners will bear on their record the history of their criminal convictions. Just this Term we rejected various challenges to state laws requiring the registration of sex offenders. Smith v. Doe, 538 U.S. 84, 123 S.Ct. 1140, 155 L.Ed.2d 164 (2003); Connecticut Dept. of Public Safety v. Doe, 538 U.S. 1, 123 S.Ct. 1160, 155 L.Ed.2d 98 (2003). We are advised that if Texas convicted an adult for private, consensual homosexual conduct under the statute here in question the convicted person would come within the registration laws of at least four States were he or she to be subject to their jurisdiction. Pet. for Cert. 13, and n. 12 (citing Idaho Code §§ 18–8301 to 18–8326 (Cum.Supp.2002); La.Code Crim. Proc. Ann. §§ 15:540–15:549 *576 West 2003); Miss.Code Ann. §§ 45–33–21 to 45–33–57 (Lexis 2003); S.C.Code Ann. §§ 23–3–400 © 2014 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. 123 S.Ct. 2472 Page 14 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472, 156 L.Ed.2d 508, 71 USLW 4574, 03 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5559, 2003 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7036, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 427 (Cite as: 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472) to 23–3–490 (West 2002)). This underscores the consequential nature of the punishment and the state-sponsored condemnation attendant to the criminal prohibition. Furthermore, the Texas criminal conviction carries with it the other collateral consequences always following a conviction, such as notations on job application forms, to mention but one example. The foundations of Bowers have sustained serious erosion from our recent decisions in Casey and Romer. When our precedent has been thus weakened, criticism from other sources is of greater significance.**2483 In the United States criticism of Bowers has been substantial and continuing, disapproving of its reasoning in all respects, not just as to its historical assumptions. See, e.g., C. Fried, Order and Law: Arguing the Reagan Revolution—A Firsthand Account 81–84 (1991); R. Posner, Sex and Reason 341–350 (1992). The courts of five different States have declined to follow it in interpreting provisions in their own state constitutions parallel to the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, see Jegley v. Picado, 349 Ark. 600, 80 S.W.3d 332 (2002); Powell v. State, 270 Ga. 327, 510 S.E.2d 18, 24 (1998); Gryczan v. State, 283 Mont. 433, 942 P.2d 112 (1997); Campbell v. Sundquist, 926 S.W.2d 250 (Tenn.App.1996); Commonwealth v. Wasson, 842 S.W.2d 487 (Ky.1992). To the extent Bowers relied on values we share with a wider civilization, it should be noted that the reasoning and holding in Bowers have been rejected elsewhere. The European Court of Human Rights has followed not Bowers but its own decision in Dudgeon v. United Kingdom. See P.G. & J.H. v. United Kingdom, App. No. 00044787/98, & ¶ 56 (Eur.Ct.H. R., Sept. 25, 2001); Modinos v. Cyprus, 259 Eur. Ct. H.R. (1993); Norris v. Ireland, 142 Eur. Ct. H.R. (1988). Other nations, too, have taken action consistent with an affirmation of the protected right of homosexual adults to engage in intimate, consensual conduct. See Brief for Mary *577 Robinson et al. as Amici Curiae 11–12. The right the petitioners seek in this case has been accepted as an integral part of human freedom in many other countries. There has been no showing that in this country the governmental interest in circumscribing personal choice is somehow more legitimate or urgent. [4] The doctrine of stare decisis is essential to the respect accorded to the judgments of the Court and to the stability of the law. It is not, however, an inexorable command. Payne v. Tennessee, 501 U.S. 808, 828, 111 S.Ct. 2597, 115 L.Ed.2d 720 (1991) (“ Stare decisis is not an inexorable command; rather, it ‘is a principle of policy and not a mechanical formula of adherence to the latest decision’ ” (quoting Helvering v. Hallock, 309 U.S. 106, 119, 60 S.Ct. 444, 84 L.Ed. 604 (1940))). In Casey we noted that when a court is asked to overrule a precedent recognizing a constitutional liberty interest, individual or societal reliance on the existence of that liberty cautions with particular strength against reversing course. 505 U.S., at 855–856, 112 S.Ct. 2791; see also id., at 844, 112 S.Ct. 2791 (“Liberty finds no refuge in a jurisprudence of doubt”). The holding in Bowers, however, has not induced detrimental reliance comparable to some instances where recognized individual rights are involved. Indeed, there has been no individual or societal reliance on Bowers of the sort that could counsel against overturning its holding once there © 2014 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. 123 S.Ct. 2472 Page 15 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472, 156 L.Ed.2d 508, 71 USLW 4574, 03 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5559, 2003 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7036, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 427 (Cite as: 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472) are compelling reasons to do so. Bowers itself causes uncertainty, for the precedents before and after its issuance contradict its central holding. The rationale of Bowers does not withstand careful analysis. In his dissenting opinion in Bowers Justice STEVENS came to these conclusions: “Our prior cases make two propositions abundantly clear. First, the fact that the governing majority in a State has traditionally viewed a particular practice as immoral is not a sufficient reason for upholding a law prohibiting the practice; neither history nor tradition could save a law prohibiting miscegenation from constitutional*578 attack. Second, individual decisions by married persons, concerning the intimacies of their physical relationship, even when not intended to produce offspring, are a form of ‘liberty’ protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Moreover, this protection extends to intimate choices by unmarried as well as married persons.” 478 U.S., at 216, 106 S.Ct. 2841 (footnotes and citations omitted). **2484 Justice STEVENS' analysis, in our view, should have been controlling in Bowers and should control here. Bowers was not correct when it was decided, and it is not correct today. It ought not to remain binding precedent. Bowers v. Hardwick should be and now is overruled. [5] The present case does not involve minors. It does not involve persons who might be injured or coerced or who are situated in relationships where consent might not easily be refused. It does not involve public conduct or prostitution. It does not involve whether the government must give formal recognition to any relationship that homosexual persons seek to enter. The case does involve two adults who, with full and mutual consent from each other, engaged in sexual practices common to a homosexual lifestyle. The petitioners are entitled to respect for their private lives. The State cannot demean their existence or control their destiny by making their private sexual conduct a crime. Their right to liberty under the Due Process Clause gives them the full right to engage in their conduct without intervention of the government. “It is a promise of the Constitution that there is a realm of personal liberty which the government may not enter.” Casey, supra, at 847, 112 S.Ct. 2791. The Texas statute furthers no legitimate state interest which can justify its intrusion into the personal and private life of the individual. Had those who drew and ratified the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth Amendment or the Fourteenth Amendment known the components of liberty in its manifold possibilities, they might have been more specific. They did not presume *579 to have this insight. They knew times can blind us to certain truths and later generations can see that laws once thought necessary and proper in fact serve only to oppress. As the Constitution endures, persons in every generation can invoke its principles in their own search for greater freedom. The judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Texas Fourteenth District is reversed, and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion. It is so ordered. © 2014 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. 123 S.Ct. 2472 Page 16 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472, 156 L.Ed.2d 508, 71 USLW 4574, 03 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5559, 2003 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7036, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 427 (Cite as: 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472) Justice O'CONNOR, concurring in the judgment. The Court today overrules Bowers v. Hardwick, 478 U.S. 186, 106 S.Ct. 2841, 92 L.Ed.2d 140 (1986). I joined Bowers, and do not join the Court in overruling it. Nevertheless, I agree with the Court that Texas' statute banning same-sex sodomy is unconstitutional. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 21.06 (2003). Rather than relying on the substantive component of the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause, as the Court does, I base my conclusion on the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause. The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment “is essentially a direction that all persons similarly situated should be treated alike.” Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc., 473 U.S. 432, 439, 105 S.Ct. 3249, 87 L.Ed.2d 313 (1985); see also Plyler v. Doe, 457 U.S. 202, 216, 102 S.Ct. 2382, 72 L.Ed.2d 786 (1982). Under our rational basis standard of review, “legislation is presumed to be valid and will be sustained if the classification drawn by the statute is rationally related to a legitimate state interest.” Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, supra, at 440, 105 S.Ct. 3249; see also Department of Agriculture v. Moreno, 413 U.S. 528, 534, 93 S.Ct. 2821, 37 L.Ed.2d 782 (1973); Romer v. Evans, 517 U.S. 620, 632–633, 116 S.Ct. 1620, 134 L.Ed.2d 855 (1996); Nordlinger v. Hahn, 505 U.S. 1, 11–12, 112 S.Ct. 2326, 120 L.Ed.2d 1 (1992). Laws such as economic or tax legislation that are scrutinized under rational basis review normally pass constitutional muster, since “the Constitution presumes that **2485 even improvident decisions will eventually be rectified by the *580 democratic processes.” Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, supra, at 440, 105 S.Ct. 3249; see also Fitzgerald v. Racing Assn. of Central Iowa, ante, 539 U.S. 103, 123 S.Ct. 2156, 156 L.Ed.2d 97 (2003); Williamson v. Lee Optical of Okla., Inc., 348 U.S. 483, 75 S.Ct. 461, 99 L.Ed. 563 (1955). We have consistently held, however, that some objectives, such as “a bare ... desire to harm a politically unpopular group,” are not legitimate state interests. Department of Agriculture v. Moreno, supra, at 534, 93 S.Ct. 2821. See also Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, supra, at 446–447, 105 S.Ct. 3249; Romer v. Evans, supra, at 632, 116 S.Ct. 1620. When a law exhibits such a desire to harm a politically unpopular group, we have applied a more searching form of rational basis review to strike down such laws under the Equal Protection Clause. We have been most likely to apply rational basis review to hold a law unconstitutional under the Equal Protection Clause where, as here, the challenged legislation inhibits personal relationships. In Department of Agriculture v. Moreno, for example, we held that a law preventing those households containing an individual unrelated to any other member of the household from receiving food stamps violated equal protection because the purpose of the law was to “ ‘discriminate against hippies.’ ” 413 U.S., at 534, 93 S.Ct. 2821. The asserted governmental interest in preventing food stamp fraud was not deemed sufficient to satisfy rational basis review. Id., at 535–538, 93 S.Ct. 2821. In Eisenstadt v. Baird, 405 U.S. 438, 447–455, 92 S.Ct. 1029, 31 L.Ed.2d 349 (1972), we refused to sanction a law that discriminated between married and unmarried persons by prohibiting the © 2014 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. 123 S.Ct. 2472 Page 17 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472, 156 L.Ed.2d 508, 71 USLW 4574, 03 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5559, 2003 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7036, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 427 (Cite as: 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472) distribution of contraceptives to single persons. Likewise, in Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, supra, we held that it was irrational for a State to require a home for the mentally disabled to obtain a special use permit when other residences—like fraternity houses and apartment buildings—did not have to obtain such a permit. And in Romer v. Evans, we disallowed a state statute that “impos[ed] a broad and undifferentiated disability on a single named group”—specifically, homosexuals. 517 U.S., at 632, 116 S.Ct. 1620. *581 The statute at issue here makes sodomy a crime only if a person “engages in deviate sexual intercourse with another individual of the same sex.” Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 21.06(a) (2003). Sodomy between opposite-sex partners, however, is not a crime in Texas. That is, Texas treats the same conduct differently based solely on the participants. Those harmed by this law are people who have a same-sex sexual orientation and thus are more likely to engage in behavior prohibited by § 21.06. The Texas statute makes homosexuals unequal in the eyes of the law by making particular conduct—and only that conduct—subject to criminal sanction. It appears that prosecutions under Texas' sodomy law are rare. See State v. Morales, 869 S.W.2d 941, 943 (Tex.1994) (noting in 1994 that § 21.06 “has not been, and in all probability will not be, enforced against private consensual conduct between adults”). This case shows, however, that prosecutions under § 21.06 do occur. And while the penalty imposed on petitioners in this case was relatively minor, the consequences of conviction are not. It appears that petitioners' convictions, if upheld, would disqualify them from or restrict their ability to engage in a variety of professions, including medicine, athletic training, and interior design. See, e.g., Tex. Occ.Code Ann. § 164.051(a)(2)(B) (2003 Pamphlet) (physician); § 451.251(a)(1) **2486 (athletic trainer); § 1053.252(2) (interior designer). Indeed, were petitioners to move to one of four States, their convictions would require them to register as sex offenders to local law enforcement. See, e.g., Idaho Code § 18–8304 (Cum.Supp.2002); La. Stat. Ann. § 15:542 (West Cum.Supp.2003); Miss.Code Ann. § 45–33–25 (West 2003); S.C.Code Ann. § 23–3–430 (West Cum.Supp.2002); cf. ante, at 2482. And the effect of Texas' sodomy law is not just limited to the threat of prosecution or consequence of conviction. Texas' sodomy law brands all homosexuals as criminals, thereby making it more difficult for homosexuals to be treated in the same manner as everyone else. Indeed, Texas *582 itself has previously acknowledged the collateral effects of the law, stipulating in a prior challenge to this action that the law “legally sanctions discrimination against [homosexuals] in a variety of ways unrelated to the criminal law,” including in the areas of “employment, family issues, and housing.” State v. Morales, 826 S.W.2d 201, 203 (Tex.App.1992). Texas attempts to justify its law, and the effects of the law, by arguing that the statute satisfies rational basis review because it furthers the legitimate governmental interest of the promotion of morality. In Bowers, we held that a state law criminalizing sodomy as applied to homosexual couples did not violate substantive due process. We rejected the argument that no rational basis existed to justify the law, pointing to the © 2014 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. 123 S.Ct. 2472 Page 18 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472, 156 L.Ed.2d 508, 71 USLW 4574, 03 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5559, 2003 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7036, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 427 (Cite as: 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472) government's interest in promoting morality. 478 U.S., at 196, 106 S.Ct. 2841. The only question in front of the Court in Bowers was whether the substantive component of the Due Process Clause protected a right to engage in homosexual sodomy. Id., at 188, n. 2. Bowers did not hold that moral disapproval of a group is a rational basis under the Equal Protection Clause to criminalize homosexual sodomy when heterosexual sodomy is not punished. This case raises a different issue than Bowers: whether, under the Equal Protection Clause, moral disapproval is a legitimate state interest to justify by itself a statute that bans homosexual sodomy, but not heterosexual sodomy. It is not. Moral disapproval of this group, like a bare desire to harm the group, is an interest that is insufficient to satisfy rational basis review under the Equal Protection Clause. See, e.g., Department of Agriculture v. Moreno, 413 U.S., at 534, 93 S.Ct. 2821; Romer v. Evans, 517 U.S., at 634–635, 116 S.Ct. 1620. Indeed, we have never held that moral disapproval, without any other asserted state interest, is a sufficient rationale under the Equal Protection Clause to justify a law that discriminates among groups of persons. *583 Moral disapproval of a group cannot be a legitimate governmental interest under the Equal Protection Clause because legal classifications must not be “drawn for the purpose of disadvantaging the group burdened by the law.” Id., at 633, 116 S.Ct. 1620. Texas' invocation of moral disapproval as a legitimate state interest proves nothing more than Texas' desire to criminalize homosexual sodomy. But the Equal Protection Clause prevents a State from creating “a classification of persons undertaken for its own sake.” Id., at 635, 116 S.Ct. 1620. And because Texas so rarely enforces its sodomy law as applied to private, consensual acts, the law serves more as a statement of dislike and disapproval against homosexuals than as a tool to stop criminal behavior. The Texas sodomy law “raise[s] the inevitable inference that the disadvantage imposed is born of animosity toward the class of persons affected.” Id., at 634, 116 S.Ct. 1620. Texas argues, however, that the sodomy law does not discriminate against homosexual persons. Instead, the State maintains that the law discriminates only against homosexual conduct. While it is true that the law applies only to conduct, the conduct targeted by this law is conduct that is closely correlated with being homosexual. Under such circumstances, Texas' **2487 sodomy law is targeted at more than conduct. It is instead directed toward gay persons as a class. “After all, there can hardly be more palpable discrimination against a class than making the conduct that defines the class criminal.” Id., at 641, 116 S.Ct. 1620 (SCALIA, J., dissenting) (internal quotation marks omitted). When a State makes homosexual conduct criminal, and not “deviate sexual intercourse” committed by persons of different sexes, “that declaration in and of itself is an invitation to subject homosexual persons to discrimination both in the public and in the private spheres.” Ante, at 2482. Indeed, Texas law confirms that the sodomy statute is directed toward homosexuals as a class. In Texas, calling a person a homosexual is slander per se because the word “homosexual*584 ”“impute[s] the commission of a crime.” Plumley v. Landmark Chevrolet, Inc., 122 F.3d 308, 310 (C.A.5 1997) (applying © 2014 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. 123 S.Ct. 2472 Page 19 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472, 156 L.Ed.2d 508, 71 USLW 4574, 03 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5559, 2003 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7036, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 427 (Cite as: 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472) Texas law); see also Head v. Newton, 596 S.W.2d 209, 210 (Tex.App.1980). The State has admitted that because of the sodomy law, being homosexual carries the presumption of being a criminal. See State v. Morales, 826 S.W.2d, at 202–203 (“[T]he statute brands lesbians and gay men as criminals and thereby legally sanctions discrimination against them in a variety of ways unrelated to the criminal law”). Texas' sodomy law therefore results in discrimination against homosexuals as a class in an array of areas outside the criminal law. See ibid. In Romer v. Evans, we refused to sanction a law that singled out homosexuals “for disfavored legal status.” 517 U.S., at 633, 116 S.Ct. 1620. The same is true here. The Equal Protection Clause “ ‘neither knows nor tolerates classes among citizens.’ ” Id., at 623, 116 S.Ct. 1620 (quoting Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537, 559, 16 S.Ct. 1138, 41 L.Ed. 256 (1896) (Harlan, J., dissenting)). A State can of course assign certain consequences to a violation of its criminal law. But the State cannot single out one identifiable class of citizens for punishment that does not apply to everyone else, with moral disapproval as the only asserted state interest for the law. The Texas sodomy statute subjects homosexuals to “a lifelong penalty and stigma. A legislative classification that threatens the creation of an underclass ... cannot be reconciled with” the Equal Protection Clause. Plyler v. Doe, 457 U.S., at 239, 102 S.Ct. 2382 (Powell, J., concurring). Whether a sodomy law that is neutral both in effect and application, see Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356, 6 S.Ct. 1064, 30 L.Ed. 220 (1886), would violate the substantive component of the Due Process Clause is an issue that need not be decided today. I am confident, however, that so long as the Equal Protection Clause requires a sodomy law to apply equally to the private consensual conduct of homosexuals and heterosexuals alike, such a *585 law would not long stand in our democratic society. In the words of Justice Jackson: “The framers of the Constitution knew, and we should not forget today, that there is no more effective practical guaranty against arbitrary and unreasonable government than to require that the principles of law which officials would impose upon a minority be imposed generally. Conversely, nothing opens the door to arbitrary action so effectively as to allow those officials to pick and choose only a few to whom they will apply legislation and thus to escape the political retribution that might be visited upon them if larger numbers were affected.” Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. New York, 336 U.S. 106, 112–113, 69 S.Ct. 463, 93 L.Ed. 533 (1949) (concurring opinion). That this law as applied to private, consensual conduct is unconstitutional under the Equal Protection Clause does not mean that other laws distinguishing between heterosexuals and homosexuals would similarly fail under rational basis review. Texas cannot assert any legitimate **2488 state interest here, such as national security or preserving the traditional institution of marriage. Unlike the moral disapproval of same-sex relations—the asserted state interest in this case—other reasons exist to promote the institution of marriage beyond mere moral disapproval of an excluded group. A law branding one class of persons as © 2014 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. 123 S.Ct. 2472 Page 20 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472, 156 L.Ed.2d 508, 71 USLW 4574, 03 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5559, 2003 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7036, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 427 (Cite as: 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472) criminal based solely on the State's moral disapproval of that class and the conduct associated with that class runs contrary to the values of the Constitution and the Equal Protection Clause, under any standard of review. I therefore concur in the Court's judgment that Texas' sodomy law banning “deviate sexual intercourse” between consenting adults of the same sex, but not between consenting adults of different sexes, is unconstitutional. *586 Justice SCALIA, with whom THE CHIEF JUSTICE and Justice THOMAS join, dissenting. “Liberty finds no refuge in a jurisprudence of doubt.” Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833, 844, 112 S.Ct. 2791, 120 L.Ed.2d 674 (1992). That was the Court's sententious response, barely more than a decade ago, to those seeking to overrule Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, 93 S.Ct. 705, 35 L.Ed.2d 147 (1973). The Court's response today, to those who have engaged in a 17–year crusade to overrule Bowers v. Hardwick, 478 U.S. 186, 106 S.Ct. 2841, 92 L.Ed.2d 140 (1986), is very different. The need for stability and certainty presents no barrier. Most of the rest of today's opinion has no relevance to its actual holding—that the Texas statute “furthers no legitimate state interest which can justify” its application to petitioners under rational-basis review. Ante, at 2484 (overruling Bowers to the extent it sustained Georgia's antisodomy statute under the rational-basis test). Though there is discussion of “fundamental proposition[s],” ante, at 2477, and “fundamental decisions,” ibid., nowhere does the Court's opinion declare that homosexual sodomy is a “fundamental right” under the Due Process Clause; nor does it subject the Texas law to the standard of review that would be appropriate (strict scrutiny) if homosexual sodomy were a “fundamental right.” Thus, while overruling the outcome of Bowers, the Court leaves strangely untouched its central legal conclusion: “[R]espondent would have us announce ... a fundamental right to engage in homosexual sodomy. This we are quite unwilling to do.” 478 U.S., at 191, 106 S.Ct. 2841. Instead the Court simply describes petitioners' conduct as “an exercise of their liberty”—which it undoubtedly is—and proceeds to apply an unheard-of form of rational-basis review that will have far-reaching implications beyond this case. Ante, at 2476. I I begin with the Court's surprising readiness to reconsider a decision rendered a mere 17 years ago in Bowers v. Hardwick. I *587 do not myself believe in rigid adherence to stare decisis in constitutional cases; but I do believe that we should be consistent rather than manipulative in invoking the doctrine. Today's opinions in support of reversal do not bother to distinguish—or indeed, even bother to mention—the paean to stare decisis coauthored by three Members of today's majority in Planned Parenthood v. Casey. There, when stare decisis meant preservation of judicially invented abortion rights, the widespread criticism of Roe was strong reason to reaffirm it: “Where, in the performance of its judicial duties, the Court decides a case in such a way as to resolve the sort of intensely divisive controversy reflected in Roe [,] ... its decision has a dimension that the resolution of the normal case does not carry.... [T]o overrule under fire in the absence of the most compelling reason ... © 2014 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. 123 S.Ct. 2472 Page 21 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472, 156 L.Ed.2d 508, 71 USLW 4574, 03 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5559, 2003 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7036, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 427 (Cite as: 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472) would subvert the Court's legitimacy beyond any serious **2489 question.” 505 U.S., at 866–867, 112 S.Ct. 2791. Today, however, the widespread opposition to Bowers, a decision resolving an issue as “intensely divisive” as the issue in Roe, is offered as a reason in favor of overruling it. See ante, at 2482–2483. Gone, too, is any “enquiry” (of the sort conducted in Casey) into whether the decision sought to be overruled has “proven ‘unworkable,’ ” Casey, supra, at 855, 112 S.Ct. 2791. Today's approach to stare decisis invites us to overrule an erroneously decided precedent (including an “intensely divisive” decision) if: (1) its foundations have been “ero[ded]” by subsequent decisions, ante, at 2482; (2) it has been subject to “substantial and continuing” criticism, ibid.; and (3) it has not induced “individual or societal reliance” that counsels against overturning, ante, at 2483. The problem is that Roe itself—which today's majority surely has no disposition to overrule—satisfies these conditions to at least the same degree as Bowers. *588 1) A preliminary digressive observation with regard to the first factor: The Court's claim that Planned Parenthood v. Casey, supra, “casts some doubt” upon the holding in Bowers (or any other case, for that matter) does not withstand analysis. Ante, at 2480. As far as its holding is concerned, Casey provided a less expansive right to abortion than did Roe, which was already on the books when Bowers was decided. And if the Court is referring not to the holding of Casey, but to the dictum of its famed sweetmystery-of-life passage, ante, at 2481 (“ ‘At the heart of liberty is the right to define one's own concept of existence, of meaning, of the universe, and of the mystery of human life’ ”): That “casts some doubt” upon either the totality of our jurisprudence or else (presumably the right answer) nothing at all. I have never heard of a law that attempted to restrict one's “right to define” certain concepts; and if the passage calls into question the government's power to regulate actions based on one's self-defined “concept of existence, etc.,” it is the passage that ate the rule of law. I do not quarrel with the Court's claim that Romer v. Evans, 517 U.S. 620, 116 S.Ct. 1620, 134 L.Ed.2d 855 (1996), “eroded” the “foundations” of Bowers' rational-basis holding. See Romer, supra, at 640–643, 116 S.Ct. 1620 (SCALIA, J., dissenting). But Roe and Casey have been equally “eroded” by Washington v. Glucksberg, 521 U.S. 702, 721, 117 S.Ct. 2258, 138 L.Ed.2d 772 (1997), which held that only fundamental rights which are “ ‘deeply rooted in this Nation's history and tradition’ ” qualify for anything other than rational-basis scrutiny under the doctrine of “substantive due process.” Roe and Casey, of course, subjected the restriction of abortion to heightened scrutiny without even attempting to establish that the freedom to abort was rooted in this Nation's tradition. (2) Bowers, the Court says, has been subject to “substantial and continuing [criticism], disapproving of its reasoning in all respects, not just as to its historical assumptions.” Ante, at 2483. Exactly what those nonhistorical criticisms are, and whether the Court even agrees with them, are left *589 unsaid, although the Court does cite two books. See ibid. (citing C. Fried, Order and Law: Arguing the Reagan Revolution—A Firsthand Account 81–84 © 2014 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. 123 S.Ct. 2472 Page 22 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472, 156 L.Ed.2d 508, 71 USLW 4574, 03 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5559, 2003 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7036, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 427 (Cite as: 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472) (1991); R. Posner, Sex and Reason 341–350 (1992)).FN1 Of course, Roe too (and by extension Casey) had been (and still is) subject to unrelenting criticism, including criticism from the two commentators cited by the Court today. See Fried, supra, at 75 (“Roe was a prime example of twisted judging”); Posner, supra, at 337 (“[The Court's] opinion in Roe (3)27 fails to measure up to professional expectations regarding**2490 judicial opinions”); Posner, Judicial Opinion Writing, 62 U. Chi. L.Rev. 1421, 1434 (1995) (describing the opinion in Roe as an “embarrassing performanc[e]”). FN1. This last-cited critic of Bowers actually writes: “ [Bowers] is correct nevertheless that the right to engage in homosexual acts is not deeply rooted in America's history and tradition.” Posner, Sex and Reason, at 343. (3) That leaves, to distinguish the rocksolid, unamendable disposition of Roe from the readily overrulable Bowers, only the third factor. “[T]here has been,” the Court says, “no individual or societal reliance on Bowers of the sort that could counsel against overturning its holding ....” Ante, at 2483. It seems to me that the “societal reliance” on the principles confirmed in Bowers and discarded today has been overwhelming. Countless judicial decisions and legislative enactments have relied on the ancient proposition that a governing majority's belief that certain sexual behavior is “immoral and unacceptable” constitutes a rational basis for regulation. See, e.g., Williams v. Pryor, 240 F.3d 944, 949 (C.A.11 2001) (citing Bowers in upholding Alabama's prohibition on the sale of sex toys on the ground that “[t]he crafting and safeguarding of public morality ... indisputably is a legitimate government interest under rational basis scrutiny”); Milner v. Apfel, 148 F.3d 812, 814 (C.A.7 1998) (citing Bowers for the proposition that “[l]egislatures are permitted to legislate with regard to morality ... rather than confined *590 to preventing demonstrable harms”); Holmes v. California Army National Guard, 124 F.3d 1126, 1136 (C.A.9 1997) (relying on Bowers in upholding the federal statute and regulations banning from military service those who engage in homosexual conduct); Owens v. State, 352 Md. 663, 683, 724 A.2d 43, 53 (1999) (relying on Bowers in holding that “a person has no constitutional right to engage in sexual intercourse, at least outside of marriage”); Sherman v. Henry, 928 S.W.2d 464, 469–473 (Tex.1996) (relying on Bowers in rejecting a claimed constitutional right to commit adultery). We ourselves relied extensively on Bowers when we concluded, in Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc., 501 U.S. 560, 569, 111 S.Ct. 2456, 115 L.Ed.2d 504 (1991), that Indiana's public indecency statute furthered “a substantial government interest in protecting order and morality,” ibid. (plurality opinion); see also id., at 575, 111 S.Ct. 2456 (SCALIA, J., concurring in judgment). State laws against bigamy, same-sex marriage, adult incest, prostitution, masturbation, adultery, fornication, bestiality, and obscenity are likewise sustainable only in light of Bowers' validation of laws based on moral choices. Every single one of these laws is called into question by today's decision; the Court makes no effort to cabin the scope of its decision to exclude them from its holding. See ante, at 2480 (noting “an emerging awareness that liberty gives substantial protection to adult persons in deciding how to conduct their private lives in matters pertaining to sex ” (emphasis © 2014 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. 123 S.Ct. 2472 Page 23 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472, 156 L.Ed.2d 508, 71 USLW 4574, 03 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5559, 2003 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7036, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 427 (Cite as: 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472) added)). The impossibility of distinguishing homosexuality from other traditional “morals” offenses is precisely why Bowers rejected the rational-basis challenge. “The law,” it said, “is constantly based on notions of morality, and if all laws representing essentially moral choices are to be invalidated under the Due Process Clause, the courts will be very busy indeed.” 478 U.S., at 196, 106 S.Ct. 2841. FN2 FN2. While the Court does not overrule Bowers ' holding that homosexual sodomy is not a “fundamental right,” it is worth noting that the “societal reliance” upon that aspect of the decision has been substantial as well. See 10 U.S.C. § 654(b)(1) (“A member of the armed forces shall be separated from the armed forces ... if ... the member has engaged in ... a homosexual act or acts”); Marcum v. McWhorter, 308 F.3d 635, 640–642 (C.A.6 2002) (relying on Bowers in rejecting a claimed fundamental right to commit adultery); Mullins v. Oregon, 57 F.3d 789, 793–794 (C.A.9 1995) (relying on Bowers in rejecting a grandparent's claimed “fundamental liberty interes[t]” in the adoption of her grandchildren); Doe v. Wigginton, 21 F.3d 733, 739–740 (C.A.6 1994) (relying on Bowers in rejecting a prisoner's claimed “fundamental right” to on-demand HIV testing); Schowengerdt v. United States, 944 F.2d 483, 490 (C.A.9 1991) (relying on Bowers in upholding a bisexual's discharge from the armed services); Charles v. Baesler, 910 F.2d 1349, 1353 (C.A.6 1990) (relying on Bowers in rejecting fire department captain's claimed “fundamental” interest in a promotion); Henne v. Wright, 904 F.2d 1208, 1214–1215 (C.A.8 1990) (relying on Bowers in rejecting a claim that state law restricting surnames that could be given to children at birth implicates a “fundamental right”); Walls v. Petersburg, 895 F.2d 188, 193 (C.A.4 1990) (relying on Bowers in rejecting substantive-due-process challenge to a police department questionnaire that asked prospective employees about homosexual activity); High Tech Gays v. Defense Industrial Security Clearance Office, 895 F.2d 563, 570–571 (C.A.9 1990) (relying on Bowers ' holding that homosexual activity is not a fundamental right in rejecting—on the basis of the rational-basis standard—an equalprotection challenge to the Defense Department's policy of conducting expanded investigations into backgrounds of gay and lesbian applicants for secret and top-secret security clearances). **2491 *591 What a massive disruption of the current social order, therefore, the overruling of Bowers entails. Not so the overruling of Roe, which would simply have restored the regime that existed for centuries before 1973, in which the permissibility of, and restrictions upon, abortion were determined legislatively State by State. Casey, however, chose to base its stare decisis determination on a different “sort” of reliance. “[P]eople,” it said, “have organized intimate relationships and made choices that define their views of themselves and their places in society, in reliance on the availability of © 2014 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. 123 S.Ct. 2472 Page 24 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472, 156 L.Ed.2d 508, 71 USLW 4574, 03 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5559, 2003 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7036, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 427 (Cite as: 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472) abortion in the event that contraception should fail.” 505 U.S., at 856, 112 S.Ct. 2791. This falsely assumes that the consequence of overruling Roe would have been to make abortion unlawful. It would not; it would merely have permitted *592 the States to do so. Many States would unquestionably have declined to prohibit abortion, and others would not have prohibited it within six months (after which the most significant reliance interests would have expired). Even for persons in States other than these, the choice would not have been between abortion and childbirth, but between abortion nearby and abortion in a neighboring State. To tell the truth, it does not surprise me, and should surprise no one, that the Court has chosen today to revise the standards of stare decisis set forth in Casey. It has thereby exposed Casey's extraordinary deference to precedent for the result-oriented expedient that it is. II Having decided that it need not adhere to stare decisis, the Court still must establish that Bowers was wrongly decided and that the Texas statute, as applied to petitioners, is unconstitutional. Texas Penal Code Ann. § 21.06(a) (2003) undoubtedly imposes constraints on liberty. So do laws prohibiting prostitution, recreational use of heroin, and, for that matter, working more than 60 hours per week in a bakery. But there is no right to “liberty” under the Due Process Clause, though today's opinion repeatedly makes that claim. Ante, at 2478 (“The liberty protected by the Constitution allows homosexual persons the right to make this choice”); ante, at 2481 (“ ‘ These matters ... are central to the liberty protected by the Fourteenth Amendment’ ”); ante, at 2484 (“Their right to liberty under the Due Process Clause gives them the full right to engage in their conduct without intervention of the government”). The Fourteenth Amendment expressly allows States to deprive their citizens of “liberty,” so long as “due process of law” is provided: “No state shall ... deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law. ” Amdt. 14 (emphasis added). *593 Our opinions applying the doctrine known as “substantive due process” hold that the Due Process Clause prohibits States from infringing fundamental liberty interests, unless the infringement is narrowly tailored to serve a compelling state interest. Washington v. Glucksberg, 521 U.S., at 721, 117 S.Ct. 2258. We have held repeatedly, in cases the Court today does **2492 not overrule, that only fundamental rights qualify for this so-called “heightened scrutiny” protection—that is, rights which are “ ‘deeply rooted in this Nation's history and tradition,’ ” ibid. See Reno v. Flores, 507 U.S. 292, 303, 113 S.Ct. 1439, 123 L.Ed.2d 1 (1993) (fundamental liberty interests must be “so rooted in the traditions and conscience of our people as to be ranked as fundamental” (internal quotation marks and citations omitted)); United States v. Salerno, 481 U.S. 739, 751, 107 S.Ct. 2095, 95 L.Ed.2d 697 (1987) (same). See also Michael H. v. Gerald D., 491 U.S. 110, 122, 109 S.Ct. 2333, 105 L.Ed.2d 91 (1989) (“[W]e have insisted not merely that the interest denominated as a ‘liberty’ be ‘fundamental’ ... but also that it be an interest traditionally protected by our society”); Moore v. East Cleveland, 431 U.S. 494, 503, 97 S.Ct. 1932, 52 L.Ed.2d © 2014 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. 123 S.Ct. 2472 Page 25 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472, 156 L.Ed.2d 508, 71 USLW 4574, 03 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5559, 2003 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7036, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 427 (Cite as: 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472) 531 (1977) (plurality opinion); Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399, 43 S.Ct. 625, 67 L.Ed. 1042 (1923) (Fourteenth Amendment protects “those privileges long recognized at common law as essential to the orderly pursuit of happiness by free men” (emphasis added)).FN3 All other liberty interests may be abridged or abrogated pursuant to a validly enacted state law if that law is rationally related to a legitimate state interest. FN3. The Court is quite right that “ ‘[h]istory and tradition are the starting point but not in all cases the ending point of the substantive due process inquiry,’ ” ante, at 2480. An asserted “fundamental liberty interest” must not only be “ ‘deeply rooted in this Nation's history and tradition,’ ” Washington v. Glucksberg, 521 U.S. 702, 721, 117 S.Ct. 2258 (1997), but it must also be “ ‘implicit in the concept of ordered liberty,’ ” so that “ ‘neither liberty nor justice would exist if [it] were sacrificed,’ ” ibid. Moreover, liberty interests unsupported by history and tradition, though not deserving of “heightened scrutiny,” are still protected from state laws that are not rationally related to any legitimate state interest. Id., at 722, 117 S.Ct. 2258. As I proceed to discuss, it is this latter principle that the Court applies in the present case. *594 Bowers held, first, that criminal prohibitions of homosexual sodomy are not subject to heightened scrutiny because they do not implicate a “fundamental right” under the Due Process Clause, 478 U.S., at 191–194, 106 S.Ct. 2841. Noting that “[p]roscriptions against that conduct have ancient roots,” id., at 192, 106 S.Ct. 2841, that “[s]odomy was a criminal offense at common law and was forbidden by the laws of the original 13 States when they ratified the Bill of Rights,” ibid., and that many States had retained their bans on sodomy, id., at 193, Bowers concluded that a right to engage in homosexual sodomy was not “ ‘deeply rooted in this Nation's history and tradition,’ ” id., at 192, 106 S.Ct. 2841. The Court today does not overrule this holding. Not once does it describe homosexual sodomy as a “fundamental right” or a “fundamental liberty interest,” nor does it subject the Texas statute to strict scrutiny. Instead, having failed to establish that the right to homosexual sodomy is “ ‘deeply rooted in this Nation's history and tradition,’ ” the Court concludes that the application of Texas's statute to petitioners' conduct fails the rational-basis test, and overrules Bowers' holding to the contrary, see id., at 196, 106 S.Ct. 2841. “The Texas statute furthers no legitimate state interest which can justify its intrusion into the personal and private life of the individual.” Ante, at 2484. I shall address that rational-basis holding presently. First, however, I address some aspersions that the Court casts upon Bowers' conclusion that homosexual sodomy is not a “fundamental right”—even though, as I have said, the Court does not have the boldness to reverse that conclusion. III The Court's description of “the state of the law” at the time of Bowers only confirms that Bowers was right. Ante, at 2477. The Court points to **2493Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479, 481–482, 85 S.Ct. 1678, 14 L.Ed.2d 510 (1965). But © 2014 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. 123 S.Ct. 2472 Page 26 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472, 156 L.Ed.2d 508, 71 USLW 4574, 03 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5559, 2003 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7036, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 427 (Cite as: 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472) that case expressly disclaimed any reliance on the doctrine of “substantive due *595 process,” and grounded the so-called “right to privacy” in penumbras of constitutional provisions other than the Due Process Clause. Eisenstadt v. Baird, 405 U.S. 438, 92 S.Ct. 1029, 31 L.Ed.2d 349 (1972), likewise had nothing to do with “substantive due process”; it invalidated a Massachusetts law prohibiting the distribution of contraceptives to unmarried persons solely on the basis of the Equal Protection Clause. Of course Eisenstadt contains well-known dictum relating to the “right to privacy,” but this referred to the right recognized in Griswold —a right penumbral to the specific guarantees in the Bill of Rights, and not a “substantive due process” right. Roe v. Wade recognized that the right to abort an unborn child was a “fundamental right” protected by the Due Process Clause. 410 U.S., at 155, 93 S.Ct. 705. The Roe Court, however, made no attempt to establish that this right was “ ‘deeply rooted in this Nation's history and tradition’ ”; instead, it based its conclusion that “the Fourteenth Amendment's concept of personal liberty ... is broad enough to encompass a woman's decision whether or not to terminate her pregnancy” on its own normative judgment that antiabortion laws were undesirable. See id., at 153, 93 S.Ct. 705. We have since rejected Roe's holding that regulations of abortion must be narrowly tailored to serve a compelling state interest, see Planned Parenthood v. Casey, 505 U.S., at 876, 112 S.Ct. 2791 (joint opinion of O'CONNOR, KENNEDY, and SOUTER, JJ.); id., at 951–953, 112 S.Ct. 2791 (REHNQUIST, C. J., concurring in judgment in part and dissenting in part)—and thus, by logical implication, Roe's holding that the right to abort an unborn child is a “fundamental right.” See 505 U.S., at 843–912, 112 S.Ct. 2791 (joint opinion of O'CONNOR, KENNEDY, and SOUTER, JJ.) (not once describing abortion as a “fundamental right” or a “fundamental liberty interest”). After discussing the history of antisodomy laws, ante, at 2478–2480, the Court proclaims that, “it should be noted that there is no longstanding history in this country of laws directed at homosexual conduct as a distinct matter,” ante, *596 at 2478. This observation in no way casts into doubt the “definitive [historical] conclusio[n],” ibid., on which Bowers relied: that our Nation has a longstanding history of laws prohibiting sodomy in general —regardless of whether it was performed by same-sex or opposite-sex couples: “It is obvious to us that neither of these formulations would extend a fundamental right to homosexuals to engage in acts of consensual sodomy. Proscriptions against that conduct have ancient roots. Sodomy was a criminal offense at common law and was forbidden by the laws of the original 13 States when they ratified the Bill of Rights. In 1868, when the Fourteenth Amendment was ratified, all but 5 of the 37 States in the Union had criminal sodomy laws. In fact, until 1961, all 50 States outlawed sodomy, and today, 24 States and the District of Columbia continue to provide criminal penalties for sodomy performed in private and between consenting adults. Against this background, to claim that a right to engage in such conduct is ‘deeply rooted in this Nation's history and tradition’ or ‘implicit in the concept of ordered liberty’ is, at best, facetious.” 478 U.S., at 192–194, 106 S.Ct. 2841 (citations and © 2014 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. 123 S.Ct. 2472 Page 27 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472, 156 L.Ed.2d 508, 71 USLW 4574, 03 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5559, 2003 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7036, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 427 (Cite as: 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472) footnotes omitted; emphasis added). It is (as Bowers recognized) entirely irrelevant whether the laws in our long national tradition criminalizing homosexual sodomy were “directed at homosexual conduct as a distinct matter.” Ante, at 2478. Whether homosexual sodomy was prohibited by a law targeted at same-sex sexual relations or by a more general law prohibiting both homosexual and heterosexual sodomy, the only relevant point is that it was criminalized**2494 —which suffices to establish that homosexual sodomy is not a right “deeply rooted in our Nation's history and tradition.” The Court today agrees that homosexual sodomy was criminalized and thus does not dispute the facts on which Bowers actually relied. *597 Next the Court makes the claim, again unsupported by any citations, that “[l]aws prohibiting sodomy do not seem to have been enforced against consenting adults acting in private.” Ante, at 2479. The key qualifier here is “acting in private”—since the Court admits that sodomy laws were enforced against consenting adults (although the Court contends that prosecutions were “infrequen[t],” ibid.). I do not know what “acting in private” means; surely consensual sodomy, like heterosexual intercourse, is rarely performed on stage. If all the Court means by “acting in private” is “on private premises, with the doors closed and windows covered,” it is entirely unsurprising that evidence of enforcement would be hard to come by. (Imagine the circumstances that would enable a search warrant to be obtained for a residence on the ground that there was probable cause to believe that consensual sodomy was then and there occurring.) Surely that lack of evidence would not sustain the proposition that consensual sodomy on private premises with the doors closed and windows covered was regarded as a “fundamental right,” even though all other consensual sodomy was criminalized. There are 203 prosecutions for consensual, adult homosexual sodomy reported in the West Reporting system and official state reporters from the years 1880–1995. See W. Eskridge, Gaylaw: Challenging the Apartheid of the Closet 375 (1999) (hereinafter Gaylaw). There are also records of 20 sodomy prosecutions and 4 executions during the colonial period. J. Katz, Gay/Lesbian Almanac 29, 58, 663 (1983). Bowers' conclusion that homosexual sodomy is not a fundamental right “deeply rooted in this Nation's history and tradition” is utterly unassailable. Realizing that fact, the Court instead says: “[W]e think that our laws and traditions in the past half century are of most relevance here. These references show an emerging awareness that liberty gives substantial protection to adult persons in deciding how to conduct their private lives in matters pertaining to sex. ” Ante, at 2480 (emphasis *598 added). Apart from the fact that such an “emerging awareness” does not establish a “fundamental right,” the statement is factually false. States continue to prosecute all sorts of crimes by adults “in matters pertaining to sex”: prostitution, adult incest, adultery, obscenity, and child pornography. Sodomy laws, too, have been enforced “in the past half century,” in which there have been 134 reported cases involving prosecutions for consensual, adult, homosexual sodomy. Gaylaw 375. In relying, for evidence of an “emerging recognition,” upon the American Law Institute's 1955 recommendation not to © 2014 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. 123 S.Ct. 2472 Page 28 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472, 156 L.Ed.2d 508, 71 USLW 4574, 03 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5559, 2003 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7036, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 427 (Cite as: 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472) criminalize “ ‘consensual sexual relations conducted in private,’ ” ante, at 2480, the Court ignores the fact that this recommendation was “a point of resistance in most of the states that considered adopting the Model Penal Code.” Gaylaw 159. In any event, an “emerging awareness” is by definition not “deeply rooted in this Nation's history and tradition[s],” as we have said “fundamental right” status requires. Constitutional entitlements do not spring into existence because some States choose to lessen or eliminate criminal sanctions on certain behavior. Much less do they spring into existence, as the Court seems to believe, because foreign nations decriminalize conduct. The Bowers majority opinion never relied on “values we share with a wider civilization,” ante, at 2483, but rather rejected the claimed right to sodomy on the ground that such a right was not “ ‘deeply rooted in this Nation's history and tradition,’ ” 478 U.S., at 193–194, 106 S.Ct. 2841 (emphasis added). Bowers' rational-basis holding is likewise devoid of any reliance on the views of a **2495 “wider civilization,” see id., at 196, 106 S.Ct. 2841. The Court's discussion of these foreign views (ignoring, of course, the many countries that have retained criminal prohibitions on sodomy) is therefore meaningless dicta. Dangerous dicta, however, since “this Court ... should not impose foreign moods, fads, or fashions on Americans.” Foster v. Florida, 537 U.S. 990, n., 123 S.Ct. 470, 154 L.Ed.2d 359 (2002) (THOMAS, J., concurring in denial of certiorari). *599 IV I turn now to the ground on which the Court squarely rests its holding: the contention that there is no rational basis for the law here under attack. This proposition is so out of accord with our jurisprudence—indeed, with the jurisprudence of any society we know—that it requires little discussion. The Texas statute undeniably seeks to further the belief of its citizens that certain forms of sexual behavior are “immoral and unacceptable,” Bowers, supra, at 196, 106 S.Ct. 2841—the same interest furthered by criminal laws against fornication, bigamy, adultery, adult incest, bestiality, and obscenity. Bowers held that this was a legitimate state interest. The Court today reaches the opposite conclusion. The Texas statute, it says, “furthers no legitimate state interest which can justify its intrusion into the personal and private life of the individual,” ante, at 2484 (emphasis added). The Court embraces instead Justice STEVENS' declaration in his Bowers dissent, that “ ‘the fact that the governing majority in a State has traditionally viewed a particular practice as immoral is not a sufficient reason for upholding a law prohibiting the practice,’ ” ante, at 2483. This effectively decrees the end of all morals legislation. If, as the Court asserts, the promotion of majoritarian sexual morality is not even a legitimate state interest, none of the above-mentioned laws can survive rational-basis review. V Finally, I turn to petitioners' equalprotection challenge, which no Member of the Court save Justice O'CONNOR, ante, at 2484 (opinion concurring in judgment), embraces: On its face § 21.06(a) applies equally to all persons. Men and women, heterosexuals and homosexuals, are all subject to its prohibition of deviate sexual intercourse with someone of the same sex. To be sure, § 21.06 does distinguish © 2014 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. 123 S.Ct. 2472 Page 29 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472, 156 L.Ed.2d 508, 71 USLW 4574, 03 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5559, 2003 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7036, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 427 (Cite as: 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472) between the sexes insofar as concerns the partner with whom the sexual *600 acts are performed: men can violate the law only with other men, and women only with other women. But this cannot itself be a denial of equal protection, since it is precisely the same distinction regarding partner that is drawn in state laws prohibiting marriage with someone of the same sex while permitting marriage with someone of the opposite sex. The objection is made, however, that the antimiscegenation laws invalidated in Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1, 8, 87 S.Ct. 1817, 18 L.Ed.2d 1010 (1967), similarly were applicable to whites and blacks alike, and only distinguished between the races insofar as the partner was concerned. In Loving, however, we correctly applied heightened scrutiny, rather than the usual rational-basis review, because the Virginia statute was “designed to maintain White Supremacy.” Id., at 6, 11, 87 S.Ct. 1817. A racially discriminatory purpose is always sufficient to subject a law to strict scrutiny, even a facially neutral law that makes no mention of race. See Washington v. Davis, 426 U.S. 229, 241–242, 96 S.Ct. 2040, 48 L.Ed.2d 597 (1976). No purpose to discriminate against men or women as a class can be gleaned from the Texas law, so rational-basis review applies. That review is readily satisfied here by the same rational basis that satisfied it in Bowers —society's belief that certain forms of sexual behavior are “immoral and unacceptable,” 478 U.S., at 196, 106 S.Ct. 2841. This is the same justification that supports many **2496 other laws regulating sexual behavior that make a distinction based upon the identity of the partner—for example, laws against adultery, fornication, and adult incest, and laws refusing to recognize homosexual marriage. Justice O'CONNOR argues that the discrimination in this law which must be justified is not its discrimination with regard to the sex of the partner but its discrimination with regard to the sexual proclivity of the principal actor. “While it is true that the law applies only to conduct, the conduct targeted by this law is conduct that is closely correlated with being homosexual. Under such circumstances, Texas' sodomy law is targeted at more than conduct.*601 It is instead directed toward gay persons as a class.” Ante, at 2486–2487. Of course the same could be said of any law. A law against public nudity targets “the conduct that is closely correlated with being a nudist,” and hence “is targeted at more than conduct”; it is “directed toward nudists as a class.” But be that as it may. Even if the Texas law does deny equal protection to “homosexuals as a class,” that denial still does not need to be justified by anything more than a rational basis, which our cases show is satisfied by the enforcement of traditional notions of sexual morality. Justice O'CONNOR simply decrees application of “a more searching form of rational basis review” to the Texas statute. Ante, at 2485. The cases she cites do not recognize such a standard, and reach their conclusions only after finding, as required by conventional rational-basis analysis, that no conceivable legitimate state interest supports the classification at issue. See Romer v. Evans, 517 U.S., at 635, 116 S.Ct. 1620; Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc., 473 U.S. 432, 448–450, 105 S.Ct. 3249, 87 L.Ed.2d 313 (1985); Department of Agriculture v. Moreno, 413 © 2014 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. 123 S.Ct. 2472 Page 30 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472, 156 L.Ed.2d 508, 71 USLW 4574, 03 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5559, 2003 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7036, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 427 (Cite as: 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472) U.S. 528, 534–538, 93 S.Ct. 2821, 37 L.Ed.2d 782 (1973). Nor does Justice O'CONNOR explain precisely what her “more searching form” of rational-basis review consists of. It must at least mean, however, that laws exhibiting “a desire to harm a politically unpopular group,” ante, at 2485, are invalid even though there may be a conceivable rational basis to support them. This reasoning leaves on pretty shaky grounds state laws limiting marriage to opposite-sex couples. Justice O'CONNOR seeks to preserve them by the conclusory statement that “preserving the traditional institution of marriage” is a legitimate state interest. Ante, at 2488. But “preserving the traditional institution of marriage” is just a kinder way of describing the State's moral disapproval of same-sex couples. Texas's interest in § 21.06 could be recast in similarly euphemistic terms: “preserving the traditional sexual mores of our society.” In the jurisprudence Justice O'CONNOR *602 has seemingly created, judges can validate laws by characterizing them as “preserving the traditions of society” (good); or invalidate them by characterizing them as “expressing moral disapproval” (bad). *** Today's opinion is the product of a Court, which is the product of a lawprofession culture, that has largely signed on to the so-called homosexual agenda, by which I mean the agenda promoted by some homosexual activists directed at eliminating the moral opprobrium that has traditionally attached to homosexual conduct. I noted in an earlier opinion the fact that the American Association of Law Schools (to which any reputable law school must seek to belong) excludes from membership any school that refuses to ban from its job-interview facilities a law firm (no matter how small) that does not wish to hire as a prospective partner a person who openly engages in homosexual conduct. See Romer, supra, at 653, 116 S.Ct. 1620. One of the most revealing statements in today's opinion is the Court's grim warning **2497 that the criminalization of homosexual conduct is “an invitation to subject homosexual persons to discrimination both in the public and in the private spheres.” Ante, at 2482. It is clear from this that the Court has taken sides in the culture war, departing from its role of assuring, as neutral observer, that the democratic rules of engagement are observed. Many Americans do not want persons who openly engage in homosexual conduct as partners in their business, as scoutmasters for their children, as teachers in their children's schools, or as boarders in their home. They view this as protecting themselves and their families from a lifestyle that they believe to be immoral and destructive. The Court views it as “discrimination” which it is the function of our judgments to deter. So imbued is the Court with the law profession's antianti-homosexual culture, that it is seemingly unaware that the attitudes of that *603 culture are not obviously “mainstream”; that in most States what the Court calls “discrimination” against those who engage in homosexual acts is perfectly legal; that proposals to ban such “discrimination” under Title VII have repeatedly been rejected by Congress, see Employment Non–Discrimination Act of 1994, S. 2238, 103d Cong., 2d Sess. (1994); Civil Rights Amendments, H.R. 5452, 94th Cong., 1st Sess. (1975); that in some cases such “discrimination” is mandated by federal statute, see 10 U.S.C. © 2014 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. 123 S.Ct. 2472 Page 31 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472, 156 L.Ed.2d 508, 71 USLW 4574, 03 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5559, 2003 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7036, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 427 (Cite as: 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472) § 654(b)(1) (mandating discharge from the Armed Forces of any service member who engages in or intends to engage in homosexual acts); and that in some cases such “discrimination” is a constitutional right, see Boy Scouts of America v. Dale, 530 U.S. 640, 120 S.Ct. 2446, 147 L.Ed.2d 554 (2000). Let me be clear that I have nothing against homosexuals, or any other group, promoting their agenda through normal democratic means. Social perceptions of sexual and other morality change over time, and every group has the right to persuade its fellow citizens that its view of such matters is the best. That homosexuals have achieved some success in that enterprise is attested to by the fact that Texas is one of the few remaining States that criminalize private, consensual homosexual acts. But persuading one's fellow citizens is one thing, and imposing one's views in absence of democratic majority will is something else. I would no more require a State to criminalize homosexual acts—or, for that matter, display any moral disapprobation of them—than I would forbid it to do so. What Texas has chosen to do is well within the range of traditional democratic action, and its hand should not be stayed through the invention of a brand-new “constitutional right” by a Court that is impatient of democratic change. It is indeed true that “later generations can see that laws once thought necessary and proper in fact serve only to oppress,” ante, at 2484; and when that happens, later generations can repeal those laws. But it is the premise of our system that those judgments are to be made *604 by the people, and not imposed by a governing caste that knows best. One of the benefits of leaving regulation of this matter to the people rather than to the courts is that the people, unlike judges, need not carry things to their logical conclusion. The people may feel that their disapprobation of homosexual conduct is strong enough to disallow homosexual marriage, but not strong enough to criminalize private homosexual acts—and may legislate accordingly. The Court today pretends that it possesses a similar freedom of action, so that we need not fear judicial imposition of homosexual marriage, as has recently occurred in Canada (in a decision that the Canadian Government has chosen not to appeal). See Halpern v. Toronto, 2003 WL 34950 (Ontario Ct.App.); Cohen, Dozens in Canada Follow Gay Couple's Lead, Washington Post, June 12, 2003, p. A25. At the end of its opinion—after having laid waste the foundations of our rational-basis jurisprudence—the Court says that the present **2498 case “does not involve whether the government must give formal recognition to any relationship that homosexual persons seek to enter.” Ante, at 2484. Do not believe it. More illuminating than this bald, unreasoned disclaimer is the progression of thought displayed by an earlier passage in the Court's opinion, which notes the constitutional protections afforded to “personal decisions relating to marriage, procreation, contraception, family relationships, child rearing, and education,” and then declares that “[p]ersons in a homosexual relationship may seek autonomy for these purposes, just as heterosexual persons do.” Ante, at 2482 (emphasis added). Today's opinion dismantles the structure of constitutional law that has permitted a distinction to be made between heterosexual and homosexual unions, insofar as formal recognition in marriage is concerned. If © 2014 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. 123 S.Ct. 2472 Page 32 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472, 156 L.Ed.2d 508, 71 USLW 4574, 03 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5559, 2003 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7036, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 427 (Cite as: 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472) moral disapprobation of homosexual conduct is “no legitimate state interest” for purposes of proscribing that conduct, ante, at 2484; and if, as the Court coos (casting aside all pretense of neutrality), “[w]hen *605 sexuality finds overt expression in intimate conduct with another person, the conduct can be but one element in a personal bond that is more enduring,” ante, at 2478; what justification could there possibly be for denying the benefits of marriage to homosexual couples exercising “[t]he liberty protected by the Constitution,” ibid.? Surely not the encouragement of procreation, since the sterile and the elderly are allowed to marry. This case “does not involve” the issue of homosexual marriage only if one entertains the belief that principle and logic have nothing to do with the decisions of this Court. Many will hope that, as the Court comfortingly assures us, this is so. The matters appropriate for this Court's resolution are only three: Texas's prohibition of sodomy neither infringes a “fundamental right” (which the Court does not dispute), nor is unsupported by a rational relation to what the Constitution considers a legitimate state interest, nor denies the equal protection of the laws. I dissent. Justice THOMAS, dissenting. I join Justice SCALIA's dissenting opinion. I write separately to note that the law before the Court today “is ... uncommonly silly.” Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479, 527, 85 S.Ct. 1678, 14 L.Ed.2d 510 (1965) (Stewart, J., dissenting). If I were a member of the Texas Legislature, I would vote to repeal it. Punishing someone for expressing his sexual preference through noncommercial consensual conduct with another adult does not appear to be a worthy way to expend valuable law enforcement resources. Notwithstanding this, I recognize that as a Member of this Court I am not empowered to help petitioners and others similarly situated. My duty, rather, is to “decide cases ‘agreeably to the Constitution and laws of the United States.’ ” Id., at 530, 85 S.Ct. 1678. And, just like Justice Stewart, I “can find [neither in the Bill of Rights nor any other part of the *606 Constitution a] general right of privacy,” ibid., or as the Court terms it today, the “liberty of the person both in its spatial and more transcendent dimensions,” ante, at 2475. U.S.,2003. Lawrence v. Texas 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472, 156 L.Ed.2d 508, 71 USLW 4574, 03 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5559, 2003 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7036, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 427 Briefs and Other Related Documents (Back to top) • 2003 WL 1098835 (Appellate Brief) Reply Brief (Mar. 10, 2003) • 2003 WL 554465 (Appellate Brief) Brief of Amicus Curiae Agudath Israel of America in Support of Respondent (Feb. 19, 2003) • 2003 WL 367560 (Appellate Brief) Brief of Amici Curiae Center for Arizona Policy and Pro-Family Network in Support of Respondent (Feb. 18, 2003) • 2003 WL 367562 (Appellate Brief) Amicus Brief of the American Center for Law and Justice in Support of Respondent (Feb. 18, 2003) • 2003 WL 367565 (Appellate Brief) Motion for Leave to File Amicus Brief and Amicus Brief of the Center for Marriage © 2014 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. 123 S.Ct. 2472 Page 33 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472, 156 L.Ed.2d 508, 71 USLW 4574, 03 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5559, 2003 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7036, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 427 (Cite as: 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472) Law in Support of Respondent (Feb. 18, 2003) • 2003 WL 367566 (Appellate Brief) Brief in Support of Respondent on Behalf of Amici Curiae Texas Physicians Resource Council, Christian Medical and Dental Associations and Catholic Medical Association (Feb. 18, 2003) • 2003 WL 469830 (Appellate Brief) Motion for Leave to File Brief Amicus Curiae and Brief Amicus Curiae of the Center for Law and Justice International Supporting Respondent (Feb. 18, 2003) • 2003 WL 469900 (Appellate Brief) Brief of Amicus Curiae Concerned Women for America, In Support of the State of Texas, Respondent (Feb. 18, 2003) • 2003 WL 470066 (Appellate Brief) Brief Amicus Curiae of the Family Research Council, Inc. and Focus on the Family in Support of the Respondent (Feb. 18, 2003) • 2003 WL 470088 (Appellate Brief) Brief of Liberty Counsel as Amicus Curiae in Support of Respondent (Feb. 18, 2003) • 2003 WL 470115 (Appellate Brief) Brief of Amici Curiae, Pro Family Law Center, Traditional Values Coalition, Traditional Values Education & Legal Institute & James Hartline, in Support of Respondents (Feb. 18, 2003) • 2003 WL 470148 (Appellate Brief) Brief Amicus Curiae of Public Advocate of the United States, Conservative Legal Defense and Education Fund, Lincoln Institute for Research and Education, Help and Caring Ministries, Inc., and Citizens United Foundation in Support of Respondent (Feb. 18, 2003) • 2003 WL 470172 (Appellate Brief) Brief of the States of Alabama, South Carolina, and Utah as Amici Curiae in Support of Respondent (Feb. 18, 2003) • 2003 WL 470177 (Appellate Brief) Brief of Texas Eagle Forum, Daughters of Liberty Republican Women, Houston, Texas and Spirit of Freedom Republican Women's Club as Amici Curiae in Support of Respondent (Feb. 18, 2003) • 2003 WL 470181 (Appellate Brief) Brief of Amici Curiae Texas Legislators, Representative Warren Chisum, et al., in Support of Respondent (Feb. 18, 2003) • 2003 WL 470184 (Appellate Brief) Respondent's Brief (Feb. 17, 2003) • 2003 WL 674354 (Appellate Brief) Brief Amicus Curiae of the Center for the Original Intent of the Constitution in Support of Respondent (Feb. 14, 2003) • 2003 WL 345829 (Appellate Brief) Brief Amicus Curiae of United Families International in Support of Respondent (Feb. 13, 2003) • 2003 WL 152331 (Appellate Brief) Brief of the Alliance of Baptists, The American Friends Service Committee, The Commission on Social Action of Reform Judaism, The Most Rev. Frank T. Griswold, III, Presiding Bishop of the Episcopal Church, The Methodist Federation for Social Action, More Light Presbyterians, The General Synod of the United Church of Christ, The Unitarian Universalist Association, and 21 Other Religious Organizations as Amici Curiae Supporting Petitioners (Jan. 16, 2003) • 2003 WL 152338 (Appellate Brief) Brief for Amici Curiae American Psychological Association, American Psychiatric Association, National Association of Social Workers, and Texas Chapter of the National Association of Social Workers in Support of Petitioners (Jan. 16, 2003) • 2003 WL 152342 (Appellate Brief) Brief of the CATO Institute as Amicus Curiae in Support of Petitioners (Jan. 16, 2003) • 2003 WL 152347 (Appellate Brief) Amicus Brief of Human Rights Campaign; National Gay & Lesbian Task Force; Parents, Families & Friends of Lesbians & Gays; National Center for Lesbian Rights; © 2014 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. 123 S.Ct. 2472 Page 34 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472, 156 L.Ed.2d 508, 71 USLW 4574, 03 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5559, 2003 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7036, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 427 (Cite as: 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472) Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders; Gay & Lesbian Alliance against Defamation; Pride at Wor k, AFL-CIO; People for the American Way Foundation; Anti-Defamation League; Mexican American Legal Defense & Education Fund; Puerto Rican Legal Defense & Education Fund; Society of American Law Teachers; Soulforce; Stonewall Law Association of Greate (Jan. 16, 2003) • 2003 WL 152348 (Appellate Brief) Brief of the National Lesbian and Gay Law Association, The Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund, Action Wisconsin, The Bay Area Lawyers for Individual Freedom, The Bay Area Transgender Lawyers' Association, Gay and Lesbian Lawyers of Phila delphia, Gay and Lesbian Lawyers Association of South Florida, Gaylaw, The Lesbian and Gay Law Association of Greater New York, The Lesbian and Gay Lawyers Association of Los Angeles, The Lesbian and Gay Bar Association of Chicago, The Massachusetts (Jan. 16, 2003) • 2003 WL 152350 (Appellate Brief) Brief of Professors of History George Chauncey, Nancy F. Cott, John D'Emilio, Estelle B. Freedman, Thomas C. Holt, John Howard, Lynn Hunt, Mark D. Jordan, Elizabeth Lapovsky Kennedy, and Linda P. Kerber as Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioners (Jan. 16, 2003) • 2003 WL 152351 (Appellate Brief) Brief of Amici Curiae Republican Unity Coalition and the Honorable Alan K. Simpson in Support of Petitioners (Jan. 16, 2003) • 2003 WL 152352 (Appellate Brief) Brief of Petitioners (Jan. 16, 2003) • 2003 WL 164108 (Appellate Brief) Brief of the American Bar Association as Amicus Curiae in Support of Petitioners (Jan. 16, 2003) • 2003 WL 164135 (Appellate Brief) Brief of the American Public Health Association, National Mental Health Association, American Orthopsychiatric Association, Aids Action, National Alliance of State and Territorial Aids Directors, Association of Nurses in Aids Care, National Minority AIDS Council, and the Whitman-Walker Clinic as Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioners (Jan. 16, 2003) • 2003 WL 164140 (Appellate Brief) Brief of the Institute for Justice as Amicus Curiae in Support of Petitioners (Jan. 16, 2003) • 2003 WL 164146 (Appellate Brief) Brief of Now Legal Defense and Education Fund as Amicus Curiae in Support of Petitioners (Jan. 16, 2003) • 2003 WL 164149 (Appellate Brief) Amici Curiae Brief of the Log Cabin Republicans and Liberty Education Forum in Support of the Petitioners (Jan. 16, 2003) • 2003 WL 164151 (Appellate Brief) Brief Amici Curiae of Mary Robinson, Amnesty International U.S.A., Human Rights Watch, Interights, the Lawyers Committee for Human Rights, and Minnesota Advocates for Human Rights in Support of Petitioners (Jan. 16, 2003) • 2003 WL 136139 (Appellate Brief) BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW PROFESSORS BRUCE A. ACKERMAN, JACK M. BALKIN, DERRICK A. BELL, JR., PAUL BREST, EVAN CAMINKER, ERWIN CHEMERINSKY, DAVID D. COLE, DAVID B. CRUZ, THOMAS C. GREY, PAMELA S. KARLAN, KENNETH L. KARST, ANDREW KOPPEL MAN, SANFORD LEVINSON, FRANK MICHELMAN, WILLIAM B. RUBENSTEIN, STEVEN H. SHIFFRIN, GEOFFREY R. STONE, AND KENJI YOSHINO IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONERS (Jan. 15, 2003) • 2003 WL 164132 (Appellate Brief) Brief © 2014 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. 123 S.Ct. 2472 Page 35 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472, 156 L.Ed.2d 508, 71 USLW 4574, 03 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5559, 2003 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7036, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 427 (Cite as: 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472) Amici Curiae of the American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU of Texas in Support of Petitioner (Jan. 15, 2003) • 2002 WL 32101086 (Appellate Petition, Motion or Filing) Motion for Leave to File Brief Amicus Curiae and Brief of Amicus Curiae, Pro Family Law Center, in Support of Denying Review (Aug. 16, 2002) Original Image of this Document (PDF) • 02-102 (Docket) (Jul. 19, 2002) • 2002 WL 32101039 (Appellate Petition, Motion or Filing) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (Jul. 16, 2002) Original Image of this Document with Appendix (PDF) • 2002 WL 32134767 (Appellate Petition, Motion or Filing) Brief Amicus Curiae of United Families International in Support of Respondent (Jan. 01, 2002) Original Image of this Document (PDF) Oral Argument Transcripts with Streaming Media (Back to top) • 2003 WL 1702534 (Oral Argument) Oral Argument (Mar. 26, 2003) • Hudson, Hon. Suzanne State of Texas Municipal Court, City of Dalworthington Gardens Dalworthington Gardens, Texas 76016 Litigation History Report | Judicial Reversal Report | Judicial Expert Challenge Report | Profiler • Kennedy, Hon. Anthony M. Supreme Court of the United States Washington, District of Columbia 20543 Litigation History Report | Judicial Motion Report | Judicial Reversal Report | Judicial Expert Challenge Report | Profiler • Ross, Hon. Sherman A. State of Texas County Court at Law, Harris County Houston, Texas 77002 Litigation History Report | Judicial Reversal Report | Profiler • Scalia, Hon. Antonin G. Supreme Court of the United States Washington, District of Columbia 20543 Litigation History Report | Judicial Reversal Report | Judicial Expert Challenge Report | Profiler • Souter, Hon. David Hackett Supreme Court of the United States Washington, District of Columbia 20543 Litigation History Report | Judicial Reversal Report | Profiler • Thomas, Hon. Clarence Supreme Court of the United States Washington, District of Columbia 20543 Litigation History Report | Judicial Reversal Report | Judicial Expert Challenge Report | Profiler Attorneys Attorneys for Petitioner • Katine, Mitchell Judges and Attorneys(Back to top) Judges | Attorneys Judges • Breyer, Hon. Stephen G. Supreme Court of the United States Washington, District of Columbia 20543 Litigation History Report | Judicial Reversal Report | Judicial Expert Challenge Report | Profiler • Ginsburg, Hon. Ruth Bader Supreme Court of the United States Washington, District of Columbia 20543 Litigation History Report | Judicial Reversal Report | Judicial Expert Challenge Report | Profiler © 2014 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. 123 S.Ct. 2472 Page 36 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472, 156 L.Ed.2d 508, 71 USLW 4574, 03 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5559, 2003 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7036, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 427 (Cite as: 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472) Houston, Texas 77008-1700 Litigation History Report | Profiler • Logue, Hon. Patricia Marian Unknown State Litigation History Report | Profiler • McGowan, Sharon M. New York, New York 10004 Litigation History Report | Profiler • Smith, Paul M. Washington, District of Columbia 20001-4412 Litigation History Report | Profiler Attorneys for Respondent • Delmore, William J. III Houston, Texas 77002 Litigation History Report | Profiler • Durfee, Scott A. Houston, Texas 77002 Litigation History Report | Profiler • Rosenthal, Charles A. Jr. Houston, Texas 77002 Litigation History Report | Profiler END OF DOCUMENT © 2014 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. Date of Printing: Jan 29, 2014 KEYCITE Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472, 156 L.Ed.2d 508, 71 USLW 4574, 03 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5559, 2003 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7036, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 427 (U.S., Jun 26, 2003) (NO. 02-102) History Direct History 1 Lawrence v. State, 2000 WL 729417 (Tex.App.-Hous. (14 Dist.) Jun 08, 2000) (NO. 14-99-00109-CR, 14-99-00111-CR) Opinion Withdrawn and Superseded on Rehearing by 2 Lawrence v. State, 41 S.W.3d 349 (Tex.App.-Hous. (14 Dist.) Mar 15, 2001) (NO. NO14-99-00111-CR, OS14-99-00109-CR), petition for discretionary review refused (Apr 17, 2002) Certiorari Granted by 3 Lawrence v. Texas, 537 U.S. 1044, 123 S.Ct. 661, 154 L.Ed.2d 514, 71 USLW 3116, 71 USLW 3379, 71 USLW 3387, 02 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 11,546 (U.S.Tex. Dec 02, 2002) (NO. 02-102) AND Judgment Reversed by 4 Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472, 156 L.Ed.2d 508, 71 USLW 4574, 03 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5559, 2003 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7036, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 427 (U.S. Jun 26, 2003) (NO. 02-102) Negative Citing References (U.S.A.) Not Followed as Dicta 5 Singson v. Com., 46 Va.App. 724, 621 S.E.2d 682 (Va.App. Nov 08, 2005) (NO. 0646-04-1) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) Declined to Extend by 6 Lofton v. Secretary of Dept. of Children and Family Services, 358 F.3d 804, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 201 (11th Cir.(Fla.) Jan 28, 2004) (NO. 01-16723) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 7 Burton v. York County Sheriff's Dept., 358 S.C. 339, 594 S.E.2d 888, 21 IER Cases 770 (S.C.App. Apr 05, 2004) (NO. 3771) 8 In re Kandu, 315 B.R. 123, Bankr. L. Rep. P 80,145 (Bankr.W.D.Wash. Aug 17, 2004) (NO. 03-51312) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 9 State v. Oakley, 167 N.C.App. 318, 605 S.E.2d 215 (N.C.App. Dec 07, 2004) (NO. COA03-1709) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) => © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 10 State v. Jenkins, 2004 WL 3015091, 2004-Ohio-7131 (Ohio App. 1 Dist. Dec 30, 2004) (NO. B-0105517-A, C-040111) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 11 Wilson v. Ake, 354 F.Supp.2d 1298, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 175, 1 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 611 (M.D.Fla. Jan 19, 2005) (NO. 8:04-CV-1680-T-30TBM) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 12 State v. Senters, 270 Neb. 19, 699 N.W.2d 810 (Neb. Jun 24, 2005) (NO. S03-945) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 13 Witt v. U.S. Dept. of Air Force, 444 F.Supp.2d 1138 (W.D.Wash. Jul 26, 2006) (NO. C06-5195RBL) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 14 U.S. v. Thompson, 458 F.Supp.2d 730 (N.D.Ind. Oct 17, 2006) (NO. 2:06CR50) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 15 Lewis v. Harris, 188 N.J. 415, 908 A.2d 196 (N.J. Oct 25, 2006) (NO. A-68 SEPT.TERM 2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 16 Doe v. Del Rio, 241 F.R.D. 154 (S.D.N.Y. Dec 11, 2006) (NO. 06 CIV. 3761 GEL) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 17 State v. Romano, 114 Hawai'i 1, 155 P.3d 1102 (Hawai'i Feb 27, 2007) (NO. 26110), as amended (Mar 30, 2007) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 18 Raich v. Gonzales, 500 F.3d 850, 07 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2698 (9th Cir.(Cal.) Mar 14, 2007) (NO. 03-15481) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 19 Price v. New York City Bd. of Educ., 16 Misc.3d 543, 837 N.Y.S.2d 507, 221 Ed. Law Rep. 303, 2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 27214 (N.Y.Sup. May 07, 2007) (NO. 109703/06) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 20 U.S. v. Palfrey, 499 F.Supp.2d 34 (D.D.C. Aug 16, 2007) (NO. CRIM.07-46GK) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 21 People v. Garza, 2008 WL 187982 (Cal.App. 4 Dist. Jan 23, 2008) (NO. E041547), unpublished/noncitable (Jan 23, 2008), review denied (Apr 30, 2008) 22 Borden v. School Dist. of Tp. of East Brunswick, 523 F.3d 153, 231 Ed. Law Rep. 583, 27 IER Cases 1004 (3rd Cir.(N.J.) Apr 15, 2008) (NO. 06-3890) 23 Seegmiller v. LaVerkin City, 528 F.3d 762, 27 IER Cases 1390 (10th Cir.(Utah) Jun 10, 2008) (NO. 07-4096) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 24 U.S. v. Handley, 564 F.Supp.2d 996 (S.D.Iowa Jul 02, 2008) (NO. 1:07-CR-00030-JEG) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 25 Brady v. Collins, 2009 WL 6407543 (N.D.Ohio Sep 15, 2009) (NO. 1:09-CV-0009) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 26 U.S. v. Gendron, 2009 WL 5909127 (E.D.Mo. Sep 16, 2009) (NO. S2-4:08CR244RWS(FRB)) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 27 U.S. v. Stagliano, 693 F.Supp.2d 25 (D.D.C. Feb 19, 2010) (NO. CRIM.A 08-93(RJL)) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 28 Brady v. Collins, 2010 WL 1741113 (N.D.Ohio Apr 29, 2010) (NO. 1:09-CV-09) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 29 Fleming v. State, 323 S.W.3d 540 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth Aug 05, 2010) (NO. 2-09-215-CR), petition for discretionary review granted (Dec 08, 2010) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.) 30 U.S. v. Lebowitz, 676 F.3d 1000, 88 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 86, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 896 (11th Cir.(Ga.) Apr 05, 2012) (NO. 10-13349) 31 Pedersen v. Office of Personnel Management, 881 F.Supp.2d 294, 115 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1228 (D.Conn. Jul 31, 2012) (NO. 3:10-CV-1750 VLB) HN: 3,5 (S.Ct.) 32 Keepers, Inc. v. City of Milford, Conn., 944 F.Supp.2d 129 (D.Conn. Mar 30, 2013) (NO. 3:07CV1231 AWT) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 33 People v. McEvoy, 215 Cal.App.4th 431, 154 Cal.Rptr.3d 914, 13 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3645, 2013 Daily Journal D.A.R. 4766 (Cal.App. 1 Dist. Apr 15, 2013) (NO. A132360), review denied (Jul 10, 2013) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 34 U.S. v. Whitaker, 72 M.J. 292 (U.S. Armed Forces Jun 18, 2013) (NO. 13-5004, CRIM.A. 1366) 35 United States v. Timsuren, 72 M.J. 823 (A.F.Ct.Crim.App. Oct 02, 2013) (NO. ACM 38146) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 36 Watson v. State, 293 Ga. 817, 750 S.E.2d 143, 13 FCDR 3243 (Ga. Oct 21, 2013) (NO. S13A0784) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 37 Glossip v. Missouri Dept. of Transp. and Highway Patrol Employees' Retirement System, 411 S.W.3d 796 (Mo. Oct 29, 2013) (NO. SC92583) Distinguished by 38 State v. Clark, 161 N.C.App. 316, 588 S.E.2d 66 (N.C.App. Nov 18, 2003) (NO. COA02-1658) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 39 U.S. v. Peterson, 294 F.Supp.2d 797 (D.S.C. Nov 25, 2003) (NO. CR. 203-0118) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 40 State v. Freeman, 155 Ohio App.3d 492, 801 N.E.2d 906, 2003-Ohio-6730 (Ohio App. 7 Dist. Dec 12, 2003) (NO. 02-JE-42) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 41 State v. Limon, 32 Kan.App.2d 369, 83 P.3d 229 (Kan.App. Jan 30, 2004) (NO. 85898), review granted (May 25, 2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 42 Cawood v. Haggard, 327 F.Supp.2d 863 (E.D.Tenn. Feb 11, 2004) (NO. 3:00-CV-272) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 43 U.S. v. Abdul-Rahman, 59 M.J. 924 (C.G.Ct.Crim.App. May 14, 2004) (NO. 1192, CGCMG 0187) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 44 People v. Williams, 347 Ill.App.3d 1123, 349 Ill.App.3d 273, 811 N.E.2d 1197, 285 Ill.Dec. 318 (Ill.App. 3 Dist. May 26, 2004) (NO. 3-02-0456) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 45 Vanderveer v. Vanderveer, 2004 WL 2157930 (Va.App. Sep 28, 2004) (NO. 0122-04-2) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 46 Howard v. Child Welfare Agency Review Bd., 2004 WL 3154530 (Ark.Cir. Dec 29, 2004) (NO. CV 1999-9881) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 47 State v. Thomas, 891 So.2d 1233, 2004-0559 (La. 1/19/05) (La. Jan 19, 2005) (NO. 2004-KA-0559) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 48 Burt v. Rumsfeld, 354 F.Supp.2d 156, 195 Ed. Law Rep. 781 (D.Conn. Jan 31, 2005) (NO. CIV.A.3-03-CV-1777(J) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 49 U.S. v. Bach, 400 F.3d 622 (8th Cir.(Minn.) Mar 14, 2005) (NO. 04-1211), rehearing denied (Apr 22, 2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 50 People v. McDermitt, 2005 WL 995520 (Cal.App. 3 Dist. Apr 29, 2005) (NO. C047482), unpublished/noncitable (Apr 29, 2005), review denied (Jul 13, 2005) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 51 Lewis v. Harris, 378 N.J.Super. 168, 875 A.2d 259 (N.J.Super.A.D. Jun 14, 2005) (NO. A-2244-03T5) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 52 State v. Lowe, 2005 WL 1983964, 2005-Ohio-4274 (Ohio App. 5 Dist. Aug 15, 2005) (NO. 2004CA00292) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 53 U.S. v. Whorley, 386 F.Supp.2d 693 (E.D.Va. Aug 18, 2005) (NO. CRIM.A. 3:05CR114-HE) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 54 People v. Jones, 2005 WL 2160425 (Cal.App. 3 Dist. Sep 07, 2005) (NO. C045990), unpublished/noncitable (Sep 07, 2005), review denied (Nov 30, 2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 55 U.S. v. Weiner, 152 Fed.Appx. 38 (2nd Cir.(N.Y.) Oct 14, 2005) (Not selected for publication in the Federal Reporter, NO. 05-1512-CR) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 56 People v. Sintay, 2005 WL 2789322 (Cal.App. 2 Dist. Oct 27, 2005) (NO. B177202), unpublished/noncitable (Oct 27, 2005), review denied (Jan 04, 2006) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 57 Tjan v. Com., 46 Va.App. 698, 621 S.E.2d 669 (Va.App. Nov 08, 2005) (NO. 3221-03-1) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 58 U.S. v. Sherr, 400 F.Supp.2d 843 (D.Md. Nov 16, 2005) (NO. CRIM. CCB03-0477) 59 U.S. v. Extreme Associates, Inc., 431 F.3d 150 (3rd Cir.(Pa.) Dec 08, 2005) (NO. 05-1555) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 60 State v. Russell, 890 A.2d 453 (R.I. Jan 30, 2006) (NO. 2003-353-C.A.) 61 State v. Freitag, 212 Ariz. 269, 130 P.3d 544, 473 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 5 (Ariz.App. Div. 1 Mar 14, 2006) (NO. 1 CA-CR 04-0770), as corrected (May 02, 2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 62 Williams v. King, 420 F.Supp.2d 1224 (N.D.Ala. Mar 15, 2006) (NO. CV 98-2-1938-NE) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 63 State v. Holm, 137 P.3d 726, 552 Utah Adv. Rep. 3, 2006 UT 31, 22 A.L.R.6th 665 (Utah May 16, 2006) (NO. 20030847) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 64 U.S. v. Cotti, Jr., 2006 WL 6624674 (Army Ct.Crim.App. Jun 16, 2006) (NO. ARMY20021210) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 65 Hubbard v. State, 849 N.E.2d 1165 (Ind.App. Jun 29, 2006) (NO. 20A03-0509-CR-409) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 66 Hernandez v. Robles, 7 N.Y.3d 338, 855 N.E.2d 1, 821 N.Y.S.2d 770, 2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 05239 (N.Y. Jul 06, 2006) (NO. 1, 3, 86, 87, 88, 89) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 67 Citizens for Equal Protection v. Bruning, 455 F.3d 859 (8th Cir.(Neb.) Jul 14, 2006) (NO. 05-2604), rehearing and rehearing en banc denied (Aug 30, 2006) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 68 State v. Mogler, 719 N.W.2d 201 (Minn.App. Jul 25, 2006) (NO. A05-1037) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 69 Andersen v. King County, 158 Wash.2d 1, 138 P.3d 963 (Wash. Jul 26, 2006) (NO. 75934-1, 75956-1) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 70 Stadium Book & Video, Inc. v. Miami-Dade County, 2006 WL 2374740 (S.D.Fla. Jul 31, 2006) (NO. 04-20537-CIV JORDAN, 04-20553-CIV JORDAN, 04-21156 CIV JORDAN) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 71 State v. Musser, 721 N.W.2d 734 (Iowa Aug 04, 2006) (NO. 04-0809), rehearing denied (Aug 29, 2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 72 Talbert v. State, 367 Ark. 262, 239 S.W.3d 504 (Ark. Sep 21, 2006) (NO. CR05-1279) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 73 In re Marriage Cases, 143 Cal.App.4th 873, 49 Cal.Rptr.3d 675, 06 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9451, 2006 Daily Journal D.A.R. 13,485 (Cal.App. 1 Dist. Oct 05, 2006) (NO. A110449, A110450, A110451, A110463, A110651, A110652), as modified on denial of rehearing (Nov 06, 2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 74 Pueblo v. Gonzalez Diaz, 2006 WL 3337605 (TCA Oct 11, 2006) (NO. KHO1999G0010Y0011, KLAN200400721) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 75 Berkovsky v. State, 209 S.W.3d 252, 215 Ed. Law Rep. 1185 (Tex.App.-Waco Oct 18, 2006) (NO. 10-06-00204-CR), petition for discretionary review refused (Feb 14, 2007) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 76 Fleck and Associates, Inc. v. Phoenix, City of, an Arizona Mun. Corp., 471 F.3d 1100, 06 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 11,716, 2006 Daily Journal D.A.R. 16,747 (9th Cir.(Ariz.) Dec 22, 2006) (NO. 05-15293) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 77 U.S. v. Roberts, 2007 WL 210402 (E.D.Pa. Jan 24, 2007) (NO. CRIM.A.04-00037-1, CRIM.A.04-00037-2) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 78 Williams v. Morgan, 478 F.3d 1316, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 333 (11th Cir.(Ala.) Feb 14, 2007) (NO. 06-11892) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 79 People v. Scott, 147 Cal.App.4th 831, 54 Cal.Rptr.3d 674, 07 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1685 (Cal.App. 4 Dist. Feb 14, 2007) (NO. E039093), as modified on denial of rehearing (Mar 15, 2007) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 80 State v. McKenzie-Adams, 281 Conn. 486, 915 A.2d 822 (Conn. Feb 27, 2007) (NO. 17451) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 81 State v. Lowe, 112 Ohio St.3d 507, 861 N.E.2d 512, 2007-Ohio-606 (Ohio Feb 28, 2007) (NO. 2005-1843) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 82 People v. McPhee, 2007 WL 912116 (Mich.App. Mar 27, 2007) (NO. 258285) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 83 Crooks v. Kline, 2007 WL 983169 (D.Kan. Mar 27, 2007) (NO. 06-3313-RDR) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 84 In re R.L.C., 361 N.C. 287, 643 S.E.2d 920 (N.C. May 04, 2007) (NO. 531A06) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 85 Ostini v. City of Burlingame, 2007 WL 1456043 (N.D.Cal. May 17, 2007) (NO. C 07 01011 WHA) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 86 State v. Bussmann, 741 N.W.2d 79 (Minn. Nov 01, 2007) (NO. A05-1782), rehearing denied (Nov 28, 2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 87 People v. Scott, 157 Cal.App.4th 189, 68 Cal.Rptr.3d 592, 07 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 13,515, 2007 Daily Journal D.A.R. 17,431 (Cal.App. 4 Dist. Nov 27, 2007) (NO. E039093), review denied (Mar 12, 2008) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 88 Interactive Media Entertainment & Gaming Ass'n, Inc. v. Gonzales, 2008 WL 5586713 (D.N.J. Mar 04, 2008) (NO. CIV.A. 07-2625MLC) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 89 Varkonyi v. State, 276 S.W.3d 27 (Tex.App.-El Paso May 08, 2008) (NO. 08-06-00255-CR), petition for discretionary review refused (Oct 29, 2008) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 90 Moore v. Rodgers, 2008 WL 2178060 (E.D.La. May 20, 2008) (NO. CIV.A. 06-2030) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 91 State v. Fischer, 219 Ariz. 408, 199 P.3d 663, 536 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 3 (Ariz.App. Div. 1 Aug 05, 2008) (NO. 1 CA-CR 06-0682), as amended (Aug 06, 2008), review denied (Dec 04, 2008) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 92 Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 452 Mass. 784, 897 N.E.2d 992 (Mass. Dec 12, 2008) (NO. SJC-10199) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 93 Interactive Media Entertainment and Gaming Ass'n Inc. v. Attorney General of U.S., 580 F.3d 113 (3rd Cir.(N.J.) Sep 01, 2009) (NO. 08-1981) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 94 Mauk v. Goodrich, 2009 WL 2914056 (S.D.Ga. Sep 10, 2009) (NO. CV 109-057) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 95 1568 Montgomery Highway, Inc. v. City of Hoover, 2009 WL 2903458 (Ala. Sep 11, 2009) (NO. 1070531) 96 State Trooper Fraternal Ass'n v. State of N.J., 2009 WL 5064770 (D.N.J. Dec 16, 2009) (NO. CIV.A. 08-3820 (MLC)) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 97 URI Student Senate v. Town of Narragansett, 2010 WL 222587 (D.R.I. Jan 22, 2010) (NO. C.A.08-207 S) 98 URI Student Senate v. Town of Narragansett, 707 F.Supp.2d 282 (D.R.I. Mar 03, 2010) (NO. 08-207 S) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 99 Collins v. Brewer, 727 F.Supp.2d 797 (D.Ariz. Jul 23, 2010) (NO. 2:09-CV-02402 JWS) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 100 Wolfe v. Schaefer, 619 F.3d 782, 38 Media L. Rep. 2217 (7th Cir.(Ill.) Aug 31, 2010) (NO. 10-1016) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 101 In re Marriage of J.B. and H.B., 326 S.W.3d 654 (Tex.App.-Dallas Aug 31, 2010) (NO. 05-09-01170-CV), review granted (Aug 23, 2013) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 102 Blackwell v. Helb, 2011 WL 346504 (D.N.J. Jan 31, 2011) (NO. CIV.A. 09-3004 GEB) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 103 People v. Grant, 195 Cal.App.4th 107, 123 Cal.Rptr.3d 840, 11 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5391, 2011 Daily Journal D.A.R. 6458 (Cal.App. 1 Dist. May 05, 2011) (NO. A128728), review denied (Aug 10, 2011) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 104 U.S. v. Truss, 70 M.J. 545 (Army Ct.Crim.App. Aug 31, 2011) (NO. ARMY 20080988) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 105 Alternative Community Health Care Co-op., Inc. v. Holder, 2011 WL 6216964 (S.D.Cal. Dec 13, 2011) (NO. 11CV2585-DMS BGS) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 106 U.S. v. Williams, 2011 WL 6826852 (Army Ct.Crim.App. Dec 21, 2011) (NO. ARMY 20090619) 107 Musser v. Mapes, 854 F.Supp.2d 652 (S.D.Iowa Apr 11, 2012) (NO. 4:10-CV-00349-JEG, 4:10-CV-00350-JEG, 4:10-CV-00352-JEG, 4:10-CV-00354-JEG) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 108 Cochran v. State, 111 So.3d 148 (Ala.Crim.App. Jun 29, 2012) (NO. CR10-0516), rehearing denied (Aug 10, 2012), certiorari denied (Nov 09, 2012) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 109 Fleming v. State, 376 S.W.3d 854 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth Aug 02, 2012) (NO. 02-09-00215-CR), petition for discretionary review granted (Jan 09, 2013) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 110 Jackson v. Abercrombie, 884 F.Supp.2d 1065 (D.Hawai'i Aug 08, 2012) (NO. CIV. 11-00734 ACK) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 111 State v. Hollenbeck, 164 N.H. 154, 53 A.3d 591 (N.H. Sep 05, 2012) (NO. 2011-165) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 112 State v. Edwards, 48 Kan.App.2d 264, 288 P.3d 494, 286 Ed. Law Rep. 719 (Kan.App. Nov 02, 2012) (NO. 106,435) HN: 3,5 (S.Ct.) 113 Sevcik v. Sandoval, 911 F.Supp.2d 996 (D.Nev. Nov 26, 2012) (NO. 2:12-CV-00578-RCJ) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 114 United States v. Gutierrez, 2013 WL 1319443 (A.F.Ct.Crim.App. Mar 21, 2013) (NO. 37913) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 115 State v. Green, 989 N.E.2d 1088, 2013-Ohio-1197 (Ohio App. 1 Dist. Mar 29, 2013) (NO. C-120283) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 116 Smith v. Thaler, 526 Fed.Appx. 395 (5th Cir.(Tex.) May 21, 2013) (Not selected for publication in the Federal Reporter, NO. 12-10435) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 117 U.S. v. Goings, 72 M.J. 202 (U.S. Armed Forces May 23, 2013) (NO. 11-0547, CRIM.A. 20080602) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 118 Musser v. Mapes, 718 F.3d 996 (8th Cir.(Iowa) Jun 24, 2013) (NO. 12-2195) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 119 Bassett v. Snyder, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2013 WL 3285111 (E.D.Mich. Jun 28, 2013) (NO. 12-10038) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 120 Stevens v. Holder, 2013 WL 4430901 (E.D.Va. Aug 16, 2013) (NO. 1:12-CV-1105 GBL/IDD) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 121 SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. Abbott Laboratories, --- F.3d ----, 2014 WL 211807 (9th Cir.(Cal.) Jan 21, 2014) (NO. 11-17357, 11-17373) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) Limitation of Holding Recognized by 122 Bronson v. Swensen, 394 F.Supp.2d 1329 (D.Utah Feb 16, 2005) (NO. 2:04-CV-21-TS) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) Court Documents Appellate Court Documents (U.S.A.) U.S. Appellate Petitions, Motions and Filings 123 John Geddes LAWRENCE and Tyron Garner, Petitioners, v. State of Texas, Respondent., 2002 WL 32134767 (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jan. 01, 2002) Brief Amicus Curiae of United Families International in Support of Respondent (NO. 02-102) 124 John Geddes LAWRENCE and Tyron Garner, Petitioners, v. STATE OF TEXAS, Respondent., 2002 WL 32101039 (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jul. 16, 2002) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 02-102) 125 John Geddes LAWRENCE and Tyron Garner, Petitioners, v. STATE OF TEXAS, Respondent., 2002 WL 32101086 (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Aug. 16, 2002) Motion for Leave to File Brief Amicus Curiae and Brief of Amicus Curiae, Pro Family Law Center, in Support of Denying Review (NO. 02-102) U.S. Appellate Briefs 126 Lawrence v. Texas, 2003 WL 136139 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan. 15, 2003) BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW PROFESSORS BRUCE A. ACKERMAN, JACK M. BALKIN, DERRICK A. BELL, JR., PAUL BREST, EVAN CAMINKER, ERWIN CHEMERINSKY, DAVID D. COLE, DAVID B. CRUZ, THOMAS C. GREY, (NO. 02-102) 127 Lawrence v. Texas, 2003 WL 164132 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan. 15, 2003) Brief Amici Curiae of the American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU of Texas in Support of Petitioner (NO. 02-102) 128 Lawrence v. Garner, 2003 WL 152331 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan. 16, 2003) Brief of the Alliance of Baptists, The American Friends Service Committee, © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. The Commission on Social Action of Reform Judaism, The Most Rev. Frank T. Griswold, III, Presiding Bishop of the Episcopal Ch (NO. 02-102) 129 Lawrence v. Garner, 2003 WL 152338 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan. 16, 2003) Brief for Amici Curiae American Psychological Association, American Psychiatric Association, National Association of Social Workers, and Texas Chapter of the National Association of Social Workers in (NO. 02-102) 130 Lawrence v. Garner, 2003 WL 152342 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan. 16, 2003) Brief of the CATO Institute as Amicus Curiae in Support of Petitioners (NO. 02-102) 131 Lawrence v. Texas, 2003 WL 152347 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan. 16, 2003) Amicus Brief of Human Rights Campaign; National Gay & Lesbian Task Force; Parents, Families & Friends of Lesbians & Gays; National Center for Lesbian Rights; Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders; Gay & (NO. 02-102) 132 Lawrence v. Garner, 2003 WL 152348 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan. 16, 2003) Brief of the National Lesbian and Gay Law Association, The Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund, Action Wisconsin, The Bay Area Lawyers for Individual Freedom, The Bay Area Transgender Lawy (NO. 02-102) 133 Lawrence v. Garner, 2003 WL 152350 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan. 16, 2003) Brief of Professors of History George Chauncey, Nancy F. Cott, John D'Emilio, Estelle B. Freedman, Thomas C. Holt, John Howard, Lynn Hunt, Mark D. Jordan, Elizabeth Lapovsky Kennedy, and Linda P. Kerb (NO. 02-102) 134 Lawrence v. Texas, 2003 WL 152351 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan. 16, 2003) Brief of Amici Curiae Republican Unity Coalition and the Honorable Alan K. Simpson in Support of Petitioners (NO. 02-102) 135 Lawrence v. Texas, 2003 WL 152352 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan. 16, 2003) Brief of Petitioners (NO. 02-102) 136 Lawrence v. Texas, 2003 WL 164108 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan. 16, 2003) Brief of the American Bar Association as Amicus Curiae in Support of Petitioners (NO. 02-102) 137 Lawrence v. Texas, 2003 WL 164135 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan. 16, 2003) Brief of the American Public Health Association, National Mental Health Association, American Orthopsychiatric Association, Aids Action, National Alliance of State and Territorial Aids Directors, Asso (NO. 02-102) 138 Lawrence v. Texas, 2003 WL 164140 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan. 16, 2003) Brief of the Institute for Justice as Amicus Curiae in Support of Petitioners (NO. 02-102) 139 Lawrence v. Texas, 2003 WL 164146 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan. 16, 2003) Brief of Now Legal Defense and Education Fund as Amicus Curiae in Support of Petitioners (NO. 02-102) 140 Lawrence v. Texas, 2003 WL 164149 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan. 16, 2003) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Amici Curiae Brief of the Log Cabin Republicans and Liberty Education Forum in Support of the Petitioners (NO. 02-102) 141 Lawrence v. Texas, 2003 WL 164151 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan. 16, 2003) Brief Amici Curiae of Mary Robinson, Amnesty International U.S.A., Human Rights Watch, Interights, the Lawyers Committee for Human Rights, and Minnesota Advocates for Human Rights in Support of Petiti (NO. 02-102) 142 Lawrence v. Texas, 2003 WL 345829 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb. 13, 2003) Brief Amicus Curiae of United Families International in Support of Respondent (NO. 02-102) 143 Lawrence v. Texas, 2003 WL 674354 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb. 14, 2003) Brief Amicus Curiae of the Center for the Original Intent of the Constitution in Support of Respondent (NO. 02-102) 144 Lawrence v. Texas, 2003 WL 470184 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb. 17, 2003) Respondent's Brief (NO. 02-102) 145 Lawrence v. Texas, 2003 WL 367560 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb. 18, 2003) Brief of Amici Curiae Center for Arizona Policy and Pro-Family Network in Support of Respondent (NO. 02-102) 146 Lawrence v. Texas, 2003 WL 367562 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb. 18, 2003) Amicus Brief of the American Center for Law and Justice in Support of Respondent (NO. 02-102) 147 Lawrence v. Texas, 2003 WL 367565 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb. 18, 2003) Motion for Leave to File Amicus Brief and Amicus Brief of the Center for Marriage Law in Support of Respondent (NO. 02-102) 148 Lawrence v. Texas, 2003 WL 367566 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb. 18, 2003) Brief in Support of Respondent on Behalf of Amici Curiae Texas Physicians Resource Council, Christian Medical and Dental Associations and Catholic Medical Association (NO. 02-102) 149 Lawrence v. Texas, 2003 WL 469830 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb. 18, 2003) Motion for Leave to File Brief Amicus Curiae and Brief Amicus Curiae of the Center for Law and Justice International Supporting Respondent (NO. 02-102) 150 Lawrence v. Texas, 2003 WL 469900 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb. 18, 2003) Brief of Amicus Curiae Concerned Women for America, In Support of the State of Texas, Respondent (NO. 02-102) 151 Lawrence v. Texas, 2003 WL 470066 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb. 18, 2003) Brief Amicus Curiae of the Family Research Council, Inc. and Focus on the Family in Support of the Respondent (NO. 02-102) 152 Lawrence v. Texas, 2003 WL 470088 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb. 18, 2003) Brief of Liberty Counsel as Amicus Curiae in Support of Respondent (NO. 02-102) 153 Lawrence v. Texas, 2003 WL 470115 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb. 18, 2003) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Brief of Amici Curiae, Pro Family Law Center, Traditional Values Coalition, Traditional Values Education & Legal Institute & James Hartline, in Support of Respondents (NO. 02-102) 154 Lawrence v. Texas, 2003 WL 470148 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb. 18, 2003) Brief Amicus Curiae of Public Advocate of the United States, Conservative Legal Defense and Education Fund, Lincoln Institute for Research and Education, Help and Caring Ministries, Inc., and Citizens (NO. 02-102) 155 Lawrence v. Texas, 2003 WL 470172 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb. 18, 2003) Brief of the States of Alabama, South Carolina, and Utah as Amici Curiae in Support of Respondent (NO. 02-102) 156 Lawrence v. Texas, 2003 WL 470177 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb. 18, 2003) Brief of Texas Eagle Forum, Daughters of Liberty Republican Women, Houston, Texas and Spirit of Freedom Republican Women's Club as Amici Curiae in Support of Respondent (NO. 02-102) 157 Lawrence v. Texas, 2003 WL 470181 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb. 18, 2003) Brief of Amici Curiae Texas Legislators, Representative Warren Chisum, et al., in Support of Respondent (NO. 02-102) 158 Lawrence v. Texas, 2003 WL 554465 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb. 19, 2003) Brief of Amicus Curiae Agudath Israel of America in Support of Respondent (NO. 02-102) 159 Lawrence v. Texas, 2003 WL 1098835 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar. 10, 2003) Reply Brief (NO. 02-102) U.S. Oral Arguments 160 Lawrence v. Texas, 2003 WL 1702534 (Oral Argument) (U.S. Mar. 26, 2003) Oral Argument (NO. 02-102) Dockets (U.S.A.) U.S. 161 JOHN GEDDES LAWRENCE AND TYRON GARNER v. TEXAS, NO. 02-102 (Docket) (U.S. Jul. 19, 2002) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Date of Printing: Jan 29, 2014 KEYCITE Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472, 156 L.Ed.2d 508, 71 USLW 4574, 03 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5559, 2003 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7036, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 427 (U.S., Jun 26, 2003) (NO. 02-102) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Date of Printing: Jan 29, 2014 KEYCITE Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558, 123 S.Ct. 2472, 156 L.Ed.2d 508, 71 USLW 4574, 03 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5559, 2003 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7036, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 427 (U.S. Jun 26, 2003) (NO. 02-102) Citing References Negative Cases (U.S.A.) Not Followed as Dicta 1 Singson v. Com., 621 S.E.2d 682, 684+, 46 Va.App. 724, 730+ (Va.App. Nov 08, 2005) (NO. 0646-04-1) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) Declined to Extend by 2 Glossip v. Missouri Dept. of Transp. and Highway Patrol Employees' Retirement System, 411 S.W.3d 796, 805+ (Mo. Oct 29, 2013) (NO. SC92583) 3 Watson v. State, 750 S.E.2d 143, 145+, 293 Ga. 817, 819+, 13 FCDR 3243, 3243+ (Ga. Oct 21, 2013) (NO. S13A0784) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4 United States v. Timsuren, 72 M.J. 823, 825+ (A.F.Ct.Crim.App. Oct 02, 2013) (NO. ACM 38146) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5 U.S. v. Whitaker, 72 M.J. 292, 293+ (U.S. Armed Forces Jun 18, 2013) (NO. 13-5004, CRIM.A. 1366) 6 People v. McEvoy, 154 Cal.Rptr.3d 914, 919+, 215 Cal.App.4th 431, 438+, 13 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3645, 3645+, 2013 Daily Journal D.A.R. 4766, 4766+ (Cal.App. 1 Dist. Apr 15, 2013) (NO. A132360) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 7 Keepers, Inc. v. City of Milford, Conn., 944 F.Supp.2d 129, 168+ (D.Conn. Mar 30, 2013) (NO. 3:07CV1231 AWT) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8 Pedersen v. Office of Personnel Management, 881 F.Supp.2d 294, 311+, 115 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1228, 1228+ (D.Conn. Jul 31, 2012) (NO. 3:10-CV-1750 VLB) " HN: 3,5 (S.Ct.) 9 U.S. v. Lebowitz, 676 F.3d 1000, 1012+, 88 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 86, 86+, 23 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 896, 896+ (11th Cir.(Ga.) Apr 05, 2012) (NO. 10-13349) 10 Fleming v. State, 323 S.W.3d 540, 545+ (Tex.App.-Fort Worth Aug 05, 2010) (NO. 2-09-215-CR) " HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.) 11 Brady v. Collins, 2010 WL 1741113, *14+ (N.D.Ohio Apr 29, 2010) (NO. 1:09-CV-09) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 12 U.S. v. Stagliano, 693 F.Supp.2d 25, 37+ (D.D.C. Feb 19, 2010) (NO. CRIM.A 08-93(RJL)) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 13 U.S. v. Gendron, 2009 WL 5909127, *4+ (E.D.Mo. Sep 16, 2009) (NO. S2-4:08CR244RWS(FRB)) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 14 Brady v. Collins, 2009 WL 6407543, *18+ (N.D.Ohio Sep 15, 2009) (NO. 1:09-CV-0009) " HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 15 U.S. v. Handley, 564 F.Supp.2d 996, 1008+ (S.D.Iowa Jul 02, 2008) (NO. 1:07-CR-00030-JEG) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 16 Seegmiller v. LaVerkin City, 528 F.3d 762, 771+, 27 IER Cases 1390, 1390+ (10th Cir.(Utah) Jun 10, 2008) (NO. 07-4096) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 17 Borden v. School Dist. of Tp. of East Brunswick, 523 F.3d 153, 174, 231 Ed. Law Rep. 583, 583, 27 IER Cases 1004, 1004 (3rd Cir.(N.J.) Apr 15, 2008) (NO. 06-3890) 18 People v. Garza, 2008 WL 187982, *6+ (Cal.App. 4 Dist. Jan 23, 2008) (NO. E041547) " 19 U.S. v. Palfrey, 499 F.Supp.2d 34, 38+ (D.D.C. Aug 16, 2007) (NO. CRIM.07-46GK) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 20 Price v. New York City Bd. of Educ., 837 N.Y.S.2d 507, 524, 16 Misc.3d 543, 565, 221 Ed. Law Rep. 303, 303, 2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 27214, 27214 (N.Y.Sup. May 07, 2007) (NO. 109703/06) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 21 Raich v. Gonzales, 500 F.3d 850, 864+, 07 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2698, 2698+ (9th Cir.(Cal.) Mar 14, 2007) (NO. 03-15481) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 22 State v. Romano, 155 P.3d 1102, 1104+, 114 Hawai'i 1, 3+ (Hawai'i Feb 27, 2007) (NO. 26110) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 23 Doe v. Del Rio, 241 F.R.D. 154, 160 (S.D.N.Y. Dec 11, 2006) (NO. 06 CIV. 3761 GEL) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 24 Lewis v. Harris, 908 A.2d 196, 209+, 188 N.J. 415, 439+ (N.J. Oct 25, 2006) (NO. A-68 SEPT.TERM 2005) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 25 U.S. v. Thompson, 458 F.Supp.2d 730, 731+ (N.D.Ind. Oct 17, 2006) (NO. 2:06CR50) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 26 Witt v. U.S. Dept. of Air Force, 444 F.Supp.2d 1138, 1141+ (W.D.Wash. Jul 26, 2006) (NO. C06-5195RBL) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 27 State v. Senters, 699 N.W.2d 810, 813+, 270 Neb. 19, 19+ (Neb. Jun 24, 2005) (NO. S-03-945) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 28 Wilson v. Ake, 354 F.Supp.2d 1298, 1302+, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 175, 175+, 1 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 611, 611+ (M.D.Fla. Jan 19, 2005) (NO. 8:04-CV-1680-T-30TBM) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 29 State v. Jenkins, 2004 WL 3015091, *1+, 2004-Ohio-7131, 7131+ (Ohio App. 1 Dist. Dec 30, 2004) (NO. B-0105517-A, C-040111) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 30 State v. Oakley, 605 S.E.2d 215, 218+, 167 N.C.App. 318, 321+ (N.C.App. Dec 07, 2004) (NO. COA03-1709) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 31 In re Kandu, 315 B.R. 123, 137+, Bankr. L. Rep. P 80,145, 80145+ (Bankr.W.D.Wash. Aug 17, 2004) (NO. 03-51312) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 32 Burton v. York County Sheriff's Dept., 594 S.E.2d 888, 896, 358 S.C. 339, 354, 21 IER Cases 770, 770 (S.C.App. Apr 05, 2004) (NO. 3771) 33 Lofton v. Secretary of Dept. of Children and Family Services, 358 F.3d 804, 809+, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 201, 201+ (11th Cir.(Fla.) Jan 28, 2004) (NO. 01-16723) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) Distinguished by 34 SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. Abbott Laboratories, --- F.3d ----+, 2014 WL 211807, *5+ (9th Cir.(Cal.) Jan 21, 2014) (NO. 11-17357, 11-17373) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 35 Stevens v. Holder, 2013 WL 4430901, *7+ (E.D.Va. Aug 16, 2013) (NO. 1:12-CV-1105 GBL/IDD) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 36 Bassett v. Snyder, --- F.Supp.2d ----+, 2013 WL 3285111, *13+ (E.D.Mich. Jun 28, 2013) (NO. 12-10038) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 37 Musser v. Mapes, 718 F.3d 996, 1001+ (8th Cir.(Iowa) Jun 24, 2013) (NO. 12-2195) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 38 U.S. v. Goings, 72 M.J. 202, 203+ (U.S. Armed Forces May 23, 2013) (NO. 11-0547, CRIM.A. 20080602) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 39 Smith v. Thaler, 526 Fed.Appx. 395, 402+ (5th Cir.(Tex.) May 21, 2013) (Table, text in WESTLAW, NO. 12-10435) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 40 State v. Green, 989 N.E.2d 1088, 1089+, 2013-Ohio-1197, 1197+ (Ohio App. 1 Dist. Mar 29, 2013) (NO. C-120283) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 41 United States v. Gutierrez, 2013 WL 1319443, *4+ (A.F.Ct.Crim.App. Mar 21, 2013) (NO. 37913) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 42 Sevcik v. Sandoval, 911 F.Supp.2d 996, 1006+ (D.Nev. Nov 26, 2012) (NO. 2:12-CV-00578-RCJ) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 43 State v. Edwards, 288 P.3d 494, 498+, 48 Kan.App.2d 264, 268+, 286 Ed. Law Rep. 719, 719+ (Kan.App. Nov 02, 2012) (NO. 106,435) " HN: 3,5 (S.Ct.) 44 State v. Hollenbeck, 53 A.3d 591, 596+, 164 N.H. 154, 160+ (N.H. Sep 05, 2012) (NO. 2011-165) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 45 Jackson v. Abercrombie, 884 F.Supp.2d 1065, 1085+ (D.Hawai'i Aug 08, 2012) (NO. CIV. 11-00734 ACK) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 46 Fleming v. State, 376 S.W.3d 854, 860+ (Tex.App.-Fort Worth Aug 02, 2012) (NO. 02-09-00215-CR) " HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 47 Cochran v. State, 111 So.3d 148, 156+ (Ala.Crim.App. Jun 29, 2012) (NO. CR10-0516) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 48 Musser v. Mapes, 854 F.Supp.2d 652, 666+ (S.D.Iowa Apr 11, 2012) (NO. 4:10-CV-00349-JEG, 4:10-CV-00350-JEG, 4:10-CV-00352-JEG, 4:10-CV-00354-JEG) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 49 U.S. v. Williams, 2011 WL 6826852, *2+ (Army Ct.Crim.App. Dec 21, 2011) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. (NO. ARMY 20090619) 50 Alternative Community Health Care Co-op., Inc. v. Holder, 2011 WL 6216964, *2+ (S.D.Cal. Dec 13, 2011) (NO. 11CV2585-DMS BGS) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 51 U.S. v. Truss, 70 M.J. 545, 545+ (Army Ct.Crim.App. Aug 31, 2011) (NO. ARMY 20080988) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 52 People v. Grant, 123 Cal.Rptr.3d 840, 844+, 195 Cal.App.4th 107, 112+, 11 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5391, 5391+, 2011 Daily Journal D.A.R. 6458, 6458+ (Cal.App. 1 Dist. May 05, 2011) (NO. A128728) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 53 Blackwell v. Helb, 2011 WL 346504, *6 (D.N.J. Jan 31, 2011) (NO. CIV.A. 09-3004 GEB) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 54 Wolfe v. Schaefer, 619 F.3d 782, 784, 38 Media L. Rep. 2217, 2217 (7th Cir.(Ill.) Aug 31, 2010) (NO. 10-1016) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 55 In re Marriage of J.B. and H.B., 326 S.W.3d 654, 673+ (Tex.App.-Dallas Aug 31, 2010) (NO. 05-09-01170-CV) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 56 Collins v. Brewer, 727 F.Supp.2d 797, 804+ (D.Ariz. Jul 23, 2010) (NO. 2:09-CV-02402 JWS) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 57 URI Student Senate v. Town of Narragansett, 707 F.Supp.2d 282, 291+ (D.R.I. Mar 03, 2010) (NO. 08-207 S) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 58 State Trooper Fraternal Ass'n v. State of N.J., 2009 WL 5064770, *12+ (D.N.J. Dec 16, 2009) (NO. CIV.A. 08-3820 (MLC)) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 59 Mauk v. Goodrich, 2009 WL 2914056, *1+ (S.D.Ga. Sep 10, 2009) (NO. CV 109-057) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 60 Interactive Media Entertainment and Gaming Ass'n Inc. v. Attorney General of U.S., 580 F.3d 113, 118+ (3rd Cir.(N.J.) Sep 01, 2009) (NO. 08-1981) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 61 Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd., 897 N.E.2d 992, 999, 452 Mass. 784, 792 (Mass. Dec 12, 2008) (NO. SJC-10199) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 62 State v. Fischer, 199 P.3d 663, 669+, 219 Ariz. 408, 414+, 536 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 3, 3+ (Ariz.App. Div. 1 Aug 05, 2008) (NO. 1 CA-CR 06-0682) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 63 Moore v. Rodgers, 2008 WL 2178060, *1+ (E.D.La. May 20, 2008) (NO. CIV.A. 06-2030) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 64 Varkonyi v. State, 276 S.W.3d 27, 38+ (Tex.App.-El Paso May 08, 2008) (NO. 08-06-00255-CR) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 65 Interactive Media Entertainment & Gaming Ass'n, Inc. v. Gonzales, 2008 WL 5586713, *2+ (D.N.J. Mar 04, 2008) (NO. CIV.A. 07-2625MLC) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 66 People v. Scott, 68 Cal.Rptr.3d 592, 593+, 157 Cal.App.4th 189, 191+, 07 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 13,515, 13515+, 2007 Daily Journal D.A.R. 17,431, 17431+ (Cal.App. 4 Dist. Nov 27, 2007) (NO. E039093) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 67 State v. Bussmann, 741 N.W.2d 79, 85+ (Minn. Nov 01, 2007) (NO. A05-1782) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 68 Ostini v. City of Burlingame, 2007 WL 1456043, *3+ (N.D.Cal. May 17, 2007) (NO. C 07 01011 WHA) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 69 In re R.L.C., 643 S.E.2d 920, 921+, 361 N.C. 287, 287+ (N.C. May 04, 2007) (NO. 531A06) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 70 Crooks v. Kline, 2007 WL 983169, *6+ (D.Kan. Mar 27, 2007) (NO. 06-3313-RDR) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 71 People v. McPhee, 2007 WL 912116, *1+ (Mich.App. Mar 27, 2007) (NO. 258285) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 72 State v. Lowe, 861 N.E.2d 512, 516+, 112 Ohio St.3d 507, 510+, 2007-Ohio-606, 606+ (Ohio Feb 28, 2007) (NO. 2005-1843) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 73 State v. McKenzie-Adams, 915 A.2d 822, 834+, 281 Conn. 486, 502+ (Conn. Feb 27, 2007) (NO. 17451) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 74 Williams v. Morgan, 478 F.3d 1316, 1318+, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 333, 333+ (11th Cir.(Ala.) Feb 14, 2007) (NO. 06-11892) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 75 People v. Scott, 54 Cal.Rptr.3d 674, 675+, 147 Cal.App.4th 831, 831+, 07 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1685, 1685+ (Cal.App. 4 Dist. Feb 14, 2007) (NO. E039093) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 76 U.S. v. Roberts, 2007 WL 210402, *3+ (E.D.Pa. Jan 24, 2007) (NO. CRIM.A.04-00037-1, CRIM.A.04-00037-2) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 77 Fleck and Associates, Inc. v. Phoenix, City of, an Arizona Mun. Corp., 471 F.3d 1100, 1104+, 06 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 11,716, 11716+, 2006 Daily Journal D.A.R. 16,747, 16747+ (9th Cir.(Ariz.) Dec 22, 2006) (NO. 05-15293) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 78 Berkovsky v. State, 209 S.W.3d 252, 253, 215 Ed. Law Rep. 1185, 1185 (Tex.App.-Waco Oct 18, 2006) (NO. 10-06-00204-CR) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 79 Pueblo v. Gonzalez Diaz, 2006 WL 3337605, *3+ (TCA Oct 11, 2006) (NO. KHO1999G0010Y0011, KLAN200400721) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 80 In re Marriage Cases, 49 Cal.Rptr.3d 675, 703+, 143 Cal.App.4th 873, 873+, 06 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9451, 9451+, 2006 Daily Journal D.A.R. 13,485, 13485+ (Cal.App. 1 Dist. Oct 05, 2006) (NO. A110449, A110450, A110451, A110463, A110651, A110652) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 81 Talbert v. State, 239 S.W.3d 504, 511+, 367 Ark. 262, 269+ (Ark. Sep 21, 2006) (NO. CR05-1279) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 82 State v. Musser, 721 N.W.2d 734, 747+ (Iowa Aug 04, 2006) (NO. 04-0809) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 83 Stadium Book & Video, Inc. v. Miami-Dade County, 2006 WL 2374740, *33+ (S.D.Fla. Jul 31, 2006) (NO. 04-20537-CIV JORDAN, 04-20553-CIV JORDAN, 04-21156 CIV JORDAN) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 84 Andersen v. King County, 138 P.3d 963, 975+, 158 Wash.2d 1, 23+ (Wash. Jul © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 26, 2006) (NO. 75934-1, 75956-1) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 85 State v. Mogler, 719 N.W.2d 201, 208+ (Minn.App. Jul 25, 2006) (NO. A05-1037) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 86 Citizens for Equal Protection v. Bruning, 455 F.3d 859, 868+ (8th Cir.(Neb.) Jul 14, 2006) (NO. 05-2604) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 87 Hernandez v. Robles, 821 N.Y.S.2d 770, 778+, 855 N.E.2d 1, 9+, 7 N.Y.3d 338, 362+, 2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 05239, 05239+ (N.Y. Jul 06, 2006) (NO. 1, 3, 86, 87, 88, 89) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 88 Hubbard v. State, 849 N.E.2d 1165, 1169+ (Ind.App. Jun 29, 2006) (NO. 20A03-0509-CR-409) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 89 U.S. v. Cotti, Jr., 2006 WL 6624674, *2+ (Army Ct.Crim.App. Jun 16, 2006) (NO. ARMY20021210) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 90 State v. Holm, 137 P.3d 726, 731+, 552 Utah Adv. Rep. 3, 3+, 2006 UT 31, 31+, 22 A.L.R.6th 665, 665+ (Utah May 16, 2006) (NO. 20030847) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 91 Williams v. King, 420 F.Supp.2d 1224, 1230+ (N.D.Ala. Mar 15, 2006) (NO. CV 98-2-1938-NE) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 92 State v. Freitag, 130 P.3d 544, 545+, 212 Ariz. 269, 270+, 473 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 5, 5+ (Ariz.App. Div. 1 Mar 14, 2006) (NO. 1 CA-CR 04-0770) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 93 State v. Russell, 890 A.2d 453, 463 (R.I. Jan 30, 2006) (NO. 2003-353-C.A.) 94 U.S. v. Extreme Associates, Inc., 431 F.3d 150, 154+ (3rd Cir.(Pa.) Dec 08, 2005) (NO. 05-1555) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 95 U.S. v. Sherr, 400 F.Supp.2d 843, 850+ (D.Md. Nov 16, 2005) (NO. CRIM. CCB-03-0477) 96 Tjan v. Com., 621 S.E.2d 669, 671+, 46 Va.App. 698, 703+ (Va.App. Nov 08, 2005) (NO. 3221-03-1) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 97 People v. Sintay, 2005 WL 2789322, *3+ (Cal.App. 2 Dist. Oct 27, 2005) (NO. B177202) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 98 U.S. v. Weiner, 152 Fed.Appx. 38, 42+ (2nd Cir.(N.Y.) Oct 14, 2005) (Table, text in WESTLAW, NO. 05-1512-CR) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 99 People v. Jones, 2005 WL 2160425, *4+ (Cal.App. 3 Dist. Sep 07, 2005) (NO. C045990) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 100 U.S. v. Whorley, 386 F.Supp.2d 693, 695+ (E.D.Va. Aug 18, 2005) (NO. CRIM.A. 3:05CR114-HE) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 101 State v. Lowe, 2005 WL 1983964, *2, 2005-Ohio-4274, 4274 (Ohio App. 5 Dist. Aug 15, 2005) (NO. 2004CA00292) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 102 Lewis v. Harris, 875 A.2d 259, 273+, 378 N.J.Super. 168, 191+ (N.J.Super.A.D. Jun 14, 2005) (NO. A-2244-03T5) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 103 People v. McDermitt, 2005 WL 995520, *1+ (Cal.App. 3 Dist. Apr 29, 2005) (NO. C047482) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 104 U.S. v. Bach, 400 F.3d 622, 627+ (8th Cir.(Minn.) Mar 14, 2005) (NO. 04-1211) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 105 Burt v. Rumsfeld, 354 F.Supp.2d 156, 189+, 195 Ed. Law Rep. 781, 781+ (D.Conn. Jan 31, 2005) (NO. CIV.A.3-03-CV-1777(J) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 106 State v. Thomas, 891 So.2d 1233, 1234+, 2004-0559 (La. 1/19/05), 1+ (La. Jan 19, 2005) (NO. 2004-KA-0559) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 107 Howard v. Child Welfare Agency Review Bd., 2004 WL 3154530, *12+ (Ark.Cir. Dec 29, 2004) (NO. CV 1999-9881) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 108 Vanderveer v. Vanderveer, 2004 WL 2157930, *4+ (Va.App. Sep 28, 2004) (NO. 0122-04-2) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 109 People v. Williams, 811 N.E.2d 1197, 1199+, 347 Ill.App.3d 1123, 275+, 349 Ill.App.3d 273, 273+, 285 Ill.Dec. 318, 320+ (Ill.App. 3 Dist. May 26, 2004) (NO. 3-02-0456) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 110 U.S. v. Abdul-Rahman, 59 M.J. 924, 925+ (C.G.Ct.Crim.App. May 14, 2004) (NO. 1192, CGCMG 0187) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 111 Cawood v. Haggard, 327 F.Supp.2d 863, 877+ (E.D.Tenn. Feb 11, 2004) (NO. 3:00-CV-272) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 112 State v. Limon, 83 P.3d 229, 232+, 32 Kan.App.2d 369, 369+ (Kan.App. Jan 30, 2004) (NO. 85898) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 113 State v. Freeman, 801 N.E.2d 906, 908+, 155 Ohio App.3d 492, 496+, 2003-Ohio-6730, 6730+ (Ohio App. 7 Dist. Dec 12, 2003) (NO. 02-JE-42) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 114 U.S. v. Peterson, 294 F.Supp.2d 797, 801+ (D.S.C. Nov 25, 2003) (NO. CR. 203-0118) " HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 115 State v. Clark, 588 S.E.2d 66, 68+, 161 N.C.App. 316, 321+ (N.C.App. Nov 18, 2003) (NO. COA02-1658) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) Limitation of Holding Recognized by 116 Bronson v. Swensen, 394 F.Supp.2d 1329, 1333+ (D.Utah Feb 16, 2005) (NO. 2:04-CV-21-TS) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) Positive Cases (U.S.A.) Examined 117 U.S. v. Windsor, 133 S.Ct. 2675, 2692+, 186 L.Ed.2d 808, 808+, 81 USLW 4633, 4633+, 118 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1417, 1417+, 111 A.F.T.R.2d 2013-2385, 2013-2385+, 2013-2 USTC P 50,400, 50400+, 47 NDLR P 120, 120+, 13 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6655, 6655+, 2013 Daily Journal D.A.R. 8343, 8343+, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 445, 445+ (U.S. Jun 26, 2013) (NO. 12-307) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 118 McDonald v. City of Chicago, Ill., 130 S.Ct. 3020, 3051+, 177 L.Ed.2d 894, 894+, 78 USLW 4844, 4844+, 10 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8030, 8030+, 2010 Daily © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Journal D.A.R. 9899, 9899+, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 619, 619+ (U.S. Jun 28, 2010) (NO. 08-1521) " HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 119 Massachusetts v. U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, 682 F.3d 1, 8+, 115 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 65, 65+, 109 A.F.T.R.2d 2012-2374, 2012-2374+, 2012-1 USTC P 50,412, 50412+ (1st Cir.(Mass.) May 31, 2012) (NO. 10-2204, 10-2207, 10-2214) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 120 Cook v. Gates, 528 F.3d 42, 45+, 103 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 826, 826+, 40 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 679, 679+ (1st Cir.(Mass.) Jun 09, 2008) (NO. 06-2313, 06-2381) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 121 Windsor v. U.S., 699 F.3d 169, 179+, 110 A.F.T.R.2d 2012-6370, 2012-6370+, 2012-2 USTC P 60,654, 60654+ (2nd Cir.(N.Y.) Oct 18, 2012) (NO. 12-2335-CV L, 12-2435) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 122 MacDonald v. Moose, 710 F.3d 154, 156+ (4th Cir.(Va.) Mar 12, 2013) (NO. 11-7427) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 123 Reliable Consultants, Inc. v. Earle, 538 F.3d 355, 356+ (5th Cir.(Tex.) Aug 01, 2008) (NO. 06-51067) " (in dissent) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 124 Reliable Consultants, Inc. v. Earle, 517 F.3d 738, 743+ (5th Cir.(Tex.) Feb 12, 2008) (NO. 06-51067) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 125 Lowe v. Swanson, 663 F.3d 258, 259+ (6th Cir.(Ohio) Dec 08, 2011) (NO. 09-3942) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 126 Muth v. Frank, 412 F.3d 808, 812+ (7th Cir.(Wis.) Jun 22, 2005) (NO. 03-3984) " HN: 1,4,5 (S.Ct.) 127 Perry v. Brown, 671 F.3d 1052, 1093+, 12 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1550, 1550+, 2012 Daily Journal D.A.R. 1705, 1705+ (9th Cir.(Cal.) Feb 07, 2012) (NO. 10-16696, 11-16577) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 128 Log Cabin Republicans v. U.S., 658 F.3d 1162, 1169+, 11 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 12,451, 12451+, 2011 Daily Journal D.A.R. 14,795, 14795+ (9th Cir.(Cal.) Sep 29, 2011) (NO. 10-56634, 10-56813) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 129 In re Golinski, 587 F.3d 901, 903+, 108 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 339, 339+ (9th Cir. Jan 13, 2009) (NO. 09-80173) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 130 Witt v. Department of Air Force, 548 F.3d 1264, 1265+, 08 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 14,734, 14734+, 2008 Daily Journal D.A.R. 17,756, 17756+ (9th Cir. Dec 04, 2008) (NO. 06-35644) " (in dissent) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 131 Witt v. Department of Air Force, 527 F.3d 806, 811+, 103 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 585, 585+, 08 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6117, 6117+, 2008 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7423, 7423+ (9th Cir.(Wash.) May 21, 2008) (NO. 06-35644) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 132 Anderson v. Morrow, 371 F.3d 1027, 1032+, 04 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4866, 4866+, 2004 Daily Journal D.A.R. 6713, 6713+ (9th Cir.(Or.) Jun 07, 2004) (NO. 02-35675) " HN: 1,4,5 (S.Ct.) 133 Williams v. Attorney General of Ala., 378 F.3d 1232, 1235+, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 837, 837+ (11th Cir.(Ala.) Jul 28, 2004) (NO. 02-16135) " HN: 1,3,5 © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. (S.Ct.) 134 Lofton v. Secretary of Dept. of Children and Family Services, 377 F.3d 1275, 1276+, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 788, 788+ (11th Cir.(Fla.) Jul 21, 2004) (NO. 01-16723) " HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 135 Doe v. Pryor, 344 F.3d 1282, 1283+, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 1083, 1083+ (11th Cir.(Ala.) Sep 11, 2003) (NO. 02-14899) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 136 Dragovich v. U.S. Dept. of Treasury, 872 F.Supp.2d 944, 953+, 115 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 466, 466+, 109 A.F.T.R.2d 2012-2286, 2012-2286+, 2012-1 USTC P 50,369, 50369+ (N.D.Cal. May 24, 2012) (NO. C 10-01564 CW) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 137 Golinski v. U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 824 F.Supp.2d 968, 984+, 114 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 819, 819+ (N.D.Cal. Feb 22, 2012) (NO. C 10-00257 JSW) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 138 Marin Alliance For Medical Marijuana v. Holder, 866 F.Supp.2d 1142, 1150+ (N.D.Cal. Nov 28, 2011) (NO. C 11-05349 SBA) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 139 Lemons v. Hedgpeth, 2011 WL 7293432, *5+ (S.D.Cal. Aug 31, 2011) (NO. 10CV0807-AJB CAB) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 140 Sintay v. Martel, 769 F.Supp.2d 1197, 1204+ (C.D.Cal. Oct 26, 2010) (NO. CV 08-7876-JVS RC) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 141 Log Cabin Republicans v. U.S., 716 F.Supp.2d 884, 895+, 110 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 801, 801+ (C.D.Cal. Oct 12, 2010) (NO. CV 04-08425-VAP EX) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) ... Sintay v. Martel (C.D.Cal. Sep 28, 2010) (NO. CV 08-7876-JVS RC) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) (Text not available on WESTLAW) 143 Perry v. Schwarzenegger, 704 F.Supp.2d 921, 931+ (N.D.Cal. Aug 04, 2010) (NO. C 09-2292 VRW) " HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 144 Wilson v. Ake, 2004 WL 3142528, *1+ (M.D.Fla. Jul 20, 2004) (NO. 8:04-CV-1680-T-30TBM) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 145 Green v. Georgia, 2013 WL 6512056, *1+ (N.D.Ga. Dec 09, 2013) (NO. 1:11-CV-4544-AT) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 146 Mauk v. Goodrich, 2009 WL 2905566, *1+ (S.D.Ga. Jun 24, 2009) (NO. CV 109-057) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 147 U.S. v. Jenkins, 2007 WL 1087337, *2+ (N.D.Ga. Apr 05, 2007) (NO. 1:06CR430 WSD) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 148 Cook v. Rumsfeld, 429 F.Supp.2d 385, 392+ (D.Mass. Apr 24, 2006) (NO. CIV.A. 04-12546-GAO) " HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 149 Gravenhorst v. U.S., 2008 WL 5216614, *7+ (D.Me. Aug 28, 2008) (NO. CIV. 07-126-P-H, CRIM. 02-79-P-H) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 150 Perry v. Scutt, 2012 WL 1890894, *3+ (E.D.Mich. May 23, 2012) (NO. 5:11-CV-13960) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 151 Kuch v. Rapelje, 2010 WL 3419823, *1+ (E.D.Mich. Jun 30, 2010) (NO. © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 2:09-CV-12872) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 152 Garrison v. Trombley, 2009 WL 311102, *1+ (E.D.Mich. Feb 09, 2009) (NO. 05-74453) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 153 832 Corp. v. Gloucester Tp., 404 F.Supp.2d 614, 621+ (D.N.J. Dec 12, 2005) (NO. CIV. 04-1140 (JEI)) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 154 Obergefell v. Wymyslo, 2013 WL 6726688, *6+ (S.D.Ohio Dec 23, 2013) (NO. 1:13-CV-501) " HN: 2,5 (S.Ct.) 155 Lowe v. Swanson, 639 F.Supp.2d 857, 859+ (N.D.Ohio Jul 07, 2009) (NO. 5:08 CV 686) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 156 Bishop v. U.S. ex rel. Holder, 2014 WL 116013, *16+ (N.D.Okla. Jan 14, 2014) (NO. 04-CV-848-TCK-TLW) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 157 U.S. v. Extreme Associates, Inc., 352 F.Supp.2d 578, 585+ (W.D.Pa. Jan 20, 2005) (NO. CRIM.03-0203) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 158 Kitchen v. Herbert, 2013 WL 6697874, *5+ (D.Utah Dec 20, 2013) (NO. 2:13-CV-217) " HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 159 Brown v. Buhman, 947 F.Supp.2d 1170, 1185+ (D.Utah Dec 13, 2013) (NO. 2:11-CV-0652-CW) " HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 160 U.S. v. Harb, 2009 WL 499467, *1+ (D.Utah Feb 27, 2009) (NO. 2:07-CR-426TS) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 161 (N G) v. U.S., 94 Fed.Cl. 375, 388+ (Fed.Cl. Aug 20, 2010) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 162 Loomis v. U.S., 68 Fed.Cl. 503, 513+ (Fed.Cl. Nov 07, 2005) (NO. 03-1653C) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 163 United States v. Brown, 2013 WL 5842240, *1+ (N.M.Ct.Crim.App. Oct 31, 2013) (NO. NMCCA 201300020) 164 U.S. v. Castellano, 72 M.J. 217, 218+ (U.S. Armed Forces May 23, 2013) (NO. 12-0684, CRIM.A. 201100248) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 165 U.S. v. Anderson, 2012 WL 1077463, *3+ (A.F.Ct.Crim.App. Mar 02, 2012) (NO. ACM 37606) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 166 U.S. v. Useche, 70 M.J. 657, 660+ (N.M.Ct.Crim.App. Feb 29, 2012) (NO. NMCCA 201100001) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 167 U.S. v. Stratton, 2012 WL 244062, *1+ (N.M.Ct.Crim.App. Jan 26, 2012) (NO. NMCCA 201000637) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 168 U.S. v. Harvey, 67 M.J. 758, 759+ (A.F.Ct.Crim.App. Apr 09, 2009) (NO. ACM36641) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 169 U.S. v. Smith, 66 M.J. 556, 561+ (C.G.Ct.Crim.App. Apr 09, 2008) (NO. 1275, CGCMG 0224) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 170 U.S. v. Habian, 2007 WL 2736097, *3+ (N.M.Ct.Crim.App. Sep 18, 2007) (NO. NMCCA 200600753) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 171 U.S. v. Mitchell, 2007 WL 2340645, *1+ (N.M.Ct.Crim.App. Aug 07, 2007) (NO. NMCCA 200602365) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 172 U.S. v. Banker, 63 M.J. 657, 659+ (A.F.Ct.Crim.App. Jun 29, 2006) (NO. ACM34531FREV) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 173 U.S. v. Diebel, 2006 WL 1513017, *1+ (A.F.Ct.Crim.App. May 31, 2006) (NO. ACM35824) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 174 U.S. v. McClelland, 2006 WL 228927, *2+ (N.M.Ct.Crim.App. Jan 24, 2006) (NO. NMCCA 200101300) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 175 U.S. v. Humphreys, 2005 WL 3591140, *2+ (N.M.Ct.Crim.App. Dec 29, 2005) (NO. NMCCA200300750) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 176 U.S. v. Orellana, 62 M.J. 595, 596+ (N.M.Ct.Crim.App. Nov 29, 2005) (NO. NMCCA 200201634) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 177 U.S. v. Meno, 2005 WL 6520748, *1+ (Army Ct.Crim.App. Jun 22, 2005) (NO. ARMY20000733) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 178 U.S. v. Bart, 61 M.J. 578, 579+ (N.M.Ct.Crim.App. May 26, 2005) (NO. NMCCA200101108) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 179 U.S. v. Christian, 61 M.J. 560, 562+ (N.M.Ct.Crim.App. May 16, 2005) (NO. NMCCA 200100734) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 180 U.S. v. Bullock, 2006 WL 3490409, *2+ (Army Ct.Crim.App. Nov 30, 2004) (NO. 20030534) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 181 U.S. v. Stirewalt, 60 M.J. 297, 297+ (U.S. Armed Forces Sep 29, 2004) (NO. 03-0433, CR.A. 1098) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 182 U.S. v. Marcum, 60 M.J. 198, 200+ (U.S. Armed Forces Aug 23, 2004) (NO. 02-0944, CR.A. 34216) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 183 1568 Montgomery Highway, Inc. v. City of Hoover, 45 So.3d 319, 329+ (Ala. Mar 05, 2010) (NO. 1070531) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 184 Standhardt v. Superior Court ex rel. County of Maricopa, 77 P.3d 451, 453+, 206 Ariz. 276, 278+, 410 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 25, 25+ (Ariz.App. Div. 1 Oct 08, 2003) (NO. 1 CA-SA 03-0150) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 185 In re Marriage Cases, 76 Cal.Rptr.3d 683, 726+, 183 P.3d 384, 421+, 43 Cal.4th 757, 811+, 08 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5820, 5820+, 2008 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7079, 7079+ (Cal. May 15, 2008) (NO. S147999) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 186 Lockyer v. City and County of San Francisco, 17 Cal.Rptr.3d 225, 260+, 95 P.3d 459, 488+, 33 Cal.4th 1055, 1104+, 04 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7342, 7342+, 2004 Daily Journal D.A.R. 9916, 9916+ (Cal. Aug 12, 2004) (NO. S122865, S122923) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 187 People v. Lemons, 2008 WL 4335684, *3+ (Cal.App. 4 Dist. Sep 24, 2008) (NO. D050763) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 188 Kerrigan v. Commissioner of Public Health, 957 A.2d 407, 431+, 289 Conn. 135, 173+ (Conn. Oct 28, 2008) (NO. 17716) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 189 State v. John M., 894 A.2d 376, 387+, 94 Conn.App. 667, 680+ (Conn.App. Apr 11, 2006) (NO. 25313) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 190 In re W.M., 851 A.2d 431, 448+ (D.C. Jun 03, 2004) (NO. 01-SP-683, © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 01-SP-684, 01-SP-725, 01-SP-726, 01-SP-739, 01-SP-744, 01-SP-748, 01-SP-824, 01-SP-848) " HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 191 People v. Downin, 828 N.E.2d 341, 347+, 357 Ill.App.3d 193, 199+, 293 Ill.Dec. 371, 377+ (Ill.App. 3 Dist. Apr 29, 2005) (NO. 3-03-0671) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 192 State v. Limon, 122 P.3d 22, 24+, 280 Kan. 275, 276+ (Kan. Oct 21, 2005) (NO. 85,898) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 193 Crooks v. State, 125 P.3d 1090, 1090+ (Kan.App. Jan 13, 2006) (Table, text in WESTLAW, NO. 93,759) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 194 Com. v. Carey, 974 N.E.2d 624, 627+, 463 Mass. 378, 379+ (Mass. Sep 07, 2012) (NO. SJC-11050) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 195 Goodridge v. Department of Public Health, 798 N.E.2d 941, 948+, 440 Mass. 309, 312+ (Mass. Nov 18, 2003) (NO. SJC-08860) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 196 Conaway v. Deane, 932 A.2d 571, 605+, 401 Md. 219, 277+ (Md. Sep 18, 2007) (NO. 44 SEPT.TERM 2006) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 197 Johnston v. Missouri Dept. of Social Services, 2006 WL 6903173, *4+ (Mo.Cir. Feb 17, 2006) (NO. 0516-CV09517) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 198 In re R.L.C., 635 S.E.2d 1, 3+, 179 N.C.App. 311, 314+ (N.C.App. Sep 05, 2006) (NO. COA05-1120) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 199 State v. Browning, 629 S.E.2d 299, 302+, 177 N.C.App. 487, 491+ (N.C.App. May 16, 2006) (NO. COA05-831) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 200 State v. Whiteley, 616 S.E.2d 576, 578+, 172 N.C.App. 772, 775+ (N.C.App. Aug 16, 2005) (NO. COA04-636) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 201 State v. Pope, 608 S.E.2d 114, 115+, 168 N.C.App. 592, 593+ (N.C.App. Feb 15, 2005) (NO. COA04-251) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 202 State v. Moore, 606 S.E.2d 127, 131+, 167 N.C.App. 495, 501+ (N.C.App. Dec 21, 2004) (NO. COA03-1421) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 203 In re M.D., 757 N.W.2d 559, 563+, 2008 ND 208, 208+ (N.D. Nov 19, 2008) (NO. 20080082) " (in dissent) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 204 State v. Van, 688 N.W.2d 600, 613+, 268 Neb. 814, 824+ (Neb. Nov 12, 2004) (NO. S-03-1106) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 205 Garden State Equality v. Dow, 2012 WL 540608, *6+ (N.J.Super.L. Feb 21, 2012) (NO. CIV.A. MER-L-1729-11) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 206 Hernandez v. Robles, 805 N.Y.S.2d 354, 358+, 26 A.D.3d 98, 101+, 2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 09436, 09436+ (N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept. Dec 08, 2005) (NO. 103434/04, 6598, 6599) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 207 Hernandez v. Robles, 794 N.Y.S.2d 579, 594+, 7 Misc.3d 459, 477+, 2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 25057, 25057+ (N.Y.Sup. Feb 04, 2005) (NO. 103434/2004) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 208 Beard v. State, 2005 WL 1334378, *1+ (Tenn.Crim.App. Jun 07, 2005) (NO. M200402227CCAR3PC) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 209 Jackson v. State, 2011 WL 2320819, *1+ (Tex.App.-Dallas Jun 14, 2011) (NO. © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 05-10-00561-CR) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 210 Ex parte Dave, 220 S.W.3d 154, 158+ (Tex.App.-Fort Worth Feb 22, 2007) (NO. 2-06-092-CR) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 211 Ex parte Morales, 212 S.W.3d 483, 487+, 216 Ed. Law Rep. 711, 711+ (Tex.App.-Austin Jul 21, 2006) (NO. 03-05-00489-CR) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 212 McDonald v. Com., 645 S.E.2d 918, 921+, 274 Va. 249, 254+ (Va. Jun 08, 2007) (NO. 061456) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 213 Martin v. Ziherl, 607 S.E.2d 367, 368+, 269 Va. 35, 38+ (Va. Jan 14, 2005) (NO. 040804) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 214 McDonald v. Com., 630 S.E.2d 754, 756+, 48 Va.App. 325, 329+ (Va.App. Jun 13, 2006) (NO. 1180-05-2) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 215 State v. Clinkenbeard, 123 P.3d 872, 876+, 130 Wash.App. 552, 559+, 203 Ed. Law Rep. 850, 850+ (Wash.App. Div. 3 Nov 29, 2005) (NO. 23189-5-III) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 216 A.A.R., Ex parte, 187 D.P.R. 835+, 2013TSPR16, 16+ (P.R. Feb 20, 2013) (NO. CC-2008-1010) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 217 Puerto Rico v. Briones Duran, 2004 WL 2268534, *1+ (TCA Jan 27, 2004) (NO. KLCE200301019, VP03-3998) Discussed 218 U.S. v. Gravenhorst, 190 Fed.Appx. 1, 4+ (1st Cir.(Me.) Jul 03, 2006) (Table, text in WESTLAW, NO. 03-2057) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 219 U.S. v. Clark, 582 F.3d 607, 613+ (5th Cir.(Tex.) Sep 10, 2009) (NO. 08-10461, 08-10467) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 220 U.S. v. Coil, 442 F.3d 912, 913+ (5th Cir.(Tex.) Mar 14, 2006) (NO. 04-51110) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 221 U.S. v. Ragsdale, 426 F.3d 765, 785+ (5th Cir.(Tex.) Sep 27, 2005) (NO. 04-10291) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 222 Beecham v. Henderson County, Tennessee, 422 F.3d 372, 376+, 151 Lab.Cas. P 60,050, 60050+, 23 IER Cases 648, 648+, 2005 Fed.App. 0385P, 0385P+ (6th Cir.(Tenn.) Sep 09, 2005) (NO. 04-5845) 223 Flaskamp v. Dearborn Public Schools, 385 F.3d 935, 941+, 150 Lab.Cas. P 59,901, 59901+, 192 Ed. Law Rep. 359, 359+, 21 IER Cases 1713, 1713+, 2004 Fed.App. 0343P, 0343P+ (6th Cir.(Mich.) Oct 05, 2004) (NO. 02-2435) " HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 224 Leveski v. ITT Educational Services, Inc., 719 F.3d 818, 837+, 295 Ed. Law Rep. 1, 1+ (7th Cir.(Ind.) Jul 08, 2013) (NO. 12-1369, 12-1967, 12-1979, 12-2008, 12-2891) 225 Gallagher v. City of Clayton, 699 F.3d 1013, 1018+ (8th Cir.(Mo.) Nov 08, 2012) (NO. 11-3880) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 226 Sylvester v. Fogley, 465 F.3d 851, 857+, 153 Lab.Cas. P 60,302, 60302+, 25 IER © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Cases 225, 225+ (8th Cir.(Ark.) Oct 18, 2006) (NO. 05-3492) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 227 Cook v. Reinke, 484 Fed.Appx. 110, 111+ (9th Cir.(Idaho) May 30, 2012) (Table, text in WESTLAW, NO. 11-35465) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 228 Karouni v. Gonzales, 399 F.3d 1163, 1173+, 05 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1982, 1982+ (9th Cir. Mar 07, 2005) (NO. 02-72651) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 229 Hensala v. Department of Air Force, 343 F.3d 951, 955+, 93 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1177, 1177+, 03 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8317, 8317+, 2003 Daily Journal D.A.R. 10,444, 10444+ (9th Cir.(Cal.) Sep 12, 2003) (NO. 01-16791) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 230 Aid for Women v. Foulston, 441 F.3d 1101, 1123+ (10th Cir. Jan 27, 2006) (NO. 04-3310) " HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 231 U.S. v. Little, 365 Fed.Appx. 159, 162+, 38 Media L. Rep. 1289, 1289+ (11th Cir.(Fla.) Feb 02, 2010) (Table, text in WESTLAW, NO. 08-15964) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 232 Abigail Alliance For Better Access to Developmental Drugs and Washington Legal Foundation v. von Eschenbach, 445 F.3d 470, 477+, 370 U.S.App.D.C. 391, 398+ (D.C.Cir. May 02, 2006) (NO. 04-5350) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 233 Fleck and Associates, Inc. v. City of Phoenix, 356 F.Supp.2d 1034, 1039+ (D.Ariz. Feb 11, 2005) (NO. CV 04-1118-PHX-DGC) " HN: 3,5 (S.Ct.) 234 Marin Alliance for Medical Marijuana v. Holder, 2012 WL 2862608, *4+ (N.D.Cal. Jul 11, 2012) (NO. C 11-05349 SBA) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 235 Dragovich v. U.S. Dept. of the Treasury, 848 F.Supp.2d 1091, 1099+, 109 A.F.T.R.2d 2012-689, 2012-689+ (N.D.Cal. Jan 26, 2012) (NO. C 10-01564 CW) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 236 Estate of Angel Antonio Mendoza-Saravia ex rel. successors of interest v. Fresno County Sheriff's Department, 2011 WL 720061, *1+ (E.D.Cal. Feb 22, 2011) (NO. 1:10-CV-0618 OWW SMS) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 237 Dragovich v. U.S. Department of the Treasury, 764 F.Supp.2d 1178, 1190+, 111 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 726, 726+, 107 A.F.T.R.2d 2011-538, 2011-538+, 2011-1 USTC P 50,166, 50166+ (N.D.Cal. Jan 18, 2011) (NO. 10-01564 CW) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 238 Smelt v. County of Orange, 374 F.Supp.2d 861, 873+ (C.D.Cal. Jun 16, 2005) (NO. SACV04-1042-GLT(MLGX) " HN: 2,5 (S.Ct.) 239 Starling v. Board of County Com'rs, 2009 WL 281051, *7+ (S.D.Fla. Feb 02, 2009) (NO. 08-80008-CIV-HURLEY) " HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 240 Cook v. Reinke, 2011 WL 1843001, *1+ (D.Idaho May 16, 2011) (NO. 3:09-00358-MHW) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 241 Gill v. Office of Personnel Management, 699 F.Supp.2d 374, 389+, 109 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1333, 1333+, 106 A.F.T.R.2d 2010-5184, 2010-5184+, 2010-2 USTC P 50,509, 50509+, 49 Employee Benefits Cas. 2751, 2751+ (D.Mass. Jul 08, 2010) (NO. CIV. A. 09-10309-JLT) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 242 U.S. v. Timms, 799 F.Supp.2d 582, 589+ (E.D.N.C. Jul 01, 2011) (NO. 5:08-HC-02156-BO) 243 Timms v. Johns, 700 F.Supp.2d 764, 772+ (E.D.N.C. Mar 31, 2010) (NO. 5:08-HC-2160-BO) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 244 Citizens for Equal Protection, Inc. v. Bruning, 368 F.Supp.2d 980, 993+ (D.Neb. May 12, 2005) (NO. 4:03CV3155) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 245 State Trooper Fraternal Ass'n v. New Jersey, 2008 WL 4378343, *5+ (D.N.J. Sep 23, 2008) (NO. CIV.A. 08-3820 (MLC)) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 246 Stern v. Cosby, 645 F.Supp.2d 258, 274+, 37 Media L. Rep. 2288, 2288+, 54 A.L.R.6th 725+ (S.D.N.Y. Aug 12, 2009) (NO. 07 CIV. 8536 (DC)) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 247 McKithen v. Brown, 565 F.Supp.2d 440, 488+ (E.D.N.Y. Jul 21, 2008) (NO. 02-CV-1670 JG LB) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 248 Westhab, Inc. v. City of New Rochelle, 2004 WL 1171400, *8+ (S.D.N.Y. May 03, 2004) (NO. 03 CIV. 8377(CM)) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 249 In re Extradition of Waters, 2003 WL 23185666, *4+ (E.D.N.Y. Nov 24, 2003) (NO. 03M1072(CLP)) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 250 Price v. Warrensville Heights City Schools, 2012 WL 7829135, *8+ (N.D.Ohio May 03, 2012) (NO. 1:09 CV 1052) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 251 U.S. v. Shreck, 2006 WL 2945368, *1+ (N.D.Okla. Oct 13, 2006) (NO. 03CR0043-CVE) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 252 Fischer v. City of Portland, 2003 WL 23537982, *1+ (D.Or. Nov 18, 2003) (NO. CV 02-1728) " HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 253 Wyatt v. Kilgore Independent School Dist., 2011 WL 6016467, *5+ (E.D.Tex. Nov 30, 2011) (NO. 6:10-CV-674) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 254 Griffith v. Dretke, 2005 WL 2372044, *6+ (S.D.Tex. Sep 27, 2005) (NO. CIV.A. H-04-4109) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 255 Caudillo ex rel. Caudillo v. Lubbock Independent School Dist., 311 F.Supp.2d 550, 566+, 187 Ed. Law Rep. 564, 564+ (N.D.Tex. Mar 03, 2004) (NO. CIV.A.5:03-CV-165-C) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 256 Saunders v. Clarke, 2012 WL 1580427, *1+ (E.D.Va. May 04, 2012) (NO. 3:11CV170) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 257 MacDonald v. Holder, 2011 WL 4498973, *4+ (E.D.Va. Sep 26, 2011) (NO. 1:09CV1047 GBL/TRJ) 258 U.S. v. Ryan, 2009 WL 1545794, *8+ (D.Vt. May 26, 2009) (NO. 2:07-CR-35) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 259 Muth v. Wisconsin, 2003 WL 24272406, *2+ (E.D.Wis. Oct 03, 2003) (NO. 01-C-0398) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 260 Daily Journal, 72 M.J. 404, 404+, 72 M.J. 406, 406+, 72 M.J. 407, 407+ (U.S. Armed Forces Jun 19, 2013) (NO. 13-187) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 261 U.S. v. Medina, 72 M.J. 148, 149+ (U.S. Armed Forces May 02, 2013) (NO. © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 13-5002, CRIM.A. 1325) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 262 U.S. v. Pearce, 2012 WL 5944996, *2+ (N.M.Ct.Crim.App. Nov 28, 2012) (NO. NMCCA 201100110) 263 U.S. v. McInnish, 2011 WL 6088635, *1+ (Army Ct.Crim.App. Nov 30, 2011) (NO. ARMY 20090923) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 264 U.S. v. Hartman, 69 M.J. 467, 468+ (U.S. Armed Forces Mar 15, 2011) (NO. 10-0291, CRIM.A. 200900389) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 265 U.S. v. Fields, 2010 WL 3398819, *4+ (N.M.Ct.Crim.App. Aug 31, 2010) (NO. NMCCA 200900589) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 266 U.S. v. Hartman, 2009 WL 5126122, *1+ (N.M.Ct.Crim.App. Dec 29, 2009) (NO. NMCCA 200900389) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 267 U.S. v. Wilson, 66 M.J. 39, 41+ (U.S. Armed Forces Feb 25, 2008) (NO. 06-0870, CR.A. 20040227) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 268 U.S. v. Stephens, 2007 WL 3025080, *1+ (N.M.Ct.Crim.App. Oct 11, 2007) (NO. NMCCA 200602368) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 269 U.S. v. Carey, 2006 WL 4572850, *5+ (N.M.Ct.Crim.App. Nov 15, 2006) (NO. NMCCA 200201238) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 270 U.S. v. Barrera, 2006 WL 4573017, *1+ (N.M.Ct.Crim.App. Aug 28, 2006) (NO. NMCCA 200400371) 271 U.S. v. Christian, 63 M.J. 714, 715+ (A.F.Ct.Crim.App. Jul 12, 2006) (NO. ACM35905) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 272 U.S. v. McCoy, 2006 WL 1029163, *9+ (N.M.Ct.Crim.App. Apr 20, 2006) (NO. 200101209) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 273 U.S. v. Tate, 2005 WL 3111979, *3+ (N.M.Ct.Crim.App. Nov 21, 2005) (NO. NMCCA 200201202) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 274 U.S. v. Teague, 2005 WL 2375179, *2+ (N.M.Ct.Crim.App. Sep 15, 2005) (NO. NMCCA 200202276) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 275 U.S. v. Brown, 2005 WL 2381094, *3+ (N.M.Ct.Crim.App. Sep 14, 2005) (NO. 200201647) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 276 U.S. v. Parker, 2005 WL 6519934, *2+ (Army Ct.Crim.App. May 17, 2005) (NO. ARMY9600945) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 277 U.S. v. Heisler, 2005 WL 995677, *2+ (N.M.Ct.Crim.App. Apr 29, 2005) (NO. NMCCA 200201325) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 278 U.S. v. Gamez, 2005 WL 743052, *1+ (A.F.Ct.Crim.App. Mar 30, 2005) (NO. ACM35576) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 279 U.S. v. Avery, 2005 WL 453135, *1+ (N.M.Ct.Crim.App. Feb 28, 2005) (NO. NMCCA 200400665) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 280 U.S. v. Myers, 2005 WL 318709, *1+ (N.M.Ct.Crim.App. Feb 10, 2005) (NO. NMCCA 200201623) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 281 U.S. v. Barber, 2004 WL 5862927, *6+ (Army Ct.Crim.App. Oct 07, 2004) (NO. ARMY20000413) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 282 L.A.M. v. B.M., 906 So.2d 942, 946+ (Ala.Civ.App. Dec 10, 2004) (NO. 2030734) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 283 Alaska Civil Liberties Union v. State, 122 P.3d 781, 783+, 96 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1428, 1428+ (Alaska Oct 28, 2005) (NO. S-10459) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 284 Paschal v. State, 388 S.W.3d 429, 434+, 2012 Ark. 127, 9+, 288 Ed. Law Rep. 946, 946+ (Ark. Mar 29, 2012) (NO. CR 11-673) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 285 Department of Human Services and Child Welfare Agency Review Bd. v. Howard, 238 S.W.3d 1, 11+, 367 Ark. 55, 69+ (Ark. Jun 29, 2006) (NO. 05-814) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 286 People v. Hofsheier, 39 Cal.Rptr.3d 821, 830+, 129 P.3d 29, 36+, 37 Cal.4th 1185, 1199+, 06 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1907, 1907+, 2006 Daily Journal D.A.R. 2668, 2668+ (Cal. Mar 06, 2006) (NO. S124636) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 287 People v. Groux, 2011 WL 2547022, *10+ (Cal.App. 5 Dist. Jun 28, 2011) (NO. F059366) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 288 People v. Febrissy, 2006 WL 2006161, *5+ (Cal.App. 3 Dist. Jul 19, 2006) (NO. C049033) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 289 People v. Westgarth, 2005 WL 1540137, *4+ (Cal.App. 4 Dist. Jul 01, 2005) (NO. D044716) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 290 Barbee v. Household Automotive Finance Corp., 6 Cal.Rptr.3d 406, 410+, 113 Cal.App.4th 525, 531+, 20 IER Cases 1143, 1143+, 03 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10,008, 10008+, 2003 Daily Journal D.A.R. 12,517, 12517+ (Cal.App. 4 Dist. Nov 20, 2003) (NO. D040421) " HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 291 State v. Griffin, 2011 WL 2083893, *8+ (Del.Super. May 16, 2011) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 292 T.M.H. v. D.M.T., 79 So.3d 787, 793+, 37 Fla. L. Weekly D4, D4+ (Fla.App. 5 Dist. Dec 23, 2011) (NO. 5D09-3559) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 293 Green v. State, 692 S.E.2d 784, 784+, 303 Ga.App. 210, 210+, 10 FCDR 1280, 1280+ (Ga.App. Mar 26, 2010) (NO. A10A0608) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 294 McGriff v. McGriff, 99 P.3d 111, 117+, 140 Idaho 642, 648+ (Idaho Sep 21, 2004) (NO. 28910) " HN: 3,5 (S.Ct.) 295 People v. Hollins, 971 N.E.2d 504, 510+, 361 Ill.Dec. 402, 408+, 2012 IL 112,754, 112754+ (Ill. Jun 21, 2012) (NO. 112754) 296 Morrison v. Sadler, 821 N.E.2d 15, 20+ (Ind.App. Jan 20, 2005) (NO. 49A02-0305-CV-447) " 297 Varnum v. Brien, 763 N.W.2d 862, 876+ (Iowa Apr 03, 2009) (NO. 07-1499) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 298 Katherine VARNUM, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Timothy J. BRIEN, Defendant., 2007 WL 2468667, *1+ (Trial Order) (Iowa Dist. Aug 30, 2007) Ruling on Plaintiffs' and Defendant's Motions for Summary Judgment (NO. CV5965) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 299 State v. Coman, 273 P.3d 701, 705+, 294 Kan. 84, 89+ (Kan. Mar 30, 2012) (NO. 100,494) 300 Louisiana Electorate of Gays and Lesbians, Inc. v. Connick, 902 So.2d 1090, 1093+, 04-1468 (La.App. 5 Cir. 4/26/05), 5+ (La.App. 5 Cir. Apr 26, 2005) (NO. 04-CA-1468) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 301 Com. v. Carey, 947 N.E.2d 1124, 1125+, 79 Mass.App.Ct. 587, 588+ (Mass.App.Ct. May 26, 2011) (NO. 09-P-1832) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 302 Com. v. Can-Port Amusement Corp., 2005 WL 2009672, *5+, 19 Mass.L.Rptr. 562, 562+ (Mass.Super. Jun 29, 2005) (NO. 050295) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 303 League of Women Voters Minnesota v. Ritchie, 819 N.W.2d 636, 684+ (Minn. Aug 27, 2012) (NO. A12-0920) " (in dissent) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 304 Donaldson v. State, 292 P.3d 364, 375+, 367 Mont. 228, 245+, 2012 MT 288, 288+ (Mont. Dec 17, 2012) (NO. DA 11-0451) " (in dissent) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 305 State v. Hunt, 710 S.E.2d 339, 349+, 211 N.C.App. 452, 468+ (N.C.App. May 03, 2011) (NO. COA10-666) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 306 In re Seven State Troopers, 2010 WL 668718, *3+ (N.J.Super.A.D. Feb 25, 2010) (NO. A-2833-09T2) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 307 State v. Druktenis, 86 P.3d 1050, 1067+, 135 N.M. 223, 240+, 2004-NMCA-032, 032+ (N.M.App. Jan 30, 2004) (NO. 22,437) " HN: 1,2,3 (S.Ct.) 308 Yonaty v. Mincolla, 945 N.Y.S.2d 774, 777+, 97 A.D.3d 141, 144+, 40 Media L. Rep. 2014, 2014+, 2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 04248, 04248+ (N.Y.A.D. 3 Dept. May 31, 2012) (NO. 512996) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 309 Samuels v. New York State Dept. Of Health, 811 N.Y.S.2d 136, 144+, 29 A.D.3d 9, 18+, 2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 01213, 01213+ (N.Y.A.D. 3 Dept. Feb 16, 2006) (NO. 98084) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 310 Langan v. St. Vincent's Hosp. of New York, 802 N.Y.S.2d 476, 478+, 25 A.D.3d 90, 93+, 2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 07495, 07495+ (N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept. Oct 11, 2005) (NO. 11618/02, 2003-04702) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 311 People v. Moi, 801 N.Y.S.2d 780, 780+, 8 Misc.3d 1012(A), 1012(A)+, 2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 51068(U), 51068(U)+ (N.Y.Co.Ct. Jun 03, 2005) (Table, text in WESTLAW, NO. 1114-87) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 312 Golden v. Paterson, 877 N.Y.S.2d 822, 835+, 23 Misc.3d 641, 655+, 2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 28546, 28546+ (N.Y.Sup. Sep 02, 2008) (NO. 260148/2008) " 313 Seymour v. Holcomb, 790 N.Y.S.2d 858, 864+, 7 Misc.3d 530, 535+, 2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 25070, 25070+ (N.Y.Sup. Feb 23, 2005) (NO. 2004-0458) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 314 State v. Bodyke, 933 N.E.2d 753, 762+, 126 Ohio St.3d 266, 275+, 2010-Ohio-2424, 2424+ (Ohio Jun 03, 2010) (NO. 2008-2502) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 315 Westfield Ins. Co. v. Galatis, 797 N.E.2d 1256, 1268+, 100 Ohio St.3d 216, 228+, 2003-Ohio-5849, 5849+ (Ohio Nov 05, 2003) (NO. 2002-0932) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 316 Kern v. Taney, 2010 WL 2510988, *1+, 11 Pa. D. & C. 5th 558, 569+ (Pa.Com.Pl. Mar 15, 2010) (NO. 09-10739, I.D. #2) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 317 Karenev v. State, 281 S.W.3d 428, 435+ (Tex.Crim.App. Apr 22, 2009) (NO. PD-0822-08) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 318 De Leon v. City of El Paso, 353 S.W.3d 285, 288+ (Tex.App.-El Paso Oct 26, 2011) (NO. 08-10-00348-CV) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 319 Jacobs v. State, 355 S.W.3d 99, 101+ (Tex.App.-Hous. (1 Dist.) Mar 03, 2011) (NO. 01-09-01150-CR) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 320 State v. Acosta, 2005 WL 2095290, *3+ (Tex.App.-El Paso Aug 31, 2005) (NO. 08-04-00312-CR) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 321 Castle v. State, 2004 WL 1985215, *10+ (Wash.Super. Sep 07, 2004) (NO. 04-2-00614-4) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 322 Andersen v. King County, 2004 WL 1738447, *2+ (Wash.Super. Aug 04, 2004) (NO. 04-2-04964-4-SEA) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 323 State v. Beecraft, 727 N.W.2d 375, 375+, 298 Wis.2d 551, 551+, 2007 WI App 19, 19+ (Wis.App. Dec 28, 2006) (Table, text in WESTLAW, NO. 2006AP982-CR) " HN: 3,5 (S.Ct.) 324 Viruet Lopez v. Ramon Miranda, 2005 WL 2738393, *3+ (TCA Aug 31, 2005) (NO. KLCE0500178, OP-05-106) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) Cited 325 Brown v. Plata, 134 S.Ct. 1, 2, 82 USLW 3069, 3069, 2013 Daily Journal D.A.R. 10,303, 10303 (U.S.Cal. Aug 02, 2013) (NO. 13A57) (in dissent) 326 National Aeronautics and Space Admin. v. Nelson, 131 S.Ct. 746, 764+, 178 L.Ed.2d 667, 667+, 79 USLW 4043, 4043+, 31 IER Cases 1057, 1057+, 11 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 696, 696+, 2011 Daily Journal D.A.R. 918, 918+, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 760, 760+ (U.S. Jan 19, 2011) (NO. 09-530) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 327 Christian Legal Soc. Chapter of the University of California, Hastings College of the Law v. Martinez, 130 S.Ct. 2971, 2990+, 177 L.Ed.2d 838, 838+, 78 USLW 4821, 4821+, 10 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7985, 7985+, 2010 Daily Journal D.A.R. 9821, 9821+, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 667, 667+, 57 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 573, 573+ (U.S. Jun 28, 2010) (NO. 08-1371) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 328 Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. Florida Dept. of Environmental Protection, 130 S.Ct. 2592, 2608, 560 U.S. 702, 724, 177 L.Ed.2d 184, 184, 78 USLW 4578, 4578, 70 ERC 1505, 1505, 10 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7553, 7553, 2010 Daily Journal D.A.R. 9081, 9081, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 484, 484 (U.S.Fla. Jun 17, 2010) (NO. 08-1151) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 329 Citizens United v. Federal Election Com'n, 130 S.Ct. 876, 920, 558 U.S. 310, 377, 175 L.Ed.2d 753, 753, 78 USLW 4078, 4078, 187 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2961, 2961, 159 Lab.Cas. P 10,166, 10166, 10 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 776, 776, 2010 Daily Journal D.A.R. 949, 949, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 73, 73 (U.S. Jan 21, 2010) (NO. 08-205) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 330 District Attorney's Office for Third Judicial Dist. v. Osborne, 129 S.Ct. 2308, 2341, 557 U.S. 52, 105, 174 L.Ed.2d 38, 38, 77 USLW 4498, 4498, 09 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7562, 7562, 2009 Daily Journal D.A.R. 8847, 8847, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 945, 945 (U.S. Jun 18, 2009) (NO. 08-6) (in dissent) 331 Arizona v. Gant, 129 S.Ct. 1710, 1722, 556 U.S. 332, 348, 173 L.Ed.2d 485, 485, 77 USLW 4285, 4285, 09 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4732, 4732, 2009 Daily Journal D.A.R. 5611, 5611, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 781, 781, 47 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 657, 657 (U.S.Ariz. Apr 21, 2009) (NO. 07-542) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 332 Gonzales v. Carhart, 127 S.Ct. 1610, 1647, 550 U.S. 124, 182, 167 L.Ed.2d 480, 480, 75 USLW 4210, 4210, 07 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4088, 4088, 2007 Daily Journal D.A.R. 5189, 5189, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 180, 180, 20 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 673, 673 (U.S. Apr 18, 2007) (NO. 05-1382, 05-380) " (in dissent) 333 Randall v. Sorrell, 126 S.Ct. 2479, 2508, 548 U.S. 230, 276, 165 L.Ed.2d 482, 482, 74 USLW 4435, 4435, 06 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5503, 5503, 6 Daily Journal D.A.R. 8056, 8056, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 354, 354, 19 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 659, 659 (U.S. Jun 26, 2006) (NO. 04-1528, 04-1530, 04-1697) (in dissent) 334 Roper v. Simmons, 125 S.Ct. 1183, 1228, 543 U.S. 551, 627, 161 L.Ed.2d 1, 1, 73 USLW 4153, 4153, 05 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1735, 1735, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 131, 131 (U.S.Mo. Mar 01, 2005) (NO. 03-633) (in dissent) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 335 Tennessee v. Lane, 124 S.Ct. 1978, 2011, 541 U.S. 509, 563, 158 L.Ed.2d 820, 820, 15 A.D. Cases 865, 865, 28 NDLR P 65, 65, 04 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4207, 4207, 2004 Daily Journal D.A.R. 5854, 5854, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 299, 299, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 997, 997 (U.S. May 17, 2004) (NO. 02-1667) (in dissent) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 336 Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Court for Dist. of Columbia, 124 S.Ct. 1391, 1402, 541 U.S. 913, 928, 158 L.Ed.2d 225, 225, 72 USLW 3593, 3593, 04 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2331, 2331, 2004 Daily Journal D.A.R. 3429, 3429, 2004 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7575, 7575 (U.S.Dist.Col. Mar 18, 2004) (NO. 03-475) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 337 Olympic Airways v. Husain, 124 S.Ct. 1221, 1231, 540 U.S. 644, 658, 157 L.Ed.2d 1146, 1146, 72 USLW 4187, 4187, 04 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1528, 1528, 2004 Daily Journal D.A.R. 2331, 2331, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 139, 139, 4 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 709, 709 (U.S. Feb 24, 2004) (NO. 02-1348) (in dissent) 338 Limon v. Kansas, 123 S.Ct. 2638, 2638, 539 U.S. 955, 955, 156 L.Ed.2d 652, 652, 71 USLW 3319, 3319, 71 USLW 3794, 3794, 71 USLW 3798, 3798 (U.S.Kan. Jun 27, 2003) (NO. 02-583) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 339 Poirier v. Massachusetts Dept. of Correction, 558 F.3d 92, 96+, 28 IER Cases 1360, 1360+ (1st Cir.(Mass.) Feb 27, 2009) (NO. 08-1290) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 340 Amrak Productions, Inc. v. Morton, 410 F.3d 69, 72, 33 Media L. Rep. 1891, 1891 (1st Cir.(Mass.) Jun 03, 2005) (NO. 04-1449) 341 U.S. v. Morales-de Jesus, 372 F.3d 6, 18 (1st Cir.(Puerto Rico) Jun 09, 2004) (NO. 02-2695) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 342 U.S. v. McLaurin, 731 F.3d 258, 264 (2nd Cir.(Vt.) Oct 03, 2013) (NO. © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 12-3514-CR) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 343 Kachalsky v. County of Westchester, 701 F.3d 81, 94+ (2nd Cir.(N.Y.) Nov 27, 2012) (NO. 11-3642 LEAD, 11-3962 XAP) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 344 Back v. Hastings On Hudson Union Free School Dist., 365 F.3d 107, 118, 93 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1430, 1430, 85 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 41,755, 41755, 187 Ed. Law Rep. 13, 13 (2nd Cir.(N.Y.) Apr 07, 2004) (NO. 03-7058) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 345 Al-Sharif v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, 734 F.3d 207, 212 (3rd Cir.(N.J.) Aug 19, 2013) (NO. 12-2767) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 346 Wilkins v. Gaddy, 734 F.3d 344, 348 (4th Cir.(N.C.) Nov 01, 2013) (NO. 12-8148) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 347 U.S. v. Lanning, 723 F.3d 476, 482 (4th Cir.(N.C.) Jul 19, 2013) (NO. 12-4547) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 348 Griffith v. Quarterman, 196 Fed.Appx. 237, 241 (5th Cir.(Tex.) Jul 21, 2006) (Table, text in WESTLAW, NO. 05-70049) 349 Ross v. Marshall, 426 F.3d 745, 754 (5th Cir.(Tex.) Sep 21, 2005) (NO. 03-20989) 350 Saldano v. Roach, 363 F.3d 545, 552, 58 Fed.R.Serv.3d 495, 495 (5th Cir.(Tex.) Mar 23, 2004) (NO. 03-40905) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 351 Knochelmann v. C.I.R., 455 Fed.Appx. 536, 540, 108 A.F.T.R.2d 2011-6011, 2011-6011, 2011-2 USTC P 50,605, 50605 (6th Cir. Aug 30, 2011) (Table, text in WESTLAW, NO. 10-1387) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 352 Jenkins v. Rock Hill Local School Dist., 513 F.3d 580, 590, 229 Ed. Law Rep. 40, 40 (6th Cir.(Ohio) Jan 17, 2008) (NO. 06-4550, 06-4551) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 353 Bailey v. City of Port Huron, 507 F.3d 364, 367 (6th Cir.(Mich.) Nov 01, 2007) (NO. 06-2375) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 354 Stewart v. Blackwell, 444 F.3d 843, 872, 2006 Fed.App. 0143P, 0143P (6th Cir.(Ohio) Apr 21, 2006) (NO. 05-3044) 355 Korte v. Sebelius, 735 F.3d 654, 701, Med & Med GD (CCH) P 304,681, 304681 (7th Cir.(Ill.) Nov 08, 2013) (NO. 12-3841, 13-1077) (in dissent) 356 Patterson v. Indiana Newspapers, Inc., 589 F.3d 357, 360, 107 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1697, 1697, 92 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 43,746, 43746 (7th Cir.(Ind.) Dec 08, 2009) (NO. 08-2050) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 357 Christensen v. County of Boone, IL, 483 F.3d 454, 463+ (7th Cir.(Ill.) Mar 21, 2007) (NO. 04 4162) 358 Christian Legal Society v. Walker, 453 F.3d 853, 873+, 210 Ed. Law Rep. 916, 916+ (7th Cir.(Ill.) Jul 10, 2006) (NO. 05-3239) " (in dissent) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 359 Doe v. City of Lafayette, Ind., 377 F.3d 757, 777, 40 A.L.R.6th 777, 777 (7th Cir.(Ind.) Jul 30, 2004) (NO. 01-3624) " (in dissent) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 360 Civil Liberties for Urban Believers v. City of Chicago, 342 F.3d 752, 768+ (7th Cir.(Ill.) Aug 20, 2003) (NO. 01-4030) (in dissent) 361 U.S. v. Shill, --- F.3d ----, 2014 WL 259872, *2 (9th Cir.(Or.) Jan 24, 2014) (NO. © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 13-30008) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 362 In re Marshall, 721 F.3d 1032, 1063+, 58 Bankr.Ct.Dec. 46, 46+, 13 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6852, 6852+, 2013 Daily Journal D.A.R. 8561, 8561+ (9th Cir.(Cal.) Jun 28, 2013) (NO. 09-55573) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 363 Lopez-Valenzuela v. County of Maricopa, 719 F.3d 1054, 1079, 13 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6212, 6212, 2013 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7816, 7816 (9th Cir.(Ariz.) Jun 18, 2013) (NO. 11-16487) (in dissent) 364 Fair Housing Council of San Fernando Valley v. Roommate.com, LLC, 666 F.3d 1216, 1221, 12 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1328, 1328, 2012 Daily Journal D.A.R. 1408, 1408 (9th Cir.(Cal.) Feb 02, 2012) (NO. 09-55272, 09-55875, 09-55969) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 365 Diaz v. Brewer, 656 F.3d 1008, 1012+, 113 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 248, 248+, 11 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 11,475, 11475+, 2011 Daily Journal D.A.R. 13,608, 13608+ (9th Cir.(Ariz.) Sep 06, 2011) (NO. 10-16797) " 366 Nordyke v. King, 644 F.3d 776, 786, 2011 Daily Journal D.A.R. 6208, 6208 (9th Cir.(Cal.) May 02, 2011) (NO. 07-15763) 367 Newdow v. Rio Linda Union School Dist., 597 F.3d 1007, 1068, 254 Ed. Law Rep. 544, 544, 10 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3031, 3031, 2010 Daily Journal D.A.R. 3781, 3781 (9th Cir.(Cal.) Mar 11, 2010) (NO. 05-17257) " (in dissent) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 368 Coyote Pub., Inc. v. Miller, 598 F.3d 592, 604, 38 Media L. Rep. 1385, 1385, 10 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3121, 3121, 2010 Daily Journal D.A.R. 3710, 3710 (9th Cir.(Nev.) Mar 11, 2010) (NO. 07-16633) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 369 Nunez v. Holder, 594 F.3d 1124, 1132, 10 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1863, 1863, 2010 Daily Journal D.A.R. 2277, 2277 (9th Cir. Feb 10, 2010) (NO. 06-70219) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 370 In re Levenson, 587 F.3d 925, 932+, 108 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 331, 331+, 09 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 13,836, 13836+, 2009 Daily Journal D.A.R. 16,261, 16261+ (9th Cir. Nov 18, 2009) (NO. 09-80172) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 371 Ileto v. Glock, Inc., 565 F.3d 1126, 1141, 09 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5678, 5678, 2009 Daily Journal D.A.R. 6722, 6722 (9th Cir.(Cal.) May 11, 2009) (NO. 06-56872, 07-15403, 07-15404) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 372 In re Levenson, 560 F.3d 1145, 1150+, 108 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 326+ (9th Cir.(Jud.C.) Feb 02, 2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 373 Ahmed v. Keisler, 504 F.3d 1183, 1198, 07 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 12,271, 12271, 2007 Daily Journal D.A.R. 15,833, 15833 (9th Cir. Oct 16, 2007) (NO. 04-76246) 374 Fields v. Palmdale School Dist., 427 F.3d 1197, 1208, 203 Ed. Law Rep. 44, 44, 05 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9521, 9521 (9th Cir.(Cal.) Nov 02, 2005) (NO. 03-56499) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 375 U.S. v. Quaempts, 411 F.3d 1046, 1048, 05 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4566, 4566, 2005 Daily Journal D.A.R. 6248, 6248 (9th Cir.(Wash.) May 31, 2005) (NO. © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 03-30471) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 376 Kyocera Corp. v. Prudential-Bache Trade Services, Inc., 341 F.3d 987, 997, 03 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7934, 7934, 2003 Daily Journal D.A.R. 10,077, 10077 (9th Cir.(Cal.) Aug 29, 2003) (NO. 01-15630, 01-15653, 01-16182, 01-16394, 01-16528) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 377 Green v. City of Tucson, 340 F.3d 891, 896, 03 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7500, 7500, 2003 Daily Journal D.A.R. 9398, 9398 (9th Cir.(Ariz.) Aug 20, 2003) (NO. 02-16700) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 378 Milligan-Hitt v. Board of Trustees of Sheridan County School Dist. No. 2, 523 F.3d 1219, 1223+, 103 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 185, 185+, 231 Ed. Law Rep. 671, 671+ (10th Cir.(Wyo.) Apr 22, 2008) (NO. 06-8086, 06-8087) 379 Coalition for Equal Rights, Inc. v. Ritter, 517 F.3d 1195, 1199 (10th Cir.(Colo.) Jan 29, 2008) (NO. 06-1511) 380 Bronson v. Swensen, 500 F.3d 1099, 1103 (10th Cir.(Utah) Aug 29, 2007) (NO. 05-4161) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 381 Winsness v. Yocom, 433 F.3d 727, 733+ (10th Cir.(Utah) Jan 05, 2006) (NO. 04-4275) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 382 Powers v. Harris, 379 F.3d 1208, 1224 (10th Cir.(Okla.) Aug 23, 2004) (NO. 03-6014) " 383 D.L.S. v. Utah, 374 F.3d 971, 975+ (10th Cir.(Utah) Jul 07, 2004) (NO. 03-4031) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 384 Hollywood Mobile Estates Ltd. v. Seminole Tribe of Florida, 641 F.3d 1259, 1266, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 2092, 2092 (11th Cir.(Fla.) May 23, 2011) (NO. 09-15336) 385 Peek-A-Boo Lounge of Bradenton, Inc. v. Manatee County, Fla., 630 F.3d 1346, 1357, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 1703, 1703 (11th Cir.(Fla.) Jan 21, 2011) (NO. 09-16438) 386 Boxer X v. Harris, 459 F.3d 1114, 1117, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 940, 940 (11th Cir.(Ga.) Aug 09, 2006) (NO. 04-13083) (in dissent) 387 Abigail Alliance for Better Access to Developmental Drugs v. von Eschenbach, 495 F.3d 695, 706+, 378 U.S.App.D.C. 33, 44+ (D.C.Cir. Aug 07, 2007) (NO. 04-5350) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 388 Horowitz v. Peace Corps, 428 F.3d 271, 279, 368 U.S.App.D.C. 192, 200, 68 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 818, 818 (D.C.Cir. Oct 28, 2005) (NO. 04-5065, 04-5087, 04-5279) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 389 Arizona Dream Act Coalition v. Brewer, 945 F.Supp.2d 1049, 1069+ (D.Ariz. May 16, 2013) (NO. CV12-02546 PHX DGC) 390 Kemp v. Schriro, 2008 WL 4418164, *2 (D.Ariz. Sep 29, 2008) (NO. CV000050TUCFRZ) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 391 Schad v. Schriro, 454 F.Supp.2d 897, 926+ (D.Ariz. Sep 28, 2006) (NO. CV97-2577-PHXROS) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 392 Chism v. Curtner, 2009 WL 1850195, *3 (E.D.Ark. Jun 25, 2009) (NO. 2:07CV00104 BSM) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 393 Glenn v. Bachand, 2007 WL 865488, *3+ (E.D.Ark. Mar 20, 2007) (NO. 2:05 CV 00132 WRW) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 394 Sylvester v. Fogley, 383 F.Supp.2d 1135, 1139 (W.D.Ark. Jul 28, 2005) (NO. 04-2200) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 395 Shinde v. Nithyananda Foundation, 2013 WL 1953707, *10 (C.D.Cal. May 10, 2013) (NO. EDCV 13-0363 JGB SPX) 396 Bezi v. Camacho, 2012 WL 5519386, *11 (C.D.Cal. Sep 27, 2012) (NO. CV 11-0677-MMM DTB) 397 Martin v. Beck, 2012 WL 4208303, *3 (E.D.Cal. Sep 19, 2012) (NO. 2:12-CV-0421-JFM PC) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 398 Smith v. Woodford, 2012 WL 2061535, *3 (N.D.Cal. Jun 07, 2012) (NO. C 04-4793 RMW PR) 399 Sacramento Nonprofit Collective v. Holder, 855 F.Supp.2d 1100, 1107 (E.D.Cal. Feb 28, 2012) (NO. 2:11-CV-02939-GEB) 400 Gilman v. Davis, 690 F.Supp.2d 1105, 1110+ (E.D.Cal. Feb 04, 2010) (NO. CIV. S-05-830 LKK/GG) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 401 Thomas v. Hickman, 2009 WL 1273190, *13 (E.D.Cal. May 05, 2009) (NO. 1:06-CV-0215 AWI SMS) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 402 Ahearn v. Andelson, 2008 WL 4999241, *8 (C.D.Cal. Nov 20, 2008) (NO. CV08-2112-AHS(RNB)) " 403 Greenly v. Sara Lee Corp., 2008 WL 1925230, *8+ (E.D.Cal. Apr 30, 2008) (NO. CIV S-06-1775 WBSEFB) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 404 Morrow v. Woodring, 2008 WL 1847228, *5 (C.D.Cal. Apr 23, 2008) (NO. CV076876RGK(RNB)) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 405 U.S.A. Express Cab, LLC v. City of San Jose, 2007 WL 4612926, *7 (N.D.Cal. Dec 31, 2007) (NO. C-07-06171RMW) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 406 County of Santa Cruz v. Gonzales, 2007 WL 2502351, *5 (N.D.Cal. Aug 30, 2007) (NO. C 03-01802 JF) " 407 Anderson v. City of Fresno, 2007 WL 2288323, *5 (E.D.Cal. Aug 08, 2007) (NO. 1:06CV 01824 OWW DLB) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 408 Brockmeier v. Solano County Sheriff's Dept., 2006 WL 3760276, *12 (E.D.Cal. Dec 18, 2006) (NO. CIV-S05-2090 MCEEFBP) 409 Brown v. County of San Joaquin, 2006 WL 1652407, *7 (E.D.Cal. Jun 13, 2006) (NO. CIVS042008FCDPAN) 410 Christian Legal Soc. Chapter of University of California v. Kane, 2006 WL 997217, *7 (N.D.Cal. Apr 17, 2006) (NO. C 04-04484 JSW) " 411 Hope v. City of Long Beach, 2005 WL 6009954, *6 (C.D.Cal. Aug 15, 2005) (NO. CV 04-4249 DT (RZX)) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 412 Fields v. Palmdale School Dist., 271 F.Supp.2d 1217, 1221+, 180 Ed. Law Rep. © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 164, 164+ (C.D.Cal. Jul 18, 2003) (NO. SACV03457JVS(SHSX)) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 413 Brown v. Cooke, 2009 WL 641301, *18 (D.Colo. Mar 09, 2009) (NO. 06-CV-01092-MSK-CBS) 414 Dias v. City and County of Denver, Colorado, 2008 WL 791939, *9 (D.Colo. Mar 20, 2008) (NO. 07-CV-00722-WDM-MJW) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 415 Brown v. Cooke, 2008 WL 638418, *8 (D.Colo. Mar 06, 2008) (NO. CIV.A.06-CV-01092MSK) 416 Free Speech Coalition v. Gonzales, 406 F.Supp.2d 1196, 1210 (D.Colo. Dec 28, 2005) (NO. CIVA05CV01126WDMBNB) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 417 Lagasse, City of Waterbury, 2011 WL 2709749, *13 (D.Conn. Jul 12, 2011) (NO. 3:09CV391 VLB) 418 Marceline v. Delgado, 2011 WL 2531081, *10 (D.Conn. Jun 23, 2011) (NO. 3:09CV1591 VLB) 419 Gold Diggers, LLC v. Town of Berlin, Conn., 469 F.Supp.2d 43, 64 (D.Conn. Jan 16, 2007) (NO. 06CV732) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 420 Scruggs v. Meriden Bd. of Educ., 2005 WL 2072312, *6, 31 NDLR P 76, 76 (D.Conn. Aug 26, 2005) (NO. 3:03CV2224(PCD)) 421 Student Members of Same v. Rumsfeld, 321 F.Supp.2d 388, 396, 189 Ed. Law Rep. 621, 621 (D.Conn. Jun 09, 2004) (NO. CIV.A.3-03-CV1867JCH) 422 Barton v. City of Bristol, 294 F.Supp.2d 184, 194, 173 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3045, 3045 (D.Conn. Nov 24, 2003) (NO. CIV.3:02 CV 1210 PCD) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 423 Thong v. Andre Chreky Salon, 634 F.Supp.2d 40, 46+ (D.D.C. Jul 13, 2009) (NO. CIV.A. 06-1807 (RCL)) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 424 Dodge v. Trustees of Nat. Gallery of Art, 326 F.Supp.2d 1, 15 (D.D.C. Jun 29, 2004) (NO. CIV.A. 03-1613 (RCL)) 425 U.S. v. Little, 2008 WL 151875, *1 (M.D.Fla. Jan 16, 2008) (NO. 807CR170T24MSS) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 426 U.S. v. Mallory, 525 F.Supp.2d 1316, 1327, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 48, 48 (S.D.Fla. Oct 31, 2007) (NO. 04-60315-CR) 427 Martyak v. Martyak, 378 F.Supp.2d 1365, 1368, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 737, 737 (S.D.Fla. Jun 03, 2005) (NO. 04-80782-CIV-ZLOCH) 428 Rabun v. Georgia Dept. of Human Resources, 2009 WL 427240, *3 (N.D.Ga. Feb 19, 2009) (NO. CIV. A.1:08-CV0296JO) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 429 Mauk v. Lanier, 2006 WL 516822, *2+ (S.D.Ga. Mar 01, 2006) (NO. CV 102-042) 430 Lee v. Orr, 2013 WL 6490577, *2 (N.D.Ill. Dec 10, 2013) (NO. 13-CV-8719) 431 Baude v. Heath, 2007 WL 2479587, *12 (S.D.Ind. Aug 29, 2007) (NO. 1:05-CV-0735JDTTAB) 432 U.S. Dept. of Educ. v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n, 2006 WL 3198822, *10 (S.D.Ind. Sep 08, 2006) (NO. 106CV-01333-JDT-TAB) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 433 Willson v. Buss, 370 F.Supp.2d 782, 786 (N.D.Ind. Mar 31, 2005) (NO. 3:03 CV 0921 AS) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 434 Hodgkins v. Peterson, 2004 WL 1854194, *6 (S.D.Ind. Jul 23, 2004) (NO. 1:04-CV-569-JDT-TAB) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 435 Doctor John's, Inc. v. City of Sioux City, IA, 438 F.Supp.2d 1005, 1033 (N.D.Iowa Jul 21, 2006) (NO. C 03-4121 MWB) 436 Doe v. Miller, 298 F.Supp.2d 844, 871 (S.D.Iowa Feb 09, 2004) (NO. 3:03-CV-90067) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 437 Abilene Retail #£30, Inc. v. Six, 641 F.Supp.2d 1185, 1193 (D.Kan. Jun 26, 2009) (NO. 09-2195-JAR) 438 Bolden v. City of Topeka, 546 F.Supp.2d 1210, 1216 (D.Kan. Apr 28, 2008) (NO. CIV.A. 02-2635-KHV) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 439 Bolden v. City of Topeka, 2007 WL 2746683, *6 (D.Kan. Sep 19, 2007) (NO. CIV.A. 02-2635-KHV) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 440 U.S. v. Lopez, 655 F.Supp.2d 720, 725 (E.D.Ky. Sep 01, 2009) (NO. CRIMA 6:06-120-DCR) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 441 Baar v. Jefferson County Public Schools, 2008 WL 360719, *6 (W.D.Ky. Feb 08, 2008) (NO. CIV.A. 3:06CV75H) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 442 729, Inc. v. Kenton County Fiscal Court, 2006 WL 2842884, *33+ (E.D.Ky. Sep 30, 2006) (NO. CIV.A. 04-212-DLB) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 443 Basco v. Goodwin, 2013 WL 1628375, *7 (E.D.La. Mar 14, 2013) (NO. CIV.A. 12-2006) 444 Doe v. Jindal, 851 F.Supp.2d 995, 1000+ (E.D.La. Mar 29, 2012) (NO. CIV.A. 11-388) 445 Doe v. Jindal, 2011 WL 3925042, *2+ (E.D.La. Sep 07, 2011) (NO. CIV.A. 11-388) 446 Schmidt v. Hubert, 2008 WL 4491467, *21+ (W.D.La. Oct 06, 2008) (NO. CIV.A.05-2168) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 447 Poirier v. Massachusetts Dept. of Correction, 532 F.Supp.2d 275, 279+ (D.Mass. Jan 30, 2008) (NO. CIV.A.06-10748-GAO) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 448 Albright v. Morton, 321 F.Supp.2d 130, 137+, 32 Media L. Rep. 1769, 1769+, 7 A.L.R.6th 757, 757+ (D.Mass. May 28, 2004) (NO. C.A.02-11458-NG) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 449 Kane v. Winn, 319 F.Supp.2d 162, 201 (D.Mass. May 27, 2004) (NO. CIV.A.03-40116-WGY) 450 U.S. v. Sampson, 275 F.Supp.2d 49, 66 (D.Mass. Aug 11, 2003) (NO. CR. 01-10384-MLW) 451 Simms v. Stewart, 2012 WL 1964101, *2 (D.Md. May 30, 2012) (NO. CIV. WDQ-12-0793) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 452 IMS Health Corp. v. Rowe, 532 F.Supp.2d 153, 170+ (D.Me. Dec 21, 2007) (NO. CV-07-127-B-W) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 453 Kuch v. Rapelje, 2010 WL 3419821, *3 (E.D.Mich. Aug 27, 2010) (NO. 09-12872) 454 Glenn v. Clement Tp., 2006 WL 2092409, *12+ (E.D.Mich. Jul 27, 2006) (NO. 05-10093-BC) " 455 U.S. v. City of Detroit, 288 F.Supp.2d 836, 841, 57 ERC 1858, 1858 (E.D.Mich. Oct 22, 2003) (NO. CIV.77-71100) " 456 U.S. v. Lussier, 2013 WL 5745370, *6 (D.Minn. Oct 23, 2013) (NO. CRIM. 13-193 MJD/LIB) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 457 Davis v. Russell, 2011 WL 1770932, *13 (E.D.Mo. May 10, 2011) (NO. 4:08CV0138 CDP) 458 Counce v. Kemna, 2005 WL 579588, *2 (W.D.Mo. Mar 08, 2005) (NO. 026065-CV-SJ-HFS-P) 459 Christian Legal Soc. v. Eck, 625 F.Supp.2d 1026, 1031+, 247 Ed. Law Rep. 87, 87+ (D.Mont. May 19, 2009) (NO. CV-07-154-MRFC) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 460 Bradley v. North Carolina Dept. of Transp., Div. of Motor Vehicles, 286 F.Supp.2d 697, 706 (W.D.N.C. Oct 07, 2003) (NO. CIV. 103CV73) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 461 North Dakota Family Alliance, Inc. v. Bader, 361 F.Supp.2d 1021, 1028 (D.N.D. Mar 21, 2005) (NO. A3-04-115) HN: 3,5 (S.Ct.) 462 Bates v. Private Jet Commercial Group, Inc., 2012 WL 1660874, *3 (D.N.H. May 11, 2012) (NO. 11-CV-547-SM) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 463 Brandt v. Monte, 626 F.Supp.2d 469, 486 (D.N.J. Jan 29, 2009) (NO. CIV. 06-0923 (RMB)) " 464 U.S. v. D.M., 942 F.Supp.2d 327, 345 (E.D.N.Y. May 03, 2013) (NO. 12-CR-170) 465 Windsor v. U.S., 833 F.Supp.2d 394, 402+, 109 A.F.T.R.2d 2012-2475, 2012-2475+, 2012-1 USTC P 60,647, 60647+ (S.D.N.Y. Jun 06, 2012) (NO. 10 CIV. 8435 (BSJ)) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 466 Broich v. Incorporated Village of Southampton, 2011 WL 284484, *9 (E.D.N.Y. Jan 25, 2011) (NO. CV-080553 SJF ARL) 467 Fiore v. Town of Whitestown, 2010 WL 4513422, *4+ (N.D.N.Y. Nov 02, 2010) (NO. 6:07-CV-797) " HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 468 Yusov v. Shaughnessey, 671 F.Supp.2d 523, 530 (S.D.N.Y. Nov 18, 2009) (NO. 09 CIV. 56 (LBS)) 469 U.S. v. Quinones, 2004 WL 1234044, *2 (S.D.N.Y. Jun 03, 2004) (NO. 00 CR.761(JSR)) 470 NYC C.L.A.S.H., Inc. v. City of New York, 315 F.Supp.2d 461, 481 (S.D.N.Y. Apr 21, 2004) (NO. 03 CIV.5463(VM)) 471 Sweeney v. City of New York, 2004 WL 744198, *5 (S.D.N.Y. Apr 02, 2004) (NO. 03 CIV. 4410 JSRRLE) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 472 Hudson Valley Black Press v. I.R.S., 307 F.Supp.2d 543, 548, 93 A.F.T.R.2d © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 2004-1356, 2004-1356, 2004-1 USTC P 50,232, 50232 (S.D.N.Y. Mar 03, 2004) (NO. 01 CIV. 8571 (WCC)) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 473 Dodge v. County of Orange, 282 F.Supp.2d 41, 80 (S.D.N.Y. Sep 09, 2003) (NO. 02 CIV. 769 (CM)(LMS, 02 CIV.8451(CM)(LMS)) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 474 Curran v. Teacher's Retirement System of the City of New York, 2003 WL 21804270, *2 (S.D.N.Y. Jul 28, 2003) (NO. 02CIV.0953DABRLE) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 475 Martin v. Cleveland Heights Police Dept., 2014 WL 272221, *4 (N.D.Ohio Jan 23, 2014) (NO. 1:13 CV 1750) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 476 Bigi v. Large, 2011 WL 6813163, *4 (S.D.Ohio Dec 28, 2011) (NO. 3:11-CV-229) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 477 G.B. v. Rogers, 2009 WL 1322451, *10 (S.D.Ohio May 11, 2009) (NO. 1:08-CV-437) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 478 Stern v. Felmet, 2008 WL 397574, *7 (S.D.Ohio Feb 11, 2008) (NO. C2-05-907) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 479 U.S. v. Shill, 2012 WL 529964, *4 (D.Or. Feb 17, 2012) (NO. 3:10-CR-493-BR) 480 G.R. ex rel. Russell v. Dallas School Dist. No. 2, 2010 WL 5232958, *4 (D.Or. Dec 15, 2010) (NO. CIV. 10-232-KI) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 481 Nguyen v. B.I. Inc., 435 F.Supp.2d 1109, 1115 (D.Or. Apr 12, 2006) (NO. CV 04-1815-PA) " 482 Chosen 300 Ministries, Inc. v. City of Philadelphia, 2012 WL 3235317, *23 (E.D.Pa. Aug 09, 2012) (NO. CIV.A. 12-3159) 483 Heffner v. Murphy, 866 F.Supp.2d 358, 391+ (M.D.Pa. May 08, 2012) (NO. 08-CV-990) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 484 Toth v. California University of Pennsylvania, 844 F.Supp.2d 611, 635, 282 Ed. Law Rep. 257, 257 (W.D.Pa. Jan 09, 2012) (NO. CIV.A. 09-1692) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 485 Douglas v. Brookville Area School Dist., 836 F.Supp.2d 329, 352+, 281 Ed. Law Rep. 154, 154+ (W.D.Pa. Dec 08, 2011) (NO. CIV.A. 10-1087) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 486 Marcavage v. Borough of Lansdowne, Pa., 826 F.Supp.2d 732, 744 (E.D.Pa. Oct 19, 2011) (NO. 09-CV-4569) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 487 Hubi v. Nalty, 2011 WL 2292808, *2 (E.D.Pa. Jun 08, 2011) (NO. CIV.A. 10-3821) 488 Behar v. Pennsylvania Dept. of Transp., 791 F.Supp.2d 383, 413+ (M.D.Pa. Mar 31, 2011) (NO. 1:09-CV-2453) 489 Gardner v. Barry, 2010 WL 4853885, *6 (M.D.Pa. Nov 23, 2010) (NO. 1:10-CV-0527) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 490 Thomas v. Cianfrani, 2009 WL 1704471, *9 (E.D.Pa. Jun 17, 2009) (NO. CIV.A. 01-3096) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 491 Schlarp v. Dern, 610 F.Supp.2d 450, 462 (W.D.Pa. Mar 24, 2009) (NO. CIV.A 06-1089) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 492 Heffner v. Murphy, 590 F.Supp.2d 710, 723+ (M.D.Pa. Dec 22, 2008) (NO. 08-CV-990) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 493 Khouzam v. Hogan, 529 F.Supp.2d 543, 566 (M.D.Pa. Jan 10, 2008) (NO. 3:CV-07-0992) " 494 Abdullah v. Fetrow, 2007 WL 2844960, *12 (M.D.Pa. Sep 26, 2007) (NO. CIV.A. 1:05-CV-1135) 495 U.S. v. Roberts, 2007 WL 2221416, *11+ (E.D.Pa. Jul 31, 2007) (NO. CRIM.A. 04-00037-1, CRIM.A. 04-00037-2) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 496 Toth v. Borough of Ambridge, Pa., 2007 WL 776102, *2 (W.D.Pa. Mar 09, 2007) (NO. 06CV1696) 497 Harris v. Township of O'Hara, 2006 WL 3231876, *5 (W.D.Pa. Nov 07, 2006) (NO. CIV A 06-169) 498 Akins v. Kasheta, 2006 WL 2828821, *5 (M.D.Pa. Sep 29, 2006) (NO. CIV A 3:CV-06-1704) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 499 Lancia v. McDaniel, 2006 WL 2794170, *3 (E.D.Pa. Sep 25, 2006) (NO. 06-1655) " 500 Abdullah v. Fetrow, 2006 WL 1274994, *5 (M.D.Pa. May 08, 2006) (NO. 1:05-CV-1135) 501 Timoney v. Upper Merion Tp., 2004 WL 2823227, *3 (E.D.Pa. Dec 08, 2004) (NO. CUV,A,01-1622) 502 Whitney v. City of Milan, 720 F.Supp.2d 958, 963 (W.D.Tenn. Jul 06, 2010) (NO. 1:09-CV-1127) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 503 Lowe v. Clift, 2007 WL 2112672, *6 (E.D.Tenn. Jul 19, 2007) (NO. 1:06-CV-076) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 504 Gill v. Devlin, 867 F.Supp.2d 849, 856+, 285 Ed. Law Rep. 800, 800+ (N.D.Tex. Mar 12, 2012) (NO. 4:11-CV-623-Y) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 505 Garcia v. MAC Equipment, Inc., 2011 WL 4345205, *13+ (S.D.Tex. Sep 15, 2011) (NO. CIV.A. H-09-902) 506 Robinson v. Radio One, Inc., 695 F.Supp.2d 425, 427+ (N.D.Tex. Feb 19, 2010) (NO. 03:09-CV-1203-O) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 507 Jennings v. Owens, 585 F.Supp.2d 881, 895 (W.D.Tex. Dec 12, 2008) (NO. A06-CA-990 RP) 508 Ragsdale v. U.S., 2008 WL 2390172, *5+ (N.D.Tex. Jun 11, 2008) (NO. 3:03-CR-0072-D (01), 3:07-CV-0325-D) 509 Moore v. Dretke, 2006 WL 1663758, *1 (S.D.Tex. Jun 14, 2006) (NO. CIV.A. H05-0213) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 510 Henderson v. Perry, 399 F.Supp.2d 756, 766 (E.D.Tex. Jun 09, 2005) (NO. CIV.A. 2:03-CV-354) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 511 Hutchison v. Brookshire Bros., Ltd., 284 F.Supp.2d 459, 467 (E.D.Tex. Sep 30, 2003) (NO. 1:01-CV-539) 512 P.J. ex rel. Jensen v. Utah, 2006 WL 1702585, *17 (D.Utah Jun 16, 2006) (NO. © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 2:05CV00739 PGC) 513 Bronson v. Swensen, 2005 WL 1310482, *2 (D.Utah May 24, 2005) (NO. 2:04CV21TS) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 514 Mercado v. Lynnhaven Lincoln-Mercury, Inc., 2011 WL 5027486, *12+ (E.D.Va. Oct 21, 2011) (NO. 2:11CV145) 515 MacDonald v. Johnson, 2009 WL 3254444, *5+ (E.D.Va. Oct 09, 2009) (NO. 1:08CV781GBL/TRJ) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 516 U.S. v. Hinen, 487 F.Supp.2d 747, 752 (W.D.Va. May 12, 2007) (NO. 2:07 CR 00005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 517 Brown v. Johnson, 2007 WL 1390185, *2 (W.D.Va. May 09, 2007) (NO. CIV.A. 7:07CV00144) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 518 Hansen v. Johnson, 2005 WL 2218034, *1 (E.D.Va. Aug 08, 2005) (NO. 2:05CV35) 519 Villegas v. U.S., 2013 WL 3990809, *6 (E.D.Wash. Aug 05, 2013) (NO. CV12-0001-EFS) 520 Villegas v. U.S., 926 F.Supp.2d 1185, 1195 (E.D.Wash. Jan 30, 2013) (NO. CV12-0001-EFS) 521 Stormans Inc. v. Selecky, 844 F.Supp.2d 1172, 1182 (W.D.Wash. Feb 22, 2012) (NO. C07-5374 RBL) 522 Witt v. U.S. Dept. of Air Force, 739 F.Supp.2d 1308, 1310+, 110 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 631, 631+ (W.D.Wash. Sep 24, 2010) (NO. 06-5195RBL) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 523 Samson v. City of Bainbridge Island, 683 F.Supp.2d 1164, 1169+ (W.D.Wash. Jan 27, 2010) (NO. 05-5197 RJB) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 524 Carlson v. Washington Dept. of Health, 2008 WL 5068654, *8 (W.D.Wash. Nov 24, 2008) (NO. C07-0681RAJ) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 525 Stiffarm v. City of Pullman Police Dept., 2006 WL 2263457, *15 (E.D.Wash. Aug 08, 2006) (NO. CV-04-0414-EFS) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 526 Strong v. Wisconsin, 544 F.Supp.2d 748, 760 (W.D.Wis. Apr 04, 2008) (NO. 07-CV-86-BBC) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 527 Dressler v. Ptacek, 2008 WL 168664, *2+ (E.D.Wis. Jan 17, 2008) (NO. 07-C-289) " 528 U.S. v. Doyle, 2007 WL 542138, *3 (E.D.Wis. Feb 16, 2007) (NO. 06-CR-224) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 529 Johnson v. Riggs, 2005 WL 2249874, *11 (E.D.Wis. Sep 15, 2005) (NO. 03-C-219) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 530 Gonzalez-Diaz v. Lopez, 2013 WL 3964120, *1 (D.Puerto Rico Aug 02, 2013) (NO. CIV. 07-1259 FAB) 531 Portugues Santa v. B. Fernandez & Hnos., Inc., 438 F.Supp.2d 33, 34+ (D.Puerto Rico Jul 14, 2006) (NO. CIV. 05-1527 (JP)) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 532 In re Balas, 449 B.R. 567, 573+, 65 Collier Bankr.Cas.2d 1307, 1307+ © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. (Bankr.C.D.Cal. Jun 13, 2011) (NO. 2:11-BK-17831 TD) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 533 In re Marshall, 300 B.R. 507, 520+ (Bankr.C.D.Cal. Oct 09, 2003) (NO. LA 02-30769-SB) 534 Adams v. U.S., 2003 WL 22339164, *10, 8 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1887, 1887 (Fed.Cl. Aug 11, 2003) (NO. 00-447 C) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 535 United States v. Adair, 2013 WL 4647553, *5+ (Army Ct.Crim.App. Aug 28, 2013) (NO. ARMY 20100933) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 536 Daily Journal, 72 M.J. 259, 259, 72 M.J. 260, 260 (U.S. Armed Forces Apr 23, 2013) (NO. 13-149) 537 Daily Journal, 72 M.J. 253, 253, 72 M.J. 254, 254 (U.S. Armed Forces Apr 16, 2013) (NO. 13-144) 538 U.S. v. Bowersox, 72 M.J. 71, 78 (U.S. Armed Forces Apr 02, 2013) (NO. 12-0398, CRIM.A. 20100580) (in dissent) 539 United States v. Chatman, 2013 WL 1319629, *1 (N.M.Ct.Crim.App. Mar 28, 2013) (NO. 201200225) 540 Daily Journal, 72 M.J. 95, 95, 72 M.J. 96, 96 (U.S. Armed Forces Feb 25, 2013) (NO. 13-109) 541 United States v. Baxter, 72 M.J. 507, 512 (Army Ct.Crim.App. Feb 20, 2013) (NO. 20100487) 542 United States v. Stevens, 2013 WL 5844657, *1+ (N.M.Ct.Crim.App. Oct 31, 2013) (NO. NMCCA 201300116) 543 U.S. v. Medina, 71 M.J. 652, 653 (C.G.Ct.Crim.App. Nov 07, 2012) (NO. 1325, CGCMG 0261) 544 U.S. v. Bazar, 2012 WL 2505280, *7+ (A.F.Ct.Crim.App. Jun 29, 2012) (NO. ACM 37548) 545 U.S. v. Kowalski, 69 M.J. 705, 710 (C.G.Ct.Crim.App. Dec 15, 2010) (NO. CGCMG 0265) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 546 U.S. v. Mejia, 2007 WL 4459535, *1 (A.F.Ct.Crim.App. Dec 19, 2007) (NO. ACM 36705) 547 U.S. v. Velazquez, 2007 WL 2340612, *6 (N.M.Ct.Crim.App. Aug 16, 2007) (NO. NMCCA 200602421) 548 Daily Journal, 65 M.J. 320, 320 (U.S. Armed Forces Aug 14, 2007) (NO. 07-214) 549 U.S. v. Johns, 2007 WL 2300965, *1+ (A.F.Ct.Crim.App. May 25, 2007) (NO. ACM 36406) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 550 U.S. v. Bonner, 64 M.J. 638, 640 (Army Ct.Crim.App. Mar 20, 2007) (NO. 20040196) 551 U.S. v. Hurst, 2007 WL 1702570, *4+ (N.M.Ct.Crim.App. Feb 08, 2007) (NO. NMCCA 200401383) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 552 U.S. v. Knepper, 2007 WL 1701362, *2 (N.M.Ct.Crim.App. Jan 31, 2007) (NO. NMCCA 200401159) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 553 U.S. v. Flores, 2006 WL 3895072, *1 (A.F.Ct.Crim.App. Dec 15, 2006) (NO. ACM 36218) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 554 U.S. v. Jaeger, 2006 WL 3895069, *3 (A.F.Ct.Crim.App. Dec 14, 2006) (NO. ACM 36127) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 555 U.S. v. Albaaj, 2006 WL 6624008, *6 (Army Ct.Crim.App. Aug 01, 2006) (NO. ARMY20000121) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 556 U.S. v. Machado, 2006 WL 1512106, *1+ (A.F.Ct.Crim.App. May 31, 2006) (NO. ACM35908) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 557 U.S. v. Meno, 2006 WL 6624654, *1 (Army Ct.Crim.App. May 15, 2006) (NO. ARMY20000733) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 558 U.S. v. Taylor, 2006 WL 618435, *3+ (N.M.Ct.Crim.App. Feb 28, 2006) (NO. NMCCA 200300876) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 559 U.S. v. Johnson, 61 M.J. 195, 202 (U.S. Armed Forces Jul 08, 2005) (NO. 04-0611, CRIM.A. 34889) (in dissent) 560 U.S. v. Amador, 61 M.J. 619, 623 (A.F.Ct.Crim.App. Jun 30, 2005) (NO. ACM35494) 561 Daily Journal, 61 M.J. 154, 154, 61 M.J. 155, 155, 61 M.J. 156, 156 (U.S. Armed Forces Apr 29, 2005) (NO. 05-141) 562 U.S. V. Ritter, 2005 WL 6520490, *4+ (Army Ct.Crim.App. Mar 04, 2005) (NO. ARMY20010528) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 563 U.S. v. Follord, 2005 WL 6519752, *1 (Army Ct.Crim.App. Feb 15, 2005) (NO. ARMY 20020350) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 564 U.S. v. Pyles, 2004 WL 5862648, *2+ (Army Ct.Crim.App. Oct 08, 2004) (NO. ARMY20010967) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 565 U.S. v. Sirk, 2004 WL 2216485, *1 (N.M.Ct.Crim.App. Sep 27, 2004) (NO. NMCCA200301084) 566 U.S. v. Banker, 60 M.J. 216, 225 (U.S. Armed Forces Aug 23, 2004) (NO. 03-0128, CR. A. 34531) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 567 Daily Journal, 60 M.J. 44, 44, 60 M.J. 45, 45 (U.S. Armed Forces May 12, 2004) (NO. 04-149) 568 Daily Journal, 59 M.J. 252, 252, 59 M.J. 253, 253 (U.S. Armed Forces Jan 07, 2004) (NO. 04-062) 569 Daily Journal, 59 M.J. 222, 222, 59 M.J. 223, 223, 59 M.J. 224, 224 (U.S. Armed Forces Dec 15, 2003) (NO. 04-049) 570 Daily Journal, 59 M.J. 216, 216 (U.S. Armed Forces Dec 01, 2003) (NO. 04-039) 571 U.S. v. Honzik, 2003 WL 22862648, *11 (A.F.Ct.Crim.App. Nov 26, 2003) (NO. ACM 34667) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 572 Daily Journal, 59 M.J. 146, 146, 59 M.J. 147, 147, 59 M.J. 148, 148 (U.S. Armed Forces Sep 30, 2003) (NO. 03-238) 573 Daily Journal, 59 M.J. 131, 131 (U.S. Armed Forces Aug 29, 2003) (NO. 03-219) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 574 J.L.M. v. S.A.K., 18 So.3d 384, 390 (Ala.Civ.App. Dec 19, 2008) (NO. 2070641) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 575 Newton v. State, 78 So.3d 458, 475+ (Ala.Crim.App. Oct 02, 2009) (NO. CR05-1517) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 576 In re Tammy J., 270 P.3d 805, 813 (Alaska Mar 02, 2012) (NO. S-13698) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 577 State v. Bateman, 2008 WL 4516447, *7+ (Ariz.App. Div. 1 Oct 02, 2008) (NO. 1 CA-CR 07-0043) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 578 Sylvester v. Director, Arkansas Employment Sec. Dept., 2006 WL 637097, *2 (Ark.App. Mar 15, 2006) (NO. E05-46) 579 People v. McCullon, 2012 WL 1548062, *1 (Cal.App. 2 Dist. May 03, 2012) (NO. B231429) 580 People v. Kinley, 2011 WL 6099374, *5 (Cal.App. 1 Dist. Dec 08, 2011) (NO. A130550) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 581 People v. Delacy, 122 Cal.Rptr.3d 216, 231, 192 Cal.App.4th 1481, 1500, 11 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2651, 2651, 2011 Daily Journal D.A.R. 3065, 3065 (Cal.App. 1 Dist. Feb 25, 2011) (NO. A125803) (in dissent) 582 People v. Gonzales, 120 Cal.Rptr.3d 911, 927, 192 Cal.App.4th 152, 152, 11 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1376, 1376, 2011 Daily Journal D.A.R. 1577, 1577 (Cal.App. 6 Dist. Jan 27, 2011) (NO. H032866) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 583 People v. Rotroff, 100 Cal.Rptr.3d 558, 569, 178 Cal.App.4th 619, 619, 09 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 12,917, 12917, 2009 Daily Journal D.A.R. 15,094, 15094 (Cal.App. 6 Dist. Oct 22, 2009) (NO. H033527) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 584 State Route 4 Bypass Authority v. Superior Court, 64 Cal.Rptr.3d 286, 299, 153 Cal.App.4th 1546, 1564, 07 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9398, 9398, 2007 Daily Journal D.A.R. 12,099, 12099 (Cal.App. 1 Dist. Aug 08, 2007) (NO. A116834, A116851) " 585 People v. Calderon, 2007 WL 1683576, *6 (Cal.App. 6 Dist. Jun 12, 2007) (NO. H030215) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 586 People v. Krause, 2007 WL 1152688, *6 (Cal.App. 3 Dist. Apr 19, 2007) (NO. C050840) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 587 Gunn v. Mariners Church, Inc., 2005 WL 1253953, *11 (Cal.App. 4 Dist. May 27, 2005) (NO. G032304) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 588 People v. Allen, 2005 WL 552470, *7 (Cal.App. 1 Dist. Mar 09, 2005) (NO. A106272) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 589 People v. Sanches, 2004 WL 2757435, *6 (Cal.App. 4 Dist. Dec 02, 2004) (NO. G032738) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 590 People v. Hofsheier, 11 Cal.Rptr.3d 762, 767, 117 Cal.App.4th 438, 438, 04 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2854, 2854, 04 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3275, 3275, 2004 Daily Journal D.A.R. 4083, 4083, 2004 Daily Journal D.A.R. 4618, 4618 (Cal.App. 6 Dist. Apr 01, 2004) (NO. H026217) " (in dissent) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 591 In re Coordination Proceeding, Special Title Rule 1550(c)¨, 2005 WL 583129, *4 (Cal.Super. Mar 14, 2005) (NO. 4365) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 592 Cendant Corp. & Subsidiaries v. Department of Revenue, 226 P.3d 1102, 1111 (Colo.App. Feb 05, 2009) (NO. 08CA0103) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 593 In re Board of County Com'rs of County of Arapahoe, 95 P.3d 593, 601, 20 IER Cases 1399, 1399, 31 Media L. Rep. 2448, 2448 (Colo.App. Jul 17, 2003) (NO. 03CA0074) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 594 Henson v. City of Colorado Springs, 2005 WL 6143989, *6143989 (Trial Order) (Colo.Dist.Ct. 2005) Order (NO. 05CV416) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 595 State v. Lawrence, 920 A.2d 236, 265, 282 Conn. 141, 186 (Conn. Apr 24, 2007) (NO. 17452) " (in dissent) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 596 Herrington v. U.S., 6 A.3d 1237, 1244, 64 A.L.R.6th 725, 725 (D.C. Nov 04, 2010) (NO. 07-CF-98) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 597 Harvey v. City of Newark, 2010 WL 4240625, *7 (Del.Ch. Oct 20, 2010) (NO. CIV. A. 5023-VCS) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 598 State v. J.P., 907 So.2d 1101, 1109 (Fla. Nov 18, 2004) (NO. SC02-2288, SC02-2452) " 599 Buckner v. Family Services of Cent. Florida, Inc., 876 So.2d 1285, 1288, 29 Fla. L. Weekly D1695, D1695 (Fla.App. 5 Dist. Jul 23, 2004) (NO. 5D03-3217) 600 In re Adoption of Doe, 2008 WL 5006172, *29 (Fla.Cir.Ct. Nov 25, 2008) 601 In re Adoption of Doe, 2008 WL 5070056, *22+ (Fla.Cir.Ct. Aug 29, 2008) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 602 State v. Green, 706 S.E.2d 720, 721+, 308 Ga.App. 33, 34+, 11 FCDR 502, 502+ (Ga.App. Feb 22, 2011) (NO. A10A1673) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 603 State v. Cook, 192 P.3d 1085, 1086, 146 Idaho 261, 262 (Idaho App. May 20, 2008) (NO. 33775) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 604 People v. Petrenko, 931 N.E.2d 1198, 1212+, 342 Ill.Dec. 15, 29+, 237 Ill.2d 490, 512+, 80 A.L.R.6th 717+ (Ill. Jun 04, 2010) (NO. 107503) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 605 Vitro v. Mihelcic, 806 N.E.2d 632, 640, 282 Ill.Dec. 335, 343, 209 Ill.2d 76, 92 (Ill. Jan 23, 2004) (NO. 94231) (in dissent) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 606 Gutraj v. Department of Financial and Professional Regulation, 2013 WL 5777170, *5, 2013 IL App (4th) 121096-U, 121096-U (Ill.App. 4 Dist. Oct 24, 2013) (NO. 4-12-1096) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 607 Hammon v. State, 809 N.E.2d 945, 950+ (Ind.App. Jun 14, 2004) (NO. 52A02-0308-CR-693) " 608 State v. Baldon, 829 N.W.2d 785, 819 (Iowa Apr 19, 2013) (NO. 10-0214) 609 State v. Seering, 701 N.W.2d 655, 664 (Iowa Jul 29, 2005) (NO. 03-0776) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 610 In re Detention of Cubbage, 671 N.W.2d 442, 447 (Iowa Nov 13, 2003) (NO. 02-0850) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 611 Miller v. Johnson, 289 P.3d 1098, 1142, 295 Kan. 636, 708 (Kan. Oct 05, 2012) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. (NO. 99,818) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 612 In re Williams, 253 P.3d 327, 337, 292 Kan. 96, 112 (Kan. Apr 22, 2011) (NO. 99,235) 613 State v. Richardson, 209 P.3d 696, 701, 289 Kan. 118, 123 (Kan. Jun 19, 2009) (NO. 100,445, 100,835) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 614 Montoy v. State, 120 P.3d 306, 317, 278 Kan. 769, 769, 202 Ed. Law Rep. 319, 319 (Kan. Jan 03, 2005) (NO. 92,032) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 615 State v. Marsh, 102 P.3d 445, 463+, 278 Kan. 520, 542+ (Kan. Dec 17, 2004) (NO. 81135) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 616 State v. Odell, 293 P.3d 168, 168 (Kan.App. Jan 18, 2013) (Table, text in WESTLAW, NO. 105,311) 617 State v. Coman, 214 P.3d 1198, 1204+, 42 Kan.App.2d 592, 600+ (Kan.App. Aug 28, 2009) (NO. 100,494) (in dissent) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 618 In re Care and Treatment of Williams, 214 P.3d 1225, 1225 (Kan.App. Aug 28, 2009) (Table, text in WESTLAW, NO. 99,235) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 619 State v. Schrader, 172 P.3d 1221, 1221 (Kan.App. Dec 21, 2007) (Table, text in WESTLAW, NO. 97,206) " 620 State v. Limon, 154 P.3d 1184, 1184 (Kan.App. Apr 06, 2007) (Table, text in WESTLAW, NO. 96,013) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 621 State v. Jones, 152 P.3d 688, 688 (Kan.App. Mar 02, 2007) (Table, text in WESTLAW, NO. 95,558) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 622 State v. Toll, 151 P.3d 864, 864+ (Kan.App. Feb 16, 2007) (Table, text in WESTLAW, NO. 95,713) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 623 State v. Irby, 150 P.3d 335, 335+ (Kan.App. Jan 26, 2007) (Table, text in WESTLAW, NO. 95,349) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 624 State v. Tillman, 125 P.3d 590, 590 (Kan.App. Dec 30, 2005) (Table, text in WESTLAW, NO. 92,850) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 625 State v. Horn, 109 P.3d 203, 203 (Kan.App. Apr 08, 2005) (Table, text in WESTLAW, NO. 91,692) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 626 Stinson v. Com., 396 S.W.3d 900, 908 (Ky. Apr 25, 2013) (NO. 2011-SC-000615-DG) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 627 Vision Mining, Inc. v. Gardner, 364 S.W.3d 455, 483 (Ky. Dec 22, 2011) (NO. 2010-SC-000311-WC, 2010-SC-000438-WC) (in dissent) 628 Woods v. Com., 142 S.W.3d 24, 55 (Ky. Aug 26, 2004) (NO. 1999-SC-0773-DG) (in dissent) 629 Cote-Whitacre v. Department of Public Health, 844 N.E.2d 623, 656, 446 Mass. 350, 389 (Mass. Mar 30, 2006) (NO. SJC-09436) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 630 Com. v. Baran, 905 N.E.2d 1122, 1147, 74 Mass.App.Ct. 256, 287 (Mass.App.Ct. May 15, 2009) (NO. 07-P-1096) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 631 Doe v. Moe, 827 N.E.2d 240, 245, 63 Mass.App.Ct. 516, 521 (Mass.App.Ct. May 16, 2005) (NO. 02-P-381) " © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 632 Com. v. Pugh, 2009 WL 890988, *6, 25 Mass.L.Rptr. 329, 329 (Mass.Super. Jan 26, 2009) (NO. CR2007-1323) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 633 Swainamer v. Chief Michael Healy & Others, 2008 WL 5536934, *5536934 (Trial Order) (Mass.Super. Feb 11, 2008) Memorandum of Decision and Order on Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment and Final Judgment (NO. 2002-01230) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 634 Com. v. Can-Port Amusement Corp., 2005 WL 937312, *10 (Mass.Super. Mar 31, 2005) (NO. 2005-0295) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 635 Barnes v. State, 31 A.3d 203, 211, 423 Md. 75, 88 (Md. Oct 27, 2011) (NO. 124 SEPT.TERM 2010) 636 Neifert v. Department of Environment, 910 A.2d 1100, 1112, 395 Md. 486, 506, 64 ERC 1685, 1685 (Md. Nov 14, 2006) (NO. 10 SEPT.TERM 2006) 637 Maxwell v. State, 895 A.2d 327, 336+, 168 Md.App. 1, 16+ (Md.App. Mar 30, 2006) (NO. 1882 SEPT.TERM 2003) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 638 Deane v. Conaway, 2006 WL 148145, *9+ (Md.Cir.Ct. Jan 20, 2006) (NO. 24-C-04-005390) 639 Deane v. Conaway, 2006 WL 6021625, *6021625 (Trial Order) (Md.Cir.Ct. Jan 20, 2006) Memorandum (NO. 24-C-04-005390) 640 O'Neal v. St. John Hosp. & Medical Center, 791 N.W.2d 853, 868, 487 Mich. 485, 514 (Mich. Jul 31, 2010) (NO. 138180) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 641 Regents of University of Michigan v. Titan Ins. Co., 791 N.W.2d 897, 908+, 487 Mich. 289, 312+ (Mich. Jul 31, 2010) (NO. 136905) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 642 Lansing Schools Educ. Ass'n v. Lansing Bd. of Educ., 792 N.W.2d 686, 696+, 487 Mich. 349, 367+, 263 Ed. Law Rep. 360, 360+ (Mich. Jul 31, 2010) (NO. 138401) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 643 McCormick v. Carrier, 795 N.W.2d 517, 535+, 487 Mich. 180, 210+ (Mich. Jul 31, 2010) (NO. 136738) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 644 Bezeau v. Palace Sports & Entertainment, Inc., 795 N.W.2d 797, 808, 487 Mich. 455, 476 (Mich. Jul 31, 2010) (NO. 137500) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 645 People v. Feezel, 783 N.W.2d 67, 84, 486 Mich. 184, 212 (Mich. Jun 08, 2010) (NO. 138031) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 646 National Pride At Work, Inc. v. Governor of Michigan, 732 N.W.2d 139, 155, 274 Mich.App. 147, 171, 99 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1356, 1356, 154 Lab.Cas. P 60,444, 60444, 220 Ed. Law Rep. 832, 832 (Mich.App. Feb 01, 2007) (NO. 265870) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 647 Kemmer v. State, 2005 WL 2277253, *3 (Minn.App. Sep 20, 2005) (NO. A04-1913) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 648 Doe v. Phillips, 194 S.W.3d 833, 844 (Mo. Jun 30, 2006) (NO. SC86573) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 649 Guerra v. Lombardi, 336 S.W.3d 167, 171 (Mo.App. W.D. Mar 08, 2011) (NO. WD71787) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 650 Snetsinger v. Montana University System, 104 P.3d 445, 458, 325 Mont. 148, 167, 194 Ed. Law Rep. 966, 966, 2004 MT 390, 390 (Mont. Dec 30, 2004) (NO. 03-238) 651 State v. Hunt, 722 S.E.2d 484, 490, 365 N.C. 432, 440 (N.C. Mar 09, 2012) (NO. 195PA11) 652 State v. Hunt, 728 S.E.2d 409, 413+ (N.C.App. Jul 17, 2012) (NO. COA10-666-2) 653 State v. Torres, 652 S.E.2d 70, 70, 186 N.C.App. 681 (N.C.App. Nov 06, 2007) (Table, text in WESTLAW, NO. COA07-156) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 654 Hobbs v. Smith, 2006 WL 3103008, *1 (N.C.Super. Aug 25, 2006) (NO. 05 CVS 267) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 655 MKB Management Corp v. Burdick, 2012 WL 1360641, *1 (Trial Order) (N.D.Dist. Feb 16, 2012) Memorandum Opinion and Order (NO. 09-2011-CV-02205) 656 State v. Rung, 774 N.W.2d 621, 630+, 278 Neb. 855, 864+ (Neb. Nov 13, 2009) (NO. S-08-878) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 657 State v. Holmes, 920 A.2d 632, 635, 154 N.H. 723, 726 (N.H. Jan 19, 2007) (NO. 2005-883) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 658 State v. Pena-Flores, 965 A.2d 114, 140, 198 N.J. 6, 49 (N.J. Feb 25, 2009) (NO. A-129 SEPT.TERM 2006, A-15 SEPT.TERM 2007) " (in dissent) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 659 Oberhand v. Director, Div. of Taxation, 940 A.2d 1202, 1213+, 193 N.J. 558, 577+ (N.J. Feb 27, 2008) (NO. A-106 SEPT.TERM 2006) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 660 State v. Brown, 919 A.2d 107, 118, 190 N.J. 144, 162 (N.J. Apr 17, 2007) (NO. A-7 SEPT.TERM 2006) " (in dissent) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 661 Hennefeld v. Township of Montclair, 22 N.J.Tax 166, 181 (N.J.Tax Mar 15, 2005) (NO. 007682-2004) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 662 Griego v. Oliver, 2013 WL 6670704, *19 (N.M. Dec 19, 2013) (NO. 34,306) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 663 Elane Photography, LLC v. Willock, 309 P.3d 53, 62+, 2013-NMSC-040, 040+ (N.M. Aug 22, 2013) (NO. 33,687) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 664 State v. Swick, 279 P.3d 747, 754, 2012-NMSC-018, 018 (N.M. Jun 01, 2012) (NO. 32,510) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 665 Wagner v. AGW Consultants, 114 P.3d 1050, 1063, 137 N.M. 734, 747, 2005-NMSC-016, 016 (N.M. May 24, 2005) (NO. 28,348) 666 Elane Photography, LLC v. Willock, 284 P.3d 428, 437+, 2012-NMCA-086, 086+ (N.M.App. May 31, 2012) (NO. 30,203) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 667 State v. Jensen, 118 P.3d 762, 770, 138 N.M. 254, 262, 2005-NMCA-113, 113 (N.M.App. Jun 23, 2005) (NO. 24,526) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 668 People v. Knox, 875 N.Y.S.2d 828, 832, 903 N.E.2d 1149, 1153, 12 N.Y.3d 60, 67, 2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 01156, 01156 (N.Y. Feb 17, 2009) (NO. 10, 11, 9) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 669 People v. Perez, 961 N.Y.S.2d 51, 52, 104 A.D.3d 403, 404, 2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 01344, 01344 (N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept. Mar 05, 2013) (NO. 3983/06, 9417) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 670 Price v. New York City Bd. of Educ., 2007 WL 7593809, *1 (Trial Order) (N.Y.Sup. May 07, 2007) Decision and Order (NO. 109703/06) 671 Godfrey v. Spano, 2007 WL 7289401, *4 (Trial Order) (N.Y.Sup. Apr 16, 2007) Amended Decision (NO. 16894/06) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 672 Godfrey v. Spano, 836 N.Y.S.2d 813, 816, 15 Misc.3d 809, 813, 2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 27105, 27105 (N.Y.Sup. Mar 12, 2007) (NO. 16894/06) 673 Shields v. Madigan, 783 N.Y.S.2d 270, 276, 5 Misc.3d 901, 907, 2004 N.Y. Slip Op. 24393, 24393 (N.Y.Sup. Oct 18, 2004) (NO. 1458/04) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 674 People v. Novie, 976 N.Y.S.2d 636, 646, 41 Misc.3d 63, 63, 2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 23315, 23315 (N.Y.Sup.App.Term Sep 17, 2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 675 In re V.R., 800 N.Y.S.2d 358, 358, 6 Misc.3d 1003(A), 1003(A), 2004 N.Y. Slip Op. 51706(U), 51706(U) (N.Y.Fam.Ct. Dec 22, 2004) (Table, text in WESTLAW, NO. 5616-04) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 676 In re Bobbijean P., 784 N.Y.S.2d 919, 919, 2 Misc.3d 1011(A), 1011(A), 2004 N.Y. Slip Op. 50286(U), 50286(U) (N.Y.Fam.Ct. Mar 31, 2004) (Table, text in WESTLAW, NO. 03626-03) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 677 People v. Greenleaf, 780 N.Y.S.2d 899, 903+, 5 Misc.3d 337, 343+, 2004 N.Y. Slip Op. 24267, 24267+ (N.Y.Just.Ct. Jul 13, 2004) (NO. 04030294) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 678 In re Guardianship of Dameris L., 956 N.Y.S.2d 848, 855, 38 Misc.3d 570, 580, 2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 22386, 22386 (N.Y.Sur. Dec 31, 2012) (NO. 2009-0892) 679 In re Mark C.H., 906 N.Y.S.2d 419, 434, 28 Misc.3d 765, 786, 2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 20156, 20156 (N.Y.Sur. Apr 21, 2010) (NO. 2006-4242) 680 State v. Mole, 994 N.E.2d 482, 489, 2013-Ohio-3131, 3131 (Ohio App. 8 Dist. Jul 18, 2013) (NO. 98900) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 681 Page v. Page, 2008 WL 2469176, *6+, 2008-Ohio-3011, 3011+ (Ohio App. 2 Dist. Jun 20, 2008) (NO. 07CA0109) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 682 CITY OF PORTLAND, Plaintiff, v. Eric Glen BURRAGE, Defendant., 2005 WL 5490460, *5490460 (Trial Order) (Or.Cir. Apr 20, 2005) Opinion and Order (NO. 0405-45747, 0405-46416, 0407-48939, 0407-49303) " 683 Nixon v. Com., 839 A.2d 277, 287+, 576 Pa. 385, 400+ (Pa. Dec 30, 2003) (NO. 004 MAP 2002) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 684 Com. v. Gallagher, 874 A.2d 49, 63, 2005 PA Super 116, 116 (Pa.Super. Mar 30, 2005) (NO. 1596 EDA 2003) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 685 Com. v. Coleman, 854 A.2d 978, 983, 2004 PA Super 226, 226 (Pa.Super. Jun 15, 2004) (NO. 3373 EDA 2002) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 686 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH, of the Commonwealth System of Higher Education, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH, Commission on Human © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Relations, Deborah HENSON, James Keith Beer, Mark S. Friedman, Ray Ann Lockard, Mark S. Stein, Bruce Venarde, Shandra D. Williams, Defendants., 2004 WL 4965668, *4965668+ (Trial Order) (Pa.Com.Pl. Jan 12, 2004) Opinion and Order of Court (NO. GD99-21287) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 687 State v. Dykes, 744 S.E.2d 505, 511+, 403 S.C. 499, 509+ (S.C. May 22, 2013) (NO. 2010-160047, 27124) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 688 Bush v. State, --- S.W.3d ----, 2014 WL 295187, *13 (Tenn. Jan 28, 2014) (NO. M2011-02133-SC-R11PC) 689 State v. Matthews, 2011 WL 3798873, *5 (Tenn.Crim.App. Aug 26, 2011) (NO. M2010-02601-CCA-R3CD) 690 Carl J. Battaglia, M.D., P.A. v. Alexander, 177 S.W.3d 893, 914, 48 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 720, 720 (Tex. May 27, 2005) (NO. 02-0701) " 691 Ex parte Masonheimer, 220 S.W.3d 494, 515 (Tex.Crim.App. Mar 21, 2007) (NO. PD-521-05) (in dissent) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 692 State v. Johnson, --- S.W.3d ----, 2014 WL 230940, *9 (Tex.App.-Tyler Jan 22, 2014) (NO. 12-12-00425-CR) 693 Baird v. State, 379 S.W.3d 353, 358 (Tex.App.-Waco Jan 11, 2012) (NO. 10-10-00297-CR) 694 Ochoa v. State, 355 S.W.3d 48, 53 (Tex.App.-Hous. (1 Dist.) Dec 02, 2010) (NO. 01-09-00189-CR) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 695 Durden v. State, 290 S.W.3d 413, 423 (Tex.App.-Texarkana May 15, 2009) (NO. 06-08-00223-CR) (in dissent) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 696 Florance v. State, 2009 WL 1267350, *6+ (Tex.App.-Dallas May 08, 2009) (NO. 05-08-00707-CR) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 697 In re J.R., 171 S.W.3d 558, 570 (Tex.App.-Hous. (14 Dist.) Jul 28, 2005) (NO. 14-04-00359-CV) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 698 Kupper v. State, 2004 WL 60768, *4 (Tex.App.-Dallas Jan 14, 2004) (NO. 05-03-00486-CR) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 699 Lawrence v. State, 2003 WL 22453791, *1 (Tex.App.-Hous. (14 Dist.) Oct 30, 2003) (NO. 14-99-00109-CR, 14-99-00111-CR) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 700 Gillmor v. Summit County, 246 P.3d 102, 111+, 672 Utah Adv. Rep. 19, 19+, 2010 UT 69, 69+ (Utah Dec 28, 2010) (NO. 20070266) 701 Jones v. Jones, 307 P.3d 598, 603, 738 Utah Adv. Rep. 46, 46, 2013 UT App 174, 174 (Utah App. Jul 11, 2013) (NO. 20110998-CA) " HN: 2,5 (S.Ct.) 702 Berg v. State, 100 P.3d 261, 264, 509 Utah Adv. Rep. 30, 30, 2004 UT App 337, 337 (Utah App. Sep 30, 2004) (NO. 20030842-CA) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 703 Home Paramount Pest Control Companies, Inc. v. Shaffer, 718 S.E.2d 762, 766, 282 Va. 412, 419, 161 Lab.Cas. P 61,201, 61201, 33 IER Cases 46, 46 (Va. Nov 04, 2011) (NO. 101837) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 704 Gilliam v. McGrady, 673 S.E.2d 474, 480, 53 Va.App. 476, 487 (Va.App. Mar 04, 2009) (NO. 0288-08-2) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 705 A.O.V. v. J.R.V., 2007 WL 581871, *4+ (Va.App. Feb 27, 2007) (NO. 0219-06-4, 0220-06-4) 706 Bomar v. Chesapeake Bay Steakhouse, 2013 WL 5797366, *3 (Trial Order) (Va.Cir.Ct. Oct 21, 2013) Trial Order (NO. CL12-2415) 707 American Legion Post #149 v. Washington State Dept. of Health, 192 P.3d 306, 336+, 164 Wash.2d 570, 628+ (Wash. Sep 11, 2008) (NO. 79839-7) " (in dissent) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 708 McNabb v. Department of Corrections, 180 P.3d 1257, 1269, 163 Wash.2d 393, 415 (Wash. Apr 10, 2008) (NO. 77359-9) (in dissent) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 709 Ferdon ex rel. Petrucelli v. Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund, 701 N.W.2d 440, 461, 284 Wis.2d 573, 615, 2005 WI 125, 125 (Wis. Jul 14, 2005) (NO. 2003AP988) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 710 State v. Pryes, 771 N.W.2d 930, 320 Wis.2d 705, 2009 WI App 110, 110 (Wis.App. Jun 10, 2009) (Table, text in WESTLAW, NO. 2009AP2-CR) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 711 Friends of Marpi v. Commonwealth Government, 2012 WL 3609958, *4, 2012 MP 9, 9 (N. Mariana Islands Aug 21, 2012) (NO. 2011-SCC-0015-CIV) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 712 Castro ex rel. Castro v. Castro, 2009 WL 2461681, *6+ (N. Mariana Islands Aug 07, 2009) (NO. 05-0010-GA, 05-0171) 713 Lozada Tirado v. Testigos Jehova, 177 D.P.R. 893, 941, 2010TSPR9, 9, P.R. Offic. Trans. (P.R. Jan 27, 2010) (NO. CC-2006-94) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 714 Salva Santiago v. Torres Padro, 171 D.P.R. 332, 365, 2007TSPR101, 101 (P.R. Jun 01, 2007) (NO. CC-2006-173) 715 Bellon Mccormick v. Palau Hartmann, 2013 WL 5525806, *5 (TCA May 31, 2013) (NO. KLAN201300514, OP20130025) 716 Pueblo v. De Jesus Morales, 2006 WL 1308687, *10 (TCA Apr 25, 2006) (NO. DEC2004G0001, DEC2004G0002, DEC2004G0011, DH02004G0022, DH02004G0033, DH02004G0034, KLAN200400907) 717 Negron v. Hopgood, 2006 WL 314366, *2 (TCA Jan 19, 2006) (NO. KAC2000-0188(505), KLAN200500910) 718 Banks v. International Rental and Leasing Corp., 2011 WL 6299025, *7, 55 V.I. 967, 967 (V.I. Dec 15, 2011) (NO. CIV. 2011-0037) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 719 Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians v. Torres, --- Am. Tribal Law ----, 2005 WL 6437828, *7, 4 Cher.Rep. 9, 9 (Eastern Cherokee Sup.Ct. Apr 12, 2005) (NO. CR 03-1443, CR 03-1529, CR 03-1530, CR 03-1531, CR 03-1819) Mentioned 720 Camreta v. Greene, 131 S.Ct. 2020, 2044, 179 L.Ed.2d 1118, 1118, 79 USLW 4382, 4382, 11 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6316, 6316, 2011 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7561, 7561, 2011 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7563, 7563, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 1019, 1019 (U.S. May 26, 2011) (NO. 09-1454, 09-1478) (in dissent) 721 Balas v. Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc., 711 F.3d 401, 409, 117 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1065, 1065, 96 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 44,786, 44786 (4th Cir.(Va.) Mar 15, 2013) (NO. 12-1201) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 722 Bell v. Duperrault, 367 F.3d 703, 710 (7th Cir.(Wis.) May 12, 2004) (NO. 03-3829) 723 Summerlin v. Stewart, 341 F.3d 1082, 1122, 03 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8013, 8013, 2003 Daily Journal D.A.R. 9927, 9927 (9th Cir.(Ariz.) Sep 02, 2003) (NO. 98-99002) 724 Glazner v. Glazner, 347 F.3d 1212, 1216, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 1199, 1199 (11th Cir.(Ala.) Oct 16, 2003) (NO. 02-11799) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 725 U.S. v. Shepard, 2012 WL 527485, *6 (D.Ariz. Feb 17, 2012) (NO. CR 10-1032-TUC-CKJ) 726 Winters ex rel. Estate of Winters v. Arkansas Department of Health and Human Services, 437 F.Supp.2d 851, 892 (E.D.Ark. Jun 02, 2006) (NO. 4:04 CV 00206 GTE) 727 Vivid Entertainment, LLC v. Fielding, 2013 WL 4451068, *14+ (C.D.Cal. Aug 16, 2013) (NO. CV 13-00190 DDP AGRX) 728 Salter v. Hernandez, 2013 WL 3054179, *6 (E.D.Cal. Jun 17, 2013) (NO. 1:12-CV-01852-LJO) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 729 Sanchez v. City of Fresno, 914 F.Supp.2d 1079, 1101 (E.D.Cal. Dec 26, 2012) (NO. 1:12-CV-00428-LJO) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 730 Vigil v. Jones, 2011 WL 1480679, *4 (D.Colo. Mar 15, 2011) (NO. 09-CV-01676-PAB-KLM) 731 Vigil v. Jones, 2010 WL 3703582, *5 (D.Colo. Aug 09, 2010) (NO. 09CV01676PABKLM) 732 U.S. v. Cardenas, 2007 WL 4245913, *9 (S.D.Fla. Nov 29, 2007) (NO. 07-80108CR) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 733 Entertainment Software Ass'n v. Foti, 451 F.Supp.2d 823, 828, 35 Media L. Rep. 1751, 1751 (M.D.La. Aug 24, 2006) (NO. 06-431-JJB-CN) 734 Gammons v. Massachusetts Dept. of Housing and Community Development, 502 F.Supp.2d 161, 167 (D.Mass. May 09, 2007) (NO. CIVA 07-10110-PBS) 735 DeBoer v. Snyder, 2013 WL 3466719, *2 (E.D.Mich. Jul 01, 2013) (NO. 12-CV-10285) 736 U.S. v. Hill, 2011 WL 1486023, *3 (D.Minn. Mar 31, 2011) (NO. 11-CR-0015-DWF-LIB) 737 Kloch v. Kohl, 2007 WL 1309752, *9 (D.Neb. Mar 30, 2007) (NO. 405CV3018) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 738 Mitchell v. Keane, 1994 WL 689076, *9 (S.D.N.Y. Dec 08, 1994) (NO. 93 CIV. 6024 (LBS)) 739 Balas v. Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc., 2011 WL 4478864, *9 (E.D.Va. Sep © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 26, 2011) (NO. 2:11CV347) 740 U.S. v. Lorenz, 2009 WL 6920843, *2 (Army Ct.Crim.App. Apr 20, 2009) (NO. ARMY20061071) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 741 Schmidt v. State, 2011 WL 8879217, *1 (Trial Order) (Alaska Super. Sep 16, 2011) Decision and Order (NO. 3AN-10-9519 CI) 742 State v. Brown, 156 S.W.3d 722, 731, 356 Ark. 460, 473 (Ark. Mar 25, 2004) (NO. CR 03-914) 743 People v. Martinez, 2009 WL 3777413, *8 (Cal.App. 6 Dist. Nov 12, 2009) (NO. H033918) 744 People v. Castellanos, 2009 WL 2438434, *19 (Cal.App. 6 Dist. Aug 11, 2009) (NO. H032865) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 745 Hernandez v. Banks, 65 A.3d 59, 65 (D.C. May 02, 2013) (NO. 08-CV-1571, 09-CV-744) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 746 Planned Parenthood of Indiana v. Carter, 854 N.E.2d 853, 876 (Ind.App. Sep 22, 2006) (NO. 49A02-0505-CV-469) 747 Matheney v. Com., 191 S.W.3d 599, 625 (Ky. Mar 23, 2006) (NO. 2002-SC-0920-MR) (in dissent) 748 State ex rel. Branson v. Fabian, 2009 WL 2447531, *2 (Minn.App. Aug 11, 2009) (NO. A09-0814) 749 Masrour v. Naghshineh, 2008 WL 7716336, *7716336 (Trial Order) (Pa.Com.Pl. Mar 28, 2008) Opinion (NO. 2006-C-1046) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 750 Ibenyenwa v. State, 367 S.W.3d 420, 428 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth Mar 22, 2012) (NO. 02-10-00142-CR) Administrative Decisions (U.S.A.) Board of Immigration Appeals Decisions 751 IN RE: VARDKES AYRAPETOVIC NAVASARDYAN A.K.A. VARDKES AYRAPEROVI NAVASARDYAN, 2008 WL 4222183, *1+ (BIA Aug 29, 2008) (NO. : A071 117 437 - LOS) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) Directorate for Industrial Security Clearance Review Decisions 752 In the Matter of: *** Applicant for Security Clearance, DISCR OSD Case No. 12-03661, Case No. 12-03661 (2013) 753 In the Matter of: *** Applicant for Security Clearance, DISCR OSD Case No. 11-14131, Case No. 11-14131 (2013) U.S. Attorney General Opinions 754 WHETHER THE CRIMINAL PROVISIONS OF THE VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN ACT APPLY TO OTHERWISE COVERED CONDUCT WHEN THE © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. OFFENDER AND VICTIM ARE THE SAME SEX, 2010 WL 2431395 (O.L.C.), *3 (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) State Administrative Materials (U.S.A.) 755 HICKS: IN MEMORANDUM DECISION, IDAHO BANKRUPTCY COURT HOLDS THAT W'S SP FUNDS CANNOT BE USED TO PAY H'S SP DEBTS IN THEIR JOINT CHAPTER 7 BANKRUPTCY CASE: IN RE HICKS JACQUELINE P.: DEPUBLISHED BY CASCT: IN BRIEF: Barbee, 2003 California Family Law Report - First Alert 1122 (2003) 756 Del. Op. Atty. Gen. 10-IB09, Mr. Dan Shortridge (2010) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 757 2006 Idaho Op. Atty. Gen. 5, Honorable Lawerence Denney (2006) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 758 Toni Ramirez Wheeler, 2007 WL 1139263 (Kan.A.G.), *11 (2007) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 759 95 Md. Op. Atty. Gen. 3, The Honorable Richard S. Madaleno, Jr. (2010) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 760 NATIONAL PRIDE AT WORK, INC., Becky Allen, Dorthea Agnostopoulos, Adnan Ayoub, Meghan Bellanger, Judith Block, Mary M. Brisbois, Wade Carlson, Courtney D.Chapin, Michael Chapman, Michelle Corwin, Lori Curry, Joseph Darby, 2007 WL 7562041 (MI.Pub.Emp.Rep.), *1 (2007) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 761 2004 N.Y. Op. Atty. Gen. No. 1, Darrin B. Derosia Peter Case Graham (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 762 Senator Timothy Z. Jennings, 2004 WL 2019901 (N.M.A.G.), *1 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 763 The Honorable Jackie E. Hayes, 2003 WL 21790886 (S.C.A.G.), *5 (2003) 764 Tenn. Op. Atty. Gen. No. 10-09, The Honorable Stratton Bone, Jr. (2010) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 765 Tenn. Op. Atty. Gen. No. 04-053, Robert S. "Bob" McKee (2004) HN: 3,5 (S.Ct.) 766 The Role of International Law in Texas Jurisprudence 1, 2011 WL 5088632 (TX Jud. Eth. Comm.), *9+ (2011) 767 Department of Corrections, 2007 WL 3376864 (VA.Dept.Emp.Disp.Res.), *3+ (2007) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 768 Department of Corrections, 2007 WL 4916360 (VA.Dept.Emp.Disp.Res.), *3+ (2007) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 769 Department of Corrections, 2007 WL 3376863 (VA.Dept.Emp.Disp.Res.), *6+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 770 Department of Corrections, 2007 WL 4916359 (VA.Dept.Emp.Disp.Res.), *6+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 771 IN THE MATTER OF Virginia State Police, 2004 WL 4185545 © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. (VA.Dept.Emp.Disp.Res.), *7+ (2004) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) Other Administrative Materials (U.S.A.) 772 LETTER FROM THE ATTORNEY GENERAL TO CONGRESS ON LITIGATION INVOLVING THE DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT, Department of Justice News Releases 11-223+ (2011) 773 IN THE MATTER OF THE ARBITRATION BETWEEN: CLAIMANT MESSING, Claimant, RESPONDENT (Amusement and Recreation Services), Respondent, 2012 WL 3198476, *4+ (AAA Jul 31, 2012) (NO. AAA REDACTED¨) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) Registers (U.S.A.) 774 Manual for Courts-Martial; Proposed Amendments, 77 Federal Register 64854+ (Oct 23, 2012) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) Secondary Sources (U.S.A.) 775 Marriage Between Persons of Same Sex--United States and Canadian Cases, 1 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 1 (2005) HN: 1,2,3,4,5 (S.Ct.) 776 2007 to 2008 ALR United States Supreme Court Review, 30 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 637 (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 777 First Amendment Protection for Members of Military Subjected to Discharge, Transfer, or Discipline Because of Speech, 40 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 229 (2009) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 778 Imputation of Homosexuality as Defamation, 7 A.L.R.6th 135 (2005) 779 Validity of Bigamy and Polygamy Statutes and Constitutional Provisions, 22 A.L.R.6th 1 (2007) 780 2007 to 2008 ALR United States Supreme Court Review, 36 A.L.R.6th 681 (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 781 Adoption of Child by Same-Sex Partners, 61 A.L.R.6th 1 (2011) 782 Constitutionality of State Statutes Banning Distribution of Sexual Devices, 94 A.L.R.5th 497 (2001) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 783 Federal and State Constitutional Provisions as Prohibiting Discrimination in Employment on Basis of Gay, Lesbian, or Bisexual Sexual Orientation or Conduct, 96 A.L.R.5th 391 (2002) 784 Federal and State Constitutional Provisions and State Statutes as Prohibiting Employment Discrimination Based on Heterosexual Conduct or Relationship, 123 A.L.R.5th 411 (2004) HN: 2,3,5 (S.Ct.) 785 Validity of statute making sodomy a criminal offense, 20 A.L.R.4th 1009 (1983) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 786 Administrative Law and Practice s 5:67, Impact of administrative decisions (2013) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 787 AHLA Seminar Materials P02080612, Diving into the Fray - Implementing Electronic Health Records 788 AHLA Seminar Materials P02150609, F. The Quest for Interoperable Electronic Health Records in Long Term Care 789 AHLA Seminar Materials P06270521, V. The Quest for Interoperable Electronic Health Records 790 20100511 AHLA Seminar Papers 12, Luncheon: Constitutional Challenges to Health Insurance Reform (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 791 2006 American Law Institute Annual Proceedings 270 (2013) 792 2007 American Law Institute Annual Proceedings 264 (2013) 793 Anderson's American Law of Zoning s 15:4, Equal protection-Rational basis review (2013) 794 5 Arkansas Family Law and Practice s 26:2, Same-sex intimate relationships (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 795 Baldwin's Ohio Practice Criminal Law s 83:7, Other constitutional limitations (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 796 Baldwin's Ohio Practice Criminal Law s 105:13, Pandering obscenity (2013) 797 Business and Commercial Litigation in Federal Courts s 56:26, Timing and form of merits briefs-Argument section (2013) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 798 California Community Property Law s 2:3, The right to marry (2013) 799 California Community Property Law s 2:47, Same sex marriages (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 800 23 Causes of Action 2d 1, Cause of Action Against Former Domestic Partner to Pay Child Support (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 801 24 Causes of Action 2d 135, Cause of Action for Legal Change of Gender (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 802 25 Causes of Action 2d 1, Cause of Action for Second-Parent Adoption (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 803 Children and the Law: Rights and Obligations s 6:3, General statement-Capacity to marry (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 804 Children and the Law: Rights and Obligations s 4:66, In general (2013) 805 Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Litigation: The Law of Section 1983 s 3:78, The "new" due process-Right of privacy (2013) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 806 Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Litigation: The Law of Section 1983 s 3:87, Equal protection-Sexual orientation discrimination: Romer v. Evans (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 807 Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Litigation: The Law of Section 1983 s 8:69, Law enforcement officers in the circuits-Privacy (2013) 808 Complete Manual of Criminal Forms 3d s 100:17.1, Petition for writ of certiorariAlternate form (2013) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 809 Computer and Information Law Digest s 12:3, Other federal statutes (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 810 20 Connecticut Practice Series s 11:21, Discrimination-Connecticut protections, interplay with federal law (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 811 Criminal Law in New York s 6:1, Introduction (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 812 Criminal Offenses and Defenses in Alabama s S80, Sexual Misconduct (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 813 5 NO. 1 Criminal Practice Guide 19, Don't Challenge the Sentence, Challenge the Procedure-Usually (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 814 5 NO. 1 Criminal Practice Guide 22, Same-Sex Sodomy Law Struck Down in Favor of Due Process/ Liberty Rights (2004) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 815 Criminal Practice Manual s 35:60, Topics for independent review-Fourteenth Amendment-Sodomy laws violate liberty interest (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 816 Criminal Procedure, Second Edition s 2.7(c), Due process methodology (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 817 ALABAMA FAMILY LAW s 42:1, Married couples and contraceptives (2013) 818 ALABAMA FAMILY LAW s 5:11, Crime against nature (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 819 Defamation: A Lawyer's Guide s 1:13, Libelous imputation of immorality (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 820 Defamation: A Lawyer's Guide s 1:16, Slanderous imputation of crime (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 821 Dobbs Law of Torts s 578, Introducing privacy rights (2013) 822 Drug Testing Law, Technology and Practice s 2:13, Liberty (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 823 Education Law: First Amendment, Due Process and Discrimination Litigation APP D, APPENDIX D. Law Review Articles (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 824 Education Law: First Amendment, Due Process and Discrimination Litigation s 4:2, Federal and State Constitutional Provisions (2013) 825 Education Law: First Amendment, Due Process and Discrimination Litigation s 2:24, Association and Privacy Rights (2013) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 826 Education Law: First Amendment, Due Process and Discrimination Litigation s 4:12, Child Abuse and Sexual Harassment (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 827 Education Law: First Amendment, Due Process and Discrimination Litigation s 4:13, Sexual Orientation (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 828 Employee Benefits Handbook/Manual s 2:36, Defense of Marriage Act ("DOMA") Supreme Court decision-Dissenting opinions (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 829 Employee Privacy Law s 9:1, Employer justifications for discrimination against lesbians and gay men (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 830 Employee Privacy Law s 9:5, Sexual orientation discrimination as violation of right to privacy (2013) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 831 Employee Privacy Law s 9:6, Sexual orientation and gender identity © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. discrimination as violation of equal protection (2013) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 832 Employee Privacy Law s 9:7, Deprivation of liberty interests without due process in discrimination based on sexual orientation (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 833 Employee Privacy Law s 13:7, Right to freedom of association and off-duty conduct (2013) 834 Employee Privacy Law s 9:50, Inquiries concerning sexual orientation and homosexual activity or gender identity as invasion of privacy (2013) 835 Employment Coordinator Employment Practices s 6:3, Sexual orientation as basis for protection under the constitution (2014) 836 Emp. Discrim. Coord. Analysis of Federal Law s 20:7, Homosexuals in the military (2014) 837 Entertainment Law: Legal Concepts and Business Practices s 12:88, Introduction (2013) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 838 Federal Appellate Practice: Ninth Circuit, 2d s 4:7, Standards of review applicable to other motions (2013) 839 Federal Civil Rights Acts s 1:45, The changing face of equal protectionDiscrimination based on sexual orientation: Romer v. Evans (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 840 Federal Civil Rights Acts s 1:46, The changing face of equal protection-Lawrence v. Texas (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 841 Federal Civil Rights Acts s 1:47, Same-sex marriage (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 842 Federal Civil Rights Acts s 10:47, Sexual orientation discrimination under the Equal Pay Act and Title VII (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 843 Federal Procedure, Lawyers Edition s 59:25, Statutory challenges, generally (2013) 844 Federal Reg. of Real Estate & Mortgage Lending s 12:34, Prohibited discriminatory activities-Discrimination specifically based on handicapApplication of definitional rules (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 845 Gillespie MI Crim. Law & Proc. Practice Deskbook s 5:229, Gross indecencyPrivate or consensual behavior (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 846 Gillespie MI Crim. Law & Proc. s 94:2, Lewd and lascivious behavior-Definition and elements (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 847 Gillespie MI Crim. Law & Proc. s 94:3, Lewd and lascivious behaviorInformation, trial, and sentence (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 848 Gillespie MI Crim. Law & Proc. s 94:9, Gross indecency between males (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 849 Gov. Discrim.: Equal Protection Law & Litig. s 1:5, Overview and models of equal protection (2013) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 850 Gov. Discrim.: Equal Protection Law & Litig. s 1:7, State constitutional standards (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 851 Gov. Discrim.: Equal Protection Law & Litig. s 3:1, Overview (2013) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 852 Gov. Discrim.: Equal Protection Law & Litig. s 4:2, Generally (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 853 Gov. Discrim.: Equal Protection Law & Litig. s 6:1, Overview (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 854 Gov. Discrim.: Equal Protection Law & Litig. s 4:26, A four-tier model: a rationality plus tier requiring interests articulated by the state or assumed by the court-toward substantive equal protection (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 855 Gov. Discrim.: Equal Protection Law & Litig. s 5:18, Gays, lesbians, and sexual orientation (2013) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 856 Gov. Discrim.: Equal Protection Law & Litig. s 6:20, Privacy and family (2013) 857 Gov. Discrim.: Equal Protection Law & Litig. s 6:21, Privacy and family-Family size and relationships (2013) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 858 Gov. Discrim.: Equal Protection Law & Litig. s 6:24, Privacy and familyMarriage and children (2013) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 859 Gov. Discrim.: Equal Protection Law & Litig. s 6:25, Other rights (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 860 Handling Child Custody, Abuse and Adoption Cases s 8:1, Sexual orientation and gender identity generally (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 861 Handling Child Custody, Abuse and Adoption Cases s 8:2, Sexual orientation as precluding custody (2013) 862 Handling Child Custody, Abuse and Adoption Cases s 8:7, Same-sex marriage, civil unions, and domestic partnerships (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 863 Handling Misdemeanor Cases s 22:28, Effect on obscenity statutes (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 864 Health Care and Antitrust Law s 9A:2, Motions to dismiss for failure to state a claim in antitrust cases (2013) 865 Housing Discrimination Law and Litigation s 28:3, Land-use restrictions: Due process (2013) 866 6 Illinois Practice Series s 19:64, Due process (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 867 14 Indiana Practice Series s 1:2, Relation to the state (2013) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 868 International Encyclopaedia of Laws: Family & Succession - USA INTRO, duction (2011) 869 International Encyclopaedia of Laws: Family & Succession - USA BIBLIO, graphy (2011) 870 International Encyclopaedia of Laws: Family & Succession - USA PT II CH 4, Chapter 4. Filiation (2011) 871 Internet Law and Practice s 24:23, Limitations on free speech-Sexually oriented speech-Obscenity (2013) 872 1 Kansas Law and Practice s 3:2, Requisites of a valid marriage (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 873 Kentucky Practice, Domestic Relations Laws s 3:1, Marriage-State ability to regulate (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 874 Kentucky Practice, Domestic Relations Laws s 3:11, Marriage-Federal constitutional validity of prohibitions against same-sex marriage (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 875 Kentucky Practice, Domestic Relations Laws s 3:12, Marriage-State constitutional challenges to same-sex marriage prohibition (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 876 Kentucky Practice, Substantive Criminal Law s 4:35, Sodomy (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 877 Kurtz Criminal Offenses and Defenses in Georgia U10, Unnatural Sexual Acts (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 878 Law of Asylum in the United States s 7:2, U.S. obligations under the treaty; 1999 implementing regulations (2013) 879 Law of Asylum in the United States s 5:53, Sexual orientation (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 880 Law of Defamation s 4:5, Recipient approach-Limitations on the American position (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 881 Law of Defamation s 4:31, Special contexts for defamatory meaning-"Visual defamation"-Photographs (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 882 Law of the Internet s 12.02, ATTEMPTS AT LEGISLATING AGAINST OBSCENITY (2014) 883 Law of Lawyer Advertising s 2:3, Tiers of scrutiny in modern constitutional lawRational basis review (2013) 884 Lawyers Desk Book s 26.02, BASIC CONCEPTS OF SUBSTANTIVE CRIMINAL LAW (2014) 885 Legal Ethics - Lawyer's Deskbk. on Prof. Resp. s 10.2-2.10, Rule 2.10 (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 886 Legal Ethics - Lawyer's Deskbk. on Prof. Resp. s 10.2-2.11, Rule 2.11 (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 887 s 1:5. Relevance of Lawrence v. Texas to the continued validity of per se test (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 888 s 8:4. Equal protection-Sexual orientation (2013) 889 s 1:11. Cases holding actual or potential teasing and ostracism is not cognizable harm (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 890 Lindey on Entertainment, Publ. & the Arts s 4:31, Child pornography (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 891 Lindey on Entertainment, Publ. & the Arts s 6:16, U.S. v. Extreme Associates; due process and obscenity (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 892 Lindey on Entertainment, Publ. & the Arts s 4:29.50, Obscenity and due process (2013) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 893 Litigating Wrongful Discharge Claims s 6:47, Federal protection (2013) HN: 3 © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. (S.Ct.) 894 Litigating Wrongful Discharge Claims s 7:11, Requirements of due process of law (2013) 895 Local Government Law s 20:43, Disciplinary suspensions-Teaching personnel (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 896 Local Regulation of Adult Businesses s 7:3, Regulating nudity-Other forms of conduct (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 897 Local Regulation of Adult Businesses s 7:7, Regulations of interiors of premises (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 898 Local Regulation of Adult Businesses s 3:26, Personal use (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 899 Local Regulation of Adult Businesses s 3:30, Protecting juveniles from exploitation (2013) 900 Local Regulation of Adult Businesses s 3:44, Regulation of nonspeech activities and objects (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 901 Local Regulation of Adult Businesses s 7:11, Other regulations (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 902 17 LA Civil Law Treatise s 10:145, Crime against nature (R.S. 14:89) (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 903 17 LA Civil Law Treatise s 10:146, [Multiple-Offense] crime against nature by Solicitation [of a person under the age of eighteen/fourteen] (R.S. 14:89.2) (2013) 904 17 LA Civil Law Treatise s 10:147, Aggravated crime against nature-Resistance to the utmost and prevented from resisting-Offender armed with a dangerous weapon (R.S. 14:89.1A(3)) (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 905 17 LA Civil Law Treatise s 10:149, Aggravated crime against nature-Incapacity to resist or understand through stupor due to drugs (R.S. 14:89.1A(5)) (2013) 906 17 LA Civil Law Treatise s 10:150, Aggravated crime against nature-Incapacity to resist (R.S. 14:89.1A(5)) (2013) 907 17 LA Civil Law Treatise s 10:151, Aggravated crime against nature-Age of the victim (R.S. 14:89.1A(6)) (2013) 908 1 Mass. Prac. Series s 17:1, Definition of marriage (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 909 1 Mass. Prac. Series s 19:17, The decision in Goodridge v. Department of Public Health (2013) 910 2 Mass. Prac. Series s 24:3, Criminal statutes regarding private consensual sexual relations between unmarried persons (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 911 2 Mass. Prac. Series s 35:2, Divorce on grounds of adultery (2013) 912 24 Mass. Prac. Series s 26.1, Introduction: The Goodridge decision (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 913 32 Mass. Prac. Series s 252, Sodomy (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 914 45 Mass. Prac. Series s 7.2, Privacy in the workplace-Definition of privacy-The © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. right to be let alone (2013) 915 45 Mass. Prac. Series s 7.3, Privacy in the workplace-Definition of privacy-The constitutional standard: a reasonable expectation of privacy concerning fundamental matters (2013) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 916 14A Mass. Prac. Series s 7.165, Armed home invasion (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 917 Massachusetts Proof of Cases Criminal s 41:9, Assault-Assault by means of a dangerous weapon-Consent not a defense (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 918 Massachusetts Proof of Cases Criminal s 61:3, Fornication (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 919 17 NO. 3 Miller & Starr, California Real Estate Newsalert 1, Always a Bridesmaid? Unveiling California's Domestic Partner Laws, Including Their Impact on Real Property (2007) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 920 9 Minnesota Practice Series s 47:17, Substantive due process; violation of liberty or privacy (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 921 9A Minnesota Practice Series s 51:16, Sodomy (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 922 19 MO Practice Series s 1:2, The United States Constitution as a source of criminal practice and procedure (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 923 32 MO Practice Series s 2.2, Due process (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 924 32 MO Practice Series s 2.3, Equal protection (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 925 32 MO Practice Series s 14.7, Assisted suicide (2013) 926 32 MO Practice Series s 23.4, Privacy (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 927 32 MO Practice Series s 26.1, Statutory rape first degree (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 928 32 MO Practice Series s 26.2, Statutory rape second degree (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 929 32 MO Practice Series s 26.4, Statutory sodomy second degree (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 930 32 MO Practice Series s 26.5, Marriage (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 931 32 MO Practice Series s 26.6, Consent and mistake as to age (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 932 32 MO Practice Series s 27.6, Consent (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 933 32 MO Practice Series s 28.1, Sexual misconduct first degree (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 934 32 MO Practice Series s 29.1, Sexual assault (2013) 935 32 MO Practice Series s 29.2, Deviate sexual assault (2013) 936 32 MO Practice Series s 29.5, Consent (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 937 32 MO Practice Series s 29.6, Bestiality (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 938 32 MO Practice Series s 29.7, Sexual contact with prisoners and nursing home residents (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 939 32 MO Practice Series s 30.1, Prostitution (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 940 32 MO Practice Series s 31.2, Incest (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 941 Modern Constitutional Law s 2:3, Precedent (2013) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 942 Modern Constitutional Law s 2:6, Historical practices (2013) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 943 Modern Constitutional Law s 2:9, Interpretations of foreign constitutions and international covenants (2013) 944 Modern Constitutional Law s 11:6, Substantive due process (2013) 945 Modern Constitutional Law s 11:7, The overlap in equal protection and substantive due process doctrine (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 946 Modern Constitutional Law s 11:8, Burdens on fundamental interests (2013) 947 Modern Constitutional Law s 15:2, Development of contemporary doctrine (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 948 Modern Constitutional Law s 15:4, Marriage, procreation, and sexual intimacy (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 949 Modern Constitutional Law s 20:8, Fourteenth Amendment (2013) 950 Modern Constitutional Law s 2:12, Shared ethical values of the culture (2013) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 951 Modern Constitutional Law s 33:4, Due process (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 952 Modern Constitutional Law s 13:18, Generally (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 953 Modern Constitutional Law s 13:20, Military service (2013) 954 Modern Constitutional Law s 13:22, Domestic partnerships and marriage (2013) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 955 Modern Constitutional Law s 35:88, The Treaty Clause as a source of authority to protect civil rights (2013) 956 Modern Law of Contracts s 24:2, Common-law rule: Agreements void and unenforceable (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 957 Modern Scientific Evid.: L. & Science Exp. Test. s 18:5, The statutory background-Defining "because of %AA sex" under title VII (2013) 958 Molnar Georgia Criminal Law - Crimes and Punishments s 55-4, Sodomy; aggravated sodomy (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 959 Native Land Law s 10:4, The domestic application of international law in the United States (2013) 960 New Wigmore, The: A Treatise on Evidence: Evidentiary Privileges s 5.3.3, An Alternative Rationale Based on the Constitutional Right to Autonomy (2014) 961 New York Practice Employment Law in New York s 3:126, Special rules for the military (2013) 962 New York Practice, New York Criminal Law s 7:1, Introduction (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 963 New York Practice, New York Law of Domestic Relations s 5:6, Capacity to marry-Same sex (2014) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 964 New York Practice, New York Law of Torts s 1:46, Defamation-Per se defamation and damages (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 965 N.C. Divorce, Alimony & Child Custody with Forms s 1:7, Criminal sanctions against unmarried cohabitation (2013) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 966 N.C. Divorce, Alimony & Child Custody with Forms s 1:8, Fornication (2013) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 967 N.C. Divorce, Alimony & Child Custody with Forms s 4:2, History of marriage (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 968 N.C. Divorce, Alimony & Child Custody with Forms s 1:10, Crime against nature (sodomy) (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 969 N.C. Divorce, Alimony & Child Custody with Forms s 1:14, Civil sanctions against unmarried cohabitation (2013) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 970 N.C. Divorce, Alimony & Child Custody with Forms s 24:4, Legal consequences of separation (2013) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 971 N.C. Divorce, Alimony & Child Custody with Forms s 5:10, Criminal conversation (2013) 972 2005 Norton Annual Survey of Bankruptcy Law 27, Section 302 Joint Cases (2013) 973 Patry on Copyright s 25:1, In general (2013) 974 Pattern Instructions Kansas - Criminal 55.050, Criminal Sodomy (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 975 Interstate Transportation of Obscene Material (For Purpose of Sale or Distribution), Pattern Jury Instructions: Fifth Circuit, Criminal Cases With Annotations 2.64 (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 976 Police Misconduct: Law and Litigation s 15:5, Justiciability problems and the "likelihood of recurrence" test-Officially authorized conduct (2013) 977 Police Misconduct: Law and Litigation s 15:6, Justiciability problems and the "likelihood of recurrence" test-Past violations (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 978 Police Misconduct: Law and Litigation s 15:7, Justiciability problems and the "likelihood of recurrence" test-Conduct directed at particular groups (2013) 979 Police Misconduct: Law and Litigation s 15:9, Procedural considerations (2013) 980 Political Activity, Lobbying Laws and Gift Rules Guide APP C-6, Appendix C-6. Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2013) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 981 Postconviction Remedies s 26:5, General principles-Procedural versus substantive rules (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 982 21 NO. 5 Probate Law Journal of Ohio 7, When Saying "I Do" Does Not Do It: Estate Planning For Same Sex Couples (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 983 Prosecutorial Misconduct s 4:7, Prosecutorial discretion-Discretion in selecting charge (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 984 Recovery for Wrongful Death s 3:24, Same-sex partners (2013) 985 Religious Organizations and the Law s 2:79, Personal autonomy in choice of intimate sexual relationships (2013) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 986 Religious Organizations and the Law s 14:13, The Equal Protection Clause and same-sex marriage (2013) 987 Religious Organizations and the Law s 14:16, Status of same-sex marriage and its impact across the states (2013) 988 Religious Organizations and the Law s 14:33, Future of polygamous relationships in the United States (2013) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 989 Rights and Liabilities in Media Content: Internet, Broadcast, and Print s 6:2, Defamatory meaning (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 990 Rights and Liabilities in Media Content: Internet, Broadcast, and Print s 6:6, Defamatory meaning-Visual defamation through photographs, symbols, or images (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 991 Rights and Liabilities in Media Content: Internet, Broadcast, and Print s 11:4, The emergence of commercial speech protections against the larger backdrop of First Amendment doctrine and theory (2013) 992 Rights of Prisoners s 9:41, Generally (2013) 993 Rutter Group - California Criminal Law (The) s 7:9, Crimes of sexual assaultSodomy (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 994 Rutter Group - California Criminal Law (The) s 7:39, Other sexual crimes-Incest (2013) 995 Search & Seizure: A Treatise on the 4th Amendment s 2.6(f), Computer data (2013) 996 Section 1983 Litigation Claims and Defenses s 3.05, DUE PROCESS (2014) 997 Sex-Based Employment Discrimination s 3:7, Sexual orientation (2013) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 998 Sex-Based Employment Discrimination s 27:1, Constitutional overview (2013) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 999 Sex-Based Employment Discrimination s 27:2, Protection for federal employees (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1000 Sex-Based Employment Discrimination s 27:4, Limited federal law protection for private employees (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1001 Sex-Based Employment Discrimination s 27:5, State law protection for private employees (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1002 Sex-Based Employment Discrimination s 27:6, Coverage under local laws and ordinances (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1003 Sexual Orientation and the Law s 1:1, Introduction (2013) 1004 Sexual Orientation and the Law s 1:5, The irrelevance of sexual orientationLawrence v. Texas (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1005 Sexual Orientation and the Law s 1:7, The irrelevance of sexual orientationNexus and specificity (2013) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 1006 Sexual Orientation and the Law s 1:9, The irrelevance of sexual orientationLifestyle and affairs-Post-divorce cohabitation (2013) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 1007 Sexual Orientation and the Law s 2:1, Introduction (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1008 Sexual Orientation and the Law s 2:2, History and overview of same-sex marriage (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1009 Sexual Orientation and the Law s 3:1, Introduction (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1010 Sexual Orientation and the Law s 7:6, Evans v. Romer: Legal challenge to Amendment 2-Evans v. Romer dissent (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1011 Sexual Orientation and the Law s 12:4, Student organizations-Higher education (2013) 1012 Sexual Orientation and the Law s 12:9, Student organizations-Public employees (2013) 1013 Sexual Orientation and the Law s 14:1, Introduction (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1014 Sexual Orientation and the Law s 15:2, The prevalence of activism (2013) 1015 Sexual Orientation and the Law s 1:12, Sexuality and parental fitness (2013) 1016 Sexual Orientation and the Law s 4:18, Claiming your partner as your dependent (2013) 1017 Sexual Orientation and the Law s 6:18, U.S. Constitution (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1018 Sexual Orientation and the Law s 6:25, Title VII-The limits of sexual "categories" exposed (2013) 1019 Sexual Orientation and the Law s 6:34, State law (2013) 1020 Sexual Orientation and the Law s 6:37, Privacy-Defining party's expectation (2013) 1021 Sexual Orientation and the Law s 6:38, Privacy-Showing harm of intrusion (2013) 1022 Sexual Orientation and the Law s 6:47, Privacy (2013) 1023 Sexual Orientation and the Law s 6:62, Security clearances (2013) 1024 Sexual Orientation and the Law s 8:10, Military justice, military crimes (2013) 1025 Sexual Orientation and the Law s 8:29, The military and HIV/AIDS-Unsafe sex prosecutions (2013) 1026 Sexual Orientation and the Law s 12:12, Student organizations-Free exercise of religion; freedom from establishment of religion (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1027 Sexual Orientation and the Law s 12:14, Student organizations-Privacy (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 1028 Sexual Orientation and the Law s 12:15, Equal protection (2013) 1029 Sexual Orientation and the Law s 12:26, Generally-Clear and present danger (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1030 Sexual Orientation and the Law s 14:107, Lawrence v. Texas (2013) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1031 Sexual Orientation and the Law s 14:108, Constitutional challenges to criminal statutes after Lawrence (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1032 Smolla & Nimmer on Freedom of Speech s 7:1, Right/privilege distinction (2013) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 1033 State and Local Government Civil Rights Liability s 1:16, Constitutional violations-Substantive due process (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1034 State and Local Government Employment Liability s 6:10, Constitutional challenges-Constitutional right to privacy (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1035 State and Local Government Employment Liability s 6:13, Constitutional challenges-Equal protection (2013) 1036 Substantive Criminal Law s 1.2, Characteristics of the substantive criminal law (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1037 Substantive Criminal Law s 3.3, Substantive due process (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1038 Substantive Criminal Law s 3.5, The Bill of Rights (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1039 Substantive Criminal Law s 6.5, Consequences: significance of consent, conduct, or condonation by victim (2013) 1040 Tax Plan. Fam. Wealth Trans.: Analysis with Forms 6.01A, DEFINITION OF MARRIAGE FOR FEDERAL TAX PURPOSES (NEW) (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1041 Termination of Employment s 1:11, Sexual orientation (2014) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1042 Texas Forms Legal and Business s 33:6, Tax aspects (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1043 7 Tex. Prac. Series s 6.1, Homosexual conduct (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1044 40 Tex. Prac. Series s 4:3, Constitutional limitations on power to create crimesSubstantive due process and right to privacy (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1045 48B Tex. Prac. Series s 27:5, Paragraph b: Adjudicative responsibilities (2013) 1046 The Rights of Publicity and Privacy s 5:57, Constitutional "privacy" rightsOutline of constitutional privacy (2013) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 1047 Treatise on Constitutional Law s 15.7, Fundamental Rights (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1048 Treatise on Constitutional Law s 18.27, Sterilization and Contraception (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1049 Treatise on Constitutional Law s 23.37, Looking to Foreign Law and Sociological Data (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1050 Treatise on Constitutional Law s 1.6(c), State Court Review of State Laws (2013) 1051 Treatise on Constitutional Law s 15.4(e), Post-1937 Decisions Regarding "Economic and Social Welfare Legislation" (2013) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 1052 Treatise on Constitutional Law s 16.4(b), Multiple Contacts-Symbiotic Relationships (2013) 1053 Treatise on Constitutional Law s 18.3(f), "Mental Status" ClassificationsConcluding Comments Concerning the Rationality Test (2013) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1054 Treatise on Constitutional Law s 18.28(b), Sexual Activity (2013) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1055 Treatise on Constitutional Law s 18.28(c), Which Relationships Are Part of the Right to Privacy? (2013) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 1056 Treatise on Constitutional Law s 15.12(b)(i), The Early Cases (2013) HN: 1 © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. (S.Ct.) 1057 Treatise on Constitutional Law s 18.29(b)(iv), The Partial Birth Abortion Cases (2013) 1058 Treatise on Constitutional Law s 18.8(d)(ii)(5), Racial Discrimination and Voting (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1059 Treatise on Constitutional Law s 18.9(a)(iii)(6), Modification of State Remedies (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1060 U.S. Citizenship and Naturalization Handbook s 7:19, In general (2013) 1061 U.S. Citizenship and Naturalization Handbook s 7:42, Special circumstancesSexual orientation (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1062 Virginia Practice Criminal Offenses and Defenses S17, Sex Offenses (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1063 Va. Prac. Family Law: Theory Practice and Forms s 1:1, Introduction (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 1064 Va. Prac. Family Law: Theory Practice and Forms s 2:5, Same sex marriage (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1065 Va. Prac. Family Law: Theory Practice and Forms s 2:6, Bigamous marriage (2013) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 1066 Va. Prac. Family Law: Theory Practice and Forms s 8:3, Grounds for absolute divorce (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1067 Va. Prac. Family Law: Theory Practice and Forms s 1:11, Nonmarital cohabitation and domestic partnerships (2013) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 1068 Va. Prac. Family Law: Theory Practice and Forms s 14:12, Homosexual parent adoption (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 1069 Virginia Practice Series; Tort and Personal Injury Law s 13:1, Introduction (2013) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1070 Virginia Practice Series; Tort and Personal Injury Law s 19:3, Sexual battery pleading (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1071 Virginia Practice Series; Tort and Personal Injury Law s 2:15, Express and implied consent (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1072 West's Federal Administrative Practice s 7852, Impact of administrative decisions-Precedent and consistency (2013) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 1073 West's Federal Administrative Practice s 11291, Equal Protection Clause-Gay and lesbian rights (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1074 West's McKinney's Forms Matrimonial and Family Law s 1:3, Qualifications for marriage-Not of the same sex (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1075 14 West's Pennsylvania Practice s 1:240, Involuntary deviate sexual intercourse (2013) 1076 Wharton's Criminal Law s 289, With consent (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1077 2 Witkin, California Criminal Law 4th Sex Offenses and Crimes Against © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Decency s 28, Nature of Crime. HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1078 2 Witkin, California Criminal Law 4th Sex Offenses and Crimes Against Decency s 140, Nature of Crime. 1079 7 Witkin, California Summary 10th Constitutional Law s 573, Sodomy Laws. HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1080 7 Witkin, California Summary 10th Constitutional Law s 226A, (New)-Marriage Between Persons of Same Sex. HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 1081 8 Witkin, California Summary 10th Constitutional Law s 798, Sexual Orientation. HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 1082 Wright & Miller: Federal Prac. & Proc. s 4003, Appeals Jurisdiction (2013) 1083 Wright & Miller: Federal Prac. & Proc. s 8248, Impact of Administrative Decisions (2013) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 1084 Wright & Miller: Federal Prac. & Proc. s 3532.5, Threats Of Enforcement (2013) 1085 Wright & Miller: Federal Prac. & Proc. s 4004.1, Certiorari JurisdictionDiscretion (2013) 1086 Am. Jur. Pl. & Pr. Forms Military; Civil Defense s 5, Complaint in federal district court-For declaratory and injunctive relief-Declaring "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" statute unconstitutional and enjoining enforcement of statute and regulations issued under it-For reinstatement at same rank, pay grade, and specialty on application of plaintiff (2013) 1087 36 Am. Jur. Proof of Facts 2d 441, Validity of Marriage (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1088 25 Am. Jur. Proof of Facts 3d 415, Employment Handicap Discrimination Based on Gender Dysphoria (Transsexualism) (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 1089 61 Am. Jur. Proof of Facts 3d 1, Employer Liability for Same-Sex Harassment (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 1090 64 Am. Jur. Proof of Facts 3d 403, Custody and Visitation of Children By Gay and Lesbian Parents (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 1091 Am. Jur. 2d Bigamy s 1, Generally; definitions (2014) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1092 Am. Jur. 2d Constitutional Law s 614, Right of privacy (2014) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 1093 Am. Jur. 2d Constitutional Law s 964, Purpose and history of "due process" (2014) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 1094 Am. Jur. 2d Sodomy s 7, Liberty interest and adults' private, consensual acts (2014) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1095 Am. Jur. 2d Sodomy s 8, Liberty interest and adults' private, consensual acts-In the military (2014) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1096 Am. Jur. 2d Sodomy s 11, Right to privacy-Acts not coming within (2014) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1097 Am. Jur. 2d Sodomy s 34, Homosexuals or heterosexuals (2014) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1098 Cal. Jur. 3d Courts s 280, Departure from precedent (2013) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 1099 Cal. Jur. 3d Criminal Law: Crimes Against Person s 631, Consent as defense © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1100 Cal. Civ. Prac. Civil Rights Litigation s 11:1, Chapter overview; Brief history of California laws prohibiting sexual orientation discrimination (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1101 Cal. Civ. Prac. Civil Rights Litigation s 11:2, California's equal protection and privacy clauses (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 1102 Cal. Civ. Prac. Civil Rights Litigation s 11:10, Comparison to federal law (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1103 CJS Adultery s 4, Constitutionality of adultery statutes (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1104 CJS Constitutional Law s 670, Marriage, sex, and family (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1105 CJS Constitutional Law s 1012, Generally (2013) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1106 CJS Constitutional Law s 1486, Generally (2013) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 1107 CJS Constitutional Law s 1911, Generally (2013) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1108 CJS Courts s 194, Rationale (2013) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 1109 CJS Military Justice s 50, Sodomy (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1110 CJS Sodomy s 1, Definitions and general considerations (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1111 CJS Sodomy s 2, Validity and construction of statutes, generally (2013) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1112 Ga. Jur. Criminal Law s 11:1, Generally; right to privacy (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 1113 Maryland Law Encyclopedia Constitutional Law s 262, Other matters (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 1114 N.C. Index 4th Crime against Nature s 4, Generally (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1115 N.Y. Jur. 2d Domestic Relations s 1573, Definition of person in need of supervision (PINS) (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1116 OH Jur. 3d Constitutional Law s 505, Generally (2013) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 1117 S.C. Jur. Constitutional Law s 72, Life and liberty rights (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1118 Texas Jurisprudence, Third Edition Criminal Law: Offenses Against The Person s 179, Generally; definitions related to sexual offenses (2014) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1119 Texas Jurisprudence, Third Edition Criminal Law: Offenses Against The Person s 187, Homosexual conduct (2014) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1120 TX Jur. 3d Constitutional Law s 191, Liberty (2014) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 1121 TX Jur. 3d Constitutional Law s 276, Balancing test (2014) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.) 1122 TX Jur. 3d Constitutional Law s 332, Classification based on sexual orientation (2014) 1123 LAFLER, FRYE, AND THE SUBTLE ART OF WINNING BY LOSING, 25 Fed.Sent.R. 126, 129 (2012) 1124 LAFLER AND FRYE: STRICKLAND REVITALIZED?, 25 Fed.Sent.R. 144, 145 (2012) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 1125 PROCEDURAL MEANS OF ENFORCEMENT UNDER 42 U.S.C. S 1983, 41 © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Geo. L.J. Ann. Rev. Crim. Proc. 1074, 1125 (2012) 1126 PROCEDURAL MEANS OF ENFORCEMENT UNDER 42 U.S.C. S 1983, 40 Geo. L.J. Ann. Rev. Crim. Proc. 1058, 1109 (2011) 1127 CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTORS BEHIND THE COUNTER: STATUTORY DEFENSES TO TORT LIABILITY FOR FAILURE TO DISPENSE CONTRACEPTIVES, 1 St. Louis U. J. Health L. & Pol'y 337, 403 (2008) 1128 THE HIGH COURT'S DANISH PRINCE Whether to be or not to be a liberal or conservative majority, Kennedy decides, 6 NO. 20 A.B.A. J. E-Report 3, 3 (2007) 1129 POLYGAMOUS UNION SPARKS SPLIT Divided Utah Supreme Court Holds Lawrence Doesn't Protect Plural Marriages, 5 NO. 21 A.B.A. J. E-Report 1, 1+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1130 SCALIA: FOREIGN LAW 'NOT APPROPRIATE' IN CONSTITUTIONAL DEBATE Justice Faces Friendly Crowd, Secret Hecklers During Speech, 5 NO. 8 A.B.A. J. E-Report 4, 4 (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1131 IT MAY BE PERNICIOUS, BUT IS IT A CRIME? Professors Make a Case for Criminalizing Reckless Sexual Conduct, 4 NO. 5 A.B.A. J. E-Report 3, 3 (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1132 LAWRENCE STRIKES AGAIN Supreme Court Ruling Is Basis for a Decision Striking Down Virgini a Fornication Law, 4 NO. 4 A.B.A. J. E-Report 4, 4+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1133 STRAIGHT-SEX CASE MAY AFFECT MILITARY GAYS Appeals Court Voids Conviction, Cites Lawrence v. Texas, 4 NO. 1 A.B.A. J. E-Report 2, 2+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1134 COURT WON'T TIE LAWRENCE TO GAY ADOPTION LAW 11th Circuit Rejects Arguments by Florida Foster Parents, 3 NO. 5 A.B.A. J. E-Report 1, 1+ (2004) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 1135 THE JOSEPH TRACHTMAN LECTURE, 33 ACTEC J. 137, 141+ (2007) 1136 GOVERNMENT ELECTION ADVOCACY: IMPLICATIONS OF RECENT SUPREME COURT ANALYSIS, 64 Admin. L. Rev. 835, 907 (2012) 1137 SINGLE-JUDGE ADJUDICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS AND THE DEVALUATION OF STARE DECISIS, 56 Admin. L. Rev. 535, 574 (2004) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 1138 CORPORATE CITIZENS AND POLITICAL SPEECH: THE PERILS SURROUNDING A SUPREME COURT GAME-CHANGER: CITIZENS UNITED v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, 558 U.S. 50 (2010), 53-SEP Advocate (Idaho) 32, 35 (2010) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 1139 ANTONIN SCALIA (2013) 1140 DIARMUID F. O'SCANNLAIN (2013) 1141 ROSEMARY BARKETT (2013) 1142 CHARLES R. WILSON (2013) 1143 ANTONIN SCALIA (2014) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 1144 DIARMUID F. O'SCANNLAIN (2014) 1145 CHARLES R. WILSON (2014) 1146 PRIVATIZING HUMAN RIGHTS? CREATING INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS FROM HUMAN RIGHTS PRINCIPLES, 46 Akron L. Rev. 675, 726 (2013) 1147 JUDGING IN A VACUUM, OR, ONCE MORE, WITHOUT FEELING: HOW JUSTICE SCALIA'S JURISPRUDENTIAL APPROACH REPEATS ERRORS MADE IN PLESSY V. FERGUSON, 45 Akron L. Rev. 513, 566+ (2012) 1148 DOMA AND DIFFUSION THEORY: ENDING ANIMUS LEGISLATION THROUGH A RATIONAL BASIS APPROACH, 44 Akron L. Rev. 621, 678+ (2011) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 1149 BEYOND THE SEX-ED WARS: ADDRESSING DISADVANTAGED SINGLE MOTHERS' SEARCH FOR COMMUNITY, 44 Akron L. Rev. 167, 220+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1150 OBAMA, THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT, AND THE DRUG WAR, 44 Akron L. Rev. 303, 331+ (2011) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) .... ANTONIN SCALIA (2011) (Text not available on WESTLAW) .... DIARMUID F. O'SCANNLAIN (2011) (Text not available on WESTLAW) .... ROSEMARY BARKETT (2011) (Text not available on WESTLAW) .... CHARLES R. WILSON (2011) (Text not available on WESTLAW) 1155 EDUCATION FOR JUDICIAL ASPIRANTS, 43 Akron L. Rev. 163, 201+ (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1156 THE TIMING OF FACIAL CHALLENGES, 43 Akron L. Rev. 51, 77 (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1157 THE LEGACY OF SLAUGHTERHOUSE, BRADWELL, AND CRUIKSHANK IN CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION, 42 Akron L. Rev. 1051, 1080+ (2009) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.) 1158 REBUILDING THE SLAUGHTER-HOUSE: THE CASES' SUPPORT FOR CIVIL RIGHTS, 42 Akron L. Rev. 1129, 1164 (2009) 1159 RELIGION IN THE SCHOOLS: ON PRAYER, NEUTRALITY, AND SECTARIAN PERSPECTIVES, 42 Akron L. Rev. 185, 241 (2009) 1160 AFTER RAPE LAW: WILL THE TURN TO CONSENT NORMALIZE THE PROSECUTION OF SEXUAL ASSAULT?, 41 Akron L. Rev. 957, 980+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1161 THE RIGHT TO FREELY HAVE SEX? BEYOND BIOLOGY: REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS AND SEXUAL SELF-DETERMINATION, 40 Akron L. Rev. 311, 337+ (2007) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1162 CHIEF JUSTICE WILLIAM REHNQUIST: HIS LAW-AND-ORDER LEGACY AND IMPACT ON CRIMINAL JUSTICE, 39 Akron L. Rev. 323, 372 (2006) 1163 THE CONSTITUTIONAL JURISPRUDENCE OF SANDRA DAY O'CONNOR: A REFUSAL TO "FORECLOSE THE UNANTICIPATED", 39 Akron L. Rev. © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 373, 415+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1164 THE LITTLE WORD "DUE", 38 Akron L. Rev. 1, 51+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1165 CHARLES DEMORE V. HYUNG JOON KIM: ANOTHER STEP AWAY FROM FULL DUE PROCESS PROTECTIONS, 38 Akron L. Rev. 207, 252+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1166 NOT JUST OLD WINE IN NEW BOTTLES: KENTUCKY ASS'N OF HEALTH PLANS, INC. V. MILLER BOTTLES A NEW TEST FOR STATE REGULATION OF INSURANCE, 38 Akron L. Rev. 253, 298+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1167 INHERENT SOVEREIGN POWERS: THE INFLUENTIAL YET CURIOUSLY UNCONTROVERSIAL FLIP SIDE OF NATURAL RIGHTS, 4 Ala. C.R. & C.L. L. Rev. 133, 167+ (2013) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 1168 ASSOCIATIONAL PRIVACY AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT: NAACP v. ALABAMA, PRIVACY AND DATA PROTECTION, 1 Ala. C.R. & C.L. L. Rev. 1, 11+ (2011) 1169 IT'S A DILDO IN 49 STATES, BUT IT'S A DILDON'T IN ALABAMA: ALABAMA'S ANTI-OBSCENITY ENFORCEMENT ACT AND THE ASSAULT ON CIVIL LIBERTY AND PERSONAL FREEDOM, 1 Ala. C.R. & C.L. L. Rev. 111, 113+ (2011) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1170 SEVERE ENVIRONMENTAL DEPRIVATION (AKA RSB): A TRAGEDY, NOT A DEFENSE, 2 Ala. C.R. & C.L. L. Rev. 147, 173+ (2011) 1171 AGAINST THE WEIGHT OF AUTHORITY: CAN COURTS SOLVE THE PROBLEM OF SIZE DISCRIMINATION?, 64 Ala. L. Rev. 1175, 1214+ (2013) 1172 DEFEASIBLE FEDERALISM, 63 Ala. L. Rev. 801, 866+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1173 THE FOURTH AMENDMENT AT A THREE-WAY STOP, 62 Ala. L. Rev. 687, 755 (2011) 1174 FREEDOM, MASS INCARCERATION, AND RACISM IN THE AGE OF OBAMA, 62 Ala. L. Rev. 1005, 1021+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1175 COVENANT MARRIAGE: AN UNNECESSARY SECOND ATTEMPT AT FAULT-BASED DIVORCE, 61 Ala. L. Rev. 869, 890 (2010) 1176 CONSTITUTIONAL SAFETY VALVE: THE PRIVILEGES OR IMMUNITIES CLAUSE AND STATUS REGIMES IN A FEDERALIST SYSTEM, 62 Ala. L. Rev. 111, 189+ (2010) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 1177 INTERSECTIONALITY THEORY, THE ANTICASTE PRINCIPLE, AND THE FUTURE OF BROWN, 60 Ala. L. Rev. 1111, 1132 (2009) 1178 EQUITY OR EQUALITY FOR WOMEN? UNDERSTANDING CEDAW'S EQUALITY PRINCIPLES, 60 Ala. L. Rev. 1133, 1170+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1179 LAW AS PALIMPSEST: CONCEPTUALIZING CONTINGENCY IN JUDICIAL OPINIONS, 61 Ala. L. Rev. 121, 163+ (2009) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1180 REVISITING KELO AND EMINENT DOMAIN'S "SUMMER OF SCRUTINY", 59 Ala. L. Rev. 561, 610+ (2008) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 1181 THE TRADITION OF THE WRITTEN CONSTITUTION: TEXT, PRECEDENT, AND BURKE, 57 Ala. L. Rev. 635, 687+ (2006) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1182 AUTONOMY versus EQUALITY: VOTING RIGHTS REDISCOVERED, 57 Ala. L. Rev. 261, 273+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1183 DIFFICULT DECISIONS: SHOULD ALABAMA LAWS BE TOUGHER ON JUVENILE SEXUAL OFFENDERS?, 57 Ala. L. Rev. 205, 230 (2005) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 1184 THE ALABAMA CRIMINAL CODE-25 YEARS AND COUNTING, 56 Ala. L. Rev. 967, 990+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1185 POLICYMAKING BY THE ADMINISTRATIVE JUDICIARY, 56 Ala. L. Rev. 693, 740 (2005) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 1186 ENTANGLED CHOICES: SELECTING CHAPLAINS FOR THE UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES, 56 Ala. L. Rev. 247, 283 (2004) 1187 MORALS LEGISLATION AND THE ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE, 55 Ala. L. Rev. 159, 182+ (2003) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1188 THE CONTINUING VITALITY OF RAVIN V. STATE: ALASKANS STILL HAVE A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO POSSESS MARIJUANA IN THE PRIVACY OF THEIR HOMES, 29 Alaska L. Rev. 175, 236+ (2012) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 1189 TRANSGENDERED IN ALASKA: NAVIGATING THE CHANGING LEGAL LANDSCAPE FOR CHANGE OF GENDER PETITIONS, 26 Alaska L. Rev. 239, 270+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1190 A NATIONAL MODEL FOR RECONCILING EQUAL PROTECTION FOR SAME-SEX COUPLES WITH STATE MARRIAGE AMENDMENTS: ALASKA CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION EX REL. CARTER V. ALASKA, 23 Alaska L. Rev. 117, 138+ (2006) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 1191 ASSISTED SUICIDE, LIBERAL INDIVIDUALISM, AND VISCERAL JURISPRUDENCE: A REPLY TO PROFESSOR CHEMERINSKY, 20 Alaska L. Rev. 321, 334+ (2003) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1192 ALASKA'S DNA DATABASE: THE STATUTE, ITS PROBLEMS, AND PROPOSED SOLUTIONS, 20 Alaska L. Rev. 389, 398 (2003) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 1193 SHARING YOU WITH YOU: INFORMATIONAL PRIVACY, GOOGLE, & THE LIMITS OF USE LIMITATION, 23 Alb. L.J. Sci. & Tech. 55, 84 (2013) 1194 INVASION CONTRACTS: THE PRIVACY IMPLICATIONS OF TERMS OF USE AGREEMENTS IN THE ONLINE SOCIAL MEDIA SETTING, 21 Alb. L.J. Sci. & Tech. 591, 636 (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1195 EXCEPTIONAL FREEDOM-THE ROBERTS COURT, THE FIRST AMENDMENT, AND THE NEW ABSOLUTISM, 76 Alb. L. Rev. 409, 431+ (2013) 1196 MINING TREASURES: A DECADE OF HUGH R. JONES MEMORIAL LECTURES AT ALBANY LAW SCHOOL, 76 Alb. L. Rev. 851, 864 (2013) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 1197 DEFINING RIGHTS IN THE STATES: JUDICIAL ACTIVISM AND POPULAR RESPONSE, 76 Alb. L. Rev. 2061, 2103+ (2013) 1198 BACKING OUT OF A CONSTITUTIONAL DITCH: CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDIES FOR GROSS PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT POST THOMPSON, 75 Alb. L. Rev. 1243, 1281+ (2012) 1199 INTRODUCTION OF THE PANELISTS, 75 Alb. L. Rev. 1695, 1702 (2012) 1200 PORTRAIT OF A JUDGE: JUDITH S. KAYE, DICHOTOMIES, AND STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 75 Alb. L. Rev. 1977, 2003+ (2012) 1201 DISSENTING: WHY DO IT?, 74 Alb. L. Rev. 869, 874 (2011) 1202 STATE CONSTITUTIONAL DECISION-MAKING AND PRINCIPLES OF EQUALITY: REVISITING BAKER V. STATE AND THE QUESTION OF GENDER IN THE MARRIAGE EQUALITY DEBATE, 74 Alb. L. Rev. 1683, 1702 (2011) 1203 TO HARM, TO VICTIMIZE, AND TO DESTROY: THE UGLY REASON WHY THE CHAMBERS MAJORITY OPINION WAS SO RIGHT, 72 Alb. L. Rev. 825, 853 (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1204 JUDICIAL ACTIVISM AND PROGRESSIVE LEGISLATION: A STEP TOWARDS DECREASING HATE ATTACKS, 71 Alb. L. Rev. 545, 564+ (2008) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1205 THE "ORDERED LIBERTY" OF SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS AND THE FUTURE OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AS A RHETORICAL ART: VARIATIONS ON A THEME FROM JUSTICE CARDOZO IN THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, 70 Alb. L. Rev. 1473, 1561+ (2007) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 1206 MORALITY-BASED LEGISLATION IS ALIVE AND WELL: WHY THE LAW PERMITS CONSENT TO BODY MODIFICATION BUT NOT SADOMASOCHISTIC SEX, 70 Alb. L. Rev. 1615, 1642+ (2007) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1207 WHO NEEDS A CONSTITUTION? IN DEFENSE OF THE NON-DECISION CONSTITUTION-MAKING TACTIC IN ISRAEL, 70 Alb. L. Rev. 409, 489 (2007) 1208 I CAN'T TO I KANT: THE SEXUAL HARASSMENT OF WORKING ADOLESCENTS, COMPETING THEORIES, AND ETHICAL DILEMMAS, 70 Alb. L. Rev. 675, 739+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1209 FORGOTTEN LAW AND JUDICIAL DUTY, 70 Alb. L. Rev. 829, 840 (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1210 CONTROLLING CONDUCT: THE EMERGING PROTECTION OF SODOMY IN THE MILITARY, 69 Alb. L. Rev. 1195, 1195+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1211 REDEFINING DUE PROCESS ANALYSIS: JUSTICE ANTHONY M. KENNEDY AND THE CONCEPT OF EMERGENT RIGHTS, 69 Alb. L. Rev. 237, 298+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1212 INTERSECTIONALITY AS "CATCH 22": WHY IDENTITY PERFORMANCE © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. DEMANDS ARE NEITHER HARMLESS NOR REASONABLE, 69 Alb. L. Rev. 299, 342 (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1213 ORDINARY AND ENHANCED RATIONAL BASIS REVIEW IN THE MASSACHUSETTS SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT: A PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION, 69 Alb. L. Rev. 415, 444 (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1214 ARISTOTLE, CICERO AND CARDOZO: A PERSPECTIVE ON EXTERNAL LAW, 69 Alb. L. Rev. 645, 652+ (2006) 1215 FOUR MISTAKES IN THE DEBATE ON "OUTSOURCING AUTHORITY", 69 Alb. L. Rev. 653, 681+ (2006) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 1216 CITING FOREIGN AND INTERNATIONAL LAW TO INTERPRET THE CONSTITUTION: WHAT'S THE POINT?, 69 Alb. L. Rev. 683, 696 (2006) 1217 TO UNDERSTAND FOREIGN COURT CITATION: DISSECTING ORIGINALISM, DYNAMISM, ROMANTICISM, AND CONSEQUENTIALISM, 69 Alb. L. Rev. 709, 743+ (2006) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 1218 THE SUPREME COURT AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS THEORY, 69 Alb. L. Rev. 771, 799+ (2006) 1219 "A DECENT RESPECT TO THE OPINIONS OF MANKIND": REFERRING TO FOREIGN LAW TO EXPRESS AMERICAN NATIONHOOD, 69 Alb. L. Rev. 809, 815 (2006) 1220 INVASION OF PRIVACY V. COMMERCIAL SPEECH: REGULATION OF SPAM WITH A COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL POINT OF VIEW, 70 Alb. L. Rev. 181, 207 (2006) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 1221 VOLUNTARY SELF-REGULATION OF COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE PRACTITIONERS, 70 Alb. L. Rev. 209, 286+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1222 ROMER PARTY PLUS ONE: MANAGING PUBLIC LAW IN COLORADO, 2000-2004, 68 Alb. L. Rev. 445, 502 (2005) 1223 JUDICIAL ACTIVISM, JUDGES' SPEECH, AND MERIT SELECTION: CONVENTIONAL WISDOM AND NONSENSE, 68 Alb. L. Rev. 557, 576 (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1224 REGULATING JUDGES' POLITICAL ACTIVITY AFTER WHITE, 68 Alb. L. Rev. 651, 702+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1225 JUVENILE EXECUTION, TERRORIST EXTRADITION, AND SUPREME COURT DISCRETION TO CONSIDER INTERNATIONAL DEATH PENALTY JURISPRUDENCE, 68 Alb. L. Rev. 909, 947+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1226 THE BALD AND GOLDEN EAGLE PROTECTION ACT, 68 Alb. L. Rev. 973, 996 (2005) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 1227 THE FUTILE QUEST FOR A SYSTEM OF JUDICIAL "MERIT" SELECTION, 67 Alb. L. Rev. 803, 819+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1228 RETHINKING POLITICS AND JUDICIAL SELECTION DURING CONTENTIOUS TIMES, 67 Alb. L. Rev. 821, 828 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 1229 A DIVIDED COURT IN MORE WAYS THAN ONE: THE SUPREME COURT OF DELAWARE AND ITS DISTINCTIVE MODEL FOR JUDICIAL EFFICACY, 1997-2003, 67 Alb. L. Rev. 849, 891 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1230 MEETING THE NEEDS: FAIRNESS, MORALITY, CREATIVITY AND COMMON SENSE Hugh R. Jones Memorial Lecture Albany Law School-March 29, 2004, 68 Alb. L. Rev. 81, 96 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1231 HUGH R. JONES LECTURE AT ALBANY LAW SCHOOL March 31, 2003, 67 Alb. L. Rev. 1, 10+ (2003) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1232 ARBITRATION CLAUSESNEED A LIGHTER TOUCH ON COURT REVIEW, 21 Alternatives to High Cost Litig. 161, 161 (2003) 1233 MORE THAN ABSTRACT JUSTICE: THE DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT AND THE EQUAL TREATMENT OF SAME-SEX MARRIED COUPLES UNDER SECTION 302(A) OF THE BANKRUPTCY CODE, 85 Am. Bankr. L.J. 195, 222+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1234 CONSTITUTIONAL PROBLEMS IN THE 2005 BANKRUPTCY AMENDMENTS, 82 Am. Bankr. L.J. 1, 75+ (2008) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 1235 THE HIGH COURT'S DANISH PRINCE Whether to be or not to be a liberal or conservative majority, Kennedy decides, 93-JUN A.B.A. J. 17, 18 (2007) 1236 VIOLATION OR SALVATION? Prosecutors Say It's a Sex Crime. Polygamist Leader Warren Jeffs Says It's Counseling His Flock, 93-FEB A.B.A. J. 26, 54+ (2007) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 1237 THE RITES WRANGLE Same-Sex-Marriage Advocates Vow to Fight On, Despite a Summer of Rulings Against Their Cause, 92-NOV A.B.A. J. 44, 74+ (2006) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 1238 DEJA VU ONCE AGAIN Despite New Faces on the Supreme Court, Term's Ending Is Familiar, 92-SEP A.B.A. J. 12, 12 (2006) 1239 AVOIDING LAWRENCE Courts Considering Last Year's Major Gay Rights Ruling Are Treading Carefully, 90-JUN A.B.A. J. 16, 16+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1240 MORAL RIGHTS: DIAGNOSIS AND REHABILITATION, 46 Am. Bus. L.J. 407, 415+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1241 WORKPLACE PRIVACY AND DISCRIMINATION ISSUES RELATED TO GENETIC DATA: A COMPARATIVE LAW STUDY OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE UNITED STATES, 43 Am. Bus. L.J. 79, 171 (2006) 1242 IT'S COMPLICATED: PRIVACY AND DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, 49 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 1777, 1788+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1243 STRIKING THE PROPER BALANCE: ARTICULATING THE ROLE OF MORALITY IN THE LEGISLATIVE AND JUDICIAL PROCESSES, 47 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 1555, 1555+ (2010) 1244 THE DUNKIN' DONUTS GAP: RETHINKING THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE AS A REMEDY IN CONSTITUTIONAL CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 47 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 1341, 1360 (2010) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 1245 WALKING THE TIGHTROPE OF STATUTORY RAPE LAW: USING INTERNATIONAL LEGAL STANDARDS TO SERVE THE BEST INTERESTS OF JUVENILE OFFENDERS AND VICTIMS, 47 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 109, 128+ (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1246 PROVIDING THOSE WITH MENTAL ILLNESS FULL AND FAIR TREATMENT: LEGISLATIVE CONSIDERATIONS IN THE POST-CLARK ERA, 47 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 129, 148 (2010) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 1247 THE SELF-DEFENSIVE COGNITION OF SELF-DEFENSE, 45 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 1, 65 (2008) 1248 OF BREACHES OF THE PEACE, HOME INVASIONS, AND SECURITIES FRAUD, 44 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 1365, 1381 (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1249 THAT OLD THING, COPYRIGHT ...: RECONCILING THE POSTMODERN PARADOX IN THE NEW DIGITAL AGE, 39 AIPLA Q.J. 71, 102 (2011) 1250 STRUCTURE MATTERS: THE IMPACT OF COURT STRUCTURE ON THE INDIAN AND U.S. SUPREME COURTS, 61 Am. J. Comp. L. 173, 208 (2013) 1251 INCLUSIVE CONSTITUTIONAL COMPARISON: REFLECTIONS ON INDIA'S SODOMY DECISION, 59 Am. J. Comp. L. 909, 934+ (2011) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 1252 FRAGMENTATION AND CONSOLIDATION IN THE LAW OF MARRIAGE AND SAME-SEX RELATIONSHIPS, 58 Am. J. Comp. L. 115, 123+ (2010) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.) 1253 INTERNATIONAL LAW IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM OF THE UNITED STATES, 58 Am. J. Comp. L. 455, 478 (2010) 1254 UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE LAW OF THE UNITED STATES, 58 Am. J. Comp. L. 533, 553+ (2010) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1255 A DEMOCRATIC THEORY OF CONSTITUTIONAL COMPARISON, 56 Am. J. Comp. L. 947, 997+ (2008) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1256 EQUAL BY COMPARISON: UNSETTLING ASSUMPTIONS OF ANTIDISCRIMINATION LAW, 55 Am. J. Comp. L. 295, 345 (2007) 1257 RECOGNITION OF SAME-SEX LEGAL RELATIONSHIPS IN THE UNITED STATES, 54 Am. J. Comp. L. 257, 279+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1258 THE DOCTRINE OF PRECEDENT IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 54 Am. J. Comp. L. 67, 88+ (2006) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 1259 THEORIES OF CRIME AND PUNISHMENT IN GERMAN CRIMINAL LAW, 53 Am. J. Comp. L. 679, 707 (2005) 1260 QUANTIFYING KATZ: EMPIRICALLY MEASURING "REASONABLE EXPECTATIONS OF PRIVACY" IN THE FOURTH AMENDMENT CONTEXT, 38 Am. J. Crim. L. 289, 373+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1261 CREATING SEX OFFENDER REGISTRIES: THE RELIGIOUS RIGHT AND THE FAILURE TO PROTECT SOCIETY'S VULNERABLE, 35 Am. J. Crim. L. 23, 89 (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 1262 WHEN PROSECUTORS CONTROL CRIMINAL COURT DOCKETS: DISPATCHES ON HISTORY AND POLICY FROM A LAND TIME FORGOT, 32 Am. J. Crim. L. 325, 379 (2005) 1263 HAMDAN v. RUMSFELD. 126 S.CT. 2749. UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, JUNE 29, 2006, 100 Am. J. Int'l L. 888, 895+ (2006) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 1264 UNITED STATES PRESENTS PERIODIC REPORTS TO HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE, RECEIVES CRITICAL RESPONSE, 100 Am. J. Int'l L. 948, 950 (2006) 1265 NORMATIVE HIERARCHY IN INTERNATIONAL LAW, 100 Am. J. Int'l L. 291, 323 (2006) 1266 INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS AND ISLAMIC LAW. BY MASHOOD A. BADERIN. OXFORD: OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS, 2003. PP. XXI, 279. INDEX. $95, 99 Am. J. Int'l L. 302, 306 (2005) 1267 SUPREME COURT'S USE OF COURT DECISIONS OF TREATY PARTNERS, 98 Am. J. Int'l L. 579, 580 (2004) 1268 THE CHALLENGE TO THE MANDATORY DEATH PENALTY IN THE COMMONWEALTH CARIBBEAN, 98 Am. J. Int'l L. 126, 140 (2004) 1269 EDITORS' INTRODUCTION, 98 Am. J. Int'l L. 42, 43 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1270 INTERNATIONAL: LAW AS PART OF OUR LAW, 98 Am. J. Int'l L. 43, 50+ (2004) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 1271 MISUSING INTERNATIONAL SOURCES TO INTERPRET THE CONSTITUTION, 98 Am. J. Int'l L. 57, 65+ (2004) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1272 INTERNATIONAL MATERIALS AND DOMESTIC RIGHTS: REFLECTIONS ON ATKINS AND LAWRENCE, 98 Am. J. Int'l L. 69, 69+ (2004) HN: 1,4,5 (S.Ct.) 1273 THE USES OF INTERNATIONAL LAW IN CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION, 98 Am. J. Int'l L. 82, 89+ (2004) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1274 INTERNATIONAL LAW, SOVEREIGNTY, AND AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONALISM: REFLECTIONS ON THE CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW DEBATE, 98 Am. J. Int'l L. 91, 108 (2004) 1275 INTERPRETATION OF U.S. CONSTITUTION BY REFERENCE TO INTERNATIONAL LAW, 97 Am. J. Int'l L. 683, 685+ (2003) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1276 DOES FREE EXERCISE OF RELIGION DESERVE CONSTITUTIONAL MENTION?, 54 Am. J. Juris. 41, 66 (2009) 1277 IS THE HARM PRINCIPLE ILLIBERAL?, 51 Am. J. Juris. 1, 42 (2006) 1278 RELIGION AND STATE: SOME MAIN ISSUES AND SOURCES, 51 Am. J. Juris. 107, 130 (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1279 WHAT'S SEX GOT TO DO WITH IT? MARRIAGE, MORALITY, AND RATIONALITY, 49 Am. J. Juris. 63, 85 (2004) 1280 BEYOND ABORTION: WHY THE PERSONHOOD MOVEMENT IMPLICATES REPRODUCTIVE CHOICE, 39 Am. J.L. & Med. 573, 616+ © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. (2013) 1281 THE LIBERTY OF FREE RIDERS: THE MINIMUM COVERAGE PROVISION, MILL'S "HARM PRINCIPLE," AND AMERICAN SOCIAL MORALITY, 38 Am. J.L. & Med. 374, 383+ (2012) 1282 PAIN DETECTION AND THE PRIVACY OF SUBJECTIVE EXPERIENCE, 33 Am. J.L. & Med. 433, 456 (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1283 SILVER SPOONS AND GOLDEN GENES: GENETIC ENGINEERING AND THE EGALITARIAN ETHOS, 33 Am. J.L. & Med. 567, 577+ (2007) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1284 PROCREATIVE LIBERTY IN THE ERA OF GENOMICS, 29 Am. J.L. & Med. 439, 454+ (2003) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1285 SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS: CONTINUATION OF VESTED RIGHTS?, 52 Am. J. Legal Hist. 459, 497+ (2012) 1286 PRIVACY AND PRURIENCE: AN ESSAY ON AMERICAN LAW, RELIGION, AND WOMEN, 51 Am. J. Legal Hist. 461, 486+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1287 THE GREAT DISSENTER'S GREATEST DISSENTS: THE FIRST JUSTICE HARLAN, THE "COLOR-BLIND" CONSTITUTION AND THE MEANING OF HIS DISSENTS IN THE INSULAR CASES FOR THE WAR ON TERROR, 48 Am. J. Legal Hist. 119, 146 (2006) 1288 REVIVING THOMAS JEFFERSON'S JURY: SPARF AND HANSEN v. UNITED STATES RECONSIDERED, 46 Am. J. Legal Hist. 353, 421 (2004) 1289 FEDERALIST SOCIETY PANEL DISCUSSION: JUDICIAL SELECTION, FEDERAL AND STATE, 32 Am. J. Trial Advoc. 453, 494 (2009) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 1290 RELIABLE CONSULTANTS, INC. v. EARLE: IS CRIMINALIZING THE SELLING, ADVERTISING, GIVING OR LENDING OF SEXUAL DEVICES A VIOLATION OF AN INDIVIDUAL'S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS?, 32 Am. J. Trial Advoc. 637, 638+ (2009) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1291 BORDER CONFIDENTIAL: WHY SEARCHES OF LAPTOP COMPUTERS AT THE BORDER SHOULD REQUIRE REASONABLE SUSPICION, 31 Am. J. Trial Advoc. 137, 152 (2007) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 1292 THREE STATE APPROACHES TO SAME-SEX MARRIAGE: WHY GOODRIDGE SHOULD HAVE FOLLOWED THE MAJORITY APPROACH, 28 Am. J. Trial Advoc. 703, 719 (2005) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 1293 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW Homosexuals' Rights to Adopt After Lofton v. Secretary of Department of Children & Family Services, 27 Am. J. Trial Advoc. 635, 635+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1294 TWO CENTURIES OF INTERNATIONAL LAW IN THE U.S. SUPREME COURT, 105 Am. Soc'y Int'l L. Proc. 529, 531+ (2011) 1295 NATIONAL SECURITY versus HUMAN RIGHTS: AN UNEVEN PLAYING FIELD, 104 Am. Soc'y Int'l L. Proc. 458, 458+ (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 1296 KEYNOTE ADDRESS: THE USE OF FOREIGN LAW-A COMPARATIVE VIEW OF CANADA AND THE UNITED STATES, 104 Am. Soc'y Int'l L. Proc. 491, 493 (2010) 1297 INTERNATIONAL LAW-THE IMPACT ON NATIONAL CONSTITUTIONS, 99 Am. Soc'y Int'l L. Proc. 1, 10+ (2005) 1298 KEYNOTE ADDRESS: FOREIGN LEGAL AUTHORITY IN THE FEDERAL COURTS, 98 Am. Soc'y Int'l L. Proc. 305, 310 (2004) 1299 IGNORING HUMAN RIGHTS FOR HOMOSEXUALS: GROSS VIOLATIONS OF INTERNATIONAL OBLIGATIONS IN CAMEROON, 27 Am. U. Int'l L. Rev. 439, 471+ (2012) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 1300 DIGNITY AS A CONSTITUTIONAL VALUE: A SOUTH AFRICAN PERSPECTIVE, 26 Am. U. Int'l L. Rev. 1377, 1407+ (2011) 1301 SELLING MEDELLÍN: THE ENTOURAGE OF LITIGATION SURROUNDING THE VIENNA CONVENTION ON CONSULAR RELATIONS AND THE WEIGHT OF INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE OPINIONS IN THE DOMESTIC SPHERE, 23 Am. U. Int'l L. Rev. 943, 960+ (2008) 1302 WHO'S AFRAID OF THE GENEVA CONVENTIONS? TREATY INTERPRETATION IN THE WAKE OF HAMDAN V. RUMSFELD, 22 Am. U. Int'l L. Rev. 709, 743 (2007) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 1303 INTERNATIONAL LAW-THE IMPACT ON NATIONAL CONSTITUTIONS, 21 Am. U. Int'l L. Rev. 327, 364+ (2006) 1304 IS TRUTH SERUM TORTURE?, 20 Am. U. Int'l L. Rev. 521, 612+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1305 GRASSROOTS GAY RIGHTS: LEGAL ADVOCACY AT THE LOCAL LEVEL, 21 Am. U.J. Gender Soc. Pol'y & L. 507, 553 (2013) 1306 THE "FEDERAL LAW OF MARRIAGE": DEFERENCE, DEVIATION, AND DOMA, 21 Am. U.J. Gender Soc. Pol'y & L. 705, 781+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1307 TRANSGRESSIONS OF INEQUALITY: THE STRUGGLE FINDING LEGAL PROTECTIONS AGAINST WRONGFUL EMPLOYMENT TERMINATION ON THE BASIS OF THE TRANSGENDER IDENTITY, 21 Am. U.J. Gender Soc. Pol'y & L. 865, 891+ (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1308 REED V. REED AT 40: EQUAL PROTECTION AND WOMEN'S RIGHTS, 20 Am. U.J. Gender Soc. Pol'y & L. 315, 344 (2012) 1309 ILLEGITIMACY AND SEX, OLD AND NEW, 20 Am. U.J. Gender Soc. Pol'y & L. 347, 385+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1310 WHAT'S SO NEW ABOUT THE NEW ILLEGITIMACY?, 20 Am. U.J. Gender Soc. Pol'y & L. 387, 436+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1311 PERRY V. SCHWARZENEGGER, PROPOSITION 8, AND THE FIGHT FOR SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, 19 Am. U.J. Gender Soc. Pol'y & L. 425, 435+ (2011) 1312 AMENDING THE DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT: A NECESSARY STEP © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. TOWARD GAINING FULL LEGAL RIGHTS FOR SAME-SEX COUPLES, 19 Am. U.J. Gender Soc. Pol'y & L. 959, 986+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1313 CHRISTIAN LEGAL SOCIETY V. MARTINEZ: HOW AN OBSCURE FIRST AMENDMENT CASE INADVERTENTLY AND UNEXPECTEDLY CREATED A SIGNIFICANT FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT ADVANCE FOR LGBT RIGHTS ADVOCATES, 19 Am. U.J. Gender Soc. Pol'y & L. 1317, 1326+ (2011) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 1314 OBLIGATION IGNORED: WHY INTERNATIONAL LAW REQUIRES THE UNITED STATES TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE CIVIL LEGAL AID, WHAT THE UNITED STATES IS DOING INSTEAD, AND HOW LEGAL EMPOWERMENT CAN HELP, 20 Am. U.J. Gender Soc. Pol'y & L. 273, 309+ (2011) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 1315 "IMMUTABILITY" AND STIGMA: TOWARDS A MORE PROGRESSIVE EQUAL PROTECTION RIGHTS DISCOURSE, 18 Am. U.J. Gender Soc. Pol'y & L. 439, 453+ (2010) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1316 OF STATE, MARKET AND JUSTICE: LATCRITICAL CHALLENGES TO THEORY, PRAXIS AND POLICY, 18 Am. U.J. Gender Soc. Pol'y & L. 563, 585 (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1317 BOBBITT, THE RISE OF THE MARKET STATE, AND RACE, 18 Am. U.J. Gender Soc. Pol'y & L. 587, 605 (2010) 1318 THE UNITING AMERICAN FAMILIES ACT: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF LEGISLATION AFFECTING BI-NATIONAL SAME-SEX COUPLES, 17 Am. U.J. Gender Soc. Pol'y & L. 521, 543+ (2009) HN: 1,2,3 (S.Ct.) 1319 "THE HEBREW LANGUAGE HAS NOT CREATED A TITLE FOR ME": A LEGAL AND SOCIOLINGUISTIC ANALYSIS OF NEW-TYPE FAMILIES, 17 Am. U.J. Gender Soc. Pol'y & L. 545, 600 (2009) 1320 WHEN STUDENTS TEST POSITIVE, THEIR PRIVACY FAILS: THE UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA'S HIV/AIDS REPORTING REQUIREMENT, 17 Am. U.J. Gender Soc. Pol'y & L. 751, 783 (2009) 1321 "PROTECTING" WOMEN'S HEALTH: HOW GONZALES V. CARHART ENDANGERS WOMEN'S HEALTH AND WOMEN'S EQUAL RIGHT TO PERSONHOOD UNDER THE CONSTITUTION, 16 Am. U.J. Gender Soc. Pol'y & L. 387, 411 (2008) 1322 REGULATING PREGNANCY BEHAVIORS: HOW THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF MINORITY WOMEN ARE DISPROPORTIONATELY COMPROMISED, 16 Am. U.J. Gender Soc. Pol'y & L. 437, 457 (2008) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 1323 SUPPLEMENTING STATE WORKERS' COMPENSATION LAWS WITH CAUSES OF ACTION UNDER STATE COMMON LAW REGIMES FOR EMPLOYEE THIRD-PARTY SEXUAL HARASSMENT SUITS AGAINST EMPLOYERS, 15 Am. U.J. Gender Soc. Pol'y & L. 577, 611+ (2007) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 1324 GAY PORNOGRAPHY AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT: UNIQUE, FIRSTPERSON PERSPECTIVES ON FREE EXPRESSION, SEXUAL CENSORSHIP, AND CULTURAL IMAGES, 15 Am. U.J. Gender Soc. Pol'y & L. 687, 731+ (2007) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 1325 FOR RICHER OR POORER OR ANY OTHER REASON: ADJUDICATING IMMIGRATION MARRIAGE FRAUD CASES WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THE CONSTITUTION, 15 Am. U.J. Gender Soc. Pol'y & L. 743, 767+ (2007) HN: 3,5 (S.Ct.) 1326 ESSENTIAL TO THE NATIONAL SECURITY: AN EXECUTIVE BAN ON "DON'T ASK, DON'T TELL", 16 Am. U.J. Gender Soc. Pol'y & L. 115, 147+ (2007) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1327 GIVING BIRTH IN SHACKLES: A CONSTITUTIONAL AND HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATION, 16 Am. U.J. Gender Soc. Pol'y & L. 223, 255+ (2007) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1328 YOU ARE NOT THE FATHER: HOW STATE PATERNITY LAWS PROTECT (AND FAIL TO PROTECT) THE BEST INTERESTS OF CHILDREN, 16 Am. U.J. Gender Soc. Pol'y & L. 311, 334 (2007) 1329 MANY ARE CHILLED, BUT FEW ARE FROZEN: HOW TRANSFORMATIVE LEARNING IN POPULAR CULTURE, CHRISTIANITY, AND SCIENCE WILL LEAD TO THE EVENTUAL DEMISE OF LEGALLY SANCTIONED DISCRIMINATION AGAINST SEXUAL MINORITIES IN THE UNITE, 14 Am. U.J. Gender Soc. Pol'y & L. 177, 252+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1330 ADAM AND STEVE VS. ADAM AND EVE: WILL THE NEW SUPREME COURT GRANT GAYS THE RIGHT TO MARRY?, 14 Am. U.J. Gender Soc. Pol'y & L. 253, 311+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1331 RHETORICAL HOLY WAR: POLYGAMY, HOMOSEXUALITY, AND THE PARADOX OF COMMUNITY AND AUTONOMY, 14 Am. U.J. Gender Soc. Pol'y & L. 313, 383+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1332 PRIDE AND PREJUDICE: THE FIRST AMENDMENT, THE EQUAL ACCESS ACT, AND THE LEGAL FIGHT FOR GAY STUDENT GROUPS IN HIGH SCHOOLS, 14 Am. U.J. Gender Soc. Pol'y & L. 613, 643+ (2006) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1333 THE MAN, THE STATE AND YOU: THE ROLE OF THE STATE IN REGULATING GENDER HIERARCHIES, 14 Am. U.J. Gender Soc. Pol'y & L. 73, 127+ (2006) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1334 CONTESTING CONSERVATISMS, FAMILY FEUDS AND THE PRIVATIZATION OF DEPENDENCY, 13 Am. U.J. Gender Soc. Pol'y & L. 415, 509+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1335 "NO NEW BABIES?" GENDER INEQUALITY AND REPRODUCTIVE CONTROL IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND PRISON SYSTEMS, 12 Am. U.J. Gender Soc. Pol'y & L. 391, 425 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 1336 DIVORCING THE DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT: JUDICIAL TENSIONS IN UPHOLDING THE LEGISLATED PRECLUSION OF FEDERAL SAMESEX MARITAL RIGHTS, 3 Am. U. Lab. & Emp. L.F. 88, 101+ (2013) 1337 DON'T ASK DON'T TELL: BEYOND THE LOG CABIN REPUBLICANS INJUNCTION AND THE DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT, 1 Am. U. Lab. & Emp. L.F. 127, 159 (2011) 1338 UNTIL THE PLENARY POWER DO US PART: JUDICIAL SCRUTINY OF THE DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT IN IMMIGRATION AFTER FLORESVILLAR, 61 Am. U. L. Rev. 1825, 1865+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1339 LOWER COURT CONSTITUTIONALISM: CIRCUIT COURT DISCRETION IN A COMPLEX ADAPTIVE SYSTEM, 61 Am. U. L. Rev. 457, 522+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1340 A SHOT IN THE ARM: WHAT A MODERN APPROACH TO JACOBSON V. MASSACHUSETTS MEANS FOR MANDATORY VACCINATIONS DURING A PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY, 60 Am. U. L. Rev. 1715, 1749+ (2011) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 1341 SPEAKING AGAINST NORMS: PUBLIC DISCOURSE AND THE ECONOMY OF RACIALIZATION IN THE WORKPLACE, 57 Am. U. L. Rev. 523, 584+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1342 COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL ADVOCACY, 56 Am. U. L. Rev. 553, 665+ (2007) HN: 1,4,5 (S.Ct.) 1343 NO RELIEF: UNDERSTANDING THE SUPREME COURT'S DECISION IN TOWN OF CASTLE ROCK V. GONZALES THROUGH THE RIGHTS/ REMEDIES FRAMEWORK, 55 Am. U. L. Rev. 1843, 1879 (2006) 1344 THE "NEW JUDICIAL FEDERALISM" BEFORE ITS TIME: A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF ECONOMIC SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS UNDER STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW SINCE 1940 AND THE REASONS FOR ITS RECENT DECLINE, 55 Am. U. L. Rev. 457, 540+ (2005) 1345 THE FEDERAL MARRIAGE AMENDMENT: TO PROTECT THE SANCTITY OF MARRIAGE OR DESTROY CONSTITUTIONAL DEMOCRACY?, 54 Am. U. L. Rev. 1487, 1536+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1346 CONSTITUTIONAL HISTORICISM: AN EXAMINATION OF THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT EVOLVING STANDARDS OF DECENCY TEST, 54 Am. U. L. Rev. 1355, 1448+ (2005) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 1347 THE OVERCRIMINALIZATION PHENOMENON, 54 Am. U. L. Rev. 703, 746+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1348 THE MANY FACES OF OVERCRIMINALIZATION: FROM MORALS AND MATTRESS TAGS TO OVERFEDERALIZATION, 54 Am. U. L. Rev. 747, 782+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1349 THE IMPLICATIONS OF DEVELOPMENTAL COGNITIVE RESEARCH ON "EVOLVING STANDARDS OF DECENCY" AND THE IMPOSITION OF THE DEATH PENALTY ON JUVENILES, 54 Am. U. L. Rev. 441, 484+ (2004) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 1350 LEGISLATORS IN THE CLASSROOM: WHY STATE LEGISLATURES CANNOT DECIDE HIGHER EDUCATION CURRICULA, 54 Am. U. L. Rev. 215, 253+ (2004) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 1351 RE-BALANCING STATE AND FEDERAL POWER: TOWARD A POLITICAL PRINCIPLE OF SUBSIDIARITY IN THE UNITED STATES, 53 Am. U. L. Rev. 1421, 1472+ (2004) 1352 THE CONSTITUTION AT THE THRESHOLD OF LIFE AND DEATH: A SUGGESTED APPROACH TO ACCOMMODATE AN INTEREST IN LIFE AND A RIGHT TO DIE, 53 Am. U. L. Rev. 971, 1020+ (2004) 1353 ON STATUTORY RAPE, STRICT LIABILITY, AND THE PUBLIC WELFARE OFFENSE MODEL, 53 Am. U. L. Rev. 313, 385+ (2003) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1354 EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER THE LAW: WHY IOLTA PROGRAMS DO NOT VIOLATE THE FIRST AMENDMENT, 53 Am. U. L. Rev. 491, 529 (2003) 1355 THE EXCLUSION OF FELONS FROM JURY SERVICE, 53 Am. U. L. Rev. 65, 189+ (2003) 1356 A SLAVE BY ANY OTHER NAME IS STILL A SLAVE: THE TILIKUM CASE AND APPLICATION OF THE THIRTEENTH AMENDMENT TO NONHUMAN ANIMALS, 19 Animal L. 221, 254+ (2013) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 1357 2007 LEGISLATIVE REVIEW, 14 Animal L. 265, 301+ (2008) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1358 A DUTCH PERSPECTIVE: THE LIMITS OF LAWFUL EUTHANASIA, 13 Annals Health L. 365, 392 (2004) 1359 THE RELATION BETWEEN AUTONOMY-BASED RIGHTS AND PROFOUNDLY MENTALLY DISABLED PERSONS, 13 Annals Health L. 37, 80 (2004) 1360 COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CRUEL & UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT FOR ENGAGING IN CONSENSUAL HOMOSEXUAL ACTS (IN INTERNATIONAL CONVENTIONS, THE UNITED STATES AND IRAN), 12 Ann. Surv. Int'l & Comp. L. 149, 157+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1361 UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS: A GENERATIONAL HISTORY, 12 Ann. Surv. Int'l & Comp. L. 219, 268 (2006) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 1362 ERRORS THAT WON'T HAPPEN TWICE: A CONSTITUTIONAL GLANCE AT A PROPOSED TEXAS STATUTE THAT WILL BAN HOMOSEXUALS FROM FOSTER PARENT ELIGIBILITY, 5 Appalachian J. L. 171, 193+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1363 IN DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE: WHY SAME-SEX MARRIAGE WILL NOT LEAD US DOWN A SLIPPERY SLOPE TOWARD THE LEGALIZATION OF POLYGAMY, 6 Appalachian J. L. 101, 133+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1364 COMPROMISING THE UNCOMPROMISABLE: A PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTS APPROACH TO RESOLVING THE ABORTION CONTROVERSY, 4 Appalachian J. L. 1, 45+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1365 SAME-SEX MARRIAGE: THE POWER OF A DEFINITION, 4 Appalachian J. © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. L. 109, 111+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1366 NEW FOUNDATIONS FOR CONSTITUTIONAL ADJUDICATION IN STATE COURT, 24 App. Advoc. 425, 439 (2012) 1367 UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT UPDATE, 16 App. Advoc. 17, 17 (2003) 1368 INTERNATIONAL COURTS TO KNOW, 46-MAR Ariz. Att'y 16, 17+ (2010) 1369 THE FREEDOM TO MARRY MUST NOT BE DENIED, 40-MAR Ariz. Att'y 14, 18+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1370 WRONG IN THE LAW AND IN THE CULTURE, 40-MAR Ariz. Att'y 15, 26 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1371 "DON'T FORGET ABOUT ME": IMPLEMENTING ARTICLE 12 OF THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD, 24 Ariz. J. Int'l & Comp. L. 803, 842 (2007) 1372 CIVIL PARTNERSHIP IN THE UNITED KINGDOM AND A MODERATE PROPOSAL FOR CHANGE IN THE UNITED STATES, 22 Ariz. J. Int'l & Comp. L. 613, 625+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1373 FIRING "IMMORAL" PUBLIC EMPLOYEES: IF ARTICLE 8 OF THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS PROTECTS EMPLOYEE PRIVACY RIGHTS, THEN WHY CAN'T WE?, 21 Ariz. J. Int'l & Comp. L. 621, 661+ (2004) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1374 AVATARS, SCARLET "A" S, AND ADULTERY IN THE TECHNOLOGICAL AGE, 55 Ariz. L. Rev. 371, 416+ (2013) 1375 REVIVING THE FEDERAL CRIME OF GRATUITIES, 55 Ariz. L. Rev. 417, 464 (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1376 AMERICA'S FUNDAMENTAL AND VANISHING RIGHT TO BAIL, 55 Ariz. L. Rev. 909, 966+ (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1377 REGULATING AT THE MARGINS: NON-TRADITIONAL KINSHIP AND THE LEGAL REGULATION OF INTIMATE AND FAMILY LIFE, 54 Ariz. L. Rev. 43, 77+ (2012) 1378 PARENTS' SELF-DETERMINATION AND CHILDREN'S CUSTODY: A NEW ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK FOR STATE STRUCTURING OF CHILDREN'S FAMILY LIFE, 54 Ariz. L. Rev. 79, 95+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1379 PERRY V. SCHWARZENEGGER AND THE FUTURE OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGE LAW, 53 Ariz. L. Rev. 913, 983+ (2011) HN: 2,5 (S.Ct.) 1380 TRANSSEXUALITY, MARRIAGE, AND THE MYTH OF TRUE SEX, 53 Ariz. L. Rev. 285, 319 (2011) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 1381 THE NEW REGULATORY ERA-AN INTRODUCTION, 51 Ariz. L. Rev. 559, 573+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1382 A RIGHT TO PSEUDONYMITY, 51 Ariz. L. Rev. 427, 464+ (2009) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 1383 BEYOND THE SUPERMAJORITY: POST-ADOPTION RATIFICATION OF THE EQUALITY AMENDMENTS, 50 Ariz. L. Rev. 25, 47+ (2008) HN: 1 © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. (S.Ct.) 1384 MAPPING THE NEW FRONTIERS OF PRIVATE ORDERING: AFTERWORD, 49 Ariz. L. Rev. 695, 715 (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1385 AMBIVALENCE ABOUT THE LAW, 49 Ariz. L. Rev. 11, 28 (2007) 1386 SEX, LIES, AND THE DUTY TO DISCLOSE, 47 Ariz. L. Rev. 871, 931+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1387 ARIZONA'S RING CYCLE, 44 Ariz. St. L.J. 1061, 1108 (2012) 1388 DIGNIFYING RIGHTS: A COMMENT ON JEREMY WALDRON'S DIGNITY, RIGHTS, AND RESPONSIBILITIES, 43 Ariz. St. L.J. 1177, 1200+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1389 THIRD WAVE LEGAL MORALISM, 42 Ariz. St. L.J. 1151, 1172+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1390 INDIVIDUAL VERSUS STATE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS UNDER HEALTH CARE REFORM, 42 Ariz. St. L.J. 1233, 1243 (2011) 1391 RECONCEPTUALIZING JUDICIAL ACTIVISM AS JUDICIAL RESPONSIBILITY: A TALE OF TWO JUSTICE KENNEDYS, 41 Ariz. St. L.J. 709, 753+ (2009) 1392 EMPOWERING CHANGE: BUILDING THE CASE FOR INTERNATIONAL INDIGENOUS LAND RIGHTS IN THE UNITED STATES, 41 Ariz. St. L.J. 1167, 1204 (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1393 RESUSCITATING PROPORTIONALITY IN NONCAPITAL CRIMINAL SENTENCING, 40 Ariz. St. L.J. 527, 583 (2008) 1394 SOCIAL CAPITAL IN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: THE CASE OF RELIGIOUS NORM ENFORCEMENT THROUGH PRAYER AT PUBLIC OCCASIONS, 40 Ariz. St. L.J. 585, 649+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1395 PUNISHING SEX OFFENDERS: WHEN GOOD INTENTIONS GO BAD, 40 Ariz. St. L.J. 651, 690+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1396 DO CRIMINAL LAWS INFLUENCE HIV RISK BEHAVIOR? AN EMPIRICAL TRIAL, 39 Ariz. St. L.J. 467, 517 (2007) 1397 UNDERMINING INALIENABLE RIGHTS: FROM DRED SCOTT TO THE REHNQUIST COURT, 39 Ariz. St. L.J. 1179, 1235 (2007) 1398 UNPROTECTED SEX: THE ARIZONA CIVIL RIGHTS ACT'S EXCLUSION OF SEXUAL MINORITIES, 38 Ariz. St. L.J. 1139, 1168+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1399 PLAYING CATCH UP: CHANGING THE BANKRUPTCY CODE TO ACCOMMODATE AMERICA'S GROWING NUMBER OF NONTRADITIONAL COUPLES, 37 Ariz. St. L.J. 681, 707+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1400 THE PECULIAR FEDERAL MARRIAGE AMENDMENT, 36 Ariz. St. L.J. 783, 804+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1401 A PRINCIPLED SOLUTION FOR NEGLIGENT INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS CLAIMS, 36 Ariz. St. L.J. 805, 884 (2004) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 1402 TOWARDS AN INDEPENDENT STATE CONSTITUTIONAL JURISPRUDENCE II - ARKANSAS SUPREME COURT RULES STATE CONSTITUTION REQUIRES WARNING PRIOR TO "KNOCK AND TALK" SEARCHES, 2004 Ark. L. Notes 3, 8 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1403 ARKANSAS 1, TEXAS 0: SODOMY LAW REFORM AND THE ARKANSAS LAW, 2003 Ark. L. Notes 87, 90+ (2003) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1404 RECENT DEVELOPMENT, 66 Ark. L. Rev. 347, 348 (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 1405 ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES V. COLE: ANOTHER STEP TOWARD SAME SEX MARRIAGE IN ARKANSAS?, 66 Ark. L. Rev. 527, 547 (2013) 1406 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS, 65 Ark. L. Rev. 517, 523 (2012) 1407 RETHINKING "BIAS": JUDICIAL ELECTIONS AND THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE AFTER CAPERTON V. A.T. MASSEY COAL CO., 64 Ark. L. Rev. 179, 220+ (2011) 1408 LIFE, LIBERTY, AND THE PURSUIT OF MATRIMONY: THE CONSTITUTIONAL IMPLICATIONS OF ARKANSAS'S "AMENDMENT CONCERNING MARRIAGE", 64 Ark. L. Rev. 383, 388+ (2011) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 1409 ARKANSAS'S UNMARRIED COUPLE ADOPTION BAN: DEPRIVING CHILDREN OF FAMILIES, 63 Ark. L. Rev. 113, 138+ (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1410 ADOPTION, BEST INTERESTS, AND THE ARKANSAS CONSTITUTION, 63 Ark. L. Rev. 3, 29+ (2010) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 1411 COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVES ON ADOPTION OF CHILDREN BY COHABITING, NONMARITAL COUPLES AND PARTNERS, 63 Ark. L. Rev. 31, 112+ (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1412 THE PERILS AND THE PROMISE OF COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: THE NEW GLOBALISM AND THE ROLE OF THE UNITED STATES IN SHAPING HUMAN RIGHTS, 61 Ark. L. Rev. 603, 620+ (2009) 1413 INNOCENT UNTIL ARRESTED?: DELIBERATE INDIFFERENCE TOWARD DETAINEES' DUE-PROCESS RIGHTS, 62 Ark. L. Rev. 101, 124 (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1414 DIALOGIC JUDICIAL REVIEW, 61 Ark. L. Rev. 205, 216 (2008) 1415 THE NEW JUDICIAL FEDERALISM TAKES ROOT IN ARKANSAS, 58 Ark. L. Rev. 883, 891 (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1416 SAME-SEX MARRIAGE: AN EXAMINATION OF THE ISSUES OF DUE PROCESS AND EQUAL PROTECTION, 59 Ark. L. Rev. 471, 509+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1417 THE ARKANSAS PROPOSAL ON ACCESS TO COURT RECORDS: UPGRADING THE COMMON LAW WITH ELECTRONIC FREEDOM OF INFORMATION NORMS, 59 Ark. L. Rev. 555, 736 (2006) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 1418 WHAT THE SUPREME COURT ISN'T SAYING ABOUT FEDERALISM, THE NINTH AMENDMENT, AND MEDICAL MARIJUANA, 59 Ark. L. Rev. 755, © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 779+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1419 THE ALLURE AND DANGER OF PRACTICING LAW AS TAXONOMY, 58 Ark. L. Rev. 159, 195+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1420 ANNUAL REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENTS IN INSTRUCTIONS, 2013-DEC Army Law. 4, 4+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1421 WHERE'S THE SODOMY? A GUIDE FOR PROSECUTING PREJUDICIAL SEXUAL RELATIONSHIPS AFTER THE POSSIBLE REPEAL OF SODOMY LAW, 2013-NOV Army Law. 4, 4+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1422 COMMAND AUTHORITY: WHAT ARE THE LIMITS ON REGULATING THE PRIVATE CONDUCT OF AMERICA'S WARRIORS?, 2010-MAY Army Law. 13, 13+ (2010) 1423 PROSECUTING AN HIV-RELATED CRIME IN A MILITARY COURTMARTIAL: A PRIMER, 2009-SEP Army Law. 29, 29+ (2009) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1424 IS ARTICLE 125, SODOMY A DEAD LETTER IN LIGHT OF LAWRENCE v. TEXAS AND THE NEW ARTICLE 120?, 2009-JAN Army Law. 1, 1+ (2009) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1425 FOREWORD: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW IS NOT FOR SISSIES!, 2008-DEC Army Law. 1, 8 (2008) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 1426 "OVERSHIFT" THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL DOUBLE BURDEN-SHIFT ON AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES IN THE NEW ARTICLE 120, 2007-MAY Army Law. 2, 2 (2007) 1427 THE USE OF ARTICLE III CASE LAW IN MILITARY JURISPRUDENCE, 2005-AUG Army Law. 25, 25+ (2005) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 1428 MEASURE FOR MEASURE: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN SUBSTANTIVE CRIMINAL LAW, 2005-MAY Army Law. 69, 69+ (2005) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 1429 FOREWORD, 2005-APR Army Law. 1, 1+ (2005) 1430 DUCK SOUP: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN SUBSTANTIVE CRIMINAL LAW, 2004-JUL Army Law. 79, 79+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1431 REFRAMING REDRESS: A "SOCIAL HEALING THROUGH JUSTICE" APPROACH TO UNITED STATES-NATIVE HAWAIIAN AND JAPAN-AINU RECONCILIATION INITIATIVES, 16 Asian Am. L.J. 5, 72 (2009) 1432 SEXUAL ORIENTATION AND GENDER IDENTITY IN HONG KONG: A CASE FOR THE STRATEGIC USE OF HUMAN RIGHTS TREATIES AND THE INTERNATIONAL REPORTING PROCESS, 14 Asian-Pac. L. & Pol'y J. 28, 83+ (2013) 1433 EDUCATING THE CLIENT IN ESTATE PLANNING, 2008 WL 5689253 (ASPATORE), *9+ (2008) 1434 9 Ave Maria L. Rev. 1, PROTECTION OF HEALTH-CARE PROVIDERS' RIGHTS OF CONSCIENCE IN AMERICAN LAW: PRESENT, PAST, AND FUTURE (2010) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 1435 9 Ave Maria L. Rev. 123, THE RIGHT TO CONSCIENCE AND THE FIRST © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. AMENDMENT (2010) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 1436 8 Ave Maria L. Rev. 431, MULIERIS DIGNITATEM AND THE EXCLUSIVITY OF MARRIAGE UNDER LAW (2010) 1437 7 Ave Maria L. Rev. 1, PROMOTING THE RULE OF LAW AND RESPECTING THE SEPARATION OF POWERS: THE LEGITIMATE ROLE OF THE AMERICAN JUDICIARY ABROAD (2008) 1438 6 Ave Maria L. Rev. 155, ORIGINALISM AND PRECEDENT: PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICES IN THE APPLICATION OF STARE DECISIS (2007) 1439 6 Ave Maria L. Rev. 61, POPE JOHN PAUL II, FREEDOM, AND CONSTITUTIONAL LAW (2007) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 1440 5 Ave Maria L. Rev. 153, STARE DECISIS IN A CLASSICAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL SETTING: A COMMENT ON THE SYMPOSIUM (2007) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 1441 5 Ave Maria L. Rev. 23, WAS ANN COULTER RIGHT? SOME REALISM ABOUT "MINIMALISM" (2007) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 1442 5 Ave Maria L. Rev. 555, MAY A JUDGE BE A SCOUTMASTER? DALE, WHITE, AND THE NEW MODEL CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT (2007) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 1443 4 Ave Maria L. Rev. 497, AN ANTHROPOLOGY FOR THE FAMILY LAW OF INDIS/SOLUBILITY (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1444 4 Ave Maria L. Rev. 567, TRADITION AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE CATHOLIC CHURCH'S TEACHING ON MARRIAGE: A RESPONSE TO CARDINAL TRUJILLO (2006) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 1445 4 Ave Maria L. Rev. 123, INTERNATIONAL LAW AND THE RIGHT TO LIFE (2006) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 1446 3 Ave Maria L. Rev. 393, THE FRAMEWORK OF FULL FAITH AND CREDIT AND INTERSTATE RECOGNITION OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGES (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1447 3 Ave Maria L. Rev. 483, IS THE MASSACHUSETTS LAW ON MARRIAGE OF NON-RESIDENTS A BARRIER TO THE SPREAD OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGE? (2005) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 1448 3 Ave Maria L. Rev. 497, CIVIL UNIONS AND THE MEANING OF THE PUBLIC POLICY EXCEPTION AT THE BOUNDARIES OF DOMESTIC RELATIONS LAW (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1449 3 Ave Maria L. Rev. 549, STATE CHOICE-OF-LAW DOCTRINE AND NONMARITAL SAME-SEX PARTNER BENEFITS: HOW WILL STATES ENFORCE THE PUBLIC POLICY EXCEPTION? (2005) 1450 3 Ave Maria L. Rev. 123, HUMAN ORIGINS AND HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE GENOME AGE (2005) 1451 3 Ave Maria L. Rev. 259, RIGHTS AND THE NEED FOR OBJECTIVE MORAL LIMITS (2005) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 1452 3 Ave Maria L. Rev. 303, CHALLENGES FACING OUR SYSTEM OF JUSTICE (2005) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 1453 2 Ave Maria L. Rev. 153, THE STATE INTERESTS IN MARRIAGE (2004) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 1454 2 Ave Maria L. Rev. 213, CHILD SUPPORT STATUTES AND THE FATHER'S RIGHT NOT TO PROCREATE (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1455 16 Barry L. Rev. 115, STANDING ON A SPECTRUM: THIRD PARTY STANDING IN THE UNITED STATES, CANADA, AND AUSTRALIA (2011) 1456 4 Barry L. Rev. I, RIGHTS: LOOKING BACK - LOOKING FORWARD (2003) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1457 SLIPPING THROUGH THE GATE: TRUSTING DAUBERT AND TRIAL PROCEDURES TO REVEAL THE "PSEUDO-HISTORIAN' EXPERT WITNESS AND TO ENABLE THE RELIABLE HISTORIAN EXPERT WITNESS-TROUBLING LESSONS FROM HOLOCAUST-RELATED TRIALS, 60 Baylor L. Rev. 824, 879+ (2008) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 1458 40 YEARS OF 8TH CIRCUIT JURISPRUDENCE Highlights in the Career of Judge Gerald Heaney, 64-MAR Bench & B. Minn. 18, 20 (2007) 1459 PAINTING BLACK SPACES RED, BLACK, AND GREEN: THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE MURAL MOVEMENT, 13 Berkeley J. Afr.-Am. L. & Pol'y 2, 44 (2011) 1460 IN DEFENSE OF THE BLACK/WHITE BINARY: RECLAIMING A TRADITION OF CIVIL RIGHTS SCHOLARSHIP, 12 Berkeley J. Afr.-Am. L. & Pol'y 107, 144+ (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1461 ABSTINENCE-ONLY EDUCATION AND MINORITY TEENAGERS: THE IMPORTANCE OF RACE IN A QUESTION OF CONSTITUTIONALITY, 10 Berkeley J. Afr.-Am. L. & Pol'y 3, 51+ (2008) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1462 LAWRENCE'S CRIMINAL LAW, 16 Berkeley J. Crim. L. 41, 42+ (2011) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1463 LIBERAL JUSTICES' RELIANCE ON LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: PRINCIPLE, STRATEGY, AND THE SCALIA EFFECT, 29 Berkeley J. Emp. & Lab. L. 117, 173+ (2008) 1464 LAWRENCE: AN UNLIKELY CATALYST FOR MASSIVE DISRUPTION IN THE SPHERE OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE PRIVACY AND INTIMATE ASSOCIATION CLAIMS, 29 Berkeley J. Emp. & Lab. L. 311, 344+ (2008) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1465 PAPERS, PETITIONS, AND PARADES: FREE EXPRESSION'S PIVOTAL FUNCTION IN THE EARLY LABOR MOVEMENT, 28 Berkeley J. Emp. & Lab. L. 63, 106 (2007) 1466 GETTING THE GOVERNMENT IN BED: HOW TO REGULATE THE SEXTOY INDUSTRY, 28 Berkeley J. Gender L. & Just. 161, 184 (2013) 1467 RECOGNIZING AND RESPECTING THE RIGHTS OF LGBT YOUTH IN CHILD CUSTODY PROCEEDINGS, 27 Berkeley J. Gender L. & Just. 171, © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 197+ (2012) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1468 DECOUPLING MARRIAGE & PROCREATION: A FEMINIST ARGUMENT FOR SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, 27 Berkeley J. Gender L. & Just. 307, 338+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1469 INCONSISTENT LEGAL TREATMENT OF UNWANTED SEXUAL ADVANCES: A STUDY OF THE HOMOSEXUAL ADVANCE DEFENSE, STREET HARASSMENT, AND SEXUAL HARASSMENT IN THE WORKPLACE, 26 Berkeley J. Gender L. & Just. 291, 355+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1470 FROM DISGUST TO HUMANITY: SEXUAL ORIENTATION AND CONSTITUTIONAL LAW BY MARTHA C. NUSSBAUM, NEW YORK: OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS, 2010. 256 PP. $21.95 PAPERBACK., 26 Berkeley J. Gender L. & Just. 179, 190 (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1471 SEXUAL ORIENTATION, GENDER NONCONFORMITY, AND TRAITBASED DISCRIMINATION: CAUTIONARY TALES FROM TITLE VII & AN ARGUMENT FOR INCLUSION, 24 Berkeley J. Gender L. & Just. 166, 207+ (2009) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1472 TOWARD A "CULTURALLY CLITERATE" FAMILY LAW?, 23 Berkeley J. Gender L. & Just. 267, 337+ (2008) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1473 LOVING COUPLES, SPLIT INTERESTS: TAX PLANNING IN THE FIGHT TO RECOGNIZE SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, 23 Berkeley J. Gender L. & Just. 145, 180 (2008) 1474 ACCESSING REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGIES: INVISIBLE BARRIERS, INDELIBLE HARMS, 23 Berkeley J. Gender L. & Just. 18, 82 (2008) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 1475 THE LESBIAN DE FACTO PARENT STANDARD IN HOLTZMAN V. KNOTT: JUDICIAL POLICY INNOVATION AND DIFFUSION, 22 Berkeley J. Gender L. & Just. 135, 182+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1476 FEMINIST LEGAL THEORY: A PRIMER BY NANCY LEVIT AND ROBERT R.M. VERCHICK, FOREWORD BY MARTHA MINOW. NEW YORK AND LONDON: NEW YORK UNIVERSITY PRESS, 2006. 228 PAGES. $20 PAPER., 22 Berkeley J. Gender L. & Just. 297, 301 (2007) 1477 "WHERE ALL BELONG:" RELIGION AND THE FIGHT FOR LGBT EQUALITY IN ALABAMA, 21 Berkeley J. Gender L. & Just. 195, 212+ (2006) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 1478 SAME-SEX MARRIAGE THROUGH THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE: A GENDER-CONSCIOUS ANALYSIS, 21 Berkeley J. Gender L. & Just. 213, 240+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1479 EXCEPTIONS TO THE RULE: CURING THE LAW'S FAILURE TO PROTECT INTERSEX INFANTS, 21 Berkeley J. Gender L. & Just. 59, 110+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1480 REFLECTIONS ON THE BIRTH OF THE JOURNAL: A FOUNDERS' © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. ROUNDTABLE DISCUSSION, 20 Berkeley J. Gender L. & Just. 12, 29 (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1481 SOVEREIGNTISM'S TWILIGHT, 31 Berkeley J. Int'l L. 307, 322 (2013) 1482 WHY IS THE U.S. ABDICATING THE POLICING OF MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS TO EUROPE?: EXTRATERRITORIALITY, SOVEREIGNTY, AND THE ALIEN TORT STATUTE, 30 Berkeley J. Int'l L. 259, 302 (2012) 1483 TOWARD A "EUROPEAN MODEL' OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGE RIGHTS: A VIABLE PATHWAY FOR THE U.S.?, 29 Berkeley J. Int'l L. 132, 174+ (2011) 1484 REVIEWING TOM BINGHAM, WIDENING HORIZONS: THE INFLUENCE OF COMPARATIVE LAW AND INTERNATIONAL LAW ON DOMESTIC LAW. CAMBRIDGE, ENGLAND, CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS 2010. PP 102, HARDBACK ISBN-13 978-0521138024, 29 Berkeley J. Int'l L. 710, 718 (2011) 1485 WHEN TWO LAWS ARE BETTER THAN ONE: PROTECTING THE RIGHTS OF MIGRANT WORKERS, 28 Berkeley J. Int'l L. 15, 63+ (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1486 THE ORIGINS OF DUE PROCESS IN INDIA: THE ROLE OF BORROWING IN PERSONAL LIBERTY AND PREVENTIVE DETENTION CASES, 28 Berkeley J. Int'l L. 216, 260+ (2010) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 1487 DIGNITARIAN POSTHUMOUS PERSONALITY RIGHTS - AN ANALYSIS OF U.S. AND GERMAN CONSTITUTIONAL AND TORT LAW, 26 Berkeley J. Int'l L. 153, 205 (2008) 1488 CONSTITUTIONALIZING DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY IN MULTILINGUAL SOCIETIES, 25 Berkeley J. Int'l L. 117, 164+ (2007) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 1489 LEGAL ORDERS AND THEIR MANIFESTATION: THE OPERATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL AND FINANCIAL LEGAL ORDER AND ITS LEX MERCATORIA, 24 Berkeley J. Int'l L. 129, 191 (2006) 1490 MAKING ITSELF AT HOME: UNDERSTANDING FOREIGN LAW IN DOMESTIC JURISPRUDENCE: THE INDIAN CASE, 24 Berkeley J. Int'l L. 218, 272+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1491 SUPREMACY AND DIPLOMACY: THE INTERNATIONAL LAW OF THE U.S. SUPREME COURT, 24 Berkeley J. Int'l L. 273, 329+ (2006) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1492 RIGHTS AND THEIR LIMITS: THE CONSTITUTION FOR EUROPE IN INTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE LEGAL PERSPECTIVE, 23 Berkeley J. Int'l L. 223, 280 (2005) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 1493 THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF THE PRODUCTION OF CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW: THE ROLE OF NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS IN U.S. COURTS, 22 Berkeley J. Int'l L. 240, 278 (2004) 1494 JEFFERSON MEMORIAL LECTURE TRANSNATIONAL LEGAL PROCESS AFTER SEPTEMBER 11TH, 22 Berkeley J. Int'l L. 337, 354 (2004) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 1495 22 Berkeley La Raza Law Journal 3, FOREWORD: DOING THE HARD WORK (2012) 1496 22 Berkeley La Raza Law Journal 67, CLUSTER INTRODUCTION: CULTURE, KNOWLEDGE, LAW, AND COMMUNITY COUNTERING "NEW SOVEREIGNTY" WITH KNOWLEDGE (2012) 1497 22 Berkeley La Raza Law Journal 155, THE ENDURING FORCE OF SCALIA'S LAWRENCE AND ROMER DISSENTS: THE CASE FOR PROPOSITION 8 (2012) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1498 22 Berkeley La Raza Law Journal 301, AT AND BEYOND FIFTEENMAPPING LATCRIT THEORY, COMMUNITY, AND PRAXIS (2012) 1499 HAPPY BIRTHDAY STATUTE OF ANNE: THE DANCE BETWEEN THE COURTS AND CONGRESS, 25 Berkeley Tech. L.J. 1145, 1174 (2010) 1500 "THE RIGHT TO BE SEXUAL" (REVISITED): REMEMBERING MARY DUNLAP, 19 Berkeley Women's L.J. 19, 29+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1501 ROPER v. SIMMONS AND THE JURISPRUDENCE OF JUSTICE SANDRA DAY O'CONNOR, 8 Boalt J. Crim. L. 1, 125+ (2004) 1502 IS THE CONSTITUTION IN HARM'S WAY? SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS AND CRIMINAL LAW, 8 Boalt J. Crim. L. 3, 2+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1503 THE WRITTEN WORD: REFLECTIONS ON COMPOSING A MAJOR CIVIL RIGHTS DECISION, 2013-NOV B. B.J. 2, 2 (2013) 1504 ALL IN THE FAMILY, 2013-NOV B. B.J. 11, 11+ (2013) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 1505 HERE, THERE, AND EVERYWHERE: HUMAN DIGNITY IN CONTEMPORARY LAW AND IN THE TRANSNATIONAL DISCOURSE, 35 B.C. Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 331, 345+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1506 "GROSS VIOLATION": WHY UGANDA'S ANTI-HOMOSEXUALITY ACT THREATENS ITS TRADE BENEFITS WITH THE UNITED STATES, 34 B.C. Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 147, 163+ (2011) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 1507 WE ARE THE WORLD? JUSTIFYING THE U.S. SUPREME COURT'S USE OF CONTEMPORARY FOREIGN LEGAL PRACTICE IN ATKINS, LAWRENCE, AND ROPER, 29 B.C. Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 269, 269+ (2006) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 1508 THE ANXIETY OF SOVEREIGNTY: BRITAIN, THE UNITED STATES AND THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT, 29 B.C. Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 1, 22 (2006) 1509 PEEKING UNDER THE COVERS: TAKING A CLOSER LOOK AT PROSECUTORIAL DECISION-MAKING INVOLVING QUEER YOUTH AND STATUTORY RAPE, 32 B.C. J.L. & Soc. Just. 421, 429+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1510 SEPARATION, DEPORTATION, TERMINATION, 32 B.C. J.L. & Soc. Just. 63, 117 (2012) 1511 FACEBOOK AND INTERPERSONAL PRIVACY: WHY THE THIRD PARTY DOCTRINE SHOULD NOT APPLY, 54 B.C. L. Rev. 1, 6+ (2013) HN: 1 © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. (S.Ct.) 1512 DEFERRING TO SECRECY, 54 B.C. L. Rev. 185, 242 (2013) 1513 BEYOND PRACTICAL SKILLS: NINE STEPS FOR IMPROVING LEGAL EDUCATION NOW, 53 B.C. L. Rev. 1515, 1532 (2012) 1514 PRESIDENTIAL POWER AND CONSTITUTIONAL RESPONSIBILITY, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 1551, 1626 (2011) 1515 THE CONSTITUTIONAL FUTURE OF RACE-NEUTRAL EFFORTS TO ACHIEVE DIVERSITY AND AVOID RACIAL ISOLATION IN ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOLS, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 277, 362+ (2009) 1516 SEPARATE AND INVISIBLE: ALTERNATIVE EDUCATION PROGRAMS AND OUR EDUCATIONAL RIGHTS, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 197, 236+ (2009) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 1517 RESPONDING TO THE TIME-BASED FAILURES OF THE CRIMINAL LAW THROUGH A CRIMINAL SUNSET AMENDMENT, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 1327, 1342+ (2008) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1518 SHOULD RELIGIOUS GROUPS BE EXEMPT FROM CIVIL RIGHTS LAWS?, 48 B.C. L. Rev. 781, 849+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1519 EMPLOYING THE NINTH AMENDMENT TO SUPPLEMENT SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS: RECOGNIZING THE HISTORY OF THE NINTH AMENDMENT AND THE EXISTENCE OF NONFUNDAMENTAL UNENUMERATED RIGHTS, 48 B.C. L. Rev. 387, 393+ (2007) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 1520 AUTHORIZATIONS FOR THE USE OF FORCE, INTERNATIONAL LAW, AND THE CHARMING BETSY CANON, 46 B.C. L. Rev. 293, 357+ (2005) 1521 INTERSTATE RECOGNITION OF SAME-SEX PARENTS IN THE WAKE OF GAY MARRIAGE, CIVIL UNIONS, AND DOMESTIC PARTNERSHIPS, 46 B.C. L. Rev. 1, 2+ (2004) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 1522 EQUAL PROTECTION THEORY AND THE HARVEY MILK HIGH SCHOOL: WHY ANTI-SUBORDINATION ALONE IS NOT ENOUGH, 45 B.C. L. Rev. 869, 889+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1523 THE FIVE FACES OF FREEDOM IN AMERICAN POLITICAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL THOUGHT, 45 B.C. L. Rev. 499, 575+ (2004) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1524 SPEAK NOW: PROGRESSIVE CONSIDERATIONS ON THE ADVENT OF CIVIL MARRIAGE FOR SAME-SEX COUPLES, 45 B.C. L. Rev. 595, 618 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1525 FURTHERING AMERICAN FREEDOM: CIVIL RIGHTS & THE THIRTEENTH AMENDMENT, 45 B.C. L. Rev. 307, 390+ (2004) 1526 PROSECUTING DIOCESES AND BISHOPS, 44 B.C. L. Rev. 1061, 1087+ (2003) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 1527 A RATIONAL BASIS REVIEW THAT WARRANTS STRICT SCRUTINY: THE FIRST CIRCUIT'S EQUAL PROTECTION ANALYSIS IN MASSACHUSETTS v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, 54 B.C. L. Rev. E-Supplement 43, 55+ (2013) 1528 PRESIDENTIAL PROMISES AND THE UNITING AMERICAN FAMILIES ACT: BRINGING SAME-SEX IMMIGRATION RIGHTS TO THE UNITED STATES, 30 B.C. Third World L.J. 329, 357 (2010) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 1529 LEGISLATING BEYOND AN EDUCATED GUESS: THE GROWING CONSENSUS TOWARD A RIGHT TO EDUCATION, 28 B.C. Third World L.J. 539, 558+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1530 IRRATIONAL EXUBERANCE ABOUT BABIES: THE TASTE FOR HETEROSEXUALITY AND ITS CONSPICUOUS REPRODUCTION, 28 B.C. Third World L.J. 1, 21+ (2008) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1531 SHEDDING THE BURDEN OF SISYPHUS: INTERNATIONAL LAW AND WRONGFUL CONVICTION IN THE UNITED STATES, 28 B.C. Third World L.J. 129, 133+ (2008) 1532 SUSPICIOUS CLOSETS: STRENGTHENING THE CLAIM TO SUSPECT CLASSIFICATION AND SAME-SEX MARRIAGE RIGHTS, 28 B.C. Third World L.J. 167, 172+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1533 A DOMESTIC RIGHT OF RETURN?: RACE, RIGHTS, AND RESIDENCY IN NEW ORLEANS IN THE AFTERMATH OF HURRICANE KATRINA, 27 B.C. Third World L.J. 325, 373 (2007) 1534 "'TIL DEATH DO THEM PART?": ASSESSING THE PERMANENCE OF GOODRIDGE, 27 B.C. Third World L.J. 499, 527+ (2007) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 1535 SEEKING ASYLUM ALONE: USING THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE CHILD PRINCIPLE TO PROTECT UNACCOMPANIED MINORS, 26 B.C. Third World L.J. 131, 168 (2006) 1536 WHAT LAWRENCE BROUGHT FOR "SHOW AND TELL": THE NONFUNDAMENTAL LIBERTY INTEREST IN A MINIMALLY ADEQUATE EDUCATION, 25 B.C. Third World L.J. 343, 343+ (2005) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 1537 A HEAT OF PASSION OFFENSE: EMOTIONS AND BIAS IN "TRANS PANIC" MITIGATION CLAIMS, 25 B.C. Third World L.J. 499, 524+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1538 ÉMIGRÉS OF THE KILLING FIELDS: THE DEPORTATION OF CAMBODIAN REFUGEES AS A VIOLATION OF INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS, 25 B.C. Third World L.J. 221, 258+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1539 THE TRANSFORMATION OF QUANTITY INTO QUALITY: CRITICAL MASS IN THE FORMATION OF CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW, 31 B.U. Int'l L.J. 1, 73+ (2013) 1540 DIGNITY VERSUS LIBERTY: THE TWO WESTERN CULTURES OF FREE SPEECH, 26 B.U. Int'l L.J. 277, 374 (2008) 1541 PROTECTING MORAL RIGHTS IN THE UNITED STATES AND THE © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. UNITED KINGDOM: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES UNDER THE U.K.'S NEW PERFORMANCES REGULATIONS, 24 B.U. Int'l L.J. 213, 282+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1542 SOMEWHERE OVER THE RAINBOW. . . INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS PROTECTIONS FOR SEXUAL MINORITIES IN THE NEW MILLENNIUM, 24 B.U. Int'l L.J. 313, 348 (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1543 CRITICAL REFLECTIONS ON SEIDMAN'S ON CONSTITUTIONAL DISOBEDIENCE, 93 B.U. L. Rev. 1373, 1379+ (2013) 1544 LIBERALISM'S ERRANT THEODICY, 93 B.U. L. Rev. 1469, 1472+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1545 BACKLASH POLITICS: HOW CONSTITUTIONAL LITIGATION HAS ADVANCED MARRIAGE EQUALITY IN THE UNITED STATES, 93 B.U. L. Rev. 275, 318+ (2013) 1546 THE AGE OF MARITAL CAPACITY: RECONSIDERING CIVIL RECOGNITION OF ADOLESCENT MARRIAGE, 92 B.U. L. Rev. 1817, 1863+ (2012) 1547 THE ROOTS OF THE LIVING CONSTITUTION, 92 B.U. L. Rev. 1129, 1160 (2012) 1548 WHY THE "ORIGINALISM" IN BALKIN'S LIVING ORIGINALISM?, 92 B.U. L. Rev. 1213, 1223 (2012) 1549 RESPONSE AND COLLOQUY CONCERNING THE PAPERS BY JACK BALKIN AND DAVID STRAUSS, 92 B.U. L. Rev. 1271, 1306 (2012) 1550 THE INCORPORATION OF DEMOCRACY: JUSTICE KENNEDY'S PHILOSOPHY OF POLITICAL PARTICIPATION IN CITIZENS UNITED, 91 B.U. L. Rev. 1783, 1814 (2011) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 1551 RESPECTING FREEDOM AND CULTIVATING VIRTUES IN JUSTIFYING CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, 91 B.U. L. Rev. 1311, 1338+ (2011) 1552 A SHORT HISTORY OF SEX AND CITIZENSHIP: THE HISTORIANS' AMICUS BRIEF IN FLORES-VILLAR V. UNITED STATES, 91 B.U. L. Rev. 1485, 1496 (2011) 1553 CONGRESS'S INABILITY TO SOLVE STANDING PROBLEMS, 91 B.U. L. Rev. 159, 226 (2011) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 1554 REGULATING ABORTION THROUGH DIRECT DEMOCRACY: THE LIBERTY OF ALL VERSUS THE MORAL CODE OF A MAJORITY, 91 B.U. L. Rev. 305, 344 (2011) 1555 TWO NATIONS, ONE WEB: COMPARATIVE LEGAL APPROACHES TO PORNOGRAPHIC OBSCENITY BY THE UNITED STATES AND THE UNITED KINGDOM, 90 B.U. L. Rev. 2121, 2148 (2010) 1556 ROE'S ROOTS: THE WOMEN'S RIGHTS CLAIMS THAT ENGENDERED ROE, 90 B.U. L. Rev. 1875, 1907+ (2010) 1557 RESURRECTING AUTONOMY: THE CRIMINAL DEFENDANT'S RIGHT © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. TO CONTROL THE CASE, 90 B.U. L. Rev. 1147, 1187 (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1558 AGAINST MAJORITARIANISM: DEMOCRATIC VALUES AND INSTITUTIONAL DESIGN, 90 B.U. L. Rev. 1029, 1042+ (2010) 1559 RIGHTS, HARMS, AND DUTIES: A RESPONSE TO JUSTICE FOR HEDGEHOGS, 90 B.U. L. Rev. 819, 837+ (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1560 FOXY FREEDOM?, 90 B.U. L. Rev. 949, 974 (2010) 1561 BEHIND CLOSED DOORS: IMPOTENCE TRIALS AND THE TRANSHISTORICAL RIGHT TO MARITAL PRIVACY, 89 B.U. L. Rev. 1725, 1752 (2009) 1562 THE FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHT AGAINST COMPELLED LISTENING, 89 B.U. L. Rev. 939, 1016+ (2009) 1563 COURTING THE PEOPLE: DEMOSPRUDENCE AND THE LAW/POLITICS DIVIDE, 89 B.U. L. Rev. 539, 561+ (2009) 1564 ROMANCING THE COURT, 89 B.U. L. Rev. 563, 579 (2009) 1565 SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, EMPATHY, AND SOCIAL CHANGE: A COMMENT ON LANI GUINIER'S DEMOSPRUDENCE THROUGH DISSENT, 89 B.U. L. Rev. 589, 604+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1566 PUNISHING FAMILY STATUS, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 1327, 1423+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1567 THE INTRIGUING FEDERALIST FUTURE OF REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 175, 225 (2008) 1568 SEEING THE EMPEROR'S CLOTHES: RECOGNIZING THE REALITY OF CONSTITUTIONAL DECISION MAKING, 86 B.U. L. Rev. 1069, 1081 (2006) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 1569 WHAT'S OLD IS NEW AGAIN, 86 B.U. L. Rev. 1267, 1296+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1570 "A SHINING CITY ON A HILL": AMERICAN EXCEPTIONALISM AND THE SUPREME COURT'S PRACTICE OF RELYING ON FOREIGN LAW, 86 B.U. L. Rev. 1335, 1416 (2006) 1571 OUR LAW, THEIR LAW, HISTORY, AND THE CITATION OF FOREIGN LAW, 86 B.U. L. Rev. 1417, 1446+ (2006) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.) 1572 CONSTITUTIONAL COMPARATIVISM AND THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT: HOW A FLAWED PROPORTIONALITY REQUIREMENT CAN BENEFIT FROM FOREIGN LAW, 86 B.U. L. Rev. 963, 999+ (2006) 1573 PRESUMING WOMEN: REVISITING THE PRESUMPTION OF LEGITIMACY IN THE SAME-SEX COUPLES ERA, 86 B.U. L. Rev. 227, 294 (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1574 THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF STRICT LIABILITY IN SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION LAWS, 86 B.U. L. Rev. 295, 370+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1575 THE FUTURE OF JUDICIAL INTERNATIONALISM: CHARMING BETSY, MEDELLIN V. DRETKE, AND THE CONSULAR RIGHTS DISPUTE, 86 B.U. © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. L. Rev. 515, 546 (2006) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 1576 DEMOCRACY'S HANDMAID, 86 B.U. L. Rev. 1, 64+ (2006) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1577 CREATING A "HYDRA IN GOVERNMENT": FEDERAL RECOURSE TO STATE LAW IN CRIME FIGHTING, 86 B.U. L. Rev. 65, 107+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1578 STRATEGIC FACIAL CHALLENGES, 85 B.U. L. Rev. 1333, 1388+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1579 LOCHNER IN EUROPE: A COMMENT ON KEITH WHITTINGTON'S "CONGRESS BEFORE THE LOCHNER COURT", 85 B.U. L. Rev. 867, 879+ (2005) 1580 TAT-TOO BAD FOR MUNICIPALITIES: UNCONSTITUTIONAL ZONING OF BODY-ART ESTABLISHMENTS, 84 B.U. L. Rev. 829, 858+ (2004) 1581 JUDGING TERROR IN THE "ZONE OF TWILIGHT" : EXIGENCY, INSTITUTIONAL EQUITY, AND PROCEDURE AFTER SEPTEMBER 11, 84 B.U. L. Rev. 383, 443+ (2004) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 1582 CONSTITUTIONAL CONSCIENCE, 83 B.U. L. Rev. 1017, 1087+ (2003) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 1583 THE FOURTH AMENDMENT BEYOND KATZ, KYLLO AND JONES: REINSTATING JUSTIFIABLE RELIANCE AS A MORE SECURE CONSTITUTIONAL STANDARD FOR PRIVACY, 22 B.U. Pub. Int. L.J. 1, 44+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1584 A TAXING DIVORCE: A SOLUTION TO DOMA'S TAX INEQUITIES IN SAME-SEX DIVORCE, 22 B.U. Pub. Int. L.J. 201, 225+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1585 FOLLOWING THAYER: THE MANY FACES OF JUDICIAL RESTRAINT, 21 B.U. Pub. Int. L.J. 61, 84+ (2011) 1586 SEXUAL ORIENTATION AND THE PUBLIC SCHOOL TEACHER, 19 B.U. Pub. Int. L.J. 65, 96+ (2009) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1587 THE SHORT, PUZZLING(?) LIFE OF THE CIVIL UNION, 19 B.U. Pub. Int. L.J. 1, 22+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1588 OF PERMISSION SLIPS AND HOMOPHOBIA: PARENTAL CONSENT POLICIES FOR SCHOOL CLUB PARTICIPATION AIMED AT GAYPOSITIVE STUDENT GROUPS, 19 B.U. Pub. Int. L.J. 23, 63+ (2009) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1589 LET THE SMALL CHANGES BEGIN: PRESIDENT OBAMA, EXECUTIVE POWER, AND "DON'T ASK DON'T TELL", 18 B.U. Pub. Int. L.J. 237, 268+ (2009) 1590 DUCK HUNTING, DELIBERATING, AND DISQUALIFICATION: CHENEY v. U.S. DISTRICT COURT AND THE FLAWS OF 28 U.S.C. S 455(A), 15 B.U. Pub. Int. L.J. 319, 340 (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1591 THE KIDS ARE NOT ALRIGHT: ADDRESSING DISCRIMINATORY TREATMENT OF QUEER YOUTH IN JUVENILE DETENTION AND © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES, 14 B.U. Pub. Int. L.J. 117, 140 (2004) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1592 PRIVACY AND PROPERTY: TWO SIDES OF THE SAME COIN: THE MANDATE FOR STRICTER SCRUTINY FOR GOVERNMENT USES OF EMINENT DOMAIN, 14 B.U. Pub. Int. L.J. 142, 154+ (2004) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1593 HOW BROWN IS GOODRIDGE? THE APPROPRIATION OF A LEGAL ICON, 14 B.U. Pub. Int. L.J. 27, 40+ (2004) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 1594 GOODRIDGE AND "THE JUSTICIARY" OF MASSACHUSETTS, 14 B.U. Pub. Int. L.J. 57, 85 (2004) 1595 FEAR AND LOATHING IN MASSACHUSETTS: SAME-SEX MARRIAGE AND SOME LESSONS FROM THE HISTORY OF MARRIAGE AND DIVORCE, 14 B.U. Pub. Int. L.J. 87, 115 (2004) 1596 REDISCOVERING BRANDEIS'S RIGHT TO PRIVACY, 45 Brandeis L.J. 643, 657+ (2007) HN: 3,5 (S.Ct.) 1597 THE CONSTITUTIONAL LYNCHPIN OF LIBERTY IN AN AGE OF NEW FEDERALISM: REPLACING SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS WITH THE RIGHT TO TRAVEL, 45 Brandeis L.J. 469, 494+ (2007) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 1598 CHALLENGES TO THE RESIDENCY REQUIREMENTS OF THE PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY AND WORK OPPORTUNITY RECONCILIATION ACT UNDER THE KENTUCKY CONSTITUTION, 45 Brandeis L.J. 151, 161+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1599 NO CORN ON THIS COBB: WHY REDUCTIONISTS SHOULD BE ALL EARS FOR PAVESICH, 42 Brandeis L.J. 751, 792 (2004) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 1600 SEXUAL MINORITY RIGHTS IN THE WORKPLACE, 43 Brandeis L.J. 145, 147+ (2004) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 1601 RECOGNITION OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGE AND PUBLIC SCHOOLS: IMPLICATIONS, CHALLENGES, AND OPPORTUNITIES, 2011 B.Y.U. Educ. & L.J. 237, 262+ (2011) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 1602 SAME-SEX MARRIAGE AND EDUCATION: IMPLICATIONS FOR SCHOOLS, STUDENTS, AND PARENTS, 2011 B.Y.U. Educ. & L.J. 385, 421+ (2011) 1603 RESPECT FOR ME BUT NOT FOR THEE: REFLECTIONS ON THE IMPACT OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGE ON EDUCATION, 2011 B.Y.U. Educ. & L.J. 471, 483+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1604 THE HEART OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL ENTERPRISE: AFFIRMING EQUALITY AND FREEDOM IN PUBLIC EDUCATION, 2011 B.Y.U. Educ. & L.J. 571, 591+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1605 ANTI-HARASSMENT PROVISIONS REVISITED: NO BRIGHT-LINE RULE, 2008 B.Y.U. Educ. & L.J. 225, 249 (2008) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 1606 THE SUPREME COURT AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN PUBLIC EDUCATION, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE MICHIGAN CASES, 2006 B.Y.U. Educ. & L.J. 1, 95 (2006) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 1607 SHOULD PUBLIC EDUCATION BE A FEDERAL FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT?, 2005 B.Y.U. Educ. & L.J. 261, 290+ (2005) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 1608 THE SUPREME COURT AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: DOES GOD STILL HAVE A PLACE IN AMERICAN SCHOOLS?, 2004 B.Y.U. Educ. & L.J. 301, 330+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1609 PROTECTING ACCESS TO EXTRACURRICULAR ACTIVITIES: THE NEED TO RECOGNIZE A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO A MINIMALLY ADEQUATE EDUCATION, 2004 B.Y.U. Educ. & L.J. 393, 420+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1610 SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS: THE POWER TO GRANT MONOPOLIES IN THE FEDERALIST MARKETPLACE OF STATE EXPERIMENTATION, 2013 B.Y.U. L. Rev. 393, 415+ (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 1611 FOREIGN LAW AS LEGISLATIVE FACT IN CONSTITUTIONAL CASES, 2011 B.Y.U. L. Rev. 1005, 1040+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1612 SHOULD I STAY OR SHOULD I GO: WHY IMMIGRANT REUNIFICATION DECISIONS SHOULD BE BASED ON THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD, 2011 B.Y.U. L. Rev. 1139, 1191+ (2011) 1613 CATHOLIC LEAGUE FOR RELIGIOUS AND CIVIL RIGHTS V. CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO: HOW THE NINTH CIRCUIT ABANDONED JUDICIAL NEUTRALITY TO STRIKE A BLOW AT RELIGION, 2010 B.Y.U. L. Rev. 101, 116 (2010) 1614 UNRAVELING LAWRENCE'S CONCERNS ABOUT LEGISLATED MORALITY: THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF LAWS CRIMINALIZING THE SALE OF OBSCENE DEVICES, 2010 B.Y.U. L. Rev. 1369, 1398+ (2010) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1615 SAVING STARE DECISIS: PRECLUSION, PRECEDENT, AND PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS, 2010 B.Y.U. L. Rev. 597, 633 (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1616 FEELS LIKE DÉJÀ VU: AN AUSTRALIAN BILL OF RIGHTS AND RELIGIOUS FREEDOM, 2010 B.Y.U. L. Rev. 821, 857 (2010) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 1617 FAIR HOUSING AND ROOMMATES: CONTESTING A PRESUMPTION OF CONSTITUTIONALITY, 2009 B.Y.U. L. Rev. 1341, 1377+ (2009) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1618 TALKING ORIGINALISM, 2009 B.Y.U. L. Rev. 847, 873 (2009) 1619 THE COMING COLLISION: ROMER AND STATE DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACTS, 2008 B.Y.U. L. Rev. 1635, 1649+ (2008) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1620 INTERSTATE RECOGNITION OF ADOPTIONS: ON JURISDICTION, FULL FAITH AND CREDIT, AND THE KINDS OF CHALLENGES THE FUTURE MAY BRING, 2008 B.Y.U. L. Rev. 1809, 1854+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1621 FROM SLAVERY TO SAME-SEX MARRIAGE: COMITY VERSUS PUBLIC POLICY IN INTER-JURISDICTIONAL RECOGNITION OF CONTROVERSIAL DOMESTIC RELATIONS, 2008 B.Y.U. L. Rev. 1855, © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 1926+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1622 MORALITY AND PUBLIC SCHOOL SPEECH: BALANCING THE RIGHTS OF STUDENTS, PARENTS, AND COMMUNITIES, 2008 B.Y.U. L. Rev. 593, 621+ (2008) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1623 PROPERTY TESTS, DUE PROCESS TESTS AND REGULATORY TAKINGS JURISPRUDENCE, 2007 B.Y.U. L. Rev. 899, 958+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1624 RELIGIOUS LAW AND SECULAR LAW IN DEMOCRACY: THE EVOLUTIONS OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC DOCTRINE AFTER THE SECOND VATICAN COUNCIL, 2006 B.Y.U. L. Rev. 661, 676 (2006) 1625 DEFINING ONE'S OWN CONCEPT OF EXISTENCE AND THE MEANING OF THE UNIVERSE: THE PRESUMPTION OF LIBERTY IN LAWRENCE V. TEXAS, 2006 B.Y.U. L. Rev. 837, 887+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1626 RELIGIOUS GROUPS AND THE GAY RIGHTS MOVEMENT: RECOGNIZING COMMON GROUND, 2006 B.Y.U. L. Rev. 995, 1031+ (2006) 1627 SPLITTING THE BABY: AN ANALYSIS OF THE SUPREME COURT'S TAKE ON CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW UNDER THE ALIEN TORT STATUTE IN SOSA V. ALVAREZ-MACHAIN, 2005 B.Y.U. L. Rev. 1415, 1461+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1628 THE THIRD WAVE OF CRIME VICTIMS' RIGHTS: STANDING, REMEDY, AND REVIEW, 2005 B.Y.U. L. Rev. 255, 370+ (2005) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 1629 RECONSIDERING ABSOLUTE PROSECUTORIAL IMMUNITY, 2005 B.Y.U. L. Rev. 53, 154+ (2005) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 1630 ARE STATE MARRIAGE AMENDMENTS BILLS OF ATTAINDER?: A CASE STUDY OF UTAH'S AMENDMENT THREE, 2005 B.Y.U. L. Rev. 799, 833+ (2005) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 1631 THE "EMBARRASSING" SECTION 134, 2003 B.Y.U. L. Rev. 959, 972 (2003) 1632 THE RISE OF EQUALITY IN INTERNATIONAL LAW AND ITS PITFALLS: LEARNING FROM COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 35 Brook. J. Int'l L. 1, 39+ (2010) 1633 HOW SUPREME IS THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND? COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE INFLUENCE OF INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS TREATIES UPON THE INTERPRETATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL TEXTS BY DOMESTIC COURTS, 31 Brook. J. Int'l L. 341, 404+ (2006) 1634 IRRECONCILABLE DIFFERENCES? A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS AS TO WHY THE UNITED STATES SHOULD FOLLOW CANADA'S LEAD AND ALLOW SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, 30 Brook. J. Int'l L. 547, 599+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1635 THE IDEOLOGY OF GENUS & THE GHOST OF HEIDEGGER(c), 29 Brook. J. Int'l L. 1, 43+ (2003) 1636 QUESTIONING LAW ENFORCEMENT The First Amendment and Counterterrorism Interviews, 77 Brook. L. Rev. 41, 105 (2011) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 1637 PROTECTING A RIGHT TO ACCESS INTERNET CONTENT The Feasibility of Judicial Enforcement in a Non-neutral Network, 77 Brook. L. Rev. 383, 435 (2011) 1638 THE PROMISE AND PERIL OF FEDERAL EMULATION OF THE BIG APPLE'S FOOD LAWS, 76 Brook. L. Rev. 1049, 1092 (2011) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 1639 THE ROLES OF A FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT JUDGE, 76 Brook. L. Rev. 439, 454 (2011) 1640 WHY DICTA BECOMES HOLDING AND WHY IT MATTERS, 76 Brook. L. Rev. 219, 264 (2010) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 1641 THE CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE TO "SAGGY" PANTS LAWS, 75 Brook. L. Rev. 667, 706 (2009) 1642 FOR THE SAKE OF THE CHILDREN A NEW APPROACH TO SECURING SAME-SEX MARRIAGE RIGHTS?, 73 Brook. L. Rev. 695, 727+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1643 DELIBERATING THE DIVINE On Extending the Justification from Truth to Relifious Expression, 73 Brook. L. Rev. 1, 90 (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1644 THE CRUCIBLE, HARVARD'S SECRET COURT, AND HOMOPHOBIC WITCH HUNTS, 73 Brook. L. Rev. 217, 298+ (2007) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1645 YOU CAN't HURRY LOVE Why Antidiscrimination Protections for Gay People Should Have Religious Exemptions, 72 Brook. L. Rev. 125, 146 (2006) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 1646 MORAL CONFLICT AND LIBERTY: GAY RIGHTS AND RELIGION, 72 Brook. L. Rev. 61, 123+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1647 UNVEILING JUSTICE BLACKMUN, 72 Brook. L. Rev. 9, 34 (2006) 1648 "EMERGING AWARENESS" AFTER THE EMERGENCE OF ROBERTS: REASONABLE SOCIETAL RELIANCE IN SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS INQUIRY, 71 Brook. L. Rev. 1587, 1630+ (2006) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 1649 A PARTY THAT WON'T SPOIL Minor Parties, State Constitutions and Fusion Voting, 70 Brook. L. Rev. 1381, 1417 (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1650 SOME KIND OF RELIGIOUS FREEDOM: NATIONAL PROHIBITION AND THE VOLSTEAD ACT'S EXEMPTION FOR THE RELIGIOUS USE OF WINE, 70 Brook. L. Rev. 739, 888+ (2005) 1651 IN DEFENSE OF THE "OLD" PUBLIC HEALTH The Legal Framework for the Regulation of Public Health, 69 Brook. L. Rev. 1421, 1470 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1652 LAWRENCE AND SAME-SEX MARRIAGE BANS: ON CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION AND SOPHISTICAL RHETORIC, 69 Brook. L. Rev. 1003, 1036+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1653 A NEW YORK STATE OF MIND: RECONCILING LEGISLATIVE INCREMENTALISM WITH SEXUAL ORIENTATION JURISPRUDENCE, 69 Brook. L. Rev. 1159, 1200+ (2004) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1654 FIRST AMENDMENT LIMITATIONS ON TORT LAW, 69 Brook. L. Rev. 755, © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 826+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1655 THE SYSTEM OF CRIMINAL WRONGS: THE CONCEPT OF LEGAL GOODS AND VICTIM-BASED JURISPRUDENCE AS A BRIDGE BETWEEN THE GENERAL AND SPECIAL PARTS OF THE CRIMINAL CODE, 7 Buff. Crim. L. Rev 551, 582+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1656 SEXUAL IDENTITY AS A FUNDAMENTAL HUMAN RIGHT, 15 Buff. Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 215, 282+ (2009) 1657 HUMAN RIGHTS BEGIN AT HOME: A POLICY ANALYSIS OF LITIGATING INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS IN U.S. STATE COURTS, 12 Buff. Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 139, 195 (2006) 1658 19 Buff. J. Gender, L. & Soc. Pol'y 75, REVISITING THE ROLE OF THE PSYCHOLOGICAL PARENT IN THE DISSOLUTION OF THE HOMOSEXUAL RELATIONSHIP (2011) 1659 18 Buff. J. Gender, L. & Soc. Pol'y 73, WE'RE ONLY FOOLING OURSELVES: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE BIASES INHERENT IN THE LEGAL SYSTEM'S TREATMENT OF RAPE VICTIMS (Or Learning from Our Mistakes: Abandoning a Fundamentally Prejudiced System & Moving Toward a Rati (2010) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 1660 17 Buff. J. Gender, L. & Soc. Pol'y 1, EVALUATING LEGAL ACTIVISM: A RESPONSE TO ROSENBERG (2009) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1661 FEAR OF THE QUEER CHILD, 61 Buff. L. Rev. 607, 689+ (2013) 1662 THE ANALYTIC CLASSROOM, 60 Buff. L. Rev. 1255, 1318+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1663 THE SUBORDINATE STATUS OF NEGATIVE SPEECH RIGHTS, 59 Buff. L. Rev. 847, 936 (2011) 1664 HORIZONTALITY AND THE "SPOOKY" DOCTRINES OF AMERICAN LAW, 59 Buff. L. Rev. 455, 506 (2011) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1665 LEGISLATIVE EPIDEMICS: A CAUTIONARY TALE OF CRIMINAL LAWS THAT HAVE SWEPT THE COUNTRY, 58 Buff. L. Rev. 1, 67+ (2010) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 1666 AT THE ALTAR OF AUTONOMY: THE DANGEROUS TERRITORY OF ABIGAIL ALLIANCE V. VON ESCHENBACH, 56 Buff. L. Rev. 821, 857 (2008) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 1667 "IF SEX OFFENDERS CAN MARRY, THEN WHY NOT GAYS AND LESBIANS?": AN ESSAY ON THE PROGRESSIVE COMPARATIVE ARGUMENT, 55 Buff. L. Rev. 777, 814+ (2007) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 1668 THINKING WITH WOLVES: LEFT LEGAL THEORY AFTER THE RIGHT'S RISE, 54 Buff. L. Rev. 1191, 1297+ (2007) 1669 CAN DIRECT DEMOCRACY BE MADE DELIBERATIVE?, 54 Buff. L. Rev. 903, 925+ (2006) HN: 2,5 (S.Ct.) 1670 BEYOND PRESUMPTIONS AND PEAFOWL: RECONCILING THE LEGAL © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. PRINCIPLE OF EQUALITY WITH THE PEDAGOGICAL BENEFITS OF GENDER DIFFERENTIATION, 53 Buff. L. Rev. 1059, 1109+ (2005) 1671 WHERE DOES FORUM FOR ACADEMIC AND INSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS V. RUMSFELD LEAVE MILITARY RECRUITING EFFORTS?, 53 Buff. L. Rev. 1313, 1368+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1672 REPORT CARD: GRADING THE COUNTRY'S RESPONSE TO COLUMBINE, 53 Buff. L. Rev. 415, 458 (2005) 1673 TRIANGULATING CONSTITUTIONAL THEORY: POWER, TIME, AND EVERYMAN, 53 Buff. L. Rev. 269, 337+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1674 THE CONSTITUTION AND THE PUBLIC TRUST, 52 Buff. L. Rev. 1077, 1178+ (2004) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1675 THE PROGRESS AND PITFALLS OF LAWRENCE V. TEXAS, 52 Buff. L. Rev. 1417, 1456+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1676 A PARENT'S CHOICE v. GOVERNMENTAL REGULATIONS: A BIOETHICAL ANALYSIS IN AN ERA OF PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC DIAGNOSIS, 29 Buff. Pub. Int. L.J. 85, 109+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1677 LET ME COUNT THE WAYS: THE UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF SAMESEX-MARRIAGE BANS, 27 BYU J. Pub. L. 301, 305+ (2013) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 1678 "THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS" COMES HOME TO ROOST? SAME-SEX UNION, THE SUMMUM BONUM, AND EQUALITY, 27 BYU J. Pub. L. 323, 333+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1679 THE FORGOTTEN FOUNDING DOCUMENT: CONSIDERING THE ENDS OF THE LAW, 27 BYU J. Pub. L. 365, 372+ (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 1680 "YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT": DOES THE U.S. CONSTITUTION REQUIRE PUBLIC AFFIRMATION OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGE?, 27 BYU J. Pub. L. 397, 440+ (2013) 1681 THE SPANISH LAW ON SAME-SEX MARRIAGE: CONSTITUTIONAL ARGUMENTS, 27 BYU J. Pub. L. 443, 464+ (2013) 1682 BELONGING IN AMERICA: HOW TO UNDERSTAND SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, 25 BYU J. Pub. L. 351, 360+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1683 CONFESSION AND MANDATORY CHILD ABUSE REPORTING: A NEW TAKE ON THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF ABROGATING THE PRIESTPENITENT PRIVILEGE, 24 BYU J. Pub. L. 117, 147+ (2009) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1684 THE SEARCH FOR MORAL NEUTRALITY IN SAME-SEX MARRIAGE DECISIONS, 23 BYU J. Pub. L. 1, 59+ (2008) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1685 BURYING OUR CONSTITUTION IN THE SAND? EVALUATING THE OSTRICH RESPONSE TO THE USE OF INTERNATIONAL AND FOREIGN LAW IN U.S. CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION, 21 BYU J. Pub. L. 1, 54+ (2007) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1686 THE HUMAN RIGHT OF SELF-DEFENSE, 22 BYU J. Pub. L. 43, 178 (2007) 1687 THE DEBATES ABOUT SAME-SEX MARRIAGE IN CANADA AND THE © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. UNITED STATES: CONTROVERSY OVER THE EVOLUTION OF A FUNDAMENTAL SOCIAL INSTITUTION, 20 BYU J. Pub. L. 195, 231+ (2006) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 1688 CONSTITUTIONAL THEMATICS AND THE PECULIAR FEDERAL MARRIAGE AMENDMENT, 20 BYU J. Pub. L. 233, 242+ (2006) 1689 FULL FAITH AND REPUBLICAN GUARANTEES: GAY MARRIAGE, FMPA, AND THE COURTS, 20 BYU J. Pub. L. 243, 273+ (2006) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 1690 WHY THE POLITICS OF MARRIAGE MATTER: EVALUATING LEGAL AND STRATEGIC APPROACHES ON BOTH SIDES OF THE DEBATE ON SAME-SEX MARRIAGES, 20 BYU J. Pub. L. 275, 312+ (2006) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 1691 "GOD'S CREATED ORDER," GENDER COMPLEMENTARITY, AND THE FEDERAL MARRIAGE AMENDMENT, 20 BYU J. Pub. L. 313, 343 (2006) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 1692 THE SUPREME COURT AND SAME-SEX MARRIAGE: A PREDICTION, 20 BYU J. Pub. L. 345, 386+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1693 AN AMENDMENT TO PROTECT MARRIAGE: BAD IN THEORY, LIKELY WORSE IN PRACTICE, 20 BYU J. Pub. L. 387, 406+ (2006) 1694 FEAR OF AN ARTICLE V CONVENTION, 20 BYU J. Pub. L. 407, 437 (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1695 FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION FOR MARRIAGE: WHY AND HOW, 20 BYU J. Pub. L. 439, 486+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1696 SAME-SEX MARRIAGE: WHEN WILL IT REACH UTAH?, 20 BYU J. Pub. L. 527, 548+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1697 WHO DECIDES AND WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE?: DEFINING MARRIAGE IN "OUR DEMOCRATIC, FEDERAL REPUBLIC", 18 BYU J. Pub. L. 273, 274+ (2004) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 1698 THE CURIOUS CASE OF THE MISSING LEGAL ANALYSIS, 18 BYU J. Pub. L. 309, 370+ (2004) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 1699 TRADITIONAL MARRIAGE: STILL WORTH DEFENDING, 18 BYU J. Pub. L. 419, 447 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1700 THE AUGUSTINIAN GOODS OF MARRIAGE: THE DISAPPEARING CORNERSTONE OF THE AMERICAN LAW OF MARRIAGE, 18 BYU J. Pub. L. 449, 478+ (2004) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 1701 STATUS, BENEFITS, AND RECOGNITION: CURRENT CONTROVERSIES IN THE MARRIAGE DEBATE, 18 BYU J. Pub. L. 569, 622+ (2004) HN: 3,5 (S.Ct.) 1702 THE LITIGATION TO REDEFINE MARRIAGE: EQUALITY AND SOCIAL MEANING, 18 BYU J. Pub. L. 623, 663+ (2004) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 1703 VARIETY IN U.S. KINSHIP PRACTICES, SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS ANALYSIS AND THE RIGHT TO MARRY, 18 BYU J. Pub. L. 665, 679+ © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. (2004) 1704 HINTS, NOT HOLDINGS: USE OF PRECEDENT IN LAWRENCE V. TEXAS, 18 BYU J. Pub. L. 681, 693+ (2004) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 1705 MARRIAGE EQUALITY IN BANKRUPTCY COURT: JOINT PETITIONS FOR SAME-SEX COUPLES, 32 Cal. Bankr. J. 109, 131 (2012) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 1706 STICKY SLOPES, 101 Cal. L. Rev. 1249, 1293+ (2013) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 1707 MARRIAGE INEQUALITY: SAME-SEX RELATIONSHIPS, RELIGIOUS EXEMPTIONS, AND THE PRODUCTION OF SEXUAL ORIENTATION DISCRIMINATION, 100 Cal. L. Rev. 1169, 1215+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1708 THE PLASTICITY OF HARM IN THE SERVICE OF CRIMINALIZATION GOALS, 100 Cal. L. Rev. 1313, 1318+ (2012) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1709 RIGHTS TO AND NOT TO, 100 Cal. L. Rev. 761, 815+ (2012) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 1710 THE TRANSFORMATION OF JUDICIAL SELF-RESTRAINT, 100 Cal. L. Rev. 607, 619+ (2012) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 1711 FEMINIST LEGAL SCHOLARSHIP: A HISTORY THROUGH THE LENS OF THE CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW, 100 Cal. L. Rev. 381, 429 (2012) 1712 MARRIAGE FRAUD, 100 Cal. L. Rev. 1, 67 (2012) 1713 REAL RAPE TOO, 99 Cal. L. Rev. 1259, 1308+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1714 MASCULINITY AS PRISON: SEXUAL IDENTITY, RACE, AND INCARCERATION, 99 Cal. L. Rev. 1309, 1408+ (2011) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 1715 FACT AND FICTION ABOUT FACIAL CHALLENGES, 99 Cal. L. Rev. 915, 974+ (2011) 1716 PRIVACY TORTS: UNRELIABLE REMEDIES FOR LGBT PLAINTIFFS, 98 Cal. L. Rev. 1711, 1764+ (2010) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1717 BEYOND PRIVACY, BEYOND RIGHTS-TOWARD A "SYSTEMS" THEORY OF INFORMATION GOVERNANCE, 98 Cal. L. Rev. 1853, 1885+ (2010) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 1718 THEORIZING DISAGREEMENT: RECONCEIVING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LAW AND POLITICS, 98 Cal. L. Rev. 1319, 1350 (2010) 1719 RESPONSE TO MARTHA NUSSBAUM, 98 Cal. L. Rev. 721, 729+ (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1720 REPLY, 98 Cal. L. Rev. 731, 747 (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1721 HOW NOT TO LIE WITH JUDICIAL VOTES: MISCONCEPTIONS, MEASUREMENT, AND MODELS, 98 Cal. L. Rev. 813, 876 (2010) 1722 WHAT DOES RICHARD POSNER KNOW ABOUT HOW JUDGES THINK?, 98 Cal. L. Rev. 625, 666+ (2010) 1723 "TEACHABLE MOMENTS": THE USE OF CHILD-CENTERED ARGUMENTS IN THE SAME-SEX MARRIAGE DEBATE, 98 Cal. L. Rev. 121, 157+ (2010) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1724 AUTONOMY, IMPERFECT CONSENT, AND POLYGAMIST SEX RIGHTS © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. CLAIMS, 98 Cal. L. Rev. 197, 242+ (2010) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1725 FOREWORD: THE MARRIAGE CASES-REVERSING THE BURDEN OF INERTIA IN A PLURALIST CONSTITUTIONAL DEMOCRACY, 97 Cal. L. Rev. 1785, 1852+ (2009) 1726 SILICON VALLEY TAXPAYERS ASSOCIATION: LOCAL VOTERS, STATE PROPOSITIONS, AND THE FATE OF PROPERTY ASSESSMENTS, 97 Cal. L. Rev. 1899, 1908 (2009) 1727 OUT OF THE SHADOWS: PREVENTIVE DETENTION, SUSPECTED TERRORISTS, AND WAR, 97 Cal. L. Rev. 693, 750 (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1728 A TALE OF TWO LOCHNERS: THE UNTOLD HISTORY OF SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS AND THE IDEA OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS, 97 Cal. L. Rev. 751, 799+ (2009) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 1729 IDEOLOGY AND EXCEPTIONALISM IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY, 97 Cal. L. Rev. 801, 856+ (2009) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 1730 BEYOND ANALOGY: PEREZ V. SHARP, ANTIMISCEGENATION LAW, AND THE FIGHT FOR SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, 96 Cal. L. Rev. 839, 900+ (2008) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1731 MICE, MEN, AND MONSTERS: OPPOSITION TO CHIMERA RESEARCH AND THE SCOPE OF FEDERAL REGULATION, 96 Cal. L. Rev. 765, 800+ (2008) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1732 WHAT LAWRENCE SHOULD HAVE SAID: RECONSTRUCTING AN EQUALITY APPROACH, 96 Cal. L. Rev. 505, 505+ (2008) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1733 THE SUPREME COURT, THE LAW OF NATIONS, AND CITATIONS OF FOREIGN LAW: THE LESSONS OF HISTORY, 95 Cal. L. Rev. 1335, 1365+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1734 THEORIZING THE LAW/POLITICS DISTINCTION: NEUTRAL PRINCIPLES, AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, AND THE ENDURING LEGACY OF PAUL MISHKIN, 95 Cal. L. Rev. 1473, 1513+ (2007) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 1735 THE DIMENSIONS OF LAW: JUDICIAL CRAFT, ITS PUBLIC PERCEPTION, AND THE ROLE OF THE SCHOLAR, 95 Cal. L. Rev. 1619, 1675+ (2007) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 1736 (TRIBAL) SOVEREIGNTY AND ILLIBERALISM, 95 Cal. L. Rev. 799, 848+ (2007) 1737 TOWARD A NEW STUDENT INSURGENCY: A CRITICAL EPISTOLARY, 94 Cal. L. Rev. 1879, 1946+ (2006) 1738 CONSTITUTIONAL CULTURE, SOCIAL MOVEMENT CONFLICT AND CONSTITUTIONAL CHANGE: THE CASE OF THE DE FACTO ERA 2005-06 Brennan Center Symposium Lecture, 94 Cal. L. Rev. 1323, 1419+ (2006) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 1739 TRANSCENDING THE INDIVIDUALIST PARADIGM IN SEXUAL ORIENTATION ANTIDISCRIMINATION LAW, 94 Cal. L. Rev. 1271, 1322+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 1740 GEDULDIG REBORN: HIBBS AS A SUCCESS (?) OF JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG'S SEX-DISCRIMINATION STRATEGY, 93 Cal. L. Rev. 541, 586 (2005) 1741 A RAGE SHARED BY LAW: POST-SEPTEMBER 11 RACIAL VIOLENCE AS CRIMES OF PASSION, 92 Cal. L. Rev. 1259, 1330 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1742 THE ORIGIN AND CURRENT MEANINGS OF "JUDICIAL ACTIVISM", 92 Cal. L. Rev. 1441, 1477+ (2004) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.) 1743 IN DEFENSE OF JUDICIAL REVIEW: A REPLY TO PROFESSOR KRAMER, 92 Cal. L. Rev. 1013, 1025 (2004) 1744 JUDICIAL SUPREMACY AND THE MODEST CONSTITUTION, 92 Cal. L. Rev. 1045, 1067+ (2004) 1745 DOMESTICATING INTERNATIONAL OBLIGATIONS: HOW TO ENSURE U.S. COMPLIANCE WITH THE VIENNA CONVENTION ON CONSULAR RELATIONS, 91 Cal. L. Rev. 1729, 1771+ (2003) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 1746 SEXUAL EPISTEMOLOGY AND BISEXUAL EXCLUSION: A RESPONSE TO RUSSELL ROBINSON'S "MASCULINITY AS PRISON: RACE, SEXUAL IDENTITY, AND INCARCERATION", 2 Cal. L. Rev. Circuit 104, 110+ (2011) 1747 WHY APPELLATE COURTS HAVE REJECTED THE ARGUMENT THAT THE DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT TRUMPS THE PARENTAL KIDNAPPING PREVENTION ACT, 41 Cal. W. Int'l L.J. 189, 228 (2010) 1748 THE CONSTITUTIONAL OBLIGATION TO ADJUDICATE PETITIONS FOR SAME-SEX DIVORCE AND THE DISSOLUTION OF CIVIL UNIONS AND ANALOGOUS SAME-SEX RELATIONSHIPS: PROLEGOMENON TO A BRIEF, 41 Cal. W. Int'l L.J. 229, 248+ (2010) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1749 RELIGION, SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, AND THE DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT, 41 Cal. W. Int'l L.J. 35, 46+ (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1750 HOW CALIFORNIA GOT IT RIGHT: MINING IN RE MARRIAGE CASES FOR THE SEEDS OF A VIABLE FEDERAL CHALLENGE TO SAME-SEX MARRIAGE BANS, 41 Cal. W. Int'l L.J. 49, 92+ (2010) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1751 THE HUMAN RIGHTS OF SEXUAL MINORITIES IN AFRICA, 35 Cal. W. Int'l L.J. 1, 52+ (2004) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1752 COMING UP: NEW FOUNDATIONS IN LATCRIT THEORY, COMMUNITY, AND PRAXIS, 48 Cal. W. L. Rev. 505, 556 (2012) 1753 "A PAINFUL PROCESS OF WAITING": THE NEW YORK, WASHINGTON, NEW JERSEY, AND MARYLAND DISSENTING JUSTICES UNDERSTAND THAT "SAME-SEX MARRIAGE" IS NOT WHAT SAME-SEX COUPLES ARE SEEKING, 45 Cal. W. L. Rev. 139, 178+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1754 DON'T ASK, DON'T TELL: A DYING POLICY ON THE PRECIPICE, 44 Cal. W. L. Rev. 413, 476+ (2008) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1755 INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE IN THE GLBT COMMUNITIES: A SELECTED ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY, 43 Cal. W. L. Rev. 417, 450+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 1756 THE PERPLEXING PROBLEM OF CHILD MODELING WEB SITES: QUASICHILD PORNOGRAPHY AND CALLS FOR NEW LEGISLATION, 40 Cal. W. L. Rev. 231, 263+ (2004) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 1757 PARENS PATRI(ARCHY): ADOPTION, EUGENICS, AND SAME-SEX COUPLES, 40 Cal. W. L. Rev. 1, 77+ (2003) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1758 RECOGNITION OF THE RIGHTS OF HOMOSEXUALS: IMPLICATIONS OF LAWRENCE V. TEXAS, 40 Cal. W. L. Rev. 149, 168+ (2003) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1759 THE OBLIGATION OF GOVERNMENT TOWARD HUMANITY: THE ROLE OF THE STATE IN THE COMMON GOOD, 35 Campbell L. Rev. 1, 58 (2012) 1760 JOHN FINNIS'S NATURAL LAW THEORY AND A CRITIQUE OF THE INCOMMENSURABLE NATURE OF BASIC GOODS, 35 Campbell L. Rev. 59, 63+ (2012) 1761 SHOULD FOREIGN PATENT LAW MATTER?, 34 Campbell L. Rev. 581, 608 (2012) 1762 IS MODERN LEGAL LIBERALISM STILL COMPATIBLE WITH FREE EXERCISE OF RELIGION?, 33 Campbell L. Rev. 641, 660 (2011) 1763 A FIGHTING CHANCE FOR OUTLAWS: STRICT SCRUTINY OF NORTH CAROLINA'S FELONY FIREARMS ACT, 32 Campbell L. Rev. 333, 434 (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1764 THE HIDDEN DICHOTOMY IN THE LAW OF MORALITY, 31 Campbell L. Rev. 591, 611+ (2009) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1765 DECONSTRUCTING THINKING LIKE A LAWYER: ANALYZING THE COGNITIVE COMPONENTS OF THE ANALYTICAL MIND, 29 Campbell L. Rev. 413, 481 (2007) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 1766 AVOIDANCE STRATEGY: SAME-SEX MARRIAGE LITIGATION AND THE FEDERAL COURTS, 29 Campbell L. Rev. 29, 46+ (2006) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 1767 AID AND COMFORT : RASUL V. BUSH AND THE SEPARATION OF POWERS DOCTRINE IN WARTIME, 28 Campbell L. Rev. 123, 143+ (2005) 1768 THE IRRATIONAL USE OF RATIONAL BASIS REVIEW IN LAWRENCE V. TEXAS: IMPLICATIONS FOR OUR SOCIETY, 26 Campbell L. Rev. 21, 39+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1769 A POLEMIC AGAINST THE STANDING REQUIREMENT IN CONSTITUTIONAL CASES, 41 Cap. U. L. Rev. 603, 635 (2013) 1770 SUFFER NOT THE LITTLE CHILDREN : PRIORITIZING CHILDREN'S RIGHTS IN CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGES TO "SAME-SEX ADOPTION BANS", 39 Cap. U. L. Rev. 231, 270+ (2011) 1771 THE OTHER DON'T ASK, DON'T TELL: ADULTERY UNDER THE UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE AFTER LAWRENCE v. TEXAS, 37 Cap. U. L. Rev. 659, 659+ (2009) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1772 CONSTITUTIONAL CLICHÉS, 36 Cap. U. L. Rev. 493, 510 (2008) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 1773 TECHNOLOGY USE AND THE GAY MOVEMENT FOR EQUALITY IN AMERICA, 35 Cap. U. L. Rev. 665, 684+ (2007) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1774 FOREIGN JURISPRUDENCE-TO CITE OR NOT TO CITE: IS THAT THE QUESTION OR IS IT MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING?, 35 Cap. U. L. Rev. 761, 761+ (2007) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1775 THE ROLE OF ADOPTION IN WINNING PUBLIC RECOGNITION FOR ADULT PARTNERSHIPS, 35 Cap. U. L. Rev. 341, 349+ (2006) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 1776 PROCREATION THROUGH ART: WHY THE ADOPTION PROCESS SHOULD NOT APPLY, 35 Cap. U. L. Rev. 399, 402+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1777 GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE ON PROCREATION AND PARENTAGE BY ASSISTED REPRODUCTION, 35 Cap. U. L. Rev. 413, 464+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1778 THE WRONGFUL REJECTION OF BIG THEORY (MARXISM) BY FEMINISM AND QUEER THEORY: A BRIEF DEBATE, 34 Cap. U. L. Rev. 125, 151+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1779 DO AS WE SAY AND NOT (NECESSARILY) AS WE DO: THE CONSTITUTION, FEDERALISM, AND THE SUPREME COURT'S EXERCISE OF JUDICIAL POWER, 34 Cap. U. L. Rev. 153, 210+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1780 CLOSING THE CRUSADE: A BRIEF RESPONSE TO PROFESSOR WOODHOUSE, 34 Cap. U. L. Rev. 331, 343+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1781 "THE CLIENT(S) OF A CORPORATE LAWYER", 33 Cap. U. L. Rev. 17, 47 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1782 CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND THE 2002-2003 UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT TERM, 32 Cap. U. L. Rev. 859, 884+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1783 SELF-REPLICATING TECHNOLOGIES AND THE CHALLENGE FOR THE PATENT AND ANTITRUST LAWS, 32 Cardozo Arts & Ent. L.J. 131, 223+ (2013) 1784 THE CONSTITUTIONAL VALIDITY OF CIRCUIT COURT OPINIONS LIMITING THE AMERICAN RIGHT TO SEXUAL PRIVACY, 24 Cardozo Arts & Ent. L.J. 261, 296+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1785 ARBITRATION AND THE CONSTITUTION,PETER B. RUTLEDGE (CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS, 2013), 15 Cardozo J. Conflict Resol. 41, 84 (2013) 1786 KNOW JUSTICE, KNOW PEACE: FURTHER REFLECTIONS ON JUSTICE, EQUALITY AND IMPARTIALITY IN SETTLEMENT ORIENTED AND TRANSFORMATIVE MEDIATIONS, 5 Cardozo J. Conflict Resol. 87, 95+ (2004) 1787 COMPARATIVIST-STRUCTURAL APPROACHES TO INTERPRETATION OF THE POST-OBAMACARE SPENDING POWER, 21 Cardozo J. Int'l & Comp. L. 1, 76+ (2012) 1788 ACCOMMODATING CHILDHOOD, 19 Cardozo J.L. & Gender 715, 779 © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. (2013) 1789 DISCRIMINATING SPEECH: THE HETEROPHILIA OF THE FREEDOM OF SPEECH DOCTRINE, 19 Cardozo J.L. & Gender 349, 391 (2013) 1790 FOR RICHER OR POORER: THE DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT'S WANING LEGITIMACY IN BANKRUPTCY COURT, 19 Cardozo J.L. & Gender 185, 212+ (2012) 1791 SURVIVING CASTLE ROCK: THE HUMAN RIGHTS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, 18 Cardozo J.L. & Gender 727, 751 (2012) 1792 "UNTIL DEATH (OR SEX CHANGE) DO US PART": ADVOCATING FOR ADOPTION OF THE EUROPEAN LEGAL APPROACH TO VALIDATING MARRIAGES INVOLVING POST-OPERATIVE TRANSSEXUALS, 18 Cardozo J.L. & Gender 35, 53+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1793 HE'S SO GAY . . . NOT THAT THERE'S ANYTHING WRONG WITH THAT: USING A COMMUNITY STANDARD TO HOMOGENIZE THE MEASURE OF REPUTATIONAL DAMAGE IN HOMOSEXUAL DEFAMATION CASES, 17 Cardozo J.L. & Gender 655, 682+ (2011) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 1794 FEMINISTS AND FIREARMS: WHY ARE SO MANY WOMEN ANTICHOICE?, 17 Cardozo J.L. & Gender 297, 319 (2011) 1795 SACRED: RELIGION, SEXUALITY, AND THE LAW, 16 Cardozo J.L. & Gender 637, 699+ (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1796 THEIR LOVE IS HERE TO STAY: WHY THE SUPREME COURT CANNOT TURN BACK THE HANDS OF TIME, 17 Cardozo J.L. & Gender 1, 31+ (2010) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 1797 DRAWING BISEXUALITY BACK INTO THE PICTURE: HOW BISEXUALITY FITS INTO LGBT LEGAL STRATEGY TEN YEARS AFTER BISEXUAL ERASURE, 17 Cardozo J.L. & Gender 65, 80+ (2010) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 1798 BOUND BY INJUSTICE: CHALLENGING THE USE OF SHACKLES ON INCARCERATED PREGNANT WOMEN, 15 Cardozo J.L. & Gender 477, 502 (2009) 1799 WHAT TO EXPECT: LEGAL DEVELOPMENTS AND CHALLENGES IN REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE, 15 Cardozo J.L. & Gender 503, 616 (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1800 INCEST AND SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION: WHO IS REGISTRATION HELPING AND WHO IS IT HURTING?, 14 Cardozo J.L. & Gender 429, 457+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1801 STRICT LIABILITY AND NEGLIGENT RAPE: OR HOW I LEARNED TO START WORRYING AND QUESTION THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM, 14 Cardozo J.L. & Gender 731, 757 (2008) 1802 IT TAKES THREE, BABY: THE LACK OF STANDARD, LEGAL DEFINITIONS OF "BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD" AND THE RIGHT TO CONTRACT FOR LESBIAN POTENTIAL PARENTS, 15 Cardozo J.L. & © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Gender 1, 31+ (2008) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 1803 LETTING "PRIVATES" BE PRIVATE: TOWARD A RIGHT OF GENDER SELF-DETERMINATION, 15 Cardozo J.L. & Gender 67, 98+ (2008) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1804 SEX REQUIRED: THE IMPACT OF MASSACHUSETTS' SAME-SEX MARRIAGE CASES ON MARRIAGES WITH INTERSEX AND TRANSSEXUAL PARTNERS, 14 Cardozo J.L. & Gender 161, 184 (2007) 1805 CONFRONTING "UNWELCOMENESS" FROM THE OUTSIDE: USING CASE THEORY TO TELL THE STORIES OF SEXUALLY-HARASSED WOMEN, 14 Cardozo J.L. & Gender 61, 95+ (2007) 1806 LANGAN V. ST. VINCENT HOSPITAL: A FEARFUL COURT OR A PROPERLY MEASURED RESPONSE?, 13 Cardozo J.L. & Gender 439, 465+ (2007) 1807 THE IMPACT OF FEMININE LEADERSHIP ON STATE COURTS: A PANEL OF WOMEN CHIEF JUSTICES, 12 Cardozo J.L. & Gender 929, 935+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1808 THE TALE OF TWO SYSTEMS: HOW INTEGRATED DIVORCE LAWS CAN REMEDY THE UNINTENDED EFFECTS OF PURE NO-FAULT DIVORCE, 12 Cardozo J.L. & Gender 609, 626 (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1809 THE SLIPPERY SLOPE: THE VITALITY OF REYNOLDS V. US AFTER ROMER AND LAWRENCE, 12 Cardozo J.L. & Gender 627, 651+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1810 ENGENDERING SEX: BIRTH CERTIFICATES, BIOLOGY AND THE BODY IN ANGLO AMERICAN LAW, 12 Cardozo J.L. & Gender 213, 245+ (2005) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 1811 HACKING THE GENDER BINARY MYTH: RECOGNIZING FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS FOR THE INTERSEXED, 12 Cardozo J.L. & Gender 31, 63+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1812 ANNOTATED LEGAL BIBLIOGRAPHY ON GENDER, 12 Cardozo J.L. & Gender 471, 478+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1813 NO PROMO HETERO: CHILDREN'S RIGHT TO BE QUEER, 35 Cardozo L. Rev. 425, 432+ (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1814 COSMOPOLITANISM IN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 35 Cardozo L. Rev. 711, 768+ (2013) 1815 CRIMINAL FORFEITURE AND THE SIXTH AMENDMENT: THE ROLE OF THE JURY AT COMMON LAW, 35 Cardozo L. Rev. 1, 77 (2013) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 1816 THE IRONY OF A FAUSTIAN BARGAIN: A RECONSIDERATION OF THE SUPREME COURT'S 1953 UNITED STATES V. REYNOLDS DECISION, 34 Cardozo L. Rev. 1283, 1399 (2013) 1817 A SHORT HISTORY OF "INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY" IN RELATION TO COPYRIGHT, 33 Cardozo L. Rev. 1293, 1340 (2012) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 1818 THE HOLLOW PROMISE OF FREEDOM OF CONSCIENCE, 33 Cardozo L. Rev. 1389, 1449 (2012) 1819 EXILE WITHOUT PROCESS: THE NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY'S UNCONSTITUTIONAL TRESPASS NOTICE PROGRAM, 33 Cardozo L. Rev. 1253, 1291 (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1820 EXEMPTIONS AND THE ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE, 32 Cardozo L. Rev. 1731, 1754+ (2011) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1821 RELIGIOUS AND POLITICAL VIRTUES AND VALUES IN CONGRUENCE OR CONFLICT?: ON SMITH, BOB JONES UNIVERSITY, AND CHRISTIAN LEGAL SOCIETY, 32 Cardozo L. Rev. 1959, 2007 (2011) 1822 THE POLITICS OF FREE EXERCISE AFTER EMPLOYMENT DIVISION V. SMITH: SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, THE "WAR ON TERROR," AND RELIGIOUS FREEDOM, 32 Cardozo L. Rev. 2009, 2031+ (2011) 1823 THE FOUR PILLARS OF CONSTITUTIONAL DOCTRINE, 32 Cardozo L. Rev. 969, 1008+ (2011) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1824 BALANCING LIBERTY, DIGNITY, AND SAFETY: THE IMPACT OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE LETHALITY SCREENING, 32 Cardozo L. Rev. 519, 580+ (2010) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 1825 RETHINKING CHILDREN AS PROPERTY: THE TRANSITIVE FAMILY, 32 Cardozo L. Rev. 225, 263 (2010) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 1826 THE GEOGRAPHY OF CRIMINAL LAW, 31 Cardozo L. Rev. 823, 904+ (2010) 1827 FREEDOM AND FAITH-FOUNDATIONS OF FREEDOM OF RELIGION, 30 Cardozo L. Rev. 2473, 2493 (2009) 1828 SECULAR CONSTITUTIONALISM VINDICATED, 30 Cardozo L. Rev. 2769, 2798+ (2009) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 1829 ORIGINALISM'S EXPIRATION DATE, 30 Cardozo L. Rev. 1295, 1365+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1830 LOVE, MARRIAGE, AND THE BABY CARRIAGE: REVISITING THE CHANNELLING FUNCTION OF FAMILY LAW, 28 Cardozo L. Rev. 2133, 2183+ (2007) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 1831 MEANS TO LEGITIMATE ENDS: SAME-SEX MARRIAGE THROUGH THE LENS OF ILLEGITIMACY-BASED DISCRIMINATION, 28 Cardozo L. Rev. 2373, 2400+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1832 THE GRISWOLD DIAGRAMS: TOWARD A UNIFIED THEORY OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, 28 Cardozo L. Rev. 623, 713+ (2006) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 1833 CONFRONTING CONVENTIONAL THINKING: THE HEURISTICS PROBLEM IN FEMINIST LEGAL THEORY, 28 Cardozo L. Rev. 391, 440+ (2006) 1834 SYMPOSIUM ON ABOLISHING CIVIL MARRIAGE: AN INTRODUCTION, © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 27 Cardozo L. Rev. 1155, 1159 (2006) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 1835 A "JUDEO-CHRISTIAN" ARGUMENT FOR PRIVATIZING MARRIAGE, 27 Cardozo L. Rev. 1221, 1259 (2006) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 1836 A MARRIAGE SKEPTIC RESPONDS TO THE PRO-MARRIAGE PROPOSALS TO ABOLISH CIVIL MARRIAGE, 27 Cardozo L. Rev. 1261, 1276 (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1837 A CASE FOR CIVIL MARRIAGE, 27 Cardozo L. Rev. 1311, 1323 (2006) 1838 IS THERE ANYTHING OUTSIDE THE CLASS? LAW, LITERATURE, AND PEDAGOGY, 26 Cardozo L. Rev. 2415, 2423 (2005) 1839 FEDERALISM'S FALLACY: THE EARLY TRADITION OF FEDERAL FAMILY LAW AND THE INVENTION OF STATES' RIGHTS, 26 Cardozo L. Rev. 1761, 1865+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1840 THE RIGHT TO MARRY, 26 Cardozo L. Rev. 2081, 2120+ (2005) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 1841 HISTORICISM, PROGRESS, AND THE REDEMPTIVE CONSTITUTION, 26 Cardozo L. Rev. 1041, 1117+ (2005) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 1842 MERIT VS. IDEOLOGY, 26 Cardozo L. Rev. 353, 375+ (2005) 1843 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AS POLITICAL SPOILS, 26 Cardozo L. Rev. 525, 541 (2005) 1844 UNEQUALLED AMONG FIRSTS, 25 Cardozo L. Rev. 2079, 2088 (2004) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 1845 SCALING BACK ON CONSTITUTIONAL ASPIRATIONS, 25 Cardozo L. Rev. 947, 952 (2003) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1846 SYMMETRY FOR SYMMETRY'S SAKE: WHY BOSE DOES NOT REQUIRE INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF A TRIAL COURT'S FIRST AMENDMENTFAVORABLE FINDINGS OF FACT, 2013 Cardozo L. Rev. de novo 1, 6+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1847 THE PERILS AND PROMISE OF THE HOLDER MEMO, 2012 Cardozo L. Rev. de novo 187, 195+ (2012) 1848 THE DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT: THE APPLICATION OF HEIGHTENED SCRUTINY TO DISCRIMINATION ON THE BASIS OF SEXUAL ORIENTATION, 2012 Cardozo L. Rev. de novo 203, 208+ (2012) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 1849 THE POTENTIALLY EXPANSIVE REACH OF MCDONALD v. CHICAGO: ENABLING THE PRIVILEGES OR IMMUNITIES CLAUSE, 2010 Cardozo L. Rev. de novo 139, 160 (2010) 1850 WOULD OTHER COUNTRIES PROTECT THE PHELPSES' FUNERAL PICKETING?, 2010 Cardozo L. Rev. de novo 408, 417 (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1851 LA VIE EN ROSE: JEFFREY WALDRON AND RICHARD FALLON'S MEANDER THROUGH THE WONDERLAND OF JUDICIAL REVIEW, 2009 Cardozo L. Rev. de novo 218, 237 (2009) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 1852 STATE CALLS FOR AN ARTICLE FIVE CONVENTION: MOBILIZATION AND INTERPRETATION, 2009 Cardozo L. Rev. de novo 74, 95+ (2009) 1853 A TALE OF TWO CASES: BAEHR V. MIIKE, PERRY V. SCHWARZENEGGER, AND THE FUTURE OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGE LITIGATION, 10 Cardozo Pub. L. Pol'y & Ethics J. 217, 266+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1854 "TIL DEATH DO US FILE JOINT INCOME TAX RETURNS (UNLESS WE'RE GAY), 9 Cardozo Pub. L. Pol'y & Ethics J. 451, 485+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1855 EQUALITY, ENTITLEMENT, AND EFFICIENCY: DWORKIN, NOZICK, POSNER, AND IMPLICATIONS FOR LEGAL THEORY, 8 Cardozo Pub. L. Pol'y & Ethics J. 31, 101+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1856 RELIGIOUS ARGUMENTS AND THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT: A REVIEW OF AMICUS CURIAE BRIEFS FILED BY RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATIONS, 7 Cardozo Pub. L. Pol'y & Ethics J. 343, 394+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1857 JUDICIAL DISCRETION IN TALMUDIC TIMES AND THE MODERN ERA, 7 Cardozo Pub. L. Pol'y & Ethics J. 429, 454+ (2009) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1858 JUSTICE KENNEDY'S SHORT-LIVED LIBERTARIAN REVOLUTION: A BRIEF HISTORY OF SUPREME COURT LIBERTARIAN IDEOLOGY, 7 Cardozo Pub. L. Pol'y & Ethics J. 1, 44+ (2008) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1859 THROWING DOWN THE INTERNATIONAL GAUNTLET: SAME-SEX MARRIAGE AS A HUMAN RIGHT, 6 Cardozo Pub. L. Pol'y & Ethics J. 1, 55+ (2007) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 1860 SEPARATING CIVIL UNIONS AND RELIGIOUS MARRIAGE-A NEW PARADIGM FOR RECOGNIZING SAME-SEX RELATIONSHIPS, 6 Cardozo Pub. L. Pol'y & Ethics J. 163, 197+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1861 READING IS FUNDAMENTAL: WHY THE NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND ACT NECESSITATES RECOGNITION OF A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO EDUCATION, 5 Cardozo Pub. L. Pol'y & Ethics J. 509, 542 (2007) 1862 THE MYTHS OF THANE ROSENBAUM, 4 Cardozo Pub. L. Pol'y & Ethics J. 33, 46 (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1863 WHY PEOPLE WHO FACE LOSING THEIR HOMES IN LEGAL PROCEEDINGS MUST HAVE A RIGHT TO COUNSEL, 3 Cardozo Pub. L. Pol'y & Ethics J. 699, 732 (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1864 FROM LAVENDER TO PURPLE: PRIVACY, BLACK WOMEN, AND FEMINIST LEGAL THEORY, 11 Cardozo Women's L.J. 303, 330 (2005) 1865 INSCRIBING LESBIAN AND GAY IDENTITIES: HOW JUDICIAL IMAGINATIONS INTERTWINE WITH THE BEST INTERESTS OF CHILDREN, 11 Cardozo Women's L.J. 1, 35 (2004) 1866 NOT IF, BUT WHEN?: DISMANTLING THE FLORIDA ADOPTION ACT OF 2001, 10 Cardozo Women's L.J. 625, 657+ (2004) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 1867 INTRODUCING LAWRENCE V. TEXAS: SOME BACKGROUND AND A GLIMPSE OF THE FUTURE, 10 Cardozo Women's L.J. 263, 288+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1868 LAWRENCE AND GARNER: THE LOVE (OR AT LEAST SEXUAL ATTRACTION) THAT FINALLY DARED SPEAK ITS NAME, 10 Cardozo Women's L.J. 289, 309+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1869 LOOSE NOT THE FLOODGATES, 10 Cardozo Women's L.J. 311, 319+ (2004) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 1870 THE OTHER "SEX" IN LAWRENCE V. TEXAS, 10 Cardozo Women's L.J. 321, 324+ (2004) 1871 LAWRENCE V. TEXAS: WHEN "PROFOUND AND DEEP CONVICTIONS" COLLIDE WITH LIBERTY INTERESTS, 10 Cardozo Women's L.J. 325, 336+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1872 IS INCEST NEXT?, 10 Cardozo Women's L.J. 337, 361+ (2004) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 1873 THE SHAG-A-DELIC SUPREME COURT: "ANAL SEX," "MYSTERY," "DESTINY," AND THE "TRANSCENDENT" IN LAWRENCE V. TEXAS, 10 Cardozo Women's L.J. 365, 395+ (2004) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 1874 THE MISSING WORD IN LAWRENCE V. TEXAS, 10 Cardozo Women's L.J. 397, 409+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1875 CHOOSING LIBERTY OVER EQUALITY AND SACRIFICING BOTH: EQUAL PROTECTION AND DUE PROCESS IN LAWRENCE V. TEXAS, 10 Cardozo Women's L.J. 411, 422+ (2004) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 1876 CHALLENGING DISSENT: THE ONTOLOGY AND LOGIC OF LAWRENCE V. TEXAS, 10 Cardozo Women's L.J. 423, 465+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1877 WHAT IS THIS CASE DOING HERE? HUMAN RIGHTS LITIGATION IN THE COURTS OF THE UNITED STATES, 44 Case W. Res. J. Int'l L. 183, 203 (2011) 1878 NONPROFITS, POLITICS, AND PRIVACY, 62 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 801, 843 (2012) 1879 THE RIGHT TO (SAME-SEX) DIVORCE, 62 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 447, 483+ (2011) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 1880 WHEN ROMER MET FEENEY: WHY THE SECOND SENTENCE OF THE OHIO MARRIAGE AMENDMENT VIOLATES EQUAL PROTECTION, 61 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 1315, 1317+ (2011) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 1881 DIACHRONIC CONSTITUTIONALISM: A REMEDY FOR THE COURT'S ORIGINALIST FIXATION, 60 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 1241, 1347+ (2010) 1882 JUDICIAL ABDICATION AND EQUAL ACCESS TO THE CIVIL JUSTICE SYSTEM, 60 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 325, 362 (2010) 1883 TAKING FREE EXERCISE RIGHTS SERIOUSLY, 57 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 55, 146 (2006) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 1884 THE CONSTITUTION RESTORATION ACT, JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE, AND POPULAR CONSTITUTIONALISM, 56 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 1083, 1118+ (2006) 1885 INTRODUCTION: "ATROCIOUS JUDGES" AND "ODIOUS" COURTS REVISITED, 56 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 899, 909 (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1886 ORIGINALISM AND THE AFFIRMATIVE ACTION DECISIONS, 55 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 1, 45 (2004) 1887 FOREWORD The Landmark Free-Speech Case That Wasn't: The Nike v. Kasky Story, 54 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 965, 1047 (2004) 1888 GAY AND LESBIAN RIGHTS TO PROCREATE AND ACCESS TO ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY, 55 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 323, 372+ (2004) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 1889 EMINENT DOMAIN FOR PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT - AN IRRATIONAL BASIS FOR THE EROSION OF PROPERTY RIGHTS, 55 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 409, 441 (2004) 1890 NARRATIVE HIGHGROUND The Failure of Intervention as a Procedural Device in Affirmative Action Litigation, 54 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 103, 148+ (2003) 1891 THE NEW SURVEILLANCE, 54 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 297, 385 (2003) 1892 FINDING MARRIAGE AMIDST A SEA OF CONFUSION: A PRECURSOR TO CONSIDERING THE PUBLIC PURPOSES OF MARRIAGE, 43 Cath. Law. 339, 365+ (2004) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1893 TAKING LIBERALISM AND RELIGIOUS LIBERTY SERIOUSLY: SHIFTING OUR NOTION OF TOLERATION FROM LOCKE TO MILL, 43 Cath. Law. 367, 408 (2004) 1894 THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF POLYGAMY PROHIBITIONS AFTER LAWRENCE V. TEXAS: IS SCALIA A PUNCHLINE OR A PROPHET?, 43 Cath. Law. 409, 442+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) .... IS ECONOMIC PROTECTIONISM A LEGITIMATE GOVERNMENTAL INTEREST UNDER RATIONAL BASIS REVIEW?, 62 Cath. U. L. Rev. 475, 505 (2013) (Text not available on WESTLAW) 1896 IF ALL YOU HAVE IS A HAMMER: SOCIETY'S INEFFECTIVE RESPONSE TO INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE, 60 Cath. U. L. Rev. 919, 948+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1897 THE INTRACTABLE OBSCENITY PROBLEM 2.0: THE EMERGING CIRCUIT SPLIT OVER THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF "LOCAL COMMUNITY STANDARDS" ONLINE, 60 Cath. U. L. Rev. 719, 748+ (2011) 1898 REGULATING MORALITY THROUGH THE COMMON LAW AND EXCLUSIONARY ZONING, 60 Cath. U. L. Rev. 403, 425+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1899 THE RIGHT TO COUNSEL IN CIVIL CASES REVISITED: THE PROPER INFLUENCE OF POVERTY AND THE CASE FOR REVERSING LASSITER © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. v. DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, 59 Cath. U. L. Rev. 1057, 1102+ (2010) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1900 INTEGRATING MARITAL PROPERTY INTO A SPOUSE'S ELECTIVE SHARE, 59 Cath. U. L. Rev. 617, 717 (2010) 1901 WHY MONUMENTS ARE GOVERNMENT SPEECH: THE HARD CASE OF PLEASANT GROVE CITY v. SUMMUM, 58 Cath. U. L. Rev. 7, 51+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1902 AMICUS FILINGS AND INTERNATIONAL LAW: TOWARD A GLOBAL VIEW OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION, 55 Cath. U. L. Rev. 267, 267+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1903 ILLUSIONS OF LIBERTY AND EQUALITY: AN "ALIEN'S" VIEW OF TIERED SCRUTINY, AD HOC BALANCING, GOVERNMENTAL POWER, AND JUDICIAL IMPERIALISM, 55 Cath. U. L. Rev. 5, 5+ (2005) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 1904 BIG ABORTION: WHAT THE ANTIABORTION MOVEMENT CAN LEARN FROM BIG TOBACCO, 54 Cath. U. L. Rev. 1273, 1311+ (2005) 1905 IS THERE A "RELIGIOUS QUESTION" DOCTRINE? JUDICIAL AUTHORITY TO EXAMINE RELIGIOUS PRACTICES AND BELIEFS, 54 Cath. U. L. Rev. 497, 551 (2005) 1906 A NEW FORM OF FAMILY PLANNING? THE ENFORCEABILITY OF NOCHILD PROVISIONS IN PRENUPTIAL AGREEMENTS, 54 Cath. U. L. Rev. 335, 343+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1907 REENCHANTING THE LAW: THE RELIGIOUS DIMENSION OF JUDICIAL DECISION MAKING, 53 Cath. U. L. Rev. 709, 816+ (2004) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 1908 INTRODUCTION, 52 Cath. U. L. Rev. 877, 881+ (2003) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1909 JUSTICE WHITE AND THE RIGHT OF PRIVACY: A MODEL OF REALISM AND RESTRAINT, 52 Cath. U. L. Rev. 915, 946+ (2003) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1910 READING THE OPINIONS-AND THE TEA LEAVES-IN UNITED STATES v. WINDSOR, 2013 Cato Sup. Ct. Rev. 95, 95+ (2013) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 1911 FEDERALISM, LIBERTY, AND EQUALITY IN UNITED STATES v. WINDSOR, 2013 Cato Sup. Ct. Rev. 117, 123+ (2013) 1912 ESCAPING FOURTH AMENDMENT DOCTRINE AFTER JONES: PHYSICS, LAW, AND PRIVACY PROTECTION, 2012 Cato Sup. Ct. Rev. 219, 255 (2012) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 1913 CHURCH AND STATE AT THE CROSSROADS: CHRISTIAN LEGAL SOCIETY v. MARTINEZ, 2010 Cato Sup. Ct. Rev. 105, 135+ (2010) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1914 THE TELL-TALE PRIVILEGES OR IMMUNITIES CLAUSE, 2010 Cato Sup. Ct. Rev. 163, 189+ (2010) 1915 UNITED STATES v. STEVENS: RESTRICTING TWO MAJOR RATIONALES FOR CONTENT-BASED SPEECH RESTRICTIONS, 2010 Cato Sup. Ct. Rev. © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 67, 104 (2010) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 1916 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. HELLER: THE SECOND AMENDMENT IS BACK, BABY, 2008 Cato Sup. Ct. Rev. 127, 159 (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1917 BOUMEDIENE AND THE UNCERTAIN MARCH OF JUDICIAL COSMOPOLITANISM, 2008 Cato Sup. Ct. Rev. 23, 46+ (2008) 1918 RIGHTS OVER BORDERS: TRANSNATIONAL CONSTITUTIONALISM AND GUANTANAMO BAY, 2008 Cato Sup. Ct. Rev. 47, 61 (2008) 1919 RELIGION AND THE CONSTITUTION: A LIBERTARIAN PERSPECTIVE, 2006 Cato Sup. Ct. Rev. 7, 49 (2006) 1920 LOOKING AHEAD TO THE 2005-2006 TERM, 2005 Cato Sup. Ct. Rev. 321, 321 (2005) 1921 TENNESSEE v. LANE: HOW ILLEGITIMATE POWER NEGATED NONEXISTENT IMMUNITY, 2004 Cato Sup. Ct. Rev. 161, 184+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1922 THE CHENEY DECISION-A MISSED CHANCE TO STRAIGHTEN OUT SOME MUDDLED ISSUES, 2004 Cato Sup. Ct. Rev. 185, 191+ (2004) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 1923 A FISTFUL OF DENIAL: THE SUPREME COURT TAKES A PASS ON COMMERCE CLAUSE CHALLENGES TO ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS, 2004 Cato Sup. Ct. Rev. 469, 491 (2004) 1924 THE INDIVISIBILITY OF ECONOMIC RIGHTS AND PERSONAL LIBERTY, 2004 Cato Sup. Ct. Rev. 9, 21 (2004) 1925 THE CONSERVATIVE SPLIT ON PUNITIVE DAMAGES STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO. v. CAMPBELL, 2003 Cato Sup. Ct. Rev. 159, 186+ (2003) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 1926 JUSTICE KENNEDY'S LIBERTARIAN REVOLUTION: LAWRENCE v. TEXAS, 2003 Cato Sup. Ct. Rev. 21, 41+ (2003) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1927 COMING UP: OCTOBER TERM 2003, 2003 Cato Sup. Ct. Rev. 271, 271+ (2003) 1928 ON CONSTITUTIONALISM, 2003 Cato Sup. Ct. Rev. 7, 20 (2003) 1929 A FEW OF THE MOST CELEBRATED OPINIONS OF JUSTICE STEVENS, 24-SEP CBA Rec. 36, 40 (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1930 TWELVE EXECUTIONS WHICH SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN, 18-JAN CBA Rec. 24, 26 (2004) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 1931 LITIGATING THE FOURTH AMENDMENT AFTER JONES, 37 Champion 20 (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 1932 SUPREME COURT 2002-2003 REVIEW, 27 Champion 12 (2003) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1933 THIRTY YEARS OF ADAMS V. HOWERTON: CHANGED CIRCUMSTANCES, DOMA, (FN2) AND A VISION OF A DOMA-FREE WORLD, 17 Chap. L. Rev. 265, 289+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1934 THE YELLOW BRICK ROAD TO NOWHERE: CALIFORNIA SAME-SEX © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. MARVIN RIGHTS AFTER PROPOSITION 8, 14 Chap. L. Rev. 483, 515+ (2011) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1935 TIME TO BURY THE SHOCKS THE CONSCIENCE TEST, 13 Chap. L. Rev. 307, 356+ (2010) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1936 THE FRAMERS' UNDERSTANDING OF ORIGINALISM AND INTERNATIONAL LAW 2005 National Lawyer's Convention November 11, 2005, 11 Chap. L. Rev. 307, 332+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1937 A SCHOLAR'S JOURNEY ON THE DARK SIDE, 11 Chap. L. Rev. 1, 83+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1938 MINE AND THINE DISTINCT: WHAT KELO SAYS ABOUT OUR PATH, 10 Chap. L. Rev. 1, 48 (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1939 A MATTER OF RHETORIC: THE DIVERSITY RATIONALE IN POLITICAL CONTEXT, 10 Chap. L. Rev. 187, 234+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1940 THE PRIVACY ADVANTAGES OF HOMESCHOOLING, 9 Chap. L. Rev. 73, 109 (2005) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 1941 NO LONGER LITTLE KNOWN BUT NOW A DOOR AJAR: AN OVERVIEW OF THE EVOLVING AND DANGEROUS ROLE OF THE ALIEN TORT STATUTE IN HUMAN RIGHTS AND INTERNATIONAL LAW JURISPRUDENCE, 8 Chap. L. Rev. 103, 133+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1942 GIMME THAT OL' TIME SEPARATION: A REVIEW ESSAY Philip Hamburger, Separation of Church and State, 8 Chap. L. Rev. 309, 327 (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1943 TOWARD "LIBERTY": HOW THE MARRIAGE OF SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS AND EQUAL PROTECTION IN LAWRENCE AND WINDSOR SETS THE STAGE FOR THE INEVITABLE LOVING OF OUR TIME, 8 Charleston L. Rev. 223, 243+ (2014) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 1944 THE STRANGE INTERSECTION BETWEEN LAW, RELIGION, AND GOVERNMENT IN THE REGULATION OF MARRIAGE, 6 Charleston L. Rev. 547, 568+ (2012) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 1945 PRENATAL PROSECUTION: TAKING A STAND FOR THE STATE AND THE WELL-BEING OF ITS SOON-TO-BE CITIZENS, 5 Charleston L. Rev. 621, 653 (2011) 1946 PREVIEW OF UNITED STATES V. STEVENS: ANIMAL LAW, OBSCENITY, AND THE LIMITS OF GOVERNMENT CENSORSHIP, 4 Charleston L. Rev. 59, 89+ (2009) 1947 DAMNED YANKEES: RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS THAT DISCRIMINATE AGAINST GEOGRAPHIC ORIGIN, 2 Charleston L. Rev. 671, 701+ (2008) 1948 DUE PROCESS AND PUNITIVE DAMAGES: AN ECONOMIC APPROACH, 2 Charleston L. Rev. 345, 374+ (2008) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1949 I. PANEL ONE: "I DO," YOU DON'T: THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF DEFINING MARRIAGE., 4 Charlotte L. Rev. 179, 196+ (2013) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 1950 III. PANEL TWO: A STRAIGHT AND NARROW PATH: NAVIGATING THE LAW FOR LGBT CLIENTS, 4 Charlotte L. Rev. 213, 213+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1951 CASE STUDIES IN THE ADVANCEMENT OF SEXUAL ORIENTATION RIGHTS AND THE ROLE OF DEVELOPING INTERNATIONAL LEGAL NORMS: ARGENTINA AND BRAZIL, 14 Chi. J. Int'l L. 259, 289+ (2013) 1952 THE LIMITS OF CONSTITUTIONAL CONVERGENCE, 11 Chi. J. Int'l L. 399, 423 (2011) 1953 SEXUAL ORIENTATION, DISCRIMINATION, AND THE UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS, 11 Chi. J. Int'l L. 789, 812+ (2011) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1954 THE NORMATIVE CYCLE OF SHAPING JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE IN DOMESTIC AND INTERNATIONAL LAW: THE MUTUAL IMPACT OF NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL JURISPRUDENCE AND CONTEMPORARY PRACTICAL AND CONCEPTUAL CHALLENGES, 10 Chi. J. Int'l L. 275, 332+ (2009) 1955 IDENTITARIAN ANXIETIES AND THE NATURE OF INTER-TRIBUNAL DELIBERATIONS, 9 Chi. J. Int'l L. 613, 626+ (2009) 1956 REMARKS AT THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW SCHOOL, 7 Chi. J. Int'l L. 289, 302 (2006) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 1957 RECALLING THE CASE FOR SOVEREIGNTY, 5 Chi. J. Int'l L. 435, 460 (2005) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 1958 UNIVERSALISM, RELATIVISM, AND PRIVATE ENFORCEMENT OF CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW, 5 Chi. J. Int'l L. 311, 323 (2004) 1959 TOWARD A NEW HUMAN RIGHTS PARADIGM: INTEGRATING HITHERTO NEGLECTED TRADITIONAL VALUES INTO THE CORPUS OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE LEGITIMACY QUESTION, 14 Chi.-Kent J. Int'l & Comp. L. 24, 43+ (2013) 1960 THE VIENNA CONVENTION ON CONSULAR RELATIONS: AFTER THE FEDERAL COURTS' ABDICATION, WILL STATE COURTS FILL IN THE BREACH?, 7 Chi.-Kent J. Int'l & Comp. L. 1, 30 (2007) 1961 COGNITIVE BIAS AND THE CONSTITUTION, 88 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 367, 410+ (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 1962 BEYOND THE OPINION: SUPREME COURT JUSTICES AND EXTRAJUDICIAL SPEECH, 88 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 487, 508+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1963 WHO AM I AND WHO DO YOU WANT ME TO BE? EFFECTIVELY DEFINING A LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, AND TRANSGENDER SOCIAL GROUP IN ASYLUM APPLICATIONS, 86 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 1363, 1387 (2011) 1964 JUDICIAL ACTIVISM V. JUDICIAL ABDICATION: A PLEA FOR A RETURN TO THE LOCHNER ERA SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. METHODOLOGY, 84 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 315, 342+ (2009) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 1965 THE EVOLUTION OF ACADEMIC DISCOURSE ON SEXUAL ORIENTATION AND THE LAW: AN INTRODUCTION TO A FESTSCHRIFT IN HONOR OF JEFFREY SHERMAN, 84 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 345, 377 (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1966 THE "ACCIDENTAL PROCREATION" ARGUMENT FOR WITHHOLDING LEGAL RECOGNITION FOR SAME-SEX RELATIONSHIPS, 84 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 403, 435+ (2009) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 1967 MARRIAGE, TORT, AND PRIVATE ORDERING: RHETORIC AND REALITY IN LGBT RIGHTS, 84 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 437, 480+ (2009) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 1968 DOMA AND THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE, 84 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 481, 518+ (2009) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.) 1969 EXORCIZING THE GHOSTS OF BOWERS V. HARDWICK: UPROOTING INVALID PRECEDENTS, 84 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 519, 557+ (2009) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1970 SCOTT V. SANDFORD: THE COURT'S MOST DREADFUL CASE AND HOW IT CHANGED HISTORY, 82 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 3, 48 (2007) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 1971 FOREIGN AUTHORITY, AMERICAN EXCEPTIONALISM, AND THE DRED SCOTT CASE, 82 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 393, 455+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1972 THIRTEEN WAYS OF LOOKING AT DRED SCOTT, 82 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 49, 95 (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1973 CONSTITUTIONAL EDUCATION FOR THE PEOPLE THEMSELVES, 81 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 1091, 1107 (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1974 "LEWD AND IMMORAL": NUDE DANCING, SEXUAL EXPRESSION, AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT, 81 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 1185, 1232 (2006) 1975 REPRESENTING TRANSGENDER YOUTH: LEARNING FROM MAE'S JOURNEY, 29 NO. 11 Child. L. Prac. 169, 169+ (2011) 1976 EXPLORING ATTITUDES ABOUT LGBTQ YOUTH IN FOSTER CARE, 26 NO. 7 Child. L. Prac. 97, 97+ (2007) 1977 JUSTICE WILLIAM J. BRENNAN, JR., JAMES WILSON, AND THE PURSUIT OF EQUALITY AND LIBERTY, 61 Clev. St. L. Rev. 665, 705+ (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1978 THE POLITICIZATION OF JUDICIAL ELECTIONS AND ITS EFFECT ON JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE, 60 Clev. St. L. Rev. 461, 475+ (2012) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 1979 THE MYSTERY OF LIFE IN THE LABORATORY OF DEMOCRACY: PERSONAL AUTONOMY IN STATE LAW, 59 Clev. St. L. Rev. 589, 621+ (2011) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 1980 TOWARD A PLAIN MEANING APPROACH TO ANALYZING TITLE VII: © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION PROTECTION OF TRANSSEXUALS, 57 Clev. St. L. Rev. 645, 654+ (2009) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 1981 REASON'S FREEDOM AND THE DIALECTIC OF ORDERED LIBERTY, 55 Clev. St. L. Rev. 157, 159+ (2007) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 1982 REPUDIATING MORALS LEGISLATION: RENDERING THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO PRIVACY OBSOLETE, 53 Clev. St. L. Rev. 447, 447+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1983 EQUAL PROTECTION FOR HOMOSEXUALS: WHY THE IMMUTABILITY ARGUMENT IS NECESSARY AND HOW IT IS MET, 53 Clev. St. L. Rev. 545, 551+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1984 CITY AND CITIZEN: COMMUNITY-MAKING AS LEGAL THEORY AND SOCIAL STRUGGLE, 52 Clev. St. L. Rev. 1, 49 (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1985 OHIO CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION, 51 Clev. St. L. Rev. 437, 489+ (2004) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 1986 NOTHING LESS THAN THE DIGNITY OF MAN: EVOLVING STANDARDS, BOTCHED EXECUTIONS AND UTAH'S CONTROVERSIAL USE OF THE FIRING SQUAD, 50 Clev. St. L. Rev. 335, 424+ (2003) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1987 PRIVACY: A COMMON LAW AND CONSTITUTIONAL CROSSROADS, 40-JUN Colo. Law. 55, 55+ (2011) 1988 Global Positioning and Transjudicialism: Taiwanese Experience from A Global Perspective, 26 Chinese (Taiwan) Y.B. Int'l L. & Aff. 169, 179+ (2008) 1989 WORKPLACE DISCRIMINATION ON THE BASIS OF SEXUAL ORIENTATION OR GENDER IDENTITY, 35-APR Colo. Law. 63, 66+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 1990 10(B) OR NOT 10(B)?: YANKING THE SECURITY BLANKET FOR ATTORNEYS IN SECURITIES LITIGATION, 2004 Colum. Bus. L. Rev. 637, 719+ (2004) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 1991 DECOLONIZING SINGAPORE'S SEX LAWS: TRACING SECTION 377A OF SINGAPORE'S PENAL CODE, 45 Colum. Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 57, 90+ (2013) 1992 LGBT IDENTITY IN IMMIGRATION, 45 Colum. Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 100, 137+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1993 EVOLUTIVE INTERPRETATION OF RIGHTS PROVISIONS: A COMPARISON OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE U.S. SUPREME COURT, 44 Colum. Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 309, 333+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1994 THE RIGHT TO DIGNITY, 43 Colum. Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 65, 90+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1995 THERE AND BACK AGAIN: THE STRANGE JOURNEY OF SPECIAL ADVOCATES AND COMPARATIVE LAW METHODOLOGY, 42 Colum. Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 279, 355+ (2011) 1996 HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE MODEL RULES OF PROFESSIONAL © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. CONDUCT: INTERSECTION AND INTEGRATION, 42 Colum. Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 157, 179+ (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1997 THICK INSTRUMENTALISM AND COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONALISM: THE CASE OF GAY RIGHTS, 40 Colum. Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 425, 478+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 1998 HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE UNITED STATES, 40 Colum. Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 1, 6 (2008) 1999 HUMAN RIGHTS AT HOME: DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AS A HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATION, 40 Colum. Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 19, 77 (2008) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 2000 THE CONSTITUTION AND EXECUTIVE COMPETENCE IN THE POSTCOLD WAR WORLD, 38 Colum. Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 547, 580 (2007) 2001 "THE MORNING AFTER": HOW FAR CAN STATES GO TO RESTRICT ACCESS TO EMERGENCY CONTRACEPTION?, 38 Colum. Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 221, 262 (2006) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2002 THE IDEA OF HUMANITY: HUMAN RIGHTS AND IMMIGRANTS' RIGHTS, 37 Colum. Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 627, 658 (2006) 2003 JUSTIFYING THE USE OF INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS PRINCIPLES IN AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 37 Colum. Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 1, 100+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2004 INTRODUCTION: BETTER LATE THAN NEVER, 36 Colum. Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 489, 492 (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2005 AN "AGENDA FOR DEMOLITION": THE FALLACY AND THE DANGER OF THE "SUBVERSIVE VOTING" ARGUMENT FOR FELONY DISENFRANCHISEMENT, 36 Colum. Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 109, 143 (2004) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2006 A JOB DESCRIPTION FOR THE U.N. HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS, 35 Colum. Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 493, 503 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2007 THREE MODELS OF GROUP-DIFFERENTIATED RIGHTS, 35 Colum. Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 215, 258+ (2004) 2008 THE HUMAN RIGHTS DILEMMA: RETHINKING THE HUMANITARIAN PROJECT, 35 Colum. Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 259, 336 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2009 A HIGH-VOLTAGE CONFLICT ON BLACKACRE: REORIENTING UTILITY EASEMENT RIGHTS FOR ELECTRIC RELIABILITY, 36 Colum. J. Envtl. L. 1, 57+ (2011) 2010 STANDING AND FUTURE GENERATIONS: DOES MASSACHUSETTS V. EPA OPEN STANDING FOR GENERATIONS TO COME?, 34 Colum. J. Envtl. L. 1, 97+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2011 WHAT'S GOOD FOR SCHOOL FINANCE SHOULD BE GOOD FOR ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE: ADDRESSING DISPARATE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS USING STATE COURTS AND CONSTITUTIONS, 30 Colum. J. Envtl. L. 135, 192 (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 2012 THE FIRST PRINCIPLES OF STANDING: PRIVILEGE, SYSTEM JUSTIFICATION, AND THE PREDICTABLE INCOHERENCE OF ARTICLE III, 1 Colum. J. Race & L. 119, 130+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2013 WINDSOR, ANIMUS, AND THE FUTURE OF MARRIAGE EQUALITY, 113 Colum. L. Rev. Sidebar 204, 208+ (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2014 MARRIAGE AS? A REPLY TO MARRIAGE AS PUNISHMENT, 112 Colum. L. Rev. Sidebar 220, 220+ (2012) 2015 SODOMY AND POLYGAMY, 111 Colum. L. Rev. Sidebar 66, 67+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2016 THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS' NORM-CREATION AND NORM-LIMITING PROCESSES: RESOLVING A NORMATIVE TENSION, 17 Colum. J. Eur. L. 307, 373 (2011) 2017 THE INSTITUTIONAL ASPECTS OF COMPARATIVE LAW, 15 Colum. J. Eur. L. 477, 493 (2009) 2018 ON THE USE AND ABUSE OF DIGNITY IN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 14 Colum. J. Eur. L. 201, 205+ (2008) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2019 SEXUALITY'S LAW, 24 Colum. J. Gender & L. 87, 224+ (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2020 A CONVERSATION WITH JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG, 25 Colum. J. Gender & L. 6, 24+ (2013) 2021 RELIGION BY ANY OTHER NAME? PROHIBITIONS ON SAME-SEX MARRIAGE AND THE LIMITS OF THE ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE, 23 Colum. J. Gender & L. 132, 149+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2022 A ROOM FOR "ADAM AND STEVE" AT MRS. MURPHY'S BED AND BREAKFAST: AVOIDING THE SIN OF INHOSPITALITY IN PLACES OF PUBLIC ACCOMMODATION, 23 Colum. J. Gender & L. 326, 394+ (2012) 2023 RULES FOR RADICAL LAWYERS: ADVANCING THE ABORTION RIGHTS OF INMATES, 21 Colum. J. Gender & L. 46, 108 (2011) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2024 THE RISING BAR FOR PERSECUTION IN ASYLUM CASES INVOLVING SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HARM, 22 Colum. J. Gender & L. 81, 159+ (2011) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 2025 TAKING INITIATIVES: RECONCILING RACE, RELIGION, MEDIA AND DEMOCRACY IN THE QUEST FOR MARRIAGE EQUALITY, 19 Colum. J. Gender & L. 805, 839+ (2010) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 2026 QUEER RELATIONS: A READING OF MARTHA NUSSBAUM ON SAMESEX MARRIAGE, 19 Colum. J. Gender & L. 133, 154+ (2010) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 2027 THEORIZING AND LITIGATING THE RIGHTS OF SEXUAL MINORITIES, 19 Colum. J. Gender & L. 21, 63+ (2010) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2028 LIBERALISM, DEVELOPMENT, AND GENDER: RESPONSES TO THE PAPERS, 19 Colum. J. Gender & L. 249, 285 (2010) 2029 MARTHA NUSSBAUM, ESSENTIALISM, AND HUMAN SEXUALITY, 19 © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Colum. J. Gender & L. 3, 19+ (2010) 2030 FINDING THE FUNDAMENTAL: SHAPING IDENTITY IN GENDER AND SEXUAL ORIENTATION BASED ASYLUM CLAIMS, 19 Colum. J. Gender & L. 367, 400+ (2010) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2031 CRIMINALIZING COERCED SUBMISSION IN THE WORKPLACE AND IN THE ACADEMY, 19 Colum. J. Gender & L. 409, 448+ (2010) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2032 A LOT TO ASK: REVIEW ESSAY OF MARTHA NUSSBAUM'S FROM DISGUST TO HUMANITY: SEXUAL ORIENTATION AND CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 19 Colum. J. Gender & L. 89, 100+ (2010) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2033 RAPE, INCEST, AND HARPER LEE'S TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD: ON ALABAMA'S LEGAL CONSTRUCTION OF GENDER AND SEXUALITY IN THE CONTEXT OF RACIAL SUBORDINATION, 18 Colum. J. Gender & L. 743, 806+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2034 TOYS ARE US: SEX TOYS, SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS, AND THE AMERICAN WAY, 18 Colum. J. Gender & L. 807, 807+ (2009) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 2035 FAMILY LAW CASES AS LAW REFORM LITIGATION: UNRECOGNIZED PARENTS AND THE STORY OF ALISON D. v. VIRGINIA M., 17 Colum. J. Gender & L. 307, 342+ (2008) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 2036 THE CULTURAL PROPERTY CLAIM WITHIN THE SAME-SEX MARRIAGE CONTROVERSY, 17 Colum. J. Gender & L. 343, 418+ (2008) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 2037 MORSE v. FREDERICK'S NEW PERSPECTIVE ON SCHOOLS' BASIC EDUCATIONAL MISSIONS AND THE IMPLICATIONS FOR GAYSTRAIGHT ALLIANCE FIRST AMENDMENT JURISPRUDENCE, 18 Colum. J. Gender & L. 281, 312+ (2008) 2038 PRIVACY, PROPERTY, AND PUBLIC SEX, 18 Colum. J. Gender & L. 1, 1+ (2008) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2039 LOVE, HONOR, OR CONTROL: DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, TRAFFICKING, AND THE QUESTION OF HOW TO REGULATE THE MAIL-ORDER BRIDE INDUSTRY, 16 Colum. J. Gender & L. 551, 601+ (2007) 2040 THE FAILURE OF ABSTINENCE-ONLY EDUCATION: MINORS HAVE A RIGHT TO HONEST TALK ABOUT SEX, 15 Colum. J. Gender & L. 12, 62+ (2006) 2041 RETHINKING PRISON SEX: SELF-EXPRESSION AND SAFETY, 15 Colum. J. Gender & L. 185, 234+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2042 A HISTORICAL GUIDE TO THE FUTURE OF MARRIAGE FOR SAME-SEX COUPLES, 15 Colum. J. Gender & L. 249, 272 (2006) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 2043 SEX AS A FORM OF GENDER AND EXPRESSION AFTER LAWRENCE v. TEXAS, 15 Colum. J. Gender & L. 297, 297+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2044 BEYOND ROMER AND LAWRENCE: THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY COMES © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. OUT OF THE CLOSET, 15 Colum. J. Gender & L. 355, 356+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2045 RE-ORIENTING THE SEX DISCRIMINATION ARGUMENT FOR GAY RIGHTS AFTER LAWRENCE v. TEXAS, 14 Colum. J. Gender & L. 131, 131+ (2005) 2046 A WOMAN SCORNED FOR THE "LEAST CONDEMNED" WAR CRIME: PRECEDENT AND PROBLEMS WITH PROSECUTING RAPE AS A SERIOUS WAR CRIME IN THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR RWANDA, 13 Colum. J. Gender & L. 274, 327 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2047 FOREWORD: THE NEXT NORMAL-DEVELOPMENTS SINCE MARRIAGE RIGHTS FOR SAME-SEX COUPLES IN NEW YORK, 13 Colum. J. Gender & L. 48, 51+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2048 WHAT THE DIGITAL MILLENNIUM COPYRIGHT ACT CAN LEARN FROM MEDICAL MARIJUANA: FIXING THE ANTITRAFFICKING PROVISIONS BY BASING LIABILITY ON THE LIKELIHOOD OF HARM, 35 Colum. J.L. & Arts 503, 547 (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2049 INTERNATIONAL COPYRIGHT LAW AND DOMESTIC CONSTITUTIONAL DOCTRINES, 30 Colum. J.L. & Arts 337, 347 (2007) 2050 DO CORPORATE RIGHTS TRUMP INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS? PRESERVING AN INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS MODEL IN A PLURALIST SOCIETY, 44 Colum. J.L. & Soc. Probs. 267, 310+ (2011) 2051 WHEN PROCEDURE EQUALS JUSTICE: FACING THE PRESSING CONSTITUTIONAL NEEDS OF A CRIMINALIZED IMMIGRATION SYSTEM, 42 Colum. J.L. & Soc. Probs. 261, 291 (2008) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 2052 FEDERALISM AND THE GAY FAMILY: FREE MOVEMENT OF SAMESEX COUPLES IN THE UNITED STATES AND THE EUROPEAN UNION, 41 Colum. J.L. & Soc. Probs. 81, 124+ (2007) 2053 BRINGING ECONOMIC JUSTICE CLOSER TO HOME: THE LEGAL VIABILITY OF LOCAL MINIMUM WAGE LAWS UNDER HOME RULE, 39 Colum. J.L. & Soc. Probs. 93, 139 (2005) 2054 DESUETUDE-BASED SEVERABILITY: A NEW APPROACH TO OLD MORALS LEGISLATION, 39 Colum. J.L. & Soc. Probs. 149, 161+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2055 BOYS WILL BE BOYS? AN ANALYSIS OF MALE-ON-MALE HETEROSEXUAL SEXUAL VIOLENCE, 38 Colum. J.L. & Soc. Probs. 37, 66 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2056 A CONTRACT READING OF RAPE LAW: REDEFINING FORCE TO INCLUDE COERCION, 37 Colum. J.L. & Soc. Probs. 57, 90+ (2003) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2057 THE COSTS OF CONSISTENCY: PRECEDENT IN INVESTMENT TREATY ARBITRATION, 51 Colum. J. Transnat'l L. 418, 478 (2013) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 2058 THE INTERNATIONALIZATION OF U.S. LAW, 47 Colum. J. Transnat'l L. © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 537, 575 (2009) 2059 INTRODUCTION TO SANDRA DAY O'CONNOR, 47 Colum. J. Transnat'l L. 1, 5+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2060 ENFORCING INTERNATIONAL NORMS IN THE UNITED STATES AFTER ROPER V. SIMMONS: THE CASE OF JUVENILE OFFENDERS SENTENCED TO LIFE WITHOUT PAROLE Dorsey & Whitney Student Writing Prize in Comparative and International Law Best, 45 Colum. J. Transnat'l L. 262, 311 (2006) 2061 CAN YOU PUT ON YOUR RED LIGHT?: LAWRENCE'S SEXUAL CITIZENSHIP RIGHTS IN TERMS OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, 43 Colum. J. Transnat'l L. 613, 636+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2062 GUANTÁNAMO, 42 Colum. J. Transnat'l L. 263, 348+ (2004) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2063 A CRITIQUE OF UNITED STATES V. BIN LADEN IN LIGHT OF CHAVEZ V. MARTINEZ AND THE INTERNATIONAL WAR ON TERROR, 43 Colum. J. Transnat'l L. 269, 309 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2064 THE UPSIDE OF LOSING, 113 Colum. L. Rev. 817, 852+ (2013) 2065 THE DANGEROUS THIRTEENTH AMENDMENT, 112 Colum. L. Rev. 1459, 1499 (2012) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 2066 GENDER DISCRIMINATION AND THE THIRTEENTH AMENDMENT, 112 Colum. L. Rev. 1641, 1695+ (2012) 2067 JUDICIAL BACKLASH OR JUST BACKLASH? EVIDENCE FROM A NATIONAL EXPERIMENT, 112 Colum. L. Rev. 731, 799+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2068 DUE PROCESS AND "THE WORST OF THE WORST": MENTAL COMPETENCE IN SEXUALLY VIOLENT PREDATOR CIVIL COMMITMENT PROCEEDINGS, 112 Colum. L. Rev. 912, 950 (2012) 2069 MARRIAGE AS PUNISHMENT, 112 Colum. L. Rev. 1, 65+ (2012) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2070 THE NINTH AMENDMENT AS A RULE OF CONSTRUCTION, 111 Colum. L. Rev. 498, 573+ (2011) 2071 REGULATING POLYGAMY: INTIMACY, DEFAULT RULES, AND BARGAINING FOR EQUALITY, 110 Colum. L. Rev. 1955, 2046+ (2010) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2072 CHEVRON AS A CANON, NOT A PRECEDENT: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF WHAT MOTIVATES JUSTICES IN AGENCY DEFERENCE CASES, 110 Colum. L. Rev. 1727, 1817+ (2010) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 2073 STARE DECISIS IN THE OFFICE OF LEGAL COUNSEL, 110 Colum. L. Rev. 1448, 1525 (2010) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 2074 SEXING SKINNER: HISTORY AND THE POLITICS OF THE RIGHT TO MARRY, 110 Colum. L. Rev. 1348, 1376+ (2010) 2075 GUNS AS SMUT: DEFENDING THE HOME-BOUND SECOND © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. AMENDMENT, 109 Colum. L. Rev. 1278, 1356+ (2009) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2076 THE FEDERAL MARRIAGE AMENDMENT AND THE FALSE PROMISE OF ORIGINALISM, 108 Colum. L. Rev. 529, 605+ (2008) 2077 DEAD HAND ARGUMENTS AND CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION, 108 Colum. L. Rev. 606, 680 (2008) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 2078 TREATING LIKE SUBDECISIONS ALIKE: THE SCOPE OF STARE DECISIS AS APPLIED TO JUDICIAL METHODOLOGY, 108 Colum. L. Rev. 681, 715 (2008) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 2079 GIVING PRECISE CONTENT TO THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT: AN ASSESSMENT OF THE REMEDIAL PROVISIONS OF THE PRISON LITIGATION REFORM ACT, 108 Colum. L. Rev. 143, 181 (2008) 2080 CREEPING MONISM: THE JUDICIAL TREND TOWARD INTERPRETIVE INCORPORATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS TREATIES, 107 Colum. L. Rev. 628, 705+ (2007) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 2081 CONSTITUTIONAL TIPPING POINTS: CIVIL RIGHTS, SOCIAL CHANGE, AND FACT-BASED ADJUDICATION, 106 Colum. L. Rev. 1955, 2022+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2082 RADICALS IN TWEED JACKETS: WHY EXTREME LEFT-WING LAW PROFESSORS ARE WRONG FOR AMERICA Radicals in Robes: Why Extreme Right-Wing Courts are Wrong for America. By Cass R. Sunstein. New York: Basic Books, 2005. Pp. 281. $26, 106 Colum. L. Rev. 2207, 2233+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2083 FROM MCLAUGHLIN V. FLORIDA TO LAWRENCE V. TEXAS: SEXUAL FREEDOM AND THE ROAD TO MARRIAGE, 106 Colum. L. Rev. 1165, 1187+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2084 WILLIAM HUBBS REHNQUIST, 106 Colum. L. Rev. 494, 497 (2006) 2085 ELITES, SOCIAL MOVEMENTS, AND THE LAW: THE CASE OF AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, 105 Colum. L. Rev. 1436, 1528+ (2005) 2086 DOES OBSCENITY CAUSE MORAL HARM?, 105 Colum. L. Rev. 1635, 1679 (2005) 2087 THE UNEXAMINED DEATH PENALTY: CAPITAL PUNISHMENT AND REFORM OF THE MODEL PENAL CODE, 105 Colum. L. Rev. 1396, 1415 (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2088 PRECLUSION IN CLASS ACTION LITIGATION, 105 Colum. L. Rev. 717, 808 (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2089 SECURING ACCESS TO TRANSPORTATION FOR THE URBAN POOR, 105 Colum. L. Rev. 503, 536+ (2005) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 2090 AL CAPONE'S REVENGE: AN ESSAY ON THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF PRETEXTUAL PROSECUTION, 105 Colum. L. Rev. 583, 639+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2091 THE NEW MORALIZERS: TRANSFORMING THE CONSERVATIVE © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. LEGAL AGENDA, 104 Colum. L. Rev. 2032, 2096+ (2004) 2092 OUR STRUCTURAL CONSTITUTION, 104 Colum. L. Rev. 1687, 1709 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2093 THE DOMESTICATED LIBERTY OF LAWRENCE V. TEXAS, 104 Colum. L. Rev. 1399, 1426+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2094 THE SUPREME COURT FORECASTING PROJECT: LEGAL AND POLITICAL SCIENCE APPROACHES TO PREDICTING SUPREME COURT DECISIONMAKING, 104 Colum. L. Rev. 1150, 1209+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2095 THE CAPITAL PUNISHMENT EXCEPTION: A CASE FOR CONSTITUTIONALIZING THE SUBSTANTIVE CRIMINAL LAW, 104 Colum. L. Rev. 426, 458+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2096 DOING ORIGINALISM, 104 Colum. L. Rev. 32, 38 (2004) 2097 THE REVIVAL OF FORWARD-LOOKING AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, 104 Colum. L. Rev. 60, 74 (2004) 2098 DON'T SPLIT THE BABY: HOW THE U.S. COULD AVOID UNCERTAINTY AND UNNECESSARY LITIGATION AND PROMOTE EQUALITY BY EMULATING THE BRITISH SURROGACY LAW REGIME, 10 Conn. Pub. Int. L.J. 477, 521 (2011) 2099 A JURISPRUDENCE OF NONVIOLENCE, 9 Conn. Pub. Int. L.J. 65, 159+ (2009) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2100 CONFLICTING APPROACHES: LEGALIZING SAME-SEX MARRIAGE THROUGH CONFLICTS OF LAW, 8 Conn. Pub. Int. L.J. 301, 331+ (2009) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2101 EMERGENCY CONTRACEPTION: LAW, POLICY AND PRACTICE, 7 Conn. Pub. Int. L.J. 157, 189+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2102 THY WILL NOT BE DONE: WHY STATES SHOULD AMEND THEIR PROBATE CODES TO ALLOW AN INTESTATE SHARE FOR UNMARRIED HOMOSEXUAL COUPLES, 7 Conn. Pub. Int. L.J. 289, 312+ (2008) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2103 THE CRIMINALIZATION OF PEACEMAKING, CORPORATE FREE SPEECH, AND THE VIOLENCE OF INTERPRETATION: NEW CHALLENGES TO CAUSE LAWYERING, 14 CUNY L. Rev. 289, 327 (2011) 2104 CAN YOU REALLY BE A GOOD ROLE MODEL TO YOUR CHILD IF YOU CAN'T BRAID HER HAIR? THE UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF FACTORING GENDER AND SEXUALITY INTO CUSTODY DETERMINATIONS, 14 CUNY L. Rev. 351, 392+ (2011) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2105 AN IRRATIONAL OVERSIGHT: APPLYING THE PLRA'S FEE RESTRICTIONS TO COLLATERAL PRISONER LITIGATION, 15 CUNY L. Rev. 53, 78+ (2011) 2106 IT BECAME NECESSARY TO DESTROY MARRIAGE IN ORDER TO DEFEND IT, 91 Denv. U. L. Rev. Online 35, 40+ (2013) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 2107 "DON'T ASK, DON'T TELL" - WHAT LIES AHEAD FOR GAYS IN THE MILITARY?, 21 DCBABR 16, 17+ (2009) 2108 CIVIL UNIONS IN ILLINOIS: A CAUTIOUS GAZE INTO A POSSIBLE FUTURE, 20 DCBABR 12, 20 (2007) 2109 NORTHERN'S EXPOSURE How One Overcomes Temptation: When Members of the Supreme Court Abandon Their Political Ideologies, 17 DCBABR 36, 38+ (2005) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.) 2110 CENSORSHIP IN THE VIDEO GAME INDUSTRY: GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION OR PARENTAL CONTROLS?, 2010 Den. U. Sports & Ent. L.J. 54, 72 (2010) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2111 THE ANALOGOUS CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION OF RACE AND SEXUAL PREFERENCE: RECOGNIZING THE SHARED VULNERABILITY, 6 DePaul J. for Soc. Just. 61, 65+ (2012) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2112 PRESERVING THE INTEGRITY OF THE COURT AGAINST MORAL DEFILEMENT: PEOPLE V. WRICE AND THE QUESTION OF WHETHER THE USE OF A PHYSICALLY COERCED CONFESSION CAN CONSTITUTE HARMLESS ERROR - LESSONS OF WISDOM FROM INTERNATIONALL, 5 DePaul J. for Soc. Just. 3, 29+ (2011) 2113 CLASSIFICATION OF HOMOSEXUALS UNDER THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE: FORWARD-LOOKING DISPARATE IMPACT TEST, 5 DePaul J. for Soc. Just. 71, 128+ (2011) 2114 RETHINKING HOMOPHOBIA IN SPORTS: LEGAL PROTECTIONS FOR GAY AND LESBIAN ATHLETES AND COACHES, 2 DePaul J. Sports L. & Contemp. Probs. 264, 281+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2115 LAW, SEXUALITY, AND TRANSNATIONAL PERSPECTIVES, 5 Drexel L. Rev. 479, 481+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2116 WE THE PEOPLE: THE CONSENT OF THE GOVERNED IN THE TWENTYFIRST CENTURY: THE PEOPLE'S UNALIENABLE RIGHT TO MAKE LAW, 4 Drexel L. Rev. 319, 397+ (2012) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2117 THE SUBSTANCE OF THE CONSTITUTION: ENGAGING WITH FOREIGN JUDGMENTS IN INDIA, SRI LANKA, AND SOUTH AFRICA, 2 Drexel L. Rev. 373, 425+ (2010) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2118 THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF TEACHER CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR HOME-SCHOOLING PARENTS: WHY THE ORIGINAL RACHEL L. DECISION WAS VALID, 2 Drexel L. Rev. 206, 226+ (2009) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2119 HOLLINGSWORTH v. PERRY: EXPRESSIVE HARM AND THE STAKES OF "MARRIAGE", 8 Duke J. Const. L. & Pub. Pol'y Sidebar 217, 226+ (2013) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 2120 PRUDENTIALISM IN MCDONALD v. CITY OF CHICAGO, 6 Duke J. Const. L. & Pub. Pol'y 16, 30 (2010) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 2121 GRAHAM v. FLORIDA: JUSTICE KENNEDY'S VISION OF CHILDHOOD © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. AND THE ROLE OF JUDGES, 6 Duke J. Const. L. & Pub. Pol'y 66, 80 (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2122 GENDERLESS MARRIAGE, INSTITUTIONAL REALITIES, AND JUDICIAL ELISION, 1 Duke J. Const. L. & Pub. Pol'y 1, 19+ (2006) 2123 IT'S A GAME THAT ANYONE CAN PLAY: ELECTION LAWS AROUND THE WORLD, 4 Election L.J. 57, 62 (2005) 2124 FRENCHIE HENDERSON, ET AL. v. RICK PERRY, ET AL., 4 Election L.J. 231, 255 (2005) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2125 LOOKING FOR STANDARDS (IN ALL THE WRONG PLACES): PARTISAN GERRYMANDERING CLAIMS AFTER VIETH, 3 Election L.J. 626, 642+ (2004) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2126 A POST-VIETH STRATEGY FOR LITIGATING PARTISAN GERRYMANDERING CLAIMS, 3 Election L.J. 643, 652+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2127 GAY LABELING AND DEFAMATION LAW: HAVE ATTITUDES TOWARD HOMOSEXUALITY CHANGED ENOUGH TO MODIFY REPUTATIONAL TORTS?, 18 CommLaw Conspectus 349, 362+ (2010) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2128 HOMOSEXUALITY AS DEFAMATION: A PROPOSAL FOR THE USE OF THE "RIGHT-THINKING MINDS" APPROACH IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF MODERN JURISPRUDENCE, 18 Comm. L. & Pol'y 349, 350+ (2013) 2129 FEDERALIZING OR ELIMINATING ONLINE OBSCENITY LAW AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO CONTEMPORARY COMMUNITY STANDARDS, 9 Comm. L. & Pol'y 25, 71+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2130 COHEN v. CALIFORNIA TURNS 40: F-- THE MIDLIFE CRISIS, 27-MAR Comm. Law. 5, 6+ (2011) 2131 REGULATING TV VIOLENCE: THE FCC'S NATIONAL RORSCHACH TEST, 22-FALL Comm. Law. 1, 30 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2132 GLOBALIZING U.S. EMPLOYMENT STATUTES THROUGH FOREIGN LAW INFLUENCE: MEXICO'S FOREIGN EMPLOYER PROVISION AND RECRUITED MEXICAN WORKERS, 29 Comp. Lab. L. & Pol'y J. 383, 425+ (2008) 2133 INTRODUCTION: ON THE JOURNAL'S MISSION IN THE NEXT QUARTER CENTURY, 25 Comp. Lab. L. & Pol'y J. 1, 4+ (2003) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2134 ONWARD AND UPWARD: THE NEXT TWENTY-FIVE YEARS OF COMPARATIVE LABOR LAW SCHOLARSHIP, 25 Comp. Lab. L. & Pol'y J. 183, 196 (2003) 2135 COSMIC CONSTITUTIONAL THEORY: WHY AMERICANS ARE LOSING THEIR INALIENABLE RIGHT TO SELF-GOVERNANCE BY J. HARVIE WILKINSON III, 14 Engage: J. Federalist Soc'y Prac. Groups 100, 103 (2013) 2136 DECODING THE CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGES TO TRADITIONAL MARRIAGE, 14 Engage: J. Federalist Soc'y Prac. Groups 4, 9+ (2013) 2137 PERRY v. SCHWARZENEGGER: IS TRADITIONAL MARRIAGE © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. UNCONSTITUTIONAL?, 12 Engage: J. Federalist Soc'y Prac. Groups 161, 164+ (2011) 2138 PERRY, SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, AND FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL GUARANTEES, 12 Engage: J. Federalist Soc'y Prac. Groups 166, 167+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2139 CATCH OR RELEASE? THE EMPLOYMENT NON-DISCRIMINATION ACT'S EXEMPTION FOR RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATIONS, 11 Engage: J. Federalist Soc'y Prac. Groups 4, 7 (2010) 2140 INCORPORATING GUN RIGHTS: A SECOND ROUND IN THE CHAMBER FOR THE SECOND AMENDMENT, 10 Engage: J. Federalist Soc'y Prac. Groups 10, 15 (2009) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2141 THE GROWING CLASH BETWEEN RELIGIOUS FREEDOM AND THE GAY MOVEMENT University of Wisconsin, March 9, 2009, 10 Engage: J. Federalist Soc'y Prac. Groups 7, 9 (2009) 2142 JUDGEMENT CALLS: PRINCIPLE AND POLITICS IN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW BY DANIEL A. FARBER & SUZANNA SHERRY, 10 Engage: J. Federalist Soc'y Prac. Groups 135, 136 (2009) 2143 THE SUPREME COURT'S 21áSTã CENTURY TRAJECTORY IN CRIMINAL CASES, 9 Engage: J. Federalist Soc'y Prac. Groups 44, 51 (2008) 2144 RESPECTING THE DEMOCRATIC PROCESS: THE ROBERTS COURT AND LIMITS ON FACIAL CHALLENGES, 9 Engage: J. Federalist Soc'y Prac. Groups 54, 57+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2145 INTERNATIONAL OR FOREIGN LAW AS AN INTERPRETIVE AID IN SUPREME COURT JURISPRUDENCE, 9 Engage: J. Federalist Soc'y Prac. Groups 79, 79+ (2008) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 2146 IS THERE ANYTHING "FUNDAMENTAL" IN THE RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS? A CALL FOR PARITY IN THE INCORPORATION DOCTRINE, 9 Engage: J. Federalist Soc'y Prac. Groups 22, 26+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2147 ORGANIZED LABOR'S INTERNATIONAL LAW PROJECT? TRANSFORMING WORKPLACE RIGHTS INTO HUMAN RIGHTS, 9 Engage: J. Federalist Soc'y Prac. Groups 98, 106+ (2008) 2148 THE "SOCIALLY ENDORSED, LEGALLY FRAMED, NORMATIVE TEMPLATE": WHAT HAS IN RE MARRIAGE CASES REALLY DONE FOR SAME-SEX MARRIAGE?, 1 Est. Plan. & Community Prop. L.J. 203, 210+ (2008) 2149 LEGAL ASPECTS OF SAME-SEX RELATIONSHIPS IN CONNECTICUT, 85 Conn. B.J. 199, 230 (2011) 2150 HUMAN DIGNITY AND JUDICIAL INTERPRETATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS, 19 Eur. J. Int'l L. 655, 700+ (2008) 2151 DEVELOPMENTS IN CONNECTICUT CRIMINAL LAW: 2007, 82 Conn. B.J. 173, 189+ (2008) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 2152 WHAT INTERNATIONAL LAW SHOULD (NOT) BECOME. A COMMENT ON KOSKENNIEMI, 16 Eur. J. Int'l L. 125, 130 (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2153 INTERNATIONAL LAW AND US COURTS: THE MYTH OF LOHENGRIN REVISITED, 15 Eur. J. Int'l L. 751, 774+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2154 FROM NEGLECT TO DEFIANCE? THE UNITED STATES AND INTERNATIONAL ADJUDICATION, 15 Eur. J. Int'l L. 783, 806+ (2004) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 2155 THE "VANISHING TRIAL": A HAYEKIAN PERSPECTIVE, 2 Faulkner L. Rev. 287, 309+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2156 PRIVACY AND THE RIGHT OF FREE EXPRESSION, 11 First Amend. L. Rev. 16, 89 (2012) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 2157 LEAVING THE DALE TO BE MORE FAIR: ON CLS v. MARTINEZ AND FIRST AMENDMENT JURISPRUDENCE, 11 First Amend. L. Rev. 235, 289+ (2012) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 2158 IMPLICATIONS OF LIBEL DOCTRINE FOR NONDEFAMATORY FALSEHOODS UNDER THE FIRST AMENDMENT, 10 First Amend. L. Rev. 465, 508+ (2012) 2159 REVISITING THE RIGHT TO OFFEND FORTY YEARS AFTER COHEN V. CALIFORNIA: ONE CASE'S LEGACY ON FIRST AMENDMENT JURISPRUDENCE, 10 First Amend. L. Rev. 1, 56+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2160 PROSECUTING OBSCENITY CASES: AN INTERVIEW WITH MARY BETH BUCHANAN, 9 First Amend. L. Rev. 56, 97+ (2010) 2161 HOW TO FIX THE SEXTING PROBLEM: AN ANALYSIS OF THE LEGAL AND POLICY CONSIDERATIONS FOR SEXTING LEGISLATION, 9 First Amend. L. Rev. 98, 148 (2010) 2162 FATHER HILL AND FANNY HILL: AN ACTIVIST GROUP'S CRUSADE TO REMAKE OBSCENITY LAW, 8 First Amend. L. Rev. 217, 282+ (2010) 2163 EXORCISING OUR FREE EXERCISE JURISPRUDENCE: A NEW INTERPRETATION OF FREE EXERCISE IN PLEASANT GLADE ASSEMBLY OF GOD V. SCHUBERT, 7 First Amend. L. Rev. 350, 372 (2009) 2164 AGAINST LEGISLATION: GARCETTI V. CEBALLOS AND THE PARADOX OF STATUTORY PROTECTION FOR PUBLIC EMPLOYEES, 7 First Amend. L. Rev. 22, 53 (2008) 2165 THE SUPREME COURT AS CIVIC EDUCATOR: FREE SPEECH ACCORDING TO JUSTICE KENNEDY, 6 First Amend. L. Rev. 252, 284+ (2008) 2166 PRESERVING JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE: JUDICIAL ELECTIONS AS THE ANTIDOTE TO JUDICIAL ACTIVISM, 6 First Amend. L. Rev. 180, 191 (2007) 2167 CLOSING THE ORWELLIAN LOOPHOLE: THE PRESENT CONSTITUTIONALITY OF BIG BROTHER AND THE POTENTIAL FOR A FIRST AMENDMENT CURE, 5 First Amend. L. Rev. 234, 304+ (2007) HN: © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2168 NEUROSCIENCE AND THE IN CORPORE-TED FIRST AMENDMENT, 4 First Amend. L. Rev. 181, 222 (2006) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 2169 THE IMPACT OF "ANTI-SHARIA" LEGISLATION ON ARBITRATION AND WHY JUDGE NIELSEN IN FLORIDA GOT IT RIGHT, 8 FIU L. Rev. 181, 204+ (2012) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 2170 NO MEANS NO, BUT SILENCE MEANS YES? THE POLICY AND CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE RECENT STATE PROPOSALS FOR OPTOUT ORGAN DONATION LAWS, 7 FIU L. Rev. 149, 186+ (2011) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 2171 A NEED FOR CULTURE CHANGE: GLBT LATINAS/OS AND IMMIGRATION, 6 FIU L. Rev. 269, 291+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2172 A MODEST EXPERIMENT IN PEDAGOGY: LESSONS ON COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 6 FIU L. Rev. 99, 122 (2010) 2173 GAY AND LESBIAN PARENTING IN FLORIDA: FAMILY CREATION AROUND THE LAW, 4 FIU L. Rev. 473, 513+ (2009) 2174 LIBERTY OVER DEATH: SEEKING DUE PROCESS DIMENSIONS FOR FREEDOM OF CONTRACT, 8 Fla. A & M U. L. Rev. 39, 52+ (2012) 2175 HOMOSEXUALITY AND DEATH: A LEGAL ANALYSIS OF UGANDA'S PROPOSED ANTI-HOMOSEXUALITY BILL, 6 Fla. A & M U. L. Rev. 135, 162 (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2176 PRIVACY, AUTHENTICITY & EQUALITY: THE MORAL AND LEGAL CASE FOR THE RIGHT TO HOMOSEXUAL MARRIAGE, 3 Fla. A & M U. L. Rev. 21, 40+ (2008) HN: 1,3,4 (S.Ct.) 2177 IN DEFENSE OF THE ROOSEVELT COURT, 2 Fla. A & M U. L. Rev. 1, 90+ (2007) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2178 IMMUNITY FROM THE FOCUSED ATTENTION OF OTHERS: A CONCEPTUAL AND NORMATIVE MODEL OF PERSONAL AND LEGAL PRIVACY, 2 Fla. A & M U. L. Rev. 131, 183 (2007) 2179 FAMILY, LIFE, AND LEGACY: PLANNING ISSUES FOR THE LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, AND TRANSGENDER COMMUNITIES, 12 Fla. Coastal L. Rev. 1, 13+ (2010) 2180 PUBLIC POLICY, SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, AND EXEMPTIONS FOR MATTERS OF CONSCIENCE, 12 Fla. Coastal L. Rev. 135, 161+ (2010) 2181 GAY AND LESBIAN ELDERS: ESTATE PLANNING AND END-OF-LIFE DECISION MAKING, 12 Fla. Coastal L. Rev. 163, 215 (2010) 2182 SAYING, WEARING, WATCHING, AND DOING: EQUAL FIRST AMENDMENT PROTECTION FOR COMING OUT, HAVING SEX, AND POSSESSING CHILD PORNOGRAPHY, 11 Fla. Coastal L. Rev. 341, 386+ (2010) 2183 THE KEYS TO THE KINGDOM: INTERPRETIVE POWER AND SOCIETAL © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. INFLUENCE DURING TWO AGES, 7 Fla. Coastal L. Rev. 697, 744+ (2006) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 2184 BAD ARGUMENTS AGAINST GAY MARRIAGE, 7 Fla. Coastal L. Rev. 181, 220+ (2005) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 2185 MARRIAGE AMENDMENTS AND THE READER IN BAD FAITH, 7 Fla. Coastal L. Rev. 233, 253 (2005) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 2186 ROMER REVISITED OR "THE DEVIL IN THE DETAILS:' IS GEORGIA'S MARRIAGE AMENDMENT CONSTITUTIONALLY DEFECTIVE?, 7 Fla. Coastal L. Rev. 255, 269+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2187 MARRIAGE AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO FREE SEX: THE STATE MARRIAGE AMENDMENTS AS RESPONSE, 7 Fla. Coastal L. Rev. 271, 338+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2188 STATE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS DEFINING MARRIAGE: ON PROTECTIONS, RESTRICTIONS, AND CREDIBILITY, 7 Fla. Coastal L. Rev. 365, 387+ (2005) 2189 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT UPDATE, 6 Fla. Coastal L. Rev. 217, 226+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2190 BENEFITS AND LIMITATIONS OF COMPUTER CONTENT ANALYSIS OF LEGAL DOCUMENTS, 65 Fla. L. Rev. F. 1, 3+ (2013) 2191 PRETENDERS TO THE THRONE: A FIRST AMENDMENT ANALYSIS OF THE PROPERTY STATUS OF ANIMALS, 18 Fordham Envtl L. Rev. 185, 230+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2192 A PREFACE TO WORLD GOVERNMENT: A COMPARISON OF THE CURRENT STATE OF INTERNATIONAL GOVERNANCE WITH THE STATE OF GOVERNANCE THAT FOLLOWED ADOPTION OF THE AMERICAN ARTICLES OF CONFEDERATION, 27 Conn. J. Int'l L. 1, 37 (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2193 BROWN AND ROPER: THE AMERICAN SOUTH AND THE SUPREME COURT, 27 Conn. J. Int'l L. 119, 164+ (2011) 2194 MARK JANIS AND THE AMERICAN TRADITION OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, 21 Conn. J. Int'l L. 191, 197 (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2195 AMERICAN HEGEMONY, U.S. POLITICAL LEADERS, AND GENERAL INTERNATIONAL LAW, 19 Conn. J. Int'l L. 293, 313 (2004) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2196 WHO DECIDES ON LIBERTY?, 44 Conn. L. Rev. 1511, 1544 (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2197 THE FUTURE OF GUN CONTROL LAWS POST-MCDONALD AND HELLER AND THE DEATH OF ONE-GUN-PER-MONTH LEGISLATION, 44 Conn. L. Rev. 1339, 1382 (2012) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2198 CRITICAL RACE MATERIALISM: THEORIZING JUSTICE IN THE WAKE OF GLOBAL NEOLIBERALISM, 43 Conn. L. Rev. 1513, 1572+ (2011) 2199 BURNING CROSSES ON CAMPUS: UNIVERSITY HATE SPEECH CODES, © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 43 Conn. L. Rev. 617, 672+ (2010) 2200 THE UNSETTLING "WELL-SETTLED" LAW OF FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION, 43 Conn. L. Rev. 149, 207+ (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2201 DEMOSPRUDENCE, INTERACTIVE FEDERALISM, AND TWENTY YEARS OF SHEFF V. O'NEILL, 42 Conn. L. Rev. 585, 609 (2009) 2202 PICKING FRIENDS FROM THE CROWD: AMICUS PARTICIPATION AS POLITICAL SYMBOLISM, 42 Conn. L. Rev. 185, 233 (2009) 2203 FROM SEPARATE TO EQUAL: LITIGATING MARRIAGE EQUALITY IN A CIVIL UNION STATE, 41 Conn. L. Rev. 1381, 1396+ (2009) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2204 MARRIAGE AS MONOPOLY: HISTORY, TRADITION, INCREMENTALISM, AND THE MARRIAGE/CIVIL UNION DISTINCTION, 41 Conn. L. Rev. 1397, 1424+ (2009) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 2205 NAME CALLING: IDENTIFYING STIGMA IN THE "CIVIL UNION"/"MARRIAGE" DISTINCTION, 41 Conn. L. Rev. 1425, 1494+ (2009) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2206 CHANGING THE IMMUTABLE, 41 Conn. L. Rev. 1495, 1522 (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2207 SEXUAL POLITICS AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 41 Conn. L. Rev. 1523, 1547+ (2009) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2208 PRINCIPLED GOVERNANCE: THE AMERICAN CREED AND CONGRESSIONAL AUTHORITY, 41 Conn. L. Rev. 679, 742 (2009) 2209 JUDICIAL POLICY MAKING AND THE PECULIAR FUNCTION OF THE LAW, 40 Conn. L. Rev. 1261, 1286 (2008) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 2210 ACCESS TO THE COURTS AS A PRIVILEGE OR IMMUNITY OF NATIONAL CITIZENSHIP, 40 Conn. L. Rev. 1477, 1530 (2008) 2211 BANNING SECOND-HAND SMOKE IN INDOOR PUBLIC PLACES UNDER THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT: A LEGAL AND PUBLIC HEALTH IMPERATIVE, 40 Conn. L. Rev. 409, 458+ (2007) 2212 CONCEPTUALIZING THE DANGERS OF THE "LEAST DANGEROUS" BRANCH: A TYPOLOGY OF JUDICIAL CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATION, 39 Conn. L. Rev. 1211, 1266+ (2007) 2213 NEVER GET OUT'A THE BOAT STENBERG V. CARHART AND THE FUTURE OF AMERICAN LAW, 39 Conn. L. Rev. 297, 323+ (2006) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 2214 DIALECTICAL REGULATION, 38 Conn. L. Rev. 863, 927+ (2006) 2215 A "PINK" HERRING: THE PROSPECT OF POLYGAMY FOLLOWING THE LEGALIZATION OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, 38 Conn. L. Rev. 1065, 1111+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2216 TRIBAL SELF-DETERMINATION AT THE CROSSROADS, 38 Conn. L. Rev. 777, 796 (2006) 2217 LIBERALISM AND REPUBLICANISM IN FEDERAL INDIAN LAW, 38 © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Conn. L. Rev. 813, 831 (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2218 A CASE AGAINST JUDICIAL INTERNATIONALISM, 38 Conn. L. Rev. 185, 185+ (2005) HN: 1,4,5 (S.Ct.) 2219 WHETHER TO ACCOMMODATE RELIGIOUS EXPRESSION THAT CONFLICTS WITH EMPLOYER ANTI-DISCRIMINATION AND DIVERSITY POLICIES DESIGNED TO SAFEGUARD HOMOSEXUAL RIGHTS: A MULTI-FACTOR APPROACH FOR THE COURTS, 38 Conn. L. Rev. 295, 305+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2220 QUASI-GLOBAL SOCIAL NORMS, 38 Conn. L. Rev. 79, 121+ (2005) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 2221 ON THE MIGRATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL IDEAS, 37 Conn. L. Rev. 907, 919+ (2005) 2222 AN OPEN DISCUSSION WITH JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG, 36 Conn. L. Rev. 1033, 1048 (2004) 2223 APPROACHING SAME-SEX MARRIAGE: HOW SECOND PARENT ADOPTION CASES CAN HELP COURTS ACHIEVE THE "BEST INTERESTS OF THE SAME-SEX FAMILY", 36 Conn. L. Rev. 1439, 1468+ (2004) HN: 3,5 (S.Ct.) 2224 AFTER GRUTTER THINGS GET INTERESTING! THE AMERICAN DEBATE OVER AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IS FINALLY READY FOR SOME FRESH IDEAS FROM ABROAD, 36 Conn. L. Rev. 665, 676+ (2004) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2225 THE FORGOTTEN EMPIRE: PRE-CIVIL WAR SOUTHERN IMPERIALISM, 36 Conn. L. Rev. 225, 273 (2003) 2226 JURISDICTIONAL RUSSIAN ROULETTE: THE INTERSECTION OF COMITY, FAMILY SECURITY, AND ACCESS TO SAME-SEX DIVORCE, 14 Geo. J. Gender & L. 133, 148+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2227 ABORTION, 14 Geo. J. Gender & L. 213, 243 (2013) 2228 ACCESS TO CONTRACEPTION, 14 Geo. J. Gender & L. 245, 279 (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2229 CONSTITUTIONALITY OF SEXUALLY ORIENTED SPEECH: OBSCENITY, INDECENCY, AND CHILD PORNOGRAPHY, 14 Geo. J. Gender & L. 319, 333+ (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2230 EQUAL PROTECTION, 14 Geo. J. Gender & L. 397, 399+ (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2231 LEGAL RECOGNITION OF SAME-SEX RELATIONSHIPS, 14 Geo. J. Gender & L. 517, 521+ (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2232 PROSTITUTION AND SEX WORK, 14 Geo. J. Gender & L. 553, 577+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2233 LGBT TAXPAYERS: A COLLISION OF "OTHERS", 13 Geo. J. Gender & L. 1, 45+ (2012) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 2234 ABORTION, 13 Geo. J. Gender & L. 109, 144 (2012) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2235 ACCESS TO CONTRACEPTION, 13 Geo. J. Gender & L. 145, 181 (2012) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2236 PROSTITUTION AND SEX WORK, 13 Geo. J. Gender & L. 333, 355+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2237 LEGAL RECOGNITION OF SAME-SEX RELATIONSHIPS, 13 Geo. J. Gender & L. 365, 371+ (2012) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2238 SEXUAL PRIVACY AFTER LAWRENCE v. TEXAS, 13 Geo. J. Gender & L. 487, 487+ (2012) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2239 SEXTING AND SLUT-SHAMING: WHY PROSECUTION OF TEEN SELFSEXTERS HARMS WOMEN, 13 Geo. J. Gender & L. 577, 587+ (2012) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2240 FUNDAMENTALLY RELIGIOUS OR FUNDAMENTALLY WRONG: A LEGAL EXAMINATION OF WHEN MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS MAY REFUSE TO DISTRIBUTE CONTRACEPTION, 12 Geo. J. Gender & L. 43, 50+ (2011) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 2241 EQUAL PROTECTION, 12 Geo. J. Gender & L. 281, 283+ (2011) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2242 SEXUAL PRIVACY AFTER LAWRENCE v. TEXAS, 12 Geo. J. Gender & L. 333, 333+ (2011) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2243 CHILD CUSTODY, VISITATION AND TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS, 12 Geo. J. Gender & L. 449, 450+ (2011) 2244 LEGAL RECOGNITION OF SAME-SEX RELATIONSHIPS, 12 Geo. J. Gender & L. 521, 527+ (2011) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2245 A DEFENSE OF NON-DEFENSE OF THE DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT, 12 Geo. J. Gender & L. 701, 706+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2246 LEGAL RECOGNITION OF SAME-SEX RELATIONSHIPS, 11 Geo. J. Gender & L. 1, 7+ (2010) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2247 PROSTITUTION AND SEX WORK, 11 Geo. J. Gender & L. 163, 183+ (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2248 ABORTION, 11 Geo. J. Gender & L. 341, 369 (2010) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2249 ACCESS TO CONTRACEPTION, 11 Geo. J. Gender & L. 371, 410 (2010) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2250 ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGIES, 11 Geo. J. Gender & L. 411, 431+ (2010) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2251 THE IRONY OF OUTLAWING AIDS: A HUMAN RIGHTS ARGUMENT AGAINST THE CRIMINALIZATION OF HIV TRANSMISSION, 11 Geo. J. Gender & L. 743, 771+ (2010) 2252 CLERKISH CONTROL OF RECENT SUPREME COURT OPINIONS?: A CASE STUDY OF JUSTICE KENNEDY'S OPINION IN GONZALES v. CARHART, 10 Geo. J. Gender & L. 63, 64+ (2009) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 2253 PUBLIC MORALITY AS A POLICE POWER AFTER LAWRENCE v. TEXAS AND GONZALES v. CARHART, 10 Geo. J. Gender & L. 165, 165+ (2009) HN: 2,5 (S.Ct.) 2254 EQUAL PROTECTION, 10 Geo. J. Gender & L. 227, 228+ (2009) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2255 SEXUAL PRIVACY AFTER LAWRENCE v. TEXAS, 10 Geo. J. Gender & L. 297, 297+ (2009) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2256 PROSTITUTION AND SEX WORK, 10 Geo. J. Gender & L. 433, 451+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2257 SEX EDUCATION IN SCHOOLS, 10 Geo. J. Gender & L. 533, 547+ (2009) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 2258 CHILD CUSTODY, VISITATION & TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS, 10 Geo. J. Gender & L. 713, 716+ (2009) 2259 LEGAL RECOGNITION OF SAME-SEX RELATIONSHIPS, 10 Geo. J. Gender & L. 751, 758+ (2009) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2260 ABORTION, 10 Geo. J. Gender & L. 827, 857 (2009) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2261 ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGIES, 10 Geo. J. Gender & L. 859, 879+ (2009) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2262 SEX ED IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS: DID YOUR TEACHERS GET IT RIGHT?, 10 Geo. J. Gender & L. 931, 949+ (2009) 2263 PRIVACY IN PUERTO RICO AND THE MADMAN'S PLIGHT: DECISIONS, 9 Geo. J. Gender & L. 1, 21+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2264 TRUE ENDORSEMENT: A CRITICAL RACE APPROACH TO BANS ON SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, 9 Geo. J. Gender & L. 237, 268 (2008) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2265 THE PERILS OF MARRIAGE AS TRANSCENDENT ONTOLOGY: NATIONAL PRIDE AT WORK v. GOVERNOR OF MICHIGAN, 9 Geo. J. Gender & L. 279, 320+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2266 AGAINST NEUTRALITY IN THE LEGAL RECOGNITION OF INTIMATE RELATIONSHIPS, 9 Geo. J. Gender & L. 321, 336 (2008) 2267 RIGHTS & WRONGS: MORALITY IN THE GAY MARRIAGE DEBATE, 9 Geo. J. Gender & L. 337, 338+ (2008) 2268 EQUAL PROTECTION, 9 Geo. J. Gender & L. 495, 496+ (2008) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2269 SEXUAL PRIVACY AFTER LAWRENCE v. TEXAS, 9 Geo. J. Gender & L. 561, 561+ (2008) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2270 PROSTITUTION AND SEX WORKERS, 9 Geo. J. Gender & L. 699, 706+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2271 SEX EDUCATION IN SCHOOLS, 9 Geo. J. Gender & L. 795, 811+ (2008) 2272 CHILD CUSTODY, VISITATION AND TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS, 9 Geo. J. Gender & L. 963, 966+ (2008) 2273 RECOGNITION OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, 9 Geo. J. Gender & L. 1031, © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 1038+ (2008) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2274 ABORTION, 9 Geo. J. Gender & L. 1097, 1123 (2008) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2275 ACCESS TO CONTRACEPTION, 9 Geo. J. Gender & L. 1125, 1151 (2008) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2276 ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGIES, 9 Geo. J. Gender & L. 1153, 1172+ (2008) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2277 EQUAL PROTECTION, 8 Geo. J. Gender & L. 145, 146+ (2007) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2278 SEXUAL PRIVACY AFTER LAWRENCE v. TEXAS, 8 Geo. J. Gender & L. 203, 203+ (2007) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2279 PROSTITUTION AND SEX WORKERS, 8 Geo. J. Gender & L. 355, 368+ (2007) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2280 SEX EDUCATION IN SCHOOLS, 8 Geo. J. Gender & L. 447, 463+ (2007) 2281 CHILD CUSTODY, VISITATION AND TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS, 8 Geo. J. Gender & L. 619, 622+ (2007) 2282 RECOGNITION OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, 8 Geo. J. Gender & L. 683, 690+ (2007) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2283 ABORTION, 8 Geo. J. Gender & L. 747, 774 (2007) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2284 ACCESS TO CONTRACEPTION, 8 Geo. J. Gender & L. 775, 805 (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2285 ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGIES, 8 Geo. J. Gender & L. 807, 824+ (2007) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2286 SEX WORK EXPLORED: RETHINKING THE LAWS REGULATING PROSTITUTION, 8 Geo. J. Gender & L. 995, 1000+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2287 INDECENCY, PORNOGRAPHY, AND THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN, 7 Geo. J. Gender & L. 701, 715+ (2006) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2288 SEXUAL PRIVACY AFTER LAWRENCE, 7 Geo. J. Gender & L. 723, 723+ (2006) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2289 PROSTITUTION, 7 Geo. J. Gender & L. 835, 843+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2290 SEX EDUCATION IN SCHOOLS, 7 Geo. J. Gender & L. 895, 905+ (2006) 2291 FEDERAL REGULATION OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, 7 Geo. J. Gender & L. 1055, 1065+ (2006) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2292 ABORTION, 7 Geo. J. Gender & L. 1099, 1128 (2006) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2293 ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGIES, 7 Geo. J. Gender & L. 1143, 1154+ (2006) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2294 HEALTH CARE COVERAGE: CONTRACEPTION AND VIAGRA, 7 Geo. J. Gender & L. 1185, 1186+ (2006) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 2295 EXECUTING HOMOSEXUALITY: REMOVING ANTI-GAY BIAS FROM CAPITAL TRIALS, 6 Geo. J. Gender & L. 71, 73+ (2005) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2296 UNMASKING THE FEDERAL MARRIAGE AMENDMENT: THE STATUS © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. OF SEXUALITY, 6 Geo. J. Gender & L. 105, 106+ (2005) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2297 CASE UPDATE: WILLIAMS v. MORGAN: THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT REVERSES WILLIAMS v. PRYOR, 6 Geo. J. Gender & L. 143, 144+ (2005) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2298 EQUAL PROTECTION, 6 Geo. J. Gender & L. 249, 250+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2299 THE FIRST AMENDMENT AND PERSONAL EXPRESSION OF SEXUALITY, 6 Geo. J. Gender & L. 359, 374+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2300 SEXUAL PRIVACY AFTER LAWRENCE: CO-HABITATION, SODOMY, AND ADULTERY, 6 Geo. J. Gender & L. 379, 380+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2301 CHILD CUSTODY AND VISITATION, 6 Geo. J. Gender & L. 691, 693+ (2005) 2302 SAME-SEX COUPLES: MARRIAGE, CIVIL UNIONS, AND DOMESTIC PARTNERSHIPS, 6 Geo. J. Gender & L. 731, 733+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2303 ACCESS TO CONTRACEPTION, 6 Geo. J. Gender & L. 785, 804 (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2304 PANEL TWO: CRITICALLY ADDRESSING DOMESTIC CIVIL RIGHTS, 5 Geo. J. Gender & L. 839, 855 (2004) 2305 EQUAL PROTECTION, 5 Geo. J. Gender & L. 17, 53+ (2004) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2306 THE FIRST AMENDMENT AND EXPRESSION OF SEXUAL ORIENTATION, 5 Geo. J. Gender & L. 109, 112+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2307 SODOMY, 5 Geo. J. Gender & L. 131, 131+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2308 CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES: PRISONERS' VISITATION RIGHTS, THE EFFECT OF OVERTON v. BAZETTA AND LAWRENCE v. TEXAS, 5 Geo. J. Gender & L. 167, 167+ (2004) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2309 PROSTITUTION AND THE LEGALIZATION/DECRIMINALIZATION DEBATE, 5 Geo. J. Gender & L. 207, 242 (2004) 2310 DISCUSSION AND EXPRESSION OF GENDER AND SEXUALITY IN SCHOOLS, 5 Geo. J. Gender & L. 329, 341 (2004) 2311 SAME-SEX MARRIAGE AND DOMESTIC PARTNERSHIPS, 5 Geo. J. Gender & L. 545, 546+ (2004) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 2312 CONTRACEPTION AND PRIVACY, 5 Geo. J. Gender & L. 643, 649+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2313 THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS AND THE RIGHT TO SEXUAL PRIVACY: A PROPOSAL FOR A MODIFIED RATIONAL BASIS REVIEW FOR DUE PROCESS RIGHTS, 5 Geo. J. Gender & L. 791, 793+ (2004) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2314 THE FUTURE OF FEDERALISM: A UNIFORM THEORY OF RIGHTS AND POWERS FOR THE NECESSARY AND PROPER CLAUSE, 11 Geo. J. L. & Pub. Pol'y 177, 219+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2315 NEUTRAL GROUNDS Revisiting the Current Legal Approaches in Frozen Embryo Disposition Disputes Through the Lens of Neutrality, 10 Geo. J. L. & Pub. Pol'y 619, 643 (2012) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 2316 BIG LOVE: PERRY v. SCHWARZENEGGER AND POLYGAMOUS MARRIAGE, 9 Geo. J. L. & Pub. Pol'y 393, 395+ (2011) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2317 THE JUST SOCIETY AND THE LIBERAL STATE: CLASSICAL AND CONTEMPORARY LIBERALISM AND THE PROBLEM OF CONSENT, 9 Geo. J. L. & Pub. Pol'y 1, 65+ (2011) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2318 NEITHER BY TREATY, NOR BY CUSTOM: THROUGH THE DOHA DECLARATION, THE WORLD REJECTS CLAIMED INTERNATIONAL RIGHTS TO ABORTION AND SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, AFFIRMING TRADITIONAL UNDERSTANDINGS OF HUMAN RIGHTS, 9 Geo. J. L. & Pub. Pol'y 67, 81+ (2011) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2319 RELIGION AND THE SWEET MYSTERIES OF LIFE: RELIGIOUS LIBERTY IN THE LAWRENCE DUE PROCESS FRAMEWORK, 9 Geo. J. L. & Pub. Pol'y 157, 158+ (2011) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2320 LESSONS FOR LAW SCHOOL DEANS REGARDING CATHOLICS IN POLITICAL LIFE, 8 Geo. J. L. & Pub. Pol'y 395, 432 (2010) 2321 KEEPING PANDORA'S BOX SEALED: PRIVILEGES OR IMMUNITIES, THE CONSTITUTION IN 2020, AND PROPERLY EXTENDING THE RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS TO THE STATES, 8 Geo. J. L. & Pub. Pol'y 1, 26+ (2010) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2322 THE PLACE OF "HIGHER LAW" IN THE QUOTIDIAN PRACTICE OF LAW HEREIN OF PRACTICAL REASON, NATURAL LAW, NATURAL RIGHTS, AND SEX TOYS, 7 Geo. J. L. & Pub. Pol'y 437, 442+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2323 LIBERTY OR DEATH: FEDERALISM, THE DEA, AND THE WAR ON THE SUFFERING, 6 Geo. J. L. & Pub. Pol'y 669, 692+ (2008) 2324 A PROCESS LONG OVERDUE: FINDING A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS, 6 Geo. J. L. & Pub. Pol'y 729, 752+ (2008) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 2325 BURKEAN MINIMALISM AND THE ROBERTS COURT'S DOCKET, 6 Geo. J. L. & Pub. Pol'y 753, 776+ (2008) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2326 ASCENDING THE SLIPPERY SLOPE: NEW ALABAMA LAW ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURES FAIL TO ADEQUATELY PROTECT SEXUAL ASSAULT VICTIMS' PRIVACY, 5 Geo. J. L. & Pub. Pol'y 785, 809 (2007) 2327 CONFORMING TO THE RULE OF LAW: WHEN PERSON AND HUMAN BEING FINALLY MEAN THE SAME THING IN FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT JURISPRUDENCE, 4 Geo. J. L. & Pub. Pol'y 361, 452+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2328 PERCEIVING THE "OTHER" ORIENTATION: A FOUNDATION ON WHICH TO BUILD, 4 Geo. J. L. & Pub. Pol'y 501, 516+ (2006) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2329 ONE TEST, TWO STANDARDS: THE ON-AND-OFF ROLE OF "PLAUSIBILITY" IN RATIONAL BASIS REVIEW, 4 Geo. J. L. & Pub. Pol'y 199, 212 (2006) 2330 ASSESSING AND RESPONDING TO SAME-SEX "MARRIAGE" IN LIGHT © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. OF NATURAL LAW, 3 Geo. J. L. & Pub. Pol'y 523, 539+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2331 DUE PROCESS IN STATUTORY DAMAGES, 3 Geo. J. L. & Pub. Pol'y 601, 638 (2005) 2332 "DIVIDED AMERICA" AND THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL TRADITION, 3 Geo. J. L. & Pub. Pol'y 1, 11 (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2333 ORIGINAL INTENT & THE TEN COMMANDMENTS: GIVING COHERENCY TO TEN COMMANDMENTS JURISPRUDENCE, 3 Geo. J. L. & Pub. Pol'y 257, 262+ (2005) 2334 HOW LAW CAN REINVIGORATE A ROBUST VISION OF MARRIAGE AND RIVAL ITS POST-MODERN COMPETITOR, 2 Geo. J. L. & Pub. Pol'y 449, 462+ (2004) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 2335 THE "WITHERING AWAY" OF MARRIAGE: SOME LESSONS FROM THE BOLSHEVIK FAMILY LAW REFORMS IN RUSSIA, 1917-1926, 2 Geo. J. L. & Pub. Pol'y 469, 502+ (2004) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 2336 THE CLASH OF RIVAL AND INCOMPATIBLE PHILOSOPHICAL TRADITIONS WITHIN CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION: ORIGINALISM AND THE ARISTOTELIAN TRADITION, 2 Geo. J. L. & Pub. Pol'y 523, 533+ (2004) 2337 GOOD GOVERNMENT AND THE HAPPINESS OF MANKIND: A CASE STUDY IN THE LIBERTARIAN/SOCIAL CONSERVATIVE DEBATE OVER MORALS LEGISLATION, 2 Geo. J. L. & Pub. Pol'y 635, 637+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2338 PROPOSALS FOR IMPLEMENTING THE TERRORISM INFORMATION AWARENESS SYSTEM, 2 Geo. J. L. & Pub. Pol'y 169, 200 (2004) 2339 THE TERM THE CONSTITUTION DIED, 2 Geo. J. L. & Pub. Pol'y 227, 236+ (2004) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2340 CONSTITUTIONAL REASONING AS LEGITIMACY OF CONSTITUTIONAL COMPARISON, 14 German L.J. 1463, 1491 (2013) 2341 REMARKS AT THE OPENING OF THE SYMPOSIUM CELEBRATING THE 10áTHã ANNIVERSARY OF THE GERMAN LAW JOURNAL - THE GERMAN LAW JOURNAL AS "LIVED" COMPARATIVE LAW, 10 German L.J. 1309, 1318 (2009) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 2342 TRANSNATIONALIZING PUBLIC LAW, 10 German L.J. 1337, 1339 (2009) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 2343 CONFERENCE REPORT-THE TRANSNATIONALIZATION OF LEGAL CULTURES, 10 German L.J. 1399, 1410+ (2009) 2344 LAW'S KNOWLEDGE AND LAW'S EFFECTIVENESS: REFLECTIONS FROM LEGAL SOCIOLOGY AND LEGAL THEORY, 10 German L.J. 417, 437 (2009) 2345 THE NETWORK OF NETWORKS: KARL-HEINZ LADEUR'S THEORY OF LAW AND GLOBALIZATION, 10 German L.J. 515, 536 (2009) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 2346 INTERNATIONAL LAW IN THE AMERICAN COURTS - THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT DECLINES TO ENFORCE THE I.C.J.'S AVENA JUDGMENT RELATING TO A U.S. OBLIGATION UNDER THE CONVENTION ON CONSULAR RELATIONS, 9 German L.J. 619, 637 (2008) 2347 ORDERED LIBERTY: RIGHTS, RESPONSIBILITIES, AND VIRTUES. JAMES E. FLEMING AND LINDA C. MCCLAIN. (FN3) CAMBRIDGE, MASS.: HARVARD UNIVERSITY PRESS. 2013. PP. 371. $49.95 (CLOTH), 28 Const. Comment. 383, 403+ (2013) 2348 ORDERED LIBERTY: RIGHTS, RESPONSIBILITIES, AND VIRTUES. JAMES E. FLEMING AND LINDA C. MCCLAIN. CAMBRIDGE, MASS.: HARVARD UNIVERSITY PRESS. 2013. PP. 371. $49.95 (CLOTH), 28 Const. Comment. 435, 438+ (2013) 2349 CONSTITUTIONAL ORIGINALISM: A DEBATE. LAWRENCE B. SOLUM AND ROBERT W. BENNETT. (FN2) ITHACA: CORNELL UNIVERSITY PRESS. 2011. PP. IX + 210. $29.95 (CLOTH), 28 Const. Comment. 539, 551+ (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2350 JUSTICE SCALIA AND THE ART OF RHETORIC, 28 Const. Comment. 287, 292 (2012) 2351 BACK TO THE FUTURE REHABILITATING LOCHNER: DEFENDING INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AGAINST PROGRESSIVE REFORM. BY DAVID BERNSTEIN. CHICAGO, UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO PRESS. 2011. PP. VIII, 194. $45.00 (CLOTH), 28 Const. Comment. 111, 138+ (2012) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 2352 OUR PERFECT, PERFECT CONSTITUTION, 27 Const. Comment. 531, 540+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2353 CONSTITUTIONAL HYPOCRISY, 27 Const. Comment. 557, 580 (2011) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2354 THE LIVING CONSTITUTION. BY DAVID A. STRAUSS. OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS. 2010. PP. XVIII + 150. $21.95 (CLOTH)., 27 Const. Comment. 621, 645 (2011) 2355 A REPUBLIC OF STATUTES: THE NEW AMERICAN CONSTITUTION. WILLIAM N. ESKRIDGE, JR. AND JOHN FEREJOHN. (FN2) NEW HAVEN: YALE UNIVERSITY PRESS. 2010. PP. VIII + 582. $85.00 (CLOTH)., 27 Const. Comment. 647, 657 (2011) 2356 AUTONOMY AND FREE SPEECH, 27 Const. Comment. 251, 282 (2011) 2357 FREE SPEECH AND POLITICAL LEGITIMACY: A RESPONSE TO ED BAKER, 27 Const. Comment. 361, 383+ (2011) 2358 IS AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW IN CRISIS?: ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN LAW SCHOOLS SECTION ON CONSTITUTIONAL LAW (JANUARY 2009), 25 Const. Comment. 425, 429 (2009) 2359 IS LAW? CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS AND EXISTENTIAL ANXIETY, 25 Const. Comment. 431, 459 (2009) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 2360 ORIGINALISM AS JUJITSU Retained by the People: The "Silent" Ninth Amendment and the Constitutional Rights Americans Don't Know They Have. By Daniel A. Farber. New York: Basic Books, 2007. Pp. xiv + 236. $26.95., 25 Const. Comment. 521, 543+ (2009) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2361 UMPIRES AT BAT: ON INTEGRATION AND LEGITIMATION, 24 Const. Comment. 701, 732 (2007) 2362 ABORTION AND ORIGINAL MEANING, 24 Const. Comment. 291, 352+ (2007) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2363 ORIGINAL MEANING AND CONSTITUTIONAL REDEMPTION, 24 Const. Comment. 427, 532 (2007) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 2364 MIDDLE GROUND? Same Sex Different States: When Same-Sex Marriages Cross State Lines. By Andrew Koppelman. Yale University Press. 2006. Pp. xviii + 204. Hardback $35.00, 24 Const. Comment. 265, 270+ (2007) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 2365 JUDICIAL ACTIVISM: AN EMPIRICAL EXAMINATION OF VOTING BEHAVIOR ON THE REHNQUIST NATURAL COURT, 24 Const. Comment. 43, 96 (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2366 FUNDAMENTALLY WRONG ABOUT FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS, 23 Const. Comment. 227, 239+ (2006) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2367 BROTHER, CAN YOU PARADIGM? Revolution by Judiciary: The Structure of American Constitutional Law. By Jed Rubenfeld. Cambridge, Harvard University Press. 2005. Pp. ix + 241. $39.95., 23 Const. Comment. 81, 120+ (2006) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 2368 THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF STATES EXTENDING PERSONHOOD TO THE UNBORN, 22 Const. Comment. 161, 179+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2369 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AS "NORMAL SCIENCE", 21 Const. Comment. 547, 590+ (2004) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 2370 THE DARK SIDE OF GRUTTER, 21 Const. Comment. 221, 250 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2371 INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW PERSPECTIVE ON GRUTTER AND GRATZ, 21 Const. Comment. 275, 284+ (2004) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2372 AFFIRMATIVE REFRACTION: GRUTTER V. BOLLINGER THROUGH THE LENS OF THE CASE OF THE SPELUNCEAN EXPLORERS, 21 Const. Comment. 63, 106+ (2004) 2373 PERILOUS TIMES: FREE SPEECH IN WARTIME FROM THE SEDITION ACT OF 1798 TO THE WAR ON TERRORISM. BY GEOFFREY R. STONE. NEW YORK. W.W. NORTON AND COMPANY. 2004. PP. 730 + XX. $ 35.00., 21 Const. Comment. 757, 770 (2004) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 2374 ENGLISH CONSTITUTIONALISM CIRCA 2005, OR, SOME FUNNY THINGS HAPPENED AFTER THE REVOLUTION Public Law. By Adam Tomkins. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2003. Pp. xx, 231. $24.95., 21 Const. Comment. 771, 802+ (2004) 2375 (SO) WHAT IF IT'S ALL JUST RHETORIC? For the Sake of Argument: © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Practical Reasoning, Character, and the Ethics of Belief. By Eugene Garver. Chicago, University of Chicago Press. 2004. 264 pp. $22.50., 21 Const. Comment. 861, 887+ (2004) 2376 THE DIMENSION OF THE SUPREME COURT, 20 Const. Comment. 557, 570 (2004) 2377 HOW MANY SPOUSES DOES THE CONSTITUTION ALLOW ONE TO HAVE? The Mormon Question: Polygamy and Constitutional Conflict in Nineteenth Century America. By Sarah Barringer Gordon. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. 200, 20 Const. Comment. 571, 609+ (2004) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2378 JUDICIAL SUPREMACY AND ITS DISCONTENTS, 20 Const. Comment. 405, 436 (2003) 2379 PICKING YOUR ROOMMATE AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO ASSOCIATE AFTER THE ROOMMATE.COM DECISION (2012) 2380 THE WORD COMMONS AND FOREIGN LAWS, 46 Cornell Int'l L.J. 219, 289 (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2381 "DEATH IS DIFFERENT" AND A REFUGEE'S RIGHT TO COUNSEL, 42 Cornell Int'l L.J. 361, 385 (2009) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2382 THE HORIZON OF RIGHTS: LESSONS FROM SOUTH AFRICA FOR THE POST-GOODRIDGE ANALYSIS OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, 40 Cornell Int'l L.J. 781, 804+ (2007) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2383 COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVES ON THE OFFICE OF CHIEF JUSTICE, 38 Cornell Int'l L.J. 219, 236+ (2005) 2384 WHEN SCHOOLS REFUSE TO "SAY GAY": THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF ANTI-LGBTQ "NO-PROMO-HOMO" PUBLIC SCHOOL POLICIES IN THE UNITED STATES, 22 Cornell J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 465, 483+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2385 UNGATING SUBURBIA: PROPERTY RIGHTS, POLITICAL PARTICIPATION, AND COMMON INTEREST COMMUNITIES, 22 Cornell J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 205, 235+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2386 THE TSUNAMI OF LEGAL UNCERTAINTY: WHAT'S A COURT TO DO POST-MCDONALD?, 21 Cornell J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 489, 524+ (2012) 2387 TEN YEARS AFTER HOFFMAN PLASTIC COMPOUNDS, INC. V. NLRB: THE POWER OF A LABOR LAW SYMBOL, 21 Cornell J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 659, 675+ (2012) 2388 REFRACTORY PAIN, EXISTENTIAL SUFFERING, AND PALLIATIVE CARE: RELEASING AN UNBEARABLE LIGHTNESS OF BEING, 20 Cornell J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 469, 532+ (2011) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2389 HORMONE THERAPY FOR INMATES: A METONYM FOR TRANSGENDER RIGHTS, 20 Cornell J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 807, 832+ (2011) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2390 SHARING GOVERNANCE: FAMILY LAW IN CONGRESS AND THE © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. STATES, 18 Cornell J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 267, 335 (2009) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2391 IS THE RIGHT TO VOTE REALLY FUNDAMENTAL?, 18 Cornell J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 143, 201 (2008) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2392 COLOR ME COLORBLIND: DEFERENCE, DISCRETION, AND VOICE IN HIGHER EDUCATION AFTER GRUTTER, 17 Cornell J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 515, 577+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2393 EVERYTHING LAWYERS KNOW ABOUT POLYGAMY IS WRONG, 16 Cornell J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 101, 185+ (2006) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 2394 BARGAINING OR BIOLOGY? THE HISTORY AND FUTURE OF PATERNITY LAW AND PARENTAL STATUS, 14 Cornell J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 1, 69+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2395 THE SUPREME COURT'S FAMILY LAW DOCTRINE REVISITED: INSIGHTS FROM SOCIAL SCIENCE ON FAMILY STRUCTURES AND KINSHIP CHANGE IN THE UNITED STATES, 13 Cornell J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 431, 501+ (2004) HN: 1,2,3 (S.Ct.) 2396 HABEAS CORPUS AND DUE PROCESS, 98 Cornell L. Rev. 47, 126 (2012) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2397 INSEVERABILITY, RELIGIOUS EXEMPTIONS, AND NEW YORK'S SAMESEX MARRIAGE LAW, 98 Cornell L. Rev. 181, 208+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2398 JUDGING SEX, 97 Cornell L. Rev. 1461, 1504+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2399 SELF-GOVERNMENT AND THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE, 97 Cornell L. Rev. 693, 751 (2012) 2400 THE AGE OF CONSENT: WHEN IS SEXTING NO LONGER "SPEECH INTEGRAL TO CRIMINAL CONDUCT"?, 97 Cornell L. Rev. 369, 404+ (2012) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2401 DOUBLE JEOPARDY AS A LIMIT ON PUNISHMENT, 97 Cornell L. Rev. 45, 86 (2011) 2402 LIBERATING COPYRIGHT: THINKING BEYOND FREE SPEECH, 95 Cornell L. Rev. 463, 534+ (2010) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 2403 JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE IN EXCESS: REVIVING THE JUDICIAL DUTY OF THE SUPREME COURT, 94 Cornell L. Rev. 587, 636 (2009) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2404 STATE COURTS UNBOUND, 93 Cornell L. Rev. 501, 554 (2008) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 2405 "RESPECTFUL CONSIDERATION" AFTER SANCHEZ-LLAMAS V. OREGON: WHY THE SUPREME COURT OWES MORE TO THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE, 93 Cornell L. Rev. 243, 273 (2007) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2406 DEATH ROW FOR CHILD RAPE? CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT UNDER THE ROPER-ATKINS "EVOLVING STANDARDS OF DECENCY" FRAMEWORK, 92 Cornell L. Rev. 129, 155+ (2006) 2407 GIARRATANO IS A SCARECROW: THE RIGHT TO COUNSEL IN STATE © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. CAPITAL POSTCONVICTION PROCEEDINGS, 91 Cornell L. Rev. 1079, 1103+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2408 WORLD HABEAS CORPUS, 91 Cornell L. Rev. 303, 367 (2006) 2409 LEVIATHAN: THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC AND THE CHALLENGE TO FREEDOM, 90 Cornell L. Rev. 1639, 1651 (2005) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2410 SPEECH AS CONDUCT: GENERALLY APPLICABLE LAWS, ILLEGAL COURSES OF CONDUCT, "SITUATION-ALTERING UTTERANCES," AND THE UNCHARTED ZONES, 90 Cornell L. Rev. 1277, 1348 (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2411 A RIGHT WITH NO REMEDY: FORCED DISCLOSURE OF SEXUAL ORIENTATION AND PUBLIC "OUTING" UNDER 42 U.S.C. S 1983, 90 Cornell L. Rev. 811, 838+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2412 (Pcite, 90 Cornell L. Rev. 839) LAMENTING LOCHNER'S LOSS: RANDY BARNETT'S CASE FOR A LIBERTARIAN CONSTITUTION Restoring the Lost Constitution. By Randy E. Barnett. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004. Pp. 357. $, 90 Cornell L. Rev. 839, 872+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2413 WHY YOU SHOULD READ MY BOOK ANYHOW: A REPLY TO TREVOR MORRISON, 90 Cornell L. Rev. 873, 891+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2414 STANDING FOR NOTHING: THE PARADOX OF DEMANDING CONCRETE CONTEXT FOR FORMALIST ADJUDICATION, 89 Cornell L. Rev. 808, 891 (2004) 2415 THE NEW FEDERALISM, THE SPENDING POWER, AND FEDERAL CRIMINAL LAW, 89 Cornell L. Rev. 1, 94 (2003) 2416 THE SEARCH INCIDENT TO ARREST EXCEPTION PLAYS CATCH UP: WHY POLICE MAY NO LONGER SEARCH CELL PHONES INCIDENT TO ARREST WITHOUT A WARRANT, 43 Creighton L. Rev. 1157, 1220+ (2010) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 2417 THE NEW RELIGION, 40 Creighton L. Rev. 399, 417+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2418 WILL THE REAL CONSTITUTIONAL ORIGINALIST PLEASE STAND UP?, 40 Creighton L. Rev. 595, 650+ (2007) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2419 JONES V. FLOWERS: AN ESSAY ON A UNIFIED THEORY OF PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS, 40 Creighton L. Rev. 343, 352 (2007) 2420 ELECTING FEDERAL JUDGES AND JUSTICES: SHOULD THE SUPRALEGISLATORS BE ACCOUNTABLE TO THE VOTERS?, 39 Creighton L. Rev. 695, 739+ (2006) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2421 REVISITING STATE MARRIAGE RECOGNITION PROVISIONS, 38 Creighton L. Rev. 233, 269+ (2005) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 2422 OUR UNWRITTEN CONSTITUTION AND PROPOSALS FOR A SAME-SEX MARRIAGE AMENDMENT, 38 Creighton L. Rev. 271, 288 (2005) 2423 A STANDARD FORM APPROACH TO SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, 38 Creighton L. Rev. 309, 335+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 2424 "DEFENDING" MARRIAGE IN LIGHT OF THE MORENOCLEBURNE-ROMER-LAWRENCE JURISPRUDENCE: WHY DOMA CANNOT PASS MUSTER AFTER LAWRENCE, 38 Creighton L. Rev. 421, 447+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2425 EXAMINING A STRAND OF THE PUBLIC POLICY EXCEPTION WITH CONSTITUTIONAL UNDERPINNINGS: HOW THE "FOREIGN MARRIAGE RECOGNITION EXCEPTION" AFFECTS THE INTERJURISDICTIONAL RECOGNITION OF SAME-SEX "MARRIAGE", 38 Creighton L. Rev. 449, 464+ (2005) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2426 WRITING ON, AROUND, AND THROUGH LAWRENCE V. TEXAS, 38 Creighton L. Rev. 493, 506+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2427 THE RETREAT FROM DOMA: THE PUBLIC POLICY OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGE AND A THEORY OF CONGRESSIONAL POWER UNDER THE FULL FAITH AND CREDIT CLAUSE, 38 Creighton L. Rev. 507, 532+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2428 LARRY KRAMER, SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, AND THE POLITICS OF LEGAL SCHOLARSHIP, 38 Creighton L. Rev. 533, 543+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2429 THE ANTIPATERNALISM PRINCIPLE IN THE FIRST AMENDMENT, 37 Creighton L. Rev. 579, 651+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2430 THE RIGHT DECISION FOR THE WRONG REASON: THE SUPREME COURT CORRECTLY INVALIDATES THE TEXAS HOMOSEXUAL SODOMY STATUTE, BUT RATHER THAN FINDING AN EQUAL PROTECTION VIOLATION IN LAWRENCE V. TEXAS, THE COURT INCORRECTLY AND, 37 Creighton L. Rev. 653, 707+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2431 RESURRECTING LAWRENCE v. TEXAS AS A BASIS FOR CHALLENGING CRIMINAL PROSECUTIONS, 25-SUM Crim. Just. 30, 30+ (2010) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2432 IMPLEMENTATION OF "DON'T ASK, DON'T TELL" REPEAL, 5 Alb. Gov't L. Rev. 407, 421 (2012) 2433 A RIGHT TO A WORD? THE INTERPLAY OF EQUAL PROTECTION AND FREEDOM OF THOUGHT IN THE MOVE TO GENDER-BLIND MARRIAGE, 5 Alb. Gov't L. Rev. 552, 612+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2434 DOMA, THE CONSTITUTION, AND THE PROMOTION OF GOOD PUBLIC POLICY, 5 Alb. Gov't L. Rev. 613, 633+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2435 AN ORAL HISTORY OF THE MARRIAGE EQUALITY ACT IN NEW YORK, 5 Alb. Gov't L. Rev. 651, 684 (2012) 2436 THE FATE OF THE MARITAL UNION: IS DOMA APPROACHING ITS LAST DAY?, 4 Alb. Gov't L. Rev. 834, 842+ (2011) 2437 B-I-N-G-O - NOT YOUR GRANDMOTHER'S CHURCH HALL SOCIAL: A LOOK AT THE EVOLUTION OF BINGO AND WHY ALABAMA SHOULD © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. GET IN ON THE GAME, 41 Cumb. L. Rev. 79, 115+ (2011) 2438 UNDERSTANDING FETAL PAIN: HOW CHANGED CIRCUMSTANCES DEMAND A LEGAL RESPONSE, 40 Cumb. L. Rev. 463, 497+ (2010) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2439 SEPARATE AND OBEDIENT: THE JUDICIAL QUALIFICATION MISSING FROM THE JOB DESCRIPTION, 38 Cumb. L. Rev. 1, 31+ (2008) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2440 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT: SURVEY OF RECENT DECISIONS, 38 Cumb. L. Rev. 405, 421+ (2008) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2441 CONSTITUTIONAL LEGITIMACY AND THE CULTURE WARS: RULE OF LAW OR DICTATORSHIP OF A SHIFTING SUPREME COURT MAJORITY?, 36 Cumb. L. Rev. 245, 292+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2442 LANDMARK DECISION OR LIMITED PRECEDENT: DOES LAWRENCE V. TEXAS REQUIRE RECOGNITION OF A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO SAME-SEX MARRIAGE?, 35 Cumb. L. Rev. 147, 176+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2443 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT: SURVEY OF RECENT DECISIONS, 35 Cumb. L. Rev. 727, 739+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2444 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-RIGHT OF PRIVACY-STATUTE CRIMINALIZING HOMOSEXUAL CONDUCT VIOLATES DUE PROCESS CLAUSE OF FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT., 34 Cumb. L. Rev. 171, 183+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2445 THE SUPREME COURT, TRIBAL LAND CLAIMS, AND THE DOCTRINE OF DISCOVERY; TRAMPLING ON THE WALKING PURCHASE, 65 Guild Prac. 104, 116 (2008) 2446 MAKING WOMEN HOMELESS AND KEEPING THEM HOMELESS DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, FLAWED INTERPRETATIONS OF 42 U.S.C. S1437D(L)(6), SEXUAL HARASSMENT IN PUBLIC HOUSING, AND MUNICIPAL VIOLATIONS OF THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT, 65 Guild Prac. 77, 85+ (2008) 2447 CHANGING THE VOCABULARY FOR LIBERATION, 61 Guild Prac. 34, 38 (2004) 2448 BOOK REVIEW: MEN IN BLACK, 73 Def. Couns. J. 82, 87+ (2006) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2449 PARENTAGE AND CHILD SUPPORT Interstate Litigation and Same-Sex Parents, 24-SPG Del. Law. 26, 30 (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2450 GOD V. GAYS? THE RIGHTS OF SEXUAL MINORITIES IN INTERNATIONAL LAW AS SEEN THROUGH THE DOOMED EXISTENCE OF THE BRAZILIAN RESOLUTION, 38 Denv. J. Int'l L. & Pol'y 659, 685+ (2010) 2451 "LIKE SNOW (FALLING) ON A BRANCH . . .": INTERNATIONAL LAW INFLUENCES ON DEATH PENALTY DECISIONS AND DEBATES IN THE © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. UNITED STATES, 38 Denv. J. Int'l L. & Pol'y 115, 160+ (2009) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2452 INTERNATIONAL LAW FROM THE TRIAL JUDGE'S VANTAGE POINT, 35 Denv. J. Int'l L. & Pol'y 379, 387+ (2007) 2453 MAKING "REGIME CHANGE" MULTILATERAL: THE WAR ON TERROR AND TRANSITIONS TO DEMOCRACY, 32 Denv. J. Int'l L. & Pol'y 389, 420 (2004) 2454 WORK WIVES, 36 Harv. J. L. & Gender 345, 404+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2455 ABORTING DIGNITY: THE ABORTION DOCTRINE AFTER GONZALES V. CARHART, 36 Harv. J. L. & Gender 123, 131+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2456 TRANSGENDERLESS, 35 Harv. J. L. & Gender 399, 422+ (2012) 2457 GIVE JUSTICE GINSBURG WHAT SHE WANTS: USING SEX EQUALITY ARGUMENTS TO DEMAND EXAMINATION OF THE LEGITIMACY OF STATE INTERESTS IN ABORTION REGULATION, 34 Harv. J. L. & Gender 377, 412 (2011) 2458 PRIVACY RIGHTS AND PUBLIC FAMILIES, 34 Harv. J. L. & Gender 113, 174+ (2011) 2459 SKEPTICAL MARRIAGE EQUALITY, 34 Harv. J. L. & Gender 37, 80+ (2011) 2460 THE BURDENS OF MANLINESS, 33 Harv. J. L. & Gender 477, 507+ (2010) 2461 THE DEEPENING DARKNESS: PATRIARCHY, RESISTANCE, & DEMOCRACY'S FUTURE. BY CAROL GILLIGAN & DAVID A.J. RICHARDS. NEW YORK, N.Y.: CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS. 2009. PP. 339. $29.99 (CLOTH)., 32 Harv. J. L. & Gender 505, 533 (2009) 2462 LGBT ELDER LAW: TOWARD EQUITY IN AGING, 32 Harv. J. L. & Gender 1, 58+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2463 ACCIDENTAL INCEST: DRAWING THE LINE - OR THE CURTAIN? - FOR REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY, 32 Harv. J. L. & Gender 59, 107+ (2009) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 2464 SEXUAL ORIENTATION & GENDER IDENTITY: AMERICAN LAW IN LIGHT OF EAST ASIAN DEVELOPMENTS, 31 Harv. J. L. & Gender 67, 100+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2465 A PENUMBRA OVERLOOKED: THE FREE EXERCISE CLAUSE AND LAWRENCE v. TEXAS, 30 Harv. J. L. & Gender 203, 203+ (2007) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2466 MARRIAGE AND THE ELEPHANT: THE LIBERAL DEMOCRATIC STATE'S REGULATION OF INTIMATE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN ADULTS, 30 Harv. J. L. & Gender 25, 66+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2467 DISABILITY, LIFE, DEATH, AND CHOICE, 29 Harv. J. L. & Gender 425, 454+ (2006) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2468 DESPERATELY SEEKING A MORALIST, 29 Harv. J. L. & Gender 1, 48+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2469 TITLE IX: BEYOND EQUAL PROTECTION, 28 Harv. J. L. & Gender 217, 283 © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. (2005) 2470 EYES WIDE SHUT: ERASING WOMEN'S EXPERIENCES FROM THE CLINIC TO THE COURTROOM, 28 Harv. J. L. & Gender 285, 303+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2471 THIS IS NOT YOUR FATHER'S AUTONOMY: LESBIAN AND GAY RIGHTS FROM A FEMINIST AND RELATIONAL PERSPECTIVE, 28 Harv. J. L. & Gender 345, 379+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2472 THE FRENCH REVOLUTION 2.0: COPYRIGHT AND THE THREE STRIKES POLICY, 2 Harv. J. Sports & Ent. L. 297, 339 (2011) 2473 LETHAL DISCRIMINATION 2: REPAIRING THE REMEDIES FOR RACIAL DISCRIMINATION IN CAPITAL SENTENCING, 26 Harv. J. Racial & Ethnic Just. 113, 162 (2010) 2474 LOCHNER FOR THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH: THE TORTURE MEMO AS ANTICANON, 7 Harv. L. & Pol'y Rev. 199, 217 (2013) 2475 LOVE AND WAR: AN ARGUMENT FOR EXTENDING DEPENDENT BENEFITS TO SAME-SEX PARTNERS OF MILITARY SERVICE MEMBERS, 6 Harv. L. & Pol'y Rev. 459, 472 (2012) 2476 HELLER HIGH WATER? THE FUTURE OF ORIGINALISM, 3 Harv. L. & Pol'y Rev. 325, 345 (2009) 2477 NOT OLD OR BORROWED: THE TRULY NEW BLUE FEDERALISM, 3 Harv. L. & Pol'y Rev. 33, 45+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2478 N.O. SCHOOLS OR NO SCHOOLS? ABSOLUTE DEPRIVATION OF EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY IN POST-KATRINA NEW ORLEANS AS A VIOLATION OF A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO A MINIMALLY ADEQUATE EDUCATION, 2 Harv. L. & Pol'y Rev. 407, 417+ (2008) 2479 EQUALITY IN THE GARDEN STATE: LITIGATION AND SOCIAL ACTIVISM IN THE STRUGGLE FOR MARRIAGE EQUALITY, 2 Harv. L. & Pol'y Rev. 419, 428+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2480 "HISTORY WILL BE HEARD": AN APPRAISAL OF THE SEATTLE/ LOUISVILLE DECISION, 2 Harv. L. & Pol'y Rev. 53, 71+ (2008) 2481 DOES FEDERAL EXECUTIVE BRANCH EXPERIENCE EXPLAIN WHY SOME REPUBLICAN SUPREME COURT JUSTICES "EVOLVE" AND OTHERS DON'T?, 1 Harv. L. & Pol'y Rev. 457, 476+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2482 SUCCESS CHANGES NOTHING: THE 2006 ELECTION RESULTS AND THE UNDIMINISHED NEED FOR A PROGRESSIVE RESPONSE TO POLITICAL GERRYMANDERING, 1 Harv. L. & Pol'y Rev. 75, 95 (2007) 2483 LESSONS FROM THE RIGHT: PROGRESSIVE CONSTITUTIONALISM FOR THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY, 1 Harv. L. & Pol'y Rev. 239, 258 (2007) 2484 HOLLOW HOPES AND EXAGGERATED FEARS: THE CANON/ ANTICANON IN CONTEXT, 125 Harv. L. Rev. F. 33, 39 (2011) 2485 RESPONSE, 121 Harv. L. Rev. F. 31, 42 (2008) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 2486 UNENUMERATED RIGHTS AND THE LIMITS OF ANALOGY: A CRITIQUE OF THE RIGHT TO MEDICAL SELF-DEFENSE, 121 Harv. L. Rev. F. 1, 12+ (2007) 2487 ASPIRATION AND UNDERENFORCEMENT, 119 Harv. L. Rev. F. 193, 193 (2006) 2488 DEMOCRACY AND REVOLUTION: AN ENDURING RELATIONSHIP?, 89 Denv. U. L. Rev. 593, 610 (2012) 2489 CONSTITUTIONAL PRAGMATISM, THE SUPREME COURT, AND DEMOCRATIC REVOLUTION, 89 Denv. U. L. Rev. 635, 650+ (2012) 2490 MIXED MESSAGES, MUDDLED MEANINGS, DRUNK DICKS, AND BOOBIES BRACELETS: SEXUALLY SUGGESTIVE STUDENT SPEECH AND THE NEED TO OVERRULE OR RADICALLY REFASHION FRASER, 90 Denv. U. L. Rev. 131, 173+ (2012) 2491 AWAD v. ZIRIAX: THE TENTH CIRCUIT'S DEFENSE AGAINST THE POWER OF RELIGIOUS MAJORITY FACTIONS, 90 Denv. U. L. Rev. 801, 818+ (2012) 2492 THE MCREYNOLDS MYSTERY SOLVED, 89 Denv. U. L. Rev. 133, 160+ (2011) 2493 THE RIGHT OF PRIVACY AND AMERICA'S AGING POPULATION, 86 Denv. U. L. Rev. 439, 456+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2494 AGAINST THE RIGHT TO BODILY INTEGRITY: OF CYBORGS AND HUMAN RIGHTS, 87 Denv. U. L. Rev. 1, 57 (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2495 FINSTUEN v. CRUTCHER: THE TENTH CIRCUIT DELIVERS A SIGNIFICANT VICTORY FOR SAME-SEX PARENTS WITH ADOPTED CHILDREN, 85 Denv. U. L. Rev. 685, 700 (2008) 2496 THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO PRIVACY, 84 Denv. U. L. Rev. 601, 644+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2497 THE SECURITY OF OUR SECRETS: A HISTORY OF PRIVACY AND CONFIDENTIALITY IN LAW AND STATISTICAL PRACTICE, 83 Denv. U. L. Rev. 147, 207 (2005) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 2498 ROPER v. SIMMONS AND INTERNATIONAL LAW, 83 Denv. U. L. Rev. 209, 225+ (2005) 2499 GOODRIDGE V. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH: THE WRONG STEP AT THE WRONG TIME FOR SAME-SEX MARRIAGES, 82 Denv. U. L. Rev. 109, 109+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2500 BEYOND LANE: WHO IS PROTECTED BY THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT, WHO SHOULD BE?, 82 Denv. U. L. Rev. 25, 56+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2501 STEPPING OUT OF THE COMPETING CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS CONUNDRUM: A COMPARATIVE HARM ANALYSIS, 82 Denv. U. L. Rev. 359, 360+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 2502 FREE EXERCISE: NEUTRALITY, ANIMUS AND A BREATH OF LIFE INTO SUBSTANTIAL BURDEN, 82 Denv. U. L. Rev. 401, 425 (2004) 2503 IN SEARCH OF TRADITION: GOODRIDGE V. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 82 Denv. U. L. Rev. 79, 79+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2504 THE CASE FOR CONSTITUTIONAL EVOLUTION: REBUTTING CONSERVATIVE COMPLAINTS OF JUDICIAL ACTIVISM IN "THE IMPERIAL JUDICIARY: WHY THE RIGHT IS WRONG ABOUT THE COURTS", 81 Denv. U. L. Rev. 191, 191+ (2003) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2505 BILL BEANEY'S CONTINUING RELEVANCE, 81 Denv. U. L. Rev. 217, 223+ (2003) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2506 WORKERS' COMPENSATION AND VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION BENEFITS FOR UNDOCUMENTED WORKERS: RECONCILING THE PURPORTED CONFLICTS BETWEEN STATE LAW, FEDERAL IMMIGRATION LAW, AND EQUAL PROTECTION TO PREVENT THE CREATION OF A DIS, 81 Denv. U. L. Rev. 347, 413+ (2003) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2507 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE NOT DEFENDING THE DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT: POLITICALLY SIGNIFICANT, LEGALLY IRRELEVANT?, 62 DePaul L. Rev. 857, 879+ (2013) 2508 BE FRUITFUL AND MULTIPLY, BY OTHER MEANS, IF NECESSARY: THE TIME HAS COME TO RECOGNIZE AND ENFORCE GESTATIONAL SURROGACY AGREEMENTS, 61 DePaul L. Rev. 799, 847+ (2012) 2509 WHEN YES MEANS NO, LEGALLY: AN EIGHTH AMENDMENT CHALLENGE TO CLASSIFYING CONSENTING TEENAGERS AS SEX OFFENDERS, 60 DePaul L. Rev. 1169, 1227+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2510 JUSTICE JOHN PAUL STEVENS: STAUNCH DEFENDER OF MIRANDA RIGHTS, 60 DePaul L. Rev. 99, 140+ (2010) 2511 INTERRING THE RHETORIC OF JUDICIAL ACTIVISM, 59 DePaul L. Rev. 555, 599+ (2010) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2512 TAINTED LOVE: WHAT THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT GOT WRONG IN MUTH V. FRANK, 56 DePaul L. Rev. 1065, 1099+ (2007) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2513 PYRRHIC VICTORY: SMITH V. CITY OF SALEM AND THE TITLE VII RIGHTS OF TRANSSEXUALS, 56 DePaul L. Rev. 1101, 1130 (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2514 SCHRIRO V. SUMMERLIN: A FATAL ACCIDENT OF TIMING, 54 DePaul L. Rev. 1325, 1369+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2515 IDENTIFYING PRIVACY: AN INTRODUCTION, 54 DePaul L. Rev. 657, 670 (2005) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 2516 CONSENT, AESTHETICS, AND THE BOUNDARIES OF SEXUAL PRIVACY AFTER LAWRENCE V. TEXAS, 54 DePaul L. Rev. 671, 700+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2517 PRIVACY AND THE DEBATE OVER SAME-SEX MARRIAGE VERSUS UNIONS, 54 DePaul L. Rev. 783, 804+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 2518 PULLING THE FIG LEAF OFF THE RIGHT OF PRIVACY: SEX AND THE CONSTITUTION, 54 DePaul L. Rev. 909, 969+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2519 DEATH DENIES DUE PROCESS: EVALUATING DUE PROCESS CHALLENGES TO THE FEDERAL DEATH PENALTY ACT, 53 DePaul L. Rev. 1777, 1895+ (2004) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 2520 WHY CAN'T WE BE FRIENDS?: WHY CALIFORNIA NEEDS A LIFESTYLE DISCRIMINATION STATUTE TO PROTECT EMPLOYEES FROM EMPLOYMENT ACTIONS BASED ON THEIR OFF-DUTY BEHAVIOR, 7 Hastings Bus. L.J. 187, 204 (2011) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 2521 WHITHER THE CANARIES: ON THE EXCLUSION OF POOR PEOPLE FROM EQUAL CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION, 60 Drake L. Rev. 1023, 1067+ (2012) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2522 WHEN ORIGINALISM ATTACKS: HOW JUSTICE SCALIA'S RESORT TO ORIGINAL EXPECTED APPLICATION IN CRAWFORD V. WASHINGTON CAME BACK TO BITE HIM IN MICHIGAN V. BRYANT, 59 Drake L. Rev. 1047, 1085+ (2011) 2523 BREAK ON THROUGH: THE OTHER SIDE OF VARNUM AND THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS, 59 Drake L. Rev. 1225, 1247+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2524 PREPARED STATEMENT OF ANDREW KOPPELMAN, 58 Drake L. Rev. 905, 912 (2010) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 2525 DOMA, ROMER, AND RATIONALITY, 58 Drake L. Rev. 923, 950+ (2010) 2526 SECTION THREE OF THE DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT: DECIDING, DEMOCRACY, AND THE CONSTITUTION, 58 Drake L. Rev. 951, 992+ (2010) 2527 MR. JUSTICE MILLER'S CLAUSE: THE PRIVILEGES OR IMMUNITIES OF CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES INTERNATIONALLY, 56 Drake L. Rev. 1051, 1116 (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2528 CONSTITUTIONAL CADENZAS, 56 Drake L. Rev. 833, 873+ (2008) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2529 THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT: RECALLING WHAT THE COURT FORGOT, 56 Drake L. Rev. 911, 1014+ (2008) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 2530 THE MORAL JUDGE, 56 Drake L. Rev. 637, 677 (2008) 2531 FREE SPEECH FOR JUDGES AND FAIR APPEALS FOR LITIGANTS: JUDICIAL RECUSAL IN A POST-WHITE WORLD, 55 Drake L. Rev. 691, 721 (2007) 2532 COURTING DISASTER: LOOKING FOR CHANGE IN ALL THE WRONG PLACES, 54 Drake L. Rev. 795, 815 (2006) 2533 PHILOSOPHER KING COURTS: IS THE EXERCISE OF HIGHER LAW AUTHORITY WITHOUT A HIGHER LAW FOUNDATION LEGITIMATE?, 54 Drake L. Rev. 831, 847+ (2006) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 2534 SEXUAL ORIENTATION, SOCIAL CHANGE, AND THE COURTS, 54 Drake L. Rev. 861, 883+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2535 DNA DRAGNETS-A CONSTITUTIONAL CATCH?, 54 Drake L. Rev. 15, 51 (2005) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 2536 WILL THE TOWER TOPPLE? THE FUTURE OF MORALITY AS A LEGITIMATE STATE INTEREST ARGUMENT IN HOMOSEXUAL LEGAL ISSUES, 53 Drake L. Rev. 1063, 1097+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2537 OUT OF SIGHT, OUT OF MIND: STATE ATTEMPTS TO BANISH SEX OFFENDERS, 53 Drake L. Rev. 711, 779 (2005) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2538 CONSTITUTIVE COMMITMENTS AND ROOSEVELT'S SECOND BILL OF RIGHTS: A DIALOGUE, 53 Drake L. Rev. 205, 229 (2005) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2539 LAWRENCE BEYOND GAY RIGHTS: TAKING THE RATIONALITY REQUIREMENT FOR JUSTIFYING CRIMINAL STATUTES SERIOUSLY, 53 Drake L. Rev. 231, 279+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2540 COURSE OF PERFORMANCE AS EVIDENCE OF INTENT OR WAIVER: A MEANINGFUL PREFERENCE FOR THE LATTER AND IMPLICATIONS FOR NEWLY BROADENED USE UNDER REVISED U.C.C. SECTION 1-303, 52 Drake L. Rev. 235, 294 (2004) 2541 PREEMPTION OF COMMON LAW CLAIMS AND THE PROSPECTS FOR FIFRA: JUSTICE STEVENS PUTS THE GENIE BACK IN THE BOTTLE, 15 Duke Envtl. L. & Pol'y F. 65, 98 (2004) 2542 GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF LAW, INTERNATIONAL DUE PROCESS, AND THE MODERN ROLE OF PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW, 23 Duke J. Comp. & Int'l L. 411, 443 (2013) 2543 THE RELEVANCE OF FOREIGN EXAMPLES TO LEGAL DEVELOPMENT, 21 Duke J. Comp. & Int'l L. 431, 460 (2011) 2544 INTERNATIONAL MATERIALS AND THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT: SOME THOUGHTS ON METHOD AFTER GRAHAM V. FLORIDA, 21 Duke J. Comp. & Int'l L. 235, 267 (2010) 2545 CUSTOM AND ITS REVIVAL IN TRANSNATIONAL PRIVATE LAW, 18 Duke J. Comp. & Int'l L. 339, 370 (2008) 2546 SUPRANATIONAL RULINGS AS JUDGMENTS AND PRECEDENTS, 18 Duke J. Comp. & Int'l L. 477, 519+ (2008) 2547 THE FREEDOM TO MANIFEST RELIGIOUS BELIEF: AN ANALYSIS OF THE NECESSITY CLAUSES OF THE ICCPR AND THE ECHR, 17 Duke J. Comp. & Int'l L. 91, 129+ (2006) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2548 FROM ROMER V. EVANS TO UNITED STATES V. WINDSOR: LAW AS A VEHICLE FOR MORAL DISAPPROVAL IN AMENDMENT 2 AND THE DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT, 20 Duke J. Gender L. & Pol'y 351, 355+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2549 THIRD-PARTY CONSENT TO SEARCH: ANALYZING TRIANGULAR RELATIONS, 19 Duke J. Gender L. & Pol'y 303, 346 (2012) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 2550 THE ROLE OF SOCIAL SCIENCE IN JUDICIAL DECISION MAKING: HOW GAY RIGHTS ADVOCATES CAN LEARN FROM INTEGRATION AND CAPITAL PUNISHMENT CASE LAW, 19 Duke J. Gender L. & Pol'y 179, 222+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2551 INCREMENTALISM, CIVIL UNIONS, AND THE POSSIBILITY OF PREDICTING LEGAL RECOGNITION OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, 18 Duke J. Gender L. & Pol'y 105, 161+ (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2552 TRANSCENDENT HOMOSEXUALS AND DANGEROUS SEX OFFENDERS: SEXUAL HARM AND FREEDOM IN THE JUDICIAL IMAGINARY, 17 Duke J. Gender L. & Pol'y 277, 311+ (2010) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2553 FINDING LGBTS A SUSPECT CLASS: ASSESSING THE POLITICAL POWER OF LGBTS AS A BASIS FOR THE COURT'S APPLICATION OF HEIGHTENED SCRUTINY, 17 Duke J. Gender L. & Pol'y 385, 398+ (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2554 LIFE AFTER DOMA, 17 Duke J. Gender L. & Pol'y 399, 424+ (2010) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2555 WHAT'S LOVE GOT TO DO WITH IT? A PROPOSAL FOR ELEVATING THE STATUS OF MARRIAGE BY NARROWING ITS DEFINITION, WHILE UNIVERSALLY EXTENDING THE RIGHTS AND BENEFITS ENJOYED BY MARRIED COUPLES, 16 Duke J. Gender L. & Pol'y 37, 87+ (2009) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 2556 "TALKING ABOUT SEXUAL ORIENTATION, TEACHING ABOUT HOMOPHOBIA'-NEGOTIATING THE DIVIDE BETWEEN RELIGIOUS BELIEF AND TOLERANCE FOR LGBT RIGHTS IN THE CLASSROOM, 15 Duke J. Gender L. & Pol'y 399, 417 (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2557 IT'S REALLY ABOUT SEX: SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, LESBIGAY PARENTING, AND THE PSYCHOLOGY OF DISGUST, 15 Duke J. Gender L. & Pol'y 127, 193+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2558 "LOVE FOR SALE" -SEX AND THE SECOND AMERICAN REVOLUTION, 15 Duke J. Gender L. & Pol'y 49, 125+ (2008) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 2559 "BUT SOME OF (THEM) ARE BRAVE": IDENTITY PERFORMANCE, THE MILITARY, AND THE DANGERS OF AN INTEGRATION SUCCESS STORY, 14 Duke J. Gender L. & Pol'y 693, 748 (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2560 CONSENSUAL SEX CRIMES IN THE ARMED FORCES: A PRIMER FOR THE UNINFORMED, 14 Duke J. Gender L. & Pol'y 791, 798+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2561 HARVARD LAW SCHOOL LAMBDA SECOND ANNUAL GAY AND LESBIAN LEGAL ADVOCACY CONFERENCE "DON'T ASK, DON'T TELL", 14 Duke J. Gender L. & Pol'y 1173, 1288+ (2007) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2562 SILENT SACRIFICES: THE IMPACT OF "DON'T ASK, DON'T TELL" ON LESBIAN AND GAY MILITARY FAMILIES, 14 Duke J. Gender L. & Pol'y 1121, 1139+ (2007) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 2563 "RUM, SODOMY, AND THE LASH": WHAT THE MILITARY THRIVES ON AND HOW IT AFFECTS LEGAL RECRUITMENT AND LAW SCHOOLS, 14 Duke J. Gender L. & Pol'y 1143, 1169 (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2564 CONSTRUCTING THE CO-ED MILITARY, 14 Duke J. Gender L. & Pol'y 815, 952+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2565 SEXUALLY SPEAKING: "DON'T ASK, DON'T TELL" AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT AFTER LAWRENCE V. TEXAS, 14 Duke J. Gender L. & Pol'y 953, 976+ (2007) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2566 PRESERVATIONISM, OR THE ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM: HOW OPPONENTS OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGE DECEIVE US INTO ESTABLISHING RELIGION, 14 Duke J. Gender L. & Pol'y 561, 679+ (2007) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2567 GRAPPLING WITH "SOLICITATION": THE NEED FOR STATUTORY REFORM IN NORTH CAROLINA AFTER LAWRENCE V. TEXAS, 14 Duke J. Gender L. & Pol'y 681, 692+ (2007) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2568 DEAR IAN,, 11 Duke J. Gender L. & Pol'y 93, 120 (2004) 2569 11 Duke L. & Tech. Rev. 313, A COMPARATIVE CRITIQUE TO U.S. COURTS' APPROACH TO E-DISCOVERY IN FOREIGN TRIALS (2012) 2570 2005 Duke L. & Tech. Rev. 26, ATTACK OF THE CLONES: LEGISLATIVE APPROACHES TO HUMAN CLONING IN THE UNITED STATES (2005) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 2571 2004 Duke L. & Tech. Rev. 7, RESTORING A PUBLIC INTEREST VISION OF LAW IN THE AGE OF THE INTERNET (2004) 2572 A CIVIL RIGHT TO COUNSEL THROUGH THE STATES USING CALIFORNIA'S EFFICIENCY PROJECT AS A MODEL TOWARD A CIVIL GIDEON, 8 Hastings Race & Poverty L.J. 39, 60 (2011) 2573 THROWING BLACK BABIES OUT WITH THE BATHWATER: A CHILDCENTERED CHALLENGE TO SAME-SEX ADOPTION BANS, 6 Hastings Race & Poverty L.J. 1, 53+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2574 "A BULWARK AGAINST ANARCHY": AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, EMORY LAW SCHOOL, AND SOUTHERN SELF-HELP, 5 Hastings Race & Poverty L.J. 195, 270 (2008) 2575 RECLAIMING CIVIL RIGHTS IN UNCIVIL TIMES, 1 Hastings Race & Poverty L.J. 11, 25 (2003) 2576 INFERRING DESIRE, 63 Duke L.J. 525, 570+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2577 DNA PROFILES, COMPUTER SEARCHES, AND THE FOURTH AMENDMENT, 62 Duke L.J. 933, 949+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2578 TRADITION AS PAST AND PRESENT IN SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS ANALYSIS, 62 Duke L.J. 535, 542+ (2012) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 2579 SHOULD MOVING IN MEAN LOSING OUT? MAKING A CASE TO CLARIFY THE LEGAL EFFECT OF COHABITATION ON ALIMONY, 62 © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Duke L.J. 403, 421+ (2012) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2580 WHEN GOVERNMENT INTRUDES: REGULATING INDIVIDUAL BEHAVIORS THAT HARM THE ENVIRONMENT, 61 Duke L.J. 1111, 1181+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2581 EXECUTIVE DEFENSE OF CONGRESSIONAL ACTS, 61 Duke L.J. 1183, 1235+ (2012) 2582 STARE DECISIS AND FOREIGN AFFAIRS, 61 Duke L.J. 941, 1024+ (2012) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 2583 THE OBSOLESCENCE OF SAN ANTONIO V. RODRIGUEZ IN THE WAKE OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT'S QUEST TO LEAVE NO CHILD BEHIND, 61 Duke L.J. 1025, 1066 (2012) 2584 WHEN FOR BETTER IS FOR WORSE: IMMIGRATION LAW'S GENDERED IMPACT ON FOREIGN POLYGAMOUS MARRIAGE, 61 Duke L.J. 1067, 1110+ (2012) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2585 A QUEST FOR FAIR AND BALANCED: THE SUPREME COURT, STATE COURTS, AND THE FUTURE OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGE REVIEW AFTER PERRY, 60 Duke L.J. 1413, 1458+ (2011) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2586 EXECUTIVE DEFERENCE IN U.S. REFUGEE LAW: INTERNATIONALIST PATHS THROUGH AND BEYOND CHEVRON, 60 Duke L.J. 1059, 1122 (2011) 2587 ADVICE AND COMPLICITY, 60 Duke L.J. 499, 535 (2010) 2588 STRUCK BY STEREOTYPE: RUTH BADER GINSBURG ON PREGNANCY DISCRIMINATION AS SEX DISCRIMINATION, 59 Duke L.J. 771, 798 (2010) 2589 WHEN INSIDERS BECOME OUTSIDERS: PARENTAL OBJECTIONS TO PUBLIC SCHOOL SEX EDUCATION PROGRAMS, 59 Duke L.J. 109, 144+ (2009) 2590 APPLYING LAWRENCE: TEENAGERS AND THE CRIME AGAINST NATURE, 58 Duke L.J. 1825, 1858+ (2009) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2591 THE LOST HISTORY OF GOVERNANCE AND EQUAL PROTECTION, 58 Duke L.J. 955, 1012+ (2009) 2592 PARADIGMS OF RESTRAINT, 57 Duke L.J. 1321, 1411 (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2593 THE INTERNATIONALIZATION OF PUBLIC INTEREST LAW, 57 Duke L.J. 891, 1036+ (2008) 2594 PROTECTING THE LEAST OF THESE: A NEW APPROACH TO CHILD PORNOGRAPHY PANDERING PROVISIONS, 57 Duke L.J. 163, 198+ (2007) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 2595 BLACK AND WHITE AND READ ALL OVER: PRESS PROTECTION AFTER BRANZBURG, 57 Duke L.J. 199, 230+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2596 AGAINST INDIVIDUALLY SIGNED JUDICIAL OPINIONS, 56 Duke L.J. 923, 951+ (2006) 2597 GAY RIGHTS AND AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONALISM: WHAT'S A © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. CONSTITUTION FOR?, 56 Duke L.J. 545, 581+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2598 WHAT HAPPENS TO A DREAM DEFERRED? : CLEANSING THE TAINT OF SAN ANTONIO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT V. RODRIGUEZ, 55 Duke L.J. 405, 436+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2599 CONDUIT-BASED REGULATION OF SPEECH, 54 Duke L.J. 1359, 1456+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2600 POLYGAMY AS A RED HERRING IN THE SAME-SEX MARRIAGE DEBATE, 54 Duke L.J. 1665, 1693+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2601 DIAMOND IN THE ROUGH: MINING ARTICLE 36(1)(B) OF THE VIENNA CONVENTION ON CONSULAR RELATIONS FOR AN INDIVIDUAL RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS, 54 Duke L.J. 587, 619+ (2004) HN: 2,5 (S.Ct.) 2602 DIVERSITY AND THE PRACTICE OF INTEREST ASSESSMENT, 53 Duke L.J. 1515, 1536+ (2004) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2603 THE CHEROKEE REMOVAL AND THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT, 53 Duke L.J. 875, 965+ (2003) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2604 USING COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW TO RESOLVE DOMESTIC FEDERAL QUESTIONS, 53 Duke L.J. 193, 221+ (2003) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2605 BRIEFING THE SECOND AMENDMENT BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT, 47 Duq. L. Rev. 225, 238 (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2606 TWO TO TANGO, ONE IN LIMBO: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF FATHERS' RIGHTS IN INFANT ADOPTIONS, 47 Duq. L. Rev. 89, 114 (2009) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 2607 JUDICIAL REVIEW AND UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT CITATIONS TO FOREIGN AND INTERNATIONAL LAW, 45 Duq. L. Rev. 423, 437+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2608 RELIGIOUS FREEDOM AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT, 45 Duq. L. Rev. 195, 267+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2609 FAITH, HARM, AND NEUTRALITY: SOME COMPLEXITIES OF FREE EXERCISE LAW, 44 Duq. L. Rev. 225, 273+ (2006) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 2610 IN DEFENSE OF TRANSJUDICIALISM, 44 Duq. L. Rev. 93, 119+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2611 PARENTAL RIGHTS OF GAY AND LESBIAN COUPLES: WILL LEGALIZING SAME-SEX MARRIAGE MAKE A DIFFERENCE?, 43 Duq. L. Rev. 273, 274+ (2005) HN: 3,5 (S.Ct.) 2612 A CONSTITUTION FOR EVERYONE, 43 Duq. L. Rev. 1, 9 (2004) 2613 CIVIL LIBERTY AND THE RESPONSE TO TERRORISM, 42 Duq. L. Rev. 663, 723 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2614 WHY JUDICIAL TAKINGS ARE UNRIPE, 38 Ecology L.Q. 749, 795 (2011) 2615 DUE PROCESS LAND USE CLAIMS AFTER LINGLE, 34 Ecology L.Q. 471, 492 (2007) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 2616 IRRATIONALITY AND ANIMUS IN CLASS-OF-ONE EQUAL PROTECTION CASES, 34 Ecology L.Q. 493, 516+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2617 "GEN SILENT": ADVOCATING FOR LGBT ELDERS, 19 Elder L.J. 289, 349 (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2618 THE UNITED STATES MILITARY AND ITS ANTI-GAY DISCRIMINATORY POLICIES: IMPACT ON THE ELDERLY LGBT COMMUNITY, 20 Elder L.J. 199, 233+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2619 EQUALITY AT THE END: AMENDING STATE SURROGACY STATUTES TO HONOR SAME-SEX COUPLES' END-OF-LIFE DECISIONS, 13 Elder L.J. 255, 283+ (2005) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 2620 A "FUNDAMENTAL" PROBLEM: THE VULNERABILITY OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LICENSES IN CHAPTER 15 AND THE MEANING OF S 1506, 28 Emory Bankr. Dev. J. 177, 229 (2011) 2621 REDEFINING "ATHEISM" IN AMERICA: WHAT THE UNITED STATES COULD LEARN FROM EUROPE'S PROTECTION OF ATHEISTS, 27 Emory Int'l L. Rev. 661, 694+ (2013) 2622 FROM BIG LOVE TO THE BIG HOUSE: JUSTIFYING ANTI-POLYGAMY LAWS IN AN AGE OF EXPANDING RIGHTS, 26 Emory Int'l L. Rev. 939, 990+ (2012) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 2623 THE USE OF INTERNATIONAL LAW IN U.S. CONSTITUTIONAL ADJUDICATION, 25 Emory Int'l L. Rev. 197, 198+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2624 PROTECTING THE HUMAN RIGHTS OF LGBT PEOPLE IN UGANDA IN THE WAKE OF UGANDA'S "ANTI HOMOSEXUALITY BILL, 2009", 25 Emory Int'l L. Rev. 1263, 1316+ (2011) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2625 ALONE IN THE WORLD: THE UNITED STATES' FAILURE TO OBSERVE THE INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHT TO COMPENSATION FOR WRONGFUL CONVICTION, 19 Emory Int'l L. Rev. 1615, 1651+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2626 THE PERMISSIBLE SCOPE OF LEGAL LIMITATIONS ON THE FREEDOM OF RELIGION OR BELIEF IN THE UNITED STATES, 19 Emory Int'l L. Rev. 1187, 1275 (2005) 2627 INVIGORATING LABOR: A HUMAN RIGHTS APPROACH IN THE UNITED STATES, 19 Emory Int'l L. Rev. 1, 68+ (2005) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 2628 HOLDING HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATORS ACCOUNTABLE BY USING INTERNATIONAL LAW IN U.S. COURTS: ADVOCACY EFFORTS AND COMPLEMENTARY STRATEGIES, 19 Emory Int'l L. Rev. 169, 226+ (2005) 2629 U.S. JUDICIAL IMPERIALISM POST EMPAGRAN V. F. HOFFMANNLAROCHE? CONFLICTS OF JURISDICTION AND INTERNATIONAL COMITY IN EXTRATERRITORIAL ANTITRUST, 18 Emory Int'l L. Rev. 555, 643 (2004) 2630 ARE YOU READY FOR A NATIONAL ID CARD? PERHAPS WE DON'T HAVE TO CHOOSE BETWEEN FEAR OF TERRORISM AND NEED FOR © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. PRIVACY, 17 Emory Int'l L. Rev. 287, 339 (2003) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2631 WHOSE DEFENSE IS IT ANYWAY? REDEFINING THE ROLE OF THE LEGISLATIVE BRANCH IN THE DEFENSE OF FEDERAL STATUTES, 62 Emory L.J. 1159, 1180+ (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2632 PRECEDENT AND RELIANCE, 62 Emory L.J. 1459, 1494+ (2013) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 2633 BIG BROTHER GETS A MAKEOVER: BEHAVIORAL TARGETING AND THE THIRD-PARTY DOCTRINE, 61 Emory L.J. 555, 600+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2634 THE LEGAL MOBILIZATION DILEMMA, 61 Emory L.J. 663, 736+ (2012) 2635 THE PARADOX OF POLITICAL POWER: POST-RACIALISM, EQUAL PROTECTION, AND DEMOCRACY, 61 Emory L.J. 1123, 1152 (2012) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2636 THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT NOT TO KILL, 62 Emory L.J. 121, 121+ (2012) HN: 2,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2637 FAMILIAL NORMS AND NORMALITY, 59 Emory L.J. 1103, 1169+ (2010) 2638 SEX IN AND OUT OF INTIMACY, 59 Emory L.J. 809, 868+ (2010) 2639 NINETEENTH-CENTURY-PRINCIPLES FOR TWENTY-FIRST-CENTURY PLEADING, 60 Emory L.J. 159, 208+ (2010) 2640 THE VULNERABLE SUBJECT AND THE RESPONSIVE STATE, 60 Emory L.J. 251, 275 (2010) 2641 A HOLY SECULAR INSTITUTION, 58 Emory L.J. 1123, 1194+ (2009) 2642 I OBJECT: THE RLUIPA AS A MODEL FOR PROTECTING THE CONSCIENCE RIGHTS OF RELIGIOUS OBJECTORS TO SAME-SEX RELATIONSHIPS, 59 Emory L.J. 259, 309+ (2009) 2643 THE REAGAN REVOLUTION IN THE NETWORK OF LAW, 57 Emory L.J. 1227, 1257 (2008) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 2644 HETEROSEXUAL REPRODUCTIVE IMPERATIVES, 56 Emory L.J. 1157, 1172 (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2645 LAWRENCE V. GEDULDIG: REGULATING WOMEN'S SEXUALITY, 56 Emory L.J. 1235, 1303+ (2007) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2646 THE CASE FOR THE SELECTIVE DISINCORPORATION OF THE ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE: IS EVERSON A SUPER-PRECEDENT?, 56 Emory L.J. 1701, 1743+ (2007) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 2647 SEX EQUALITY ARGUMENTS FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS: THEIR CRITICAL BASIS AND EVOLVING CONSTITUTIONAL EXPRESSION, 56 Emory L.J. 815, 842 (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2648 THE UNITARY FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT, 56 Emory L.J. 907, 940+ (2007) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2649 OUR OTHER REPRODUCTIVE CHOICES: EQUALITY IN SEX EDUCATION, CONTRACEPTIVE ACCESS, AND WORK-FAMILY POLICY, © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 56 Emory L.J. 941, 991+ (2007) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 2650 THINGS FALL APART: A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS OF LEGISLATIVE EXCLUSION, 55 Emory L.J. 1, 60 (2006) 2651 CLEANING OUT THE CLOSET: USING SUNSET PROVISIONS TO CLEAN UP CLUTTERED CRIMINAL CODES, 54 Emory L.J. 1671, 1700+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2652 INTRODUCTION: THE PAST AS PROLOGUE, 54 Emory L.J. 1219, 1229 (2005) 2653 FATHERS AND THE SUPREME COURT: FOUNDING FATHERS AND NURTURING FATHERS, 54 Emory L.J. 1271, 1333+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2654 HOMOSEXUALITY'S HORIZON, 54 Emory L.J. 1361, 1406+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2655 GOVERNMENT REGULATION OR OTHER "ABRIDGEMENTS" OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH: THE PROPER SCOPE OF JUDICIAL REVIEW UNDER THE FIRST AMENDMENT, 54 Emory L.J. 979, 1091 (2005) 2656 THE SOCIAL FOUNDATIONS OF LAW, 54 Emory L.J. 201, 237+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2657 THE NEW DISCRIMINATION LAW: PRICE WATERHOUSE IS DEAD, WHITHER MCDONNELL DOUGLAS?, 53 Emory L.J. 1887, 1949 (2004) 2658 ADOPTING LAWRENCE: LAWRENCE V. TEXAS AND DISCRIMINATORY ADOPTION LAWS, 53 Emory L.J. 1491, 1531+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2659 WHY PUNITIVE DAMAGES ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL, 53 Emory L.J. 1, 53 (2004) 2660 SAME SEX MARRIAGE AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR EMPLOYEE BENEFITS: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2005 MEETING OF THE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN LAW SCHOOLS SECTIONS ON EMPLOYEE BENEFITS, AND SEXUAL ORIENTATION AND GENDER IDENTITY ISSUES, 9 Employee Rts. & Emp. Pol'y J. 499, 520+ (2005) 2661 THE M WORD, 4 Hum. Rts. & Globalization L. Rev. 3, 20+ (2011) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2662 ESTATE PLANNING IMPLICATIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT'S DOMA DECISION, 40 Est. Plan. 12, 16 (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2663 UPDATE ON EVOLVING LEGAL STATUS OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGES, 37 Est. Plan. 21, 30 (2010) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 2664 DOMA DAMAGES SAME-SEX FAMILIES AND THEIR CHILDREN, 32-WTR Fam. Advoc. 10, 16+ (2010) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 2665 WHY CAN'T MY WIFE GET A GREEN CARD?, 32-WTR Fam. Advoc. 38, 40 (2010) 2666 TRANSFORMATION: THE PROGRESSION OF IMMIGRATION PETITIONS FOR TRANSGENDER SPOUSES, 50 Fam. Ct. Rev. 666, 673 (2012) 2667 SAME SEX, DIFFERENT RIGHTS: AMENDING U.S. IMMIGRATION LAW © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. TO RECOGNIZE SAME-SEX PARTNERS OF REFUGEES AND ASYLEES, 50 Fam. Ct. Rev. 357, 360+ (2012) 2668 TEACHING CONTROVERSIAL TOPICS, 49 Fam. Ct. Rev. 678, 683+ (2011) 2669 THE EVOLUTION-OR END-OF MARRIAGE?: REFLECTIONS ON THE IMPASSE OVER SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, 44 Fam. Ct. Rev. 200, 200+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2670 PREFACE, 44 Fam. Ct. Rev. 31, 32 (2006) 2671 THE RIGHT TO MARRY AND THE SAN FRANCISCO EXPERIENCE, 44 Fam. Ct. Rev. 33, 33+ (2006) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2672 THE "END" OF MARRIAGE, 44 Fam. Ct. Rev. 45, 45+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2673 OUTING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE Affording Appropriate Protections to Gay and Lesbian Victims, 42 Fam. Ct. Rev. 162, 164+ (2004) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 2674 WHAT MAKES A FAMILY? Addressing the Issue of Gay and Lesbian Adoption, 42 Fam. Ct. Rev. 178, 187+ (2004) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2675 EDITORIAL NOTES, 42 Fam. Ct. Rev. 5, 8+ (2004) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 2676 CRIMINAL LAW OR FAMILY LAW: THE OVERLAPPING ISSUES, 44 Fam. L.Q. 155, 167 (2010) 2677 THE SPACE BETWEEN: THE COOPERATIVE REGULATION OF CRIMINAL LAW AND FAMILY LAW, 44 Fam. L.Q. 227, 228+ (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2678 INAPPROPRIATE INJURY: THE CASE FOR BARRING CONSIDERATION OF A PARENT'S HOMOSEXUALITY IN CUSTODY ACTIONS, 44 Fam. L.Q. 115, 124+ (2010) 2679 SECOND-CLASS FAMILIES: INTERSTATE RECOGNITION OF QUEER ADOPTION, 43 Fam. L.Q. 161, 176+ (2009) 2680 GOLDEN ANNIVERSARY REFLECTIONS: CHANGES IN MARRIAGE AFTER FIFTY YEARS, 42 Fam. L.Q. 333, 339+ (2008) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 2681 PARADIGM SHIFTS AND PENDULUM SWINGS IN CHILD CUSTODY: THE INTERESTS OF CHILDREN IN THE BALANCE, 42 Fam. L.Q. 381, 418 (2008) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 2682 THE CONSTITUTIONALIZATION OF FAMILY LAW, 42 Fam. L.Q. 529, 548+ (2008) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2683 PRINCIPLES OF THE LAW OF RELATIONSHIPS AMONG ADULTS, 41 Fam. L.Q. 433, 435+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2684 A WORLD WITHOUT MARRIAGE, 41 Fam. L.Q. 537, 566+ (2007) 2685 ADULTS' SEXUAL ORIENTATION AND STATE DETERMINATIONS REGARDING PLACEMENT OF CHILDREN, 40 Fam. L.Q. 381, 434 (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2686 EQUAL PROTECTION FOR HUMAN CLONES A REVIEW OF ILLEGAL BEINGS: HUMAN CLONES AND THE LAW BY KERRY MACINTOSH, 40 © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Fam. L.Q. 529, 544+ (2006) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 2687 A REVIEW OF THE YEAR IN FAMILY LAW: PARENTAGE AND ASSISTED REPRODUCTION PROBLEMS TAKE CENTER STAGE, 39 Fam. L.Q. 879, 914+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2688 AUTONOMY, PROTECTION, AND INCREMENTAL DEVELOPMENT IN FAMILY LAW A REVIEW OF FAMILY LAW IN AMERICA BY SANFORD N. KATZ, 39 Fam. L.Q. 805, 810+ (2005) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 2689 USING ARTICLE 20, 38 Fam. L.Q. 583, 622 (2004) 2690 THE LEGALITY OF POLYGAMY: USING THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE OF THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT, 38 Fam. L.Q. 711, 712+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2691 AN OUNCE OF PREVENTION: MARITAL COUNSELING LAWS AS AN ANTI-DIVORCE MEASURE, 38 Fam. L.Q. 733, 744+ (2004) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 2692 A WHITE PAPER: AN ANALYSIS OF THE LAW REGARDING SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, CIVIL UNIONS, AND DOMESTIC PARTNERSHIPS, 38 Fam. L.Q. 339, 345+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2693 SAME-SEX MARRIAGE: THE CULTURAL WARS AND THE LESSONS OF LEGAL HISTORY, 38 Fam. L.Q. 427, 442+ (2004) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 2694 AN AMERICAN PERSPECTIVE ON THE DEBATE OVER THE HARMONISATION OR UNIFICATION OF FAMILY LAW IN EUROPE, BOOK REVIEW OF PERSPECTIVES ON THE UNIFICATION AND HARMONISATION OF FAMILY LAW IN EUROPE, 38 Fam. L.Q. 185, 211 (2004) 2695 A REVIEW OF THE YEAR IN FAMILY LAW: CHILDREN'S ISSUES REMAIN THE FOCUS, 37 Fam. L.Q. 527, 528+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2696 DOE v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE: A CALL FOR RENEWED CONSIDERATION OF FEDERAL EMPLOYEES' ETHICAL RESPONSIBILITIES, 20 Fed. Circuit B.J. 127, 167 (2010) 2697 REASSESSING TURNER AND LITIGATING THE MUST-CARRY LAW BEYOND A FACIAL CHALLENGE, 60 Fed. Comm. L.J. 359, 389 (2008) 2698 RIGHTS UNDER THE NINTH AMENDMENT: NOT HARD TO IDENTIFY AFTER ALL, 7 Fed. Cts. L. Rev. 35, 85+ (2013) 2699 INTERNATIONAL LAW AND THE CONSTITUTION, 4 Fed. Cts. L. Rev. 185, 241 (2011) 2700 PRIVACY: IS THERE ANY LEFT?, 3 Fed. Cts. L. Rev. 87, 107 (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2701 RELIGION AND THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE: WHY THE CONSTITUTION REQUIRES SCHOOL VOUCHERS, 65 Fla. L. Rev. 909, 1044+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2702 THE FIRST AMENDMENT, EQUAL PROTECTION, AND FELON DISENFRANCHISEMENT: A NEW VIEWPOINT, 65 Fla. L. Rev. 111, 172 © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. (2013) 2703 CONFRONTING COVENTURERS: COCONSPIRATOR HEARSAY, SIR WALTER RALEIGH, AND THE SIXTH AMENDMENT CONFRONTATION CLAUSE, 64 Fla. L. Rev. 1669, 1675+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2704 THE MISSING JURY: THE NEGLECTED ROLE OF JURIES IN EIGHTH AMENDMENT PUNISHMENTS CLAUSE DETERMINATIONS, 64 Fla. L. Rev. 549, 590+ (2012) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 2705 TWO FACES OF JUDICIAL RESTRAINT (OR ARE THERE MORE?) IN MCDONALD V. CITY OF CHICAGO, 63 Fla. L. Rev. 487, 523+ (2011) 2706 RESOLVING INTERSTATE CONFLICTS OVER SAME-SEX NONMARRIAGE, 63 Fla. L. Rev. 47, 96 (2011) 2707 THE LAVENDER LETTER: (FNaa1) APPLYING THE LAW OF ADULTERY TO SAME-SEX COUPLES AND SAME-SEX CONDUCT, 63 Fla. L. Rev. 97, 127+ (2011) 2708 REINING IN ABUSES OF EXECUTIVE POWER THROUGH SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS, 60 Fla. L. Rev. 519, 587+ (2008) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 2709 SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS: SEX TOYS AFTER LAWRENCE Williams v. Morgan, 478 F.3d 1316 (11th Cir. 2007), 60 Fla. L. Rev. 507, 518+ (2008) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 2710 COUNTER-MAJORITARIAN POWER AND JUDGES' POLITICAL SPEECH, 58 Fla. L. Rev. 53, 118+ (2006) 2711 BODY POLITICS: LAWRENCE V. TEXAS AND THE CONSTITUTION OF DISGUST AND CONTAGION, 57 Fla. L. Rev. 1011, 1064+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2712 MOVING BEYOND RHETORIC, 57 Fla. L. Rev. 1065, 1096+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2713 "NOT THE LAW'S BUSINESS:" THE POLITICS OF TOLERANCE AND THE ENFORCEMENT OF MORALITY, 57 Fla. L. Rev. 1097, 1133+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2714 PROTECTING CHILDREN FROM SPEECH, 57 Fla. L. Rev. 565, 651 (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2715 CONSTITUTIONAL VALUE JUDGMENTS AND INTERPRETIVE THEORY CHOICE, 40 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 259, 302+ (2013) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 2716 TICKY TACKY LITTLE GOVERNMENTS? A More Faithful Approach to Community Associations Under the State Action Doctrine, 40 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 201, 220 (2012) 2717 LAW'S PUBLIC/PRIVATE STRUCTURE, 39 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 1003, 1042+ (2012) 2718 THE TERMS OF THE DEBATE: LITIGATION, ARGUMENTATIVE STRATEGIES, AND COALITIONS IN THE SAME-SEX MARRIAGE STRUGGLE, 39 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 467, 510+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 2719 NAVIGATING THE PATH OF THE SUPREME APPOINTMENT, 38 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 537, 595 (2011) 2720 SHOTGUNS, WEDDINGS, AND LUNCH COUNTERS: WHY CULTURAL FRAMES MATTER TO CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 38 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 345, 386+ (2011) 2721 NEW GROUPS AND OLD DOCTRINE: RETHINKING CONGRESSIONAL POWER TO ENFORCE THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE, 37 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 451, 537+ (2010) 2722 THE LAW CLERK PROXY WARS: SECRECY, ACCOUNTABILITY, AND IDEOLOGY IN THE SUPREME COURT, 37 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 101, 136+ (2009) 2723 ARMED AND LITIGIOUS: THE FLORIDA GUNS AT WORK LAW AND CONSTITUTIONAL SCRUTINY, 36 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 931, 942+ (2009) 2724 FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 52(A) AS AN IDEOLOGICAL WEAPON?, 34 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 1025, 1087+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2725 OPTING OUT OF PUBLIC SCHOOL CURRICULA: FREE EXERCISE AND ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE IMPLICATIONS, 33 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 1199, 1226 (2006) 2726 TOWARD A POLITICAL THEORY OF CONSTITUTIONAL DEFAULT RULES, 33 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 825, 860+ (2006) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2727 TRANSGRESSIVE CAREGIVING, 33 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 1, 34+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2728 EMPIRICAL MEASURES OF JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE: THOUGHTS ON CHOI AND GULATI'S TOURNAMENT OF JUDGES, 32 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 1123, 1143 (2005) 2729 JUDICIAL SELECTION BY THE NUMBERS, 32 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 1197, 1235+ (2005) 2730 WHO JUDGES THE JUDGES?, 32 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 1245, 1257 (2005) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 2731 JUDICIAL STRATIFICATION AND THE REPUTATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES COURTS OF APPEALS, 32 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 1331, 1363 (2005) 2732 KEEPING SCORE: THE UTILITY OF EMPIRICAL MEASUREMENTS IN JUDICIAL SELECTION, 32 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 1415, 1442 (2005) 2733 AUTHORITY OF THE LAW? THE CONTRIBUTION OF SECULARIZED LEGAL EDUCATION TO THE MORAL CRISIS OF THE PROFESSION, 31 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 707, 736+ (2004) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.) 2734 EMBRYONIC DISCOURSE: ABORTION, STEM CELLS, AND CLONING, 31 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 101, 162 (2003) 2735 A NATION OF ONE? COMMUNITY STANDARDS IN THE INTERNET ERA, 22 Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. L.J. 145, 190+ (2011) 2736 NOT THAT THERE'S ANYTHING WRONG WITH THAT: IMPUTATIONS © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. OF HOMOSEXUALITY AND THE NORMATIVE STRUCTURE OF DEFAMATION LAW, 21 Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. L.J. 581, 609+ (2011) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2737 DOES IT REALLY SUCK?: THE IMPACT OF CUTTING-EDGE MARKETING TACTICS ON INTERNET TRADEMARK LAW AND GRIPE SITE DOMAIN NAME DISPUTES, 20 Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. L.J. 225, 287+ (2009) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 2738 CONSENT TO MONITORING OF ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS OF EMPLOYEES AS AN ASPECT OF LIBERTY AND DIGNITY: LOOKING TO EUROPE, 19 Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. L.J. 799, 830+ (2009) 2739 A CONSTITUTIONAL IDEA-EXPRESSION DOCTRINE: QUALIFYING CONGRESS' COMMERCE POWER WHEN PROTECTING INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS, 18 Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. L.J. 441, 513 (2008) 2740 A GREEDY INSTITUTION: DOMESTIC WORKERS AND A LEGACY OF LEGISLATIVE EXCLUSION, 36 Fordham Int'l L.J. 706, 735+ (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2741 ON OPTIONS OF CITIZENS AND MORAL CHOICES OF STATES: GAYS AND EUROPEAN FEDERALISM, 33 Fordham Int'l L.J. 156, 205+ (2009) 2742 THE EUROPEAN COUNTERTERRORIST AS THE NEXT U.S. COLD WARRIOR: WHY THE UNITED STATES SHOULD SELECT FROM THE GERMAN AND BRITISH MODELS OF PROCEDURE, EVIDENCE, AND OVERSIGHT FOR NATIONAL SECURITY WIRETAPPING, 32 Fordham Int'l L.J. 1947, 1989 (2009) 2743 CONCEPTUALIZING INTIMATE VIOLENCE AND GENDER EQUALITY: A COMPARATIVE APPROACH, 31 Fordham Int'l L.J. 487, 527 (2008) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2744 PRECEDENT AND CONTROL IN INVESTMENT TREATY ARBITRATION, 30 Fordham Int'l L.J. 1014, 1049 (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2745 SOVEREIGNTY AND THE AMERICAN COURTS AT THE COCKTAIL PARTY OF INTERNATIONAL LAW: THE DANGERS OF DOMESTIC JUDICIAL INVOCATIONS OF FOREIGN AND INTERNATIONAL LAW, 29 Fordham Int'l L.J. 507, 551+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2746 REASON WITHOUT BORDERS: HOW TRANSNATIONAL VALUES CANNOT BE CONTAINED, 28 Fordham Int'l L.J. 1595, 1644+ (2005) HN: 1,4,5 (S.Ct.) 2747 THE EFTA COURT: AN ACTOR IN THE EUROPEAN JUDICIAL DIALOGUE, 28 Fordham Int'l L.J. 353, 391+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2748 THE UTILITY OF PRO BONO REPRESENTATION OF U.S.-BASED AMICUS CURIAE IN NON-U.S. AND MULTI-NATIONAL COURTS AS A MEANS OF ADVANCING THE PUBLIC INTEREST, 28 Fordham Int'l L.J. 88, 126+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 2749 OUT OF THE "TROUBLES" AND INTO RIGHTS: PROTECTION FOR GAYS, LESBIANS, AND BISEXUALS IN NORTHERN IRELAND THROUGH EQUALITY LEGISLATION IN THE BELFAST AGREEMENT, 27 Fordham Int'l L.J. 1207, 1263 (2004) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2750 PENUMBRAS, PRIVACY, AND THE DEATH OF MORALS-BASED LEGISLATION: COMPARING U.S. CONSTITUTIONAL LAW WITH THE INHERENT RIGHT OF PRIVACY IN ISLAMIC JURISPRUDENCE, 27 Fordham Int'l L.J. 370, 454+ (2003) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2751 DEFERENTIALISM: A POST-ORIGINALIST THEORY OF LEGAL INTERPRETATION, 82 Fordham L. Rev. 597, 609+ (2013) 2752 ORIGINALISM, VINTAGE OR NOUVEAU: "HE SAID, SHE SAID" LAW, 82 Fordham L. Rev. 619, 639 (2013) 2753 THE NEW ORIGINALISM AND THE USES OF HISTORY, 82 Fordham L. Rev. 641, 719 (2013) 2754 THE DANGEROUS LAW OF BIOLOGICAL RACE, 82 Fordham L. Rev. 21, 27+ (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2755 MEASURING A "SPIRITUAL STAKE": HOW TO DETERMINE INJURYIN-FACT IN CHALLENGES TO PUBLIC DISPLAYS OF RELIGION, 81 Fordham L. Rev. 2901, 2943 (2013) 2756 NATURAL LAW, SLAVERY, AND THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY TORT, 81 Fordham L. Rev. 1187, 1191+ (2012) 2757 UNEARTHING THE PUBLIC INTEREST: RECOGNIZING INTRASTATE ECONOMIC PROTECTIONISM AS A LEGITIMATE STATE INTEREST, 81 Fordham L. Rev. 1485, 1532 (2012) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2758 ENRON, DOMA, AND SPOUSAL PRIVILEGES: RETHINKING THE MARRIAGE PLOT, 81 Fordham L. Rev. 715, 729+ (2012) 2759 INVOLUNTARY IMPORTS: WILLIAMS, LUTWAK, THE DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT, FEDERALISM, AND "THICK" AND "THIN" CONCEPTIONS OF MARRIAGE, 81 Fordham L. Rev. 771, 802+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2760 UNCONSTITUTIONAL ANIMUS, 81 Fordham L. Rev. 887, 891+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2761 SEEKING LIBERTY'S REFUGE: ANALYZING LEGISLATIVE PURPOSE UNDER CASEY'S UNDUE BURDEN STANDARD, 81 Fordham L. Rev. 365, 372+ (2012) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2762 E PLURIBUS UNUM? THE FULL FAITH AND CREDIT CLAUSE AND MEANINGFUL RECOGNITION OF OUT-OF-STATE ADOPTIONS, 80 Fordham L. Rev. 3093, 3135 (2012) 2763 THE DECIDERS: THE FUTURE OF PRIVACY AND FREE SPEECH IN THE AGE OF FACEBOOK AND GOOGLE, 80 Fordham L. Rev. 1525, 1538+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2764 FROM EUGENICS TO THE "NEW" GENETICS: "THE PLAY'S THE THING", © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 79 Fordham L. Rev. 407, 433 (2010) 2765 HOW THE ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE CAN INFLUENCE SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS: ADULTERY BANS AFTER LAWRENCE, 79 Fordham L. Rev. 605, 647+ (2010) 2766 DNA AND DUE PROCESS, 78 Fordham L. Rev. 2919, 2960+ (2010) 2767 SKEPTICAL INTERNATIONALISM: A STUDY OF WHETHER INTERNATIONAL LAW IS LAW, 78 Fordham L. Rev. 2451, 2530 (2010) 2768 THE RIGHTS OF DIVORCED LESBIANS: INTERSTATE RECOGNITION OF CHILD CUSTODY JUDGMENTS IN THE CONTEXT OF SAME-SEX DIVORCE, 78 Fordham L. Rev. 1379, 1431+ (2009) 2769 THE PROS AND CONS OF POLITICALLY REVERSIBLE "SEMISUBSTANTIVE" CONSTITUTIONAL RULES, 77 Fordham L. Rev. 2835, 2891+ (2009) 2770 BEYOND LAWRENCE V. TEXAS: CRAFTING A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO SEXUAL PRIVACY, 77 Fordham L. Rev. 2997, 3043+ (2009) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2771 FOREWORD, 77 Fordham L. Rev. 399, 410+ (2008) 2772 BRINGING THEORIES OF HUMAN RIGHTS CHANGE HOME, 77 Fordham L. Rev. 459, 500+ (2008) 2773 "FEDERALIZING" IMMIGRATION LAW: INTERNATIONAL LAW AS A LIMITATION ON CONGRESS'S POWER TO LEGISLATE IN THE FIELD OF IMMIGRATION, 77 Fordham L. Rev. 501, 527 (2008) 2774 A COMMUNITY OF REASON AND RIGHTS, 77 Fordham L. Rev. 583, 607+ (2008) 2775 GETTING BEYOND THE CROSSFIRE PHENOMENON: A MILITANT MODERATE'S TAKE ON THE ROLE OF FOREIGN AUTHORITY IN CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION, 77 Fordham L. Rev. 635, 646 (2008) 2776 LOWER COURTS AND CONSTITUTIONAL COMPARATIVISM, 77 Fordham L. Rev. 647, 665+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2777 HUMANITY LAW: A NEW INTERPRETIVE LENS ON THE INTERNATIONAL SPHERE, 77 Fordham L. Rev. 667, 702+ (2008) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 2778 REVISITING THE LEGAL STANDARDS THAT GOVERN REQUESTS TO STERILIZE PROFOUNDLY INCOMPETENT CHILDREN: IN LIGHT OF THE "ASHLEY TREATMENT," IS A NEW STANDARD APPROPRIATE?, 77 Fordham L. Rev. 287, 326+ (2008) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2779 THE EMERGING FIRST AMENDMENT LAW OF MANAGERIAL PREROGATIVE, 77 Fordham L. Rev. 33, 112 (2008) 2780 INTRODUCTION, 76 Fordham L. Rev. 2669, 2684+ (2008) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 2781 LONGING FOR LOVING, 76 Fordham L. Rev. 2685, 2707 (2008) 2782 TIME FOR RIGHTS? LOVING, GAY MARRIAGE, AND THE LIMITS OF © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. LEGAL JUSTICE, 76 Fordham L. Rev. 2849, 2872 (2008) 2783 FIGHTING DISCRIMINATION WHILE FIGHTING LITIGATION: A TALE OF TWO SUPREME COURTS, 76 Fordham L. Rev. 981, 1013+ (2007) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 2784 SECOND-ORDER PERFECTIONISM, 75 Fordham L. Rev. 2867, 2883+ (2007) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 2785 THE INCREDIBLE SHRINKING CONSTITUTIONAL THEORY: FROM THE PARTIAL CONSTITUTION TO THE MINIMAL CONSTITUTION, 75 Fordham L. Rev. 2885, 2920+ (2007) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2786 THE FIT DIMENSION, 75 Fordham L. Rev. 2921, 2949 (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2787 PRIVACY, MINIMALISM, AND PERFECTIONISM, 75 Fordham L. Rev. 2951, 2971+ (2007) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 2788 VALUING AUTONOMY, 75 Fordham L. Rev. 2973, 2988+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2789 MINIMALISM, PERFECTIONISM, AND COMMON LAW CONSTITUTIONALISM: REFLECTIONS ON SUNSTEIN'S AND FLEMING'S EFFORTS TO FIND THE SWEET SPOT IN CONSTITUTIONAL THEORY, 75 Fordham L. Rev. 2997, 3012+ (2007) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 2790 DISPLACING DISSENT: THE ROLE OF "PLACE" IN FIRST AMENDMENT JURISPRUDENCE, 75 Fordham L. Rev. 2587, 2639+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2791 ABOVE THE LAW? THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE MINISTERIAL EXEMPTION FROM ANTIDISCRIMINATION LAW, 75 Fordham L. Rev. 1965, 2038+ (2007) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2792 UNDERENFORCEMENT, 75 Fordham L. Rev. 1715, 1743+ (2006) 2793 THE PROCESSES OF CONSTITUTIONAL CHANGE: FROM PARTISAN ENTRENCHMENT TO THE NATIONAL SURVEILLANCE STATE, 75 Fordham L. Rev. 489, 535 (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2794 THE NEW CONSTITUTIONAL ORDER AND THE HEARTENING OF CONSERVATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL ASPIRATIONS, 75 Fordham L. Rev. 537, 543 (2006) 2795 ORIGINALISM AS A POLITICAL PRACTICE: THE RIGHT'S LIVING CONSTITUTION, 75 Fordham L. Rev. 545, 574+ (2006) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2796 DOES IT REALLY MATTER? CONSERVATIVE COURTS IN A CONSERVATIVE ERA, 75 Fordham L. Rev. 675, 708+ (2006) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2797 FROM STATES' RIGHTS BLUES TO BLUE STATES' RIGHTS: FEDERALISM AFTER THE REHNQUIST COURT, 75 Fordham L. Rev. 799, 813 (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2798 CONSTITUTIONS AS "LIVING TREES"? COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AND INTERPRETIVE METAPHORS, 75 Fordham L. Rev. 921, 960 (2006) 2799 PRINCIPLES OF U.S. FAMILY LAW, 75 Fordham L. Rev. 31, 73+ (2006) HN: © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 3 (S.Ct.) 2800 REEVALUATING THE DEBATE SURROUNDING THE SUPREME COURT'S USE OF FOREIGN PRECEDENT, 74 Fordham L. Rev. 2695, 2759+ (2006) HN: 1,2,4 (S.Ct.) 2801 SAY HELLO AND WAVE GOODBYE: THE LEGITIMACY OF PLAIN VIEW SEIZURES AT THE THRESHOLD OF THE HOME, 74 Fordham L. Rev. 2761, 2808 (2006) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 2802 LEARNING ON THE JOB, 74 Fordham L. Rev. 1561, 1567 (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2803 JOHN PAUL STEVENS, HUMAN RIGHTS JUDGE, 74 Fordham L. Rev. 1569, 1605+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2804 JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT IN TWO DIMENSIONS: CHARTING AREA AND INTENSITY IN THE DECISIONS OF JUSTICE STEVENS, 74 Fordham L. Rev. 2051, 2079 (2006) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 2805 TYING THE BRAID OF SECOND-PARENT ADOPTIONS-WHERE DUE PROCESS MEETS EQUAL PROTECTION, 74 Fordham L. Rev. 1425, 1473+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2806 DISPUTE RESOLUTION AS INSTITUTIONALIZATION IN INTERNATIONAL TRADE AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 74 Fordham L. Rev. 489, 504 (2005) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 2807 THE FLAWS OF RATIONAL BASIS WITH BITE: WHY THE SUPREME COURT SHOULD ACKNOWLEDGE ITS APPLICATION OF HEIGHTENED SCRUTINY TO CLASSIFICATIONS BASED ON SEXUAL ORIENTATION, 73 Fordham L. Rev. 2769, 2814+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2808 COURTING DISASTER, 73 Fordham L. Rev. 1361, 1376+ (2005) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 2809 CONSTITUTIONAL PARTNERSHIP AND THE STATES, 73 Fordham L. Rev. 1439, 1462+ (2005) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2810 THE TEN COMMANDMENTS ON THE COURTHOUSE LAWN AND ELSEWHERE, 73 Fordham L. Rev. 1477, 1520+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2811 A SHEEP IN WOLF'S CLOTHING: WHY THE DEBATE SURROUNDING COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW IS SPECTACULARLY ORDINARY, 73 Fordham L. Rev. 1239, 1288+ (2004) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2812 IDENTITY POLITICS AND THE SECOND AMENDMENT, 73 Fordham L. Rev. 549, 572+ (2004) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 2813 ELITES, IDENTITY POLITICS, GUNS, AND THE MANUFACTURE OF LEGAL RIGHTS, 73 Fordham L. Rev. 573, 588+ (2004) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2814 ON GUN REGISTRATION, THE NRA, ADOLF HITLER, AND NAZI GUN LAWS: EXPLODING THE GUN CULTURE WARS (A CALL TO HISTORIANS), 73 Fordham L. Rev. 653, 680+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2815 A SECULAR THEORY OF NATURAL LAW, 72 Fordham L. Rev. 2287, 2300 (2004) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 2816 NEW YORK'S POST-SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 RECOGNITION OF SAME-SEX RELATIONSHIPS: A VICTORY SUGGESTIVE OF FUTURE CHANGE, 72 Fordham L. Rev. 2823, 2888+ (2004) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 2817 SECURING DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY, 72 Fordham L. Rev. 1435, 1475+ (2004) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2818 ARE THERE LIMITS TO CONSTITUTIONAL CHANGE? RAWLS ON COMPREHENSIVE DOCTRINES, UNCONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS, AND THE BASIS OF EQUALITY, 72 Fordham L. Rev. 1487, 1536+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2819 PUBLIC REASON AND POLITICAL JUSTIFICATIONS, 72 Fordham L. Rev. 2021, 2072 (2004) 2820 WILD POLITICAL DREAMING: CONSTITUTIONAL REFORMATION OF THE UNITED STATES SENATE, 72 Fordham L. Rev. 1017, 1051 (2004) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2821 LEGISLATING WITH INTEGRITY, 72 Fordham L. Rev. 373, 394 (2003) 2822 CONFLICTS OF INTEGRITY, 72 Fordham L. Rev. 395, 403 (2003) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2823 TOWARD A FUTURE, WISER COURT: A BLUEPRINT FOR OVERTURNING DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA V. HELLER, 39 Fordham Urb. L.J. 1353, 1358+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2824 RIGHTS VERSUS DUTIES, HISTORY DEPARTMENT LAWYERING, AND THE INCOHERENCE OF JUSTICE STEVENS'S HELLER DISSENT, 39 Fordham Urb. L.J. 1503, 1526 (2012) 2825 THE GREAT GUN CONTROL WAR OF THE TWENTIETH CENTURY-AND ITS LESSONS FOR GUN LAWS TODAY, 39 Fordham Urb. L.J. 1527, 1616 (2012) 2826 PUBLIC RIGHTS, GLOBAL PERSPECTIVES, AND COMMON LAW, 36 Fordham Urb. L.J. 653, 686 (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2827 POSITIVE HEALTH: THE HUMAN RIGHT TO HEALTH CARE UNDER THE NEW YORK STATE CONSTITUTION, 35 Fordham Urb. L.J. 479, 559 (2008) 2828 NO SCRUTINY WHATSOEVER: DECONSTITUTIONALIZATION OF POVERTY LAW, DUAL RULES OF LAW, & DIALOGIC DEFAULT, 35 Fordham Urb. L.J. 629, 671+ (2008) 2829 INCOMPLETELY THEORIZED AGREEMENTS: AN UNWORKABLE THEORY OF JUDICIAL MODESTY, 34 Fordham Urb. L.J. 1457, 1488+ (2007) 2830 MEDICINAL MARIJUANA AND PALLIATIVE CARE: CARVING A LIBERTY INTEREST OUT OF THE GLUCKSBERG FRAMEWORK, 33 Fordham Urb. L.J. 1345, 1367+ (2006) 2831 THE DEATH PENALTY AND THE DEBATE OVER THE U.S. SUPREME COURT'S CITATION OF FOREIGN AND INTERNATIONAL LAW, 33 Fordham Urb. L.J. 1421, 1452+ (2006) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 2832 WOMEN AS PERPETRATORS: DOES MOTHERHOOD HAVE A REFORMATIVE EFFECT ON PROSTITUTION?, 33 Fordham Urb. L.J. 407, 435+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2833 EVEN MORE WRONGFUL DEATH: STATUTES DIVORCED FROM REALITY, 32 Fordham Urb. L.J. 171, 195 (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2834 THE FUTURE OF SODOMY, 32 Fordham Urb. L.J. 197, 228+ (2005) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 2835 SEXUAL MINORITIES, CRIMINAL JUSTICE, AND THE DEATH PENALTY, 32 Fordham Urb. L.J. 231, 235 (2005) 2836 "SOFT IMMUTABILITY" AND "IMPUTED GAY IDENTITY": RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN TRANSGENDER AND SEXUALORIENTATION-BASED ASYLUM LAW, 32 Fordham Urb. L.J. 237, 263+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2837 UNCHARTED TERRITORY: CHOOSING AN EFFECTIVE APPROACH IN TRANSGENDER-BASED ASYLUM CLAIMS, 32 Fordham Urb. L.J. 265, 289+ (2005) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2838 THE UNBEARABLE "LITE"NESS OF HISTORY: AMERICAN SODOMY LAWS FROM BOWERS TO LAWRENCE AND THE RAMIFICATIONS OF ANNOUNCING A NEW PAST, 32 Fordham Urb. L.J. 355, 397+ (2005) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 2839 AUSTRIA'S PRE-WARBROWN V. BOARD OF EDUCATION, 32 Fordham Urb. L.J. 1, 81 (2004) 2840 TOO LITTLE, TOO LATE: INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL, THE DUTY TO INVESTIGATE, AND PRETRIAL DISCOVERY IN CRIMINAL CASES, 31 Fordham Urb. L.J. 1097, 1155 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2841 WHAT LAWRENCE V. TEXAS SAYS ABOUT THE HISTORY AND FUTURE OF REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS, 31 Fordham Urb. L.J. 717, 723+ (2004) 2842 CASEY AND ITS IMPACT ON ABORTION REGULATION, 31 Fordham Urb. L.J. 805, 815+ (2004) 2843 PRACTICE WHAT YOU PREACH: POWER, PATERNALISM, AND THE CHRISTIAN LAWYER FOR THE POOR, 31 Fordham Urb. L.J. 111, 133+ (2003) 2844 DOES A MARRIAGE REALLY NEED SEX?: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE GENDER RESTRICTION ON MARRIAGE, 30 Fordham Urb. L.J. 2007, 2037+ (2003) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 2845 WATCHING OUT FOR GRANDMA: VIDEO CAMERAS IN NURSING HOMES MAY HELP TO ELIMINATE ABUSE, 30 Fordham Urb. L.J. 2083, 2106 (2003) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2846 GAY RIGHTS, EQUAL PROTECTION, AND THE CLASSIFICATIONFRAMING QUANDARY, 21 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 329, 341+ (2014) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 2847 ANONYMITY, FACEPRINTS, AND THE CONSTITUTION, 21 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 409, 466 (2014) 2848 PATENT LAW AS PUBLIC LAW, 20 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 41, 104 (2012) 2849 JUDICIAL ENGAGEMENT, WRITTEN CONSTITUTIONS, AND THE VALUE OF PRESERVATION: THE CASE OF INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS, 19 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 909, 930+ (2012) 2850 WILL THE SUPREME COURT BE FAITHFUL TO ITS OATH TO UPHOLD THE CONSTITUTION IN THE OBAMACARE CASE?, 19 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 959, 972 (2012) 2851 JUDICIAL ENGAGEMENT IN ENFORCING LIMITS ON GOVERNMENT POWER, 19 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 973, 987 (2012) 2852 ENGAGING HUMAN NATURE IN SUPPORT OF JUDICIAL ENGAGEMENT, 19 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 989, 1028 (2012) 2853 JUDICIAL ENGAGEMENT MEANS NO MORE MAKE-BELIEVE JUDGING, 19 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 1053, 1070 (2012) 2854 PORNOGRAPHY, MORALITY, AND HARM: WHY MILLER SHOULD SURVIVE LAWRENCE, 15 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 611, 679+ (2008) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2855 PRECEDENT, SUPER-PRECEDENT, 14 Geo. Mason L. Rev. 363, 411+ (2007) 2856 THE FUTURE OF FAMILY, 23 Geo. Mason U. Civ. Rts. L.J. 177, 186+ (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2857 THE IVORY TOWER UNDER SIEGE: A CONSTITUTIONAL BASIS FOR ACADEMIC FREEDOM, 21 Geo. Mason U. Civ. Rts. L.J. 259, 298 (2011) 2858 DE FACTO DISPARATE IMPACT FAMILIAL DISCRIMINATION (HOUSING FOR OLDER PERSONS AGE FIFTY-FIVE AND OVER) UNDER THE FAIR HOUSING ACT: IS IT LEGAL? IS IT CONSTITUTIONAL?, 21 Geo. Mason U. Civ. Rts. L.J. 1, 29+ (2010) 2859 PERSONAL DIGNITY, EQUAL OPPORTUNITY, AND THE ELIMINATION OF LEGACY PREFERENCES, 21 Geo. Mason U. Civ. Rts. L.J. 31, 82+ (2010) 2860 GET A ROOM: SEXUAL DEVICE STATUTES AND THE LEGAL CLOSETING OF SEXUAL IDENTITY, 20 Geo. Mason U. Civ. Rts. L.J. 315, 349+ (2010) 2861 THE DEFINITION OF "MAJOR LIFE ACTIVITY" UNDER ADAMS V. RICE IS NOT "SUBSTANTIALLY LIMITING", 20 Geo. Mason U. Civ. Rts. L.J. 417, 448+ (2010) 2862 SAME-SEX MARRIAGE AND THE NEW MEXICO EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT, 20 Geo. Mason U. Civ. Rts. L.J. 209, 235 (2010) 2863 RECONCILING LAWRENCE V. TEXAS WITH "DON'T ASK, DON'T TELL": THE VALUE OF THE COOK V. GATES INTERMEDIATE-DEFERENTIAL APPROACH, 20 Geo. Mason U. Civ. Rts. L.J. 237, 278+ (2010) 2864 RACIAL AND SEXUAL PATERNALISM, 19 Geo. Mason U. Civ. Rts. L.J. 553, © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 624+ (2009) 2865 THE UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF DOMA + INA: HOW IMMIGRATION LAW PROVIDES A FORUM FOR ATTACKING DOMA, 18 Geo. Mason U. Civ. Rts. L.J. 455, 493+ (2008) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2866 ARMED BY RIGHT: THE EMERGING JURISPRUDENCE OF THE SECOND AMENDMENT, 18 Geo. Mason U. Civ. Rts. L.J. 167, 190+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2867 WRITING ON THE WALL: THE IMPENDING DEMISE OF MODERN SIGN REGULATION UNDER THE FIRST AMENDMENT AND STATE CONSTITUTIONS, 18 Geo. Mason U. Civ. Rts. L.J. 1, 50 (2007) 2868 THE FREEDOM OF INTIMATE ASSOCIATION IN THE TWENTY FIRST CENTURY, 16 Geo. Mason U. Civ. Rts. L.J. 269, 307+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2869 THE JUVENILE DEATH PENALTY AND THE COURT'S CONSENSUSPLUS EIGHTH AMENDMENT, 17 Geo. Mason U. Civ. Rts. L.J. 157, 197+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2870 A STEP FORWARD: LESBIAN PARENTAGE AFTER ELISA B. V. SUPERIOR COURT, 17 Geo. Mason U. Civ. Rts. L.J. 237, 266+ (2006) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2871 THE PRIMACY OF THE INDIVIDUAL IN THE POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY AND CIVIL RIGHTS JURISPRUDENCE OF JUSTICE CLARENCE THOMAS, 14 Geo. Mason U. Civ. Rts. L.J. 27, 73 (2004) 2872 LIFE AFTER LAWRENCE V. TEXAS: AN EXAMINATION OF THE DECISION'S IMPACT ON A HOMOSEXUAL PARENT'S RIGHT TO CUSTODY OF HIS/HER OWN CHILDREN IN VIRGINIA "The effects of . . . prejudice, however real, cannot justify a . . . cl, 15 Geo. Mason U. Civ. Rts. L.J. 105, 145+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2873 A NEW AGE OF PRIVACY PROTECTION: A PROPOSAL FOR AN INTERNATIONAL PERSONAL DATA PRIVACY TREATY, 42 Geo. Wash. Int'l L. Rev. 659, 685 (2010) 2874 HOME IS WHERE THE HEART IS: SEXUAL ORIENTATION DISCRIMINATION AND THE RIGHT TO ADEQUATE HOUSING IN INTERNATIONAL LAW, 40 Geo. Wash. Int'l L. Rev. 1343, 1364+ (2009) 2875 TRANSNATIONAL GUIDANCE IN TERRORISM CASES, 38 Geo. Wash. Int'l L. Rev. 1, 31 (2006) 2876 THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE DEATH PENALTY: SOUTH AFRICA AS A MODEL FOR THE UNITED STATES, 38 Geo. Wash. Int'l L. Rev. 209, 245+ (2006) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 2877 CANADIAN FUNDAMENTAL JUSTICE AND U.S. DUE PROCESS: TWO MODELS FOR A GUARANTEE OF BASIC ADJUDICATIVE FAIRNESS, 37 Geo. Wash. Int'l L. Rev. 1, 50 (2005) 2878 HISTORICAL AND COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVES ON THE EXCEPTIONAL SEVERITY OF SENTENCING IN THE UNITED STATES, 36 © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Geo. Wash. Int'l L. Rev. 227, 230+ (2004) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2879 FAMILY "DE-UNIFICATION" IN THE UNITED STATES: INTERNATIONAL LAW ENCOURAGES IMMIGRATION REFORM FOR SAME-GENDER BINATIONAL PARTNERS, 36 Geo. Wash. Int'l L. Rev. 915, 924+ (2004) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 2880 POSITIVE LAW : PROVIDING ADEQUATE MEDICAL CARE FOR HIVPOSITIVE IMMIGRATION DETAINEES, 81 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1329, 1367 (2013) 2881 THE FEDERAL RIGHT TO AN ADEQUATE EDUCATION, 81 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 92, 107+ (2013) HN: 2,5 (S.Ct.) 2882 NAMING BABY: THE CONSTITUTIONAL DIMENSIONS OF PARENTAL NAMING RIGHTS, 80 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 159, 201+ (2011) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2883 POLICING THE POLICE: FREEDOM OF THE PRESS, THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY, AND CIVILIAN RECORDINGS OF POLICE ACTIVITY, 80 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 274, 310+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2884 THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE AND THE PROCESS OF CONSTITUTIONAL CHANGE, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1232, 1254+ (2010) 2885 PENALIZING PUNITIVE DAMAGES: WHY THE SUPREME COURT NEEDS A LESSON IN LAW AND ECONOMICS, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 774, 821 (2010) 2886 SPLITTING THE ATOM OF PROPERTY: RIGHTS EXPERIMENTALISM AS OBLIGATION TO FUTURE GENERATIONS, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1411, 1477 (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2887 THE ASPIRATIONAL CONSTITUTION, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1631, 1671+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2888 A RIGHT TO DECIDE NOT TO BE A LEGAL FATHER: GONZALES V. CARHART AND THE ACCEPTANCE OF EMOTIONAL HARM AS A CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED INTEREST, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 141, 171+ (2008) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2889 EQUAL LIBERTY: ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE EQUALITY, 76 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1457, 1489+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2890 THE "REPUGNANCE" LENS OF GONZALES V. CARHART AND OTHER THEORIES OF REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS: EVALUATING ADVANCED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGIES, 76 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1514, 1598+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2891 PROSECUTING THE WOMB, 76 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1657, 1746 (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2892 TWO ZONES OF PROPHYLAXIS: THE SCOPE OF THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT ENFORCEMENT POWER, 76 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1, 51 (2007) 2893 THE RIGHT TO BE HURT: TESTING THE BOUNDARIES OF CONSENT, 75 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 165, 236+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 2894 REHNQUIST, RACISM, AND RACE JURISPRUDENCE, 74 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1019, 1042 (2006) 2895 THE CONSERVATIVE CASE FOR FEDERALISM, 74 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 874, 887 (2006) 2896 THE INDIVIDUAL RIGHT TO FEDERALISM IN THE REHNQUIST COURT, 74 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 888, 905+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2897 FEDERALISM, INSTRUMENTALISM, AND THE LEGACY OF THE REHNQUIST COURT, 74 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 906, 955+ (2006) 2898 IF SEPARATE, THEN AT LEAST EQUAL: RETHINKING BROWN V. BOARD OF EDUCATION AND DE FACTO PUBLIC SCHOOL SEGREGATION, 73 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 668, 691 (2005) 2899 THE FIRST AMENDMENT, THE PUBLIC-PRIVATE DISTINCTION, AND NONGOVERNMENTAL SUPPRESSION OF WARTIME POLITICAL DEBATE, 73 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 101, 173+ (2004) 2900 DISENTANGLING PRIVACY FROM PROPERTY: TOWARD A DEEPER UNDERSTANDING OF GENETIC PRIVACY, 72 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 737, 814+ (2004) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 2901 EUGENICS AND COMPULSORY STERILIZATION LAWS: PROVIDING REDRESS FOR THE VICTIMS OF A SHAMEFUL ERA IN UNITED STATES HISTORY, 72 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 862, 891+ (2004) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2902 HOMICIDE AND THE UNREASONABLE MAN Murder and the Reasonable Man: Passion and Fear in the Criminal Courtroom by Cynthia Lee. NYU Press 2003. Pp. 278. $37.95., 72 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 597, 620 (2004) 2903 ELUSIVE FOUNDATION: JOHN MARSHALL, JAMES WILSON, AND THE PROBLEM OF RECONCILING POPULAR SOVEREIGNTY AND NATURAL LAW JURISPRUDENCE IN THE NEW FEDERAL REPUBLIC, 72 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 113, 193+ (2003) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2904 MARBURY V. MADISON AND THE MADISONIAN VISION, 72 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 197, 252+ (2003) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2905 A MODEST PROPOSAL TO DEPORT THE CHILDREN OF GAY CITIZENS, & ETC.: IMMIGRATION LAW, THE DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT AND THE CHILDREN OF SAME-SEX COUPLES, 25 Geo. Immigr. L.J. 407, 485+ (2011) 2906 ASKING AND TELLING: IDENTITY AND PERSECUTION IN SEXUAL AND/OR GENDER ORIENTATION ASYLUM CLAIMS-IMMUTABLE CHARACTERISTICS AND CONCEPTS OF PERSECUTION UNDER U.S. ASYLUM LAW, 25 Geo. Immigr. L.J. 117, 150+ (2010) 2907 PLYLER IN PERIL: WHY THE SUPREME COURT'S DECISION IN PLYLER v. DOE IS AT RISK OF BEING REVERSED-AND WHAT CONGRESS SHOULD DO ABOUT IT, 25 Geo. Immigr. L.J. 195, 212+ (2010) 2908 IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT AND HARBORING DOCTRINE, 24 Geo. Immigr. L.J. 147, 188+ (2010) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 2909 UNDERSTANDING GLOBAL DUE PROCESS, 23 Geo. Immigr. L.J. 365, 401 (2009) 2910 LOVE AND WAR: FAMILY MIGRATION IN TIME OF NATIONAL EMERGENCY, 23 Geo. Immigr. L.J. 85, 127 (2008) 2911 THE IMPERFECT LEGACY OF GOMEZ v. INS: USING SOCIAL PERCEPTIONS TO ADJUDICATE SOCIAL GROUP CLAIMS, 20 Geo. Immigr. L.J. 681, 710 (2006) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2912 ADMISSION DENIED: IN SUPPORT OF A DURESS EXCEPTION TO THE IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY ACT'S "MATERIAL SUPPORT FOR TERRORISM" PROVISION, 20 Geo. Immigr. L.J. 437, 481 (2006) 2913 INTERNATIONAL LAW AS A TOOL OF CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION IN THE EARLY IMMIGRATION POWER CASES, 19 Geo. Immigr. L.J. 125, 126+ (2004) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2914 DEMORE v. KIM-A DANCE OF POWER AND HUMAN RIGHTS, 18 Geo. Immigr. L.J. 697, 744 (2004) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 2915 THE NEW IMPERIALISM: TOWARD AN ADVOCACY STRATEGY FOR GMO ACCOUNTABILITY, 21 Geo. Int'l Envtl. L. Rev. 37, 69+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2916 HALF FULL ... OR COMPLETELY EMPTY?: ENVIRONMENTAL ALIEN TORT CLAIMS POST SOSA v. ALVAREZ-MACHAIN, 18 Geo. Int'l Envtl. L. Rev. 109, 147+ (2005) 2917 TYPE II PARTNERSHIPS, INTERNATIONAL LAW, AND THE COMMONS, 15 Geo. Int'l Envtl. L. Rev. 855, 886+ (2003) 2918 EQUILIBRIUM IN HIGH COURT REPRESENTATION FOR CRIMINAL DEFENDANTS: HOW THE SUPREME COURT BAR CAN CHAMPION CIVIL LIBERTIES, 26 Geo. J. Legal Ethics 911, 922+ (2013) 2919 SUPREME COURT RECUSAL FROM MARBURY TO THE MODERN DAY, 26 Geo. J. Legal Ethics 95, 151 (2013) 2920 THE EXECUTIVE AS ADVOCATE: MORAL CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION IN ENFORCEMENT DECISIONS AND THE ETHICAL OBLIGATIONS OF THE TAKE CARE CLAUSE, 25 Geo. J. Legal Ethics 751, 755+ (2012) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2921 LAWYERS, CONTEXT, AND LEGITIMACY: A NEW THEORY OF LEGAL ETHICS, 25 Geo. J. Legal Ethics 107, 163+ (2012) 2922 ETHICAL DUTIES OF EXPERT SUPREME COURT COUNSEL, 24 Geo. J. Legal Ethics 659, 675+ (2011) 2923 AMERICA IN LAWYERS' HANDS: LAWYERS AS SOCIAL ACTORS, 23 Geo. J. Legal Ethics 455, 461+ (2010) 2924 BOOK REVIEW: CASE OF A LIFETIME, 23 Geo. J. Legal Ethics 619, 632 (2010) 2925 FROM LAWYER-SPOUSE TO LAWYER-PARTNER: CONFLICTS OF © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. INTEREST IN THE 21ST CENTURY, 19 Geo. J. Legal Ethics 405, 418+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2926 TAXING PRIVACY, 21 Geo. J. on Poverty L. & Pol'y 1, 41 (2013) 2927 REDEFINING HUMAN RIGHTS LAWYERING THROUGH THE LENS OF CRITICAL THEORY: LESSONS FOR PEDAGOGY AND PRACTICE, 18 Geo. J. on Poverty L. & Pol'y 337, 399 (2011) 2928 BEYOND SEX: LEGAL REFORM FOR HIV/AIDS AND POVERTY REDUCTION, 15 Geo. J. on Poverty L. & Pol'y 781, 820+ (2008) 2929 PROTECTING CHILDREN'S RIGHTS INSIDE OF THE SCHOOLHOUSE GATES: ENDING CORPORAL PUNISHMENT IN SCHOOLS, 102 Geo. L.J. 481, 498+ (2014) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 2930 UPSIDE-DOWN JUDICIAL REVIEW, 101 Geo. L.J. 113, 156+ (2012) 2931 INTRODUCTION: THE FUTURE IMPACT OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGE: MORE QUESTIONS THAN ANSWERS, 100 Geo. L.J. 1855, 1879 (2012) 2932 FAMILY LAW PLURALISM: THE GUIDED-CHOICE REGIME OF MENUS, DEFAULT RULES, AND OVERRIDE RULES, 100 Geo. L.J. 1881, 1985+ (2012) 2933 RESPONSE: NO SUBSTITUTIONS, PLEASE, 100 Geo. L.J. 1989, 2014 (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2934 SEXUAL REORIENTATION, 100 Geo. L.J. 997, 1030+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2935 RESPONSE: HYBRID REVISITED, 100 Geo. L.J. 1069, 1081+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2936 THE JURY'S SECOND COMING, 100 Geo. L.J. 657, 707 (2012) 2937 THE ALIEN TORT STATUTE, FEDERALISM, AND THE NEXT WAVE OF TRANSNATIONAL LITIGATION, 100 Geo. L.J. 709, 757 (2012) 2938 THE NEW KINSHIP, 100 Geo. L.J. 367, 370+ (2012) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 2939 RELIGION AS A CONVERSATION STARTER: WHAT LIBERAL RELIGIOUS POLITICAL ADVOCATES ADD TO THE DEBATE ABOUT RELIGION'S PLACE IN LEGAL AND POLITICAL DISCOURSE, 100 Geo. L.J. 331, 365+ (2011) 2940 THE RULE OF LAW AS A LAW OF STANDARDS, 99 Geo. L.J. 1289, 1299 (2011) 2941 DON'T TELL MOM THE BABYSITTER'S DEAD: ARGUMENTS FOR A FEDERAL PARENT-CHILD PRIVILEGE AND A PROPOSAL TO AMEND ARTICLE V, 99 Geo. L.J. 605, 648+ (2011) 2942 THE WAGES OF STEALTH OVERRULING (WITH PARTICULAR ATTENTION TO MIRANDA v. ARIZONA), 99 Geo. L.J. 1, 63 (2010) 2943 WHY THE SUPREME COURT CARES ABOUT ELITES, NOT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, 98 Geo. L.J. 1515, 1581+ (2010) 2944 ROCKY MOUNTAIN SHOOTOUT: FREE EXERCISE & PRESERVING THE OPEN RANGE, 98 Geo. L.J. 1859, 1889 (2010) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 2945 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AND INTERNATIONAL LAW: NATIONAL EXCEPTIONALISM AND THE DEMOCRATIC DEFICIT?, 98 Geo. L.J. 433, 443+ (2010) 2946 TRIGGER LAWS, 97 Geo. L.J. 1639, 1671+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2947 (STILL) NOT FIT TO BE NAMED: MOVING BEYOND RACE TO EXPLAIN WHY "SEPARATE' NOMENCLATURE FOR GAY AND STRAIGHT RELATIONSHIPS WILL NEVER BE "EQUAL', 97 Geo. L.J. 1155, 1188+ (2009) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2948 A REPLY TO PIERRE, 97 Geo. L.J. 865, 866+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2949 "THE GREAT EQUALIZER": MAKING SENSE OF THE SUPREME COURT'S EQUAL PROTECTION JURISPRUDENCE IN AMERICAN PUBLIC EDUCATION AND BEYOND, 97 Geo. L.J. 917, 943+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2950 LEGISLATIVE SUPREMACY IN THE UNITED STATES?: RETHINKING THE "ENROLLED BILL" DOCTRINE, 97 Geo. L.J. 323, 390 (2009) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 2951 IS PRIVACY A WOMAN?, 97 Geo. L.J. 485, 510+ (2009) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2952 UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS: A CONVENIENT MEANS TO AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL END, 97 Geo. L.J. 621, 640+ (2009) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 2953 JUDICIAL REVIEW AND THE RIGHT TO RESIST, 97 Geo. L.J. 61, 118 (2008) 2954 SHOULD COURTS GIVE STARE DECISIS EFFECT TO STATUTORY INTERPRETATION METHODOLOGY?, 96 Geo. L.J. 1863, 1875+ (2008) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.) 2955 GODS & GAYS: ANALYZING THE SAME-SEX MARRIAGE DEBATE FROM A RELIGIOUS PERSPECTIVE, 96 Geo. L.J. 2103, 2119+ (2008) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2956 ADVOCACY MATTERS BEFORE AND WITHIN THE SUPREME COURT: TRANSFORMING THE COURT BY TRANSFORMING THE BAR, 96 Geo. L.J. 1487, 1564 (2008) 2957 HOW SELF-RESTRICTION LAWS CAN INFLUENCE SOCIETAL NORMS AND ADDRESS PROBLEMS OF BOUNDED RATIONALITY, 96 Geo. L.J. 1775, 1777+ (2008) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2958 CAN INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW COUNTENANCE FEDERAL FUNDING OF ABSTINENCE-ONLY EDUCATION?, 95 Geo. L.J. 1979, 1993+ (2007) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2959 THREATS TO JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE, REAL AND IMAGINED, 95 Geo. L.J. 929, 940+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2960 "PLUCKING THE MASK OF MYSTERY FROM ITS FACE": JURISPRUDENCE AND H.L.A. HART A Life of H.L.A. Hart: The Nightmare and the Noble Dream. By Nicola Lacey. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2004. Pp. xxii, 422. $35.00, 95 Geo. L.J. 733, 764+ (2007) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 2961 INTERNATIONAL LAW AND REHNQUIST-ERA REVERSALS, 94 Geo. L.J. 1319, 1319+ (2006) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2962 CRIMINAL JUSTICE AFTER THE CONSERVATIVE REFORMATION, 94 Geo. L.J. 1347, 1365 (2006) 2963 THE REHNQUIST COURT AND THE DEATH PENALTY, 94 Geo. L.J. 1367, 1383 (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2964 THE LIBERAL LEGACY OF BUSH v. GORE, 94 Geo. L.J. 1427, 1462+ (2006) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2965 CATEGORICAL REQUIREMENTS IN CONSTITUTIONAL CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 94 Geo. L.J. 1493, 1536+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2966 THE COURT OF PRAGMATISM AND INTERNATIONALIZATION: A RESPONSE TO PROFESSORS CHEMERINSKY AND AMANN, 94 Geo. L.J. 1565, 1588 (2006) 2967 THE INFORMATION PRIVACY LAW PROJECT, 94 Geo. L.J. 1087, 1088+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 2968 THE DEATH OF GOOD FAITH IN TREATY JURISPRUDENCE AND A CALL FOR RESURRECTION, 93 Geo. L.J. 1885, 1945 (2005) 2969 THE PATTERNS AND IMPLICATIONS OF POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS BY ELITE LAW SCHOOL FACULTY, 93 Geo. L.J. 1167, 1212 (2005) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2970 BOLLING, EQUAL PROTECTION, DUE PROCESS, AND LOCHNERPHOBIA, 93 Geo. L.J. 1253, 1285+ (2005) 2971 THE LIBERTARIAN-LITE CONSTITUTIONAL ORDER AND THE REHNQUIST COURT REVIEWING THE NEW CONSTITUTIONAL ORDER, BY MARK TUSHNET. PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS, 2003. 265 PAGES, 93 Geo. L.J. 1023, 1043+ (2005) HN: 1,2,4 (S.Ct.) 2972 THE CURRENT GENERATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW REVIEW OF THE NEW CONSTITUTIONAL ORDER, BY MARK TUSHNET. PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS, 2003. 265 PAGES, 93 Geo. L.J. 1061, 1091+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2973 GLORY DAYS: POPULAR CONSTITUTIONALISM, NOSTALGIA, AND THE TRUE NATURE OF CONSTITUTIONAL CULTURE, 93 Geo. L.J. 897, 906+ (2005) 2974 MEDIATING NORMS AND IDENTITY: THE ROLE OF TRANSNATIONAL JUDICIAL DIALOGUE IN CREATING AND ENFORCING INTERNATIONAL LAW, 93 Geo. L.J. 487, 487+ (2005) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 2975 FIRE, METAPHOR, AND CONSTITUTIONAL MYTH-MAKING, 93 Geo. L.J. 181, 239 (2004) 2976 ALBERT EINSTEIN, ESQ., 93 Geo. L.J. 319, 333 (2004) 2977 FEDERAL COURTS, STATE COURTS AND CIVIL RIGHTS: JUDICIAL POWER AND POLITICS REVIEW OF DANIEL R. PINELLO, GAY RIGHTS © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. AND AMERICAN LAW, CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS, 2003, PP. 349. $23.00 (HARDCOVER), 92 Geo. L.J. 941, 941+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2978 COMMENT: CHARLES BLACK AND HUMAN RIGHTS, 92 Geo. L.J. 773, 778+ (2004) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2979 THE MOBILITY PARADOX, 92 Geo. L.J. 481, 521 (2004) 2980 LOCHNER ERA REVISIONISM, REVISED: LOCHNER AND THE ORIGINS OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS CONSTITUTIONALISM, 92 Geo. L.J. 1, 13+ (2003) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2981 STATE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AS RESISTANCE TO NATIONAL POWER: TOWARD A FUNCTIONAL THEORY OF STATE CONSTITUTIONS, 91 Geo. L.J. 1003, 1064+ (2003) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2982 MINING FOR GOLD: THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA'S EXPERIENCE WITH COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 37 Ga. J. Int'l & Comp. L. 219, 265 (2009) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 2983 THE JURISPRUDENCE OF DISCRIMINATION AS OPPOSED TO SIMPLE INEQUALITY IN THE INTERNATIONAL CIVIL SERVICE, 36 Ga. J. Int'l & Comp. L. 1, 87+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2984 REDEFINING THE RIGHT TO BE LET ALONE: PRIVACY RIGHTS AND THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF TECHNICAL SURVEILLANCE MEASURES IN GERMANY AND THE UNITED STATES, 35 Ga. J. Int'l & Comp. L. 433, 493 (2007) 2985 RETHINKING CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW IN AMERICA AND THE COMMONWEALTH: JUDICIAL PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE COMMON LAW WORLD, 35 Ga. J. Int'l & Comp. L. 99, 143+ (2006) HN: 3,5 (S.Ct.) 2986 WOMEN AND LAW: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE UNITED STATES AND INDIAN SUPREME COURTS' EQUALITY JURISPRUDENCE, 34 Ga. J. Int'l & Comp. L. 557, 618 (2006) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 2987 THE USE OF INTERNATIONAL SOURCES IN CONSTITUTIONAL OPINION, 32 Ga. J. Int'l & Comp. L. 421, 428+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2988 INTERNATIONAL NORMS IN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 32 Ga. J. Int'l & Comp. L. 429, 436+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2989 DEMOCRACY IN DISGUISE: ASSESSING THE REFORMS TO THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS PROVISIONS IN GUYANA, 32 Ga. J. Int'l & Comp. L. 613, 655+ (2004) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 2990 A RELIANCE APPROACH TO PRECEDENT, 47 Ga. L. Rev. 1035, 1043+ (2013) 2991 COLLAPSING SUSPECT CLASS WITH SUSPECT CLASSIFICATION: WHY STRICT SCRUTINY IS TOO STRICT AND MAYBE NOT STRICT ENOUGH, 47 Ga. L. Rev. 301, 368+ (2013) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 2992 GENETIC PRIVACY & THE FOURTH AMENDMENT: UNREGULATED SURREPTITIOUS DNA HARVESTING, 47 Ga. L. Rev. 445, 476+ (2013) HN: © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 1 (S.Ct.) 2993 DISCRIMINATION UNDER A DESCRIPTION, 47 Ga. L. Rev. 1, 39+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 2994 PLAYING WELL WITH OTHERS-BUT STILL WINNING: CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS, PRECEDENT, AND THE POSSIBILITIES OF A MULTIMEMBER COURT, 46 Ga. L. Rev. 1059, 1087+ (2012) 2995 STATE AMICI, COLLECTIVE ACTION, AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF FEDERALISM DOCTRINE, 46 Ga. L. Rev. 355, 406 (2012) 2996 WHAT MCDONALD MEANS FOR UNENUMERATED RIGHTS, 45 Ga. L. Rev. 1073, 1093+ (2011) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 2997 NOAH'S CURSE: HOW RELIGION OFTEN CONFLATES STATUS, BELIEF, AND CONDUCT TO RESIST ANTIDISCRIMINATION NORMS, 45 Ga. L. Rev. 657, 720+ (2011) 2998 FOREIGN STATES ARE FOREIGN STATES: WHY FOREIGN STATEOWNED CORPORATIONS ARE NOT PERSONS UNDER THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE, 45 Ga. L. Rev. 913, 949+ (2011) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 2999 "I'M NOT GAY, M'KAY?": SHOULD FALSELY CALLING SOMEONE A HOMOSEXUAL BE DEFAMATORY?, 44 Ga. L. Rev. 739, 767+ (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3000 STATE-CREATED PROPERTY AND DUE PROCESS OF LAW: FILLING THE VOID LEFT BY ENGQUIST V. OREGON DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, 44 Ga. L. Rev. 161, 214+ (2009) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 3001 "RABBIT" HUNTING IN THE SUPREME COURT: THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF STATE PROHIBITIONS OF SEX TOY SALES FOLLOWING LAWRENCE V. TEXAS, 44 Ga. L. Rev. 245, 283+ (2009) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3002 FINDING A BALANCE: CREATING AN INTERNATIONAL EXHAUSTION REQUIREMENT FOR THE ALIEN TORT STATUTE, 43 Ga. L. Rev. 1245, 1284+ (2009) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 3003 CHILD WELFARE AND FUTURE PERSONS, 43 Ga. L. Rev. 367, 445+ (2009) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 3004 DISTORTING DUE PROCESS FOR NOBLE PURPOSES: THE EMASCULATION OF AMERICA'S MATERIAL WITNESS LAWS, 42 Ga. L. Rev. 941, 978 (2008) 3005 JUDICIAL DECISIONMAKING, 42 Ga. L. Rev. 813, 832 (2008) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 3006 THE FUTURE OF FOOTNOTE FOUR, 41 Ga. L. Rev. 797, 841 (2007) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 3007 WHAT SHOULD WE CELEBRATE ON CONSTITUTION DAY?, 41 Ga. L. Rev. 453, 501+ (2007) 3008 THE CITY OF GOD AND THE CITIES OF MEN: A RESPONSE TO JASON CARTER, 41 Ga. L. Rev. 113, 155+ (2006) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 3009 EYES ON THEIR OWN PAPER: PRACTICAL CONSTRUCTION IN CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION, 39 Ga. L. Rev. 1065, 1108+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3010 CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION, COERCIVE INTERROGATION, AND CIVIL RIGHTS LITIGATION AFTER CHAVEZ V. MARTINEZ, 39 Ga. L. Rev. 733, 838+ (2005) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.) 3011 THE RIGHT TO A JURY DECISION ON SENTENCING FACTS AFTER BOOKER: WHAT THE SEVENTH AMENDMENT CAN TEACH THE SIXTH, 39 Ga. L. Rev. 895, 969 (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3012 ARBITRATION AND THE BATSON PRINCIPLE, 38 Ga. L. Rev. 1145, 1240+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3013 PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS V. MICHIGAN DOCUMENT SERVICES, INC.: THE SIXTH CIRCUIT FRUSTRATES THE CONSTITUTIONAL PURPOSE OF COPYRIGHT AND THE FAIR USE DOCTRINE, 31 Ga. L. Rev. 325, 325 (1996) 3014 GAYBORHOODS: INTERSECTIONS OF LAND USE REGULATION, SEXUAL MINORITIES, AND THE CREATIVE CLASS, 28 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 789, 799+ (2012) 3015 THE FIRST AMENDMENT . . . UNITED, 27 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 935, 987 (2011) 3016 LOCHNER, LAWRENCE, AND LIBERTY, 27 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 609, 672+ (2011) 3017 AN UNINTENDED CASUALTY OF THE WAR ON TERROR, 27 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 299, 304+ (2011) 3018 THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO COMMUNITY SERVICES, 26 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 763, 801 (2010) 3019 UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES: WHY CONGRESS SHOULD TREAD LIGHTLY WHEN ENTERING THE FIELD OF FAMILY LAW, 25 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 397, 434+ (2008) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 3020 THE RELEVANCY OF FOREIGN LAW AS PERSUASIVE AUTHORITY AND CONGRESS'S RESPONSE TO ITS USE: A PREEMPTIVE ATTACK ON THE CONSTITUTION RESTORATION ACT, 23 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 455, 480+ (2006) HN: 1,4,5 (S.Ct.) 3021 WITT V. DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE SUBJECTS "DON'T ASK, DON'T TELL" TO INTERMEDIATE SCRUTINY, 39 Golden Gate U. L. Rev. 363, 376+ (2009) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3022 WHEN ARE LAW AND ECONOMICS ISOMORPHIC?, 39 Golden Gate U. L. Rev. 183, 220+ (2009) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3023 THE SERVANT OF ALL: HUMILITY, HUMANITY, AND JUDICIAL DIVERSITY, 38 Golden Gate U. L. Rev. 175, 194 (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3024 OUTGROWING THE COMMERCE CLAUSE: FINDING ENDANGERED SPECIES A HOME IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK, 36 Golden Gate U. L. Rev. 489, 526 (2006) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 3025 SYMPTOMS FOR SCALIA AND TEXAS: GAY RIGHTS AND AMERICAN NATIONALISM, 35 Golden Gate U. L. Rev. 111, 111+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3026 PRETEND TO DEFEND: EXECUTIVE DUTY AND THE DEMISE OF "DON'T ASK, DON'T TELL", 48 Gonz. L. Rev. 107, 112+ (2013) 3027 "GIVE ME YOUR TIRED, YOUR POOR, YOUR HUDDLED MASSES"-JUST AS LONG AS THEY FIT THE HETERONORMATIVE IDEAL: U.S. IMMIGRATION LAW'S EXCLUSIONARY & INEQUITABLE TREATMENT OF LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, TRANSGENDERED, AND QUEER MIG, 48 Gonz. L. Rev. 673, 700 (2013) 3028 CONCERNING THEIR HEARTS AND MINDS STATE OF OREGON V. BEAGLEY, FAITH-HEALING, AND A SUGGESTION FOR MEANINGFUL FREE EXERCISE EXEMPTIONS, 46 Gonz. L. Rev. 147, 187+ (2011) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 3029 A RESTATEMENT OF JURISPRUDENCE: WHY NOT?, 44 Gonz. L. Rev. 159, 186+ (2009) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3030 JUSTICE STEPHEN FIELD'S EXPANSION OF THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT: FROM THE SAFEGUARDS OF FEDERALISM TO A STATE OF JUDICIAL HEGEMONY, 43 Gonz. L. Rev. 77, 168+ (2008) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3031 HER BODY IS A BATTLEFIELD: THE APPLICABILITY OF THE ALIEN TORT STATUTE TO CORPORATE HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES IN JUAREZ, MEXICO, 40 Gonz. L. Rev. 503, 533 (2005) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 3032 A SURVEY OF GAY RIGHTS CULMINATING IN LAWRENCE V. TEXAS, 39 Gonz. L. Rev. 539, 573+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3033 TEMPEST IN A TEACUP OR THE MYSTIQUE OF SEXUAL LEGAL DISCOURSE, 38 Gonz. L. Rev. 601, 653+ (2002) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3034 INTERNATIONAL LAW FRAMEWORKS BY DAVID J. BEDERMAN, 22 NO. 7 GPSolo 60, 60 (2005) 3035 SHERRY'S MODEL JUSTICE: ANTHONY KENNEDY, 16 Green Bag 2d 455, 456+ (2013) 3036 LIBERTY'S SAFETY NET, 16 Green Bag 2d 467, 472+ (2013) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 3037 WHEN IT MATTERS MOST, IT IS STILL THE KENNEDY COURT, 11 Green Bag 2d 427, 442 (2008) 3038 JUSTICE KENNEDY The Swing Voter & His Critics, 11 Green Bag 2d 317, 319+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3039 CERAMIC SYMBOLISM, 10 Green Bag 2d 6, 6 (2006) 3040 THE END OF AN ERA October Term 2004, 8 Green Bag 2d 345, 354 (2005) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 3041 REFLECTIONS ON THE JUDICIAL OATH, 8 Green Bag 2d 177, 186 (2005) 3042 LOWER COURT OBEDIENCE & THE NINTH CIRCUIT, 7 Green Bag 2d 315, 319+ (2004) 3043 THE NEW "NEW FEDERALISM" The Supreme Court in Hibbs (and Guillen), 6 © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Green Bag 2d 349, 357 (2003) 3044 OCTOBER TERM 2002, 6 Green Bag 2d 367, 369+ (2003) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3045 "THE TYRANNY OF THE MAJORITY IS NO MYTH": ITS DANGERS FOR SAME-SEX COUPLES, 34 Hamline J. Pub. L. & Pol'y 235, 257+ (2013) 3046 PERRY V. SCHWARZENEGGER: WHY THE FEDERAL JUDICIARY IS THE RIGHT COURSE TO SECURE MARRIAGE EQUALITY, REMOVE UNNECESSARY DISPARITIES, AND INTEGRATE SAME-SEX COUPLES INTO SOCIETY, 32 Hamline J. Pub. L. & Pol'y 215, 260+ (2010) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 3047 THE UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND CONSTITUTIONAL ADJUDICATION: CHALLENGES TO COSMOPOLITAN LAW, 30 Hamline J. Pub. L. & Pol'y 245, 283 (2008) 3048 WHY THE CIVIL INSTITUTION OF MARRIAGE MUST BE EXTENDED TO SAME SEX COUPLES, 26 Hamline J. Pub. L. & Pol'y 73, 110+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3049 SCALIA'S SHIP OF REVULSION HAS SAILED: WILL LAWRENCE PROTECT ADULTS WHO ADOPT LOVERS TO HELP ENSURE THEIR INHERITANCE FROM INCEST PROSECUTION?, 32 Hamline L. Rev. 95, 132+ (2009) 3050 CITIZENS FOR EQUAL PROTECTION V. BRUNING: WHY THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT WRONGLY UPHELD NEBRASKA'S S 29 IN THE FACE OF AN EQUAL PROTECTION CHALLENGE, 30 Hamline L. Rev. 373, 408+ (2007) 3051 THE SECOND AMENDMENT IN THE SUPREME COURT: WHERE IT'S BEEN AND WHERE IT'S GOING, 29 Hamline L. Rev. 449, 459 (2006) 3052 BAKER v. NELSON REVISITED: IS SAME-SEX MARRIAGE COMING TO MINNESOTA?, 28 Hamline L. Rev. 425, 429+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3053 A RENEWED CALL FOR DIVERSITY AMONG SUPREME COURT CLERKS: HOW A DIVERSE BODY OF CLERKS CAN AID THE HIGH COURT AS AN INSTITUTION, 23 Harv. BlackLetter L.J. 23, 54+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3054 RESTRUCTURING THE FRAMEWORK FOR LEGAL ANALYSES OF GAY PARENTING, 21 Harv. BlackLetter L.J. 109, 127 (2005) 3055 CYBERBULLYING AND THE INNOCENCE NARRATIVE, 48 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 357, 407+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3056 ABORTION AND DISGUST, 48 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 409, 410+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3057 GIVING CASEY ITS BITE BACK: THE ROLE OF RATIONAL BASIS REVIEW IN UNDUE BURDEN ANALYSIS, 48 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 279, 323+ (2013) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 3058 THE STATE OF PROGRESSIVE CONSTITUTIONAL THEORY: THE PARADOX OF CONSTITUTIONAL DEMOCRACY AND THE PROJECT OF POLITICAL JUSTIFICATION, 47 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 371, 455+ (2012) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 3059 REPUTATION IN A NETWORKED WORLD: REVISITING THE SOCIAL FOUNDATIONS OF DEFAMATION LAW, 45 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 261, 328 (2010) 3060 THE EMERGING CRIMINAL WAR ON SEX OFFENDERS, 45 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 435, 481 (2010) 3061 WORKING WITH CLIENTS TO DEVELOP COMPATIBLE VISIONS OF WHAT IT MEANS TO "WIN" A CASE: REFLECTIONS ON SCHROER V. BILLINGTON, 45 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 205, 245+ (2010) 3062 ROE RAGE: DEMOCRATIC CONSTITUTIONALISM AND BACKLASH, 42 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 373, 399+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3063 LAWRENCE v. TEXAS AND THE LIMITS OF THE CRIMINAL LAW, 42 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 1, 1+ (2007) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 3064 THE IMMIGRANT RIGHTS MARCHES OF 2006 AND THE PROSPECTS FOR A NEW CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT, 42 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 99, 138 (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3065 MARITAL STATUS AS PROPERTY: TOWARD A NEW JURISPRUDENCE FOR GAY RIGHTS, 41 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 509, 551+ (2006) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 3066 CONSTITUTIONAL CONSCIENCE, CONSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY: THE ROLE OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS IN PROTECTING INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS, 41 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 219, 263 (2006) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 3067 GOODRIDGE IN CONTEXT, 40 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 1, 29+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3068 SMITH v. CITY OF SALEM: TITLE VII PROTECTS CONTRA-GENDER BEHAVIOR, 40 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 277, 288 (2005) 3069 TURNING LEMONS INTO LEMONADE: MAKING GEORGIA v. ASHCROFT THE MOBILE v. BOLDEN OF 2007, 39 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 485, 511+ (2004) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 3070 MY HARVARD LAW SCHOOL, 39 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 317, 330+ (2004) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 3071 REACHING OUT TO THE MOST INSULAR MINORITIES: A PROPOSAL FOR IMPROVING LATINO ACCESS TO THE AMERICAN LEGAL SYSTEM, 39 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 543, 583 (2004) 3072 GAY RIGHTS AND AMERICAN LAW. BY DANIEL R. PINELLO. CAMBRIDGE, U.K.: CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS, 2003. PP. 162 + APPENDICES, INDEX. $23.00 (CLOTH), 39 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 275, 277 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3073 THE MYTHOLOGY OF A HUMAN RIGHTS LEADER: HOW THE UNITED STATES HAS FAILED SEXUAL MINORITIES AT HOME AND ABROAD, 21 Harv. Hum. Rts. J. 197, 205+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3074 SUFFER THE CHILDREN?: A CALL FOR UNITED STATES RATIFICATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD, 19 Harv. Hum. Rts. J. 161, 190+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 3075 DEMOCRATIC DISOBEDIENCE: RECONCEIVING SELFDETERMINATION AND SECESSION AT INTERNATIONAL LAW, 51 Harv. Int'l L.J. 553, 598 (2010) 3076 RECENT DEVELOPMENT: THE UNITED STATES' SECOND AND THIRD PERIODIC REPORT TO THE UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE, 49 Harv. Int'l L.J. 509, 516+ (2008) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 3077 ON THE SINGULARITY OF LAW, 47 Harv. Int'l L.J. 517, 519+ (2006) 3078 THE DENATIONALIZATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 47 Harv. Int'l L.J. 243, 261+ (2006) 3079 THE NEW CANON: USING OR MISUSING FOREIGN LAW TO DECIDE DOMESTIC INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CLAIMS, 46 Harv. Int'l L.J. 1, 64+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3080 CRACK COCAINE, CONGRESSIONAL INACTION, AND EQUAL PROTECTION, 37 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 241, 294 (2014) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) .... MONOPOLIES AND THE CONSTITUTION: A HISTORY OF CRONY CAPITALISM, 36 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 983, 1054+ (2013) (Text not available on WESTLAW) .... UNDERSTANDING "THE LOOP": REGULATING THE NEXT GENERATION OF WAR MACHINES, 36 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 1139, 1185+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) (Text not available on WESTLAW) 3083 PUBLIC CHOICE THEORY AND OVERCRIMINALIZATION, 36 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 715, 793 (2013) 3084 SHOULD WE MAKE CRIME IMPOSSIBLE?, 36 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 795, 848+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3085 ECONOMIC FREEDOMS AND THE CONSTITUTION, 35 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 13, 24+ (2012) 3086 FEDERALISM AS A DISCOVERY PROCESS AND A CATALYST FOR HUMILITY, 35 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 115, 120 (2012) 3087 IN DEFENSE OF SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS, OR THE PROMISE OF LAWFUL RULE, 35 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 283, 287+ (2012) 3088 THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF PROPOSITION 8, 34 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 879, 888+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3089 WHY WE CANNOT ASK WHY: ETHICAL INDEPENDENCE AND VOTER INTENT, 34 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 1099, 1116 (2011) 3090 DAMAGES UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT: SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY AND A CALL FOR LEGISLATIVE REFORM, 34 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 705, 767 (2011) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 3091 CAN CONGRESS OVERTURN GRAHAM v. FLORIDA?, 34 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 367, 375 (2011) 3092 ORIGINALISM AND THE CONSTITUTION: DOES ORIGINALISM ALWAYS PROVIDE THE ANSWER?, 34 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 73, 88 (2011) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 3093 INTERPRETATION AND CONSTRUCTION: ORIGINALISM AND ITS DISCONTENTS, 34 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 99, 108+ (2011) 3094 CAN CONGRESS OVERTURN KENNEDY v. LOUISIANA?, 33 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 1031, 1037+ (2010) 3095 A FAINT-HEARTED LIBERTARIAN AT BEST: THE SWEET MYSTERY OF JUSTICE ANTHONY KENNEDY THE TIE GOES TO FREEDOM: JUSTICE ANTHONY M. KENNEDY ON LIBERTY. HELEN J. KNOWLES. ROWMAN & LITTLEFIELD, 2009, 33 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 333, 343+ (2010) 3096 SPEAKING UP FOR MARRIAGE, 32 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 915, 930 (2009) 3097 AN AMERICAN AMENDMENT, 32 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 475, 475+ (2009) 3098 COUNTING STATES, 32 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 17, 23+ (2009) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.) 3099 SODOMY AND GUNS: TRADITION AS DEMOCRATIC DELIBERATION AND CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION, 32 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 193, 201+ (2009) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.) 3100 MANLINESS AND THE CONSTITUTION, 32 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 261, 332+ (2009) 3101 FOREWORD, 31 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 871, 873 (2008) 3102 TEXT vs. PRECEDENT IN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 31 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 947, 959+ (2008) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.) 3103 A GOVERNMENT OF ADEQUATE POWERS, 31 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 991, 993+ (2008) 3104 PARTIAL-BIRTH ABORTION AND THE PERILS OF CONSTITUTIONAL COMMON LAW, 31 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 519, 589+ (2008) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.) 3105 LOPEZ, MORRISON, AND RAICH: FEDERALISM IN THE REHNQUIST COURT, 31 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 761, 793 (2008) 3106 GAY SEX AND MARRIAGE, THE RECIPROCAL DISADVANTAGE PROBLEM, AND THE CRISIS IN LIBERAL CONSTITUTIONAL THEORY, 31 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 135, 145+ (2008) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3107 MORAL DUTY AND THE RULE OF LAW, 31 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 153, 170 (2008) 3108 OR FOR POORER? HOW SAME-SEX MARRIAGE THREATENS RELIGIOUS LIBERTY, 30 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 939, 945+ (2007) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3109 FOREIGN AND INTERNATIONAL LAW SOURCES IN DOMESTIC CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION, 30 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 173, 175 (2006) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3110 INTERNATIONAL LAW AS A RESOURCE IN CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION, 30 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 177, 189 (2006) 3111 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AND TRANSNATIONAL COMPARISONS: THE YOUNGSTOWN DECISION AND AMERICAN EXCEPTIONALISM, 30 Harv. © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 191, 221+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3112 FOREIGN SOURCES AND THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTION, 30 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 223, 230+ (2006) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 3113 BEFORE ROE v. WADE: JUDGE FRIENDLY'S DRAFT ABORTION OPINION, 29 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 1035, 1035+ (2006) HN: 1,4,5 (S.Ct.) 3114 DEFENDING AMERICA'S CHILDREN: HOW THE CURRENT SYSTEM GETS IT WRONG, 29 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 719, 742+ (2006) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 3115 AGAINST FOREIGN LAW, 29 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 291, 291+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3116 NEWS FOR THE LIBERTARIANS: THE MORAL TRADITION ALREADY CONTAINS THE LIBERTARIAN PREMISES, 29 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 61, 72 (2005) 3117 FREEDOM, 29 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 9, 26 (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3118 IF RACIAL DESEGREGATION, THEN SAME-SEX MARRIAGE? ORIGINALISM AND THE SUPREME COURT'S FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT, 28 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 781, 836+ (2005) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 3119 THE ANTIDISCRIMINATION EIGHTH AMENDMENT, 28 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 119, 168 (2004) 3120 THE USE OF INTERNATIONAL LAW IN JUDICIAL DECISIONS, 27 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 423, 429 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3121 THE USE OF INTERNATIONAL LAW IN THE AMERICAN ADJUDICATIVE PROCESS, 27 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 431, 442 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3122 LIBERAL ORIGINALISM: A PAST FOR THE FUTURE, 27 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 489, 541+ (2004) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3123 THE FEDERAL MARRIAGE AMENDMENT AND RULE BY JUDGES, 27 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 543, 544+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3124 DAVEY'S PLEA: BLAINE, BLAIR, WITTERS, AND THE PROTECTION OF RELIGIOUS FREEDOM, 27 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 299, 337 (2003) 3125 PRIVACY AND THE MODERN GRID, 25 Harv. J.L. & Tech. 199, 224 (2011) 3126 EMBRYONIC STEM CELL RESEARCH AND THE THEORY OF MEDICAL SELF-DEFENSE, 21 Harv. J.L. & Tech. 547, 564+ (2008) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 3127 ALONE AND UNREPRESENTED: A CALL TO CONGRESS TO PROVIDE COUNSEL FOR UNACCOMPANIED MINORS, 50 Harv. J. on Legis. 331, 347+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3128 SEX, SHAME, AND THE LAW: AN ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVE ON MEGAN'S LAWS, 42 Harv. J. on Legis. 355, 415+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3129 JURISDICTION-STRIPPING: THE PLEDGE PROTECTION ACT OF 2004, 42 Harv. J. on Legis. 511, 523+ (2005) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 3130 THE VICTIMS' RIGHTS AMENDMENT, 42 Harv. J. on Legis. 525, 555 (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3131 FEDERAL MARRIAGE AMENDMENT, 41 Harv. J. on Legis. 483, 492+ (2004) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3132 14 Harv. Latino L. Rev. 397, LATCRIT XV SYMPOSIUM AFTERWORD-AT AND BEYOND FIFTEEN: MAPPING LATCRIT THEORY, COMMUNITY, AND PRAXIS (2011) 3133 FOREWORD: EQUALITY DIVIDED, 127 Harv. L. Rev. 1, 83+ (2013) 3134 BEYOND THE DISCRIMINATION MODEL ON VOTING, 127 Harv. L. Rev. 95, 126 (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 3135 WINDSOR AND BROWN: MARRIAGE EQUALITY AND RACIAL EQUALITY, 127 Harv. L. Rev. 127, 138+ (2013) 3136 GRUTTER V. BOLLINGER: JUSTICE RUTH BADER GINSBURG'S LEGITIMIZATION OF THE ROLE OF COMPARATIVE AND INTERNATIONAL LAW IN U.S. JURISPRUDENCE, 127 Harv. L. Rev. 425, 425+ (2013) 3137 COURTING THE PEOPLE: DEMOSPRUDENCE AND THE LAW/POLITICS DIVIDE, 127 Harv. L. Rev. 437, 444+ (2013) 3138 RESPECTING DISSENT: JUSTICE GINSBURG'S CRITIQUE OF THE TROUBLING INVOCATION OF APPEARANCE, 127 Harv. L. Rev. 478, 480 (2013) 3139 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - SECOND AMENDMENT - SEVENTH CIRCUIT STRIKES DOWN ILLINOIS'S BAN ON PUBLIC CARRY OF READYTO-USE FIREARMS. - MOORE V. MADIGAN, 702 F.3D 933 (7TH CIR. 2012), REH'G EN BANC DENIED, 708 F.3D 901 (7TH CIR., 126 Harv. L. Rev. 2461, 2468+ (2013) 3140 AMERICA'S UNWRITTEN CONSTITUTION: THE PRECEDENTS AND PRINCIPLES WE LIVE BY. BY AKHIL REED AMAR. NEW YORK, N.Y.: BASIC BOOKS. 2012. PP. XVI, 615. $29.99, 126 Harv. L. Rev. 1532, 1551+ (2013) 3141 THE BENEFITS OF UNEQUAL PROTECTION, 126 Harv. L. Rev. 1348, 1362+ (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 3142 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-ECONOMIC LEGISLATION-D.C. CIRCUIT REJECTS CHALLENGE TO MILK REGULATION.-HETTINGA V. UNITED STATES, 677 F.3D 471 (D.C. CIR. 2012) (PER CURIAM), REH'G EN BANC DENIED, NO. 11-5065 (D.C. CIR. JUNE 21, 2012, 126 Harv. L. Rev. 1146, 1153 (2013) 3143 TORT LAW - DEFAMATION - NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION HOLDS THAT THE IMPUTATION OF HOMOSEXUALITY IS NO LONGER DEFAMATION PER SE. - YONATY V. MINCOLLA, 945 N.Y.S.2D 774 (APP. DIV. 2012)., 126 Harv. L. Rev. 852, 855+ (2013) 3144 EQUAL PROTECTION-SEXUAL ORIENTATION-FIRST CIRCUIT INVALIDATES STATUTE THAT DEFINES MARRIAGE AS LEGAL UNION BETWEEN ONE MAN AND ONE WOMAN.-MASSACHUSETTS V. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, 682 F.3D 1 (, © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 126 Harv. L. Rev. 611, 612+ (2012) 3145 REHABILITATING LOCHNER: DEFENDING INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AGAINST PROGRESSIVE REFORM. BY DAVID E. BERNSTEIN. CHICAGO, ILL.: UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO PRESS. 2011. PP. VIII, 194. $34.99., 125 Harv. L. Rev. 1120, 1128+ (2012) HN: 2,5 (S.Ct.) 3146 THE ANTICANON, 125 Harv. L. Rev. 379, 475+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3147 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-EIGHTH AMENDMENT-SEVENTH CIRCUIT INVALIDATES WISCONSIN INMATE SEX CHANGE PREVENTION ACT.-FIELDS V. SMITH, 653 F.3D 550 (7TH CIR. 2011), 125 Harv. L. Rev. 650, 657+ (2011) 3148 FOREWORD: NEUTRAL PRINCIPLES, MOTIVATED COGNITION, AND SOME PROBLEMS FOR CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 125 Harv. L. Rev. 1, 77+ (2011) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 3149 ADVISORY OPINIONS AND THE INFLUENCE OF THE SUPREME COURT OVER AMERICAN POLICYMAKING, 124 Harv. L. Rev. 2064, 2082+ (2011) 3150 THE STRUCTURAL SAFEGUARDS OF FEDERAL JURISDICTION, 124 Harv. L. Rev. 869, 940 (2011) 3151 THE NEW EQUAL PROTECTION, 124 Harv. L. Rev. 747, 803+ (2011) 3152 CAUSE LAWYERING FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES LAW AND THE CONTRADICTIONS OF THE DISABILITY RIGHTS MOVEMENT. By Samuel R. Bagenstos. New Haven & London: Yale Univ. Press. 2009. Pp. xii, 228. $48.00., 123 Harv. L. Rev. 1658, 1703 (2010) 3153 OVERBREADTH AND LISTENERS' RIGHTS, 123 Harv. L. Rev. 1749, 1770 (2010) 3154 EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION - CONGRESS CONSIDERS BILL TO PROHIBIT EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION ON THE BASIS OF SEXUAL ORIENTATION AND GENDER IDENTITY. - EMPLOYMENT NONDISCRIMINATION ACT OF 2009, H.R. 3017, 111TH CONG. (2009)., 123 Harv. L. Rev. 1803, 1810+ (2010) 3155 EQUAL PROTECTION - SAME-SEX MARRIAGE - CALIFORNIASUPREME COURT CLASSIFIES PROPOSITION 8 AS "AMENDMENT"RATHER THAN "REVISION." - STRAUSS V. HORTON, 207 P.3D 48 (CAL.2009)., 123 Harv. L. Rev. 1516, 1523 (2010) 3156 2. POSTCONVICTION ACCESS TO DNA EVIDENCE, 123 Harv. L. Rev. 222, 232 (2009) 3157 ANTI-INQUISITORIALISM, 122 Harv. L. Rev. 1634, 1704 (2009) 3158 INTIMATE DISCRIMINATION: THE STATE'S ROLE IN THE ACCIDENTS OF SEX AND LOVE, 122 Harv. L. Rev. 1307, 1402+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3159 STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT DECLARES PROHIBITION OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGES UNCONSTITUTIONAL.-IN RE MARRIAGE CASES, 183 P.3D 384 (CAL. 2008)., 122 Harv. L. Rev. 1557, 1564 (2009) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 3160 TRIMMING, 122 Harv. L. Rev. 1049, 1094+ (2009) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 3161 STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - SAME-SEX RELATIONS - SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN HOLDS THAT PUBLIC EMPLOYERS MAY NOT PROVIDE HEALTHCARE BENEFITS TO SAME-SEX DOMESTIC PARTNERS OF EMPLOYEES. - NATIONAL PRIDE AT WORK, INC. V. GOVE, 122 Harv. L. Rev. 1263, 1270 (2009) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 3162 DEAD OR ALIVE: ORIGINALISM AS POPULAR CONSTITUTIONALISM IN HELLER, 122 Harv. L. Rev. 191, 245+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3163 SECOND AMENDMENT MINIMALISM: HELLER AS GRISWOLD, 122 Harv. L. Rev. 246, 274+ (2008) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3164 FOREWORD: DEMOSPRUDENCE THROUGH DISSENT, 122 Harv. L. Rev. 4, 138+ (2008) 3165 UNEQUAL JUSTICE, 121 Harv. L. Rev. 1969, 2040 (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3166 REGULATING EUGENICS, 121 Harv. L. Rev. 1578, 1599+ (2008) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 3167 THE SEATTLE AND LOUISVILLE SCHOOL CASES: THERE IS NO OTHER WAY, 121 Harv. L. Rev. 158, 183+ (2007) 3168 1. ABORTION RIGHTS - "PARTIAL BIRTH" ABORTION, 121 Harv. L. Rev. 265, 275 (2007) 3169 MEDICAL SELF-DEFENSE, PROHIBITED EXPERIMENTAL THERAPIES, AND PAYMENT FOR ORGANS, 120 Harv. L. Rev. 1813, 1846+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3170 CONGRESS, ARTICLE IV, AND INTERSTATE RELATIONS, 120 Harv. L. Rev. 1468, 1542 (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3171 AN ORIGINALIST ANALYSIS OF THE NO RELIGIOUS TEST CLAUSE, 120 Harv. L. Rev. 1649, 1669 (2007) 3172 STATE LAW AS "OTHER LAW": OUR FIFTY SOVEREIGNS IN THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL CANON, 120 Harv. L. Rev. 1670, 1690+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3173 AFFIRMATIVE DUTIES AND JUDGES' DUTIES: UNITED STATES V. STOCKBERGER, 120 Harv. L. Rev. 1228, 1238+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3174 ORIGINAL MEANING AND ITS LIMITS, 120 Harv. L. Rev. 1279, 1300 (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3175 A RIGHT TO LEARN?: IMPROVING EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES THROUGH SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS, 120 Harv. L. Rev. 1323, 1344 (2007) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 3176 SOSA, CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW, AND THE CONTINUING RELEVANCE OF ERIE, 120 Harv. L. Rev. 869, 936 (2007) 3177 FOREWORD: THE COURT'S AGENDA - AND THE NATION'S, 120 Harv. L. Rev. 4, 64 (2006) 3178 ACTIVE LIBERTY: A PROGRESSIVE ALTERNATIVE TO TEXTUALISM © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. AND ORIGINALISM? Active Liberty: Interpreting Our Democratic Constitution. By Stephen Breyer. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. 2005. Pp. x, 161. $21.00., 119 Harv. L. Rev. 2387, 2418+ (2006) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 3179 INBRED OBSCURITY: IMPROVING INCEST LAWS IN THE SHADOW OF THE "SEXUAL FAMILY", 119 Harv. L. Rev. 2464, 2485+ (2006) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 3180 DESUETUDE, 119 Harv. L. Rev. 2209, 2229+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3181 EQUAL PROTECTION - SEXUAL ORIENTATION - KANSAS SUPREME COURT INVALIDATES UNEQUAL PUNISHMENTS FOR HOMOSEXUAL AND HETEROSEXUAL TEENAGE SEX OFFENDERS. - STATE V. LIMON, 122 P.3D 22 (KAN. 2005), 119 Harv. L. Rev. 2276, 2283+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3182 THE POLITICAL CONSTITUTION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, 119 Harv. L. Rev. 780, 851+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3183 IN MEMORIAM: WILLIAM H. REHNQUIST The editors of the Harvard Law Review respectfully dedicate this issue to Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist., 119 Harv. L. Rev. 10, 16 (2005) 3184 THE DEBATE OVER FOREIGN LAW IN ROPER V. SIMMONS, 119 Harv. L. Rev. 103, 108+ (2005) 3185 CONSTITUTIONAL COMPARISONS: CONVERGENCE, RESISTANCE, ENGAGEMENT, 119 Harv. L. Rev. 109, 128+ (2005) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 3186 FOREIGN LAW AND THE MODERN IUS GENTIUM, 119 Harv. L. Rev. 129, 147+ (2005) 3187 FOREIGN LAW AND THE DENOMINATOR PROBLEM, 119 Harv. L. Rev. 148, 167+ (2005) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 3188 FOREWORD: A POLITICAL COURT, 119 Harv. L. Rev. 31, 102+ (2005) 3189 RETALIATION AS SEX DISCRIMINATION, 119 Harv. L. Rev. 357, 366 (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3190 ASSESSING THE VIABILITY OF A SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS RIGHT TO IN VITRO FERTILIZATION, 118 Harv. L. Rev. 2792, 2813+ (2005) HN: 2,5 (S.Ct.) 3191 UNFIXING LAWRENCE, 118 Harv. L. Rev. 2858, 2881+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3192 JUVENILE CURFEWS AND THE MAJOR CONFUSION OVER MINOR RIGHTS, 118 Harv. L. Rev. 2400, 2421 (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3193 LAST RESORTS AND FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS: THE SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS IMPLICATIONS OF PROHIBITIONS ON MEDICAL MARIJUANA, 118 Harv. L. Rev. 1985, 2006+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3194 SQUARING THE CIRCLE? RECONCILING SOVEREIGNTY AND GLOBAL GOVERNANCE THROUGH GLOBAL GOVERNMENT NETWORKS A New World Order. By Anne-Marie Slaughter. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. University Press. 2004. Pp. xviii, 341. $2, 118 Harv. L. Rev. 1255, 1312 (2005) 3195 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - FREEDOM OF THOUGHT - SEVENTH CIRCUIT UPHOLDS CITY'S ORDER BANNING FORMER SEX OFFENDER FROM PUBLIC PARKS. - DOE V. CITY OF LAFAYETTE, 377 F.3D 757 (7TH CIR. 2004) (EN BANC)., 118 Harv. L. Rev. 1054, 1061 (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3196 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - STANDING - TENTH CIRCUIT DENIES STANDING TO MAN SEEKING INVALIDATION OF UTAH'S CONSENSUAL SODOMY LAW. - D.L.S. V. UTAH, 374 F.3D 971 (10TH CIR. 2004)., 118 Harv. L. Rev. 1070, 1077+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3197 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS - ELEVENTH CIRCUIT UPHOLDS ALABAMA STATUTE BANNING SALE OF SEX TOYS. - WILLIAMS V. ATTORNEY GENERAL, 378 F.3D 1232 (11TH CIR. 2004)., 118 Harv. L. Rev. 802, 809+ (2004) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 3198 COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW IN A GLOBAL AGE Comparative Constitutionalism: Cases and Materials. Edited by Norman Dorsen, Michel Rosenfeld, András Sajó & Susanne Baer. 2003. St. Paul, Minn.: West Group. Pp.lxv, 1383., 117 Harv. L. Rev. 2570, 2596+ (2004) 3199 LITIGATING THE DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT: THE NEXT BATTLEGROUND FOR SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, 117 Harv. L. Rev. 2684, 2707+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3200 MAKING OUTCASTS OUT OF OUTLAWS: THE UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION AND CRIMINAL ALIEN DETENTION, 117 Harv. L. Rev. 2731, 2752+ (2004) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3201 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS-ELEVENTH CIRCUIT UPHOLDS FLORIDA STATUTE BARRING GAYS FROM ADOPTING.-LOFTON V. SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES, 538 F.3D 804 (11TH CIR. 2004)., 117 Harv. L. Rev. 2791, 2798+ (2004) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 3202 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - DUE PROCESS CLAUSE - MASSACHUSETTS SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT HOLDS THAT OPPOSITE-SEX MARRIAGE LAW VIOLATES RIGHT TO MARRY. - GOODRIDGE V. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 798 N.E.2D 941 (MASS. 2003)., 117 Harv. L. Rev. 2441, 2447+ (2004) 3203 EIGHTH AMENDMENT - DEATH PENALTY - MISSOURI SUPREME COURT HOLDS THAT THE JUVENILE DEATH PENALTY VIOLATES THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT. - STATE EX REL. SIMMONS V. ROPER, 112 S.W.3D 397 (MO. 2003) (EN BANC), CERT. GRANTED, 124 S., 117 Harv. L. Rev. 2456, 2461 (2004) 3204 THE ROLE OF THE LOCAL IN THE DOCTRINE AND DISCOURSE OF RELIGIOUS LIBERTY, 117 Harv. L. Rev. 1810, 1892 (2004) 3205 LAWRENCE V. TEXAS: THE "FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT" THAT DARE NOT SPEAK ITS NAME, 117 Harv. L. Rev. 1893, 1955+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 3206 EQUALITY TALK: ANTISUBORDINATION AND ANTICLASSIFICATION VALUES IN CONSTITUTIONAL STRUGGLES OVER BROWN, 117 Harv. L. Rev. 1470, 1547+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3207 THE THEORISTS' CONSTITUTION - AND OURS Identity in Democracy. By Amy Gutmann. 2003. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press. Pp. ix, 246. $27.95 (Cloth)., 117 Harv. L. Rev. 1163, 1194 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3208 THE NOT-SO-BRAVE NEW CONSTITUTIONAL ORDER The New Constitutional Order. By Mark Tushnet. 2003. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. Pp. x, 265. $29.95 (cloth), 117 Harv. L. Rev. 647, 687+ (2003) 3209 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 117 Harv. L. Rev. 297, 307+ (2003) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3210 FOREWORD: FASHIONING THE LEGAL CONSTITUTION: CULTURE, COURTS, AND LAW, 117 Harv. L. Rev. 4, 112+ (2003) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3211 SAME-SEX MARRIAGE: AN ISSUE OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS NOT MORAL OPINIONS, 27 Harv. Women's L.J. 345, 346+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3212 QUEERING LEGAL EDUCATION: A PROJECT OF THEORETICAL DISCOVERY, 27 Harv. Women's L.J. 89, 136 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3213 "I AGREED TO WHAT?": A CALL FOR ENFORCEMENT OF CLARITY IN THE PRESENTATION OF PRIVACY POLICIES, 35 Hastings Comm. & Ent. L.J. 199, 222+ (2012) 3214 CUTTING CUPID OUT OF THE WORKPLACE: THE CAPACITY OF EMPLOYEES' CONSTITUTIONAL PRIVACY RIGHTS TO CONSTRAIN EMPLOYERS' ATTEMPTS TO LIMIT OFF-DUTY INTIMATE ASSOCIATIONS, 32 Hastings Comm. & Ent. L.J. 427, 446+ (2010) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3215 WHAT'S SEX GOT TO DO WITH IT? A CINEMATIC CRITIQUE ON THE ARGUMENTS AGAINST SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, 31 Hastings Comm. & Ent. L.J. 321, 338 (2009) 3216 SOMETHING TO (LEX LOCI) CELEBRATIONIS?: FEDERAL MARRIAGE BENEFITS FOLLOWING UNITED STATES V. WINDSOR, 41 Hastings Const. L.Q. 41, 51+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3217 A FAMILIAL PRIVACY RIGHT OVER DEATH IMAGES: CRITIQUING THE INTERNET-PROPELLED EMERGENCE OF A NASCENT CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT THAT PRESERVES HAPPY MEMORIES AND EMOTIONS, 40 Hastings Const. L.Q. 475, 480+ (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 3218 PAID ORGAN DONATIONS AND THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE NATIONAL ORGAN TRANSPLANT ACT, 40 Hastings Const. L.Q. 221, 275+ (2013) 3219 DOES A BROAD FREE EXERCISE RIGHT REQUIRE A NARROW DEFINITION OF "RELIGION"?, 39 Hastings Const. L.Q. 357, 390+ (2012) 3220 THE ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM: CONDUCT, GROUPS, AND LAWRENCE V. TEXAS, 39 Hastings Const. L.Q. 951, 978+ (2012) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 3221 WHOSE CONSTITUTION IS IT ANYWAY? THE EXECUTIVES' DISCRETION TO DEFEND INITIATIVES AMENDING THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION, 39 Hastings Const. L.Q. 327, 356 (2011) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 3222 HOW EQUALITY CONSTITUTES LIBERTY: THE ALIGNMENT OF CLS V. MARTINEZ, 38 Hastings Const. L.Q. 631, 672+ (2011) 3223 MARKETPLACE OF IDEAS 2.0: EXCLUDING VIEWPOINTS TO INCLUDE INDIVIDUALS, 38 Hastings Const. L.Q. 673, 695+ (2011) 3224 LESS THAN MEETS THE EYE: ANTIDISCRIMINATION AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF SECTION 5 ENFORCEMENT AND ELEVENTH AMENDMENT ABROGATION LAW SINCE CITY OF BOERNE V. FLORES, 38 Hastings Const. L.Q. 259, 337 (2011) 3225 SEEKING "COMMON GROUND:' A SECULAR STATEMENT, 38 Hastings Const. L.Q. 49, 90 (2010) 3226 "SEXTING' AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT, 37 Hastings Const. L.Q. 433, 485+ (2010) 3227 PROPOSITION 8 AND THE NEED FOR CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT INITIATIVE REFORM: TOLERANCE REQUIRES TIME AND DELIBERATION, 37 Hastings Const. L.Q. 591, 616+ (2010) 3228 THEOCRACY IN AMERICA: SHOULD CORE FIRST AMENDMENT VALUES BE PERMANENT?, 37 Hastings Const. L.Q. 65, 127+ (2009) 3229 HOLDING LEGISLATURES CONSTITUTIONALLY ACCOUNTABLE THROUGH FACIAL CHALLENGES, 36 Hastings Const. L.Q. 563, 610 (2009) 3230 A REEXAMINATION OF THE TINKER STANDARD: FREEDOM OF SPEECH IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS, 35 Hastings Const. L.Q. 575, 576+ (2008) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3231 MARBURY IN MEXICO: JUDICIAL REVIEW'S PRECOCIOUS SOUTHERN MIGRATION, 35 Hastings Const. L.Q. 41, 97+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3232 HAS MIGHTY CASEY STRUCK OUT?: SOCIETAL RELIANCE AND THE SUPREME COURT'S MODERN STARE DECISIS ANALYSIS, 34 Hastings Const. L.Q. 591, 622+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3233 THE REVIVAL OF IMPEACHMENT AS A PARTISAN POLITICAL WEAPON, 34 Hastings Const. L.Q. 161, 327 (2007) 3234 CHOICE V. CHANCE: THE CONSTITUTIONAL CASE FOR REGULATING HUMAN GERMLINE GENETIC MODIFICATION, 34 Hastings Const. L.Q. 133, 159+ (2006) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3235 WHY THE CASE FOR AMENDING THE U.S. CONSTITUTION TO PROHIBIT OR REGULATE GAY MARRIAGE IS "NOT PROVED", 32 Hastings Const. L.Q. 637, 651 (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3236 THE PROCREATIVE ARGUMENT FOR PROSCRIBING SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, 32 Hastings Const. L.Q. 653, 676+ (2005) HN: 3,5 (S.Ct.) 3237 SQUARE CIRCLES?!! RESTORING RATIONALITY TO THE SAME-SEX © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. "MARRIAGE" DEBATE, 32 Hastings Const. L.Q. 681, 724+ (2005) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 3238 A CONSERVATIVE CRITIQUE OF THE FEDERAL MARRIAGE AMENDMENT, 32 Hastings Const. L.Q. 725, 736+ (2005) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 3239 SUPREME COURT VOTING BEHAVIOR: 2002 TERM, 31 Hastings Const. L.Q. 499, 585 (2004) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 3240 FROM KIERKEGAARD TO KENNEDY: EXISTENTIALIST PHILOSOPHY IN THE SUPREME COURT'S DECISION IN PLANNED PARENTHOOD v. CASEY AND ITS EFFECT ON THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY, 31 Hastings Const. L.Q. 611, 613+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3241 OUR CONSTITUTION AS FEDERAL TREATY: A NEW THEORY OF UNITED STATES CONSTITUTIONAL CONSTRUCTION BASED ON AN ORIGINALIST UNDERSTANDING FOR ADDRESSING A NEW WORLD, 31 Hastings Const. L.Q. 269, 354+ (2004) 3242 REPORTERS AS REFUGEES: APPLYING UNITED STATES ASYLUM LAWS TO PERSECUTED JOURNALISTS IN MEXICO, 35 Hastings Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 149, 172 (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3243 LESS PRIVACY PLEASE, WE'RE BRITISH: INVESTIGATING CRIME WITH DNA IN THE U.K. AND THE U.S., 31 Hastings Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 487, 507+ (2008) 3244 LOOKING OVER A CROWD AND PICKING YOUR FRIENDS: CIVIL RIGHTS AND THE DEBATE OVER THE INFLUENCE OF FOREIGN AND INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW ON THE INTERPRETATION OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION, 30 Hastings Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 1, 41+ (2006) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3245 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN THE DEBATE CONCERNING THE USE OF FOREIGN LAW IN CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION, 30 Hastings Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 131, 150 (2006) 3246 FROM SEX FOR PLEASURE TO SEX FOR PARENTHOOD: HOW THE LAW MANUFACTURES MOTHERS, 65 Hastings L.J. 211, 226+ (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 3247 MARRIAGE RIGHTS AND THE GOOD LIFE: A SOCIOLOGICAL THEORY OF MARRIAGE AND CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 64 Hastings L.J. 739, 779+ (2013) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 3248 GOING ROGUE: STOP THE BEACH RENOURISHMENT AS AN OBJECT OF MORBID FASCINATION, 64 Hastings L.J. 83, 140 (2012) 3249 JUSTICE GINSBURG AND RELIGIOUS LIBERTY, 63 Hastings L.J. 1213, 1242+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3250 THE EVOLUTION OF UNCONSTITUTIONALITY IN SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION LAWS, 63 Hastings L.J. 1071, 1133+ (2012) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 3251 IS THERE A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO SELECT THE GENES OF ONE'S OFFSPRING?, 63 Hastings L.J. 233, 295+ (2011) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 3252 HOW DIFFERENT ARE ORIGINALISM AND NON-ORIGINALISM?, 62 Hastings L.J. 707, 736 (2011) 3253 DON'T FORGET DUE PROCESS: THE PATH NOT (YET) TAKEN IN S 2254 HABEAS CORPUS ADJUDICATIONS, 62 Hastings L.J. 1, 65+ (2010) 3254 DEMOCRACY AND THE COURTS: THE CASE OF ABORTION, 61 Hastings L.J. 1333, 1344+ (2010) 3255 HOW SENATE CONFIRMATION HEARINGS SHOULD BETTER EDUCATE SENATORS AND THE AMERICAN PUBLIC: THE INSTRUCTIONAL NECESSITY OF CASE-SPECIFIC QUESTIONING, 61 Hastings L.J. 1407, 1435+ (2010) 3256 PUBLIC OPINION, CULTURAL CHANGE, AND CONSTITUTIONAL ADJUDICATION, 61 Hastings L.J. 1437, 1452+ (2010) 3257 SODOM'S SHADOW: THE UNCERTAIN LINE BETWEEN PUBLIC AND PRIVATE MORALITY, 61 Hastings L.J. 1161, 1215+ (2010) 3258 ENGQUIST AND THE EROSION OF THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE: AN ATTEMPT TO STOP THE CREEP OF IRRATIONAL DICTA, 61 Hastings L.J. 969, 996+ (2010) 3259 INEQUITABLE ENFORCEMENT: INTRODUCING THE CONCEPT OF EQUITY INTO CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW OF LAW ENFORCEMENT, 61 Hastings L.J. 413, 455 (2009) 3260 THE PROCEDURAL ANNIHILATION OF STRUCTURAL RIGHTS, 61 Hastings L.J. 1, 63+ (2009) 3261 THE CONSTITUTIONALIZATION OF SELF-DEFENSE IN TORT AND CRIMINAL LAW, GRAMMATICALLY-CORRECT ORIGINALISM, AND OTHER SECOND AMENDMENT MUSINGS, 60 Hastings L.J. 1205, 1244+ (2009) 3262 HELLER, HIGH WATER(MARK)? LOWER COURTS AND THE NEW RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS, 60 Hastings L.J. 1245, 1268 (2009) 3263 SECOND AMENDMENT LIMITATIONS AND CRIMINOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS, 60 Hastings L.J. 1339, 1369+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3264 CAN A SUBSEQUENT CHANGE IN LAW VOID A MARRIAGE THAT WAS VALID AT ITS INCEPTION? CONSIDERING THE LEGAL EFFECT OF PROPOSITION 8 ON CALIFORNIA'S EXISTING SAME-SEX MARRIAGES, 60 Hastings L.J. 1063, 1127+ (2009) 3265 ORIGINALISM AND THE "CHALLENGE OF CHANGE": ABDUCEDPRINCIPLE ORIGINALISM AND OTHER MECHANISMS BY WHICH ORIGINALISM SUFFICIENTLY ACCOMMODATES CHANGED SOCIAL CONDITIONS, 60 Hastings L.J. 927, 995 (2009) 3266 FORMALISM: FROM RACIAL INTEGRATION TO SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, 59 Hastings L.J. 843, 876+ (2008) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.) 3267 GENERALIZED GRIEVANCES AND JUDICIAL DISCRETION, 58 Hastings L.J. 1331, 1370+ (2007) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 3268 LIFTING OUR VEIL OF IGNORANCE: CULTURE, CONSTITUTIONALISM, AND WOMEN'S HUMAN RIGHTS IN POST-SEPTEMBER 11 AMERICA, 57 Hastings L.J. 331, 383 (2005) 3269 FREE EXERCISE AND THE PROBLEM OF SYMMETRY, 56 Hastings L.J. 699, 748+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3270 TOWARD A CONSTITUTIONAL LAW OF CRIME AND PUNISHMENT, 55 Hastings L.J. 509, 572+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3271 FEDERALISM AND THE FEDERAL CRIMINAL LAW, 55 Hastings L.J. 573, 611 (2004) 3272 SLAUGHTER-HOUSE FIVE: VIEWS OF THE CASE, 55 Hastings L.J. 333, 398+ (2003) 3273 PROTECTING TRADITIONAL SURROGACY CONTRACTING THROUGH FEE PAYMENT REGULATION, 23 Hastings Women's L.J. 245, 273+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3274 KICKING THE INA OUT OF BED: ABOLISHING THE CONSUMMATION REQUIREMENT FOR PROXY MARRIAGES, 22 Hastings Women's L.J. 55, 80 (2011) 3275 ECONOMIC, SOCIAL, AND CULTURAL RIGHTS AND THE RIGHT TO EDUCATION IN AMERICAN JURISPRUDENCE: BARRIERS AND APPROACHES TO IMPLEMENTATION, 19 Hastings Women's L.J. 303, 323+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3276 "BEING GAY IN LUBBOCK:" THE EQUAL ACCESS ACT IN CAUDILLO, 17 Hastings Women's L.J. 227, 246 (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3277 COERCION IN CALIFORNIA: EUGENICS RECONSTITUTED IN WELFARE REFORM, THE CONTRACTING OF REPRODUCTIVE CAPACITY, AND TERMS OF PROBATION, 17 Hastings Women's L.J. 269, 294+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3278 CALIFORNIA'S ASSEMBLY BILL 205, THE DOMESTIC PARTNER RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES ACT OF 2003: IS DOMESTIC PARTNER LEGISLATION COMPROMISING THE CAMPAIGN FOR MARRIAGE EQUALITY?, 17 Hastings Women's L.J. 39, 64 (2006) 3279 CASE NOTES, 11-MAY Haw. B.J. 20, 20+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3280 JUSTICE ANTHONY M. KENNEDY, 11-FEB Haw. B.J. 30, 30+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3281 Court Upholds City's Zoning Restriction on Group Home, 32 NO. CD-13 HDRCURDEV 39, 39 (2004) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 3282 THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF AN HPV MANDATE AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR THE MINOR PATIENT, 25 NO. 2 Health Law. 1, 1+ (2012) 3283 EXPANDING ACCESS TO INVESTIGATIONAL DRUGS FOR TREATMENT USE: A POLICY ANALYSIS AND LEGISLATIVE PROPOSAL, 19 Health Matrix 205, 246 (2009) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 3284 WHEN ATLAS SHRUGS: MAY THE STATE WASH ITS HANDS OF THOSE IN NEED OF LIFE-SUSTAINING MEDICAL TREATMENT?, 18 Health Matrix 291, 372 (2008) 3285 HEALTH LAW AT FIFTY YEARS: A LOOK BACK, 14 Health Matrix 197, 211 (2004) 3286 COMING OUT TO FIGHT FOR OUR COUNTRY: ACHIEVING EQUALITY FOR GAY SERVICE MEMBERS IN A POST-"DON'T ASK, DON'T TELL" MILITARY, 29 Hofstra Lab. & Emp. L.J. 189, 228+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3287 EDUCATING THE MASSES: EXPANDING TITLE VII TO INCLUDE SEXUAL ORIENTATION IN THE EDUCATION ARENA, 25 Hofstra Lab. & Emp. L.J. 311, 320+ (2007) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3288 FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AT WORK AND THE LAW OF NATIONS: AN AMERICAN LAWYER'S PERSPECTIVE, 23 Hofstra Lab. & Emp. L.J. 1, 9+ (2005) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 3289 DRAWING THE LINE AFTER HOFFMAN PLASTIC COMPOUNDS, INC. V. NLRB: STRATEGIES FOR PROTECTING UNDOCUMENTED WORKERS IN THE TITLE VII CONTEXT AND BEYOND, 22 Hofstra Lab. & Emp. L.J. 473, 531 (2005) 3290 THE ARGUMENT FOR A HYBRID RETALIATION LAW: A COMPARATIVE LAW STUDY TO DEFINE RETALIATION UNDER TITLE VII BY COMPARING THE UNITED KINGDOM, INCLUDING THE EUROPEAN UNION, AUSTRALIA, AND CANADA, 22 Hofstra Lab. & Emp. L.J. 751, 789+ (2005) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 3291 WHEN HARRY MET LARRY AND LARRY GOT SICK: WHY SAME-SEX FAMILIES SHOULD BE ENTITLED TO BENEFITS UNDER THE FAMILY AND MEDICAL LEAVE ACT, 22 Hofstra Lab. & Emp. L.J. 276, 323+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3292 "DON'T ASK, DON'T TELL": A QUALIFIED DEFENSE, 21 Hofstra Lab. & Emp. L.J. 349, 402+ (2004) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3293 A BAN BY ANY OTHER NAME: TEN YEARS OF "DON'T ASK, DON'T TELL", 21 Hofstra Lab. & Emp. L.J. 403, 436+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3294 CONSTITUTIONAL BRANDING, 40 Hofstra L. Rev. 655, 687+ (2012) 3295 FAMILIES NOW: WHAT WE DON'T KNOW IS HURTING US, 40 Hofstra L. Rev. 719, 733+ (2012) 3296 JUSTICE SAMUEL A. ALITO'S LONELY WAR AGAINST ABHORRENT, LOW-VALUE EXPRESSION: A MALLEABLE FIRST AMENDMENT PHILOSOPHY PRIVILEGING SUBJECTIVE NOTIONS OF MORALITY AND MERIT, 40 Hofstra L. Rev. 115, 175+ (2011) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 3297 STRIPPING DOWN THE REASONABLENESS STANDARD: THE PROBLEMS WITH USING IN LOCO PARENTIS TO DEFINE STUDENTS' FOURTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS, 39 Hofstra L. Rev. 169, 199+ (2011) 3298 OUT OF THE CHANNEL AND INTO THE SWAMP: HOW FAMILY LAW © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. FAILS IN A NEW ERA OF CLASS DIVISION, 39 Hofstra L. Rev. 859, 895+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3299 GIVING PUBLIC OPINION THE PROCESS THAT IS DUE: WHAT THE SUPREME COURT CAN LEARN FROM ITS EIGHTH AMENDMENT JURISPRUDENCE, 38 Hofstra L. Rev. 367, 410+ (2009) 3300 CRACKING OPEN THE GOLDEN DOOR: REVISITING U.S. ASYLUM LAW'S RESPONSE TO CHINA'S ONE-CHILD POLICY, 37 Hofstra L. Rev. 1135, 1169 (2009) 3301 INCENTIVIZING ORGAN DONATION: A PROPOSAL TO END THE ORGAN SHORTAGE, 38 Hofstra L. Rev. 757, 791 (2009) 3302 PARENTS BY THE NUMBERS, 37 Hofstra L. Rev. 11, 69 (2008) 3303 DREAMS AND FORMULAS: THE ROLES OF PARTICULARISM AND PRINCIPLISM IN THE LAW, 37 Hofstra L. Rev. 195, 223+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3304 BARBARIANS AT THE BAR: REGULATION OF THE LEGAL PROFESSION THROUGH THE ADMISSIONS PROCESS, 36 Hofstra L. Rev. 1193, 1225 (2008) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3305 THE ENHANCED ARBITRATION APPEAL AMENDMENT: A PROPOSAL TO SAVE AMERICAN JURISPRUDENCE FROM ARBITRATION, MODELED ON THE ENGLISH ARBITRATION ACT OF 1996, 36 Hofstra L. Rev. 1095, 1138 (2008) 3306 THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF NON-CUSTODIAL PARENTS, 34 Hofstra L. Rev. 1461, 1493+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3307 THE STATE ACTION DOCTRINE AND THE PRINCIPLE OF DEMOCRATIC CHOICE, 34 Hofstra L. Rev. 1379, 1460+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3308 THE SUPREME COURT WILL NOT OVERRULE ROE V. WADE, 34 Hofstra L. Rev. 1207, 1213+ (2006) 3309 YOU CAN'T CHOOSE YOUR PARENTS: WHY CHILDREN RAISED BY SAME-SEX COUPLES ARE ENTITLED TO INHERITANCE RIGHTS FROM BOTH THEIR PARENTS, 35 Hofstra L. Rev. 857, 899 (2006) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 3310 SAME-SEX MARRIAGE AND SLIPPERY SLOPES, 33 Hofstra L. Rev. 1155, 1201+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3311 A MEDITATION ON THE FIRST PRINCIPLES OF JUDICIAL ETHICS, 32 Hofstra L. Rev. 1227, 1244+ (2004) 3312 "ANNOUNCEMENT" BY FEDERAL JUDICIAL NOMINEES, 32 Hofstra L. Rev. 1281, 1291 (2004) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 3313 JUDICIAL CORRECTNESS MEETS CONSTITUTIONAL CORRECTNESS: SECTION 2C OF THE CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT, 32 Hofstra L. Rev. 1293, 1348 (2004) 3314 DEFENSE-ORIENTED JUDGES, 32 Hofstra L. Rev. 1483, 1505 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 3315 WITH ALL DUE DEFERENCE: JUDICIAL RESPONSIBILITY IN A TIME OF CRISIS, 32 Hofstra L. Rev. 1605, 1662 (2004) 3316 WITH ALL DUE DEFERENCE: JUDICIAL RESPONSIBILITY IN A TIME OF CRISIS, 32 Hofstra L. Rev. 795, 852 (2004) 3317 THE IMPORTANCE OF PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW FOR FAMILY ISSUES IN AN ERA OF GLOBALIZATION: TWO CASE STUDIESINTERNATIONAL CHILD ABDUCTION AND SAME-SEX UNIONS, 32 Hofstra L. Rev. 233, 272+ (2003) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 3318 UNBUNDLING MARRIAGE, 32 Hofstra L. Rev. 31, 70+ (2003) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3319 INTIMATE AFFILIATION AND DEMOCRACY: BEYOND MARRIAGE?, 32 Hofstra L. Rev. 379, 421+ (2003) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 3320 THE PROFESSIONAL OBLIGATION TO RAISE FRIVOLOUS ISSUES IN DEATH PENALTY CASES, 31 Hofstra L. Rev. 1167, 1180 (2003) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 3321 INTERNATIONAL LAW ISSUES IN DEATH PENALTY DEFENSE, 31 Hofstra L. Rev. 1195, 1211+ (2003) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 3322 NORMS AND INTERESTS, 32 Hofstra L. Rev. 637, 673+ (2003) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3323 9 Hous. Bus. & Tax. L.J. 62, REGULATING IMMIGRATION THROUGH FISCAL POLICYMAKING: REEXAMINING TEXAS' NEW MARGIN TAX (2008) 3324 JUST SAY NO?: REDEFINING THE FOUNDATION OF ABSTINENCE EDUCATION IN THE UNITED STATES, 9 Houston Journal of Health Law and Policy 97+ (2008) 3325 THE "CATCH-22" OF XENOTRANSPLANTATION: COMPELLING COMPLIANCE WITH LONG-TERM SURVEILLANCE, 7 Houston Journal of Health Law and Policy 151 (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3326 LOOKING AT THE CONSTITUTION THROUGH WORLD-COLORED GLASSES: THE SUPREME COURT'S USE OF TRANSNATIONAL LAW IN CONSTITUTIONAL ADJUDICATION, 28 Hous. J. Int'l L. 913, 958+ (2006) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3327 DELINEATING SEXUAL DANGEROUSNESS, 50 Hous. L. Rev. 855, 898 (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3328 ABORTION-FROM PRIVACY TO EQUALITY: THE FAILURE OF THE JUSTIFICATIONS FOR TAKING HUMAN LIFE, 45 Hous. L. Rev. 1737, 1793+ (2009) 3329 TEXAS POLYGAMY AND CHILD WELFARE, 46 Hous. L. Rev. 759, 816+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3330 ALMENDAREZ-TORRES AND THE ANDERS ETHICAL DILEMMA, 45 Hous. L. Rev. 747, 805 (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3331 POLYGAMIST EYE FOR THE MONOGAMIST GUY: HOMOSEXUAL © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. SODOMY . . . GAY MARRIAGE . . . IS POLYGAMY NEXT?, 42 Hous. L. Rev. 1451, 1486+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3332 MORAL COMMUNITIES OR A MARKET STATE: THE SUPREME COURT'S VISION OF THE POLICE POWER IN THE AGE OF GLOBALIZATION, 42 Hous. L. Rev. 637, 725+ (2005) 3333 SELECTIVE CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS IN LAWRENCE V. TEXAS: AN EXERCISE IN JUDICIAL RESTRAINT OR A WILLINGNESS TO RECONSIDER EQUAL PROTECTION CLASSIFICATION FOR HOMOSEXUALS?, 41 Hous. L. Rev. 1407, 1435+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3334 THE SIGNIFICANCE OF LAWRENCE v. TEXAS, 41-FEB Hous. Law. 32, 38+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3335 THE COMING CONSTITUTIONAL YO-YO? ELITE OPINION, POLARIZATION, AND THE DIRECTION OF JUDICIAL DECISION MAKING, 56 How. L.J. 661, 719+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3336 FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT OR LIBERTY?: ONLINE PRIVACY'S THEORY FOR CO-EXISTENCE WITH SOCIAL MEDIA, 56 How. L.J. 951, 982+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3337 KEEP THE COURT ROOM DOORS CLOSED SO THE DOORS OF OPPORTUNITY CAN REMAIN OPEN: AN ARGUMENT FOR MAINTAINING PRIVACY IN THE JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM, 55 How. L.J. 205, 246 (2011) 3338 THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT AND STATE BANS ON SAME-SEX MARRIAGE: WHY THEY WON'T SURVIVE, 54 How. L.J. 125, 174+ (2010) 3339 THE ASSOCIATIONAL THESIS: A NEW LOGIC FOR FREE EXERCISE JURISPRUDENCE, 53 How. L.J. 133, 175 (2009) 3340 DEEP AND WIDE: JUSTICE MARSHALL'S CONTRIBUTIONS TO CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 52 How. L.J. 637, 653+ (2009) 3341 THE DANGEROUS SEARCH FOR AN ELUSIVE CONSENSUS: WHAT THE SUPREME COURT SHOULD LEARN FROM THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, 52 How. L.J. 277, 318 (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3342 OUT OF THE FIRE AND INTO THE FRYING PAN: GEORGIA LEGISLATURE'S ATTEMPT TO REGULATE TEEN SEX THROUGH THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM, 52 How. L.J. 197, 238 (2008) 3343 THE "MYSTERY OF LIFE" IN THE LOWER COURTS: THE INFLUENCE OF THE MYSTERY PASSAGE ON AMERICAN JURISPRUDENCE, 51 How. L.J. 335, 365+ (2008) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 3344 FROM FAMILY TO INDIVIDUAL AND BACK AGAIN, 51 How. L.J. 1, 14+ (2007) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3345 IN PRAISE OF LOVING: REFLECTIONS ON THE "LOVING ANALOGY" FOR SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, 51 How. L.J. 117, 186+ (2007) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 3346 THE LEGACY OF LOVING, 51 How. L.J. 15, 52+ (2007) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.) 3347 CROSSING BORDERS: LOVING V. VIRGINIA AS A STORY OF MIGRATION, 51 How. L.J. 53, 74+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3348 LOVING REVISIONISM: ON RESTRICTING MARRIAGE AND SUBVERTING THE CONSTITUTION, 51 How. L.J. 75, 115+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3349 MAJORITY POLITICS AND RACE BASED REMEDIES, 50 How. L.J. 827, 840 (2007) 3350 THE ROAD NOT TAKEN: DECRIMINALIZING PRIVATE CONSENSUAL SODOMY IN THE MILITARY, 49 How. L.J. 139, 140+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3351 FLAGS, 48 How. L.J. 121, 164 (2004) 3352 TRAGICOMEDY, 48 How. L.J. 309, 350+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3353 JUDGING JUDGES JUDGING, 48 How. L.J. 459, 489 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3354 THE DESEGREGATION LEGACY: UNCERTAIN ACHIEVEMENT AND DOCTRINAL DISTRESS, 47 How. L.J. 679, 704 (2004) 3355 BROWN, BOLLINGER, AND BEYOND, 47 How. L.J. 705, 768 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3356 COURTS, CONGRESS, AND EQUAL PROTECTION: WHAT BROWN TEACHES US ABOUT THE SECTION 5 POWER, 47 How. L.J. 199, 242 (2004) 3357 ESTRANGED BEDFELLOWS Sexual Rights and Reproductive Rights in U.S. Constitutional Law, 38-SPG Hum. Rts. 2, 2+ (2011) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3358 STRUCTURAL BARRIERS TO SEXUAL AUTONOMY FOR DISABLED PEOPLE, 38-SPG Hum. Rts. 14, 14 (2011) 3359 SHOULD POLYGAMY BE PERMITTED IN THE UNITED STATES?, 38-SPG Hum. Rts. 20, 20+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3360 HUMAN RIGHTS: THE KEY TO PROGRESSIVE CROSS-MOVEMENT BUILDING IN THE UNITED STATES, 16 NO. 1 Hum. Rts. Brief 11, 14+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3361 ANALYZING PRISON SEX: RECONCILING SELF-EXPRESSION WITH SAFETY, 13 NO. 3 Hum. Rts. Brief 17, 21+ (2006) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3362 MCGRIFF V. MCGRIFF: CONSIDERATION OF A PARENT'S SEXUAL ORIENTATION IN CHILD CUSTODY DISPUTES, 41 Idaho L. Rev. 593, 644+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3363 OF SLEEPING DOGS AND SILENT LOVE: STARE DECISIS AND LAWRENCE v. TEXAS, 41 Idaho L. Rev. 177, 178+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3364 LOOKING BEYOND OUR BORDERS: THE VALUE OF A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE IN CONSTITUTIONAL ADJUDICATION, 40 Idaho L. Rev. 1, 10+ (2003) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3365 HOW ILLINOIS' NEW GAY RIGHTS LAW AFFECTS EMPLOYERS AND © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. WORKERS, 94 Ill. B.J. 182, 185 (2006) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3366 SEXUAL MORALITY AND CHILDREN OF DIVORCE, 92 Ill. B.J. 468, 489 (2004) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 3367 THE AMERICANIZATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AND ITS PARADOXES: CONSTITUTIONAL THEORY AND CONSTITUTIONAL JURISDICTION IN THE CONTEMPORARY WORLD, 16 ILSA J. Int'l & Comp. L. 579, 625 (2010) 3368 DETENTION IN THE "WAR ON TERROR": CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION INFORMED BY THE LAW OF WAR, 14 ILSA J. Int'l & Comp. L. 45, 97 (2007) 3369 KING ARTHUR IN A YANKEE COURT: THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT'S USE OF EUROPEAN LAW IN LAWRENCE V. TEXAS, 10 ILSA J. Int'l & Comp. L. 143, 160+ (2003) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3370 THE FORGOTTEN PATIENT: A HEALTH PROVIDER'S GUIDE TO PROVIDING COMPREHENSIVE CARE FOR TRANSGENDER PATIENTS, 9 Ind. Health L. Rev. 69, 114+ (2012) 3371 MY FATHER, JOHN LOCKE, AND ASSISTED SUICIDE: THE REAL CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT, 3 Ind. Health L. Rev. 45, 100+ (2006) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 3372 THE INTERNATIONALIZATION OF LEGAL EDUCATION The James P. White Lecture on Legal Education Wynne Courtroom, Indiana University School of Law-Indianapolis, 19 Ind. Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 129, 136 (2009) 3373 USING INTERNATIONAL AND FOREIGN HUMAN RIGHTS LAW IN PUBLIC INTEREST ADVOCACY, 18 Ind. Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 1, 18+ (2008) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3374 PRIVACY WARS: EU VERSUS US: SCATTERED SKIRMISHES, STORM CLOUDS AHEAD, 17 Ind. Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 355, 393 (2007) 3375 "NEW THINKING ABOUT AN OLD ISSUE:" THE ABORTION CONTROVERSY CONTINUES IN RUSSIA AND IRELAND - COULD ROE V. WADE HAVE BEEN THE BETTER SOLUTION?, 15 Ind. Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 183, 213+ (2004) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 3376 NORTH AND SOUTH: THE DISPARATE LEGAL APPROACHES TO HOMOSEXUAL ACTIVITY IN THE UNITED STATES AND NICARAGUA, 15 Ind. Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 215, 255+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3377 CITIZENSHIP AFTER THE CONSERVATIVE MOVEMENT, 20 Ind. J. Global Legal Stud. 279, 312 (2013) 3378 RESPECT MY AUTHORITY: ANALYZING CLAIMS OF DIMINISHED U.S. SUPREME COURT INFLUENCE ABROAD, 18 Ind. J. Global Legal Stud. 421, 454 (2011) 3379 SEXUALITY AND GLOBAL FORCES: DR. ALFRED KINSEY AND THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, 14 Ind. J. Global Legal Stud. 485, 486+ (2007) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 3380 THE USE AND MISUSE OF COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 13 Ind. J. Global Legal Stud. 37, 40+ (2006) 3381 THE ART AND SCIENCE OF GENETIC MODIFICATION: REENGINEERING PATENT LAW AND CONSTITUTIONAL ORTHODOXIES, 11 Ind. J. Global Legal Stud. 1, 25+ (2004) 3382 FROM EMPIRE TO GLOBALIZATION ... AND BACK? A POST-COLONIAL VIEW OF TRANSJUDICIALISM, 11 Ind. J. Global Legal Stud. 183, 189+ (2004) 3383 COURTS AND GLOBALIZATION, 11 Ind. J. Global Legal Stud. 57, 58+ (2004) 3384 7/21/2008 HR Wire "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" Statute Was Upheld (2008) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3385 WINDSOR, SHELBY COUNTY, AND THE DEMISE OF ORIGINALISM: A PERSONAL ACCOUNT, 89 Ind. L.J. 3, 9+ (2014) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3386 EVOLVING VALUES, ANIMUS, AND SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, 89 Ind. L.J. 27, 31+ (2014) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3387 HOW PARENTS ARE MADE: A RESPONSE TO DISCRIMINATION IN BABY MAKING: THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL TREATMENT OF PROSPECTIVE PARENTS THROUGH SURROGACY, 88 Ind. L.J. 1207, 1213+ (2013) 3388 HIERARCHIES OF DISCRIMINATION IN BABY MAKING? A RESPONSE TO PROFESSOR CARROLL, 88 Ind. L.J. 1217, 1218+ (2013) 3389 "WE THE PEOPLE," CONSTITUTIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY, AND OUTSOURCING GOVERNMENT, 88 Ind. L.J. 1347, 1403+ (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 3390 THE POLYSEMY OF PRIVACY, 88 Ind. L.J. 881, 918 (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3391 RETHINKING HIV-EXPOSURE CRIMES, 87 Ind. L.J. 1517, 1570 (2012) 3392 STEP ASIDE, MR. SENATOR: A REQUEST FOR MEMBERS OF THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE TO GIVE UP THEIR MICS, 87 Ind. L.J. 1791, 1824 (2012) 3393 GOVERNING BADLY: THEORY AND PRACTICE OF BAD IDEAS IN COLLEGE DECISION MAKING, 87 Ind. L.J. 951, 977 (2012) 3394 ORIGINALISM IN PRACTICE, 87 Ind. L.J. 1183, 1244+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3395 THE PARADOX OF STATUTORY RAPE, 87 Ind. L.J. 505, 549+ (2012) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 3396 STANDING LESSONS: WHAT WE CAN LEARN WHEN CONSERVATIVE PLAINTIFFS LOSE UNDER ARTICLE III STANDING DOCTRINE, 87 Ind. L.J. 551, 598 (2012) 3397 "DON'T ASK, DON'T TELL," THE SUPREME COURT, AND LAWRENCE THE "LAGGARD", 87 Ind. L.J. 795, 822+ (2012) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3398 BEYOND EQUALITY? AGAINST THE UNIVERSAL TURN IN © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. WORKPLACE PROTECTIONS, 86 Ind. L.J. 1219, 1287 (2011) 3399 THE BOUNDARIES OF PRIVACY HARM, 86 Ind. L.J. 1131, 1162+ (2011) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3400 DISCRIMINATION OUT OF DISMISSIVENESS: THE EXAMPLE OF INFERTILITY, 85 Ind. L.J. 143, 186 (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3401 LIBERTY LOST: THE MORAL CASE FOR MARIJUANA LAW REFORM, 85 Ind. L.J. 279, 299+ (2010) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3402 A DEFENSE OF EMBRYONIC STEM CELL RESEARCH, 84 Ind. L.J. 1203, 1257+ (2009) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 3403 SAY "I DO": THE JUDICIAL DUTY TO HEIGHTEN CONSTITUTIONAL SCRUTINY OF IMMIGRATION POLICIES AFFECTING SAME-SEX BINATIONAL COUPLES, 84 Ind. L.J. 689, 712+ (2009) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 3404 RETHINKING JUDICIAL DEFERENCE TO LEGISLATIVE FACT-FINDING, 84 Ind. L.J. 1, 37+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3405 AN ASSESSMENT OF LATCRIT THEORY TEN YEARS AFTER, 83 Ind. L.J. 1151, 1195 (2008) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 3406 LAW & POLITICS: THE CASE AGAINST JUDICIAL REVIEW OF DIRECT DEMOCRACY, 82 Ind. L.J. 1125, 1152+ (2007) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 3407 IN SEARCH OF A THEORY OF PUBLIC MEMORY: THE STATE, THE INDIVIDUAL, AND MARCEL PROUST, 80 Ind. L.J. 605, 726+ (2005) 3408 THE MIDWIFERY STALEMATE AND CHILDBIRTH CHOICE: RECOGNIZING MOTHERS-TO-BE AS THE BEST LATE PREGNANCY DECISIONMAKERS, 80 Ind. L.J. 849, 869+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3409 CONTESTING GENDER IN POPULAR CULTURE AND FAMILY LAW: MIDDLESEX AND OTHER TRANSGENDER TALES, 80 Ind. L.J. 391, 409+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3410 STRUCTURING SENTENCING: APPRENDI, THE OFFENSE OF CONVICTION, AND THE LIMITED ROLE OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 79 Ind. L.J. 863, 935 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3411 A GOVERNMENT OF LAWS AND NOT MEN: PROHIBITING NONPRECEDENTIAL OPINIONS BY STATUTE OR PROCEDURAL RULE, 79 Ind. L.J. 711, 766 (2004) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 3412 OKLAHOMA AND BEYOND: UNDERSTANDING THE WAVE OF STATE ANTI-TRANSNATIONAL LAW INITIATIVES, 87 Ind. L.J. Supplement 1, 16 (2011) 3413 PLOTTING PRIVACY AS INTIMACY, 46 Ind. L. Rev. 311, 315+ (2013) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3414 DOUBTING THOMAS: JUSTICE CLARENCE THOMAS'S EFFORT TO RESURRECT THE PRIVILEGES OR IMMUNITIES CLAUSE, 46 Ind. L. Rev. 341, 385+ (2013) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 3415 WOULD GOVERNMENT PROHIBITION OF MARIJUANA PASS STRICT © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. SCRUTINY?, 46 Ind. L. Rev. 529, 556+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3416 WHOSE FOURTH AMENDMENT AND DOES IT MATTER? A DUE PROCESS APPROACH TO FOURTH AMENDMENT STANDING, 46 Ind. L. Rev. 753, 795 (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3417 THE CHANGING SUPREME COURT AND PRISONERS' RIGHTS, 44 Ind. L. Rev. 853, 888 (2011) 3418 WHAT IF SLAUGHTER-HOUSE HAD BEEN DECIDED DIFFERENTLY?, 45 Ind. L. Rev. 61, 88 (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3419 HONORING THE LEGACIES OF JUSTICE WILLIAM J. BRENNAN, JR., AND JUSTICE THURGOOD MARSHALL A Panel Discussion Presented by the Indianapolis Lawyer Chapter of the American Constitution Society, 43 Ind. L. Rev. 441, 465 (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3420 POST-GEORGIA V. RANDOLPH: AN OPPORTUNITY TO RETHINK THE REASONABLENESS OF THIRD-PARTY CONSENT SEARCHES UNDER THE FOURTH AMENDMENT, 43 Ind. L. Rev. 237, 268+ (2009) 3421 CONFERENCE ON RELATIONS BETWEEN CONGRESS AND THE FEDERAL COURTS, 41 Ind. L. Rev. 305, 382 (2008) 3422 TAKING BACK EMINENT DOMAIN: USING HEIGHTENED SCRUTINY TO STOP EMINENT DOMAIN ABUSE, 39 Ind. L. Rev. 449, 481 (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3423 INDIANA CONSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENTS: LACHES, SENTENCES, AND PRIVACY, 39 Ind. L. Rev. 847, 891 (2006) 3424 THE PLACE OF MORAL JUDGMENT IN CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION, 37 Ind. L. Rev. 375, 416 (2004) 3425 GROKSTER UNPLUGGED: IT'S TIME TO LEGALIZE P2P FILE SHARING, 12 Intell. Prop. L. Bull. 1, 18+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3426 ELIMINATING CONFLICTING INTERPRETATIONS OF THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS BY THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE AND THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS: THE PDIQ SYSTEM AS A PREVENTATIVE SOLUTION, 2 Intercultural Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 183, 247 (2007) 3427 INTERPRETATION AND THE COURT OF JUSTICE: A BASIS FOR COMPARATIVE REFLECTION, 41 Int'l Law. 1011, 1032+ (2007) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 3428 HUMAN RIGHTS LAW, 38 Int'l Law. 499, 503+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3429 - THE FUNDAMENTAL HUMAN RIGHTS Compared in Two Progressive Consitutions: Japan and Montana, 14-FALL Int'l Legal Persp. 30, 49 (2004) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 3430 - BRING ON THE BLUEWASH: A SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIVIST ARGUMENT AGAINST USING NIKE v. KASKY TO ATTACK THE UN GLOBAL COMPACT, 14-SPG Int'l Legal Persp. 6, 19 (2004) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 3431 DEFERENCE DETERMINATIONS AND STEALTH CONSTITUTIONAL DECISION MAKING, 98 Iowa L. Rev. 465, 533+ (2013) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 3432 THE DELAWARE DEATH PENALTY: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY, 97 Iowa L. Rev. 1925, 1964 (2012) 3433 UNIVERSITY-FUNDED DISCRIMINATION: UNRESOLVED ISSUES AFTER THE SUPREME COURT'S "RESOLUTION" OF THE CIRCUIT SPLIT ON UNIVERSITY FUNDING FOR DISCRIMINATORY ORGANIZATIONS, 96 Iowa L. Rev. 1767, 1789 (2011) 3434 WINNING THROUGH LOSING, 96 Iowa L. Rev. 941, 1012+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3435 EQUAL EDUCATION OPPORTUNITY AND THE PURSUIT OF "JUST SCHOOLS": THE DES MOINES INDEPENDENT COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT RETHINKS DIVERSITY AND THE MEANING OF "MINORITY STUDENT", 95 Iowa L. Rev. 1341, 1367+ (2010) 3436 STRANGE BEDFELLOWS: CRIMINAL LAW, FAMILY LAW, AND THE LEGAL CONSTRUCTION OF INTIMATE LIFE, 94 Iowa L. Rev. 1253, 1313+ (2009) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3437 GAMBLING, GREYHOUNDS, AND GAY MARRIAGE: HOW THE IOWA SUPREME COURT CAN USE THE RATIONAL-BASIS TEST TO ADDRESS VARNUM V. BRIEN, 94 Iowa L. Rev. 413, 448+ (2008) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3438 SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND THE PROGRESSIVE CONSTITUTION, 93 Iowa L. Rev. 1653, 1666 (2008) 3439 CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION REVISITED: THE EFFECTS OF A DELICATE SUPREME COURT BALANCE ON THE INCLUSION OF FOREIGN LAW IN AMERICAN JURISPRUDENCE, 92 Iowa L. Rev. 1037, 1071+ (2007) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3440 STIGMATIC HARM AND STANDING, 92 Iowa L. Rev. 417, 488+ (2007) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 3441 STRIKING BATSON GOLD AT THE END OF THE RAINBOW?: REVISITING BATSON V. KENTUCKY AND ITS PROGENY IN LIGHT OF ROMER V. EVANS AND LAWRENCE V. TEXAS, 91 Iowa L. Rev. 1091, 1115+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3442 DEVELOPING CITIZENS, 91 Iowa L. Rev. 431, 503+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3443 BY THE LIGHT OF VIRTUE: PRISON RAPE AND THE CORRUPTION OF CHARACTER, 91 Iowa L. Rev. 561, 607 (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3444 TOWARD A THEORY OF INTERACTIVE FEDERALISM, 91 Iowa L. Rev. 243, 289+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3445 PREACHERS, POLITICIANS, AND SAME-SEX COUPLES: CHALLENGING SAME-SEX CIVIL UNIONS AND IMPLICATIONS ON INTERSTATE RECOGNITION, 91 Iowa L. Rev. 319, 348+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3446 SACRED VISIONS OF LAW, 90 Iowa L. Rev. 1095, 1161+ (2005) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 3447 SILENCE AND THE RACIAL DIMENSION OF MEGAN'S LAW, 89 Iowa L. Rev. 1535, 1594 (2004) 3448 POLITICAL REPRESENTATION AND ACCOUNTABILITY UNDER DON'T ASK, DON'T TELL, 89 Iowa L. Rev. 1633, 1716+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3449 AN ECONOMIC ARGUMENT FOR ELECTRONIC PRIVACY, 6 I/S: J. L. & Pol'y for Info. Soc'y 513, 554 (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3450 PRIVACY LAW DEVELOPMENTS IN CALIFORNIA, 2 I/S: J. L. & Pol'y for Info. Soc'y 831, 877+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3451 NO DIRECTION HOME: WILL THE LAW KEEP PACE WITH HUMAN TRACKING TECHNOLOGY TO PROTECT INDIVIDUAL PRIVACY AND STOP GEOSLAVERY?, 2 I/S: J. L. & Pol'y for Info. Soc'y 409, 473 (2006) 3452 UNBORN CHILDREN AS CONSTITUTIONAL PERSONS, 25 Issues L. & Med. 185, 273+ (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3453 CAN GLUCKSBERG SURVIVE LAWRENCE? ANOTHER LOOK AT THE END OF LIFE AND PERSONAL AUTOMONY, 24 Issues L. & Med. 95, 95+ (2008) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3454 CONFORMING TO THE RULE OF LAW: WHEN PERSON AND HUMAN BEING FINALLY MEAN THE SAME THING IN FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT JURISPRUDENCE, 22 Issues L. & Med. 119, 260+ (2007) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 3455 EMBRYONIC DISCOURSE: ABORTION, STEM CELLS AND CLONING, 19 Issues L. & Med. 203, 261 (2004) 3456 30 IUS Gentium 15, CHAPTER 2 UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW IN THE UNITED STATES (2014) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3457 16 IUS Gentium 13, CHAPTER 2 UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE LAW OF THE UNITED STATES (2012) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3458 1 IUS Gentium 11, AUTONOMY TO CHOOSE WHAT CONSTITUTES FAMILY: OXYMORON OR BASIC RIGHT? (2007) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3459 ADOPTION: HOW PROTECTING PRIVACY IS IN THE BEST INTEREST OF GEORGIA'S CHILDREN, 2 J. Marshall L.J. 264, 298+ (2009) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3460 HOSPITAL VISITATION: THE FORGOTTEN GAY RIGHTS STRUGGLE, 45 J. Marshall L. Rev. 939, 946+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3461 SECOND-CLASS CITIZENSHIP: THE TENSION BETWEEN THE SUPREMACY OF THE PEOPLE AND MINORITY RIGHTS, 43 J. Marshall L. Rev. 963, 1008 (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3462 PHOTO ENFORCEMENT PROGRAMS: ARE THEY PERMISSIBLE UNDER THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION?, 43 J. Marshall L. Rev. 463, 489 (2010) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 3463 SOCIAL MOVEMENTS, SOCIAL PROCESS: A RESPONSE TO GERALD ROSENBERG, 42 J. Marshall L. Rev. 671, 683 (2009) 3464 REFORMING THE ILLINOIS CRIMINAL CODE: WHERE THE CLEAR © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. COMMISSION STOPPED SHORT OF ITS GOALS, 41 J. Marshall L. Rev. 741, 776+ (2008) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3465 CRIMINAL AND SENTENCING LAW REVIEW COMMISSIONS: DETACHED, CONTEMPLATIVE DECISION MAKING ON MATTERS OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM REFORM, 41 J. Marshall L. Rev. 777, 813+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3466 POLITICAL CURRENCY AND HARD CURRENCY: THE NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND ACT TURNS THREE, 40 J. Marshall L. Rev. 345, 370 (2006) 3467 LIMITING THE PRESIDENCY TO NATURAL BORN CITIZENS VIOLATES DUE PROCESS, 39 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1343, 1370 (2006) 3468 THE HISTORY OF SLAVE MARRIAGE IN THE UNITED STATES, 39 J. Marshall L. Rev. 299, 347+ (2006) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 3469 FELONS, GUNS, AND THE LIMITS OF FEDERAL POWER, 39 J. Marshall L. Rev. 385, 427 (2006) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 3470 DON'T ASK, DON'T TELL, DON'T WORK: THE DISCRIMINATORY EFFECT OF VETERANS' PREFERENCES ON HOMOSEXUALS, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1083, 1119+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3471 MUST THE JURY REACH A VERDICT? THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF ELIMINATING JURIES IN PATENT TRIALS BY CREATING AN ARTICLE I TRIBUNAL, 7 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 754, 774 (2008) 3472 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, FLAWED INTERPRETATIONS OF 42 U.S.C. S 1437(D)(L)(6), SEXUAL HARASSMENT IN PUBLIC HOUSING, AND MUNICIPAL VIOLATIONS OF THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT: MAKING WOMEN HOMELESS AND KEEPING THEM HOMELESS, 13 Jones L. Rev. 1, 1+ (2008) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3473 "... NOT RELATED BY BLOOD, MARRIAGE, OR ADOPTION": A HISTORY OF THE DEFINITION OF "FAMILY" IN ZONING LAW, 16 J. Affordable Housing & Community Dev. L. 144, 162+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3474 GAYS IN THE MILITARY-THE NINTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FAILS TO SUBJECT "DON'T ASK, DON'T TELL" TO A STRICT SCRUTINY TEST: WITT V. DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, 74 J. Air L. & Com. 143, 149+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3475 GAZING INTO THE FUTURE: THE 100-YEAR LEGACY OF JUSTICE WILLIAM J. BRENNAN, 13 J. App. Prac. & Process 173, 182 (2012) 3476 GO EAST, YOUNG LAWYERS: THE STANFORD LAW SCHOOL SUPREME COURT LITIGATION CLINIC, 7 J. App. Prac. & Process 207, 230 (2005) 3477 REFLECTIONS ON BROWN, 6 J. App. Prac. & Process 17, 37 (2004) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 3478 FUNDAMENTALS OF PREPARING A UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT AMICUS BRIEF, 5 J. App. Prac. & Process 523, 536 (2003) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3479 Profoundly Unwise and Even Irresponsible Uncertainty: Some Questions as to the Effect of the Defense of Marriage Act on Marital Status in Bankruptcy for © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Same-Sex Couples Validly Married under State Law, 14 J. Bankr. L. & Prac. 1 ART. 1, 1 Art. 1+ (2005) 3480 THE RELATION BETWEEN JUSTICE AND LOVE IN THE NATURAL ORDER, 51 J. Cath. Legal Stud. 55, 75 (2012) 3481 LAÏCITÉ IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE PANEL DISCUSSION, 49 J. Cath. Legal Stud. 101, 142 (2010) 3482 KEEPERS OF THE NEW COVENANT: THE PURITAN LEGACY IN AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 49 J. Cath. Legal Stud. 143, 193+ (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3483 PLEDGING TO GOD WHILE GETTING A PUBLIC EDUCATION: WHY A WALL OF SEPARATION DIVIDES CEREMONIAL CELEBRATION FROM RELIGIOUS INDOCTRINATION: ELK GROVE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT V. NEWDOW AND THE RIGHT OF PARENTAL PRIVACY, 48 J. Cath. Legal Stud. 147, 200+ (2009) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3484 HOW SECULAR IDEOLOGY IS MARGINALIZING THE RULE OF LAW AND CATHOLIC CONTRIBUTIONS TO LAW AND SOCIETY II: THE TEN COMMANDMENTS AND THE REJECTION OF DIVINE LAW IN AMERICAN JURISPRUDENCE, 47 J. Cath. Legal Stud. 145, 156+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3485 THE PRIVATIZATION OF RELIGION AND CATHOLIC JUSTICES, 47 J. Cath. Legal Stud. 157, 166 (2008) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 3486 THE BLESSING OR THE CURSE: WHOSE VALUES WILL GUIDE US? WHERE WILL THEY LEAD US?, 47 J. Cath. Legal Stud. 167, 190+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3487 AN "OTHER" CHRISTIAN PERSPECTIVE ON LAWRENCE V. TEXAS, 45 J. Cath. Legal Stud. 115, 130+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3488 REHABILITATING THE "MYSTERY PASSAGE": AN EXAMINATION OF THE SUPREME COURT'S ANTHROPOLOGY USING THE PERSONALISTIC NORM EXPLICIT IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF KAROL WOJTYLA, 45 J. Cath. Legal Stud. 631, 647+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3489 A NATURAL LAW APPROACH TO AN ISSUE OF THE DAY: A CRITIQUE OF THE (EQUALITY) JUSTIFICATION FOR SAME SEX MARRIAGE, 26 J. Civ. Rts. & Econ. Dev 565, 570+ (2012) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3490 WOMEN'S RIGHTS ARE HUMAN RIGHTS REDUX: AIN'T I A HUMAN?, 26 J. Civ. Rts. & Econ. Dev 753, 787 (2012) 3491 SOCIETAL PROPERTIES AND LAW ON SAME-SEX NON-MARITAL PARTNERSHIPS AND SAME-SEX MARRIAGE IN EUROPEAN UNION NATIONS, 25 J. Civ. Rts. & Econ. Dev 625, 672+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3492 UNTYING THE KNOT: EXTENDING INTESTACY BENEFITS TO NONTRADITIONAL FAMILIES BY SEVERING THE LINK TO MARRIAGE, 25 J. Civ. Rts. & Econ. Dev 323, 352 (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3493 THE UNIVERSITY CURRICULUM AND THE CONSTITUTION: PERSONAL © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. BELIEFS AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS IN GRADUATE SCHOOL COUNSELING PROGRAMS, 39 J.C. & U.L. 303, 342+ (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 3494 A PELAGIAN VISION FOR OUR AUGUSTINIAN CONSTITUTION: A REVIEW OF JUSTICE BREYER'S ACTIVE LIBERTY, 32 J.C. & U.L. 491, 504+ (2006) 3495 JUSTICE SCALIA'S EQUITABLE CONSTITUTION, 33 J.C. & U.L. 143, 167+ (2006) 3496 SEX, DRUGS, AND FEDERALISM'S ROLE: REGULATION OF THE MORNING AFTER PILL ON PUBLIC COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY CAMPUSES, 33 J.C. & U.L. 191, 213+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3497 THE CAMPUS AS AGORA: THE CONSTITUTION, COMMERCE, GADFLY STONECUTTERS, AND IRREVERENT YOUTH, 31 J.C. & U.L. 513, 619+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3498 REVIEW OF DAVID COLE'S ENEMY ALIENS: DOUBLE STANDARDS AND CONSTITUTIONAL FREEDOMS IN THE WAR ON TERRORISM, 30 J.C. & U.L. 493, 501 (2004) 3499 YOU'VE GOT TO HAVE FRIENDS: LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE ROLE OF AMICI IN THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN CASES, 30 J.C. & U.L. 503, 506+ (2004) 3500 EVOLVING LAW IN SAME-SEX SEXUAL HARASSMENT AND SEXUAL ORIENTATION DISCRIMINATION, 31 J.C. & U.L. 193, 238+ (2004) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3501 MEDICATION ADHERENCE TECHNOLOGY: MEDICINE OF THE FUTURE, EMERGING PRIVACY CONCERN, 28 J. Contemp. Health L. & Pol'y 324, 349 (2012) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 3502 DO THE ENDS JUSTIFY THE MEANS? COMPELLING THE USE OF HPV VACCINATION ON MEN, 27 J. Contemp. Health L. & Pol'y 183, 212 (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3503 LEARNING FROM HISTORY: WHAT THE PUBLIC HEALTH RESPONSE TO SYPHILIS TEACHES US ABOUT HIV/AIDS, 26 J. Contemp. Health L. & Pol'y 253, 299+ (2010) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 3504 DELIBERATELY INDIFFERENT: GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO HIV IN U.S. PRISONS, 24 J. Contemp. Health L. & Pol'y 251, 303+ (2008) HN: 3,5 (S.Ct.) 3505 SNUFFING OUT TOBACCO: THE CITY OF ST. CLOUD'S ATTEMPT TO BAN TOBACCO USE IN THE NAME OF HEALTHCARE REFORM; CAN EVERYTHING BE A SPECIAL NEED?, 20 J. Contemp. Health L. & Pol'y 181, 215+ (2003) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 3506 PROTECTING THE RELIGIOUS LIBERTY OF RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS, 21 J. Contemp. Legal Issues 201, 272+ (2013) 3507 RELIGIOUS TOLERATION AND CLAIMS OF CONSCIENCE, 21 J. Contemp. Legal Issues 449, 486 (2013) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 3508 HOW MASSACHUSETTS GOT GAY MARRIAGE: THE INTERSECTION OF POPULAR OPINION, LEGISLATIVE ACTION, AND JUDICIAL POWER, 15 J. Contemp. Legal Issues 219, 241 (2006) 3509 ROUSSEAU AND DIRECT DEMOCRACY (WITH A NOTE ON THE SUPREME COURT'S TERM LIMITS DECISION), 13 J. Contemp. Legal Issues 459, 510 (2004) 3510 MOORE V. CITY OF EAST CLEVELAND: THE SUPREME COURT'S FRACTURED PAEAN TO THE EXTENDED FAMILY, 14 J. Contemp. Legal Issues 57, 64 (2004) 3511 LAWRENCE V. TEXAS: ONE SMALL STEP FOR GAY RIGHTS; ONE GIANT LEAP FOR LIBERTY, 14 J. Contemp. Legal Issues 73, 82+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3512 ORDER, TECHNOLOGY, AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL MEANINGS OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 103 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 685, 702+ (2013) 3513 JOEY L. MOGUL, ANDREA J. RITCHIE & KAY WHITLOCK, QUEER (IN)JUSTICE: THE CRIMINALIZATION OF LGBT PEOPLE IN THE UNITED STATES (BEACON PRESS 2011). 216 PP., 102 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 171, 193+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3514 SEX OFFENDER EXCEPTIONALISM AND PREVENTIVE DETENTION, 101 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 969, 1003 (2011) 3515 CHILDREN OF INCARCERATED PARENTS: THE CHILD'S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO THE FAMILY RELATIONSHIP, 101 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 77, 118 (2011) 3516 CAN'T BUY A THRILL: SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS, EQUAL PROTECTION, AND CRIMINALIZING SEX TOYS, 100 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 555, 598+ (2010) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3517 MENS REA FOR SEXUAL ABUSE: THE CASE FOR DEFINING THE ACCEPTABLE RISK, 99 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 1, 50+ (2009) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 3518 PEDOPHILES IN WONDERLAND: CENSORING THE SINFUL IN CYBERSPACE, 98 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 1467, 1499+ (2008) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3519 RETHINKING ROBINSON V. CALIFORNIA IN THE WAKE OF JONES V. LOS ANGELES: AVOIDING THE "DEMISE OF THE CRIMINAL LAW" BY ATTENDING TO "PUNISHMENT", 98 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 429, 487+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3520 DESERT, DEMOCRACY, AND SENTENCING REFORM, 96 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 1293, 1352 (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3521 A MINOR EXCEPTION?: THE IMPACT OF LAWRENCE V. TEXAS ON LGBT YOUTH, 95 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 1363, 1410+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3522 EVERYTHING OLD IS NEW AGAIN: JUSTICE SCALIA'S ACTIVIST © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. ORIGINALISM IN SCHRIRO V. SUMMERLIN, 95 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 763, 807 (2005) 3523 FOREWORD: "YOU ARE ENTERING A GAY AND LESBIAN FREE ZONE" : ON THE RADICAL DISSENTS OF JUSTICE SCALIA AND OTHER (POST-) QUEERS. (RAISING QUESTIONS ABOUT LAWRENCE, SEX WARS, AND THE CRIMINAL LAW), 94 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 503, 549+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3524 ARBITRATION CLAUSES SHOULD BE ENFORCED ACCORDING TO THEIR TERMS-EXCEPT WHEN THEY SHOULDN'T BE: THE NINTH CIRCUIT LIMITS PARTIES' ABILITY TO CONTRACT FOR STANDARDS OF REVIEW OF ARBITRATION AWARDS, 2004 J. Disp. Resol. 461, 475 (2005) 3525 NOT IN COURT "CAUSE I STOLE A BEAT : THE DIGITAL MUSIC SAMPLING DEBATE'S DISCOURSE ON RACE AND CULTURE, AND THE NEED FOR TEST CASE LITIGATION, 2012 U. Ill. J.L. Tech. & Pol'y 141, 166+ (2012) 3526 BRAVE NEW EUGENICS: REGULATING ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGIES IN THE NAME OF BETTER BABIES, 2010 U. Ill. J.L. Tech. & Pol'y 257, 310 (2010) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 3527 SPILLAGE FROM THE FOUNTAIN OF YOUTH: THE REGULATION OF PROSPECTIVE ANTI-AGING MOLECULAR AND GENETIC THERAPIES, 2006 U. Ill. J.L. Tech. & Pol'y 159, 199+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3528 THE COMING TECHNOLOGY OF KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY: A FINAL BLOW TO PRIVACY PROTECTION?, 2004 U. Ill. J.L. Tech. & Pol'y 253, 281 (2004) 3529 MARITAL STATUS AND PRIVILEGE, 16 J. Gender Race & Just. 769, 784+ (2013) 3530 BALANCING BABIES, BIRTH, AND BELIEF: A LEGAL ARGUMENT AGAINST PLANNED HOMEBIRTH, 16 J. Gender Race & Just. 607, 615+ (2013) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 3531 THE TICKING SEX-OFFENDER BOMB, 15 J. Gender Race & Just. 81, 108+ (2012) 3532 SSDP V. SPELLINGS: JUDICIARY ACQUIESCENCE OF A LAW WITH RACIALLY DISCRIMINATORY EFFECTS?, 14 J. Gender Race & Just. 301, 326+ (2010) 3533 "YOU CAN VIOLATE THE RIGHTS OF UNDOCUMENTED PERSONS WITH IMPUNITY": THE SHOCKING MESSAGE ARIZONA'S CONSTITUTION SENDS AND ITS INCONSISTENCY WITH INTERNATIONAL LAW, 13 J. Gender Race & Just. 491, 531 (2010) 3534 LAW, JUSTICE, AND COSMOPOLITAN JURISPRUDENCE IN THE AFTERMATH OF THE FINANCIAL CRISIS, 13 J. Gender Race & Just. 647, 670+ (2010) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 3535 TO GO INTO BATTLE WITH SPACE AND TIME: EMANCIPATED SLAVE MARRIAGE, INTERRACIAL MARRIAGE, AND SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, 13 J. Gender Race & Just. 105, 151 (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3536 THE LEGAL LANDSCAPE POST-DOMA, 13 J. Gender Race & Just. 153, 179+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3537 CONTEXTUALIZING VARNUM V. BRIEN: A "MOMENT" IN HISTORY, 13 J. Gender Race & Just. 27, 58+ (2009) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 3538 DON'T TAP, DON'T STARE, AND KEEP YOUR HANDS TO YOURSELF! CRITIQUING THE LEGALITY OF GAY STING OPERATIONS, 12 J. Gender Race & Just. 545, 578+ (2009) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3539 EQUALITY OPPORTUNITY: MARRIAGE LITIGATION AND IOWA'S EQUAL PROTECTION LAW, 12 J. Gender Race & Just. 107, 113+ (2008) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 3540 IT'S ABOUT TIME, OR IS IT?: IOWA DISTRICT COURT'S INVALIDATION OF IOWA'S MINI-DOMA, 12 J. Gender Race & Just. 153, 184+ (2008) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3541 MUCH ADO ABOUT . . . SOMETHING ELSE: D.C. V. HELLER, THE RACIALIZED MYTHOLOGY OF THE SECOND AMENDMENT, AND GUN POLICY REFORM, 12 J. Gender Race & Just. 57, 105 (2008) 3542 GUIDELINES BUT NO GUIDANCE: GAYSPERMBANK.COM VS. FDA, 9 J. Gender Race & Just. 613, 620+ (2006) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3543 MODEL ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY ACT, 9 J. Gender Race & Just. 55, 103 (2005) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 3544 ART AND THE SEARCH FOR PERFECTIONISM: ON SELECTING GENDER, GENES, AND GAMETES, 9 J. Gender Race & Just. 241, 272+ (2005) 3545 CONSTRUCTING THE TRANNIE: TRANSGENDER PEOPLE AND THE LAWFOOTNOTE, 8 J. Gender Race & Just. 237, 280 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3546 TO HAVE, TO HOLD, TO RECEIVE PUBLIC ASSISTANCE: TANF AND MARRIAGE-PROMOTION POLICIES, 7 J. Gender Race & Just. 413, 438+ (2003) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3547 STEM CELL CENTURY: LAW AND POLICY FOR A BREAKTHROUGH TECHNOLOGY, 5 J. Health & Biomedical L. 131, 149 (2009) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 3548 A FUNDAMENTAL CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT OF THE MONIED TO "BUY OUT OF" UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE PROGRAM RESTRICTIONS VERSUS THE MORAL CLAIM OF EVERYONE ELSE TO DECENT HEALTH CARE: AN UNREMITTING PARADOX OF HEALTH CARE REFORM?, 3 J. Health & Biomedical L. 1, 90 (2007) 3549 MEDICAL DECISION MAKING BY AND ON BEHALF OF ADOLESCENTS: RECONSIDERING FIRST PRINCIPLES, 15 J. Health Care L. & Pol'y 37, 73+ (2012) 3550 KEEPING PREVENTION IN THE CROSSHAIRS: A BETTER HIV © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. EXPOSURE LAW FOR MARYLAND, 13 J. Health Care L. & Pol'y 495, 524+ (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3551 AIDS AND ADOLESCENTS, 7 J. Health Care L. & Pol'y 280, 315+ (2004) 3552 RECONCILING SOCIAL NORMS AND COPYRIGHT LAW: STRATEGIES FOR PERSUADING PEOPLE TO PAY FOR RECORDED MUSIC, 17 Journal of Intellectual Property Law 59 (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3553 Marriage and Civil Partnership for Same-Sex Couples: The International Imperative, 1 Journal of International Law & International Relations 249 (2005) 3554 Canada Is a Blue State: Global Jurisprudence and Domestic Consciousness in American Gay Rights Discourse, 1 Journal of International Law & International Relations 261+ (2005) 3555 We Are the World? What United States Courts Can and Should Learn from the Law and Politics of Other Western Nations, 1 Journal of International Law & International Relations 279+ (2005) 3556 CENSORING THE CENSORS IN THE WTO: RECONCILING THE COMMUNITARIAN AND HUMAN RIGHTS THEORIES OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, 3 J. Int'l Media & Ent. L. 17, 119 (2010) 3557 REPARATIVE THERAPY FOR HOMOSEXUAL TEENS: THE CHOICE OF THE TEEN SHOULD BE THE ONLY CHOICE DISCUSSED, 27 J. Juv. L. 33, 46+ (2006) 3558 IS THERE A THERE THERE IN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW?, 19 J. Land Use & Envtl. L. 213, 254 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3559 DYING TO WAIT: HOW THE ABIGAIL COURT GOT IT WRONG, 22 J.L. & Health 53, 90+ (2009) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 3560 HOW OHIO v. TALTY PROVIDED FOR FUTURE BANS ON PROCREATION AND THE CONSEQUENCES THAT ACTION BRINGS: OHIO v. TALTY: HIDING IN THE SHADOW OF THE SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN, 19 J.L. & Health 141, 176+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3561 NEUROCOPS: THE POLITICS OF PROHIBITION AND THE FUTURE OF ENFORCING SOCIAL POLICY FROM INSIDE THE BODY, 19 J.L. & Health 215, 257 (2005) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 3562 BIOTERRORISM DEFENSE: ARE STATE MANDATED COMPULSORY VACCINATION PROGRAMS AN INFRINGEMENT UPON A CITIZEN'S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS?, 17 J.L. & Health 241, 270 (2002) HN: 3,5 (S.Ct.) 3563 THE PUBLIC-PRIVATE DICHOTOMY IN MORALITY AND LAW, 18 J.L. & Pol'y 541, 605+ (2010) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3564 THE FIRST AMENDMENT IMPLICATIONS OF SEXTING AT PUBLIC SCHOOLS: A QUANDARY FOR ADMINISTRATORS WHO INTERCEPT VISUAL LOVE NOTES, 18 J.L. & Pol'y 701, 737+ (2010) 3565 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND BARS: THE NEED TO COMBAT CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT OF STATE STATUTORY RAPE LAWS, 16 J.L. & © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Pol'y 717, 756+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3566 THE "PARTIAL-BIRTH ABORTION" BAN: HEALTH CARE IN THE SHADOW OF CRIMINAL LIABILITY PANEL II, THE PATH AHEAD: LEGAL CHALLENGES AND RESPONSES, 17 J.L. & Pol'y 1, 7+ (2008) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.) 3567 GONZALES v. CARHART AND THE HAZARDS OF MUDDLED SCRUTINY, 17 J.L. & Pol'y 57, 59+ (2008) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3568 RESPONSIBILITY FOR LIFE: HOW ABORTION SERVES WOMEN'S INTERESTS IN MOTHERHOOD, 17 J.L. & Pol'y 97, 134+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3569 BEARD V. BANKS: RESTRICTED READING, REHABILITATION, AND PRISONERS' FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS, 15 J.L. & Pol'y 1225, 1270 (2007) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 3570 THE QUESTIONABLE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTION CLAUSES FOR PHARMACISTS, 16 J.L. & Pol'y 225, 264 (2007) 3571 THE SECRET OF BEING GAY AND STILL BEING HAPPY?, 43 J.L. & Educ. 61, 63 (2014) 3572 CUSTOMIZABLE "SEXUAL ORIENTATION PRIVACY" FOR MINOR SCHOOLCHILDREN: A LAW SCHOOL INVENTION IN SEARCH OF A CONSTITUTIONAL MANDATE, 43 J.L. & Educ. 65, 69+ (2014) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3573 THE RIGHT TO SEXUAL ORIENTATION PRIVACY: STRENGTHENING PROTECTIONS FOR MINORS WHO ARE "OUTED" IN SCHOOLS, 42 J.L. & Educ. 381, 393+ (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3574 PLEASE DON'T TELL MY MOM! A MINOR'S RIGHT TO INFORMATIONAL PRIVACY, 40 J.L. & Educ. 417, 460 (2011) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 3575 SECRETLY FALLING IN LOVE: AMERICA'S LOVE AFFAIR WITH CONTROLLING THE HEARTS AND MINDS OF PUBLIC SCHOOL TEACHERS, 39 J.L. & Educ. 37, 73 (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3576 SCHOOL SURVEYS AND CHILDREN'S EDUCATION: THE ARGUMENT FOR SHARED AUTHORITY BETWEEN PARENTS AND THE STATE, 38 J.L. & Educ. 459, 471 (2009) 3577 PARENTAL RIGHTS AND PUBLIC SCHOOL CURRICULA: REVISITING MOZERT AFTER 20 YEARS, 38 J.L. & Educ. 83, 133+ (2009) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 3578 A POST-MORSE FRAMEWORK FOR STUDENTS' POTENTIALLY HURTFUL SPEECH (RELIGIOUS AND OTHERWISE), 37 J.L. & Educ. 463, 503 (2008) 3579 SEPARATE PUBLIC HIGH SCHOOLS FOR SEXUAL MINORITY STUDENTS AND THE LIMITS OF THE BROWN ANALOGY, 35 J.L. & Educ. 339, 348+ (2006) 3580 THE LEGAL EFFECT OF COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY POLICIES PROHIBITING ROMANTIC RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN STUDENTS AND © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. PROFESSORS, 32 J.L. & Educ. 411, 412+ (2003) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3581 SAME-SEX MARRIAGE AND THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY, 13 J. L. & Fam. Stud. 117, 150+ (2011) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 3582 JEANNIE SUK, "AT HOME IN THE LAW: HOW THE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE REVOLUTION IS TRANSFORMING PRIVACY" (2009), 13 J. L. & Fam. Stud. 345, 361 (2011) 3583 THE HUCK FINN SYNDROME IN HISTORY AND THEORY: THE ORIGINS OF FAMILY PRIVACY, 12 J. L. & Fam. Stud. 87, 150+ (2010) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 3584 AN ANALYSIS OF AND ALTERNATIVE TO THE RADICAL FEMINIST POSITION ON THE INSTITUTION OF MARRIAGE, 11 J. L. & Fam. Stud. 113, 131+ (2008) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 3585 TRANSFORMING MARRIAGE: THE TRANSFORMATION OF INTIMACY AND THE DEMOCRATIZING POTENTIAL OF LOVE, 9 J. L. & Fam. Stud. 101, 127+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3586 MULTIPLE PARENTS/MULTIPLE FATHERS, 9 J. L. & Fam. Stud. 231, 263+ (2007) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 3587 WHAT ABOUT THE CHILD?: THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE FAILED ADOPTION OF ANTHONY, 9 J. L. & Fam. Stud. 351, 360 (2007) 3588 WHO NEEDS MARRIAGE?: EQUALITY AND THE ROLE OF THE STATE, 8 J. L. & Fam. Stud. 325, 362+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3589 SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS AND PARENTAL RIGHTS: FROM MEYER V. NEBRASKA TO TROXEL V. GRANVILLE, 8 J. L. & Fam. Stud. 71, 116+ (2006) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 3590 FORCES SHAPING THE LAW OF COHABITATION FOR OPPOSITE SEX COUPLES, 7 J. L. & Fam. Stud. 135, 204+ (2005) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 3591 A BREACH OF VOWS BUT NOT CRIMINAL: DOES LAWRENCE V. TEXAS INVALIDATE UTAH'S STATUTE CRIMINALIZING ADULTERY?, 7 J. L. & Fam. Stud. 253, 261+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3592 WHEN MARRIAGE IS NOT ENOUGH: UTAH'S MARRIAGE AMENDMENT IN CONTEXT, 7 J. L. & Fam. Stud. 275, 287+ (2005) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 3593 I PRONOUNCE YOU HUSBAND AND WIFE AND WIFE AND WIFE: THE UTAH SUPREME COURT'S RE-AFFIRMATION OF ANTI-POLYGAMY LAWS IN UTAH V. GREEN, 7 J. L. & Fam. Stud. 405, 416+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3594 SLEEPING ON THE COUCH: GOVERNMENT BOOTED FROM THE BEDROOM IN LAWRENCE V. TEXAS, 6 J. L. & Fam. Stud. 127, 127+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3595 ADOPTION BY HOMOSEXUALS IN THE WAKE OF LAWRENCE V. TEXAS, 6 J. L. & Fam. Stud. 19, 58+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3596 UTAH'S PROHIBITION OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGES-WILL THE STATUTE STAND OR EVOLVE?, 6 J. L. & Fam. Stud. 419, 427+ (2004) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 3597 ARE ANTI-POLYGAMY LAWS AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL INFRINGEMENT ON THE LIBERTY INTERESTS OF CONSENTING ADULTS?, 6 J. L. & Fam. Stud. 451, 460+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3598 THE REALITY OF MORAL IMPERATIVES IN LIBERAL RELIGION, 28 J.L. & Religion 297, 335+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3599 FOR THE LOVE OF GOD AND PEOPLE: A PHILOSOPHY OF JEWISH LAW. BY ELLIOT N. DORFF. JEWISH PUBLICATION 2007. PP. XX + 326. $35.00. ISBN: 978-0-8276-0840-5., 24 J.L. & Religion 763, 768 (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3600 CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURE AND AMERICAN SCRIPTURE: AN INSTRUCTIVE ANALOGY? Interpreting the Bible and the Constitution. By Jaroslav Pelikan. Yale University Press 2004. Pp. xiii, 216. $30.00. ISBN: 0-300-10267-4., 21 J.L. & Religion 101, 142 (2006) 3601 CANON LAW AND THE HUMAN PERSON, 19 J.L. & Religion 1, 58 (2004) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 3602 CONTINUING TO MEET THE PARENTS, THROUGH THE INTERNATIONAL LAW ROUTE, 12 J. L. & Soc. Challenges 1, 12+ (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3603 FROM IMMUTABLE TO EXISTENTIAL: PROTECTING WHO WE ARE AND WHO WE WANT TO BE WITH THE "EQUALERTY" OF THE SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE, 12 J. L. & Soc. Challenges 220, 330+ (2010) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3604 EXPANDING ASYLUM LAW'S PATTERNOR-PRACTICE-OF-PERSECUTION FRAMEWORK TO BETTER PROTECT LGBT REFUGEES, 16 U. Pa. J. L. & Soc. Change 111, 131+ (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 3605 ORIGINALISM AND SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, 16 U. Pa. J. L. & Soc. Change 237, 280+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3606 THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT EVOLVES: DEFINING CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT THROUGH THE LENS OF CHILDHOOD AND ADOLESCENCE, 15 U. Pa. J. L. & Soc. Change 285, 321 (2012) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 3607 CURRENCY OF LOVE: CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW AND THE BATTLE FOR SAME-SEX MARRIAGE IN THE UNITED STATES, 14 U. Pa. J. L. & Soc. Change 53, 123+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3608 ECONOMIC RIGHTS AS GROUP RIGHTS, 15 U. Pa. J. L. & Soc. Change 87, 108+ (2011) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 3609 OUR "RIGHTS ARE NOT CAST IN STONE": POST-KATRINA ENVIRONMENTAL "RED-LINING" AND THE NEED FOR A BROADBASED HUMAN RIGHT LAWYERING MOVEMENT, 12 U. Pa. J. L. & Soc. Change 37, 71+ (2009) 3610 CRIMINAL LAW'S UNFORTUNATE TRIUMPH OVER ADMINISTRATIVE LAW, 7 J.L. Econ. & Pol'y 657, 683+ (2011) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 3611 A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO SELF DEFENSE?, 2 J.L. Econ. & Pol'y 213, 220 (2006) 3612 7 J. L. Society 196, RELIGIOUS INFLUENCES IN AMERICAN LEGISLATION: LAWRENCE v. TEXAS, THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY, THE RIGHT TO CHOICE, AND THE "RIGHT TO BE LET ALONE!" (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3613 5 J. L. Society 255, ZABLOCKI REBORN?: THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF PROBATION CONDITIONS PROHIBITING DEADBEAT AND ABUSIVE FATHERS FROM CONCEIVING CHILDREN (2003) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3614 TEACHING COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVES IN THE DOMESTIC CONSTITUTIONAL LAW CLASS: A STEP-BY-STEP PRIMER, 61 J. Legal Educ. 310, 313+ (2011) 3615 THE ADDED VALUE AND PREROGATIVES OF LAW SCHOOLS WITH A FAITH MISSION, 59 J. Legal Educ. 158, 165+ (2009) 3616 BRINGING SEXUAL ORIENTATION AND GENDER IDENTITY INTO THE TAX CLASSROOM, 59 J. Legal Educ. 3, 25+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3617 REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS IN THE LEGAL ACADEMY: A NEW ROLE FOR TRANSNATIONAL LAW, 59 J. Legal Educ. 35, 59 (2009) 3618 AN ASSESSMENT OF THE LAW SCHOOL CLIMATE FOR GLBT STUDENTS, 58 J. Legal Educ. 214, 222+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3619 INTEGRATING THE STUDY OF SEXUALITY INTO THE CORE LAW SCHOOL CURRICULUM: SUGGESTIONS FOR SUBSTANTIVE CRIMINAL LAW COURSES, 57 J. Legal Educ. 60, 76 (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3620 ON NOURISHING THE CURRICULUM WITH A TRANSNATIONAL LAW LAGNIAPPE, 56 J. Legal Educ. 578, 591+ (2006) 3621 CRIMINAL LAW IN COMPARATIVE CONTEXT, 56 J. Legal Educ. 433, 443 (2006) 3622 SOME MODEST USES OF TRANSNATIONAL LEGAL PERSPECTIVES IN FIRST-YEAR CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 56 J. Legal Educ. 201, 215 (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3623 CROSSING BORDERS IN THE CLASSROOM: A COMPARATIVE LAW EXPERIMENT IN FAMILY LAW, 55 J. Legal Educ. 542, 559 (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3624 A CONTINUOUS BODY: ONGOING CONVERSATIONS ABOUT WOMEN AND LEGAL EDUCATION, 53 J. Legal Educ. 564, 575+ (2003) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3625 2012-2013 NATIONAL HEALTH LAW MOOT COURT COMPETITION BEST BRIEF, 34 J. Legal Med. 357, 371 (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 3626 2010-2011 NATIONAL HEALTH LAW MOOT COURT COMPETITION, 32 J. Legal Med. 345, 356 (2011) 3627 JACOBSON REVISITED An Argument for Strict Judicial Scrutiny of Compulsory Vaccination, 32 J. Legal Med. 409, 429+ (2011) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 3628 THE NEED FOR MORE SPECIFIC LEGISLATION IN SEXUAL CONSENT CAPACITY ASSESSMENTS FOR NURSING HOME RESIDENTS How Grandpa Got His Groove Back, 31 J. Legal Med. 303, 323+ (2010) 3629 FAITH-BASED MENTAL HEALTH TREATMENT OF MINORS A Call for Legislative Reform, 31 J. Legal Med. 171, 201 (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3630 2006-2007 NATIONAL HEALTH LAW MOOT COURT COMPETITION, 28 J. Legal Med. 437, 444+ (2007) 3631 2006-2007 NATIONAL HEALTH LAW MOOT COURT COMPETITION: BEST BRIEF, 28 J. Legal Med. 455, 461+ (2007) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3632 2005-2006 NATIONAL HEALTH LAW MOOT COURT COMPETITION: BEST BRIEF, 27 J. Legal Med. 395, 425 (2006) 3633 REDEFINING THE EMOTIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL ABUSE AND MALTREATMENT OF CHILDREN Legal Implications, 26 J. Legal Med. 311, 337+ (2005) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 3634 BORROWING AND NONBORROWING AMONG INTERNATIONAL COURTS, 39 J. Legal Stud. 547, 562 (2010) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 3635 RIDING THE WAVE: THE UNCERTAIN FUTURE OF RFID LEGISLATION, 35 J. Legis. 48, 75 (2009) 3636 THE SUPREME COURT AND ELECTION LAW: A REPLY TO THREE COMMENTATORS, 31 J. Legis. 1, 15+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3637 READING FOR TERRORISM: SECTION 215 OF THE USA PATRIOT ACT AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO INFORMATION PRIVACY, 31 J. Legis. 45, 68 (2004) 3638 GOD AND WOMAN IN THE CATHOLIC HOSPITAL, 31 J. Legis. 69, 128+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3639 DOES THE THIRTEENTH AMENDMENT PROVIDE A JURISDICTIONAL BASIS FOR A FEDERAL BAN ON CLONING?, 30 J. Legis. 183, 191 (2003) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 3640 "TORTURE LITE," "FULL BODIED" TORTURE, AND THE INSULATION OF LEGAL CONSCIENCE, 1 J. Nat'l Security L. & Pol'y 187, 229+ (2005) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 3641 A BLUEPRINT FOR LAW SCHOOL ENGAGEMENT WITH THE MILITARY, 1 J. Nat'l Security L. & Pol'y 473, 519+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3642 THE PROGRESSIVE STREAK OF CHIEF JUSTICE LEAH WARD SEARS: INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND JUDICIAL ELECTIONS IN GEORGIA, 1992-2005, 20 J. S. Legal Hist. 101, 132+ (2012) 3643 THE INDIVIDUAL'S RIGHT OF PRIVACY IN A MARRIAGE, 23 J. Am. Acad. Matrim. Law. 111, 129 (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3644 BEYOND PRIVATE ORDERING: FAMILIES AND THE SUPPORTIVE STATE, 23 J. Am. Acad. Matrim. Law. 305, 347 (2010) 3645 UNITED STATES SURVEY ON DOMESTIC PARTNERSHIPS, 22 J. Am. © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Acad. Matrim. Law. 125, 150+ (2009) 3646 PROTECTING CHILDREN AND THE CUSTODIAL RIGHTS OF COHABITANTS, 22 J. Am. Acad. Matrim. Law. 29, 54+ (2009) 3647 THE FUTURE OF MARRIAGE, 21 J. Am. Acad. Matrim. Law. 87, 119 (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3648 BEING HUMAN AND GAY/LESBIAN: A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE OF CANADIAN AND U.S. POLITICAL DISCOURSE, 2006 J. Inst. Just. Int'l Stud. 139, 142+ (2006) 3649 17 J. Legal Aspects Sport 253, SEXUAL ORIENTATION HARASSMENT AND DISCRIMINATION: LEGAL PROTECTION FOR STUDENT-ATHLETES (2007) 3650 16 J. Legal Aspects Sport 25, GENDER, EMPLOYMENT, AND SEXUAL HARASSMENT ISSUES IN THE GOLF INDUSTRY (2006) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 3651 A LEGAL ESSAY: THE JUDICIAL ACTIVISM MYTH, 67 J. Mo. B. 106, 111 (2011) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 3652 POLICYMAKING BY THE ADMINISTRATIVE JUDICIARY, 25 J. Nat'l A. Admin. L. Judges 49, 117 (2005) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 3653 EDUCATION FOR JUDICIAL ASPIRANTS, 31 J. Nat'l Ass'n Admin. L. Judiciary 99, 147+ (2011) 3654 THE EXTRAORDINARY RESTRICTIONS ON THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY EMPLOYEES: HOW NATIONAL SECURITY CONCERNS LEGALLY TRUMP INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS, 21 J. Transnat'l L. & Pol'y 105, 122+ (2012) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3655 THE REALPOLITIK OF EMPIRE, 13 J. Transnat'l L. & Pol'y 281, 303+ (2003) 3656 EMBRACING THE DNA FINGERPRINT ACT, 5 J. Telecomm. & High Tech. L. 629, 655+ (2007) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 3657 FIGHTING DISCRIMINATION BASED ON SEXUAL ORIENTATION, 34 NO. 1 Litigation 31, 31 (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3658 AMICI CURIAE: FRIENDS OF THE COURT OR NUISANCES?, 33 NO. 1 Litigation 5, 66 (2006) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 3659 THE BEHAVIOR OF SUPREME COURT JUSTICES WHEN THEIR BEHAVIOR COUNTS THE MOST AN INFORMAL STUDY, 97 Judicature 82, 84+ (2013) 3660 LEGITIMACY, YES: BUT AT WHAT COST?, 96 Judicature 209, 212 (2013) 3661 MEETING JUSTICE STEVENS, 94 Judicature 34, 36 (2010) 3662 AMICI CURIAE DURING THE REHNQUIST YEARS, 89 Judicature 127, 132 (2005) 3663 DECISION-MAKING TRENDS OF THE REHNQUIST COURT ERA: CIVIL RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES CASES, 89 Judicature 161, 161 (2005) 3664 MEDIA AND SOVEREIGNTY: THE GLOBAL INFORMATION REVOLUTION AND ITS CHALLENGE TO STATE POWER Monroe E. Price © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. The MIT Press, 2002 250 Pages, $29.95 ISBN 0262162113, 45 Jurimetrics J. 333, 353 (2005) 3665 VOTING FOR PROGRESS: COPYRIGHT AND THE ROLE OF THE JUDICIARY IN ELDRED v. ASHCROFT, 44 Jurimetrics J. 465, 486+ (2004) 3666 JUDICIAL DEPARTURES AND THE INTRODUCTION OF QUALIFIED RETIREMENT, 1892-1953, 30 Just. Sys. J. 139, 139+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3667 VARIABLE VOTING BEHAVIOR ON THE SUPREME COURT: A PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS AND RESEARCH FRAMEWORK, 25 Just. Sys. J. 57, 72+ (2004) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.) 3668 THE CONSTITUTIONAL STATUS OF MORALS LEGISLATION, 98 Ky. L.J. 1, 66+ (2010) 3669 JUDICIAL HUMILITY: THE ENDURING LEGACY OF ROSE V. COUNCIL FOR BETTER EDUCATION, 98 Ky. L.J. 717, 738 (2010) 3670 STRADER V. GRAHAM: KENTUCKY'S CONTRIBUTION TO NATIONAL SLAVERY LITIGATION AND THE DRED SCOTT DECISION, 97 Ky. L.J. 353, 438 (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3671 WHAT THE DOCTOR ORDERED: BALANCING RELIGION AND PATIENT RIGHTS IN U.S. PHARMACIES, 97 Ky. L.J. 521, 539+ (2009) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 3672 THE FACEBOOK FRONTIER: RESPONDING TO THE CHANGING FACE OF PRIVACY ON THE INTERNET, 97 Ky. L.J. 541, 564+ (2009) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3673 REFLECTIONS ON THE TECHNICOLOR RIGHT TO ASSOCIATION IN AMERICAN LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT LAW, 96 Ky. L.J. 343, 368+ (2008) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3674 LIBERTY FROM ON HIGH: THE GROWING RELIANCE ON A CENTRALIZED JUDICIARY TO PROTECT INDIVIDUAL LIBERTY, 95 Ky. L.J. 385, 427+ (2007) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3675 CIVIL RIGHTS FOR WHOM?: GAY RIGHTS VERSUS RELIGIOUS FREEDOM, 95 Ky. L.J. 553, 647+ (2007) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3676 A DOOR AJAR OR A FLOODGATE?: CORPORATE LIABILITY AFTER SOSA V. ALVAREZ MACHAIN, 94 Ky. L.J. 691, 714+ (2006) 3677 ELIMINATING THE EXCEPTION? LAWRENCE V. TEXAS AND THE ARGUMENTS FOR EXTENDING THE RIGHT TO MARRY TO SAME-SEX COUPLES, 93 Ky. L.J. 813, 838+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3678 FAIR USE AND EDUCATIONAL COPYING: A REEXAMINATION OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS V. MICHIGAN DOCUMENT SERVICES, INC., 86 Ky. L.J. 675, 709+ (1998) 3679 4 Law & Ethics Hum. Rts. 78, A DEMOCRATIC DEFENSE OF CONSTITUTIONAL BALANCING (2010) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 3680 GAY GENTRIFICATION: WHITEWASHED FICTIONS OF LGBT PRIVILEGE AND THE NEW INTEREST-CONVERGENCE DILEMMA, 31 © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Law & Ineq. 117, 119+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3681 EQUAL PROTECTION FOR CHILDREN OF GAY AND LESBIAN PARENTS: CHALLENGING THE THREE PILLARS OF EXCLUSIONLEGITIMACY, DUAL-GENDER PARENTING, AND BIOLOGY, 28 Law & Ineq. 307, 332+ (2010) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 3682 LOOKING BEYOND FULL RELATIONSHIP RECOGNITION FOR COUPLES REGARDLESS OF SEX: ABOLITION, ALTERNATIVES, AND/OR FUNCTIONALISM, 28 Law & Ineq. 345, 372+ (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3683 FAIR TRIALS? THE MANUAL FOR MILITARY COMMISSIONS IN LIGHT OF COMMON ARTICLE 3 AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL LAW, 26 Law & Ineq. 353, 400+ (2008) 3684 PREGNANT WOMEN AND THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT: A FEMINIST EXAMINATION OF THE TREND TO ELIMINATE WOMEN'S RIGHTS DURING PREGNANCY, 26 Law & Ineq. 171, 202+ (2008) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 3685 MARRIAGE, FREE EXERCISE, AND THE CONSTITUTION, 26 Law & Ineq. 59, 108+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3686 INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW: PRINCIPLED, DOUBLE, OR ABSENT STANDARDS?, 25 Law & Ineq. 467, 513 (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3687 DILDOS, ARTIFICIAL VAGINAS, AND PHTHALATES: HOW TOXIC SEX TOYS ILLUSTRATE A BROADER PROBLEM FOR CONSUMER PROTECTION, 25 Law & Ineq. 203, 226+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3688 STATE MARRIAGE AMENDMENTS AND OVERREACHING: ON PLAIN MEANING, GOOD PUBLIC POLICY, AND CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITATIONS, 25 Law & Ineq. 59, 113+ (2007) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3689 BROWN II: ORDINARY REMEDIES FOR EXTRAORDINARY WRONGS, 24 Law & Ineq. 47, 79+ (2006) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 3690 BROWN II: A CASE OF MISSED OPPORTUNITY?, 24 Law & Ineq. 9, 30 (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3691 LOFTON V. SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES: FLORIDA'S GAY ADOPTION BAN UNDER IRRATIONAL EQUAL PROTECTION ANALYSIS, 23 Law & Ineq. 407, 428+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3692 THE MAJORITARIAN DIFFICULTY: AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, SODOMY, AND SUPREME COURT POLITICS, 23 Law & Ineq. 1, 93+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3693 VIDERI QUAM ESSE : THE ROLE OF EMPATHY IN JUDICIAL DISCOURSE, 34 Law & Psychol. Rev. 121, 133 (2010) 3694 DESPERATELY CLINGING TO THE CLEAVERS: WHAT FAMILY LAW COURTS ARE DOING ABOUT HOMOSEXUAL PARENTS, AND WHAT SOME ARE REFUSING TO SEE, 29 Law & Psychol. Rev. 223, 241 (2005) 3695 NORTH CAROLINA COURTS: LEGISLATING COMPULSORY © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. HETEROSEXUALITY BY CREATING NEW CRIMES UNDER THE CRIME AGAINST NATURE STATUTE POST-LAWRENCE V. TEXAS, 20 Law & Sexuality 1, 30+ (2011) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3696 PERRY V. SCHWARZENEGGER: A LARGE STEP IN THE DIRECTION OF MARRIAGE EQUALITY IN CALIFORNIA, 20 Law & Sexuality 121, 131 (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3697 THE PRESENT CASE DOES INVOLVE MINORS: AN OVERVIEW OF THE DISCRIMINATORY EFFECTS OF ROMEO AND JULIET PROVISIONS AND SENTENCING PRACTICES ON LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, AND TRANSGENDER YOUTH, 20 Law & Sexuality 97, 119+ (2011) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3698 DEFENDING ENDA: THE RAMIFICATIONS OF OMITTING THE BFOQ DEFENSE IN THE EMPLOYMENT NON-DISCRIMINATION ACT, 19 Law & Sexuality 1, 30+ (2010) 3699 HAVE WE ARRIVED YET? LGBT RIGHTS AND THE LIMITS OF FORMAL EQUALITY, 19 Law & Sexuality 159, 165 (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3700 NAMING'S NECESSITY, 19 Law & Sexuality 166, 169 (2010) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 3701 SEXUAL JUSTICE, STUDENT SCHOLARSHIP AND THE SO-CALLED SEVEN SINS, 19 Law & Sexuality 31, 65+ (2010) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3702 ASSESSING THE KOREAN MILITARY'S GAY SEX BAN IN THE INTERNATIONAL CONTEXT, 19 Law & Sexuality 67, 94+ (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3703 A PROHIBITION ON ANTISODOMY LAWS THROUGH REGIONAL CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW, 19 Law & Sexuality 95, 135+ (2010) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3704 COOK V. GATES: DON'T ASK, DON'T TELL REMAINS A LEGAL OPTION FOR THE MILITARY, BUT THE END MAY BE IN SIGHT, 18 Law & Sexuality 183, 195+ (2009) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3705 THE GERONIMO BANK MURDERS: A GAY TRAGEDY, 17 Law & Sexuality 39, 73+ (2008) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3706 THE PROPOSED ANTI-GAY MARRIAGE AMENDMENT: THE CONSTITUTION, THE LAW OF STANDING, AND LIBERALDEMOCRATIC VALUES, 17 Law & Sexuality 75, 106+ (2008) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3707 INTRODUCTORY REMARKS PRESENTATION OF 2006 DAN BRADLEY AWARD TO URVASHI VAID, 16 Law & Sexuality 111, 113+ (2007) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 3708 2006 DAN BRADLEY AWARD ACCEPTANCE SPEECH, 16 Law & Sexuality 115, 122 (2007) 3709 THE REALITY OF GENDER AMBIGUITY: A ROAD TOWARD TRANSGENDER HEALTH CARE INCLUSION, 16 Law & Sexuality 123, 144+ (2007) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3710 LEWIS V. HARRIS: SAME-SEX MARRIAGE IS A QUESTION FOR THE © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. LEGISLATURE, NOT THE COURTS, 16 Law & Sexuality 157, 168+ (2007) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3711 STANDING TOGETHER, 15 Law & Sexuality 1, 9+ (2006) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3712 SHARING THE LOVE: THE POLITICAL POWER OF REMEDIAL DELAY IN SAME-SEX MARRIAGE CASES, 15 Law & Sexuality 11, 58+ (2006) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 3713 NOT GAY ENOUGH FOR THE GOVERNMENT: RACIAL AND SEXUAL STEREOTYPES IN SEXUAL ORIENTATION ASYLUM CASES, 15 Law & Sexuality 135, 161+ (2006) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3714 HOMOSEXUALITY IN ASYLUM AND CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: RHETORIC OF ACTS AND IDENTITY, 15 Law & Sexuality 59, 89+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3715 TO HAVE AND TO HOLD-OR NOT: THE INFLUENCE OF THE CHRISTIAN RIGHT ON GAY MARRIAGE LAWS IN THE NETHERLANDS, CANADA, AND THE UNITED STATES, 14 Law & Sexuality 1, 50+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3716 ANDERSEN V. KING COUNTY: THE BATTLE FOR SAME-SEX MARRIAGE-WILL WASHINGTON STATE BE THE NEXT TO FALL?, 14 Law & Sexuality 181, 192+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3717 IN RE KANDU: DEFENDING DOMA-DEFERENTIAL WASHINGTON BANKRUPTCY COURT DEALS BLOW TO EQUAL PROTECTION AND DUE PROCESS BY UPHOLDING FEDERAL BAN ON RECOGNITION OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, 14 Law & Sexuality 193, 204+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3718 RECONSIDERING THE GENDER-EQUALITY PERSPECTIVE FOR UNDERSTANDING LGBT RIGHTS, 13 Law & Sexuality 605, 703+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3719 LAWRENCE V. TEXAS: DIGNITY, A NEW STANDARD FOR SUBSTANTIVE RATIONAL BASIS REVIEW?, 13 Law & Sexuality 727, 727+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3720 K.B. V. NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE PENSIONS AGENCY AND THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR HEALTH: THE INFLUENCE OF HUMAN RIGHTS LAW IN PROTECTING TRANSSEXUALS FROM EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION, 13 Law & Sexuality 739, 751+ (2004) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3721 CREATION STORIES: STANLEY HAUERWAS, SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, AND NARRATIVE IN LAW AND THEOLOGY, 75 Law & Contemp. Probs. 87, 107+ (2012) 3722 POPULAR CONSTITUTIONALISM AND THE UNDERENFORCEMENT PROBLEM: THE CASE OF THE NATIONAL HEALTHCARE LAW, 75 Law & Contemp. Probs. 157, 201 (2012) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 3723 INTERNATIONAL DELEGATIONS AND THE VALUES OF FEDERALISM, 71-WTR Law & Contemp. Probs. 93, 113+ (2008) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 3724 THE FUTURE AND PAST OF U.S. FOREIGN RELATIONS LAW, 67-FALL © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Law & Contemp. Probs. 169, 193+ (2004) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 3725 DISAGGREGATING U.S. INTERESTS IN INTERNATIONAL LAW, 67-FALL Law & Contemp. Probs. 195, 219+ (2004) 3726 FOREWORD, 67-SUM Law & Contemp. Probs. 1, 10 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3727 WARNING: LABELING CONSTITUTIONS MAY BE HAZARDOUS TO YOUR REGIME, 67-SUM Law & Contemp. Probs. 33, 52+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3728 PROGRESSIVE AND CONSERVATIVE CONSTITUTIONALISM AS THE UNITED STATES ENTERS THE 21ST CENTURY, 67-SUM Law & Contemp. Probs. 53, 62 (2004) 3729 THE MAJORITARIAN REHNQUIST COURT?, 67-SUM Law & Contemp. Probs. 63, 81 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3730 SPEECH AND STRIFE, 67-SUM Law & Contemp. Probs. 83, 104+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3731 INTRODUCING APPLIED LEGAL HISTORY, 31 Law & Hist. Rev. 233, 234+ (2013) 3732 RETHINKING "THE NATION' IN NATIONAL LEGAL HISTORY: A CANADIAN PERSPECTIVE, 29 Law & Hist. Rev. 607, 626 (2011) 3733 BOUTILIER AND THE U.S. SUPREME COURT'S SEXUAL REVOLUTION, 23 Law & Hist. Rev. 491, 491+ (2005) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 3734 22 Law & Literature 48, KULTURKAMPF AND SPITE: THE REHNQUIST COURT AND AMERICAN "THEOCONSERVATISM" (2010) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 3735 19 Law & Literature 471, BREAKING THE LAW IN AMERICA (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3736 18 Law & Literature 225, PANIC IN THE PROJECT Critical Queer Studies and the Matthew Shepard Murder (2006) 3737 SELF-REPRESENTATION IN THE INTERNATIONAL ARENA: REMOVING A FALSE RIGHT OF SPECTACLE, 40 Geo. J. Int'l L. 919, 946+ (2009) 3738 LOCK THEM UP - AND THROW AWAY THE KEY: THE PREVENTIVE DETENTION OF SEX OFFENDERS IN THE UNITED STATES AND GERMANY, 39 Geo. J. Int'l L. 551, 572 (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3739 PROTECTING RIGHTS IN THE AGE OF TERRORISM: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES, 36 Geo. J. Int'l L. 669, 669+ (2005) HN: 3,5 (S.Ct.) 3740 ARTICLE 36 OF THE VIENNA CONVENTION ON CONSULAR RELATIONS: THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE IN MEXICO V. UNITED STATES (AVENA) SPEAKS EMPHATICALLY TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES ABOUT THE FUNDAMENTAL NATURE, 36 Geo. J. Int'l L. 1, 4+ (2004) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 3741 INTERNATIONAL LAW, U.S. SOVEREIGNTY, AND THE DEATH PENALTY, 35 Geo. J. Int'l L. 547, 591+ (2004) 3742 FRAME SPILLOVER: MEDIA FRAMING AND PUBLIC OPINION OF A © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. MULTIFACETED LGBT RIGHTS AGENDA, 38 Law & Soc. Inquiry 403, 403+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3743 SINGAPORE'S CULTURE WAR OVER SECTION 377A: THROUGH THE LENS OF PUBLIC CHOICE AND MULTILINGUAL RESEARCH, 38 Law & Soc. Inquiry 106, 130+ (2013) 3744 QUEER LEGAL HISTORY: A FIELD GROWS UP AND COMES OUT, 36 Law & Soc. Inquiry 537, 538+ (2011) 3745 FROM PUBLIC SOCIOLOGY TO PUBLIC PHILOSOPHY: LESSONS FOR LAW AND SOCIETY, 35 Law & Soc. Inquiry 1137, 1145+ (2010) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 3746 FROM PUBLIC INTEREST TO PRIVATE RIGHTS: FREE SPEECH, LIBERAL INDIVIDUALISM, AND THE MAKING OF MODERN TORT LAW, 34 Law & Soc. Inquiry 187, 222+ (2009) 3747 JUDICIAL CULTURE AND THE POLITICOLEGAL OPPORTUNITY STRUCTURE: EXPLAINING BILL OF RIGHTS LEGAL IMPACT IN NEW ZEALAND, 34 Law & Soc. Inquiry 95, 126+ (2009) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 3748 THE PAST DOES NOT REPEAT ITSELF, BUT IT RHYMES: THE SECOND COMING OF THE LIBERAL ANTI-COURT MOVEMENT, 33 Law & Soc. Inquiry 1071, 1095+ (2008) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 3749 THE MISCEGENATION/SAME-SEX MARRIAGE ANALOGY: WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM LEGAL HISTORY?, 33 Law & Soc. Inquiry 345, 386 (2008) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 3750 IS FERTILITY THE UNSPOKEN ISSUE IN THE DEBATE BETWEEN LIBERAL AND CONSERVATIVE FAMILY VALUES?, 32 Law & Soc. Inquiry 809, 813+ (2007) 3751 PARTY POLITICS OR JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE? THE REGIME POLITICS LITERATURE HITS THE LAW SCHOOLS, 32 Law & Soc. Inquiry 511, 523+ (2007) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 3752 THE RULE OF LAW OR THE RULE OF POLITICS? HARMONIZING THE INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL VIEWS OF SUPREME COURT DECISION MAKING, 30 Law & Soc. Inquiry 89, 134+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3753 LAW AND ECONOMICS IN THE PERSONAL SPHERE, 29 Law & Soc. Inquiry 219, 260+ (2004) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3754 47 Law and Society Review 409, INSTITUTIONAL PATHS TO POLICY CHANGE: JUDICIAL versus NONJUDICIAL REPEAL OF SODOMY LAWS (2013) 3755 46 Law and Society Review 297, IGNORANCE IN BLISS: MODELING KNOWLEDGE OF RIGHTS IN MARRIAGE AND COHABITATION (2012) 3756 45 Law and Society Review 139, THE TRANSMISSION OF LEGAL PRECEDENT ACROSS THE AUSTRALIAN STATE SUPREME COURTS OVER THE TWENTIETH CENTURY (2011) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 3757 44 Law and Society Review 195, ELOQUENCE & REASON: CREATING A © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. FIRST AMENDMENT CULTURE. BY ROBERT TSAI. NEW HAVEN, CT: YALE UNIVERSITY PRESS, 2008. PP. XIII+198. $45.00 CLOTH (2010) 3758 43 Law and Society Review 151, BEYOND BACKLASH: ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF JUDICIAL DECISIONS ON LGBT RIGHTS (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3759 42 Law and Society Review 439, ANSWERING THE CALL OF THE COURT: HOW JUSTICES AND LITIGANTS SET THE SUPREME COURT AGENDA. BY VANESSA A. BAIRD. CHARLOTTESVILLE AND LONDON: UNIV. OF VIRGINIA PRESS, 2007. PP. XII+225. $45.00 CLOTH (2008) 3760 39 Law and Society Review 457, SAME-SEX UNIONS AND THE SPECTACLES OF RECOGNITION (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3761 DISSENTS FROM THE BENCH: A COMPILATION OF ORAL DISSENTS BY U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, 102 Law Libr. J. 7, 34+ (2010) 3762 KEEPING UP WITH NEW LEGAL TITLES, 101 Law Libr. J. 95, 114 (2009) 3763 KEEPING UP WITH NEW LEGAL TITLES, 98 Law Libr. J. 531, 549 (2006) 3764 COOL WEB SITES, 97 Law Libr. J. 721, 725+ (2005) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 3765 KEEPING UP WITH NEW LEGAL TITLES, 96 Law Libr. J. 733, 743+ (2004) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 3766 PROFESSORS AGREE EXTREME ASSOCIATES WILL NOT GO TO SUPREME COURT, 8 NO. 10 Lawyers J. 5, 5+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3767 THE PLOT THICKENS: THE APPELLATE BRIEF AS STORY, 14 Legal Writing: J. Legal Writing Inst. 127, 169 (2008) 3768 OF GOLF AND GHOULS: THE PROSE STYLE OF JUSTICE SCALIA Love him or hate him, Antonin Scalia demands attention, 9 Legal Writing: J. Legal Writing Inst. 71, 108+ (2003) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 3769 IMMORAL WAIVER: JUDICIAL REVIEW OF INTRA-MILITARY SEXUAL ASSAULT CLAIMS, 17 Lewis & Clark L. Rev. 723, 775+ (2013) 3770 A STRUCTURAL APPROACH TO JUDICIAL TAKINGS, 16 Lewis & Clark L. Rev. 1381, 1436+ (2012) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 3771 POSNER'S PRAGMATISM AND THE TURN TOWARD FIDELITY, 16 Lewis & Clark L. Rev. 69, 123 (2012) 3772 ON JUDGMENT, 15 Lewis & Clark L. Rev. 1025, 1046+ (2011) 3773 THE NOT SO GREAT WRIT: TRAPPED IN THE NARROW HOLDINGS OF SUPREME COURT PRECEDENTS, 14 Lewis & Clark L. Rev. 741, 769+ (2010) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3774 REMOVING THE DEAD HAND ON THE FUTURE: RECOGNIZING CITIZEN CHILDREN'S RIGHTS AGAINST PARENTAL DEPORTATION, 13 Lewis & Clark L. Rev. 751, 786 (2009) 3775 THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA V. HELLER AND ANTONIN SCALIA'S PERVERSE SENSE OF ORIGINALISM, 13 Lewis & Clark L. Rev. 349, 381 (2009) 3776 RETHINKING THE USE OF FOREIGN LAW AND PUBLIC CONSENSUS: © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. THE U.S. SUPREME COURT'S INCONSISTENT METHODS FOR DEFINING CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, 13 Lewis & Clark L. Rev. 1007, 1036+ (2009) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3777 SANCHEZ-LLAMAS, AMERICAN HUMAN RIGHTS EXCEPTIONALISM AND THE VCCR NORM PORTAL, 11 Lewis & Clark L. Rev. 47, 64 (2007) 3778 COMPULSORY EDUCATION AND SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS: ASSERTING STUDENT RIGHTS TO A SAFE AND HEALTHY SCHOOL FACILITY, 10 Lewis & Clark L. Rev. 201, 235+ (2006) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3779 SHOCKING THE CONSCIENCE OF MANKIND: USING INTERNATIONAL LAW TO DEFINE "CRIMES INVOLVING MORAL TURPITUDE" IN IMMIGRATION LAW, 10 Lewis & Clark L. Rev. 955, 988+ (2006) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3780 THE CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITS TO COURT-STRIPPING, 9 Lewis & Clark L. Rev. 347, 362+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3781 SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, THE CONSTITUTION, AND CONGRESSIONAL POWER TO CONTROL FEDERAL JURISDICTION: BE CAREFUL WHAT YOU WISH FOR, 9 Lewis & Clark L. Rev. 363, 380 (2005) 3782 RAICH AND JUDICIAL CONSERVATISM AT THE CLOSE OF THE REHNQUIST COURT, 9 Lewis & Clark L. Rev. 791, 822 (2005) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 3783 ALIEN ETHICS: TESTING THE LIMITS OF ABSOLUTE LIABILITY, 7 Liberty U. L. Rev. 397, 441+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3784 GOD VERSUS GOVERNMENT: UNDERSTANDING STATE AUTHORITY IN THE CONTEXT OF THE SAME-SEX MARRIAGE MOVEMENT, 7 Liberty U. L. Rev. 235, 253+ (2013) 3785 A STATE'S OBLIGATION TO FUND HORMONAL THERAPY AND SEXREASSIGNMENT SURGERY FOR PRISONERS DIAGNOSED WITH GENDER IDENTITY DISORDER, 7 Liberty U. L. Rev. 15, 47+ (2012) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 3786 TAMING THE SUPREME COURT, 6 Liberty U. L. Rev. 597, 664+ (2012) 3787 RATIONAL RELATIONSHIP TO WHAT? HOW LAWRENCE V. TEXAS DESTROYED OUR UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT CONSTITUTES A LEGITIMATE STATE INTEREST, 6 Liberty U. L. Rev. 415, 452+ (2012) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 3788 CRIMINALS BY NECESSITY: THE AMERICAN HOMELESS IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY, 5 Liberty U. L. Rev. 275, 301 (2011) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 3789 PROBLEMS OF CLASSIFICATION, 4 Liberty U. L. Rev. 465, 478+ (2010) 3790 HOW THE CONCEPT OF "SEXUAL ORIENTATION" THREATENS RELIGIOUS LIBERTY, 4 Liberty U. L. Rev. 503, 536+ (2010) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 3791 CONSTRUCTING THE CO-ED MILITARY, 4 Liberty U. L. Rev. 617, 794+ (2010) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 3792 WHICH IS TO BE MASTER?: THE PEOPLE, JUDGES, AND THE CONSTITUTION'S MEANING, 2 Liberty U. L. Rev. 419, 458+ (2008) 3793 THE NEED FOR RELIGIOUS GROUPS TO BE EXEMPT FROM THE DIVERSITY POLICIES OF UNIVERSITIES IN LIGHT OF CHRISTIAN LEGAL SOCIETY V. MARTINEZ, 72 La. L. Rev. 1055, 1094 (2012) 3794 THE LOUISIANA DOMA AS AN IMPROPER IMPEDIMENT TO THE EVOLUTION OF PUBLIC POLICY TOWARD COHABITANTS, 72 La. L. Rev. 789, 813 (2012) 3795 THE RIGHT, THE TEST, AND THE VOTE: EVALUATING THE REASONING EMPLOYED IN CRAWFORD V. MARION COUNTY ELECTION BOARD, 70 La. L. Rev. 1023, 1060+ (2010) 3796 THE TROXEL AFTERMATH: A PROPOSED SOLUTION FOR STATE COURTS AND LEGISLATURES, 69 La. L. Rev. 927, 954+ (2009) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 3797 GOVERNMENT AS LIBERTY'S SERVANT: THE "REASONABLE TIME, PLACE, AND MANNER" STANDARD OF REVIEW FOR ALL GOVERNMENT RESTRICTIONS ON LIBERTY INTERESTS, 68 La. L. Rev. 1, 61+ (2007) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3798 WHO'S YOUR MOMMA, WHO ARE YOUR DADDIES? LOUISIANA'S NEW LAW OF FILIATION, 67 La. L. Rev. 307, 386 (2007) 3799 THE SUPREME COURT, JUSTINIAN, AND ANTONIN SCALIA : TWENTY YEARS IN RETROSPECT, 67 La. L. Rev. 489, 521+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3800 THE KELO EFFECT: EMINENT DOMAIN AND PROPERTY RIGHTS IN LOUISIANA, 67 La. L. Rev. 171, 193 (2006) 3801 WHO'S YOUR DADDY?: A LEGITIMATE QUESTION GIVEN LOUISIANA'S LACK OF LEGISLATION GOVERNING ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY, 66 La. L. Rev. 609, 660+ (2006) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 3802 WHY THE RULE OF LAW?, 66 La. L. Rev. 63, 94+ (2005) 3803 LAWLESSNESS REVEALED: THE SUPREME COURT'S MAN OF LIBERTY TRANSCENDS TORT LAW, 66 La. L. Rev. 95, 122 (2005) 3804 COVENANT MARRIAGE SEVEN YEARS LATER: ITS AS YET UNFULFILLED PROMISE, 65 La. L. Rev. 605, 624+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3805 CONTEMPLATING A CIVIL LAW PARADIGM FOR A FUTURE INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL CODE, 65 La. L. Rev. 677, 774+ (2005) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.) 3806 OF CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS, HUMAN RIGHTS, AND SAMESEX MARRIAGES, 64 La. L. Rev. 459, 475+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3807 NO LONGER THE UGLY DUCKLING: THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS RECOGNIZES TRANSSEXUAL CIVIL RIGHTS IN GOODWIN V. UNITED KINGDOM AND SETS THE TONE FOR FUTURE UNITED STATES REFORM, 64 La. L. Rev. 643, 677+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 3808 14 Loyola Journal of Public Interest Law 331, WHEN POWER YIELDS TO JUSTICE: DOE V. JINDAL AND THE CAMPAIGN TO DISMANTLE LOUISIANA'S CRIME AGAINST NATURE STATUTE (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3809 13 Loyola Journal of Public Interest Law 115, FROM COMPASSIONATE CONSERVATISM TO CALCULATED INDIFFERENCE: POLITICS TAKES AIM AT AMERICA'S FAMILIES (2011) 3810 12 Loyola Journal of Public Interest Law 495, THE MATTHEW SHEPARD AND JAMES BYRD, JR. HATE CRIMES ACT: THE INTERPLAY OF THE JUDICIARY AND CONGRESS IN SUSPECT CLASSIFICATION ANALYSIS (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3811 11 Loyola Journal of Public Interest Law 87, ALL WHO LIVE IN LOVE (2009) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3812 8 Loyola Journal of Public Interest Law 163, RIGHT-TO-WORK: SETTLED LAW OR UNFINISHED JOURNEY (2007) 3813 THE "DETERMINATION OF MARRIAGE ACT": A REASONABLE RESPONSE TO THE DISCRIMINATORY "DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT", 58 Loy. L. Rev. 939, 958+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3814 THE HARMLESS PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS: WHY "RATIONAL BASIS WITH BITE" REVIEW MAKES SENSE FOR CHALLENGES TO OCCUPATIONAL LICENSES, 58 Loy. L. Rev. 721, 725+ (2012) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3815 HOW LAWYERS (COME TO) SEE THE WORLD: A NARRATIVE THEORY OF LEGAL PEDAGOGY, 56 Loy. L. Rev. 619, 649 (2010) 3816 BEYOND BLACK INK: FROM LANGDELL TO THE OYEZ PROJECT-THE VOICE OF THE PAST, 55 Loy. L. Rev. 277, 330+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3817 LONELINESS AND THE LAW: SOLITUDE, ACTION, AND POWER IN LAW AND LITERATURE, 55 Loy. L. Rev. 45, 77 (2009) 3818 CHANGE IN THE EUROPEAN CIVIL LAW SYSTEMS: INFILTRATION OF THE ANGLO-AMERICAN CASE LAW SYSTEM OF PRECEDENT INTO THE CIVIL LAW SYSTEM, 55 Loy. L. Rev. 5, 21 (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3819 DISMANTLING THE DICTATED MORAL CODE: MODIFYING LOUISIANA'S IN VITRO FERTILIZATION STATUTES TO PROTECT PATIENTS' PROCREATIVE LIBERTY, 51 Loy. L. Rev. 549, 601 (2005) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 3820 BANNED FROM THE BAR: CLASSIFICATION OF THE TEMPORARY ALIEN IN LOUISIANA, 51 Loy. L. Rev. 139, 164 (2005) 3821 TIME, PLACE, AND MANNER ANALYSIS, BRANDEIS BRIEFS, AND THE PARTIAL-BIRTH ABORTION BAN ACT OF 2003, 50 Loy. L. Rev. 173, 208 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3822 WINNER, WINNER, NO CHICKEN DINNER: AN ANALYSIS OF INTERACTIVE MEDIA ENT'MT & GAMING ASS'N V. ATT'Y GEN. OF THE U.S. AND THE UNJUSTIFIED CONSEQUENCES OF THE UIGEA, 31 Loy. © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. L.A. Ent. L. Rev. 55, 82+ (2011) 3823 FREEWAY PORN & THE SIGNS OF SIN: SEX, CIGARETTES AND CENSORSHIP OF BILLBOARDS, 30 Loy. L.A. Ent. L. Rev. 215, 261+ (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3824 MYSPACE-ING IS NOT A CRIME: WHY BREACHING TERMS OF SERVICE AGREEMENTS SHOULD NOT IMPLICATE THE COMPUTER FRAUD AND ABUSE ACT Written February 2, 2009, 29 Loy. L.A. Ent. L. Rev. 475, 515 (2009) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 3825 THE PRIVACY OF DEATH: AN EMERGENT JURISPRUDENCE AND LEGAL REBUKE TO MEDIA EXPLOITATION AND A VOYEURISTIC CULTURE, 26 Loy. L.A. Ent. L. Rev. 133, 169 (2006) 3826 THE E.U. MODEL AS AN ADOPTABLE APPROACH FOR U.S. PRIVACY LAWS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF DATA COLLECTION LAWS IN THE UNITED KINGDOM, GERMANY, AND THE UNITED STATES, 34 Loy. L.A. Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 267, 294+ (2011) 3827 EXPANDING STARE DECISIS: THE ROLE OF PRECEDENT IN THE UNFOLDING DIALECTIC OF BRADY V. MARYLAND, 46 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 77, 162+ (2012) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 3828 INTRODUCTION: TALKING AROUND MARRIAGE, 45 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 675, 692 (2012) 3829 EVIDENCE OF PERSISTENT AND PERVASIVE WORKPLACE DISCRIMINATION AGAINST LGBT PEOPLE: THE NEED FOR FEDERAL LEGISLATION PROHIBITING DISCRIMINATION AND PROVIDING FOR EQUAL EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS, 45 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 715, 779 (2012) 3830 THE DESCENT OF RESPONSIBLE PROCREATION: A GENEALOGY OF AN IDEOLOGY, 45 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 781, 847+ (2012) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 3831 HEALTH CARE ISSUES AFFECTING PEOPLE WITH AN INTERSEX CONDITION OR DSD: SEX OR DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION?, 45 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 849, 907+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3832 GAME OVER FOR REGULATING VIOLENT VIDEO GAMES? THE EFFECT OF BROWN V. ENTERTAINMENT MERCHANTS ASS'N ON FIRST AMENDMENT JURISPRUDENCE, 45 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 633, 655 (2012) 3833 TRENDLINES: COURT DECISIONS, PROPOSED LEGISLATION, AND THEIR LIKELY IMPACT ON BINATIONAL SAME-SEX FAMILIES, 44 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 1339, 1397+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3834 SUPREME COURT-OCTOBER TERM 2009 FOREWORD: CONSERVATIVE JUDICIAL ACTIVISM, 44 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 863, 887+ (2011) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 3835 IS LIFE THE SAME AS DEATH?: IMPLICATIONS OF GRAHAM V. FLORIDA, ROPER V. SIMMONS, AND ATKINS V. VIRGINIA ON LIFE WITHOUT PAROLE SENTENCES FOR JUVENILE AND MENTALLY RETARDED OFFENDERS, 43 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 1495, 1532 (2010) 3836 "ON ONE FOOT" BOOK REVIEW OF IN THE NAME OF JUSTICE, 43 Loy. © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. L.A. L. Rev. 627, 640 (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3837 TAKING CAUSALITY SERIOUSLY IN COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: INSIGHTS FROM COMPARATIVE POLITICS AND COMPARATIVE POLITICAL ECONOMY, 41 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 629, 682+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3838 PHILOSOPHICAL UNDERPINNINGS OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT, 41 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 329, 332 (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3839 IV. THE PROPRIETY OF INDEPENDENTLY REFERENCING INTERNATIONAL LAW, 40 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 1407, 1448+ (2007) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3840 MARRIAGE EQUALITY IN CALIFORNIA: LEGAL AND POLITICAL PROSPECTS, 40 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 1209, 1246 (2007) 3841 THE FIFTH AMENDMENT'S TAKINGS CLAUSE: PUBLIC USE AND PRIVATE USE; UNFORTUNATELY, THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE, 40 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 809, 852 (2007) 3842 THE POLITICS OF CRITICIZING JUDGES, 39 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 839, 857 (2006) 3843 INTERPRETIVE-REGIME CHANGE, 38 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 1971, 1999 (2005) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 3844 LETTING GO OF A NATIONAL RELIGION: WHY THE STATE SHOULD RELINQUISH ALL CONTROL OVER MARRIAGE, 38 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 2185, 2218+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3845 THE NEXT GENERATION OF TRANSNATIONAL/DOMESTIC CONSTITUTIONAL LAW SCHOLARSHIP: A REPLY TO PROFESSOR TUSHNET, 38 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 445, 483+ (2004) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 3846 MILITARY DISCRIMINATION ON THE BASIS OF SEXUAL ORIENTATION: "DON'T ASK, DON'T TELL" AND THE SOLOMON AMENDMENT, 37 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 1331, 1371+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3847 CONSTITUTIONAL ANALOGIES IN THE INTERNATIONAL LEGAL SYSTEM, 37 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 193, 237+ (2003) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3848 TRANSNATIONAL/DOMESTIC CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 37 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 239, 269+ (2003) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3849 TRANSNATIONAL DISCOURSE, RELATIONAL AUTHORITY, AND THE U.S. COURT: GENDER EQUALITY, 37 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 271, 361+ (2003) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 3850 THE INDIVIDUAL MANDATE'S DUE PROCESS LEGALITY: A KANTIAN EXPLANATION, AND WHY IT MATTERS, 44 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 865, 910+ (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 3851 JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE AND ACCOUNTABILITY IN AN AGE OF UNCONSTITUTIONAL CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS, 41 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 327, 349+ (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 3852 FREE TO LITIGATE OR FREE FROM LITIGATION: BALANCING PLAINTIFFS' RIGHTS WITH COURT CONSIDERATIONS AND DEFENDANTS' INTERESTS IN HUDSON V. CITY OF CHICAGO, 40 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 995, 1040 (2009) 3853 JUDICIAL IDEOLOGY AND THE SURVIVAL OF THE RULE OF LAW: A FIELD GUIDE TO THE CURRENT POLITICAL WAR OVER THE JUDICIARY, 39 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 427, 468+ (2008) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3854 THE DIFFERENCE THE MINI-DOMAS MAKE, 38 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 265, 278+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3855 IN SEARCH OF PATERNAL EQUITY: A FATHER'S RIGHT TO PURSUE A CLAIM OF MISREPRESENTATION OF FERTILITY, 36 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 1045, 1109+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3856 THE SEARCH FOR SEX EQUALITY: A PERSPECTIVE FROM THE PODIUM ON LAW AND CULTURAL CHANGE, 36 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 445, 456 (2005) 3857 IT'S MY BODY, IT'S MY CHOICE: THE PARTIAL-BIRTH ABORTION BAN ACT OF 2003, 35 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 1117, 1188 (2004) 3858 LAW REGULATING CODE REGULATING LAW, 35 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 1, 14+ (2003) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3859 DEFINING MARITAL PROPERTY, 25 Me. B.J. 48, 56 (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3860 DENYING MARRIAGE RIGHTS IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL, 19 Me. B.J. 78, 80+ (2004) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 3861 "GAY MARRIAGE' IS AN OXYMORON, 19 Me. B.J. 79, 87 (2004) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 3862 A JUDICIALLY CREATED EXEMPTION FROM STATUTE The Law Court's Cases on Prejudgment Interest in Excess of the Policy Limits in Direct Claims against Uninsured Motorist Carriers, 19 Me. B.J. 30, 35+ (2004) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 3863 PREEMPTING HUMANITY: WHY NATIONAL MEAT ASS'N V. HARRIS ANSWERED THE WRONG QUESTION, 65 Me. L. Rev. 685, 704 (2013) 3864 POST-TRIAL JUDICIAL REVIEW OF CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE UNITED STATES AND FINLAND, 64 Me. L. Rev. 425, 476 (2012) 3865 CONSTITUTION DAY LECTURE: AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONALISM, ALMOST (BUT NOT QUITE) VERSION 2.0, 65 Me. L. Rev. 77, 85+ (2012) 3866 THE CROSSROADS OF A LEGAL FICTION AND THE REALITY OF FAMILIES, 61 Me. L. Rev. 319, 351+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3867 ALEXIS DE TOCQUEVILLE AND AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: ON DEMOCRACY, THE MAJORITY WILL, INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS, FEDERALISM, RELIGION, CIVIC ASSOCIATIONS, AND ORIGINALIST CONSTITUTIONAL THEORY, 59 Me. L. Rev. 35, 74+ (2007) 3868 FRENCH AND AMERICAN PERSPECTIVES ON INTERNATIONAL LAW: © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. LEGAL CULTURES AND INTERNATIONAL LAW, 58 Me. L. Rev. 292, 335 (2006) 3869 WHAT GOT INTO THE COURT? WHAT HAPPENS NEXT? Libra Journalistin-Residence Lecture, 57 Me. L. Rev. 1, 2+ (2005) 3870 CHURCH LIABILITY FOR CLERGY SEXUAL ABUSE: HAVE TIME AND EVENTS OVERTHROWN SWANSON v. ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF PORTLAND?, 57 Me. L. Rev. 259, 275+ (2005) HN: 3,4 (S.Ct.) 3871 THE DEBATE OVER THE DENIAL OF MARRIAGE RIGHTS AND BENEFITS TO SAME-SEX COUPLES AND THEIR CHILDREN, 4 Margins: Md. L.J. Race, Religion, Gender & Class 127, 144+ (2004) HN: 1,2,3 (S.Ct.) 3872 FUNDING STEM CELL RESEARCH: THE CONVERGENCE OF SCIENCE, RELIGION & POLITICS IN THE FORMATION OF PUBLIC HEALTH POLICY, 12 Marq. Elder's Advisor 247, 293+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3873 SCHIAVO REVISITED? THE STRUGGLE FOR AUTONOMY AT THE END OF LIFE IN ITALY, 12 Marq. Elder's Advisor 295, 362+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3874 TO BE OR NOT TO BE, SHOULD DOCTORS DECIDE? ETHICAL AND LEGAL ASPECTS OF MEDICAL FUTILITY POLICIES, 7 Marq. Elder's Advisor 313, 355+ (2006) 3875 SEMIOTICS OF THE SCANDALOUS AND THE IMMORAL AND THE DISPARAGING: SECTION 2(A) TRADEMARK LAW AFTER LAWRENCE V. TEXAS, 9 Marq. Intell. Prop. L. Rev. 187, 248+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3876 EXILE ON MAIN STREET: COMPETING TRADITIONS AND DUE PROCESS DISSENT, 95 Marq. L. Rev. 1253, 1325+ (2012) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 3877 BALANCING LEGAL PROCESS WITH SCIENTIFIC EXPERTISE: EXPERT WITNESS METHODOLOGY IN FIVE NATIONS AND SUGGESTIONS FOR REFORM OF POST-DAUBERT U.S. RELIABILITY DETERMINATIONS, 95 Marq. L. Rev. 1329, 1415 (2012) 3878 LIFTING THE VEIL ON RIGOROUS RATIONAL BASIS SCRUTINY, 96 Marq. L. Rev. 377, 382+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3879 RACIAL HATE SPEECH: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACT OF INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW UPON THE LAW OF THE UNITED KINGDOM AND THE UNITED STATES, 94 Marq. L. Rev. 463, 497 (2010) 3880 (UNFAIR) ADVANTAGE: DAMOCLES' SWORD AND THE COERCIVE USE OF IMMIGRATION STATUS IN A CIVIL SOCIETY, 94 Marq. L. Rev. 613, 678 (2010) 3881 FRAMING CHANGE: CAUSE LAWYERING, CONSTITUTIONAL DECISIONS, AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 94 Marq. L. Rev. 263, 310 (2010) 3882 LAWMAKING AND INTERPRETATION: THE ROLE OF A FEDERAL JUDGE IN OUR CONSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK, 91 Marq. L. Rev. 895, 915 (2008) 3883 SCALIA'S RAICH CONCURRENCE: A SIGNIFICANT DEPARTURE FROM © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. ORIGINALIST INTERPRETATION?, 90 Marq. L. Rev. 1043, 1068+ (2007) HN: 1,3,4 (S.Ct.) 3884 FROM REHNQUIST TO ROBERTS: HAS INFORMATIONAL PRIVACY LOST A FRIEND AND GAINED A FOE?, 91 Marq. L. Rev. 453, 483 (2007) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 3885 QUESTIONING THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO MARRY, 90 Marq. L. Rev. 21, 85+ (2006) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 3886 STATUTORY RAPE IN WISCONSIN: HISTORY, RATIONALE, AND THE NEED FOR REFORM, 89 Marq. L. Rev. 693, 719+ (2006) 3887 STRUCTURAL INTERPRETATION AND THE NEW FEDERALISM: FINDING THE PROPER BALANCE BETWEEN STATE SOVEREIGNTY AND FEDERAL SUPREMACY, 88 Marq. L. Rev. 693, 750+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3888 IN THE LIGHT OF REASON AND EXPERIENCE: SHOULD FEDERAL EVIDENCE LAW PROTECT CONFIDENTIAL COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN SAME-SEX PARTNERS?, 88 Marq. L. Rev. 815, 845+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3889 THE TROUBLE WITH "FIGHTING WORDS": CHAPLINSKY V. NEW HAMPSHIRE IS A THREAT TO FIRST AMENDMENT VALUES AND SHOULD BE OVERRULED, 88 Marq. L. Rev. 441, 562 (2004) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 3890 FUN WITH DICK AND JANE AND LAWRENCE: A PRIMER ON EDUCATION PRIVACY AS CONSTITUTIONAL LIBERTY, 88 Marq. L. Rev. 563, 643+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3891 THE EVOLUTION OF FAMILY LAW, MARRIAGE AND THE LGBT COMMUNITY - THE LONG ROAD FOR FAMILY RECOGNITION AND THE REMAINING GAPS IN THE PATCHWORK OF PROTECTIONS, 46-OCT Md. B.J. 42, 42 (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3892 THREE STRIKES AND YOU'RE OUTSIDE THE CONSTITUTION Will the Guantanamo Bay Alien Detainees Be Granted Fundamental Due Process?, 37-APR Md. B.J. 14, 19 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3893 THE COMMERCE CLAUSE AND EXECUTIVE POWER: EXPLORING NASCENT INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS IN NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS V. SEBELIUS, 73 Md. L. Rev. 133, 136+ (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 3894 APPLYING FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL THEORY TO THE INTERPRETATION OF STATE CONSTITUTIONS: THE BAN ON SPECIAL LAWS IN MARYLAND, 71 Md. L. Rev. 411, 470+ (2012) 3895 THE CONSTITUTIONAL INEVITABILITY OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, 71 Md. L. Rev. 471, 489+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3896 FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT ORIGINALISM, 71 Md. L. Rev. 978, 1014 (2012) 3897 CONSTITUTIONAL FAITH, CONSTITUTIONAL REDEMPTION, AND © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. POLITICAL SCIENCE: CAN FAITH AND POLITICAL SCIENCE COEXIST?, 71 Md. L. Rev. 1098, 1125 (2012) 3898 RECUSAL, GOVERNMENT ETHICS, AND SUPERANNUATED CONSTITUTIONAL THEORY, 72 Md. L. Rev. 219, 250+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3899 OSCAR WILDE'S LONG TAIL: FRAMING SEXUAL IDENTITY IN THE LAW, 70 Md. L. Rev. 985, 1043+ (2011) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3900 BEYOND ORIGINALISM: CONSERVATIVE DECLARATIONISM AND CONSTITUTIONAL REDEMPTION, 71 Md. L. Rev. 229, 282+ (2011) 3901 MEDELLÍN AND ORIGINALISM, 68 Md. L. Rev. 377, 429 (2009) 3902 ATMOSPHERIC HARMS IN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 69 Md. L. Rev. 149, 161+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3903 A TIME TO MOURN: BALANCING THE RIGHT OF FREE SPEECH AGAINST THE RIGHT OF PRIVACY IN FUNERAL PICKETING, 67 Md. L. Rev. 295, 357 (2008) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 3904 YOU AIN'T SEEN NOTHIN' YET: THE INEVITABLE POST-HAMDAN CONFLICT BETWEEN THE SUPREME COURT AND THE POLITICAL BRANCHES, 66 Md. L. Rev. 805, 834+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3905 ORIGINALISM, THE LIVING CONSTITUTION, AND SUPREME COURT DECISION MAKING IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY: EXPLAINING LAWRENCE V. TEXAS, 67 Md. L. Rev. 25, 35+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3906 ASSESSING JURISTOCRACY: ARE JUDGES RULERS OR AGENTS?, 65 Md. L. Rev. 100, 114+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3907 JUDICIAL POWER AND MOBILIZABLE HISTORY, 65 Md. L. Rev. 171, 196+ (2006) 3908 SMOKE, NOT FIRE, 65 Md. L. Rev. 197, 205+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3909 JUDGES, LEGISLATORS, AND EUROPE'S LAW: COMMON-LAW CONSTITUTIONALISM AND FOREIGN PRECEDENTS, 65 Md. L. Rev. 32, 48+ (2006) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 3910 DIFFERENT BUT EQUAL: THE HUMAN RIGHTS OF PERSONS WITH INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 63 Md. L. Rev. 1, 19 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3911 GOODRIDGE: SAME-SEX MARRIAGE AND THE MASSACHUSETTS CONSTITUTION Hillary Goodridge & Others v. Department of Public Health & Another, 440 Mass. 309 (2003), 88 Mass. L. Rev. 155, 155+ (2004) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 3912 JUSTICE KENNEDY'S "GAY AGENDA": ROMER, LAWRENCE, AND THE STRUGGLE FOR MARRIAGE EQUALITY, 44 McGeorge L. Rev. 1, 1+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3913 STATE INTERESTS AND THE DURATION OF ABORTION RIGHTS, 44 McGeorge L. Rev. 31, 60+ (2013) 3914 THE PROPERTY JURISPRUDENCE OF JUSTICE KENNEDY, 44 McGeorge L. Rev. 61, 75+ (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 3915 JUSTICE KENNEDY'S JURISPRUDENCE ON THE FIRST AMENDMENT RELIGION CLAUSES, 44 McGeorge L. Rev. 103, 106+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3916 JUSTICE KENNEDY'S FREE SPEECH JURISPRUDENCE: A QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS, 44 McGeorge L. Rev. 167, 190+ (2013) 3917 THERE'S A WHOLE WORLD OUT THERE: JUSTICE KENNEDY'S USE OF INTERNATIONAL SOURCES, 44 McGeorge L. Rev. 201, 201+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3918 APPROACHES TO ASSESSING THE EFFECTS OF MARIJUANA CRIMINAL LAW REPEAL IN CALIFORNIA, 43 McGeorge L. Rev. 1, 21 (2012) 3919 REPRODUCTIVE ORGANS AND DIFFERENCES OF SEX DEVELOPMENT: THE CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES CREATED BY THE SURGICAL TREATMENT OF INTERSEX CHILDREN, 42 McGeorge L. Rev. 841, 872+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3920 LOCK THE CLOSET DOOR: DOES PRIVATE MEAN SECRET?, 42 McGeorge L. Rev. 901, 927+ (2011) 3921 THE RHETORIC OF CATHARSIS AND CHANGE: LAW SCHOOL AUTOBIOGRAPHY AS A NONFICTION LAW AND LITERATURE SUBGENRE, 41 McGeorge L. Rev. 843, 866 (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3922 PUBLIC ASSISTANCE FOR THE PRICE OF PRIVACY: LEAVING THE DOOR OPEN ON WELFARE HOME SEARCHES, 40 McGeorge L. Rev. 227, 260 (2009) 3923 THE NINE: INSIDE THE SECRET WORLD OF THE SUPREME COURT, 39 McGeorge L. Rev. 1131, 1142 (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3924 REGULATING THE MARRYING KIND: THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF FEDERAL REGULATION OF POLYGAMY UNDER THE MANN ACT, 39 McGeorge L. Rev. 267, 297+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3925 BEYOND REASONABLE: A CONSTITUTIONAL AND POLICY ANALYSIS OF WHY IT IS NECESSARY AND PRUDENT TO ALLOW NONPROFITS OR HEALTH CARE AGENCIES TO DISTRIBUTE SEXUAL BARRIER PROTECTION DEVICES TO INMATES, 39 McGeorge L. Rev. 329, 357 (2008) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 3926 CHAPTER 567: SAYING "I DO" TO NAME CHANGES BY HUSBANDS AND DOMESTIC PARTNERS, 39 McGeorge L. Rev. 429, 443+ (2008) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 3927 DIVESTING FROM "THE APARTHEID OF THE CLOSET": TOWARD AN ENRICHED LEGAL DISCOURSE OF SEXUAL AND GENDER IDENTITY, 38 McGeorge L. Rev. 571, 602+ (2007) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3928 EMPIRICIZING THE EQUAL PROTECTION APPROACH TO ABORTION, 38 McGeorge L. Rev. 775, 780+ (2007) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 3929 KEEPING THE BOSS OUT OF THE BEDROOM: CALIFORNIA'S © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT OF PRIVACY AS A LIMITATION ON PRIVATE EMPLOYERS' REGULATION OF EMPLOYEES' OFF-DUTY INTIMATE ASSOCIATION, 37 McGeorge L. Rev. 449, 485+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3930 GAY RIGHTS, DANGEROUS FOREIGN LAW, AND AMERICAN CIVIL PROCEDURE, 35 McGeorge L. Rev. 685, 700+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3931 SEXUALLY ORIENTED BUSINESS ORDINANCE CONSTITUTIONAL (2011) 3932 MUNICIPAL LIABILITY AND QUALIFIED IMMUNITY EXPLORED IN DISCRIMINATION CASE (2008) 3933 Transnational Judicial Dialogue, Internationalisation of Law and Australian Judges, 9 Melb. J. Int'l L. 171, 189 (2008) 3934 Activism from the Closet: Gay Rights Strategising in Egypt, 7 Melb. J. Int'l L. 28, 51 (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3935 Chief Justice Nicholson, Australian Family Law and International Human Rights, 5 Melb. J. Int'l L. 221, 240 (2004) 3936 CASE LAW DEVELOPMENTS, 35 Mental & Physical Disability L. Rep. 721, 763 (2011) 3937 CASE LAW DEVELOPMENTS, 34 Mental & Physical Disability L. Rep. 827, 886 (2010) 3938 CASE LAW DEVELOPMENTS, 28 Mental & Physical Disability L. Rep. 501, 510+ (2004) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3939 ROE V. WADE INVERTED: HOW THE SUPREME COURT MIGHT HAVE PRIVILEGED FETAL RIGHTS OVER REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOMS, 63 Mercer L. Rev. 639, 696 (2012) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 3940 SCHOOLHOUSE ROCK: LESSONS OF HOMOSEXUAL TOLERANCE IN KEETON V. ANDERSON-WILEY FROM THE CLASSROOM TO THE CONSTITUTION, 62 Mercer L. Rev. 1011, 1029+ (2011) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 3941 THE LAST RIGHTS: CONTROVERSIAL NE EXEAT CLAUSE GRANTS CUSTODIAL POWER UNDER ABBOTT V. ABBOTT, 62 Mercer L. Rev. 663, 683 (2011) 3942 STEM CELL RESEARCH AND CLONING FOR HUMAN REPRODUCTION: AN ANALYSIS OF THE LAWS, THE DIRECTION IN WHICH THEY MAY BE HEADING IN LIGHT OF RECENT DEVELOPMENTS, AND POTENTIAL CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES, 61 Mercer L. Rev. 943, 976+ (2010) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 3943 CONSTITUTIONAL CIVIL RIGHTS, 55 Mercer L. Rev. 1131, 1148 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3944 GEORGIA'S CHILDRENON OUR MINDS . . ., 55 Mercer L. Rev. 1415, 1451+ (2004) 3945 O'NEILL v MORSE Unborn Persons in Michigan 385 Mich 130 (1971), 88-MAR Mich. B.J. S2, S5 (2009) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 3946 JURISPRUDENCE OF DOUBT Obscenity, Indecency, and Morality at the Dawn of the 21st Century, 84-JUN Mich. B.J. 22, 24+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3947 THE DORMANT COMMERCE CLAUSE AND CALIFORNIA'S LOW CARBON FUEL STANDARD, 3 Mich. J. Envtl. & Admin. L. 179, 229 (2013) 3948 CIVIL MARRIAGE: THREAT TO DEMOCRACY, 18 Mich. J. Gender & L. 361, 421+ (2012) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3949 THE FAILURE OF CONSENT: RE-CONCEPTUALIZING RAPE AS SEXUAL ABUSE OF POWER, 18 Mich. J. Gender & L. 147, 228+ (2011) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3950 RETHINKING CONSENT IN A BIG LOVE WAY, 17 Mich. J. Gender & L. 111, 156+ (2010) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3951 BEYOND THE BINARY: WHAT CAN FEMINISTS LEARN FROM INTERSEX AND TRANSGENDER JURISPRUDENCE?, 17 Mich. J. Gender & L. 13, 37 (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3952 PASSIONS WE LIKE . . . AND THOSE WE DON'T: ANTI-GAY HATE CRIME LAWS AND THE DISCURSIVE CONSTRUCTION OF SEX, GENDER, AND THE BODY, 16 Mich. J. Gender & L. 1, 48+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 3953 THE GAY AGENDA, 16 Mich. J. Gender & L. 147, 216+ (2009) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3954 A QUEST FOR ACCEPTANCE: THE REAL ID ACT AND THE NEED FOR COMPREHENSIVE GENDER RECOGNITION LEGISLATION IN THE UNITED STATES, 14 Mich. J. Gender & L. 169, 199+ (2008) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 3955 "PLEASE WRITE "E' IN THIS BOX" TOWARD SELF-IDENTIFICATION AND RECOGNITION OF A THIRD GENDER: APPROACHES IN THE UNITED STATES AND INDIA, 14 Mich. J. Gender & L. 223, 258+ (2008) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3956 THE EVOLUTION OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGE IN CANADA: LESSONS THE U.S. CAN LEARN FROM THEIR NORTHERN NEIGHBOR REGARDING SAME-SEX MARRIAGE RIGHTS, 15 Mich. J. Gender & L. 143, 204+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3957 CHAOS, LAW, AND GOD: THE RELIGIOUS MEANINGS OF HOMOSEXUALITY, 15 Mich. J. Gender & L. 41, 119 (2008) 3958 MORE THAN MERE SEMANTICS: THE CASE FOR AN EXPANSIVE DEFINITION OF PERSECUTION IN SEXUAL MINORITY ASYLUM CLAIMS, 12 Mich. J. Gender & L. 331, 357+ (2006) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3959 "JUST" MARRIED?: SAME-SEX MARRIAGE AND A HISTORY OF FAMILY PLURALITY, 12 Mich. J. Gender & L. 1, 85+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3960 RESTRUCTURING THE MARITAL BEDROOM: THE ROLE OF THE PRIVACY DOCTRINE IN ADVOCATING THE LEGALIZATION OF SAMESEX MARRIAGE, 11 Mich. J. Gender & L. 1, 26+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3961 MAKING ROOM FOR SEXUAL ORIENTATION AND GENDER IDENTITY IN INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW: AN INTRODUCTION TO THE YOGYAKARTA PRINCIPLES, 31 Mich. J. Int'l L. 821, 879+ (2010) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 3962 JUDICIAL DIALOGUE FOR LEGAL MULTICULTURALISM, 25 Mich. J. Int'l L. 879, 902 (2004) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 3963 INTERNATIONAL LEGAL PLURALISM, 25 Mich. J. Int'l L. 963, 979+ (2004) 3964 THE ABOLITION OF THE DEATH PENALTY IN NEW JERSEY AND ITS IMPACT ON OUR NATION'S "EVOLVING STANDARDS OF DECENCY", 15 Mich. J. Race & L. 223, 263+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3965 SAME-SEX LOVING: SUBVERTING WHITE SUPREMACY THROUGH SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, 13 Mich. J. Race & L. 177, 225+ (2007) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 3966 BÊTE NOIRE: HOW RACE-BASED POLICING THREATENS NATIONAL SECURITY, 9 Mich. J. Race & L. 149, 214+ (2003) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.) .... FAMILY HISTORY: INSIDE AND OUT, 111 Mich. L. Rev. 1001, 1013+ (2013) (Text not available on WESTLAW) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. .... TYRONE GARNER'S LAWRENCE V. TEXAS, 111 Mich. L. Rev. 1111, 1111+ (2013) (Text not available on WESTLAW) .... JUSTICE BRENNAN: LEGACY OF A CHAMPION, 111 Mich. L. Rev. 1151, 1181 (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) (Text not available on WESTLAW) 3970 THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO(KEEP YOUR) SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, 110 Mich. L. Rev. 1421, 1481+ (2012) HN: 2,3 (S.Ct.) 3971 STARE DECISIS AND CONSTITUTIONAL TEXT, 110 Mich. L. Rev. 1, 68+ (2011) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 3972 ELY AT THE ALTAR: POLITICAL PROCESS THEORY THROUGH THE LENS OF THE MARRIAGE DEBATE, 109 Mich. L. Rev. 1363, 1411+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3973 DISGUST AND THE PROBLEMATIC POLITICS OF SIMILARITY, 109 Mich. L. Rev. 943, 961+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3974 BUT HOW WILL THE PEOPLE KNOW? PUBLIC OPINION AS A MEAGER INFLUENCE IN SHAPING CONTEMPORARY SUPREME COURT DECISION MAKING, 109 Mich. L. Rev. 963, 978 (2011) 3975 HOME IS WHERE THE CRIME IS, 109 Mich. L. Rev. 979, 991+ (2011) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3976 CONSTITUTIONAL EXPECTATIONS, 109 Mich. L. Rev. 91, 110 (2010) 3977 THE (MIS)CATEGORIZATION OF SEX IN ANGLO-AMERICAN CASES OF TRANSSEXUAL MARRIAGE, 108 Mich. L. Rev. 1497, 1525+ (2010) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 3978 THE VITALITY OF THE AMERICAN SOVEREIGN, 108 Mich. L. Rev. 939, 955 (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3979 CAN CRIMINAL LAW BE CONTROLLED?, 108 Mich. L. Rev. 971, 991+ (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3980 CONSTITUTIONAL BORROWING, 108 Mich. L. Rev. 459, 522+ (2010) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3981 THE MYTH AND THE REALITY OF AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL EXCEPTIONALISM, 107 Mich. L. Rev. 391, 466+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3982 FOREWORD: CAN GLUCKSBERG SURVIVE LAWRENCE? ANOTHER LOOK AT THE END OF LIFE AND PERSONAL AUTONOMY, 106 Mich. L. Rev. 1453, 1478+ (2008) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3983 SCRUTINY LAND, 106 Mich. L. Rev. 1479, 1500+ (2008) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 3984 WASHINGTON V. GLUCKSBERG WAS TRAGICALLY WRONG, 106 Mich. L. Rev. 1501, 1516 (2008) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 3985 SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS AFTER GONZALES V. CARHART, 106 Mich. L. Rev. 1517, 1541+ (2008) 3986 DUE PROCESS TRADITIONALISM, 106 Mich. L. Rev. 1543, 1570+ (2008) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.) 3987 DE-MORALIZED: GLUCKSBERG IN THE MALAISE, 106 Mich. L. Rev. © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 1571, 1591 (2008) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 3988 ON COMMUNICATION, 106 Mich. L. Rev. 1337, 1378 (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3989 FRIENDS WITH BENEFITS?, 106 Mich. L. Rev. 189, 242 (2007) 3990 TRANSNATIONAL NETWORKS AND INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE, 105 Mich. L. Rev. 985, 1032+ (2007) 3991 SCRUTINIZING THE SECOND AMENDMENT, 105 Mich. L. Rev. 683, 733+ (2007) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 3992 BURKEAN MINIMALISM, 105 Mich. L. Rev. 353, 408+ (2006) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.) 3993 THE GLUCKSBERG RENAISSANCE: SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS SINCE LAWRENCE V. TEXAS, 105 Mich. L. Rev. 409, 444+ (2006) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 3994 EVOLVING OBJECTIVE STANDARDS: A DEVELOPMENTAL APPROACH TO CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW OF MORALS LEGISLATION, 105 Mich. L. Rev. 151, 181+ (2006) 3995 CRIME, CRIMINALS, AND COMPETITIVE CRIME CONTROL, 104 Mich. L. Rev. 1733, 1748+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 3996 "I'D LIKE TO TEACH THE WORLD TO SING (IN PERFECT HARMONY)": INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL DIALOGUE AND THE MUSESREFLECTIONS ON THE PERILS AND THE PROMISE OF INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL DIALOGUE, 104 Mich. L. Rev. 1321, 1359+ (2006) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 3997 BROWN AND LAWRENCE (AND GOODRIDGE), 104 Mich. L. Rev. 431, 489+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 3998 TESTING MINIMALISM: A REPLY, 104 Mich. L. Rev. 123, 129 (2005) 3999 A THEORY IN SEARCH OF A COURT, AND ITSELF: JUDICIAL MINIMALISM AT THE SUPREME COURT BAR, 103 Mich. L. Rev. 1951, 2019 (2005) 4000 WORD GAMES: RAISING AND RESOLVING THE SHORTCOMINGS IN ACCIDENT-INSURANCE DOCTRINE THAT AUTOEROTICASPHYXIATION CASES REVEAL, 103 Mich. L. Rev. 2172, 2208+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4001 THE ORIGINALIST AND NORMATIVE CASE AGAINST JUDICIAL ACTIVISM: A REPLY TO PROFESSOR RANDY BARNETT, 103 Mich. L. Rev. 1081, 1098 (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4002 GAY POLITICS AND PRECEDENTS, 103 Mich. L. Rev. 1186, 1230 (2005) 4003 IS THERE A FUTURE FOR LENIENCY IN THE U.S. CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM?, 103 Mich. L. Rev. 1231, 1272 (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4004 THE UNFULFILLED PROMISE OF THE CONSTITUTION IN EXECUTIVE HANDS, 103 Mich. L. Rev. 676, 758 (2005) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4005 TURNING THE PAGE ON SECTION 5: THE IMPLICATIONS OF © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. MULTIRACIAL COALITION DISTRICTS ON SECTION 5 OF THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT, 103 Mich. L. Rev. 189, 216 (2004) 4006 CHECKS AND BALANCES IN WARTIME: AMERICAN, BRITISH AND ISRAELI EXPERIENCES, 102 Mich. L. Rev. 1906, 1958 (2004) 4007 FOREWORD: LOVING LAWRENCE, 102 Mich. L. Rev. 1447, 1463+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4008 THE UNKNOWN PAST OF LAWRENCE V. TEXAS, 102 Mich. L. Rev. 1464, 1527+ (2004) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4009 SEXUAL ORIENTATION AND THE PARADOX OF HEIGHTENED SCRUTINY, 102 Mich. L. Rev. 1528, 1554+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4010 LAWRENCE V. TEXAS AND JUDICIAL HUBRIS, 102 Mich. L. Rev. 1555, 1614+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4011 SURVIVING LAWRENCE V. TEXAS, 102 Mich. L. Rev. 1615, 1667+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4012 KATZ IS DEAD. LONG LIVE KATZ., 102 Mich. L. Rev. 904, 932+ (2004) 4013 FOR AND AGAINST MARRIAGE: A REVISION, 102 Mich. L. Rev. 129, 212+ (2003) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4014 IF HISTORY MATTERED: JOHN MARSHALL AND REFRAMING THE CONSTITUTION John Marshall and the Heroic Age of the Supreme Court. By R. Kent Newmyer. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press. 2001. Pp. xviii, 568. $39.95., 101 Mich. L. Rev. 2134, 2145 (2003) 4015 LIVE AND LET LOVE: SELF-DETERMINATION IN MATTERS OF INTIMACY AND IDENTITY Interracial Intimacies: Sex, Marriage, Identity, and Adoption. By Randall Kennedy. New York: Pantheon Books. 2003. Pp. viii, 677. $30., 101 Mich. L. Rev. 2185, 2208 (2003) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4016 TRANSFORMING JUVENILE JUSTICE: MAKING DOCTRINE OUT OF DICTA IN GRAHAM v. FLORIDA, 112 Mich. L. Rev. First Impressions 30, 37+ (2013) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 4017 "MACHISMO AT THE CROSSROADS - RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN COSTA RICAN GAY RIGHTS LAW", 20 Mich. St. Int'l. L. Rev. 421, 436+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4018 JUDICIAL ACTIVISM IN THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE - THE CASE OF LGBT RIGHTS, 19 Mich. St. J. Int'l L 639, 664+ (2011) 4019 TERRORISM AS AN "INTERNAL CONFLICT" UNDER THE 1977 GENEVA PROTOCOL: DEFINING "ENEMY COMBATANT" AND THE INTERNATIONAL/DOMESTIC CONSEQUENCES, 14 Mich. St. J. Int'l L 27, 34 (2006) 4020 MARRIAGE AS A STATE OF MIND: FEDERALISM, CONTRACT, AND THE EXPRESSIVE INTEREST IN FAMILY LAW, 2011 Mich. St. L. Rev 49, 82+ (2011) 4021 TOWARD MORE PARSIMONY AND TRANSPARENCY IN "THE © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. ESSENTIALS OF MARRIAGE", 2011 Mich. St. L. Rev 83, 139 (2011) 4022 IMMIGRANT EDUCATION AND THE PROMISE OF INTEGRATIVE EGALITARIANISM, 2011 Mich. St. L. Rev 275, 303+ (2011) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4023 THE EVANGELICAL FOOTPRINT, 2011 Mich. St. L. Rev 1235, 1291+ (2011) 4024 WILL AND PRINCIPLE, 2010 Mich. St. L. Rev 569, 582 (2010) 4025 A COASE THEOREM FOR CONSTITUTIONAL THEORY, 2010 Mich. St. L. Rev 583, 595 (2010) 4026 THE DOCTRINAL SIDE OF MAJORITY WILL, 2010 Mich. St. L. Rev 775, 793+ (2010) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 4027 OF INKBLOTS AND OMNISIGNIFICANCE: CONCEPTUALIZING SECONDARY AND SYMBOLIC FUNCTIONS OF THE NINTH AMENDMENT, IN A COMPARATIVE HERMENEUTIC FRAMEWORK, 2009 Mich. St. L. Rev 277, 288 (2009) 4028 TRADITIONAL ADVOCACY FOR NONTRADITIONAL YOUTH: RETHINKING BEST INTEREST FOR THE QUEER CHILD, 2008 Mich. St. L. Rev 1053, 1113 (2008) 4029 JUDICIAL ANARCHY: THE ADMISSION OF CONVICTIONS TO IMPEACH: STATE SUPREME COURTS' INTERPRETATIVE STANDARDS, 1990-2004, 2007 Mich. St. L. Rev 307, 401 (2007) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 4030 THE LIMITS OF EQUALITY AND THE VIRTUES OF DISCRIMINATION, 2006 Mich. St. L. Rev 593, 636+ (2006) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4031 EVERYTHING THAT CAN BE COUNTED DOES NOT NECESSARILY COUNT: THE RIGHT TO VOTE AND THE CHOICE OF A VOTING SYSTEM, 2006 Mich. St. L. Rev 327, 376+ (2006) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4032 FILTERING OUT CHILDREN: THE FIRST AMENDMENT AND INTERNET PORN IN THE U.S.SUPREME COURT, 3 Mich. St. L. Rev 843, 856 (2005) 4033 THE VIEW OUTSIDE: WHAT KIND OF EXPRESSION FOR ADOLESCENTS OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES?, 3 Mich. St. L. Rev 879, 910 (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4034 THE CROOKED TIMBER OF LIBERAL DEMOCRACY, 2005 Mich. St. L. Rev 461, 481+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4035 A THIRD PARALLEL PRIMROSE PATH: THE SUPREME COURT'S REPEATED, UNEXPLAINED, AND STILL GROWING REGULATION OF STATE COURTS' CRIMINAL APPEALS, 2005 Mich. St. L. Rev 541, 634 (2005) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 4036 DOING BUSINESS AROUND THE WORLD: CORPORATE LIABILITY UNDER THE ALIEN TORT CLAIMS ACT, 2005 Mich. St. L. Rev 1065, 1112 (2005) 4037 PROSECUTORIAL WAIVER IN MICHIGAN AND NATIONWIDE, 2004 Mich. St. L. Rev 1071, 1099+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4038 PROTECTING A MAN'S RIGHT TO CHOOSE: WHY MANDATORY © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. IDENTITY RELEASE FOR SPERM DONORS IS A BAD IDEA, 16 Mich. St. U. J. Med. & L. 429, 452+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4039 ALL I NEED IS A MIRACLE (AND A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO ACCESS IT): THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF THE TERMINALLY ILL RECONSIDERED, 14 Mich. St. U. J. Med. & L. 249, 280+ (2010) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 4040 A MATTER OF LIFE AND DEATH: AFFORDING TERMINALLY-ILL PATIENTS ACCESS TO POST-PHASE I INVESTIGATIONAL NEW DRUGS, 12 Mich. St. U. J. Med. & L. 265, 295+ (2008) 4041 THE GREAT BATHHOUSE BUGABOO: A PRACTITIONER'S INQUIRY INTO THE CRIMINAL AND PUBLIC HEALTH POLICY OF GAY BATHHOUSES, 12 Mich. St. U. J. Med. & L. 341, 342+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4042 A DOSE OF REALITY: THE PRESCRIPTION FOR A LIMITED CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO PRIVACY IN PHARMACEUTICAL RECORDS IS EXAMINED IN DOUGLAS v. DOBBS, 12 Mich. St. U. J. Med. & L. 73, 75+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4043 HOW IT WORKS: SOBRIETY SENTENCING, THE CONSTITUTION, AND ALCOHOLICS ANONYMOUS, 10 Mich. St. U. J. Med. & L. 255, 298 (2006) 4044 THE FAILURE OF SEXTING CRIMINALIZATION: A PLEA FOR THE EXERCISE OF PROSECUTORIAL RESTRAINT, 16 Mich. Telecomm. & Tech. L. Rev. 151, 178+ (2009) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4045 EQUAL PROTECTION, DUE PROCESS, AND SAME-SEX MARRIAGE: THE REFORMATION CONTINUES, 20 Midwest L.J. 23, 23+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4046 SERVING WITH INTEGRITY: THE RATONALE FOR THE REPEAL OF "DON'T ASK, DON'T TELL" AND ITS BAN ON ACKNOWLEDGED HOMOSEXUALS IN THE ARMED FORCES, 203 Mil. L. Rev. 284, 290+ (2010) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4047 THE HISTORY OF "DON'T ASK, DON'T TELL" IN THE ARMY: HOW WE GOT TO IT AND WHY IT IS WHAT IT IS, 203 Mil. L. Rev. 189, 206 (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4048 STRAIGHT TALK: THE IMPLICATIONS OF REPEALING "DON'T ASK, DON'T TELL" AND THE RATIONALE FOR PRESERVING ASPECTS OF THE CURRENT POLICY, 203 Mil. L. Rev. 207, 213+ (2010) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4049 DON'T ASK, DO TELL: THE IMPLICATIONS OF 2008 CIRCUIT COURT DECISIONS FOR THE STANDARD OF CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW APPLICABLE TO THE MILITARY HOMOSEXUAL CONDUCT POLICY, 201 Mil. L. Rev. 184, 185+ (2009) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4050 AN END TO "TIL DEROS DO US PART": THE ARMY'S REGULATION OF INTERNATIONAL MARRIAGES IN KOREA, 200 Mil. L. Rev. 154, 194+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4051 THE THIRTY-FIFTH KENNETH J. HODSON LECTURE ON CRIMINAL © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. LAW, 193 Mil. L. Rev. 178, 194+ (2007) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4052 MAKING SENSE OF CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT: A NEW APPROACH TO RECONCILING MILITARY AND CIVILIAN EIGHTH AMENDMENT LAW, 184 Mil. L. Rev. 66, 128+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4053 PROSECUTING INDECENT CONDUCT IN THE MILITARY: HONEY, SHOULD WE GET A LEGAL REVIEW FIRST?, 179 Mil. L. Rev. 128, 129+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4054 THE EUROPEAN UNION TRIPS OVER THE U.S. CONSTITUTION: CAN THE FIRST AMENDMENT SAVE THE BOLOGNA THAT HAS A FIRST NAME?, 13 Minn. J. Global Trade 413, 441 (2004) 4055 BULLYING IN THE WORKPLACE: LESSONS FROM THE UNITED KINGDOM, 17 Minn. J. Int'l L. 247, 302 (2008) 4056 SQUARING THE CIRCLE: DEMOCRATIZING JUDICIAL REVIEW AND THE COUNTER-CONSTITUTIONAL DIFFICULTY, 16 Minn. J. Int'l L. 61, 113 (2007) 4057 IT'S AN ART NOT A SCIENCE: STATE-MANDATED INSURANCE COVERAGE OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGIES AND LEGAL IMPLICATIONS FOR GAY AND UNMARRIED PERSONS, 12 Minn. J. L. Sci. & Tech. 651, 713+ (2011) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4058 SMOKERS: NUISANCES IN BELMONT CITY, CALIFORNIA-IN THEIR HOMES, BUT NOT ON PUBLIC SIDEWALKS, 10 Minn. J. L. Sci. & Tech. 413, 440 (2009) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 4059 UNDERSTANDING LEGAL RESPONSES TO TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE: THE EXAMPLE OF IN VITRO FERTILIZATION, 6 Minn. J. L. Sci. & Tech. 505, 618 (2005) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 4060 GOVERNMENT NONENDORSEMENT, 98 Minn. L. Rev. 648, 712+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4061 THE RIGHT TO QUANTITATIVE PRIVACY, 98 Minn. L. Rev. 62, 144+ (2013) .... TURNER V. ROGERS, THE RIGHT TO COUNSEL, AND THE DEFICIENCIES OF MATHEWS V. ELDRIDGE, 97 Minn. L. Rev. 1854, 1889 (2013) (Text not available on WESTLAW) 4063 IN DEFENSE OF JUDICIAL EMPATHY, 96 Minn. L. Rev. 1944, 1974+ (2012) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4064 JUVENILES LOCKED IN LIMBO: WHY PRETRIAL DETENTION IMPLICATES A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT, 96 Minn. L. Rev. 2150, 2169+ (2012) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.) 4065 BEYOND BEST INTERESTS, 96 Minn. L. Rev. 1187, 1274+ (2012) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 4066 REGULATING REPRODUCTION: THE PROBLEM WITH BEST INTERESTS, 96 Minn. L. Rev. 423, 519 (2011) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 4067 SUBSTANTIVE EQUALITY: A PERSPECTIVE, 96 Minn. L. Rev. 1, 27+ (2011) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 4068 MONEY TALKS BUT IT ISN'T SPEECH, 95 Minn. L. Rev. 953, 1002+ (2011) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4069 BORN (NOT SO) FREE: LEGAL LIMITS ON THE PRACTICE OF UNASSISTED CHILDBIRTH OR FREEBIRTHING IN THE UNITED STATES, 94 Minn. L. Rev. 1651, 1681 (2010) 4070 SPEAKING OF SILENCE: A REPLY TO MAKING DEFENDANTS SPEAK, 94 Minn. L. Rev. 800, 838 (2010) 4071 THE MYTHICAL DIVIDE BETWEEN COLLATERAL AND DIRECT CONSEQUENCES OF CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS: INVOLUNTARY COMMITMENT OF "SEXUALLY VIOLENT PREDATORS", 93 Minn. L. Rev. 670, 740+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4072 FIGHTING WOMEN: THE MILITARY, SEX, AND EXTRAJUDICIAL CONSTITUTIONAL CHANGE, 93 Minn. L. Rev. 96, 164+ (2008) 4073 REMEDIES FOR UNDOCUMENTED NONCITIZENS IN THE WORKPLACE: USING INTERNATIONAL LAW TO NARROW THE HOLDING OF HOFFMAN PLASTIC COMPOUNDS, INC. V. NLRB, 92 Minn. L. Rev. 1424, 1445+ (2008) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4074 AMENDING THE EXCEPTIONS CLAUSE, 92 Minn. L. Rev. 971, 1030 (2008) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 4075 IMMIGRATION LAW AND THE REGULATION OF MARRIAGE, 91 Minn. L. Rev. 1625, 1709+ (2007) 4076 THE SCIENTIFIC STUDY OF JUDICIAL ACTIVISM, 91 Minn. L. Rev. 1752, 1784 (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4077 WHEN JUDGES LIE (AND WHEN THEY SHOULD), 91 Minn. L. Rev. 1785, 1828+ (2007) 4078 HAMDAN AND COMMON ARTICLE 3: DID THE SUPREME COURT GET IT RIGHT?, 91 Minn. L. Rev. 1523, 1561 (2007) 4079 SEX TORTS, 91 Minn. L. Rev. 769, 824+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4080 SUPER PRECEDENT, 90 Minn. L. Rev. 1204, 1231 (2006) 4081 WHEN IS KNOWING LESS BETTER THAN KNOWING MORE? UNPACKING THE CONTROVERSY OVER SUPREME COURT REFERENCE TO NON-U.S. LAW, 90 Minn. L. Rev. 1275, 1302 (2006) 4082 THE SUPREME COURT AND ITS SHRINKING DOCKET: THE GHOST OF WILLIAM HOWARD TAFT, 90 Minn. L. Rev. 1363, 1385+ (2006) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 4083 REINTRODUCING CIRCUIT RIDING: A TIMELY PROPOSAL, 90 Minn. L. Rev. 1386, 1416+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4084 WHY THE DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT IS NOT (YET?) UNCONSTITUTIONAL: LAWRENCE, FULL FAITH AND CREDIT, AND © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. THE MANY SOCIETAL ACTORS THAT DETERMINE WHAT THE CONSTITUTION REQUIRES, 90 Minn. L. Rev. 915, 999+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4085 GIVING LAWRENCE ITS DUE: HOW THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT UNDERESTIMATED THE DUE PROCESS IMPLICATIONS OF LAWRENCE V. TEXAS IN LOFTON V. SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES, 90 Minn. L. Rev. 745, 779+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4086 SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS AS A SOURCE OF CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION FOR NONPOLITICAL SPEECH, 90 Minn. L. Rev. 247, 316+ (2005) HN: 1,2,3 (S.Ct.) 4087 LAWYERS, JUSTICE, AND THE CHALLENGE OF MORAL PLURALISM, 90 Minn. L. Rev. 389, 458+ (2005) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4088 MEET ME AT THE (WEST COAST) HOTEL: THE LOCHNER ERA AND THE DEMISE OF ROE V. WADE, 90 Minn. L. Rev. 500, 535+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4089 MARRIAGE LICENSES, 89 Minn. L. Rev. 1758, 1797+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4090 GRADING JUSTICE KENNEDY: A REPLY TO PROFESSOR CARPENTER, 89 Minn. L. Rev. 1582, 1589+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4091 EXCESSIVE PRISON SENTENCES, PUNISHMENT GOALS, AND THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT: "PROPORTIONALITY" RELATIVE TO WHAT?, 89 Minn. L. Rev. 571, 651 (2005) 4092 GENERIC CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 89 Minn. L. Rev. 652, 742+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4093 AGAINST MERCY, 88 Minn. L. Rev. 1421, 1480+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4094 A VISION SOFTLY CREEPING: CONGRESSIONAL ACQUIESCENCE AND THE DORMANT COMMERCE CLAUSE A Response to Brannon P. Denning, Why the Privileges and Immunities Clause of Article IV Cannot Replace the Dormant Commerce Clause Doc, 88 Minn. L. Rev. 1764, 1800 (2004) 4095 LAWRENCE'S JURISPRUDENCE OF TOLERANCE: JUDICIAL REVIEW TO LOWER THE STAKES OF IDENTITY POLITICS, 88 Minn. L. Rev. 1021, 1102+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4096 LIVING WITH LAWRENCE, 88 Minn. L. Rev. 1103, 1139+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4097 IS LAWRENCE LIBERTARIAN?, 88 Minn. L. Rev. 1140, 1169+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4098 LAWRENCE'S PENUMBRA, 88 Minn. L. Rev. 1171, 1183+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4099 THE POSITIVE IN THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO MARRY: SAME-SEX MARRIAGE IN THE AFTERMATH OF LAWRENCE V. TEXAS, 88 Minn. L. Rev. 1184, 1231+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 4100 MORALS-BASED JUSTIFICATIONS FOR LAWMAKING: BEFORE AND AFTER LAWRENCE V. TEXAS, 88 Minn. L. Rev. 1233, 1311+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4101 FROM OUTLAWS TO INGROUP: ROMER, LAWRENCE, AND THE INEVITABLE NORMATIVITY OF GROUP RECOGNITION, 88 Minn. L. Rev. 1312, 1312+ (2004) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 4102 "PRICKING THE LINES": THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE, PUNITIVE DAMAGES, AND CRIMINAL PUNISHMENT, 88 Minn. L. Rev. 880, 920+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4103 A RESPONSE TO PROFESSOR I. GLENN COHEN'S REGULATING REPRODUCTION: THE PROBLEM WITH BEST INTERESTS, 96 Minn. L. Rev. Headnotes 8, 17 (2012) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 4104 SPEAKING OF SILENCE: A REPLY TO MAKING DEFENDANTS SPEAK, 94 Minn. L. Rev. Headnotes 11, 49 (2009) 4105 NO MORE CHIPPING AWAY: THE ROBERTS COURT USES AN AXE TO TAKE OUT THE FOURTH AMENDMENT EXCLUSIONARY RULE, 81 Miss. L.J. 1183, 1227+ (2012) 4106 THE U.S. SUPREME COURT, THE WAR ON TERROR, AND THE NEED FOR THICK CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW, 80 Miss. L.J. 1539, 1553+ (2011) 4107 STRIP SEARCHING STUDENTS: THE SUPREME COURT'S LATEST FAILURE TO ARTICULATE A "SUFFICIENTLY CLEAR" STATEMENT OF FOURTH AMENDMENT LAW, 80 Miss. L.J. 955, 1033 (2011) 4108 WHY IS IT A CRIME TO STOMP ON A GOLDFISH? - HARM, VICTIMHOOD AND THE STRUCTURE OF ANTI-CRUELTY OFFENSES, 78 Miss. L.J. 1, 67+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4109 REACTIVE AND INCOMPLETELY THEORIZED STATE CONSTITUTIONAL DECISION-MAKING, 77 Miss. L.J. 265, 313+ (2007) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 4110 ELIMINATING INJUSTICE: REVISING MISSISSIPPI'S STATUTORY RAPE LAWS, 76 Miss. L.J. 1067, 1100+ (2007) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4111 CHILD PORNOGRAPHY AND FIRST AMENDMENT STANDARDS, 76 Miss. L.J. 677, 703+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4112 THE MODALITIES OF THE NINTH AMENDMENT: WAYS OF THINKING ABOUT UNENUMERATED RIGHTS INSPIRED BY PHILIP BOBBITT's CONSTITUTIONAL FATE, 75 Miss. L.J. 495, 544+ (2006) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4113 COMPUTER SEARCHES OF PROBATIONERS-DIMINISHED PRIVACIES, "SPECIAL NEEDS" & "'WHILST' QUIET PEDOPHILES"-PLUGGING THE FOURTH AMENDMENT INTO THE "VIRTUAL HOME VISIT", 75 Miss. L.J. 273, 365+ (2005) 4114 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT-STATE ANTISODOMY LAWS AS APPLIED TO CONSENSUAL HOMOSEXUAL ACTIVITY IN THE PRIVACY OF THE HOME HELD © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. UNCONSTITUTIONAL, 73 Miss. L.J. 347, 363+ (2003) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4115 MY WAY OR NO WAY: THE AMERICAN RELUCTANCE FOR TRANSTERRITORIAL PUBLIC LAW, 78 Mo. L. Rev. 413, 422 (2013) 4116 CLOAKING A CHALLENGE TO MISSOURI'S MARRIAGE AMENDMENT WITH A CHALLENGE FOR SURVIVOR BENEFITS, 77 Mo. L. Rev. 1201, 1209+ (2012) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4117 ALL THOSE LIKE YOU: IDENTITY AGGRESSION AND STUDENT SPEECH, 77 Mo. L. Rev. 653, 660+ (2012) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4118 CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION THROUGH A GLOBAL LENS, 75 Mo. L. Rev. 1171, 1241+ (2010) 4119 ANTI-DISCRIMINATION LAW IN PERIL?, 75 Mo. L. Rev. 423, 441+ (2010) 4120 RATIONALIZING AWAY POLITICAL POWERLESSNESS: EQUAL PROTECTION ANALYSIS OF LAWS CLASSIFYING GAYS AND LESBIANS, 72 Mo. L. Rev. 891, 907+ (2007) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4121 SECOND AMENDMENT INCORPORATION THROUGH THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT PRIVILEGES OR IMMUNITIES AND DUE PROCESS CLAUSES, 72 Mo. L. Rev. 1, 72 (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4122 LIFTING THE VEIL: JUSTICE BLACKMUN'S PAPERS AND THE PUBLIC PERCEPTION OF THE SUPREME COURT, 70 Mo. L. Rev. 1037, 1047+ (2005) 4123 THE WILLFUL JUDGING OF HARRY BLACKMUN, 70 Mo. L. Rev. 1049, 1073 (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4124 TALES FROM THE BLACKMUN PAPERS: A FULLER APPRECIATION OF HARRY BLACKMUN'S JUDICIAL LEGACY, 70 Mo. L. Rev. 1075, 1078+ (2005) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 4125 JUSTICE HARRY BLACKMUN AND THE PHENOMENON OF JUDICIAL PREFERENCE CHANGE, 70 Mo. L. Rev. 1209, 1215+ (2005) 4126 WHY DO SUPREME COURT JUSTICES SUCCEED OR FAIL? HARRY BLACKMUN AS AN EXAMPLE, 70 Mo. L. Rev. 1261, 1287 (2005) 4127 THE INTERNATIONALISM OF JUSTICE HARRY BLACKMUN, 70 Mo. L. Rev. 1289, 1305+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4128 WHICH ONE HERE IS NOT LIKE THE OTHER? NO THIRD-PARTY STANDING FOR LAWYERS TO ASSERT INDIGENT CRIMINAL DEFENDANTS' RIGHT TO COUNSEL ON APPEAL Kowalski v. Tesmer, 70 Mo. L. Rev. 1355, 1384+ (2005) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4129 FOREWORD, 70 Mo. L. Rev. 965, 971 (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4130 MILITARY DISCIPLINE AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE: PRIOR MILITARY CONVICTIONS AS PREDICATE FELONIES UNDER MISSOURI'S RECIDIVISM STATUTE, 70 Mo. L. Rev. 219, 252+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4131 DUE PROCESS RIGHT TO PRIVACY: THE SUPREME COURT'S ULTIMATE TRUMP CARD, 69 Mo. L. Rev. 831, 851+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. (S.Ct.) 4132 SLOW PROGRESS: NEW FEDERAL RULES ONLY BEGIN TO ADDRESS HOUSING DISCRIMINATION BASED ON SEXUAL ORIENTATION AND GENDER IDENTITY, 9 Mod. Am. 2, 3+ (2013) 4133 SEE NO EVIL, HEAR NO EVIL, SPEAK NO EVIL; STEMMING THE TIDE OF NO PROMO HOMO LAWS IN AMERICAN SCHOOLS, 8 Mod. Am. 29, 33+ (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4134 ADAR v. SMITH: PENALIZING INNOCENT CHILDREN FOR THE "SINS" OF THE PARENTS, 8 Mod. Am. 35, 36+ (2012) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4135 A REVIEW OF BROCK THOMPSON'S THE UN-NATURAL STATE: ARKANSAS AND THE QUEER SOUTH, 7 Mod. Am. 59, 60+ (2011) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4136 FUTILE ARGUMENTS: LAWRENCE v. TEXAS AND THE SUPREME COURT BAR, 6 Mod. Am. 47, 47+ (2010) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 4137 FAIR HOUSING LAWS AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF ROOMMATE SEEKERS, 4 Mod. Am. 3, 13 (2008) 4138 WHAT'S GOOD FOR THE GOOSE SHOULD BE GOOD FOR THE GANDER: THE IMPLEMENTATION OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS IN THE WAKE OF LOFTON, 4 Mod. Am. 10, 10+ (2008) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4139 GOING WITH THE FLOW: THE MONTANA COURT'S CONSERVATIVE APPROACH TO CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION, 72 Mont. L. Rev. 237, 260 (2011) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4140 KEEPING FAITH WITH THE VISION: INTERPRETING A CONSTITUTION FOR THIS AND FUTURE GENERATIONS, 71 Mont. L. Rev. 299, 323 (2010) 4141 THE RISE AND FALL OF THE NEW JUDICIAL FEDERALISM UNDER THE MONTANA CONSTITUTION, 71 Mont. L. Rev. 383, 393 (2010) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4142 THE IMPENDING STORM: THE SUPREME COURT'S FORAY INTO THE SECOND AMENDMENT DEBATE, 69 Mont. L. Rev. 113, 142+ (2008) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 4143 TRIBUTE TO JUSTICE JAMES C. NELSON, 68 Mont. L. Rev. 251, 256+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4144 THE COURTS' CONFUSED (AND CONFUSING) UNDERSTANDING OF THE CREATION AND TAKING OF HUMAN LIFE, 68 Mont. L. Rev. 265, 283+ (2007) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 4145 PRIVACY AND REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS: WHERE WE'VE BEEN AND WHERE WE'RE GOING, 68 Mont. L. Rev. 299, 317+ (2007) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4146 PRIVACY AND DIGNITY AT THE END OF LIFE: PROTECTING THE RIGHT OF MONTANANS TO CHOOSE AID IN DYING, 68 Mont. L. Rev. 317, 333 (2007) 4147 PRIVACY AND SAME-SEX MARRIAGE: THE CASE FOR TREATING SAME-SEX MARRIAGE AS A HUMAN RIGHT, 68 Mont. L. Rev. 335, 361+ © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. (2007) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 4148 MONTANA'S MARRIAGE AMENDMENT: UNCONSTITUTIONALLY DENYING A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT, 66 Mont. L. Rev. 405, 443+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4149 LOVE OR CONFUSION? COMMON LAW MARRIAGE, HOMOSEXUALITY AND THE MONTANA SUPREME COURT INSNETSINGER V. MONTANA UNIVERSITY SYSTEM, 66 Mont. L. Rev. 445, 474+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4150 TOWARD A "CIVIL GIDEON" UNDER THE MONTANA CONSTITUTION: PARENTAL RIGHTS AS THE STARTING POINT, 66 Mont. L. Rev. 81, 137 (2005) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 4151 CONSTITUTIONAL DIALOGUE AND HUMAN DIGNITY: STATES AND TRANSNATIONAL CONSTITUTIONAL DISCOURSE, 65 Mont. L. Rev. 15, 40+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4152 "ORIGINAL" MEANS OLD, "ORIGINAL" MEANS NEW: AN "ORIGINAL" LOOK AT WHAT "ORIGINALISTS" DO, 67 Nat'l Law. Guild Rev. 135, 135+ (2010) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4153 FREEING JANE: THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY AND THE WORLD'S OLDEST PROFESSION, 66 Nat'l Law. Guild Rev. 137, 140+ (2009) 4154 IN A TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY "MINUTE", 44 Nat. Resources J. 163, 211+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4155 REVERSAL OF FORTUNE: THE INAPPOSITE STANDARDS APPLIED TO REMEDIAL RACE-, GENDER-, AND ORIENTATION-BASED CLASSIFICATIONS, 92 Neb. L. Rev. 1, 20+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4156 DUCK, DUCK, GOOSE . . . BECAUSE YOU'RE CHRISTIAN: AN ANALYSIS OF SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT AND VIEWPOINT DISCRIMINATION IN A LIMITED PUBLIC FORUM IN CHRISTIAN LEGAL SOCIETY V. MARTINEZ, 130 S. CT. 2971 (2010), 90 Neb. L. Rev. 586, 610+ (2011) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4157 IS ASHCROFT V. IQBAL THE DEATH (FINALLY) OF THE "HISTORICAL TEST" FOR INTERPRETING THE SEVENTH AMENDMENT?, 88 Neb. L. Rev. 467, 493+ (2010) 4158 AN ACCIDENTAL VIOLATION: HOW REQUIRED GARDASIL VACCINATIONS FOR FEMALE IMMIGRANTS TO THE UNITED STATES CONTRAVENE INTERNATIONAL LAW, 88 Neb. L. Rev. 524, 560 (2010) 4159 INCORPORATING THE SUPREME COURT'S EIGHTH AMENDMENT FRAMEWORK INTO SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS JURISPRUDENCE THROUGH THE INTRODUCTION OF A CONTINGENT-BASED AND LEGISLATIVELY-DRIVEN CONSTITUTIONAL THEORY, 88 Neb. L. Rev. 692, 759+ (2010) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 4160 A SHARED EXISTENCE: THE CURRENT COMPATIBILITY OF THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE AND SECTION 5 OF THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT, 88 Neb. L. Rev. 124, 179 (2009) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 4161 IF YOU CAN'T BEAT "EM, JOIN "EM: A PRAGMATIC APPROACH TO NONPRECEDENTIAL OPINIONS IN THE FEDERAL APPELLATE COURTS, 86 Neb. L. Rev. 895, 952 (2008) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 4162 CURBING THE DOG: EXTENDING THE PROTECTION OF THE FOURTH AMENDMENT TO POLICE DRUG DOGS, 85 Neb. L. Rev. 735, 792 (2007) 4163 HUMAN DIGNITY IN SUPREME COURT CONSTITUTIONAL JURISPRUDENCE, 84 Neb. L. Rev. 740, 794+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4164 THE IRRATIONAL SUPREME COURT, 84 Neb. L. Rev. 895, 961 (2006) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4165 THE ULTIMATE BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD ENURES FROM PARENTAL REINFORCEMENT: THE JOURNEY TO FAMILY INTEGRITY, 83 Neb. L. Rev. 1240, 1298 (2005) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 4166 BACK TO BAKKE: DEFINING THE STRICT SCRUTINY TEST FOR AFFIRMATIVE ACTION POLICIES AIMED AT ACHIEVING DIVERSITY IN THE CLASSROOM, 83 Neb. L. Rev. 631, 684 (2005) 4167 DOUBLE JEOPARDY AND NONMEMBER INDIANS IN INDIAN COUNTRY, 82 Neb. L. Rev. 889, 946 (2004) 4168 NOT ON "SHAKY GROUNDS" : LAWRENCE V. TEXAS, 123 S. CT. 2472 (2003), AND THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF STATE DOMAS SUCH AS NEBRASKA'S MARRIAGE PROVISION, NEB. CONST. ART. I, S 29, 83 Neb. L. Rev. 179, 224+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4169 12 Nev. L.J. 727, CIRCUMSTANCE AND STRATEGY: JOINTLY AUTHORED SUPREME COURT OPINIONS (2012) 4170 12 Nev. L.J. 787, STARE DECISIS IN THE INFERIOR COURTS OF THE UNITED STATES (2012) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 4171 12 Nev. L.J. 418, FOOD CHOICE AND FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS: A PIECE OF CAKE OR PIE IN THE SKY? (2012) 4172 9 Nev. L.J. 495, THE RITE OF RHETORIC: COGNITIVE FRAMING IN TECHNOLOGY LAW (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4173 9 Nev. L.J. 368, ARE YOU A BOY OR A GIRL? SHOW ME YOUR REAL ID (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4174 7 Nev. L.J. 973, SECOND ANNUAL CULP LATCRIT LECTURE - THE CONSTITUTION OF TERROR: BIG LIES, BACKLASH JURISPRUDENCE, AND THE RULE OF LAW IN THE UNITED STATES TODAY (2007) 4175 6 Nev. L.J. 774, COMING OUT FOR KIDS: RECOGNIZING, RESPECTING, AND REPRESENTING LGBTQ YOUTH (2006) 4176 6 Nev. L.J. 425, THE ORIGINAL INTENT OF THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT: A CONVERSATION WITH ERIC FONER (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4177 6 Nev. L.J. 217, THE BEST LITTLE WHOREHOUSE IS NOT IN TEXAS: HOW NEVADA'S PROSTITUTION LAWS SERVE PUBLIC POLICY, AND © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. HOW THOSE LAWS MAY BE IMPROVED (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4178 5 Nev. L.J. 1, FOREWORD: PURSUING EQUAL JUSTICE IN THE WEST (2004) 4179 5 Nev. L.J. 260, ADVENTURES IN HETERONORMATIVITY: THE STRAIGHT LINE FROM LIBERACE TO LAWRENCE (2004) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4180 PUBLIC POLICY AND THE RECOGNITION OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, 12-FEB Nev. Law. 32, 32+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4181 ASSESSING DIGITAL PREEMPTION (AND THE FUTURE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT?), 14 New Crim. L. Rev. 576, 602+ (2011) 4182 PROTECT AND PRESERVE?, 13 New Crim. L. Rev. 127, 133+ (2010) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 4183 THE MORAL LIMITS OF CONSENT AS A DEFENSE IN THE CRIMINAL LAW, 12 New Crim. L. Rev. 93, 121+ (2009) 4184 NORMATIVE GAPS IN THE CRIMINAL LAW: A REASONS THEORY OF WRONGDOING, 10 New Crim. L. Rev. 102, 133+ (2007) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4185 THE RIGHTS ORCHESTRA: PROPORTIONALITY, BALANCING, AND VIKING, 17 New Eng. J. Int'l & Comp. L. 87, 120 (2011) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 4186 GAY MARRIAGE IN CANADA: STRATEGIES OF THE GAY LIBERATION MOVEMENT AND THE IMPLICATIONS IT WILL HAVE ON THE UNITED STATES, 10 New Eng. J. Int'l & Comp. L. 175, 215+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4187 REFRAMING THE DEBATE OVER EXCESSIVE SENTENCES TO MOVE BEYOND THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT, 38 New Eng. J. on Crim. & Civ. Confinement 3, 55 (2012) 4188 THE MEANING OF GUILT: RETHINKING APPRENDI, 33 New Eng. J. on Crim. & Civ. Confinement 501, 549 (2007) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 4189 WHEN THE HONEYMOON IS OVER: HOW A FEDERAL COURT'S DENIAL OF THE SPOUSAL PRIVILEGE TO A LEGALLY MARRIED SAME-SEX COUPLE CAN RESULT IN THE INCARCERATION OF A SPOUSE WHO REFUSES TO ADVERSELY TESTIFY, 33 New Eng. J. on Crim. & Civ. Confinement 243, 259+ (2007) 4190 THE COSTS OF JUDICIAL RESTRAINT: FORGONE OPPORTUNITIES TO LIMIT AMERICA'S IMPRISONMENT BINGE, 33 New Eng. J. on Crim. & Civ. Confinement 29, 59 (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4191 ALL THE KIDS ARE DOING IT: THE UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF ENFORCING STATUTORY RAPE LAWS AGAINST CHILDREN & TEENAGERS, 47 New Eng. L. Rev. 681, 713+ (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4192 FOR TRAILBLAZERS, WHEN THE U.S. CONSTITUTION IS NOT ENOUGH, 45 New Eng. L. Rev. 855, 878 (2011) 4193 THE REVIVIFICATION OF IN LOCO PARENTIS BEHAVIORAL REGULATION IN PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION TO COMBAT THE OBESITY EPIDEMIC, 45 New Eng. L. Rev. 101, 137 (2010) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 4194 "EQUAL CITIZENSHIP STATURE": JUSTICE GINSBURG'S CONSTITUTIONAL VISION, 43 New Eng. L. Rev. 799, 855+ (2009) 4195 BIG LOVE OR BIG PROBLEM: SHOULD POLYGAMOUS RELATIONSHIPS BE A FACTOR IN DETERMINING CHILD CUSTODY?, 43 New Eng. L. Rev. 105, 134+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4196 A MARRIAGE OF PRINCIPLES: THE RELEVANCE OF FEDERAL PRECEDENT AND INTERNATIONAL SOURCES OF LAW IN ANALYZING CLAIMS FOR A RIGHT TO SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, 41 New Eng. L. Rev. 683, 710+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4197 NEW ENGLAND SCHOOL OF LAW COMMENCEMENT ADDRESS, 41 New Eng. L. Rev. 247, 258+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4198 NINE QUESTIONS ABOUT SAME-SEX MARRIAGE CONFLICTS, 40 New Eng. L. Rev. 361, 408+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4199 RECKONING WITH DISSONANCE: THOUGHTS ON STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AND CONSTITUTIONAL DISCOURSE, 40 New Eng. L. Rev. 437, 445+ (2006) 4200 "TIL CONGRESS DO US PART: THE MARRIAGE PROTECTION ACT, FEDERAL COURT-STRIPPING, AND SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, 40 New Eng. L. Rev. 619, 661+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4201 THE THOUGHT POLICE: DOLING OUT PUNISHMENT FOR THINKING ABOUT CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR IN JOHN DOE V. CITY OF LAFAYETTE, 40 New Eng. L. Rev. 263, 301+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4202 KEYNOTE ADDRESS Civil Marriage For Same-sex Couples, 38 New Eng. L. Rev. 495, 504+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4203 THE MASSACHUSETTS SAME-SEX MARRIAGE CASE: COULD DECISIONS FROM CANADA, EUROPE, AND SOUTH AFRICA HELP THE SJC?, 38 New Eng. L. Rev. 505, 526 (2004) 4204 CAN SAME-SEX MARRIAGES COEXIST WITH RELIGION?, 38 New Eng. L. Rev. 533, 539 (2004) 4205 THE INEVITABILITY OF GAY MARRIAGE, 38 New Eng. L. Rev. 563, 567 (2004) 4206 THE CANADIAN EARTHQUAKE: SAME-SEX MARRIAGE IN CANADA, 38 New Eng. L. Rev. 591, 620 (2004) 4207 TO WED & LET WED? THE INTRUSIVE IMPACT ON DISSENTING RELIGIOUS BELIEF & PRACTICES CREATED BY SAME-SEX MARRIAGES, 38 New Eng. L. Rev. 621, 628+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4208 LAWRENCE, SAME-SEX MARRIAGE AND THE CONSTITUTION: WHAT IS PROTECTED AND WHY?, 38 New Eng. L. Rev. 667, 681+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4209 MARRIAGE: AN ACHIEVEMENT OF CENTURIES FOR THE PROTECTION © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. OF WOMEN AND CHILDREN, 38 New Eng. L. Rev. 683, 688+ (2004) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 4210 TRANSNATIONAL LAW AS A DOMESTIC RESOURCE: THOUGHTS ON THE CASE OF WOMEN'S RIGHTS, 38 New Eng. L. Rev. 689, 723+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4211 THE FIGHT TO BE A PARENT: HOW COURTS HAVE RESTRICTED THE CONSTITUTIONALLY-BASED CHALLENGES AVAILABLE TO HOMOSEXUALS, 38 New Eng. L. Rev. 841, 896+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4212 MINDING YOUR BUSINESS: IS YOUR LIFE AFTER WORK REALLY PRIVATE?, 251-APR N.J. Law. 46, 49 (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4213 DEBATING THE BAN: THE PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE OF DON'T ASK, DON'T TELL, 246-JUN N.J. Law. 51, 55+ (2007) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4214 STATE V. RUDY B.: DENYING YOUTHFUL OFFENDERS THE BENEFIT OF APPRENDI'S BRIGHT-LINE RULE BEFORE ADULT SENTENCING, 43 N.M. L. Rev. 317, 346+ (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4215 IS YOUR BEDROOM A PRIVATE PLACE? FORNICATION AND FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS, 39 N.M. L. Rev. 507, 507+ (2009) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 4216 CITIZEN GUN RIGHTS: INCORPORATING THE SECOND AMENDMENT THROUGH THE PRIVILEGES OR IMMUNITIES CLAUSE, 39 N.M. L. Rev. 195, 205+ (2009) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4217 NEW MEXICO'S ACCOUNTANT-CLIENT PRIVILEGE, 37 N.M. L. Rev. 387, 429 (2007) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 4218 THE IRRATIONAL LEGACY OF ROMER V. EVANS: A DECADE OF JUDICIAL REVIEW REVEALS THE NEED FOR HEIGHTENED SCRUTINY OF LEGISLATION THAT DENIES EQUAL PROTECTION TO MEMBERS OF THE GAY COMMUNITY, 36 N.M. L. Rev. 565, 601+ (2006) 4219 TRANS-LITERACY WITHIN EIGHTH AMENDMENT JURISPRUDENCE: DE/FUSING GENDER AND SEX, 36 N.M. L. Rev. 627, 660 (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4220 AN ORIGINALIST THEORY OF PRECEDENT: ORIGINALISM, NONORIGINALIST PRECEDENT, AND THE COMMON GOOD, 36 N.M. L. Rev. 419, 486+ (2006) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4221 LOOKING BEYOND THE BOUNDARIES: INCORPORATING INTERNATIONAL NORMS INTO THE SUPREME COURT'S CONSTITUTIONAL JURISPRUDENCE, 36 N.M. L. Rev. 75, 98+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4222 A SMALL STEP FORWARD IN THE LAST CIVIL RIGHTS BATTLE: EXTENDING BENEFITS UNDER FEDERALLY REGULATED EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS TO SAME-SEX COUPLES, 36 N.M. L. Rev. 99, 124+ (2006) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4223 REFLECTIONS ON FIFTEEN YEARS OF THE TEAGUE V. LANE © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. RETROACTIVITY PARADIGM: A STUDY OF THE PERSISTENCE, THE PERVASIVENESS, AND THE PERVERSITY OF THE COURT'S DOCTRINE, 35 N.M. L. Rev. 161, 214 (2005) 4224 NEW TORT RULES FOR UNMARRIED PARTNERS: THE ENHANCED POTENTIAL FOR SUCCESSFUL LOSS OF CONSORTIUM AND NIED CLAIMS BY SAME SEX PARTNERS IN NEW MEXICO AFTER LOZOYA, 34 N.M. L. Rev. 461, 487 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4225 TREMORS: JUSTICE SCALIA AND PROFESSOR CLINTON RE-SHAPE THE DEBATE OVER THE CROSS-BOUNDARY ENFORCEMENT OF TRIBAL AND STATE JUDGMENTS, 34 N.M. L. Rev. 239, 261 (2004) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 4226 OVERBREADTH OUTSIDE THE FIRST AMENDMENT, 34 N.M. L. Rev. 53, 107+ (2004) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4227 "PURGATORY CANNOT BE WORSE THAN HELL" : THE FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS OF CIVILLY COMMITTED SEX OFFENDERS, 12 N.Y. City L. Rev. 283, 327+ (2009) 4228 BRINGING DOWN THE ESTABLISHMENT: FAITH-BASED AND COMMUNITY INITIATIVE FUNDING, CHRISTIANITY, AND SAME-SEX EQUALITY, 12 N.Y. City L. Rev. 129, 173+ (2008) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4229 A BOY OF BOISE: IN DEFENSE OF IDAHO'S MOST FAMOUS TOETAPPER, 11 N.Y. City L. Rev. 441, 468+ (2008) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4230 DEVIANT DREAMS: EXTREME ASSOCIATES AND THE CASE FOR PORN, 10 N.Y. City L. Rev. 155, 197+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4231 IMAGINING LESBIAN LEGAL THEORY, 8 N.Y. City L. Rev. 505, 510 (2005) 4232 REFLECTIONS ON COMPLICITY, 8 N.Y. City L. Rev. 657, 679+ (2005) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 4233 RUTHANN ROBSON: AN ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY 1979-2005, 8 N.Y. City L. Rev. 681, 773 (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4234 THE GAY BAR: THE EFFECT OF THE ONE-YEAR FILING DEADLINE ON LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, TRANSGENDER, AND HIV-POSITIVE FOREIGN NATIONALS SEEKING ASYLUM OR WITHHOLDING OF REMOVAL, 8 N.Y. City L. Rev. 233, 282 (2005) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4235 SHAKEN FROM HER PEDESTAL: A DECADE OF NEW YORK CITY'S SEX INDUSTRY UNDER SIEGE, 9 N.Y. City L. Rev. 121, 159 (2005) 4236 REIMAGINING THE RIGHT TO COMMERCIAL SEX: THE IMPACT OF LAWRENCE V. TEXAS ON PROSTITUTION STATUTES, 9 N.Y. City L. Rev. 161, 181+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4237 REAL DIFFERENCES AND STEREOTYPES-TWO VISIONS OF GENDER, CITIZENSHIP, AND INTERNATIONAL LAW, 7 N.Y. City L. Rev. 315, 356 (2004) 4238 RUTH BADER GINSBURG: AN ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY, 7 N.Y. City L. Rev. 391, 451+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 4239 TEN YEARS ON: MILITARY JUSTICE AND CIVIL LIBERTIES IN THE POST-9/11 ERA, 56 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 103, 117 (2012) 4240 LAW, POLITICS, AND THE EROSION OF LEGITIMACY IN THE DELAWARE COURTS, 55 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 481, 489+ (2011) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4241 FINDING HOME IN THE WORLD: A DEONTOLOGICAL THEORY OF THE RIGHT TO BE ADOPTED, 55 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 701, 731 (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4242 REBALANCING THE SCALES: RESTORING THE AVAILABILITY OF DISPARATE IMPACT CAUSES OF ACTION IN TITLE VI CASES, 54 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 27, 57+ (2010) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 4243 MISINFORMED CONSENT: NON-MEDICAL BASES FOR AMERICAN BIRTH RECOMMENDATIONS AS A HUMAN RIGHTS ISSUE, 54 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 59, 103 (2010) 4244 FROM JOHN F. KENNEDY'S 1960 CAMPAIGN SPEECH TO CHRISTIAN SUPREMACY: RELIGION IN MODERN PRESIDENTIAL POLITICS, 53 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 691, 706+ (2009) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4245 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AND VALUES-VERSION '08 (NOT NECESSARILY AN UPGRADE), 53 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 735, 743+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4246 INTRODUCTION, 52 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 163, 167 (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4247 POLITICAL ADVOCACY ON THE SUPREME COURT: THE DAMAGING RHETORIC OF ANTONIN SCALIA, 51 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 907, 926+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4248 REFLECTIONS ON THE ESSENTIAL ROLE OF LEGAL SCHOLARSHIP IN ADVANCING CAUSES OF CITIZEN GROUPS, 49 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 505, 524 (2005) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 4249 THE IMPACT OF INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS DEVELOPMENTS ON SEXUAL MINORITY RIGHTS, 49 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 525, 535+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4250 HOMOPHOBIA AND THE "MATHEW SHEPARD EFFECT" IN LAWRENCE V. TEXAS, 48 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 657, 695+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4251 ROUTINE VIOLATIONS OF MEDICAL PRIVACY IN ARTICLE 81 GUARDIANSHIP CASES: SO WHAT OR NOW WHAT?, 85-JAN N.Y. St. B.J. 34, 34 (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4252 TOWARD A "MORE ENLIGHTENED AND TOLERANT VIEW": EDUCATIONAL CHOICE AND THE REGULATION OF RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS, 66 N.Y.U. Ann. Surv. Am. L. 31, 74 (2010) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 4253 REMARKS OF STEVEN R. SHAPIRO, 64 N.Y.U. Ann. Surv. Am. L. 469, 473+ (2009) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.) 4254 OUT OF THE MOUTH OF STATES: DEFERENCE TO STATE ACTION FINDING EFFECT IN FEDERAL LAW, 63 N.Y.U. Ann. Surv. Am. L. 429, 465 © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. (2008) 4255 TOWARD A LIMITED-GOVERNMENT THEORY OF EXTRATERRITORIAL DETENTION, 62 N.Y.U. Ann. Surv. Am. L. 637, 670 (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4256 FOREIGN LAW AND AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION: A LONG AND VENERABLE TRADITION, 63 N.Y.U. Ann. Surv. Am. L. 29, 61+ (2007) 4257 TRIBUTE TO JUSTICE ANTONIN SCALIA, 62 N.Y.U. Ann. Surv. Am. L. 1, 9+ (2006) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4258 TRIBUTE TO JUSTICE SCALIA, 62 N.Y.U. Ann. Surv. Am. L. 21, 26+ (2006) 4259 THE CHICKEN AND THE EGG: THE PURSUIT OF CHOICE FOR A HUMAN HASTENED-DEATH AS A CATALYST FOR IMPROVED ENDOF-LIFE CARE; IMPROVED END-OF-LIFE CARE AS A PRECONDITION FOR LEGALIZATION OF ASSISTED DYING, 60 N.Y.U. Ann. Surv. Am. L. 355, 378+ (2004) 4260 LAWRENCE V. TEXAS AND FAMILY LAW: GAY PARENTS' CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS IN CHILD CUSTODY PROCEEDINGS, 60 N.Y.U. Ann. Surv. Am. L. 53, 96+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4261 HUMAN RIGHTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION, 19 N.Y.U. Envtl. L.J. 225, 302+ (2012) 4262 GLOBAL GOVERNANCE IN THE INFORMATION AGE: THE TERRORIST FINANCE TRACKING PROGRAM, 45 N.Y.U. J. Int'l L. & Pol. 595, 639 (2013) 4263 INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION AND THE ENDS OF APPELLATE REVIEW, 44 N.Y.U. J. Int'l L. & Pol. 1109, 1204 (2012) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 4264 ESCALATING PERSECUTION OF GAYS AND REFUGEE PROTECTION: COMMENT ON QUEER CASES MAKE BAD LAW, 44 N.Y.U. J. Int'l L. & Pol. 529, 557 (2012) 4265 THE UNSIGNED UNITED NATIONS MIGRANT WORKER RIGHTS CONVENTION: AN OVERLOOKED OPPORTUNITY TO CHANGE THE "BROWN COLLAR" MIGRATION PARADIGM, 42 N.Y.U. J. Int'l L. & Pol. 389, 499 (2010) 4266 SLICING THE AMERICAN PIE: FEDERALISM AND PERSONAL LAW, 40 N.Y.U. J. Int'l L. & Pol. 941, 1018+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4267 TINKERING WITH TORTURE IN THE AFTERMATH OF HAMDAN: TESTING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INTERNATIONALISM AND CONSTITUTIONALISM, 40 N.Y.U. J. Int'l L. & Pol. 723, 802 (2008) 4268 FOUR COUNTS OF CORPORATE COMPLICITY: ALTERNATIVE FORMS OF ACCOMPLICE LIABILITY UNDER THE ALIEN TORT CLAIMS ACT, 38 N.Y.U. J. Int'l L. & Pol. 39, 65 (2006) 4269 MAKING IT TO CLASS: SOCIOECONOMIC DIVERSITY AND THE STATUTORY AUTHORITY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, 16 N.Y.U. J. Legis. & Pub. Pol'y 757, 813+ (2013) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 4270 UNFINISHED BUSINESS: THE EMPLOYMENT NON-DISCRIMINATION ACT (ENDA) AND THE K-12 EDUCATION COMMUNITY, 14 N.Y.U. J. Legis. & Pub. Pol'y 357, 413+ (2011) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4271 THE FUNDAMENTAL MEANING OF "MEDICAL UNCERTAINTY": JUDICIAL DEFERENCE TO SELECTIVE SCIENCE IN GONZALES V. CARHART, 12 N.Y.U. J. Legis. & Pub. Pol'y 379, 408+ (2009) 4272 THE UNLAWFUL INTERNET GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT ACT OF 2006: THE PITFALLS OF PROHIBITION, 12 N.Y.U. J. Legis. & Pub. Pol'y 151, 189+ (2008) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4273 LOWERING THE BAR: RETHINKING UNDERAGE DRINKING, 9 N.Y.U. J. Legis. & Pub. Pol'y 303, 397+ (2006) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.) 4274 HUMAN REPRODUCTIVE CLONING: MORE THAN A CONSTITUTIONAL CONCERN The Naked Clone: How Cloning Bans Threaten Our Personal Rights. By John Charles Kunich. Westport, Conn.: Praeger Publishers, 2003. Pp. 157., 7 N.Y.U. J. Legis. & Pub. Pol'y 437, 447+ (2004) 4275 LEGISLATIVE AND CONSTITUTIONAL RESPONSES TO GOODRIDGE V. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 7 N.Y.U. J. Legis. & Pub. Pol'y 465, 485+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4276 WRAPPED IN AMBIGUITY: ASSESSING THE EXPRESSIVENESS OF BAREBACK PORNOGRAPHY, 88 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1839, 1861+ (2013) 4277 UNSCRAMBLING THE EGG: SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIONISM AND THE ANTIREIFICATION PRINCIPLE IN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 88 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1873, 1900+ (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4278 DEFERENCE TO CONGRESSIONAL FACT-FINDING IN RIGHTSENFORCING AND RIGHTS-LIMITING LEGISLATION, 88 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 878, 957 (2013) 4279 STAGING THE FAMILY, 88 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 589, 628+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4280 ASSUMING RESPONSIBILITY FOR WHO YOU ARE: THE RIGHT TO CHOOSE "IMMUTABLE" IDENTITY CHARACTERISTICS, 88 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 373, 397+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4281 OVERLY INTIMATE SURVEILLANCE: WHY EMERGENT PUBLIC HEALTH SURVEILLANCE PROGRAMS DESERVE STRICT SCRUTINY UNDER THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT, 87 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1950, 1995+ (2012) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4282 COMMENT ON LAW AND VERSTEEG, 87 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 2102, 2117 (2012) 4283 THE RECONSTRUCTION POWER, 85 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1801, 1861 (2010) 4284 INCOMPREHENSIBLE CRIMES: DEFENDANTS WITH MENTAL RETARDATION CHARGED WITH STATUTORY RAPE, 85 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1067, 1129 (2010) 4285 THE BOGEYMAN OF "HARM TO CHILDREN": EVALUATING THE GOVERNMENT INTEREST BEHIND BROADCAST INDECENCY REGULATION, 85 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1225, 1262 (2010) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 4286 COLLATERAL CONSEQUENCES OF CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS: CONFRONTING ISSUES OF RACE AND DIGNITY, 85 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 457, 534+ (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4287 THE ANTI-STEREOTYPING PRINCIPLE IN CONSTITUTIONAL SEX DISCRIMINATION LAW, 85 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 83, 173+ (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4288 THE COSTS OF "DISCERNIBLE AND MANAGEABLE STANDARDS" IN VIETH AND BEYOND, 84 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1292, 1330+ (2009) 4289 THINGS BETTER LEFT UNWRITTEN?: CONSTITUTIONAL TEXT AND THE RULE OF LAW, 83 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1979, 2012 (2008) 4290 CHOOSING INTERPRETIVE METHODS: A POSITIVE THEORY OF JUDGES AND EVERYONE ELSE, 83 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 769, 846+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4291 NO HARM, NO FOUL: RECONCEPTUALIZING FREE SPEECH VIA TORT LAW, 83 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 949, 981+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4292 TOWARD ONE AMERICA: A VISION IN LAW, 83 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 323, 336 (2008) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 4293 JUVENILE CURFEWS AND THE BREAKDOWN OF THE TIERED APPROACH TO EQUAL PROTECTION, 82 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1857, 1894 (2007) 4294 A CHILD'S EXPERTISE: ESTABLISHING STATUTORY PROTECTION FOR INTERSEXED CHILDREN WHO REJECT THEIR GENDER OF ASSIGNMENT, 82 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 531, 568 (2007) 4295 THE CIVIL COMMITMENT OF STATE-DEPENDENT MINORS: RESONATING DISCOURSES THAT LEAVE HER HETEROSEXUALITY AND HIS HOMOSEXUALITY VULNERABLE TO SCRUTINY, 81 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 2129, 2157+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4296 THE IMPACT OF LIBERTY ON STARE DECISIS: THE REHNQUIST COURT FROM CASEY TO LAWRENCE, 81 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1137, 1165+ (2006) HN: 1,4,5 (S.Ct.) 4297 PARENT-CHILD SPEECH AND CHILD CUSTODY SPEECH RESTRICTIONS, 81 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 631, 733+ (2006) 4298 THE UNWORKABLE UNWORKABILITY TEST, 80 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1665, 1692 (2005) 4299 OUR 18TH CENTURY CONSTITUTION IN THE 21ST CENTURY WORLD, 80 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1079, 1107+ (2005) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 4300 GIRLS! GIRLS! GIRLS!: THE SUPREME COURT CONFRONTS THE GSTRING, 80 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1108, 1155+ (2005) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.) 4301 A USEFUL CONVERSATION Judges in Contemporary Democracy: An International Conversation. Edited by Robert Badinter and Stephen Breyer. (FNd1) New York: New York University Press, 2004. Pp. 317. $55.00., 80 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 694, 701+ (2005) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4302 BETWEEN DIALOGUE AND DECREE: INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. NATIONAL COURTS, 79 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 2029, 2163+ (2004) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 4303 "WISE PARENTS DO NOT HESITATE TO LEARN FROM THEIR CHILDREN": INTERPRETING STATE CONSTITUTIONS IN AN AGE OF GLOBAL JURISPRUDENCE, 79 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1633, 1656+ (2004) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4304 NEITHER ICARUS NOR OSTRICH: STATE CONSTITUTIONS AS AN INDEPENDENT SOURCE OF INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS, 79 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1833, 1872+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4305 JUDICIAL METHODOLOGY, SOUTHERN SCHOOL DESEGREGATION, AND THE RULE OF LAW, 79 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1071, 1133 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4306 FORTRESS OF SOLITUDE OR LAIR OF MALEVOLENCE? RETHINKING THE DESIRABILITY OF BRIGHT-LINE PROTECTION OF THE HOME, 78 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 1789, 1820+ (2003) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) .... MARRIAGE AND MASS INCARCERATION, 37 N.Y.U. Rev. L. & Soc. Change 13, 21 (2013) (Text not available on WESTLAW) .... PERRY AND THE LGBTQ MOVEMENT, 37 N.Y.U. Rev. L. & Soc. Change 23, 28 (2013) (Text not available on WESTLAW) .... PROP 8: ADVANCING CIVIL RIGHTS THROUGH CULTURAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL CHANGE, 37 N.Y.U. Rev. L. & Soc. Change 29, 34 (2013) (Text not available on WESTLAW) .... THE PERTINENCE OF PERRY TO CHALLENGING THE CONTINUING CRIMINALIZATION OF LGBT PEOPLE, 37 N.Y.U. Rev. L. & Soc. Change 63, 64+ (2013) (Text not available on WESTLAW) .... REINHARDT IS RIGHT; PERRY IS A CASE ABOUT CALIFORNIA, 37 N.Y.U. Rev. L. & Soc. Change 131, 141 (2013) (Text not available on WESTLAW) .... HOW HAS PERRY AFFECTED OTHER MARRIAGE-RIGHTS LITIGATION STRATEGIES? REFLECTIONS ON A SILVER ANNIVERSARY AND THE GOLDEN RULE, 37 N.Y.U. Rev. L. & Soc. Change 165, 168+ (2013) (Text not available on WESTLAW) .... THE PERRY LITIGATION AND THE CHANGING POLITICAL LANDSCAPE FOR MARRIAGE EQUALITY, 37 N.Y.U. Rev. L. & Soc. Change 181, 186+ (2013) (Text not available on WESTLAW) .... AN EPHEMERAL MOMENT: MINIMALISM, EQUALITY, AND FEDERALISM IN THE STRUGGLE FOR SAME-SEX MARRIAGE RIGHTS, 37 N.Y.U. Rev. L. & Soc. Change 199, 205+ (2013) (Text not available on WESTLAW) .... PERRY'S PATH TO EQUALITY: REJECTING "GAY MARRIAGE" AND RETHINKING THE "RIGHT TO MARRY", 37 N.Y.U. Rev. L. & Soc. Change 215, 217+ (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) (Text not available on WESTLAW) .... HOLLINGSWORTH V. PERRY: WHAT SHOULD THE COURT DO?, 37 N.Y.U. Rev. L. & Soc. Change 229, 229+ (2013) (Text not available on © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. WESTLAW) .... REPEALING RIGHTS: PROPOSITION 8, PERRY, AND CRAWFORD CONTEXTUALIZED, 37 N.Y.U. Rev. L. & Soc. Change 235, 241+ (2013) (Text not available on WESTLAW) .... IMAGINING A SAME-SEX MARRIAGE DECISION BASED ON DIGNITY: CONSIDERING HUMAN EXPERIENCE IN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 37 N.Y.U. Rev. L. & Soc. Change 251, 263+ (2013) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) (Text not available on WESTLAW) .... PARADIGMS LOST: HOW DOMESTIC PARTNERSHIP WENT FROM INNOVATION TO INJURY, 37 N.Y.U. Rev. L. & Soc. Change 291, 301+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) (Text not available on WESTLAW) .... THIRTEEN FALSE BLACKBIRDS, 37 N.Y.U. Rev. L. & Soc. Change 315, 318+ (2013) (Text not available on WESTLAW) .... WHY THE COURT CAN STRIKE DOWN MARRIAGE RESTRICTIONS UNDER RATIONAL-BASIS REVIEW, 37 N.Y.U. Rev. L. & Soc. Change 331, 336+ (2013) (Text not available on WESTLAW) .... THE MILITARY MUST LEAD IN ADVOCATING FOR MARRIAGE EQUALITY, 37 N.Y.U. Rev. L. & Soc. Change 457, 470+ (2013) (Text not available on WESTLAW) 4323 THE PROPER ROLE OF MORALITY IN STATE POLICIES ON SEXUAL ORIENTATION AND INTIMATE RELATIONSHIPS, 35 N.Y.U. Rev. L. & Soc. Change 81, 102+ (2011) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 4324 THE PRODUCTION AND REPRODUCTION OF CONSTITUTIONAL NORMS, 35 N.Y.U. Rev. L. & Soc. Change 226, 246 (2011) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4325 LESBIANS AND ABORTION, 35 N.Y.U. Rev. L. & Soc. Change 247, 280+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4326 MONEY AND RIGHTS, 35 N.Y.U. Rev. L. & Soc. Change 527, 549+ (2011) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4327 USING LAWS DESIGNED TO PROTECT AS A WEAPON: PROSECUTING MINORS UNDER CHILD PORNOGRAPHY LAWS, 34 N.Y.U. Rev. L. & Soc. Change 299, 338+ (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4328 GAY-STRAIGHT ALLIANCES AND SANCTIONING PRETEXTUAL DISCRIMINATION UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS ACT, 34 N.Y.U. Rev. L. & Soc. Change 373, 423 (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4329 SEX ON THE BRAIN: ADOLESCENT PSYCHOSOCIAL SCIENCE AND SANCTIONS FOR RISKY SEX, 34 N.Y.U. Rev. L. & Soc. Change 708, 759+ (2010) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 4330 ALL PORN ALL THE TIME, 31 N.Y.U. Rev. L. & Soc. Change 695, 710+ (2007) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 4331 POSSESSING POLLUTION, 31 N.Y.U. Rev. L. & Soc. Change 733, 772 (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 4332 DEMOCRACY, SEX AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT, 31 N.Y.U. Rev. L. & Soc. Change 865, 898+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4333 FOREWORD, 30 N.Y.U. Rev. L. & Soc. Change 351, 357 (2006) 4334 THE SPIRIT OF OUR TIMES: STATE CONSTITUTIONS AND INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS, 30 N.Y.U. Rev. L. & Soc. Change 359, 409+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4335 MAKING AMERICA "THE LAND OF SECOND CHANCES": RESTORING SOCIOECONOMIC RIGHTS FOR EX-OFFENDERS, 30 N.Y.U. Rev. L. & Soc. Change 527, 584 (2006) 4336 SECURING A CIVIL RIGHT TO COUNSEL: THE IMPORTANCE OF COLLABORATING, 30 N.Y.U. Rev. L. & Soc. Change 675, 685+ (2006) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 4337 THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS DEFINES UNAUTHORIZED MIGRANT WORKERS' RIGHTS FOR THE HEMISPHERE: A COMMENT ON ADVISORY OPINION 18, 28 N.Y.U. Rev. L. & Soc. Change 547, 596 (2004) 4338 MONOGAMY'S LAW: COMPULSORY MONOGAMY AND POLYAMOROUS EXISTENCE, 29 N.Y.U. Rev. L. & Soc. Change 277, 376+ (2004) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4339 FLUNKING THE METHODOLOGY TEST: A FLAWED TAX-EXEMPTION STANDARD FOR EDUCATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS THAT "ADVOCATE() A PARTICULAR POSITION OR VIEWPOINT" (FN1), 29 N.Y.U. Rev. L. & Soc. Change 377, 424+ (2004) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4340 The Case for a Right to Privacy in the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act, 11 N.Z. J. Pub. & Int'l L. 213, 238+ (2013) 4341 Deep Lying Rights - A Constitutional Conversation Continues, 3 N.Z. J. Pub. & Int'l L. 195, 221+ (2005) 4342 LEGAL BLOGS AND THE SUPREME COURT CONFIRMATION PROCESS, 11 NEXUS 79, 86 (2006) 4343 OBSCENITY: AN OUTDATED CONCEPT FOR THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY, 10 NEXUS 21, 27+ (2005) 4344 OBSCENITY IN THE DIGITAL AGE: THE RE-EVALUATION OF COMMUNITY STANDARDS, 10 NEXUS 59, 70+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4345 PROPOSITION 8 AND THE FUTURE OF AMERICAN SAME-SEX MARRIAGE ACTIVISM, 14 Nexus: Chap. J. L. & Pol'y 113, 124 (2009) 4346 HUGO BLACK AND JUDICIAL LAWMAKING: FORTY YEARS IN RETROSPECT, 14 Nexus: Chap. J. L. & Pol'y 3, 15+ (2009) 4347 JUDICIAL ACTIVISM AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT PRIVACY CLAIMS: THE ALLURE OF ORIGINALISM AND THE UNAPPRECIATED PROMISE OF CONSTRAINED NONORIGINALISM, 14 Nexus: Chap. J. L. & Pol'y 31, 44+ (2009) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 4348 CRYING WOLF?: IN RE MARRIAGE CASES AND CHARGES OF JUDICIAL ACTIVISM, 14 Nexus: Chap. J. L. & Pol'y 45, 54 (2009) 4349 WHERE SEXUAL PRIVACY MEETS PUBLIC MORALITY: HOW WILLIAMS V. KING IS INSTRUCTIVE FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT IN APPLYING PUBLIC MORALITY AS A LEGITIMATE STATE INTEREST AFTER LAWRENCE V. TEXAS, 29 N.C. Cent. L.J. 127, 146+ (2006) 4350 OHIO ISSUE 1 IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL, 28 N.C. Cent. L.J. 1, 31+ (2005) 4351 EMBRACING THE LIVING CONSTITUTION: JUSTICE ANTHONY M. KENNEDY'S MOVE AWAY FROM A CONSERVATIVE METHODOLOGY OF CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION, 30 N.C. Cent. L. Rev. 25, 74+ (2007) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 4352 A DISCURSIVE APPROACH TO FEMALE CIRCUMCISION: WHY THE UNITED NATIONS SHOULD DROP THE ONE-SIDED CONVERSATION IN FAVOR OF THE VAGINA DIALOGUES, 38 N.C. J. Int'l L. & Com. Reg. 601, 649+ (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4353 HUMAN TRAFFICKING: LEGAL ISSUES IN PRESUMED CONSENT LAWS, 30 N.C. J. Int'l L. & Com. Reg. 685, 732+ (2005) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 4354 JUST AGE PLAYING AROUND? HOW SECOND LIFE AIDS AND ABETS CHILD PORNOGRAPHY, 9 N.C. J.L. & Tech. On. 88, 111+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4355 THE UNDOCUMENTED CLOSET, 92 N.C. L. Rev. 1, 12+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4356 PRECIOUS KNOWLEDGE: STATE BANS ON ETHNIC STUDIES, BOOK TRAFFICKERS (LIBROTRAFICANTES), AND A NEW TYPE OF RACE TRIAL, 91 N.C. L. Rev. 1513, 1546+ (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4357 DUE PROCESS BY PROXY: UNITED STATES V. BREHM AND THE PROBLEM OF EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION OVER FOREIGN NATIONALS, 91 N.C. L. Rev. 1463, 1496+ (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4358 DO AS I SAY, NOT AS I DO: THE MYTH OF NEUTRALITY IN NONDISCRIMINATION POLICIES AT PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES, 91 N.C. L. Rev. 280, 325 (2012) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4359 JUDICIAL DEFERENCE TO LEGISLATURES IN CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS, 90 N.C. L. Rev. 2083, 2127+ (2012) 4360 FACEBOOKISTAN, 90 N.C. L. Rev. 1807, 1844+ (2012) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 4361 THE GEOGRAPHY OF SEXUALITY, 90 N.C. L. Rev. 955, 1025+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4362 "LET US NOW TRY LIBERTY": FREEING THE PRIVATE SECTOR TO TACKLE NORTH CAROLINA'S TOBACCO ADDICTION BY REINSTATING EMPLOYMENT FREEDOM OF CONTRACT, 90 N.C. L. Rev. 510, 550+ (2012) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4363 NO EXIT: THE PROBLEM OF SAME-SEX DIVORCE, 90 N.C. L. Rev. 73, 124+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 4364 ABORTION ACCESS IN THE GLOBAL MARKETPLACE, 88 N.C. L. Rev. 1657, 1685 (2010) 4365 DAMAGES UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT: IS EMOTIONAL HARM "ACTUAL"?, 88 N.C. L. Rev. 334, 356 (2009) 4366 THE SEC'S GLOBAL ACCOUNTING VISION: A REALISTIC APPRAISAL OF A QUIXOTIC QUEST, 87 N.C. L. Rev. 1, 81+ (2008) 4367 OUT OF STEP: WHY PULLIAM V. SMITH SHOULD BE OVERRULED TO HOLD ALL NORTH CAROLINA PARENTS-GAY AND STRAIGHT-TO THE SAME CUSTODY STANDARD, 87 N.C. L. Rev. 257, 304+ (2008) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4368 CONSTITUTIONAL PRECEDENT VIEWED THROUGH THE LENS OF HARTIAN POSITIVIST JURISPRUDENCE, 86 N.C. L. Rev. 1107, 1163+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4369 DOES THE SUPREME COURT'S CURRENT DOCTRINE OF STARE DECISIS REQUIRE ADHERENCE TO THE SUPREME COURT'S CURRENT DOCTRINE OF STARE DECISIS?, 86 N.C. L. Rev. 1165, 1212+ (2008) HN: 1,2,4 (S.Ct.) 4370 IDEOLOGICAL COHESION AND PRECEDENT (OR WHY THE COURT ONLY CARES ABOUT PRECEDENT WHEN MOST JUSTICES AGREE WITH EACH OTHER), 86 N.C. L. Rev. 1399, 1442+ (2008) HN: 1,2,4 (S.Ct.) 4371 BETWEEN WAR AND PEACE: EXPLORING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF SUBJECTING PRIVATE CIVILIAN CONTRACTORS TO THE UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE DURING "CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS", 86 N.C. L. Rev. 1047, 1061+ (2008) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4372 TURNING STONES OF HOPE INTO BOULDERS OF RESISTANCE: THE FIRST AND LAST TASK OF SOCIAL JUSTICE CURRICULUM, SCHOLARSHIP, AND PRACTICE, 86 N.C. L. Rev. 673, 738+ (2008) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4373 THE LAW OF ALIENATION OF AFFECTIONS AFTER MCCUTCHEN V. MCCUTCHEN: IN NORTH CAROLINA, BREAKING UP JUST GOT HARDER TO DO, 85 N.C. L. Rev. 1761, 1783 (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4374 DOES STARE DECISIS APPLY IN THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT DEATH PENALTY CONTEXT?, 85 N.C. L. Rev. 847, 884+ (2007) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4375 SMITH'S HYBRID RIGHTS DOCTRINE AND THE PIERCE RIGHT: AN UNINTELLIGENT DESIGN, 85 N.C. L. Rev. 385, 422+ (2006) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 4376 TEACHING FROM THE CLOSET: FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION AND OUTSPEECH BY PUBLIC SCHOOL TEACHERS, 85 N.C. L. Rev. 301, 348+ (2006) 4377 THREE THEORIES OF SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS, 85 N.C. L. Rev. 63, 148+ (2006) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 4378 PUBLIC LAW LIMITATIONS ON PRIVATIZATION OF GOVERNMENT FUNCTIONS, 84 N.C. L. Rev. 397, 469+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4379 "MEET THE NEW BOSS": THE NEW JUDICIAL CENTER, 83 N.C. L. Rev. © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 1205, 1227+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4380 THE MEDIAN JUSTICE ON THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, 83 N.C. L. Rev. 1275, 1317 (2005) 4381 GRAND CENTRISM AND THE CENTRIST JUDICIAL PERSONAM, 83 N.C. L. Rev. 1353, 1382+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4382 THE RISE OF UNNECESSARY CONSTITUTIONAL RULINGS, 83 N.C. L. Rev. 847, 937 (2005) 4383 THE INCOHERENCE OF DEFENDANT AUTONOMY, 83 N.C. L. Rev. 621, 666+ (2005) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 4384 PETERSON V. HEWLETT-PACKARD: EXPOSING TITLE VII INCONSISTENCIES IN ITS PROTECTION OF EMPLOYEES FROM WORKPLACE HARASSMENT, 83 N.C. L. Rev. 776, 792 (2005) 4385 AWAKENING THE MORAL CONSCIOUSNESS: ON THE NUMBING OF THE CONSCIENCE OF A NATION, 83 N.C. L. Rev. 289, 321+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4386 FROM ASHES TO FIRE: TRADEMARK AND COPYRIGHT IN TRANSITION, 82 N.C. L. Rev. 1009, 1066 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4387 THE ROAD NOT TAKEN: USING THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT TO STRIKE DOWN CRIMINAL PUNISHMENT FOR ENGAGING IN CONSENSUAL SEXUAL ACTS, 82 N.C. L. Rev. 723, 758+ (2004) HN: 1,4,5 (S.Ct.) 4388 WHAT'S WRONG WITH A PARENTHOOD MARKET? A New and Improved Theory of Commodification, 82 N.C. L. Rev. 1, 59+ (2003) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4389 SEXUAL IDENTITY AS PERSONHOOD: TOWARDS AN EXPRESSIVE LIBERTY IN THE MILITARY CONTEXT, 84 N.D. L. Rev. 175, 218+ (2008) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4390 THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE CHILD AND THE RIGHTS OF THE PARENT: DAMRON V. DAMRON AND THE FUTURE OF PARENTING AND CHILD CUSTODY IN NORTH DAKOTA, 84 N.D. L. Rev. 999, 1034+ (2008) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4391 GRISWOLD AND THE DEFENSE OF TRADITIONAL MARRIAGE, 83 N.D. L. Rev. 1199, 1225+ (2007) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4392 MARRIAGE MATTERS: A CASE FOR A GET-THE-JOB-DONE-RIGHT FEDERAL MARRIAGE AMENDMENT, 83 N.D. L. Rev. 1301, 1363+ (2007) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4393 THE QUESTION RAISED BY LAWRENCE: MARRIAGE, THE SUPREME COURT AND A WRITTEN CONSTITUTION, 83 N.D. L. Rev. 1393, 1412+ (2007) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4394 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-CIVIL RIGHTS: THE SUPREME COURT STRIKES DOWN SODOMY STATUTE BY CREATING NEW LIBERTIES AND INVALIDATING OLD LAWS LAWRENCE V. TEXAS, 539 U.S. 558 (2003), 80 N.D. L. Rev. 323, 354+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 4395 ANNUAL SUBJECT INDEX VOLUME 80 LIST OF SUBJECT HEADINGS, 80 N.D. L. Rev. 857, 858+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4396 TWO WRONGS DON'T MAKE A RIGHT: IMPLICATIONS OF THE SEX DISCRIMINATION PRESENT IN SAME-SEX MARRIAGE EXCLUSIONS FOR THE NEXT SUPREME COURT SAME-SEX MARRIAGE CASE, 34 N. Ill. U. L. Rev. 1, 37+ (2013) 4397 THE LAW OF CITATIONS AND SERIATIM OPINIONS: WERE THE ANCIENT ROMANS AND THE EARLY SUPREME COURT ON THE RIGHT TRACK?, 31 N. Ill. U. L. Rev. 19, 34+ (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4398 HOW THE LACK OF PRESCRIPTIVE TECHNICAL GRANULARITY IN HIPAA HAS COMPROMISED PATIENT PRIVACY, 30 N. Ill. U. L. Rev. 531, 552 (2010) 4399 IN THE GLOBAL MARKET FOR JUSTICE: WHO IS PAYING THE HIGHEST PRICE FOR JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE?, 27 N. Ill. U. L. Rev. 445, 477+ (2007) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 4400 DON'T TAKE YOUR ORGANS TO HEAVEN .... HEAVEN KNOWS WE NEED THEM HERE: ANOTHER LOOK AT THE REQUIRED RESPONSE SYSTEM, 26 N. Ill. U. L. Rev. 365, 412 (2006) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 4401 EQUALITY OF OPPORTUNITY IN THE REGULATORY AGE: WHY YESTERDAY'S RATIONALITY REVIEW ISN'T ENOUGH, 24 N. Ill. U. L. Rev. 457, 507+ (2004) 4402 WHAT COULD AMERICAN INDIAN LAW POSSIBLY HAVE TO DO WITH THE ISSUE OF GAY-MARRIAGE RECOGNITION?: DEFINITIONAL JURISPRUDENCE, EQUAL PROTECTION AND FULL FAITH AND CREDIT, 24 N. Ill. U. L. Rev. 563, 587+ (2004) 4403 THE WEDDING BELLS HEARD AROUND THE WORLD: YEARS FROM NOW, WILL WE WONDER WHY WE WORRIED ABOUT SAME-SEX MARRIAGE?, 24 N. Ill. U. L. Rev. 589, 681+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4404 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AFTER GRUTTER AND GRATZ, 24 N. Ill. U. L. Rev. 691, 691+ (2004) 4405 A DECADE OF SPOUSE-BASED IMMIGRATION LAWS: COVERTURE'S DIMINISHMENT, BUT NOT ITS DEMISE, 24 N. Ill. U. L. Rev. 153, 209 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4406 SPOUSAL COMPANIONSHIP AND CONSORTIUM CLAIMS UNDER 42 U.S.C. S 1983, 40 N. Ky. L. Rev. 401, 426+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4407 CONSTITUTIONAL ATTACKS AGAINST THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT'S "MANDATING" THAT CERTAIN INDIVIDUALS AND EMPLOYERS PURCHASE INSURANCE WHILE RESTRICTING PURCHASE BY UNDOCUMENTED IMMIGRANTS AND WOMEN SEEKIN, 38 N. Ky. L. Rev. 489, 587+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4408 DE-CLOTHING SEX-BASED CLASSIFICATIONS - SAME-SEX MARRIAGE IS JUST THE BEGINNING: ACHIEVING FORMAL SEX EQUALITY IN THE © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. MODERN ERA, 36 N. Ky. L. Rev. 1, 43+ (2009) 4409 "NO BETTER THAN THEY DESERVE:" DRED SCOTT AND CONSTITUTIONAL DEMOCRACY, 34 N. Ky. L. Rev. 589, 617 (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4410 AN EMERGING CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT: IMMIGRANT POPULATIONS IN NEED OF EQUAL PROTECTION UNDER THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT, 34 N. Ky. L. Rev. 749, 773+ (2007) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4411 THE WORST WAY OF SELECTING JUDGES-EXCEPT ALL THE OTHERS THAT HAVE BEEN TRIED, 32 N. Ky. L. Rev. 267, 304+ (2005) 4412 CONTESTING ADJUDICATION: THE PARTISAN DIVIDE OVER ALIEN TORT STATUTE LITIGATION, 33 Nw. J. Int'l L. & Bus. 475, 526 (2013) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 4413 THE NEW CHAPTER 15 OF THE BANKRUPTCY CODE: A STEP TOWARD EROSION OF NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY, 27 Nw. J. Int'l L. & Bus. 89, 135 (2006) 4414 EL DERECHO A AMAR (THE RIGHT TO LOVE): SAME-SEX RELATIONSHIPS IN SPAIN AND EL SALVADOR, 9 Nw. U. J. Int'l Hum. Rts. 185, 63 (2011) 4415 HUMAN RIGHTS AND HOMO-SECTUALS: THE INTERNATIONAL POLITICS OF SEXUALITY, RELIGION, AND LAW, 4 Nw. U. J. Int'l Hum. Rts. 436, 100+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4416 FOREWORD: HUMAN RIGHTS, THE RULE OF LAW, AND NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY, 2 Nw. U. J. Int'l Hum. Rts. 1, 28+ (2004) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4417 WHY SCALIA SHOULD HAVE VOTED TO OVERTURN DOMA, 108 Nw. U. L. Rev. Colloquy 131, 153 (2013) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 4418 A VISUAL GUIDE TO UNITED STATES v. WINDSOR: DOCTRINAL ORIGINS OF JUSTICE KENNEDY'S MAJORITY OPINION, 108 Nw. U. L. Rev. Colloquy 130, 130+ (2013) 4419 WHEN MAY A PRESIDENT REFUSE TO DEFEND A STATUTE? THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION AND DOMA, 106 Nw. U. L. Rev. Colloquy 77, 95+ (2011) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4420 HETEROSEXUALITY AND MILITARY SERVICE, 104 Nw. U. L. Rev. Colloquy 341, 352+ (2010) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4421 SEEING IT, KNOWING IT, 104 Nw. U. L. Rev. Colloquy 217, 217+ (2009) HN: 1,4,5 (S.Ct.) 4422 THOUGHTS ON THE CHURN LAW, 104 Nw. U. L. Rev. Colloquy 132, 144+ (2009) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4423 LOST IN SPACE: LAURENCE TRIBE'S INVISIBLE CONSTITUTION, 103 Nw. U. L. Rev. Colloquy 434, 441+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4424 IF OBSCENITY WERE TO DISCRIMINATE, 103 Nw. U. L. Rev. Colloquy 72, © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 72+ (2008) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4425 THERE IS NOTHING PRAGMATIC ABOUT ORIGINALISM, 102 Nw. U. L. Rev. Colloquy 86, 101 (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4426 THERE IS NOTHING PRAGMATIC ABOUT ORIGINALISM, 102 Nw. U. L. Rev. Colloquy 86, 101 (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4427 IDEOLOGICAL DRIFT AMONG SUPREME COURT JUSTICES: WHO, WHEN, AND HOW IMPORTANT?, 101 Nw. U. L. Rev. Colloquy 127, 131 (2007) 4428 SKIN FLICKS WITHOUT THE SKIN: WHY GOVERNMENT MANDATED CONDOM USE IN ADULT FILMS IS A VIOLATION OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT, 9 NW J. L. & Soc. Pol'y 138, 154+ (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4429 'TIL DEATH DO US PART: THE DIFFICULTIES OF OBTAINING A SAMESEX DIVORCE, 8 NW J. L. & Soc. Pol'y 208, 235+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4430 TO "ADVICE AND <<strikethrough>>CONSENT<<end strikethrough>>DELAY": THE ROLE OF INTEREST GROUPS IN THE CONFIRMATION OF JUDGES TO THE FEDERAL COURTS OF APPEAL, 8 NW J. L. & Soc. Pol'y 1, 25+ (2012) 4431 EXPOSING THE TRADITIONAL MARRIAGE AGENDA, 7 NW J. L. & Soc. Pol'y 301, 323+ (2012) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4432 AUTONOMY AND "GRAY-AREA" PRO SE DEFENDANTS: ENSURING COMPETENCE TO GUARANTEE FREEDOM, 6 NW J. L. & Soc. Pol'y 130, 177+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4433 MISCONSTRUCTING SEXUALITY IN SAME-SEX MARRIAGE JURISPRUDENCE, 6 NW J. L. & Soc. Pol'y 238, 278+ (2011) HN: 3,5 (S.Ct.) 4434 LIBERTY v. EQUALITY; EQUALITY v. LIBERTY, 5 NW J. L. & Soc. Pol'y 307, 317 (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4435 WHAT SAME-SEX-MARRIAGE AND RELIGIOUS-LIBERTY CLAIMS HAVE IN COMMON, 5 NW J. L. & Soc. Pol'y 206, 235 (2010) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 4436 CLARION CALL OR FALSE ALARM: WHY PROPOSED EXEMPTIONS TO EQUAL MARRIAGE STATUTES RETURN US TO A RELIGIOUS UNDERSTANDING OF THE PUBLIC MARKETPLACE, 5 NW J. L. & Soc. Pol'y 236, 253+ (2010) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4437 SAME-SEX FAMILY EQUALITY AND RELIGIOUS FREEDOM, 5 NW J. L. & Soc. Pol'y 274, 306 (2010) 4438 SOME SUGGESTIONS FOR THE UAFA: A BILL FOR SAME-SEX BINATIONAL COUPLES, 4 NW J. L. & Soc. Pol'y 150, 57+ (2009) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4439 SUPREME COURT PREQUEL: JUSTICE STEVENS ON THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, 106 Nw. U. L. Rev. 715, 742 (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4440 JUSTICE STEVENS'S BLACK LEATHER ARM CHAIR, 106 Nw. U. L. Rev. 845, 845+ (2012) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 4441 ADULT ADOPTION: INTESTATE SUCCESSION AND CLASS GIFTS UNDER THE UNIFORM PROBATE CODE, 105 Nw. U. L. Rev. 1777, 1805 (2011) 4442 INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE ROLE OF THE UNITED STATES, 104 Nw. U. L. Rev. 293, 306+ (2010) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4443 FRAMEWORK ORIGINALISM AND THE LIVING CONSTITUTION, 103 Nw. U. L. Rev. 549, 614+ (2009) 4444 DOES THE CONSTITUTION PRESCRIBE RULES FOR ITS OWN INTERPRETATION?, 103 Nw. U. L. Rev. 857, 921+ (2009) 4445 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA V. HELLER AND ORIGINALISM, 103 Nw. U. L. Rev. 923, 981 (2009) 4446 GONZALES, CASEY, AND THE VIABILITY RULE, 103 Nw. U. L. Rev. 249, 280 (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4447 IF OBSCENITY WERE TO DISCRIMINATE, 103 Nw. U. L. Rev. 475, 490+ (2009) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4448 IF JUDGES WERE ANGELS: RELIGIOUS EQUALITY, FREE EXERCISE, AND THE (UNDERAPPRECIATED) MERITS OF SMITH, 102 Nw. U. L. Rev. 1189, 1274+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4449 GLOBALIZATION AND THE FUTURE OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, 102 Nw. U. L. Rev. 1277, 1349 (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4450 WHEN OBSCENITY DISCRIMINATES, 102 Nw. U. L. Rev. 1379, 1434+ (2008) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4451 RESTRAINING FEDERAL PREEMPTION WHEN THERE IS AN "EMERGING CONSENSUS" OF STATE ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS AND POLICIES, 102 Nw. U. L. Rev. 649, 663+ (2008) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4452 IDEOLOGICAL DRIFT AMONG SUPREME COURT JUSTICES: WHO, WHEN, AND HOW IMPORTANT?, 101 Nw. U. L. Rev. 1483, 1541+ (2007) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 4453 UNCOVERING COVERING, 101 Nw. U. L. Rev. 1809, 1849+ (2007) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4454 INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARDS AND THE CONSTITUTION, 101 Nw. U. L. Rev. 493, 561+ (2007) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4455 POPULAR CONSTITUTIONALISM AND THE RULE OF RECOGNITION: WHOSE PRACTICES GROUND U.S. LAW?, 100 Nw. U. L. Rev. 719, 805 (2006) 4456 FOREIGN TO OUR CONSTITUTION, 100 Nw. U. L. Rev. 303, 329 (2006) 4457 SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, SLIPPERY SLOPE RHETORIC, AND THE POLITICS OF DISGUST: A CRITICAL PERSPECTIVE ON CONTEMPORARY FAMILY DISCOURSE AND THE INCEST TABOO, 99 Nw. U. L. Rev. 1543, 1611+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4458 ESCAPING THE FISHBOWL: A PROPOSAL TO FORTIFY THE © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. DELIBERATIVE PROCESS PRIVILEGE, 99 Nw. U. L. Rev. 1769, 1815 (2005) 4459 WHAT IS REALLY WRONG WITH COMPELLED ASSOCIATION?, 99 Nw. U. L. Rev. 839, 888+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4460 OUTSIDERS, SWING JUSTICES, AND ORIGINAL UNDERSTANDING: CAN THE RELIGION CLAUSES BE SAVED? A COMMENT ON GREENAWALT, 99 Nw. U. L. Rev. 177, 185+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4461 THE INEVITABLE FAILURE OF NUISANCE-BASED THEORIES OF THE TAKINGS CLAUSE: A REPLY TO PROFESSOR CLAEYS, 99 Nw. U. L. Rev. 231, 247+ (2004) 4462 PRAGMATISM AND JUDGMENT: A COMMENT ON LUND, 99 Nw. U. L. Rev. 289, 296+ (2004) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 4463 HARD CASES MAKE GOOD JUDGES, 99 Nw. U. L. Rev. 3, 31 (2004) 4464 IT'S THE O'CONNOR COURT: A BRIEF DISCUSSION OF SOME CRITIQUES OF THE REHNQUIST COURT AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR ADMINISTRATIVE LAW, 99 Nw. U. L. Rev. 369, 381 (2004) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 4465 THE PRESIDENT'S POWER TO DETAIN "ENEMY COMBATANTS": MODERN LESSONS FROM MR. MADISON'S FORGOTTEN WAR, 98 Nw. U. L. Rev. 1567, 1615+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4466 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACROSS STATE LINES: THE FULL FAITH AND CREDIT CLAUSE, CONGRESSIONAL POWER, AND INTERSTATE ENFORCEMENT OF PROTECTION ORDERS, 98 Nw. U. L. Rev. 827, 906+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4467 Bankruptcy and the Unresolved DOMA Questions, 22 J. Bankr. L. & Prac. 2 ART. 1, 2 ART. 1 (2013) 4468 COURTING DELIBERATION: AN ESSAY ON DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY IN THE AMERICAN JUDICIAL SYSTEM, 27 Notre Dame J.L. Ethics & Pub. Pol'y 303, 328+ (2013) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 4469 INSTITUTIONAL INTEGRITY AND RESPECT FOR PRECEDENT: DO THEY FAVOR CONTINUED ADHERENCE TO AN ABORTION RIGHT?, 27 Notre Dame J.L. Ethics & Pub. Pol'y 541, 568+ (2013) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 4470 INSIDERS, OUTSIDERS, AND THE AMERICAN DREAM: HOW CERTIFICATE OF NECESSITY LAWS HARM OUR SOCIETY'S VALUES, 26 Notre Dame J.L. Ethics & Pub. Pol'y 381, 426+ (2012) 4471 TWO CONCEPTIONS OF JUDICIAL INTEGRITY: TRADITIONAL AND PERFECTIONIST APPROACHES TO ISSUES OF MORALITY AND SOCIAL JUSTICE, 22 Notre Dame J.L. Ethics & Pub. Pol'y 233, 303+ (2008) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4472 GAULT'S LEGACY: DIGNITY, DUE PROCESS, AND ADOLESCENTS' LIBERTY INTERESTS IN LIVING DONATION, 22 Notre Dame J.L. Ethics & Pub. Pol'y 67, 106+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4473 TAKING THEOLOGY SERIOUSLY: THE STATUS OF THE RELIGIOUS © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. BELIEFS OF JUDICIAL NOMINEES FOR THE FEDERAL BENCH, 20 Notre Dame J.L. Ethics & Pub. Pol'y 455, 470+ (2006) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4474 MARRIAGE IS THE FOUNDATION OF THE FAMILY, 18 Notre Dame J.L. Ethics & Pub. Pol'y 1, 6 (2004) 4475 LAW AND THE CULTURE OF MARRIAGE, 18 Notre Dame J.L. Ethics & Pub. Pol'y 189, 217+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4476 DEBUNKING "CONSERVATIVE" ARGUMENTS AGAINST THE FEDERAL MARRIAGE AMENDMENT, 18 Notre Dame J.L. Ethics & Pub. Pol'y 219, 223+ (2004) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 4477 RITES, RIGHTS, AND SOCIAL INSTITUTIONS: WHY AND HOW SHOULD THE LAW SUPPORT MARRIAGE?, 18 Notre Dame J.L. Ethics & Pub. Pol'y 225, 241 (2004) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 4478 A PROPOSAL: LEGAL RE-REGULATION OF THE CONTENT OF MARRIAGE, 18 Notre Dame J.L. Ethics & Pub. Pol'y 243, 262+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4479 KEEP FRIENDSHIP UNREGULATED, 18 Notre Dame J.L. Ethics & Pub. Pol'y 263, 271+ (2004) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4480 FOREWORD, 18 Notre Dame J.L. Ethics & Pub. Pol'y 303, 309+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4481 OUR MILLIAN CONSTITUTION: THE SUPREME COURT'S REPUDIATION OF IMMORALITY AS A GROUND OF CRIMINAL PUNISHMENT, 18 Notre Dame J.L. Ethics & Pub. Pol'y 407, 417+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4482 SAYING "YES" BEFORE SAYING "I DO": PREMARITAL SEX AND COHABITATION AS A PIECE OF THE DIVORCE PUZZLE, 18 Notre Dame J.L. Ethics & Pub. Pol'y 7, 87+ (2004) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 4483 THE CONSTRAINT OF DIGNITY: LAWRENCE V. TEXAS AND PUBLIC MORALITY, 89 Notre Dame L. Rev. 451, 452+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4484 SUSTAINED DISSENT AND THE EXTENDED DELIBERATIVE PROCESS, 88 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1939, 1990+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4485 VIRTUE JURISPRUDENCE AND THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTION, 88 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1521, 1542+ (2013) 4486 PRIVATIZING WORKPLACE PRIVACY, 88 Notre Dame L. Rev. 277, 321 (2012) 4487 JURISPRUDENCE THAT NECESSARILY EMBODIES MORAL JUDGMENT: THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT, CATHOLIC TEACHING, AND DEATH PENALTY DISCOURSE, 88 Notre Dame L. Rev. 323, 393 (2012) 4488 WAITING FOR THE JUSTICE LEAGUE: MOTIVATING CHILD WELFARE AGENCIES TO SAVE CHILDREN, 88 Notre Dame L. Rev. 523, 555+ (2012) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 4489 TRANSTEMPORAL SEPARATION OF POWERS IN THE LAW OF PRECEDENT, 87 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1405, 1464+ (2012) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 4490 A CALL TO REJECT THE NEUROLOGICAL STANDARD IN THE DETERMINATION OF DEATH AND ABANDON THE DEAD DONOR RULE, 87 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1749, 1795+ (2012) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4491 A NATURAL LAW MANIFESTO OR AN APPEAL FROM THE OLD JURISPRUDENCE TO THE NEW, 87 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1245, 1275 (2012) 4492 THE LAW AND ECONOMICS OF THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE, 87 Notre Dame L. Rev. 585, 675 (2011) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4493 THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT NOT TO PARTICIPATE IN ABORTIONS: ROE, CASEY, AND THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS OF HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS, 87 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1, 56+ (2011) HN: 3,5 (S.Ct.) 4494 ORIGINALISM AS POPULAR CONSTITUTIONALISM?: THEORETICAL POSSIBILITIES AND PRACTICAL DIFFERENCES, 87 Notre Dame L. Rev. 253, 291 (2011) 4495 THE CASE AGAINST INSTITUTIONAL CONSCIENCE, 86 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1655, 1686 (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4496 BIBLICAL LITERALISM AND CONSTITUTIONAL ORIGINALISM, 86 Notre Dame L. Rev. 693, 763+ (2011) 4497 THREE CONCEPTS OF DIGNITY IN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 86 Notre Dame L. Rev. 183, 271+ (2011) 4498 RETHINKING THE PRESUMPTION OF CONSTITUTIONALITY, 85 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1447, 1504+ (2010) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4499 UMPIRES, EMPATHY, AND ACTIVISM: LESSONS FROM JUDGE CARDOZO, 85 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1629, 1662 (2010) 4500 THE UNWELCOME COHORT: WHEN THE SENTENCING JUDGE INVADES YOUR BEDROOM, 85 Notre Dame L. Rev. 745, 770+ (2010) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 4501 CREATING LEGAL RIGHTS FOR SUSPECTED TERRORISTS: IS THE COURT BEING COURAGEOUS OR POLITICALLY PRAGMATIC?, 84 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1975, 2051+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4502 THE MYTH OF THE WRITTEN CONSTITUTION, 84 Notre Dame L. Rev. 991, 1055 (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4503 STATE COURTS, STATE TERRITORY, STATE POWER: REFLECTIONS ON THE EXTRATERRITORIALITY PRINCIPLE IN CHOICE OF LAW AND LEGISLATION, 84 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1057, 1134 (2009) 4504 THE CULPABILITY OF FELONY MURDER, 83 Notre Dame L. Rev. 965, 1060+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4505 INTRODUCTION, 83 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1147, 1172+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4506 STARE DECISIS AND THE CONSTITUTION: FOUR QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS, 83 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1173, 1226+ (2008) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 4507 LINCOLN AND JUDICIAL AUTHORITY, 83 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1227, 1301 © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. (2008) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 4508 POLYPHONIC STARE DECISIS: LISTENING TO NON-ARTICLE III ACTORS, 83 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1303, 1337+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4509 MEDELLÍN, NORM PORTALS, AND THE HORIZONTAL INTEGRATION OF INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS, 82 Notre Dame L. Rev. 755, 842+ (2006) 4510 SPEECH AND DISTRUST: RETHINKING THE CONTENT APPROACH TO PROTECTING THE FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION, 81 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1347, 1430 (2006) 4511 THE ORIGINALIST'S DILEMMA: KATZ AND THE NEW APPROACH TO THE STATE SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY DEFENSE, 81 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1553, 1594 (2006) 4512 SHADOW OF A BULLDOZER?: RLUIPA AND EMINENT DOMAIN AFTER KELO, 81 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1653, 1696 (2006) 4513 WHAT ROLE SHOULD FOREIGN PRACTICE AND PRECEDENT PLAY IN THE INTERPRETATION OF DOMESTIC LAW?, 80 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1893, 1909+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4514 RACIAL EQUALITY: OLD AND NEW STRAINS AND AMERICAN INDIANS, 80 Notre Dame L. Rev. 333, 375 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4515 SUNSETTING JUDICIAL OPINIONS, 79 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1237, 1256 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4516 THE GOOD, THE BAD AND THE UGLY: RETHINKING THE VALUE OF ASSOCIATIONS, 79 Notre Dame L. Rev. 949, 1021+ (2004) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4517 THE PROPER SCOPE OF THE POLICE POWER, 79 Notre Dame L. Rev. 429, 495+ (2004) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4518 REDISCOVERING THE COMMON LAW, 79 Notre Dame L. Rev. 755, 763 (2004) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 4519 TO UNKNOWN MALE: NOTICE OF PLAN FOR ADOPTION IN THE FLORIDA 2001 ADOPTION ACT, 79 Notre Dame L. Rev. 789, 813 (2004) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 4520 TRESPASS-ZONING: ENSURING NEIGHBORHOODS A SAFER FUTURE BY EXCLUDING THOSE WITH A CRIMINAL PAST, 79 Notre Dame L. Rev. 327, 387 (2003) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 4521 STOP THE BEACH RENOURISHMENT: A CASE OF MACGUFFINS AND LEGAL FICTIONS, 35 Nova L. Rev. 587, 710 (2011) 4522 BLACKWATER AND BEYOND: CAN POTENTIAL PLAINTIFFS SUE PRIVATE SECURITY COMPANIES FOR DUE PROCESS VIOLATIONS VIA EXCEPTIONS TO THE STATE ACTION DOCTRINE, INCLUDING THROUGH SECTION 1983 ACTIONS?, 33 Nova L. Rev. 627, 659 (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4523 INTRODUCTION: THE FLORIDA EXAMPLE, 32 Nova L. Rev. 515, 522+ © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. (2008) 4524 INTUITION, MORALS, AND THE LEGAL CONVERSATION ABOUT GAY RIGHTS, 32 Nova L. Rev. 523, 539+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4525 GAY IS GOOD, 32 Nova L. Rev. 557, 571+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4526 A PUBLIC LECTURE: WHY RELIGION MATTERS IN THE CIVIL RIGHTS DEBATE FOR GAYS AND LESBIANS, 32 Nova L. Rev. 573, 593+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4527 LITTLE TO BE GAY ABOUT: FEW PROTECTIONS IN FLORIDA AGAINST DISCRIMINATION BASED UPON SEXUAL ORIENTATION, 32 Nova L. Rev. 633, 660 (2008) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4528 CRITIQUE, CULTURE AND COMMITMENT: THE DANGEROUS AND COUNTERPRODUCTIVE PATHS OF INTERNATIONAL LEGAL DISCOURSE, 29 Nova L. Rev. 211, 285 (2005) 4529 2003 SURVEY OF FLORIDA PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT LAW, 28 Nova L. Rev. 29, 60 (2003) 4530 TAXPAYERS AS VICTIMS: TAXPAYER HARM & CRIMINALIZATION, 7 NYU J. L. & Liberty 126, 183 (2013) 4531 TOWARD A THEORY OF LEGAL INTERPRETATION, 6 NYU J. L. & Liberty 231, 259 (2011) 4532 PRIVILEGES, IMMUNITIES, AND SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS, 5 NYU J. L. & Liberty 115, 172+ (2010) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4533 RECKLESS CAUTION: THE PERILS OF JUDICIAL MINIMALISM, 5 NYU J. L. & Liberty 347, 393 (2010) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 4534 THE CHARADE OF TRADITION-BASED SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS, 4 NYU J. L. & Liberty 172, 208+ (2009) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 4535 THE ROBERTS COURT AND FEDERALISM, 4 NYU J. L. & Liberty 330, 371 (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4536 CLARENCE THOMAS'S JURISPRUDENCE UNEXPLAINED, 4 NYU J. L. & Liberty 535, 556+ (2009) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4537 THE LIBERAL JUSTICE THOMAS: AN ANALYSIS OF JUSTICE THOMAS'S ARTICULATION AND APPLICATION OF CLASSICAL LIBERALISM, 4 NYU J. L. & Liberty 557, 582+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4538 "BUT FOR THE GRACE OF GOD THERE GO I": JUSTICE THOMAS AND THE LITTLE GUY, 4 NYU J. L. & Liberty 626, 647 (2009) 4539 LEGAL REASONING: JUSTIFYING TOLERANCE IN THE U.S. SUPREME COURT, 2 NYU J. L. & Liberty 262, 310+ (2007) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4540 INTUITION, CUSTOM, AND PROTOCOL: HOW TO MAKE SOUND DECISIONS WITH LIMITED KNOWLEDGE, 2 NYU J. L. & Liberty 1, 27 (2006) 4541 OF CITIZENS AND PERSONS: RECONSTRUCTING THE PRIVILEGES OR IMMUNITIES CLAUSE OF THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT, 1 NYU J. L. © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. & Liberty 334, 352+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4542 LOCHNER, LIBERTY, PROPERTY, AND HUMAN RIGHTS, 1 NYU J. L. & Liberty 432, 437+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4543 FREEDOM OF CONTRACT AND THE "POLITICAL ECONOMY" OF LOCHNER v. NEW YORK, 1 NYU J. L. & Liberty 515, 569 (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4544 THE ART OF READING LOCHNER, 1 NYU J. L. & Liberty 570, 588+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4545 THE PROBLEM OF MORAL DIRIGISME: A NEW ARGUMENT AGAINST MORALISTIC LEGISLATION, 1 NYU J. L. & Liberty 790, 828+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4546 NO SUCH THING: LITIGATING UNDER THE RATIONAL BASIS TEST, 1 NYU J. L. & Liberty 898, 914 (2005) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4547 AMENDABILITY-CONTINGENT INTERPRETATION: IMPLICATIONS OF VARIANCE IN DIFFICULTY OF FORMAL CONSTITUTIONAL CHANGE, 38 Ohio N.U. L. Rev. 729, 785+ (2012) 4548 ROPER v. SIMMONS: HOW THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES HAS ESTABLISHED THE FRAMEWORK FOR JUDICIAL ABOLITION OF THE DEATH PENALTY IN THE UNITED STATES, 37 Ohio N.U. L. Rev. 221, 236+ (2011) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4549 LEVELING THE PLAYING FIELD: USING RATIONAL BASIS WITH A BITE AS MEANS OF OVERCOMING THE NCAA'S VIOLATION OF EQUAL PROTECTION, 37 Ohio N.U. L. Rev. 283, 310 (2011) 4550 HUMAN DIGNITY IN THE ROBERTS COURT: A STORY OF INCHOATE INSTITUTIONS, AUTONOMOUS INDIVIDUALS, AND THE RELUCTANT RECOGNITION OF A RIGHT, 37 Ohio N.U. L. Rev. 381, 427+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4551 THE TREATY POWER AND THE SUPREMACY CLAUSE: RETHINKING REID V. COVERT IN A GLOBAL CONTEXT, 36 Ohio N.U. L. Rev. 287, 357 (2010) 4552 JUDICIAL REGIMES AND SAME-SEX MARRIAGE: ENFORCING JUDICIALLY DETERMINED PERSONAL AUTONOMY AT THE EXPENSE OF MAJORITARIAN DEMOCRACY, 35 Ohio N.U. L. Rev. 619, 645 (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4553 STATE OF OHIO V. LOWE 112 Ohio St.3d 507, 2007 Ohio 606, 861 N.E.2d 512 Decided February 28, 2007, 34 Ohio N.U. L. Rev. 1036, 1042 (2008) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4554 THE RIGHT RESPONSIBILITY: DOES THE RIGHT TO PROCREATE INCLUDE THE RESPONSIBILITY TO PARENT?, 34 Ohio N.U. L. Rev. 85, 133+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4555 DIVERGENT VIEWS ON THE USE OF INTERNATIONAL AND FOREIGN LAW: CONGRESS AND THE EXECUTIVE VERSUS THE COURT, 33 Ohio © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. N.U. L. Rev. 113, 152+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4556 SAME-SEX COUPLES AND THE TAX LAW: TAX FILING STATUS FOR LESBIANS AND OTHERS, 33 Ohio N.U. L. Rev. 19, 39+ (2007) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4557 FROM A VALUE TO A RIGHT: THE SUPREME COURT'S OHSO-CONSCIOUS MOVE FROM "PRIVACY' TO "LIBERTY', 33 Ohio N.U. L. Rev. 595, 621+ (2007) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4558 EUROPEAN LAW IN AMERICAN COURTS: FOREIGN LAW AS EVIDENCE OF DOMESTIC LAW, 33 Ohio N.U. L. Rev. 99, 112+ (2007) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4559 ROPER V. SIMMONS, 32 Ohio N.U. L. Rev. 369, 380 (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4560 UNDERSTANDING THE REHNQUIST COURT, 31 Ohio N.U. L. Rev. 197, 210 (2005) 4561 WHY PLESSY/BROWN AND BOWERS/LAWRENCE ARE CORRECT: THOMISTIC NATURAL LAW AS THE CONTENT OF A MORAL CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION, 31 Ohio N.U. L. Rev. 75, 126+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4562 LAWRENCE V. TEXAS AND THE NEW LAW OF GAY RIGHTS, 30 Ohio N.U. L. Rev. 189, 210+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4563 KLEIN V. LEIS 99 Ohio St. 3d 537, 2003 Ohio 4779, 795 N.E.2d 633 Decided September 24, 2003, 30 Ohio N.U. L. Rev. 689, 701 (2004) 4564 QUESTIONING RETRIBUTION, VALUING HUMILITY, 11 Ohio St. J. Crim. L. 263, 271+ (2013) 4565 CRIMINAL JUSTICE FEDERALISM AND NATIONAL SEX OFFENDER POLICY, 6 Ohio St. J. Crim. L. 51, 122 (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4566 CONNECTEDNESS AND ITS DISCONTENTS: THE DIFFICULTIES OF FEDERALISM AND CRIMINAL LAW, 4 Ohio St. J. Crim. L. 573, 585+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4567 KELO-STYLE FAILINGS, 72 Ohio St. L.J. 777, 820 (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4568 HOW CONSTITUTIONAL THEORY MATTERS, 72 Ohio St. L.J. 1183, 1200+ (2011) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4569 PROGRESSIVE CONSTITUTIONALISM, ORIGINALISM, AND THE SIGNIFICANCE OF LANDMARK DECISIONS IN EVALUATING CONSTITUTIONAL THEORY, 72 Ohio St. L.J. 1251, 1276 (2011) 4570 THE CAUSES OF PROGRESSIVE STAGNATION, 72 Ohio St. L.J. 1277, 1280 (2011) 4571 TOWARD THE STUDY OF THE LEGISLATED CONSTITUTION, 72 Ohio St. L.J. 1343, 1366+ (2011) 4572 THE SPECTER OF SEX OFFENDERS ON HALLOWEEN: UNMASKING CULTURAL, CONSTITUTIONAL, AND CRIMINOLOGICAL CONCERNS, 71 Ohio St. L.J. 417, 456 (2010) 4573 QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE PROPORTIONALITY: A SPECIFIC © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. CRITIQUE OF RETRIBUTIVISM, 71 Ohio St. L.J. 71, 125 (2010) 4574 TOWARD A PROGRESSIVE PERSPECTIVE ON JUSTICE GINSBURG'S CONSTITUTION, 70 Ohio St. L.J. 1115, 1126+ (2009) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4575 THOSE APPEALING INDIGENTS: JUSTICE GINSBURG AND THE CLAIMS OF EQUAL CITIZENSHIP, 70 Ohio St. L.J. 927, 942 (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4576 CELEBRATING THE DIFFERENCES THAT COULD MAKE A DIFFERENCE: UNITED STATES V. VIRGINIA AND A NEW VISION OF SEXUAL EQUALITY, 70 Ohio St. L.J. 943, 1001+ (2009) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 4577 SCIENCE AND CONSTITUTIONAL FACT FINDING IN EQUAL PROTECTION ANALYSIS, 69 Ohio St. L.J. 1115, 1172 (2008) 4578 FIVE TAKES ON DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA V. HELLER, 69 Ohio St. L.J. 671, 699 (2008) 4579 THE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE: ROMER AS THE GROUNDWORK FOR CHALLENGING STATE "DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE" AMENDMENTS, 68 Ohio St. L.J. 1419, 1467+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4580 THE POPULIST SAFEGUARDS OF FEDERALISM, 68 Ohio St. L.J. 1669, 1731 (2007) 4581 RESTRUCTURING THE DEBATE OVER FETAL HOMICIDE LAWS, 67 Ohio St. L.J. 721, 782 (2006) 4582 JUSTICE O'CONNOR'S TWENTY-FIVE YEAR EXPECTATION: THE LEGITIMACY OF DURATIONAL LIMITS IN GRUTTER, 67 Ohio St. L.J. 83, 144 (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4583 JUSTICE FOR ALL: ANALYZING BLAKELY RETROACTIVITY AND ENSURING JUST SENTENCES IN PRE-BLAKELY CONVICTIONS, 66 Ohio St. L.J. 875, 945 (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4584 FOREWORD, 65 Ohio St. L.J. 1057, 1058 (2004) 4585 LIBERTY AFTER LAWRENCE, 65 Ohio St. L.J. 1059, 1059+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4586 THE ROAD NOT TAKEN: SEX EQUALITY IN LAWRENCE v. TEXAS, 65 Ohio St. L.J. 1081, 1081+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4587 LAWRENCE, THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT, AND THE SUPREME COURT'S RELIANCE ON FOREIGN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: AN ORIGINALIST REAPPRAISAL, 65 Ohio St. L.J. 1097, 1098+ (2004) HN: 1,2,3 (S.Ct.) 4588 IS LAWRENCE STILL GOOD LAW?, 65 Ohio St. L.J. 1133, 1133+ (2004) HN: 1,3,4 (S.Ct.) 4589 LAWRENCE v. TEXAS: OUR PHILOSOPHER-KINGS ADOPT LIBERTARIANISM AS OUR OFFICIAL NATIONAL PHILOSOPHY AND REJECT TRADITIONAL MORALITY AS A BASIS FOR LAW, 65 Ohio St. L.J. 1139, 1139+ (2004) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4590 QUERYING LAWRENCE, 65 Ohio St. L.J. 1151, 1152+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. (S.Ct.) 4591 INTERSTATE RECOGNITION OF SAME-SEX CIVIL UNIONS AFTER LAWRENCE v. TEXAS, 65 Ohio St. L.J. 1265, 1265+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4592 IMPORTING CONSTITUTIONAL NORMS FROM A "WIDER CIVILIZATION": LAWRENCE AND THE REHNQUIST COURT'S USE OF FOREIGN AND INTERNATIONAL LAW IN DOMESTIC CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION, 65 Ohio St. L.J. 1283, 1283+ (2004) HN: 1,4,5 (S.Ct.) 4593 OUT OF BOUNDS, 65 Ohio St. L.J. 1329, 1329+ (2004) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4594 ANOMALIES, WARTS AND ALL: FOUR SCORE OF LIBERTY, PRIVACY AND EQUALITY, 65 Ohio St. L.J. 1341, 1341+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4595 LIABILITY & FEAR, 65 Ohio St. L.J. 713, 851 (2004) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4596 REGULATORY GIVINGS AND THE ANTICOMMONS, 64 Ohio St. L.J. 1041, 1124 (2003) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4597 ABRAHAM LINCOLN'S INFLUENCE ON THE MODERN SUPREME COURT'S UNDERSTANDING OF LIBERTY AND EQUALITY, 36 Okla. City U. L. Rev. 555, 605+ (2011) HN: 2,3 (S.Ct.) 4598 GENDER AS A CORE VALUE IN TEACHING CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 36 Okla. City U. L. Rev. 513, 524+ (2011) 4599 CAN A CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT BE UNCONSTITUTIONAL?, 33 Okla. City U. L. Rev. 667, 748+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4600 A LEGAL DOCTRINE FOR THE STARTER MARRIAGE, 33 Okla. City U. L. Rev. 793, 822+ (2008) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 4601 UNPOPULAR PRIVACY: THE CASE FOR GOVERNMENT MANDATES, 32 Okla. City U. L. Rev. 87, 102 (2007) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 4602 THE BOY SCOUTS, FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION, AND THE RIGHT TO DISCRIMINATE: A LEGAL, PHILOSOPHICAL, AND ECONOMIC ANALYSIS, 29 Okla. City U. L. Rev. 851, 882+ (2004) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4603 TINKERING WITH TINKER: APPLYING A NEW TEST TO PEER ON PEER BULLYING IN SOCIAL MEDIA, 8 Okla. J. L. & Tech 59, 59 (2012) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4604 FOREIGN LAW IN AMERICAN COURTS, 66 Okla. L. Rev. 219, 220+ (2014) 4605 PRO-GUN PROPERTY REGULATION: HOW THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA CONTROLS THE PROPERTY RIGHTS OF EMPLOYERS THROUGH FIREARM LEGISLATION, 64 Okla. L. Rev. 81, 110 (2011) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 4606 SEX-CELLS: EVALUATING PUNISHMENTS FOR TEEN "SEXTING" IN OKLAHOMA AND BEYOND, 63 Okla. L. Rev. 317, 359 (2011) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4607 BLACKSTONE'S NINTH AMENDMENT: A HISTORICAL COMMON LAW BASELINE FOR THE INTERPRETATION OF UNENUMERATED RIGHTS, 62 Okla. L. Rev. 167, 222+ (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4608 DANFORTH, RETROACTIVITY, AND FEDERALISM, 61 Okla. L. Rev. 425, © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 502 (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4609 DOES DUE PROCESS HAVE AN ORIGINAL MEANING? ON ORIGINALISM, DUE PROCESS, PROCEDURAL INNOVATION . . . AND PARKING TICKETS, 60 Okla. L. Rev. 1, 52+ (2007) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 4610 TRADITION & THE ABOLITION OF CAPITAL PUNISHMENT FOR JUVENILE CRIME, 59 Okla. L. Rev. 809, 831+ (2006) 4611 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: BEYOND THE BOUNDS OF ROE: DOES STENBERG V. CARHART INVALIDATE THE PARTIAL-BIRTH ABORTION BAN ACT OF 2003?, 57 Okla. L. Rev. 601, 655+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4612 EXPECTED VALUE ARBITRATION, 57 Okla. L. Rev. 47, 125 (2004) 4613 A CLOSER LOOK AT THE MARRIAGE EQUALITY CASES BEFORE THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, 55-MAY Orange County Law. 18, 18+ (2013) 4614 A MATTER OF TIME, 54-MAY Orange County Law. 16, 16+ (2012) 4615 IS THERE A PERMANENCE IN LAW? A Perennial Legal Philosophy?, 48-JAN Orange County Law. 34, 44 (2006) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4616 CRIMINAL JURISDICTION AND THE NATION-STATE: TOWARD BOUNDED PLURALISM, 91 Or. L. Rev. 725, 781 (2013) 4617 A LEGAL RESPONSE IS NECESSARY FOR SELF-PRODUCED CHILD PORNOGRAPHY: A LEGISLATOR'S CHECKLIST FOR DRAFTING THE BILL, 89 Or. L. Rev. 645, 699 (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4618 FEDERALISM, THE REHNQUIST COURT, AND THE MODERN REPUBLICAN PARTY, 87 Or. L. Rev. 117, 174+ (2008) 4619 FROM PIERCE TO SMITH: THE OREGON CONNECTION AND SUPREME COURT RELIGION JURISPRUDENCE, 86 Or. L. Rev. 635, 656 (2007) 4620 COLORBLIND CONTEXT: REDEFINING RACE-CONSCIOUS POLICIES IN PRIMARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION, 86 Or. L. Rev. 679, 731 (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4621 FAST-FOOD GOVERNMENT AND PHYSICIAN-ASSISTED DEATH: THE ROLE OF DIRECT DEMOCRACY IN FEDERALISM, 86 Or. L. Rev. 895, 972+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4622 DISABILITY AND THE END OF LIFE, 85 Or. L. Rev. 123, 182 (2006) 4623 "THE IRRESISTIBLE FORCE MEETS THE IMMOVABLE OBJECT": WHEN ANTIDISCRIMINATION STANDARDS AND RELIGIOUS BELIEF COLLIDE IN ABA-ACCREDITED LAW SCHOOLS, 85 Or. L. Rev. 943, 991+ (2006) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4624 RESURRECTING COMITY: REVISITING THE PROBLEM OF NONUNIFORM MARRIAGE LAWS, 84 Or. L. Rev. 433, 488 (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4625 FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT, FUNDAMENTALLY WRONGED: OREGON'S UNCONSTITUTIONAL STAND ON SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, 84 Or. L. Rev. © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 861, 905+ (2005) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 4626 RELIGIOUS FREEDOM AND "ACCOMMODATIONIST NEUTRALITY": A NON-NEUTRAL CRITIQUE, 84 Or. L. Rev. 935, 1000+ (2005) 4627 FORTY YEARS AFTER NEW YORK TIMES V. SULLIVAN: THE GOOD, THE BAD, AND THE UGLY, 83 Or. L. Rev. 1203, 1238 (2004) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 4628 MASCULINITIES AT WORK, 83 Or. L. Rev. 359, 433 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4629 RACE, POLITICS, AND DENIAL: WHY OREGON FORGOT TO RATIFY THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT, 83 Or. L. Rev. 731, 761 (2004) 4630 THE SOCIAL GOOD OF MARRIAGE AND LEGAL RESPONSES TO NONMARITAL COHABITATION, 82 Or. L. Rev. 1001, 1031 (2003) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4631 GREATEST HITS: DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN AMERICAN COUNTRY MUSIC, 82 Or. L. Rev. 1107, 1123 (2003) 4632 ON MAKING ANTI-ESSENTIALIST AND SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIONIST ARGUMENTS IN COURT, 81 Or. L. Rev. 629, 661+ (2002) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4633 (IN)VISIBLE CITIES: THREE LOCAL GOVERNMENT MODELS AND IMMIGRATION REGULATION, 10 Or. Rev. Int'l L. 453, 529 (2008) 4634 NEVER SAY NEVER The Supreme Court and jurisprudential groundhog days, 65-JUL Or. St. B. Bull. 19, 22 (2005) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4635 THE PRIMARY RIGHT, 29 Pace Envtl. L. Rev. 860, 913+ (2012) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4636 SOME THOUGHTS ON THE ROLE OF SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS IN THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL LAW OF PROPERTY RIGHTS PROTECTION, 25 Pace Envtl. L. Rev. 1, 35 (2008) 4637 THE STATE OF ISRAEL'S CONSTITUTION; A COMPARISON OF CIVILIZED NATIONS, 25 Pace Int'l L. Rev. 65, 88 (2013) 4638 WHAT ROLE FOR "WOMEN," "MEN," AND TRANSPEOPLE/INTERSEX PEOPLE IN GENDER EQUALITY?: A COMMENTARY, 31 Pace L. Rev. 821, 823 (2011) 4639 GLOBAL FEMINISM AND THE HUMAN RIGHTS DISCOURSE Women's Human Rights: The International and Comparative Law Casebook. By Susan Deller Ross. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. 2008. Pp. xxix, 665. $135.00., 29 Pace L. Rev. 391, 416+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4640 MULTISTABLE FIGURES: SEXUAL ORIENTATION VISIBILITY AND ITS EFFECTS ON THE EXPERIENCES OF SEXUAL MINORITIES IN THE COURTS, 27 Pace L. Rev. 141, 198 (2007) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 4641 THE COST OF GOOD INTENTIONS: WHY THE SUPREME COURT'S DECISION UPHOLDING AFFIRMATIVE ACTION ADMISSION PROGRAMS IS DETRIMENTAL TO THE CAUSE, 27 Pace L. Rev. 15, 54 (2006) 4642 AUTHENTICATING AMERICAN DEMOCRACY, 26 Pace L. Rev. 397, 443+ (2006) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4643 CONFRONTATION, FIDELITY, TRANSFORMATION: THE © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. "FUNDAMENTALIST" JUDICIAL PERSONA OF JUSTICE ANTONIN SCALIA, 26 Pace L. Rev. 445, 488+ (2006) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 4644 USING INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAWS AND STANDARDS FOR U.S. PRISON REFORM, 24 Pace L. Rev. 811, 824+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4645 KEYNOTE SPEECH PRISON REFORM REVISITED: THE UNFINISHED AGENDA, 24 Pace L. Rev. 839, 846 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4646 RETHINKING THE DEATH PENALTY: CAN WE DEFINE WHO DESERVES DEATH? A Symposium Held at the Association of the Bar of the City of New York May 22, 2002, 24 Pace L. Rev. 107, 186+ (2003) 4647 SWEET LAND OF LIBERTY: THE CASE AGAINST THE FEDERAL MARRIAGE AMENDMENT, 24 Pace L. Rev. 301, 355+ (2003) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4648 FROM FRAGMENTATION TO CONSTITUTIONALIZATION, 25 Pac. McGeorge Global Bus. & Dev. L.J. 381, 394 (2012) 4649 REPORT REGARDING THE PACIFIC MCGEORGE WORKSHOP ON GLOBALIZING THE LAW SCHOOL CURRICULUM, 19 Pac. McGeorge Global Bus. & Dev. L.J. 267, 330+ (2006) 4650 USING INTERNATIONAL LAW MORE EFFECTIVELY TO SECURE AND ADVANCE INDIGENOUS PEOPLES' RIGHTS: TOWARDS ENFORCEMENT IN U.S. AND AUSTRALIAN DOMESTIC COURTS, 15 Pac. Rim L. & Pol'y J. 301, 330+ (2006) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 4651 GAY MARRIAGE: ANALYZING LEGAL STRATEGIES FOR REFORM IN HONG KONG AND THE UNITED STATES, 13 Pac. Rim L. & Pol'y J. 771, 805+ (2004) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 4652 FEDERALISM DOES WELL ENOUGH NOW: WHY FEDERALISM PROVIDES SUFFICIENT PROTECTION FOR THE ENVIRONMENT, AND NO OTHER MODEL IS NEEDED, 18 Penn St. Envtl. L. Rev. 293, 317+ (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4653 THE EMERGENCE OF TRANSNATIONAL CONSTITUTIONALISM: ITS FEATURES, CHALLENGES AND SOLUTIONS, 27 Penn St. Int'l L. Rev. 89, 124+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4654 TRANSNATIONALIZATION OF LEGAL EDUCATION: A SWISS (AND COMPARATIVE) PERSPECTIVE, 26 Penn St. Int'l L. Rev. 811, 830 (2008) 4655 POSITIVISM, HUMANISM, AND HEGEMONY: SOVEREIGNTY AND SECURITY FOR OUR TIME, 25 Penn St. Int'l L. Rev. 433, 477+ (2006) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 4656 COMPETENT PERSONS' CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO REFUSE MEDICAL TREATMENT IN THE U.S. AND JAPAN: APPLICATION TO JAPANESE LAW, 25 Penn St. Int'l L. Rev. 5, 73+ (2006) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 4657 WHY TRANSNATIONAL LAW MATTERS, 24 Penn St. Int'l L. Rev. 745, 753 (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4658 DOMESTIC PARTNERSHIPS: WHAT THE UNITED STATES SHOULD © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. LEARN FROM FRANCE'S EXPERIENCE, 24 Penn St. Int'l L. Rev. 683, 705+ (2006) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4659 PLAYING POOHSTICKS WITH THE BRITISH CONSTITUTION? THE BLAIR GOVERNMENT'S PROPOSAL TO ABOLISH THE LORD CHANCELLOR, 24 Penn St. Int'l L. Rev. 257, 329 (2005) 4660 SOVEREIGNTY VS. INTERNATIONALISM AND WHERE UNITED STATES COURTS SHOULD FIND INTERNATIONAL LAW, 24 Penn St. Int'l L. Rev. 353, 372 (2005) 4661 "STRIKING FOR THE GUARDIANS AND PROTECTORS OF THE MIND": THE CONVENTION ON THE RIGHTS OF PERSONS WITH MENTAL DISABILITIES AND THE FUTURE OF GUARDIANSHIP LAW, 117 Penn St. L. Rev. 1159, 1190 (2013) 4662 WHY MARRIAGE IS STILL THE BEST DEFAULT IN ESTATE PLANNING CONFLICTS, 117 Penn St. L. Rev. 1219, 1240+ (2013) 4663 MORALITY AS A LEGITIMATE GOVERNMENT INTEREST, 117 Penn St. L. Rev. 139, 142+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4664 BE CAREFUL WHAT YOU WISH FOR: WHY MCDONALD V. CITY OF CHICAGO'S REJECTION OF THE PRIVILEGES OR IMMUNITIES CLAUSE MAY NOT BE SUCH A BAD THING FOR RIGHTS, 115 Penn St. L. Rev. 561, 606+ (2011) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4665 THE LEGACY OF A SUPREME COURT CLERKSHIP: STEPHEN BREYER AND ARTHUR GOLDBERG, 115 Penn St. L. Rev. 83, 134 (2010) 4666 INTERROGATING IQBAL: INTENT, INERTIA, AND (A LACK OF) IMAGINATION, 114 Penn St. L. Rev. 1419, 1442+ (2010) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4667 BALANCING POLICE ACTION AGAINST AN UNDERDEVELOPED FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT: IS THERE A RIGHT TO TRAVEL FREELY ON PUBLIC FORA?, 114 Penn St. L. Rev. 667, 692 (2009) 4668 A DEARTH OF REMEDIES, 113 Penn St. L. Rev. 1, 53 (2008) 4669 ONLY CONNECT: THE RIGHT TO COMMUNITY AND THE INDIVIDUAL LIBERTY INTEREST IN STATE-SPONSORED RACIAL INTEGRATION, 112 Penn St. L. Rev. 985, 1022+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4670 AFTER THE GOLD RUSH-PART I: HAMDI, 9/11, AND THE DARK SIDE OF THE ENLIGHTENMENT, 112 Penn St. L. Rev. 341, 423+ (2007) 4671 FINDING RIGHTS SPECIFICALLY, 111 Penn St. L. Rev. 945, 979+ (2007) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4672 ORIGINALISM, THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE, AND THE CONSTITUTION: A UNIQUE ROLE IN CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION?, 111 Penn St. L. Rev. 413, 479+ (2006) 4673 WHEN TO REGULATE HATE SPEECH, 110 Penn St. L. Rev. 539, 579 (2006) 4674 INTERNET INDECENCY AND MINORS: THE CASE FOR PARENTAL AND SCHOOL RESPONSIBILITY NOT CONGRESSIONAL REGULATION, 110 © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Penn St. L. Rev. 615, 623+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4675 OVERCRIMINALIZATION, DISCRETION, WAIVER: A SURVEY OF POSSIBLE EXIT STRATEGIES, 109 Penn St. L. Rev. 1155, 1179 (2005) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 4676 OUT OF THE SHADOWS: THE POSITIVE IMPACT OF LAWRENCE V. TEXAS ON VICTIMS OF SAME-SEX DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, 109 Penn St. L. Rev. 1251, 1277+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4677 MOVING FORWARD TOGETHER: THE LGBT COMMUNITY AND THE FAMILY MEDIATION FIELD, 6 Pepp. Disp. Resol. L.J. 295, 311 (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4678 THE NINTH AMENDMENT IN CONGRESS, 40 Pepp. L. Rev. 75, 109 (2012) 4679 PLESSY V. FERGUSON AND THE ANTI-CANON, 39 Pepp. L. Rev. 75, 89+ (2011) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4680 WRONG, OUT OF STEP, AND PERNICIOUS: ERIE AS THE WORST DECISION OF ALL TIME, 39 Pepp. L. Rev. 129, 154 (2011) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 4681 EXPLAINING KOREMATSU: A RESPONSE TO DEAN CHEMERINSKY, 39 Pepp. L. Rev. 173, 196+ (2011) 4682 CONSTITUTIONAL DIVIDE: THE TRANSFORMATIVE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE SCHOOL PRAYER DECISIONS, 38 Pepp. L. Rev. 945, 1020+ (2011) 4683 EQUAL PROTECTION, SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, AND CLASSIFYING ON THE BASIS OF SEX, 38 Pepp. L. Rev. 1021, 1052+ (2011) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4684 MARRIAGE IN CALIFORNIA: IS THE FEDERAL LAWSUIT AGAINST PROPOSITION 8 ABOUT APPLYING THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT OR PRESERVING FEDERALISM?, 38 Pepp. L. Rev. 161, 209+ (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4685 PERSONS, PARTICIPATING, AND "HIGHER LAW", 36 Pepp. L. Rev. 475, 490 (2009) 4686 WHAT FEDERALISM & WHY? SCIENCE VERSUS DOCTRINE, 35 Pepp. L. Rev. 47, 76 (2007) 4687 OVERVIEW OF THE TERM: THE RULE OF LAW & ROBERTS'S REVOLUTION OF RESTRAINT, 34 Pepp. L. Rev. 495, 520+ (2007) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4688 INTERMITTENT STATE CONSTITUTIONALISM, 34 Pepp. L. Rev. 41, 103 (2006) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4689 ACCOMPLICE CONFESSIONS AND THE CONFRONTATION CLAUSE: CRAWFORD V. WASHINGTON CONFRONTS PAST ISSUES WITH A NEW RULE, 32 Pepp. L. Rev. 315, 372+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4690 KANT'S CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE: AN UNSPOKEN FACTOR IN CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS BALANCING, 31 Pepp. L. Rev. 949, 977+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4691 THE SECTION 5 POWER AFTER TENNESSEE V. LANE, 32 Pepp. L. Rev. © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 39, 88+ (2004) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4692 6 Phoenix L. Rev. 63, INEXTRICABLY LINKED? RETHINKING THE SUPREME COURT'S CONNECTION BETWEEN RELIGION AND VIOLENCE (2012) 4693 5 Phoenix L. Rev. 645, UNNECESSARY ROUGHNESS: THE SINGLE ENTITY DEFENSE AND THE SUPREME COURT'S MISGUIDED ENCROACHMENT ON THE NFL'S CONSUMER BRAND IN AMERICAN NEEDLE V. NFL (2012) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 4694 5 Phoenix L. Rev. 39, A REVIEW OF THE CONCURRENT DEBATES ABOUT THE LEGAL RECOGNITION OF SAME-SEX RELATIONSHIPS IN THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE AND THE UNITED STATES (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4695 5 Phoenix L. Rev. 151, THE SEX LESS SCRUTINIZED: THE CASE FOR SUSPECT CLASSIFICATION FOR SEXUAL ORIENTATION (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4696 4 Phoenix L. Rev. 391, MANAGE WHAT MATTERS: PROJECT MANAGEMENT TOOLS TO GROW A LEGAL PRACTICE (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4697 3 Phoenix L. Rev. 769, "THE PLAY'S THE THING" : WORLD OF WARCRAFT AND LEGAL PHILOSOPHY (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4698 THE ENHANCED ARBITRATION APPEAL AMENDMENT: A PROPOSAL TO SAVE AMERICAN JURISPRUDENCE FROM ARBITRATION, MODELED ON THE ENGLISH ARBITRATION ACT OF 1996, 15-FALL PIABA B.J. 27, 56 (2008) 4699 THE SUPREME COURTS: DID SEPTEMBER 11TH ACCELERATE THEIR SANCTIONING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF CRIMINALIZING SUSPICION?, 7 Pierce L. Rev. 39, 83+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4700 THE ABOLITIONIST'S DILEMMA: ESTABLISHING THE STANDARDS FOR THE EVOLVING STANDARDS OF DECENCY, 6 Pierce L. Rev. 441, 467+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4701 WILL THE UNITED STATES FOLLOW ENGLAND (AND THE REST OF THE WORLD) IN ABANDONING CAPITAL PUNISHMENT?, 6 Pierce L. Rev. 547, 645+ (2008) 4702 GENDER MATTERS: MAKING THE CASE FOR TRANS INCLUSION, 6 Pierce L. Rev. 1, 53+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4703 HUMAN ZONING: THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF SEX-OFFENDER RESIDENCY RESTRICTIONS AS APPLIED TO POST-CONVICTION OFFENDERS, 5 Pierce L. Rev. 331, 345 (2007) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 4704 FREEDOM OF THOUGHT, OFFENSIVE FANTASIES AND THE FUNDAMENTAL HUMAN RIGHT TO HOLD DEVIANT IDEAS: WHY THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT GOT IT WRONG IN DOE V. CITY OF LAFAYETTE, INDIANA, 3 Pierce L. Rev. 125, 159 (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 4705 STATES' RIGHTS AND THE SCOPE OF THE TREATY POWER: COULD THE PATRIOT ACT BE CONSTITUTIONAL AS A TREATY?, 3 Pierce L. Rev. 161, 181 (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4706 SODOMY AND PROSTITUTION: LAWS PROTECTING THE "FABRIC OF SOCIETY", 3 Pierce L. Rev. 101, 124+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4707 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH, COMMISSION ON HUMAN RELATIONS, DEBORAH HENSON, JAMES KEITH BEER, MARK S. FRIEDMAN, RAY ANN LOCKARD, MARK S. STEIN, BRUCE VENARDE, SHANDRA D. WILLIAMS Equity-Jurisdiction of, 152-MAY Pittsburgh Legal J. 119, 120+ (2004) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4708 INCOME TAX AND OTHER TAX RAMIFICATIONS OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, DOMESTIC PARTNERSHIPS, AND CIVIL UNIONS Same-sex couples can't do their tax planning the way traditional married couples do - and for the smart planner, that c, 26 NO. 2 Prac. Tax Law. 15, 15 (2012) 4709 INTIMACY IN THE ELDER LAW SETTING, 22-DEC Prob. & Prop. 34, 35+ (2008) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4710 RESEARCH AND CONFIDENTIALITY: LEGAL ISSUES AND RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES, 17 Psychol. Pub. Pol'y & L. 333, 356 (2011) 4711 "WHERE SOULS ARE FORGOTTEN": CULTURAL COMPETENCIES, FORENSIC EVALUATIONS, AND INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS, 15 Psychol. Pub. Pol'y & L. 257, 271+ (2009) 4712 CIVIL GIDEON: THE POOR MAN'S FIGHT, 16 Pub. Int. L. Rep. 32, 35+ (2010) 4713 SELF RESTRAINT AND SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS, 27 Quinnipiac L. Rev. 817+ (2009) 4714 MULTI-VALENCED CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION AND CONSTITUTIONAL COMPARISONS: AN ESSAY IN HONOR OF MARK TUSHNET, 26 Quinnipiac L. Rev. 599+ (2008) 4715 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN THE SECOND CIRCUIT: EQUAL PROTECTION, 24 QLR 365, 371+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4716 DESERTING MOTHERS, ABANDONED BABIES, LOST FATHERS: DANGERS IN SAFE HAVENS, 24 QLR 335, 348+ (2006) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4717 THE LAW OF UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES: THE FAR-REACHING EFFECTS OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGE BAN AMENDMENTS, 25 Quinnipiac L. Rev. 211+ (2006) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4718 THE POTENTIAL FOR AN EQUAL PROTECTION REVOLUTION, 25 Quinnipiac L. Rev. 287+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4719 PERSONHOOD 2.0: ENHANCED AND UNENHANCED PERSONS AND THE EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAWS, 23 QLR 1047, 1095+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4720 ROSENGARTEN V. DOWNES: CONNECTICUT REFUSES TO DISSOLVE VERMONT CIVIL UNION (FNd1), 22 QLR 523, 568+ (2004) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 4721 AGAINST REDEFINING MARRIAGE: A REVIEW AND CRITIQUE OF RECENT LEGAL DEVELOPMENTS, 23 QLR 427, 446 (2004) 4722 DOES SEX MAKE BABIES? MARRIAGE, SAME-SEX MARRIAGE AND LEGAL JUSTIFICATIONS FOR THE REGULATION OF INTIMACY IN A POST-LAWRENCE WORLD, 23 QLR 447, 472 (2004) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4723 CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION OF PRIVATE POWER, 23 QLR 47, 59 (2004) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 4724 REMARKS OF ROBERT WINTEMUTE: INTERNATIONAL TRENDS IN LEGAL RECOGNITION OF SAME-SEX PARTNERSHIPS, 23 QLR 577, 595+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4725 THE HARD EDGE OF KULTURKAMPF: CULTURAL VIOLENCE, POLITICAL BACKLASHES AND JUDICIAL RESISTANCE TO LAWRENCE AND BROWN, 23 QLR 707, 736+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4726 EVIDENCE LAW AS PRAGMATIC LEGAL RHETORIC: RECONNECTING LEGAL SCHOLARSHIP, TEACHING AND ETHICS, 21 QLR 813, 891 (2003) 4727 NOT OUT THERE: WHY OUTDOOR SMOKING BANS FINALLY PASS CONSTITUTIONAL MUSTER, 15 Quinnipiac Health L.J. 127, 154+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4728 WHY FAST FOOD BANS ARE THE WRONG SOLUTION TO ADDRESS AMERICA'S OBESITY PROBLEM AND WHAT SHOULD BE DONE INSTEAD, 15 Quinnipiac Health L.J. 209, 241+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4729 HANDS OFF MY PUDENDUM: A CRITIQUE OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS APPROACH TO FEMALE GENITAL RITUAL, 15 Quinnipiac Health L.J. 243, 282+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4730 IS SELF-HARM BY CUTTING A CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED RIGHT?, 12 Quinnipiac Health L.J. 303, 330+ (2009) 4731 MODERN MORAL REASONING AND EMERGING TRENDS IN CONSTITUTIONAL AND OTHER RIGHTS DECISION-MAKING AROUND THE WORLD, 29 Quinnipiac L. Rev. 433, 462 (2011) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 4732 FIGHTING FOR VICTORIA: FEDERAL EQUAL PROTECTION CLAIMS AVAILABLE TO AMERICAN TRANSGENDER SCHOOLCHILDREN, 29 Quinnipiac L. Rev. 493, 549+ (2011) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4733 FATHER-ABSENCE, SOCIAL EQUALITY, AND SOCIAL PROGRESS, 29 Quinnipiac L. Rev. 123, 163 (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4734 LIBERALISM IN LOVE, 28 Quinnipiac L. Rev. 593, 616+ (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4735 LIBERALISM'S AMBIVALENCE, 28 Quinnipiac L. Rev. 617, 623+ (2010) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4736 LOVE IN A TIME OF ENVY, 28 Quinnipiac L. Rev. 699, 745+ (2010) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 4737 AN EQUAL PROTECTION VIEW OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT, 28 Quinnipiac L. Rev. 787, 854+ (2010) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 4738 RECONCILING CAMPAIGN FINANCE REFORM WITH THE FIRST AMENDMENT: LOOKING BOTH INSIDE AND OUTSIDE AMERICA'S BORDERS, 25 Quinnipiac L. Rev. 27, 72+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4739 9 Regent Journal of International Law 75, IMMIGRATION REFORM: A REFLECTION ON ARIZONA BILL 1070 AND BEYOND (2012) 4740 8 Regent Journal of International Law 57, PRESERVING AMERICA'S ROLE IN THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY: THE PROPER PLACE FOR INTERNATIONAL TRENDS IN INTERPRETING THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT (2011) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 4741 5 Regent Journal of International Law 183, THE TUG OF WAR BETWEEN FIRST AMENDMENT FREEDOMS AND ANTIDISCRIMINATION: A LOOK AT THE RISING CONFLICT OF HOMOSEXUAL LEGISLATION (2007) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4742 5 Regent Journal of International Law 269, FROM POLITICAL QUESTIONS TO HUMAN RIGHTS: THE GLOBAL DEBATE ON SAME-SEX MARRIAGE AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR U.S. LAW (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4743 3 Regent Journal of International Law 1, FEDERAL COURTS ENFORCING CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW: THE SALUTARY EFFECT OF SOSA V. ALVAREZ-MACHAIN ON THE INSTITUTIONAL LEGITIMACY OF THE JUDICIARY (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4744 ADOPTION: UPSIDE DOWN AND SIDEWAYS? SOME CAUSES OF AND REMEDIES FOR DECLINING DOMESTIC AND INTERNATIONAL ADOPTIONS, 26 Regent U. L. Rev. 209, 247+ (2014) 4745 ONLINE PRIVACY PROTECTION: PROTECTING PRIVACY, THE SOCIAL CONTRACT, AND THE RULE OF LAW IN THE VIRTUAL WORLD, 25 Regent U. L. Rev. 153, 183 (2013) 4746 AS GOES DOMA ... DEFENDING DOMA AND THE STATE MARRIAGE MEASURES, 24 Regent U. L. Rev. 1, 47+ (2012) 4747 THOMAS V. SCALIA ON THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF PARENTS: PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITIES, OR JUST "SPINACH"?, 24 Regent U. L. Rev. 49, 82+ (2012) HN: 2,5 (S.Ct.) 4748 ENFORCING A TRADITIONAL MORAL CODE DOES NOT TRIGGER A RELIGIOUS INSTITUTION'S LOSS OF TAX EXEMPTION, 24 Regent U. L. Rev. 433, 458+ (2012) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4749 THE DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT (DOMA) AND CALIFORNIA'S STRUGGLE WITH SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, 23 Regent U. L. Rev. 97, 138+ (2011) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4750 THE USE AND SCOPE OF EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE IN EVALUATING ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE CASES IN LIGHT OF THE LEMON TEST'S SECULAR PURPOSE REQUIREMENT, 20 Regent U. L. Rev. 201, 255 (2008) 4751 THE DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT AS AN EFFICACIOUS EXPRESSION OF PUBLIC POLICY: TOWARDS A RESOLUTION OF MILLER V. JENKINS © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. AND THE EMERGING CONFLICT BETWEEN STATES OVER SAME-SEX PARENTING, 20 Regent U. L. Rev. 363, 388 (2008) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4752 THE DEFINITION OF "PERSON": APPLYING THE CASEY DECISION TO ROE V. WADE, 19 Regent U. L. Rev. 235, 250+ (2007) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.) 4753 THE ARTICLE III EXCEPTIONS CLAUSE: ANY EXCEPTIONS TO THE POWER OF CONGRESS TO MAKE EXCEPTIONS?, 19 Regent U. L. Rev. 95, 147 (2007) 4754 THE IRONY OF POPULISM: THE REPUBLICAN SHIFT AND THE INEVITABILITY OF AMERICAN ARISTOCRACY, 18 Regent U. L. Rev. 271, 299 (2006) 4755 A BRIEF CATECHISM ON MARRIAGE, 18 Regent U. L. Rev. 301, 313+ (2006) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4756 A SUPREME COURT THAT IS "WILLING TO START DOWN THAT ROAD": THE SLIPPERY SLOPE OF LAWRENCE v. TEXAS, 17 Regent U. L. Rev. 125, 125+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4757 JUDICIAL USURPATION AND SEXUAL LIBERATION: COURTS AND THE ABOLITION OF MARRIAGE, 17 Regent U. L. Rev. 21, 27+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4758 THE NECESSITY OF A FEDERAL MARRIAGE AMENDMENT, 17 Regent U. L. Rev. 211, 218+ (2005) 4759 DEFENDING THE PARENTAL RIGHT TO DIRECT EDUCATION: MEYER AND PIERCE AS BULWARKS AGAINST STATE INDOCTRINATION, 17 Regent U. L. Rev. 311, 353 (2005) 4760 BEGGING THE HIGH COURT FOR CLARIFICATION: HYBRID RIGHTS UNDER EMPLOYMENT DIVISION v. SMITH, 17 Regent U. L. Rev. 77, 100 (2005) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 4761 THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF LEGAL PREFERENCES FOR HETEROSEXUAL MARRIAGE, 16 Regent U. L. Rev. 121, 122+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4762 BUSH v. GORE: UN ANÁLISIS AL PROCESO JUDICIAL DETRÁS DE LA VALIDACIÓN DE LA ELECCIÓN DEL 2000 Y SU IMPACTO EN LAS ELECCIONES DEL 2004 EN PUERTO RICO, 49 Rev. Der. P.R. 237, 246+ (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4763 COMENTARIO A LA LECCIÓN MAGISTRAL DICTADA POR LA PROFA. REGINA GAYA SICILIA, 47 Rev. Der. P.R. 191, 197 (2008) 4764 MILDRED PABÓN CHARNECO Y SU METODOLOGÍA ADJUDICATIVA: TEXTO LEGAL Y VALORES JURÍDICOS, 80 Rev. Jur. U.P.R. 377, 406 (2011) 4765 PONENCIA ANTE LA COMISION CONJUNTA PERMANENTE PARA LA REVISION Y REFORMA DEL CODIGO CIVIL DE PUERTO RICO, AUDIENCIA SOBRE EL LIBRO SEGUNDO: LAS INSTITUCIONES FAMILIARES, 77 Rev. Jur. U.P.R. 199, 211 (2008) 4766 LA CONSTITUCION EN CEROS Y UNOS: UN ACERCAMIENTO DIGITAL © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. AL DERECHO A LA INTIMIDAD Y LA SEGURIDAD PUBLICA, 77 Rev. Jur. U.P.R. 45, 78+ (2008) 4767 DERECHO DE FAMILIA, 77 Rev. Jur. U.P.R. 739, 755 (2008) 4768 LOS DELITOS ADMINISTRATIVOS Y LA MORALIDAD PÚBLICA COMO FUNDAMENTO DEL PODER PUNITIVO DEL ESTADO EN LA OBRA DERECHO PENAL SUSTANTIVO DEL PROFESOR LUIS ERNESTO CHIESA APONTE, 76 Rev. Jur. U.P.R. 411, 419 (2007) 4769 DERECHO CONSTITUCIONAL, 75 Rev. Jur. U.P.R. 29, 66 (2006) 4770 DERECHO DE FAMILIA, 75 Rev. Jur. U.P.R. 293, 320 (2006) 4771 LA CATÁSTROFE DE LOS DELITOS DE RIESGO CATASTRÓFICO, 75 Rev. Jur. U.P.R. 529, 559 (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4772 EL RECONOCIMIENTO LEGAL DEL MATRIMONIO HOMOSEXUAL EN LOS ESTADOS UNIDOS DE AMÉRICA Y ALGUNOS PROBLEMAS DE FEDERALISMO, 74 Rev. Jur. U.P.R. 1213, 1231 (2005) 4773 THE VALUE OF A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE IN JUDICIAL DECISIONMAKING: IMPARTING EXPERIENCES TO, AND LEARNING FROM, OTHER ADHERENTS TO THE RULE OF LAW, 74 Rev. Jur. U.P.R. 213, 227+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4774 DERECHO CONSTITUCIONAL, 73 Rev. Jur. U.P.R. 561, 577 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4775 DERECHO A LA INTIMIDAD Y LA AUTONOMÍA PERSONAL, 72 Rev. Jur. U.P.R. 1061, 1096 (2003) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4776 EL SEMINARIO SOBRE LA INTIMIDAD: SU ORIGEN, EL SIGNIFICADO DE SU OBRA Y SU FUNCIONAMIENTO FUTURO, 72 Rev. Jur. U.P.R. 651, 663 (2003) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4777 INTERPRETANDO LA FACTURA MÁS ANCHA, 46 Rev. Juridica U. Inter. P.R. 303, 321+ (2012) 4778 DERECHO DE FAMILIA: EL MODELO DE TOLERANCIA Y LA MORAL RELIGIOSA COMO SU OBSTÁCULO, 46 Rev. Juridica U. Inter. P.R. 599, 617+ (2012) 4779 LA DECLARACIÓN UNIVERSAL DE DERECHOS HUMANOS EN LA JURISPRUDENCIA DEL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO Ponencia, 44 Rev. Juridica U. Inter. P.R. 1, 15 (2010) 4780 REFORMA DEL DERECHO INTERNACIONAL PRIVADO PUERTORRIQUEÑO EN EL MATRIMONIO Y SU RÉGIMEN ECONÓMICO, 43 Rev. Juridica U. Inter. P.R. 151, 190 (2008) 4781 PONENCIA CONTRA LA CONSTITUCIONALIZACIÓN DEL MATRIMONIO HETEROSEXUAL, 42 Rev. Juridica U. Inter. P.R. 259, 268 (2008) 4782 EL REGISTRO DE PERSONAS CONVICTAS POR DELITOS SEXUALES Y ABUSOS CONTRA MENORES: ¿SEGURIDAD O CASTIGO?, 42 Rev. © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Juridica U. Inter. P.R. 337, 377 (2008) 4783 EL DERECHO DE FAMILIA EN EL CÓDIGO PENAL DE PUERTO RICO, 42 Rev. Juridica U. Inter. P.R. 153, 168 (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4784 MANIFESTACIONES DE HOMOFOBIA EN DECISIONES DEL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO, 42 Rev. Juridica U. Inter. P.R. 53, 87 (2007) 4785 EL CAMBIO TRANSEXUAL Y LA INMUTABILIDAD LEGAL: HACIA UNA CONCILIACIÓN ENTRE LA SEXUALIDAD HUMANA Y LA JURISPRUDENCIA, 42 Rev. Juridica U. Inter. P.R. 89, 124 (2007) 4786 UNITED STATES v. WINDSOR: ANOTHER VICTORY FOR GAY RIGHTS, 62-OCT R.I. B.J. 13, 13+ (2013) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 4787 LEGAL REALISM, LEGAL FORMALISM AND THE D'OENCH DUHME DOCTRINE: A PERSPECTIVE ON R.I. DEPOSITORS ECON. PROT. CORP. v. NFD, 53-AUG R.I. B.J. 9, 54 (2004) 4788 A VICTORY FOR GAY RIGHTS IN LAWRENCE v. TEXAS, 52-DEC R.I. B.J. 5, 39+ (2003) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 4789 8/13/2012 RIA-PBW ANOTHER COURT STRIKES DOWN DOMA'S DEFINITION OF MARRIAGE FOR FEDERAL LAW/CODE PURPOSES (2012) 4790 MISUSE AND ABUSE OF LEGAL ARGUMENT BY ANALOGY IN TRANSJUDICIAL COMMUNICATION: THE CASE OF ZAHEERUDDIN V. STATE, 10 Rich. J. Global L. & Bus. 497, 523 (2011) 4791 FOUR YEARS LATER: HOW THE 2006 AMENDMENTS TO THE FEDERAL RULES HAVE RESHAPED THE E-DISCOVERY LANDSCAPE AND ARE REVITALIZING THE CIVIL JUSTICE SYSTEM, 17 Rich. J.L. & Tech. 10, 60+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4792 RETHINKING REASONABLE EXPECTATIONS OF PRIVACY IN ONLINE SOCIAL NETWORKS, 17 Rich. J.L. & Tech. 12, 59+ (2011) 4793 THE "FIRST-TO-FILE" PATENT SYSTEM: WHY ADOPTION IS NOT AN OPTION!, 14 Rich. J.L. & Tech. 3, 73+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4794 DISPATCH FROM THE CULTURE WAR: VIRGINIA'S FAILED HPV VACCINATION MANDATE, 16 Rich. J.L. & Pub. Int. 59, 80+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4795 "TILL DEATH (OR DOMA) DOES US PART": HOW DOMA IMPOSES AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL CLASSIFYING AND COERCIVE CONDITION ON FEDERAL FUNDING IN THE WAKE OF MASSACHUSETTS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, 14 Rich. J.L. & Pub. Int. 611, 639+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4796 INJURY-IN-FACT, JUSTICE-IN-FICTION: TOWARD A MORE REALISTIC DEFINITION OF "INJURY" IN THE CONTEXT OF UNENFORCED CRIMINAL LAWS, 13 Rich. J.L. & Pub. Int. 1, 26+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4797 A THREE-RING CIRCUS: THE EXPLOITATION OF CIVIL RICO, HOW TREBLE DAMAGES CAUSED IT, AND WHETHER RULE 11 CAN © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. REMEDY THE ABUSE, 18 Roger Williams U. L. Rev. 19, 51 (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4798 THE GREAT DEBATE: LESSONS TO BE LEARNED FROM AN INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS ON SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, 16 Roger Williams U. L. Rev. 577, 607+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4799 CHAMBERS V. ORMISTON: THE HARMFUL AND DISCRIMINATORY AVOIDANCE OF THE LAWS OF COMITY AND PUBLIC POLICY FOR VALID SAME-SEX MARRIAGES, 15 Roger Williams U. L. Rev. 187, 216 (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4800 GAY MARRIAGE IN RHODE ISLAND: A BIG ISSUE IN A SMALL STATE, 12 Roger Williams U. L. Rev. 291, 312+ (2007) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4801 A NEEDED IMAGE MAKEOVER: INTEREST CONVERGENCE AND THE UNITED STATES' WAR ON TERROR, 11 Roger Williams U. L. Rev. 403, 430 (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4802 FOR A MORE VIGOROUS STATE CONSTITUTIONALISM, 10 Roger Williams U. L. Rev. 621, 683+ (2005) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 4803 LAWRENCE V. TEXAS: EVOLUTION OF CONSTITUTIONAL DOCTRINE, 9 Roger Williams U. L. Rev. 565, 577+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4804 NEW HISTORICAL INSIGHTS ON THE CURIOUS CASE OF BAIRD V. EISENSTADT, 9 Roger Williams U. L. Rev. 9, 55+ (2003) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4805 SEPARATED BY A COMMON LANGUAGE? AN EXAMINATION OF THE TRANSATLANTIC DIALOGUE ON DATA PRIVACY LAW AND POLICY IN THE FIGHT AGAINST TERRORISM, 36 Rutgers Computer & Tech. L.J. 73, 98 (2009) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4806 STRAIGHTENING YOUR HEIR: ON THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF REGULATING THE USE OF PREIMPLANTATION TECHNOLOGIES TO SELECT PREEMBRYOS OR MODIFY THE GENETIC PROFILE THEREOF BASED ON EXPECTED SEXUAL ORIENTATION, 33 Rutgers Computer & Tech. L.J. 331, 366+ (2007) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4807 TO-GET-HER FOREVER: A MAN HATER'S RIGHT TO SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, 10 Rutgers J. L. & Pub. Pol'y 63, 75+ (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4808 CONSTITUTIONAL NIHILISM: POLITICAL SCIENCE AND THE DECONSTRUCTION OF THE JUDICIARY, 6 Rutgers J. L. & Pub. Pol'y 1, 34 (2008) 4809 HASTE MAKES WASTE: A CALL TO REVAMP NEW JERSEY'S MEGAN'S LAW LEGISLATION AS-APPLIED TO JUVENILES, 5 Rutgers J. L. & Pub. Pol'y 408, 455+ (2008) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 4810 A QUEER ALLIANCE: GAY MARRIAGE AND THE NEW FEDERALISM, 4 Rutgers J. L. & Pub. Pol'y 200, 200+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4811 TINKERING WITH THE LEGAL STATUS QUO ON PHYSICIAN ASSISTED SUICIDE: A MINIMALIST APPROACH, 14 Rutgers Journal of Law & Religion 361+ (2013) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 4812 POPE PIUS XI'S EXTRAORDINARY-BUT UNDESERVED-PRAISE OF THE AMERICAN SUPREME COURT, 14 Rutgers Journal of Law & Religion 25+ (2012) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4813 RELIGIOUS FREE SPEECH AND SOMEBODY ELSE'S CIVIL RIGHTS: REVIEWING AN OLD CONFLICT IN LIGHT OF CALIFORNIA'S PROPOSITION 8, 13 Rutgers Journal of Law & Religion 363+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4814 "PRAY AWAY THE GAY?" AN ANALYSIS OF THE LEGALITY OF CONVERSION THERAPY BY HOMOPHOBIC RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATIONS, 13 Rutgers Journal of Law & Religion 67+ (2011) 4815 A HIGHER LAW: ABRAHAM LINCOLN'S USE OF BIBLICAL IMAGERY, 13 Rutgers Journal of Law & Religion 227+ (2011) 4816 EVOLUTION AND THE HOLY GHOST OF SCOPES: CAN SCIENCE LOSE THE NEXT ROUND?, 8 Rutgers Journal of Law & Religion 11+ (2007) 4817 ROE v. WADE: A SCANDAL UPON THE COURT Part I: The Unsettling of Roe v. Wade, 7 Rutgers Journal of Law & Religion 1+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4818 THE RELIGIOUS LIBERTY ARGUMENT FOR SAME-SEX MARRIAGE AND ITS EFFECT UPON LEGAL RECOGNITION, 7 Rutgers Journal of Law & Religion 4 (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4819 AMERICAN FAMILY ASSOCIATION v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO: CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSES TO THE HARMS OF RELIGIOUS SPEECH ADVANCING ANTI-HOMOSEXUAL MESSAGES, 5 Rutgers Journal of Law & Religion 1+ (2003) 4820 3 Rutgers J. L. & Urb. Pol'y 357, SEEKING A CONSOLIDATED FEMINIST VOICE FOR PROSTITUTION IN THE US (2006) 4821 STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-SEARCH AND SEIZURE-THE WASHINGTON SUPREME COURT MISTAKENLY INTERPRETS AND ADOPTS THE FEDERAL ATTENUATION DOCTRINE DESPITE CLEAR STATE PRECEDENT. STATE v. ESERJOSE, 259 P.3D 172 (WASH. 2011), 43 Rutgers L.J. 747, 770 (2013) 4822 RELATIONAL PRIVACY-A RIGHT TO GRIEVE IN THE INFORMATION AGE: HALTING THE DIGITAL DISSEMINATION OF DEATH-SCENE IMAGES, 42 Rutgers L.J. 765, 818 (2011) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 4823 GAME OVER?: THE POTENTIAL DEMISE OF THE PROFESSIONAL AND AMATEUR SPORTS PROTECTION ACT, 42 Rutgers L.J. 213, 245 (2010) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 4824 EQUAL PROTECTION-SUPREME COURT OF IOWA INVALIDATES A STATE STATUTE LIMITING CIVIL MARRIAGE TO A UNION BETWEEN A MAN AND A WOMAN. VARNUM v. BRIEN, 763 N.W.2D 862 (IOWA 2009)., 41 Rutgers L.J. 1205, 1226+ (2010) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4825 STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-EQUAL PROTECTION AND FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS-ANALOGIZING SAME- SEX MARRIAGE © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. EXCLUSIONS AND ANTI- MISCEGENATION LAWS: CALIFORNIA OFFERS A MODEL FOR SUBJECTING SAME-SEX MARRIAGE EXCLUSIONS TO STRICT SCR, 40 Rutgers L.J. 1031, 1067+ (2009) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4826 STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-PRIVACY- WASHINGTON SUPREME COURT APPLIES WRONG STANDARD IN DETERMINING IF INMATE'S RIGHTS WERE VIOLATED BY PRISON'S FORCE-FEEDING POLICY. McNabb v. Department of Corrections,, 40 Rutgers L.J. 1069, 1089 (2009) 4827 ARE STATE CONSTITUTIONS UN-AMERICAN? BOOK REVIEW, JEFFREY M. SHAMAN, EQUALITY AND LIBERTY IN THE GOLDEN AGE OF STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW (2009), 40 Rutgers L.J. 793, 810+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4828 STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-EQUAL PROTECTION-WHY SEPARATE IS NOT EQUAL IN CONNECTICUT. STATUTORY PROHIBITION OF MARRIAGE BETWEEN SAME-SEX COUPLES IS VIOLATIVE OF THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE OF THE CONNECTICUT CONSTITUTION., 40 Rutgers L.J. 855, 884+ (2009) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4829 THE DEATH OF "LIFE?" DUE PROCESS DOCTRINE AFTER ABIGAIL ALLIANCE FOR BETTER ACCESS TO DEVELOPMENTAL DRUGS v. VON ESCHENBACH, 40 Rutgers L.J. 503, 533 (2009) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4830 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT, EQUAL PROTECTION, AND DUE PROCESS-THE RIGHT OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGE IS NOT FUNDAMENTAL, PROHIBITING SAME-SEX MARRIAGE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE GENDER-BASED DISCRIMINATION, AND RESTRICTI, 39 Rutgers L.J. 1003, 1035+ (2008) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4831 WELFARE RIGHTS IN STATE CONSTITUTIONS, 39 Rutgers L.J. 863, 901+ (2008) 4832 EQUAL PROTECTION-"AND NOW, BY THE POWER VESTED IN THE PEOPLE OF NEW JERSEY YOU WILL NOT BE PRONOUNCED. . ." POPULAR CONSTITUTIONALISM AND THE STRUGGLE FOR SAME- SEX MARRIAGE. LEWIS V. HARRIS, 908 A.2D 196 (N.J. 2006)., 38 Rutgers L.J. 1215, 1234 (2007) 4833 STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-EQUAL PROTECTION & DUE PROCESS - NONRESIDENT, SAME-SEX MARRIAGE APPLICANTS NOT TO OBTAIN MASSACHUSETTS MARRIAGE LICENSE IF PROHIBITED FROM OBTAINING A LEGAL MARRIAGE IN THEIR HOME STATE. COTE-WHI, 38 Rutgers L.J. 1235, 1264 (2007) 4834 INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS-RATIONAL BASIS REVIEW REVEALS THAT WASHINGTON STATUTE FORBIDDING SAME-SEX MARRIAGE IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND IMPLICATES THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO MARRIAGE. ANDERSEN V. KING COUNTY, 138 P.3D 963 (WASH. 2006, 38 Rutgers L.J. 1299, 1327+ (2007) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 4835 SAME-SEX MARRIAGE - NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS DENIES INDIVIDUALS THE ABILITY TO MARRY THEIR SAME-SEX PARTNERS. HERNANDEZ V. ROBLES, 855 N.E.2D 1 (N.Y. 2006)., 38 Rutgers L.J. 1431, 1451+ (2007) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.) 4836 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-EQUAL PROTECTION-NO REAL BENEFITS. HOW THE MONTANA SUPREME COURT'S IMPROPER APPLICATION OF EQUAL PROTECTION ANALYSIS IN ESTABLISHING SAME-SEX INSURANCE BENEFITS CREATED MORE CONFUSION THAN IT RESOLVED., 37 Rutgers L.J. 1439, 1457 (2006) 4837 EQUAL PROTECTION-STATE BENEFIT PROGRAM OFFERED TO STATE EMPLOYEES' SPOUSES BUT NOT TO UNMARRIED EMPLOYEES' DOMESTIC PARTNERS WAS UNABLE TO WITHSTAND MINIMUM SCRUTINY UNDER THE ALASKA CONSTITUTION WHICH HAS HISTORICALLY G, 37 Rutgers L.J. 1513, 1527+ (2006) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4838 THE RIGHT OF PRIVACY IN STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 37 Rutgers L.J. 971, 985+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4839 STATE EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENTS REVISITED: EVALUATING THEIR EFFECTIVENESS IN ADVANCING PROTECTION AGAINST SEX DISCRIMINATION, 36 Rutgers L.J. 1201, 1293+ (2005) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 4840 EQUAL PROTECTION-INDIVIDUAL AUTONOMY RIGHTS AND EQUALITY UNDER THE MASSACHUSETTS CONSTITUTION PROHIBIT THE EXCLUSION OF SAME-SEX COUPLES FROM CIVIL MARRIAGE. GOODRIDGE V. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 798 N.E.2D 941 (MASS, 36 Rutgers L.J. 1381, 1407+ (2005) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 4841 HABIT AND DISCERNMENT IN ABORTION PRACTICE: THE PARTIALBIRTH ABORTION BAN ACT OF 2003 AS MORALS LEGISLATION, 36 Rutgers L.J. 549, 549+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4842 THE END OR JUST THE BEGINNING FOR GAY RIGHTS UNDER THE NEW JERSEY CONSTITUTION?: THE NEW JERSEY DOMESTIC PARTNERSHIP ACT, LEWIS V. HARRIS, AND THE FUTURE OF GAY RIGHTS IN NEW JERSEY, 36 Rutgers L.J. 289, 349+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4843 SYMPOSIUM KEYNOTE ADDRESS, 65 Rutgers L. Rev. 965, 977+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4844 RETHINKING SECTION FIVE: DEFERENCE, DIRECT REGULATION, AND RESTORING CONGRESSIONAL AUTHORITY TO ENFORCE THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT, 65 Rutgers L. Rev. 667, 697+ (2013) 4845 FROM LOUISE BROWN TO BABY M AND BEYOND: A PROPOSED FRAMEWORK FOR UNDERSTANDING SURROGACY, 65 Rutgers L. Rev. 851, 890 (2013) 4846 AMERICAN WORK-LIFE BALANCE: OVERCOMING FAMILY RESPONSIBILITIES DISCRIMINATION IN THE WORKPLACE, 65 Rutgers L. Rev. 543, 565+ (2013) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 4847 CONFLICTS OF RIGHTS: WHEN THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION RESTRICTS CIVIL LIBERTIES, 64 Rutgers L. Rev. 381, 408 (2012) 4848 WHAT CONSERVATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL REVOLUTION? MODERATING FIVE DEGREES OF JUDICIAL CONSERVATISM AFTER SIX YEARS OF THE ROBERTS COURT, 64 Rutgers L. Rev. 1, 72+ (2011) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 4849 WHICH CAME FIRST THE PARENT OR THE CHILD?, 62 Rutgers L. Rev. 305, 343+ (2010) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 4850 "TO CATCH A PREDATOR,' ARE WE CASTING OUR NETS TOO FAR?: CONSTITUTIONAL CONCERNS REGARDING THE CIVIL COMMITMENT OF SEX OFFENDERS, 62 Rutgers L. Rev. 559, 598 (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4851 A LITTLE OLDER, A LITTLE WISER, AND STILL COMMITTED, 61 Rutgers L. Rev. 507, 527+ (2009) 4852 MARRIAGE OR LIBERATION?: REFLECTIONS ON TWO STRATEGIES IN THE STRUGGLE FOR LESBIAN AND GAY RIGHTS AND RELATIONSHIP RECOGNITION, 61 Rutgers L. Rev. 567, 593+ (2009) 4853 THE THEORETIC AND DEMOCRATIC IMPLICATIONS OF ANTIABORTION TRIGGER LAWS, 61 Rutgers L. Rev. 381, 407+ (2009) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4854 NEW JERSEY DOMESTIC PARTNERSHIP ACT IN THE AFTERMATH OF LEWIS V. HARRIS: SHOULD NEW JERSEY EXPAND THE ACT TO INCLUDE ALL UNMARRIED COHABITANTS?, 60 Rutgers L. Rev. 519, 546 (2008) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 4855 PROTECTING PERSONHOOD: LEGAL STRATEGIES TO COMBAT THE USE OF STRIP SEARCHES ON YOUTH IN DETENTION, 60 Rutgers L. Rev. 67, 103 (2007) 4856 LEWIS V. HARRIS: ESSAY ON A SETTLED QUESTION AND AN OPEN QUESTION, 59 Rutgers L. Rev. 221, 232 (2007) 4857 "HOW DOES SAME-SEX MARRIAGE THREATEN YOU?", 59 Rutgers L. Rev. 233, 264 (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4858 PIECEMEAL AND WHOLESALE APPROACHES TOWARDS MARRIAGE EQUALITY IN NEW JERSEY: IS LEWIS V. HARRIS A DEAD END OR JUST A DETOUR?, 59 Rutgers L. Rev. 291, 349+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4859 STRUCTURING CONSTITUTIONAL DOCTRINE: PRINCIPLES, PROOF, AND THE FUNCTIONS OF JUDICIAL REVIEW, 58 Rutgers L. Rev. 777, 937 (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4860 A FLAWED FOUNDATION: CHRISTIANITY'S LOSS OF PREEMINENT INFLUENCE ON AMERICAN LAW, 56 Rutgers L. Rev. 625, 710+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4861 USING LAW AGAINST ITSELF: BUSH V. GORE APPLIED IN THE COURTS, 55 Rutgers L. Rev. 1109, 1174+ (2003) 4862 THE MISSING INGREDIENT: HOW OFT-OVERLOOKED MODERN © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. CONFLICT OF LAWS PRINCIPLES WILL DICTATE THE REACH OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGE IN AMERICA, 30 St. Louis U. Pub. L. Rev. 325, 376+ (2011) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4863 THE ANALYTIC APOSTERIORI AND A NEW UNDERSTANDING OF SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS THAT IS EXHIBITED IN THE LIVED EXPERIENCES OF THOSE SEEKING TO MARRY SOMEONE OF THE SAME SEX, 30 St. Louis U. Pub. L. Rev. 377, 408+ (2011) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4864 HOME SWEET HOME? THE EFFICACY OF RENTAL RESTRICTIONS TO PROMOTE NEIGHBORHOOD STABILITY, 29 St. Louis U. Pub. L. Rev. 41, 83+ (2009) 4865 AN EXCESS OF METHODS: IDENTIFYING IMPLIED FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS IN THE SUPREME COURT, 26 St. Louis U. Pub. L. Rev. 203, 231+ (2007) 4866 "A DECENT RESPECT TO THE OPINIONS OF (HUMAN)KIND": THE VALUE OF A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE IN CONSTITUTIONAL ADJUDICATION (FNa1), 26 St. Louis U. Pub. L. Rev. 187, 201+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4867 PERSONAL INFORMATION IN GOVERNMENT RECORDS: PROTECTING THE PUBLIC INTEREST IN PRIVACY, 25 St. Louis U. Pub. L. Rev. 63, 121 (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4868 THE ROLE OF LITIGATION IN GAY RIGHTS: THE MARRIAGE EXPERIENCE, 24 St. Louis U. Pub. L. Rev. 113, 127 (2005) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4869 DEMOCRACY AND DISSENT: CHALLENGING THE SOLOMON AMENDMENT AS A CULTURAL THREAT TO ACADEMIC FREEDOM AND CIVIL RIGHTS, 24 St. Louis U. Pub. L. Rev. 149, 167+ (2005) 4870 PARENTHOOD AND THE LIMITS OF ADULT AUTONOMY, 24 St. Louis U. Pub. L. Rev. 169, 194+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4871 FROM QUEER TO PATERNITY: HOW PRIMARY GAY FATHERS ARE CHANGING FATHERHOOD AND GAY IDENTITY, 24 St. Louis U. Pub. L. Rev. 195, 220+ (2005) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 4872 TAX PROTEST, "A HOMOSEXUAL," AND FRIVOLITY: A DECONSTRUCTIONIST MEDITATION, 24 St. Louis U. Pub. L. Rev. 21, 58+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4873 MISS SUSAN'S ETIQUETTE TIPS FOR THE SOCIALLY CONSCIOUS JUDGE: A GUIDE TO HONORABLE CONDUCT TOWARD GAYS AND LESBIANS IN THE COURTROOM, 24 St. Louis U. Pub. L. Rev. 221, 242+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4874 AVOIDING THE NEED TO "UNSCRAMBLE THE EGG:" A PROPOSAL FOR THE AUTOMATIC STAY OF SUBSEQUENT ADOPTION PROCEEDINGS WHEN PARENTS APPEAL A JUDGMENT TERMINATING THEIR PARENTAL RIGHTS, 24 St. Louis U. Pub. L. Rev. 445, 476 (2005) 4875 INTRODUCTION, 24 St. Louis U. Pub. L. Rev. 5, 10+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 4876 THE LAWRENCE READER: STANDHARDT AND LEWIS ON WOMEN IN LOVE, 24 St. Louis U. Pub. L. Rev. 59, 88+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4877 BOWERS, LAWRENCE AND SAME-SEX MARRIAGE: A MEETING OF HARD AND VERY HARD CASES, 24 St. Louis U. Pub. L. Rev. 89, 111+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4878 SCHOOL BOARD CONTROL OVER EDUCATION AND A TEACHER'S RIGHT TO PRIVACY, 23 St. Louis U. Pub. L. Rev. 609, 633+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4879 A MAN'S HOME IS HIS CASTLE: HOW THE LAW SHELTERS DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND SEXUAL HARASSMENT, 23 St. Louis U. Pub. L. Rev. 77, 105 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4880 CHILDREN ON THE FRONT LINES OF AN IDEOLOGICAL WAR: THE DIFFERING VALUES OF DIFFERING VALUES, 22 St. Louis U. Pub. L. Rev. 371, 400 (2003) 4881 14 San Diego Int'l L.J. 225, "THERE'S NO PLACE LIKE HOME" DOMA DEPORTATION: THE FORCED EXPATRIATION OF BI-NATIONAL SAMESEX COUPLES FROM THE UNITED STATES TO CANADA (2012) 4882 10 San Diego Int'l L.J. 5, THE MEANING OF WRONGDOING-A CRIME OF DISRESPECTING THE FLAG: GROUNDS FOR PRESERVING "NATIONAL UNITY"? (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4883 8 San Diego Int'l L.J. 459, "THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL JUDICIARY MAY NOT BE A "THIRD, CO-EQUAL BRANCH' OF GOVERNMENT. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR THE IRISH DEBATE ON "JUDICIAL ACTIVISM?"' (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4884 ADOLESCENT IDENTITY VERSUS THE FIRST AMENDMENT: SEXUALITY AND SPEECH RIGHTS IN THE PUBLIC SCHOOLS, 49 San Diego L. Rev. 791, 822 (2012) 4885 SEXUAL LIBERTY AND SAME-SEX MARRIAGE: AN ARGUMENT FROM BISEXUALITY, 49 San Diego L. Rev. 415, 486+ (2012) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4886 PREVENTION AS THE PRIMARY GOAL OF SENTENCING: THE MODERN CASE FOR INDETERMINATE DISPOSITIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES, 48 San Diego L. Rev. 1127, 1171 (2011) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 4887 DO SEXTING PROSECUTIONS VIOLATE TEENAGERS' CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS?, 48 San Diego L. Rev. 951, 991+ (2011) 4888 AN AFFAIR TO REMEMBER: THE STATE OF THE CRIME OF ADULTERY IN THE MILITARY, 47 San Diego L. Rev. 1161, 1164+ (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4889 THE FIRST AMENDMENT'S RELIGION CLAUSES: "FREEDOM OF CONSCIENCE" VERSUS INSTITUTIONAL ACCOMMODATION, 47 San Diego L. Rev. 1075, 1105 (2010) 4890 THE END OF ORIGINALISM, 47 San Diego L. Rev. 83, 108+ (2010) 4891 THE HIDDEN FOREIGN LAW DEBATE IN HELLER: THE PROPORTIONALITY APPROACH IN AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. LAW, 46 San Diego L. Rev. 367, 413+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4892 UNREASONABLE: INVOLUNTARY MEDICATIONS, INCOMPETENT CRIMINAL DEFENDANTS, AND THE FOURTH AMENDMENT, 46 San Diego L. Rev. 161, 205 (2009) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4893 MOVING BEYOND ANIMAL RIGHTS: A LEGAL/CONTRACTUALIST CRITIQUE, 46 San Diego L. Rev. 27, 84 (2009) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4894 THE HUMAN RIGHT TO PRIVACY, 44 San Diego L. Rev. 697, 721+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4895 KEEPING IT PRIVATE, 44 San Diego L. Rev. 677, 694 (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4896 TOO HIGH A PRICE FOR SOME DRUGS?: THE FDA BURDENS REPRODUCTIVE CHOICE, 44 San Diego L. Rev. 231, 258+ (2007) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 4897 WHY NOT REGULATE PRIVATE DISCRIMINATION?, 43 San Diego L. Rev. 1043, 1061 (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4898 IS THE PRIVILEGE OF PRIVATE DISCRIMINATION AN ARTIFACT OF AN ICON?, 43 San Diego L. Rev. 1063, 1069+ (2006) 4899 CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS COMING HOME TO ROOST? RIGHTS INTERNATIONALISM IN AMERICAN COURTS, 43 San Diego L. Rev. 1, 59+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4900 POLYGAMY AND SAME-SEX MARRIAGE: A RESPONSE TO CALHOUN, 42 San Diego L. Rev. 1043, 1048+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4901 THINKING ABOUT POLYGAMY, 42 San Diego L. Rev. 1049, 1058+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4902 THE CONSERVATIVE'S DILEMMA: TRADITIONAL INSTITUTIONS, SOCIAL CHANGE, AND SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, 42 San Diego L. Rev. 1059, 1103+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4903 WHY THE FEDERAL MARRIAGE AMENDMENT IS NECESSARY, 42 San Diego L. Rev. 895, 924+ (2005) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4904 THREE TENSIONS, AND ONE OMISSION, IN THE CASE FOR THE FEDERAL MARRIAGE AMENDMENT, 42 San Diego L. Rev. 935, 948+ (2005) 4905 PREGNANCY CRIMES: NEW WORRIES TO EXPECT WHEN YOU'RE EXPECTING, 53 Santa Clara L. Rev. 661, 691 (2013) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 4906 PRIVACY IN AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES, 52 Santa Clara L. Rev. 1171, 1239 (2012) 4907 THE FCC'S NEW THEORY OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT, 51 Santa Clara L. Rev. 417, 513 (2011) 4908 THE INFLUENCE OF JUSTICE JOHN PAUL STEVENS: OPINION ASSIGNMENTS BY THE SENIOR ASSOCIATE JUSTICE, 51 Santa Clara L. Rev. 743, 774+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4909 BUSINESS AND CONSTITUTIONAL ORIGINALISM IN THE ROBERTS © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. COURT, 49 Santa Clara L. Rev. 979, 995 (2009) 4910 JUDGING AND SELF-PRESENTATION: TOWARDS A MORE REALISTIC CONCEPTION OF THE HUMAN (JUDICIAL) ANIMAL Reviewing: Lawrence Baum, Judges and Their Audiences: A Perspective on Judicial Behavior, 48 Santa Clara L. Rev. 523, 568+ (2008) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4911 TAXING FAMILIES FAIRLY, 48 Santa Clara L. Rev. 805, 855 (2008) 4912 AGE MATTERS: CLASS, FAMILY FORMATION, AND INEQUALITY, 48 Santa Clara L. Rev. 901, 958+ (2008) 4913 EXPANSION OF FAMILY RIGHTS WHILE SEARCHING FOR THE MEANING OF LIFE, INDIVIDUALITY, AND SELF, 48 Santa Clara L. Rev. 959, 997+ (2008) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 4914 COVERING DISCRIMINATION: A REVIEW OF KENJI YOSHINO'S COVERING: THE HIDDEN ASSAULT ON OUR CIVIL RIGHTS, 47 Santa Clara L. Rev. 187, 199+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4915 THE FACE OF DIGNITY: PRINCIPLED OVERSIGHT OF BIOMEDICAL INNOVATION, 47 Santa Clara L. Rev. 55, 91+ (2007) 4916 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW DOCTRINE MEETS REALITY: DON'T ASK, DON'T TELL IN LIGHT OF LAWRENCE V. TEXAS, 46 Santa Clara L. Rev. 635, 675+ (2006) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 4917 LAW, POLITICS, AND THE APPOINTMENTS PROCESS, 46 Santa Clara L. Rev. 737, 765 (2006) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 4918 REFOCUS ON THE FAMILY: EXPLORING THE COMPLICATIONS IN GRANTING THE FAMILY IMMIGRATION BENEFIT TO GAY AND LESBIAN UNITED STATES CITIZENS, 45 Santa Clara L. Rev. 493, 530+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4919 SOMETHING TO CHEW ON: A REFLECTIVE SURVEY OF FOOD AND THE LAW, AND A PLEASANT DIVERSION Habeas Codfish: Reflections on Food and the Law by Barry M. Levenson. Madison, Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin Press, 2001. P, 45 Santa Clara L. Rev. 531, 546 (2005) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4920 TALK IS CHEAP, BUT A PICTURE IS WORTH A THOUSAND WORDS: PRIVACY RIGHTS IN THE ERA OF CAMERA PHONE TECHNOLOGY, 45 Santa Clara L. Rev. 679, 706 (2005) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 4921 INTERNATIONAL LAW IN THE UNITED STATES LEGAL SYSTEM: OBSERVANCE, APPLICATION, AND ENFORCEMENT, 45 Santa Clara L. Rev. 807, 815+ (2005) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 4922 STRUCTURAL CONFLICTS IN THE INTERPRETATION OF CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW, 45 Santa Clara L. Rev. 857, 875+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4923 ENFORCING THE DECISIONS OF INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNALS IN THE U.S. LEGAL SYSTEM, 45 Santa Clara L. Rev. 877, 888 (2005) 4924 THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE AS SODOMY STATUTE, 44 Santa Clara © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. L. Rev. 763, 804+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4925 IN TIMES OF MEDICAL CRISIS: INADEQUACY OF LEGAL REMEDIES AVAILABLE TO SEXUAL MINORITIES, 14 SCHOLAR 447, 487+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4926 SECRETS AND LIES: THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY'S "DON'T ASK, DON'T TELL", 12 SCHOLAR 551, 554+ (2010) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4927 PERRY V. SCHWARZENEGGER: TRYING SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, 13 SCHOLAR 363, 375+ (2010) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4928 MOVING BEYOND THE "IMMUTABILITY DEBATE" IN THE FIGHT FOR EQUALITY AFTER PROPOSITION 8, 12 SCHOLAR 1, 17+ (2009) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4929 SEPARATION ANXIETY: UNITING THE FAMILIES OF LAWFUL PERMANENT RESIDENTS, 10 SCHOLAR 169, 209+ (2008) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 4930 PARENTAL CHOICE AND SCHOOL VOUCHERS: A VIABLE FACET OF TEXAS PUBLIC EDUCATION REFORM?, 9 SCHOLAR 497, 521+ (2007) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 4931 FOSTERING TO CHILDREN'S NEEDS OR FOSTERING TO LEGISLATORS' PERSONAL AGENDAS?, 9 SCHOLAR 313, 329+ (2007) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4932 REFUSAL CLAUSES & PRO-LIFE PHARMACISTS: HOW CAN WE PROTECT OURSELVES FROM THEM?, 8 SCHOLAR 251, 260+ (2006) HN: 3,5 (S.Ct.) 4933 CHILD CUSTODY IN TEXAS AND THE BEST INTEREST STANDARD: IN THE BEST INTEREST OF WHOM?, 6 SCHOLAR 197, 212+ (2003) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4934 RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF OUT-OF-STATE ADOPTION DECREES UNDER THE FULL FAITH AND CREDIT CLAUSE: THE CASE OF SUPPLEMENTAL BIRTH CERTIFICATES, 15 Scholar: St. Mary's L. Rev. & Soc. Just. 293, 295+ (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4935 DARK MEDICINE: HOW THE NATIONAL RESEARCH ACT HAS FAILED TO ADDRESS RACIST PRACTICES IN BIOMEDICAL EXPERIMENTS TARGETING THE AFRICAN-AMERICAN COMMUNITY, 11 Seattle J. for Soc. Just. 1123, 1181+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4936 QUEERING JURY NULLIFICATION: USING JURY NULLIFICATION AS A TOOL TO FIGHT AGAINST THE CRIMINALIZATION OF QUEER AND TRANSGENDER PEOPLE, 10 Seattle J. for Soc. Just. 709, 713+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4937 IN RE MARRIAGE OF KING: AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF OF INTERNATIONAL LAW SCHOLARS IN SUPPORT OF APPELLANT, 9 Seattle J. for Soc. Just. 185, 204 (2010) 4938 THE ROLE OF LAWYERS IN TRANS LIBERATION: BUILDING A TRANSFORMATIVE MOVEMENT FOR SOCIAL CHANGE, 8 Seattle J. for Soc. Just. 579, 609+ (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 4939 CHATTING WITH THE LADY IN THE GROCERY STORE ABOUT HERNANDEZ v. ROBLES, THE NEW YORK SAME-SEX MARRIAGE CASE, 6 Seattle J. for Soc. Just. 255, 283+ (2007) 4940 TRADING THE PRIVACY RIGHT: JUSTICE ALITO'S DANGEROUS REASONING ON PRIVACY RIGHTS, 5 Seattle J. for Soc. Just. 373, 401 (2006) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4941 ARE WE ON THE PATH TO LIBERATION NOW?: SAME-SEX MARRIAGE AT HOME AND ABROAD, 2 Seattle J. for Soc. Just. 475, 492 (2004) 4942 EXCLUSIONARY EQUALITY AND THE CASE FOR SAME-SEX FAMILIES: A REWORKING OF MARTHA FINEMAN'S RE-VISIONED FAMILY LAW, 2 Seattle J. for Soc. Just. 505, 505+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4943 WASHINGTON'S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO COUNSEL IN CIVIL CASES: ACCESS TO JUSTICE v. FUNDAMENTAL INTEREST, 2 Seattle J. for Soc. Just. 571, 598 (2004) 4944 THE ADA: ONE AVENUE TO APPOINTED COUNSEL BEFORE A FULL CIVIL GIDEON, 2 Seattle J. for Soc. Just. 609, 626+ (2004) 4945 WILL GIDEON'S TRUMPET SOUND A NEW MELODY? THE GLOBALIZATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL VALUES AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR A RIGHT TO EQUAL JUSTICE IN CIVIL CASES, 2 Seattle J. for Soc. Just. 201, 224+ (2003) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4946 OBSCENITY & INDECENCY LAW: WHY HOWL IS STILL SILENCED, 37 Seattle U. L. Rev. LXI, lxix+ (2013) 4947 PROPOSITION 8 IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL, BUT NOT BECAUSE THE NINTH CIRCUIT SAID SO: THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE DOES NOT SUPPORT A LEGAL DISTINCTION BETWEEN DENYING THE RIGHT TO SAME-SEX MARRIAGE AND NOT PROVIDING IT IN THE FI, 36 Seattle U. L. Rev. 1243, 1268 (2013) 4948 UNJUSTIFIABLE EXPECTATIONS: LAYING TO REST THE GHOSTS OF ALLOTMENT-ERA SETTLERS, 36 Seattle U. L. Rev. 129, 188 (2012) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4949 REEVALUATING SUSPECT CLASSIFICATIONS, 35 Seattle U. L. Rev. 135, 174 (2011) 4950 RELUCTANT JUDICIAL FACTFINDING: WHEN MINIMALISM AND JUDICIAL MODESTY GO TOO FAR, 32 Seattle U. L. Rev. 549, 567 (2009) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 4951 HIPAA HYPOCRISY AND THE CASE FOR ENFORCING FEDERAL PRIVACY STANDARDS UNDER STATE LAW, 30 Seattle U. L. Rev. 745, 776 (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4952 NAKED CAME I: JURISDICTION-STRIPPING AND THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF HOUSE BILL 3313, 29 Seattle U. L. Rev. 963, 984+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4953 STRETCHING THE EQUAL ACCESS ACT BEYOND EQUAL ACCESS, 27 © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Seattle U. L. Rev. 273, 383 (2003) 4954 DAMAGE CONTROL: STAKING CLAIM TO EMPLOYMENT LAW REMEDIES FOR UNDOCUMENTED IMMIGRANT WORKERS AFTER HOFFMAN PLASTIC COMPOUNDS, INC. V. NLRB, 27 Seattle U. L. Rev. 233, 271 (2003) 4955 HARM TO THE "FABRIC OF SOCIETY" AS A BASIS FOR REGULATING OTHERWISE HARMLESS CONDUCT: NOTES ON A THEME FROM RAVIN V. STATE, 27 Seattle U. L. Rev. 41, 74+ (2003) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4956 12 Sedona Conf. J. 173, UNITED STATES APPROACH TO PRIVACY PROTECTION IN LITIGATION (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4957 9 Seton Hall Circuit Review 193, CHILD PORNOGRAPHY AND CHILD MOLESTATION: ONE AND THE SAME OR SEPARATE CRIMES? (2012) 4958 7 Seton Hall Circuit Review 155, LAWRENCE AND THE MORALITY OF "DON'T ASK, DON'T TELL" AFTER LOFTON, WITT, AND COOK: THE LAW BEFORE AND AFTER REPEAL (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4959 4 Seton Hall Circuit Review 303, APPLYING THE RULE OF LAW SUBJECTIVELY: HOW APPELLATE COURTS ADJUDICATE (2008) 4960 SHOW AND TELL, SEEK AND FIND: A BALANCED APPROACH TO DEFINING A FOURTH AMENDMENT SEARCH AND THE LESSONS OF RAPE REFORM, 43 Seton Hall L. Rev. 127, 227+ (2013) 4961 THE DUE PROCESS PLANK, 43 Seton Hall L. Rev. 229, 271+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4962 A KISS IS JUST A KISS, OR IS IT? A COMPARATIVE LOOK AT ITALIAN AND AMERICAN SEX CRIMES, 40 Seton Hall L. Rev. 191, 223 (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4963 PRECEDENT MISAPPLIED: CRAWFORD V. MARION COUNTY ELECTION BOARD: A COMPELLING CASE STUDY IN THE IMPORTANCE OF BOTH IDENTIFYING APPROPRIATE AND RELEVANT CASE LAW AND ESTABLISHING A UNIFORM METHODOLOGY OF JUDICIAL REVIEW, 40 Seton Hall L. Rev. 341, 369+ (2010) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4964 UNITED STATES V. WECHT: WHEN ANONYMOUS JURIES, THE RIGHT OF ACCESS, AND JUDICIAL DISCRETION COLLIDE, 40 Seton Hall L. Rev. 763, 810 (2010) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 4965 THEISM, REALISM, AND RAWLS, 40 Seton Hall L. Rev. 905, 932 (2010) 4966 APPLYING JEWISH LEGAL THEORY IN THE CONTEXT OF AMERICAN LAW AND LEGAL SCHOLARSHIP: A METHODOLOGICAL ANALYSIS, 40 Seton Hall L. Rev. 933, 954 (2010) 4967 THE LOOMING COLLAPSE OF RESTRICTIONS ON JUDICIAL CAMPAIGN SPEECH, 38 Seton Hall L. Rev. 63, 135 (2008) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4968 A TRIPARTITE BATTLE ROYAL: HAMDAN V. RUMSFELD AND THE ASSERTION OF SEPARATION-OF-POWERS PRINCIPLES, 38 Seton Hall L. Rev. 279, 329+ (2008) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 4969 THE FUTURE OF PRIVACY IN A UNIFIED NATIONAL HEALTH INFORMATION INFRASTRUCTURE, 38 Seton Hall L. Rev. 787, 821+ (2008) 4970 INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS: AN OVERVIEW: ANNUAL VANDERBILT ADDRESS TO THE NEW JERSEY ALUMNI OF HARVARD LAW SCHOOL, 37 Seton Hall L. Rev. 661, 684 (2007) 4971 A ONE-SIDED FEDERALISM REVOLUTION: THE UNADDRESSED CONSTITUTIONAL COMPROMISE ON FEDERALISM AND INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS, 36 Seton Hall L. Rev. 851, 893+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4972 TOWARDS THE RECOGNITION OF A PARENTAL RIGHT OF COMPANIONSHIP IN ADULT CHILDREN UNDER THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE, 35 Seton Hall L. Rev. 1121, 1153+ (2005) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 4973 COUNTERING KULTURKAMPF POLITICS THROUGH CRITIQUE AND JUSTICE PEDAGOGY, RACE, KULTURKAMPF, AND IMMIGRATION, 35 Seton Hall L. Rev. 1155, 1189+ (2005) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4974 HOW EQUALITY BECAME ELITIST: THE CULTURAL POLITICS OF ECONOMICS FROM THE COURT TO THE "NANNY WARS", 35 Seton Hall L. Rev. 1291, 1308+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4975 "WE ARE NOW OF THE VIEW" : BACKLASH ACTIVISM, CULTURAL CLEANSING, AND THE KULTURKAMPF TO RESURRECT THE OLD DEAL, 35 Seton Hall L. Rev. 1407, 1463 (2005) 4976 WHEN HARRY MET LAWRENCE: ALLOWING GAYS AND LESBIANS TO ADOPT, 35 Seton Hall L. Rev. 873, 909+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4977 FOURTH AMENDMENT FEDERALISM? THE COURT'S VACILLATING MISTRUST AND TRUST OF STATE SEARCH AND SEIZURE LAWS, 35 Seton Hall L. Rev. 911, 970+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4978 RESERVING THE RIGHT: DOES A CONSTITUTIONAL MARRIAGE AMENDMENT NECESSARILY TRUMP AN EARLIER AND MORE GENERAL EQUAL PROTECTION OR PRIVACY PROVISION?, 36 Seton Hall L. Rev. 125, 162+ (2005) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 4979 PLANNED PARENTHOOD IS NOT A BANK: CLOSING THE CLINIC DOORS TO THE FOURTH AMENDMENT THIRD PARTY DOCTRINE, 34 Seton Hall L. Rev. 1093, 1120 (2004) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4980 CLARIFYING GENERAL JURISDICTION, 34 Seton Hall L. Rev. 807, 920 (2004) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 4981 "ROMEO AND ROMEO": AN EXAMINATION OF LIMON V. KANSAS IN LIGHT OF LAWRENCE V. TEXAS, 35 Seton Hall L. Rev. 359, 401+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4982 HEALTH CARE REFORM: SEEKING THE CURE FOR TAX AND SOCIAL JUSTICE ON THE LANDSCAPE OF CHANGING FAMILIAL NORMS, 36 Seton Hall Legis. J. 343, 378 (2012) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 4983 UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS: A STANDARD FOR © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. STATES, 28 Seton Hall Legis. J. 259, 279+ (2004) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4984 SIX QUESTIONS IN LIGHT OF J. MCINTYRE MACHINERY, LTD. V. NICASTRO, 63 S.C. L. Rev. 517, 526 (2012) 4985 TAKING THE "SUBSTANCE" OUT OF SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS AND RETURNING LAWMAKING POWER TO THE FEDERAL AND STATE LEGISLATURES, 63 S.C. L. Rev. 285, 338+ (2011) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 4986 SOUTH CAROLINA'S SEXUAL CONDUCT LAWS AFTER LAWRENCE V. TEXAS, 61 S.C. L. Rev. 799, 821+ (2010) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 4987 A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO LEARN: THE UNCERTAIN ALLURE OF MAKING A FEDERAL CASE OUT OF EDUCATION, 59 S.C. L. Rev. 755, 784 (2008) 4988 JUSTICE KENNEDY'S GENDERED WORLD, 59 S.C. L. Rev. 673, 699+ (2008) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 4989 JUDICIAL MODESTY AND ABORTION, 59 S.C. L. Rev. 701, 733+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4990 THE AVAILABILITY AND VIABILITY OF SOCIOECONOMIC INTEGRATION POST-PARENTS INVOLVED, 59 S.C. L. Rev. 841, 849 (2008) 4991 THE ROLE OF GOVERNMENTAL PURPOSE IN CONSTITUTIONAL JUDICIAL REVIEW, 59 S.C. L. Rev. 1, 60+ (2007) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4992 PROTECTING SPEECH V. PROTECTING CHILDREN: AN EXAMINATION OF THE JUDICIAL REFUSAL TO ALLOW LEGISLATIVE ACTION IN THE REALM OF MINORS AND INTERNET PORNOGRAPHY, 57 S.C. L. Rev. 489, 504+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4993 KILLING THE NON-WILLING: ATKINS, THE VOLITIONALLY INCAPACITATED, AND THE DEATH PENALTY, 55 S.C. L. Rev. 93, 143+ (2003) 4994 HOMOSEXUALITY IN THE COURTROOM, 22-NOV S.C. Law. 11, 11 (2010) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 4995 SEAMON'S PICKS A Review of U.S. Supreme Court Decisions from the Latest Term, 15-SEP S.C. Law. 31, 32+ (2003) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 4996 THEMES AND PERSUASION, 56 S.D. L. Rev. 256, 284 (2011) 4997 ARIZONA V. GANT: HEIGHTENING A PERSON'S EXPECTATION OF PRIVACY IN A MOTOR VEHICLE FOLLOWING SEARCHES INCIDENT TO ARREST, 55 S.D. L. Rev. 299, 324 (2010) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 4998 AVOIDING "WILD BLUE YONDERS": THE PRUDENTIALISM OF HENRY J. FRIENDLY AND JOHN ROBERTS, 52 S.D. L. Rev. 73, 135+ (2007) 4999 SIR WALTER RALEIGH REVIVED: THE SUPREME COURT RE-VAMPS TWO DECADES OF CONFRONTATION CLAUSE PRECEDENT IN CRAWFORD V. WASHINGTON, 50 S.D. L. Rev. 41, 77 (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5000 DISCRIMINATION IN THE DORMANT COMMERCE CLAUSE, 49 S.D. L. © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Rev. 844, 866 (2004) 5001 THE IMPORTANCE OF TIME OFF: VALUING RESTRICTED VS. UNRESTRICTED COMPENSATORY TIME UNDER THE FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT, 47 S.D. L. Rev. 511, 553+ (2002) 5002 NOT WHETHER BUT HOW: GAY MARRIAGE AND THE REVIVAL OF BURKEAN CONSERVATISM, 50 S. Tex. L. Rev. 1, 13 (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5003 CAN THE GOVERNMENT PROHIBIT GAY MARRIAGE?, 50 S. Tex. L. Rev. 15, 35+ (2008) 5004 THREE LIBERAL-BUT MISTAKEN-ARGUMENTS FOR SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, 50 S. Tex. L. Rev. 45, 76+ (2008) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5005 PERSONHOOD AND THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY IN TEXAS, 48 S. Tex. L. Rev. 575, 611 (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5006 TROUBLES WITH HIIBEL: HOW THE COURT INVERTED THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CITIZENS AND THE STATE, 48 S. Tex. L. Rev. 613, 643 (2007) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 5007 THE IMPLICATIONS FOR THE LEGAL PROFESSION OF CONFLICTS BETWEEN INTERNATIONAL LAW AND NATIONAL LAW, 46 S. Tex. L. Rev. 579, 594+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5008 SPARE THE DEATH PENALTY, SPOIL THE CHILD: HOW THE EXECUTION OF JUVENILES VIOLATES THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT'S BAN ON CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT IN 2005, 46 S. Tex. L. Rev. 695, 728 (2005) 5009 FOREWORD, 46 S. Tex. L. Rev. 245, 254+ (2004) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5010 JUDICIAL BIAS CLAIMS OF HOMOSEXUAL PERSONS IN THE WAKE OF LAWRENCE V. TEXAS, 46 S. Tex. L. Rev. 255, 308+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5011 LAWRENCE & THE ROAD FROM LIBERATION TO EQUALITY, 46 S. Tex. L. Rev. 309, 316+ (2004) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 5012 A PREDICTION OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT'S ANALYSIS OF THE DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT, AFTER LAWRENCE V. TEXAS, 46 S. Tex. L. Rev. 361, 389+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5013 WHAT IS ALL THE FUSS ABOUT?: THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS MAY IMPOSE A TAX (IT'S CALLED THE "INDIVIDUAL MANDATE"), 22 S. Cal. Interdisc. L.J. 729, 780 (2013) 5014 PUSHING THE BOUNDARIES?: EQUAL PROTECTION, RATIONAL BASIS, AND RATIONAL DECISION MAKING BY DISTRICT COURTS IN CASES CHALLENGING LEGISLATIVE CLASSIFICATIONS ON THE BASIS OF SEXUAL ORIENTATION, 21 S. Cal. Interdisc. L.J. 727, 741+ (2012) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 5015 UNWARRANTED! PRIVACY IN A TECHNOLOGICAL AGE: THE FOURTH AMENDMENT DIFFICULTY IN PROTECTING AGAINST WARRANTLESS GPS TRACKING AND THE SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS AND FIRST AMENDMENT BOOST, 21 S. Cal. Interdisc. L.J. 359, 402+ (2012) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 5016 A BIOLOGICAL BASIS OF RIGHTS, 19 S. Cal. Interdisc. L.J. 195, 235 (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5017 THE GAY RELIGION, 19 S. Cal. Interdisc. L.J. 129, 161+ (2009) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5018 LAW AS STORY: A CIVIC CONCEPT OF LAW (WITH CONSTITUTIONAL ILLUSTRATIONS), 18 S. Cal. Interdisc. L.J. 603, 649 (2009) 5019 DO SUPREME COURT NOMINEES LIE? THE POLITICS OF ADJUDICATION, 18 S. Cal. Interdisc. L.J. 17, 43 (2008) 5020 MORAL LIMITS ON MORALS LEGISLATION: LESSONS FOR U.S. CONSTITUTIONAL LAW FROM THE DECLARATION ON RELIGIOUS FREEDOM, 16 S. Cal. Interdisc. L.J. 1, 48+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5021 LAWRENCE, MILL, AND SAME-SEX RELATIONSHIPS: ON VALUES, VALUING, AND THE CONSTITUTION, 15 S. Cal. Interdisc. L.J. 285, 306+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5022 MISDEMEANORS, 85 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1313, 1375+ (2012) 5023 ALTRUISM OR COMMERCIALISM? EVALUATING THE FEDERAL BAN ON COMPENSATION FOR BONE MARROW DONORS, 84 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1205, 1250+ (2011) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 5024 REVERSE INCORPORATION OF STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 84 S. Cal. L. Rev. 323, 386+ (2011) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5025 COURTS AND THE POLITICS OF BACKLASH: MARRIAGE EQUALITY LITIGATION, THEN AND NOW, 82 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1153, 1223+ (2009) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5026 SECOND AMENDMENT STANDARDS OF REVIEW: WHAT THE SUPREME COURT LEFT UNANSWERED IN DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA V. HELLER, 82 S. Cal. L. Rev. 547, 594+ (2009) 5027 PROTECTING PRIVACY EXPECTATIONS AND PERSONAL DOCUMENTS IN SEC INVESTIGATIONS, 81 S. Cal. L. Rev. 781, 829 (2008) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 5028 BALANCING THE SCALES: EXPANDING THE FAMILY MOVIE ACT TO PROTECT CONSUMERS AFTER CLEAN FLICKS OF COLORADO, LLC V. SODERBERGH, 81 S. Cal. L. Rev. 351, 403 (2008) 5029 INKBLOTS: HOW THE NINTH AMENDMENT AND THE PRIVILEGES OR IMMUNITIES CLAUSE PROTECT UNENUMERATED CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, 80 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1383, 1431+ (2007) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 5030 A POLITICAL PROCESS THEORY OF JUDICIAL REVIEW UNDER THE RELIGION CLAUSES, 80 S. Cal. L. Rev. 793, 864 (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5031 THE RESEARCHER'S SECOND LABORATORY: PROTECTING OUR CHILDREN FROM SOCIAL SURVEYS IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS IN LIGHT OF FIELDS V. PALMDALE SCHOOL DISTRICT, 80 S. Cal. L. Rev. 589, 640 (2007) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 5032 U.S. COURTS AND THE INTERNATIONAL LAW OF EXPROPRIATION: © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. TOWARD A NEW MODEL FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT, 80 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1, 87 (2006) 5033 DUE PROCESS AND PUNITIVE DAMAGES: THE ERROR OF FEDERAL EXCESSIVENESS JURISPRUDENCE, 79 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1085, 1154+ (2006) 5034 CATEGORICALLY BIASED: THE INFLUENCE OF KNOWLEDGE STRUCTURES ON LAW AND LEGAL THEORY, 77 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1103, 1253+ (2004) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 5035 EQUALITY WITHOUT TIERS, 77 S. Cal. L. Rev. 481, 582+ (2004) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 5036 READING ZELMAN: THE TRIUMPH OF PLURALISM, AND ITS EFFECTS ON LIBERTY, EQUALITY, AND CHOICE, 76 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1105, 1187+ (2003) 5037 THE PRURIENT INVESTMENT: HOW FIRST AMENDMENT SPEECH JURISPRUDENCE OBSTRUCTS THE MOVEMENT FOR LGBT EQUALITY, 22 S. Cal. Rev. L. & Soc. Just. 377, 400+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5038 UNFINISHED BUSINESS: A DISCUSSION OF REMEDIES FOR VICTIMS OF INVOLUNTARY DISMISSAL UNDER DON'T ASK, DON'T TELL AND ITS PREDECESSOR, TOWARD A TRUE RECONCILIATION, 22 S. Cal. Rev. L. & Soc. Just. 1, 23+ (2012) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 5039 LEARNING FROM HISTORY: THE FEDERAL UNION AND MARRIAGE, 20 S. Cal. Rev. L. & Soc. Just. 67, 87+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5040 TESTING DEMOCRACY: MARRIAGE EQUALITY, CITIZEN-LAWMAKING AND CONSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE, 19 S. Cal. Rev. L. & Soc. Just. 3, 43 (2010) 5041 THE GREAT DIVORCE: THE SEPARATION OF EQUALITY AND DEMOCRACY IN CONTEMPORARY MARRIAGE JURISPRUDENCE, 19 S. Cal. Rev. L. & Soc. Just. 89, 146+ (2010) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5042 ARGUMENT SELECTION IN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: CHOOSING AND RECONSTRUCTING CONCEPTUAL SYSTEMS, 18 S. Cal. Rev. L. & Soc. Just. 209, 392+ (2009) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 5043 CAN'T BUY ME LOVE: FUNDING MARRIAGE PROMOTION VERSUS LISTENING TO REAL NEEDS IN BREAKING THE CYCLE OF POVERTY, 18 S. Cal. Rev. L. & Soc. Just. 493, 536+ (2009) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5044 REFLECTIONS ON PROTECTING CONSCIENCE FOR HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS: A CALL FOR MORE INCLUSIVE STATUTORY PROTECTION IN LIGHT OF CONSTITUTIONAL CONSIDERATIONS, 15 S. Cal. Rev. L. & Soc. Just. 327, 362+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5045 MONOGAMY, LICENTIOUSNESS, DESUETUDE AND MERE TOLERANCE: THE MULTIPLE MISINTERPRETATIONS OF LAWRENCE V. TEXAS, 15 S. Cal. Rev. L. & Women's Stud. 95, 144+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5046 GAY MARRIAGE: EQUALITY MATTERS, 14 S. Cal. Rev. L. & Women's © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Stud. 3, 5+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5047 ALL YOU NEED IS LOVE?, 14 S. Cal. Rev. L. & Women's Stud. 51, 68+ (2004) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 5048 LOOKING FOR LAW IN ALL THE "WRONG" PLACES: OUTLAW TEXTS AND EARLY WOMEN'S ADVOCACY, 13 S. Cal. Rev. L. & Women's Stud. 273, 325+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5049 QUEERING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE TO "STRAIGHTEN OUT" CRIMINAL LAW: WHAT MIGHT HAPPEN WHEN QUEER THEORY AND PRACTICE MEETCRIMINAL LAW'S CONVENTIONAL RESPONSES TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, 13 S. Cal. Rev. L. & Women's Stud. 81, 160 (2003) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5050 THE SECOND AMENDMENT'S FIXED MEANING AND MULTIPLE PURPOSES, 37 S. Ill. U. L.J. 337, 393 (2013) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 5051 ACT LIKE A LADY!: RECONSIDERING GENDER STEREOTYPES & THE EXCLUSION OF WOMEN FROM COMBAT IN LIGHT OF CHALLENGES TO "DON'T ASK, DON'T TELL", 36 S. Ill. U. L.J. 355, 365+ (2012) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5052 THE UNWISE AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL HATCH ACT: WHY STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES SHOULD BE FREE TO RUN FOR PUBLIC OFFICE., 34 S. Ill. U. L.J. 313, 357 (2010) 5053 IS IT TIME? REFORM OF "DON'T ASK, DON'T TELL" AND ARTICLE 125 OF THE UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE, 34 S. Ill. U. L.J. 175, 185+ (2009) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5054 SUPREME COURT REVERSALS: EXPLORING THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT, 32 S. Ill. U. L.J. 641, 657 (2008) 5055 OVERRULING PRECEDENT: "A DERELICT IN THE STREAM OF THE LAW", 66 SMU L. Rev. 711, 760+ (2013) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 5056 ON SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS AND DISCRETIONARY TRADITIONALISM, 66 SMU L. Rev. 841, 845+ (2013) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 5057 PERCOLATION, UNIFORMITY, AND COHERENT ADJUDICATION: THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT EXPERIENCE, 66 SMU L. Rev. 505, 540 (2013) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 5058 CONSTITUTIONAL RULES AND INSTITUTIONAL ROLES: THE FATE OF THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLASS OF ONE AND WHAT IT MEANS FOR CONGRESSIONAL POWER TO ENFORCE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, 62 SMU L. Rev. 27, 80 (2009) 5059 ELEMENTS OF LIBERTY, 61 SMU L. Rev. 1557, 1604+ (2008) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 5060 OVERCOMING NECESSITY: TORTURE AND THE STATE OF CONSTITUTIONAL CULTURE, 61 SMU L. Rev. 221, 279 (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5061 THE BURIAL OF FAMILY LAW, 61 SMU L. Rev. 459, 483+ (2008) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 5062 THE PROPER FOCUS FOR FDA REGULATIONS: WHY THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO SELF-PRESERVATION SHOULD ALLOW TERMINALLY ILL PATIENTS WITH NO TREATMENT OPTIONS TO ATTEMPT TO SAVE THEIR LIVES, 60 SMU L. Rev. 635, 665+ (2007) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5063 MODEST HOPE FOR A MODEST ROBERTS COURT: DEFERENCE, FACIAL CHALLENGES, AND THE COMPARATIVE COMPETENCE OF COURTS, 59 SMU L. Rev. 1735, 1760 (2006) 5064 CAN FELON DISENFRANCHISEMENT SURVIVE UNDER MODERN CONCEPTIONS OF VOTING RIGHTS?: POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY, STATE INTERESTS, AND SCHOLARLY SCORN, 59 SMU L. Rev. 1841, 1867 (2006) 5065 U.S. TAX TREATIES: TRENDS, ISSUES, & POLICIES IN 2006 AND BEYOND, 59 SMU L. Rev. 853, 878+ (2006) 5066 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FUMBLES THE SUPREME COURT'S RECOGNITION OF A DUE PROCESS RIGHT TO SEXUAL INTIMACY, 58 SMU L. Rev. 481, 486+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5067 STATUTORY RAPE IN A POST LAWRENCE V. TEXAS WORLD, 58 SMU L. Rev. 77, 101+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5068 THE WAR WITHIN THE WAR ON CRIME: THE CONGRESSIONAL ASSAULT ON JUDICIAL SENTENCING DISCRETION, 57 SMU L. Rev. 211, 267 (2004) 5069 FUNCTIONALITY OR FORMALISM? PARTNERS AND SHAREHOLDERS AS "EMPLOYEES" UNDER THE ANTI-DISCRIMINATION LAWS, 57 SMU L. Rev. 3, 62 (2004) 5070 DUAL RATIONALITY OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGE: CREATION OF NEW RIGHTS IN THE SHADOW OF INCOMPLETE CONTRACT PARADIGM, 2 S. New Eng. Roundtable Symp. L.J. 59, 91+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5071 "TOO MUCH OF A GOOD THING?" : QUESTIONING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF A LEGISLATIVE BODY REQUIRING DNA TTESTING FOR ALL FELONY ARRESTEES, 7 S. Region Black L. Students Ass'n L.J. 75, 94+ (2013) 5072 HOW THE WHEELS COME OFF: THE INEVITABLE CRASH OF IRRECONCILABLE JURISPRUDENCE: LAWS BASED ON ORTHODOX JUDEO-CHRISTIAN THEOLOGY IN A PLURALISTIC SOCIETY, 37 S.U. L. Rev. 127, 183+ (2009) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5073 AND THEY BECAME ONE FLESH: ONE CATHOLIC'S RESPONSE TO VICTOR ROMERO'S "OTHER" CHRISTIAN PERSPECTIVE ON LAWRENCE V. TEXAS, 35 S.U. L. Rev. 631, 672+ (2008) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5074 HISTORY DOESN'T REPEAT ITSELF, BUT IT DOES RHYME-SAME-SEX MARRIAGE: IS THE AFRICAN- AMERICAN COMMUNITY THE OPPRESSOR THIS TIME?, 34 S.U. L. Rev. 169, 200+ (2007) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5075 CONSTITUTIONAL TEMPO IN THE LAW THAT DARES NOT SPEAK ITS © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. NAME, 19 Sw. J. Int'l L. 67, 79+ (2012) 5076 REDESIGNING GLOBAL TRADE INSTITUTIONS, 18 Sw. J. Int'l L. 75, 86+ (2011) 5077 CHECK MARKS THE SPOT: EVALUATING THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO VOTE AND FELON DISENFRANCHISEMENT IN THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA, 13 Sw. J.L. & Trade Am. 423, 443 (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5078 INTRODUCTION: SYMPOSIUM ON 40 YEARS OF LGBT LEGAL ACTIVISM: TAKING STOCK AND LOOKING AHEAD, 42 Sw. L. Rev. 761, 764 (2013) 5079 STAND AND BE RECOGNIZED: THE EMERGENCE OF A VISIBLE LGBT LAWYER DEMOGRAPHIC, 42 Sw. L. Rev. 777, 794+ (2013) 5080 FRAMING CONTEXT, ANONYMOUS INTERNET SPEECH, AND INTENT: NEW UNCERTAINTY ABOUT THE CONSTITUTIONAL TEST FOR TRUE THREATS, 41 Sw. L. Rev. 43, 118 (2011) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 5081 MISTAKING DOUBTS AND QUALMS FOR CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: AGAINST THE REJECTION OF LEGISLATIVE HISTORY AS A TOOL OF LEGAL INTERPRETATION, 39 Sw. L. Rev. 103, 153+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5082 IF "I DO," THEN SO SHOULD YOU: AN ANALYSIS OF STATE CONSTITUTIONAL BANS ON SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, 39 Sw. L. Rev. 365, 394+ (2009) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5083 TWO JURISDICTIONS, THREE STANDARDS: THE ADMISSIBILITY OF MISCONDUCT EVIDENCE TO IMPEACH, 36 Sw. U. L. Rev. 769, 791 (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5084 VULGARIANS AT THE GATE: PRIVACY, PORNOGRAPHY & THE END OF OBSCENITY LAW AS WE KNOW IT, 34 Sw. U. L. Rev. 427, 448+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5085 SAME SEX MARRIAGE: AN ESSENTIAL STEP TOWARDS EQUALITY, 34 Sw. U. L. Rev. 579, 596+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5086 TO FULFILL A PROMISE: USING CANONS 3B(5) AND 3B(6) OF THE JUDICIAL CODE OF CONDUCT TO COMBAT SEXUAL ORIENTATION BIAS AGAINST GAY AND LESBIAN CRIMINAL DEFENDANTS, 34 Sw. U. L. Rev. 607, 634+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5087 DEATH IS CERTAIN, ARE TAXES? ANOTHER ARGUMENT FOR EQUALITY FOR SAME-SEX COUPLES UNDER THE CODE, 34 Sw. U. L. Rev. 635, 655+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5088 A MOST FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOM OF CHOICE: AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTION TO ELECTIVE ABORTION, 24 St. John's J. Legal Comment. 771, 809 (2010) 5089 EXAMINING JUSTICE BREYER'S CONSTITUTIONAL CONSEQUENTIAL THINKING: CAN JUSTICE SCALIA BE WRONG AND JUSTICE KENNEDY BE RIGHT?, 23 St. John's J. Legal Comment. 137, 166+ (2008) 5090 JUDICIAL ACTIVISM ON THE REHNQUIST COURT: AN EMPIRICAL © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. ASSESSMENT, 23 St. John's J. Legal Comment. 35, 110+ (2008) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 5091 LAWRENCE V. TEXAS AND ROPER V. SIMMONS: ENRICHING CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION WITH INTERNATIONAL LAW, 22 St. John's J. Legal Comment. 685, 716+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5092 WHOSE OX IS BEING GORED? WHEN ATTITUDINALISM MEETS FEDERALISM, 21 St. John's J. Legal Comment. 497, 525+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5093 AN OBJECTIVE APPROACH TO OBSCENITY IN THE DIGITAL AGE, 86 St. John's L. Rev. 211, 241+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5094 MARRIAGE AND THE RELIGION CLAUSES, 85 St. John's L. Rev. 1451, 1482+ (2011) 5095 GUILTY UNTIL PROVEN INNOCENT: CLEARING MASSACHUSETTS'S UNCERTAIN ROAD TO POST-CONVICTION DNA TESTING, 85 St. John's L. Rev. 1595, 1620 (2011) 5096 THE SUPREME COURT'S CATHOLIC MAJORITY: DOCTRINE, DISCRETION, AND JUDICIAL DECISION-MAKING, 85 St. John's L. Rev. 649, 681+ (2011) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 5097 THE TROUBLE WITH TREATIES: IMMIGRATION AND JUDICIAL REVIEW, 84 St. John's L. Rev. 1219, 1271+ (2010) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5098 WHAT WE TALK ABOUT WHEN WE TALK ABOUT IDEOLOGY: JUDICIAL POLITICS SCHOLARSHIP AND NAIVE LEGAL REALISM, 83 St. John's L. Rev. 231, 305+ (2009) 5099 "MR. SCALIA'S NEIGHBORHOOD": A HOME FOR MINORITY RELIGIONS?, 81 St. John's L. Rev. 819, 880 (2007) 5100 SOLOMON'S MINES: THE EXPLOSION OVER ON-CAMPUS MILITARY RECRUITING AND WHY THE SOLOMON AMENDMENT TRUMPS LAW SCHOOL NON-DISCRIMINATION POLICIES, 79 St. John's L. Rev. 689, 732 (2005) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 5101 JUSTIFICATION AND EXCUSE: WHAT THEY WERE, WHAT THEY ARE, AND WHAT THEY OUGHT TO BE, 78 St. John's L. Rev. 725, 895+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5102 QUEER EYE FOR THE MILITARY GUY: WILL "DON'T ASK, DON'T TELL" SURVIVE IN THE WAKE OF LAWRENCE V. TEXAS?, 78 St. John's L. Rev. 897, 931+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5103 AND THEN THERE WERE NONE: THE REPEAL OF SODOMY LAWS AFTER LAWRENCE V. TEXAS AND ITS EFFECT ON THE CUSTODY AND VISITATION RIGHTS OF GAY AND LESBIAN PARENTS, 78 St. John's L. Rev. 397, 425+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5104 IF IT'S NOT BROKE, DON'T FIX IT: IGNORING CRITICISMS OF SUPREME COURT RECUSALS, 57 St. Louis U. L.J. 521, 546 (2013) 5105 RIGHTS WITHOUT A BASE: THE TROUBLING AMBIGUITY AT THE HEART OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 57 St. Louis U. L.J. 101, 107+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 5106 REFLECTIONS ON SUBSTANCE AND FORM IN THE CIVIL RIGHTS CLASSROOM, 54 St. Louis U. L.J. 783, 794 (2010) 5107 TEACHING FEDERAL COURTS: FROM BOTTOM LINE TO MYSTERY, 53 St. Louis U. L.J. 797, 806 (2009) 5108 JUDICIAL SUPREMACY, JUDICIAL ACTIVISM: COOPER V. AARON AND PARENTS INVOLVED, 52 St. Louis U. L.J. 1191, 1210+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5109 OPEN ATTENDANCE-THE FIRST AMENDMENT IMPLICATIONS OF FIGHTING DISCRIMINATION AGAINST HOMOSEXUALS IN LAW SCHOOL STUDENT ORGANIZATIONS, 52 St. Louis U. L.J. 1249, 1290+ (2008) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 5110 IF ROE WERE OVERRULED: ABORTION AND THE CONSTITUTION IN A POST-ROE WORLD, 51 St. Louis U. L.J. 611, 653+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5111 GENDER, ABORTION, AND TRAVEL AFTER ROE'S END, 51 St. Louis U. L.J. 655, 683+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5112 STATE AND COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW PERSPECTIVES ON A POSSIBLE POST-ROE WORLD, 51 St. Louis U. L.J. 685, 699 (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5113 DEPRIVING AMERICA OF EVOLVING ITS OWN STANDARDS OF DECENCY?: AN ANALYSIS OF THE USE OF FOREIGN LAW IN EIGHTH AMENDMENT JURISPRUDENCE AND ITS EFFECT ON DEMOCRACY, 51 St. Louis U. L.J. 855, 893+ (2007) 5114 ORIGINALISM AND THE SENSE-REFERENCE DISTINCTION, 50 St. Louis U. L.J. 555, 627 (2006) 5115 GIMP THEORY AND THE ADA'S "FEEDBACK LOOP", 49 St. Louis U. L.J. 1047, 1079+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5116 MODELING CONSTITUTIONAL DOCTRINE, 49 St. Louis U. L.J. 691, 707+ (2005) 5117 CONSTITUTIONALIZATION, 49 St. Louis U. L.J. 709, 747+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5118 LESSONS TO BE LEARNED, LESSONS TO LIVE OUT: CATHOLICISM AT THE CROSSROADS OF JUDAISM AND AMERICAN LEGALISM, 49 St. Louis U. L.J. 367, 391 (2005) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 5119 ON TEACHING CRIMINAL LAW FROM A TRIAL PERSPECTIVE, 48 St. Louis U. L.J. 1181, 1194 (2004) 5120 BROWN V. BOARD OF EDUCATION AND THE JURISPRUDENCE OF LEGAL REALISM, 48 St. Louis U. L.J. 795, 838+ (2004) 5121 FROM CARDOZO TO DWORKIN: SOME VARIATIONS ON PROFESSOR NELSON'S THEME, 48 St. Louis U. L.J. 859, 867 (2004) 5122 A THIRTEENTH AMENDMENT CHALLENGE TO BOTH RACIAL DISPARITIES IN MEDICAL TREATMENTS AND IMPROPER PHYSICIANS' INFORMED CONSENT DISCLOSURES, 48 St. Louis U. L.J. 131, 189+ (2003) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5123 THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF COLLATERAL POST-CONVICTION CLAIMS OF ACTUAL INNOCENCE, 42 St. Mary's L.J. 455, 500+ (2011) 5124 SHOULD TEXAS'S FORMER BAN ON OBSCENE-DEVICE PROMOTION PASS CONSTITUTIONAL MUSTER UNDER A MURKY LAWRENCE?, 41 St. Mary's L.J. 177, 213+ (2009) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5125 READING, WRITING, AND RADICALISM: THE LIMITS ON GOVERNMENT CONTROL OVER PRIVATE SCHOOLING IN AN AGE OF TERRORISM, 37 St. Mary's L.J. 607, 674+ (2006) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 5126 DECRIMINALIZING SEXUAL CONDUCT: THE SUPREME COURT RULING IN LAWRENCE V. TEXAS, 35 St. Mary's L.J. 685, 706+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5127 THE U.S. SUPREME COURT GETS IT RIGHT IN ARIZONA V. GANT: JUSTIFICATIONS FOR RULES PROTECT CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, 23 St. Thomas L. Rev. 532, 575+ (2011) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 5128 WHY THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT GOT SOME (BUT NOT A LOT) OF THE SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO COUNSEL ANALYSIS RIGHT, 21 St. Thomas L. Rev. 142, 189+ (2009) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 5129 ESSAY: A SEARCH FOR REASON IN FAIRY TALES, 18 St. Thomas L. Rev. 259, 268 (2005) 5130 OPENING ANOTHER EXIT FROM CHILD WELFARE FOR SPECIAL NEEDS CHILDREN - WHY SOME GAY MEN AND LESBIANS SHOULD HAVE THE PRIVILEGE TO ADOPT CHILDREN IN FLORIDA, 18 St. Thomas L. Rev. 269, 324 (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5131 LAWRENCE, LOFTON, AND REASONED JUDGMENT: ON WHO CAN ADOPT AND WHY, 18 St. Thomas L. Rev. 473, 493+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5132 THE "INNER LIVES" OF CHILDREN IN LESBIGAY ADOPTION: NARRATIVES AND OTHER CONCERNS, 18 St. Thomas L. Rev. 511, 542+ (2005) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 5133 ADULT SEXUAL DESIRE AND THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE CHILD, 18 St. Thomas L. Rev. 543, 598+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5134 PRENATAL TORT LAW AND THE PERSONHOOD OF THE UNBORN CHILD: A SEPARATE LEGAL EXISTENCE, 16 St. Thomas L. Rev. 207, 286+ (2003) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 5135 PRO-BUSINESS OR ANTI-GAY? DISGUISING LGBT ANIMUS AS ECONOMIC LEGISLATION, 9 Stanford Journal of Civil Rights & Civil Liberties 153+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5136 IS THERE A RIGHT TO HAVE CHILDREN? SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS AND PROBATION CONDITIONS THAT RESTRICT REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS, 6 Stanford Journal of Civil Rights & Civil Liberties 1+ (2010) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5137 IN DEMOCRACY'S SHADOW: FENCES, RAIDS, AND THE PRODUCTION © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. OF MIGRANT ILLEGALITY, 5 Stanford Journal of Civil Rights & Civil Liberties 23 (2009) 5138 WHO GETS TO INTERPRET THE CONSTITUTION? THE CASE OF MAYORS AND MARRIAGE EQUALITY, 3 Stanford Journal of Civil Rights & Civil Liberties 1+ (2007) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 5139 LINGUAPHOBIA, LANGUAGE RIGHTS, AND THE RIGHT OF PRIVACY, 3 Stanford Journal of Civil Rights & Civil Liberties 53+ (2007) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5140 POLYGAMY COMES OUT OF THE CLOSET: THE NEW STRATEGY OF POLYGAMY ACTIVISTS, 3 Stanford Journal of Civil Rights & Civil Liberties 99+ (2007) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5141 GETTING BEYOND SODOMY: LAWRENCE AND DON'T ASK, DON'T TELL, 2 Stanford Journal of Civil Rights & Civil Liberties 63+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5142 SAME SEX MARRIAGE, FULL FAITH AND CREDIT, AND THE EVASION OF OBLIGATION, 1 Stanford Journal of Civil Rights & Civil Liberties 1+ (2005) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 5143 WHAT IF BROWN v. BOARD OF EDUCATION WAS A HATE-SPEECH CASE?, 1 Stanford Journal of Civil Rights & Civil Liberties 271 (2005) 5144 DEMOSPRUDENCE IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE, 47 Stan. J. Int'l L. 111, 173+ (2011) 5145 THE WAY AHEAD? ACCESS-TO-JUSTICE, PUBLIC INTEREST LAWYERING, AND THE RIGHT TO LEGAL AID IN SOUTH AFRICA: THE NKUZI CASE, 41 Stan. J. Int'l L. 357, 400+ (2005) 5146 THE DEFENSELESS MARRIAGE ACT: THE LEGITIMACY OF PRESIDENT OBAMA'S REFUSAL TO DEFEND DOMA S 3, 24 Stan. L. & Pol'y Rev. 1, 34 (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 5147 PRESERVING ROE V. WADE . . . WHEN YOU WIN ONLY HALF THE LOAF, 24 Stan. L. & Pol'y Rev. 143, 165 (2013) 5148 FIGHTING THE PORNIFICATION OF AMERICA BY ENFORCING OBSCENITY LAWS, 23 Stan. L. & Pol'y Rev. 1, 18+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5149 THE OBSCENITY CONUNDRUM, CONTINGENT HARMS, AND CONSTITUTIONAL CONSISTENCY, 23 Stan. L. & Pol'y Rev. 31, 100+ (2012) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 5150 SEX EXCEPTIONALISM IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, 23 Stan. L. & Pol'y Rev. 119, 170 (2012) 5151 IMAGINING IMMIGRATION WITHOUT DOMA, 21 Stan. L. & Pol'y Rev. 383, 398 (2010) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5152 LABOR LAW BEYOND U.S. BORDERS: DOES WHAT HAPPENS OUTSIDE OF AMERICA STAY OUTSIDE OF AMERICA?, 21 Stan. L. & Pol'y Rev. 401, 426 (2010) 5153 STEM CELL RESEARCH AND THE CLONING WARS, 18 Stan. L. & Pol'y © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Rev. 161, 189 (2007) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 5154 A CULTURAL TURN: REFLECTIONS ON RECENT HISTORICAL AND LEGAL WRITING ON THE SECOND AMENDMENT, 17 Stan. L. & Pol'y Rev. 671, 698 (2006) 5155 INTRODUCTION: SAME-SEX MARRIAGE AS A MOVING STORY, 16 Stan. L. & Pol'y Rev. 1, 9+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5156 LEGAL & POLITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON THE BATTLE OVER SAMESEX MARRIAGE, 16 Stan. L. & Pol'y Rev. 11, 22+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5157 LAWRENCE V. TEXAS & THE REFINEMENT OF SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS, 16 Stan. L. & Pol'y Rev. 23, 56+ (2005) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 5158 HOMOSEXUAL OR FEMALE? APPLYING GENDER-BASED ASYLUM JURISPRUDENCE TO LESBIAN ASYLUM CLAIMS, 16 Stan. L. & Pol'y Rev. 417, 444+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5159 MARRIAGE BETWEEN A MAN & A WOMAN: A FIGHT TO SAVE THE TRADITIONAL FAMILY ONE CASE AT A TIME, 16 Stan. L. & Pol'y Rev. 57, 71 (2005) 5160 GOVERNMENT AFFIXES A LABEL OF INFERIORITY ON SAME-SEX COUPLES WHEN IT IMPOSES CIVIL UNIONS & DENIES ACCESS TO MARRIAGE, 16 Stan. L. & Pol'y Rev. 73, 82 (2005) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 5161 LEGISLATIVE DEFERENCE & THE NOVELTY OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, 16 Stan. L. & Pol'y Rev. 83, 96 (2005) 5162 MISSING IN ACTION? SEARCHING FOR GENDER TALK IN THE SAMESEX MARRIAGE DEBATE, 16 Stan. L. & Pol'y Rev. 97, 134+ (2005) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 5163 NONPROFIT FUNDRAISING AND CONSUMER PROTECTION: A DONOR'S RIGHT TO PRIVACY, 15 Stan. L. & Pol'y Rev. 519, 577+ (2004) 5164 MORALS LEGISLATION AFTER LAWRENCE: CAN STATES CRIMINALIZE THE SALE OF SEXUAL DEVICES?, 65 Stan. L. Rev. 565, 565+ (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5165 "THEY SAW A PROTEST": COGNITIVE ILLIBERALISM AND THE SPEECH-CONDUCT DISTINCTION, 64 Stan. L. Rev. 851, 906 (2012) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 5166 HARRINGTON'S WAKE: UNANSWERED QUESTIONS ON AEDPA'S APPLICATION TO SUMMARY DISPOSITIONS, 64 Stan. L. Rev. 469, 506 (2012) 5167 COLLECTIVE ACTION FEDERALISM: A GENERAL THEORY OF ARTICLE I, SECTION 8, 63 Stan. L. Rev. 115, 185+ (2010) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 5168 TWO CHEERS FOR STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 62 Stan. L. Rev. 1695, 1709+ (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5169 THE LAW, CULTURE, AND ECONOMICS OF FASHION, 61 Stan. L. Rev. 1147, 1199+ (2009) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 5170 VIEWPOINT DIVERSITY AND MEDIA CONSOLIDATION: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY, 61 Stan. L. Rev. 781, 868+ (2009) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 5171 THE FUNCTIONS OF STANDING, 61 Stan. L. Rev. 459, 517 (2008) 5172 RETHINKING CONSTITUTIONAL WELFARE RIGHTS, 61 Stan. L. Rev. 203, 269+ (2008) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5173 THE CONSTITUTION AND THE RIGHTS NOT TO PROCREATE, 60 Stan. L. Rev. 1135, 1196+ (2008) 5174 THE COGNITIVELY ILLIBERAL STATE, 60 Stan. L. Rev. 115, 154+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5175 IF PEOPLE WOULD BE OUTRAGED BY THEIR RULINGS, SHOULD JUDGES CARE?, 60 Stan. L. Rev. 155, 212+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5176 WELL, SHOULD THEY? A RESPONSE TO IF PEOPLE WOULD BE OUTRAGED BY THEIR RULINGS, SHOULD JUDGES CARE?, 60 Stan. L. Rev. 213, 240+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5177 SHOULD WE HAVE LAY JUSTICES?, 59 Stan. L. Rev. 1569, 1611+ (2007) 5178 WHY JUSTICE SCALIA SHOULD BE A CONSTITUTIONAL COMPARATIVIST . . . SOMETIMES, 59 Stan. L. Rev. 1249, 1279+ (2007) 5179 CONDORCET AND THE CONSTITUTION: A RESPONSE TO THE LAW OF OTHER STATES, 59 Stan. L. Rev. 1281, 1308 (2007) 5180 TOWARDS A COMMON LAW ORIGINALISM, 59 Stan. L. Rev. 551, 600+ (2006) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 5181 THE CASE AGAINST BLANKET FIRST AMENDMENT PROTECTION OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH: ARTICULATING A MORE LIMITED SCOPE OF PROTECTION, 59 Stan. L. Rev. 505, 550+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5182 THE LAW OF OTHER STATES, 59 Stan. L. Rev. 131, 179+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5183 YOUNG MR. REHNQUIST'S THEORY OF MORAL RIGHTS-MOSTLY OBSERVED, 58 Stan. L. Rev. 1827, 1869 (2006) 5184 PROBLEMS WITH MINIMALISM, 58 Stan. L. Rev. 1899, 1918 (2006) 5185 THE REHNQUIST COURT AT TWILIGHT: THE LURES AND PERILS OF SPLIT-THE-DIFFERENCE JURISPRUDENCE, 58 Stan. L. Rev. 1969, 1996+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5186 THINKING ABOUT SEXUAL CONSENT, 58 Stan. L. Rev. 935, 987 (2005) 5187 TESTING CRUZAN: PRISONERS AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION OF SELF-STARVATION, 58 Stan. L. Rev. 631, 662+ (2005) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 5188 THE ELYSIAN FIELDS OF THE LAW, 57 Stan. L. Rev. 695, 722+ (2004) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 5189 ELY AND THE IDEA OF DEMOCRACY, 57 Stan. L. Rev. 737, 760+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5190 MODERNIZATION AND REPRESENTATION REINFORCEMENT: AN © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. ESSAY IN MEMORY OF JOHN HART ELY, 57 Stan. L. Rev. 761, 778+ (2004) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5191 THE CANON OF FAMILY LAW, 57 Stan. L. Rev. 825, 900 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5192 CONVICTIONS AND DOUBTS: RETRIBUTION, REPRESENTATION, AND THE DEBATE OVER FELON DISENFRANCHISEMENT, 56 Stan. L. Rev. 1147, 1170 (2004) 5193 TOWARDS AN INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL SYSTEM, 56 Stan. L. Rev. 429, 529 (2003) .... FORGETTING ROMER, 65 Stan. L. Rev. Online 86, 89+ (2013) (Text not available on WESTLAW) .... ANIMUS THICK AND THIN: THE BROADER IMPACT OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT DECISION IN PERRY v. BROWN, 64 Stan. L. Rev. Online 111, 116 (2012) (Text not available on WESTLAW) 5196 REGULATION OF ELECTRONIC EMPLOYEE MONITORING: IDENTIFYING FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF EMPLOYEE PRIVACY THROUGH A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DATA PRIVACY LEGISLATION IN THE EUROPEAN UNION, UNITED STATES AND CANADA, 2004 Stan. Tech. L. Rev. 4, 121 (2004) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5197 IS THE ROBERTS COURT REALLY A COURT?, 40 Stetson L. Rev. 701, 715 (2011) 5198 GETTING BACK TO SEX: THE NEED TO REFINE CURRENT ANTIDISCRIMINATION STATUTES TO INCLUDE ALL SEXUAL MINORITIES, 39 Stetson L. Rev. 925, 959+ (2010) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5199 TROUBLED WATERS: MID-TWENTIETH CENTURY AMERICAN SOCIETY ON "TRIAL" IN THE FILMS OF JOHN WATERS, 39 Stetson L. Rev. 153, 182+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5200 "JUST TRYING TO BE HUMAN IN THIS PLACE": STORYTELLING AND FILM IN THE FIRST-YEAR LAW SCHOOL CLASSROOM, 39 Stetson L. Rev. 247, 284 (2009) 5201 ALLOWING FOR CULTURAL DISCUSSION OF QUEERNESS AND PANSEXUALITY: SEX/GENDER/SEXUAL BELIEF SYSTEMS, THE RELIGION CLAUSES, AND THE IDEAL OF PLURALISM, 38 Stetson L. Rev. 409, 457+ (2009) 5202 ZEROING IN ON CHARMING BETSY: HOW AN ANTIDUMPING CONTROVERSY THREATENS TO SINK THE SCHOONER, 36 Stetson L. Rev. 255, 291+ (2006) 5203 CITIZENSHIP IN A TIME OF REPRESSION, 35 Stetson L. Rev. 775, 809+ (2006) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5204 DIFFICULT PROBLEMS CALL FOR NEW SOLUTIONS: ARE GUARDIANS PROPER FOR VIABLE FETUSES OF MENTALLY INCOMPETENT MOTHERS IN STATE CUSTODY?, 34 Stetson L. Rev. 193, 230+ (2004) HN: © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5205 FLORIDA'S INCONSISTENT USE OF THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE CHILD STANDARD, 33 Stetson L. Rev. 369, 371+ (2003) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5206 INTERNATIONAL ENFORCEMENT LAW TRENDS FOR 2010 AND BEYOND: CAN THE COPS KEEP UP WITH THE CRIMINALS?, 34 Suffolk Transnat'l L. Rev. 1, 67+ (2011) 5207 FOREIGN LAW - A FRIEND OF THE COURT: AN ARGUMENT FOR PRUDENT USE OF INTERNATIONAL LAW IN DOMESTIC, HUMAN RIGHTS RELATED CONSTITUTIONAL DECISIONS, 34 Suffolk Transnat'l L. Rev. 117, 143+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5208 EXECUTING THE DEATH PENALTY: INTERNATIONAL LAW INFLUENCES ON UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT DECISIONMAKING IN CAPITAL PUNISHMENT CASES, 32 Suffolk Transnat'l L. Rev. 599, 630+ (2009) 5209 4 J. High Tech. L. 1, WHOSE VIEW OF LIFE? EMBRYOS, CLONING, AND STEM CELLS Cambridge, Massachusetts, Harvard University Press, 2003, Paper: ISBN: 0-674-01170-8 (Price $27.95) pp. 304 (excluding footnotes) (2005) 5210 TARGETED HATE SPEECH AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT: HOW THE SUPREME COURT SHOULD HAVE DECIDED SNYDER, 46 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 45, 78 (2013) 5211 THE MASSACHUSETTS CONSTITUTION-THE LAST THIRTY YEARS, 44 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 331, 358+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5212 A CONSTITUTION OF MANY MINDS: WHY THE FOUNDING DOCUMENT DOESN'T MEAN WHAT IT MEANT BEFORE, 43 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 441, 446 (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5213 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-"DON'T ASK, DON'T TELL": ACCEPTABLE IN AN ACCEPTING SOCIETY?-COOK V. GATES, 528 F.3D 42 (1ST CIR. 2008), 42 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 321, 328+ (2009) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5214 CITATION OF FOREIGN DECISIONS IN CONSTITUTIONAL ADJUDICATION: THE RELEVANCE OF THE DEMOCRATIC DEFICIT, 43 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 117, 134+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5215 CITATION TO FOREIGN DECISIONS IN CONSTITUTIONAL ADJUDICATION, 43 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 135, 161+ (2009) 5216 THE 2007 ROBERTS COURT EDUCATION LAW CASES: REAFFIRMATION OR CUT-BACK OF STUDENT RIGHTS?, 42 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 61, 76+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5217 NATURAL LAW ORIGINALISM FOR THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY - A PRINCIPLE OF JUDICIAL RESTRAINT, NOT INVENTION, 40 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 383, 417+ (2007) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5218 ENDING MARRIAGE DISCRIMINATION: A WORK IN PROGRESS, 40 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 813, 859+ (2007) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5219 RELIGION, POLYGAMY, AND NON-TRADITIONAL FAMILIES: © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. DISPARATE VIEWS ON THE EVOLUTION OF MARRIAGE IN HISTORY AND IN THE DEBATE OVER SAME-SEX UNIONS, 41 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 19, 48+ (2007) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 5220 CRIMINAL LAW-INNOCENT THIRD PARTIES DESERVE GREATER FOURTH AMENDMENT PROTECTIONS THAN CRIMINAL SUSPECTS AND DEFENDANTS-COMMONWEALTH V. DRAHEIM, 849 N.E.2D 823 (MASS. 2006), 41 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 305, 312+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5221 THE MEDIA'S FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS AND THE RAPE VICTIM'S RIGHT TO PRIVACY: WHERE DOES ONE RIGHT END AND THE OTHER BEGIN?, 39 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 745, 756+ (2006) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5222 CROWD CONTROL: THE MAJORITARIAN COURT AND THE REFLECTION OF PUBLIC OPINION IN DOCTRINE, 39 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 379, 423+ (2006) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 5223 THE VALIDITY OF CRIMINAL ADULTERY PROHIBITIONS AFTER LAWRENCE V. TEXAS, 39 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 837, 861+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5224 WHOSE CONSCIENCE IS IT ANYWAY? THE STATE'S ROLE IN CONSCIENCE CLAUSE CREATION AND THE DENIAL OF CONTRACEPTION, 40 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 215, 235 (2006) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 5225 THE TYRANNY OF LABELS, 38 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 749, 760+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5226 HOW SOCIAL MOVEMENTS CHANGE (OR FAIL TO CHANGE) THE CONSTITUTION: THE CASE OF THE NEW DEPARTURE, 39 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 27, 65+ (2005) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 5227 CONTRACT LAW-FOR BETTER OR FOR WORSE: THE MISSING ELEMENT IN SAME-SEX "MARRIAGE" CONTRACTS-GOODRIDGE V. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 798 N.E.2D 941 (MASS. 2003), 37 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 1227, 1234+ (2004) HN: 3,5 (S.Ct.) 5228 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS AND THE NOTSO FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO SEXUAL ORIENTATION-LAWRENCE V. TEXAS, 123 S. CT. 2472 (2003), 37 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 1249, 1254+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5229 THE JUDICIAL SIGNALING GAME: HOW JUDGES SHAPE THEIR DOCKETS, 16 Sup. Ct. Econ. Rev. 1, 37 (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5230 OF SAME SEX RELATIONSHIPS AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION: THE COVERT LIBERTARIANISM OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, 12 Sup. Ct. Econ. Rev. 75, 76+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5231 THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE FRONTIER IN AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 2011 Sup. Ct. Rev. 345, 395+ (2011) 5232 THROUGH STREETS BROAD AND NARROW: SIX "CENTRIST" JUSTICES ON THE PATHS TO INCLUSION, 2010 Sup. Ct. Rev. 1, 33+ (2010) 5233 THE GAY AND THE ANGRY: THE SUPREME COURT AND THE BATTLES © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. SURROUNDING SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, 2010 Sup. Ct. Rev. 159, 160+ (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5234 UNDERSTANDING SUPREME COURT CONFIRMATIONS, 2010 Sup. Ct. Rev. 381, 460+ (2010) 5235 SIGNIFICANT RISKS: GONZALES v CARHART AND THE FUTURE OF ABORTION LAW, 2007 Sup. Ct. Rev. 1, 50 (2007) 5236 THE FEDERAL JUDICIAL POWER AND THE INTERNATIONAL LEGAL ORDER, 2006 Sup. Ct. Rev. 59, 113 (2006) 5237 JUST BLOWING SMOKE? POLITICS, DOCTRINE, AND THE FEDERALIST REVIVAL AFTER GONZALES v RAICH, 2005 Sup. Ct. Rev. 1, 11+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5238 BAKKE REVISITED, 55 Sup. Ct. Rev. 1, 25 (2003) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 5239 THE UNMAKING OF A PRECEDENT, 55 Sup. Ct. Rev. 231, 254+ (2003) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.) 5240 CHAVEZ v MARTINEZ'S CONSTITUTIONAL DIVISION OF LABOR, 55 Sup. Ct. Rev. 269, 301 (2003) 5241 WHAT DID LAWRENCE HOLD? OF AUTONOMY, DESUETUDE, SEXUALITY, AND MARRIAGE, 55 Sup. Ct. Rev. 27, 74+ (2003) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5242 JUSTICE O'CONNOR AND THE SUBSTANCE OF EQUAL CITIZENSHIP, 55 Sup. Ct. Rev. 357, 439+ (2003) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5243 OF "THIS" AND "THAT" IN LAWRENCE v TEXAS, 55 Sup. Ct. Rev. 75, 75+ (2003) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5244 THE TWO PERCENT: THE PRACTICAL APPLICATION OF INTERNATIONAL LAW ON THE DEATH PENALTY IN THE UNITED STATES, 38 Syracuse J. Int'l L. & Com. 31, 54+ (2010) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5245 MEDIA LAW, 61 Syracuse L. Rev. 879, 904 (2011) 5246 AFTER COMSTOCK: EQUAL PROTECTION CHALLENGES TO THE CIVIL COMMITMENT PROVISIONS OF THE ADAM WALSH CHILD PROTECTION AND SAFETY ACT, 61 Syracuse L. Rev. 427, 446+ (2011) 5247 OMG TXT PIX PLZ: THE PHENOMENON OF SEXTING AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL BATTLE OF PROTECTING MINORS FROM THEIR OWN DEVICES, 61 Syracuse L. Rev. 499, 530+ (2011) 5248 IMPLICIT THEORIES AND CAPITAL SENTENCING: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY, 59 Syracuse L. Rev. 1, 29 (2008) 5249 FEDERALISM AND THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RIGHT TO ARMS, 59 Syracuse L. Rev. 201, 224 (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5250 DOES HELLER PROTECT A RIGHT TO CARRY GUNS OUTSIDE THE HOME?, 59 Syracuse L. Rev. 225, 234+ (2008) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5251 THE NATURAL RIGHT OF SELF-DEFENSE: HELLER'S LESSON FOR THE WORLD, 59 Syracuse L. Rev. 235, 252 (2008) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 5252 BETWEEN SUPREMACY AND EXCLUSIVITY, 57 Syracuse L. Rev. 187, 208 (2007) 5253 READING LOLITA AT GUANTANAMO OR, THIS PAGE CANNOT BE DISPLAYED, 57 Syracuse L. Rev. 209, 225+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5254 LEGAL PROTECTIONS FOR HOME DWELLERS: CAULKING THE CRACKS TO PRESERVE OCCUPANCY, 56 Syracuse L. Rev. 277, 319+ (2006) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5255 FAMILY LAW, 55 Syracuse L. Rev. 1053, 1106+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5256 THE MARK OF CAIN: DISENFRANCHISED FELONS AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL NO MAN'S LAND, 56 Syracuse L. Rev. 85, 144 (2005) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 5257 FAMILY LAW, 54 Syracuse L. Rev. 1127, 1178+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5258 POLITICS AND THE CONFIRMATION PROCESS: THE IMPORTANCE OF CONGRESSIONAL RESTRAINT IN SAFEGUARDING JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE, 55 Syracuse L. Rev. 1, 13+ (2004) Secondary Sources (Australia) 5259 Thinking Like a Lawyer: A New Introduction to Legal Reasoning by Frederick Schauer, Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Ma), 2009, 239pp, ISBN 0-674-03270-5, 31 Sydney L. Rev. 499, 502+ (2009) 5260 Constitutional Issues Regarding Same-Sex Marriage: A Comparative Survey North America and Australasia, 30 Sydney L. Rev. 27, 60 (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) Secondary Sources (U.S.A.) 5261 CASH, TRASH, AND TRADITION: A NEW DORMANT COMMERCE CLAUSE EXCEPTION EMERGES FROM UNITED HAULERS AND DAVIS, 61 Tax Law. 1021, 1073 (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5262 SHOULD BONE MARROW DONORS BE PAID TO SAVE LIVES? AN ASSESSMENT OF THE LEGAL BAN ON DONOR COMPENSATION AND OTHER OBSTACLES FACING DOMESTIC AND INTERNATIONAL BONE MARROW REGISTRIES, 24 Temp. Int'l & Comp. L.J. 477, 506 (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5263 CITATIONS OF FOREIGN DECISIONS IN AUSTRALIAN STATE SUPREME COURTS OVER THE COURSE OF THE TWENTIETH CENTURY: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS, 22 Temp. Int'l & Comp. L.J. 409, 436+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5264 A SENSE AND SENSIBILITY OF LEGAL OBLIGATION: CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW AND GAME THEORY, 20 Temp. Int'l & Comp. L.J. 111, 131 (2006) 5265 POST-CONVICTION DUE PROCESS RIGHT TO ACCESS DNA EVIDENCE: Dist. Attorney's Office v. Osborne, 129 S. Ct. 2308 (2009), 29 Temp. J. Sci. Tech. & Envtl. L. 127, 170+ (2010) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 5266 THE RIGHT TO LIVE: DO THE TERMINALLY ILL HAVE A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO USE EXPERIMENTAL DRUGS? ABIGAIL ALLIANCE V. VON ESCHENBACH, 445 F.3D 470 (D.C. CIR. 2006), 26 Temp. J. Sci. Tech. & Envtl. L. 149, 168+ (2007) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 5267 THE TREATING PHYSICIAN AS RESEARCHER: IS ASSUMING THIS DUAL ROLE A VIOLATION OF THE NUREMBERG CODE?, 25 Temp. J. Sci. Tech. & Envtl. L. 15, 48 (2006) 5268 I CONCUR! DO I MATTER?: DEVELOPING A FRAMEWORK FOR DETERMINING THE PRECEDENTIAL INFLUENCE OF CONCURRING OPINIONS, 84 Temp. L. Rev. 743, 793 (2012) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 5269 DEVELOPMENTAL DUE PROCESS: WAGING A CONSTITUTIONAL CAMPAIGN TO ALIGN SCHOOL DISCIPLINE WITH DEVELOPMENTAL KNOWLEDGE, 82 Temp. L. Rev. 929, 996 (2009) 5270 THE FDA'S RECENT ABOUT-FACE: PLAN B AGE RESTRICTION IS UNLAWFUL RULEMAKING AND VIOLATES MINORS' DUE PROCESS RIGHTS, 81 Temp. L. Rev. 303, 330 (2008) 5271 LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, AND TRANSGENDER YOUNG PEOPLE IN STATE CUSTODY: MAKING THE CHILD WELFARE AND JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEMS SAFE FOR ALL YOUTH THROUGH LITIGATION, ADVOCACY, AND EDUCATION, 79 Temp. L. Rev. 415, 438 (2006) 5272 GROUNDING NIKE: EXPOSING NIKE'S QUEST FOR A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO LIE, 78 Temp. L. Rev. 151, 200+ (2005) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 5273 FORCED TO CHOOSE: TORTURE, FAMILY REUNIFICATION, AND UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION POLICY, 78 Temp. L. Rev. 897, 948 (2005) 5274 THE MICHIGAN AFFIRMATIVE ACTION CASES: JUSTICE O'CONNOR, BAKKE REDUX, AND THE MICE THAT ROARED BUT DID NOT PREVAIL, 76 Temp. L. Rev. 579, 594+ (2003) 5275 JUDGING THE JUSTICES: A SUPREME COURT PERFORMANCE REVIEW, 76 Temp. L. Rev. 209, 223+ (2003) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5276 AGING IN THE UNITED STATES: RETHINKING JUSTICE, EQUALITY, AND IDENTITY ACROSS THE LIFESPAN, 21 Temp. Pol. & Civ. Rts. L. Rev. 305, 320 (2012) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 5277 FEDERAL POLICY, ACTIVISM, AND LGBT OLDER ADULTS, 21 Temp. Pol. & Civ. Rts. L. Rev. 511, 520+ (2012) 5278 THE BROAD JURISPRUDENTIAL SIGNIFICANCE OF SOSA V. ÁLVAREZMACHAIN: AN HONEST ASSESSMENT OF THE ROLE OF FEDERAL JUDGES AND WHY CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW CAN BE MORE EFFECTIVE THAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW FOR REDRESSING SERI, 21 Temp. Pol. & Civ. Rts. L. Rev. 41, 99+ (2011) 5279 THE CIVIC UNDERPINNINGS OF LEGAL CHANGE: GAY RIGHTS, ABORTION, AND GUN CONTROL, 21 Temp. Pol. & Civ. Rts. L. Rev. 117, 162+ (2011) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 5280 WOMEN'S WRONGS, RELIGIONS' RIGHTS: WOMEN, FREE EXERCISE, AND ESTABLISHMENT IN AMERICAN LAW, 21 Temp. Pol. & Civ. Rts. L. Rev. 163, 214 (2011) 5281 A REPLY TO JULES EPSTEIN: IS THERE AN OBJECTIVE WAY TO DEFINE THE "WORST OF THE WORST'?, 19 Temp. Pol. & Civ. Rts. L. Rev. 421, 427 (2010) 5282 LIBERTY AND PRIVACY INTERESTS THROUGH THE POLITICAL QUESTION LENS, 19 Temp. Pol. & Civ. Rts. L. Rev. 187, 222+ (2009) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5283 RECENT CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTIONS IN TAXATION: TOWARD A LEGISLATIVE SOLUTION TO CONSTITUTIONAL PROBLEMS OF SAMESEX COUPLES AND MINISTERS OF THE GOSPEL?, 19 Temp. Pol. & Civ. Rts. L. Rev. 223, 264+ (2009) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5284 WHERE THE RUBBER LEFT THE ROAD: THE USE AND MISUSE OF HISTORY IN THE QUEST FOR THE FEDERAL EMPLOYMENT NONDISCRIMINATION ACT, 18 Temp. Pol. & Civ. Rts. L. Rev. 397, 463+ (2009) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 5285 INSTANT (GENDER) MESSAGING: EXPRESSION-BASED CHALLENGES TO STATE ENFORCEMENT OF GENDER NORMS, 18 Temp. Pol. & Civ. Rts. L. Rev. 465, 503 (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5286 THE UNTIMELY DEATH OF THE COMMERCE CLAUSE: GONZALES V. RAICH'S THREAT TO FEDERALISM, THE DEMOCRATIC PROCESS, AND INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS & LIBERTIES, 18 Temp. Pol. & Civ. Rts. L. Rev. 213, 252 (2008) 5287 SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, IDENTITY PROCESSES, AND THE KULTURKAMPF: WHY FEDERALISM IS NOT THE MAIN EVENT, 17 Temp. Pol. & Civ. Rts. L. Rev. 387, 420+ (2008) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5288 SAME-SEX MARRIAGE AND FEDERALISM, 17 Temp. Pol. & Civ. Rts. L. Rev. 421, 442+ (2008) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5289 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE MATTERS: THE CASE FOR APPOINTED COUNSEL IN PROTECTIVE ORDER PROCEEDINGS, 15 Temp. Pol. & Civ. Rts. L. Rev. 557, 602+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5290 CIVIL GIDEON AS A HUMAN RIGHT: IS THE U.S. GOING TO JOIN STEP WITH THE REST OF THE DEVELOPED WORLD, 15 Temp. Pol. & Civ. Rts. L. Rev. 769, 789+ (2006) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5291 THE SCHIAVO LITIGATION: A CASE STUDY FOR FEDERALISM, 15 Temp. Pol. & Civ. Rts. L. Rev. 423, 448 (2006) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 5292 ON SHIFTING SAND: THE PERILS OF GROUNDING THE CASE FOR SAME-SEX MARRIAGE IN THE CONTEXT OF ANTIMISCEGENATION, 14 Temp. Pol. & Civ. Rts. L. Rev. 285, 305+ (2004) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5293 RETOOLING THE INTENT REQUIREMENT UNDER THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT, 13 Temp. Pol. & Civ. Rts. L. Rev. 611, 627+ (2004) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 5294 POLITICS, NOT HISTORY, EXPLAINS THE REHNQUIST COURT, 13 Temp. Pol. & Civ. Rts. L. Rev. 647, 661+ (2004) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5295 WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE? THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT, ORIGINAL INTENT, AND PRESENT REALITIES, 13 Temp. Pol. & Civ. Rts. L. Rev. 691, 705+ (2004) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5296 LAWRENCE V. TEXAS AND THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT'S DEMOCRATIC ASPIRATIONS, 13 Temp. Pol. & Civ. Rts. L. Rev. 733, 768+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5297 NEGLECTED STORIES AND THE SWEET MYSTERY OF LIBERTY, 13 Temp. Pol. & Civ. Rts. L. Rev. 769, 784+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5298 THE STULTIFICATION OF THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT, 13 Temp. Pol. & Civ. Rts. L. Rev. 875, 890+ (2004) 5299 "CSI" AFTER GRUTTER V. BOLLINGER: SEARCHING FOR EVIDENCE TO CONSTRUCT THE ACCUMULATION OF WEALTH AND ECONOMIC DIVERSITY AS COMPELLING STATE INTERESTS, 13 Temp. Pol. & Civ. Rts. L. Rev. 927, 961 (2004) 5300 PROTECTING OR DISMANTLING THE FAMILY: A LOOK AT FOSTER FAMILIES AND HOMOSEXUAL PARENTS AFTER LOFTON V. KEARNEY, 13 Temp. Pol. & Civ. Rts. L. Rev. 227, 251+ (2003) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5301 THE CRIME OF POLYGAMY, 12 Temp. Pol. & Civ. Rts. L. Rev. 353, 431+ (2003) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 5302 CHRISTENSEN V. HARRIS COUNTY: THE U.S. SUPREME COURT EXCUSES PUBLIC EMPLOYERS FROM THE FAIR STANDARDS OF OVERTIME COMPENSATION, 11 Temp. Pol. & Civ. Rts. L. Rev. 279, 298+ (2001) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 5303 WHEN THE CASE GIVES YOU LEMONS ... Using Negative Authority in Persuasive Legal Writing, 46-MAR Tenn. B.J. 14, 18 (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5304 THE NINE: INSIDE THE SECRET WORLD OF THE SUPREME COURT BY JEFFREY TOOBIN DOUBLEDAY PUBLISHING $27.95 384 PAGES 2007, 44-JUN Tenn. B.J. 32, 32 (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5305 SUPREME COURT REVIEW How will Recent Court Decisions Impact your Practice? Find out Here, 39-SEP Tenn. B.J. 18, 21 (2003) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5306 OBAMACARE AS A WINDOW ON JUDICIAL STRATEGY, 80 Tenn. L. Rev. 763, 845+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5307 DRUGS, DIGNITY, AND DANGER: HUMAN DIGNITY AS A CONSTITUTIONAL CONSTRAINT TO LIMIT OVERCRIMINALIZATION, 80 Tenn. L. Rev. 291, 295+ (2013) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 5308 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-RIGHT TO PRIVACY-GOVERNMENT CONTRACT EMPLOYEES' RIGHT TO INFORMATIONAL PRIVACY, 79 Tenn. L. Rev. 417, 435+ (2012) 5309 DOMA'S BANKRUPTCY, 79 Tenn. L. Rev. 1, 28+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 5310 CONVENTIONAL WISDOM: ACKNOWLEDGING UNCERTAINTY IN THE UNKNOWN, 78 Tenn. L. Rev. 789, 805 (2011) 5311 THE CASE FOR THE REPEAL AMENDMENT, 78 Tenn. L. Rev. 813, 822 (2011) 5312 SUNLIGHT'S GLARE: HOW OVERBROAD OPEN GOVERNMENT LAWS CHILL FREE SPEECH AND HAMPER EFFECTIVE DEMOCRACY, 78 Tenn. L. Rev. 309, 376 (2011) 5313 ONCE UPON A TIME IN LAW: MYTH, METAPHOR, AND AUTHORITY, 77 Tenn. L. Rev. 883, 916+ (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5314 SEXTING, STATUTES, AND SAVED BY THE BELL: INTRODUCING A LESSER JUVENILE CHARGE WITH AN "AGGRAVATING FACTORS" FRAMEWORK, 77 Tenn. L. Rev. 1, 56 (2009) 5315 GUNS AND GAY SEX: SOME NOTES ON FIREARMS, THE SECOND AMENDMENT, AND "REASONABLE REGULATION", 75 Tenn. L. Rev. 137, 149+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5316 IN SEARCH OF JUDICIAL ACTIVISM: DANGERS IN QUANTIFYING THE QUALITATIVE, 74 Tenn. L. Rev. 567, 621 (2007) 5317 WHOSE LAW IS IT ANYWAY? THE CULTURAL LEGITIMACY OF INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE UNITED STATES, 73 Tenn. L. Rev. 669, 710+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5318 PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS TO DETERMINE "ENEMY COMBATANT" STATUS IN THE WAR ON TERRORISM, 73 Tenn. L. Rev. 351, 414+ (2006) 5319 PURPOSELESS RESTRAINTS: FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT RATIONALITY SCRUTINY AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW OF PRISON SENTENCES, 72 Tenn. L. Rev. 1041, 1110+ (2005) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 5320 ON THE 100TH ANNIVERSARY OF LOCHNER V. NEW YORK, 72 Tenn. L. Rev. 455, 507+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5321 SURFING THE WEB FOR A "BRANDEIS BRIEF" The Internet and Judicial Use of Legislative Facts, 70 Tex. B.J. 780, 782 (2007) 5322 2004-2005 STATE BAR OF TEXAS SECTION REPORTS, 68 Tex. B.J. 620, 631 (2005) 5323 CIVIL RIGHTS Landmark Supreme Court Decision Sets Stage for Future Gay and Lesbian Civil Rights, 67 Tex. B.J. 58, 59 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5324 FAMILY LAW Top 10 Things that Happened in 2003, 66 Tex. B.J. 684, 687 (2003) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5325 THE BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP CONTROVERSY: A STUDY OF CONSERVATIVE SUBSTANCE AND RHETORIC, 18 Tex. Hisp. J.L. & Pol'y 49, 79 (2012) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 5326 VINDICATION WITHOUT SUBSTANCE: GENDER RECOGNITION AND THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT, 40 Tex. Int'l L.J. 807, 835+ (2005) 5327 FOREWORD: GLOBALIZATION AND THE JUDICIARY, 39 Tex. Int'l L.J. © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 347, 351 (2004) 5328 LOOKING ABROAD WHEN INTERPRETING THE U.S. CONSTITUTION: SOME REFLECTIONS, 39 Tex. Int'l L.J. 353, 365+ (2004) 5329 LEARNING FROM THE FOREIGNERS: A RESPONSE TO JUSTICE SCALIA'S AND PROFESSOR LEVINSON'S PROFESSIONAL MORAL PAROCHIALISM, 39 Tex. Int'l L.J. 367, 379+ (2004) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 5330 "SMALL TOWN VALUES" AND "THE GAY PROBLEM:" HOW DO WE APPLY TINKER AND ITS PROGENY TO LGBTQA SPEECH IN SCHOOLS?, 22 Tex. J. Women & L. 131, 152+ (2013) 5331 AFRAID OF WHO YOU ARE: NO PROMO HOMO LAWS IN PUBLIC SCHOOL SEX EDUCATION, 22 Tex. J. Women & L. 219, 220+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5332 OBSCENE SQUIRTING: IF THE GOVERNMENT THINKS IT'S URINE, THEN THEY'VE GOT ANOTHER THING COMING, 22 Tex. J. Women & L. 45, 69+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5333 CAUGHT IN THE MIDDLE: TRANSSEXUAL MARRIAGE AND THE DISCONNECT BETWEEN SEX AND LEGAL SEX, 21 Tex. J. Women & L. 153, 186+ (2012) HN: 3,5 (S.Ct.) 5334 CAUGHT IN A BAD BROMANCE, 21 Tex. J. Women & L. 241, 266+ (2012) 5335 TRANSGENDER FOSTER YOUTH: A FORCED IDENTITY, 19 Tex. J. Women & L. 25, 57 (2009) 5336 GOOD VIBRATIONS: LIBERATING SEXUALITY FROM THE COMMERCIAL REGULATION OF SEXUAL DEVICES, 18 Tex. J. Women & L. 263, 303+ (2009) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5337 THE MEANING OF "LIFE": THE MORNING-AFTER PILL, THE QUESTION OF WHEN LIFE BEGINS, AND JUDICIAL REVIEW, 16 Tex. J. Women & L. 205, 240+ (2007) 5338 A HISTORY OF GENDER VARIANCE IN PRE-20TH CENTURY ANGLOAMERICAN LAW, 14 Tex. J. Women & L. 77, 119 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5339 SUBVERSIVE MOMENTS: CHALLENGING THE TRADITIONS OF CONSTITUTIONAL HISTORY, 13 Tex. J. Women & L. 91, 111 (2003) 5340 THE NORMAN/FRIEDMAN PRINCIPLE: EQUAL RIGHTS TO INFORMATION AND TECHNOLOGY ACCESS, 18 Tex. J. on C.L. & C.R. 47, 70+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5341 AMENDING CHRISTIAN LEGAL SOCIETY V. MARTINEZ: PROTECTING EXPRESSIVE ASSOCIATION AS AN INDEPENDENT RIGHT IN A LIMITED PUBLIC FORUM, 16 Tex. J. on C.L. & C.R. 129, 169+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5342 CONGRESS NEEDS TO REPAIR THE COURT'S DAMAGE TO S 1983, 16 Tex. J. on C.L. & C.R. 29, 76 (2010) 5343 SELF-DETERMINATION IN A GENDER FUNDAMENTALIST STATE: © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. TOWARD LEGAL LIBERATION OF TRANSGENDER IDENTITIES, 12 Tex. J. on C.L. & C.R. 101, 131+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5344 CONGRESSIONAL THREATS OF REMOVAL AGAINST FEDERAL JUDGES, 10 Tex. J. on C.L. & C.R. 111, 164+ (2005) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 5345 GOING TO THE CHAPEL AND WE'RE GOING TO GET MARRIED; BUT WILL THE STATE RECOGNIZE THE MARRIAGE? (FN2) THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF STATE MARRIAGE LAWS AFTER LAWRENCE V. TEXAS (FN3), 10 Tex. J. on C.L. & C.R. 189, 221+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5346 MORALISM, THE FEAR OF SOCIAL CHAOS: THE DISSENT IN LAWRENCE AND THE ANTIDOTES OF VERMONT AND BROWN, 9 Tex. J. on C.L. & C.R. 1, 21+ (2003) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5347 SELF-GOVERNMENT AND THE JUDICIAL FUNCTION COSMIC CONSTITUTIONAL THEORY: WHY AMERICANS ARE LOSING THEIR INALIENABLE RIGHT TO SELF-GOVERNANCE. BY J. HARVIE WILKINSON III. NEW YORK, NEW YORK: OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS, 2012., 92 Tex. L. Rev. 161, 196+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5348 MAXIM CONSTITUTIONALISM: LIBERAL EQUALITY FOR THE COMMON GOOD, 91 Tex. L. Rev. 1609, 1664+ (2013) 5349 VERDI'S HIGH C, 91 Tex. L. Rev. 1687, 1705+ (2013) 5350 PRECEDENT AND JURISPRUDENTIAL DISAGREEMENT, 91 Tex. L. Rev. 1711, 1719+ (2013) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 5351 PLURALISTIC NONORIGINALISM AND THE COMBINABILITY PROBLEM, 91 Tex. L. Rev. 1739, 1783+ (2013) 5352 ARE WE ALL ORIGINALISTS NOW? I HOPE NOT!, 91 Tex. L. Rev. 1785, 1808+ (2013) 5353 SETTLED VERSUS RIGHT: CONSTITUTIONAL METHOD AND THE PATH OF PRECEDENT, 91 Tex. L. Rev. 1843, 1896+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5354 MAKING SENSE OF THE MARRIAGE DEBATE FROM THE CLOSET TO THE ALTAR: COURTS, BACKLASH, AND THE STRUGGLE FOR SAMESEX MARRIAGE. BY MICHAEL J. KLARMAN. NEW YORK, NEW YORK: OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS, 2013. 276 PAGES. $27.95, 91 Tex. L. Rev. 1185, 1202+ (2013) 5355 SPEAKING TRUTH TO FIREPOWER: HOW THE FIRST AMENDMENT DESTABILIZES THE SECOND, 91 Tex. L. Rev. 49, 66+ (2012) 5356 RECONSTRUCTION AND RESISTANCE, 91 Tex. L. Rev. 121, 145 (2012) 5357 THE CASE FOR "TRIAL BY FORMULA", 90 Tex. L. Rev. 571, 634 (2012) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 5358 FIDELITY TO LAW AND THE MORAL PLURALISM PREMISE Lawyers and Fidelity to Law. By W. Bradley Wendel. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2010. 286 pages. $35.00., 90 Tex. L. Rev. 657, 672 (2012) 5359 ORIGINALISM AND SEX DISCRIMINATION, 90 Tex. L. Rev. 1, 101 (2011) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 5360 POLYPHONIC FEDERALISM. BY ROBERT A. SCHAPIRO. CHICAGO, THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO PRESS. 2009. PP. 237, $45.00., 89 Tex. L. Rev. 1365, 1394+ (2011) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 5361 THE CONSENSUS CONSTITUTION, 89 Tex. L. Rev. 755, 832+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5362 THE RELATIVE IRRELEVANCE OF THE ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE, 89 Tex. L. Rev. 583, 651+ (2011) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 5363 JUSTICE: WHAT'S THE RIGHT THING TO DO? BY MICHAEL J. SANDEL. NEW YORK: FARRAR, STRAUS, AND GIROUX, 2009. 308 PAGES. $15.00., 89 Tex. L. Rev. 653, 669 (2011) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 5364 CHILD PORNOGRAPHY, THE FIRST AMENDMENT, AND MISTAKES OF AGE: AN AGE-OLD DEBATE, 88 Tex. L. Rev. 1101, 1123 (2010) 5365 ON THE ORIGINS OF ORIGINALISM, 88 Tex. L. Rev. 1, 89 (2009) 5366 CONSTITUTIONAL HORTICULTURE: DELIBERATION-RESPECTING JUDICIAL REVIEW, 87 Tex. L. Rev. 1273, 1302+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5367 THREE THEORIES OF RELIGIOUS EQUALITY . . . AND OF EXEMPTIONS LIBERTY OF CONSCIENCE: IN DEFENSE OF AMERICA'S TRADITION OF RELIGIOUS EQUALITY. By Martha Nussbaum. New York, New York: Basic Books, 2008. 416 Pages. $28.95. R, 87 Tex. L. Rev. 963, 1007 (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5368 INTELLECTUAL PRIVACY, 87 Tex. L. Rev. 387, 445+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5369 INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS UNDER STATE CONSTITUTIONS WHEN THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT WAS RATIFIED IN 1868: WHAT RIGHTS ARE DEEPLY ROOTED IN AMERICAN HISTORY AND TRADITION?, 87 Tex. L. Rev. 7, 120+ (2008) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5370 UNDERSTANDING THE NEW POLITICS OF JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS Confirmation Wars: Preserving Independent Courts in Angry Times. By Benjamin Wittes. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., 2006. Pp. 168. $22.95. Supre, 86 Tex. L. Rev. 1033, 1078+ (2008) 5371 THE VIRTUE OF JUDICIAL STATESMANSHIP, 86 Tex. L. Rev. 959, 1032+ (2008) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 5372 DEMOCRACY AND DECRIMINALIZATION, 86 Tex. L. Rev. 223, 275+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5373 THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO MAKE MEDICAL TREATMENT DECISIONS: A TALE OF TWO DOCTRINES, 86 Tex. L. Rev. 277, 345+ (2007) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 5374 A THEORY OF JUSTICIABILITY, 86 Tex. L. Rev. 73, 139+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5375 A THEORY OF DECEPTION AND THEN OF COMMON LAW CATEGORIES, 85 Tex. L. Rev. 1359, 1383 (2007) 5376 CHIPS OFF OUR BLOCK? A REPLY TO BERG, GREENAWALT, LUPU © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. AND TUTTLE, 85 Tex. L. Rev. 1273, 1287 (2007) 5377 WHERE EVERYTHING OLD IS NEW AGAIN-ENDURING EPISODIC DISCRIMINATION AGAINST HOMOSEXUAL PERSONS, 84 Tex. L. Rev. 1587, 1632+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5378 THE COURT AGAINST THE COURTS: HOSTILITY TO LITIGATION AS AN ORGANIZING THEME IN THE REHNQUIST COURT'S JURISPRUDENCE, 84 Tex. L. Rev. 1097, 1202+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5379 RATIONAL REVIEWS, IRRATIONAL RESULTS, 84 Tex. L. Rev. 801, 829+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5380 THE POLITICS OF JUDICIAL REVIEW, 84 Tex. L. Rev. 257, 337+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5381 A THEORY OF PUNITIVE DAMAGES, 84 Tex. L. Rev. 105, 171 (2005) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 5382 FLOUTING THE LAW, 83 Tex. L. Rev. 1399, 1441+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5383 THE LOST JURISPRUDENCE OF THE NINTH AMENDMENT, 83 Tex. L. Rev. 597, 716 (2005) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 5384 ARE "THE PEOPLE" MISSING IN ACTION (AND SHOULD ANYONE CARE)? The People Themselves: Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review. By Larry D. Kramer. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004. Pp. xii, 363. $29.95., 83 Tex. L. Rev. 855, 896+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5385 THE LOST ORIGINAL MEANING OF THE NINTH AMENDMENT, 83 Tex. L. Rev. 331, 429 (2004) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 5386 THE REHNQUIST COURT'S TWO FEDERALISMS, 83 Tex. L. Rev. 1, 165+ (2004) 5387 COMPARATIVE AVENUES IN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: AN INTRODUCTION, 82 Tex. L. Rev. 1653, 1669+ (2004) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 5388 THE CONSEQUENCES OF CENTRALIZING CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW IN A SPECIAL COURT: SOME THOUGHTS ON JUDICIAL ACTIVISM, 82 Tex. L. Rev. 1705, 1736 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5389 THE PERMEABILITY OF CONSTITUTIONAL BORDERS, 82 Tex. L. Rev. 1763, 1818+ (2004) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 5390 SOCIAL WELFARE RIGHTS AND THE FORMS OF JUDICIAL REVIEW, 82 Tex. L. Rev. 1895, 1919 (2004) 5391 THINKING OUTSIDE THE SOVEREIGNTY BOX: TRANSNATIONAL LAW AND THE U.S. CONSTITUTION, 82 Tex. L. Rev. 1989, 2016 (2004) 5392 LOCHNER'S LEGACY'S LEGACY, 82 Tex. L. Rev. 1, 64+ (2003) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5393 HOW TO STOP WORRYING AND LEARN TO LOVE THE SECOND AMENDMENT: A REPLY TO PROFESSOR MAGARIAN, 91 Tex. L. Rev. See Also 89, 101 (2013) 5394 INTELLECTUAL PRIVACY, 87 Tex. L. Rev. See Also 387, 445+ (2009) HN: 1 © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. (S.Ct.) 5395 THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO MAKE MEDICAL TREATMENT DECISIONS: A TALE OF TWO DOCTRINES, 86 Tex. L. Rev. See Also 277, 342+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5396 A THEORY OF JUSTICIABILITY, 86 Tex. L. Rev. See Also 73, 97+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5397 9 Tex. Rev. Ent. & Sports L. 1, STOPPING THE OBSCENITY MADNESS 50 YEARS AFTER ROTH V. UNITED STATES (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5398 6 Tex. Rev. Ent. & Sports L. 79, PRECEDENT BE DAMNED - IT'S ALL ABOUT GOOD POLITICS & SENSATIONAL SOUNDBITES: THE VIDEO GAME CENSORSHIP SAGA OF 2005 (2005) 5399 STRAIGHT IS BETTER: WHY LAW AND SOCIETY MAY JUSTLY PREFER HETEROSEXUALITY, 15 Tex. Rev. L. & Pol. 359, 436+ (2011) 5400 GETTING BEYOND GUNS: CONTEXT FOR THE COMING DEBATE OVER PRIVILEGES OR IMMUNITIES, 14 Tex. Rev. L. & Pol. 15, 47 (2009) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 5401 JUDICIAL REVIEW OF SPECIAL INTEREST SPENDING: THE GENERAL WELFARE CLAUSE AND THE FIDUCIARY LAW OF THE FOUNDERS, 11 Tex. Rev. L. & Pol. 239, 282+ (2007) 5402 ABORTING ROE: JANE ROE QUESTIONS THE VIABILITY OF ROE V. WADE, 9 Tex. Rev. L. & Pol. 325, 365+ (2005) 5403 IS ABSTINENCE STILL THE BEST POLICY? MODERNIZING HUMAN SEXUALITY INSTRUCTION IN TEXAS PUBLIC SCHOOLS, 10 Tex. Tech Admin. L.J. 315, 338+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5404 SUPREME COURT REPORT, 44 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 333, 352 (2012) 5405 CLEAR AND PRESENT DEMOCRATIC DANGERS: "DON'T TOUCH MY JUNK", 44 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 59, 67 (2011) 5406 THE FRAYING FABRIC OF FREEDOM: CRISIS AND CRIMINAL LAW IN STRUGGLES FOR DEMOCRACY AND FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION, 44 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 89, 145 (2011) 5407 WHY DID TINKERBELL GET OFF SO EASY?: THE ROLES OF IMAGINATION AND SOCIAL NORMS IN EXCUSING HUMAN WEAKNESS, 42 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 419, 480 (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5408 BACK TO BASICS: CONSTITUTIONAL MEANING AND "TRADITION", 39 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 261, 287+ (2007) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 5409 SOMEBODY POISONED THE JURY POOL: SOCIAL MEDIA'S EFFECT ON JURY IMPARTIALITY, 19 Tex. Wesleyan L. Rev. 809, 829+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5410 SERVICES AGAINST OUR WILL: TEXAS FAMILY CODE S 264.203 IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL, 19 Tex. Wesleyan L. Rev. 935, 946 (2013) 5411 SUICIDE: A LEGAL, CONSTITUTIONAL, AND HUMAN RIGHT, 18 Tex. © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Wesleyan L. Rev. 797, 834+ (2012) HN: 2,5 (S.Ct.) 5412 A PRISONER'S RIGHT TO ACCESS DNA EVIDENCE TO PROVE HIS INNOCENCE: POST-OSBORNE OPTIONS, 17 Tex. Wesleyan L. Rev. 565, 591+ (2011) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 5413 RISING ABOVE THEMSELVES: WHY TODAY'S LAWYERS OF COLOR MUST LOOK BEYOND COLOR, 16 Tex. Wesleyan L. Rev. 495, 534+ (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5414 DEMOCRACY AND HUMAN RIGHTS-NOT FOR GAY PEOPLE?: EU EASTERN ENLARGEMENT AND ITS IMPACT ON THE PROTECTION OF THE RIGHTS OF SEXUAL MINORITIES, 13 Tex. Wesleyan L. Rev. 459, 495 (2007) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 5415 THE EQUALITY PARADISE: PARADOXES OF THE LAW'S POWER TO ADVANCE EQUALITY, 13 Tex. Wesleyan L. Rev. 515, 543+ (2007) 5416 PROTECTING GAY AND LESBIAN FAMILIES FROM EVICTION FROM THEIR HOMES: THE QUEST FOR EQUALITY FOR GAY AND LESBIAN FAMILIES IN BRASCHI V. STAHL ASSOCIATES, 13 Tex. Wesleyan L. Rev. 619, 644+ (2007) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 5417 HADLEY V. BAXENDALE AND THE SEAMLESS WEB OF LAW, 11 Tex. Wesleyan L. Rev. 225, 237+ (2005) 5418 HADLEY'S LIABILITY-LIMITING AND COMMERCE-ENHANCING PRINCIPLES APPLIED IN THE BRITISH COMMONWEALTH AND THE U.S.A, 11 Tex. Wesleyan L. Rev. 649, 673 (2005) 5419 IDENTITY, LAW, AND ESSENTIALISM: WHAT'S LOVE GOT TO DO WITH SAME-SEX MARRIAGE?, 6 the crit: Critical Stud. J. 1, 3+ (2012) 5420 WHY THE DEMANDS OF FORMALISM WILL PREVENT NEW ORIGINALISM FROM FURTHERING CONSERVATIVE POLITICAL GOALS, 5 the crit: Critical Stud. J. 1, 17+ (2012) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 5421 THE DEATH PENALTY AND THE MENTALLY ILL: A SELECTED AND ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY, 5 the crit: Critical Stud. J. 1, 29 (2012) 5422 PROVOCATION AND THE HOMOSEXUAL ADVANCE DEFENSE IN AUSTRALIA AND THE UNITED STATES: LAW OUT OF STEP WITH COMMUNITY VALUES, 3 the crit: Critical Stud. J. 53, 71 (2010) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 5423 THE MARRIAGE AMENDMENTS, EQUALITY AND PARTNER BENEFITS: A LETTER TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF MOSCOW, IDAHO, 2 the crit: Critical Stud. J. 38, 62 (2009) 5424 THE POST-DOMA IMMIGRATION LAW LANDSCAPE, 60-DEC Fed. Law. 15, 15 (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5425 SAME SEX, DIFFERENT STATES: WHEN SAME-SEX MARRIAGES CROSS STATE LINES BY ANDREW KOPPELMAN YALE UNIVERSITY PRESS, NEW HAVEN, CT, 2006. 204 PAGES, $35.00, 54-JUL Fed. Law. 46, 46+ (2007) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5426 LAWRENCE v. TEXAS: A STUDENT'S PERSPECTIVE, 51-JAN Fed. Law. 11, © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 11+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5427 CARRY THAT WEIGHT: VICTIM PRIVACY WITHIN THE MILITARY SEXUAL ASSAULT REPORTING METHODS, 28 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 551, 564+ (2011) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 5428 UNITED STATES V. ANDRUS: PASSWORD PROTECT YOUR ROOMMATE, NOT YOUR COMPUTER, 26 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 183, 205 (2008) 5429 FROM TAYLORISM TO THE OMNIPTICON: EXPANDING EMPLOYEE SURVEILLANCE BEYOND THE WORKPLACE, 25 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 1, 35 (2007) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 5430 TRANSSEXUALS AND THE FAMILY MEDICAL LEAVE ACT, 24 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 315, 352+ (2006) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5431 BRIEF FOR PETITIONER, 24 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 97, 111 (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5432 RELIGIOUS TOLERATION AND CLAIMS OF CONSCIENCE, 28 J.L. & Pol. 91, 128 (2013) 5433 WHERE LAW MEETS POLITICS: FREEDOM OF CONTRACT, FEDERALISM, AND THE FIGHT OVER HEALTH CARE, 27 J.L. & Pol. 177, 237+ (2011) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 5434 JUDICIAL DISCRETION IN CONSTITUTIONAL CASES, 26 J.L. & Pol. 123, 178 (2011) 5435 FIVE TAKES ON MCDONALD V. CHICAGO, 26 J.L. & Pol. 273, 303 (2011) 5436 MORE SMOKE THAN FIRE: THE REHNQUIST COURT'S USE OF COMPARATIVE JUDICIAL OPINIONS AND LAW IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, 22 J.L. & Pol. 83, 111+ (2006) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5437 CITIES AS CONSTITUTIONAL ACTORS: THE CASE OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, 21 J.L. & Pol. 147, 185+ (2005) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 5438 THE CONGRESSIONAL ROOTS OF JUDICIAL ACTIVISM, 20 J.L. & Pol. 577, 593 (2004) 5439 JUSTICE HARLAN'S LAW AND DEMOCRACY, 20 J.L. & Pol. 373, 461+ (2004) 5440 A CRITIQUE OF HUMAN CLONING AND HUMAN DIGNITY: THE REPORT OF THE PRESIDENT'S COUNCIL ON BIOETHICS, 20 J.L. & Pol. 463, 488 (2004) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 5441 BEST FRIENDS? SUPREME COURT LAW CLERKS ON EFFECTIVE AMICUS CURIAE BRIEFS, 20 J.L. & Pol. 33, 75 (2004) 5442 ISOLATED DNA PATENTS: INCENTIVIZING MEDICAL RESEARCH OR SELLING HUMAN IDENTITY?: ASSOCIATION FOR MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY v. U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, 40 J.L. Med. & Ethics 413, 417 (2012) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 5443 THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF MANDATES TO PURCHASE HEALTH INSURANCE, 37 J.L. Med. & Ethics 40, 48 (2009) 5444 RIGHT TO EXPERIMENTAL TREATMENT: FDA NEW DRUG APPROVAL, CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, AND THE PUBLIC'S HEALTH, 37 J.L. Med. & Ethics 269, 275 (2009) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5445 DUE PROCESS AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 35 J.L. Med. & Ethics 33, 34+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5446 SLAYING THE INEQUALITY VILLAIN IN SCHOOL FINANCE: IS THE RIGHT TO EDUCATION THE SILVER BULLET?, 20-SUM Kan. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 351, 351 (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5447 THE UNITED STATES MILITARY'S "DON'T ASK, DON'T TELL" POLICY: THE AFTERMATH OF LAWRENCE, 19-WTR Kan. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 341, 363+ (2010) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5448 THE POLICY CONSIDERATIONS SURROUNDING THE UNITED STATES' IMMIGRATION LAW AS APPLIED TO BI-NATIONAL SAME-SEX COUPLES: MAKING THE CASE FOR THE UNITING AMERICAN FAMILIES ACT, 18-SPG Kan. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 301, 319+ (2009) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5449 JUDICIAL REVERIES: THE SUPREME COURT ENCOUNTERS DISABILITY Distinguished Professor Lecture The Marianna and Ross Beach Professorship The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS November 19, 2007, 17-SPG Kan. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 509, 519+ (2008) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 5450 AN EXAMINATION OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGE AND THE RAMIFICATIONS OF LAWRENCE v. TEXAS, 14-SPG Kan. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 687, 688+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5451 ARE THE ROADS A SAFER PLACE BECAUSE DRUG OFFENDERS AREN'T ON THEM?: AN ANALYSIS OF PUNISHING DRUG OFFENDERS WITH LICENSE SUSPENSIONS, 13-SUM Kan. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 557, 575 (2004) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 5452 THE SUPREME COURT'S LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT DECISIONS: 2002-2003 TERM, 19 Lab. Law. 247, 247+ (2003) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5453 INCREASING ETHICS, PROFESSIONALISM AND CIVILITY: KEY TO PRESERVING THE AMERICAN COMMON LAW AND ADVERSARIAL SYSTEMS, 2005 Prof. Law. 91, 118 (2005) 5454 THE HIGH PRICE FOR LEVELING THE PLAYING FIELD: THE SOCIOECONOMIC DIVIDE IN ESTATE PLANNING FOR SAME-SEX COUPLES, 25 Quinnipiac Prob. L.J. 32, 66+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5455 ADULT ADOPTION: THE VARYING MOTIVES, POTENTIAL CONSEQUENCES, AND ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS, 22 Quinnipiac Prob. L.J. 300, 319 (2009) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 5456 MERIT AND MOBILITY: A PROGRESSIVE VIEW OF CLASS, CULTURE, AND THE LAW, 43 U. Mem. L. Rev. 239, 318 (2012) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 5457 PARTIAL TEXTUALISM, 41 U. Mem. L. Rev. 1, 64+ (2010) 5458 BUT WHO WILL PROTECT POOR JOSHUA DESHANEY, A FOURYEAR-OLD CHILD WITH NO POSITIVE DUE PROCESS RIGHTS?, 39 U. Mem. L. Rev. 543, 594+ (2009) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5459 THE DISTRACTING DEBATE OVER JUDICIAL REVIEW, 39 U. Mem. L. Rev. 47, 84 (2008) 5460 DEFENDING THE FREEDOM TO BE HEARD: WHERE ALTERNATE AVENUES INTERSECT EMPTY PUBLIC SPACES, 36 U. Mem. L. Rev. 277, 334 (2006) 5461 DOES TENNESSEE'S CONSTITUTION REQUIRE PERMITTING SAMEGENDER MARRIAGES?, 36 U. Mem. L. Rev. 413, 421+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5462 THE DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT (DOMA) IS BAD INCOME TAX POLICY, 35 U. Mem. L. Rev. 399, 445+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5463 RELIABLE CONSULTANTS, INC. v. EARLE, 517 F.3D 738 (5TH CIR. 2008), 40 Urb. Law. 1005, 1006 (2008) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5464 INDIGESTION FROM EATING CROW : THE IMPACT OF LINGLE v. CHEVRON U.S.A., INC. ON THE FUTURE OF REGULATORY TAKINGS DOCTRINE, 38 Urb. Law. 451, 483+ (2006) 5465 THE FREILICH REPORT 2003-04: THE SUPREME COURT IN AN AGE OF SECRECY AND FEAR, 36 Urb. Law. 583, 670+ (2004) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 5466 THE FREILICH REPORT: A REVIEW OF 2002-03 U.S. SUPREME COURT DECISIONS DURING AN ERA OF DOMESTIC INSECURITY, 35 Urb. Law. 565, 573+ (2003) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5467 HOW INTERNATIONAL COURTS ENHANCE THEIR LEGITIMACY, 14 Theoretical Inquiries L. 455, 465+ (2013) 5468 REDUCING UNAUTHORIZED DIGITAL DOWNLOADING OF MUSIC BY OBTAINING VOLUNTARY COMPLIANCE WITH COPYRIGHT LAW THROUGH THE REMOVAL OF CORPORATE POWER IN THE RECORDING INDUSTRY, 34 T. Jefferson L. Rev. 225, 301 (2012) 5469 THE RULE OF LAW AND ENFORCEMENT OF CHINESE TORT LAW, 34 T. Jefferson L. Rev. 43, 93+ (2011) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 5470 BEHIND THE CASTLE WALLS: BALANCING PRIVACY AND SECURITY IN DOMESTIC ABUSE CASES, 32 T. Jefferson L. Rev. 65, 86+ (2009) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5471 WILLIAMS V. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ALABAMA: DOES A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO SEXUAL PRIVACY EXIST?, 31 T. Jefferson L. Rev. 1, 24+ (2008) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5472 DIGNITY AS A NEW FRAMEWORK, REPLACING THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY, 30 T. Jefferson L. Rev. 1, 51+ (2007) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5473 STRIKING THE BALANCE BETWEEN ANTI-DISCRIMINATION LAWS © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. AND FIRST AMENDMENT FREEDOMS: AN ALTERNATIVE PROPOSAL TO PRESERVE DIVERSITY, 30 T. Jefferson L. Rev. 249, 278+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5474 STANDING TO SUE IN THE ABSENCE OF PROSECUTION: CAN A CASE BE TOO CONTROVERSIAL FOR CASE OR CONTROVERSY?, 30 T. Jefferson L. Rev. 53, 68 (2007) 5475 PUNISHING THOUGHTS TOO CLOSE TO REALITY: A NEW SOLUTION TO PROTECT CHILDREN FROM PEDOPHILES, 27 T. Jefferson L. Rev. 393, 420 (2005) 5476 EQUALITY ACROSS LEGAL CULTURES: THE ROLE FOR INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS, 27 T. Jefferson L. Rev. 1, 13+ (2004) 5477 FROM PATSONE & MILLER TO SILVEIRA V. LOCKYER: TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS, 26 T. Jefferson L. Rev. 257, 331+ (2004) 5478 RELIGION IN THE MARKETPLACE: ESTABLISHMENTS, PLURALISMS, AND THE DOCTRINAL ECLIPSE OF FREE EXERCISE, 26 T. Jefferson L. Rev. 333, 408 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5479 DOES THE EQUAL PROTECTION ANALYSIS IN LAWRENCE MAKE BANS ON SAME-SEX MARRIAGE UNCONSTITUTIONAL?, 26 T. Jefferson L. Rev. 447, 467+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5480 REVEALING THE INADEQUACY OF AB17: HOW DICTATING MORALITY UPON FAITH-BASED ORGANIZATIONS WILL WREAK HAVOC ON CALIFORNIA'S ECONOMY, 26 T. Jefferson L. Rev. 125, 156 (2003) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 5481 MICHIGAN RULE OF EVIDENCE 611(B) AND THE NIQAB: A VIOLATION OF FREE EXERCISE OF RELIGION, 27 T.M. Cooley L. Rev. 611, 646 (2010) 5482 BEYOND THE MODEL RULES: ARISTOTLE, LINCOLN, AND THE LAWYER'S ASPIRATIONAL DRIVE TO AN ETHICAL PRACTICE, 26 T.M. Cooley L. Rev. 591, 636+ (2009) 5483 ABIGAIL ALLIANCE FOR BETTER ACCESS TO DEVELOPMENTAL DRUGS V. VON ESCHENBACH: IS THERE A RIGHT TO LIVE?, 25 T.M. Cooley L. Rev. 347, 379 (2008) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 5484 STARE DECISIS: CHARTING A COURSE IN THE MICHIGAN SUPREME COURT OF 2009, 25 T.M. Cooley L. Rev. 463, 474+ (2008) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 5485 WRONGFUL SELECTION: ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INTENTIONAL DIMINISHMENT, AND THE PROCREATIVE RIGHT, 25 T.M. Cooley L. Rev. 475, 501+ (2008) 5486 UPDATE: PHASING OUT ABORTION: ONE STEP CLOSER TO TERMINATING A WOMAN'S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT, IN GONZALES V. CARHART, 24 T.M. Cooley L. Rev. 597, 628+ (2007) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5487 THE NOBILITY OF THE AMERICAN LAWYER: THE ENNOBLING HISTORY, PHILOSOPHY, AND MORALITY OF A MALIGNED PROFESSION, 22 T.M. Cooley L. Rev. 209, 307+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 5488 MULTIPLE MORALITIES: TENSIONS AND TRADEOFFS IN MORAL PSYCHOLOGY AND THE LAW, 36 T. Marshall L. Rev. 177, 191+ (2011) 5489 MANDATING PUBLIC SCHOOL ATTENDANCE: A PROPOSAL FOR ACHIEVING RACIAL AND CLASS INTEGRATION, 34 T. Marshall L. Rev. 109, 155 (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5490 "THE HOW TO GUIDE FOR PROSECUTORS" DEFENDING THE SENTENCING GUIDELINES ON CRACK, 33 T. Marshall L. Rev. 329, 349+ (2008) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 5491 INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW VIOLATIONS BEFORE, DURING, AND AFTER HURRICANE KATRINA: AN INTERNATIONAL LAW FRAMEWORK FOR ANALYSIS, 31 T. Marshall L. Rev. 353, 362+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5492 HURRICANE KATRINA: FIRST AMENDMENT CENSORSHIP AND THE NEWS MEDIA, 31 T. Marshall L. Rev. 479, 498+ (2006) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5493 REVIVING THE DISPARATE IMPACT DOCTRINE TO COMBAT UNCONSCIOUS DISCRIMINATION: A STUDY OF CHIN V. RUNNELS, 31 T. Marshall L. Rev. 43, 62 (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5494 THE CASE FOR A FEDERAL MARRIAGE AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION, CIVIL RIGHTS, RELIGION & SAME-SEX MARRIAGE: WHERE ARE WE GOING?, 30 T. Marshall L. Rev. 145, 151+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5495 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN MEDIA, PRIVACY, AND DEFAMATION LAW, 48 Tort Trial & Ins. Prac. L.J. 359, 389 (2012) 5496 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN APPELLATE ADVOCACY, 46 Tort Trial & Ins. Prac. L.J. 195, 224 (2011) 5497 JOHN ROBERTS: NATIONALISM, CONSERVATISM, AND THE SHIFTING TRENDS ON THE CONTEMPORARY SUPREME COURT, 13 Touro Int'l L. Rev. 165, 165+ (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5498 EXTREME MEASURES: DOES THE UNITED STATES NEED PREVENTIVE DETENTION TO COMBAT DOMESTIC TERRORISM?, 14 Touro Int'l L. Rev. 128, 128 (2010) 5499 DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY AND WEAK COURTS: CONSTITUTIONAL DESIGN IN NASCENT DEMOCRACIES, 12 Touro Int'l L. Rev. 1, 1+ (2009) 5500 THE PLIGHT OF BI-NATIONAL SAME-SEX COUPLES IN AMERICA, 29 Touro L. Rev. 903, 923+ (2013) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 5501 HOMOSEXUALS, EQUAL PROTECTION, AND THE GUARANTEE OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS IN THE NEW DECADE: AN OPTIMIST'S QUASISUSPECT VIEW OF RECENT EVENTS AND THEIR IMPACT ON HEIGHTENED SCRUTINY FOR SEXUAL ORIENTATION-BASED DISCRIMINAT, 28 Touro L. Rev. 285, 322+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5502 THREE VITAL ISSUES: INCORPORATION OF THE SECOND AMENDMENT, FEDERAL GOVERNMENT POWER, AND SEPARATION © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. OF POWERS-OCTOBER 2009 TERM, 27 Touro L. Rev. 125, 148 (2011) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5503 THE PRAISE OF SILLY: CRITICAL LEGAL STUDIES AND THE ROBERTS COURT, 26 Touro L. Rev. 619, 647+ (2010) HN: 1,4,5 (S.Ct.) 5504 THE TIPPING POINT ON THE SCALES OF CIVIL JUSTICE, 25 Touro L. Rev. 347, 436+ (2009) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5505 COMITY OF ERRORS: FOREIGN SAME-SEX MARRIAGES IN NEW YORK, 24 Touro L. Rev. 199, 221+ (2008) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 5506 DEFAULTS AND CHOICES IN THE MARRIAGE CONTRACT: HOW TO INCREASE AUTONOMY, ENCOURAGE DISCUSSION, AND CIRCUMVENT CONSTITUTIONAL CONSTRAINTS, 24 Touro L. Rev. 31, 72+ (2008) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 5507 WHEN CONGRESS PRACTICES MEDICINE: HOW CONGRESSIONAL LEGISLATION OF MEDICAL JUDGMENT MAY INFRINGE A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT, 24 Touro L. Rev. 791, 848+ (2008) 5508 COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK, 23 Touro L. Rev. 515, 527+ (2007) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5509 THE CASE FOR RATIONAL BASIS REVIEW OF GENERAL SUSPICIONLESS SEARCHES AND SEIZURES, 23 Touro L. Rev. 93, 198 (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5510 ROPER V. SIMMONS-SUPREME COURT'S RELIANCE ON INTERNATIONAL LAW IN CONSTITUTIONAL DECISION-MAKING, 21 Touro L. Rev. 1299, 1325+ (2006) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5511 A LOOK BACK AT THE REHNQUIST ERA AND AN OVERVIEW OF THE 2004 SUPREME COURT TERM, 21 Touro L. Rev. 731, 762+ (2006) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5512 LANGAN V. ST. VINCENT'S HOSPITAL OF NEW YORK (decided October 11, 2005), 22 Touro L. Rev. 147, 156+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5513 DRED SCOTT: A NIGHTMARE FOR THE ORIGINALISTS, 22 Touro L. Rev. 575, 611+ (2006) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5514 SEYMOUR V. HOLCOMB (decided February 23, 2005), 22 Touro L. Rev. 83, 92+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5515 WHAT'S A LOWER COURT TO DO? LIMITING LAWRENCE V. TEXAS AND THE RIGHT TO SEXUAL AUTONOMY, 21 Touro L. Rev. 597, 664+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5516 DISCRIMINATION CASES OF THE 2002 TERM, 20 Touro L. Rev. 195, 220 (2004) 5517 LAWRENCE v. TEXAS: THE DECISION AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR THE FUTURE, 20 Touro L. Rev. 221, 221+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5518 SURPRISE SYMPHONY: THE SUPREME COURT'S MAJOR CRIMINAL LAW RULINGS OF THE 2002 TERM, 20 Touro L. Rev. 279, 325 (2004) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 5519 AMICUS BRIEF OF THE INTERNATIONAL TRADEMARK ASSOCIATION IN TIFFANY (NJ), INC. v. EBAY, INC., 100 Trademark Rep. 1406, 1439 (2010) 5520 TWO PESOS v. TACO CABANA: STILL MORE INTERESTING FOR WHAT IT DID NOT DECIDE, 94 Trademark Rep. 944, 978 (2004) 5521 ALTERNATIVE VISIONS OF THE FAMILY: THE EUROPEAN CONSTITUTIONAL PERCEPTION OF FAMILY LAW: COMPARISON WITH AMERICAN JURISPRUDENCE, 18 Transnat'l L. & Contemp. Probs. 419, 460+ (2009) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5522 PUNISH OR SURVEIL, 16 Transnat'l L. & Contemp. Probs. 873, 932 (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5523 CONSTITUTIONAL WORDS ABOUT WORDS: PROTECTED SPEECH AND "FIGHTING WORDS" UNDER THE AUSTRALIAN AND AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONS, 15 Transnat'l L. & Contemp. Probs. 489, 513 (2006) 5524 CIRCUITS SPLIT OVER MILITARY'S "DON'T ASK, DON'T TELL' POLICY, 44-AUG Trial 65, 65+ (2008) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5525 SEXUAL PRIVACY IS NOT A RIGHT IN ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, DESPITE LAWRENCE, 40-OCT Trial 87, 87 (2004) 5526 CALIFORNIA CASE BRINGS INTERNET INTO GAY ADOPTION DEBATE, 40-MAR Trial 88, 93 (2004) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 5527 THE BIBLE AND THE CONSTITUTION, 17 Trinity L. Rev. 1, 55 (2011) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 5528 IN DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE: PRESERVING MARRIAGE IN A POSTMODERN CULTURE, 17 Trinity L. Rev. 125, 135+ (2011) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5529 INCORPORATING ECOLOGICAL ETHICS INTO MANIFEST DESTINY: SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, THE POPULATION EXPLOSION, AND THE TRADITION OF SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS, 21 Tul. Envtl. L.J. 473, 493+ (2008) 5530 MAY THE MARKET DO WHAT TAKING JURISPRUDENCE DOES NOT: DIVIDE A SINGLE PARCEL INTO DISCRETE SEGMENTS?, 19 Tul. Envtl. L.J. 269, 291 (2006) 5531 THREE MILESTONES IN THE HISTORY OF PRIVACY IN THE UNITED STATES, 26 Tul. Euro. Civ. LF 67, 97 (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5532 EXTRAORDINARY OFFENDERS IN OUR MIDST: AN EVALUATION OF AN AMERICAN INTERPRETIVE SOLUTION AND ITS APPLICATION TO SECTION 745(B) OF CANADA'S CRIMINAL CODE, 22 Tul. J. Int'l & Comp. L. 63, 86 (2013) 5533 EU LAW IN U.S. LEGAL ACADEMIA, 20 Tul. J. Int'l & Comp. L. 175, 201 (2011) 5534 IN THE WAKE OF CITIZENS UNITED, DO FOREIGN POLITICS STILL STOP AT THE WATER'S EDGE?, 19 Tul. J. Int'l & Comp. L. 281, 313 (2010) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 5535 AUSTRALIA AND THE UNITED STATES: TWO COMMON CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEMS UNCOMMONLY AT ODDS, 12 Tul. J. Int'l & Comp. L. 27, 116 (2004) 5536 IT'S (NOT) A BLACK THING: THE BLACK/GAY SPLIT OVER SAME-SEX MARRIAGE-A CRITICAL (RACE) PERSPECTIVE, 22 Tul. J. L. & Sexuality 1, 53+ (2013) 5537 WHAT MARRIAGE LAW CAN LEARN FROM CITIZENSHIP LAW (AND VICE VERSA), 22 Tul. J. L. & Sexuality 103, 125 (2013) 5538 PROTECTING POLY: APPLYING THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT TO THE NONMONOGAMOUS, 22 Tul. J. L. & Sexuality 127, 133+ (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5539 IDENTITY, INTERRUPTED: THE PARENTAL NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENT OF THE MASSACHUSETTS ANTI-BULLYING LAW, 21 Tul. J. L. & Sexuality 125, 145 (2012) 5540 THE VIEW FROM THE CROSSROADS: THE EUROPEAN UNION'S NEW DATA RULES AND THE FUTURE OF U.S. PRIVACY LAW, 16 Tul. J. Tech. & Intell. Prop. 267, 286 (2013) 5541 REGISTERING RELATIONSHIPS, 87 Tul. L. Rev. 573, 579+ (2013) 5542 BEYOND LAW ENFORCEMENT: CAMRETA V. GREENE, CHILD PROTECTION INVESTIGATIONS, AND THE NEED TO REFORM THE FOURTH AMENDMENT SPECIAL NEEDS DOCTRINE, 87 Tul. L. Rev. 353, 425 (2012) 5543 CAPITALISM, LIBERALISM, AND THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY, 86 Tul. L. Rev. 1243, 1287+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5544 LEGAL REALISM, INNATE MORALITY, AND THE STRUCTURAL ROLE OF THE SUPREME COURT IN THE U.S. CONSTITUTIONAL DEMOCRACY, 86 Tul. L. Rev. 181, 218+ (2011) 5545 "SPORTS LAW": IMPLICATIONS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF INTERNATIONAL, COMPARATIVE, AND NATIONAL LAW AND GLOBAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION, 85 Tul. L. Rev. 269, 322 (2010) 5546 DYNAMIC FEDERALISM IN HUMAN RIGHTS TREATY IMPLEMENTATION, 84 Tul. L. Rev. 1025, 1066 (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5547 "UNDEAD" WARTIME CASES: STARE DECISIS AND THE LESSONS OF HISTORY, 84 Tul. L. Rev. 957, 1023 (2010) 5548 A CRIME AGAINST COMMON SENSE: HOW LOUISIANA'S IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ADAM WALSH ACT EXPOSES THE LAW'S MOST SIGNIFICANT FLAW, 84 Tul. L. Rev. 429, 468+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5549 LIBERTY, SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS, AND PERSONAL JURISDICTION, 82 Tul. L. Rev. 567, 644+ (2007) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 5550 UNDERSTANDING AMERICAN LAW BY LOOKING AT IT THROUGH FOREIGN EYES: TOWARDS A WIDER THEORY FOR THE STUDY AND USE OF FOREIGN LAW, 81 Tul. L. Rev. 123, 185+ (2006) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 5551 RELIGION IN THE CLASSROOM IN GERMANY AND THE UNITED STATES, 81 Tul. L. Rev. 67, 122 (2006) 5552 MARBURY IN AFRICA: JUDICIAL REVIEW AND THE CHALLENGE OF CONSTITUTIONALISM IN CONTEMPORARY AFRICA, 80 Tul. L. Rev. 1239, 1323 (2006) 5553 JUDICIAL MENTALITY: MENTAL DISPOSITION OR OUTLOOK AS A FACTOR IMPEDING RECOURSE TO FOREIGN LAW, 80 Tul. L. Rev. 1325, 1375 (2006) 5554 STRAIGHTFORWARD: HOW TO MOBILIZE HETEROSEXUAL SUPPORT FOR GAY RIGHTS. BY IAN AYRES & JENNIFER GERARDA BROWN. PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS 2005. 304 PP., 80 Tul. L. Rev. 1001, 1008+ (2006) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 5555 THE JUDGE AS COMPARATIST, 80 Tul. L. Rev. 11, 167+ (2005) 5556 RESPONSE TO THE JUDGE AS COMPARATIST: COMPARISON IN PUBLIC LAW, 80 Tul. L. Rev. 195, 202 (2005) 5557 COMPARATIVE LAW IN CONSTITUTIONAL ADJUDICATION: THE SOUTH AFRICAN EXPERIENCE, 80 Tul. L. Rev. 245, 256+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5558 THE EUROPEAN JUDGE AS COMPARATIST, 80 Tul. L. Rev. 257, 279 (2005) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 5559 THE SECTION 5 POWER AND THE RATIONAL BASIS STANDARD OF EQUAL PROTECTION, 79 Tul. L. Rev. 519, 585+ (2005) 5560 SUPERIMPOSING TITLE VII'S ADVERSE ACTION REQUIREMENT ON FIRST AMENDMENT RETALIATION CLAIMS: A CHILLING PROSPECT FOR GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE SPEECH, 79 Tul. L. Rev. 669, 700+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5561 INHERITANCE RIGHTS FOR DOMESTIC PARTNERS, 79 Tul. L. Rev. 55, 58+ (2004) 5562 NAKED FITZIES AND IRON CAGES: INDIVIDUAL VALUES, PROFESSIONAL VIRTUES, AND THE STRUGGLE FOR PUBLIC SPACE, 78 Tul. L. Rev. 1687, 1717+ (2004) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 5563 OF GOD'S MERCY AND THE FOUR BIBLICAL METHODS OF CAPITAL PUNISHMENT: STONING, BURNING, BEHEADING, AND STRANGULATION, 78 Tul. L. Rev. 1169, 1211 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5564 DIVERSITY DISCOURSES, 78 Tul. L. Rev. 827, 851+ (2004) 5565 ABUNDANT DULCIBUS VITIIS, JUSTICE KENNEDY: IN LAWRENCE V. TEXAS, AN ELOQUENT AND OVERDUE VINDICATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS INADVERTENTLY REVEALS WHAT IS WRONG WITH THE WAY THE REHNQUIST COURT DISCUSSES STARE DECISIS, 78 Tul. L. Rev. 969, 1009+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5566 MIXING IT UP, 78 Tul. L. Rev. 79, 87 (2003) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 5567 MARITIME LAW-THE NATURE AND IMPORTANCE OF ITS INTERNATIONAL CHARACTER, 34 Tul. Mar. L.J. 555, 589 (2010) 5568 TRANSNATIONAL JUDICIAL DISCOURSE AND FELON DISENFRANCHISEMENT: RE-EXAMINING RICHARDSON V. RAMIREZ, 13 Tulsa J. Comp. & Int'l L. 279, 319+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5569 THE NINTH ANNUAL JOHN W. HAGER LECTURE, THE 2004 TERM: THE SUPREME COURT MEETS INTERNATIONAL LAW, 12 Tulsa J. Comp. & Int'l L. 1, 22+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5570 TRANSNATIONAL LEGAL PROCESS AND THE SUPREME COURT'S 2003-2004 TERM: SOME SKEPTICAL OBSERVATIONS, 12 Tulsa J. Comp. & Int'l L. 23, 37+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5571 THE UNCERTAIN LEGACY OF RASUL V. BUSH, 12 Tulsa J. Comp. & Int'l L. 39, 52 (2004) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 5572 THE SEARCH FOR COHERENCE IN THE USE OF FOREIGN COURT JUDGMENTS BY THE SUPREME COURT OF IRELAND, 12 Tulsa J. Comp. & Int'l L. 123, 148+ (2004) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.) 5573 JUSTICE SCALIA ON THE USE OF FOREIGN LAW IN CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION: UNIDIRECTIONAL MONOLOGUE OR COCONSTITUTIVE DIALOGUE?, 12 Tulsa J. Comp. & Int'l L. 149, 161+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5574 A TALE OF INTERNATIONAL LAW IN THE HEARTLAND: TORRES AND THE ROLE OF STATE COURTS IN TRANSNATIONAL LEGAL CONVERSATION, 12 Tulsa J. Comp. & Int'l L. 163, 187 (2004) 5575 GIVING SHELTER FROM THE STORM: COLOMBIANS FLEEING PERSECUTION BASED ON SEXUAL ORIENTATION, 48 Tulsa L. Rev. 1, 5+ (2012) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 5576 LAW ENFORCEMENT'S FLAGRANT CONDUCT, 48 Tulsa L. Rev. 275, 275+ (2012) 5577 INDEPENDENT TOGETHER, 48 Tulsa L. Rev. 313, 316+ (2012) 5578 TRANSNATIONAL PERSPECTIVES ON THE U.S. TRANSNATIONAL LAW CONTROVERSY, 47 Tulsa L. Rev. 379, 387+ (2011) 5579 JUDICIAL CONVERSATIONS AND COMPARATIVE LAW: THE CASE OF NON-HEGEMONIC COUNTRIES, 47 Tulsa L. Rev. 405, 436 (2011) 5580 TRANSNATIONAL LEGAL COMMUNICATION: A PARTIAL LEGACY OF SUPREME COURT PRESIDENT AHARON BARAK, 47 Tulsa L. Rev. 437, 463 (2011) 5581 CONSTITUTING POLITICS AND THE POLITICAL CONSTITUTION, 47 Tulsa L. Rev. 177, 183 (2011) 5582 TRUMPING POLITICS: THE ROBERTS COURT AND "JUDICIAL" REVIEW, 46 Tulsa L. Rev. 421, 429 (2011) 5583 GAY MEN AND SEX EQUALITY, 46 Tulsa L. Rev. 123, 150+ (2010) HN: 1 © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. (S.Ct.) 5584 LANDMARKS, PORTENTS, OR JUST CURVES IN THE ROAD?, 45 Tulsa L. Rev. 659, 667+ (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5585 THE CONTINUED RENAISSANCE OF COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 45 Tulsa L. Rev. 771, 780 (2010) 5586 BACHELORS BEWARE: THE CURRENT VALIDITY AND FUTURE FEASIBILITY OF A CAUSE OF ACTION FOR BREACH OF PROMISE TO MARRY, 45 Tulsa L. Rev. 331, 358 (2009) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 5587 PARKER: AN INTERPRETIVE SHIFT FOR THE SUPREME COURT TO ADOPT, 43 Tulsa L. Rev. 793, 824 (2008) 5588 THE PROMISE OF TRIBE'S CITY: SELF-GOVERNMENT, THE CONSTITUTION, AND A NEW URBAN AGE, 42 Tulsa L. Rev. 811, 832 (2007) 5589 IN DEFENSE OF ROE AND PROFESSOR TRIBE, 42 Tulsa L. Rev. 833, 842 (2007) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 5590 LARRY AND LAWRENCE, 42 Tulsa L. Rev. 843, 855+ (2007) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 5591 THE NOT SO PUZZLING PERSISTENCE OF THE FUTILE SEARCH: TRIBE ON PROCEDURALISM IN CONSTITUTIONAL THEORY, 42 Tulsa L. Rev. 891, 910+ (2007) 5592 THE GOVERNMENT CAN'T, MAY, OR MUST FUND RELIGIOUS SCHOOLS: THREE RIDDLES OF CONSTITUTIONAL CHANGE FOR LAURENCE TRIBE, 42 Tulsa L. Rev. 911, 937+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5593 TRIBUTE TO PROFESSOR LAURENCE TRIBE, 42 Tulsa L. Rev. 939, 947+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5594 LAW AND TOPOLOGY, 42 Tulsa L. Rev. 949, 959+ (2007) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5595 TRIBE, 42 Tulsa L. Rev. 961, 971+ (2007) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5596 THE RACIAL DISCOURSE OF FEDERAL INDIAN LAW, 42 Tulsa L. Rev. 103, 123 (2006) 5597 THE EYE THAT NEVER SLEEPS: PRIVACY AND LAW IN THE INTERNET ERA, 40 Tulsa L. Rev. 561, 577+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5598 SYMPOSIUM FOREWORD: COPING WITH THE AFTERMATH OF VICTORY, 40 Tulsa L. Rev. 371, 379+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5599 SAME-SEX UNIONS: THE NEW CIVIL RIGHTS STRUGGLE OR AN ASSAULT ON TRADITIONAL MARRIAGE?, 40 Tulsa L. Rev. 381, 420+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5600 REBELLION IN THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT: ON LAWRENCE, LOFTON, AND THE BEST INTERESTS OF CHILDREN, 40 Tulsa L. Rev. 421, 442+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5601 THE GAY MARRIAGE BACKLASH AND ITS SPILLOVER EFFECTS: LESSONS FROM A (SLIGHTLY) "BLUE STATE", 40 Tulsa L. Rev. 443, 465+ © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5602 THE UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF OKLAHOMA'S STATUTE DENYING RECOGNITION TO ADOPTIONS BY SAME-SEX COUPLES FROM OTHER STATES, 40 Tulsa L. Rev. 467, 477+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5603 JUDICIAL IMPEDIMENTS TO LEGISLATING EQUALITY FOR SAME-SEX COUPLES IN THE EUROPEAN UNION, 40 Tulsa L. Rev. 527, 560 (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5604 MEDELLÍN V. DRETKE: ANOTHER CHAPTER IN THE VIENNA CONVENTION NARRATIVE, 41 Tulsa L. Rev. 193, 217+ (2005) 5605 DON'T THINK OF A HIPPOPOTAMUS: AN ESSAY ON FIRST-YEAR CONTRACTS, EARTHQUAKE PREDICTION, GUN CONTROL IN BAGHDAD, THE INDIAN CIVIL RIGHTS ACT, THE CLEAN WATER ACT, AND JUSTICE THOMAS'S SEPARATE OPINION IN UNITED STATES V., 40 Tulsa L. Rev. 137, 153 (2004) 5606 LARA, LAWRENCE, SUPREME COURT LITIGATION, AND LESSONS FROM SOCIAL MOVEMENTS, 40 Tulsa L. Rev. 25, 45+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5607 RETHINKING CRIME LEGISLATION: HISTORY AND HARSHNESS, 39 Tulsa L. Rev. 925, 939+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5608 LAWRENCE'S REPUBLIC, 39 Tulsa L. Rev. 563, 582+ (2004) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 5609 INTRODUCTION, 39 Tulsa L. Rev. 1, 10+ (2003) HN: 1,2,4 (S.Ct.) 5610 GOING PUBLIC WITH TRANSNATIONAL LAW: THE 2002-2003 SUPREME COURT TERM, 39 Tulsa L. Rev. 155, 165+ (2003) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5611 FATHER KNOWS BEST: THE COURT'S RESULT-ORIENTED ACTIVISM CONTINUES APACE: SELECTED BUSINESS-RELATED DECISIONS FROM THE 2002-2003 TERM, 39 Tulsa L. Rev. 75, 93+ (2003) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5612 SANCTIONING SODOMY: THE SUPREME COURT LIBERATES GAY SEX AND LIMITS STATE POWER TO VINDICATE THE MORAL SENTIMENTS OF THE PEOPLE, 39 Tulsa L. Rev. 95, 153+ (2003) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5613 ADDRESSING THE HARM OF SILENCE AND ASSUMPTIONS OF MUTABILITY: IMPLEMENTING EFFECTIVE NON-DISCRIMINATION POLICIES FOR LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, TRANSGENDER, AND QUEER YOUTH IN FOSTER CARE, 17 U.C. Davis J. Juv. L. & Pol'y 79, 120 (2013) 5614 HOW ARE REASONABLE CHILDREN COERCED? THE DIFFICULTY OF APPLYING THE ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE TO MINORS, 10 U.C. Davis J. Juv. L. & Pol'y 379, 428 (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5615 RECENT COURT DECISIONS AND LEGISLATION IMPACTING JUVENILES, 10 U.C. Davis J. Juv. L. & Pol'y 562, 567+ (2006) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5616 CASE SPOTLIGHT: LOFTON V. KEARNEY 157 F. Supp. 2d 1372 (S.D. Fla. © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 2001), 7 U.C. Davis J. Juv. L. & Pol'y 400, 408+ (2003) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 5617 RESPONSIBILITY LINKS, FAIR LABELING, AND PROPORTIONALITY IN CHINA: COMPARING CHINA'S CRIMINAL LAW THEORY AND DOCTRINE, 14 UCLA J. Int'l L. & Foreign Aff. 275, 329 (2009) 5618 AT THE INTERSECTION OF NORTH AMERICAN FREE TRADE AND SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, 9 UCLA J. Int'l L. & Foreign Aff. 163, 226 (2004) 5619 2005 UCLA J. L. & Tech. 3, "IT'S A DESIGNER BABY!": OPINIONS ON REGULATION OF PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC DIAGNOSIS (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5620 ON DOMA, PROPOSITION 8, AND THE IMPLICATIONS OF THEIR POTENTIAL UNCONSTITUTIONALITY FOR EQUAL PROTECTION AND SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS JURISPRUDENCE, 60 UCLA L. Rev. Discourse 128, 133+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5621 REFLECTIONS ON SEXUAL LIBERTY AND EQUALITY: "THROUGH SENECA FALLS AND SELMA AND STONEWALL", 60 UCLA L. Rev. Discourse 172, 172+ (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 5622 CUSTODY RIGHTS OF LESBIAN AND GAY PARENTS REDUX: THE IRRELEVANCE OF CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLES, 60 UCLA L. Rev. Discourse 226, 228+ (2013) 5623 BACKLASH TO THE FUTURE? FROM ROE TO PERRY, 60 UCLA L. Rev. Discourse 240, 243+ (2013) 5624 WILL WE SANCTION DISCRIMINATION?: CAN "HETEROSEXUALS ONLY" BE AMONG THE SIGNS OF TODAY?, 60 UCLA L. Rev. Discourse 248, 255+ (2013) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 5625 MARRIAGE THIS TERM: ON LIBERTY AND THE "NEW EQUAL PROTECTION", 60 UCLA L. Rev. Discourse 2, 8+ (2012) 5626 PICTURING THE LIFE COURSE OF PROCREATIVE CHOICE, 58 UCLA L. Rev. Discourse 5, 24+ (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5627 THE DIGNITY OF SEX, 17 UCLA Women's L.J. 1, 52+ (2008) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5628 SOMETHING OLD, SOMETHING NEW: CIVIC VIRTUE AND THE CASE FOR SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, 17 UCLA Women's L.J. 53, 120+ (2008) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5629 THE UNCERTAIN FUTURE OF MARRIAGE AND THE ALTERNATIVES, 16 UCLA Women's L.J. 97, 113+ (2007) 5630 FROM RIGHT TO WRONG: A CRITIQUE OF THE 2000 UNIFORM PARENTAGE ACT, 16 UCLA Women's L.J. 163, 227+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5631 HUNTING EXPEDITIONS: PERVERTING SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS AND UNDERMINING SEXUAL PRIVACY IN THE PURSUIT OF MORAL TROPHY GAME, 15 UCLA Women's L.J. 171, 211+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5632 ARTICULATING LESBIAN HUMAN RIGHTS: THE CREATION OF A © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. CONVENTION ON THE ELIMINATION OF ALL FORMS OF DISCRIMINATION AGAINST LESBIANS, 14 UCLA Women's L.J. 61, 87 (2005) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 5633 HOMO SACER, HOMOSEXUAL: SOME THOUGHTS ON WAGING TAX GUERRILLA WARFARE, 2 Unbound: Harv. J. Legal Left 27, 39+ (2006) 5634 DISPUTES BETWEEN CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS AND LGBT STUDENTS: SHOULD THE LAW GET INVOLVED?, 81 UMKC L. Rev. 701, 723+ (2013) 5635 PULLING AN OLD DUSTY WEAPON OUT OF THE DRAWER: THE RETURN OF MORALITY POLICE POWERS TO REGULATE UNWANTED HOME-BASED BUSINESSES, 81 UMKC L. Rev. 231, 233+ (2012) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 5636 "THE OTHER ONE": LIFE AS A FEMINIST/FEMALE LAW PROFESSOR, 1975-1987, 80 UMKC L. Rev. 683, 693 (2012) 5637 SHOE-HORNING, SHELL GAMES, AND ENFORCING CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY, 78 UMKC L. Rev. 875, 888 (2010) 5638 RIGHTS DONE RIGHT: A CRITIQUE OF LIBERTARIAN ORIGINALISM, 78 UMKC L. Rev. 661, 704 (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5639 NEGATING THE GENETIC TIE: DOES THE LAW ENCOURAGE UNNECESSARY RISKS?, 79 UMKC L. Rev. 333, 360 (2010) 5640 RORTY, PRAGMATISM, AND GAYLAW: A EULOGY, A CELEBRATION, AND A TRIUMPH, 77 UMKC L. Rev. 85, 117+ (2008) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5641 THE COHERENCE OF NATURAL INALIENABLE RIGHTS, 76 UMKC L. Rev. 939, 992+ (2008) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 5642 JUDGING FAMILIES, 77 UMKC L. Rev. 267, 305+ (2008) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 5643 THE MANY MEANINGS OF "POLITICS" IN JUDICIAL DECISION MAKING, 77 UMKC L. Rev. 347, 379+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5644 RED VERSUS BLUE (AND PURPLE) STATES AND THE SAME-SEX MARRIAGE DEBATE: FROM VALUES POLARIZATION TO COMMON GROUND?, 77 UMKC L. Rev. 415, 455+ (2008) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5645 ONE STATE, TWO STATE; RED STATE, BLUE STATE: AN ANALYSIS OF LGBT EQUAL RIGHTS, 77 UMKC L. Rev. 513, 533+ (2008) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5646 THE ESSENTIAL HOLDING OF CASEY: RETHINKING VIABILITY, 75 UMKC L. Rev. 713, 740 (2007) 5647 QUEERING THE OFFICE: CAN SEXUAL ORIENTATION EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION LAWS TRANSFORM WORK PLACE NORMS FOR LGBT EMPLOYEES?, 73 UMKC L. Rev. 643, 643+ (2005) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 5648 SEX OFFENDERS: YOU ARE NOW FREE TO MOVE ABOUT THE COUNTRY. AN ANALYSIS OF DOE v. MILLER'S EFFECTS ON SEX OFFENDER RESIDENTIAL RESTRICTIONS, 73 UMKC L. Rev. 797, 840 (2005) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 5649 "THE FIGHT FOR THE RIGHT TO FIGHT": EQUAL PROTECTION & THE UNITED STATES MILITARY, 74 UMKC L. Rev. 383, 408+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5650 PAY NO ATTENTION TO THE MEN BEHIND THE CURTAIN: THE SUPREME COURT, POPULAR CULTURE, AND THE COUNTERMAJORITARIAN PROBLEM, 73 UMKC L. Rev. 53, 82+ (2004) 5651 FAMILY LAW'S CHALLENGE TO RELIGIOUS LIBERTY, 35 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 3, 66+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5652 IS FALSE IMPUTATION OF BEING GAY, LESBIAN, OR BISEXUAL STILL DEFAMATORY? THE ARKANSAS CASE, 34 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 527, 549+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5653 A JUDICIAL RETROSPECTIVE: SIGNIFICANT DECISIONS BY THE ARKANSAS SUPREME COURT FROM 1991 THROUGH 2011, 34 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 219, 251+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5654 A BRIEF SUMMARY OF DECISIONS FROM THE ARKANSAS SUPREME COURT AFFECTING GAYS AND LESBIANS, 34 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 337, 381+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5655 ARKANSAS'S TRADITION OF POPULAR CONSTITUTIONAL ACTIVISM AND THE ASCENDANCY OF THE ARKANSAS SUPREME COURT, 32 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 33, 101+ (2009) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5656 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-EQUAL PROTECTION & DUE PROCESS-IS THE ARKANSAS SUPREME COURT ABANDONING JUDICIAL FEDERALISM?, 30 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 105, 123+ (2007) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5657 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 29 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 809, 841+ (2007) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5658 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-FIRST AMENDMENT AND FREEDOM OF THOUGHT-BANISHING SEX OFFENDERS: SEVENTH CIRCUIT UPHOLDS SEX OFFENDER'S BAN FROM PUBLIC PARKS AFTER THINKING OBSCENE THOUGHTS ABOUT CHILDREN. DOE V. CITY OF LAFAYETTE, 37, 28 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 119, 148 (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5659 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 26 U. Ark. Little Rock L. Rev. 845, 845+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5660 A RIPPING TAX: A FAIR-USE ANALYSIS OF RIPPING AND A PROPOSAL FOR TAXING MP3 PLAYERS, 18 U. Balt. Intell. Prop. L.J. 39, 40+ (2009) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5661 A CASE FOR SCANDAL AND IMMORALITY: PROPOSING THIN PROTECTION OF CONTROVERSIAL TRADEMARKS, 17 U. Balt. Intell. Prop. L.J. 55, 78 (2008) 5662 THE ERROR OF STREAMLINING CEQA FOR TRANSIT PRIORITY PROJECTS: WHY CALIFORNIA TRANSIT AGENCIES MAY SHARE THE SAME FUTURE AS POLAR BEARS, 18 U. Balt. J. Envtl. L. 171, 213 (2011) 5663 MARRIAGE AND INEVITABILITY: A LESSON FROM MARYLAND, 41 U. © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Balt. L.F. 99, 119 (2011) 5664 ADDITIONAL BARRIERS TO BREAKING THE SILENCE: ISSUES TO CONSIDER WHEN REPRESENTING A VICTIM OF SAME-SEX DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, 41 U. Balt. L.F. 150, 171+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5665 LAWRENCE v. TEXAS: TEXAS HOMOSEXUAL SODOMY STATUTE VIOLATED THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT DUE PROCESS CLAUSE, 34 U. Balt. L.F. 23, 23+ (2003) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5666 THE CASE OF TWO BIOLOGICAL INTENDED MOTHERS: ILLUSTRATING THE NEED TO STATUTORILY DEFINE MATERNITY IN MARYLAND, 42 U. Balt. L. Rev. 365, 390 (2013) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 5667 FOUR TERMS OF THE KENNEDY COURT: PROJECTING THE FUTURE OF CONSTITUTIONAL DOCTRINE, 39 U. Balt. L. Rev. 1, 62+ (2009) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 5668 JUSTICE DELAYED IS, ONCE AGAIN, JUSTICE DENIED: THE OVERDUE RIGHT TO COUNSEL IN CIVIL CASES, 37 U. Balt. L. Rev. 59, 77 (2007) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5669 VIRTUAL ESPIONAGE: SPYWARE AND THE COMMON LAW PRIVACY TORTS, 36 U. Balt. L. Rev. 1, 36 (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5670 REFERRING TO FOREIGN LAW IN CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION: AN EPISODE IN THE CULTURE WARS, 35 U. Balt. L. Rev. 299, 312+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5671 APPELLATE FRUIT SALAD AND OTHER CONCEPTS: A SHORT COURSE IN APPELLATE PROCESS, 35 U. Balt. L. Rev. 43, 71 (2005) 5672 SOMETHING OLD, SOMETHING NEW, SOMETHING BORROWED, SOMETHING LONG OVERDUE: THE EVOLUTION OF A "SEXUAL ORIENTATION-BLIND" LEGAL SYSTEM IN MARYLAND AND THE RECOGNITION OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, 35 U. Balt. L. Rev. 73, 103+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5673 CHECK YOUR PRIVACY RIGHTS AT THE FRONT GATE: CONSENSUAL SODOMY REGULATION IN TODAY'S MILITARY FOLLOWING UNITED STATES V. MARCUM, 35 U. Balt. L. Rev. 239, 239+ (2005) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 5674 CITING FOREIGN LAW IN U.S. COURTS: IS OUR SOVEREIGNTY REALLY AT STAKE?, 35 U. Balt. L. Rev. 171, 174+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5675 "LIFE" IN THE BALANCE: JUDICIAL REVIEW OF ABORTION REGULATIONS, 46 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 1285, 1331+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5676 CONFOUNDING IDENTITIES: THE PARADOX OF LGBT CHILDREN UNDER ASYLUM LAW, 45 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 373, 443+ (2011) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5677 GROUNDING CONVERSATIONS ON SEXUALITY AND ASIAN LAW, 44 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 773, 802+ (2011) 5678 LIFE TO DEATH: OUR CONSTITUTION AND HOW IT GROWS, 44 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 391, 411 (2010) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 5679 RETHINKING THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF AGE DISCRIMINATION: A CHALLENGE TO A DECADES-OLD CONSENSUS, 44 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 213, 282+ (2010) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 5680 A REASONABLE SEARCH FOR CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION IN SERNA V. GOODNO: INVOLUNTARY CIVIL COMMITMENT AND THE FOURTH AMENDMENT, 44 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 363, 390 (2010) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 5681 THE SO-CALLED RIGHT TO PRIVACY, 43 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 715, 747+ (2010) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5682 SATISFYING LAWRENCE: THE FIFTH CIRCUIT STRIKES BAN ON SEX TOY SALES, 43 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 655, 681+ (2009) 5683 PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS AND REPUTATIONAL HARM: LIBERTY AS SELF-INVENTION, 43 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 79, 142 (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5684 STATE ACTORS BEATING CHILDREN: A CALL FOR JUDICIAL RELIEF, 42 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 1165, 1229+ (2009) 5685 TEACHING FREEDOM: EXCLUSIONARY RIGHTS OF STUDENT GROUPS, 42 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 889, 910+ (2009) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 5686 THE GAY PANIC DEFENSE, 42 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 471, 566+ (2008) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5687 QUEER TEENS AND LEGISLATIVE BULLIES: THE CRUEL AND INVIDIOUS DISCRIMINATION BEHIND HETEROSEXIST STATUTORY RAPE LAWS, 42 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 195, 253+ (2008) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 5688 ONE LAST CHANCE: ABIGAIL ALLIANCE V. VON ESCHENBACH AND THE RIGHT TO ACCESS EXPERIMENTAL DRUGS, 41 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 1969, 2000+ (2008) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 5689 DIGITUS IMPUDICUS: THE MIDDLE FINGER AND THE LAW, 41 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 1403, 1485 (2008) 5690 "ONE TRAIN MAY HIDE ANOTHER": KATZ, STONEWALL, AND THE SECRET SUBTEXT OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 41 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 875, 934 (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5691 AMERICA'S STATUTORY "CONSTITUTION", 41 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 1, 44+ (2007) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 5692 DECENCY, DIGNITY, AND DESERT: RESTORING IDEALS OF HUMANE PUNISHMENT TO CONSTITUTIONAL DISCOURSE, 41 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 111, 175+ (2007) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5693 RACE, RIGHTS, AND THE THIRTEENTH AMENDMENT: DEFINING THE BADGES AND INCIDENTS OF SLAVERY, 40 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 1311, 1379+ (2007) 5694 BEYOND INTERSTATE RECOGNITION IN THE SAME-SEX MARRIAGE DEBATE, 40 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 313, 383+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5695 THE (NEGLECTED) IMPORTANCE OF BEING LAWRENCE: THE CONSTITUTIONALIZATION OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RIGHTS TO © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. DECISIONAL NON-INTERFERENCE IN PRIVATE AFFAIRS, 40 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 85, 136+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5696 PARITY/DISPARITY: ELECTORAL GENDER INEQUALITY ON THE TIGHTROPE OF LIBERAL CONSTITUTIONAL TRADITIONS, 39 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 1119, 1187+ (2006) 5697 "ALIENS" IN OUR MIDST POST-9/11: LEGISLATING OUTSIDERNESS WITHIN THE BORDERS, 38 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 1683, 1723 (2005) 5698 THE DETENTION AND TREATMENT OF ALIENS THREE YEARS AFTER SEPTEMBER 11: A NEW NEW WORLD?, 38 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 815, 860+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5699 LAWRENCE V. TEXAS AS THE PERFECT STORM, 38 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 509, 544+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5700 DEPORTATION INTO CHAOS: THE QUESTIONABLE REMOVAL OF SOMALI REFUGEES, 38 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 309, 342 (2004) 5701 URBAN BIAS, RURAL SEXUAL MINORITIES, AND THE COURTS, 60 UCLA L. Rev. 562, 592+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5702 NOT THIS CHILD: CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTIONS IN REGULATING NONINVASIVE PRENATAL GENETIC DIAGNOSIS AND SELECTIVE ABORTION, 60 UCLA L. Rev. 2, 32+ (2012) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 5703 POVERTY UNMODIFIED?: CRITICAL REFLECTIONS ON THE DESERVING/UNDESERVING DISTINCTION, 59 UCLA L. Rev. 550, 597+ (2012) 5704 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AS GOVERNMENT SPEECH, 59 UCLA L. Rev. 2, 58+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5705 RACIAL TERRITORIALITY, 58 UCLA L. Rev. 401, 463+ (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5706 INTRODUCTION TO THE SYMPOSIUM ISSUE SEXUALITY AND GENDER LAW: THE DIFFERENCE A FIELD MAKES, 57 UCLA L. Rev. 1129, 1133 (2010) 5707 THE SEX DISCOUNT, 57 UCLA L. Rev. 1149, 1150+ (2010) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5708 LAWYERING FOR MARRIAGE EQUALITY, 57 UCLA L. Rev. 1235, 1331 (2010) 5709 SEXUAL AND GENDER VARIATION IN AMERICAN PUBLIC LAW: FROM MALIGNANT TO BENIGN TO PRODUCTIVE, 57 UCLA L. Rev. 1333, 1373+ (2010) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 5710 STICKY INTUITIONS AND THE FUTURE OF SEXUAL ORIENTATION DISCRIMINATION, 57 UCLA L. Rev. 1375, 1414+ (2010) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5711 THE DISSIDENT CITIZEN, 57 UCLA L. Rev. 1415, 1476+ (2010) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5712 THE UNEXCEPTIONALISM OF "EVOLVING STANDARDS", 57 UCLA L. Rev. 365, 419+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 5713 FROM PRIVACY TO LIBERTY: THE FOURTH AMENDMENT AFTER LAWRENCE, 57 UCLA L. Rev. 1, 69+ (2009) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5714 THE RIGHT TO CONTROL ONE'S NAME, 57 UCLA L. Rev. 313, 364+ (2009) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5715 IMPLEMENTING THE RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS FOR SELFDEFENSE: AN ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK AND A RESEARCH AGENDA, 56 UCLA L. Rev. 1443, 1549+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5716 HELLER'S CATCH-22, 56 UCLA L. Rev. 1551, 1577 (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5717 A CONSTITUTIONAL BIRTHRIGHT: THE STATE, PARENTAGE, AND THE RIGHTS OF NEWBORN PERSONS, 56 UCLA L. Rev. 755, 835+ (2009) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5718 NORMATIVE METHODS FOR LAWYERS, 56 UCLA L. Rev. 899, 982 (2009) 5719 SEX OUTSIDE OF THE THERAPY HOUR: PRACTICAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITS ON THERAPIST SEXUAL MISCONDUCT REGULATIONS, 56 UCLA L. Rev. 983, 1039+ (2009) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5720 EDUCATING EXPELLED STUDENTS AFTER NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND: MENDING AN INCENTIVE STRUCTURE THAT DISCOURAGES ALTERNATIVE EDUCATION AND REINSTATEMENT, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 1909, 1969 (2008) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 5721 AN AESTHETIC DEFENSE OF THE NONPRECEDENTIAL OPINION: THE EASY CASES DEBATE IN THE WAKE OF THE 2007 AMENDMENTS TO THE FEDERAL RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 643, 703 (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5722 THE PATH TO RECOGNITION OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGE: RECONCILING THE INCONSISTENCIES BETWEEN MARRIAGE AND ADOPTION CASES, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 247, 291+ (2007) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 5723 THE LIBERTIES OF EQUAL CITIZENS: GROUPS AND THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 99, 142+ (2007) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5724 FREE SPEECH RIGHTS THAT WORK AT WORK: FROM THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO DUE PROCESS, 54 UCLA L. Rev. 1463, 1496 (2007) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 5725 REVISITING YOUNGSTOWN: AGAINST THE VIEW THAT JACKSON'S CONCURRENCE RESOLVES THE RELATION BETWEEN CONGRESS AND THE COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF, 54 UCLA L. Rev. 1703, 1745 (2007) 5726 THE SOLOMON AMENDMENT, EXPRESSIVE ASSOCIATIONS, AND PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT, 54 UCLA L. Rev. 1767, 1813+ (2007) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5727 STRICT JUDICIAL SCRUTINY, 54 UCLA L. Rev. 1267, 1337+ (2007) 5728 FOREIGN LAW AND THE U.S. CONSTITUTION: DELIMITING THE RANGE OF PERSUASIVE AUTHORITY, 54 UCLA L. Rev. 1413, 1461+ (2007) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 5729 LIMITING CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, 54 UCLA L. Rev. 789, 854+ (2007) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5730 HEPATITIS C IN PRISONS: EVOLVING TOWARD DECENCY THROUGH ADEQUATE MEDICAL CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH REFORM, 54 UCLA L. Rev. 465, 507 (2006) 5731 "CONSULTING" THE FEDERAL SENTENCING GUIDELINES AFTER BOOKER, 53 UCLA L. Rev. 1497, 1546+ (2006) 5732 WHAT INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE CAN TELL U.S. COURTS ABOUT SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, 53 UCLA L. Rev. 1073, 1105+ (2006) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 5733 WAS THE DISPARATE IMPACT THEORY A MISTAKE?, 53 UCLA L. Rev. 701, 782 (2006) 5734 SEXUALLY PROVOKED: RECOGNIZING SEXUAL MISREPRESENTATION AS ADEQUATE PROVOCATION, 53 UCLA L. Rev. 783, 831+ (2006) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5735 ROPER V. SIMMONS AND OUR CONSTITUTION IN INTERNATIONAL EQUIPOISE, 53 UCLA L. Rev. 1, 27+ (2005) 5736 RECONCILING DATA PRIVACY AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT, 52 UCLA L. Rev. 1149, 1222+ (2005) 5737 CONSERVATIVE LAWYERS AND THE CONTEST OVER THE MEANING OF "PUBLIC INTEREST LAW", 52 UCLA L. Rev. 1223, 1278+ (2005) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 5738 CONSERVATIVE REFORMATION, POPULARIZATION, AND THE LESSONS OF READING CRIMINAL JUSTICE AS CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 52 UCLA L. Rev. 979, 1060+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5739 IN SEARCH OF A THEORY FOR CONSTITUTIONAL COMPARATIVISM, 52 UCLA L. Rev. 639, 714+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5740 NATIONAL RULEMAKING THROUGH TRIAL COURTS: THE BIG CASE AND INSTITUTIONAL REFORM, 51 UCLA L. Rev. 1015, 1078+ (2004) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 5741 ADJUDICATIVE SPEECH AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT, 51 UCLA L. Rev. 705, 797+ (2004) 5742 STATING A TITLE VII CLAIM FOR SEXUAL ORIENTATION DISCRIMINATION IN THE WORKPLACE: THE LEGAL THEORIES AVAILABLE AFTER RENE V. MGM GRAND HOTEL, 51 UCLA L. Rev. 313, 338+ (2003) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5743 TRADITION AS JUSTIFICATION: THE CASE OF OPPOSITE-SEX MARRIAGE, 78 U. Chi. L. Rev. 281, 343+ (2011) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 5744 REALISM ON CHANGE IN MORAL INTUITIONS, 77 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1643, 1653 (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5745 THE PRICE OF VICTORY: POLITICAL TRIUMPHS AND JUDICIAL © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. PROTECTION IN THE GAY RIGHTS MOVEMENT, 77 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1437, 1471+ (2010) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5746 THE CLASSICAL LIBERAL ALTERNATIVE TO PROGRESSIVE AND CONSERVATIVE CONSTITUTIONALISM, 77 U. Chi. L. Rev. 887, 919+ (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5747 FROM VICTORIAN SECRETS TO CYBERSPACE SHAMING, 76 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1407, 1448+ (2009) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 5748 THE MODERNIZING MISSION OF JUDICIAL REVIEW, 76 U. Chi. L. Rev. 859, 907+ (2009) 5749 THE DALE PROBLEM: PROPERTY AND SPEECH UNDER THE REGULATORY STATE, 75 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1541, 1600 (2008) 5750 MINORS' CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO INFORMATIONAL PRIVACY, 74 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1375, 1410+ (2007) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 5751 BANISHMENT AND THE RIGHT TO LIVE WHERE YOU WANT, 74 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1023, 1055+ (2007) HN: 2,5 (S.Ct.) 5752 JUDGE RICHARD POSNER ON CIVIL LIBERTIES: PRAGMATIC AUTHORITARIAN LIBERTARIAN, 74 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1723, 1737 (2007) 5753 THE CIVIL WAR CONGRESS, 73 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1131, 1226 (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5754 JUSTICE BREYER's MANDARIN LIBERTY, 73 U. Chi. L. Rev. 759, 822 (2006) 5755 THE PRESIDENT, THE SUPREME COURT, AND THE FOUNDING FATHERS: A REPLY TO PROFESSOR ACKERMAN, 73 U. Chi. L. Rev. 469, 473+ (2006) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 5756 A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS OF GRANDPARENTS' CUSTODY RIGHTS, 72 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1473, 1499+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5757 TORTURE'S TRUTH, 72 U. Chi. L. Rev. 881, 918+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5758 A SEPARATE CRIME OF RECKLESS SEX, 72 U. Chi. L. Rev. 599, 666+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5759 UNDER SIEGE: FREEDOM OF CHOICE AND THE STATUTORY BAN ON ABORTIONS ON MILITARY BASES, 71 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1549, 1582 (2004) 5760 SEXUAL ORIENTATION: TESTING THE UNIVERSALITY OF INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW, 71 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1689, 1720+ (2004) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5761 LABOR UNION COALITION CHALLENGES TO GOVERNMENTAL ACTION: DEFENDING THE CIVIL RIGHTS OF LOW-WAGE WORKERS, 1 U. Chi. Legal F. 103, 146 (2009) 5762 EMBRYO CULTURE AND THE "CULTURE OF LIFE": CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES IN THE EMBRYONIC STEM CELL DEBATE, 2006 U. Chi. Legal F. 1, 14+ (2006) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5763 CRIMINALIZING CONSENSUAL TRANSMISSION OF HIV, 2006 U. Chi. © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Legal F. 389, 395+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5764 PROGRESS AND PROGRESSION IN FAMILY LAW, 2004 U. Chi. Legal F. 1, 25 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5765 MARRIAGE, COHABITATION AND COLLECTIVE RESPONSIBILITY FOR DEPENDENCY, 2004 U. Chi. Legal F. 225, 264 (2004) 5766 SHOULD THE RULES OF MARITAL PROPERTY BE NORMATIVE?, 2004 U. Chi. Legal F. 265, 286+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5767 THE PUBLIC AND PRIVATE ORDERING OF MARRIAGE, 2004 U. Chi. Legal F. 295, 318+ (2004) 5768 ADOPTION IN THE AGE OF REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY, 2004 U. Chi. Legal F. 393, 451+ (2004) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 5769 DOMESTICATING LAWRENCE, 2004 U. Chi. Legal F. 453, 453+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5770 THE KISS OF DEATH FOR "LIVING IN MARITAL UNION": STRICT JUDICIAL SCRUTINY OF DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY MARITAL FRAUD PROCEDURES, 2004 U. Chi. Legal F. 495, 524 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5771 JUDICIAL DEFERENCE AND INSTITUTIONAL CHARACTER: HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATIONS AND THE PUZZLE OF PRIVATE GOVERNANCE, 81 U. Cin. L. Rev. 839, 895+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5772 SEXUAL PRIVACY IN THE MODERN ERA: LOWE V. SWANSON, 81 U. Cin. L. Rev. 1127, 1127+ (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5773 POLYAMORY AS A SEXUAL ORIENTATION, 79 U. Cin. L. Rev. 1461, 1515+ (2011) 5774 THE "OTHER" PARENT: PROTECTING THE RIGHTS OF NONCUSTODIAL PARENTS IN EMERGENCY REMOVAL SITUATIONS, 79 U. Cin. L. Rev. 1189, 1212 (2011) 5775 RECONSTRUCTING FAULT: THE CASE FOR SPOUSAL TORTS, 79 U. Cin. L. Rev. 207, 265 (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5776 THE IRREPRESSIBLE MYTH OF KLEIN, 79 U. Cin. L. Rev. 53, 96+ (2010) 5777 THE IMPACT OF THE GENETIC INFORMATION NONDISCRIMINATION ACT ON THE DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION IN ADOPTION PROCEEDINGS, 78 U. Cin. L. Rev. 1629, 1650 (2010) 5778 PATIENTS WITHOUT BORDERS: EXTRALEGAL DEPORTATION BY HOSPITALS, 78 U. Cin. L. Rev. 657, 697 (2009) 5779 WE ARE ALL JUDICIAL ACTIVISTS NOW, 77 U. Cin. L. Rev. 181, 232+ (2008) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 5780 CONSTITUTIONAL HUMILITY, 76 U. Cin. L. Rev. 23, 53 (2007) 5781 THE FOREIGN SOURCE DOCTRINE: EXPLAINING THE ROLE OF FOREIGN AND INTERNATIONAL LAW IN INTERPRETING THE CONSTITUTION, 75 U. Cin. L. Rev. 1389, 1451+ (2007) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 5782 DEMOCRACY AND THE DEATH OF KNOWLEDGE, 75 U. Cin. L. Rev. 1053, 1069 (2007) 5783 KISS AND TELL: PROTECTING INTIMATE RELATIONSHIP PRIVACY THROUGH IMPLIED CONTRACTS OF CONFIDENTIALITY, 74 U. Cin. L. Rev. 887, 939+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5784 "YOU GOT NO SECRETS TO CONCEAL": CONSIDERING THE APPLICATION OF THE TARASOFF DOCTRINE ABROAD, 75 U. Cin. L. Rev. 611, 629+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5785 SQUARE PEGS INTO ROUND HOLES? STRICT SCRUTINY AND VOLUNTARY SCHOOL DESEGREGATION PLANS, 75 U. Cin. L. Rev. 791, 839 (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5786 CIVIL AND CRIMINAL RECIDIVISTS: EXTRATERRITORIALITY IN TORT AND CRIME, 73 U. Cin. L. Rev. 1609, 1641 (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5787 UNITED STATES V. EXTREME ASSOCIATES, INC.: THE SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS DEATH OF OBSCENITY LAW, 74 U. Cin. L. Rev. 607, 637+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5788 THE IMPORTANCE OF BEING POSITIVE: THE NATURE AND FUNCTION OF JUDICIAL REVIEW, 72 U. Cin. L. Rev. 1257, 1303+ (2004) 5789 CONTINENTAL DRIFT: THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE ABOLITION OF ANTI-SODOMY LAWS IN LAWRENCE V. TEXAS, 72 U. Cin. L. Rev. 1799, 1819+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5790 DIVERSITY AND DEMOCRACY, 72 U. Cin. L. Rev. 961, 976+ (2004) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 5791 BETWEEN TRADITION AND PROGRESS: A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE ON POLYGAMY IN THE UNITED STATES AND INDIA, 83 U. Colo. L. Rev. 963, 1025+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5792 PARCHMENT, PIXELS, & PERSONHOOD: USER RIGHTS AND THE IP (IDENTITY POLITICS) OF IP (INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY), 82 U. Colo. L. Rev. 1, 84 (2011) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 5793 WHITHER THE PICKERING RIGHTS OF FEDERAL EMPLOYEES?, 79 U. Colo. L. Rev. 1101, 1149 (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5794 A PRACTICAL AND PRAGMATIC APPROACH TO FREEDOM OF CONSCIENCE, 76 U. Colo. L. Rev. 1057, 1080 (2005) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 5795 WHAT DOES RELIGION HAVE TO DO WITH FREEDOM OF CONSCIENCE?, 76 U. Colo. L. Rev. 911, 940+ (2005) 5796 NAVIGATING DANGEROUS CONSTITUTIONAL STRAITS: A PROLEGOMENON ON THE FEDERAL MARRIAGE AMENDMENT AND THE DISENFRANCHISEMENT OF SEXUAL MINORITIES, 76 U. Colo. L. Rev. 599, 652+ (2005) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 5797 THE VALIDITY OF THE 2010 FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 26 AMENDMENT GOVERNING THE WAIVER OF WORK PRODUCT PROTECTION: IS THE WORK PRODUCT DOCTRINE AN EVIDENTIARY © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. PRIVILEGE?, 37 U. Dayton L. Rev. 279, 301 (2012) 5798 SAME-SEX MARRIAGE AND PUBLIC SCHOOL CURRICULA: PRESERVING PARENTAL RIGHTS TO DIRECT THE EDUCATION OF THEIR CHILDREN, 32 U. Dayton L. Rev. 361, 384+ (2007) 5799 AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL DEATH: THE OREGON DEATH WITH DIGNITY ACT'S PROHIBITION AGAINST SELF-ADMINISTERED LETHAL INJECTION, 32 U. Dayton L. Rev. 441, 459 (2007) 5800 GRUTTER v. BOLLINGER AND CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE, 31 U. Dayton L. Rev. 345, 380+ (2006) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 5801 "DON'T ASK, DON'T TELL:" HAS THE POLICY MET ITS GOALS?, 31 U. Dayton L. Rev. 1, 24+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5802 THE FUTURE OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGE AFTER LAWRENCE v. TEXAS AND THE ELECTION OF 2004, 30 U. Dayton L. Rev. 313, 317+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5803 MIMICKING MARRIAGE: AS THE EVOLUTION OF THE LEGAL RECOGNITION OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGE PROGRESSES, CIVIL UNIONS CURRENTLY REPRESENT THE BEST ALTERNATIVE TO MARRIAGE, 30 U. Dayton L. Rev. 119, 147+ (2004) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 5804 RIGHT DECISION, WRONG CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: TAKING THE BETTER PATH WITH EQUAL PROTECTION JURISPRUDENCELAWRENCE V. TEXAS, 123 S. CT. 2472 (2003), 29 U. Dayton L. Rev. 447, 464+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5805 CONSCIENCE OF A CATHOLIC JUDGE, 29 U. Dayton L. Rev. 305, 316+ (2004) 5806 DEATH IS DIFFERENT: AN ESSAY CONSIDERING THE PROPRIETY OF UTILIZING FOREIGN CASE LAW IN EIGHTH AMENDMENT JURISPRUDENCE, 29 U. Dayton L. Rev. 345, 347+ (2004) 5807 JUSTICE FOR CLARENCE THOMAS: AN INTELLECTUAL HISTORY OF JUSTICE THOMAS'S TWENTY YEARS ON THE SUPREME COURT, 88 U. Det. Mercy L. Rev. 667, 690 (2011) 5808 THE LAST COMMON LAW JUSTICE: THE PERSONAL JURISDICTION JURISPRUDENCE OF JUSTICE JOHN PAUL STEVENS, 88 U. Det. Mercy L. Rev. 433, 471 (2011) 5809 CONNECTICUT'S CLASS DIVIDE: SEXUAL ORIENTATION AS A QUASISUSPECT CLASS, 87 U. Det. Mercy L. Rev. 227, 246 (2010) 5810 NO LAW RESPECTING THE PRACTICE OF RELIGION, 85 U. Det. Mercy L. Rev. 475, 493 (2008) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 5811 THE SUPREME COURT AND THE FUTURE OF MARRIAGE, 84 U. Det. Mercy L. Rev. 479, 498+ (2007) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 5812 THE NINTH AMENDMENT AND AMERICA'S UNCONSTITUTIONAL WAR ON DRUGS, 84 U. Det. Mercy L. Rev. 417, 449+ (2007) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 5813 THE REJECTION OF DIVINE LAW IN AMERICAN JURISPRUDENCE: THE TEN COMMANDMENTS, TRIVIA, AND THE STARS AND STRIPES, 83 U. Det. Mercy L. Rev. 641, 677+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5814 THE POSSIBILITIES OF AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW IN A FRACTURED WORLD: A RELATIONAL APPROACH TO LEGAL HERMENEUTICS, 83 U. Det. Mercy L. Rev. 789, 827 (2006) 5815 DEFINING CONSTITUTIONAL DISCRIMINATION: AN ANALYSIS OF MICHIGAN'S CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT TO DEFINE MARRIAGE, 83 U. Det. Mercy L. Rev. 91, 114+ (2006) 5816 NO-FAULT TORT LAW AS A "STRATEGIC ASSUMPTION': THROWING OUT THE BABY WITH THE BATHWATER, 82 U. Det. Mercy L. Rev. 47, 58+ (2004) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 5817 SAME SEX MARRIAGE: DOES THE CONSTITUTION OR STATE CONSTITUTION SUPPORT SAME-SEX MARRIAGES?, 14 U. D.C. L. Rev. 133, 158+ (2011) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 5818 THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA V. THE 50 STATES: A 21ST CENTURY LAWSUIT TO REMEDY AN 18TH CENTURY INJUSTICE, 14 U. D.C. L. Rev. 43, 113 (2011) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 5819 PERRY V. SCHWARZENEGGER: A JUDICIAL ATTACK ON TRADITIONAL MARRIAGE, 22 U. Fla. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 145, 181+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5820 WHEN COURTS LET INSANE DELUSIONS PASS THE RATIONAL BASIS TEST: THE NEWEST CHALLENGE TO FLORIDA'S EXCLUSION OF HOMOSEXUALS FROM ADOPTION, 21 U. Fla. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 1, 76+ (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5821 SEXUAL ABUSE OF POWER, 21 U. Fla. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 77, 146+ (2010) 5822 STOPPING FOR DEATH: RE-FRAMING OUR PERSPECTIVE ON THE END OF LIFE, 20 U. Fla. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 387, 437+ (2009) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5823 REFLECTIONS ON LOVING AND CHILDREN'S RIGHTS, 20 U. Fla. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 11, 32 (2009) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 5824 WORKPLACE ELECTRONIC PRIVACY PROTECTIONS ABROAD: THE WHOLE WIDE WORLD IS WATCHING, 19 U. Fla. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 379, 420+ (2008) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5825 A NEW METHOD TO GUIDE CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION: INTRODUCING "NEGATIVE ORIGINALISM", 18 U. Fla. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 383, 414+ (2007) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 5826 THE CONSTITUTION AND FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS, 18 U. Fla. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y IX, xiii (2007) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 5827 INCONSISTENT LEVELS OF GENERALITY IN THE CHARACTERIZATION OF UNENUMERATED FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS, 16 U. Fla. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 401, 434+ (2005) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 5828 THE LOGIC AND EXPERIENCE OF LAW: LAWRENCE v. TEXAS AND © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. THE POLITICS OF PRIVACY, 15 U. Fla. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 403, 403+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5829 IS "DON'T ASK, DON'T TELL" UNCONSTITUTIONAL AFTER LAWRENCE? WHAT IT WILL TAKE TO OVERTURN THE POLICY, 15 U. Fla. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 423, 424+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5830 CIVIL UNION STATUTES: A SHORTCUT TO LEGAL EQUALITY FOR SAME-SEX PARTNERS IN A LANDSCAPE LITTERED WITH DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACTS, 15 U. Fla. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 229, 230+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5831 FLORIDA'S GAY ADOPTION BAN: WHAT DO FLORIDIANS THINK?, 15 U. Fla. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 261, 283+ (2004) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 5832 BRADLEY, BREYER, BUSH AND BEYOND: THE LEGAL REALISM OF LEGAL HISTORY, 15 U. Fla. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 57, 90 (2003) 5833 HOMELESS PROPERTY RIGHTS: AN ANALYSIS OF HOMELESSNESS, HONOLULU'S "SIDEWALK LAW," AND WHETHER REAL PROPERTY IS A CONDITION PRECEDENT TO THE FULL ENJOYMENT OF RIGHTS UNDER THE U.S. CONSTITUTION, 35 U. Haw. L. Rev. 197, 247+ (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 5834 HAWAI'I'S RIGHT TO PRIVACY, 33 U. Haw. L. Rev. 669, 673+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5835 BAEHR V. LEWIN AND THE LONG ROAD TO MARRIAGE EQUALITY, 33 U. Haw. L. Rev. 705, 728+ (2011) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5836 THE CONSTITUTION AND INKING: HOW ANDERSON V. CITY OF HERMOSA BEACH EXPANDED FIRST AMENDMENT PROTECTION FOR THE TATTOO INDUSTRY, 33 U. Haw. L. Rev. 417, 437+ (2010) 5837 THE STATE MARRIAGE CASES: IMPLICATIONS FOR HAWAI'I'S MARRIAGE EQUALITY DEBATE IN THE POST-LAWRENCE AND ROMER ERA, 31 U. Haw. L. Rev. 653, 680+ (2009) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5838 JUDICIAL REVIEW AND SEXUAL FREEDOM, 30 U. Haw. L. Rev. 1, 47+ (2007) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5839 PROSTITUTION: PROTECTED IN PARADISE?, 30 U. Haw. L. Rev. 193, 217+ (2007) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5840 FREE EXERCISE AND HYBRID RIGHTS: AN ALTERNATIVE PERSPECTIVE ON THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGE BANS, 29 U. Haw. L. Rev. 23, 57+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5841 DON'T SMILE, YOUR IMAGE HAS JUST BEEN RECORDED ON A CAMERA-PHONE: THE NEED FOR PRIVACY IN THE PUBLIC SPHERE, 27 U. Haw. L. Rev. 377, 416 (2005) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 5842 PRUDENT USE OF JUDICIAL MINIMALISM: WHY MINIMALISM MAY NOT BE APPROPRIATE IN THE CONTEXT OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, 27 U. Haw. L. Rev. 501, 523+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5843 THE RECOGNITION OF SAME-SEX RELATIONSHIPS: COMPARATIVE INSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS, CONTESTED SOCIAL GOALS, AND © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. STRATEGIC INSTITUTIONAL CHOICE, 28 U. Haw. L. Rev. 23, 80+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5844 GLOBALIZING HUMAN RIGHTS AND FEDERAL COURT JURISDICTION: A REPLY TO JUSTICE GINSBURG, 26 U. Haw. L. Rev. 337, 350+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5845 THE ROLE OF CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW IN FEDERAL AND STATE COURT LITIGATION, 26 U. Haw. L. Rev. 361, 384 (2004) 5846 PEEKING ABROAD?: THE SUPREME COURT'S USE OF FOREIGN PRECEDENTS IN CONSTITUTIONAL CASES, 26 U. Haw. L. Rev. 385, 404+ (2004) 5847 EMERGENCY CONTRACEPTION IN RELIGIOUS HOSPITALS: THE STRUGGLE BETWEEN RELIGIOUS FREEDOM AND PERSONAL AUTONOMY, 27 U. Haw. L. Rev. 65, 109 (2004) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 5848 PROSTITUTION AND THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CURRENT LAW IN THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA, 2013 U. Ill. L. Rev. 625, 633+ (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5849 LEVELS OF GENERALITY, CONSTITUTIONAL COMEDY, AND LEGAL DESIGN, 2013 U. Ill. L. Rev. 1733, 1756+ (2013) 5850 WAYS TO THINK ABOUT UNENUMERATED RIGHTS, 2013 U. Ill. L. Rev. 1985, 1990+ (2013) 5851 HOMOGENOUS RULES FOR HETEROGENEOUS FAMILIES: THE STANDARDIZATION OF FAMILY LAW WHEN THERE IS NO STANDARD FAMILY, 2012 U. Ill. L. Rev. 319, 371+ (2012) 5852 CITIZENS UNITED AND CONSERVATIVE JUDICIAL ACTIVISM, 2012 U. Ill. L. Rev. 485, 500 (2012) 5853 MOVING THE STRIKE ZONE: HOW JUDGES SOMETIMES MAKE LAW, 2012 U. Ill. L. Rev. 1207, 1223+ (2012) 5854 NEVER A LOST CAUSE: EVALUATING SCHOOL FINANCE LITIGATION IN THE FACE OF CONTINUING EDUCATION INEQUALITY IN POSTRODRIGUEZ AMERICA, 2012 U. Ill. L. Rev. 1225, 1263+ (2012) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 5855 ADJUDICATING IN THE KINGDOM OF ENDS: A CONSTRUCTIVIST RESPONSE TO THE HART/DWORKIN DEBATE, 2011 U. Ill. L. Rev. 1387, 1417+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5856 FOUNDATIONAL FACTS AND DOCTRINAL CHANGE, 2011 U. Ill. L. Rev. 145, 185 (2011) 5857 STOPPING THE PENDULUM: WHY STARE DECISIS SHOULD CONSTRAIN THE COURT FROM FURTHER MODIFICATION OF THE SEARCH INCIDENT TO ARREST EXCEPTION, 2011 U. Ill. L. Rev. 695, 739+ (2011) HN: 1,4,5 (S.Ct.) 5858 NOT A MORAL ISSUE: SAME-SEX MARRIAGE AND RELIGIOUS LIBERTY, 2010 U. Ill. L. Rev. 205, 223 (2010) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 5859 YICK WO AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL REGULATION OF CRIMINAL LAW, 2008 U. Ill. L. Rev. 1405, 1413 (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5860 PREDICTION MARKETS AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT, 2008 U. Ill. L. Rev. 833, 879 (2008) 5861 STORM IN A TEACUP: THE U.S. SUPREME COURT'S USE OF FOREIGN LAW, 2007 U. Ill. L. Rev. 637, 680+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5862 THE EUROPEAN LEGACY OF BROWN V. BOARD OF EDUCATION, 2006 U. Ill. L. Rev. 605, 623 (2006) 5863 MAKE WAY FOR THE NEW KID ON THE BLOCK: THE POSSIBLE ZONING IMPLICATIONS OF LAWRENCE V. TEXAS, 2005 U. Ill. L. Rev. 847, 847+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5864 RUNNING IN PLACE: THE PARADOX OF EXPANDING RIGHTS AND RESTRICTED REMEDIES, 2005 U. Ill. L. Rev. 1199, 1255 (2005) 5865 DOES THE CONSTITUTION EMBODY A "PRESUMPTION OF LIBERTY"?, 2005 U. Ill. L. Rev. 319, 338+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5866 EMBRACING SEGREGATION: THE JURISPRUDENCE OF CHOICE AND DIVERSITY IN RACE AND SEX SEPARATISM IN SCHOOLS, 2005 U. Ill. L. Rev. 455, 512 (2005) 5867 BAN LISTS: CAN PUBLIC HOUSING AUTHORITIES HAVE UNWANTED VISITORS ARRESTED?, 2004 U. Ill. L. Rev. 1223, 1260+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5868 THE ULTIMATE GENDER STEREOTYPE: EQUALIZING GENDERCONFORMING AND GENDER-NONCONFORMING HOMOSEXUALS UNDER TITLE VII, 2004 U. Ill. L. Rev. 465, 499+ (2004) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5869 IN DEFENSE OF JUDICIAL REVIEW: THE PERILS OF POPULAR CONSTITUTIONALISM, 2004 U. Ill. L. Rev. 673, 690 (2004) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 5870 "UNVEILING" KANSAS'S BAN ON APPLICATION OF FOREIGN LAW, 61 U. Kan. L. Rev. 1061, 1087+ (2013) 5871 IN SEARCH OF A SECOND CHANCE: CHANNELING BMW V. GORE AND RECONSIDERING OCCUPATIONAL LICENSING RESTRICTIONS, 61 U. Kan. L. Rev. 495, 513+ (2012) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 5872 MCDONALD V. CITY OF CHICAGO: DID JUSTICE THOMAS RESURRECT THE PRIVILEGES OR IMMUNITIES CLAUSE FROM THE DEAD? (AND DID JUSTICE SCALIA KILL IT AGAIN?), 60 U. Kan. L. Rev. 435, 460+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5873 THE RIGHTS QUESTION, 58 U. Kan. L. Rev. 615, 663+ (2010) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.) 5874 PRIVATE OPPRESSION: HOW LAWS THAT PROTECT PRIVACY CAN LEAD TO OPPRESSION, 58 U. Kan. L. Rev. 415, 471+ (2010) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 5875 SETTING THE SOCIAL AGENDA: DECIDING TO REVIEW HIGH-PROFILE CASES AT THE SUPREME COURT, 57 U. Kan. L. Rev. 313, 365+ (2009) 5876 GUNFIGHT AT THE K-12 CORRAL: LEGISLATIVE VS. JUDICIAL POWER © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. IN THE KANSAS SCHOOL FINANCE LITIGATION, 54 U. Kan. L. Rev. 1021, 1114+ (2006) 5877 KANSAS'S DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE AMENDMENT: THE PROBLEMATIC CONSEQUENCES OF A BLANKET NONRECOGNITION RULE ON KANSAS LAW, 54 U. Kan. L. Rev. 1165, 1210+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5878 TRADITIONALISM, MAJORITARIAN MORALITY, AND THE HOMOSEXUAL SODOMY ISSUE: THE JOURNEY FROM BOWERS TO LAWRENCE, 53 U. Kan. L. Rev. 1, 80+ (2004) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 5879 PRIVACY, PLAINTIFFS, AND PSEUDONYMS: THE ANONYMOUS DOE PLAINTIFF IN THE INFORMATION AGE, 53 U. Kan. L. Rev. 195, 256 (2004) 5880 HAS PRESIDENT OBAMA ABANDONED HIS PROMISES? THE DENIAL OF FEDERAL HEALTH BENEFITS FOR SAME-SEX SPOUSES OF NINTH CIRCUIT EMPLOYEES, 32 U. La Verne L. Rev. 105, 135+ (2010) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 5881 KING AND KING: LEARNING TO TREAT OTHERS ROYALLY THROUGH DIVERSITY EDUCATION, 31 U. La Verne L. Rev. 109, 138+ (2009) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5882 ESTABLISHING A FREE MARKET IN HUMAN ORGANS: ECONOMIC REASONING AND THE PERFECTLY COMPETITIVE MODEL, 31 U. La Verne L. Rev. 67, 108 (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5883 THE MIGRATION OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGE FROM CANADA TO THE UNITED STATES: AN INCREMENTAL APPROACH, 30 U. La Verne L. Rev. 200, 215+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5884 BEYOND BLAME-MENS REA AND REGULATORY CRIME, 46 U. Louisville L. Rev. 1, 72 (2007) 5885 A TIME FOR CHANGE: WHY THE MSM LIFETIME DEFERRAL POLICY SHOULD BE AMENDED, 13 U. Md. L.J. Race, Religion, Gender & Class 134, 149+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5886 CHILD, PLEASE -STOP THE ANTI-QUEER SCHOOL BULLYCIDES: A MODEST PROPOSAL TO HOIST SOCIAL CONSERVATIVES BY THEIR OWN "GOD, GUNS, AND GAYS" PETARD (FN2), 11 U. Md. L.J. Race, Religion, Gender & Class 151, 223+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5887 AND THE BAN PLAYS ON . . . FOR NOW: WHY COURTS MUST CONSIDER RELIGION IN MARRIAGE EQUALITY CASES, 10 U. Md. L.J. Race, Religion, Gender & Class 221, 247+ (2010) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5888 THE ROLE OF COURTS VIS-À-VIS LEGISLATURES IN THE SAME-SEX MARRIAGE CONTEXT: SEXUAL ORIENTATION AS A SUSPECT CLASSIFICATION, 9 U. Md. L.J. Race, Religion, Gender & Class 213, 239+ (2009) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5889 10 YEARS OUT OF STEP & OUT OF LINE: FLORIDA'S STATUTORY BAN OF "LESBI-GAY ADOPTION" VIOLATES THE ADOPTION AND SAFE FAMILIES ACT OF 1997 (ASFA), 8 U. Md. L.J. Race, Religion, Gender & © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Class 71, 122+ (2008) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5890 SANDRA DAY O'CONNOR'S POSITION ON DISCRIMINATION, 4 U. Md. L.J. Race, Religion, Gender & Class 241, 246+ (2004) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5891 MEMPHIS SINGS "SOUL' MUSIC, RURAL DOES COUNTRY: SCHOOL FINANCE LITIGATION IN TENNESSEE, 4 U. Md. L.J. Race, Religion, Gender & Class 315, 363 (2004) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 5892 MEDELLÍN V. TEXAS: THE ROBERTS COURT AND NEW FRONTIERS FOR FEDERALISM, 41 U. Miami Inter-Am. L. Rev. 255, 288+ (2010) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5893 HOW BROMFIELD V. MUKASEY CORRECTLY APPLIED U.S. IMMIGRATION LAW IN A VICTORY FOR CIVIL RIGHTS AND A SCATHING REBUKE OF JAMAICA'S PERVASIVE HOMOPHOBIA, 40 U. Miami Inter-Am. L. Rev. 495, 519 (2009) 5894 WONG KIM ARK AND SENTENCIA QUE DECLARA CONSTITUCIONAL LA LEY GENERAL DE MIGRACIÓN 285-04 IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE: CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION, JUS SOLI PRINCIPLES, AND POLITICAL MORALITY, 39 U. Miami Inter-Am. L. Rev. 67, 109 (2007) 5895 BENEATH THE VEIL OF MORMONISM: UNCOVERING THE TRUTH ABOUT POLYGAMY IN THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA, 38 U. Miami Inter-Am. L. Rev. 615, 640+ (2007) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5896 FORUM NON CONVENIENS AND THE FOREIGN FORUM: A DEFENSE PERSPECTIVE, 35 U. Miami Inter-Am. L. Rev. 1, 20 (2004) 5897 THE MANY FACES OF POWER: AN INTERNATIONAL LAW RESPONSE TO ROBERT KAGAN'S OF PARADISE AND POWER, 12 U. Miami Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 361, 384+ (2004) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 5898 THE EVANS CASE: A SIXTH AMENDMENT CHALLENGE TO FLORIDA'S CAPITAL SENTENCING STATUTE, 67 U. Miami L. Rev. 933, 974 (2013) 5899 WEDLOCKED, 67 U. Miami L. Rev. 1, 39 (2012) 5900 PUTTING THE LID ON STATE-SANCTIONED CARTELS: WHY THE STATE ACTION DOCTRINE IN ITS CURRENT FORM SHOULD BECOME A REMNANT OF THE PAST, 66 U. Miami L. Rev. 123, 139+ (2011) 5901 COOK V. GATES AND WITT V. DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE: JUDICIAL DEFERENCE AND THE FUTURE OF DON'T ASK DON'T TELL, 64 U. Miami L. Rev. 397, 424+ (2009) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5902 THE ULTIMATE ASSOCIATION: SAME-SEX MARRIAGE AND THE BATTLE AGAINST JIM CROW'S OTHER COUSIN, 63 U. Miami L. Rev. 269, 299+ (2008) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5903 ARTICLE II: THE USES AND ABUSES OF EXECUTIVE POWER, 62 U. Miami L. Rev. 181, 212 (2008) 5904 THE CONSTITUTION, THE CAMPS & THE HUMANITARIAN FIFTH AMENDMENT, 62 U. Miami L. Rev. 307, 363 (2008) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 5905 A DIFFERENT MODEL FOR THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY: THE POLITICAL QUESTION DOCTRINE AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS, 61 U. Miami L. Rev. 169, 201+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5906 SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, INDIAN TRIBES, AND THE CONSTITUTION, 61 U. Miami L. Rev. 53, 85+ (2006) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 5907 ETHICAL AND AGGRESSIVE APPELLATE ADVOCACY: CONFRONTING ADVERSE AUTHORITY, 59 U. Miami L. Rev. 341, 383+ (2005) 5908 BEHIND THE PROCESS: REMEMBERING JOHN ELY'S COMPASSION, 58 U. Miami L. Rev. 955, 959 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5909 A FLAWED SYSTEM EXPOSED: THE IMMIGRATION ADJUDICATORY SYSTEM AND ASYLUM FOR SEXUAL MINORITIES, 58 U. Miami L. Rev. 679, 699 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5910 HOLISTIC INTERPRETATION, COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONALISM, AND FISS-IAN FREEDOMS, 58 U. Miami L. Rev. 265, 321+ (2003) 5911 A NEW AMERICAN DILEMMA?: U.S. CONSTITUTIONALISM VS. INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS, 58 U. Miami L. Rev. 323, 346+ (2003) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 5912 FOR NONTRADITIONAL NAMES' SAKE: A CALL TO REFORM THE NAME-CHANGE PROCESS FOR MARRYING COUPLES, 47 U. Mich. J.L. Reform 247, 270+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5913 A VICTIMLESS SEX CRIME: THE CASE FOR DECRIMINALIZING CONSENSUAL TEEN SEXTING, 46 U. Mich. J.L. Reform 703, 718+ (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5914 PUT THE TOWN ON NOTICE: SCHOOL DISTRICT LIABILITY AND LGBT BULLYING NOTIFICATION LAWS, 46 U. Mich. J.L. Reform 303, 347+ (2012) 5915 ADVERSE POSSESSION, PRIVATE-ZONING WAIVER & DESUETUDE: ABANDONMENT & RECAPTURE OF PROPERTY AND LIBERTY INTERESTS, 44 U. Mich. J.L. Reform 557, 624+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5916 BALANCING THE DEMANDS OF THE WORKPLACE WITH THE NEEDS OF THE MODERN FAMILY: EXPANDING FAMILY AND MEDICAL LEAVE TO PROTECT DOMESTIC PARTNERS, 37 U. Mich. J.L. Reform 837, 877+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5917 GHOST WORKERS IN AN INTERCONNECTED WORLD: GOING BEYOND THE DICHOTOMIES OF DOMESTIC IMMIGRATION AND LABOR LAWS, 36 U. Mich. J.L. Reform 737, 765 (2003) 5918 TAX CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTIONS IN "OBAMACARE": NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS v. SEBELIUS IN LIGHT OF CITIZENS UNITED v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION AND SPEISER v. RANDALL: CONDITIONING A TAX BENEFIT ON THE NO, 11 U. N.H. L. Rev. 189, 200+ (2013) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 5919 IN LOVE AND IN JEOPARDY: WHY LEGAL RECOGNITION OF SAME- © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. SEX UNIONS DOES NOT END THE NEED FOR DOMESTIC PARTNER BENEFIT PROGRAMS, 10 U. Pa. J. Bus. & Emp. L. 225, 243 (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5920 THE CONSTITUTIONAL INCOMPLETENESS THEOREM, 15 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 1373, 1454+ (2013) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 5921 "ONE IS NOT BORN, BUT BECOMES A WOMAN": A FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT ARGUMENT IN SUPPORT OF HOUSING MALETO-FEMALE TRANSGENDER INMATES IN FEMALE FACILITIES, 15 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 1259, 1286+ (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5922 EQUALITY FEDERALISM: A SOLUTION TO THE MARRIAGE WARS, 15 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 377, 449+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5923 DIAZ V. BREWER AND THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE: A ROADMAP FOR THE RETENTION OF SAME-SEX PUBLIC EMPLOYEE BENEFITS, 14 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 1351, 1387+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5924 SYMPOSIUM: PRIVACY JURISPRUDENCE AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SOCIAL CHANGE FIRST AMENDMENT PRIVACY AND THE BATTLE FOR PROGRESSIVELY LIBERAL SOCIAL CHANGE, 14 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 885, 927+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5925 CONSTITUTIONALIZING INFORMATIONAL PRIVACY BY ASSUMPTION, 14 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 953, 988+ (2012) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5926 OF SUSPENSION, DUE PROCESS, AND GUANTANAMO: THE REACH OF THE FIFTH AMENDMENT AFTER BOUMEDIENE AND THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HABEAS CORPUS AND DUE PROCESS, 14 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 719, 780 (2012) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 5927 ABORTION AND TECHNOLOGY: SONOGRAMS, FETAL PAIN, VIABILITY, AND EARLY PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 14 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 327, 390 (2011) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 5928 THROWING AWAY THE KEY: HAS THE ADAM WALSH ACT LOWERED THE THRESHOLD FOR SEXUALLY VIOLENT PREDATOR COMMITMENTS TOO FAR?, 14 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 391, 428 (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5929 SCIENCE OR STIGMA: POTENTIAL CHALLENGES TO THE FDA'S BAN ON GAY BLOOD, 14 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 485, 510+ (2011) 5930 WHY LIBERTY JUDICIAL REVIEW IS AS LEGITIMATE AS EQUALITY REVIEW: THE CASE OF GAY RIGHTS JURISPRUDENCE, 14 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 1, 76+ (2011) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5931 SEARCHING FOR THE "CIVIL GIDEON": PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS AND THE JUVENILE RIGHT TO COUNSEL IN TERMINATION PROCEEDINGS, 13 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 1079, 1113 (2011) 5932 PARTIAL CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS, 13 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 643, 685+ (2011) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 5933 DEMOCRACY AND JUDICIAL REVIEW, WILL AND REASON, © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. AMENDMENT AND INTERPRETATION: A REVIEW OF BARRY FRIEDMAN'S THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE, 13 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 413, 453+ (2010) 5934 "A SPECIAL CLASS OF PERSONS": PREGNANT WOMEN'S RIGHT TO REFUSE MEDICAL TREATMENT AFTER GONZALES V. CARHART, 13 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 145, 206+ (2010) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5935 WINNING THE HOUSING LOTTERY: CHANGING UNIVERSITY HOUSING POLICIES FOR TRANSGENDER STUDENTS, 12 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 1215, 1255+ (2010) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 5936 THE BRANDENBURG PARADIGM AND OTHER FIRST AMENDMENTS, 12 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 971, 1052 (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5937 A PLURALIST THEORY OF THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE, 11 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 1239, 1267+ (2009) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5938 INTERPRETING THE THIRTEENTH AMENDMENT, 11 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 1337, 1362 (2009) 5939 RESPONSIVE CONSTITUTIONALISM AND THE IDEA OF DIGNITY, 11 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 1373, 1380+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5940 ON SECTION 5 OF THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT, 11 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 1431, 1450 (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5941 FREEDOM, FATE, AND THE FEAR OF FRANKENSTEIN: DUE PROCESS PROTECTION FOR EMBRYONIC STEM CELL RESEARCH, 11 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 1077, 1134+ (2009) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 5942 "WE THE JURISTS": ISLAMIC CONSTITUTIONALISM IN IRAQ, 10 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 527, 579+ (2008) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 5943 "WHAT'S IN A NAME?" : CIVIL UNIONS AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL SIGNIFICANCE OF "MARRIAGE", 10 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 607, 642+ (2008) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5944 THE FAILURE OF FEDERALISM: DOES COMPETITIVE FEDERALISM ACTUALLY PROTECT INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS?, 10 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 643, 664+ (2008) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 5945 HOW MANY AVOIDANCE CANONS ARE THERE AFTER CLARK V. MARTINEZ?, 10 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 193, 224 (2007) 5946 THE EQUAL APPLICATION DEFENSE: THE EQUAL APPLICATION DEFENSE, 9 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 1207, 1231+ (2007) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 5947 SEX AND DEATH: LAWRENCE'S LIBERTY AND PHYSICIAN-ASSISTED SUICIDE, 9 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 1003, 1032+ (2007) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5948 THE REHNQUIST COURT: A "BY THE NUMBERS" RETROSPECTIVE, 9 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 1033, 1075 (2007) 5949 DNA TESTING FOR EDDY CURRY? CREATING A NEW CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION, 9 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 1105, 1129+ (2007) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 5950 THE HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF THE POLICE POWER, 9 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 745, 796+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5951 THE CONSTITUTIONAL IMPLICATIONS OF BATHROOM ACCESS BASED ON GENDER IDENTITY: AN EXAMINATION OF RECENT DEVELOPMENTS PAVING THE WAY FOR THE NEXT FRONTIER OF EQUAL PROTECTION, 9 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 895, 928+ (2007) 5952 REJECTING "UNCONTROLLED AUTHORITY OVER THE BODY": THE DECENCIES OF CIVILIZED CONDUCT, THE PAST AND THE FUTURE OF UNENUMERATED RIGHTS, 9 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 423, 455+ (2007) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 5953 REFLECTIONS ON UNENUMERATED RIGHTS, 9 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 483, 500+ (2007) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 5954 2006 TEMPLETON LECTURE: EMINENT DOMAIN POST-KELO Introduction to the 2006 Templeton Lecture Hitting Home-The Supreme Court Earns Public Notice Opining on Public Use, 9 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 501, 543 (2007) 5955 ASK, TELL, AND BE MERRY: THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF "DON'T ASK, DON'T TELL" FOLLOWING LAWRENCE V. TEXAS AND UNITED STATES V. MARCUM, 9 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 565, 593+ (2007) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5956 UNENUMERATED RIGHTS UNDER POPULAR CONSTITUTIONALISM, 9 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 121, 153 (2006) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 5957 THE SUPREME COURT IN BONDAGE: CONSTITUTIONAL STARE DECISIS, LEGAL FORMALISM, AND THE FUTURE OF UNENUMERATED RIGHTS, 9 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 155, 208 (2006) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 5958 CAN YOU WATCH UNENUMERATED RIGHTS DRIFT?, 9 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 209, 220+ (2006) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5959 THE LOGIC OF MAJORITY RULE, 9 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 23, 45+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5960 THE ENUMERATION OF RIGHTS: "LET ME COUNT THE WAYS", 9 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 281, 289 (2006) 5961 LAW AND LIMITS: HOW CATEGORIES CONSTRUCT CONSTITUTIONAL MEANING, 8 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 1005, 1032+ (2006) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5962 POOR LAW: THE DEFICIT REDUCTION ACT'S CITIZENSHIP DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENT FOR MEDICAID ELIGIBILITY, 8 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 1033, 1070+ (2006) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5963 "LIBERTY": ENUMERATED RIGHTS? UNENUMERATED RIGHTS? PENUMBRAL RIGHTS? OTHER?, 8 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 905, 916 (2006) 5964 EVERYTHING IS ENUMERATED: THE DEVELOPMENTAL PAST AND FUTURE OF AN INTERPRETIVE PROBLEM, 8 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 957, 982 (2006) 5965 FORGET THE FUNDAMENTALS: FIXING SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS, 8 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 983, 1004 (2006) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 5966 RECONCILING THE SUPREME COURT'S FOUR ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSES, 8 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 725, 800+ (2006) 5967 BEYOND COERCION: JUSTICE KENNEDY'S AVERSION TO ANIMUS, 8 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 801, 807+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5968 THE "HOLEY" BONDS OF MATRIMONY: A CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE TO BURDENSOME DIVORCE LAWS, 8 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 877, 901+ (2006) HN: 1,2,3 (S.Ct.) 5969 PROTECTING LAWS DESIGNED TO REMEDY ANTI-GAY DISCRIMINATION FROM EQUAL PROTECTION CHALLENGES: THE DESIRABILITY OF RATIONAL BASIS SCRUTINY, 8 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 513, 558+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5970 ON JURISDICTION-STRIPPING: THE PROPER SCOPE OF INFERIOR FEDERAL COURTS' INDEPENDENCE FROM CONGRESS, 8 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 559, 583+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5971 PROTECTED CONDUCT AND VISUAL PLEASURE: A DISCURSIVE ANALYSIS OF LAWRENCE AND BARNES, 7 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 1131, 1153+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5972 THE LIMITED PATH DEPENDENCY OF PRECEDENT, 7 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 903, 1000+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 5973 DIGNITY IN RACE JURISPRUDENCE, 7 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 669, 720+ (2005) HN: 1,4,5 (S.Ct.) 5974 THE TRANSFORMATIVE RACIAL POLITICS OF JUSTICE THOMAS?: THE GRUTTER V. BOLLINGER OPINION, 7 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 787, 807+ (2005) 5975 THE JUDICIAL APPOINTMENT POWER OF THE CHIEF JUSTICE, 7 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 341, 402 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5976 FILTERS AND FEDERALISM: PUBLIC LIBRARY INTERNET ACCESS, LOCAL CONTROL, AND THE FEDERAL SPENDING POWER, 7 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 1, 131+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5977 SAFE RULES OR GAYS' SCHOOLS? THE DILEMMA OF SEXUAL ORIENTATION SEGREGATION IN PUBLIC EDUCATION, 7 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 183, 196+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5978 LAW IN A TIME OF EMERGENCY: STATES OF EXCEPTION AND THE TEMPTATIONS OF 9/11, 6 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 1001, 1083+ (2004) 5979 THE NEW FORMALISM: REQUIEM FOR TIERED SCRUTINY?, 6 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 945, 997+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 5980 SKEPTICISM AND FREEDOM: THE INTELLECTUAL FOUNDATIONS OF OUR CONSTITUTIONAL ORDER, 6 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 657, 683 (2004) 5981 TOO CLOSE TO THE RACK AND THE SCREW: CONSTITUTIONAL CONSTRAINTS ON TORTURE IN THE WAR ON TERROR, 6 U. Pa. J. Const. L. 278, 325+ (2003) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5982 UNIVERSAL RIGHTS, NON-UNIVERSAL PROCESS: CONFRONTING © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. CULTURALLY GROUNDED HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES, 30 U. Pa. J. Int'l L. 1383, 1428+ (2009) 5983 TIPPING THE BALANCE: WHY COURTS SHOULD LOOK TO INTERNATIONAL AND FOREIGN LAW ON UNAUTHORIZED IMMIGRANT WORKER RIGHTS, 29 U. Pa. J. Int'l L. 169, 242+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5984 FIRING THOREAU: CONSCIENCE AND AT-WILL EMPLOYMENT, 9 U. Pa. J. Lab. & Emp. L. 235, 291+ (2007) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 5985 LABOR'S FRAGILE FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION POST-9/11, 8 U. Pa. J. Lab. & Emp. L. 283, 351 (2006) 5986 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS AND THE PARADOX OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGES AND EQUAL RIGHTS, 8 U. Pa. J. Lab. & Emp. L. 543, 573+ (2006) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 5987 WHAT DO YOU DO WHEN YOU ARE NOT AT WORK?: LIMITING THE USE OF OFF-DUTY CONDUCT AS THE BASIS FOR ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT DECISIONS, 6 U. Pa. J. Lab. & Emp. L. 625, 684 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5988 TAKE CARE THAT THE LAWS BE FAITHFULLY LITIGATED, 161 U. Pa. L. Rev. 291, 327+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5989 THE NEW CIVIL DEATH: RETHINKING PUNISHMENT IN THE ERA OF MASS CONVICTION, 160 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1789, 1833 (2012) 5990 THE JURISPRUDENCE OF DIGNITY, 160 U. Pa. L. Rev. 169, 232+ (2011) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 5991 THE INDIVIDUAL MANDATE, SOVEREIGNTY, AND THE ENDS OF GOOD GOVERNMENT: A REPLY TO PROFESSOR RANDY BARNETT, 159 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1623, 1648 (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5992 COMMERCE CLAUSE CHALLENGES TO HEALTH CARE REFORM, 159 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1825, 1872 (2011) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 5993 THE FREEDOM OF HEALTH, 159 U. Pa. L. Rev. 2209, 2252+ (2011) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 5994 ESTABLISHING RIGHTS WITHOUT REMEDIES? ACHIEVING AN EFFECTIVE CIVIL GIDEON BY AVOIDING A CIVIL STRICKLAND, 159 U. Pa. L. Rev. 893, 927 (2011) 5995 PERVASIVE IMAGE CAPTURE AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT: MEMORY, DISCOURSE, AND THE RIGHT TO RECORD, 159 U. Pa. L. Rev. 335, 409 (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 5996 EQUAL ACCESS AND THE RIGHT TO MARRY, 158 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1375, 1449+ (2010) 5997 VOWS TO COLLIDE: THE BURGEONING CONFLICT BETWEEN RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS AND SAME-SEX MARRIAGE ANTIDISCRIMINATION LAWS, 158 U. Pa. L. Rev. 179, 230+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 5998 THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF FEDERAL RESTRICTIONS ON THE INDEMNIFICATION OF ATTORNEYS' FEES, 156 U. Pa. L. Rev. 491, 548+ (2007) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 5999 INTERNATIONAL CONSENSUS AS PERSUASIVE AUTHORITY IN THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT, 156 U. Pa. L. Rev. 63, 120+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6000 INFORMATION MARKETS AS GAMES OF CHANCE, 155 U. Pa. L. Rev. 749, 776 (2007) 6001 ASSESSING CHIEF JUSTICE WILLIAM REHNQUIST, 154 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1331, 1364+ (2006) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6002 PRINCIPLES, PRACTICES, AND SOCIAL MOVEMENTS, 154 U. Pa. L. Rev. 927, 950 (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6003 A TAXONOMY OF PRIVACY, 154 U. Pa. L. Rev. 477, 564+ (2006) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6004 EXECUTIVE REVIEW IN THE FRAGMENTED EXECUTIVE: STATE CONSTITUTIONALISM AND SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, 154 U. Pa. L. Rev. 565, 648 (2006) 6005 HORIZONTAL FEDERALISM IN AN AGE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE INTERCONNECTEDNESS, 154 U. Pa. L. Rev. 257, 333+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6006 THE UNDERPRIVILEGED PROFESSION: THE CASE FOR SUPREME COURT RECOGNITION OF THE JOURNALIST'S PRIVILEGE, 154 U. Pa. L. Rev. 201, 256+ (2005) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 6007 GUANTANAMO AND THE CONFLICT OF LAWS: RASUL AND BEYOND, 153 U. Pa. L. Rev. 2017, 2071+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6008 ABU GHRAIB, 153 U. Pa. L. Rev. 2085, 2141 (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6009 INTERSTATE RECOGNITION OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGES AND CIVIL UNIONS: A HANDBOOK FOR JUDGES, 153 U. Pa. L. Rev. 2143, 2194+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6010 SAME-SEX MARRIAGE: REFINING THE CONFLICT OF LAWS ANALYSIS, 153 U. Pa. L. Rev. 2195, 2214 (2005) 6011 INTEREST ANALYSIS IN INTERJURISDICTIONAL MARRIAGE DISPUTES, 153 U. Pa. L. Rev. 2215, 2250+ (2005) 6012 RAINING ON THE PARADE OF HORRIBLES: OF SLIPPERY SLOPES, FAUX SLOPES, AND JUSTICE SCALIA'S DISSENT IN LAWRENCE V. TEXAS, 153 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1097, 1120+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6013 WAR EVERYWHERE: RIGHTS, NATIONAL SECURITY LAW, AND THE LAW OF ARMED CONFLICT IN THE AGE OF TERROR, 153 U. Pa. L. Rev. 675, 761 (2004) 6014 VANGUARD STATES, LAGGARD STATES: FEDERALISM AND CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, 152 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1745, 1827+ (2004) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6015 A CRITIQUE OF THE STRICT LIABILITY STANDARD FOR © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. DETERMINING CHILD SUPPORT IN CASES OF MALE VICTIMS OF SEXUAL ASSAULT AND STATUTORY RAPE, 152 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1957, 1999+ (2004) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6016 EXPLAINING GRUTTER V. BOLLINGER, 152 U. Pa. L. Rev. 347, 383+ (2003) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6017 THE ARGUMENT FOR SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, 159 U. Pa. L. Rev. PENNumbra 21, 30+ (2010) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6018 EXCLUDING RELIGION: A REPLY, 157 U. Pa. L. Rev. PENNumbra 283, 296 (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6019 ASSESSING CHIEF JUSTICE WILLIAM REHNQUIST'S COURT, 155 U. Pa. L. Rev. PENNumbra 1, 7 (2007) 6020 PRINCIPLES IN PRACTICE: "UNSTUCK" OR STICKY?, 155 U. Pa. L. Rev. PENNumbra 26, 37 (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6021 CONNECTEDNESS AND ITS DISCONTENTS, 155 U. Pa. L. Rev. PENNumbra 38, 51+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6022 THE GEOGRAPHY OF FAMILY PRIVACY, 156 U. Pa. L. Rev. PENNumbra 136, 146 (2007) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6023 PROHIBITION'S PENDING DEMISE: INTERNET GAMBLING & UNITED STATES POLICY, 10 U. Pitt. J. Tech. L. & Pol'y 3, 3 (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6024 WHILE EFFUSIVE, "CONCLUSORY" IS STILL QUITE ELUSIVE: THE STORY OF A WORD, IQBAL, AND A PERPLEXING LEXICAL INQUIRY OF SUPREME IMPORTANCE, 73 U. Pitt. L. Rev. 215, 317 (2011) 6025 CONSTITUTIONAL TRADITIONALISM IN THE ROBERTS COURT, 73 U. Pitt. L. Rev. 1, 63+ (2011) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 6026 SHIFTING TOWARDS A EUROPEAN ROE V. WADE: SHOULD JUDICIAL ACTIVISM CREATE AN INTERNATIONAL RIGHT TO ABORTION WITH A., B. AND C. V. IRELAND?, 72 U. Pitt. L. Rev. 389, 430+ (2010) 6027 SURVEYING THE LEGAL LANDSCAPE FOR PENNSYLVANIA SAME-SEX COUPLES, 71 U. Pitt. L. Rev. 187, 215 (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6028 PROVIDING HOPE: DEVELOPING A VIABLE REGULATORY FRAMEWORK FOR PROVIDING TERMINALLY ILL PATIENTS WITH ADEQUATE ACCESS TO INVESTIGATIONAL DRUGS, 70 U. Pitt. L. Rev. 191, 215+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6029 WATCHING THE OPERA IN SILENCE: DISGUST, AUTONOMY, AND THE SEARCH FOR UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS, 70 U. Pitt. L. Rev. 277, 300 (2008) 6030 A CONSTITUTION FOR JUDICIAL LAWMAKING, 65 U. Pitt. L. Rev. 545, 596+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6031 THE FIRST AMENDMENT IN A TIME OF MEDIA PROLIFERATION: DOES FREEDOM OF SPEECH ENTAIL A PRIVATE RIGHT TO CENSOR?, 65 U. Pitt. L. Rev. 183, 225 (2004) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 6032 COMMONWEALTH AND CONSTITUTION, 48 U. Rich. L. Rev. 415, 477+ (2013) 6033 CONSTITUTIONAL FORBEARANCE, 46 U. Rich. L. Rev. 695, 744+ (2012) 6034 THE COMPLEXITIES OF JUDICIAL TAKINGS, 45 U. Rich. L. Rev. 903, 960 (2011) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 6035 FAILED CONSTITUTIONAL METAPHORS: THE WALL OF SEPARATION AND THE PENUMBRA, 45 U. Rich. L. Rev. 459, 489+ (2011) 6036 PUTTING RATIONALITY BACK INTO THE RATIONAL BASIS TEST: SAVING SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS AND REDEEMING THE PROMISE OF THE NINTH AMENDMENT, 45 U. Rich. L. Rev. 491, 548+ (2011) 6037 SOMETHING JUDICIOUS THIS WAY COMES . . . THE USE OF FORESHADOWING AS A PERSUASIVE DEVICE IN JUDICIAL NARRATIVE, 44 U. Rich. L. Rev. 1213, 1260+ (2010) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.) 6038 PLEASE CHECK ONE-MALE OR FEMALE?: CONFRONTING GENDER IDENTITY DISCRIMINATION IN COLLEGIATE RESIDENTIAL LIFE, 44 U. Rich. L. Rev. 1365, 1397+ (2010) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6039 RADICALS IN ROBES: WHY EXTREME RIGHT-WING COURTS ARE WRONG FOR AMERICA. BY CASS R. SUNSTEIN, NEW YORK, N.Y.: BASIC BOOKS. 2005. 252 PP. $16.95., 43 U. Rich. L. Rev. 1175, 1183 (2009) 6040 THE ESSENCE OF HUMAN RIGHTS: A RELIGIOUS CRITIQUE, 43 U. Rich. L. Rev. 1255, 1317 (2009) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6041 OUR FOUNDING FEELINGS: EMOTION, COMMITMENT, AND IMAGINATION IN CONSTITUTIONAL CULTURE, 43 U. Rich. L. Rev. 623, 683+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6042 OVERCOMING LOCHNER IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY: TAKING BOTH RIGHTS AND POPULAR SOVEREIGNTY SERIOUSLY AS WE SEEK TO SECURE EQUAL CITIZENSHIP AND PROMOTE THE PUBLIC GOOD, 42 U. Rich. L. Rev. 597, 633+ (2008) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6043 THE BRIDGE AT JAMESTOWN: THE VIRGINIA CHARTER OF 1606 AND CONSTITUTIONALISM IN THE MODERN WORLD, 42 U. Rich. L. Rev. 9, 36 (2007) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6044 THE DOUBLE STANDARD IN JUDICIAL SELECTION, 41 U. Rich. L. Rev. 369, 377 (2007) 6045 CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE, 42 U. Rich. L. Rev. 311, 353 (2007) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 6046 FAMILY AND JUVENILE LAW, 42 U. Rich. L. Rev. 417, 439 (2007) 6047 LOVE DOESN'T PAY: THE FICTION OF MARRIAGE RIGHTS IN THE WORKPLACE, 40 U. Rich. L. Rev. 867, 947 (2006) 6048 PLAYING GAMES WITH THE FIRST AMENDMENT: ARE VIDEO GAMES SPEECH AND MAY MINORS' ACCESS TO GRAPHICALLY VIOLENT VIDEO GAMES BE RESTRICTED?, 40 U. Rich. L. Rev. 481, 545+ (2006) HN: © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 1 (S.Ct.) 6049 FAMILY AND JUVENILE LAW, 41 U. Rich. L. Rev. 151, 178 (2006) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 6050 CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE, 41 U. Rich. L. Rev. 83, 120+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6051 BORK WAS THE BEGINNING: CONSTITUTIONAL MORALISM AND THE POLITICS OF FEDERAL JUDICIAL SELECTION, 39 U. Rich. L. Rev. 809, 818+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6052 THE JUDICIAL NOMINATIONS WARS, 39 U. Rich. L. Rev. 819, 832+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6053 NO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO A RUBBER STAMP, 39 U. Rich. L. Rev. 989, 999+ (2005) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 6054 LET US NOW PRAISE FAMOUS JUDGES: EXPLORING THE ROLES OF JUDICIAL "INTUITION" AND "ACTIVISM" IN AMERICAN LAW, 40 U. Rich. L. Rev. 39, 45 (2005) 6055 GENETIC PLASTIC SURGERY: HOW NEOEUGENICS CREATES A CULTURE OF STAGE MOMS, 7 U. St. Thomas L.J. 203, 228+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6056 CATHOLIC JUDGES AND COOPERATION IN SIN, 4 U. St. Thomas L.J. 221, 268 (2006) 6057 SEX OFFENDER RESIDENCY STATUTES AND THE CULTURE OF FEAR: THE CASE FOR MORE MEANINGFUL RATIONAL BASIS REVIEW OF FEAR-DRIVEN PUBLIC SAFETY LAWS, 3 U. St. Thomas L.J. 600, 628 (2006) 6058 EDWARD DOUGLASS WHITE'S USE OF ROMAN AND CANON LAW: A STUDY IN THE SUPREME COURT'S USE OF FOREIGN LEGAL CITATIONS, 3 U. St. Thomas L.J. 281, 310+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6059 UNRAVELING THE "SEAMLESS GARMENT": LOOSE THREADS IN PROLIFE PROGRESSIVISM, 2 U. St. Thomas L.J. 294, 307 (2005) 6060 GRISWOLD AT 40: THE STATE'S COMPELLING INTEREST IN BANNING CONTRACEPTIVES, 2 U. St. Thomas L.J. 475, 507+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6061 FEDERAL MARRIAGE AMENDMENT: YES OR NO?, 2 U. St. Thomas L.J. 1, 4 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6062 MARRIAGE, PARENTAL RIGHTS, AND PUBLIC POLICY: ON THE FMA, ITS PURPORTED JUSTIFICATION, AND ITS LIKELY EFFECTS ON FAMILIES, 2 U. St. Thomas L.J. 118, 136+ (2004) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6063 THE PROPOSED FEDERAL MARRIAGE AMENDMENT AND THE RISKS TO FEDERALISM IN FAMILY LAW, 2 U. St. Thomas L.J. 137, 198+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6064 (HOW) WILL GAY MARRIAGE WEAKEN MARRIAGE AS A SOCIAL INSTITUTION: A REPLY TO ANDREW KOPPELMAN, 2 U. St. Thomas L.J. © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 33, 70+ (2004) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6065 THE DECLINE AND FALL OF THE CASE AGAINST SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, 2 U. St. Thomas L.J. 5, 32 (2004) 6066 FOUR ARGUMENTS AGAINST A MARRIAGE AMENDMENT THAT EVEN AN OPPONENT OF GAY MARRIAGE SHOULD ACCEPT, 2 U. St. Thomas L.J. 71, 94+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6067 RESTORING DEMOCRATIC SELF-GOVERNANCE THROUGH THE FEDERAL MARRIAGE AMENDMENT, 2 U. St. Thomas L.J. 95, 117+ (2004) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 6068 THE ROLE OF SOCIAL JUSTICE IN JUDGING CASES, 1 U. St. Thomas L.J. 18, 29 (2003) 6069 A CRITIQUE OF JOHN NOONAN'S APPROACH TO DEVELOPMENT OF DOCTRINE, 1 U. St. Thomas L.J. 285, 306 (2003) 6070 JUSTIFYING FREE EXERCISE RIGHTS, 1 U. St. Thomas L.J. 504, 548+ (2003) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6071 WHAT MIGHT HAVE BEEN: CONTRACEPTION AND RELIGIOUS LIBERTY, 1 U. St. Thomas L.J. 632, 646+ (2003) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6072 THE GINGERBREAD MAN THIRTY YEARS ON: THE PARLOUS STATE OF MARITAL THEORY, 1 U. St. Thomas L.J. 656, 712+ (2003) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6073 CONTRACEPTION AS A MASK OF PERSONHOOD, 1 U. St. Thomas L.J. 713, 723+ (2003) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 6074 JOHN NOONAN ON MARRIAGE AND THE FAMILY: CONTINUITY AND CHANGE IN DOCTRINE, 1 U. St. Thomas L.J. 724, 749+ (2003) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6075 MRS. GAY MEET MISS POOR: WHAT THE GAYS HAVE DONE FOR POOR PEOPLE, 47 U.S.F. L. Rev. 133, 150+ (2012) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6076 JUDICIAL MAGIC: THE USE OF DICTA AS EQUITABLE REMEDY, 46 U.S.F. L. Rev. 883, 938+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6077 THE IRS MOVES TOWARD INCOME TAX EQUALITY FOR SAME-SEX COUPLES DESPITE DOMA, 45 U.S.F. L. Rev. 1145, 1172+ (2011) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6078 BY ANY OTHER NAME: THE SOCIAL AND LEGAL STAKES OF SAMESEX MARRIAGE, 45 U.S.F. L. Rev. 357, 387+ (2010) 6079 GAYS, JEWS, AND OTHER STRANGERS IN A STRANGE LAND: THE CASE FOR RECIPROCAL ACCOMMODATION OF RELIGIOUS LIBERTY AND THE RIGHT OF SAME-SEX COUPLES TO MARRY, 45 U.S.F. L. Rev. 389, 436 (2010) 6080 THE PARADOXES OF POPULAR CONSTITUTIONALISM: PROPOSITION 8 AND STRAUSS V. HORTON, 45 U.S.F. L. Rev. 517, 596+ (2010) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.) 6081 A GENEALOGY OF HOME VISITS: EXPLAINING THE RELENTLESS SEARCH FOR INDIVIDUALIZED INFORMATION WITHOUT INDIVIDUAL © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. SUSPICION, 44 U.S.F. L. Rev. 1007, 1032 (2010) 6082 A WAR OF WORDS: HOW FUNDAMENTALIST RHETORIC THREATENS REPRODUCTIVE AUTONOMY, 43 U.S.F. L. Rev. 671, 701+ (2009) 6083 THROUGH THE PRICE WATERHOUSE-LOOKING GLASS: DOMINANCE AND OPPRESSION REVEALED, 43 U.S.F. L. Rev. 703, 731+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6084 THE LINK BETWEEN CAROLENE PRODUCTS AND GRISWOLD: HOW THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY PROTECTS POPULAR PRACTICES FROM DEMOCRATIC FAILURES, 42 U.S.F. L. Rev. 715, 746+ (2008) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6085 DISMANTLING ROE BRICK BY BRICK-THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL PURPOSE BEHIND THE FEDERAL PARTIAL-BIRTH ABORTION ACT OF 2003, 42 U.S.F. L. Rev. 227, 263+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6086 DECEPTIVE APPEARANCES: JUDGES, COGNITIVE BIAS, AND DRESS CODES, 41 U.S.F. L. Rev. 299, 331+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6087 THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS: WHAT IT IS, HOW IT WORKS, AND ITS FUTURE, 40 U.S.F. L. Rev. 1, 84+ (2005) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 6088 TRANSNATIONAL CONSTITUTIONALISM IN THE UNITED STATES: TOWARD A WORLDWIDE USE OF INTERPRETIVE MODES OF COMPARATIVE REASONING, 39 U.S.F. L. Rev. 999, 1044+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6089 PROTECTING GAYS FROM THE GOVERNMENT'S CROSSHAIRS: A REEVALUATION OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT'S TREATMENT OF GAYS UNDER THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION'S EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE FOLLOWING LAWRENCE V. TEXAS, 39 U.S.F. L. Rev. 617, 640+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6090 LOSING THE NUPTIALS IN LOSS OF CONSORTIUM: CORRECTING CALIFORNIA'S COMMON LAW CLAIM, 39 U.S.F. L. Rev. 201, 225+ (2004) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6091 ABSTINENCE-ONLY ADOLESCENT EDUCATION: INEFFECTIVE, UNPOPULAR, AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL, 38 U.S.F. L. Rev. 665, 700+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6092 THE COMMON LAW AND THE RELIGIOUS FOUNDATIONS OF THE RULE OF LAW BEFORE CASEY, 38 U.S.F. L. Rev. 499, 524+ (2004) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 6093 PREFACE: SILENCE OF THE LAW (TEXTBOOKS), 6 U. St. Thomas J. L. & Pub. Pol'y 1, 7+ (2011) 6094 ADVANCING THE CULTURE OF LIFE THROUGH FAITHFUL CITIZENSHIP, 2 U. St. Thomas J. L. & Pub. Pol'y 20, 52+ (2008) 6095 SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS: A HISTORY OF LIBERTY IN THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE, 2 U. St. Thomas J. L. & Pub. Pol'y 125, 140+ (2008) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 6096 A SIGN OF CONTRADICTION, 1 U. St. Thomas J. L. & Pub. Pol'y 28, 39+ (2007) 6097 FEDERALISM AND POLARIZATION, 1 U. St. Thomas J. L. & Pub. Pol'y 63, 78+ (2007) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6098 THE SLIPPERY SLOPE AND ITS TENDENCY TO RESULT IN POOR POLICY DECISIONS, 1 U. St. Thomas J. L. & Pub. Pol'y 226, 233+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6099 JUSTICE CLARENCE THOMAS'S INTERPRETATION OF THE PRIVILEGES OR IMMUNITIES CLAUSE: MCDONALD V. CITY OF CHICAGO AND THE FUTURE OF THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT, 42 U. Tol. L. Rev. 933, 962 (2011) 6100 SCOPE OF THE SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHT-POST-HELLER STANDARD OF REVIEW, 41 U. Tol. L. Rev. 43, 71+ (2009) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6101 HAMDAN V. RUMSFELD AND THE GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSE: THE MILITARY COMMISSIONS ACT OF 2006 AND ITS IMPLICATIONS ON THE SEPARATION OF POWERS, 39 U. Tol. L. Rev. 497, 523 (2008) 6102 K.M. V. E.G., MY TWO MOMS: CALIFORNIA COURTS HOLD THAT A CHILD CAN HAVE TWO NATURAL MOTHERS, 38 U. Tol. L. Rev. 1065, 1086 (2007) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6103 WHAT MISSOURI "SHOWS ME' ABOUT SEXUAL ORIENTATION LEGISLATION, 37 U. Tol. L. Rev. 807, 840+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6104 REMARKS, 36 U. Tol. L. Rev. 911, 922 (2005) 6105 FORBIDDING FEMALE TOPLESSNESS: WHY "REAL DIFFERENCE" JURISPRUDENCE LACKS "SUPPORT" AND WHAT CAN BE DONE ABOUT IT, 36 U. Tol. L. Rev. 273, 319+ (2005) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 6106 MORE THAN MARRIAGE: UTAH'S SYSTEM OF DE JURE DENIGRATION GOES BEFORE THE U.S. SUPREME COURT, 26-JUN Utah B.J. 24, 24 (2013) 6107 RECONCILING LIBERTY AND EQUALITY IN THE DEBATE OVER PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC DIAGNOSIS, 2013 Utah L. Rev. 107, 128+ (2013) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6108 THE PARADOX OF POLITICAL POWER: SAME-SEX MARRIAGE AND THE SUPREME COURT, 2012 Utah L. Rev. 527, 530+ (2012) 6109 MORAL TURPITUDE, 2012 Utah L. Rev. 1001, 1005+ (2012) 6110 ANTI-EVASION DOCTRINES IN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 2012 Utah L. Rev. 1773, 1808+ (2012) 6111 SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS, BLACK SWANS, AND INNOVATION, 2011 Utah L. Rev. 987, 1024+ (2011) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 6112 PREVENTIVE DETENTION, CHARACTER EVIDENCE, AND THE NEW CRIMINAL LAW, 2010 Utah L. Rev. 723, 760 (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6113 REASONABLE PERCEPTION AND PARODY IN COPYRIGHT LAW, 2010 Utah L. Rev. 779, 855 (2010) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 6114 FROM IDENTITY POLITICS TO IDEOLOGY POLITICS, 2009 Utah L. Rev. 749, 795+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6115 DISABILITY-SELECTIVE ABORTION AND THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT, 2009 Utah L. Rev. 845, 905 (2009) 6116 WHAT GOOGLE KNOWS: PRIVACY AND INTERNET SEARCH ENGINES, 2008 Utah L. Rev. 1433, 1492+ (2008) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6117 THE PUZZLING PARAMETERS OF THE FOREIGN LAW DEBATE, 2007 Utah L. Rev. 167, 214+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6118 BRINGING SCALIA'S DECALOGUE DISSENT DOWN FROM THE MOUNTAIN, 2007 Utah L. Rev. 287, 344+ (2007) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 6119 TENTH CIRCUIT JUDICIAL CONFERENCE, 2005 Utah L. Rev. 199, 213 (2005) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 6120 MARRIAGE AND THE STRUGGLE FOR GAY, LESBIAN, AND BLACK LIBERATION, 2005 Utah L. Rev. 781, 801 (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6121 JUDICIAL NOMINATION FILIBUSTER CAUSE AND CURE, 2005 Utah L. Rev. 803, 861+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6122 COURTS OVER CONSTITUTIONS REVISITED: UNWRITTEN CONSTITUTIONALISM IN THE STATES, 2004 Utah L. Rev. 333, 394+ (2004) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.) 6123 THE CHILDREN OF ART (ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY): SHOULD THE LAW PROTECT THEM FROM HARM?, 2004 Utah L. Rev. 57, 109+ (2004) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) .... THE BRAVE NEW WORLD OF GENETIC BIOBANKS: INTERNATIONAL LESSONS FOR A POTENTIAL UNITED STATES BIOBANK, 46 Val. U. L. Rev. 69, 101 (2011) (Text not available on WESTLAW) 6125 WHEN INTERNATIONAL LAW WAS A DOMESTIC PROBLEM, 44 Val. U. L. Rev. 779, 823+ (2010) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6126 TEACHING PRIVACY IN THE AGE OF OCTOMOM: ENHANCING CASE/ SOCRATIC METHOD WITH STRUCTURED CLASS DISCUSSION, 44 Val. U. L. Rev. 391, 421 (2010) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6127 INTERNATIONAL LAW BY CONSENT OF THE GOVERNED, 42 Val. U. L. Rev. 119, 144 (2007) 6128 CONSTITUTIONAL COMPARATIVISM: THE EMERGING RISK OF COMPARATIVE LAW AS A CONSTITUTIONAL TIEBREAKER, 41 Val. U. L. Rev. 1739, 1760+ (2007) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6129 WILL THE NEW FEDERALISM BE THE LEGACY OF THE REHNQUIST COURT?, 40 Val. U. L. Rev. 589, 598 (2006) 6130 RULES WERE NOT MEANT TO BE BROKEN: ALLEVIATING THE TENSION BETWEEN PRIVACY AND DISCOVERY IN MEDICAL RECORD DISPUTES, 40 Val. U. L. Rev. 845, 855+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6131 LIFE, LIBERTY, AND THE PURSUIT OF URINALYSIS: THE © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. CONSTITUTIONALITY OF RANDOM SUSPICIONLESS DRUG TESTING IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS, 41 Val. U. L. Rev. 815, 858+ (2006) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 6132 GOOGLE BOOKS: PAGE BY PAGE, CLICK BY CLICK, USERS ARE READING AWAY PRIVACY RIGHTS, 13 Vand. J. Ent. & Tech. L. 217, 254 (2010) 6133 RESPECT MY AUTHORITY! SOUTH PARK'S EXPRESSION OF LEGAL IDEOLOGY AND CONTRIBUTION TO LEGAL CULTURE, 11 Vand. J. Ent. & Tech. L. 491, 541 (2009) 6134 FANTASY CRIME: THE ROLE OF CRIMINAL LAW IN VIRTUAL WORLDS, 11 Vand. J. Ent. & Tech. L. 1, 97+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6135 THE REALITY OF FANTASY: ADDRESSING THE VIABILITY OF A SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS ATTACK ON FLORIDA'S PURPORTED STANCE AGAINST PARTICIPATION IN FANTASY SPORTS LEAGUES THAT INVOLVE THE EXCHANGE OF MONEY, 6 Vand. J. Ent. L. & Prac. 355, 371+ (2004) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6136 LAW AND DEVELOPMENT AS ANTI-COMPARATIVE LAW, 45 Vand. J. Transnat'l L. 477, 555+ (2012) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6137 BROWN ABROAD: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF FOREIGN JUDICIAL CITATION AND THE METAPHOR OF COSMOPOLITAN CONVERSATION, 45 Vand. J. Transnat'l L. 83, 143 (2012) 6138 THE ISLAMIC RULE OF LENITY: JUDICIAL DISCRETION AND LEGAL CANONS, 44 Vand. J. Transnat'l L. 1299, 1351+ (2011) 6139 DECONSTRUCTING TRANSNATIONALISM: CONCEPTUALIZING METANATIONALISM AS A PUTATIVE MODEL OF EVOLVING JURISPRUDENCE, 43 Vand. J. Transnat'l L. 1265, 1336+ (2010) 6140 RESOLVING THE DISSONANCE OF RODRIGUEZ AND THE RIGHT TO EDUCATION: INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS INSTRUMENTS AS A SOURCE OF REPOSE FOR THE UNITED STATES, 41 Vand. J. Transnat'l L. 229, 268+ (2008) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6141 WHEN GLOBALIZATION HITS HOME: INTERNATIONAL FAMILY LAW COMES OF AGE, 39 Vand. J. Transnat'l L. 1551, 1603+ (2006) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 6142 ENFORCING INTERNATIONAL LABOR STANDARDS: THE POTENTIAL OF THE ALIEN TORT CLAIMS ACT, 37 Vand. J. Transnat'l L. 203, 263 (2004) 6143 MASS TORTS AND DUE PROCESS, 65 Vand. L. Rev. 1059, 1121 (2012) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 6144 THE MONSTER UNDER THE BED: THE IMAGINARY CIRCUIT SPLIT AND THE NIGHTMARES CREATED IN THE SPECIAL NEEDS DOCTRINE'S APPLICATION TO CHILD ABUSE, 65 Vand. L. Rev. 563, 614+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6145 BRINGING IT ALL BACK HOME: ESTABLISHING A COHERENT CONSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK FOR THE RE-REGULATION OF HOMESCHOOLING, 63 Vand. L. Rev. 541, 597+ (2010) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 6146 THE LIBERAL TRADITION OF THE SUPREME COURT CLERKSHIP: ITS RISE, FALL, AND REINCARNATION?, 62 Vand. L. Rev. 1749, 1814+ (2009) 6147 THE REVIEWABILITY OF THE PRESIDENT'S STATUTORY POWERS, 62 Vand. L. Rev. 1171, 1213 (2009) 6148 REAWAKENING "PRIVILEGES OR IMMUNITIES": AN ORIGINALIST BLUEPRINT FOR INVALIDATING STATE FELON DISENFRANCHISEMENT LAWS, 62 Vand. L. Rev. 1285, 1314 (2009) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 6149 PRIVACY, ACCOUNTABILITY, AND THE COOPERATING DEFENDANT: TOWARDS A NEW ROLE FOR INTERNET ACCESS TO COURT RECORDS, 62 Vand. L. Rev. 921, 978 (2009) 6150 2008 SYMPOSIUM ON NEGLECTED JUSTICES, 62 Vand. L. Rev. 311, 317 (2009) 6151 THE COURT, THE CONSTITUTION, AND THE HISTORY OF IDEAS, 61 Vand. L. Rev. 1067, 1126 (2008) 6152 NON-JUDICIAL PRECEDENT, 61 Vand. L. Rev. 713, 784+ (2008) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6153 FIRST AMENDMENT PROTECTION FOR THE PUBLICATION OF PRIVATE INFORMATION, 60 Vand. L. Rev. 235, 282 (2007) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 6154 RETHINKING THE SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS RIGHT TO PRIVACY: GROUNDING PRIVACY IN THE FOURTH AMENDMENT, 60 Vand. L. Rev. 283, 322+ (2007) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6155 WE CAN DO BETTER: ANTI-HOMELESS ORDINANCES AS VIOLATIONS OF STATE SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS LAW, 59 Vand. L. Rev. 1413, 1455 (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6156 FATAL IN THEORY AND STRICT IN FACT: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF STRICT SCRUTINY IN THE FEDERAL COURTS, 59 Vand. L. Rev. 793, 871+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6157 FROM NO MEANS NO TO ONLY YES MEANS YES: THE RATIONAL RESULTS OF AN AFFIRMATIVE CONSENT STANDARD IN RAPE LAW, 58 Vand. L. Rev. 1321, 1364 (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6158 TOWARDS AN ESTABLISHMENT THEORY OF GAY PERSONHOOD, 58 Vand. L. Rev. 555, 597+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6159 UNINCORPORATED, UNPROTECTED: RELIGION IN AN ESTABLISHED STATE, 58 Vand. L. Rev. 301, 337+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6160 THE ROLE OF PROSECUTORS IN SERVING JUSTICE AFTER CONVICTIONS, 58 Vand. L. Rev. 171, 239 (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6161 GROWING PAINS: THE SCOPE OF SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS RIGHTS OF PARENTS OF ADULT CHILDREN, 57 Vand. L. Rev. 1883, 1933+ (2004) 6162 "NO PROVINCIAL OR TRANSIENT NOTION": THE NEED FOR A © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. MISTAKE OF AGE DEFENSE IN CHILD RAPE PROSECUTIONS, 57 Vand. L. Rev. 693, 740+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6163 REVISITING THE MEANING OF MARRIAGE: IMMIGRATION FOR SAMESEX SPOUSES IN A POST-WINDSOR WORLD, 66 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 167, 171+ (2013) 6164 THE EDUCATION OF AN ADMISSIONS OFFICE, 65 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 211, 212+ (2012) 6165 A FLAWED PERFORMANCE, 29-FALL Vt. B.J. 5, 5+ (2003) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 6166 SEX, DRUGS, AND AMERICAN JURISPRUDENCE: THE MEDICALIZATION OF PLEASURE, 37 Vt. L. Rev. 47, 57+ (2012) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6167 SORRELL V. IMS HEALTH AND THE END OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL DOUBLE STANDARD, 36 Vt. L. Rev. 903, 930 (2012) 6168 TOWARD A NEW SOCIAL-POLITICAL THEORY OF THE PUBLIC TRUST DOCTRINE, 35 Vt. L. Rev. 563, 622 (2011) 6169 JUDICIAL TAKINGS AND SCALIA'S SHIFTING SANDS, 35 Vt. L. Rev. 423, 435+ (2010) 6170 SOME EFFECTS OF MORAL INDIGNATION ON LAW, 33 Vt. L. Rev. 405, 433+ (2009) 6171 THE TIPPING POINT: LEGAL EPIDEMICS, CONSTITUTIONAL DOCTRINE, AND THE DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT, 34 Vt. L. Rev. 291, 309+ (2009) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6172 REPRODUCING WOMEN'S RIGHTS: ALL OVER AGAIN, 31 Vt. L. Rev. 1, 38+ (2006) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 6173 UNBREAKABLE VOWS: SAME-SEX MARRIAGE AND THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO DIVORCE, 58 Vill. L. Rev. 169, 209+ (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6174 THE INEVITABILITY OF FEDERAL SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY, 55 Vill. L. Rev. 899, 927 (2010) 6175 JUST NOT WHO WE ARE: A CRITIQUE OF COMMON LAW CONSTITUTIONALISM, 54 Vill. L. Rev. 181, 245+ (2009) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6176 INCOMPATIBLE THEORIES: NATURAL LAW AND SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS, 54 Vill. L. Rev. 247, 289+ (2009) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6177 VIRTUAL WORLDS-REAL COURTS, 52 Vill. L. Rev. 187, 240+ (2007) 6178 EXPERTISE AND INSTINCT IN THE ASSESSMENT OF TESTAMENTARY CAPACITY, 51 Vill. L. Rev. 25, 93 (2006) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6179 JURISDICTION STRIPPING IN THREE ACTS: A THREE STRING SERENADE, 51 Vill. L. Rev. 593, 663+ (2006) 6180 PRIVACY LAW IN THE NEW MILLENNIUM: A TRIBUTE TO RICHARD C. TURKINGTON, 51 Vill. L. Rev. 787, 792 (2006) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 6181 A VEIL OF GENETIC IGNORANCE? PROTECTING GENETIC PRIVACY TO ENSURE EQUALITY, 51 Vill. L. Rev. 827, 840+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6182 DISROBED: THE CONSTITUTION OF MODESTY, 51 Vill. L. Rev. 841, 857 (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6183 IN SEARCH OF A CONSERVATIVE VISION OF CONSTITUTIONAL PRIVACY: TWO CASE STUDIES FROM THE REHNQUIST COURT, 51 Vill. L. Rev. 859, 890+ (2006) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6184 A PRIVACY RIGHT TO PUBLIC RECOGNITION OF FAMILY RELATIONSHIPS? THE CASES OF MARRIAGE AND ADOPTION, 51 Vill. L. Rev. 891, 920+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6185 CULTURE BY LAW: BACKLASH AS JURISPRUDENCE, 50 Vill. L. Rev. 1135, 1170+ (2005) HN: 1,2,3 (S.Ct.) 6186 LAWRENCE'S QUINTESSENTIAL MILLIAN MOMENT AND ITS IMPACT ON THE DOCTRINE OF UNCONSTITUTIONAL CONDITIONS, 50 Vill. L. Rev. 117, 162+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6187 DIFFERENCE AND DEFERENCE IN TREATY INTERPRETATION, 50 Vill. L. Rev. 25, 86+ (2005) 6188 COUNTERING KULTURKAMPF POLITICS THROUGH CRITIQUE AND JUSTICE PEDAGOGY, 50 Vill. L. Rev. 749, 774+ (2005) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 6189 RETHINKING MINORITY COALITION BUILDING: VALUING SELFSACRIFICE, STEWARDSHIP AND ANTI-SUBORDINATION, 50 Vill. L. Rev. 823, 835 (2005) 6190 SISTER WIVES: A NEW BEGINNING FOR UNITED STATES POLYGAMIST FAMILIES ON THE EVE OF POLYGAMY PROSECUTION?, 19 Vill. Sports & Ent. L.J. 249, 280+ (2012) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6191 THE HUNKIEST LITTLE WHOREHOUSE IN TOWN IS LOOKING FOR A FEW GOOD MEN, BUT ONLY TO WORK: THE CONSTITUTIONAL IMPLICATIONS OF HEIDI FLEISS'S FEMALE BROTHEL, 14 Vill. Sports & Ent. L.J. 77, 125+ (2007) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6192 IS IT TIME TO REVISIT THE DOCTRINE OF "STATE ACTION" IN THE CONTEXT OF INTERCOLLEGIATE AND INTERSCHOLASTIC SPORTS?, 14 Vill. Sports & Ent. L.J. 191, 232+ (2007) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6193 OBSCENITY PROSECUTIONS AND THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION: THE INSIDE PERSPECTIVE OF THE ADULT ENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY & DEFENSE ATTORNEY LOUIS SIRKIN, 14 Vill. Sports & Ent. L.J. 233, 286+ (2007) HN: 1,3,4 (S.Ct.) 6194 AN UNIMPROVED LIE: GENDER DISCRIMINATION CONTINUES AT AUGUSTA NATIONAL GOLF CLUB, 11 Vill. Sports & Ent. L.J. 111, 138+ (2004) HN: 3,5 (S.Ct.) 6195 Oklahoma Outlaws Foreign & International Law: The Impact on International Trade Law of America's Emerging Anti-Foreign and International Law Contagion, 16 VJ 43, 64 (2012) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 6196 THE APPLICATION OF FINANCE THEORY TO INCREASED RISK HARMS IN TOXIC TORT LITIGATION, 23 Va. Envtl. L.J. 111, 202 (2004) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 6197 THE FLAWS OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS LEGALISM, 51 Va. J. Int'l L. 507, 548+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6198 FREE MOVEMENT OF JUDGMENTS: INCREASING DETERRENCE OF INTERNATIONAL CARTELS THROUGH JURISDICTIONAL RELIANCE, 51 Va. J. Int'l L. 57, 94 (2010) 6199 A TRAVELER FROM AN ANTIQUE LAND: THE MODERN RENAISSANCE OF COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONALISM, 50 Va. J. Int'l L. 3, 41+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6200 GAY RIGHTS IN UGANDA: SEEKING TO OVERTURN UGANDA'S ANTISODOMY LAWS, 50 Va. J. Int'l L. 219, 266+ (2009) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6201 JUDGING INTERNATIONAL JUDGMENTS, 48 Va. J. Int'l L. 65, 118 (2007) 6202 USING INTERNATIONAL LAW TO ENHANCE DEMOCRACY, 47 Va. J. Int'l L. 1, 61+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6203 THE ROLE OF "EXTRA-COMPENSATORY" DAMAGES FOR VIOLATIONS OF FUNDAMENTAL HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE UNITED KINGDOM & THE UNITED STATES, 46 Va. J. Int'l L. 475, 500 (2006) 6204 WHICH COUNTRIES COUNT?: LAWRENCE V. TEXAS AND THE SELECTION OF FOREIGN PERSUASIVE AUTHORITY, 45 Va. J. Int'l L. 357, 449+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6205 FEDERAL COURTS, INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNALS, AND THE CONTINUUM OF DEFERENCE: A POSTSCRIPT ON LAWRENCE V. TEXAS, 44 Va. J. Int'l L. 913, 929+ (2004) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 6206 CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION OF "SEXTING" IN THE WAKE OF LAWRENCE: THE RIGHTS OF PARENTS AND PRIVACY, 16 Va. J.L. & Tech. 189, 189+ (2011) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6207 THE SHIFTING DOCTRINAL FACE OF IMMUTABILITY, 19 Va. J. Soc. Pol'y & L. 169, 198+ (2011) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6208 EXCEPTIONS: THE CRIMINAL LAW'S ILLOGICAL APPROACH TO HIVRELATED AGGRAVATED ASSAULTS, 18 Va. J. Soc. Pol'y & L. 550, 605 (2011) 6209 TOWARD A MEANINGFUL RESPONSE TO THE PROBLEM OF ANTI-GAY BULLYING IN AMERICAN PUBLIC SCHOOLS, 19 Va. J. Soc. Pol'y & L. 58, 108 (2011) 6210 THE PATERNITY ESTABLISHMENT THEORY OF MARRIAGE AND ITS RAMIFICATIONS FOR SAME-SEX MARRIAGE CONSTITUTIONAL CLAIMS, 19 Va. J. Soc. Pol'y & L. 133, 168 (2011) 6211 ENABLING URBAN SPRAWL: REVISITING THE SUPREME COURT'S SEMINAL ZONING DECISION EUCLID V. AMBLER IN THE 21ST CENTURY, 17 Va. J. Soc. Pol'y & L. 373, 403 (2010) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 6212 NO RATIONAL BASIS: THE PRAGMATIC CASE FOR MARIJUANA LAW REFORM, 17 Va. J. Soc. Pol'y & L. 43, 82+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6213 EXPLORING THE IMPACT OF THE MARRIAGE AMENDMENTS: CAN PUBLIC EMPLOYERS OFFER DOMESTIC PARTNER BENEFITS TO THEIR GAY AND LESBIAN EMPLOYEES?, 17 Va. J. Soc. Pol'y & L. 83, 143+ (2009) 6214 BARRIERS AND BOUNDARIES: EXPLORING EMOTION IN THE LAW OF THE FAMILY, 16 Va. J. Soc. Pol'y & L. 301, 321 (2009) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 6215 HAPPY FAMILIES? TRANSLATING POSITIVE PSYCHOLOGY INTO FAMILY LAW, 16 Va. J. Soc. Pol'y & L. 385, 424 (2009) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6216 COMMON GROUND: THE CASE FOR COLLABORATION BETWEEN ANTI-POVERTY ADVOCATES AND PUBLIC INTEREST INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ADVOCATES, 15 Va. J. Soc. Pol'y & L. 415, 445 (2008) 6217 JAIL FOR JUVENILE CHILD PORNOGRAPHERS?: A REPLY TO PROFESSOR LEARY, 15 Va. J. Soc. Pol'y & L. 505, 544+ (2008) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6218 GENDER ASSIGNMENT SURGERY FOR INTERSEXED INFANTS: HOW THE SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS RIGHT TO PRIVACY BOTH SUPPORTS AND OPPOSES A MORATORIUM, 12 Va. J. Soc. Pol'y & L. 170, 196+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6219 MISTAKING MARRIAGE FOR SOCIAL POLICY, 11 Va. J. Soc. Pol'y & L. 307, 371+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6220 STATE v. WORTHEN: DEMONSTRATING UTAH'S NEED FOR AN EXPANDED, ABSOLUTE VICTIM-COUNSELOR TESTIMONIAL PRIVILEGE, 2013 Utah L. Rev. OnLaw 124, 155+ (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 6221 INTERNATIONAL LAW AND THE DOMESTIC SEPARATION OF POWERS, 99 Va. L. Rev. 987, 1048 (2013) 6222 ECONOMIC LIBERTY AND THE SECOND-ORDER RATIONAL BASIS TEST, 99 Va. L. Rev. 1065, 1067+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6223 GLUCKSBERG, LAWRENCE, AND THE DECLINE OF LOVING'S MARRIAGE PRECEDENT, 98 Va. L. Rev. 1825, 1826+ (2012) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6224 CONTENT DISCRIMINATION REVISITED, 98 Va. L. Rev. 231, 300 (2012) 6225 APPLYING CONSTITUTIONAL DECISION RULES VERSUS INVALIDATING STATUTES IN TOTO, 98 Va. L. Rev. 301, 366 (2012) 6226 SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, SECOND-CLASS CITIZENSHIP, AND LAW'S SOCIAL MEANINGS, 97 Va. L. Rev. 1267, 1346+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6227 PARTICIPATORY DEMOCRACY AS THE CENTRAL VALUE OF AMERICAN FREE SPEECH DOCTRINE, 97 Va. L. Rev. 491, 514 (2011) 6228 PARTICIPATORY DEMOCRACY AS THE BASIS OF AMERICAN FREE SPEECH DOCTRINE: A REPLY, 97 Va. L. Rev. 633, 679 (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6229 STRUCTURAL EXCEPTIONALISM AND COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 96 Va. L. Rev. 1965, 2010+ (2010) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 6230 CONSTITUTIONAL ENFORCEMENT BY PROXY, 95 Va. L. Rev. 1663, 1744 (2009) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 6231 AUTHORITY AND AUTHORITIES, 94 Va. L. Rev. 1931, 1961 (2008) 6232 THE NETWORKED FAMILY: REFRAMING THE LEGAL UNDERSTANDING OF CAREGIVING AND CAREGIVERS, 94 Va. L. Rev. 385, 455 (2008) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6233 TAKING ITS PROPER PLACE IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL CANON: BOLLING V. SHARPE, KOREMATSU, AND THE EQUAL PROTECTION COMPONENT OF FIFTH AMENDMENT DUE PROCESS, 92 Va. L. Rev. 1879, 1897 (2006) 6234 CONSTITUTIONAL CALCIFICATION: HOW THE LAW BECOMES WHAT THE COURT DOES, 91 Va. L. Rev. 1649, 1720+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6235 A FOREST WITH NO TREES: THE SUPREME COURT AND INTERNATIONAL LAW IN THE 2003 TERM, 91 Va. L. Rev. 579, 675+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6236 WHAT BROWN TEACHES US ABOUT CONSTITUTIONAL THEORY, 90 Va. L. Rev. 1537, 1577+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6237 BEYOND STATUTORY ELEMENTS: THE SUBSTANTIVE EFFECTS OF THE RIGHT TO A JURY TRIAL ON CONSTITUTIONALLY SIGNIFICANT FACTS, 90 Va. L. Rev. 645, 692 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6238 "HAPPY" BIRTHDAY, BROWN V. BOARD OF EDUCATION? BROWN'S FIFTIETH ANNIVERSARY AND THE NEW CRITICS OF SUPREME COURT MUSCULARITY, 90 Va. L. Rev. 693, 729 (2004) 6239 THE FEDERAL COMMON LAW ORIGINS OF JUDICIAL JURISDICTION: IMPLICATIONS FOR MODERN DOCTRINE, 90 Va. L. Rev. 169, 300+ (2004) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.) 6240 THE EMPTY PROMISE OF COMPASSIONATE CONSERVATISM: A REPLY TO JUDGE WILKINSON, 90 Va. L. Rev. 355, 385 (2004) 6241 CONSTITUTIONAL EXISTENCE CONDITIONS AND JUDICIAL REVIEW, 89 Va. L. Rev. 1105, 1202 (2003) 6242 TOM PAINE'S CONSTITUTION, 89 Va. L. Rev. 1413, 1461 (2003) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6243 THE TROUBLE WITH DIGNITY AND RIGHTS OF RECOGNITION, 99 Va. L. Rev. In Brief 29, 31+ (2013) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6244 OUT OF INFANCY: THE ROBERTS COURT AT SEVEN, 98 Va. L. Rev. In Brief 76, 107 (2012) 6245 REMAKING LAWRENCE, 98 Va. L. Rev. In Brief 61, 61+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6246 OUR BODIES, OUR (TAX) SELVES, 31 Va. Tax Rev. 695, 761 (2012) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 6247 RETHINKING THE ROLE OF THE DORMANT COMMERCE CLAUSE IN © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. STATE TAX JURISDICTION, 24 Va. Tax Rev. 109, 139 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6248 SAME-SEX MARRIAGE IN ISLAMIC LAW, 2 Wake Forest J.L. & Pol'y 375, 485+ (2012) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6249 NEW NATURAL LAW, RELIGION, AND SAME-SEX MARRIAGE: CURRENT CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES, 1 Wake Forest J.L. & Pol'y 207, 209+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6250 COVERT FUNDAMENTALISM, 1 Wake Forest J.L. & Pol'y 281, 291 (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6251 A UNIQUE RELIGIOUS EXEMPTION FROM ANTIDISCRIMINATION LAWS IN THE CASE OF GAYS? PUTTING THE CALL FOR EXEMPTIONS FOR THOSE WHO DISCRIMINATE AGAINST MARRIED OR MARRYING GAYS IN CONTEXT, 47 Wake Forest L. Rev. 173, 209+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6252 THE NORMATIVE CASE FOR NORMATIVE GRAND JURIES, 47 Wake Forest L. Rev. 319, 359 (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6253 THE PARENTLESS CHILD'S RIGHT TO A PERMANENT FAMILY, 46 Wake Forest L. Rev. 1, 44+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6254 A PRISONER'S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO MEDICAL INFORMATION: DOCTRINALLY FLAWED AND A THREAT TO STATE INFORMED CONSENT LAW, 45 Wake Forest L. Rev. 1025, 1065+ (2010) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 6255 BE CAREFUL WHAT YOU WISH FOR: GAYS, DUELING HIGH SCHOOL T-SHIRTS, AND THE PERILS OF SUPPRESSION, 44 Wake Forest L. Rev. 431, 495 (2009) 6256 UNPACKING EMOTIONAL DISTRESS: SEXUAL EXPLOITATION, REPRODUCTIVE HARM, AND FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS, 44 Wake Forest L. Rev. 1109, 1130 (2009) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6257 GONZALES V. CARHART AND THE COURT'S "WOMEN'S REGRET" RATIONALE, 43 Wake Forest L. Rev. 1, 43 (2008) 6258 TRANSFORMING TEENAGERS INTO ORAL SEX FELONS: THE PERSISTENCE OF THE CRIME AGAINST NATURE AFTER LAWRENCE V. TEXAS, 43 Wake Forest L. Rev. 155, 221+ (2008) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6259 BACK TO THE BEGINNING: AN ESSAY ON THE COURT, THE LAW OF DEMOCRACY, AND TRUST, 43 Wake Forest L. Rev. 1045, 1087 (2008) 6260 VERBAL POISON-CRIMINALIZING HATE SPEECH: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS AND A PROPOSAL FOR THE AMERICAN SYSTEM, 50 Washburn L.J. 445, 481+ (2011) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 6261 IS POLITICAL POWERLESSNESS A REQUIREMENT FOR HEIGHTENED EQUAL PROTECTION SCRUTINY?, 50 Washburn L.J. 1, 31+ (2010) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6262 POLITICAL INVISIBILITY OF BLACK WOMEN: STILL SUSPECT BUT NO SUSPECT CLASS, 50 Washburn L.J. 109, 132 (2010) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 6263 POLITICAL PROCESS AND INDIVIDUAL FAIRNESS RATIONALES IN © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. THE U.S. SUPREME COURT'S SUSPECT CLASSIFICATION JURISPRUDENCE, 50 Washburn L.J. 33, 60+ (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6264 NOT THE USUAL SUSPECTS: SUSPECT CLASSIFICATION DETERMINATIONS AND SAME-SEX MARRIAGE PROHIBITIONS, 50 Washburn L.J. 61, 77+ (2010) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6265 THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT ELIMINATES THE "CLASSOF-ONE" EQUAL PROTECTION CLAIM IN PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT (ENGQUIST V. OR. DEP'T OF AGRIC., 128 S. CT. 2146 (2008)), 48 Washburn L.J. 529, 562+ (2009) 6266 THE INTERSECTION OF ZONING REGULATIONS, RELIGIOUS HOUSE MEETINGS, AND THE CONSTITUTION, 48 Washburn L.J. 133, 174+ (2008) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6267 CAN I GET THAT IN WRITING?: ESTABLISHED AND EMERGING PROTECTIONS OF PATERNITY RIGHTS (IN RE K.M.H., 169 P.3D 1025 (KAN. 2007)), 48 Washburn L.J. 209, 240+ (2008) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 6268 THE SUPREME COURT: JUDICIAL TEMPERAMENT AND THE DEMOCRATIC IDEAL, 47 Washburn L.J. 1, 11 (2007) 6269 FINDING CONSENSUS WHILE FOOTNOTING THE "OPINIONS OF MANKIND": ROPER V. SIMMONS AND THE PROPER ROLE OF INTERNATIONAL CONSENSUS IN UNITED STATES EIGHTH AMENDMENT JURISPRUDENCE (ROPER V. SIMMONS, 125 S. CT. 1183 (2005)), 45 Washburn L.J. 233, 266+ (2005) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 6270 REDUCTION IN THE PROTECTION FOR MENTALLY ILL CRIMINAL DEFENDANTS: KANSAS UPHOLDS THE REPLACEMENT OF THE M'NAUGHTEN APPROACH WITH THE MENS REA APPROACH, EFFECTIVELY ELIMINATING THE INSANITY DEFENSE (STATE V. BETHEL, 66 P., 44 Washburn L.J. 213, 245+ (2004) 6271 DISCRIMINATION FOR THE SAKE OF THE CHILDREN (LOFTON V. SEC'Y OF THE DEP'T OF CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVS., 358 F.3D 804 (11TH CIR. 2004)), 44 Washburn L.J. 247, 273+ (2004) 6272 LESSONS FOR RELIGIOUS LIBERTY LITIGATION FROM KENTUCKY, 19 Wash. & Lee J. Civil Rts. & Soc. Just. 275, 316+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6273 ASK, TELL, BUT DO NOT GET GREEDY: THE INEQUALITIES THAT PERVADE IN THE MILITARY IN LIGHT OF THE REPEAL OF "DON'T ASK, DON'T TELL", 19 Wash. & Lee J. Civil Rts. & Soc. Just. 121, 146+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6274 ELUDING THE GRIM REAPER: HOW SECTION 2 OF THE DEFENSE OF MARRIAGE ACT COULD SURVIVE STRICT SCRUTINY, 19 Wash. & Lee J. Civil Rts. & Soc. Just. 151, 182+ (2012) 6275 THE VIRGINIA GARDASIL LAW: A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS OF MANDATED PROTECTION FOR SCHOOLCHILDREN AGAINST THE HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS, 17 Wash. & Lee J. Civil Rts. & Soc. Just. 223, © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 265+ (2010) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6276 THE UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF MISSISSIPPI'S EMPLOYMENT PROTECTION ACT AND A FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING SIMILAR STATE IMMIGRATION EMPLOYMENT LAWS, 16 Wash. & Lee J. Civil Rts. & Soc. Just. 225, 256 (2009) 6277 THE LIBERTY OF INNOCENT DELIGHTS: OBSCENE DEVICES AND THE LIMITS OF STATE POWER AFTER LAWRENCE v. TEXAS, 16 Wash. & Lee J. Civil Rts. & Soc. Just. 257, 258+ (2009) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6278 THE GOVERNMENT MÉNAGE À TROIS: UNRAVELING THE GOVERNMENT SEX PARTNER IN UNDERCOVER PROSTITUTION STINGS, 15 Wash. & Lee J. Civil Rts. & Soc. Just. 453, 482+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6279 MICROPERFORMANCES OF IDENTITY: VISIBLE SAME-SEX COUPLES AND THE MARRIAGE CONTROVERSY, 15 Wash. & Lee J. Civil Rts. & Soc. Just. 3, 29+ (2008) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6280 REPEAL OF "DON'T ASK, DON'T TELL:" A SMOOTH TRANSITION, 15 Wash. & Lee J. Civil Rts. & Soc. Just. 129, 144+ (2008) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6281 GENDER TROUBLE IN THE LAW: ARGUMENTS AGAINST THE USE OF STATUS/CONDUCT BINARIES IN SEXUAL ORIENTATION LAW, 15 Wash. & Lee J. Civil Rts. & Soc. Just. 147, 154+ (2008) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6282 PEOPLE NOT EQUAL: A GLIMPSE INTO THE USE OF PROFILING AND THE EFFECT A PENDING U.N. HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE CASE MAY HAVE ON UNITED STATES' POLICY, 14 Wash. & Lee J. Civil Rts. & Soc. Just. 303, 326+ (2008) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.) 6283 WAKE OF THE FLOOD: EXAMINING THE DISSIPATION OF PROPERTY RIGHTS THROUGH A MODEL OF POST-KATRINA NEW ORLEANS, 13 Wash. & Lee J. Civil Rts. & Soc. Just. 389, 433 (2007) 6284 SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS AND DISCOURSE ETHICS: RETHINKING FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS ANALYSIS, 13 Wash. & Lee J. Civil Rts. & Soc. Just. 41, 82+ (2006) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6285 WHAT IF YOU WERE FIRST AND NO ONE CARED: THE APPOINTMENT OF ALBERTO GONZALES AND COALITION BUILDING BETWEEN LATINOS AND COMMUNITIES OF COLOR, 12 Wash. & Lee J. Civil Rts. & Soc. Just. 21, 40+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6286 PAPER DAUGHTERS, 12 Wash. & Lee J. Civil Rts. & Soc. Just. 41, 79 (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6287 WHY GIDEON FAILED: POLITICS AND FEEDBACK LOOPS IN THE REFORM OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, 70 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 883, 923+ (2013) 6288 FROM PLYLER V. DOE TO TRAYVON MARTIN: TOWARD CLOSING THE OPEN SOCIETY, 69 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 1799, 1817+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6289 COHABITATION AND THE RESTATEMENT (THIRD) OF RESTITUTION & UNJUST ENRICHMENT, 68 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 1407, 1442 (2011) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 6290 PROSECUTORS AS JUDGES, 67 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 1413, 1532+ (2010) 6291 CAPTURING THE JUDICIARY: CARHART AND THE UNDUE BURDEN STANDARD, 67 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 915, 965+ (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6292 STARE DECISIS AS JUDICIAL DOCTRINE, 67 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 411, 434+ (2010) HN: 1,3,4 (S.Ct.) 6293 POLICE PATERNALISM: COMMUNITY CARETAKING, ASSISTANCE SEARCHES, AND FOURTH AMENDMENT REASONABLENESS, 66 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 1485, 1563+ (2009) 6294 IS THE FAMILY A FEDERAL QUESTION?, 66 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 131, 177+ (2009) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6295 THE UNINTENDED TAX ADVANTAGES OF GAY MARRIAGE, 65 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 1529, 1592+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6296 THE UNDERAPPRECIATED FIRST AMENDMENT IMPORTANCE OF LAWRENCE v. TEXAS, 65 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 1045, 1046+ (2008) HN: 1,3,4 (S.Ct.) 6297 "SOCIOLOGICAL LEGITIMACY" IN SUPREME COURT OPINIONS, 64 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 1011, 1070+ (2007) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 6298 THE GENUINE ARTICLE: A SUBVERSIVE ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVE ON THE LAW'S PROCREATIONIST VISION OF MARRIAGE, 64 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 393, 468+ (2007) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6299 THE CONSTITUTION IN A POSTMODERN AGE, 64 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 165, 184+ (2007) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6300 RECONCILING RING v. ARIZONA WITH THE CURRENT STRUCTURE OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL MURDER TRIAL: THE CASE FOR TRIFURCATION, 64 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 349, 389+ (2007) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 6301 THE COLLISION OF THE TAKINGS AND STATE SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY DOCTRINES, 63 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 493, 602+ (2006) 6302 CONGRESS GAVE AND CONGRESS HATH TAKEN AWAY: JURISDICTION WITHDRAWAL AND THE CONSTITUTION, 62 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 1139, 1218+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6303 INTERNET HATE SPEECH: THE EUROPEAN FRAMEWORK AND THE EMERGING AMERICAN HAVEN, 62 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 781, 830+ (2005) 6304 VIEWPOINT DISCRIMINATION BY PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES: STUDENT RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATIONS AND VIOLATIONS OF UNIVERSITY NONDISCRIMINATION POLICIES, 61 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 841, 882+ (2004) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 6305 APPLICATIONS FOR BENEFITS: DUE PROCESS, EQUAL PROTECTION, AND THE RIGHT TO BE FREE FROM ARBITRARY PROCEDURES, 61 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 883, 927+ (2004) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 6306 COGNITIVE DISSONANCE THEORY: A CASE STUDY OF LOVING v. VIRGINIA, BOWERS v. HARDWICK, AND LAWRENCE v. TEXAS, 10 © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Wash. & Lee Race & Ethnic Anc. L.J. 75, 75+ (2004) 6307 LAWRENCE v. TEXAS, 123 S. CT. 2472 (2003), 10 Wash. & Lee Race & Ethnic Anc. L.J. 143, 150+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6308 AN UNEASY UNION: SAME-SEX MARRIAGE AND RELIGIOUS EXEMPTION IN WASHINGTON STATE, 88 Wash. L. Rev. 1119, 1149+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6309 PREGNANT AND PREJUDICED: THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF SEXAND RACE-SELECTIVE ABORTION RESTRICTIONS, 88 Wash. L. Rev. 645, 670+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6310 DUN & BRADSTREET V. GREENMOSS BUILDERS AS AN EXAMPLE OF JUSTICE POWELL'S APPROACH TO CONSTITUTIONAL JURISPRUDENCE, 88 Wash. L. Rev. 143, 153+ (2013) 6311 REASONING ABOUT THE IRRATIONAL: THE ROBERTS COURT AND THE FUTURE OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 86 Wash. L. Rev. 217, 280+ (2011) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 6312 THE TWO VERSIONS OF RATIONAL-BASIS REVIEW AND SAME-SEX RELATIONSHIPS, 86 Wash. L. Rev. 281, 282+ (2011) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 6313 DEPOLITICIZING JUDICIAL REVIEW OF AGENCY RULEMAKING, 84 Wash. L. Rev. 419, 489+ (2009) 6314 UNEQUAL RIGHTS: THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT AND DE FACTO PARENTAGE, 81 Wash. L. Rev. 787, 811 (2006) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 6315 ZERO PRIVACY: SCHOOLS ARE VIOLATING STUDENTS' FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT RIGHT OF PRIVACY UNDER THE GUISE OF ENFORCING ZERO TOLERANCE POLICIES, 81 Wash. L. Rev. 391, 416 (2006) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6316 BEYOND RATIONAL RELATIONS: THE CONSTITUTIONAL INFIRMITIES OF ANTI-GAY PARTNERSHIP LAWS UNDER THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE, 81 Wash. L. Rev. 417, 445+ (2006) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6317 YOU CAN'T TAKE IT WITH YOU: CONSTITUTIONAL CONSEQUENCES OF INTERSTATE GENDER-IDENTITY RULINGS, 80 Wash. L. Rev. 819, 885+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6318 11 Wash. U. Global Stud. L. Rev. 93, A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE DOCTRINAL CONSEQUENCES OF INTERPRETIVE DISAGREEMENT FOR IMPLIED CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS (2012) 6319 10 Wash. U. Global Stud. L. Rev. 143, IS SAME-SEX MARRIAGE A THREAT TO TRADITIONAL MARRIAGES?: HOW COURTS STRUGGLE WITH THE QUESTION (2011) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6320 7 Wash. U. Global Stud. L. Rev. 257, MAPPING COMPARATIVE JUDICIAL REVIEW (2008) 6321 4 Wash. U. Global Stud. L. Rev. 345, THE NEW LEGAL TRANSNATIONALISM, THE GLOBALIZED JUDICIARY, AND THE RULE OF LAW (2005) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 6322 SEX THERAPY IN THE AGE OF VIAGRA: "MONEY CAN'T BUY ME LOVE", 35 Wash. U. J.L. & Pol'y 363, 420+ (2011) 6323 MAJOR PRIVACY CONCERNS WHEN MINOR SUES FOR PATERNITY, 26 Wash. U. J.L. & Pol'y 459, 485 (2008) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6324 TAKING THE NINTH: A VICTIM'S RIGHT OF PRIVACY, 28 Wash. U. J.L. & Pol'y 457, 480+ (2008) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6325 STATE V. CARSWELL: THE WHIPSAWS OF BACKLASH, 24 Wash. U. J.L. & Pol'y 165, 205+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6326 COMMUNITY PARENTING, 24 Wash. U. J.L. & Pol'y 47, 77 (2007) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6327 FAMILY STRUCTURE, CHILDREN, AND LAW, 24 Wash. U. J.L. & Pol'y 9, 29+ (2007) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6328 REVOLUTIONARY LAWYERING: ADDRESSING THE ROOT CAUSES OF POVERTY AND WEALTH, 20 Wash. U. J.L. & Pol'y 101, 168 (2006) 6329 SECOND-PARENT ADOPTION AND THE EQUITABLE PARENT DOCTRINE: THE FUTURE OF CUSTODY AND VISITATION RIGHTS FOR SAME-SEX PARTNERS IN MISSOURI, 20 Wash. U. J.L. & Pol'y 283, 309+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6330 THE MILITARY'S BAN ON CONSENSUAL SODOMY IN A POSTLAWRENCE WORLD, 21 Wash. U. J.L. & Pol'y 379, 406+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6331 THE PRESUMPTION OF LIBERTY AND THE PUBLIC INTEREST: MEDICAL MARIJUANA AND FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS, 22 Wash. U. J.L. & Pol'y 29, 45 (2006) 6332 RACE, GENDER, AND WORK/FAMILY POLICY, 15 Wash. U. J.L. & Pol'y 219, 251 (2004) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6333 FOR BETTER AND FOR BETTER: THE CASE FOR ABOLISHING CIVIL MARRIAGE, 5 Wash. U. Jurisprudence Rev. 189, 202+ (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 6334 LOCHNER V. NEW YORK: A CENTENNIAL RETROSPECTIVE, 83 Wash. U. L.Q. 1469, 1527+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6335 THE ELUSIVE MEANING OF RELIGIOUS EQUALITY, 83 Wash. U. L.Q. 1529, 1566 (2005) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 6336 UNCONSTITUTIONAL COURSES, 83 Wash. U. L.Q. 1679, 1731+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6337 JUDICIAL SELECTION AND THE RELIGIOUS TEST CLAUSE, 82 Wash. U. L.Q. 1129, 1167 (2004) 6338 PAST AND PRESENT PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION REGARDING MARRIAGE, 82 Wash. U. L.Q. 611, 666+ (2004) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 6339 THE PHILOSOPHY OF CERTIORARI: JURISPRUDENTIAL CONSIDERATIONS IN SUPREME COURT CASE SELECTION, 82 Wash. U. © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. L.Q. 389, 452+ (2004) 6340 ADMISSIBILITY OF FRUITS OF BREACHED EVIDENTIARY PRIVILEGES: THE IMPORTANCE OF ADVERSARIAL FAIRNESS, PARTY CULPABILITY, AND FEAR OF IMMUNITY, 81 Wash. U. L.Q. 961, 1016 (2003) 6341 EQUAL PROTECTION FOR CHILDREN OF SAME-SEX PARENTS, 90 Wash. U. L. Rev. 1589, 1641+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6342 SOVEREIGNTY MISMATCH AND THE NEW ADMINISTRATIVE LAW, 91 Wash. U. L. Rev. 59, 112 (2013) 6343 TAXING POLYGAMY, 91 Wash. U. L. Rev. 113, 132+ (2013) 6344 LIBERTY'S REFUGE, OR THE REFUGE OF SCOUNDRELS?: THE LIMITS OF THE RIGHT OF ASSEMBLY, 89 Wash. U. L. Rev. 1381, 1402+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6345 LIBERTY'S FORGOTTEN REFUGEES? ENGENDERING ASSEMBLY, 89 Wash. U. L. Rev. 1423, 1434+ (2012) 6346 FACTIONS FOR THE REST OF US, 89 Wash. U. L. Rev. 1435, 1456+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6347 FROM PRESERVATIVE TO TRANSFORMATIVE: SQUARING SOCIOECONOMIC RIGHTS WITH LIBERTY AND THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK, 88 Wash. U. L. Rev. 735, 764+ (2011) 6348 DOES THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT PUNISHMENTS CLAUSE PROHIBIT ONLY PUNISHMENTS THAT ARE BOTH CRUEL AND UNUSUAL?, 87 Wash. U. L. Rev. 567, 624+ (2010) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 6349 IN SEARCH OF A THEORY OF DEFERENCE: THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT, DEMOCRATIC PEDIGREE, AND CONSTITUTIONAL DECISION MAKING, 88 Wash. U. L. Rev. 1, 76+ (2010) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 6350 THE POLITICAL FOURTH AMENDMENT, 88 Wash. U. L. Rev. 303, 379+ (2010) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6351 OUTLIVING CIVIL RIGHTS, 86 Wash. U. L. Rev. 1053, 1115+ (2009) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6352 THE PUBLIC'S RIGHT TO HEALTH: WHEN PATIENT RIGHTS THREATEN THE COMMONS, 86 Wash. U. L. Rev. 1335, 1396+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6353 CONSTITUTIONAL DISPLACEMENT, 86 Wash. U. L. Rev. 515, 608+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6354 ARGUMENTS AGAINST MARRIAGE EQUALITY: COMMEMORATING & RECONSTRUCTING LOVING V. VIRGINIA, 85 Wash. U. L. Rev. 575, 609+ (2007) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6355 THE DOMESTIC RELATIONS EXCEPTION, DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, AND EQUAL ACCESS TO FEDERAL COURTS, 84 Wash. U. L. Rev. 1441, 1512 (2006) 6356 THE EXPRESSIVE IMPACT OF PATENTS, 84 Wash. U. L. Rev. 573, 622+ © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6357 THE END OF BORDENKIRCHER: EXTENDING THE LOGIC OF APPRENDI TO PLEA BARGAINING, 84 Wash. U. L. Rev. 835, 904 (2006) 6358 WHERE LIBERTY LIES: CIVIL SOCIETY AND INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AFTER 9/11, 57 Wayne L. Rev. 1203, 1238+ (2011) 6359 UNDERSTANDING THE OVERRULINGS: A RESPONSE TO ROBERT SEDLER, 56 Wayne L. Rev. 1761, 1810+ (2010) 6360 THE MICHIGAN SUPREME COURT, STARE DECISIS, AND OVERRULING THE OVERRULINGS, 55 Wayne L. Rev. 1911, 1953+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6361 QUESTION REGARDING D.C. v. HELLER: AS A JUSTICE, ANTONIN SCALIA IS (A) GREAT, (B) ACCEPTABLE, (C) INJUDICIOUS, 54 Wayne L. Rev. 1105, 1130+ (2008) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 6362 THE SUPREME COURT AND ENEMY COMBATANTS, 54 Wayne L. Rev. 1131, 1148+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6363 GETTING THE ROBERTS COURT RIGHT: A RESPONSE TO CHEMERINSKY, 54 Wayne L. Rev. 983, 1013 (2008) 6364 DEFERENCE, FEDERALISM, AND THE MYTH OF DEMOCRACY, 54 Wayne L. Rev. 577, 599+ (2008) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 6365 SURROGACY AGREEMENTS: PERMITTING AMERICANS TO STRUCTURE WORK AND HOME, 53 Wayne L. Rev. 1063, 1078+ (2007) HN: 3,5 (S.Ct.) 6366 THE BOUNDARIES OF COSMOPOLITAN PLURALISM, 51 Wayne L. Rev. 1261, 1269 (2005) 6367 WHAT ABOUT THE CHILDREN? THE FIGHT FOR HOMOSEXUAL ADOPTION AFTER LAWRENCE AND LOFTON, 51 Wayne L. Rev. 1271, 1272+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6368 CIVIL RIGHTS: "RIGHTS WITHOUT REMEDIES-WRONGS UN-RIGHTED", 50 Wayne L. Rev. 933, 959+ (2004) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6369 THE CONSTITUTION SHOULD PROTECT THE RIGHT TO SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, 49 Wayne L. Rev. 975, 980+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6370 LABOR LAW AND ITS LIMITS: SOME PROPOSALS FOR REFORM, 49 Wayne L. Rev. 667, 684 (2003) 6371 A GOOD NAME: APPLYING REGULATORY TAKINGS ANALYSIS TO REPUTATIONAL DAMAGE CAUSED BY CRIMINAL HISTORY, 116 W. Va. L. Rev. 497, 533 (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6372 DEMOCRATIZING THE ECONOMIC SPHERE: A CASE FOR THE POLITICAL BOYCOTT, 115 W. Va. L. Rev. 531, 576+ (2012) 6373 THE REACTIONARY ROAD TO FREE LOVE: HOW DOMA, STATE MARRIAGE AMENDMENTS, AND SOCIAL CONSERVATIVES UNDERMINE TRADITIONAL MARRIAGE, 115 W. Va. L. Rev. 205, 241+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 6374 BRENNAN V. SCALIA, JUSTICE OR JURISPRUDENCE? A MODERATE PROPOSAL, 110 W. Va. L. Rev. 1265, 1301+ (2008) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6375 THE UNJUST EXCLUSION OF GAY SPERM DONORS: LITIGATION STRATEGIES TO END DISCRIMINATION IN THE GENE POOL, 110 W. Va. L. Rev. 843, 882+ (2008) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6376 LIFE AFTER THE ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE, 110 W. Va. L. Rev. 1, 50+ (2007) 6377 DEEP PURPLE: RELIGIOUS SHADES OF FAMILY LAW, 110 W. Va. L. Rev. 459, 499+ (2007) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 6378 RELIGIOUS V. SECULAR IDEOLOGIES AND SEX EDUCATION: A RESPONSE TO PROFESSORS CAHN AND CARBONE, 110 W. Va. L. Rev. 501, 513+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6379 DOUBLE JEOPARDY LAW AND THE SEPARATION OF POWERS, 109 W. Va. L. Rev. 527, 570 (2007) 6380 CONFRONTING AMERICA'S AMBIVALENCE TOWARDS SAME-SEX MARRIAGE: A LEGAL AND POLICY PERSPECTIVE, 108 W. Va. L. Rev. 267, 307+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6381 COSTS OF SOVEREIGNTY, 107 W. Va. L. Rev. 385, 441+ (2005) 6382 IF AT FIRST YOU DON'T SUCCEED: A CRITICAL EVALUATION OF JUDICIAL SELECTION REFORM EFFORTS, 107 W. Va. L. Rev. 499, 523+ (2005) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 6383 SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS/PRIVACY-STAY CALM, DON'T GET HYSTERICAL: A USER'S GUIDE TO ARGUING THE UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF ANTI-VIBRATOR STATUTES, 33 W. New Eng. L. Rev. 211, 245+ (2011) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.) 6384 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-SACRIFICING THE GOOD OF THE FEW FOR THE GOOD OF THE MANY: DENYING THE TERMINALLY ILL ACCESS TO EXPERIMENTAL MEDICATION, 31 W. New Eng. L. Rev. 535, 580+ (2009) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 6385 BLAINE AMENDMENTS AND POLYGAMY LAWS: THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF ANTI-POLYGAMY LAWS TARGETING RELIGION, 28 W. New Eng. L. Rev. 257, 292+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6386 WHERE TO GO AFTER KELO? BACK TO THE FUTURE!, 29 W. New Eng. L. Rev. 75, 108 (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6387 WILL NEW APPOINTEES TO THE SUPREME COURT BE ABLE TO EFFECT AN OVERRULING OF ROE V. WADE?, 28 W. New Eng. L. Rev. 29, 55+ (2005) HN: 1,3,4 (S.Ct.) 6388 PROBATION RESTRICTIONS IMPACTING THE RIGHT TO PROCREATE: THE OAKLEY ERROR, 26 W. New Eng. L. Rev. 81, 108 (2004) 6389 THE FATE OF CALIFORNIA'S MARRIAGE LAWS IN THE HANDS OF THE COURT, 32 W. St. U. L. Rev. 271, 286+ (2005) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 6390 EXPLAIN THIS TO ME AGAIN; IF WE PROTECT THE RIGHT TO INTIMATE SEXUAL RELATIONS, WE CAN'T PROTECT THE RIGHT TO ABORTION? JUSTICE SCALIA'S IMPLAUSIBLE DISSENT IN LAWRENCE V. TEXAS, 31 W. St. U. L. Rev. 163, 183+ (2003) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6391 20 NO. 15 West's Criminal Law News 61, Texas statute criminalizing sexual intimacy by same-sex couples is unconstitutional (2003) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 6392 12 Whittier J. Child & Fam. Advoc. 1, WHAT ABOUT THE CHILDREN?: CHILD-CENTERED CHALLENGES TO SAME-SEX MARRIAGE BANS (2012) 6393 11 Whittier J. Child & Fam. Advoc. 185, JUDICIAL DECISION MAKING, PERSONALITY THEORY, AND CHILD CUSTODY CONFLICT: CAN HEURISTICS BETTER PREDICT A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN PARENTS WHO DO AND THOSE WHO DON'T? (2012) 6394 9 Whittier J. Child & Fam. Advoc. 279, IN WHOSE BEST INTEREST? FLORIDA'S STATUTORY BAN ON HOMOSEXUAL ADOPTION AND THE ARGUMENTS SET FORTH IN SUPPORT OF AN ABSOLUTE BAN, REPRESENT THE PERCEIVED BEST INTEREST OF A CONSERVATIVE MORALITY AND NOT THOSE OF THE CHIL (2010) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 6395 8 Whittier J. Child & Fam. Advoc. 237, ROMEO AND ROMEO: COMING OUT FROM UNDER THE UMBRELLA OF SEXUAL ABUSE (2009) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6396 7 Whittier J. Child & Fam. Advoc. 277, IF YOU CAN'T FIX IT, YOU'VE GOT TO STAND IT: LOFTON V. SECRETARY OF DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES AND THE FLORIDA ADOPTION STATUTE'S DISCRIMINATION AGAINST HOMOSEXUALS AND FOSTER CHILDREN (2008) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6397 6 Whittier J. Child & Fam. Advoc. 331, CONSTITUTIONS AND MARRIAGE (2007) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6398 6 Whittier J. Child & Fam. Advoc. 437, LOCKED IN THE CLOSET: THE IMPACT OF LAWRENCE V. TEXAS ON THE LIVES OF GAY YOUTH IN THE JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM (2007) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6399 6 Whittier J. Child & Fam. Advoc. 463, TAKING A CLOSER STEP TOWARD EQUALITY: DOMESTIC PARTNER BENEFITS FOR SAME-SEX COUPLES AND THE UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SYSTEM (2007) 6400 6 Whittier J. Child & Fam. Advoc. 125, WEIGHING THE EFFECTS ON CHILDREN OF EXPOSURE TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE VERSUS THE EFFECTS OF RESIDENCE IN A SAME-SEX HOUSEHOLD: WHY THE MISSISSIPPI CASE OF WEIGAND V. HOUGHTON WAS WRONGLY DECIDED (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6401 6 Whittier J. Child & Fam. Advoc. 217, THE CASE FOR SAME-SEX MARRIAGE IN CALIFORNIA FROM A SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVE (2006) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 6402 6 Whittier J. Child & Fam. Advoc. 53, WHAT IS MARRIAGE? (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6403 5 Whittier J. Child & Fam. Advoc. 669, THE FUTURE OF THE ABORTION RIGHT: AYOTTE V. PLANNED PARENTHOOD & THE ROBERTS' COURT (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6404 4 Whittier J. Child & Fam. Advoc. 241, MARRIED WITH KIDS AND MOVING: ACHIEVING RECOGNITION FOR SAME-SEX PARENTS UNDER THE UNIFORM PARENTAGE ACT (2005) 6405 4 Whittier J. Child & Fam. Advoc. 491, THE RIGHT TO BE HEARD Incorporating the Needs and Interests of Children of Nonmarital Families into the Visitation Rights Dialogue (2005) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.) 6406 PUTTING HISTORY ON THE STAND: A CLOSER LOOK AT THE LEGITIMACY OF CRITICISMS LEVIED AGAINST HISTORIANS WHO TESTIFY AS EXPERT WITNESSES, 34 Whittier L. Rev. 343, 364 (2013) 6407 THE NATURE OF THE JUDICIAL PROCESS, 34 Whittier L. Rev. 163, 185+ (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 6408 NATURAL LAW CONSIDERATIONS OF JUVENILE LAW, 32 Whittier L. Rev. 57, 119+ (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6409 FIRST COMES LOVE, THEN COMES "MARRIAGE"? NOT FOR SOME: A LOOK AT THE STRUGGLE OF SAME-SEX COUPLES TO BE RECOGNIZED AS LEGALLY "MARRIED", 31 Whittier L. Rev. 345, 375+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6410 FROM MURDER TO EATING FRENCH FRIES IN A METRO STATION-THE DEFENDANT'S RIGHT TO A JURY TRIAL FOR ALL TYPES OF OFFENSES, 30 Whittier L. Rev. 5, 40+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6411 THE ROBERTS COURT AND THE FUTURE OF SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS: THE DEMISE OF "SPLIT-THE-DIFFERENCE" JURISPRUDENCE?, 28 Whittier L. Rev. 861, 904+ (2007) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 6412 THE 2005-2006 TERM OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT: A COURT IN TRANSITION, 28 Whittier L. Rev. 3, 173 (2006) 6413 THE DUTY TO DEFEND ADVERTISING INJURIES CAUSED BY JUNK FAXES: AN ANALYSIS OF PRIVACY, SPAM, DETECTION AND BLACKMAIL, 27 Whittier L. Rev. 925, 949 (2006) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6414 GOOD FOR THE NATION, GOOD FOR THE ADMINISTRATION: WHY THE COURTS SHOULD HEAR THE GUANTANAMO BAY DETAINEE CASES AND HOW IT WILL HAVE POSITIVE EFFECTS, 27 Whittier L. Rev. 867, 891 (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6415 MESSAGES FROM STRASBOURG: LESSONS FOR AMERICAN COURTS FROM THE HIGHEST VOLUME HUMAN RIGHTS COURT IN THE WORLD-THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, 27 Whittier L. Rev. 357, 414+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6416 DECISIONS OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT 2002-2003 © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. TERM: FOUR STARS AND AN INTERESTING SUPPORTING CAST, 25 Whittier L. Rev. 695, 767+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6417 CRIME AND PUNISHMENT: IS THERE A ROLE FOR CRIMINAL LAW IN HIV PREVENTION POLICY?, 25 Whittier L. Rev. 821, 886+ (2004) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 6418 THE HOMOSEXUAL POLICY IN THE MILITARY-WILL LAWRENCE V. TEXAS OPEN THE CLOSET DOOR?, 25 Whittier L. Rev. 645, 666+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6419 I TEACH YOU THE SUPERMAN: WHY CONGRESS CANNOT CONSTITUTIONALLY PROHIBIT GENETIC MODIFICATION, 25 Whittier L. Rev. 409, 439+ (2003) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6420 21 Widener L.J. 655, JUDICIAL TAKINGS: ROBINSON v. ARIYOSHI REVISITED (2012) 6421 17 Widener L.J. 245, DEPORTING PRIVATE RYAN: THE LESS THAN HONORABLE CONDITION OF THE NONCITIZEN IN THE UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES For Donald W. Dowd, Professor Emeritus, Villanova University School of Law (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6422 17 Widener L.J. 73, OVERRULING DRED SCOTT: THE CASE FOR SAMESEX MARRIAGE (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6423 15 Widener L.J. 135, DANGEROUS PREDICTIONS: REFERENCING "EMERGING" HISTORY AND TRADITION IN SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS JURISPRUDENCE IN AN ERA OF BLUE STATE FEDERALISM (2005) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 6424 15 Widener L.J. 85, THE U.S. SUPREME COURT AND THE INSTITUTIONAL ROLE OF POLITICAL PARTIES IN THE POLITICAL PROCESS: WHAT TRADITION? (2005) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 6425 13 Widener L.J. 691, INTRODUCTION: MARRIAGE, EQUALITY AND AMERICA: COMMITTED COUPLES, COMMITTED LIVES (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6426 13 Widener L.J. 759, THE HETEROSEXUAL AGENDA (2004) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 6427 13 Widener L.J. 799, THE PRESIDENT, GAY MARRIAGE, AND THE CONSTITUTION: A TANGLED WEB (2004) HN: 3,5 (S.Ct.) 6428 13 Widener L.J. 825, RECOGNIZING FRIENDS AMIDST THE RUBBLE: SEEKING TRUTH OUTSIDE THE CULTURE WARS (2004) 6429 13 Widener L.J. 831, TOWARD A MORE PERFECT UNION: THE ROAD TO MARRIAGE EQUALITY FOR SAME-SEX COUPLES (2004) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6430 13 Widener L.J. 859, INTERPRETATIONS OF LOVING IN LAWRENCE, BAKER, AND GOODRIDGE: ON EQUAL PROTECTION AND THE TIERS OF SCRUTINY (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6431 THE INVASION OF PRIVACY ACT: THE DISCLOSURE OF MY INFORMATION IN YOUR GOVERNMENT FILE, 19 Widener L. Rev. 345, 385 (2013) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 6432 PLURALITY DECISIONS, IMPLICIT CONSENSUSES, AND THE FIFTHVOTE RULE UNDER MARKS V. UNITED STATES, 19 Widener L. Rev. 387, 436+ (2013) 6433 I'M SORRY: EXPLORING THE REASONS BEHIND THE DIFFERING ROLES OF APOLOGY IN AMERICAN AND JAPANESE CIVIL CASES, 14 Widener L. Rev. 185, 204+ (2008) 6434 THE INTERRELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INTERNATIONAL LAW AND CONSTITUTIONAL THEORY, 14 Widener L. Rev. 53, 75+ (2008) 6435 THE MAN WHO DECLINES TO BE SOCRATES: JUSTICE SCALIA, TRUTH, AND THE JURISPRUDENCE OF TRADITION, 12 Widener L. Rev. 473, 489 (2006) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 6436 COMMENT: HEEDING THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE IN THE CASE OF STATE V. LIMON AND IN OTHER INSTANCES OF DISCRIMINATORY ROMEO AND JULIET STATUTES, 12 Widener L. Rev. 613, 635+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6437 THOUGHTS ON LAWRENCE V. TEXAS, 11 Widener L. Rev. 171, 187+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6438 THE IMPORTANCE OF LAWRENCE IN THE CONTEXT OF THE SUPREME COURT'S HISTORICAL TREATMENT OF GAY LITIGANTS, 11 Widener L. Rev. 189, 220+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6439 THE NEW LIBERTY, 11 Widener L. Rev. 221, 248+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6440 SPINNING LAWRENCE, OR LAWRENCE V. TEXAS AND THE PROMOTION OF HETEROSEXUALITY, 11 Widener L. Rev. 249, 257+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6441 "LAWRENCE-IUM": THE DENSEST KNOWN SUBSTANCE?, 11 Widener L. Rev. 259, 276+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6442 THE HARM OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGE: REAL OR IMAGINED?, 11 Widener L. Rev. 277, 308+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6443 FREEDOM IN A REGULATORY STATE?: LAWRENCE, MARRIAGE AND BIOPOLITICS, 11 Widener L. Rev. 309, 329+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6444 THE SUPREME COURT, FOREIGN LAW, AND CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNANCE, 11 Widener L. Rev. 59, 81+ (2004) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 6445 UNIVERSALISM AND CULTURAL RELATIVISM IN ROPER V. SIMMONS, 14 Willamette J. Int'l L. & Disp. Resol. 132, 153 (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6446 THE LIMITS OF QUEER THEORY IN LGBT LITIGATION AND THE INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS DISCOURSE, 14 Willamette J. Int'l L. & Disp. Resol. 73, 96 (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6447 OUTING BATSON: HOW THE CASE OF GAY JURORS REVEALS THE SHORTCOMINGS OF MODERN VOIR DIRE, 48 Willamette L. Rev. 243, 271 (2011) 6448 DISCOUNTING FOREIGN IMPORTS: FOREIGN AUTHORITY IN © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION & THE CURB OF POPULAR SOVEREIGNTY, 45 Willamette L. Rev. 767, 797+ (2009) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6449 IN DEFENSE OF STARE DECISIS, 45 Willamette L. Rev. 799, 822 (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6450 MARRYING INTO HEAVEN: THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF POLYGAMY BANS UNDER THE FREE EXERCISE CLAUSE, 44 Willamette L. Rev. 105, 129+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6451 SAME-SEX RELATIONSHIPS AND STATE CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS, 43 Willamette L. Rev. 235, 249+ (2007) 6452 REVIVING A NATURAL RIGHT: THE FREEDOM OF AUTONOMY, 42 Willamette L. Rev. 123, 185+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6453 THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR INDIGENOUS LANGUAGE RIGHTS IN THE UNITED STATES, 41 Willamette L. Rev. 325, 371 (2005) 6454 THE GAY CODES: FEDERAL & STATE LAWS EXCLUDING GAY & LESBIAN FAMILIES, 41 Willamette L. Rev. 881, 929+ (2005) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.) .... SECONDARY SPEECH AND THE PROTECTIVE APPROACH TO INTERPRETIVE DUALITIES IN THE ROBERTS COURT, 22 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 133, 175 (2013) (Text not available on WESTLAW) 6456 SOCIAL SCIENCE STUDIES AND THE CHILDREN OF LESBIANS AND GAY MEN: THE RATIONAL BASIS PERSPECTIVE, 21 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 691, 760+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6457 LAWRENCE'S STEALTH CONSTITUTIONALISM AND SAME-SEX MARRIAGE LITIGATION, 21 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 765, 765+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6458 "ALIEN" LITIGATION AS POLITY-PARTICIPATION: THE POSITIVE POWER OF A "VOTELESS CLASS OF LITIGANTS", 21 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 399, 461 (2012) 6459 A CLARIFICATION OF THE CONSTITUTION'S APPLICATION ABROAD: MAKING THE "IMPRACTICABLE AND ANOMALOUS" STANDARD MORE PRACTICABLE AND LESS ANOMALOUS, 21 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 171, 172+ (2012) 6460 "GIVE ME A FEW MORE MINUTES!": HOW VIRGINIA VIOLATES DUE PROCESS BY HITTING THE SNOOZE BUTTON ON A TIMELY DECLARATION OF DEATH, 20 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 981, 1015+ (2012) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6461 SACRIFICE AND SACRED HONOR: WHY THE CONSTITUTION IS A "SUICIDE PACT", 20 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 287, 404+ (2011) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6462 THE AUTO-AUTHENTICATION OF THE PAGE: PURELY WRITTEN SPEECH AND THE DOCTRINE OF OBSCENITY, 20 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 253, 285+ (2011) 6463 THE DARK SIDE OF THE FORCE: THE LEGACY OF JUSTICE HOLMES © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. FOR FIRST AMENDMENT JURISPRUDENCE, 19 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 661, 723 (2011) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6464 CONSTANTLY APPROXIMATING POPULAR SOVEREIGNTY: SEVEN FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 19 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 291, 337+ (2010) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 6465 DODGING A BULLET: MCDONALD V. CITY OF CHICAGO AND THE LIMITS OF PROGRESSIVE ORIGINALISM, 19 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 369, 417 (2010) 6466 ORAL DISSENTING ON THE SUPREME COURT, 19 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 75, 129 (2010) 6467 FAMILY VALUES, COURTS, AND CULTURE WAR: THE CASE OF ABSTINENCE-ONLY SEX EDUCATION, 18 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 1053, 1095+ (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6468 IMPEACHMENT AS JUDICIAL SELECTION?, 18 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 595, 656+ (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6469 OF FAT PEOPLE AND FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS: THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE NEW YORK CITY TRANS-FAT BAN, 18 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 857, 882+ (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6470 MUST GOD BE DEAD OR IRRELEVANT: DRAWING A CIRCLE THAT LETS ME IN, 18 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 1, 59 (2009) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 6471 THE UNBEARABLE LIGHTNESS OF MARRIAGE IN THE ABORTION DECISIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT: ALTERED STATES IN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 18 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 61, 74+ (2009) 6472 METAPHORS AND MODALITIES: MEDITATIONS ON BOBBITT'S THEORY OF THE CONSTITUTION, 17 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 157, 189 (2008) 6473 JUSTIFYING MOTIVE ANALYSIS IN JUDICIAL REVIEW, 17 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 191, 261+ (2008) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 6474 A WELFARE STATE OF CIVIL RIGHTS: THE TRIUMPH OF THE THERAPEUTIC IN AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 16 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 649, 684+ (2008) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6475 WHITHER SEXUAL ORIENTATION ANALYSIS?: THE PROPER METHODOLOGY WHEN DUE PROCESS AND EQUAL PROTECTION INTERSECT, 16 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 685, 743+ (2008) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6476 BE THEY FISH OR NOT FISH: THE FISHY REGISTRATION OF NONSEXUAL OFFENDERS, 16 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 497, 536+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6477 PUBLIC EMPLOYEE SPEECH RIGHTS FALL PREY TO AN EMERGING DOCTRINAL FORMALISM, 15 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 1173, 1204+ (2007) 6478 SPEECH AND THE SELF-GOVERNANCE VALUE, 14 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 1251, 1307 (2006) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 6479 FOREWORD: DISABLING BROWN, 14 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 1421, 1428 (2006) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 6480 SEXUALITY AND SOVEREIGNTY: THE GLOBAL LIMITS AND POSSIBILITIES OF LAWRENCE, 14 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 1429, 1492+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6481 THE BACKLASH THESIS AND SAME-SEX MARRIAGE: LEARNING FROM BROWN V. BOARD OF EDUCATION AND ITS AFTERMATH, 14 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 1493, 1538+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6482 FROM STONEWALL TO THE SUBURBS?: TOWARD A POLITICAL ECONOMY OF SEXUALITY, 14 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 1539, 1582+ (2006) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 6483 THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF "BEST INTERESTS" PARENTAGE, 14 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 857, 881+ (2006) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 6484 MAJORITY RIGHTS, MINORITY FREEDOMS: PROTESTANT CULTURE, PERSONAL AUTONOMY, AND CIVIL LIBERTIES IN NINETEENTHCENTURY AMERICA, 14 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 987, 1022+ (2006) 6485 IS ECONOMIC EXCLUSION A LEGITIMATE STATE INTEREST? FOUR RECENT CASES TEST THE BOUNDARIES, 14 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 1023, 1062 (2006) 6486 CONGRESSIONAL STRIPTEASE: HOW THE FAILURES OF THE 108TH CONGRESS'S JURISDICTION-STRIPPING BILLS WERE USED FOR POLITICAL SUCCESS, 14 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 1121, 1157+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6487 THE MARKET FOR LEGAL EDUCATION & FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION: WHY THE "SOLOMON AMENDMENT" IS CONSTITUTIONAL AND LAW SCHOOLS ARE NOT EXPRESSIVE ASSOCIATIONS, 14 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 415, 474 (2005) 6488 CLEANING UP THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT MESS, 14 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 475, 553+ (2005) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.) 6489 UP AGAINST THE WALL OF SEPARATION: THE QUESTION OF AMERICAN RELIGIOUS DEMOCRACY, 14 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 555, 675+ (2005) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 6490 FROM BREARD TO ATKINS TO MALVO: LEGAL INCOMPETENCY AND HUMAN RIGHTS NORMS ON THE FRINGES OF THE DEATH PENALTY, 13 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 363, 363+ (2004) 6491 NOT SO LANDMARK AFTER ALL? LAWRENCE v. TEXAS: CLASSICAL LIBERALISM AND DUE PROCESS JURISPRUDENCE, 13 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 617, 618+ (2004) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 6492 CONSTITUTIONAL THEORY IN A NUTSHELL, 13 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 57, 123+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6493 SCIENTER, CAUSATION, AND HARM IN FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION ANALYSIS: THE RIGHT HAND SIDE OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. CALCULUS, 13 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 125, 203+ (2004) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6494 BEYOND GAY RIGHTS: LAWRENCE V. TEXAS AND THE PROMISE OF LIBERTY, 13 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 245, 274+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6495 INTRODUCTION: ANCIENTS, MODERNS AND GUNS, 12 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 307, 313 (2004) 6496 "DEMOCRATIC DESPOTISM" AND CONSTITUTIONAL CONSTRAINT: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF EX POST FACTO CLAIMS IN STATE COURTS, 12 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 439, 509 (2004) 6497 THE JURISPRUDENTIAL REVOLUTION: UNLOCKING HUMAN POTENTIAL IN GRUTTER AND LAWRENCE, 12 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 65, 115+ (2003) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6498 THE MODEST PROMISE OF CHILDREN'S RELATIONSHIP RIGHTS, 11 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 1117, 1137 (2003) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6499 INTERNATIONAL CONSENSUS AND U.S. CLIMATE CHANGE LITIGATION, 33 Wm. & Mary Envtl. L. & Pol'y Rev. 177, 218 (2008) 6500 WHY GAYS SHOULD NOT SERVE IN THE UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES: A GAY LIBERATIONIST STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLE, 18 Wm. & Mary J. Women & L. 7, 34+ (2011) 6501 TURNING POINTS: CHALLENGES AND SUCCESSES IN ENDING DON'T ASK, DON'T TELL, 18 Wm. & Mary J. Women & L. 35, 86+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6502 THE FEW, THE PROUD, THE GAYS: DON'T ASK, DON'T TELL AND THE TRAP OF TOLERANCE, 18 Wm. & Mary J. Women & L. 87, 114+ (2011) 6503 THE DON'T ASK, DON'T TELL REPEAL ACT: BREACHING THE CONSTITUTIONAL RAMPARTS, 18 Wm. & Mary J. Women & L. 115, 133+ (2011) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6504 THE DEATH OF THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT: CASTLE ROCK AND ITS PROGENY, 17 Wm. & Mary J. Women & L. 277, 320+ (2011) 6505 AN EXPLORATION OF "THE "WILD WEST' OF REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY": ETHICAL AND FEMINIST PERSPECTIVES ON SEXSELECTION PRACTICES IN THE UNITED STATES, 17 Wm. & Mary J. Women & L. 223, 247+ (2010) 6506 THE MEANING OF MARRIAGE: IMMIGRATION RULES AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR SAME-SEX SPOUSES IN A WORLD WITHOUT DOMA, 16 Wm. & Mary J. Women & L. 537, 611+ (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6507 ABORTION, THE UNDUE BURDEN STANDARD, AND THE EVISCERATION OF WOMEN'S PRIVACY, 16 Wm. & Mary J. Women & L. 291, 325+ (2010) 6508 TAXATION, PREGNANCY, AND PRIVACY, 16 Wm. & Mary J. Women & L. 327, 368+ (2010) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6509 SAME-SEX RELATIONSHIPS AND THE FULL FAITH AND CREDIT © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. CLAUSE: REDUCING AMERICA TO THE LOWEST COMMON DENOMINATOR, 16 Wm. & Mary J. Women & L. 29, 82 (2009) 6510 ROE AT THIRTY-SIX AND BEYOND: ENHANCING PROTECTION FOR ABORTION RIGHTS THROUGH STATE CONSTITUTIONS, 15 Wm. & Mary J. Women & L. 469, 534+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6511 LAWRENCE AS AN EIGHTH AMENDMENT CASE: SODOMY AND THE EVOLVING STANDARDS OF DECENCY, 15 Wm. & Mary J. Women & L. 633, 659+ (2009) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 6512 WHEN FREEDOM IS NOT FREE: INVESTIGATING THE FIRST AMENDMENT'S POTENTIAL FOR PROVIDING PROTECTION AGAINST SEXUAL PROFILING IN THE PUBLIC WORKPLACE, 15 Wm. & Mary J. Women & L. 377, 413+ (2009) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6513 POLYGAMY AND SAME-SEX MARRIAGE - ALLIES OR ADVERSARIES WITHIN THE SAME-SEX MARRIAGE MOVEMENT, 14 Wm. & Mary J. Women & L. 559, 603+ (2008) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6514 WOMEN IN PRISON: INTERNATIONAL PROBLEMS AND HUMAN RIGHTS BASED APPROACHES TO REFORM, 14 Wm. & Mary J. Women & L. 271, 304+ (2008) 6515 CROSS-GENDER SUPERVISION IN PRISONS AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT OF PRISONERS TO REMAIN FREE FROM RAPE, 13 Wm. & Mary J. Women & L. 841, 866 (2007) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6516 ESSENTIALLY A MOTHER, 13 Wm. & Mary J. Women & L. 429, 482 (2007) 6517 WHY DON'T MORE PUBLIC SCHOOLS TEACH SEX EDUCATION?: A CONSTITUTIONAL EXPLANATION AND CRITIQUE, 13 Wm. & Mary J. Women & L. 539, 591+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6518 PLAN B FOR THE FDA: A NEED FOR A THIRD CLASS OF DRUG REGULATION IN THE UNITED STATES INVOLVING A "PHARMACISTONLY" CLASS OF DRUGS, 12 Wm. & Mary J. Women & L. 521, 561 (2006) 6519 PRIVATE CHOICES, PUBLIC CONSEQUENCES: PUBLIC EDUCATION REFORM AND FEMINIST LEGAL THEORY, 12 Wm. & Mary J. Women & L. 563, 601 (2006) 6520 WHY SEGREGATED SCHOOLS FOR GAY STUDENTS MAY PASS A "SEPARATE BUT EQUAL' ANALYSIS BUT FAIL OTHER ISSUES AND CONCERNS, 12 Wm. & Mary J. Women & L. 101, 134+ (2005) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 6521 ADAM AND STEVE AND EVE: WHY SEXUALITY SEGREGATION IN ASSISTED REPRODUCTION IN VIRGINIA IS NO LONGER ACCEPTABLE, 11 Wm. & Mary J. Women & L. 293, 315+ (2005) 6522 I NOW PRONOUNCE YOU HUSBAND AND WIVES: LAWRENCE V. TEXAS AND THE PRACTICE OF POLYGAMY IN MODERN AMERICA, 11 Wm. & Mary J. Women & L. 131, 151+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6523 THE PARADOX OF UNMARRIED FATHERS AND THE CONSTITUTION: BIOLOGY "PLUS' DEFINES RELATIONSHIPS; BIOLOGY ALONE © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. SAFEGUARDS THE PUBLIC FISC, 11 Wm. & Mary J. Women & L. 47, 129+ (2004) 6524 AUTONOMY, GAY RIGHTS AND HUMAN SELF-FULFILLMENT: AN ARGUMENT FOR MODIFIED LIBERALISM IN PUBLIC EDUCATION, 10 Wm. & Mary J. Women & L. 137, 193+ (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6525 A PEACE PROPOSAL FOR THE SAME-SEX MARRIAGE WARS: RESTORING THE HOUSEHOLD TO ITS PROPER PLACE, 10 Wm. & Mary J. Women & L. 195, 293+ (2004) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6526 FLUNKING THE CLASS-OF-ONE / FAILING EQUAL PROTECTION, 55 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 435, 470+ (2013) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6527 KNOWLEDGE IS POWER: THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO RECORD PRESENT OBSERVATIONS IN PUBLIC, 54 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1409, 1449+ (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 6528 HOW CUSTOMARY IS CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW?, 54 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 885, 920+ (2013) 6529 VALID RULE DUE PROCESS CHALLENGES: BOND V. UNITED STATES AND ERIE'S CONSTITUTIONAL SOURCE, 54 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 987, 1022 (2013) 6530 A GENERAL THEORY OF GOVERNANCE: DUE PROCESS AND LAWMAKING POWER, 54 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1057, 1121+ (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 6531 THE EQUAL PROTECTION IMPLICATIONS OF GOVERNMENT'S HATEFUL SPEECH, 54 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 159, 209+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6532 BEYOND MORRISON: THE EFFECT OF THE "PRESUMPTION AGAINST EXTRATERRITORIALITY" AND THE TRANSACTIONAL TEST ON FOREIGN TENDER OFFERS, 54 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 263, 296 (2012) 6533 THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT, THE CONSTITUTIONAL MEANING OF STATUTES, AND THE EMERGING DOCTRINE OF POSITIVE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, 53 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1639, 1715+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6534 DISABILITY CAUSE LAWYERS, 53 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1287, 1359 (2012) 6535 TRAGIC RIGHTS: THE RIGHTS CRITIQUE IN THE AGE OF OBAMA, 53 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 713, 746+ (2011) 6536 PAGING DR. GOOGLE: PERSONAL HEALTH RECORDS AND PATIENT PRIVACY, 51 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 2243, 2268 (2010) 6537 UNLOCKING THE POWER OF STATE CONSTITUTIONS WITH EQUAL PROTECTION: THE FIRST STEP TOWARD EDUCATION AS A FEDERALLY PROTECTED RIGHT, 51 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1343, 1416+ (2010) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 6538 CONTINGENT CONSTITUTIONALISM: STATE AND LOCAL CRIMINAL LAWS AND THE APPLICABILITY OF FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, 51 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 143, 182 (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 6539 STATE REGULATION OF SEXUALITY IN INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW AND THEORY, 50 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 797, 936+ (2008) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6540 RECONSTRUCTING THE DORMANT COMMERCE CLAUSE DOCTRINE, 50 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 417, 516+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6541 LAW'S LIMITED DOMAIN CONFRONTS MORALITY'S UNIVERSAL EMPIRE, 48 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1579, 1603 (2007) 6542 POLITICAL JUDGING: WHEN DUE PROCESS GOES INTERNATIONAL, 48 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1159, 1246+ (2007) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 6543 DUMBO'S FEATHER: AN EXAMINATION AND CRITIQUE OF THE SUPREME COURT'S USE, MISUSE, AND ABUSE OF TRADITION IN PROTECTING FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS, 48 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 923, 1023+ (2006) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 6544 THE SUPREME COURT AND FOREIGN SOURCES OF LAW: TWO HUNDRED YEARS OF PRACTICE AND THE JUVENILE DEATH PENALTY DECISION, 47 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 743, 909+ (2005) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 6545 SEX, POLITICS, AND MORALITY, 47 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1, 29+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6546 MAKING FEDERALISM DOCTRINE: FIDELITY, INSTITUTIONAL COMPETENCE, AND COMPENSATING ADJUSTMENTS, 46 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1733, 1855 (2005) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 6547 WHOSE CONSTITUTION IS IT? WHY FEDERALISM AND CONSTITUTIONAL POSITIVISM DON'T MIX, 46 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1245, 1271 (2005) 6548 BRIDGING THE ENFORCEMENT GAP IN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: A CRITIQUE OF THE SUPREME COURT'S THEORY THAT SELFRESTRAINT PROMOTES FEDERALISM, 46 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1289, 1341 (2005) 6549 COOL FEDERALISM AND THE LIFE-CYCLE OF MORAL PROGRESS, 46 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1385, 1398 (2005) 6550 THE FUTURE OF PARITY, 46 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1457, 1497 (2005) 6551 WEIGHING IN ON THE WINE WARS: WHAT THE EUROPEAN UNION CAN TEACH US ABOUT THE DIRECT SHIPMENT CONTROVERSY, 46 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 1533, 1568 (2005) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 6552 AMERICAN INSURANCE ASSOCIATION v. GARAMENDI AND EXECUTIVE PREEMPTION IN FOREIGN AFFAIRS, 46 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 825, 950 (2004) 6553 WHEN EQUALITY LEAVES EVERYONE WORSE OFF: THE PROBLEM OF LEVELING DOWN IN EQUALITY LAW, 46 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 513, 618+ (2004) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 6554 STATEHOOD AS THE NEW PERSONHOOD: THE DISCOVERY OF FUNDAMENTAL "STATES' RIGHTS", 46 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 213, 343+ © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6555 CROSS BURNING, COCKFIGHTING, AND SYMBOLIC MEANING: TOWARD A FIRST AMENDMENT ETHNOGRAPHY, 45 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 2261, 2382+ (2004) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6556 STRATEGIC PRAGMATISM OR RADICAL IDEALISM?: THE SAME-SEX MARRIAGE AND CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENTS JUXTAPOSED, 2 Wm. & Mary Pol'y Rev. 194, 223+ (2010) 6557 ROCKS RATHER THAN CATHEDRALS: THE MINIMALIST ARCHITECTURE OF THE MINNESOTA SUPREME COURT, 37 Wm. Mitchell L. Rev. 882, 906+ (2011) 6558 GREAT BRITAIN'S NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE AND ASSISTED REPRODUCTION, 35 Wm. Mitchell L. Rev. 403, 411 (2009) 6559 CONSTITUTIONAL CONFUSION: THE CASE FOR THE MINNESOTA MARRIAGE AMENDMENT, 33 Wm. Mitchell L. Rev. 1029, 1057 (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6560 HOW A MARRIAGE DISCRIMINATION AMENDMENT WOULD DISRESPECT DEMOCRACY IN MINNESOTA, 33 Wm. Mitchell L. Rev. 1059, 1080+ (2007) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6561 FOREIGN AND INTERNATIONAL LAW IN CONSTITUTIONAL GAY RIGHTS LITIGATION: WHAT CLAIMS, WHAT USE, AND WHOSE LAW?, 32 Wm. Mitchell L. Rev. 455, 508+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6562 A SPECULATION ON ENLIGHTENMENT ROOTS, FOREIGN LAW, AND FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS, 32 Wm. Mitchell L. Rev. 509, 541+ (2006) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 6563 "DANGEROUS DICTA": THE DISPOSITION OF U.S. COURTS TOWARD RECOURSE TO INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS IN GAY RIGHTS ADJUDICATION, 32 Wm. Mitchell L. Rev. 543, 557+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6564 SEPARATED AND UNEQUAL, 32 Wm. Mitchell L. Rev. 559, 597+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6565 CHANGES IN LATITUDES, CHANGES IN ATTITUDES: IS THERE A ROLE FOR CANADIAN JURISPRUDENCE IN ENDING DISCRIMINATION IN THE U.S. MILITARY?, 32 Wm. Mitchell L. Rev. 599, 624+ (2006) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6566 THE "AUTHORITATIVE MOMENT": EXPLORING THE BOUNDARIES OF INTERPRETATION IN THE RECOGNITION OF QUEER FAMILIES, 32 Wm. Mitchell L. Rev. 655, 718+ (2006) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6567 NOTE: MINNESOTA'S PROPOSED SAME-SEX MARRIAGE AMENDMENT: A FLAMINGLY UNCONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATION OF FULL FAITH AND CREDIT, DUE PROCESS, AND EQUAL PROTECTION, 31 Wm. Mitchell L. Rev. 1649, 1676+ (2005) HN: 3,5 (S.Ct.) 6568 NOTE: NIKE V. KASKY: LEAVING CORPORATE AMERICA SPEECHLESS, 30 Wm. Mitchell L. Rev. 1531, 1569 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 6569 PHILOSOPHY AND OPINIONS, 30 Wm. Mitchell L. Rev. 385, 393+ (2003) HN: 1,3,4 (S.Ct.) 6570 A "SUPREMER" COURT?: HOW AN UNFAVORABLE RULING IN THE INTER-AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS SHOULD IMPACT UNITED STATES DOMESTIC VIOLENCE JURISPRUDENCE, 28 Wis. Int'l L.J. 430, 463+ (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6571 IS INTERNATIONAL TRAVEL PER SE SUSPICION OF TERRORISM? THE DISPUTE BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES AND EUROPEAN UNION OVER PASSENGER NAME RECORD DATA TRANSFERS, 26 Wis. Int'l L.J. 551, 590 (2008) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6572 GAY AMERICAN "DEVIANCE:" USING INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS TO ARGUE FOR A FREE SPEECH AND ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE APPROACH TO FURTHERING GAY MARRIAGE IN THE UNITED STATES, 26 Wis. Int'l L.J. 1, 85+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6573 THE UNFINISHED BUSINESS OF AMERICAN DEMOCRACY, 24 Wis. Int'l L.J. 871, 913+ (2007) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6574 THE NINTH AMENDMENT: TEXTUAL SUPPORT FOR MARRIAGE FREEDOM, 28 Wis. J.L. Gender & Soc'y 39, 51+ (2013) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.) 6575 THE UNSCIENTIFIC SCIENCE OF GENDER JURISPRUDENCE: EVALUATING THE NEGATIVE IMPACT OF NORMATIVE LEGAL LANGUAGE ON ISSUES OF SEX AND GENDER, 27 Wis. J.L. Gender & Soc'y 229, 235+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6576 REDEFINING MARRIAGE: HOW THE INSTITUTION OF MARRIAGE HAS CHANGED TO MAKE ROOM FOR SAME-SEX COUPLES, 27 Wis. J.L. Gender & Soc'y 305, 310+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6577 WHERE SOVEREIGNS AND CULTURES COLLIDE: BALANCING FEDERALISM, TRIBAL SELF-DETERMINATION, AND INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS IN THE ADOPTION OF INDIAN CHILDREN BY GAYS AND LESBIANS, 25 Wis. J.L. Gender & Soc'y 327, 352 (2010) 6578 INTERSTATE MARRIAGE RECOGNITION AND THE RIGHT TO TRAVEL, 25 Wis. J.L. Gender & Soc'y 1, 34+ (2010) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6579 DOMA AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL COMING OUT OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, 24 Wis. J.L. Gender & Soc'y 145, 203+ (2009) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6580 THE POLITICS OF CARE, 23 Wis. J.L. Gender & Soc'y 169, 199+ (2008) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6581 THE ILLUSION OF PROPERTY AS A RIGHT AND ITS REALITY AS AN IMPERFECT ALTERNATIVE, 2013 Wis. L. Rev. 573, 606 (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 6582 CONSTITUTIONAL ADVERSE POSSESSION: RECESS APPOINTMENTS AND THE ROLE OF HISTORICAL PRACTICE IN CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION, 2013 Wis. L. Rev. 965, 1027+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 6583 WISCONSIN'S "GREATER LATITUDE" RULE: A BACKDOOR TO UNCONSTITUTIONAL PROPENSITY EVIDENCE, 2012 Wis. L. Rev. 1403, 1433 (2012) 6584 JUSTICE STEVENS, RELIGION, AND CIVIL SOCIETY, 2011 Wis. L. Rev. 733, 776 (2011) 6585 FREEDOM OF THOUGHT FOR THE EXTENDED MIND: COGNITIVE ENHANCEMENT AND THE CONSTITUTION, 2010 Wis. L. Rev. 1049, 1117 (2010) 6586 NONATTAINDER AS A LIBERTY INTEREST, 2010 Wis. L. Rev. 1203, 1268+ (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6587 DEDUCTING THE COSTS OF FERTILITY TREATMENT: IMPLICATIONS OF MAGDALIN V. COMMISSIONER FOR OPPOSITE-SEX COUPLES, GAY AND LESBIAN SAME-SEX COUPLES, AND SINGLE WOMEN AND MEN, 2009 Wis. L. Rev. 1283, 1347+ (2009) 6588 THE PROPER ROLE OF COURTS: THE MISTAKES OF THE SUPREME COURT IN LEEGIN, 2008 Wis. L. Rev. 405, 461+ (2008) 6589 HUMAN DIGNITY UNDER THE FOURTH AMENDMENT, 2008 Wis. L. Rev. 655, 711 (2008) 6590 LOVING AND THE LEGACY OF UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES, 2007 Wis. L. Rev. 239, 281 (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6591 LOVING ACROSS BORDERS: IMMIGRATION LAW AND THE LIMITS OF LOVING, 2007 Wis. L. Rev. 345, 378+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6592 THE BAIT-AND-SWITCH IN DIRECT DEMOCRACY, 2006 Wis. L. Rev. 17, 73 (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6593 GAY SELF-IDENTIFICATION AND THE RIGHT TO POLITICAL LEGIBILITY, 2006 Wis. L. Rev. 75, 134+ (2006) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6594 THE UNIFYING ROLE OF HARM IN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW, 2006 Wis. L. Rev. 897, 985 (2006) 6595 CITIZENSHIP IN A TIME OF REPRESSION, 2005 Wis. L. Rev. 1, 34+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6596 THE SUPREME COURT AND THE DIG: AN EMPIRICAL AND INSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS, 2005 Wis. L. Rev. 1421, 1475 (2005) 6597 PUTTING THE CONTRACT INTO CONTRACTIONS: REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS AND THE FOUNDING OF THE REPUBLIC, 2005 Wis. L. Rev. 1535, 1610+ (2005) 6598 PROSECUTORIAL NEUTRALITY, 2004 Wis. L. Rev. 837, 904+ (2004) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6599 WISCONSIN CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT TO DEFINE MARRIAGE: THE LEGAL CONTEXT, 78-MAR Wis. Law. 16, 18+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6600 THE GAY RIGHTS STATE: WISCONSIN'S PIONEERING LEGISLATION TO PROHIBIT DISCRIMINATION BASED ON SEXUAL ORIENTATION, 22 © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Wis. Women's L.J. 91, 131+ (2007) 6601 SEXUAL HARASSMENT AT HOME: ALTERING THE TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PRIVILEGES OF RENTAL HOUSING FOR SECTION 8 RECIPIENTS, 21 Wis. Women's L.J. 223, 261 (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6602 ASKING THE STRAIGHT QUESTION: HOW TO COME TO SPEECH IN SPITE OF CONCEPTUAL LIQUIDATION AS A HOMOSEXUAL, 21 Wis. Women's L.J. 1, 45+ (2006) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6603 MY TWO MOMS: CALIFORNIA'S SUPREME COURT DECISION IN K.M. V. E.G. AND WHY GAY MARRIAGE OFFERS THE BEST PROTECTION FOR SAME-SEX FAMILIES, 21 Wis. Women's L.J. 111, 131+ (2006) 6604 THE PRACTICE OF MARRIAGE, 20 Wis. Women's L.J. 189, 216+ (2005) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6605 TAKE NOTICE UNWED FATHERS: AN UNWED MOTHER'S RIGHT TO PRIVACY IN ADOPTION PROCEEDINGS, 20 Wis. Women's L.J. 1, 41+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6606 BOOB LAWS: AN ANALYSIS OF SOCIAL DEVIANCE WITHIN GENDER, FAMILIES, OR THE HOME (ETUDES 2), 33 Women's Rts. L. Rep. 197, 200+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) .... THE INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHT TO SAFE AND HUMANE TREATMENT DURING PREGNANCY AND A THEORY FOR ITS APPLICATION IN U.S. COURTS, 33 Women's Rts. L. Rep. 244, 283+ (2012) (Text not available on WESTLAW) 6608 CONSTITUTING STATUS: AN ANALYSIS OF THE OPERATION OF STATUS IN PERRY V. SCHWARZENEGGER, 33 Women's Rts. L. Rep. 58, 81 (2011) 6609 WHAT BEST TO PROTECT TRANSSEXUALS FROM DISCRIMINATION: USING CURRENT LEGISLATION OR ADOPTING A NEW JUDICIAL FRAMEWORK, 32 Women's Rts. L. Rep. 283, 323+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6610 EQUAL, BUT STILL SEPARATE?: THE CONSTITUTIONAL DEBATE OF SEX-SEGREGATED PUBLIC RESTROOMS IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY, 32 Women's Rts. L. Rep. 248, 282+ (2011) 6611 PERSONAL AUTONOMY: TOWARDS A NEW TAXONOMY FOR PRIVACY LAW, 31 Women's Rts. L. Rep. 447, 486+ (2010) 6612 A LOVE LETTER TO RUTH BADER GINSBURG, 31 Women's Rts. L. Rep. 177, 184 (2010) 6613 WHERE CONSCIENCE MEETS DESIRE: REFUSAL OF HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS TO HONOR HEALTH CARE PROXIES FOR SEXUAL MINORITIES, 31 Women's Rts. L. Rep. 1, 41+ (2009) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6614 REVISITING THE PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY AND WORK OPPORTUNITY RECONCILIATION ACT AND CALLING FOR EQUALITY: PROBLEMATIC MORAL REGULATIONS AND THE CHANGING LEGAL STATUS OF LGBT FAMILIES IN A NEW OBAMA ADMINISTRATION, 31 © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Women's Rts. L. Rep. 104, 146+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6615 SOME PENETRATING OBSERVATIONS ON THE FIFTH ANNIVERSARY OF LAWRENCE V. TEXAS: PRIVACY, DOMINANCE, AND SUBSTANTIVE EQUALITY THEORY, 30 Women's Rts. L. Rep. 442, 478+ (2009) 6616 DEFINING FAMILY IN AMERICAN PRISONS, 30 Women's Rts. L. Rep. 357, 406+ (2009) 6617 PLACING SECOND-PARENT ADOPTION ALONG THE "RATIONAL CONTINUUM" OF CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED FAMILY RIGHTS, 30 Women's Rts. L. Rep. 1, 41+ (2008) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6618 HARASSMENT AND HOSTILITY: DETERMINING THE PROPER STANDARD OF LIABILITY FOR DISCRIMINATORY PEER-TO-PEER HARASSMENT OF YOUTH IN SCHOOLS, 29 Women's Rts. L. Rep. 117, 148 (2008) 6619 THE RIGHT TO CONTRACT: USE OF DOMESTIC PARTNERSHIP AS A STRATEGIC ALTERNATIVE TO THE RIGHT TO MARRY SAME-SEX PARTNERS, 28 Women's Rts. L. Rep. 145, 162+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6620 THREE'S COMPANY FOR LESBIAN PARENTAL RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS: A DISCUSSION OF THREE CALIFORNIA DECISIONS, 28 Women's Rts. L. Rep. 163, 179+ (2007) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6621 "I JUST CAN'T HANDLE IT": THE CASE OF HERNANDEZ V. ROBLES, 28 Women's Rts. L. Rep. 61, 72+ (2007) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6622 A FAIRY TALE: THE MYTH OF THE HOMOSEXUAL LIFESTYLE IN ANTI-GAY-AND-LESBIAN RHETORIC, 27 Women's Rts. L. Rep. 69, 86+ (2006) 6623 SEX 24/7: WHAT'S THE HARM IN BROADCAST INDECENCY?, 26 Women's Rts. L. Rep. 167, 179 (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6624 THE SEPTEMBER 11 RELIEF EFFORTS AND SURVIVING SAME-SEX PARTNERS: REFLECTIONS ON RELATIONSHIPS IN THE ABSENCE OF UNIFORM LEGAL RECOGNITION, 26 Women's Rts. L. Rep. 79, 96+ (2005) 6625 ROE ON THE ROCKS? THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE FEDERAL PARTIAL BIRTH ABORTION BAN ON THE EVER-DIMINISHING RIGHT TO PRIVACY, 26 Women's Rts. L. Rep. 1, 12+ (2005) 6626 THE BIOLOGICAL BASIS OF COMMITMENT: DOES ONE SIZE FIT ALL?, 25 Women's Rts. L. Rep. 223, 248 (2004) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6627 LAWRENCE V. TEXAS: A CASE FOR CAUTIOUS OPTIMISM REGARDING PROCREATIVE LIBERTY, 25 Women's Rts. L. Rep. 249, 257+ (2004) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 6628 CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS'S MARBURY MOMENT: THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT CASE (NFIB v. SEBELIUS), 13 Wyo. L. Rev. 335, 348 (2013) 6629 GAY RIGHTS IN WYOMING: A REVIEW OF FEDERAL AND STATE LAW, 11 Wyo. L. Rev. 125, 131+ (2011) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 6630 CRIMINAL LAW-ONE SMALL STEP FOR JUVENILES, ONE GIANT LEAP FOR JUVENILE JUSTICE; GRAHAM v. FLORIDA, 130 S. CT. 2011 (2010), 11 Wyo. L. Rev. 269, 293+ (2011) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 6631 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - STRIKING DOWN ANTI-SODOMY LAWS: A BAD WAY TO REACH A GOOD DECISION? LAWRENCE V. TEXAS, 123 S. CT. 2472 (2003)., 4 Wyo. L. Rev. 795, 825+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6632 RESTRICTING THE FREEDOM OF CONTRACT: A FUNDAMENTAL PROHIBITION, 16 Yale Hum. Rts. & Dev. L.J. 51, 103 (2013) 6633 THE ROAD TO DECRIMINALIZATION: LITIGATING INDIA'S ANTISODOMY LAW, 16 Yale Hum. Rts. & Dev. L.J. 104, 106+ (2013) 6634 OBLIGATORY HEALTH, 15 Yale Hum. Rts. & Dev. L.J. 1, 18 (2012) 6635 THE DUTY OF TREATMENT: HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE HIV/AIDS PANDEMIC, 12 Yale Hum. Rts. & Dev. L.J. 1, 61 (2009) 6636 RETHINKING THE PROCREATIVE RIGHT, 10 Yale Hum. Rts. & Dev. L.J. 1, 63+ (2007) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 6637 12 Yale J. Health Pol'y, L. & Ethics 39, COMPULSORY VACCINATION, THE CONSTITUTION, AND THE HEPATITIS B MANDATE FOR INFANTS AND YOUNG CHILDREN (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6638 12 Yale J. Health Pol'y, L. & Ethics 87, UPDATING CONSTITUTIONAL DOCTRINE: AN EXTENDED RESPONSE TO THE CRITIQUE OF COMPULSORY VACCINATION (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6639 8 Yale J. Health Pol'y, L. & Ethics 145, E PLURIBUS UNOS: THE NATIONAL ORGAN TRANSPLANT ACT AND ITS POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS (2008) 6640 7 Yale J. Health Pol'y, L. & Ethics 319, A HUMAN RIGHTS APPROACH TO ROUTINE PROVIDER-INITIATED HIV TESTING (2007) 6641 6 Yale J. Health Pol'y, L. & Ethics 163, DOES "REPARATIVE" THERAPY REALLY CONSTITUTE CHILD ABUSE?: A CLOSER LOOK (2006) 6642 4 Yale J. Health Pol'y, L. & Ethics 305, CLONING MATTERS: HOW LAWRENCE V. TEXAS PROTECTS THERAPEUTIC RESEARCH (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6643 THE JUDICIAL ROLE IN NEW DEMOCRACIES: A STRATEGIC ACCOUNT OF COMPARATIVE CITATION, 38 Yale J. Int'l L. 423, 465+ (2013) 6644 FUNDAMENTAL NORMS, INTERNATIONAL LAW, AND THE EXTRATERRITORIAL CONSTITUTION, 36 Yale J. Int'l L. 307, 369+ (2011) 6645 THE RISE AND FALL OF COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW IN THE POSTWAR ERA, 36 Yale J. Int'l L. 1, 53+ (2011) 6646 FROM PARADOX TO SUBSIDIARITY: THE UNITED STATES AND HUMAN RIGHTS TREATY BODIES, 34 Yale J. Int'l L. 389, 462 (2009) 6647 NONDISCRIMINATION AS A UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHT, 34 Yale J. Int'l L. 588, 595 (2009) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 6648 OBSCENITY AND COMMUNITY STANDARDS, 33 Yale J. Int'l L. 299, 368+ (2008) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6649 SUSPECT SYMBOLS: VALUE PLURALISM AS A THEORY OF RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN INTERNATIONAL LAW, 33 Yale J. Int'l L. 1, 61 (2008) 6650 THE MINIMUM CORE OF ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL RIGHTS: A CONCEPT IN SEARCH OF CONTENT, 33 Yale J. Int'l L. 113, 175 (2008) 6651 THE USE AND MISUSE OF SECRET EVIDENCE IN IMMIGRATION CASES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE UNITED STATES, CANADA, AND THE UNITED KINGDOM, 32 Yale J. Int'l L. 219, 253 (2007) 6652 OUR INTERNATIONAL CONSTITUTION, 31 Yale J. Int'l L. 1, 125+ (2006) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6653 TAMING THE GREEN-EYED MONSTER: ON THE NEED TO RETHINK OUR CULTURAL CONCEPTION OF JEALOUSY, 25 Yale J.L. & Feminism 217, 248+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6654 "IT'S NOT ALL FLOWERS AND DAISIES": MASCULINITY, HETERONORMATIVITY AND THE OBSCURING OF LESBIAN IDENTITY IN THE REPEAL OF "DON'T ASK, DON'T TELL", 24 Yale J.L. & Feminism 61, 117+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6655 UNLIMITED INTIMACY: REFLECTIONS ON THE SUBCULTURE OF BAREBACKING. BY TIM DEAN. CHICAGO: THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO PRESS. 2009. PP XIV, 212. $20.00., 23 Yale J.L. & Feminism 179, 253+ (2011) 6656 REPRODUCTION AND REGRET, 23 Yale J.L. & Feminism 255, 333+ (2011) 6657 PER SE OR POWER? AGE AND SEXUAL CONSENT, 22 Yale J.L. & Feminism 279, 341 (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6658 LIKE FATHER, LIKE SON: HOMOSEXUALITY, PARENTHOOD, AND THE GENDER OF HOMOPHOBIA, 20 Yale J.L. & Feminism 257, 355+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6659 WHO SAYS "I DO"? Reviewing Judith Butler & Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak, Who Sings the Nation-State? Language, Politics, Belonging (2007), 21 Yale J.L. & Feminism 245, 260+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6660 QUEER KIDS: A COMPREHENSIVE ANNOTATED LEGAL BIBLIOGRAPHY ON LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, TRANSGENDER, AND QUESTIONING YOUTH, 19 Yale J.L. & Feminism 449, 461+ (2008) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6661 UNCONSTITUTIONAL ENTANGLEMENTS: THE RELIGIOUS RIGHT, THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, AND ABSTINENCE EDUCATION IN THE SCHOOLS, 19 Yale J.L. & Feminism 495, 531+ (2008) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 6662 BOOK REVIEW: WHY SMART MEN MARRY SMART WOMEN BY CHRISTINE B. WHELAN Comforting Insights into What Should Be Obvious (But May Not Necessarily Be So), 19 Yale J.L. & Feminism 533, 565 (2008) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 6663 WHEN IS A BATTERED WOMAN NOT A BATTERED WOMAN? WHEN SHE FIGHTS BACK, 20 Yale J.L. & Feminism 75, 129 (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6664 ADJUDICATING APPEARANCE: FROM IDENTITY TO PERSONHOOD, 19 Yale J.L. & Feminism 49, 124 (2007) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6665 BOOK REVIEW: SPLIT DECISIONS: HOW AND WHY TO TAKE A BREAK FROM FEMINISM BY JANET HALLEY Methodological Descriptions: "Feminist" and "Queer" Legal Theories, 19 Yale J.L. & Feminism 227, 258 (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6666 PRESERVING THE CORE OF ROE: REFLECTIONS ON PLANNED PARENTHOOD V. CASEY, 18 Yale J.L. & Feminism 317, 387+ (2006) 6667 EMASCULATED MEN, EFFEMINATE LAW IN THE UNITED STATES, ZIMBABWE AND MALAYSIA, 17 Yale J.L. & Feminism 1, 63 (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6668 LESBIAN LOVE STORIES: HOW WE WON EQUAL MARRIAGE IN CANADA, 17 Yale J.L. & Feminism 99, 131 (2005) 6669 GAY IS GOOD: THE MORAL CASE FOR MARRIAGE EQUALITY AND MORE, 17 Yale J.L. & Feminism 139, 184+ (2005) 6670 AGAINST BLANKET INTERSTATE NONRECOGNITION OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGE, 17 Yale J.L. & Feminism 205, 219+ (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6671 WINNING MARRIAGE EQUALITY: LESSONS FROM COURT, 17 Yale J.L. & Feminism 297, 308+ (2005) 6672 DEFENSE OF OTHERS AND DEFENSELESS "OTHERS", 17 Yale J.L. & Feminism 327, 383 (2005) 6673 A BEDROOM OF ONE'S OWN: MORALITY AND SEXUAL PRIVACY AFTER LAWRENCE V. TEXAS, 16 Yale J.L. & Feminism 1, 40+ (2004) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6674 REWRITING THE LEGAL FAMILY: BEYOND EXCLUSIVITY TO A CAREBASED STANDARD, 16 Yale J.L. & Feminism 83, 143+ (2004) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6675 ATTORNEY-CLIENT SEX: A FEMINIST CRITIQUE OF THE ABSENCE OF REGULATION, 15 Yale J.L. & Feminism 175, 223+ (2003) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6676 HISTORIANS BEFORE THE BENCH: FRIENDS OF THE COURT, FOES OF ORIGINALISM, 25 Yale J.L. & Human. 359, 371+ (2013) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 6677 LIVING ORIGINALISM IN INDIA? "OUR LAW" AND COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 25 Yale J.L. & Human. 1, 3+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6678 THE NEW TEXTUALISM, PROGRESSIVE CONSTITUTIONALISM, AND ABORTION RIGHTS: A REPLY TO JEFFREY ROSEN, 25 Yale J.L. & Human. 55, 67+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6679 HOW TO TALK ABOUT THE CONSTITUTION, 25 Yale J.L. & Human. 69, 77+ (2013) 6680 THE ORIGINALISM THAT WAS, AND THE ONE THAT WILL BE, 25 Yale © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. J.L. & Human. 101, 111 (2013) 6681 THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTION AS "OUR LAW", 25 Yale J.L. & Human. 113, 121+ (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 6682 MARRIAGE AS A MESSAGE: SAME-SEX COUPLES AND THE RHETORIC OF ACCIDENTAL PROCREATION, 21 Yale J.L. & Human. 1, 35+ (2009) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6683 PRIVACY AND THE LIMITS OF HISTORY Lawrence M. Friedman, Guarding Life's Dark Secrets: Legal and Social Controls over Reputation, Propriety, and Privacy. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, 2007. Pp. 360. $29.95., 21 Yale J.L. & Human. 165, 171 (2009) 6684 NARRATIVE TRANSACTIONS-DOES THE LAW NEED A NARRATOLOGY?, 18 Yale J.L. & Human. 1, 28 (2006) 6685 WHO'S AFRAID OF JURISPATHIC COURTS?: VIOLENCE AND PUBLIC REASON IN NOMOS AND NARRATIVE, 17 Yale J.L. & Human. 9, 16 (2005) 6686 15 Yale J. L. & Tech. 139, MOVING FROM NIXON TO NASA: PRIVACY'S SECOND STRAND-A RIGHT TO INFORMATIONAL PRIVACY (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6687 7 Yale J. L. & Tech. 222, PRIVACY VS. PIRACY (2005) 6688 WHAT IS GOVERNMENT FAILURE?, 30 Yale J. on Reg. Online 44, 56+ (2013) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 6689 MAKING CYBERSPACE SAFE FOR DEMOCRACY: THE CHALLENGE POSED BY DENIAL-OF-SERVICE ATTACKS, 30 Yale L. & Pol'y Rev. 211, 254 (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6690 CITIZENSHIP, CIVIC VIRTUE, AND IMMIGRANT INTEGRATION: THE ENDURING POWER OF COMMUNITY-BASED NORMS, 27 Yale L. & Pol'y Rev. 335, 398+ (2009) 6691 THE EMERGING IMPORTANCE OF "SOCIAL VISIBILITY" IN DEFINING A "PARTICULAR SOCIAL GROUP" AND ITS POTENTIAL IMPACT ON ASYLUM CLAIMS RELATED TO SEXUAL ORIENTATION AND GENDER, 27 Yale L. & Pol'y Rev. 47, 106+ (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6692 MUNICIPAL INTERPRETATION OF STATE LAW AS "CONSCIOUS CHOICE": MUNICIPAL LIABILITY IN STATE LAW ENFORCEMENT, 27 Yale L. & Pol'y Rev. 249, 258 (2008) 6693 LOOKING BEYOND OUR BORDERS: THE VALUE OF A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE IN CONSTITUTIONAL ADJUDICATION, 22 Yale L. & Pol'y Rev. 329, 337+ (2004) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6694 DEVELOPMENTS IN LAW AND POLICY: THE COSTS OF POST-9/11 NATIONAL SECURITY STRATEGY, 22 Yale L. & Pol'y Rev. 197, 233+ (2004) 6695 FIREARM LOCALISM, 123 Yale L.J. 82, 146 (2013) 6696 THE RIDDLE OF RAPE-BY-DECEPTION AND THE MYTH OF SEXUAL © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. AUTONOMY, 122 Yale L.J. 1372, 1379+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6697 AGGREGATION AND LAW, 122 Yale L.J. 2, 51+ (2012) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 6698 DUE PROCESS AS SEPARATION OF POWERS, 121 Yale L.J. 1672, 1807+ (2012) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 6699 AMERICA'S LIVED CONSTITUTION, 120 Yale L.J. 1734, 1783+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6700 SECTION 5 CONSTRAINTS ON CONGRESS THROUGH THE LENS OF ARTICLE III AND THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE EMPLOYMENT NON-DISCRIMINATION ACT, 120 Yale L.J. 1263, 1277+ (2011) 6701 THE ONE AND ONLY SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE, 120 Yale L.J. 408, 512 (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6702 WHEN FAMILY MATTERS, 119 Yale L.J. 1210, 1234+ (2010) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 6703 DISESTABLISHING THE FAMILY, 119 Yale L.J. 1236, 1279+ (2010) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 6704 CONSTRUCTING AMERICA: MYTHMAKING IN U.S. IMMIGRATION COURTS, 119 Yale L.J. 1012, 1058 (2010) 6705 CREATED IN ITS IMAGE: THE RACE ANALOGY, GAY IDENTITY, AND GAY LITIGATION IN THE 1950S-1970S, 119 Yale L.J. 316, 372 (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6706 FROM CHOICE TO REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE: DECONSTITUTIONALIZING ABORTION RIGHTS, 118 Yale L.J. 1394, 1432+ (2009) 6707 DIGNITY AND THE POLITICS OF PROTECTION: ABORTION RESTRICTIONS UNDER CASEY/CARHART, 117 Yale L.J. 1694, 1800+ (2008) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 6708 COSMOPOLITAN LAW?, 116 Yale L.J. 1022, 1070 (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6709 RESTORING THE RIGHT CONSTITUTION? Restoring the Lost Constitution: The Presumption of Liberty By Randy E. Barnett New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2004. Pp. 384. $49.95, 116 Yale L.J. 732, 766+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6710 UNPACKING THE HOUSEHOLD: INFORMAL PROPERTY RIGHTS AROUND THE HEARTH, 116 Yale L.J. 226, 328 (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6711 CRIMINAL LAW COMES HOME, 116 Yale L.J. 2, 70+ (2006) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6712 BEYOND LAWRENCE: METAPRIVACY AND PUNISHMENT, 115 Yale L.J. 1862, 1928+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6713 LAW'S MIGRATION: AMERICAN EXCEPTIONALISM, SILENT DIALOGUES, AND FEDERALISM'S MULTIPLE PORTS OF ENTRY, 115 Yale L.J. 1564, 1670+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6714 THE PRAGMATIC PASSION OF STEPHEN BREYER, 115 Yale L.J. 1675, 1698 (2006) 6715 JUSTICE BREYER THROWS DOWN THE GAUNTLET, 115 Yale L.J. 1699, © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 1717 (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6716 THE CORE OF THE CASE AGAINST JUDICIAL REVIEW, 115 Yale L.J. 1346, 1406 (2006) 6717 IMMORAL PURPOSES: MARRIAGE AND THE GENUS OF ILLICIT SEX, 115 Yale L.J. 756, 812+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6718 WHY (AND WHEN) CITIES HAVE A STAKE IN ENFORCING THE CONSTITUTION, 115 Yale L.J. 2218, 2253+ (2006) 6719 DIVORCING MARRIAGE FROM PROCREATION, 114 Yale L.J. 1989, 1996+ (2005) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6720 PLURALISM AND DISTRUST: HOW COURTS CAN SUPPORT DEMOCRACY BY LOWERING THE STAKES OF POLITICS, 114 Yale L.J. 1279, 1328+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6721 THE ANTI-EMERGENCY CONSTITUTION, 113 Yale L.J. 1801, 1870 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6722 THE TWO WESTERN CULTURES OF PRIVACY: DIGNITY VERSUS LIBERTY, 113 Yale L.J. 1151, 1221+ (2004) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 6723 PRIVATE VOUCHER SCHOOLS AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHT TO DISCRIMINATE, 113 Yale L.J. 743, 784+ (2003) HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.) 6724 HOW JUDGES OVERRULE: SPEECH ACT THEORY AND THE DOCTRINE OF STARE DECISIS, 113 Yale L.J. 493, 531+ (2003) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6725 NOT LOGIC, BUT EXPERIENCE: DRAWING ON LESSONS FROM THE REAL WORLD IN THINKING ABOUT THE RIDDLE OF RAPE-BY-FRAUD, 123 Yale L.J. Online 353, 357+ (2013) 6726 DELINEATING THE HEINOUS: RAPE, SEX, AND SELF-POSSESSION, 123 Yale L.J. Online 371, 387+ (2013) 6727 LOWER COURT POPULAR CONSTITUTIONALISM, 123 Yale L.J. Online 197, 206+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6728 WINDSOR'S RIGHT TO MARRY, 123 Yale L.J. Online 219, 248+ (2013) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6729 LAWRENCE MEETS LIBEL: SQUARING CONSTITUTIONAL NORMS WITH SEXUAL-ORIENTATION DEFAMATION, 122 Yale L.J. Online 125, 127+ (2012) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6730 WHEN MACHINES ARE WATCHING: HOW WARRANTLESS USE OF GPS SURVEILLANCE TECHNOLOGY VIOLATES THE FOURTH AMENDMENT RIGHT AGAINST UNREASONABLE SEARCHES, 121 Yale L.J. Online 177, 201 (2011) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6731 HOW STATUTES INTERPRET THE CONSTITUTION, 120 Yale L.J. Online 297, 323 (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6732 THE NEW JUDICIAL TAKINGS CONSTRUCT, 120 Yale L.J. Online 247, 266 (2011) 6733 IS IT IMPORTANT TO BE IMPORTANT?: EVALUATING THE SUPREME © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. COURT'S CASE-SELECTION PROCESS, 119 Yale L.J. Online 77, 86 (2010) 6734 ASSESSING THE SUPREME COURT'S CURRENT CASELOAD: A QUESTION OF LAW OR POLITICS?, 119 Yale L.J. Online 99, 111+ (2010) 6735 THE EXAMPLE OF AMERICA, 119 Yale L.J. Online 1, 19+ (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6736 HOW "SWINGERS" MIGHT SAVE HOLLYWOOD FROM A FEDERAL PORNOGRAPHY STATUTE, 118 Yale L.J. Pocket Part 1, 6 (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6737 TO YOUNG PEOPLE, "DON'T ASK, DON'T TELL" MEANS "DON'T ENLIST", 116 Yale L.J. Pocket Part 254, 254+ (2006) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 6738 LAWRENCE AND THE RIGHT TO METAPRIVACY, 115 Yale L.J. Pocket Part 125, 125+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6739 WHAT THE COURT SAID IN LAWRENCE, 115 Yale L.J. Pocket Part 129, 129+ (2006) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6740 THE META-NONSENSE OF LAWRENCE, 115 Yale L.J. Pocket Part 133, 133+ (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6741 A Practical Guide to Divorce in Rhode Island s 20.2, ENFORCEMENT OF COHABITATION AGREEMENTS (2009) 6742 091312 American Bankruptcy Institute 175, CONCURRENT SESSION: Consumer Track: Impact of Bankruptcy on the Respective Rights of Husbands and Wives and Significant Others (2012) 6743 080212 American Bankruptcy Institute 5, Plenary Session: Gender and Diversity Issues in Practice GENDER & DIVERSITY IN PRACTICE PLENARY SESSION (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6744 071212 American Bankruptcy Institute 627, The Right to Marry versus the Right to Bankruptcy Relief The Meaning of the Word "Spouse" for Means Testing Purposes: Some Considerations (2012) 6745 "WELL, THAT CERTAINLY RESOLVED EVERYTHING..." SAME SEX PLANNING IN A POST-WINDSOR AND PERRY WORLD, SV030 American Law Institute-American Bar Association 367+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6746 STUDY MATERIALS, RWUJ15 American Law Institute-American Bar Association 1 (2012) 6747 ESTATE PLANNING FOR UNMARRIED ADULTS, ST042 American Law Institute-American Bar Association 575+ (2012) 6748 PLANNING FOR NONTRADITIONAL COUPLES, SS043 American Law Institute-American Bar Association 859 (2011) 6749 ESTATE PLANNING FOR THE UNMARRIED ADULT, SS002 American Law Institute-American Bar Association 275 (2011) 6750 ABIGAIL ALLIANCE FOR BETTER ACCESS TO DEVELOPMENTAL DRUGS V. ESCHENBACH, NO. 04-5350 (DC CIR., MAY 2, 2006) (OPINION HOLDING FDA CANNOT CONSTITUTIONALLY PREVENT PEOPLE © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. FROM RECEIVING INVESTIGATIONAL DRUGS), SN014 American Law Institute-American Bar Association 121+ (2007) 6751 ABIGAIL ALLIANCE FOR BETTER ACCESS TO DEVELOPMENTAL DRUGS V. ESCHENBACH, NO. 04-5350 (DC CIR., EN BANC, AUGUST 7, 2007) (OPINION HOLDING FDA CAN CONSTITUTIONALLY PREVENT PEOPLE FROM RECEIVING INVESTIGATIONAL DRUGS), SN014 American Law Institute-American Bar Association 179 (2007) 6752 THE CHALLENGE OF DUE PROCESS, 1983, AND PROPERTY RIGHTS, SM040 American Law Institute-American Bar Association 417 (2007) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 6753 SPOUSAL RIGHTS ALTERNATIVES; DOMESTIC PARTNER ISSUES, WITH EMPHASIS ON HEALTH PLANS, SM079 American Law InstituteAmerican Bar Association 943+ (2007) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6754 TAKINGS AND DUE PROCESS, SL049 American Law Institute-American Bar Association 501 (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6755 AMICI CURIAE BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENTS, SL005 American Law Institute-American Bar Association 129+ (2005) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6756 THE CHALLENGE OF DUE PROCESS, SK045 American Law InstituteAmerican Bar Association 713 (2005) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 6757 REGULATING VERSUS PAYING TO ACHIEVE CONSERVATION PURPOSES, SJ053 American Law Institute-American Bar Association 1141 (2004) 6758 AUTONOMY: THE KEY THEORY FOR UNDERSTANDING THE EVOLUTION OF US PRIVACY LAW, 2014 WL 10438 (ASPATORE), *4+ (2014) 6759 LEGAL ISSUES AFFECTING SAME-SEX COUPLES IN NORTH CAROLINA AND ELSEWHERE, 2013 WL 4391621 (ASPATORE), *5 (2013) 6760 SUCCESSFUL STRATEGIES FOR APPELLATE ATTORNEYS: PRACTICAL TIPS FOR PREPARING AND PRESENTING YOUR CASE, 2013 WL 574529 (ASPATORE), *4+ (2013) 6761 2011 Aspatore Instant Awareness 2, CONSEQUENCES AND OPPORTUNITIES SPRINGING FROM DON'T ASK DON'T TELL'S REPEAL (2011) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 6762 2011 Aspatore Instant Awareness 2, DON'T ASK DON'T TELL AND ITS IMPACT ON GAY RIGHTS (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6763 P 60,155 IMS HEALTH CORP., ET AL., PLAINTIFFS V. G. STEVEN ROWE, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MAINE, DEFENDANT., CCH Privacy Law in Marketing 60155+ (2013) 6764 48 NO 2 Criminal Law Bulletin ART 7, From the Legal Literature %AA (2012) 6765 47 NO 5 Criminal Law Bulletin ART 8, From the Legal Literature %AA (2011) 6766 39 NO 4 Criminal Law Bulletin ART 4, Recent Decisions (2010) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 6767 39 NO 5 Criminal Law Bulletin ART 5, Lawrence v. Texas: Genuine or Illusory Progress for Gay Rights in America? (2010) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6768 40 NO 6 Criminal Law Bulletin ART 3, The Preventive State, Terrorists and Sexual Predators: Countering the Threat of a New Outsider Jurisprudence (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6769 41 NO 4 Criminal Law Bulletin ART 2, Of God's Mercy and the Four Biblical Methods of Capital Punishment: Stoning, Burning, Beheading and Strangulation (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6770 41 NO 4 Criminal Law Bulletin ART 4, Sex Crime Reforms in Texas, 1999-2003: A Legislative Analysis (2010) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6771 44 NO 1 Criminal Law Bulletin ART 1, Nine Scorpions in a Bottle: (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6772 44 NO 3 Criminal Law Bulletin ART 3, Gault Turns 40: Reflections on Ambiguity (2010) 6773 45 NO 5 Criminal Law Bulletin ART 1, The Rights of Delinquents in Juvenile Court: Why Not Equal Protection? (2010) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6774 45 NO 6 Criminal Law Bulletin ART 10, From the Legal Literature (2010) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6775 JUSTICE SCALIA'S "WILD RIDE": LAWRENCE v. TEXAS AND THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF PENALIZING ADULTERY, 17 NO. 7 Divorce Litigation 109+ (2005) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6776 OBSERVATIONS OF PERSUASION Lessons from Politics for the Appellate Lawyer?, 55 NO. 4 DRI For the Defense 58+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6777 "DON'T ASK, DON'T TELL" STATUTE WAS UPHELD. (2008) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6778 Defense of Marriage Act: What Will Be the Impact of the Supreme Court's Decision on Employee Benefits?, 30 No. 19 Employment Alert NL 3 (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6779 8/9/2012 Federal Taxes Weekly Alert Art. 13, ON RECONSIDERATION, TAX COURT AGAIN FINDS APPRAISAL FOR FA&CCEDIL;ADE EASEMENT WASN'T QUALIFIED (2012) 6780 PROCEDURAL MEANS OF ENFORCEMENT UNDER 42 U.S.C. S 1983, 42 Geo. L.J. Ann. Rev. Crim. Proc. 1095, 1146 (2013) 6781 ABIGAIL ALLIANCE APPEAL HEADED TO SUPREME COURT, 15 NO. 1 Guide to Good Clinical Practice Newsl. 13, 13 (2007) 6782 45 International Legal Materials 1241, INTRODUCTORY NOTE TO MILITARY COMMISSIONS ACT OF 2006 BY DAVID SCHEFFER (2006) 6783 PDPA MD. Inst. for Contin. Prof. Educ. of Lawyers 3-1, VALIDITY OF PREMARITAL AND DOMESTIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENTS (2009) 6784 ELI Massachusetts Continuing Legal Education Materials 12-1, SAME-SEX SEXUAL HARASSMENT, SEXUAL ORIENTATION DISCRIMINATION, © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. AND GENDER IDENTITY DISCRIMINATION (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6785 SEXO Massachusetts Continuing Legal Education Materials 11-1, ISSUES PERTAINING TO THE JUVENILE DEFENDANT AT TRIAL (2012) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6786 ELI Massachusetts Continuing Legal Education Materials S-12-1, SAME-SEX SEXUAL HARASSMENT AND SEXUAL ORIENTATION DISCRIMINATION (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6787 EMPDI Massachusetts Continuing Legal Education Materials 193, SEXUAL ORIENTATION DISCRIMINATION (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6788 NTFAM Massachusetts Continuing Legal Education Materials 369, WILL MARRIAGE BE AN OPTION? (2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6789 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS AND ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN COUNSELING SAME SEX COUPLES, 2005 NAELA Symposium Conference Materials 15-1+ (2005) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 6790 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW: BOARD OF IMMIGRATION - SAMPLE SUA SPONTE MOTION TO REOPEN, 20131029P NYCBAR 87, 109 (2013) 6791 UNITED STATES, PETITIONER v. EDITH SCHLAIN WINDSOR, IN HER CAPACITY AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF THEA CLARA SPYER, ET AL., 20131008P NYCBAR 117, 131+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6792 THE EMPLOYMENT NON-DISCRIMINATION ACT, 20131008P NYCBAR 363, 379 (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6793 DEBRA H., APPELLANT V JANICE R., RESPONDENT, 20130607A NYCBAR 124, 126 (2013) 6794 EQUAL ACCESS AND THE RIGHT TO MARRY, 20120625A NYCBAR 169, 187+ (2012) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 6795 GILL V. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, DECISION (MAY 31, 2012), 20120625A NYCBAR 303, 314+ (2012) 6796 LETTER TO SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE JOHN BOEHNER FROM U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL ERIC H. HOLDER ANNOUNCING THAT THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES AND ATTORNEY GENERAL HOLDER HAVE DETERMINED THAT SECTION 3 OF DOMA IS UNCONSTITUTIO, 20120625A NYCBAR 338, 339+ (2012) 6797 KAREN GOLINSKI, PLAINTIFF, V. UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT AND JOHN BERRY, DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY, DEFENDANTS., 20120625A NYCBAR 345, 360+ (2012) 6798 EDWIN BLESCH, TIMOTHY SMULIAN, FRANCES HERBERT, TAKAKO UEDA, SANTIAGO ORTIZ, PABLO GARCÍA, KELLI RYAN, LUCY TRUMAN, HEATHER MORGAN AND MARIA DEL MAR VERDUGO, PLAINTIFFS, V. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GE, © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 20120625A NYCBAR 388, 408 (2012) 6799 40 Preview of the United States Supreme Court Cases 232, Does a Prohibition of Marriage Between Same-Sex Couples Violate the Constitution? Hollingsworth v. Perry (2013) 6800 40 Preview of the United States Supreme Court Cases 238, Does the Federal Defense of Marriage Act, Which Defines Marriage As Only Between One Man and One Woman, Violate Equal Protection, and Does the Supreme Court Have Jurisdiction to Hear the Issue? United States v. Windsor (2013) 6801 34 Preview of the United States Supreme Court Cases 437, The Court and the Schools in the 2006 Term (2007) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 6802 2004-05 Preview of the United States Supreme Court Cases 274, Is Private Economic Development Condemnation an Abuse of the "Despotic Power"? Kelo v. New London (2005) 6803 RETIREMENT BENEFITS, GENDER DISCRIMINATION, CONSTITUTIONALITY Curran v. Teacher's Retirement System of the City of New York, 2003 WL 21804270 (S.D.N.Y. July 28, 2003)., 2003 Public Employment Law Notes 191 (2003) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6804 Defense of Marriage Act, 6 No. 8 Quinlan, Compensation Benefits Law Bulletin NL 3 (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6805 Constitutionality of Virginia's Anti-Sodomy Statute, 10-18-2013 United States Supreme Court Actions 18+ (2013) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6806 Constitutionality of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" Statute, 06-19-2009 United States Supreme Court Actions 21+ (2009) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6807 Constitutionality of Law Banning Sale of Sexual Devices, 03-4-2005 United States Supreme Court Actions 16 (2005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6808 Constitutionality of Prohibiting Adoptions by Homosexuals, 01-21-2005 United States Supreme Court Actions 17 (2005) 6809 Constitutionality of Airman's Conviction for Consensual Sodomy, 01-21-2005 United States Supreme Court Actions 20+ (2005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6810 Review of Cases Decided This Term, 07-3-2003 United States Supreme Court Actions 36 (2003) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6811 Constitutionality of Kansas's Criminal Sodomy Law, 07-3-2003 United States Supreme Court Actions 12 (2003) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6812 DOMA Precludes Same-Sex Couple From Filing Joint Petition, 09-1-04 West's Bankruptcy Newsletter 2+ (2004) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 6813 UNDERMININGCHRISTIAN LEGAL SOCIETY v. MARTINEZ, 295 Ed. Law Rep. 867, 883 (2013) 6814 DOUBT OR DEFERENCE:COMPARING THE SOUTH DAKOTA AND WASHINGTON SCHOOL FINANCE DECISIONS, 281 Ed. Law Rep. 771, 790 (2012) 6815 SCHOOL FINANCE LITIGATION AS FACIAL CHALLENGES, 272 Ed. Law © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Rep. 687, 706+ (2011) 6816 ROSENKRANZ' CONSTITUTIONAL SUBJECTS AND SCHOOL FINANCE LITIGATION, 260 Ed. Law Rep. 1, 1 (2010) 6817 SEXUAL ORIENTATION AND THE COLLEGE CAMPUS, 254 Ed. Law Rep. 19, 37 (2010) 6818 THE CONSTITUTIONAL, EDUCATIONAL, AND INSTITUTIONAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE MAJORITY AND CONCURRING OPINIONS IN PARENTS INVOLVED FOR COMMUNITY SCHOOLS, 231 Ed. Law Rep. 495, 510 (2008) 6819 AN ESSAY: THE ROBERTS COURT AT DAWN: CLARITY, HUMILITY, AND THE FUTURE OF EDUCATION LAW, 222 Ed. Law Rep. 491, 514 (2007) 6820 THE FUTURE OF SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY, 215 Ed. Law Rep. 1, 31+ (2007) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 6821 THE SCHOOL FINANCE PARADOX: HOW THE CONSTITUTIONAL VALUES OF DECENTRALIZATION AND JUDICIAL RESTRAINT INHIBIT THE ACHIEVEMENT OF QUALITY EDUCATION, 197 Ed. Law Rep. 477, 487 (2005) 6822 INTERNET CENSORSHIP: VALUES IN CONFLICT, 183 Ed. Law Rep. 299, 311 (2004) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) Westlaw Journals (U.S.A.) 6823 27 Andrews Computer and Internet Litigation Reporter 8, 3RD CIR. SAYS BID TO OVERTURN ONLINE GAMING BAN A LOSING BET (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6824 6 Andrews Privacy Litigation Reporter 6, 5TH CIRCUIT REJECTS BID FOR REHEARING OF SEX TOYS DECISION (2008) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6825 13 Andrews Telecomm. Industry Litig. Rep. 9, 3RD CIR. SAYS BID TO OVERTURN ONLINE GAMING BAN A LOSING BET (2009) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) Court Documents Appellate Court Documents (U.S.A.) Appellate Petitions, Motions and Filings 6826 Bunck v. King, 2013 WL 6236876, *1 (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Nov 26, 2013) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 13-661) 6827 Horne v. Isaacson, 2013 WL 5837683, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Oct 29, 2013) Amicus Brief of the States of Ohio, Montana, and 14 Other States Supporting Petitioners (NO. 13-402) 6828 Read v. United States of America, 2013 WL 5720394, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Oct 17, 2013) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 13-505) 6829 In Re Merrill v. Alaska Bar Ass'n, 2013 WL 5666600, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Oct 2013) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 13-488) 6830 Moose v. MacDonald, 2013 WL 4829942, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Sep 09, 2013) Reply Brief (NO. 12-1490) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6831 Moose v. MacDonald, 2013 WL 4539897, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Aug 26, 2013) Brief Amicus Curiae of Virginia Delegate Bob Marshall, Virginia Senator Dick Black, Public Advocate of the United States, U.S. Justice Foundation, Institute on the Constitution, The Lincoln Institute ... (NO. 12-1490) " HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.) 6832 Moose v. MacDonald, 2013 WL 4541109, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Aug 26, 2013) Respondent's Opposition to Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 12-1490) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6833 Bowersox v. U.S., 2013 WL 3991873, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jul 30, 2013) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 13-168) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6834 Castille v. St. Joseph's Abbey, 2013 WL 6407546, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jul 17, 2013) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 13-91) 6835 Moose v. MacDonald, 2013 WL 3208674, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jun 25, 2013) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 12-1490) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6836 Edokobi v. Litton Loan Servicing, LP, 2013 WL 3225972, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jun 21, 2013) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 12-1500) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6837 Onondaga Nation v. The State of New York, 2013 WL 1771079, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Apr 22, 2013) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 12-1279) 6838 Barth v. Barth, 2013 WL 1619308, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Apr 16, 2013) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 12-1244) 6839 Wilson v. Flaherty, 2013 WL 1143729, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Mar 13, 2013) Brief of the Rutherford Institute, Frankie Sue Del Papa, Jeffrey A. Modisett, Michael Moore and Grant Woods as Amici Curiae in Support of the Petitioner (NO. 12-986) 6840 Gallagher v. City of Clayton, Missouri, 2013 WL 1092155, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Mar 12, 2013) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 12-1122) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 6841 Kachalsky v. Cacace, 2013 WL 543338, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Feb 11, 2013) Amicus Curiae Brief of Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence in Support of Petitioners (NO. 12-845) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 6842 Ilagan v. Ungacta, 2013 WL 99192, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. (U.S. Jan 07, 2013) Motion for Leave to File and Brief of Amici Curiae The National Federation of Independent Business Small Business Legal Center; CATO Institute; Goldwater Institute; Owners Council of America; ... (NO. 12-723) 6843 Karbin v. Karbin, 2013 WL 859978, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jan 02, 2013) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 12-1081) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6844 Herron v. Williams, 2012 WL 6762615, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Dec 28, 2012) Brief of Respondent County of Dakota, Nebraska in Support of Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 12-730) 6845 Askew v. The Trustees of the General Assembly of the Church of the Lord Jesus Christ of the Apostolic Faith, Inc., 2012 WL 6625245, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Dec 14, 2012) Respondents' Joint Brief in Opposition to the Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 12-624) 6846 Askew v. The Trustees of the General Assembly of the Church of the Lord Jesus Christ of the Apostolic Faith, Inc., 2012 WL 6625246, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Dec 14, 2012) Respondents' Joint Brief in Opposition to the Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 12-624) 6847 Coalition for the Protection of Marriage v. Sevcik, 2012 WL 6054793, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Dec 05, 2012) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari Before Judgment (NO. 12-689) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 6848 Pedersen v. Office of Personnel Management, 2012 WL 5209991, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Oct 19, 2012) Brief for the Office of Personnel Management, et al. (NO. 12-231) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6849 Hettinga v. United States of America, 2012 WL 5267671, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Oct 19, 2012) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 12-506) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 6850 United States of America v. Windsor, 2012 WL 3991414, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Sep 11, 2012) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari Before Judgment (NO. 12-307) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6851 Office of Personnel Management v. Pedersen, 2012 WL 3991479, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Sep 11, 2012) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari Before Judgment (NO. 12-302) " 6852 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 2012 WL 3866469, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Sep 04, 2012) Reply Brief for Petitioners (NO. 12-144) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6853 Windsor v. United States of America, 2012 WL 3838138, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Aug 31, 2012) Brief for the United States (NO. 12-63) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6854 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 2012 WL 3864333, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Aug 31, 2012) Brief Amicus Curiae of Eagle Forum Education & Legal Defense Fund, Inc., in Support of Petitioners (NO. 12-144) " HN: © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 1 (S.Ct.) 6855 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 2012 WL 3864338, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Aug 31, 2012) Brief of Indiana, Michigan, Virginia, Alaska, Arizona, Idaho and 9 Other States as Amici Curiae in Support of the Petition (NO. 12-144) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6856 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 2012 WL 3864339, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Aug 31, 2012) Brief of Amicus Curiae Foundation for Moral Law in Support of Petitioners (NO. 12-144) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6857 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 2012 WL 3864340, *1 (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Aug 31, 2012) Brief of Amicus Curiae American Civil Rights Union in Support of Petitioners (NO. 12-144) " 6858 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 2012 WL 3864341, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Aug 31, 2012) Brief of Amici Curiae National Association of Evangelicals; The Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission of the Southern Baptist Convention; The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints; The Lutheran ... (NO. 12-144) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6859 Office of Personnel Management v. Golinski, 2012 WL 3866473, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Aug 31, 2012) Brief in Opposition (NO. 12-16) 6860 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 2012 WL 3838124, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Aug 30, 2012) Brief of Amici Curiae William N. Eskridge Jr., Bruce A. Ackerman, Daniel A. Farber, and Andrew Koppelman in Support of Respondents (NO. 12-144) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6861 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 2012 WL 3683450, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Aug 24, 2012) Brief in Opposition (NO. 12-144) " HN: 3,5 (S.Ct.) 6862 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 2012 WL 3724711, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Aug 24, 2012) City and County of San Francisco's Brief in Opposition (NO. 12-144) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 6863 Pedersen v. Office of Personnel Management, 2012 WL 3613467, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Aug 21, 2012) Petition for Writ of Certiorari Before Judgment (NO. 12-231) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6864 Brewer v. Diaz, 2012 WL 3613466, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Aug 20, 2012) Brief of Respondents in Opposition (NO. 12-23) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6865 Brewer v. Diaz, 2012 WL 3229405, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Aug 06, 2012) Brief Amicus Curiae of Eagle Forum Education & Legal Defense Fund, Inc., in Support of Petitioner (NO. 12-23) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6866 Brewer v. Diaz, 2012 WL 3229406, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Aug 06, 2012) Brief of the States of Indiana, Alabama, Colorado, Georgia, Idaho, Kansas, Michigan, Nebraska, Oklahoma, South Carolina © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. and Virginia as Amici Curiae in Support of the Petition (NO. 12-23) 6867 Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives v. Gill, 2012 WL 3158877, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Aug 02, 2012) Brief in Response of Nancy Gill et al. (NO. 12-13, 12-15) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6868 Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives v. Gill, 2012 WL 3158878, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Aug 02, 2012) Brief Amicus Curiae of Eagle Forum Education & Legal Defense Fund, Inc., in Support of Petitioner (NO. 12-13) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6869 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 2012 WL 3109489, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jul 30, 2012) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 12-144) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6870 Castro v. The Florida Bd. of Bar Examiners, 2012 WL 3058323, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jul 25, 2012) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 12-124) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 6871 Law Offices of Theodore Coates v. AIG Annuity Ins. Co., 2012 WL 2930903, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jul 16, 2012) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 12-68) 6872 United States Dept. of Health and Human Services v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 2012 WL 2586937, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jul 03, 2012) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 12-15) " 6873 Office of Personnel Management v. Golinski, 2012 WL 2586938, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jul 03, 2012) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari Before Judgment (NO. 12-16) 6874 Brewer v. Diaz, 2012 WL 2645111, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jul 02, 2012) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 12-23) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6875 Jennings v. Owens, 2012 WL 1406868, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Apr 20, 2012) Respondents' Brief in Opposition (NO. 11-789) 6876 Susko v. City of Weirton, 2011 WL 6468087, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Dec 21, 2011) Brief in Opposition to Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 11-628) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6877 Jennings v. Owens, 2011 WL 6468115, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Dec 20, 2011) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 11-789) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6878 Susko v. City of Weirton, 2011 WL 5856202, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Nov 16, 2011) Petition For Writ Of Certiorari (NO. 11-628) 6879 Kinsel v. Cain, 2011 WL 5007913, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Oct 17, 2011) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari Petition for Writ of © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Habeas Corpus (NO. 11-494) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 6880 Valle v. State of Florida, 2011 WL 3860775, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Aug 31, 2011) Motion for Waiver of Time and Leave to File Amicus Curiae Brief and Brief of the Bar Human Rights Committee of England and Wales, The International Bar Association's Human Rights Institute, The Law ... (NO. 11-6029) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 6881 Marchiondo v. State of Arizona, 2011 WL 3860773, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Aug 29, 2011) Motion for Leave to File Petition for Writ of Certiorari Out of Time and Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 11-272) 6882 Barnett v. Carberry, 2011 WL 3799096, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Aug 24, 2011) Reply Brief for Petitioner (NO. 11-70) 6883 Downing/Salt Pond Partners, L.P. v. State of Rhode Island, 2011 WL 3733871, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Aug 23, 2011) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 11-231) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 6884 Barnett v. Carberry, 2011 WL 3706746, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Aug 17, 2011) Brief in Opposition of Respondents Robert E. Carberry, Connecticut Light & Power Company, Northeast Utilities, Northeast Utilities Service Company, and the United Illuminating Company (NO. 11-70) 6885 Barnett v. Carberry, 2011 WL 2790726, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jul 13, 2011) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 11-70) 6886 Eist v. Maryland State Bd. of Physicians, 2011 WL 2581849, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jun 20, 2011) Brief for American Association of Practicing Psychiatrists et al as Amici Curiae Supporting Petitioner (NO. 10-1425) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6887 McMenamin v. McMenamin, 2011 WL 2192277, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jun 02, 2011) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 10-1470) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 6888 Johnson v. Haslam, 2011 WL 1769337, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. May 03, 2011) Reply to Brief in Opposition (NO. 10-1149) " 6889 Coates v. The Office of Attorney Regulation Counsel for the People of the State of Colorado, 2011 WL 1540433, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Apr 20, 2011) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 10-1296) 6890 Evans-Marshall v. Board of Educ. of the Tipp City Exempted Village School Dist., 2011 WL 1570829, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Apr 20, 2011) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 10-1305) 6891 Harrison Cent. Appraisal Dist. v. The Peoples Gas, 2011 WL 1110991, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Mar 23, 2011) Reply Brief for Petitioner (NO. 10-896) 6892 Zhang v. Inland Regional Center, 2011 WL 1523295, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Feb 15, 2011) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 10-1288) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6893 Benlolo v. French Medical Bd. of Physicians, 2011 WL 527364, *527364+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Feb 10, 2011) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 10-1021) 6894 State of Utah v. Ott, 2011 WL 1821805, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jan 12, 2011) Brief in Opposition to Certiorari (NO. 10-490) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 6895 Ryskamp v. C.I.R., 2011 WL 141218, *141218+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jan 05, 2011) Petition for Writ of Ceritorari (NO. 10-916) 6896 MacDonald v. Johnson, 2010 WL 5487505, *5487505+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Dec 23, 2010) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 10-852) 6897 Pineda-Moreno v. United States of America, 2010 WL 5149244, *5149244+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Dec 16, 2010) Brief of Amici Curiae, Information Society Project at Yale Law School Fellows Nabiha Syed, Albert Wong, David Thaw and Priscilla Smith in Support of the Petition (NO. 10-7515) 6898 Kuelbs v. Hill, 2010 WL 5545404, *5545404+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Dec 06, 2010) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 10-878) 6899 Shepherd Montessori Center Milan v. Ann Arbor Charter Township, 2010 WL 4314346, *4314346+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Oct 28, 2010) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 10-573) " 6900 Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v. eBay, Inc., 2010 WL 4163755, *4163755+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Oct 20, 2010) Brief of Amicus Curiae the International Trademark Association in Support of a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals (NO. 10-300) " 6901 Turner v. Rogers, 2010 WL 5855419, *5855419+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Sep 24, 2010) Respondents¨' Brief in Opposition (NO. 10-10) 6902 Neal v. United States of America, 2010 WL 3501244, *3501244+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Sep 07, 2010) Reply Brief for Petitioner (NO. 09-1414) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6903 A.F. v. State of Texas, 2010 WL 3054371, *3054371+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jul 28, 2010) Original Petition for a Writ of Certiorari with Appendix A (NO. 10-172) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 6904 Mattis v. State of New Jersey, 2010 WL 3337668, *3337668+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jun 23, 2010) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 10-260) 6905 DiLacqua v. United States of America, 2010 WL 2132041, *2132041+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. May 20, 2010) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 09-1429) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6906 Walker v. City of Waterbury, 2010 WL 2771703, *2771703+ (Appellate Petition, © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Motion and Filing) (U.S. Apr 02, 2010) Opposition to the Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 09-1053) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6907 Magdalin v. Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, 2010 WL 1049386, *1049386+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Mar 17, 2010) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 09-1136) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6908 Superior Highwall Miners, Inc. v. Frye, 2010 WL 673819, *673819+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Feb 19, 2010) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 09-1018) 6909 Frequent Flyer Depot, Inc. v. American Airlines, Inc., 2009 WL 5216081, *5216081+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Dec 30, 2009) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 09-815) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6910 Crawford v. TRW Automotive U.S. LLC, 2009 WL 4465242, *4465242+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Nov 27, 2009) Brief for Maurice & Jane Sugar Law Center for Economic & Social Justice and Interfaith Workers Justice as Amici Curiae Supporting Petitioners (NO. 09-494) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 6911 D'Jamoos v. Pilatus Aircraft, Ltd., 2009 WL 3444799, *3444799+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Oct 22, 2009) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 09-489) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6912 Harjo v. Pro-Football, Inc., 2009 WL 3375042, *3375042+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Oct 16, 2009) Brief of the Social Justice Advocacy Group as Amicus Curiae in Support of Petitioners (NO. 09-326) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 6913 Macerich Management Co. v. United Broth. of Carpenters, 2009 WL 3162183, *3162183+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Sep 25, 2009) Brief Amicus Curiae of Pacific Legal Foundation in Support of Petitioners (NO. 09-235) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 6914 Frankel v. United States of America, 2009 WL 3231651, *3231651 (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Sep 02, 2009) Reply Brief of the Petitioner (In Reply to the ""Brief for the United States,'' Filed With This Court by the Solicitor General of the United States) (NO. 08-10150) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6915 National Rifle Ass'n of America, Inc. v. City of Chicago, 2009 WL 2491800, *2491800+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Aug 14, 2009) Reply to Brief in Opposition (NO. 08-1497) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 6916 J.W. v. Knight, 2009 WL 2491812, *2491812+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Aug 12, 2009) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 09-191) 6917 National Rifle Ass'n of America, Inc. v. City of Chicago, 2009 WL 2419169, *2419169+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Aug 05, 2009) Brief for Respondents in Opposition (NO. 08-1497, 08-1521) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 6918 Christian Legal Soc. Chapter of University of California v. Martinez, 2009 WL 2009347, *2009347+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jul 08, 2009) Brief in Opposition for Hastings College of the Law Respondents (NO. © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 08-1371) 6919 National Rifle Ass'n of America, Inc. v. City of Chicago and Village of Aak Park, 2009 WL 1970181, *1970181+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jul 06, 2009) Amicus Curiae Brief of the American Civil Rights Union in Support of Petitioners (NO. 08-1497) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 6920 National Rifle Ass'n of America, Inc. v. City of Chicago and Village of Oak Park, 2009 WL 1763596, *1763596+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jun 18, 2009) Brief of Arms Keepers as Amicus Curiae in Support of Petitioners (NO. 08-1497, 08-1521) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 6921 McDonald v. City of Chicago, 2009 WL 1640363, *1640363+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jun 09, 2009) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 08-1521) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6922 National Rifle Ass'n of America, Inc. v. City of Chicago, 2009 WL 1556563, *1556563+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jun 03, 2009) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 08-1497) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6923 Pietrangelo v. Gates, 2009 WL 1245199, *1245199+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. May 06, 2009) Brief for the Cook Respondents (NO. 08-824) 6924 Pietrangelo, II v. Gates, 2009 WL 1265300, *1265300+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. May 06, 2009) Brief for the Federal Respondents in Opposition (NO. 08-824) 6925 Pietrangelo v. Gates, 2009 WL 208131, *208131+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jan 26, 2009) Brief for the Cook Respondents (NO. 08-824) 6926 Ristroph v. Pipeline Technology, VI, L.L.C., 2009 WL 180864, *180864+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jan 22, 2009) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 08-926) 6927 Borden v. School Dist. of the Tp. of East Brunswick, 2008 WL 5433363, *5433363+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Dec 29, 2008) Brief for the Respondents in Opposition (NO. 08-482) 6928 Pietrangelo, II v. Gates, 2008 WL 5451850, *5451850+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Dec 23, 2008) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 08-824) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6929 Fernandes v. United States of America, 2008 WL 4792485, *4792485+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Oct 29, 2008) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 08-581) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6930 NiSource Inc. v. Estate of Garrison G. Tawney, 2008 WL 3875295, *3875295+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Aug 20, 2008) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 08-219) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 6931 Wilson v. United States of America, 2008 WL 2155258, *2155258+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. May 21, 2008) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 07-1447) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 6932 Parker v. Hurley, 2008 WL 1923279, *1923279+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Apr 29, 2008) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 07-1368) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6933 Roman v. Roman, 2008 WL 437024, *437024+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Feb 13, 2008) Brief for Randy M. Roman in Opposition (NO. 07-926) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 6934 Pittman v. State of South Carolina, 2008 WL 320511, *320511+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Feb 01, 2008) Brief of Amici Curiae Penal Reform International, Defence for Children International, Columbia Law School Human Rights Clinic, Bluhm Legal Clinic and the World Organization for Human Rights USA in ... (NO. 07-8436) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 6935 In re Almejo, 2008 WL 194308, *194308+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jan 16, 2008) Petition for a Common Law Writ of Certiorari (NO. 07-955) 6936 Abigail Alliance for Better Access to Developmental Drugs v. Von Eschenbach, 2007 WL 4613634, *4613634+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Dec 21, 2007) Petitioners' Reply Brief (NO. 07-444) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 6937 Peters v. Village of Clifton, 2007 WL 4458905, *4458905+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Dec 17, 2007) Motion for Leave to File Brief Amici Curiae and Brief Amici Curiae for Elizabeth J. Neumont (and all Others Similarly Situated) in Support of Petitioner (NO. 07-635) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 6938 Abigail Alliance for Better Access to Developmental Drugs v. Eschenbach, 2007 WL 4458896, *4458896+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Dec 14, 2007) Brief for the Respondents in Opposition (NO. 07-444) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 6939 Abigail Alliance for Better Access to Developmental Drugs v. Eschenbach, 2007 WL 4377579, *4377579+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Dec 13, 2007) Brief Amicus Curiae of the Senior Citizens League in Support of Petitioners (NO. 07-444) 6940 Fitch v. Valentine, 2007 WL 4404238, *4404238+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Dec 12, 2007) Rebuttal in Support of Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 07-569) 6941 Fitch v. Valentine, 2007 WL 4231056, *4231056+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Nov 28, 2007) Brief in Opposition (NO. 07-569) " 6942 Peters v. Village of Clifton, 2007 WL 4103969, *4103969+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Nov 13, 2007) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 07-635) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 6943 Fitch v. Valentine, 2007 WL 3196730, *3196730+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Oct 24, 2007) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 07-569) " HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 6944 Abigail Alliance for Better Access to Developmental Drugs v. Von Eschenbach, 2007 WL 2846053, *2846053+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Sep © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 28, 2007) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 07-444) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 6945 Williams v. King, 2007 WL 2736273, *2736273+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Sep 19, 2007) Reply to Brief in Opposition (NO. 06-1501) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6946 Dave v. State of Texas, 2007 WL 2734409, *2734409+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Sep 17, 2007) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 07-374) " 6947 Rockstead v. City of Crystal Lake, Illinois, 2007 WL 2461587, *2461587+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Aug 24, 2007) Brief Amici Curiae for Elizabeth J. Neumont (and All Others Similarly Situated) in Support of Petitioners (NO. 06-1716) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 6948 Mann v. Boatright, 2007 WL 3085103, *3085103+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Aug 17, 2007) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 07-523) 6949 Williams v. King, 2007 WL 2274439, *2274439+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Aug 06, 2007) Brief for the Respondent in Opposition (NO. 06-1501) " 6950 McKenzie-Adams v. State of Connecticut, 2007 WL 2010146, *2010146+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jul 10, 2007) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 07-53) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6951 Davis v. Kohout, 2007 WL 1835542, *1835542+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jun 22, 2007) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 06-1707) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 6952 Williams v. King, 2007 WL 1768213, *1768213+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jun 14, 2007) Brief of Amici Curiae Free Speech Coalition and First Amendment Lawyers Association In Support of Petitioners (Filed with the Consent of All Parties) (NO. 06-1501) " 6953 Undseth v. Undseth, 2007 WL 1772129, *1772129+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jun 11, 2007) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 06-1678) " 6954 Landa v. United States of America, 2007 WL 4439469, *4439469+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. May 26, 2007) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 07-804) 6955 Banker v. United States of America, 2007 WL 1494691, *1494691+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. May 21, 2007) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 06-1544) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6956 Muhammad v. United States of America, 2007 WL 1455729, *1455729+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. May 18, 2007) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 06-1529) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6957 Williams v. King, 2007 WL 1434961, *1434961+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. May 14, 2007) Petition for Writ of Certiorari With Appendix (NO. 06-1501) " © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 6958 Stark v. The State of Texas, 2007 WL 1223769, *1223769+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Apr 23, 2007) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 06-1414) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6959 Jones v. Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community, 2007 WL 1257816, *1257816+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Apr 05, 2007) Petition for Rehearing (NO. 06-966) 6960 Smook v. Minnehaha County, 2007 WL 648300, *648300+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Feb 27, 2007) Motion of Juvenile Law Center for Leave to File an Amicus Curiae Brief in Support of Petition for a Writ of Certiorari and Brief of Juvenile Law Center in Support of Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 06-1034) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 6961 Knight v. State of Washington, 2007 WL 579741, *579741+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Feb 21, 2007) Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Suprem Court of Washington (NO. 06-1162) 6962 National Ass'n for the Advancement of Multijurisdiction Practice (NAAMJP) v. Gonzales, 2007 WL 496326, *496326+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Feb 13, 2007) Petition for Writ Certiorari (NO. 06-1133) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6963 Healy v. Spencer, 2007 WL 419290, *419290+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Feb 02, 2007) Brief of Amicus Curiae, Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders, in Support of Petitioner (NO. 06-8625) 6964 Holm v. State of Utah, 2007 WL 294593, *294593+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jan 29, 2007) Reply in Support of Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 06-535) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6965 Holm v. State of Utah, 2007 WL 119437, *119437+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jan 12, 2007) Brief in Opposition (NO. 06-535) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6966 Holm v. State of Utah, 2007 WL 119438, *119438+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jan 12, 2007) Brief of Amicus Curiae Family Research Council In Support of Respondent (NO. 06-535) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6967 Rose v. United States of America, 2006 WL 3507929, *3507929+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Dec 06, 2006) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 06-771) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6968 A.A. v. State of New Jersey, 2006 WL 3627019, *3627019+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Dec 05, 2006) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 06-793) 6969 Okwedy v. Molinari, 2006 WL 3336658, *3336658+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Nov 13, 2006) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 06-676) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 6970 Holm v. State of Utah, 2006 WL 2985282, *2985282+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Oct 13, 2006) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 06-535) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 6971 Montana Bd. of Inv. v. Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc., 2006 WL 2725960, *2725960+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Sep 20, 2006) Brief of the Commonwealth of Virginia, 41 Other States, and Puerto Rico as Amici Curiae in Support of the Petitioner (NO. 06-291) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 6972 Acosta v. State of Texas, 2006 WL 2593051, *2593051+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Sep 06, 2006) Petitioner's Reply Brief (NO. 05-1574) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 6973 Jacob v. State of Louisiana, 2006 WL 2593058, *2593058+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Sep 06, 2006) Opposition to Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 06-198) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 6974 Acosta v. The State of Texas, 2006 WL 2384649, *2384649+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Aug 15, 2006) Brief in Opposition (NO. 05-1574) " 6975 LeClerc v. Webb, 2006 WL 2285760, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Aug 04, 2006) Motion of Amicus Curiae the Innocence Network for Leave to File Brief Amicus Curiae in Support of Petitioners and Brief Amicus Curiae (NO. 06-11) 6976 Jacob v. State of Louisiana, 2006 WL 2285773, *2285773+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Aug 03, 2006) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 06-198) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6977 Evans v. City of Berkeley, 2006 WL 1909675, *1909675+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jul 07, 2006) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 06-40) " 6978 Angelos v. United States of America, 2006 WL 1876565, *1876565+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jul 03, 2006) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 06-26) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 6979 Citizens for Health v. Leavitt, 2006 WL 1674310, *1674310+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jun 14, 2006) Brief of Amici Curiae Consumer Attorneys of California, Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights, Congress of California Seniors, California Consumer Federation, and Health Administration ... (NO. 05-1311) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6980 Coil v. United States of America, 2006 WL 3916519, *3916519+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jun 12, 2006) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 06-980) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6981 Acosta v. State of Texas, 2006 WL 1594037, *1594037+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jun 07, 2006) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 05-1574) " HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 6982 In Re: Doe, 2006 WL 1516943, *1516943+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jun 01, 2006) Petition for Writ of Certiorari Redacted Version¨ (NO. 05-1526) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 6983 Huffman v. The People of the State of Michigan, 2006 WL 1327221, *1327221+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. May 12, 2006) Petition for Writ of © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Certiorari (NO. 05-1449) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6984 Extreme Associates, Inc. v. United States of America, 2006 WL 1267582, *1267582+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. May 05, 2006) Brief of Amici Curiae First Amendment Lawyers Association Free Speech Coalition and Association of Club Executives In Support of Petitioners (Filed with the Consent of All Parties) (NO. 05-1306) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6985 Weiner v. United States of America, 2006 WL 1139458, *1139458+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Apr 26, 2006) Brief for the United States in Opposition (NO. 05-884) 6986 Stearman v. C.I.R., 2006 WL 1138994, *1138994+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Apr 10, 2006) Original Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 05-1364) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6987 O'Connor v. C.I.R, 2006 WL 1440816, *1440816+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Apr 06, 2006) Original Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 05-1487) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6988 du Pont v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 2006 WL 598176, *598176+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Mar 09, 2006) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 05-1150) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 6989 Walter v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline, 2006 WL 776786, *776786+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Mar 02, 2006) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 05-1241) 6990 Herring v. Richmond Medical Center for Women, 2006 WL 406136, *406136 (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Feb 21, 2006) Reply Brief in Support of the Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 05-730) 6991 Roman Catholic Archbishop of Los Angeles v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County, 2006 WL 323245, *323245+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Feb 02, 2006) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 05-1017) 6992 Seven Up Pete Venture v. The State of Montana, 2006 WL 62027, *62027+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jan 09, 2006) Amicus Curiae Brief of Mountain States Legal Foundation in Support of Petitioners (NO. 05-588) " HN: 3,4 (S.Ct.) 6993 Schneider v. Kissinger, 2005 WL 3351257, *3351257+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Dec 08, 2005) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 05-743) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6994 Crousser v. United States of America, 2005 WL 3295172, *3295172+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Dec 02, 2005) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 05-719) HN: 3,5 (S.Ct.) 6995 Tello v. C.I.R., 2005 WL 2646368, *2646368+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Oct 08, 2005) Original Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 05-486) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 6996 Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. Cardegna, 2005 WL 2477361, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Sep 23, 2005) Brief of Florida, Alaska, © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, ... (NO. 04-1264) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 6997 Lommen v. McIntyre, 2005 WL 1630464, *1630464+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jun 08, 2005) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 05-65) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 6998 Strother v. United States of America, 2005 WL 1333355, *1333355+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jun 03, 2005) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 04-1622) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 6999 Gillette v. Stucki, 2005 WL 1199077, *1199077+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. May 17, 2005) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 04-1550) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7000 Clancy v. A.T.&T. Corp., 2005 WL 1113628, *1113628 (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. May 05, 2005) Petitioner's Reply Memorandum (NO. 04-1205) 7001 Clancy v. A.T.& T. Corp., 2005 WL 879499, *879499+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Apr 11, 2005) Brief in Opposition (NO. 04-1205) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 7002 Moses v. United States of America, 2005 WL 643388, *643388+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Mar 17, 2005) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 04-1254) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 7003 Tolbert v. The Estate of Anna Jane Key, 2005 WL 607354, *607354+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Mar 11, 2005) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 04-1235) 7004 Lal v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 2005 WL 1190435, *1190435+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Mar 05, 2005) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 04-1522) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7005 Stirewalt v. The United States of America, 2005 WL 330767, *330767+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Feb 09, 2005) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 04-1083) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 7006 1690 COBB L.L.C. v. City of Marietta, 2005 WL 539736, *539736+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Feb 04, 2005) Petition for Rehearing Pursuant to Rule 44.2 (NO. 04-640) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 7007 Williams v. Attorney General of Alabama, 2005 WL 154044, *154044+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jan 20, 2005) Brief for the Respondent in Opposition (NO. 04-849) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 7008 McCreary County, Kentucky v. American Civil Liberties, 2005 WL 68040, *68040+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jan 07, 2005) Brief of Amici Curiae Atheist Law Center et al., in Support of Respondent (NO. 03-1693) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 7009 1690 Cobb L.L.C. v. The City of Marietta, 2005 WL 39889, *39889+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jan 03, 2005) Reply to Brief in Opposition © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. (NO. 04-640) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 7010 Davis v. United States of America, 2004 WL 2932918, *2932918+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Dec 17, 2004) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 04-817) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 7011 Lofton v. Secretary of the Florida Dept. of Children a, 2004 WL 2961072, *2961072+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Dec 17, 2004) Reply to Brief in Opposition (NO. 04-478) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7012 Williams v. Attorney General of Alabama, 2004 WL 2967838, *2967838+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Dec 17, 2004) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 04-849) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 7013 1690 Cobb L.L.C. d/b/a Waterpipe World v. The City of, 2004 WL 2912779, *2912779+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Dec 10, 2004) Brief in Opposition (NO. 04-640) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 7014 Lofton v. Secretary, Florida Dept. of Children and Fam, 2004 WL 2851226, *2851226+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Dec 08, 2004) Respondents' Brief in Opposition (NO. 04-478) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 7015 Powers v. Harris, 2004 WL 2702947, *2702947+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Nov 22, 2004) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 04-716) HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 7016 1690 Cobb L.L.C. v. The City of Marietta, 2004 WL 2569704, *2569704+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Nov 09, 2004) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 04-640) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 7017 Lofton v. Secretary of the Florida Dept. of Children a, 2004 WL 2289198, *2289198+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Oct 01, 2004) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 04-478) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 7018 Brager v. Brager, 2004 WL 2097425, *2097425+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Sep 15, 2004) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 04-377) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 7019 Kelo v. City of New London, 2004 WL 1950427, *1950427+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Aug 30, 2004) Reply Brief for Petitioners (NO. 04-108) 7020 Doe v. Tandeske, 2004 WL 1950682, *1950682+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Aug 26, 2004) Brief for the Respondents in Opposition (NO. 03-1652) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 7021 Beaumont v. Castator, 2004 WL 1950695, *1950695+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Aug 26, 2004) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 04-271) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7022 Roper v. Simmons, 2004 WL 1619203, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jul 12, 2004) Brief of Amici Curiae the European Union and Members of the International Community in Support of Respondent (NO. 03-633) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7023 Akers v. McGinnis, 2004 WL 1535851, *1535851+ (Appellate Petition, Motion © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. and Filing) (U.S. Jul 02, 2004) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 04-28) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7024 Doe v. Tandeske, 2004 WL 1347286, *1347286+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jun 10, 2004) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 03-1652) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 7025 John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, et al, Petitioners, v. Angel McClary RAICH, et al., Respondents., 2004 WL 1329967, *1329967+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jun 07, 2004) Respondents' Brief in Opposition (NO. 03-1454) " HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.) 7026 Peter D. BARNA, Petitioner, v. Angela C. BARNA, Respondent., 2004 WL 1243144, *1243144+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. May 28, 2004) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 03-1626) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7027 THE RECTOR AND VISITORS OF GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY, Petitioner, v. Amy SHEPARD and United States of America, Respondents., 2004 WL 1203078, *1203078+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. May 26, 2004) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 03-1598) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 7028 CHRIST CENTER, Christian Covenant Outreach Church, His Word Ministries to All Nations, Christian Bible Church, Monte De Sion (Mount Zion) Church, and Civil Liberties for Urban Believers, Petitioners, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, Respondent., 2004 WL 745687, *745687 (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Apr 02, 2004) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 03-1397) 7029 Bruce J. GERMAN, Petitioner, v. THERM-O-DISC, INC., and Old Republic Insurance Company, Respondent., 2004 WL 632804, *632804+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Mar 23, 2004) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari with Appendix (NO. 03-1364) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 7030 MOUNTAIN ENTERPRISES, INC., Petitioner, v. Daniel R. FITCH and Gregory Adam Plumley, Co-Administrators of the Estates of Tyler Fitch and Harley Fitch, Deceased, Daniel R. Fitch, Individually, Jerry Galloway, Individually and d/b/a Galloway's Trucking, and Billy D. Kirk, Respondents., 2004 WL 367611, *367611+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Feb 26, 2004) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 03-1223) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 7031 NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA, Petitioner, v. TERRA INDUSTRIES, INC. and Terra Nitrogen (UK) Limited, Respondents., 2004 WL 304350, *304350+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Feb 11, 2004) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 03-1157) " HN: 3,4 (S.Ct.) 7032 BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA and Connecticut Rivers Council, Boy Scouts of America, Petitioners, v. Nancy WYMAN, et al., Respondents., 2004 WL 267769, *267769+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Feb 05, 2004) Brief of Agudath Israel of America as Amicus Curiae in Support of the Petition (NO. 03-956) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7033 Jimmy Doug SHELTON, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent., 2004 WL 206197, *206197+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Filing) (U.S. Jan 28, 2004) Motion of the Louisiana Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers for Leave to File Brief Amicus Curiae in Support of Petitioner and Brief Amicus Curiae (NO. 03-781) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7034 Edward Brian CAPETILLO, Petitioner, v. Doug DRETKE, Director Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Respondent., 2004 WL 210661, *210661+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jan 28, 2004) Brief of Amici Curiae President James Earl Carter, Jr., President Mikhail Sergeyevich Gorbachev, President Oscar Arias Sanchez, President Lech Walesa, Adolfo Perez Esquivel, The Dalai Lama, Mairead ... (NO. 03-8067) 7035 Anzel Keon JONES, Petitioner, v. Doug DRETKE, Director Texas Department Of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Respondent., 2004 WL 114462, *114462+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jan 20, 2004) Brief of Amici Curiae President James Earl Carter, Jr., President Mikhail Sergeyevich Gorbachev, President Oscar Arias Sanchez, President Lech Walesa, Adolfo Perez Esquivel, the Dalai Lama, Mairead ... (NO. 03-7999) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7036 James GALDIKAS, et al., Petitioners, v. Stuart I. FAGAN, et al., Respondents., 2003 WL 23119171, *23119171+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Dec 22, 2003) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 03-926) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7037 CIGNA HEALTHCARE OF CALIFORNIA, INC., Petitioner, v. Muzeyyen BALABAN-ZILKE, Ph.D., Individually and as Successor-in-Interest to Brad Zilke, Respondent., 2003 WL 22970612, *22970612+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Dec 11, 2003) Respondents Brief in Opposition (NO. 03-709) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7038 Cedric JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. George M. DALEY, Respondent, United States of America, Intervenor-Respondent., 2003 WL 22812422, *22812422+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Nov 17, 2003) Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 03-732) 7039 In the Interest of A.B., A Child. Norean Hoots, L.S.W., of Cass County Social Services, and Monty Mertz, Guardian ad Litem, on behalf of A.B., Petitioners, v. K.B., F.B., AND TURTLE MOUNTAIN BAND OF CHIPPEWA, Respondents., 2003 WL 22873069, *22873069+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Nov 17, 2003) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 03-784) " HN: 1,4 (S.Ct.) 7040 Arboleda A. ORTIZ, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent., 2003 WL 22429181, *22429181+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Oct 10, 2003) Brief of Amicus Curiae of the Governments of Colombia, Argentina, Chile, Mexico, and Paraguay in Support of Petitioner (NO. 02-11188) 7041 German SINISTERRA, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent., 2003 WL 22429258, *22429258+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Filing) (U.S. Oct 10, 2003) Brief of Amicus Curiae of the Governments of Colombia, Argentina, Chile, Mexico, and Paraguay in Support of Petitioner (NO. 03-5286) 7042 William YEE, Petitioner, v. SHIAWASSEE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, Respondent. William R. Yee, Petitioner, v. George Braidwood, II, (Jr.), et al, Respondents. William Yee, Petitioner, v. Donald G. Cummings, et al, Respondents. In the Matter of: Determination of a Lake Level for the Waters of Bambi Lake, Bennington Township, Shiawassee County, Michigan, William Yee, Petitioner, and Shiawassee County Board of Commissioners, et al, Respondents., 2003 WL 22490617, *22490617+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Oct 07, 2003) Respondents Cummings, Fayling & Call, et al Response in Opposition to Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 03-352) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 7043 Fawzi Khalid Abdullah Fahad AL ODAH, et al., Petitioners, Shafiq Rasul, et al., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES, et al., Respondents, George W. Bush, et al., Respondents., 2003 WL 22490568, *22490568+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Oct 03, 2003) Brief Amicus Curiae of the Human Rights Institute of the International Bar Association in Support of Petitioners (NO. 03-334, 03-343) " 7044 Yaser Esam HAMDI; Esam Fouad Hamdi, as next friend of Yaser Esam Hamdi, Petitioners, v. Donald RUMSFELD; W. R. Paulette, Commander, Respondents., 2003 WL 23170355, *23170355+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Oct 01, 2003) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 03-6696) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.) 7045 Tommy D. JARRELL, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent., 2003 WL 22429230, *22429230+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Sep 04, 2003) Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 03-527) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7046 Franklin KOTTSCHADE, Petitioner, v. CITY OF ROCHESTER, Respondent., 2003 WL 22428338, *22428338+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Aug 25, 2003) Brief for the Respondent in Opposition (NO. 02-1848) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 7047 Fred RIGGS, Donna Singer, and Al Dickson, Petitioners, v. SAN JUAN COUNTY, San Juan Health Services District, County Commissioner J. Tyron Lewis, County Commissioner Lyn Stevens (official capacity only), County Commissioner Manual Morgan (official capacity only), Rick Bailey, County Attorney Craig Halls, Reid Wood, Karen Adams, Roger Atcitty, Patsy Shumway (official capacity only), John Lewis, Lauren Schafer, Truck Insurance Exchange and Attorney Dennis Ickes,, 2003 WL 22428218, *22428218+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Aug 24, 2003) Health District Respondents' Supplemental Brief in Response to Petitioners' Supplemental Authority Brief (NO. 02-1774) 7048 E. Joseph FACE, Jr., in his official capacity as Commissioner of Financial © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Institutions, Bureau of Financial Institutions, Virginia State Corporation Commission, and Susan E. Hancock, in her official capacity as Deputy Commissioner, Consumer Finance, Bureau of Financial Institutions, Virginia State Corporation Commission, Petitioners, v. NATIONAL HOME EQUITY MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, Respondent., 2003 WL 22428279, *22428279+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Aug 15, 2003) Reply Brief of Petitioners (NO. 02-1810) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 7049 Sean SILVEIRA, et als., Petitioner, v. Bill LOCKYER, Attorney General, and Gray Davis, Governor, State of California, Respondents., 2003 WL 22428484, *22428484+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (U.S. Jul 30, 2003) Amicus Brief in Support of Petitioners' Petition for a Writ of Certiorari (NO. 03-51) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7050 Jing, Xiua LONG a.k.a. Jiang, Xiao Long, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Attorney General Michael B. Mukasey, Respondent., 2009 WL 6027858, *6027858+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (2nd Cir. Aug 09, 2009) Petitioner's Brief and Special Appendix (NO. 03-41047) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7051 LIAN, Yin Ting Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Respondent., 2009 WL 8242598, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (2nd Cir. Feb 23, 2009) Petitioner's Brief and Special Appendix (NO. 06-3913) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7052 NI, Yun, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Attorney General Mark Filip, Respondent., 2009 WL 8156913, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (2nd Cir. Feb 02, 2009) Petitioner's Brief and Special Appendix (NO. 08-4495) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7053 LIN, Lan Fang, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Attorney General Michael B. Mukasey, Respondent., 2009 WL 5776139, *5776139+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (2nd Cir. Jan 05, 2009) Petitioner's Brief and Special Appendix (NO. 04-2536) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7054 CHEN, Ai Yun, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Attorney General Michael B. Mukasey, Respondent., 2008 WL 8113578, *8113578 (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (2nd Cir. Nov 13, 2008) Petition for Panel Rehearing & Appendix (NO. 03-40321) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7055 PAN, Gui Wei, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Attorney General Michael B. Mukasey, Respondent., 2008 WL 7080051, *7080051+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (2nd Cir. Nov 05, 2008) Petitioner's Brief and Special Appendix (NO. 08-1328) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7056 YE, Yi Yan, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Attorney General Michael B. Mukasey, Respondent., 2008 WL 8118711, *8118711+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (2nd Cir. Oct 20, 2008) Petitioner's Brief and Special Appendix (NO. 08-1329) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7057 Jiao Fang CHEN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Attorney General Michael B. Mukasey, Respondent., 2008 WL © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 6824889, *6824889 (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (2nd Cir. Sep 29, 2008) Petition for Panel Rehearing/Rehearing En Banc & Appendices (NO. 06-0004) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7058 Jiao Fang CHEN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Attorney General Michael B. Mukasey, Respondent., 2008 WL 6934367, *6934367 (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (2nd Cir. Sep 29, 2008) Petition for En Banc Rehearing (NO. 06-0004) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7059 Peter Conrad ALI, Petitioner, v. Alberto GONZALES, Attorney General of the United States, Respondent., 2007 WL 7070520, *7070520+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (2nd Cir. Feb 09, 2007) Reply Brief of Petitioner (NO. 06-1469-AG) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 7060 Liang Xiu CHEN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Attorney General Alberto Gonzalez, Respondent., 2006 WL 4674000, *4674000+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (2nd Cir. Sep 22, 2006) Petitioner's Brief & Special Appendix (NO. 05-6407-AG) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7061 Jian Xian WANG, Petitioner, v. Alberto GONZALES, United States Attorney General, Respondent., 2006 WL 4794099, *4794099+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (2nd Cir. Sep 08, 2006) Brief for Petitioner and Special Appendix (NO. 04-5657-AG) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7062 Marseno A. MARTINS, Petitioner, v. Alberto GONZALES Attorney General, Respondent., 2006 WL 6105733, *6105733+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (2nd Cir. May 26, 2006) Brief for Petitioner Marseno A. Martins (NO. 05-6756) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7063 Yu Chun CHEN, Petitioner, v. Alberto GONZALES, United States Attorney General, Respondent., 2006 WL 3929938, *3929938+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (2nd Cir. Feb 09, 2006) Brief for Petitioner and Special Appendix (NO. 05-0807-AG) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7064 Min Xiong LI, Petitioner, v. Alberto GONZALES, United States Attorney General, Respondent., 2005 WL 5117550, *5117550+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (2nd Cir. Sep 30, 2005) Brief for Petitioner and Special Appendix (NO. 05-0805-AG) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7065 Heru SEWIDJAJA (A 79 513 390), Petitioner, v. Alberto GONZALES, United States Attorney General, Respondent., 2006 WL 5487019, *5487019+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (3rd Cir. Mar 28, 2006) Petitioner's Reply Brief (NO. 05-4557) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7066 Jessica Jeannette SAMAYOA-SOSA, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General of the United States, Respondent., 2004 WL 4996638, *4996638+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (3rd Cir. Jun 28, 2004) Brief and Appendix on behalf of Petitioner (NO. 03-1699, 03-4552) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7067 Rodrigo Vargas SANCHEZ, also known as Rodrigo Vargas, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., U.S. Attorney General, Respondent., 2011 WL 9752643, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (5th Cir. Oct 25, 2011) Petitioner's © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Opening Brief (NO. 11-60540) 7068 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Farooq Ahmed-Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER Jr., U S Attorney General - Respondent., 2009 WL 6697971, *6697971+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (5th Cir. Aug 07, 2009) Petitioner's Brief in Support of Petition for Review (NO. 09-60376) 7069 Oren ADAR, Individually and as Parent and Next Friend of J.C.A.-S. a minor; Mickey Ray Smith, Individually and as Parent and Next Friend of J.C.A.-S. a minor, Plaintiffs -- Appellees, v. Darlene W. SMITH, In Her Capacity as State Registrar and Director, Office of Vital Records and Statistics, State of Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals, Defendant -- Appellant., 2009 WL 6027998, *6027998+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (5th Cir. Jul 10, 2009) Reply Brief of Appellant State Registrar Darlene W. Smith (NO. 09-30036) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7070 Oren ADAR, Individually and as Parent and Next Friend of J.C.A.-S., a Minor; and Mickey Ray Smith, Individually and as Parent and Next Friend of J.C.A.-S., a Minor, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Darlene W. SMITH, in Her Capacity as State Registrar and Director, Office of Vital Records and Statistics, State of Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals, Defendant-Appellant., 2009 WL 6027997, *6027997+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (5th Cir. Jul 07, 2009) Brief of Amici Curiae American Civil Liberties Union and American Civil Liberties Union of Louisiana in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellees Oren Adar and Mickey Ray Smith and in Support of Affirmance (NO. 09-30036) " 7071 Oren ADAR, Individually and as Parent and Next Friend of J.C.A.-S., a minor; Mickey Ray Smith, Individually and as Parent and Next Friend of J.C.A.-S., a minor, Plaintiffs -- Appellees, v. Darlene W. SMITH, In her Capacity as State Registrar and Director, Office of Vital Records and Statistics, State of Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals, Defendant -- Appellant., 2009 WL 6027996, *6027996+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (5th Cir. Jun 24, 2009) Brief of Appellees Oren Adar and Mickey Ray Smith (NO. 09-30036) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7072 William S. SOLESBEE, Appellant, v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee., 2004 WL 2805891, *2805891+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (5th Cir. Jun 28, 2004) Petition for Rehearing En Banc (NO. 02-10829) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7073 MARVIN PAREDES (A XX-XXX-XXX), Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent., 2008 WL 3978145, *3978145 (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (9th Cir. Jun 17, 2008) Petitioner's Opening Brief (NO. 06-74782) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7074 Victor Hugo MARTINEZ-JARAMILLO, Petitioner, v. Alberto GONZALES, Respondent., 2007 WL 2891672, *2891672+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (9th Cir. Jul 13, 2007) Replacement Reply Brief of Petitioner (NO. 05-73975) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7075 Juan Ramirez JUAREZ, et al. (A 95 448 651/652), Petitioner, v. Alberto © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent., 2007 WL 1536977, *1536977+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (9th Cir. Apr 17, 2007) Petitioners Opening Brief (NO. 06-72525) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7076 Kaizad NAJMI, Agency No. A71-605-139, Petitioner, v. Alberto GONZALES, United States Attorney General, Respondent., 2006 WL 2951682, *2951682+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (9th Cir. Jul 03, 2006) Brief for Petitioner (NO. 05-70337) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7077 Kaizad NAJMI, Agency No. A71-605-139, Petitioner, v. Alberto GONZALES, United States Attorney General, Respondent., 2006 WL 3085976, *3085976+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (9th Cir. Jul 03, 2006) Brief for Petitioner (NO. 05-70337) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7078 Premachandra W. WEDIWELA Mudiyanselage, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent., 2006 WL 2967168, *2967168+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (9th Cir. Mar 06, 2006) Petitioner's Opening Brief (NO. 05-75166) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 7079 Javier Romero FEBRONIO, Petitioner, v. Alberto GONZALES, U.S. Attorney General, Respondent., 2006 WL 5022059, *5022059+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (9th Cir. Mar 01, 2006) Reply Brief of Amicus Curiae (NO. 05-73044) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7080 Christopher Kiankok YEOH, Petitioner, v. Alberto GONZALES, U.S. Attorney General, Respondent., 2005 WL 3126421, *3126421+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (9th Cir. Sep 09, 2005) Petitioner's Reply Brief (NO. 04-74613) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 7081 Saul Gregorio MARTINEZ, Petitioner, v. Alberto GONZALEZ, US Attorney General, Respondent., 2005 WL 3508587, *3508587+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (9th Cir. Aug 01, 2005) Petitioner's Opening Brief (NO. 04-72975) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7082 Alberto Rene QUINTERO-SALAZAR, Petitioner, v. Alberto GONZALES, Attorney General of the United States, Respondent., 2005 WL 2570843, *2570843+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (9th Cir. May 18, 2005) Reply Brief for Petitioner (NO. 04-73128) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7083 Christopher Klankok YEOH, Petitioner, v. Alberto GONZALES, U.S. Attorney General, Respondent., 2005 WL 1791861, *1791861 (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (9th Cir. May 10, 2005) Petitioner's Opening Brief (NO. 04-74613) 7084 Dallas E. BUTLER, Tom Gamble, Jeannie C. De Lamos, Paul Turner III, Alan J. De Sa, Arthur B. Ward, Woodrow M. Hassinger, Rudy Mack, Sr, Joe R. McCabe, Philip B. Nash, Michael L. Oksner, and William M. Siegel, Petitioners, v. Marion C. BLAKEY, Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration, and Norman Y. Mtneta, Secretary, U.S. Department of Transportation, Respondents., 2004 WL 5846612, *5846612+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (D.C.Cir. Jun 14, 2004) Final Brief for Petitioners-Appellants (NO. 03-1386) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 7085 1568 MONTGOMERY HIHHWAY, INC., v. CITY OF HOOVER, ALABAMA., © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 2009 WL 4273149, *4273149+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Ala. Sep 25, 2009) Appellant's Application for Rehearing and Brief in Support of Application for Rehearing (NO. 1070531) 7086 Ex Parte Kathy SCHWOCK. Re: Joyce Morgan, as Executrix of the Estate of James C. Morgan, Deceased, Plaintiff, v. Medical Center Enterprise, et als., Defendants., 2006 WL 6310168, *6310168+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Ala. Jan 23, 2006) Petition for Writ of Mandamus (NO. 1050514) 7087 STATE OF ARIZONA, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Edward Harold SCHAD, Defendant-Petitioner., 2013 WL 1140151, *1 (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Ariz. Feb 22, 2013) The State of Arizona's Opposition to the Petition for Review and the Motion to Recall the Mandate (NO. CR-13-0058-PC) 7088 STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent, v. Edward H. SCHAD, Petitioner., 2013 WL 1140150, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Ariz. Feb 17, 2013) Petition for Review, or in the Alternative, Motion to Recall the Mandate (NO. CR13-0058-PR) 7089 DC, Petitioner, v. Hon. Boyd T. JOHNSON, Judge of the Superior Court of the State of Arizona, in and for the County of Pinal, Respondent, THE STATE OF ARIZONA, Real Party in Interest., 2009 WL 2335064, *2335064 (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Ariz. May 20, 2009) Response to Petition for Review of a Special Action Decision of the Court of Appeals (NO. 2-CA-SA2009-0016, CV-09-0114-PR) 7090 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Daniel Ruben MCEVOY, Defendant and Appellant., 2013 WL 3166386, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Cal. May 28, 2013) Petition for Review (NO. S210988) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 7091 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Michael DELEON, Defendants and Appellant., 2013 WL 1899025, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Cal. Apr 05, 2013) Petition for Review (NO. S209696) 7092 Adil HIRAMANEK, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent. Roda HIRAMANEK, Kamal Hiramanek, Minor Children, Real Party in Interest., 2013 WL 1411166, *1 (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Cal. Mar 05, 2013) Petition for Review (NO. S208587) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 7093 BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, County of Santa Barbara, Respondent. John ROE 1, et al., Real Parties in Interest., 2012 WL 7159764, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Cal. Dec 31, 2012) Reply in Support of Petition for Review (NO. S207521) 7094 In re the Marriage of Barth Jeffrey BARTH, Appellant, v. Andrea BARTH, Respondent, Orange Co. Dept. of Child Support Services, Intervenor., 2012 WL 6826901, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Cal. Dec 04, 2012) Petition for Review (NO. S207050) 7095 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Ross WOLLSCHLAGER, Defendant and Appellant., 2012 WL 4006360, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Cal. Aug 07, 2012) Petition for Review (NO. S204511) 7096 In re J.S., a Minor. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. J.S., Defendant and Appellant., 2012 WL 2926785, *1 (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Cal. Jun 22, 2012) Petition for Review (NO. S203272) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7097 In re Gary Wayne STUCKEY, Petitioner, on Habeas Corpus., 2012 WL 2914050, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Cal. Jun 18, 2012) Petition for Review (NO. S203364) 7098 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Dale Wayne RODDY, Defendant and Appellant., 2012 WL 1947016, *1 (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Cal. Apr 30, 2012) Petition for Review (NO. S201923) 7099 THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. SEAN MONTEL SHELTON LEWIS, Defendant and Appellant., 2012 WL 725994, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Cal. Feb 10, 2012) Petition for Review (NO. S200034) 7100 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Timothy Michael GROUX, Defendant and Appellant., 2011 WL 3728597, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Cal. Aug 03, 2011) Petition for Review (NO. S195338) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 7101 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Virgil Anthony MILLON, Defendant and Appellant., 2011 WL 3560049, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Cal. Jul 19, 2011) Petition for Review of Decision of the Court of Appeal Fourth Appellate District, Division Two (NO. S194399) 7102 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Sean Ali GRANT, Defendant and Petitioner., 2011 WL 2710348, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Cal. Jun 14, 2011) Petition for Review (NO. S193992) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7103 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Nathaniel LEWIS, Defendant and Appellant., 2011 WL 2551278, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Cal. Jun 01, 2011) Petition for Review after the Unpublished Decision of the Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Eight, Affirming the Judgment of Conviction with Directions (NO. S193326) 7104 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Rick Charles DELACY, Defendant and Petitioner., 2011 WL 1574111, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Cal. Mar 29, 2011) Petition for Review by Appellant Rick Charles Delacy Following the Published Decision by the First Appellate District, Division One Affirming the Judgment (NO. S191745) 7105 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Michael PADILLA, Petitioner and Appellant., 2011 WL 1574068, *1 (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Cal. Mar 04, 2011) Petition for Review (NO. S191116) 7106 Krista CLEM-O'SULLIVAN and her Minor Children, Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, County of Amador, Respondent, Kenneth John Zimmerman, Real Party in Interest., 2010 WL 2691523, *2691523+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Cal. Jun 03, 2010) Verified Petition for Review of Summary Denial of a Peremptory Writ of Mandamus by the Third District Court of Appeal, Memorandum of Points & Authorities in Support Thereof (NO. S183176) 7107 John TZ DOE, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, County of San Joaquin, Respondent, Does 1, 2, 3 and 4, Real Parties In Interest., 2010 WL 2650134, *2650134+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Cal. May 20, 2010) Petition for Review (NO. S182817) 7108 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Richard ZWIERCAN Jr., Defendant and Appellant/Petitioner., 2009 WL 5538582, *5538582 (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Cal. Dec 11, 2009) Petition for Review (NO. S178608) 7109 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. David Reid CAVALLARO, Defendant and Petitioner., 2009 WL 4864584, *4864584+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Cal. Nov 16, 2009) Petition for Review (NO. S177969) 7110 In re N.G., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. People of the State of California, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. N.G., Defendant and Appellant., 2009 WL 3660309, *3660309+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Cal. Sep 29, 2009) Petition for Review (NO. S176694) 7111 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Alex TOBIAS, Defendant and Appellant., 2009 WL 1701746, *1701746+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Cal. May 13, 2009) Petition for Review (NO. S172895) 7112 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Keith NEWELL, Defendant and Appellant., 2009 WL 1242522, *1242522+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Cal. Apr 06, 2009) Appellant's Petition for Review (NO. S171794) 7113 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Richard William HAMLIN, Defendant and Appellant., 2009 WL 1043138, *1043138+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Cal. Mar 26, 2009) Petition for Review (NO. S171464) 7114 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Rocky PULIZZI, Defendants and Appellants., 2009 WL 1242486, *1242486+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Cal. Mar 23, 2009) Petition for Review of the Unpublished Decision of the Court of Appeal, Sixth Appellate District Affirming Indeterminate Commintment Under Welfare and Institutions © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Code Section 6600 (NO. S171395) 7115 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and respondent, v. Raymond MARSH, Defendant and appellant., 2009 WL 976163, *976163+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Cal. Mar 23, 2009) Petition for Review (NO. S171344) 7116 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and respondent, v. David INSELMAN, Defendant and appellant., 2009 WL 934700, *934700+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Cal. Feb 13, 2009) Petition for Review (NO. S170511) 7117 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Michael T. CHEEK, Respondent and Cross-Appellant., 2009 WL 684097, *684097+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Cal. Jan 21, 2009) Petition for Review of the Unpublished Decision of the Court of Appeal, Sixth Appellate District Reversing A Two-Year Order of Commitment under Welfare and Institutions Code Section 6600 and ... (NO. S169754) 7118 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Warren Claudias LEMONS, Defendant and Petitioner., 2008 WL 5148800, *5148800+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Cal. Nov 03, 2008) Petition for Review After the Published Decision of the Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division One, Affirming the Judgment of Conviction (NO. S168050) 7119 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent, v. Mario Antonio BAUTISTA, Petitioner/Appellant., 2008 WL 3994912, *3994912+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Cal. Jul 16, 2008) Petition for Review (NO. S165133) 7120 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and respondent, v. Kevin Lee BARRIOS, Defendant and appellant., 2008 WL 3993533, *3993533+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Cal. Jul 03, 2008) Appellant's Petition for Review (NO. S164857) 7121 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff, and Respondent, v. Michael Arubo GARZA, Defendant and Appellant., 2008 WL 1868542, *1868542+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Cal. Feb 28, 2008) Appellant's Petition for Review of an Unpublished Decision of the Court of Appeal (NO. S161404) 7122 David INSELMAN, Petitioner, v. APPELLATE DIVISION OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Respondent, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Real party in interest., 2008 WL 1746003, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Cal. Jan 22, 2008) Petition for Review (NO. S160191) 7123 In re Jason Allen HEMMES, On Habeas Corpus., 2008 WL 715559, *715559+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Cal. Jan 04, 2008) Petition for Review (NO. S159622) 7124 In Re Marriage CASES., 2007 WL 4668726, *4668726 (Appellate Petition, © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Motion and Filing) (Cal. Oct 04, 2007) Application to File Brief of Amicus Curiae California Naacp; Brief of Amicus Curiae California Naacp in Support of Parties Challenging the Marriage Exclusion (NO. A110449, A110450, A110451, A110463, A110651, A110652, S147999) 7125 In re CLAIRE W., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. People of the State of California, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Claire W., Defendant and Appellant., 2007 WL 2777300, *2777300+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Cal. Aug 24, 2007) Petition for Review (NO. S155673) 7126 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Gerry Glenn SCOTT, Defendant and Appellant., 2007 WL 1349173, *1349173+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Cal. Mar 21, 2007) Petition for Review (NO. S150994) 7127 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondents, v. Jessica Louise SIMMERSON, Defendant and Appellant., 2007 WL 1348996, *1348996+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Cal. Mar 20, 2007) Petition for Review (NO. S150728) 7128 In re MARRIAGE CASES., 2006 WL 3887033, *3887033+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Cal. Dec 04, 2006) Answer to Petitions for Review (NO. S147999) 7129 In re Marriage CASES Judicial Council Coordination Proceeding No. 4365 No. A 110450. Robin Tyler, et al., Petitioners and Respondents, v. The State of California, et al., Respondents and Appellants., 2006 WL 3522226, *3522226+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Cal. Nov 14, 2006) Petition for Review (NO. S147999) 7130 In re Marriage CASES Judicial Council Coordination Proceeding No. 4365 No. A110451. Lancy Woo, et al., Plaintiffs-Petitioners and Respondents, v. Bill Lockyer, et al., Defendants-Respondents and Appellants., 2006 WL 3522227, *3522227+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Cal. Nov 14, 2006) Petition for Review (NO. S147999) 7131 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Christopher T. DAVIS et al., Defendants and Appellants., 2006 WL 3520216, *3520216 (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Cal. Aug 25, 2006) Appellant Davis' Petition for Review (NO. S146020) 7132 THE ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF LOS ANGELES., Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; The People Real Party in Interest, Does I and 2 Petitioners, v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County., Respondent, The People., Real Party in Interest., 2005 WL 3878809, *3878809+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Cal. Dec 16, 2005) Petition For Review (NO. S139672) 7133 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Richard Eugene MCDERMITT, Defendant and Appellant., 2005 WL 1876852, *1876852+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Cal. Jun 08, 2005) Petition for Review of the Unpublished Decision of the Court of Appeal, Third © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Appellate District Filed April 29, 2005 (NO. C047482, S134693) 7134 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Richard GRIFFIN, Dendant and Appellant., 2005 WL 1876796, *1876796+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Cal. Jun 07, 2005) Appellant's Petition For Review (NO. S134547) 7135 B. Birgit KOEBKE, et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. BERNARDO HEIGHTS COUNTRY CLUB, Defendant and Respondent., 2004 WL 3269743, *3269743 (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Cal. Dec 08, 2004) Application for Leave to File Amicus Curiae Brief and Amicus Brief of the American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California, the American Civil Liberies Union of Southern California, the American ... (NO. S124179) 7136 B. Birgit KOEBKE, et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. BERNARDO HEIGHTS COUNTRY CLUB, Defendant and Respondent., 2004 WL 1347517, *1347517+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Cal. Apr 19, 2004) Petition for Review (NO. S124179) 7137 THE FIRM, INC., Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT FOR LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent, David Weiner, Real Party in Interest., 2003 WL 23020835, *23020835+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Cal. Jul 08, 2003) Petition For Review (NO. S117317) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 7138 BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, County of Santa Barbara, Respondent; John Roe 1, et al., Real Parties in Interest., 2012 WL 1985531, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Cal.App. 2 Dist. May 16, 2012) Opposition to Petition for Writ of Mandate, Prohibition or Other Extraordinary Relief (NO. B240706) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7139 Steven KALSKI, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Michael D. ANTONOVICH, as Supervisor, etc., et al., Defendants and Appellants, California Association of Professional Employees, Defendant and Respondent., 2009 WL 3398091, *3398091+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Cal.App. 2 Dist. Aug 31, 2009) Petition for Rehearing of August 17, 2009 Filed Affirmance (NO. B208252) 7140 Eunice VIOLA; Michael Viola; Viola Incorporated; Muzeyyen Balaban-Zilke; Michael Giammateo; Moira Giammateo; and Vicki Magee, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF MANAGED HEALTH CARE; Daniel Zingale, an Individual; and Does 1 Through 20, Defendants and Respondents., 2005 WL 723781, *723781 (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Cal.App. 2 Dist. Feb 14, 2005) Appellants' Petition for Rehearing (NO. B174455) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7141 Emily NEWDOW et al., Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. EDMUND G. BROWN, AS GOVERNOR, etc. et al., Defendants/Respondents., 2012 WL 6729963, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Cal.App. 3 Dist. Aug 29, 2012) Appellants' Petition for Rehearing (NO. C069557) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7142 NORTH COAST WOMEN'S CARE MEDICAL GROUP, INC. et al., Petitioners, © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, Respondent. Guadalupe T. BENITEZ, Real party in interest., 2005 WL 6132616, *6132616+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Cal.App. 4 Dist. Feb 25, 2005) Return to Order to Show Cause Regarding Petition for Writ of Mandate and/or Prohibition or Other Appropriate Relief; Memorandum of Points and Authorities (NO. D045438) 7143 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert WOODRUM, Defendant-Appellee., 2006 WL 4526756, *4526756 (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Ill. Oct 26, 2006) Petition for Rehearing for Defendant-Appellee (NO. 99984) 7144 State of North Carolina, v. Teresa Darlene POPE., 2005 WL 776189, *776189+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (N.C. Mar 16, 2005) Petition for Discretionary Review Under G.S. 7A-31 (NO. 159P05) 7145 State of Ohio, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Shawn JENKINS, Defendant-Appellant., 2005 WL 5434411, *5434411+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Ohio Mar 11, 2005) Memorandum in Response (NO. 2005-0342) 7146 State of Ohio, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Shawn JENKINS, Defendant-Appellant., 2005 WL 5434410, *5434410+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Ohio Feb 14, 2005) Memorandum in Support of Jurisdiction of DefendantAppellant Shawn Jenkins (NO. 2005-0342) 7147 State of Ohio, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sean TALTY, Defendant-Appellant., 2003 WL 23470481, *23470481+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Ohio Aug 04, 2003) Brief in Support of Jurisdiction of Amicus Curiae the American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio Foundation (NO. 2003-1344) 7148 STATE OF OHIO, Appellee, v. Sean TALTY, Appellant., 2003 WL 23522946, *23522946+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Ohio Aug 01, 2003) Memorandum in Support of Jurisdiction of Appellant Sean Talty (NO. 2003-1344) 7149 Joan PROCITO, Petitioner, v. UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION BOARD OF REVIEW, Respondent., 2007 WL 5764594, *5764594+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Pa.Cmwlth. Feb 20, 2007) Brief for Petitioner Joan Procito (NO. 2402CD2006) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7150 CITY OF FORT WORTH, Petitioner, v. Cecilia JACOBS, Respondent., 2012 WL 6803563, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Tex. Dec 11, 2012) Petition for Review and Appendix (NO. 12-0992) 7151 In the Matter of the Marriage of J.B. and H.B., 2011 WL 8584394, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Tex. Sep 26, 2011) Brief on the Merits of Respondent the State of Texas (NO. 11-0024) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7152 In the Matter of the Marriage of J.B. and H.B., J. B., Petitioner, v. The State of Texas, Respondent., 2011 WL 8584393, *1+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Tex. Sep 06, 2011) Petitioner's Brief on the Merits (NO. 11-0024) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7153 FREQUENT FLYER DEPOT, INC., George Pirkle and Robert Pirkle, © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Petitioners, v. AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., Respondent., 2009 WL 2237154, *2237154+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Tex. Jul 03, 2009) Reply to Response to Petition for Review (NO. 09-0240) 7154 In re MAIN ST. TRAVEL CENTER OF MONSEY, INC., 2009 WL 1172389, *1172389+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Tex. Mar 31, 2009) Amicus Brief in Support of Petition for Mandamus (NO. 09-0194) 7155 FREQUENT FLYER DEPOT, INC., George Pirkle and Robert Pirkle, Petitioners, v. AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., Respondent., 2009 WL 1004279, *1004279+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Tex. Mar 23, 2009) Petition for Review (NO. 2009-0240) 7156 WOLFGANG HIRCZY DE MINO, Petitioner, v. Edward P. SHERIDAN, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Provost of the University of Houston, and Donald J. Foss, His Successor in Office, Respondents., 2006 WL 2482603, *2482603 (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Tex. Aug 01, 2006) Petition for Review (NO. 06-0668) 7157 Mark FLEMING, Petitioner, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Respondent., 2010 WL 5177602, *5177602+ (Appellate Petition, Motion and Filing) (Tex.Crim.App. Nov 03, 2010) Petition for Discretionary Review (NO. 1529-10) Appellate Briefs 7158 Township of Mount Holly New Jersey v. Mount Holly Gardens Citizens in Action, Inc., 2013 WL 5820522, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct 28, 2013) Brief of Amicus Curiae Empower D.C. in Support of Respondents (NO. 11-1507) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7159 Township of Mount Holly v. Mt. Holly Gardens Citizens in Action, Inc., 2013 WL 5863749, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct 28, 2013) Brief of the Opportunity Agenda, the Poverty & Race Research Action Council, the Anti-Defamation League, Asian Americans Advancing Justice - AAJC, Asian Americans Advancing Justice - Asian Law ... (NO. 11-1507) 7160 Township of Mount Holly v. Mt. Holly Gardens Citizens in Action, Inc, 2013 WL 6040050, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct 28, 2013) Brief of the Opportunity Agenda, the Poverty & Race Research Action Council, the Anti-Defamation League, Asian Americans Advancing Justice - AAJC, Asian Americans Advancing Justice - Asian Law ... (NO. 11-1507) 7161 Town of Greece v. Galloway, 2013 WL 5348583, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Sep 23, 2013) Brief Amicus Curiae of the Freedom from Religion Foundation in Support of Respondents (NO. 12-696) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7162 McCullen v. Coakley, 2013 WL 5274827, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Sep 16, 2013) Brief of Amicus Curiae Cato Institute in Support of Petitioners (NO. 12-1168) 7163 Fernandez v. California, 2013 WL 4072519, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 07, 2013) Brief of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers as © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Amicus Curiae in Support of Petitioner (NO. 12-7822) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7164 United States of America v. Windsor, 2013 WL 1143561, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 19, 2013) Reply Brief on the Merits for Respondent the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives (NO. 12-307) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7165 United States of America v. Windsor, 2013 WL 1177268, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 04, 2013) Brief of Amici Curiae Professors Nan D. Hunter, Suzanne B. Goldberg, Kathryn Abrams, Katherine M. Franke, Burt Neuborne, and Angela P. Harris Addressing the Merits in Support of Respondents (NO. 12-307) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7166 United States of America v. Windsor, 2013 WL 785630, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 01, 2013) Brief of the Cato Institute and Constitutional Accountability Center as Amici Curiae in Support of Respondents (NO. 12-307) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 7167 United States of America v. Windsor, 2013 WL 785631, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 01, 2013) Brief of Former Federal Intelligence Officer as Amicus Curiae In Support of Petitioner and Respondent (Merits) (NO. 12-307) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7168 United States of America v. Windsor, 2013 WL 785632, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 01, 2013) Brief of Amici Curiae Family and Child Welfare Law Professors Addressing the Merits and in Support of Respondents (NO. 12-307) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7169 United States of America v. Windsor, 2013 WL 785633, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 01, 2013) Brief of Amici Curiae National Women's Law Center, Williams Institute Scholars of Sexual Orientation and Gender Law, and Women's Legal Groups in Support of Respondent Edith Schlain Windsor on the ... (NO. 12-307) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7170 United States of America v. Windsor, 2013 WL 785636, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 01, 2013) Brief of Amicus Curiae NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc. in Support of Respondent Windsor (Equal Protection Guarantee) (NO. 12-307) 7171 United States of America v. Windsor, 2013 WL 840017, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 01, 2013) Amicus Curiae Brief of Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders and Lambda Legal Defense & Education Fund, Inc. in Support of Edith Windsor and the United States Addressing the Merits and Supporting ... (NO. 12-307) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7172 United States v. Windsor, 2013 WL 840019, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 01, 2013) Brief for Amici Curiae Former Senators Bill Bradley, Tom Daschle, Christopher J. Dodd, and Alan K. Simpson on the Merits in Support of Respondent Windsor (NO. 12-307) 7173 United States of America v. Windsor, 2013 WL 840022, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 01, 2013) Brief For The Anti-Defamation League, Americans United for Separation of Church and State; Bend the Arc: A Jewish © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Partnership For Justice, Central Conference of American Rabbis, Congregation Beit ... (NO. 12-307) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7174 United States of America v. Windsor, 2013 WL 840025, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 01, 2013) Brief of Amicus Curiae Institute for Justice in Support of Respondent Edith S. Windsor Addressing the Merits (NO. 12-307) 7175 United States of America v. Windsor, 2013 WL 840028, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 01, 2013) Brief for Amici Curiae Scholars of the Constitutional Rights of Children in Support of Respondent Edith Windsor Addressing the Merits and Supporting Affirmance (NO. 12-307) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 7176 United States of America v. Windsor, 2013 WL 840029, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 01, 2013) Brief of 172 Members of the U.S. House of Representatives and 40 U.S. Senators as Amici Curiae in Support of Respondent Edith Schlain Windsor, Urging Affirmance on the Merits (NO. 12-307) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7177 United States of America v. Windsor, 2013 WL 840034, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 01, 2013) Brief of Amicus Curiae the Honorable John K. Olson in Support of Respondent Addressing the Merits (NO. 12-307) 7178 United States of America v. Windsor, 2013 WL 860313, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 01, 2013) Brief of Amicus Curiae The American Bar Association in Support of Respondent Edith Schlain Windsor on the Merits Question (NO. 12-307) 7179 United States of America v. Windsor, 2013 WL 860459, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 01, 2013) Brief of Federalism Scholars as Amici Curiae in Support of Respondent Windsor (NO. 12-307) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7180 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 2013 WL 769311, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 28, 2013) Brief of Bay Area Lawyers for Individual Freedom, et al., as Amici Curiae in Support of Respondent (NO. 12-144) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7181 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 2013 WL 769312, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 28, 2013) Brief of Amici Curiae Kenneth B. Mehlman et al. Supporting Respondents (NO. 12-144) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7182 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 2013 WL 769315, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 28, 2013) Brief of International Human Rights Advocates as Amici Curiae in Support of Respondents (NO. 12-144) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7183 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 2013 WL 769317, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 28, 2013) Brief of Amici Curiae American Anthropological Association, American Academy of Pediatrics, California, and Robert M. Galatzer-Levy, M.D., in Support of Respondents and Affirmance, Addressing ... (NO. 12-144) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7184 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 2013 WL 769319, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 28, 2013) Brief of Amici Curiae Anti-Defamation League et al. in Support of Respondents (NO. 12-144) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7185 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 2013 WL 769326, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 28, © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 2013) Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae Supporting Respondents (NO. 12-144) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7186 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 2013 WL 769330, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 28, 2013) Brief for Amici Curiae Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, Bar Associations and Public Interest and Legal Service Organizations in Support of Respondents (NO. 12-144) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7187 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 2013 WL 769332, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 28, 2013) Brief of the Cato Institute and Constitutional Accountability Center as Amici Curiae in Support of Respondents (NO. 12-144) 7188 United States of America v. Windsor, 2013 WL 769334, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 28, 2013) Brief for Amici Curiae Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, Bar Associations and Public Interest and Legal Service Organizations in Support of Respondent Edith Windsor (NO. 12-307) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7189 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 2013 WL 795541, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 28, 2013) Brief of the Organization of American Historians and the American Studies Association as Amici Curiae in Support of Respondents (NO. 12-144) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7190 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 2013 WL 795542, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 28, 2013) Brief Of Constitutional Law Scholars Bruce Ackerman, Ash Bhagwat, Lee Bollinger, Erwin Chemerinsky, Michael C. Dorf, Lee Epstein, Barry Friedman, John C. Jeffries, Jr., Lawrence Lessig, William ... (NO. 12-144, 12-307) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7191 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 2013 WL 795543, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 28, 2013) Brief for Amici Curiae California Council of Churches; California Faith for Equality; Unitarian Universalist Legislative Ministry California; Northern California Nevada Conference, United Church of ... (NO. 12-144) 7192 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 2013 WL 795544, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 28, 2013) Brief for Foreign and Comparative Law Experts Harold Hongju Koh, Sarah H. Cleveland, Laurence R. Helfer, and Ryan Goodman as Amici Curiae Supporting Respondents (NO. 12-144) " HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 7193 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 2013 WL 795547, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 28, 2013) Brief of Amici Curiae Chris Kluwe and Brendon Ayanbadejo in Support of Respondents (NO. 12-144) 7194 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 2013 WL 795548, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 28, 2013) Brief of American Companies as Amici Curiae in Support of Respondents (NO. 12-144) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7195 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 2013 WL 795551, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 28, 2013) Brief of Amici Curiae the California Teachers Association and the National Education Association in Support of Respondents (NO. 12-144) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 7196 United States of America v. Windsor, 2013 WL 838150, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 28, 2013) Brief of the Organization of American Historians and the American Studies Association as Amici Curiae Support of Respondent Edith Windsor (NO. 12-307) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7197 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 2013 WL 840011, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 28, 2013) Brief of Amici Curiae William N. Eskridge Jr., Rebecca L. Brown, Daniel A. Farber, and Andrew Koppelman in Support of Respondents (NO. 12-144) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7198 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 2013 WL 860452, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 28, 2013) Brief of Amici Curiae National Women'S Law Center, Williams Institute Scholars of Sexual Orientation and Gender Law, and Women's Legal Groups in Support of Respondents on the Merits (NO. 12-144) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7199 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 2013 WL 871954, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 28, 2013) Brief of Amici Curiae Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc. and Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders in Support of Respondents (NO. 12-144) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7200 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 2013 WL 871956, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 28, 2013) Brief Amicus Curiae of the American Jewish Committee in Support of the Individual Respondents on the Merits (NO. 12-144, 12-307) 7201 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 2013 WL 4737187, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 28, 2013) Brief Amicus Curiae of the American Jewish Committee in Support of the Individual Respondents on the Merits (NO. 12-144, 12-307) 7202 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 2013 WL 769314, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 27, 2013) Amici Curiae Brief of Utah Pride Center, Campaign for Southern Equality, Equality Federation and Twenty-Five State-Wide Equality Organizations (NO. 12-144, 12-307) 7203 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 2013 WL 769323, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 27, 2013) Brief of Amici Curiae Edward D. Stein, Joanna L. Grossman, Kerry Abrams, Holning Lau, Katharine B. Silbaugh and 32 Other Professors of Family Law and Constitutional Law in Support of Respondents (NO. 12-144) " HN: 2,3 (S.Ct.) 7204 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 2013 WL 769327, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 27, 2013) Brief of Amicus Curiae Marriage Equality USA In Support of Respondents (NO. 12-144) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7205 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 2013 WL 769329, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 27, 2013) Brief for the State of California as Amicus Curiae in Support of Respondents (NO. 12-144) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7206 United States of America v. Windsor, 2013 WL 769333, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 27, 2013) Brief Amici Curiae of the American Humanist Association and American Atheists, Inc., American Ethical Union, the Center for Inquiry, Military Association of Atheists and Freethinkers, Secular ... (NO. 12-307) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 7207 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 2013 WL 823226, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 27, 2013) Brief Amici Curiae of the American Humanist Association and American Atheists, Inc., American Ethical Union, The Center for Inquiry, Military Association of Atheists and Freethinkers, Secular ... (NO. 12-144) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 7208 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 2013 WL 871955, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 27, 2013) Brief of Amici Jonathan Wallace, Meri Wallace and Duncan Pflaster in Support of Respondents (NO. 12-144) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7209 United States of America v. Windsor, 2013 WL 701228, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 26, 2013) Brief on the Merits for Respondent Edith Schlain Windsor (NO. 12-307) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7210 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 2013 WL 769313, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 26, 2013) Brief of Amicus Curiae GLMA: Health Professionals Advancing LGBT Equality (Gay and Lesbian Medical Association) Concerning the Immutability of Sexual Orientation in Support of Affirmance on the Merits (NO. 12-144) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7211 United States of America v. Windsor, 2013 WL 860299, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 26, 2013) Brief of Amicus Curiae GLMA: Health Professionals Advancing LGBT Equality (Gay and Lesbian Medical Association) Concerning the Immutability of Sexual Orientation in Support of Affirmance on the Merits (NO. 12-307) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7212 United States of America v. Windsor, 2013 WL 683048, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 22, 2013) Brief for the United States on the Merits Question (NO. 12-307) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7213 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 2013 WL 648742, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 21, 2013) Brief for Respondents (NO. 12-144) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7214 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 2013 WL 662703, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 21, 2013) Brief of Respondent City and County of San Francisco (NO. 12-144) 7215 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 2013 WL 838141, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 18, 2013) Brief of Amici Curiae Rev. Rick Yramategui, Rev. Herb Schmidt, and Rev. Darrell W. Yeaney in Support of Respondents' Position on the Merits (NO. 12-144) 7216 United States of America v. Windsor, 2013 WL 355760, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 29, 2013) Brief Amicus Curiae of Eagle Forum Education & Legal Defense Fund, Inc., in Support of Respondent Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives in Support of Reversal ... (NO. 12-307) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7217 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 2013 WL 367055, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 29, 2013) Brief Amicus Curiae of Eagle Forum Education & Legal Defense Fund, Inc., in Support of Petitioners in Support of Reversal (NO. 12-144) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7218 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 2013 WL 367058, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 29, © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 2013) Brief of Amicus Curiae Patrick Henry College in Support of Petitioners (NO. 12-144) 7219 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 2013 WL 390984, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 29, 2013) Amici Curiae Brief of Robert P. George, Sherif Girgis, and Ryan T. Anderson in Support of Hollingsworth and Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group Addressing the Merits and Supporting Reversal (NO. 12-144, 12-307) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7220 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 2013 WL 390989, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 29, 2013) Brief of Amici Liberty Counsel, Inc. and Campaign for Children and Families In Support of Petitioners (NO. 12-144) 7221 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 2013 WL 390991, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 29, 2013) Brief of Amici Curiae Judicial Watch, Inc. and Allied Educational Foundation in Support of Petitioners (NO. 12-144) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7222 United States of America v. Windsor, 2013 WL 390994, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 29, 2013) Brief of Amicus Curiae Liberty Counsel in Support of Respondent Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives (Merits Brief) (NO. 12-307) 7223 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 2013 WL 416198, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 29, 2013) Brief Addressing the Merits of the States of Indiana, Virginia, Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Georgia, Idaho, Kansas, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, ... (NO. 12-144) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7224 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 2013 WL 416201, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 29, 2013) Amicus Brief of the State of Michigan in Support of Petitioners (NO. 12-144) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7225 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 2013 WL 416204, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 29, 2013) Brief Of Amicus Curiae Matthew B. O'Brien in Support of Hollingsworth and Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the U.S. House of Representatives Addressing the Merits and Supporting Reversal (NO. 12-144, 12-307) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7226 United States of America v. Windsor, 2013 WL 416205, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 29, 2013) Brief of Dovid Z. Schwartz as Amicus Curiae in Support of Respondents Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives (NO. 12-307) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7227 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 2013 WL 417724, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 29, 2013) Amicus Curiae Brief of the American Civil Rights Union in Support of Hollingsworth and Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group Addressing the Merits and Supporting Reversal (NO. 12-144, 12-307) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7228 United States of America v. Windsor, 2013 WL 417728, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 29, 2013) Brief on the Merits of Amici Curiae United States Senators Orrin G. Hatch, Saxby Chambliss, Dan Coats, Thad Cochran, Mike Crapo, Charles Grassley, Lindsey Graham, Mitch McConnell, Richard Shelby and ... (NO. 12-307) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 7229 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 2013 WL 476700, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 29, 2013) Brief of Amicus Curiae David Boyle in Support of Petitioners, on the Non-Jurisdictional Issues (NO. 12-144) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7230 United States of America v. Windsor, 2013 WL 476703, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 29, 2013) Brief of Amicus Curiae Foundation for Moral Law in Support of Respondent Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives (NO. 12-307) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7231 United States v. Windsor, 2013 WL 476704, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 29, 2013) Brief of Amicus Curiae David Boyle in Support of Respondent Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives, on the Non-Jurisdictional Issues (NO. 12-307) 7232 United States v. Windsor, 2013 WL 1780814, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 29, 2013) Brief Amicus Curiae of United States Conference of Catholic Bishops in Support of Respondent Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group, Addressing the Merits, and Supporting Reversal (NO. 12-307) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7233 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 2013 WL 355750, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 28, 2013) Amicus Brief of the Thomas More Law Center and Chuck Storey, Imperial County Clerk, in Support of Petitioners (Addressing the Merits) (NO. 12-144) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7234 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 2013 WL 390987, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 28, 2013) Brief of Thirty-Seven Scholars of Federalism and Judicial Restraint as Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioners (NO. 12-144) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 7235 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 2013 WL 390990, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 28, 2013) Brief of Amici Curiae National Association of Evangelicals; the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission of the Southern Baptist Convention; the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints; the Lutheran ... (NO. 12-144) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7236 United States of America v. Windsor, 2013 WL 390995, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 28, 2013) Amicus Curiae Brief of Manhattan Declaration in Support of Respondent Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group Addressing the Merits and Supporting Reversal (NO. 12-307) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7237 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 2013 WL 1780811, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 28, 2013) Brief of the Lighted Candle Society Amicus Curiae in Support of Petitioners (NO. 12-144) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7238 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 2013 WL 315229, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 25, 2013) Amici Curiae Brief of Scholars of History and Related Disciplines in Support of Petitioners (NO. 12-144) 7239 Hollingsworth v. Peery, 2013 WL 355751, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 25, 2013) Brief of Westboro Baptist Church as Amicus Curiae in Support of Neither Party Suggesting Reversal (NO. 12-144) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7240 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 2013 WL 355752, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 25, 2013) Brief of Liberty, Life and Law Foundation and North Carolina Values Coalition as Amici Curiae in Support Of Hollingsworth and Bipartisan Legal © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Advisory Group Addressing the Merits and Supporting ... (NO. 12-144, 12-307) " HN: 3,5 (S.Ct.) 7241 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 2013 WL 355754, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 25, 2013) Brief Amicus Curiae of United States Conference of Catholic Bishops in Support of Petitioners and Supporting Reversal (NO. 12-144) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7242 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 2013 WL 355756, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 25, 2013) Brief of Amicus Curiae Foundation for Moral Law In Support of Petitioner (NO. 12-144) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7243 United States v. Windsor, 2013 WL 355757, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 25, 2013) Brief of Westboro Baptist Church as Amicus Curiae in Support of Neither Party Suggesting Reversal (On Merits Issue) (NO. 12-307) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7244 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 2013 WL 314462, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 24, 2013) Brief Amicus Curiae of the Family Research Council in Support of Petitioners Addressing the Merits and Supporting Reversal (NO. 12-144) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 7245 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 2013 WL 315228, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 24, 2013) Amicus Curiae Brief of Dr. Paul McHugh in Support of Hollingsworth and Bipartisan Legal Advocacy Group Addressing the Merits and Supporting Reversal (NO. 12-144, 12-307) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7246 United States of America v. Windsor, 2013 WL 315235, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 24, 2013) Brief Amicus Curiae of the Family Research Council in Support of Respondent Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group Addressing the Merits and Supporting Reversal (NO. 12-307) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7247 United States of America v. Windsor, 2013 WL 267026, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 22, 2013) Brief on the Merits for Respondent the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the U.S. House of Representatives (NO. 12-307) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7248 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 2013 WL 457384, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 22, 2013) Brief of Petitioners (NO. 12-144) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7249 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 2013 WL 503388, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 21, 2013) Brief For Amici Curiae The Coalition of African American Pastors USA, The Center for Urban Renewal and Education, The Frederick Douglass Foundation, Inc., and Numerous Law Professors in Support of ... (NO. 12-144) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7250 Alleyne v. United States of America, 2012 WL 5884834, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Nov 19, 2012) Brief for Petitioner (NO. 11-9335) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 7251 Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin, 2012 WL 3418847, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 13, 2012) Brief of the Black Student Alliance at the University of Texas at Austin, the Black Ex-Students of Texas, Inc., and the NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc. as Amici Curiae in Support of ... (NO. 11-345) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 7252 Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin, 2012 WL 3527864, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 13, 2012) Brief for Leading Public Research Universities the University of Delaware, the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois, Indiana University, the University of Kansas, the University of ... (NO. 11-345) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 7253 Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin, 2012 WL 3418597, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 10, 2012) Brief of Amici Curiae Human Rights Advocates, Et Al., in Support of Respondents (NO. 11-345) 7254 Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., 2012 WL 2165328, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jun 12, 2012) Brief of Amicus Curiae The Rutgers Law School Constitutional Litigation Clinic in Support of Petitioners, on Re-Argument of the Case (NO. 10-1491) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7255 Department of Health and Human Services v. State of Florida, 2012 WL 523364, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 13, 2012) Brief on Behalf of the 1851 Center for Constitutional Law as Amicus Curiae in Support of Respondents (Minimum Coverage Provision) (NO. 11-398) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7256 Magner v. Gallagher, 2012 WL 392534, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 30, 2012) Brief of the Opportunity Agenda, Poverty & Race Research Action Council, Public Advocates Inc., Professor Michelle Adams, The Equal Justice Society, and the Kirwan Institute for the Study of Race and ... (NO. 10-1032) 7257 Department of Health and Human Services v. State of Florida, 2012 WL 160235, *1 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 13, 2012) Brief for Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc., AIDS United, Asian & Pacific-Islander Coalition on HIV/AIDS, Black AIDS Institute, Center for HIV Law and Policy, Gay & Lesbian Advocates & ... (NO. 11-398) 7258 Department of Health and Human Services v. State of Florida, 2012 WL 121241, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 11, 2012) Brief of Amici Curiae NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc., American Civil Liberties Union, and the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights in Support of Petitioners (Minimum Coverage ... (NO. 11-398) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7259 Armour v. City of Indianapolis, Indiana, 2012 WL 92509, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 05, 2012) Brief of Amicus Curiae Institute for Justice in Support of Petitioners (NO. 11-161) 7260 Federal Aviation Administration v. Cooper, 2011 WL 4642655, *1 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct 04, 2011) Brief for Amici Curiae Aids Foundation of Chicago, Aids Legal Referral Panel, APICHA, Inc., Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders, Gay City Health Project, Global Network of People Living with HIV, ... (NO. 10-1024) 7261 United States of America v. Jones, 2011 WL 4614429, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct 03, 2011) Brief of Amici Curiae, Yale Law School Information Society Project Scholars and Other Experts in the Law of Privacy and Technology in Support of the Respondent (NO. 10-1259) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 7262 Knox v. Service Employees International Union, Local 1000, 2011 WL 4352228, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Sep 15, 2011) Brief Amicus Curiae of Pacific Legal Foundation, Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence, Mountain States Legal Foundation, and Cato Institute in Support of Petitioners (NO. 10-1121) 7263 Camreta v. Greene, 2011 WL 331942, *331942+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 31, 2011) Brief for the New York University School of Law Family Defense Clinic, Columbia Law School Child Advocacy Clinic, The Bronx Defenders, The Brooklyn Family Defense Project, and The Center for Family ... (NO. 09-1454, 09-1478) " 7264 National Aeronautics and Space Administration v. Nelson, 2010 WL 3048324, *3048324+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 02, 2010) Brief for the Respondents (NO. 09-530) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7265 Schwarzenegger v. Entertainment Merchants Association, 2010 WL 2866116, *2866116+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jul 19, 2010) Brief for Amici Curiae Louisiana, Connecticut, Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Texas and Virginia Supporting Petitioners (NO. 08-1448) " 7266 Flores-Villar v. The United States of America, 2010 WL 2602011, *2602011+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jun 25, 2010) Brief of Amici Curiae Equality Now, Human Rights Watch and Other Human Rights Organizations and Institutions in Support of Petitioner Bahrain Women Association for Human Development Ethiopian Women ... (NO. 09-5801) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7267 Flores-Villar v. United States of America, 2010 WL 2513316, *2513316+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jun 18, 2010) Brief for Petitioner (NO. 09-5801) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7268 Doe v. Reed, 2010 WL 1256468, *1256468 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Apr 01, 2010) Brief of Amici Curiae Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc., Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders, National Center for Lesbian Rights, the Human Rights Campaign, and National Gay and Lesbian ... (NO. 09-559) 7269 Christian Legal Society Chapter of the University of California, Hastings College of the Law v. Martinez, 2010 WL 1513022, *1513022+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 15, 2010) Brief Amicus Curiae of the American Civil Liberties Union, American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California, and The National Education Association in Support of Respondents (NO. 08-1371) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7270 Christian Legal Society Chapter of University of California, Hastings College of the Law v. Martinez, 2010 WL 928039, *928039+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 15, 2010) Brief of Amicus Curiae Association of American Law Schools in Support of Respondent (NO. 08-1371) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7271 Christian Legal Society Chapter of University of California, Hastings College of the Law v. Martinez, 2010 WL 977370, *977370+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 15, 2010) Brief of the National LGBT Bar Association, The National LGBT © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Bar Association Law Student Division and 55 LGBT Law Student Organizations as Amici Curiae in Support of Respondents (NO. 08-1371) 7272 Christian Legal Society Chapter of University of California, Hastings College of the Law v. Martinez, 2010 WL 989697, *989697+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 15, 2010) Brief of Amici Curiae Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc. and Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders in Support of Respondents (NO. 08-1371) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7273 Doe v. Reed, 2010 WL 768492, *768492+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 04, 2010) Brief of Amici Curiae Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) and Legal Scholars and Technical Experts in Support of the Petitioners (NO. 09-559) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7274 Christian Legal Society Chapter of University of California, Hastings college of the Law v. Martinez, 2010 WL 565210, *565210+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 04, 2010) Brief Amicus Curiae of United States Conference of Catholic Bishops in Support of Petitioner (NO. 08-1371) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7275 Christian Legal Society Chapter of University of California, Hastings College of the Law v. Martinez, 2010 WL 497337, *497337+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 03, 2010) Brief of Amicus Curiae the Cato Institute in Support of Petitioner (NO. 08-1371) 7276 Magwood v. Patterson, 2010 WL 565216, *565216+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 03, 2010) Brief of Respondents (NO. 09-158) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 7277 McDonald v. City of Chicago, 2010 WL 383619, *383619+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 29, 2010) Reply Brief (NO. 08-1521) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7278 McDonald v. City of Chicago, 2010 WL 59031, *59031+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 06, 2010) Brief of Historians on Early American Legal, Constitutional and Pennsylvania History as Amici Curiae in Support of Respondent City of Chicago (NO. 08-1521) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 7279 McDonald v. City of Chicago, 2009 WL 5190478, *5190478+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec 30, 2009) Brief for Respondents City of Chicago and Village of Oak Park (NO. 08-1521) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7280 Kiyemba v. Obama, 2009 WL 4832170, *4832170+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec 11, 2009) Brief of International Law Experts as Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioners (NO. 08-1234) " 7281 Kiyemba v. Obama, 2009 WL 4882844, *4882844+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec 11, 2009) Brief of Amici Curiae Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, the International Commission of Jurists in Support of Petitioners (NO. 08-1234) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7282 McDonald v. City of Chicago, 2009 WL 4074858, *4074858+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Nov 23, 2009) Brief of Amicus Curiae NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc. in Support of Neither Party (NO. 08-1521) 7283 National Rifle Association of America, Inc. v. City of Chicago, 2009 WL 4099503, *4099503+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Nov 23, 2009) Brief of Amicus © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Curiae Foundation for Moral Law, in Support of Petitioners (NO. 08-1497, 08-1521) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7284 McDonald v. City of Chicago, 2009 WL 4099509, *4099509+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Nov 23, 2009) Brief of Amicae Curiae Women State Legislators and Academics in Support of Petitioners (NO. 08-1521) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7285 McDonald v. City of Chicago, Illinois, 2009 WL 4099517, *4099517+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Nov 23, 2009) Brief of Arms Keepers as Amicus Curiae in Support of Petitioners (NO. 08-1521) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 7286 McDonald v. City of Chicago, 2009 WL 4099523, *4099523+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Nov 23, 2009) Brief Amicus Curiae of Gun Owners of America, Inc., Gun Owners Foundation, Gun Owners of California, Inc., Maryland Shall Issue, Inc., DownsizeDC.org, Conservative Legal Defense and Education Fund, ... (NO. 08-1521) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7287 McDonald v. City of Chicago, 2009 WL 4247970, *4247970+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Nov 23, 2009) Brief for the Goldwater Institute, scharf-norton Center for Constitutional Government, and Wyoming Liberty Aroup as Amici Curiae Supporting Petitioners (NO. 08-1521) 7288 McDonald v. City of Chicago, 2009 WL 4074859, *4074859+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Nov 20, 2009) Amicus Curiae Brief of the Appellants from the Ninth Circuit Incorporation Case of Nordyke v. King, Madison Society, and Golden State Second Amendment Council - in Support of Reversal (NO. 08-1521) 7289 McDonald v. City of Chicago, 2009 WL 3844394, *3844394+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Nov 16, 2009) Brief for Respondents the National Rifle Association of America, Inc. Et Al. in Support of Petitioners (NO. 08-1521) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 7290 McDonald v. City of Chicago, 2009 WL 4378912, *4378912+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Nov 16, 2009) Petitioners' Brief (NO. 08-1521) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7291 Graham v. State of Florida, 2009 WL 3340114, *3340114+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct 14, 2009) Reply Brief (NO. 08-7412) 7292 Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 2009 WL 2365223, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jul 31, 2009) Supplemental Brief for Amicus Curiae Cato Institute in Support of Appellant (NO. 08-205) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7293 United States of America v. Stevens, 2009 WL 2247129, *2247129+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jul 27, 2009) Brief of the DKT Liberty Project, The American Civil Liberties Union, and The Center for Democracy and Technology, as Amici Curiae in Support of Respondent. (NO. 08-769) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7294 United States of America v. Stevens, 2009 WL 2331224, *2331224+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jul 27, 2009) Brief of First Amendment Lawyers Association as Amicus Curiae in Support of Respondent (NO. 08-769) 7295 Graham v. State of Florida, 2009 WL 2219304, *2219304+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jul 22, 2009) Brief for Amnesty International, et al., as Amici Curiae in © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Support of Petitioners (NO. 08-7412, 08-7621) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7296 Ricci v. DeStefano, 2009 WL 815210, *815210+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 25, 2009) Amicus Brief of the Opportunity Agenda in Support of Respondents (NO. 07-1428, 08-328) 7297 Al-Marri v. Spagone, 2009 WL 230946, *230946+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 28, 2009) Brief of Historians and Scholars of Ex Parte Quirin as Amicus Curiae in Support of Petitioner (NO. 08-368) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 7298 Fitzgerald v. Barnstable School Committee, 2008 WL 4063961, *4063961 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 29, 2008) Brief Amici Curiae of the American Civil Liberties Union and the National Women's Law Center, et al. in Support of Petitioners (NO. 07-1125) 7299 Philip Morris USA Inc. v. Williams, 2008 WL 3883431, *3883431+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 19, 2008) Brief Amicus Curiae of Pacific Legal Foundation in Support of Petitioner (NO. 07-1216) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 7300 Pleasant Grove City, Utah v. Summum, 2008 WL 2550615, *2550615+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jun 23, 2008) Brief of American Jewish Committee, Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Anti-Defamation League, Baptist Joint Committee for Religious Liberty, and People For the American Way ... (NO. 07-665) 7301 Pleasant Grove City v. Summum, 2008 WL 2550618, *2550618+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jun 23, 2008) Brief of Amicus Curiae International Municipal Lawyers Association in Support of Petitioners (NO. 07-665) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 7302 Locke v. Karass, 2008 WL 2066118, *2066118+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. May 12, 2008) Brief of the Commonwealth of Virginia as Amicus Curiae in Support of Neither Party (NO. 07-610) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 7303 Engquist v. Oregon Department of Agriculture, 2008 WL 556756, *556756+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 27, 2008) Brief of Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund, American Association of People with Disabilities, American Civil Liberties Union, Gay & Lesbian ... (NO. 07-474) 7304 District of Columbia v. Heller, 2008 WL 405576, *405576+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 11, 2008) Brief of the International Law Enforcement Educators and Trainers Association (ILEETA), the International Association of Law Enforcement Firearms Instructors (IALEFI), Maryland State Lodge, Fraternal ... (NO. 07-290) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7305 District of Columbia v. Heller, 2008 WL 383521, *383521+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 08, 2008) Brief of Pink Pistols and Gays and Lesbians for Individual Liberty as Amici Curiae in Support of Respondent (NO. 07-290) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 7306 District of Columbia v. Heller, 2008 WL 383524, *383524+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 08, 2008) Brief of Amicus Curiae Grass Roots of South Carolina, Inc. in Support of Respondent (NO. 07-290) HN: 3,5 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 7307 District of Columbia v. Heller, 2008 WL 157186, *157186+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 11, 2008) Brief of Law Professors Erwin Chemerinsky and Adam Winkler, as Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioner (NO. 07-290) " 7308 Boumediene v. Bush, 2007 WL 2441589, *2441589+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 24, 2007) Brief of Amici Curiae Amnesty International, Human Rights Institute of the International Bar Association, International Federation for Human Rights, International Law Association in Support of ... (NO. 06-1195, 06-1196) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7309 Boumediene v. Bush, 2007 WL 2456943, *2456943+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 24, 2007) Brief of Amici Curiae Canadian Parliamentarians and Professors of Law in Support of Reversal (NO. 06-1195, 06-1196) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7310 Federal Election Commission v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc., 2007 WL 868545, *868545+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 22, 2007) Brief for Appellee (NO. 06-969, 06-970) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 7311 Morse v. Frederick, 2007 WL 594575, *594575+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 20, 2007) Brief for the Drug Policy Alliance and the Campaign for New Drug Policies as Amici Curiae Supporting Respondent (NO. 06-278) 7312 State of Washington v. Washington Education Association, 2006 WL 3294735, *3294735+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Nov 08, 2006) Amicus Curiae Brief of Mountain States Legal Foundation in Support of Petitioner (NO. 05-1657) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 7313 State of Washington v. Washington Education Association, 2006 WL 3265613, *3265613+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Nov 07, 2006) Brief Amicus Curiae of Pacific Legal Foundation in Support of Petitioners (NO. 05-1589, 05-1657) 7314 Meredith v. Jefferson County Board of Education, 2006 WL 2882700, *2882700+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct 10, 2006) Brief of Human Rights Advocacy Groups and International Law Professors as Amicus Curiae in Support of Respondents (NO. 05-915) 7315 Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1, 2006 WL 2927080, *2927080+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct 10, 2006) Brief of Interested Human Rights Clinics and Organizations as Amici Curiae in Support of Respondents (NO. 05-908, 05-915) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7316 Whorton v. Bockting, 2006 WL 2725692, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Sep 20, 2006) Brief of Amici Curiae Hon. Edward N. Cahn, Hon. John J. Gibbons, Hon. Timothy K. Lewis, Hon. H. Curtis Meanor, Hon. Stephen M. Orlofsky, Hon. Patricia M. Wald and the Public Defender Service for the ... (NO. 05-595) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 7317 Gonzales v. Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc., 2006 WL 2710731, *2710731+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Sep 20, 2006) Brief of Amici Curiae American Medical Women's Association, American Public Health Association, et al. in Support of Respondents (NO. 05-1382) HN: 1 © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. (S.Ct.) 7318 Gonzales v. Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc., 2006 WL 2725690, *2725690+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Sep 20, 2006) Brief for IntervenorRespondent City and County of San Francisco (NO. 05-1382) 7319 Gonzales v. Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc., 2006 WL 2725691, *2725691+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Sep 20, 2006) Brief of Planned Parenthood Respondents (NO. 05-1382) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7320 Gonzales v. Planned Parenthood Federation Of America, 2006 WL 2736634, *2736634+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Sep 20, 2006) Motion for Leave to File Brief Amici Curiae in Support of Respondents in Related Case and Brief of Amici Curiae Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice and Thirty-Four Other Religious and ... (NO. 05-1382) 7321 Gonzales v. Carhart, 2006 WL 2736636, *2736636+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Sep 20, 2006) Motion for Leave to File Out of Time in Case No. 05-380 Brief Amici Curiae and Brief Amici Curiae for the National Women's Law Center and 31 Other Organizations Committed to the Safest Health Care ... (NO. 05-1382, 05-280) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 7322 Gonzales v. Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc., 2006 WL 2736632, *2736632+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Sep 18, 2006) Brief of Amicus Curiae NARAL Pro-Choice America Foundation, et al., in Support of Respondents (NO. 05-1382) 7323 Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District, No. 1, 2006 WL 2453610, *2453610+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 21, 2006) Amicus Curiae Brief on the Merits of Mountain States Legal Foundation in Support of Petitioner (NO. 05-908) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 7324 Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1, 2006 WL 2453592, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 17, 2006) Brief Amici Curiae of The Project on Fair Representation, National Association of Scholars, and Law Professors in Support of Petitioners (NO. 05-908, 05-915) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 7325 Gonzales v. Carhart, 2006 WL 2345934, *2345934+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 10, 2006) Brief of Respondents (NO. 05-380) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7326 Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1, 2006 WL 2351492, *2351492+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 10, 2006) Brief Amicus Curiae of Timothy Don-Hugh Mak in Support of the Petitioner (NO. 05-908) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 7327 Gonzales v. Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc., 2006 WL 2281978, *2281978 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 03, 2006) Brief Amici Curiae of Christian Legal Society, National Association of Evangelicals, Pro-Life Legal Defense Fund, Alliance Defense Fund and Concerned Women for America in Support of Petitioner (NO. 05-1382) 7328 Gonzales v. Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc, 2006 WL 2317060, *2317060+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 03, 2006) Brief of Faith and Action, © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Institute in Basic Life Principles, International Reapers Foundation, The National Clergy Council and Illinois State Senator David Syverson as Amici Curiae in Support of ... (NO. 05-1382) 7329 Whorton v. Bockting, 2006 WL 2066491, *2066491+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jul 20, 2006) Brief Amicus Curiae of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation in Support of Petitioner (NO. 05-595) 7330 BP America Production Company v. Watson, 2006 WL 1662238, *1662238+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jun 13, 2006) Amicus Curiae Brief of Mountain States Legal Foundation in Support of Petitioners (NO. 05-669) " HN: 3,4 (S.Ct.) 7331 Gonzales v. Carhart, 2006 WL 4099006, *4099006+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. May 22, 2006) Brief Amicus Curiae of Judicial Watch, Inc. in Support of Petitioner (NO. 05-380) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 7332 Gonzales v. Carhart, 2006 WL 1386209, *1386209+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. May 17, 2006) Amicus Curiae Brief of Right to Life Advocates, Inc. in Support of the Petitioner (NO. 05-380) 7333 Sanchez-Llamas v. State of Oregon, 2006 WL 247769, *247769+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 30, 2006) Brief of the Alliance Defense Fund, as Amicus Curiae, Supporting Respondents (NO. 04-10566, 05-51) 7334 Jackson v. Perry, 2006 WL 62062, *62062+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 10, 2006) Brief for Appellants (NO. 05-276) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7335 Randall v. Sorrell, 2005 WL 3476617, *3476617+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec 14, 2005) Brief of the Republican National Committee as Amicus Curiae Supporting Petitioners and Conditional Cross-Petition Respondents (NO. 04-1528, 04-1530, 04-1697) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7336 Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, 2005 WL 2646472, *2646472+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct 12, 2005) Brief of Organizations Committed to Women's Equality as Amici Curiae in Support of Respondents (NO. 04-1144) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7337 Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights, 2005 WL 2347173, *2347173+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Sep 21, 2005) Brief for the Association of American Law Schools as Amicus Curiae in Support of Respondents (NO. 04-1152) 7338 Lee v. Perry, 2005 WL 2738324, *2738324 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Sep 08, 2005) Jurisdictional Statement (NO. 05-460) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7339 Soechting v. Perry, 2005 WL 2178803, *2178803 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Sep 02, 2005) Jurisdictional Statement (NO. 05-298) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7340 State of Georgia v. Randolph, 2005 WL 2176603, *2176603+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Sep 01, 2005) Brief for the Respondent (NO. 04-1067) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7341 Jackson v. Perry, 2005 WL 2104582, *2104582+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 31, 2005) Jurisdictional Statement (NO. 05-276) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7342 Travis County, Texas v. Perry, 2005 WL 2071467, *2071467 (Appellate Brief) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. (U.S. Aug 24, 2005) Jurisdictional Statement (NO. 05-254) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7343 League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry, 2005 WL 1920935, *1920935 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 09, 2005) Jurisdictional Statement (NO. 05-204) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7344 Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, 2005 WL 1912326, *1912326+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 08, 2005) Brief of University Faculty for Life as Amicus Curiae in Support of Petitioner (NO. 04-1144) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 7345 United States of America v. State of Georgia, 2005 WL 1812486, *1812486+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jul 29, 2005) Brief for the American Bar Association as Amicus Curiae Supporting Petitioners%tc (NO. 04-1203, 04-1236) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7346 Wilkinson v. Austin, 2005 WL 556215, *556215+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 04, 2005) Brief of Amici Curiae Human Rights Watch, American Friends Service Committee, Bluhm Legal Clinic, The Center for Justice in Capital Cases, Illinois Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, and ... (NO. 04-495) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 7347 Medellin v. Dretke, 2005 WL 490228, *490228+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 28, 2005) Brief of Liberty Legal Institute as Amicus Curiae in Support of Respondent (NO. 04-5928) 7348 Medellin v. Dretke, 2005 WL 430106, *430106+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 18, 2005) Brief of the Alliance Defense Fund, as Amicus Curiae, Supporting Respondent (NO. 04-5928) 7349 Town of Castle Rock, Colorado v. Gonzales, 2005 WL 328202, *328202+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 10, 2005) Brief Amicus Curiae of the American Civil Liberties Union and ACLU of Colorado, Hon. John J. Gibbons, Hon. Timothy K. Lewis, AALDEF, California Women's Law Center, National Asian Pacific American ... (NO. 04-278) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 7350 Town of Castle Rock, Colorado v. Gonzales, 2005 WL 328200, *328200+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 09, 2005) Brief of International Law Scholars and Women's, Civil Rights and Human Rights Organizations As Amici Curiae in Support of Respondents (NO. 04-278) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 7351 Van Orden v. Perry, 2005 WL 263785, *263785+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 31, 2005) Brief Amicus Curiae of the American Family Association Center for Law & Policy in Support of Respondents (NO. 03-1500) 7352 San Remo Hotel, L.P. v. City and County of San Francis, 2005 WL 176429, *176429+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 24, 2005) Brief Amici Curiae for Elizabeth J. Neumont (and All Others Similarly Situated) in Support of Petitioners (NO. 04-340) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 7353 Kelo v. City of New London, 2005 WL 176672, *176672+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 21, 2005) Brief of Law Professors Robert H. Freilich, Richard Briffault, Julie Cheslik, Janice C. Griffith, Tim Iglesias, Julian Conrad © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Juergensmayer, Anita Miller, Thomas E. Roberts, Patricia E. Salkin, ... (NO. 04-108) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7354 Deck v. State of Missouri, 2004 WL 2945393, *2945393+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec 16, 2004) Amicus Curiae Brief of the Bar Human Rights Committee of England and Wales; Amicus; and the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers in Support of the Petitioner (NO. 04-5293) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 7355 McCreary County, Kentucky v. American Civil Liberties, 2004 WL 2812087, *2812087+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec 08, 2004) Brief Amicus Curiae of Conservative Legal Defense and Education Fund, Joyce Meyer Ministries, Committee to Protect the Family Foundation, Lincoln Institute for Research and Education, American ... (NO. 03-1693) 7356 Kelo v. City of New London, 2004 WL 2802967, *2802967+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Dec 02, 2004) Brief Amici Curiae of Robert Nigel Richards, Charles William Coupe, Joan Elizabeth Coupe, and Joan Coupe Supporting Petitioners%tc (NO. 04-108) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 7357 Ashcroft v. Raich, 2004 WL 2336547, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct 13, 2004) Brief of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML), the NORML Foundation, the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL), Washington Association of Criminal ... (NO. 03-1454) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 7358 Ashcroft v. Raich, 2004 WL 2308766, *2308766+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct 13, 2004) Brief for Respondents (NO. 03-1454) " HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.) 7359 Ashcroft v. Raich, 2004 WL 2336485, *2336485+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct 13, 2004) Brief of Constitutional Law Scholars as Amici Curiae in Support of Respondents (NO. 03-1454) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 7360 Ashcroft v. Raich, 2004 WL 2336486, *2336486+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct 13, 2004) Brief of the States of Alabama, Louisiana, and Mississippi as Amici Curiae in Support of Respondents (NO. 03-1454) 7361 Ashcroft v. Raich, 2004 WL 2344235, *2344235+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct 13, 2004) Brief of The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, Pain Relief Network, California Medical Association, AIDS Action Council, Compassion in Dying Federation, End-of-Life Choices, National Women's Health ... (NO. 03-1454) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 7362 Roper v. Simmons, 2004 WL 1636446, *1636446+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jul 19, 2004) Brief of Amici Curiae President James Earl Carter, Jr., President Frederik Willem De Klerk, President Mikhail Sergeyevich Gorbachev, President Oscar Arias Sanchez, President Lech Walesa, Shirin ... (NO. 03-633) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 7363 Roper v. Simmons, 2004 WL 1636448, *1636448+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jul 19, 2004) Brief of Amici Curiae former U.S. Diplomats Morton Abramowitz, Stephen W. Bosworth, Stuart E. Eizenstat, John C. Kornblum, Phyllis E. Oakley, Thomas R. Pickering, Felix G. Rohatyn, J. Stapleton Roy, ... (NO. © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 03-633) " 7364 Roper v. Simmons, 2004 WL 1947812, *1947812+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jul 19, 2004) Brief for Respondent (NO. 03-633) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7365 Roper v. Simmons, 2004 WL 1628523, *1628523+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jul 15, 2004) Brief for the Human Rights Committee of the Bar of England and Wales, Human Rights Advocates, Human Rights Watch, and the World Organization for Human Rights USA as Amici Curiae in Support of ... (NO. 03-633) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 7366 Donald RUMSFELD, Petitioner, v. Jose PADILLA and Donna NEWMAN, as next friend for Jose PADILLA, Respondent., 2004 WL 782148, *782148+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Apr 12, 2004) Brief Amicus Curiae of Comparative Law Scholars and Experts on the Laws of the United Kingdom and Israel in Support of Respondent (NO. 03-1027) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 7367 Donald H. RUMSFELD, Secretary of Defense, Petitioner, v. Jose PADILLA and Donna R. NEWMAN, As Next Friend of Jose PADILLA, Respondents., 2004 WL 812789, *812789+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Apr 12, 2004) Brief of Amicus Curiae Global Rights in Support of Respondents (NO. 03-1027) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7368 Donald RUMSFELD, Petitioner, v. Jose PADILLA and Donna R. NEWMAN, as Next Friend of Jose PADILLA, Respondents., 2004 WL 792207, *792207+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Apr 09, 2004) Brief for Amici Curiae Law Professors in Support of Respondent (NO. 03-1027) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7369 Donald RUMSFELD, Secretary of Defense, Petitioner, v. Jose PADILLA; Donna R. NEWMAN, as Next Friend of Jose PADILLA, Respondents., 2004 WL 741060, *741060 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Apr 02, 2004) Brief of Amici Curiae International Law Professors Listed Herein in Support of Respondents (NO. 03-1027) 7370 Fawzi Khalid Abdullah Fahad AL ODAH, et al., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Respondents. Shafiq RASUL, et al., Petitioners, v. George W. BUSH, et al., Respondents., 2004 WL 442301, *442301+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Mar 03, 2004) Brief of Citizens for the Common Defence as Amicus Curiae in Support of Respondents (NO. 03-334, 03-343) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 7371 Daniel BENITEZ, Petitioner, v. Robert A. WALLIS, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service, Respondent., 2004 WL 371676, *371676+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 24, 2004) North Carolina Justice and Community Development Center Amicus Curiae in Support of Petitioner (NO. 03-7434) 7372 Yaser Esam HAMDI; Esam Fouad HAMDI, As Next Friend of Yaser Esam HAMDI, Petitioners, v. Donald H. RUMSFELD, W.R. PAULETTE, Commander, Respondents., 2004 WL 354184, *354184+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 23, 2004) Brief of Amicus Curiae Global Rights in Support of Petitioners (NO. 03-6696) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 7373 Yaser Esam HAMDI; Esam Fouad HAMDI, As Next Friend of Yaser Esam HAMDI, Petitioners, v. Donald H. RUMSFELD, W.R. PAULETTE, Commander, Respondents., 2004 WL 354186, *354186+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 23, 2004) Brief of Amici Curiae International Law Professors Listed Herein in Support of Petitioners (NO. 03-6696) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 7374 ELK GROVE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT and David W. GORDON, Superintendent, Petitioners, v. Michael A. NEWDOW, Respondent., 2004 WL 298117, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 13, 2004) Brief Amicus Curiae of Atheist for Human Rights in Support of Respondent (NO. 02-1624) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 7375 ELK GROVE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT and David W. GORDON, Superintendent, Petitioners, v. Michael A. NEWDOW, et al., 2004 WL 298118, *298118+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Feb 13, 2004) Amicus Curiae Brief of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, American Civil Liberties Union, and Americans for Religious Liberty in Support of Affirmance (NO. 02-1624) " 7376 Shafiq RASUL, et al., Petitioners, v. George W. BUSH, et al., Respondents., 2004 WL 162758, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 22, 2004) Petitioners' Brief on the Merits (NO. 03-334) 7377 Shafiq RASUL, et al., Petitioners, v. George W. BUSH, et al., Respondents., 2004 WL 96762, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 14, 2004) Petitioners' Brief on the Merits (NO. 03-334) 7378 Shafiq RASUL, et al., Petitioners, v. George W. BUSH, et al., Respondents. Fawzi Khalid Abdullah Fahad AL ODAH, et al., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Respondents., 2004 WL 73257, *73257+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 14, 2004) Brief of Amicus Curiae Abdullah AlJoaid in Support of Petitioners (NO. 03-334, 03-343) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7379 Shafiq RASUL, et al., Petitioners, v. George W. BUSH, et al., Respondents. Fawzi Khalid Abdullah Fahad AL ODAH, et al., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Respondents., 2004 WL 96761, *96761+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 14, 2004) Brief of Human Rights Institute of the International Bar Association as Amicus Curiae in Support of Petitioners (NO. 03-334, 03-343) " 7380 Shafiq RASUL, et al., Petitioners, v. George W. BUSH, et al., Respondents. Fawzi Khalid Abdullah Fahad AL ODAH, et al., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Respondents., 2004 WL 96766, *96766+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 14, 2004) Brief of 175 Members of Both Houses of the Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland* as Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioners (NO. 03-334, 03-343) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 7381 John ASHCROFT, Attorney General of the United States, Petitioner, v. AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, et al., Respondents., 2004 WL 73256, *73256+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 13, 2004) Brief of Amici Curiae American © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Society of Journalists and Authors, et al. in Support of Respondents (NO. 03-218) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 7382 Shafiq RASUL, et al., Petitioners, v. George W. BUSH, et al., Respondents. Fawzi Khalid Abdullah Fahad Al ODAH, et al., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES, et al., Respondents., 2004 WL 69144, *69144+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jan 12, 2004) Brief of International Law and Jurisdiction Professors as Amici Curiae in Support of the Petitioners (NO. 03-334, 03-343) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7383 STATE OF TENNESSEE, Petitioner, v. George LANE, et al., 2003 WL 22733902, *22733902+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Nov 12, 2003) Brief for the United States (NO. 02-1667) 7384 Fellers v. U.S., 2003 WL 22282522, *22282522+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Sep 26, 2003) Brief Amicus Curiae of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation in Support of Respondent (NO. 02-6320) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 7385 Illinois v. Lidster, 2003 WL 22220097, *22220097+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Sep 17, 2003) Reply Brief for the Petitioner (NO. 02-1060) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7386 Locke v. Davey, 2003 WL 22087520, *22087520+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Sep 08, 2003) Brief For The Fairness Foundation Amicus Curiae In Support Of Respondent (NO. 02-1315) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7387 Locke v. Davey, 2003 WL 22087608, *22087608+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Sep 08, 2003) Brief of the National Jewish Commission on Law and Public Affairs (""COLPA'') as Amicus Curiae in Support of Respondent (NO. 02-1315) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7388 Locke v. Davey, 2003 WL 22118855, *22118855+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Sep 08, 2003) Brief of Black Alliance for Educational Options as Amicus Curiae in Support of Respondent (NO. 02-1315) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 7389 Tennessee v. Lane, 2003 WL 22137324, *22137324+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Sep 08, 2003) Brief of Petitioner (NO. 02-1667) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7390 Locke v. Davey, 2003 WL 22176103, *22176103+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Sep 08, 2003) Brief of the National Jewish Commission on Law and Public Affairs (""COLPA'') as Amicus Curiae in Support of Respondent (NO. 02-1315) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7391 Office of Independent Counsel v. Favish, 2003 WL 21940001, *21940001+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 06, 2003) Brief on the Merits of Respondent Allan J. Favish (NO. 02-954) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 7392 McConnell v. Federal Election Com'n, 2003 WL 21845329, *21845329+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Aug 05, 2003) Brief of Amici Curiae International Experts in Support of Appellees/Cross-Appellants (NO. 02-1674) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 7393 National Right to Life Committee, Inc. v. Federal Election Com'n, 2003 WL 21999398, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Jul 08, 2003) Brief of PlaintiffsAppellants/Cross-Appellees National Right to Life Committee et al. (NO. 02-1733) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 7394 Ernest L. MONTANYE, Former Superintendent of Attica Correctional Facility, et al., Petitioners, v. Rodney R. HAYMES, Respondent., 1975 WL 173432, *173432 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Oct 20, 1975) Brief for the Respondent (NO. 74-520) 7395 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. Sonia Flores RIVERA, Defendant-Appellant., 2012 WL 2366589, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (1st Cir. Jun 11, 2012) Brief of Appellant Sonia Flores Rivera (NO. 10-1434) 7396 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. Angel Rivera CLAUDIO, Defendant-Appellant., 2012 WL 1075752, *1 (Appellate Brief) (1st Cir. Feb 23, 2012) Brief of Appellant Angel Rivera Claudio (NO. 11-1742) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7397 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, et al., DefendantsAppellants. Nancy Gill, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, Dean Hara, PlaintiffAppellee/Cross-Appellant, v. Office of Personnel Management, et al., Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Appellees., 2011 WL 6147004, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (1st Cir. Dec 01, 2011) Reply Brief for Intervenor-Appellant the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives (NO. 10-2204, 10-2207, 10-2214) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7398 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, et al., Defendants-Appellants. Dean Hara, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, Nancy Gill, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Office of Personnel Management, et al., Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Appellees., 2011 WL 5833105, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (1st Cir. Nov 14, 2011) Brief of Amici Curiae 31 Bar Associations, Public-Interest Organizations and Legal Service Organizations in Support of Appellees and in Support of Affirmance of the Judgment Below (NO. 10-2204, 10-2207, 10-2214) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7399 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, et al., Defendants-Appellants. Dean Hara, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, Nancy Gill, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Office of Personnel Management, et al., Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Appellees., 2011 WL 6741993, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (1st Cir. Nov 14, 2011) Brief of Amici Curiae 31 Bar Associations, Public-Interest Organizations and Legal Service Organizations in Support of Appellees and in Support of Affirmance of the Judgment Below (NO. 10-2204, 10-2207, 10-2214) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7400 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, et al., Defendants-Appellants. Dean Hara, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, Nancy Gill, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Office of Personnel Management, et al., Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Appellees., 2011 WL 5517815, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (1st Cir. Nov 03, 2011) Brief of Amici Curiae 31 Bar Associations, Public-Interest Organizations and Legal Service Organizations in Support of © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Appellees and in Support of Affirmance of the Judgment Below (NO. 10-2204, 10-2207, 10-2214) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7401 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, et al., Defendants-Appellants. Dean Hara, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, Nancy Gill, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Office of Personnel Management, et al., Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Appellees., 2011 WL 5517817, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (1st Cir. Nov 03, 2011) Brief of Amici Curiae Anti-Defamation League %75 Andover Newton Theological School %75 California Council of Churches %75 California Faith for Equality %75 Central Conference of American Rabbis %75 ... (NO. 10-2204, 10-2207, 10-2214) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7402 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, et al., Defendants-Appellants. Dean Hara, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, Nancy Gill, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, Keith Toney; Albert Toney, III, Plaintiffs, v. Office of Personnel Management, et al., Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Appellees, Hillary Rodham Clinton, in her official capacity as United States Secretary of State, Defendant., 2011 WL 5517823, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (1st Cir. Nov 03, 2011) Brief of Amici Curiae Family and Child Welfare Law Professors in Support of Affirmance of the Judgment Below (NO. 10-2204, 10-2207, 10-2214) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7403 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al., Defendants-Appellants. Dean Hara, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, Nancy Gill et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Office of Personnel Management et al., Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Appellees., 2011 WL 5833107, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (1st Cir. Nov 03, 2011) Brief of Members of the U.S. House of Representatives--Including Objecting Members of the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group, Representatives Nancy Pelosi and Steny H. Hoyer--As Amici Curiae in Support ... (NO. 10-2204, 10-2207, 10-2214) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7404 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, et al., Defendants-Appellants. Dean Hara, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, Nancy GILL, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Office of Personnel Management, et al., Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Appellees., 2011 WL 6961723, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (1st Cir. Nov 03, 2011) Brief of Amici Curiae Anti-Defamation League %75 Andover Newton Theological School %75 California Council of Churches %75 California Faith for Equality %75 Central Conference of American Rabbis %75 ... (NO. 10-2204, 10-2207, 10-2214) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7405 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, et al., © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Defendants-Appellants. Nancy Gill, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, Dean Hara, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. Office of Personnel Management, et al., Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Appellees., 2011 WL 5323302, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (1st Cir. Oct 27, 2011) Brief for Plaintiff-Appellee Commonwealth of Massachusetts (NO. 10-2204, 10-2207, 10-2214) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7406 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, et al., DefendantsAppellants. Nancy Gill, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, Dean Hara, PlaintiffAppellee/Cross-Appellant, v. Office of Personnel Management, et al., Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Appellees., 2011 WL 4539095, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (1st Cir. Sep 22, 2011) Brief for Intervenor-Appellant the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives (NO. 10-2204, 10-2207, 10-2214) " 7407 Calixto COLON-RIVERA; Juan Sanchez; Jorge Plard; Adalberto Aviles; and Noemi Valentin, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ASOCIACION DE SUSCRIPCION CONJUNTA DEL SEGURO DE RESPONSABILIDAD OBLIGATORIO, Defendant-Appellee., 2011 WL 2603680, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (1st Cir. Jun 22, 2011) Brief of the Asociacion de Suscripcion Conjunta del Seguro de Responsabilidad Obligatorio (NO. 11-1148) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7408 Calixto COLON-RIVERA; Juan Sanchez; Jorge Plard; Adalberto Aviles; and Noemi Valentin, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ASOCIACION DE SUSCRIPCION CONJUNTA DEL SEGURO DE RESPONSABILIDAD OBLIGATORIO, Defendant-Appellee., 2011 WL 2603681, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (1st Cir. Jun 22, 2011) Brief of the Asociacion de Suscripcion Conjunta del Seguro de Responsabilidad Obligatorio (NO. 11-1148) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7409 Calixto COLON-RIVERA; Juan Sanchez; Jorge Plard; Adalberto Aviles; and Noemi Valentin, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ASOCIACION DE SUSCRIPCION CONJUNTA DEL SEGURO DE RESPONSABILIDAD OBLIGATORIO, Defendant-Appellee., 2011 WL 2603679, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (1st Cir. Jun 13, 2011) Brief of the Asociacion de Suscripcion Conjunta del Seguro de Responsabilidad Obligatorio (NO. 11-1148) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7410 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. William DOUGLAS, Defendant, Appellee., 2011 WL 1836173, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (1st Cir. Apr 22, 2011) Brief Amicus Curiae of the Federal Public Defender for the Districts of Massachusetts, New Hampshire and Rhode Island Supporting Appellee and Affirmance of the District Court (NO. 10-2341) 7411 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. William GUIVAS, Appellant., 2011 WL 1108743, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (1st Cir. Mar 17, 2011) Brief of Appellant William Guivas (NO. 10-1757) 7412 Luis Aik AYALA-SEPULVEDA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MUNICIPALITY OF SAN GERMAN; Isidro Negron-Irizarry, Mayor of San German, Defendants Appellees., 2011 WL 970386, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (1st Cir. Mar 02, 2011) Brief for Appellee Municipality of San German (NO. 10-2123) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 7413 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, et al., Defendants-Appellants. Dean Hara, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, Nancy Gill, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, Keith Toney; Albert Toney, III, Plaintiffs, v. Office of Personnel Management, et al., Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Appellees, Hilary Rodham Clinton, in her official capacity as United States Secretary of State, Defendant., 2011 WL 970395, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (1st Cir. Feb 02, 2011) Brief Amicus Curiae of Agudath Israel of America. in Support of Defendants-Appellants and in Support of Reversal (NO. 10-2204, 10-2207, 10-2214) 7414 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, et al., Defendants-Appellants. Dean Hara, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, Nancy Gill, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, Keith Toney; Albert Toney, III, Plaintiffs, v. Office of Personnel Management, et al., Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Appellees, Hilary Rodham Clinton, in her official capacity as United States Secretary of State, Defendant., 2011 WL 494356, *494356+ (Appellate Brief) (1st Cir. Jan 27, 2011) Brief of Amici Curiae U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops; National Association of Evangelicals; the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints; the Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission of the ... (NO. 10-2204, 10-2207, 10-2214) 7415 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, et al., Defendants-Appellants. Dean Hara, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, Nancy Gill, et al, Plaintiffs-Appellees, Keith Toney; Albert Toney, III, Plaintiffs, v. Office of Personnel Management, et al, Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Appellees, Hilary Rodham Clinton, in her official capacity as United States Secretary of State, Defendant., 2011 WL 494357, *494357+ (Appellate Brief) (1st Cir. Jan 27, 2011) Brief of Amici Curiae, Robert P. George, Sherif Girgis, and Ryan T. Anderson, in Support of Reversal and the Intervening DefendantsAppellants (NO. 10-2204, 10-2207, 10-2214) 7416 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, et al., Defendants-Appellants. Dean Hara, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, Nancy Gill, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Office of Personnel Management, et al., Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Appellees., 2011 WL 494348, *494348+ (Appellate Brief) (1st Cir. Jan 20, 2011) Brief of Amicus Curiae Foundation for Moral Law Supporting Defendants-Appellants and Supporting Reversal (NO. 10-2204, 10-2207, 10-2214) 7417 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, Plaintiff -- Appellee, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES; et. al., Defendants -- Appellants. Dean Hara, Plaintiff, Appellee/Cross-Appellant, Nancy Gill; et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, keith Toney; Albert Toney, III, Plaintiffs, v. Office of Personnel Management, et al., Defendants, Appellants/Cross-Appellees, © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Dean Hara, Plaintiff, Appellee/Cross-Appellant, Nancy Gill; et al.,, 2011 WL 970394, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (1st Cir. Jan 19, 2011) Brief of Amicus Curiae George I. Goverman in Support of Federal Defendants (NO. 10-2204, 10-2207, 10-2214) 7418 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES DEP'T OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, et al., DefendantsAppellants. & Nancy Gill, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Office of Personnel Management, et al., Defendants-Appellants. & Dean Hara, Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, v. Office of Personnel Management, et al., DefendantsAppellants, Cross-Appellees., 2011 WL 494346, *494346+ (Appellate Brief) (1st Cir. Jan 18, 2011) Brief of Amicus Curiae, the Family Research Council, in Support of Defendants-Appellants and in Support of Reversal in No. 10-2207 (NO. 10-2204, 10-2207, 10-2214) 7419 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. Hector O. LABOY-VEGA, Defendant-Appellant., 2010 WL 5269709, *5269709+ (Appellate Brief) (1st Cir. Nov 08, 2010) Brief and Addendum of Defendant-Appellant Hector O. Laboy-Vega (NO. 10-1439) 7420 ST. PAUL FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE CO., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. VDE CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellant, Banco Santander Puerto Rico, Defendant., 2009 WL 6841383, *6841383 (Appellate Brief) (1st Cir. Jul 13, 2009) Vde Corporation's Reply Brief on Appeal (NO. 08-2576) 7421 Thomas COOK, et al, v. Donald RUMSFELD., 2006 WL 4015624, *4015624+ (Appellate Brief) (1st Cir. Dec 22, 2006) Brief of the Appellees (NO. 06-2313) 7422 Thomas COOK, Megan Dresch; Laura Galaburda; Jack Glover, David Hall; Monica Hill; Jenny Lynn Kopestein; Jennifer McGinn; Justin Peacock; Derek Spearks; and Stacy Vasquez, Plaintiffs-Appellants, James E. Petrangelo, II, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donald H. RUMSFELD, Secretary of Defense; Michael Chertoff, Secretary of Homeland Security, United States of America, DefendnatsAppellees., 2006 WL 4035216, *4035216+ (Appellate Brief) (1st Cir. Nov 22, 2006) Brief of Law Perofessors as Amici Curiae in Support of Appellants (NO. 06-2313, 06-2381) 7423 Thomas COOK, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, James E. Pietrangelo, II Plaintiff, v. Donald H. RUMSFELD, et al., Defendants-Appellees; James E. Pietrangelo, II, Plaintiff-Appellant, Thomas Cook, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Donald H. Rumsfeld, et al. Defendants-Appellees., 2006 WL 4035218, *4035218+ (Appellate Brief) (1st Cir. Nov 22, 2006) Brief of Amicus Curiae Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc. in Support of All Plaintiffs-Appellants, and Supporting Reversal (NO. 06-2313, 06-2381) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 7424 Thomas COOK; Megan Dresch: Laura Galaburda; Jack Glover; David Hall; Monica Hill; Jenny Lynn Kopfstein; Jennifer McGrinn; Justin Peacock; Derek Sparks; Stacy Vasquez, Plaintiffs-Appellants, James E. Pietrangelo, II Plaintiff, v. Donald H. RUMSFELD, Secretary of Defense; Michael Chertoff, Secretary of © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Homeland Security; United States, Defendants-Appellees., 2006 WL 4035219, *4035219+ (Appellate Brief) (1st Cir. Nov 22, 2006) Brief of Amicus Curiae. Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellants (NO. 06-2313, 06-2381) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7425 Thomas COOK, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, James E. Pietrangelo, II, Plaintiff, v. Donald H. RUMSFELD, et al., Defendants-Appellees; James E. Pietrangelo, II Plaintiff-Appellant, Thomas Cook, et al., Plaintiffs., v. Donald H. Rumsfeld, et al., Defendants-Appellants., 2006 WL 4035220, *4035220+ (Appellate Brief) (1st Cir. Nov 21, 2006) Brief of Amicus curiae American Civil Liberties Union and American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellants and in Support of Reversal (NO. 06-2313, 06-2381) " 7426 Thomas COOK, Megan Dresch, Laura Galaburda, Jack Glover, David Hall, Monica Hill, Jenny Lynn Kopfstein, Jennifer McGinn, Justin Peacock, James Pietrangelo II, Derek Sparks, and Stacy Vazquez, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Donald H. RUMSFELD, Secretary Of Defense; Tom Ridge, Secretary of Homeland Security; United States of America, Defendants-Appellees., 2006 WL 4035215, *4035215+ (Appellate Brief) (1st Cir. Nov 20, 2006) Amicus Curiae Brief of American Sociological Association and Social Science Professors for Appellants and Supporting Reversal (NO. 06-2313, 06-2381) 7427 Thomas COOK; Megan Dresch; Laura Galaburda; Jack Glover; David Hall; Monica Till; Jenny Lynn Kopfstein; Jennifer McGinn; Justin Peacock; Derek Sparks; Stacy Vasquez, Plaintiffs-Appellants, James E. Pietrangelo, II, Plaintiff, v. Donald H. RUMSFELD, Secretary of Defense; Michael Chertoff, Secretary of Homeland Security; United States, Defendants-Appellees., 2006 WL 4035217, *4035217+ (Appellate Brief) (1st Cir. Nov 13, 2006) Brief of PlaintiffsAppellants in No. 06-2313 (NO. 06-2313, 06-2381) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 7428 Thomas COOK, et al., Appellant, v. Donald H. RUMSFELD, Secretary of Defense, et al, Appellees., 2006 WL 4015625, *4015625+ (Appellate Brief) (1st Cir. Nov 06, 2006) Brief of Appellant James E Pietrangelo, II (NO. 06-2313, 06-2381) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7429 Wayne Blyth HEALY, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Luis SPENCER, RespondentAppellant., 2006 WL 4402539, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (1st Cir. May 05, 2006) Brief of Amicus Curiae, Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders, In Support of Petitioner-appellee, Wayne Healy (NO. 06-1269) 7430 James DONALDSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TOWN OF WAKEFIELD; American Federation of Stat Municipal Employees, Council 93 Afl-cio; and C of Massachusetts, Defendants-Appellees., 2004 WL 5665833, *5665833+ (Appellate Brief) (1st Cir. Nov 23, 2004) Brief of the Plaintiff-Appellee, James Don (NO. 04-2344) 7431 James ALBRIGHT; Amrak Productions, Inc., Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. Andrew MORTON; Michael O'Mara; Michael O'Mara Books Limited, Defendants/ Appellees, St. Martin's Press, Inc.; Time, Inc., News Group Newspapers Ltd., © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Defendants., 2004 WL 5684130, *5684130+ (Appellate Brief) (1st Cir. Nov 22, 2004) Brief (NO. 2004-1449) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7432 Eukild SHOMO, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. George FOURKAS; Human Service Management Corporation; City of Worcester; Dimitra Delights, Inc.; Table Talk Pies, Inc.; Alexander Gjoncaj; and John Sekuj, Defendants, Appellees., 2003 WL 25797571, *25797571+ (Appellate Brief) (1st Cir. Sep 17, 2003) Brief (NO. 2003-1923) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7433 Gail M. NORTON, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Russell L. HOYT, Defendant/ Appellee., 2003 WL 25796841, *25796841+ (Appellate Brief) (1st Cir. 2003) Brief of Plaintiff-Appellant Gail R. Norton (NO. 03-2281) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7434 Delores GONSALVES, Administratrix of the Estate of Morris Pina, Jr., as Administratrix, and on her own behalf, Appellant, v. THE CITY OF NEW BEDFORD, Massachusetts, et. al., Appellees., 1992 WL 12576019, *12576019 (Appellate Brief) (1st Cir. Jun 10, 1992) Appellants Brief (NO. 92-1733) 7435 John DOE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Andrew CUOMO, as Governor of the State of New York, in his official and individual capacity, M. Sean Byrne, as Acting Commissioner of the State of New York Division of Criminal Justice Services, in his official and individual capacity, Defendants-Appellees, The New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, Defendant., 2013 WL 3120748, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Jun 17, 2013) Brief for Appellees (NO. 12-4288) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7436 John DOE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Andrew CUOMO, as Governor of the State of New York, in his official and individual capacity, M. Sean Byrne, as Acting Commissioner of the State of New York Division of Criminal Justice Services, in his official and individual capacity, The New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, Defendants-Appellees., 2013 WL 1151615, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Mar 13, 2013) Brief for Plaintiff-Appellant (NO. 12-4288-CV) " HN: 3,5 (S.Ct.) 7437 John DOE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Andrew CUOMO, as Governor of the State of New York, in his official and individual capacity, M. Sean Byrne, as Acting Commissioner of the State of New York Division of Criminal Justice Services, in his official and individual capacity, The New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, Defendants-Appellees., 2013 WL 1291285, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Mar 13, 2013) Brief for Plaintiff-Appellant (NO. 12-4288-CV) " HN: 3,5 (S.Ct.) 7438 Michael SANTULLI, Rosemarie Santulli, Our Future LLC, M. Santulli, LLC, Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants-Appellees, v. Francis RUSSELLO, Individually and as a Code Enforcement Officer of the Town of Brookhaven, New York, Patrick Campbell, Individually and as a Code Enforcement Officer of the Town of Brookhaven, New York, Robert N. Incagliato, Individually and as a Senior Inspector of the Town of Brookhaven, New York, Raymond Negron,, 2012 WL 5986988, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Nov 26, 2012) Reply Brief for Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellants (NO. 12-1790-CV) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 7439 Michael SANTULLI, Rosemarie Santulli, Our Future LLC, M. Santulli, LLC, Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants-Appellees, v. Francis RUSSELLO, Individually and as a Code Enforcement Officer of the Town of Brookhaven, New York, Patrick Campbell, Individually and as a Code Enforcement Officer of the Town of Brookhaven, New York, Robert N. Incagliato, Individually and as a Senior Inspector of the Town of Brookhaven, New York, Raymond Negron,, 2012 WL 5894275, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Nov 14, 2012) Brief for PlaintiffsCounter-Defendants-Appellees (NO. 12-1790-CV) 7440 Michael SANTULLI, Rosemarie Santulli, Our Future LLC, M. Santulli, LLC, Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants-Appellees, v. Francis RUSSELLO, Individually and as a Code Enforcement Officer of the Town of Brookhaven, New York, Patrick Campbell, Individually and as a Code Enforcement Officer of the Town of Brookhaven, New York, Robert N. Incagliato, Individually and as a Senior Inspector of the Town of Brookhaven, New York, Raymond Negron,, 2012 WL 5829113, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Nov 12, 2012) Brief for PlaintiffsCounter-Defendants-Appellees (NO. 12-1790-CV) 7441 Edith Schlain WINDSOR, in her Official Capacity as Executor of the Estate of Thea Clara Spyer, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BIPARTISAN LEGAL ADVISORY GROUP OF THE UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Intervenor-Defendant-Appellant, United States of America, DefendantAppellant., 2012 WL 4338888, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Sep 18, 2012) Brief of Amicus Curiae Columbia Law School Sexuality & Gender Law Clinic in Support of Plaintiff-Appellee (NO. 12-2335(L), 12-2435) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7442 Edith Schlain WINDSOR, In Her Official Capacity as Executor of the Estate of Thea Clara Spyer, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellant, Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the U.S. House of Representatives, Intervenor-Defendant-Appellant., 2012 WL 4338887, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Sep 17, 2012) Reply Brief for Defendant-Appellant the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives (NO. 12-2335(L), 12-2435(CON)) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7443 Edith Schlain WINDSOR, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellant, Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the U.S. House of Representatives, Intervenor-Defendant-Appellant., 2012 WL 4338886, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Sep 14, 2012) Reply Brief for DefendantAppellant the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives (NO. 12-2335(L), 12-2435(CON)) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7444 Edith Schlain WINDSOR, in her Official Capacity as Executor of the Estate of Thea Clara Spyer, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BIPARTISAN LEGAL ADVISORY GROUP OF THE UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Intervenor-Defendant-Appellant, United States of America, DefendantAppellant., 2012 WL 4338884, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Sep 13, 2012) Brief of Amicus Curiae Columbia Law School Sexuality & Gender Law Clinic in Support of Plaintiff-Appellee (NO. 12-2335(L), 12-2435) " HN: © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 5 (S.Ct.) 7445 Edith Schlain WINDSOR, in her capacity as executor of the estate of Thea Clara Spyer, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DefendantAppellant, Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the U.S. House of Representatives, Intervenor-Defendant-Appellant., 2012 WL 4338882, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Sep 12, 2012) Brief of Members of the U.S. House of Representatives--Including Objecting Members of the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group, Representatives Nancy Pelosi and Steny H. Hoyer--as Amici Curiae in Support ... (NO. 12-2335, 12-2435) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7446 Edith Schlain WINDSOR, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant, BIPARTISAN LEGAL ADVISORY GROUP OF THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Intervenor-Defendant-Appellant., 2012 WL 4201890, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Sep 07, 2012) Brief of Members of the U.S. House of Representatives-Including Objecting Members of the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group, Representatives Nancy Pelosi and Steny H. Hoyer-As Amici Curiae in Support of ... (NO. 12-2335, 12-2435) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7447 Edith Schlain WINDSOR, in Her Official Capacity as Executor of the Estate of Thea Clara Spyer, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellant, BIPARTISAN LEGAL ADVISORY GROUP OF THE UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, IntervenorDefendant-Appellant., 2012 WL 4201893, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Sep 07, 2012) Brief of Amici Curiae Bar Associations and Public Interest and Legal Service Organizations in Support of Plaintiff-Appellee and Affirmance of the Judgment Below (NO. 12-2335, 12-2435) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7448 Edith Schlain WINDSOR, in her Official capacity as Executor of the estate of Thea Clara Spyer, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BIPARTISAN LEGAL ADVISORY GROUP OF THE UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Intervenor-Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DefendantAppellant., 2012 WL 4201898, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Sep 07, 2012) Brief of Amici Curiae Professors of Family and Child Welfare Law Susan Appleton, Carlos Ball, Brian Bix, Cynthia Bowman, Naomi Cahn, Marion Crain, Nancy Dowd, Joanna L. Grossman, Joan Heifetz ... (NO. 12-2335-CV(L), 12-2435-CV) " HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 7449 Edith Schlain WINDSOR, in her Official capacity as Executor of the estate of Thea Clara Spyer, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BIPARTISAN LEGAL ADVISORY GROUP OF THE UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Intervenor-Defendant-Appellant, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DefendantAppellant., 2012 WL 4201899, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Sep 07, 2012) Brief of Amicus Curiae Naacp Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc. IN Support of Plaintiff-Appellee and Affirmance (NO. 12-2335, L) 7450 Edith Schlain WINDSOR, in her Official Capacity as Executor of the Estate of Thea Clara Spyer, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellant. BIPARTISAN LEGAL ADVISORY GROUP OF THE © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, IntervenorDefendant-Appellant., 2012 WL 4201903, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Sep 07, 2012) Brief of Amici Curiae Anti-Defamation League Central Conference of American Rabbis Congregation Beit Simchat Torah Bend the Arc: A Jewish Partnership for Justice Hadassah, the Women's Zionist ... (NO. 12-2335, 12-2435) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7451 Edith Schlain WINDSOR, in her Official Capacity as Executor of the Estate of Thea Clara Spyer, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BIPARTISAN LEGAL ADVISORY GROUP OF THE UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Intervenor-Defendant-Appellant, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DefendantAppellant., 2012 WL 4201907, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Sep 07, 2012) Brief of Amicus Curiae Columbia Law School Sexuality & Gender Law Clinic in Support of Plaintiff-Appellee (NO. 12-2335(L), 12-2435) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7452 Edith Schlain WINDSOR, in Her Official Capacity as Executor of the Estate of Thea Clara Spyer, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BIPARTISAN LEGAL ADVISORY GROUP OF THE UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Intervenor-Defendant-Appellant, United States of America, DefendantAppellant., 2012 WL 3900586, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Aug 31, 2012) Brief of Plaintiff-Appellee (NO. 12-2335-CV, 12-2435) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7453 Michael SANTULLI, Rosemarie Santulli, Our Future LLC, M. Santulli, LLC, Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants-Appellees, v. Francis RUSSELLO, Individually and as a Code Enforcement Officer of the Town of Brookhaven, New York, Patrick Campbell, Individually and as a Code Enforcement Officer of the Town of Brookhaven, New York, Robert N. Incagliato, Individually and as a Senior Inspector of the Town of Brookhaven, New York, Raymond Negron,, 2012 WL 3547054, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Aug 13, 2012) Brief and Special Appendix for Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellants (NO. 12-1790-CV) 7454 Edith Schlain WINDSOR, In Her Official Capacity as Executor of the Estate of Thea Clara Spyer, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellant, Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives, Intervenor-Defendant-Appellant., 2012 WL 3548007, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Aug 10, 2012) Brief for the United States (NO. 12-2335, 12-2435) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7455 Edith Schlain WINDSOR, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant, Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the U.S. House of Representatives, Intervenor-Defendant-Appellant., 2012 WL 3548008, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Aug 10, 2012) Brief for Defendant-Appellant the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives (NO. 12-2335, 12-2435) " 7456 Edith Schlain WINDSOR, in Her Official Capacity As Executor of the Estate of Thea Clara Spyer, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellant, Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the U.S. House of © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Representatives, Intervenor-Defendant-Appellant., 2012 WL 3647722, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Aug 10, 2012) Brief for Defendant-Appellant the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives (NO. 12-2335, 12-2435) " 7457 Benjamin J. ASHMORE, Sr., Appellant-Appellant, v. STATE OF NEW YORK, Eric I. Prus, Randall T. Eng, Reinaldo E. Rivera, L. Priscilla Hall, Sandra L. Sgroi, Jonathan Lippman, Respondent-Appellees., 2012 WL 3144078, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Jul 31, 2012) Brief of Appellant Benjamin J. Ashmore, Sr. (NO. 12-2760) 7458 Benjamin J. ASHMORE, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF NEW YORK, Eric I. Prus, Randall T. Eng, Reinaldo E. Rivera, L. Priscilla Hall, Sandra L. Sgroi, Jonathan Lippman, Defendants-Appellees, New York State Office of the Attorney General, Amicus Curiae., 2012 WL 3647735, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Jul 31, 2012) Brief of Appellant Benjamin J. Ashmore, Sr. (NO. 12-2760) 7459 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. Jeremy ZIELINSKI, DefendantAppellant., 2012 WL 2366540, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Jun 12, 2012) Brief and Special Appendix for Defendant-Appellant (NO. 12-0595-) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7460 Erin MITCHELL, Danielle Digirolamo, Josh Smith, Donald Montano, Alexander Suarez, TY Hailey, Ray Neal, and Josh Heltke, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF NEW HAVEN, John Destefano, Dean Esserman, and Committee of Common & Undividied Lands in New Haven, Defendants., 2012 WL 1407421, *1 (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Apr 16, 2012) Supplementary Memorandum in Suport of Plaintiffs' Motion for Stay Pending Appeal (NO. 12-1403) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 7461 STATE EMP BARGAINING AGENT COALITION, Ind & o/b/o of all of its members, Connecticut Association of Prosecutors, Congress of Ct Community Colleges, Seiu, Aflcio, Judicial Marshals, Intl Brotherhood of Police Officers, Connecticut State University American Assoc, of University Professors, Protective Svc Coalition, Iaff, Aflcio, National Assn of Govt Emp, Aflcio, Connecticut State Employees Association, Seiu, AFL-CIO, Connecticut Employees Union Independent,, 2012 WL 605778, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Feb 03, 2012) Brief of the Defendants-Appellees (NO. 11-3061-CV) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7462 Alfred G. OSTERWEIL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. George R. BARTLETT, III, In his official capacity as Licensing Officer in the County of Schoharie, Defendant - Appellee, David A. Paterson, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of New York; Andrew M. Cuomo, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of New York, Defendants., 2012 WL 363877, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Jan 26, 2012) Brief for Appellant Alfred G. Osterweil (NO. 11-2420CV) 7463 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. Quentin J. LEEPER, aka Q, Defendant-Appellant, Quincy O. Turner, Kevin Mims, Ronquike E. Maisoner, © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Hashaun L. Leeper, Raymond A. Hodnett, Sr., Major Anthony Newton, Roger Allen Leeper, aka Dew, Koran Donnell Leeper, aka Korry D. Leeper, Millicent L. Leeper, Dion D. Knight, Jose Martinez, aka Noelle, Defendants., 2011 WL 2678295, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Jun 28, 2011) Brief for DefendantAppellant (NO. 11-0157-) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7464 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. Jarvis HINES, DefendantAppellant., 2011 WL 2603326, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Jun 22, 2011) Brief on Appeal for Defendant-Appellant Jarvis Hines (NO. 11-621-) 7465 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. Charles VASCONCELLOS, aka Cheeba, Sherwin Maxwell, aka Pitch, Timothy T. Wilson, Nathan Merritt, aka Ted, Moleak Battice, Anthony B. Blackmore, Andrew Whitaker, aka Country, McKinsey Williams, aka Bug, Andrew Wallace, aka Roan, Lee Wallace, Raheem Brown, aka Rah, Deanthony Wilson, aka Ant, Bryan Wilson, aka KB, Vance Wilson, Alexander Torres, aka Bay, Jason Reid, aka J-Bird, Stanley Boyd, aka Toedoe, Natika McCrae, aka, 2011 WL 1836828, *1 (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Apr 18, 2011) Corrected Brief and Appendix for Defendant-Appellant Joey McCrae, aka Jax (NO. 10-4970-CR(L), 11-0844-CR(CON)) 7466 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. Johnnie BUSH, DefendantAppellant., 2011 WL 1111190, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Mar 22, 2011) Brief on Appeal for Defendant-Appellant Johnnie Bush (NO. 10-4156-) 7467 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. Charles VASCONCELLOS, aka Cheeba, Sherwin Maxwell, aka Pitch, Timothy T. Wilson, Nathan Merritt, aka Ted, Moleak Battice, Anthony B. Blackmore, Andrew Whitaker, aka Country, McKinsey Williams, aka Bug, Andrew Wallace, aka Roan, Lee Wallace, Raheem Brown, aka Rah, Deanthony Wilson, aka Ant, Bryan Wilson, aka KB, Vance Wilson, Alexander Torres, aka Bay, Jason Reid, aka J-Bird, Stanley Boyd, aka Toedoe, Natika McCrae, aka, 2011 WL 956112, *956112 (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Mar 09, 2011) Brief and Appendix for Defendant-Appellant (NO. 10-4970-) 7468 Evertt W. COX III, and Nan Ping Peng, the natural parents of Nan Ping Raphael Cox On Behalf of Their Minor Son and Their Own Behalf, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. WARWICK VALLEY CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, and John Kolesar, Principal, Warwick Middle School, Defendants-Appellees., 2011 WL 680420, *680420+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Feb 17, 2011) Appellee's Brief-in-Chief (NO. 10-3633-CV) 7469 Evertt W. COX III, and Nan Ping Peng, the natural parents of Nan Ping Raphael Cox On Behalf of Their Minor Son and Their Own Behalf, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. WARWICK VALLEY CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, and John Kolesar, principal, Warwick Middle School, Defendants-Appellees., 2011 WL 680419, *680419+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Feb 10, 2011) Appellee's Brief-in-Chief (NO. 10-3633-CV) 7470 STATE EMPLOYEES BARGAINING AGENT COALITION, individually, and on behalf of all of its members, American Federation of School Administration, © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Local 61, AFL-CIO, Connecticut Association of Prosecutors, Protective Service Coalition, IAFF, AFL-CIO, Judicial Marshalls, International Brotherhood of Police Officers, National Association of Government Employees, AFL-CIO, Connecticut State Police Union, Congress of Connecticut Community Colleges, SEIU,, 2011 WL 7277727, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. 2011) Brief of the Dfendants-Appellees (NO. 11-3061-CV) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7471 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. Antoine MCCOREY, also known as Twon, and Oral Ffrench, also known as Oral Richard Ffrench, also known as Son Son, also known as Franklin Jerome Miller, DefendantsAppellants., 2010 WL 4597214, *4597214+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Nov 04, 2010) Appellant Ffrench's Brief and Appendix (NO. 09-4363-CR(LEAD-CLOS, 10-1198-CR(CON)) 7472 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. Oral FFRENCH, DefendantAppellant., 2010 WL 4597215, *4597215+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Nov 03, 2010) Appellant's Brief and Appendix (NO. 09-4363-CR(LEAD-CLOS, 10-1198-CR(CON)) 7473 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellant, v. Joshua ACOFF, DefendantAppellee., 2010 WL 4278431, *4278431+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Oct 21, 2010) Brief for Defendant-Appellee Joshua Acoff (NO. 10-285-) 7474 Judy Prescott BARNETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert E. CARBERRY, S. Derek Phelps, Connecticut Light & Power Company, Northeast Utilities, Northeast Utilities Service Company, United Illuminating Company, Connecticut Sitting Council, John Doe, Mary Roe, Defendants-Appellees., 2010 WL 3213690, *3213690 (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Aug 05, 2010) Brief and Special Appendix for Plaintiff-Appellant Judy Prescott Barnett (NO. 10-1342-CV) 7475 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. ARIEL DE LOS ANGELES, Defendant, Dennis Torres, Defendant-Appellant., 2010 WL 3159565, *3159565+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Aug 02, 2010) Brief and Appendix for Appellant Dennis Torres (NO. 10-0907-) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7476 Timothy D. WALKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, James W. Burns, Mark Gostyla, Russell Paltauf, Fernando Ramirez, Dale Salmon, Alexander Cruz, Ivan Hernandez, David Krasnowski, Richard T. Paltauf, Robert Stokes, Gerald Zarella, Consolidated-Plaintiffs-Appellants, Joseph Fischetti, Edward Grenier, Mark Johnston, John F. Moffo, Nathaniel Shulde, Consolidated-Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF WATERBURY, Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Appellee, Waterbury Financial, 2009 WL 7111317, *7111317+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Oct 02, 2009) Brief of City of Waterbury Defendant-Cross-Claimant Appellee (NO. 09-2104-CV) 7477 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. Lamont REEVES, DefendantAppellant., 2009 WL 8185932, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Mar 20, 2009) Reply Brief for Appellant Lamont Reeves (NO. 08-2966-CR(L), 08-2975-) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 7478 Joseph AMORE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF ITHACA, Andrew Novarro, Defendants-Appellants., 2009 WL 8185951, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Mar 02, 2009) Reply Brief for Defendants-Appellants (NO. 08-3150-CV) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7479 Joseph AMORE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF ITHACA, Andrew Novarro, Defendants-Appellants., 2008 WL 8594934, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Dec 09, 2008) Brief and Special Appendix for Defendants-Appellants (NO. 08-3150-CV) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7480 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. Lamont REEVES, DefendantAppellant., 2008 WL 8054326, *8054326+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Nov 21, 2008) Corrected Brief for Appellant Lamont Reeves (NO. 08-2966-CR(L)) " HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 7481 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. Lamont REEVES, DefendantAppellant., 2008 WL 8054327, *8054327+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Nov 18, 2008) Brief for Appellant Lamont Reeves (NO. 08-2966-CR(L), 08-2975-) " HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 7482 LIN, Bao Di, A#XX-XXX-XXX, Petitioner., 2008 WL 7562440, *7562440 (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Oct 17, 2008) Letter Brief (NO. 06-1775-AG) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7483 Maher ARAR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General of the United States, Larry D. Thompson, Formerly Acting Deputy Attorney General, Tom Ridge, Secretary of State of Homeland Security, J. Scott Blackman, Formerly Regional Director of the Regional Office of Immigration and Naturalization Services, Paula Corrigan, Regional Director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Edward J. McElroy, Formerly District Director of Immigration and, 2008 WL 8132328, *8132328+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Jul 29, 2008) Brief of Scholars of American Constitutional Law as Amici Curiae in Support of Plaintiff-Appellant and Urging Reversal (NO. 06-4216-CV) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7484 Maher ARAR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General of the United States, Larry D. Thompson, formerly Acting Deputy Attorney General, Tom Ridge, Secretary of State of Homeland Security, J. Scott Blackman, formerly Regional Director of the Regional Office of Immigration and Naturalization Services, Paula Corrigan, Regional Director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Edward J. McElroy, formerly District Director of Immigration and, 2008 WL 8132338, *8132338+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Jul 29, 2008) Brief of Scholars of American Constitutional Law as Amici Curiae in Support of Plaintiff-Appellant and Urging Reversal (NO. 06-4216-CV) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7485 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. Glenn MARCUS, DefendantAppellant., 2007 WL 6910959, *6910959+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Dec 14, 2007) Brief for the United States (NO. 07-4005-) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7486 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. Glenn MARCUS, Defendant- © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Appellant., 2007 WL 7577148, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Nov 15, 2007) Brief for Defendant-Appellant (NO. 07-4005-) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7487 Bibiano ROSA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK, Board of Trustees of the City University of New York, Eugenio Maria De Hostos Community College and Professional Staff Congress/Cuny, DefendantsAppellees., 2007 WL 6376155, *6376155+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Nov 15, 2007) Additional Reply Brief for Plaintiff-Appellant (NO. 07-1707-CV) " 7488 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. Glenn MARCUS, DefendantAppellant., 2007 WL 6910958, *6910958+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Nov 15, 2007) Brief for Defendant-Appellant (NO. 07-4005-) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7489 James M. MALONEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Andrew CUOMO, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of New York, Eliot Spitzer, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of New York, and Kathleen A. Rice, in her official capacity as District Attorney of the County of Nassau, and their successors, Defendants-Appellees., 2007 WL 6424864, *6424864+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Oct 24, 2007) Brief of Defendant-Appellee Kathleen A. Rice (NO. 07-0581-CV) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 7490 James M. MALONEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Andrew CUOMO, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of New York, Eliot Spitzer, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of New York, and Kathleen A. Rice, in her official capacity as District Attorney of the County of Nassau, and their successors, Defendants-Appellees., 2007 WL 6424863, *6424863+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Sep 24, 2007) Appellant's Brief, (NO. 07-0581-CV) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 7491 Bibiano ROSA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK, Board of Trustees of the City University of New York, Eugenio Maria De Hostos Community College and Professional Staff Congress/Cuny, DefendantsAppellees., 2007 WL 6376152, *6376152+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Jul 27, 2007) Brief for Plaintiff-Appellant (NO. 07-1707-CV) " 7492 Maher ARAR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John ASHCROFT, formerly Attorney General; Larry D. Thompson, formerly Deputy Attorney General, Tom Ridge, Secretary of Homeland Security, J. Scott Blackman, formerly Regional Director of the Regional Office of Immigration and Naturalization Services, Paula Corrigan, Regional Director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Edward J. McElroy, formerly District Director of Immigration and Naturalization Services, 2007 WL 7285648, *7285648+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Feb 22, 2007) Brief for Defendant-Appellee John Ashcroft in His Individual Capacity (NO. 06-4216-CV) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 7493 PORT WASHINGTON TEACHERS' ASSOCIATION; Mary Anne Cariello, as President of the Port Washington Teachers' Association; and Michele Weiden, on behalf of themselves and the female students of the Port Washington Union Free School District, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. PORT WASHINGTON UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT; Laura Mogul, Nancy V. Cowles, Mark Marcellus, Dean Nardone, Dr. Roy Nelson, Robert Seiden, and David Strom, as, 2006 WL 4847069, *4847069+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Oct 26, 2006) Proposed Amicus Curiae Brief in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellants on the Merits and for Affirmance in Part and Vacatur in Part (NO. 06-0708-CV) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7494 CITY OF NEW YORK, Plaintiff-Appellee, Rudolph W. GUILIANI, Mayor of the City of New York, Peter F. Vallone, Speaker of the New York City Council, New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. BERETTA U.S.A. CORP., Browning Arms Co., Colt's Mfg. Co., LLC, Forjas Taurus, S.A., Glock Inc., Phoenix Arms, Sigarms, Inc., Smith & Wesson Corp., Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc., Taurus International Manufacturing, Inc., Sigarms Sauer GMBH,, 2006 WL 4452961, *4452961+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Sep 06, 2006) Appellants' Reply Brief In Support of Appeal and Response to Cross-appeal (NO. 05-6942-CV(LEAD)05-6) 7495 CITY OF NEW YORK, Plaintiff-Appellee, Rudolph W. GUILIANI, Mayor of the City of New York, Peter F. Vallone, Speaker of the New York City Council, New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. BERETTA U.S.A CORP., Browning Arms Co., Colt's MFG. Co. Inc., Forjas Tauraus, S.A., Glock Inc., Phoenix Arms, Sigarms, Inc., Smith & Wesson Corp., Sturm, Ruger and Co., Inc., Taurus International Manufacturing, Inc., SIG Arms Sauer, 2006 WL 5487818, *5487818+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Sep 06, 2006) Brief for Intervenor United States of America (NO. 05-6673-CV(CON), 05-6711-CV(XAP), 05-6942-CV(L), 05-6964-CV(XAP)) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 7496 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. Irwin ZELLERMAIER, Defendant, Paul WEINER, Defendant-Appellant., 2005 WL 6090904, *6090904+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Aug 01, 2005) Brief for the United States of America (NO. 05-1512-) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 7497 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. Irwin ZELLERMAIER, Defendant, Paul WEINER, Defendant-Appellant., 2005 WL 6090903, *6090903+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. May 25, 2005) Brief and Special Appendix for Defendant-Appellant (NO. 05-1512-) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 7498 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. Yakov ROZENFELD, Dimitri Starikov, Igor Souvorkine and Yuri Serov, Defendants; Igor Brunshtein, Defendant-Appellant., 2005 WL 2390122, *2390122 (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. May 02, 2005) Supplemental Brief For Appellant Igor Brunshtein, pro se (NO. 02-1769-) 7499 ALFIEN PAUL LEIGHTON GORDON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles MULE, Director, Batavia Prison, Respondent-Appellee., 2005 WL 4961955, *4961955+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Apr 28, 2005) Brief for the Petitioner-Appellant (NO. 02-2051) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 7500 Alfien P. GORDON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles MULE, Facility Director, © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Respondent-Appellee., 2005 WL 6426403, *6426403+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Mar 10, 2005) Brief of Amicus Curiae the Center for Constitutional Rights in Support of Petitioner-Appellant Alfien P. Gordon (NO. 02-2051) 7501 Jehed DIAMOND, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, PlaintiffAppellant, v. George E. PATAKI, individually and in his official capacity as Governor of the State of New York, Eliot Spitzer, individually and in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of New York, Alan G. Hevesi, individually and in his official capacity as Comptroller of the State of New York, Gary L. Cady, in his official capacity as Clerk of Delaware County, and, 2005 WL 2605295, *2605295+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Feb 08, 2005) Brief of the Plaintiff-Appellant (NO. 03-0326-CV(L)04-5411) 7502 Jalil Abdul MUNTAQIM, a/k/a Anthony Bottom; Joseph hayden, on Behalf of Himself and all Individuals Similarly Situated; Lumumba Akinwole-Bandelle; Wilson Andino; Gina Arias; Wanda Best-Deveaux; Carlos Bristol; Augustine Carmona; David Galarza; Kimalee Garner; Mark Graham; Keran Holmnes, Iii; Chaujuantheyia Lochard; Steven Mangual; Jamel Massey; Stephen Ramon; Nilda Rivera; Mario Romero; Jessica Sanclemente; Paul Satterfield; and Barbara Scott,, 2005 WL 4680735, *4680735+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Feb 07, 2005) In Banc Brief of the Center for Constitutional Rights, the National Alliance of Formerly Incarcerated Persons, the Osborne Association, the Coalition for Parole Restoration, Voice of the Ex-Offender, ... (NO. 01-7260-CV04-388-PR) 7503 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. Curtis MAYO, also known as Cupcake, also known as Cool-City and Jack Williams, Defendants-Appellants; Corey Jenkins, Michael Ledbetter, also known as Buck and Rudolph Otero, also known as Rudy, Defendants., 2004 WL 3700037, *3700037+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Sep 15, 2004) Brief of the Defendant-Appellant, Jack Williams (NO. 03-1666(L)04-0483(LO) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 7504 Allan John WATERS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent-Appellee., 2004 WL 3734626, *3734626+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Aug 13, 2004) Brief for the United States (NO. 04-0589-PR) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7505 PINK TRIANGLE COALITION, Karl Lange and Pierre Seel, InterestedParty-Appellants, v. UNION BANK OF SWITZERLAND, Swiss Bank Corp., also known as Swiss National Bank, Banking Institutions #1-100, John Does #1-100, Certain Swiss Bank Accounts described as follows, Swiss Bankers Assoc., Swiss bankers Association, Bank of Internationa, Bank of International Settlements, Defendants-Appellees; Polish American Defense Committee, Inc., a California, 2004 WL 3756918, *3756918+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Jul 23, 2004) Brief for Appellants Pink Triangle Coalition, Karl Lange and Pierre Seel (NO. 04-2511-CV04-1898(L)) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7506 Allan John WATERS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent-Appellee., 2004 WL 3734627, *3734627+ (Appellate © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Brief) (2nd Cir. Jul 13, 2004) Brief for Petitioner-Appellant Allan John Waters (NO. 04-0589-PR) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7507 Steven STORY, Timothy Bryant, Ulrik Trojaborg, Jessica Dyson, Leonard Gay. Robert Takacs, Maurice Cassidy and Joseph Defilippis, Plaintiff-Appellants, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Howard Safir, individually and in his official capacity as Police Commissioner of the Nypd, Allan Hoehl, individually and in his official capacity as Police Chief of the Nypd, John Doe, City of New York Police Department and Rudolph Giuliani, individually and in his official capacity as Mayor of, 2004 WL 3760644, *3760644+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Jun 23, 2004) Brief for Plaintiffs-Appellants (NO. 04-0199CV) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7508 Yuen Shing LEE, Petitioner-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General of the United States of America and Edward Mcelroy, New York District Director of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, Respondents-Appellants-Cross-Appellees., 2004 WL 3769956, *3769956+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. May 12, 2004) Brief for PetitionerAppellee-Cross-Appellant (NO. 03-2522(L)03-2529(XA) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7509 Patrica J. CURTO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donald SMITH, Dr., Dean; Katherine Edmondson, Dr., Assistant Dean; Hunter Rawlings III, Dr., President;; Cornell University's College of Veterinary Medicine; Cornell University; Robert King, Chancellor of Suny; Rod Paige, Secretary of Education; Leroy Rooker, Director Family Policy Compliance; United States Department of Education; State University of New York; State of New York; Mr. Richard Mills; Nelson Roth; Valerie Cross;, 2003 WL 24072179, *24072179 (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Nov 03, 2003) Reply Brief for Pro-Se Plaintiff-Appellant (NO. 03-6105) 7510 Vinoda J. KUDCHADKAR,. Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ROLLUP SHUTTERS & AWNINGS, INC., And M. Ray Braun, Individually, Defendants-Appellees., 2003 WL 24056658, *24056658+ (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Oct 30, 2003) Reply Brief of Plaintiff-Appellant (NO. 03-7146) 7511 Patrica J. CURTO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donald SMITH, Dr., Dean; Katherine Edmondson, Dr., Assistant Dean; Hunter Rawlings III, Dr., President;; Cornell University's College of Veterinary Medicine; Cornell University; Robert King, Chancellor of Suny; Rod Paige, Secretary of Education; Leroy Rooker, Director Family Policy Compliance; United States Department of Education; State University of New York; State of New York; Mr. Richard Mills; Nelson Roth; Valerie Cross;, 2003 WL 24072177, *24072177 (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Aug 08, 2003) Brief for Pro-Se Plaintiff-Appellant (NO. 03-6105) 7512 NUTRITIONAL HEALTH ALLIANCE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION and Donna Shalala, in her official capacity as Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, DefendantsAppellees., 2001 WL 34401248, *34401248 (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Jun 06, 2001) Corrected Brief for Defendants-Appellees (NO. 01-6011) 7513 NUTRITIONAL HEALTH ALLIANCE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION and Donna Shalala, in her official capacity as © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, DefendantsAppellees., 2001 WL 34401250, *34401250 (Appellate Brief) (2nd Cir. Jun 05, 2001) Brief for Defendants-Appellees (NO. 01-6011) 7514 CONESTOGA WOOD SPECIALTIES CORPORATION, et al., PlaintiffsAppellants, v. Kathleen SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Hearlth and Human Services, et al., Defendants-Appellees., 2013 WL 1792353, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (3rd Cir. Apr 22, 2013) Brief of Amici Curiae Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Union for Reform Judaism, Central Conference of American Rabbis, Women of Reform Judaism, and the Hindu American Foundation ... (NO. 13-1144) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7515 Elias Halim EID; Gwen Packard-Eid, Appellants, v. John THOMPSON, District Director, Newark District; US Citizenship and Immigration Services., 2013 WL 1623581, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (3rd Cir. Apr 08, 2013) Brief and Appendix Volume I of II (Pages A1-A10) on Behalf of Appellants Elias Halim Eid and Gwen Packard-Eid (NO. 12-4271) 7516 Ernest F. HEFFNER; Harry C. Neel; Bart H. Cavanagh, Sr.; John Katora; Brian Leffler; Rebecca Ann Wessel; Mark Patrick Dougherty; Cynthia Lee Finney; Nathan Ray; Todd Eckert; Ben Blascovich; Matthew Morris; William Sucharski; John McGee; Amber M. Scott; Erika Haas; Nicolas Wachter; David Halpate; Patrick Connell; Eugene Connell; Matthew Connell; James J. Connell, Jr.; Jefferson Memorial Park, Inc.; Jefferson Memorial Funeral Home, Inc.; Wellman Funeral Associates, Inc.,, 2013 WL 1451450, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (3rd Cir. Mar 28, 2013) Brief of Appellees (NO. 12-3591) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 7517 Ernest F. HEFFNER; Harry C. Neel; Bart H. Cavanagh, Sr.; John Katora; Brian Leffler; Rebecca Ann Wessel; Mark Patrick Dougherty; Cynthia Lee Finney; Nathan Ray; Todd Eckert; Ben Blascovich; Matthew Morris; William Sucharski; John McGee; Amber M. Scott; Erika Haas; Nicolas Wachter; David Halpate; Patrick Connell; Eugene Connell; Matthew Connell; James J. Connell, Jr.; Jefferson Memorial Park, Inc.; Jefferson Memorial Funeral Home, Inc.; Wellman Funeral Associates, Inc.,, 2013 WL 1305312, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (3rd Cir. Mar 25, 2013) Brief for Appellants (NO. 12-3591) 7518 CONESTOGA WOOD SPECIALTIES CORPORATION; Norman Hahn; Norman Lemar Hahn; Anthony H. Hahn; Elizabeth Hahn; Kevin Hahn, PlaintiffsAppellants, v. SECRETARY OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; Secretary of the United States Department of Labor; Secretary of the United States Department of The Treasury; United States Department of Health and Human Services; United States Department of Labor; and United States Department of the Treasury,, 2013 WL 1308479, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (3rd Cir. Mar 21, 2013) Brief for Liberty, Life, and Law Foundation as Amicus Curiae in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellants and Urging Reversal (NO. 13-1144) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7519 Ernest F. HEFFNER; Harry C. Neel; Bart H. Cavanagh, Sr.; John Katora; Brian Leffler; Rebecca Ann Wessel; Mark Patrick Dougherty; Cynthia Lee Finney; © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Nathan Ray; Todd Eckert; Ben Blascovich; Matthew Morris; William Sucharski; John McGee; Amber M. Scott; Erika Haas; Nicolas Wachter; David Halpate; Patrick Connell; Eugene Connell; Matthew Connell; James J. Connell, Jr; Jefferson Memorial Park, Inc.; Jefferson Mememorial Funeral Home, Inc.; Wellman Funeral Associates Inc.,, 2013 WL 784431, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (3rd Cir. Feb 21, 2013) Brief of Amicus Curiae Institute for Justice (NO. 12-3591) 7520 Ernest F. HEFFNER; Harry C. Neel; Bart H. Cavanagh, Sr.; John Katora; Brian Leffler; Rebecca Ann Wessel; Mark Patrick Dougherty; Cynthia Lee Finney; Nathan Ray; Todd Eckert; Ben Blascovich; Matthew Morris; William Sucharski; John McGee; Amber M. Scott; Erika Haas; Nicolas Wachter; David Halpate; Patrick Connell; Eugene Connell; Matthew Connell; James J. Connell, Jr.; Jefferson Memorial Park, Inc.; Jefferson Memorial Funeral Home, Inc.; Wellman Funeral Associates, Inc.,, 2013 WL 653672, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (3rd Cir. Feb 14, 2013) Brief of Appellees (NO. 12-3591) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 7521 In re W.R. GRACE & CO., et al., Debtor. HER MAGESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF CANADA, State of Montana, Appellants, v. W.R. Grace & Co., et al., Appellees., 2013 WL 431372, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (3rd Cir. Jan 28, 2013) Brief of Imperial Tobacco Canada Limited As Amicus Curiae in Support of Defendants-Appellees (NO. 12-2904) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7522 In re W.R. GRACE & CO., et al., Debtor. Her Magesty the Queen in Right of Canada, State of Montana Appellants, v. W.R. Grace & Co., et al., Appellees., 2013 WL 653662, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (3rd Cir. Jan 24, 2013) Motion for Leave to File Brief As Amicus Curiae and Brief of Imperial Tobacco Canada Limited as Amicus Curiae in Support of Defendants-Appellees (NO. 12-2904) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7523 Ernest F. HEFFNER; Harry C. Neel; Bart H. Cavanagh, Sr.; John Katora; Brian Leffler; Rebecca Ann Wessel; Mark Patrick Dougherty; Cynthia Lee Finney; Nathan Ray; Todd Eckert; Ben Blascovich; Matthew Morris; William Sucharski; John McGee; Amber M. Scott; Erika Haas; Nicolas Wachter; David Halpate; Patrick Connell; Eugene Connell; Matthew Connell; James J. Connell, Jr.; Jefferson Memorial Park, Inc.; Jefferson Memorial Funeral Home, Inc.; Wellman Funeral Associates, Inc.,, 2012 WL 5986912, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (3rd Cir. Nov 27, 2012) Brief for Appellants (NO. 12-3591) 7524 STATE OF DELAWARE, v. Rodney BURR., 2012 WL 3144180, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (3rd Cir. Jul 31, 2012) Informal Brief (NO. 12-1843) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7525 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark Wayne BALLARD, Defendant-Appellant., 2012 WL 1141543, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (3rd Cir. Apr 06, 2012) Opening Brief of Appellant Mark Wayne Ballard (NO. 11-5014) 7526 FREE SPEECH COALITION, INC., et al., Appellant, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, Appellee., 2011 WL 860315, *860315+ © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. (Appellate Brief) (3rd Cir. Feb 23, 2011) Brief of the American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania as Amicus Curiae in Support of Appellants Free Speech Coalition, et al. and Reversal (NO. 10-4085) 7527 FREE SPEECH COALITION, INC., et al., Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee., 2011 WL 791889, *791889+ (Appellate Brief) (3rd Cir. Feb 16, 2011) Appellants' Brief (NO. 10-4085) 7528 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Kenneth DIXON, Appellant., 2011 WL 681659, *681659+ (Appellate Brief) (3rd Cir. Jan 24, 2011) Brief of Appellant and Appendix, Vol. 1 (pp. 1 - 11) (NO. 10-4300) 7529 Karen MALLEUS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John GEORGE, in his individual capacity; Jill Hackman, in her individual capacity; Jeffrey Conrad, in his individual capacity; Lancaster Newspapers, Inc.; Cindy Stauffer; and Editors Doe, Defendants-Appellees., 2010 WL 5557606, *5557606+ (Appellate Brief) (3rd Cir. Dec 21, 2010) Response Brief of Defendant-Appellee Jeffrey Conrad (NO. 10-3539) 7530 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. Shane D. WILLIAMS, Appellant., 2010 WL 4057439, *4057439+ (Appellate Brief) (3rd Cir. Sep 09, 2010) Brief of Appellant (NO. 10-2195) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7531 In re: GROSSMAN'S INC., et al., Debtors. Jeld-Wen, Inc., f/k/a Grossman's Inc., Debtor-Appellant, v. Mary Van Brunt, Gordon Van Brunt, DefendantsAppellees., 2009 WL 6083313, *6083313+ (Appellate Brief) (3rd Cir. Aug 31, 2009) Brief for Defendants-Appellees (NO. 09-1563) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 7532 In re: GROSSMAN'S INC., et al. Jeld-Wen, Inc., Appellant, v. Mary Van Brunt and Gordan Van Brunt, Appellees., 2009 WL 6083312, *6083312+ (Appellate Brief) (3rd Cir. Jul 21, 2009) Brief and Appendix Volume I of II (A1-A30) on Behalf of Appellant (NO. 09-1563) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 7533 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Jose BRITO, appellant., 2008 WL 5517284, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (3rd Cir. Nov 13, 2008) Brief for Appellant (NO. 08-1527) 7534 INTERACTIVE MEDIA ENTERTAINMENT & GAMING ASSOCIATION, L.L.C., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Peter D. KEISLER, Attorney General, et al., Defendants-Appellees., 2008 WL 8132269, *8132269 (Appellate Brief) (3rd Cir. Nov 13, 2008) Plaintiff's Reply Brief (NO. 08-1981) 7535 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. Paul R. THIELEMANN, Appellant., 2008 WL 5785701, *5785701+ (Appellate Brief) (3rd Cir. Oct 27, 2008) Opening Brief for Appellant Thielemann (NO. 08-2335) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7536 INTERACTIVE MEDIA ENTERTAINMENT AND GAMING ASSOCIATION, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Attorney General Michael B. MUKASEY, the Federal Trade Commission, and the Federal Reserve System, DefendantsAppellees., 2008 WL 4973809, *4973809+ (Appellate Brief) (3rd Cir. Oct 2008) Brief for Appellees (NO. 08-1981) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 7537 Pedro LOZANO; Humberto Hernandez; Rosa Lechuga; John Doe 1; John Doe 2; John Doe 3, a minor, by his parents; Jane Doe 1 Jane Doe 2; Jane Doe 3; John Doe 4, a minor, by his parents; Brenda Lee Mieles; Casa Dominicana of Hazleton, Inc; Hazleton Hispanic Business Association; Pennsylvania Statewide Latino Coalition; Jane Doe 5; John Doe 7; Jose Luis Lechuga, PlaintiffsAppellees, v. CITY OF HAZLETON, Defendant-Appellant., 2008 WL 3989652, *3989652+ (Appellate Brief) (3rd Cir. Apr 17, 2008) Brief of Amici Curiae Non-Governmental Organizations Dedicated to International Human Rights in Support of the Appellees and Affirmance (NO. 07-3531) 7538 ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. BROTHER INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION d/b/a Brother Mall, Defendant - Appellant., 2008 WL 4005146, *4005146+ (Appellate Brief) (3rd Cir. Jan 29, 2008) Brief of Amicus Curiae United Policyholders in Support of Appellant Brother International Corporation (NO. 07-3886) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7539 INTERACTIVE MEDIA ENTERTAINMENT & GAMING ASSOCIATION, L.L.C., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Peter D. KEISLER, Attorney General, et al., Defendants-Appellees., 2008 WL 4574156, *4574156+ (Appellate Brief) (3rd Cir. 2008) Plaintiff's Principal Brief and Appendix Volume One JA-1 to JA33 Lar 32.2. (NO. 08-1981) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 7540 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EXTREME ASSOCIATES, INC., Robert Zicari, and Janet Romano, Defendants-Appellees., 2005 WL 6104852, *6104852+ (Appellate Brief) (3rd Cir. May 25, 2005) Brief of Amicus Curiae, National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers in Support of Defendants-Appellees Extreme Associates, Inc., Robert Zicari and Janet Romano (NO. 05-1555) 7541 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellant, v. EXTREME ASSOCIATES, INC., Robert Zicari, a/k/a. Rob Black and Janet Romano, a/k/a/ Lizzie Borden, Appellees., 2005 WL 6104851, *6104851 (Appellate Brief) (3rd Cir. May 23, 2005) Brief of Amicus Curiae PHE, Inc. in Support of Appellees-Defendants (NO. 05-1555) 7542 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EXTREME ASSOCIATES, INC.; Robert Zicari a/k/a Rob Black; and Janet Romano a/k/a Lizzie Borden, Defendants-Appellees., 2005 WL 6104856, *6104856+ (Appellate Brief) (3rd Cir. May 20, 2005) Brief of Amici Curiae First Amendment Lawyers Association Free Speech Coalition and Association of Club Executives in Support of Defendants-Appellees and Urging Affirmance (NO. 05-1555) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7543 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellant, v. EXTREME ASSOCIATES, INC., Robert Zicari, a/k/a Rob Black, and Janet Romano, a/k/a Lizzie Borden, Appellees., 2005 WL 6104853, *6104853+ (Appellate Brief) (3rd Cir. May 17, 2005) Amicus Brief on Behalf of Barbara Nitke and the National Coalition for Sexual Freedom in Support of Appellees and Affirmance of the District Court (NO. 05-1555) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 7544 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EXTREME ASSOCIATES, INC., Robert Zicari, and Janet Romano, Defendants-Appellees., 2005 WL 6104850, *6104850+ (Appellate Brief) (3rd Cir. May 12, 2005) Defendants-Appellees' Brief (NO. 05-1555) " 7545 UNITED STATES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EXTREME ASSOCIATES, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees., 2005 WL 6104855, *6104855+ (Appellate Brief) (3rd Cir. Apr 18, 2005) Brief Amici Curiae of Concerned Women for America, the National Law Center for Children and Families, Citizens for Community Values, American Decency Association in Support of Plaintiff-Appellant, ... (NO. 05-1555) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7546 UNITED STATES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EXTREME ASSOCIATES, INC., Robert Zicari, and Janet Romano, Defendants-Appellees., 2005 WL 6104854, *6104854+ (Appellate Brief) (3rd Cir. Apr 14, 2005) Brief of Morality in Media, Inc., as Amicus Curiae in Support of Appellant, United States, and Reversal (NO. 05-1555) 7547 THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EXTREME ASSOCIATES, INC., Robert Zicari, and Janet Romano, Defendants-Appellees., 2005 WL 6104857, *6104857+ (Appellate Brief) (3rd Cir. Apr 14, 2005) Brief of Focus on the Family, Family Research Council, the Alliance Defense Fund, and Alan Sears as Amici Curiae, Supporting Appellant United States (NO. 05-1555) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7548 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellant, v. EXTREME ASSOCIATES, INC., Robert Zicari, a/k/a Rob Black and Janet Romano, a/k/a Lizzie Borden., 2005 WL 6104849, *6104849+ (Appellate Brief) (3rd Cir. Apr 13, 2005) Brief for the United States (NO. 05-1555) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7549 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. Edwin VILLALONA, Appellant., 2005 WL 4962359, *4962359+ (Appellate Brief) (3rd Cir. Mar 14, 2005) Reply Brief of Appellant Edwin Villalona (NO. 04-3426) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7550 CITIZENS FOR HEALTH, American Psychoanalytic Association, American Association for Health Freedom, New Hampshire Citizens for Health Freedom, American Mental Health Alliance, American Association of Practicing Psychiatrists, Health Administration Responsibility Project, Congress of California Seniors, National Coalition of Mental Health, Professionals and Consumers, California Consumer Health Care Council, American Association of, 2004 WL 5248179, *5248179+ (Appellate Brief) (3rd Cir. Nov 08, 2004) Reply Brief of Appellants (NO. 04-2550) 7551 CITIZENS FOR HEALTH, American Psychoanalytic Association, American Association for Health Freedom, New Hampshire Citizens for Health Freedom, American Mental Health Alliance, American Association of Practicing Psychiatrists, Health Administration Responsibility Project, Congress of California Seniors, National Coalition of Mental Health, Professionals and Consumers, California Consumer Health Care Council, American Association of © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Practice, 2004 WL 5248173, *5248173+ (Appellate Brief) (3rd Cir. Sep 01, 2004) Brief of Naral Pro-Choice America Foundation as Amicus Curiae in Support of Appellants (NO. 04-2550) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7552 CITIZENS FOR HEALTH, American Psychoanalytic Association, American Association for Health Freedom, New Hampshire Citizens for Health Freedom, American Mental Health Alliance, American Association of Practicing Psychiatrists, Health Administration Responsibility Project, Congress of California Seniors, National Coalition of Mental Health, Professionals and Consumers, California Consumer Health Care Council, American Association of Practice, 2004 WL 5248175, *5248175+ (Appellate Brief) (3rd Cir. Sep 01, 2004) Brief of Amicus Curiae Texas Civil Rights Project (NO. 04-2550) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 7553 CITIZENS FOR HEALTH, American Psychoanalytic Association, American Association for Health Freedom, New Hampshire Citizens for Health Freedom, American Mental Health Alliance, American Association of Practicing Psychiatrists, Health Administration Responsibility Project, Congress of California Seniors, National Coalition of Mental Health, Professionals and Consumers, California Consumer Health Care Council, American Association of Practice, 2004 WL 5248176, *5248176+ (Appellate Brief) (3rd Cir. Aug 31, 2004) Brief of Amicus Consumer Attorneys of California in Support of Appellants (NO. 04-2550) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7554 CITIZENS FOR HEALTH, American Psychoanalytic Association, American Association for Health Freedom, New Hampshire Citizens for Health Freedom, American Mental Health Alliance, American Association of Practicing Psychiatrists, Health Administration Responsibility Project, Congress of California Seniors, National Coalition of Mental Health, Professionals and Consumers, California Consumer Health Care Council, American Association of Practice, 2004 WL 5248182, *5248182+ (Appellate Brief) (3rd Cir. Aug 23, 2004) Brief of Appellants And Joint Appendix Vol I. (NO. 04-2550) 7555 Luis Hernan GUTIERREZ (A30 429 435), Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General of the United States; James Ziglar, Commissioner of the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service; Andrea Quarantillo, U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service District Director for the District of New Jersey; and the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Appellants/ Cross-Appellees., 2004 WL 4184750, *4184750+ (Appellate Brief) (3rd Cir. Apr 15, 2004) Brief of Appellee/Cross-Appellant (NO. 03-4798, 04-1031) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7556 Michael BLACK, Appellant, v. THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA; The Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania; Robert Shannon, Supt. SCI Mahanoy, Appellees., 2003 WL 25816863, *25816863+ (Appellate Brief) (3rd Cir. Oct 29, 2003) Brief of Appellees (NO. 02-2154) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 7557 Kevin KENDRICK, Appellant, v. THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILA.; The Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania; © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Nancy Bailey, Superintendent of FCI, fort Dix, Appellees., 2003 WL 25816865, *25816865+ (Appellate Brief) (3rd Cir. Aug 08, 2003) Brief of Appellees (NO. 02-3158) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 7558 In re: GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS; United States of America, Plaintiff Appellee, v. Under Seal, Party-in-Interest - Appellants., 2013 WL 5767938, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Oct 24, 2013) Brief of Amicus Curiae Empeopled, LLC in Support of the Appellants and Reversal of the Judgment Below (NO. 13-4625, 13-4626) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7559 Joanna PROFILI; Jenine Gangi; and Joseph Weigel, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. State of Maryland; Armistead Homes Corp.; Martin J. O'Malley, Governor; Douglas F. Gansler, in his capacity as Attorney General for the State of Maryland; Court of Appeals of Maryland; Robert M. Bell, in his capacity as Chief Judge of the Maryland Court of Appeals; and Mary Ellen Barbera, in her official capacity as Chief Judge of the Court of Appeals of Maryland, Defendants-Appellees., 2013 WL 5574501, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Oct 10, 2013) Opening Brief of Plaintiffs-Appellants (NO. 13-1903) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7560 Joanna PROFILI; Jenine Gangi; and Joseph Weigel, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. State of Maryland; Armistead Homes Corp.; Martin J. O'malley, Governor; Douglas F. Gansler, in his capacity as Attorney General for the State of Maryland; Court of Appeals of Maryland; Robert M. Bell, in his capacity as Chief Judge of the Maryland Court of Appeals; and Mary Ellen Barbera, in her official capacity as Chief Judge of the Court of Appeals of Maryland, Defendants-Appellees., 2013 WL 5589759, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Oct 09, 2013) On Appeal From the United States District Court for the District of Maryland at Baltimore (NO. 13-1903) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7561 LIBERTY UNIVERSITY, a Virginia Nonprofit Corporation; Michele G. Waddell; Joanne V. Merrill, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Jacob LEW, Secretary of the Treasury of the United States, in his official capacity; Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, in her official capacity; Seth D. Harris, Acting Secretary of the United States Department of Labor in his official capacity; Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General of the, 2013 WL 1842066, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. May 01, 2013) Reply Brief of Amicus Curiae David Boyle Supporting Appellants, and for Partial Reversal (NO. 10-2347) 7562 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. Paul Alston VAUGHN, Jr., Defendant - Appellant., 2013 WL 841516, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Mar 07, 2013) Brief of Appellant (NO. 12-4748) 7563 LIBERTY UNIVERSITY, a Virginia Nonprofit Corporation; Michele G. Waddell; Joanne V. Merrill, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Timothy GEITHNER, Secretary of the Treasury of the United States, in his official capacity; Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, in her official capacity; Hilda L. Solis, Secretary of the United States Department of Labor in her official capacity; Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. General of the, 2013 WL 839758, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Mar 06, 2013) Brief of Amicus Curiae David Boyle Supporting Appellants, and for Partial Reversal (NO. 10-2347) 7564 COLON HEALTH CENTERS OF AMERICA, LLC; Washington Imaging Associates-Maryland, LLC, d/b/a Progressive Radiology, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. Bill HAZEL, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Resources; Bruce Edwards, in his official capacity as Chairman of the Virginia State Board of Health; Paul Clements, in his official capacity as member of the Virginia State Board of Health; Kay R. Curling, in her official capacity as member of the Virginia State, 2013 WL 753137, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Feb 28, 2013) Brief of Appellants (NO. 12-2272) 7565 Raymond WOOLLARD, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Denis GALLAGHER, et al., Defendants-Appellants., 2012 WL 3164532, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Aug 02, 2012) Brief Amicus Curiae of NRA Civil Rights Defense Fund in Support of Appellees Urging the Court to Affirm the District Court Ruling (NO. 12-1437) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7566 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rondell HAMMONDS, Defendant-Appellant., 2012 WL 1376190, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Apr 19, 2012) Opening Brief of Appellant Rondell Hammonds (NO. 12-4006) 7567 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark Wayne BALLARD, Defendant-Appellant., 2012 WL 1141533, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Apr 05, 2012) Opening Brief of Appellant Mark Wayne Ballard (NO. 11-5014) 7568 HARMAN MINING CO., et al., Petitioners, v. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, United States Department of Labor and Gary Looney, Respondents., 2011 WL 4848881, *1 (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Oct 12, 2011) Petitioners' Reply Brief (NO. 05-1620, 11-1450) 7569 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. Stanley Lamar DOGAN, Jr.; Thomas Otis Mackey, Defendants - Appellants., 2011 WL 2649056, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Jul 07, 2011) Brief of Appellants (NO. 11-4157(L), 11-4158) 7570 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. Lashawn Antonio TORRENCE, Defendant - Appellant., 2011 WL 2096351, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. May 27, 2011) Brief of Appellant (NO. 11-4150) 7571 J.W., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. Honorable David W. KNIGHT, in his official capacity as Judge of the Circuit Court of Mercer County for the State of West Virginia, Defendant - Appellee, Jason Wilson, a Citizen and Resident of Mercer County, West Virginia, Real Party in Interest, Defendant., 2011 WL 2015386, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. May 23, 2011) Brief of Appellant (NO. 11-1315) 7572 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Calandus Duval INGRAM, Defendant-Appellant., 2011 WL 1899082, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. May 19, 2011) Brief of Appellant (NO. 11-4210) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 7573 Rosemary SUSKO, d/b/a Rosemont Manor, Plaintiff- Appellant, v. CITY OF WEIRTON; Mark Harris; William Miller; Rod Rosnick; Jim Mchenry; Gary Dufour; Dewey Guida; Tom Virtue; Bob Arango; Bob Mrvos; Ethel Yeager, as Executrix of the Estate of John Yeager, deceased, substituted as a party in place John Yeager, Defendants - Appellees., 2011 WL 1749970, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. May 09, 2011) Brief of Appellees (NO. 11-1114) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7574 Rosemary SUSKO, an individual and d/b/a Rosemont Manor, Appellant, v. CITY OF WEIRTON, Rod Rosnick, Jim Mchenry, William Miller, Gary Dufour, Dewey Guida, Tom Virtue, Bob Arango, Bob Mrvos, Mark Harris and Ethel Yeager, Executrix of the Estate of John Yeager, Appellees., 2011 WL 1251264, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Apr 04, 2011) Brief of Appellant (NO. 11-1114) 7575 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. Gerard LOUIS, Defendant - Appellant., 2011 WL 203630, *203630+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Jan 24, 2011) Brief of Appellant (NO. 10-4779) 7576 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. Darryl Davon LAW, a/k/a Dave, a/k/a Jersey, a/k/a Jersey Mike, Defendant - Appellant., 2011 WL 191409, *191409+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Jan 21, 2011) Brief of Appellant (NO. 10-5125) 7577 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. Gregory Alan HAYES, Appellant., 2010 WL 2567826, *2567826+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Jun 28, 2010) Brief for Appellant (NO. 10-4344) HN: 3,5 (S.Ct.) .... Gerald Wayne TIMMS, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Tracy JOHNS, Warden, Respondent-Appellant. (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Jun 17, 2010) Reply Brief (NO. 10-6496) (Text not available on WESTLAW) 7579 Gerald Wayne TIMMS, Petitioner - Appellee, v. Tracy JOHNS, Warden, FCI Butner, Respondent - Appellant., 2010 WL 2286939, *2286939+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Jun 07, 2010) Brief of Appellee (NO. 10-6496) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 7580 Gerald Wayne TIMMS, Petitioner -- Appellee, v. Tracy JOHNS, Warden, FCI Butner, Respondent -- Appellant., 2010 WL 2543203, *2543203+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Jun 07, 2010) Brief of Appellee (NO. 10-6496) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 7581 Gerald Wayne TIMMS, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Tracy JOHNS, Warden, Respondent-Appellant., 2010 WL 1922791, *1922791+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. May 12, 2010) Brief for the Appellant (NO. 10-6496) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 7582 Gerald Wayne TIMMS, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Tracy JOHNS, Warden, Respondent-Appellant., 2010 WL 2211053, *2211053+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. May 12, 2010) Brief for the Appellant (NO. 10-6496) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 7583 J.W., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. Honorable David W. KNIGHT, in his official capacity as Judge of the Circuit Court of Mercer County for the State of West Virginia; Jason Wilson, a Citizen and Resident of Mercer County, West Virginia, Real Party in Interest, Defendants - Appellees., 2010 WL 1484286, *1484286+ © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Apr 13, 2010) Brief of Appellant (NO. 10-1194) 7584 Stephanie H. WHEELER, Petitioner, v. NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING AND DRY DOCK COMPANY; Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, Respondents., 2010 WL 1048991, *1048991 (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Mar 22, 2010) Opening Brief of Petitioner Stephanie H. Wheeler (NO. 10-1164) 7585 Oliva RUX, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. REPUBLIC OF THE SUDAN, Defendant-Appellee, v. United States of America, Intervenor-Appellee/Amicus Curiae., 2010 WL 784290, *784290+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Mar 08, 2010) Brief for the United States as Intervenor-Appellee and Amicus Curiae Supporting Affirmance (NO. 09-2359) " 7586 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. Cory CHAFIN, Appellant., 2009 WL 1867928, *1867928+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Jun 29, 2009) Brief of Appellee (NO. 09-4098) 7587 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. William Samuel CHESTER, Jr., Appellant., 2009 WL 890132, *890132+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Apr 02, 2009) Brief of Appellee (NO. 09-4084) 7588 Albert SNYDER, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. WESTBORO BAPTIST CHURCH, INC., et al., Defendants/Appellants., 2008 WL 4103454, *4103454 (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Aug 25, 2008) Reply Brief of Appellant (NO. 08-1026) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7589 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. Dwight E. WHORLEY, Defendant/Appellant., 2007 WL 1834270, *1834270+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Jun 08, 2007) Reply Brief of the Appellant (NO. 06-4288) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 7590 Robert SHARPE, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION a/k/a Amtrak, Defendant/Appellee., 2007 WL 1231939, *1231939+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Apr 16, 2007) Brief of Defendant/ Appellee National Railroad Passenger Corporation (NO. 07-1079) " 7591 RETAIL INDUSTRY LEADERS ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross Appellant, v. James D. FIELDER, Jr., in his official capacity as Maryland Secretary of Labor, Licensing, and Regulation, Defendant - Appellant/ Cross-Appellee., 2006 WL 3203317, *3203317+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Oct 27, 2006) Brief of Amicus Curiae National Federation of Independent Business Legal Foundation in Support of Appellee/Cross-Appellant (NO. 06-1840(L)06-1901(XA) 7592 Cornell W. MCCLURE, Defendant - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee., 2006 WL 2934215, *2934215+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Sep 21, 2006) Brief of Appellant (NO. 05-4550) 7593 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mohan Othniel GREENWOOD, Defendant-Appellant., 2006 WL 2623103, *2623103+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Aug 28, 2006) Brief of Appellant Mohan Otheniel Greenwood (NO. 06-4339) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 7594 Edward R. MYERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOUDOUN COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD and Commonwealth of Virginia, Appellees-Appellees., 2005 WL 5164921, *5164921+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Mar 07, 2005) Reply Brief of Plaintiff-Appellant (NO. 03-1364) " 7595 William FONNER; Samuel Durie, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FAIRFAX COUNTY, VIRGINIA, et al., Defendants-Appellees., 2003 WL 25299571, *25299571+ (Appellate Brief) (4th Cir. Sep 23, 2003) Reply Brief of Appellants (NO. 03-1068(L)CONSWITH03) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 7596 PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS SURGICAL HEALTH SERVICES; Planned Parenthood Center for Choice; Planned Parenthood Sexual Healthcare Services; Whole Woman's Health; Austin Women's Health Center; Killeen Women's Health Center; Southwestern Women's Surgery Center; West Side Clinic, Incorporated; Routh Street Women's Clinic; Houston Women's Clinic, Each on Behalf of Itself, Its Patients and Physicians; Alan Braid, M.D.; Lamar Robinson, M.D.; Pamela J. Richter, D.O.,, 2013 WL 6729236, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Dec 13, 2013) Brief of Plaintiffs-Appellees (NO. 13-51008) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7597 BILLY RAY FARMER, III; Diane Farmer, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee., 2013 WL 7086499, *1 (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Mar 13, 2013) Brief for Appellee, United States of America (NO. 12-31255) 7598 Billy Ray FARMER, III; Diane Farmer, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee., 2013 WL 1193600, *1 (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Mar 12, 2013) Brief for Appellee, United States of America (NO. 12-31255) 7599 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard A. HIGGINS, Defendant-Appellant., 2013 WL 1095044, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Mar 11, 2013) Appellant's Brief (NO. 12-30818) 7600 Billy FARMER, III; Diane Farmer Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee., 2013 WL 600742, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Feb 08, 2013) Brief of Plaintiffs-Appellants (NO. 12-31255) 7601 BILLY FARMER, III; Diane Farmer, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee., 2013 WL 7086498, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Feb 08, 2013) Brief of Plaintiffs-Appellants (NO. 12-31255) 7602 Jesus C. HERNANDEZ, Individually and as the surviving father of Sergio Adrian Hernandez Guereca, and as Successor-in-Interest to the Estate of Sergio Adrian Hernandez Guereca; Maria Guadalupe Guereca Bentacour, Individually and as the surviving mother of Sergio Adrian Hernandez Guereca, and as Successorin-Interest to the Estate of Sergio Adrian Hernandez Guereca, PlaintiffsAppellants, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; United States Department of Homeland Security; United, 2012 WL 3066823, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Jul 02, 2012) Brief for the Government of the United Mexican States as Amicus Curiae in Support of Appellants in No. 12-50217 (NO. 11-50792, © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 12-50217, 12-50301) 7603 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David Hien Vinh TANG, Defendant-Appellant., 2012 WL 2374294, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Jun 15, 2012) Brief for Appellant (NO. 12-20043) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7604 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David Hien Vinh TANG, Defendant-Appellant., 2012 WL 8746936, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Jun 15, 2012) Brief for Appellant (NO. 12-20043) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7605 Barbara WYATT, As Next Friend of S.W., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rhonda FLETCHER; Cassandra Newell, Defendants-Appellants., 2012 WL 2374254, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Jun 13, 2012) Brief of Plaintiff-Appellee (NO. 11-41359) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7606 Jose DAVILA and Marcela Duarte, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants-Appellees., 2012 WL 1112905, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Mar 26, 2012) Brief of Plaintiffs - Appellants (NO. 12-50044) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 7607 St. Joseph ABBEY; Mark Coudrain, Plaintiffs - Appellees, v. Paul Wes CASTILLE; Belva M. Pichon; Craig G. Gill; Andrew Hayes; Wall V. McKneely; Margaret Shehee; Kelly Rush Williams; Louis Charbonnet, in their official capacities as Members of the Louisiana State Board of Embalmers and Funeral Directors; Patrick H. Sanders, in his official capacity in place of Oscar A. Rollins (deceased), Defendants - Appellants., 2011 WL 6980052, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Dec 29, 2011) Reply Brief of Appellants (NO. 11-30756) 7608 St. Joseph ABBEY; Mark Coudrain, Plaintiffs - Appellees, v. Paul Wes CASTILLE; Belva M. Pichon; Craig G. Gill; Andrew Hayes; Wall V. McKneely; Margaret Shehee; Kelly Rush Williams; Louis Charbonnet, in their official capacities as Members of the Louisiana State Board of Embalmers and Funeral Directors; Patrick H. Sanders, in his official capacity in place of Oscar A. Rollins (deceased), Defendants - Appellants., 2011 WL 10922990, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Dec 29, 2011) Reply Brief of Appellants (NO. 11-30756) 7609 St. Joseph ABBEY; Mark Coudrain, Plaintiffs - Appellees, v. Paul Wes CASTILLE; Belva M. Pichon; Craig G. Gill; Andrew Hayes; Wall V. Mckneely; Margaret Shehee; Kelly Rush Williams; Louis Charbonnet, in their official capacities as Members of the Louisiana State Board of Embalmers and Funeral Directors; Patrick H. Sanders, in his official capacity in place of Oscar A. Rollins (deceased), Defendants - Appellants., 2011 WL 6385868, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Dec 12, 2011) Brief of Appellees (NO. 11-30756) 7610 St. Joseph ABBEY; Mark Coudrain, Plaintiffs - Appellees, v. PAUL WES CASTILLE; Belva M. Pichon; Craig G. Gill; Andrew Hayes; Wall V. McKneely; Margaret Shehee; Kelly Rush Williams; Louis Charbonnet, in Their Official Capacities As Members Of The Louisiana State Board of Embalmers and Funeral Directors; Patrick H. Sanders, in his official capacity in place of Oscar A. Rollins (deceased), Defendants - Appellants., 2011 WL 10922985, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Dec 12, 2011) Brief of Appellees (NO. 11-30756) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 7611 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. Valerie DOBY, Appellant., 2011 WL 3276424, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Jul 14, 2011) Appellant's Brief (NO. 11-10227) 7612 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Larry SHOUMAKER, Defendant-Appellant., 2011 WL 2441977, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Jun 13, 2011) Brief for Appellant (NO. 10-61009) 7613 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Larry SHOUMAKER, Defendant-Appellant., 2011 WL 8066903, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Jun 13, 2011) Brief for Appellant (NO. 10-61009) 7614 David JENNINGS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Rissie OWENS, in her Official Capacity as Presiding Officer of the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles; Stuart Jenkins, in his Official Capacity as Director of the Parole Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice; IVY Anderson-York, in her Official Capacity as Director of Region I of the Parole Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice; Linda Mccarver, in her Official Capacity as Supervisor of Parole, 2011 WL 2000154, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. May 13, 2011) Appellant's Reply Brief (NO. 10-51061) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7615 Craig P. BOWCOCK, Plaintiff -- Appellant, v. CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC., Defendant -- Appellee., 2011 WL 2191276, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Apr 25, 2011) Reply Brief of Plaintiff-Appellant (NO. 10-20856) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 7616 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Marcus LEBLANC, Defendant-Appellant, Howard Ronald Guillory, Sr., DefendantAppellant., 2010 WL 6775449, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Dec 22, 2010) Appellant's Original Brief (NO. 10-30057) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7617 Oren ADAR, Individually and as Parent and Next Friend of J.C.A.-S., a minor; Mickey Ray Smith, Individually and as Parent and Next Friend of J.C.A.-S., a minor, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Darlene W. SMITH, In her Capacity as State Registrar and Director, Office of Vital Records and Statistics, State of Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals, Defendant-Appellant., 2010 WL 5778041, *5778041+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Dec 20, 2010) Supplemental Brief of Appellees Oren Adar and Mickey Ray Smith on En Banc Review (NO. 09-30036) 7618 Oren ADAR, Individually and as Parent and Next Friend of J.C.A.-S., a Minor; and Mickey Ray Smith, Individually and as Parent and Next Friend of J.C.A.-S., a Minor, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Darlene W. SMITH, in Her Capacity as State Registrar and Director, Office of Vital Records and Statistics, State of Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals, Defendant-Appellant., 2010 WL 5778047, *5778047+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Dec 20, 2010) Brief of Amici Curiae American Civil Liberties Union and American Civil Liberties Union of Louisiana in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellees Oren Adar and Mickey Ray Smith and in Support of Affirmance (NO. 09-30036) 7619 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Clarence CALLIES, © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Defendant-Appellant., 2010 WL 7011578, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Nov 15, 2010) Brief for Appellant (NO. 09-50213) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7620 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. Carlos B. MOORE, Defendant/Appellant., 2010 WL 9509486, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Nov 01, 2010) Brief of the Appellant Carlos B. Moore (NO. 10-30555) 7621 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Monroe WHITFIELD, III, Defendant-Appellee., 2010 WL 6635294, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. May 09, 2010) Brief for Appellee (NO. 11-60045) 7622 Yvonne MEADOWS; Larry Meadows, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Janie BRAXDALE; Lake Travis Independent School District, Defendants-Appellees., 2010 WL 2665817, *2665817+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Jan 12, 2010) Appellants' Brief (NO. 09-50850) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7623 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Howard Ronald GUILLORY, Sr., Defendant-Appellant., 2010 WL 6775450, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Jan 10, 2010) Original Brief for the Appellant Howard Ronald Guillory, Sr. (NO. 10-30057) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7624 GULF COAST SHELL AND AGGREGATE LP; and Richmond Material Company, Gulf Coasts-Appellees, v. THE DREDGE LA CONCHA, in rem, Defendant-Appellee, v. Charles T. Newlin, individually, Defendant-Appellant, Quimicos Amibex S.A. De C.V., appearing solely in its capacity as a person who asserts a right of ownership in the Dredge La Concha, Claimant-Appellant, v. International Fidelity Insurance Company, Intervenor-Appellant., 2010 WL 5580781, *5580781+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Jan 05, 2010) Brief of Appellant-Intervenor International Fidelity Insurance Company (NO. 09-40942) 7625 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Oscar TrujilloURBINA, also known as Oscar Trujillo, Defendant-Appellant., 2009 WL 6297414, *6297414+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Sep 21, 2009) Brief of PlaintiffAppellee (NO. 09-40467) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 7626 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Oscar Trujillo URBINA, also known as Oscar Trujillo, Defendant-Appellant., 2009 WL 6297413, *6297413+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Aug 19, 2009) Brief for Appellant (NO. 09-40467) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 7627 Rissie OWENS, et al., Defendants-Appellants, v. David Brian JENNINGS, Plaintiff-Appellee., 2009 WL 6749418, *6749418+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Aug 05, 2009) Brief of Appellee (NO. 09-50047) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7628 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. Herbey Garcia ARMENDARIZ, also known as Herman Garcia, Defendant - Appellant., 2009 WL 5408818, *5408818+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Apr 29, 2009) Brief of Appellant Herbey Garcia Armendariz also known as Herman Garcia (NO. 08-50611) 7629 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. Wendall Keith ROBINSON, Defendant - Appellant., 2009 WL 6339009, *6339009+ (Appellate © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Brief) (5th Cir. Mar 28, 2009) Brief of Appellant Wendall Keith Robinson (NO. 08-51272) 7630 Teodulo CANTU-DELGADILLO, Petitioner, v. Michael MUKASEY, United States Attorney General, Respondent., 2008 WL 7597117, *7597117+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Aug 27, 2008) Reply Brief for Petitioner (NO. 08-60122) HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.) 7631 Jonathan Shane ALLEN, Defendant-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee., 2007 WL 4982899, *4982899+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Sep 28, 2007) Brief of Defendant-Appellant (NO. 07-50715) 7632 Alex Ramirez TORRES, Defedant-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee., 2007 WL 5629654, *5629654+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Jun 24, 2007) Brief of Defendant-Appellant (NO. 07-50286) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 7633 RELIABLE CONSULTANTS INC., Doing Business As Dreamers and Le Rouge Boutique, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TEXAS ATTORNEY GENERAL GREG ABBOTT; District Attorney Ronnie Earle, Defendants-Appellees., 2007 WL 6048303, *6048303+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Jan 25, 2007) Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott's Appellee's Brief (NO. 06-51067, 06-51104) 7634 RELIABLE CONSULTANTS, INC., Doing Business As Dreamer's, and Le Rouge Boutique, Plaintiff - Appellant, PHE, INC., Doing Business As Adam and Eve, Inc., Intervenor-Plaintiff - Appellant, v. Greg ABBOTT, in His Official Capacity Only, Texas Attorney General; Ronnie Earle, in His Official Capacity Only, Travis County District Attorney, Defendants-Appellees., 2006 WL 6192919, *6192919+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Dec 14, 2006) Opening Brief of Plaintiff-Appellant Phe, Inc. (NO. 06-51067) 7635 RELIABLE CONSULTANTS INC., Doing Business as Dreamer's and Le Rouge Boutique, Plaintiff-Appellant;, PHE, INC., Doing Business As Adam and Eve, Inc., Intervenor-Plaintiffappellant, v. Greg ABBOTT, in His Official Capacity Only, Texas Attorney General;, Ronnie EARLE, in His Official Capacity Only, Travis County District Attorney;, Defendants-Appellees., 2006 WL 6192918, *6192918+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Dec 13, 2006) Brief of Appellant Reliable Consultants, Inc. (NO. 06-51067) 7636 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles A. FANTOZZI, Defendant-Appellant., 2004 WL 3588601, *3588601 (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Dec 03, 2004) Brief of Defendant - Appellant (NO. 04-40700) 7637 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jesus DELEONGARCIA, Defendant-Appellant., 2004 WL 3417715, *3417715+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Aug 26, 2004) Brief for Appellant (NO. 04-20316) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7638 Karen LECLERC, Guillaume Jarry, Beatrice Boulord, Plaintiffs and Appellants, Cross-Appellees, v. Daniel E. WEBB, et al., Defendants and Appellees, CrossAppellants., 2004 WL 5493573, *5493573+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Mar 08, 2004) Original Brief of Plaintiffs and Appellants, Karen Leclerc, Guillaume © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Jarry, Beatrice Boulord, and Maureen Affleck (NO. 03-30752) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 7639 Samuel G. NEWTON, III, et. al. Appellants, v. A.M. STRINGFELLOW, Et. Al., Appellees., 2003 WL 23534069, *1 (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Oct 30, 2003) Reply Brief of the Appellants (NO. 03-50739) 7640 Kenneth EPPERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF SHREVEPORT, Defendant-Appellee., 2003 WL 23529367, *23529367+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Oct 21, 2003) Reply Brief of Kenneth Epperson Plaintiff-Appellant (NO. 03-30708) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7641 Norma MCCORVEY, formerly known as Jane Roe, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William ""Bill"" HILL, Dallas County District Attorney, as Official Successor in Office to Henry Wade, Defendant Appellee., 2003 WL 24016584, *24016584+ (Appellate Brief) (5th Cir. Oct 21, 2003) Brief Amicus Curiae of Texas Black Americans for Life and the Life Education and Resource Network (Learn) in Support of Appellants, Supporting Reversal (NO. 03-10711) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7642 In re: David W. NOBLIT, Administrator ad Litem of the Estate of Steve A. McKenzie, Deceased, Debtor. Nelson E. Bowers, II, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. F. Scott Leroy, d/b/a LeRoy & Bickerstaff; F. Scott Leroy; Leroy & Bickerstaff, PLLC; Leroy, Hurst, & Bickerstaff, PLLC; C. Kenneth Still; David W. Noblit, Administrator ad Litem of the Estate of Steve A. McKenzie, Deceased, Defendants-Appellees., 2013 WL 6705338, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (6th Cir. Dec 10, 2013) Corrected Joint Brief of Appellees (NO. 13-6215, 13-6225) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 7643 In re: David W. NOBLIT, Administrator ad litem of the estate of Steve A. McKenzie, Deceased Debtor. Nelson E. Bowers, II, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. F. Scott Leroy, d/b/a LeRoy & Bickerstaff; F. Scott Leroy; Leroy & Bickerstaff, PLLC; Leroy, Hurst, & Bickerstaff, PLLC; C. Kenneth Still; David W. Noblit, Administrator ad litem of the estate of Steve A. McKenzie, deceased, Defendants-Appellees., 2013 WL 6530330, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (6th Cir. Dec 09, 2013) Joint Brief of Appellees (NO. 13-6215, 13-6225) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 7644 Megan GILLEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. Marcia DUNAWAY; Garry Jackson, Individually and in their Official Capacities; Trimble County, Kentucky Board of Education, Defendants - Appellees., 2013 WL 5504355, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (6th Cir. Sep 30, 2013) Brief for Appellees Marcia Dunaway and Board of Education of Trimble County, Kentucky (NO. 13-5933) 7645 DOMINO'S FARMS CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Kathleen SEBELIUS, et al., Defendants-Appellants., 2013 WL 4401121, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (6th Cir. Aug 12, 2013) Brief In Support of Appellants and Reversal by Amici Curiae Americans United for Separation of Church and State; American Civil Liberties Union; American Civil Liberties Union Fund of Michigan; ... (NO. 13-1654) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7646 DOMINO'S FARMS CORPORATION and Thomas Monaghan, Plaintiffs- © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Appellees, v. Kathleen SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services; United States Department of Health and Human Services; Thomas E. Perez, in his official capacity as Secretary of Labor; United States Department of Labor; Jacob J. Lew, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Treasury; United States Department of the Treasury, Defendants-Appellants., 2013 WL 4401122, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (6th Cir. Aug 12, 2013) Brief of Amicus Curiae Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc. in Support of Appellants and for Reversal of the District Court (NO. 13-1654) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7647 EDEN FOODS, INC. and Michael Potter, Chairman, President and Sole Shareholder of Eden Foods, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Kathleen SEBELIUS, Secretary of Health and Human Services; United States Department of Health and Human Services; Seth D. Harris, Acting Secretary of Labor; United States Department of Labor; Jacob J. Lew, Secretary of Treasury; United States Department of the Treasury, Defendants-Appellees., 2013 WL 3964846, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (6th Cir. Jul 29, 2013) Brief of Amicus Curiae Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc. in Support of Appellees and for Affirmance of the District Court (NO. 13-1677) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7648 EDEN FOODS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Kathleen SEBELIUS, et al., Defendants-Appellees., 2013 WL 3964847, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (6th Cir. Jul 29, 2013) Brief In Support of Appellees and Affirmance by Amici Curiae Americans United for Separation of Church and State; American Civil Liberties Union; American Civil Liberties Union Fund of Michigan; ... (NO. 13-1677) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7649 Eden FOODS, Inc.; Michael Potter, Chairman, President, and Sole Shareholder of Eden Foods, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Kathleen SEBELIUS, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services; Seth D. Harris Acting Secretary of the United States Department of Labor; Jacob Lew, Secretary of the United States Department of the Treasury; United States Department of Health and Human Services; United States Department of Labor; and, 2013 WL 3597679, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (6th Cir. Jul 03, 2013) Brief for Liberty, Life, and Law Foundation as Amicus Curiae in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellants and Urging Reversal (NO. 13-1677) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7650 LEGATUS; Weingartz Supply Company; and Daniel Weingartz, President of Weingartz Supply Company Plaintiffs-Appellees/Cross-Appellants, v. Kathleen SEBELIUS, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services; Seth D. Harris Acting Secretary of the United States Department of Labor; Jacob Lew, Secretary of the United States Department of the Treasury; United States Department of Health and Human Services; United States Department of Labor;, 2013 WL 1869675, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (6th Cir. Apr 25, 2013) Brief for Liberty, Life, and Law Foundation As Amicus Curiae in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellees/Cross-Appellants and Urging Affirmance (Weingartz)/Reversal (Legatus) (NO. 13-1092, 13-1093) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7651 LEGATUS; Weingartz Supply Company; and Daniel Weingartz, President of © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Weingartz Supply Company Plaintiffs-Appellees/Cross-Appellants, v. Kathleen SEBELIUS, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services; Seth D. Harris Acting Secretary of the United States Department of Labor; Jacob Lew, Secretary of the United States Department of the Treasury; United States Department of Health and Human Services; United States Department of Labor;, 2013 WL 1869678, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (6th Cir. Apr 25, 2013) Brief for Liberty, Life, and Law Foundation As Amicus Curiae in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellees/Cross-Appellants and Urging Affirmance (Weingartz)/Reversal (Legatus) (NO. 13-1092, 13-1093) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7652 LEGATUS, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees/Cross-Appellants, v. Kathleen SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, et al., Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Appellees., 2013 WL 1399440, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (6th Cir. Mar 27, 2013) Brief of Amici Curiae Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Union for Reform Judaism, Central Conference of American Rabbis, Women of Reform Judaism, and the Hindu American Foundation ... (NO. 13-1092, 13-1093) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7653 AUTOCAM CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Kathleen SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Depart of Health and Human Ser, Defenetants-Appellees., 2013 WL 1291107, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (6th Cir. Mar 21, 2013) Brief of Amici Curiae Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Union for Reform Judaism, Central Conference of American Rabbis, Women of Reform Judaism, and the Hindu American Foundation ... (NO. 12-2673) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7654 AUTOCAM CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Kathleen SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, et al., Defendants-Appellees., 2013 WL 1399522, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (6th Cir. Mar 21, 2013) Brief of Amici Curiae Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Union for Reform Judaism, Central Conference of American Rabbis, Women of Reform Judaism, and the Hindu American Foundation ... (NO. 12-2673) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7655 AUTOCAM CORPORATION; Autocam Medical, LLC; John Kennedy; Paul Kennedy; John Kennedy IV; Margaret Kennedy; and Thomas Kennedy, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Kathleen SEBELIUS, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services; United States Department of Health and Human Services; Hilda L. Solis, Secretary of the United States Department of Labor; United States Department of Labor; Timothy F. Geithner, Secretary of the United States Department of, 2013 WL 635520, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (6th Cir. Feb 15, 2013) Brief for Liberty, Life, and Law Foundation as Amicus Curiae in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellants and Urging Reversal (NO. 12-2673) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7656 Juana VILLEGAS, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT OF DAVIDSON COUNTY/NASHVILLE - Davidson County Sheriff's Office, Defendant/Appellant., 2012 WL 1850522, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (6th Cir. May © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 09, 2012) Brief of Amici Curiae in Support of Appellee and Affirmance of the District Court's Order (NO. 11-6031) 7657 A & E COAL CO., et al., Petitioners, v. DIRECTOR, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, and James Adams, Respondents., 2012 WL 366677, *1 (Appellate Brief) (6th Cir. Jan 30, 2012) Petitioners' Reply Brief (NO. 11-3926) 7658 PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTHWEST OHIO REGION; Planned Parenthood of Central Ohio; Planned Parenthood of Northeast Ohio; Preterm Dr. Timothy Kress; and Dr. Laszlo Sogor, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Mike DEWINE, Attorney General of Ohio; and Joseph Deters, as Prosecuting Attorney for Hamilton County, Ohio and as representative of a class of all Prosecuting Attorneys in Ohio, Defendants-Appellees., 2012 WL 256654, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (6th Cir. Jan 20, 2012) Reply Brief of Plaintiffs-Appellants (NO. 11-4062) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7659 Re: Dean BOLAND, v. Eric HOLDER., 2012 WL 6056622, *1 (Appellate Brief) (6th Cir. Jan 20, 2012) Brief (NO. 10-4381) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7660 LITTLE DAVID COAL CO., et al., Petitioners, v. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and Billy Collins, Respondents., 2011 WL 6740624, *1 (Appellate Brief) (6th Cir. Dec 16, 2011) Petitioners' Reply Brief (NO. 11-3574) 7661 COALITION TO DEFEND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, Integration and Immigrant Rights and Fight for Equality by any Means Necessary (Bamn), et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants Cross-Appellees, v. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, et al., Defendants-Appellees Cross-Appellants, Bill Scheutte, Michigan Attorney General, Intervening Defendat-Appellee., 2011 WL 5122713, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (6th Cir. Oct 25, 2011) Coalition Plaintiffs' Supplemental Brief on En Banc Review (NO. 08-1387, 08-1534) 7662 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. Stacy ALLEN, Defendant/Appellant., 2011 WL 4037694, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (6th Cir. Sep 02, 2011) Brief of the Defendant/Appellant (NO. 10-5914) 7663 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Aaron MOORE, Defendant-Appellant., 2011 WL 3006925, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (6th Cir. Jul 18, 2011) Defendant-Appellant's Brief on Appeal (NO. 11-1402) 7664 Rudolph BABCOCK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF CONNEAUT, et al., Defendants-Appellees., 2011 WL 1977407, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (6th Cir. May 16, 2011) Brief of Appellees (NO. 10-4319) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 7665 Julea WARD, Appellant, v. Roy WILBANKS, et al., Appellees., 2011 WL 1460529, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (6th Cir. Feb 11, 2011) Amicus Brief of Parents, Families and Friends of Lesbians and Gays (Pflag), Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (Glsen), Affirmations, and Ruth Ellis Center in Support of Defendant-Appellee ... (NO. 10-2100, 10-2145) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 7666 Julea WARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, Cross-Appellee, v. Roy WILBANKS, et al., Defendants-Appellees, Cross-Appellants., 2010 WL 6510381, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (6th Cir. Dec 28, 2010) Brief Amicus Curiae of Foundation for Moral Law, on Behalf of Plaintiff-Appellant (NO. 10-2100, 10-2145) 7667 Ronald KUCH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lloyd RAPELJE, Defendant-Appellee., 2010 WL 6573006, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (6th Cir. Dec 14, 2010) Brief for Respondent-Appellee (NO. 10-2176) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7668 Shelley EVANS-MARHSALL, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellant, v. Board of EDUCATION of the Tipp City Exempted Village School District, et al., Defendants-Appellees., 2010 WL 7325404, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (6th Cir. Nov 30, 2010) Brief of Amicus Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, Integration and Immigrant Rights and Fight for Equality By Any Means Necessary (bamn) in Support of the Appellant's Petitition for Rehearing ... (NO. 09-3775) 7669 Ronald KUCH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Lloyd RAPELJE, Warden, RespondentAppellee., 2010 WL 6573005, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (6th Cir. Oct 25, 2010) Brief for Petitioner-Appellant (NO. 10-2176) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7670 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John MCKINNEY, Sr., Defendant-Appellant., 2010 WL 6510708, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (6th Cir. Sep 23, 2010) Appellant's Supplemental Brief (NO. 09-2212) 7671 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John McKINNEY, Sr., Defendant-Appellant., 2010 WL 7354682, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (6th Cir. Sep 23, 2010) Appellant's Supplemental Brief (NO. 09-2212) 7672 Troy D. OGLE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Rick HOCKER, Defendant-Appellee., 2010 WL 7354881, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (6th Cir. Feb 11, 2010) Brief of Appellee (NO. 09-2481) 7673 Northville DOWNS, Plaintiff-Appellant, Oil Capital Race Venture Inc., dba Mt. Pleasant Meadows; Great Lakes Quarterhorse Association, Plaintiffs, v. GOVERNOR OF STATE OF MICHIGAN, Jennifer Granholm; Michigan Attorney General, Michael A. Cox, MGM Grand Detroit, L.L.C., DefendantsAppellees., 2009 WL 2946627, *2946627+ (Appellate Brief) (6th Cir. Sep 03, 2009) Brief for Defendants-Appellees Governor and Attorney General (NO. 09-1370) 7674 WEDGEWOOD LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. TOWNSHIP OF LIBERTY, OHIO; Board of Trustees of Liberty Township; Holly C. Foust, Liberty Township Zoning Inspector in her official capacity; Peggy Guzzo, Liberty Township Trustee in her official capacity; Robert Mann, Liberty Township Trustee in his official capacity; Curt Sybert, Liberty Township Trustee in his official capacity, Defendants-Appellants, LIBERTY TOWNSHIP/ POWELL, 2009 WL 1044056, *1044056+ (Appellate Brief) (6th Cir. Apr 09, 2009) Brief of Defendants-Appellants (NO. 08-4446) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7675 Robert Lewis BAAR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JEFFERSON COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION; Stephen W. Daeschner; Carolyn Meredith; Melissa Payne; © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Marsha Dohn; Minor Daniels; James Jury, Defendants-Appellees., 2008 WL 5452829, *5452829+ (Appellate Brief) (6th Cir. Sep 12, 2008) Final Brief of Appellant (NO. 08-5302) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7676 Shirley L. PHELPS-ROPER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ted STRICKLAND, Governor, et al., Defendants-Appellees., 2007 WL 4792684, *4792684+ (Appellate Brief) (6th Cir. Oct 03, 2007) Final Brief of Plaintiff-Appellant, Shirley L. Phelps-Roper (NO. 07-3600) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7677 729, INC., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. KENTON COUNTY FISCAL COURT, Defendant-Appellee., 2007 WL 2051708, *2051708+ (Appellate Brief) (6th Cir. Apr 09, 2007) Plaintiffs-Appellants 729, Inc., et al.,'s Brief (NO. 06-6390) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 7678 DEJA VU OF NASHVILLE, INC., a Tennessee corporation, et al., Plaintiffs Appellants, v. THE METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT OF NASHVILLE AND DAVIDSON COUNTY, Tennessee, Defendant - Appellee., 2005 WL 4582828, *4582828+ (Appellate Brief) (6th Cir. Nov 29, 2005) Final Brief of PlaintiffsAppellants (NO. 05-5895) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 7679 DEJA VU OF NASHVILLE, INC., a Tennessee corporation, et al., Plaintiffs Appellants, v. THE METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT OF NASHVILLE AND DAVIDSON COUNTY, Tennessee, Defendant - Appellee., 2005 WL 4582830, *4582830+ (Appellate Brief) (6th Cir. Nov 29, 2005) Final Reply Brief of Plaintiffs-Appellants (NO. 05-5895) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 7680 DEJA VU OF NASHVILLE, INC., a Tennessee corporation, et al., Plaintiffs Appellants. v. THE METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT OF NASHVILLE AND DAVIDSON COUNTY, Tennessee, Defendant - Appellee., 2005 WL 4582829, *4582829+ (Appellate Brief) (6th Cir. Nov 20, 2005) Final Brief of Defendant Appellee the Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee (NO. 05-5895) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7681 Robin LEPARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. A DIVISION OF NBD BANK, Bank One, Walter O. Koch, and Jeremy H. and Patricia A. Lepard, DefendantsAppellees., 2004 WL 5573461, *5573461+ (Appellate Brief) (6th Cir. Sep 30, 2004) Plaintiff-Appellant's Petition for Panel Rehearing (NO. 02-1887) 7682 CENTRAL VIRGINIA COMMUNITY COLLEGE, Virginia Military Institute, New River Community College, and Blue Ridge Community College, Appellants, v. Bernard KATZ, Liquidating Supervisor of the Bankrupt Estate in In re Wallace Bookstores, Inc., No. 01-50545 (Bkr. E.D. Ky.), Appellee., 2003 WL 25710682, *25710682 (Appellate Brief) (6th Cir. Dec 22, 2003) Opening Brief (NO. 03-6054) " 7683 Robin LEPARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. A DIVISION OF NBD BANK BANK ONE, Walter O. Koch, and Jeremy H. And Patricia C. Lepard, DendantsAppellees., 2003 WL 25739275, *25739275+ (Appellate Brief) (6th Cir. Nov 20, 2003) Plaintiff-Appellant's Final Brief on Appeal (NO. 02-1887) 7684 Becky S. CHASENSKY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Scott WALKER, individually, and in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Wisconsin, Cullen © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Werwie, individually, and in his official capacity as a staff member and spokesman for the administration of Governor Scott Walker, DefendantsAppellants, United States of America, Intervening Party., 2013 WL 5885519, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (7th Cir. Oct 23, 2013) Brief and Supplemental Appendix of Plaintiff-Appellee (NO. 13-1761) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 7685 PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WISCONSIN, INC., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. J.B. Van HOLLEN, et al., Defendants-Appellants., 2013 WL 5798786, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (7th Cir. Oct 16, 2013) Brief of Plaintiffs-Appellees (NO. 13-2726) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7686 Becky S. CHASENSKY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Scott WALKER, individually, and in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Wisconsin, Cullen Werwie, individually, and in his official capacity as a staff member and spokesman for the administration of Governor Scott Walker, DefendantsAppellants, United States of America, Intervening Party., 2013 WL 5698398, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (7th Cir. Oct 09, 2013) Brief and Supplemental Appendix of Plaintiff-Appellee (NO. 13-1761) 7687 GROTE INDUSTRIES, LLC, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Kathleen SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, et al., Defendants-Appellees., 2013 WL 1451374, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (7th Cir. Mar 25, 2013) Brief of Amici Curiae Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Union for Reform Judaism, Central Conference of American Rabbis, Women of Reform Judaism, and the Hindu American Foundation ... (NO. 13-1077) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7688 Cyril B. KORTE, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Kathleen SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, et al., Defendants-Appellees., 2013 WL 1095209, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (7th Cir. Mar 08, 2013) Brief of Amici Curiae Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Union for Reform Judaism, Central Conference of American Rabbis, Women of Reform Judaism, and the Hindu American Foundation ... (NO. 12-3841) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7689 Cyril B. KORTE, et al., Plaintiffs -- Appellants, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, et al., Defendants -Appellees., 2013 WL 526299, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (7th Cir. Feb 01, 2013) Brief of Liberty, Life, and Law Foundaton as Amicus Curiae in Support of Appellants and Reversal (NO. 12-3841) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7690 TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION 705, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, et al., Defendants-Appellees., 2012 WL 3066792, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (7th Cir. Jul 16, 2012) Brief of Plaintiffs-Appellants and Required Short Appendix (NO. 11-3705) 7691 Steven J. WHITE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF WAUKEGAN, et al., Defendants-Appellees., 2011 WL 5357199, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (7th Cir. Oct 26, 2011) Brief and Required Short Appendix of Plaintiff-Appellant Steven J. White (NO. 11-3017) 7692 Rhonda EZELL, William Hespen, Joseph Brown, Action Target, Inc., Second Amendment Foundation, Inc., and Illinois State Rifle Association, PlaintiffsAppellants, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, Defendant-Appellee., 2011 WL 1837507, © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. *1+ (Appellate Brief) (7th Cir. Mar 14, 2011) Reply Brief (NO. 10-3525) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7693 Andrea FIELDS, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, Cross-Appellants, v. Judy P. SMITH, et al., Defendant-Appellants, Cross Appellees., 2010 WL 6019674, *6019674+ (Appellate Brief) (7th Cir. Nov 23, 2010) Brief and Appendix of Plaintiffs-Appellees, Cross-Appellants (NO. 10-2339, 10-2466) 7694 Andrea FIELDS, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, Cross-Appellants, v. Judy P. SMITH, et al., Defendants-Appellants, Cross-Appellees., 2010 WL 6019675, *6019675+ (Appellate Brief) (7th Cir. Sep 24, 2010) Brief and Appendix of Defendants-Appellants, Cross-Appellees (NO. 10-2339, 10-2466) 7695 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Steven M. SKOIEN, Defendant-Appellant., 2010 WL 2665131, *2665131+ (Appellate Brief) (7th Cir. Apr 02, 2010) Brief Amicus Curiae of the National Rifle Association of America, Inc., in Support of Appellant and in Support of Reversal on Rehearing En Banc (NO. 08-3770) " 7696 Brewster MCCAULEY, as Special Administrator of the Estate of Mersaides McCauley, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, et. al., DefendantsAppellees., 2010 WL 1424160, *1424160+ (Appellate Brief) (7th Cir. Mar 01, 2010) Brief and Required Short Appendix of Plaintiff-Appellant Brewster McCauley, as Special Administrator of the Estate of Mersaides McCauley (NO. 09-3561) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7697 Miguel A. ROSILES-CAMARENA, Petitioner, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General of the United States of America, Respondent., 2009 WL 1330309, *1330309+ (Appellate Brief) (7th Cir. Apr 27, 2009) Brief and Required Short Appendix of Petitioner (NO. 09-1512) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7698 Otis MCDONALD, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, Defendant-Appellee. NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. VILLAGE OF OAK PARK, Defendant-Appellee. NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC., et al., Plaintiff's-Appellants, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, Defendant-Appellee., 2009 WL 908684, *908684+ (Appellate Brief) (7th Cir. Jan 30, 2009) Appellants' Brief and Required Short Appendix (NO. 08-4241, 08-4243, 08-4244) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7699 Lacey OGBOLUMANI and David Ogbolumani, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. USCIS, Michael Chertoff, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Michael M. Comfort, DistrictDirector, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Alberto R. Gonzales, and Emilio Gonzalez, Director, United States Citizenship and Immigration Serices, Defendants-Appellees., 2008 WL 2559050, *2559050+ (Appellate Brief) (7th Cir. Jun 17, 2008) Brief of Plaintiffs-Appellants (NO. 08-2143) 7700 CAVEL INTERNATIONAL, INC., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Lisa MADIGAN, et al., Defendants-Appellees., 2007 WL 2426700, *2426700+ (Appellate Brief) (7th Cir. Aug 13, 2007) Reply Brief of Plaintiffs-Appellants © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. (NO. 07-2658) " 7701 CAVEL INTERNATIONAL, INC., James D. Tucker, Randy Beasley, Angela Fabris, Ruben Gonzalez, Brad D. Melville, Amparo Milan, Raul Milan, Raul Escutia Milan, Roberto Resendiz, Ron Warner, and Isaac Zamora, PlaintiffsAppellants, v. Lisa MADIGAN, Illinois Attorney General; Ron Matekaitis, Dekalb County State's Attorney; and Charles A. Hartke, Director, Illinois Department of Agriculture, Defendants-Appellees., 2007 WL 2426697, *2426697+ (Appellate Brief) (7th Cir. Aug 08, 2007) Brief of State DefendantsAppellees (NO. 07-2658) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 7702 CAVEL INTERNATIONAL, INC., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Lisa MADIGAN, et al., Defendants-Appellees., 2007 WL 2329468, *2329468+ (Appellate Brief) (7th Cir. Aug 01, 2007) Brief and Required Short Appendix of Plaintiffs-Appellants (NO. 07-2658) " 7703 Jose Luis GUTIERREZ, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, as AttorneyGeneral of the United States, Respondent., 2005 WL 3736484, *3736484+ (Appellate Brief) (7th Cir. Sep 28, 2005) Reply Brief of Petitioner (NO. 05-2011) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 7704 Ahmed ALI, Petitioner - Appellant, v. Deborah ACHIM, Michael Chertoff, Secretary, and Alberto Gonzales, Respondents - Appellees., 2005 WL 3736149, *3736149+ (Appellate Brief) (7th Cir. Sep 06, 2005) Brief of %iAmicus curiae%i Hon. Abner J. Mikva in Support of Petitioner-Appellant Urging Reversal (NO. 05-1194, 05-2028, 05-3009) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7705 Isaac RUSS and Vera Love, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Van B. WATTS, IV; Phillip Banaszkiewicz; the City of Chicago; and Robert Helson, Defendants-Appellees., 2005 WL 5801212, *5801212+ (Appellate Brief) (7th Cir. Jan 31, 2005) Brief of Municipal Defendants-Appellees (NO. 04-3628) 7706 ANNEX MEDICAL, INC.; Stuart Lind; Tom Janas, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Kathleen SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services; Seth D. Harris, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Labor; Jacob J. Lew, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Treasury; United States Department of Health and Human Services; United States Department of Labor; United States Department of the Treasury, Defendants-Appellees., 2013 WL 1821284, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (8th Cir. Apr 17, 2013) Brief of Amicus Curiae, Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc. (NO. 13-1118) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7707 ANNEX MEDICAL, INC., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Kathleen SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Se Defenda et al, Defedants-Appellees., 2013 WL 1821286, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (8th Cir. Apr 17, 2013) Brief of Amici Curiae Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Union for Reform Judaism, Central Conference of American Rabbis, Women of Reform Judaism, and the Hindu American Foundation ... (NO. 13-1118) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7708 ANNEX MEDICAL, INC.; Stuart Lind; Tom Janas, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Kathleen SEBELIUS, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services; Hilda L. Solis, Secretary of the United States Department of Labor; Timothy F. Geithner, Secretary of the United States Department of the Treasury; United States Department of Health and Human Services; United States Department of Labor; and United States Department of the Treasury,, 2013 WL 1332873, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (8th Cir. Mar 11, 2013) Brief for Liberty, Life, and Law Foundation as Amicus Curiae in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellants and Reversal (NO. 13-1118) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7709 Shirley L. PHELPS-ROPER, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Dave HEINEMAN, et al, Defendants/Appellees., 2013 WL 526233, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (8th Cir. Feb 01, 2013) Supplemental Brief of Appellant (NO. 10-2601) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7710 Frank R. O'BRIEN, Jr.; O'Brien Industrial Holdings, LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, et al., Defendants-Appellees., 2012 WL 6850105, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (8th Cir. Dec 28, 2012) Brief of Amici Curiae Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Union for Reform Judaism, Central Conference of American Rabbis, and Women of Reform Judaism in Support of Appellees and ... (NO. 12-3357) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7711 Frank R. O'BRIEN, Jr.; O'Brien Industrial Holdings, LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; Kathleen Sebelius, in her official capacity as the Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services; United States Department of the Treasury; Timothy F. Geithner, in his official capacity as the Secretary of the United States Department of the Treasury; United States Department of Labor; Hilda L. Solis, in her, 2012 WL 5947183, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (8th Cir. Nov 20, 2012) Brief for Liberty, Life and Law Foundation As Amicus Curiae in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellants and Reversal (NO. 12-3357) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7712 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. James BRUGUIER, also known as James Bruguier, Jr., Appellant., 2012 WL 5493228, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (8th Cir. Oct 30, 2012) Appellant's Supplemental Reply Brief (NO. 11-3634) 7713 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. Jerry Matthew Chasing HAWK, Appellant., 2012 WL 5387220, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (8th Cir. Oct 29, 2012) Appellant's Supplemental Brief (NO. 12-1193) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7714 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. James BRUGUIER, also known as James Bruguier, Jr., Appellant., 2012 WL 4061630, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (8th Cir. Sep 05, 2012) Appellant's Supplemental Brief (NO. 11-3634) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7715 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. Diamond D. BLAIR, Appellant., 2012 WL 3594473, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (8th Cir. Aug 08, 2012) Brief for Appellant (NO. 12-1927) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7716 Arthur GALLAGHER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF CLAYTON, MISSOURI, et al., Defendants-Appellees., 2012 WL 2330456, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (8th Cir. May 29, 2012) Appellant's Reply Brief (NO. 11-3880) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 7717 Arthur GALLAGHER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF CLAYTON, MISSOURI, et al., Defendants-Appellees., 2012 WL 831382, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (8th Cir. Mar 02, 2012) Appellant's Brief (NO. 11-3880) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7718 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose M. STRAYHORN, Defendant-Appellant., 2010 WL 4080335, *4080335+ (Appellate Brief) (8th Cir. Oct 01, 2010) Brief of Defendant - Appellant (NO. 10-2652EMCG) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7719 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. Shawon MCBRIDE, Appellant., 2010 WL 4080337, *4080337+ (Appellate Brief) (8th Cir. Oct 01, 2010) Brief of Appellant (NO. 10-2689) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7720 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. Diondrey HARDWICT, Appellant., 2010 WL 3948630, *3948630+ (Appellate Brief) (8th Cir. Sep 24, 2010) Appellant's Brief and Addendum (NO. 10-1884) 7721 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John Wesley WILLIAMS, Jr., Defendant-Appellant., 2010 WL 3762194, *3762194+ (Appellate Brief) (8th Cir. Sep 17, 2010) Brief of Appellant-Defendant (NO. 10-2500EMSL) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7722 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Allen R. DAVISON, Defendant-Appellant., 2010 WL 3576598, *3576598+ (Appellate Brief) (8th Cir. Sep 02, 2010) Brief for Defend Ant-Appellant (NO. 10-2327-CV) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7723 Alex SYLVESTER, Appellant, v. Doug FOGLEY, Steve Clemmons, and Don Melton, Appellees., 2006 WL 4634125, *4634125+ (Appellate Brief) (8th Cir. Jan 04, 2006) Appellees' Brief (NO. 05-3492) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 7724 J. Michael MCCONNELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee., 2005 WL 5628597, *5628597+ (Appellate Brief) (8th Cir. 2005) Brief and Addendum of Appellant (NO. 05-1781) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7725 Xuelin ZHUANG, Appellant, v. DATACARD CORPORATION, Appellee., 2004 WL 5465335, *5465335 (Appellate Brief) (8th Cir. Oct 22, 2004) Brief (NO. 2004-3204) 7726 MINNESOTA LICENSED PRACTICAL NURSES ASSOCIATION, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent., 2003 WL 23005596, *23005596 (Appellate Brief) (8th Cir. Oct 28, 2003) Petitioner's Opening Brief (NO. 03-3306) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 7727 Beverly SEVCIK, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Brian SANDOVAL, et al., Defendants-Appellees, Coalition for the Protection of Marriage, IntervenorDefendant-Appellee. Natasha N. Jackson, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Neil S. Abercrombie, Governor, State of Hawaii, Defendant-Appellant, Loretta J. Fuddy, Director, Department of Health, State of Hawaii, Defendant-Appellee, Hawaii Family Forum, Intervenor-Defendant-Appellee., 2013 WL 5880759, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Oct 25, 2013) Brief of Amicus Curiae Naacp Legal © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Defense & Educational Fund, Inc. in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellants and Reversal of the District Court Judgments (NO. 12-16995, 12-16998, 12-17668) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7728 Beverly SEVCIK, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Brian SANDOVAL, et al., Defendants-Appellees, Coalition for the Protection of Marriage, IntervenorDefendant-Appellee. Natasha N. Jackson, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Neil S. Abercrombie, Governor, State of Hawai'i, Defendant-Appellant, Loretta J. Fuddy, Director, Department of Health, State of Hawai'i, Defendant-Appellee, Hawai'i Family Forum, Intervenor-Defendant-Appellee., 2013 WL 5880762, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Oct 25, 2013) Amicus Curiae Brief of the American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Nevada and the American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Hawai'i (NO. 12-16995, 12-16998, 12-17668) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7729 Beverly SEVCIK, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Brian SANDOVAL, et al., Defendants-Appellees, Coalition for the Protection of Marriage, IntervenorDefendant-Appellee. Natasha N. Jackson, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Neil S. Abercrombie, Governor, State of Hawai'i, Defendant-Appellant, Loretta J. Fuddy, Director, Department of Health, State of Hawai'i, Defendant-Appellee, Hawai'i Family Forum, Intervenor-Defendant-Appellee., 2013 WL 5880763, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Oct 25, 2013) Amicus Curiae Brief of the American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Nevada and the American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Hawai'i (NO. 12-16995, 12-16998, 12-17668) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7730 Beverly SEVCIK, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Brian SANDOVAL, et al., Defendants-Appellees. Natasha N. Jackson, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Neil Abercrombie, et al., Defendant-Appellant., 2013 WL 5880765, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Oct 25, 2013) Brief of Amici Curiae 13 Public Interest and Legal Service Organizations in Support of Appellants and Reversal of the Judgments Below (NO. 12-16995, 12-16998, 12-17668) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7731 Beverly SEVCIK, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Brian SANDOVAL, et al., Defendants-Appellees, Coalition for the Protection of Marriage, IntervenorDefendant-Appellee. Natasha N. Jackson, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Neil S. Abercrombie, Governor, State of Hawai'i, Defendant-Appellant, Loretta J. Fuddy, Director, Department of Health, State of Hawai'i, Defendant-Appellee, Hawaii Family Forum, Intervenor-Defendant-Appellee., 2013 WL 5880766, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Oct 25, 2013) Brief of Amicus Curiae Brief of AntiDefamation League %75 Americans United for Separation of Church and State %75 Bend the Arc: a Jewish Partnership for Justice %75 Board of Trustees of the Pacific ... (NO. 12-16995, 12-16998, 12-17668) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7732 Beverly SEVCIK, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Brian SANDOVAL, et al., Defendants-Appellees, Coalition for the Protection of Marriage, IntervenorDefendant-Appellee. Natasha N. Jackson, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Neil S. Abercrombie, Defendant-Appellant, Loretta J. Fuddy, Defendant-Appellee, © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Hawaii Family Forum, Intervenor-Defendant-Appellee., 2013 WL 5880767, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Oct 25, 2013) Amici Curiae Brief of National Women's Law Center, Williams Institute Scholars of Sexual Orientation and Gender Law, and Women's Legal Groups in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellants and Reversal All ... (NO. 12-16995, 12-16998, 12-17668) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7733 Natasha N. JACKSON, Janin Kleid, and Gary Bradley, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Neil S. ABERCROMBIE, Governor, State of Hawai'i, Defendant-Appellant, Loretta J. Fuddy, Director of Health, State of Hawai'i, Defendant-Appellee, Hawaii Family Forum, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellee., 2013 WL 5798889, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Oct 18, 2013) Defendant-Appellant Governor Neil S. Abercrombie's Motion to Exceed Type-Volume Limitation Declaration of Girard D. Lau Proposed Opening Brief (NO. 12-16995, 12-16998) " HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.) 7734 Gwendolyn SMITH, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Paul PAYNE and The Santa Rosa Press Democrat, Defendants-Appellees., 2013 WL 5424833, *1 (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Sep 17, 2013) Appellant's Opening Brief (NO. 13-CV-15070) 7735 SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORP. d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline, Plaintiff/ Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. Abbott LABORATORIES, Defendant/ Appellant/Cross-Appellee., 2013 WL 4446817, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Aug 14, 2013) Abbott Laboratories Supplemental Brief Regarding United States v. Windsor (NO. 11-17357, 11-17373) 7736 SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline, PlaintiffAppellee/Cross-Appellant, v. Abbott LABORATORIES, DefendantAppellant/Cross-Appellee., 2013 WL 4446818, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Aug 14, 2013) Supplemental Brief on Cross-Appeal of Plaintiff-Appellee and Cross-Appellant SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline (NO. 2011-17357, 2011-17373) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7737 SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORP. d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline, Plaintiff/ Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. Abbott LABORATORIES, Defendant/ Appellant/Cross-Appellee., 2013 WL 4540201, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Aug 14, 2013) Abbott Laboratories Supplemental Brief Regarding United States v. Windsor (NO. 11-17357, 11-17373) 7738 SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline, PlaintiffAppellee/Cross-Appellant, v. Abbott LABORATORIES, DefendantAppellant/Cross-Appellee., 2013 WL 4540202, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Aug 14, 2013) Supplemental Brief on Cross-Appeal of Plaintiff-Appellee and Cross-Appellant Smithkline Beecham Corporation d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline (NO. 2011-17357, 2011-17373) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7739 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Randy Lee SHILL, Defendant-Appellant., 2013 WL 3193427, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Jun 14, 2013) Answering Brief of the Plaintiff-Appellee (NO. 13-30008) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 7740 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Randy Lee SHILL, Defendant-Appellant., 2013 WL 2318140, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. May 12, 2013) Opening Brief of Appellant (NO. 13-30008) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7741 David PICKUP, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Edmund G. BROWN, Jr., et al., Defendants-Appellees, Equality California, Intervenor-Defendant-Appellee., 2013 WL 600688, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Feb 06, 2013) Motion for Leave to File Amicus Curiae Brief Supporting Defendants-Appellees Urging Affirmance (NO. 12-17681) 7742 David H. PICKUP, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Edmund G. BROWN, et al., Defendants-Appellees, Equality California, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellee., 2013 WL 600686, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Feb 05, 2013) Motion for Leave to File Amicus Curiae Brief in Support of Defendants-Appellees and in Support of Affirmance of the Judgment Below (NO. 12-17681) 7743 James COURTNEY; Clifford Courntey, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Jeffrey GOLTZ, chairman and commissioner; Patrick Oshie, commissioner; Philip Jones, commissioner, in their official capacity as officers and members of the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission; David Danner, in his official capacity as executive director of the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission, Defendants-Appellees., 2012 WL 5493219, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Nov 06, 2012) Motion for Leave to File Oversize Brief (NO. 12-35392) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 7744 SACRAMENTO NONPROFIT COLLECTIVE, dba El Camino Wellness Center, a mutual benefit nonprofit collective; Ryan Landers, an individual; Alternative Community Health Care Cooperative, Inc. et al; Marin Alliance for Medical Marijuana et al, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. Eric HOLDER, Attorney General et al, Defendants - Appellees., 2012 WL 5387245, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Oct 24, 2012) Appellants' Consolidated Opening Brief (NO. 12-15991, 12-16710, 12-55775) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7745 SACRAMENTO NONPROFIT COLLECTIVE, dba El Camino Wellness Center, a mutual benefit nonprofit collective; Ryan Landers, an individual; Alternative Community Health Care Cooperative, Inc. et al; Marin Alliance for Medical Marijuana et al, Plaintiffs--Appellants, v. Eric HOLDER, Attorney General et al, Defendants--Appellees., 2012 WL 5426183, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Oct 24, 2012) Appellants' Consolidated Opening Brief (NO. 12-15991, 12-16710, 12-55775) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7746 OBSIDIAN FINANCE GROUP, LLC et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees and CrossAppellants, v. Crystal COX, Defendant-Appellant and Cross-Appellee., 2012 WL 5332324, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Oct 22, 2012) Motion for Leave to File Amicus Brief and Amicus Brief of Scotusblog.Com in Support of Neither Party (NO. 12-35238, 12-35319) 7747 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Plaintiff-Appellant, Central City SRO Collaborative; San Francisco Tenants Union; Housing Rights Committee of San Francisco, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE; © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. John E. Potter; Michael Daley, Defendants-Appellees., 2012 WL 4764107, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Sep 28, 2012) Appellants' Reply Brief (NO. 12-15473, 12-15490) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7748 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Plaintiff-Appellant, Central City SRO Collaborative; San Francisco Tenants Union; Housing Rights Committee of San Francisco, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE; John E. Potter; Michael Daley, Defendants-Appellees., 2012 WL 4764108, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Sep 28, 2012) Appellants' Reply Brief (NO. 12-15473, 12-15490) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7749 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. Jefferson Ray MORGAN, Jr., Defendant - Appellant., 2012 WL 4665598, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Sep 21, 2012) Defendant - Appellant's Opening Brief (NO. 12-10303) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7750 STORMANS, INC., doing business as Ralph's Thriftway, et al., PlaintiffsAppellees, v. Mary SELECKY, et al., Defendants-Appellants, Judith Billings, et al., Intervenors-Appellants., 2012 WL 3911750, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Sep 04, 2012) Brief of Amici Curiae Center for Reproductive Rights and National Women's Law Center in Support of Appellants and Reversal (NO. 12-35221, 12-35223) " 7751 Cheyenne DESERTRAIN, et al., Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, et al., Defendants - Appellees., 2012 WL 3594574, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Aug 09, 2012) Appellants' Opening Brief (NO. 11-56957) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7752 Karen GOLINSKI, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, et al., Defendants-Appellants., 2012 WL 3151741, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Jul 31, 2012) Reply Brief for the Office of Personnel Management, et al. (NO. 12-15388, 12-15409) " HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.) 7753 Karen GOLINSKI, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, et al., Defendants-Appellants., 2012 WL 3151742, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Jul 31, 2012) Reply Brief for the Office of Personnel Management, et al. (NO. 12-15388, 12-15409) " HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.) 7754 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Patrick JONES, Defendant-Appellant., 2012 WL 3164234, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Jul 30, 2012) Appellant's Opening Brief (NO. 12-50120) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7755 SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline, PlaintiffAppellee/Cross-Appellant, v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES, DefendantAppellant/Cross-Appellee., 2012 WL 3151767, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Jul 27, 2012) Fourth Brief on Cross-Appeal of Plaintiff-Appellee and CrossAppellant SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline (NO. 2011-17357, 2011-17373) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7756 SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION d/b/a, GlaxoSmithKline, PlaintiffAppellee/Cross-Appellant, v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES, DefendantAppellant/Cross-Appellee., 2012 WL 3151781, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Jul 27, 2012) Fourth Brief on Cross-Appeal of Plaintiff-Appellee and CrossAppellant SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a/ GlaxoSmithKline (NO. 2011-17357, 2011-17373) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7757 Karen GOLINSKI, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, et al., Defendants. The Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the U.S. House of Representatives, Intervener-Defendant-Appellant. Karen Golinski, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Office of Personnel Management, et al., Defendants-Appellants, The Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the U.S. House of Representatives, Intervener-Defendant., 2012 WL 2338874, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Jun 11, 2012) Amicus Curiae Brief of Eagle Forum Education & Legal Defense Fund in Support of Intervener-Appellant in Support of Reversal (NO. 12-15388, 12-15409) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7758 Karen GOLINSKI, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; John Berry, Director of the United States Office of Personnel Management, in his official capacity, Defendants, Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the U.S. House of Representatives, IntervenorDefendant-Appellant. Karen Golinski, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. United States Office of Personnel Management; John Berry, Director of the United States Office of Personnel Management, in his, 2012 WL 2132484, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Jun 04, 2012) Brief of Intervenor-Defendant-Appellant the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States of Representatives (NO. 12-15388, 12-15409) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7759 Karen GOLINSKI, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; John Berry, Director of the United States Office of Personnel Management, in his official capacity, Defendants, Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the U.S. House of Representatives, IntervenorDefendant-Appellant. Karen Golinski, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. United States Office of Personnel Management; John Berry, Director of the United States Office of Personnel Management, in his, 2012 WL 2132485, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Jun 04, 2012) Brief of Intervenor-Defendant-Appellant the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States of Representatives (NO. 12-15388, 12-15409) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7760 SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORP. d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline, Plaintiff/ Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES, Defendant/ Appellant/Cross-Appellee., 2012 WL 1943252, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. May 21, 2012) Third Brief on Cross-Appeal of Defendant-Appellant and Cross-Appellee Abbott Laboratories (NO. 11-17357, 11-17373) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7761 SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, dba GlaxoSmithKline, PlaintiffAppellee/Cross-Appellant, v. Abbott LABORATORIES, DefendantsAppellant/Cross-Appellee., 2012 WL 1226050, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Mar 28, 2012) Brief of Amici Curiae Lambda Legal and Twelve Other Legal and Public Interest Organizations in Support of Plaintiff-Appellee SmithKline Beecham Corporation Dba GlaxoSmithKline and in Support of © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. ... (NO. 2011-17357, 2011-17373) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7762 SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION d/b/a Glaxosmithkline, PlaintiffAppellee/Cross-Appellant, v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES, DefendantAppellant/Cross-Appellee., 2012 WL 1133815, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Mar 21, 2012) Brief of Plaintiff-Appellee and Cross-Appellant Smithkline Beecham Corporation d/b/a Glaxosmithkline (NO. 2011-17357, 2011-17373) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7763 Kristin PERRY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Edmund G. BROWN, Jr., et al., Defendants, Dennis HollingSworth, et al., Defendant-Intervenors-Appellants., 2012 WL 956455, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Mar 05, 2012) Brief for Amicus Curiae Eagle Forum Education & Legal Defense Fund in Support of Appellants' Petition for Reconsideration and Rehearing En Banc (NO. 10-16696, 11-16577) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7764 Kristin PERRY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., Defendants, Dennis Hollingsworth, et al., Defendant-Intervenors-Appellants., 2011 WL 5561044, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Nov 01, 2011) Brief of Amicus Curiae, Gage Raley, in Support of DefendantIntervenors-Appellants Urging Reversal of the District Court (NO. 10-16696) " 7765 Kristin M. PERRY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Edmund G. BROWN, Jr., et al., Defendants, Dennis Hollingsworth, et al., Defendants-Intervenors-Appellants., 2011 WL 6117217, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Nov 01, 2011) Brief for Appellees Kristin M. Perry, et al. and Appellee-Intervenor City and County of San Francisco (NO. 11-16577) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7766 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel OSAZUWA, Jr., Defendant-Appellant., 2011 WL 3288063, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Jul 26, 2011) Appellant's Response to Government's Supplemental Brief (NO. 10-50109) 7767 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Preston Gabriel DUNCAN, Defendant-Appellee., 2011 WL 2823288, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Jul 11, 2011) Defendant-Appellee's Answering Brief (NO. 11-30036) 7768 Edward PERUTA, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., Defendants-Appellees., 2011 WL 2180508, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. May 27, 2011) Amicus Curiae Brief of National Rifle Association of America, Inc., in Support of Appellants and Reversal (NO. 10-56971) 7769 COALITION TO DEFEND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, et al., PlaintiffsAppellants, v. Edmund G. BROWN, Jr., in his official capacity as Governor of the State of California, and Mark Yudof, in his official capacity as the President of the University of California, Defendants-Appellees, Ward Connerly and American Civil Rights Foundation, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellees., 2011 WL 2130593, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. May 18, 2011) First Brief on CrossAppeal (NO. 11-15100, 11-15241, L) 7770 SCHAD, v. RYAN., 2011 WL 1849263, *1 (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. May 09, © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 2011) Letter brief filed pursuant to court order dated April 25, 2011 (NO. 07-99005) 7771 LOG CABIN REPUBLICANS, a non-profit corporation, PlaintiffsAppellee/Cross-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; Robert M. Gates, Secretary of Defense, in his official capacity, DefendantsAppellants/Cross-Appellees., 2011 WL 2443733, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Apr 08, 2011) Brief for Amicus Curiae the Palm Center in Support of Appellee/Cross-Appellant Log Cabin Republicans (NO. 10-56634, 10-56813) 7772 Log Cabin REPUBLICANS, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; and Robert M. Gates, Secretary of Defense, DefendantAppellants/Cross-Appellees., 2011 WL 2443729, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Apr 04, 2011) Brief of Amici Curiae Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc.; Knights Out; Outserve; Human Rights Campaign; and AntiDefamation League in Support of Plaintiff Appellee/Cross-Appellant for ... (NO. 10-56634, 10-56813) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7773 Log Cabin REPUBLICANS, a non-profit corporation, PlaintiffAppellee/Cross-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; and Robert M. Gates, Secretary of Defense, in his official capacity, Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Appellees., 2011 WL 2443731, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Apr 04, 2011) Brief of Amicus Curiae Servicemembers United in Support of Brief for Appellee / Cross-Appellant, Log Cabin Republicans (NO. 10-56634, 10-56813) 7774 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel OSAZUWA, Jr., Defendant-Appellant., 2011 WL 2455538, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Apr 04, 2011) Appellant's Reply Brief (NO. 10-50109) 7775 LOG CABIN REPUBLICANS, a non-profit corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; Robert M. Gates, Secretary of Defense, in his official capacity, Defendants-Appellants., 2011 WL 1556173, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Mar 31, 2011) Amicus Curiae Brief of Servicemembers Legal Defense Network in Support of Plaintiff-Appellee (NO. 10-56634) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7776 LOG CABIN REPUBLICANS, a non-profit corporation, PlaintiffAppellee/Cross-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; Robert M. Gates, Secretary of Defense, in his official capacity, DefendantsAppellants/Cross-Appellees., 2011 WL 1556172, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Mar 28, 2011) Brief for Appellee / Cross-Appellant Log Cabin Republicans (NO. 10-56634, 10-56813) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7777 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Stafford Eugene ANDERSON, II, Defendant-Appellant., 2011 WL 1248287, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Mar 18, 2011) Reply Brief of Appellant (NO. 10-30033) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7778 LOG CABIN REPUBLICANS, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. UNITED © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Appellees., 2011 WL 1556169, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Mar 04, 2011) Brief Amicus Curiae of Foundation for Moral Law, on Behalf of DefendantsAppellants/Cross-Appellees (NO. 10-56634, 10-56813) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7779 LOG CABIN REPUBLICANS, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al., Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Appellees., 2011 WL 1556170, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Mar 04, 2011) Brief of Amici Curiae the Church of God of Prophecy Chaplaincy Ministries, the Conservative Congregational Christian Conference, Grace Churches International, the International Association of ... (NO. 10-56634, 10-56813) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7780 LOG CABIN REPUBLICANS, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Robert M. Gates, Secretary of Defense, in his official capacity, Defendant-Appellants-Cross-Appellees., 2011 WL 1556171, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Mar 04, 2011) Brief Amicus Curiae of the National Legal Foundation, in Support of DefendantAppellants-Cross-Appellees Urging Reversal (NO. 10-56634, 10-56813) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 7781 Kristin M. PERRY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., Defendants, Dennis Hollingsworth, et al., Defendants-Intervenors-Appellants., 2011 WL 991502, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Mar 01, 2011) Brief of Amici Curiae Equality California, National Center for Lesbian Rights, Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc., And Aclu Foundation of Northern California in Support of ... (NO. 10-16696) 7782 Log Cabin REPUBLICANS, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al., Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Appellees., 2011 WL 860457, *860457 (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Feb 25, 2011) Brief for the Appellants (NO. 10-56634, 10-56813) 7783 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiffs and Appellees, v. Julius Xavier HEXON, Defendant and Appellant., 2011 WL 1158818, *1 (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Feb 22, 2011) Appellant's Reply Brief (NO. 09-30379) 7784 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel OSAZUWA, Jr., Defendant-Appellant., 2011 WL 2455537, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Feb 15, 2011) Government's Answering Brief (NO. 10-50109) 7785 Fauzia DIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Hillary CLINTON, Secretary of State, et al., Defendants-Appellees., 2010 WL 6753384, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Dec 20, 2010) Brief of Appellant (NO. 10-16772) 7786 Doreen FLYNN; Akiim Deshay; Mike Hamel; Mark Hachey; Kumud Majumder; moremarrowdonors.org; John Wagner, M.D., Plaintiffs -- Appellants, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General of the United States, sued in his Official Capacity, Defendant -- Appellee., 2010 WL 5854342, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Nov 15, 2010) Reply Brief of Appellants (NO. 10-55643) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 7787 Kristin M. PERRY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., Defendants, County of Imperial, et al., MovantsAppellants., 2010 WL 5854271, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Nov 01, 2010) Movants-Appellants' Reply Brief (NO. 10-16751) " HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 7788 Doreen FLYNN, et. al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Eric J. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General of the United States, sued in his Official Capacity, Defendant-Appellee., 2010 WL 5854341, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Nov 01, 2010) Brief for the Appellee (NO. 10-55643) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7789 Kristin PERRY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., Defendants, Dennis Hollingsworth, et al., Defendant-Intervenors-Appellants., 2010 WL 4622581, *4622581+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Nov 01, 2010) Defendant-Intervenors-Appellants' Reply Brief (NO. 10-16696) 7790 Tommy Lee FRYMAN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. W.A. DUNCAN, Warden, Respondent-Appellee., 2010 WL 6201163, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Oct 27, 2010) Appellant's Reply Brief (NO. 10-15371) 7791 Kristin M. PERRY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., Defendants, Proposition 8 Official Proponents Dennis Hollingsworth, et al., Defendants-Intervenors-Appellants., 2010 WL 4622576, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Oct 25, 2010) Brief of Amici Curiae ACLU Foundation of Northern California, Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders, Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc., and National Center for Lesbian Rights (NO. 10-16696) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7792 Kristen M. PERRY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., Defendants, Proposition 8 Official Proponents Dennis Hollingsworth, et al., Defendants-Intervenors-Appellants., 2010 WL 4622549, *4622549+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Oct 25, 2010) Brief of Amicus Curiae Constitutional Accountability Center in Support of PlaintiffsAppellees (NO. 10-16696) 7793 Kristin M. PERRY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, City and County of San Francisco, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., Defendants Proposition 8 Official Proponents Dennis Hollingsworth, et al., Defendants-Intervenors-Appellants., 2010 WL 4622552, *4622552+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Oct 25, 2010) Brief of Amici Curiae Bay Area Lawyers for Individual Freedom (BALIF), et al. in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellees Supporting Affirmance (NO. 10-16696) 7794 Kristin PERRY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., Defendants, Dennis Hollingsworth, et al., Defendant-Intervenors-Appellants., 2010 WL 4622562, *4622562+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Oct 25, 2010) Brief of the National LGBT Bar Association As Amicus Curiae in Support of Appellees (NO. 10-16696) 7795 Kristen M. PERRY, et al, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor of the State of California, et al, Defendants, Dennis Hollingsworth, et al, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellants., 2010 WL 4622568, *4622568+ © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Oct 25, 2010) Brief of Amicus Curiae Naacp Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc. in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellees and Affirmance of the District Court Judgment (NO. 10-16696) 7796 Kristin PERRY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., Defendants, Dennis Hollingsworth, et al., DefendantsIntervenors-Appellants., 2010 WL 4622570, *4622570+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Oct 25, 2010) Brief of Amici Curiae, Professors William N. Eskridge Jr., Rebecca L. Brown, Bruce A. Ackerman, Daniel A. Farber, Kenneth L. Karst, and Andrew Koppelman, in Support of Appellees (NO. 10-16696) 7797 Kristin PERRY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., Defendants, Dennis Hollingsworth, et al., Defendant-Intervenors-Appellants., 2010 WL 4622573, *4622573+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Oct 25, 2010) Brief of Amici Curiae American Anthropological Association, American Psychoanalytic Association, National Association of Social Workers, National Association of Social Workers, California Chapter, ... (NO. 10-16696) 7798 Kristin M. PERRY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., Defendants, Proposition 8 Official Proponents Dennis Hollingsworth, et al., Defendants-Intervenors-Appellants., 2010 WL 4622574, *4622574+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Oct 25, 2010) Amicus Curiae Brief by the Southern Poverty Law Center in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellees (NO. 10-16696) 7799 Kristin M. PERRY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., Defendants, Proposition 8 Official Proponents Dennis Hollingsworth, et al., Defendants-Intervenors-Appellants., 2010 WL 4622578, *4622578+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Oct 25, 2010) Brief of Amici Curiae California Faith for Equality, California Council of Churches, General Synod of the United Church of Christ, Universal Fellowship of Metropolitan Community Churches, The ... (NO. 10-16696) 7800 LOG CABIN REPUBLICANS, Plaintiff-Appellees, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; and Robert M. Gates, Secretary of Defense, Defendant-Appellants., 2010 WL 4622637, *4622637+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Oct 25, 2010) Brief of Amicus Curiae Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc. in Support of Appellees' Opposition to a Stay Pending Appeal (NO. 10-56634) 7801 Tracy COLLINS, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Janice K. BREWER, in her official capacity as Governor of the State of Arizona, et al., DefendantsAppellants., 2010 WL 5813347, *5813347+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Oct 19, 2010) Brief of Amici Curiae Wingspan and One Voice Community Center Supporting Plaintiffs-Appellees and Affirmation of the District Court Decision (NO. 10-16797) 7802 Kristin M. PERRY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, City and County of San Francisco, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., Defendants, Dennis Hollingsworth, et al., Defendants- © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Intervenors-Appellants., 2010 WL 4310745, *4310745+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Oct 18, 2010) Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee City and County of San Francisco's Response Brief (NO. 10-16696) 7803 KRISTIN M. Perry, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., Defendants, Proposition 8 Official Proponents Dennis Hollingsworth, et al., Defendants-Intervenors-Appellants., 2010 WL 4310749, *4310749+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Oct 18, 2010) Brief for Appellees (NO. 10-16696) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 7804 Tracy COLLINS, Keith B. Humphrey, Joseph R. Diaz, Judith McDaniel, Beverly Seckinger, Stephen Russell, Deanna Pfleger, Corey Seemiller, Carrie Sperling and Leslie Kemp, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Janice K. BREWER, in her official capacity as Governor of the State of Arizona; David Raber, in his official capacity as Interim Director of the Arizona Department of Administration and Personnel Board; Kathy Peckardt, in her official capacity as Director of Human, 2010 WL 5813343, *5813343+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Oct 12, 2010) Plaintiffs-Appellees' Response Brief (NO. 10-16797) 7805 Joseph Damon FAIR, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee., 2010 WL 5854288, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Oct 06, 2010) Appellant's Opening Brief (NO. 10-30183) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7806 Kristin PERRY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., Defendants, Dennis Hollingsworth, et al., Defendants-Intervenors, County of Imperial, et al., Proposed Intervenors-Appellants., 2010 WL 5854267, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Sep 24, 2010) Brief of Amicus Curiae Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence in Support of Appellants County of Imperial, et al., and Reversal (NO. 10-16751) 7807 Kristin PERRY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, City and County of San Francisco, Plaintiff-Intervener-Appellee, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., Defendants, Dennis Hollingsworth, et al., Defendant-Intervenors-Appellants., 2010 WL 4075737, *4075737+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Sep 24, 2010) Amicus Brief of the American Center for Law and Justice in Support of Appellants and Urging Reversal (NO. 10-16696) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 7808 Kristin PERRY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., Defendants, Dennis Hollingsworth, et al., Defendant-Intervenors-Appellants., 2010 WL 4075738, *4075738+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Sep 24, 2010) Brief Amicus Curiae for the Hausvater Project in Support of DefendantIntervenors-Appellants for Reversal of the District Court's Ruling (NO. 10-16696) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7809 Kristin M. PERRY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., Defendants-Appellants., 2010 WL 4075740, *4075740+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Sep 24, 2010) Brief of Amici Curiae, Robert P. George, Sherif Girgis, and Ryan T. Anderson, in Support of Reversal and the Intervening Defendants-Appellants (NO. 10-16696) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 7810 Kristin M. PERRY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, in his official capacity as Governor of California, et al., Defendants, Dennis Hollingsworth, et al., Defendants-Intervenors-Appellants., 2010 WL 4075743, *4075743+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Sep 24, 2010) Brief of States of Indiana, Virginia, Louisiana, Michigan, Alabama, Alaska, Florida, Idaho, Nebraska, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Utah, and Wyoming as Amici Curiae in Support of ... (NO. 10-16696) " HN: 3,5 (S.Ct.) 7811 Kristin PERRY, et al, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, et al, Defendants, Dennis Hollingsworth, et al, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellants., 2010 WL 4075745, *4075745+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Sep 24, 2010) Brief of Amicus Curiae Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence in Support of Appellants and Reversal (NO. 10-16696) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 7812 Kristin PERRY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., Defendants, Dennis Hollingsworth, et al, Defendant-Intervenors-Appellants., 2010 WL 4075747, *4075747+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Sep 24, 2010) Brief Amicus Curiae of National Legal Foundation, in Support of DefendantIntervenors-Appellants Urging Reversal (NO. 10-16696) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 7813 Kristin PERRY, et al., Plaintiffs/Appellees, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., Defendants, Dennis Hollingsworth, et al., Defendant-Interveners-Appellants., 2010 WL 4075748, *4075748+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Sep 24, 2010) Amicus Curiae Brief of Eagle Forum Education & Legal Defense Fund in Support of Appellants in Support of Reversal (NO. 10-16696) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7814 Kristin PERRY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., Defendants, Dennis Hollingsworth, et al., Defendant-Intervenors-Appellants., 2010 WL 4075750, *4075750+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Sep 24, 2010) Brief of Amici Curiae National Organization for Marriage, National Organization for Marriage Rhode Island, and Family Leader in Support of the Intervening Defendants-Appellants (NO. 10-16696) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7815 Kristin PERRY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., Defendants., 2010 WL 4075754, *4075754+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Sep 24, 2010) Brief of Amicus Curiae Catholics for the Common Good in Support of Defendant-Intervenors-Appellants (NO. 10-16696) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7816 Tracy COLLINS, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Janice K. BREWER, in her official capacity as Governor of the State of Arizona, et al., DefendantsAppellants., 2010 WL 5813346, *5813346+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Sep 20, 2010) Brief of Amicus Curiae Center for Arizona Policy Supporting Defendants-Appellants and Reversal of the District Court Decision (NO. 10-16797) 7817 Kristin PERRY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., Defendants, Dennis Hollingsworth, et al., Defendant-Intervenors-Appellants., 2010 WL 3762119, *3762119+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Sep 17, 2010) Defendant-Intervenors-Appellants' Opening Brief (NO. 10-16696) " © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 7818 Kristin M. PERRY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., Defendants., 2010 WL 3762120, *3762120+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Sep 17, 2010) Movant-Appellants Opening Brief (NO. 10-16751) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 7819 Doreen FLYNN; Akiim Deshay; Mike Hamel; Mark Hachey; Kumud Majumder; moremarrowdonors.org; John Wagner, M.D., Plaintiffs -- Appellants, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General of the United States, sued in his Official Capacity, Defendant -- Appellee., 2010 WL 5854339, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Sep 01, 2010) Brief of Appellants (NO. 10-55643) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7820 Doreen FLYNN; Akiim Deshay; Mike Hamel; Mark Hachey; Kumud Majumder; Moremarrowdonors.org; John Wagner, M.D., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General of the United States, sued in his Official Capacity, Defendant-Appellee., 2010 WL 4470823, *4470823+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Sep 01, 2010) Brief of Appellants (NO. 09-55643) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 7821 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiffs and Appellees, v. Julius Xavier HEXON, Defendant and Appellant., 2010 WL 5853601, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Aug 25, 2010) Appellant's Opening Brief (NO. 09-30379) 7822 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. APPROXIMATELY $133,803.53 IN U.S. CURRENCY SEIZED FROM WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, N.A., Account #XXXXXXXXXX, Held In the Name of Advantage Financial Group Holdings Management LLC, and Approximately $328,495.75 In U.S. Currency Seized from Washington Mutual Bank, N.A., Account #XXXXXXXXXX, Held In the Name of Loomis Wealth Solutions LLC, Defendants. Flagstar Bank, Claimant-Appellant., 2010 WL 6753336, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Aug 17, 2010) Appellant's Opening Brief (NO. 10-15458) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7823 Kristin PERRY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., Defendants., 2010 WL 3299979, *3299979+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Aug 12, 2010) Emergency Motion under Circuit Rule 27-3 (NO. 10-16696) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 7824 ROOMMATE.COM, LLC, Defendant-Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL OF SAN FERNANDO VALLEY; Fair Housing Council of San Diego; Each Individually and on Behalf of the General Public, PlaintiffsAppellees and Cross-Appellants., 2010 WL 2751575, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. May 14, 2010) Appellant Roommate.com, LLC's Third Brief on CrossAppeal (NO. 09-55272, 09-55875, 09-55969) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7825 ROOMMATE.COM, LLC, Defendant-Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL OF SAN FERNANDO VALLEY; Fair Housing Council of San Diego; each individually and on behalf of the general public, PlaintiffsAppellees and Cross-Appellants., 2010 WL 2751572, *2751572+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Mar 15, 2010) Plaintiffs-Appellees' Response Brief in Case © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Nos. 09-55272 and 09-55875 and Opening Brief in Case No. 09-55969 (NO. 09-55272, 09-55875, 09-55969) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7826 James E. MCKINNEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dora SCHRIRO, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, and Robert Stewart, Warden, Arizona State Prison - Eyman Complex, Respondent-Appellees., 2010 WL 4622694, *4622694+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Feb 26, 2010) Opening Brief of Petitioner - Appellant (NO. 09-99018) 7827 Walter B. HOYE, II, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF OAKLAND, DefendantAppellee., 2010 WL 5650054, *5650054+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Feb 23, 2010) Brief of Amici Curiae American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American Women's Medical Association, National Abortion Federation, Physicians for Reproductive Choice and Health, et al., ... (NO. 09-16753) 7828 CAREY TRAVEL, INC., Bradley Carey and Celeste Carey, Appellants, v. ALASKA AIRLINES, INC., Points International, Ltd., Kyle Levine and Ann Ardizzone, Appellees., 2010 WL 5780050, *5780050+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Feb 16, 2010) Appellants' Brief (NO. 09-35979) 7829 ROOMMATE.COM, LLC, Defendant-Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL OF SAN FERNANDO VALLEY; Fair Housing Council of San Diego; each individually and on behalf of the general public, PlaintiffsAppellees and Cross-Appellants., 2010 WL 2751573, *2751573+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Jan 11, 2010) Appellant Roommate.Com, LLC's First Brief on Cross-Appeal (NO. 09-55272, 09-55875, 09-55969) " 7830 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. Maynard Martin RICHARDS, Defendant/Appellant., 2009 WL 7325510, *7325510+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Nov 17, 2009) Appellant's Opening Brief (NO. 09-10324) 7831 Kristin M. PERRY, et. al., Plaintiffs/Appellees, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, in his official capacity as Governor of California, et. al., Defendants, Proposition 8 Official Proponents, et. al., DefendantIntervenors/Appellees, Campaign for California Families, Proposed DefendantIntervenor/Appellant, v. Our Family Coalition, et. al. Proposed PlaintiffIntervenors City and County of San Francisco, Plaintiff-Intervenor., 2009 WL 4922578, *4922578+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Sep 25, 2009) Appellant's Opening Brief, (Expedited Oral Argument Requested) (NO. 09-16959) 7832 ALPHA DELTA CHI-DELTA CHAPTER, Alpha Gamma Omega-Epsilon Chapter, Melissa Perea, Jackie Lewis, James Rosenberg, and David Shokir, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Charles B. REED, Stephen L. Weber, and Douglas Case, Defendants-Appellees., 2009 WL 6303851, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Jul 30, 2009) Brief of Amici Curiae American Civil Liberties Union and American Civil Liberties Union of San Diego and Imperial Counties in Support of Affirmance (NO. 09-55299) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7833 Marc PERKEL / Church of Reality, Petitioners, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Drug Enforcement Administration, Respondent., 2009 WL 4275655, © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. *4275655+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Jul 08, 2009) Reply Brief for the Petitioner (NO. 08-74457) " 7834 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rodney PARKER, Defendant-Appellant., 2009 WL 5836073, *5836073+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Jun 04, 2009) Appellant's Opening Brief (NO. 08-50536) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7835 A. Calvin BROWN, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL and Health Services, et al., Defendants-Appellees., 2009 WL 2444550, *2444550+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Apr 21, 2009) Answering Brief of Defendants-Appellees (NO. 08-35793, 08-35934, 08-35968) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7836 A. Calvin BROWN, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND HEALTH SERVICES, et al., DefendantsAppellees., 2009 WL 2444565, *2444565+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Apr 21, 2009) Answering Brief of Defendants-Appellees (NO. 08-35793, 08-35934, 08-35968) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7837 A. Calvin BROWN, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND HEALTH SERVICES, et al., DefendantsAppellees., 2009 WL 3459968, *3459968+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Apr 21, 2009) Answering Brief of Defendants-Appellees (NO. 08-35793, 08-35934, 08-35968) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7838 Marc PERKEL / Church of Reality, Petitioners, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Drug Enforcement Administration, Respondent., 2009 WL 4275653, *4275653 (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Apr 21, 2009) Brief for the Petitioner (NO. 08-74457) " 7839 Justin HEGNEY, Appellant, v. Harold CLARKE, et al., Appellees., 2009 WL 2494142, *2494142+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Feb 02, 2009) Opening Brief of Appellant (NO. 08-35997) 7840 LOG CABIN REPUBLICANS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent, United States of America and Robert M. Gates, Secretary of Defense, in his official capacity, Real Parties in Interest., 2008 WL 7043810, *7043810 (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Nov 10, 2008) Log Cabin Republicans' Reply in Support of Petition for Writ of Mandamus (NO. 08-73194) 7841 RUSSELL ALLEN NORDYKE, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Mary KING, et al., Defendants-Appellees., 2008 WL 5008974, *5008974+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Oct 03, 2008) Brief Amicus Curiae of Second Amendment Foundation, Inc. in Support of Appellants Seeking Reversal (NO. 07-15763) " 7842 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. Jose GERMAN, Defendant - Appellant., 2008 WL 5010945, *5010945+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Sep 17, 2008) Defendant - Appellant's Opening Brief (NO. 08-10281) " HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 7843 David K. MEHL; Lok T. Lau; Frank Flores, Appellants/Plaintiffs, v. Lou BLANAS, individually and in his official capacity as Sheriff of County of © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Sacramento; County of Sacramento, Sheriff's Department; County of Sacramento; Bill Lockyer Attorney General, State of California; Randi Rossi, State Firearms Director and Custodian of Records., Appellees/Defendants., 2008 WL 4300896, *4300896 (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Aug 13, 2008) Appellants' Opening Brief (NO. 08-15773) 7844 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ruben FLORESVILLAR, Defendant-Appellant., 2008 WL 891254, *891254+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Feb 25, 2008) Appellant's Opening Brief (NO. 07-50445) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7845 Edward Harold SCHAD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dora SCHRIRO, Warden, Respondent-Appellee., 2008 WL 890982, *890982+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Feb 05, 2008) Appellant's Principle Brief (NO. 07-99005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7846 TE-MOAK TRIBE OF WESTERN SHOSHONE OF NEVADA, Western Shoshone Defense Project Great Basin Mine Watch,Appellants, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, et al., Appellees, CORTEZ GOLD MINES, INC., Defendant-Intervenor-Appellees., 2008 WL 592044, *592044+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Jan 28, 2008) Appellants' Reply Brief (NO. 07-16336) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 7847 Edward Harold SCHAD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Dora SCHRIRO, Warden, Respondent-Appellee., 2007 WL 3388865, *3388865+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Oct 01, 2007) Appellant's Principle Brief (NO. 07-99005) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7848 Lilian S. ILETO; Joshua Stepakoff; Mindy Gale Finkelstein; Benjamin Kadish; and Nathan Lawrence Powers, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. RSR MANAGEMENT CORPORATION; RSR Group Nevada, Inc.; and Glock, Inc., a Georgia corporation, Defendants - Appellees. Lilian S. Ileto; Joshua Stepakoff; Mindy Gale Finkelstein; Benjamin Kadish; and Nathan Lawrence Powers, Plaintiffs Appellants / Appellees, v. China North Industries Corp., aka Norinco, Defendant - Appellant /, 2007 WL 4266471, *4266471+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Sep 25, 2007) Opening Brief for Plaintiffs / Appellants-Appellees (NO. 06-56872, 07-15403, 07-15404) " 7849 Triono TRIONO, Non-Detained Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent., 2007 WL 2786913, *2786913+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Aug 14, 2007) Petitioner Triono Triono's Substitution Opening Brief (NO. 06-72991) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7850 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MARIN ALLIANCE FOR MEDICAL MARIJUANA/Lynnette Shaw, Appellants-Defendants., 2007 WL 2302031, *2302031+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Jun 21, 2007) Appellant's Supplemental Opening Brief (NO. 05-16466) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 7851 CHRISTIAN LEGAL SOCIETY CHAPTER OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Hastings College of the Law, Appellant, v. Mary Kay KANE, et al., Appellees ., Hastings Outlaw, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellee., 2007 WL 894852, *894852+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Feb 05, 2007) Brief of Amici Curiae American Civil Liberties Union, American Civil Liberties Union of © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Northern California, Anti-Defamation League, Bay Area Lawyers for Individual Freedom, Equal Justice Society, ... (NO. 06-15956) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 7852 Major Margaret WITT, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE ; Donald Rumsfeld Secretary of Defense; Michael W. Wynne, Secretary of the Department of the Air Force; and Colonel Mary L. Walker, Commander, Appellees., 2007 WL 968365, *968365+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Jan 29, 2007) Reply Brief of Appellant (NO. 06-35644) 7853 CHRISTIAN LEGAL SOCIETY CHAPTER OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Hastings College of the Law, Appellant, v. Mary Kay KANE, et al. Appellees., Hastings Outlaw, Defendant-intervenor-Appellee., 2007 WL 649133, *649133+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Jan 19, 2007) Brief of Amici Curiae American Civil Liberties Union, American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California, Anti-Defamation League, Bay Area Lawyers for Individual Freedom, Equal Justice Society, ... (NO. 06-15956) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 7854 CHRISTIAN LEGAL SOCIETY CHAPTER OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Hastings College of the Law, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mary Kay KANE et al., Defendants-Appellees., Hastings OUTLAW, DefendantIntervenor-Appellee., 2007 WL 968269, *968269+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Jan 12, 2007) Brief of Appellees (NO. 06-15956) 7855 Major MARGARET WITT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, et al., Defendants-Appellees., 2007 WL 286474, *286474+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Jan 03, 2007) Brief for the Appellees (NO. 06-35644) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 7856 Triono TRIONO, Non-Detained Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent., 2006 WL 4054034, *4054034+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Dec 28, 2006) Petitioner Triono Triono's Opening Brief (NO. 06-72991) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7857 CHRISTIAN LEGAL SOCIETY CHAPTER OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, HAstings College of The Law, Appellant, v. Mary Kay KANE, et al., Appellees, and Hastings Outlaw, Defendant-Intervenor - Appellee., 2006 WL 4054015, *4054015+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Dec 26, 2006) Brief of Appellee Hastings Outlaw (NO. 06-15956) 7858 Muhammad Shabazz FARRAKHAN, a/k/a Ernest S. Walker-bey; Al-kareem Shadeed; Marcus Price; Ramon Barrientes; Timothy Schaaf; and Clifton Briceno, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Christine O. GREGOIRE, Governor of the State of Washington; Sam Reed, Secretary of State for the State of Washington; Harold W. CLARKE, Director of the Washington State Department of Corrections; and The State of Washington, Defendants-Appellees., 2006 WL 4030104, *4030104+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Dec 11, 2006) Brief Submitted on Behalf of Leading Criminologists (NO. 06-35669) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 7859 Kevin R. WALSH, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. HONOLULU, A Hawaii Municipal Corporation, Defendant, Mark J. BENNETT, in his Official Capacity as Attorney General of the State of Hawaii, et al., Defendants-Appellants., 2006 WL 4007445, *4007445+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Dec 07, 2006) Plaintiffs-Appellees' Answering Brief, Certificate of Compliance, Statement of Related Cases and Certificate of Service (NO. 06-16280, 06-16568) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7860 Major Margaret WITT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE; Donald Rumsfeld Secretary of Defense; Michael W. Wynne, Secretary of the Department of the Air Force; and Colonel Mary L. Walker, Commander, Defendant-Appellees., 2006 WL 3845639, *3845639+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Oct 25, 2006) Brief Of Amicus Curiae Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc. In Support Of Appellant And Supporting Reversal (NO. 06-35644) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 7861 Major Margaret WITT, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE; Donald Rumsfeld Secretary of Defense; Michael W. Wynne, Secretary, Department of the Air Force; and Colonel Mary L. Walker, Commander, Appellees., 2006 WL 3845641, *3845641+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Oct 25, 2006) Brief of Amicus Curiae Servicemembers Legal Defense Network in Support of Appellant Major Margaret Witt and Reversal (Filed With Consent of Both Parties) (NO. 06-35644) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7862 Major Margaret WITT, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE; Donald Rumsfeld Secretary of Defense; Michael W. Wynne, Secretary of the Department of the Air Force; and Colonel Mary L. Walker, Commander, Appellees., 2006 WL 3420559, *3420559+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Oct 24, 2006) Brief of Amici Curiae International Commission of Jurists and the Center for Constitutional Rights in Support of Plaintiff-Appellant and Reversal (Filed with Consent of Both Parties) (NO. 06-35644) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 7863 Major Margaret WITT, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE; Donald Rumsfeld Secretary of Defense; Michael W. Wynne, Secretary of the Department of the Air Force; and Colonel Mary L. Walker, Commander, Appellees., 2006 WL 3623332, *3623332+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Oct 16, 2006) Brief of Appellant (NO. 06-35644) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 7864 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roman CISNEROSAGUILAR, Defendant-Appellant., 2006 WL 2984167, *2984167+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Jun 28, 2006) Appellant's Opening Brief (NO. 06-50036) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7865 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Konileti LATU, Defendant-Appellant., 2006 WL 2951584, *2951584+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Mar 22, 2006) Defendant-Appellant's Opening Brief (NO. 05-10815) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7866 Meletus Okafor UGWUEKE A77-293-290, Petitioner, v. Alberto GONZALES, © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. United States Attorney General, Respondent., 2005 WL 4638126, *4638126+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Dec 15, 2005) Petitioner's Opening Brief (NO. 05-73980) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7867 Arthur Bruno SMELL, et al., Plain tiffs-Appellants, v. COUNTY OF ORANGE, et al., Defendants-Appellees., 2005 WL 4238974, *4238974+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Oct 31, 2005) Brief Amicus Curiae of the National Legal Foundation In support of Defendants-Appellees Urging affirmance (NO. 05-56040) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7868 Arthur Bruno SMELT and Christopher David Hammer, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. COUNTY OF ORANGE, California, et al., Defendants-Appellees., 2005 WL 4121256, *4121256+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Oct 12, 2005) Appellee's Brief (NO. 05-56040) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 7869 Arthur Bruno SMELT, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. COUNTY OF ORANGE, et al., Defendants-Appellees., 2005 WL 4121255, *4121255+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Oct 2005) Brief for Appellee United States (NO. 05-56040) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 7870 Arthur Bruno SMELT; Christopher David Hammer, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. COUNTY OF ORANGE, California, et al., Defendants - Appellees., 2005 WL 3526835, *3526835+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Sep 23, 2005) Appellee's Brief (NO. 05-56040) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 7871 Edmundo EVAN-SANGUINO, (Agency No. A78 739 220), Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent., 2005 WL 4155219, *4155219+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Sep 09, 2005) Brief for Respondent (NO. 04-74550) " HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 7872 Arthur Bruno SMELT; Christopher David Hammer, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. COUNTY OF ORANGE, California, et al., Defendants - Appellees., 2005 WL 3227255, *3227255+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Aug 22, 2005) Appellants' Brief (NO. 05-56040) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 7873 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee-Plaintiff, v. Lynn OSBURN and Judy Osburn, Appellants-Co-Defendants., 2005 WL 2394318, *2394318+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Jul 25, 2005) Appellant Lynn Osburn's Opening Brief (NO. 04-5017604-50177) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 7874 FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL OF SAN FERNANDO VALLEY; Fair Housing Council of San Diego, Plaintiffs, Appellants, and Appellees, v. ROOMMATES.COM, LLC, Defendant, Appellee, and Appellant., 2005 WL 2598926, *2598926+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Jul 21, 2005) Appellants' Reply Brief and Answering Brief to the Cross-Appeal (NO. 04-56916, 04-57173) " HN: 3,5 (S.Ct.) 7875 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gerardo OROZCOQUIROZ, Defendant-Appellant., 2005 WL 3517834, *3517834+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Jul 11, 2005) Appellant's Opening Brief (NO. 05-50190) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 7876 FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL OF SAN FERNANDO VALLEY, et al., Plaintiffs, © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Appellants, and Appellees, v. ROOMMATE.COM, LLC, Defendant, Appellee, and Appellant., 2005 WL 2598925, *2598925+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Jun 07, 2005) Roommate.com, LLC's Answering Brief as to the Judgment and Opening Brief as to Attorneys' Fees and Costs (NO. 04-56916, 04-57173) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 7877 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eugene K. ALBINO, Defendant-Appellant., 2005 WL 3132420, *3132420+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Jun 06, 2005) Defendant-Appellant Eugene K. Albino's Opening Brief (NO. 05-10146) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7878 NIGHTLIFE PARTNERS, LTD., Entertainment Associates, of L.A., Inc., Deja Vu Showgirls of Beverly Hills, LLC, Deja Vu Consulting, Inc., Jane Doe I, and Jane Doe II, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS, Defendant Appellee., 2005 WL 1926849, *1926849+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. May 24, 2005) Appellants' Reply Brief (NO. 04-56248) " HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 7879 Frederick FEIED, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA; Administrator of the University of California Retirement Plan; California Public Employees' Retirement System (a.k.a. California PERS); Administrator of the California Public Employees' Retirement System, Defendants - Appellees., 2005 WL 2596930, *2596930 (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. May 12, 2005) Appellant's (Consolidated) Reply Brief (NO. 04-17523) 7880 Tracy MATTHEWS, A79 810 375, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent., 2005 WL 1926894, *1926894+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. May 10, 2005) Brief for Rrespondent (NO. 04-71320) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 7881 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Paul OROZCO, Defendant-Appellant., 2005 WL 2480770, *2480770+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Apr 18, 2005) Appellant's Opening Brief (NO. 04-10572) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 7882 NIGHTLIFE PARTNERS, LTD., Entertainment Associates of L.A., Inc., Deja Vu Showgirls of Beverly Hills, LLC, Deja Vu Consulting, Inc., Jane Doe I, And Jane Doe II, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS, Defendant and Appellee., 2005 WL 1789826, *1789826+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Apr 07, 2005) Brief of Appellee City of Beverly Hills (NO. 04-56248) " HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.) 7883 Jorge Soto VEGA, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent., 2005 WL 4668881, *4668881 (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Jan 23, 2005) Reply Brief of Petitioner (NO. 04-70868) 7884 Michael and Barbara AUSTIN; George Jerolemon, Walter Berringer, Harriet Berringer; Individually and on Behalf of all Others Similarly Situated, PlaintiffsAppellees/Cross-Appellants, v. LEHMAN COMMERCIAL PAPER, INC., a New York Corporation; and Lehman Brothers, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Appellees., 2005 WL 516730, *516730+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Jan 21, 2005) Plaintiffs- © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Appellees./Cross-Appellants'reply Brief on Cross-Appeal (NO. 04-55396, 04-55920, 04-55942) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 7885 Jane DOE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES, Donald Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense, and Tricare Management Activity (formerly known as Office of Civilian Health and Medical Programs of the Uniformed Services), DefendantsAppellants., 2005 WL 516688, *516688+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Jan 19, 2005) Reply Brief (NO. 04-35810) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 7886 Jane DOE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES, Donald Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense, and Tricare Management Activity (formerly known as Office of Civilian Health and Medical Programs of the Uniformed Services), DefendantAppellants., 2004 WL 3155877, *3155877+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Dec 20, 2004) Brief of Appellee (NO. 04-35810) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7887 NIGHTLIFE PARTNERS, LTD., Entertainment Associates, of L.A., Inc., Deja Vu Showgirls of Beverly Hills, LLC, Deja Vu Consulting, Inc., Jane Doe I, and Jane Doe II, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS, DefendantAppellee., 2004 WL 2919607, *2919607+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Nov 05, 2004) Appellants' Opening Brief (NO. 04-56248) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7888 Jorge Soto VEGA, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent., 2004 WL 5466690, *5466690+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Oct 25, 2004) Opening Brief of Petitioner (NO. 04-70868) " 7889 Tracy MATTHEWS, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General Respondent., 2004 WL 2681863, *2681863+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Sep 29, 2004) Opening Brief of Petitioner (NO. 04-71320) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 7890 Hani Moussa El YOUSSEF Agency No. A75 769 995, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent., 2004 WL 2681857, *2681857+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Aug 09, 2004) Brief for Petitioner (NO. 04-71127) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7891 HASEL WOOD BUICK-PONTIAC COMPANY, a Washington Business corporation, Appellant, v. Joseph C. WICKERSHAM, Appellee., 2004 WL 865753, *865753+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Feb 25, 2004) Brief of Appellee (NO. 03-35707) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7892 Robert Joseph BENGE, Petitioner/Appellant/, v. Dora B. SHIRIRO et al., Respondents/Appellee., 2004 WL 540043, *540043+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Jan 15, 2004) Appellant's Reply Brief (NO. 03-16338) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7893 Mohamad ABDUL-KARIM, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General of the United States, Respondent., 2003 WL 22907673, *22907673+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Nov 07, 2003) Petitioner's Reply Brief (NO. 02-74498) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 7894 Mohamad ABDUL-KARIM, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General of the United States, Respondent., 2003 WL 22767738, *22767738+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Sep 30, 2003) Brief for Respondent (NO. 02-74498) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7895 Anil CHADHA A78 654 118, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Respondent., 2003 WL 22752300, *22752300+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Sep 04, 2003) Brief for Respondent (NO. 02-73272) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7896 Jamie DEMERY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. MARICOPA COUNTY SHERIFF JOSEPH ARPAIO, Defendant-Appellant, Maricopy County, Defendant., 2003 WL 22716980, *22716980+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Aug 13, 2003) Reply Brief of Defendant-Appellant (NO. 03-15698) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7897 TUCSON WOMAN'S CLINIC; Damon Raphael, M.D.; Old Pueblo Family Planning; Robert U. Tamis, M.D. P.C.; Simat Corp., dba Abortion Services of Phoenix; and Robert H. Tamis, M.D., on behalf of themselves and their patients seeking abortions, Plaintiffs-Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. Catherine EDEN, in her capacity as the Director of Arizona Department of Health Services; Janet Napolitano, in her capacity as Attorney General of the State of, 2003 WL 22670272, *22670272+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Jul 10, 2003) PlaintiffsAppellants/Cross-Appellees' Combined Response and Reply Brief (NO. 02-17375, 02-17381, AND02-17382) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7898 RUI ONE CORP., a Washington corporation, Appellant, v. CITY OF BERKELEY; Hotel Employees & Restaurant Employees Local 2850, Appellees., 2003 WL 22594024, *22594024+ (Appellate Brief) (9th Cir. Jul 07, 2003) Appellees' Brief in Response to Appellant's Supplemental Brief (NO. 02-15762) " 7899 William NEWLAND; Paul Newland; James Newland; Christine Ketterhagen; Andrew Newland; Hercules Industries, Inc., a Colorado corporation, PlaintiffsAppellees, v. Kathleen SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services; Hilda L. Solis, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Labor; Timothy F. Geithner, in his official capacity as Secretary of the, 2013 WL 858225, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (10th Cir. Feb 27, 2013) Brief for Liberty, Life, and Law Foundation as Amicus Curiae in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellees and Urging Affirmance (NO. 12-1380) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7900 HOBBY LOBBY STORES, INC., Mardel, Inc., David Green, Barbara Green, Mart Green, Steve Green, and Darsee Lett, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Kathleen SEBELIUS, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services; Hilda L. Solis, Secretary of the United States Department of Labor; United States Department of Labor; Timothy F. Geithner, Secretary of the United States Department of the Treasury; and United States Department of the Treasury,, 2013 WL 656600, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (10th Cir. Feb 15, 2013) Brief for Liberty, Life, and Law Foundation as Amicus Curiae in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellants and Urging Reversal (NO. 12-6294) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7901 BUSHCO, a Utah Corp.; Companions, L.L.C.; and TT II, a Utah Corp., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Mark SHURTLEFF, in his official capacity as Utah Attorney General, Defendant-Appellee., 2012 WL 6627524, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (10th Cir. Dec 12, 2012) Appellants' Reply Brief and Response to Cross-Appeal (NO. 12-4083, 12-4093) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 7902 BUSHCO, a Utah Corp.; Companion L.L.C.; and TT II, a Utah Corp., PlaintiffsAppellants, v. Mark SHURTLEFF, in his official capacity as Utah Attorney General, Defendant-Appellee., 2012 WL 3886662, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (10th Cir. Aug 25, 2012) Brief of Appellant (NO. 12-4083) 7903 Muneer AWAD, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Paul ZIRIAX, et al., DefendantsAppellants., 2011 WL 1461738, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (10th Cir. Apr 04, 2011) Brief Amicus Curiae of Foundation for Moral Law, on Behalf of DefendantAppellants, in Support of Reversal (NO. 10-6273) 7904 SECSYS, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert VIGIL and Ann Marie Gallegos, Defendants-Appellees., 2011 WL 959521, *959521+ (Appellate Brief) (10th Cir. Mar 07, 2011) Appellant's Opening Brief (NO. 11-2006) 7905 Malachi Z. YORK, a/k/a Dwight York, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, et al., Defendants - Appellees., 2009 WL 2816504, *2816504 (Appellate Brief) (10th Cir. Aug 21, 2009) Jurisdictional Memorandum Brief (NO. 09-1283, 09-1284) 7906 Malachi Z. YORK, a/k/a Dwight York, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, et al., Defendants - Appellees., 2009 WL 2816505, *2816505 (Appellate Brief) (10th Cir. Aug 21, 2009) Jurisdictional Memorandum Brief (NO. 09-1283, 09-1284) 7907 Wesley R. BROWN, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Michael COOKE, Exec. Director, Colorado Department of Revenue, et. al., Defendants/Appellees., 2009 WL 2141472, *2141472+ (Appellate Brief) (10th Cir. Jul 10, 2009) Appellees' Response Brief (NO. 09-1144) 7908 Sonya DIAS, et al., Appellants-Petitioners, v. THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, Colorado, et al., Appellees-Respondents., 2008 WL 3285433, *3285433+ (Appellate Brief) (10th Cir. Jul 30, 2008) Appellants' Opening Brief (NO. 08-1132) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7909 State of Oklahoma, ex rel., W.A. Drew Attorney General of Oklahoma, Appellee/ Plaintiff, v. Tim POPE, Appellant/Defendant., 2007 WL 2726625, *2726625+ (Appellate Brief) (10th Cir. Jul 30, 2007) Opening Brief of Appellant, Tim Pope (NO. 07-6093) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7910 Kim SEEGMILLER and Sharon Johnson, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LAVERKIN CITY INC., Defendant-Appellee., 2007 WL 2426131, *2426131+ (Appellate Brief) (10th Cir. Jul 12, 2007) Appellant's Opening Brief (NO. 07-4096) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 7911 Kathleen MILLIGAN-HITT and Kathryn R. Roberts, Plaintiffs-Appellees Cross-Appellants, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF SHERIDAN COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT NUMBER 2, Craig Dougherty, individually and in his official capacity as Superintendent, and Terry Burgess, in his official capacity as Assistant Superintendent, Defendants-Appellants - Cross-Appellees., 2007 WL 1898932, *1898932+ (Appellate Brief) (10th Cir. May 25, 2007) Principal and Response Brief of Appellee Craig Dougherty in his Individual Capacity (NO. 06-8086, 06-8087) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 7912 Heather FINSTUEN, Anne Magro, SGF-M, KBF-M, Lucy Doel, Jennifer Doel, and Ed, Plaintiffs/Appellees, v. Dr. Mike CRUTCHER, In His Official Capacity as Commissioner of Health of Oklahoma, Defendant/Appellant., 2006 WL 3671813, *3671813+ (Appellate Brief) (10th Cir. Oct 25, 2006) Reply Brief of Defendant/Appellant, Dr. Mike Cructher (NO. 06-6213) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 7913 Heather FINSTUEN, Anne Magro, SGF-M, KBF-M, Lucy Doel, Jennifer Doel and Ed, Plaintiffs - Appellees, Greg Hampel, Ed Swaya and VNH-S, Plaintiffs, v. Dr. Mike CRUTCHER, In His Official Capacity As Commissioner Of Health Of Oklahoma, Defendant - Appellant, Drew Edmondson, In His Official Capacity As Attorney General Of Oklahoma and Brad Henry, In His Official Capacity As Governor Of Oklahoma, Defendants., 2006 WL 3381195, *3381195+ (Appellate Brief) (10th Cir. Oct 16, 2006) Appellees' Principal Brief (NO. 06-6213) " HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 7914 ABILENE RETAIL #30, INC., Appellant, v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF DICKINSON County Kansas, et al., Appellees., 2006 WL 1786492, *1786492+ (Appellate Brief) (10th Cir. Apr 25, 2006) Reply Brief of Appellant Abilene Retail #30, Inc. (NO. 05-3473) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 7915 ABILENE RETAIL # 30, INC., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DICKINSON COUNTY, Kansas, and Keith D. Hoffman, Defendants/Appellees., 2006 WL 6233570, *6233570+ (Appellate Brief) (10th Cir. Apr 07, 2006) Brief of Appellees (NO. 05-3473) HN: 3,5 (S.Ct.) 7916 ABILENE RETAIL # 30. INC., Appellant, v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DICKINSON COUNTY KANSAS, et al., Appellees., 2006 WL 6233456, *6233456+ (Appellate Brief) (10th Cir. Mar 06, 2006) Brief of Appellant Abilene Retail # 30, Inc. (NO. 05-3473) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 7917 ABILENE RETAIL # 30, INC., Appellant, v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DICKINSON COUNTY KANSAS, et al., Appellees., 2006 WL 6610253, *6610253+ (Appellate Brief) (10th Cir. Mar 06, 2006) Brief of Appellant Abilene Retail # 30, Inc. (NO. 05-3473) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 7918 J. BRONSON, G. Lee Cook, and D. Cook, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. Sherrie SWENSEN, Defendant/Appellee., 2006 WL 728582, *728582+ (Appellate Brief) (10th Cir. Feb 06, 2006) Reply Brief (NO. 05-4161) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 7919 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. Jose Natividad VALENZUELA-PUENTES, Defendant/Appellant., 2005 WL 3749207, *3749207 (Appellate Brief) (10th Cir. Dec 01, 2005) Appellee's Answer Brief No Attachments (NO. 04-2283) 7920 Lawrence GOLAN, Richard Kapp, S.A. Publishing Col, Inc., d/b/a Ess.A.Y. Recordings, Symphony of the Canyons, Ron Hall d/b/a Festival Films, and John McDonough, d/b/a Timeless Video Alternatives International, PlaintiffsAppellants, v. Alberto GONZALES, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, and Marybeth Peters, Register of Copyrights, Copyright © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Office of the United States, Defendant-Appellees., 2005 WL 6148017, *6148017+ (Appellate Brief) (10th Cir. Nov 04, 2005) Appellants' Reply Brief (NO. 05-1259) 7921 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Brian Von BEHREN, Defendant-Appellant., 2005 WL 6109486, *6109486+ (Appellate Brief) (10th Cir. Jun 16, 2005) Appellant's Opening Brief (NO. 05-1165) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7922 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roberts Schuyler BENNETT, Defendant-Appellant., 2005 WL 3957116, *3957116+ (Appellate Brief) (10th Cir. Jun 08, 2005) Appellant's Opening Brief (NO. 05-1133) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7923 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David STEPHENSON, Defendant-Appellant., 2005 WL 2124392, *2124392+ (Appellate Brief) (10th Cir. May 18, 2005) Appellant's Reply Brief (NO. 04-1519) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7924 DOCTOR JOHNS, INC, a Utah Corp., and John Haltom, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. CITY OF ROY, Defendant/Appellee., 2005 WL 2105626, *2105626+ (Appellate Brief) (10th Cir. May 16, 2005) Reply Brief of Appellant (NO. 04-4270) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7925 DOCTOR JOHN'S INC., a Utah Corporation, and John Haltom, Plaintiffs/ Appellants, v. CITY OF ROY, G. Blake Wahlen & Tammy Nelson, Defendants/ Appellees., 2005 WL 2124411, *2124411+ (Appellate Brief) (10th Cir. Apr 14, 2005) Brief of Appellees (NO. 04-4270) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7926 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marc NICKL, Defendant-Appellant., 2005 WL 1649482, *1649482 (Appellate Brief) (10th Cir. Apr 04, 2005) Brief of Appellant (NO. 04-3499) 7927 DOCTOR JOHNS, INC, a Utah Corp., and John Haltom, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. CITY OF ROY, Defendant/Appellee., 2005 WL 676682, *676682+ (Appellate Brief) (10th Cir. Feb 15, 2005) Brief of Appellant (NO. 04-4270) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 7928 Flona M. HEIDEMAN, et al., Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. SOUTH SALT LAKE CITY, A Municipal Corporation, Defendant/Appellee., 2005 WL 735506, *735506+ (Appellate Brief) (10th Cir. Jan 26, 2005) Brief of Appellee (NO. 04-4199) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7929 AID FOR WOMEN, on its own behalf; and Teri Augustus, L.M.S.W.; Margot Breckbill, R.N.; Tracy Cowles, M.D.; Willow Eby. R.N.; Vicki Epp, L.B.S.W.; Margaret Estrin, M.D.; Herbert Hodes, M.D.; Traci Nauser, M.D.; Colleen O'Donnell, R.N.-C; Stacey Morgan, D.O.; Beth McGilley, Ph.D.; Trina Wheeler, L.M.S.W.; and Sherman Zaremski, M.D., on behalf of themselves and their adolescent patients and clients under the age of sixteen, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Nola FOULSTON, in, 2004 WL 3092150, *3092150+ (Appellate Brief) (10th Cir. Dec 27, 2004) Brief of Appellees (NO. 04-3310) " HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 7930 AID FOR WOMEN, on its own behalf; and Teri Augustus, L.M.S.W.; Margot Breckbill, R.N.; Tracy Cowles, M.D.; Willow Eby, R.N.; Vicki Epp, L.B.S.W.; Margaret Estrin, M.D.; Herbert Hodes, M.D.; Traci Nauser, M.D.; Colleen © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. O'Donnell, R.N.-C; Stacey Morgan, D.O.; Beth McGilley, Ph.D.; Trina Wheeler, L.M.S.W.; and Sherman Zaremski, M.D., on behalf of themselves and their adolescent patients and clients under the age of sixteen, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Nola FOULSTON, in, 2004 WL 5403066, *5403066+ (Appellate Brief) (10th Cir. Dec 27, 2004) Brief of Appellees (NO. 04-3310) " HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 7931 Flona M. HEIDEMAN, et al., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. SOUTH SALT LAKE CITY, A Utah Municipal Corporation, Defendant/Appellee., 2004 WL 3049639, *3049639+ (Appellate Brief) (10th Cir. Nov 24, 2004) Brief of Appellants (NO. 04-4199) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7932 Flona M. HEIDEMAN, et al., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. SOUTH SALT LAKE CITY, A Utah Municipal Corporation, Defendant/Appellee., 2004 WL 3079954, *3079954+ (Appellate Brief) (10th Cir. Nov 24, 2004) Brief of Appellants (NO. 04-4199) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7933 Mary-Ann Sontag BOWMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Amanda BARUSCH, et al., Defendants-Appellees., 2004 WL 2730936, *2730936+ (Appellate Brief) (10th Cir. Oct 12, 2004) Brief for the Appellant (NO. 04-4217, 04-4235) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7934 Mary-Ann Sontag BOWMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Amanda BARUSCH, et al., Defendants-Appellees., 2004 WL 3331271, *3331271+ (Appellate Brief) (10th Cir. Oct 12, 2004) Brief for the Appellant (NO. 04-4217) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7935 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lorenzo GONZALEZCORONADO, Defendant-Appellant., 2004 WL 3804224, *3804224+ (Appellate Brief) (10th Cir. Sep 14, 2004) Defendant-Appellant's Supplemental Brief on the Applicability of Blakely V. Washington (NO. 03-2226) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 7936 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. Jorge ESPARZAMENDOZA, Defendant/Appellant., 2003 WL 24132809, *24132809+ (Appellate Brief) (10th Cir. Dec 29, 2003) Brief for Amici Curiae American Civil Liberties Union Immigrants' Rights Project, ACLU of Utah, National Association of Federal Defenders, and National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers in ... (NO. 03-4218) " 7937 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Orlando MORALESCERVANTES, Defendant-Appellant., 2003 WL 23517597, *23517597+ (Appellate Brief) (10th Cir. Sep 24, 2003) Appellant's Opening Brief (NO. 03-4159) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 7938 Feng Hsin CHEN, v. John ASHCROFT, U.S. Attorney General, et al., 2003 WL 23517588, *23517588+ (Appellate Brief) (10th Cir. Sep 17, 2003) Opening Brief for the Appellant (NO. 03-2078) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7939 BECKWITH ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, et al., Defendants-Appellants., 2013 WL 5871663, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Oct 28, 2013) Brief In Support of Appellants and Reversal by Amici Curiae Americans United for Separation of Church and State; American © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Civil Liberties Union; American Civil Liberties Union of Florida; ... (NO. 13-13879) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7940 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Brandon ALLEN, Appellant., 2011 WL 6018945, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Nov 25, 2011) Initial Brief of Appellant (NO. 11-11640-EE) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7941 Jack GALARDI, et al., Appellants-Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF FOREST PARK, GEORGIA, et al., Appellees-Defendants., 2011 WL 3260671, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Apr 11, 2011) Opening Brief of Appellant (NO. 11-10704) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7942 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Petronium BAILEY, Defendant-Appellant., 2011 WL 1977675, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. 2011) Brief of Defendant-Appellant, Petronium Bailey (NO. 11-10187-HH) 7943 UNITED STATES, Appellant, v. Cleotha JOHNSON, Defendant -- Appellee., 2011 WL 3006840, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. 2011) Appellee's Response Brief (NO. 11-10763-GG, 11-10826-GG) 7944 Jennifer KEETON, Appellant, v. Mary Jane ANDERSON-WILEY, et al., Appellees., 2010 WL 6019494, *6019494+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Nov 30, 2010) Corrected Amicus Brief of Parents and Friends of Lesbians and Gays (PFLAG) and Georgia Safe Schools Coalition (GSSC) in Support of the Appellee for Affirmance (NO. 10-13925-JJ) 7945 Jennifer KEETON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mary Jane ANDERSON-WILEY, et al., Defendants-Appellees., 2010 WL 5622333, *5622333+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Oct 19, 2010) Brief of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education and the National Association of Scholars as Amici Curiae in Support of Plaintiff-Appellant (NO. 10-13925-J) 7946 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. Tyrone MCINTYRE, Defendant/Appellant., 2010 WL 6707333, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Sep 27, 2010) Brief of the Appellant Tyrone McIntyre (NO. 10-11566-GG) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7947 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Philip Harris BRADLEY, Appellant., 2010 WL 6707351, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Sep 09, 2010) Reply Brief of Appellant (NO. 10-11639-CC) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7948 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff/appellee, v. Pierre COLEMAN, Defendant/appellant., 2010 WL 6707352, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Aug 2010) Brief of the Appellant Pierre Coleman (NO. 10-11658-DD) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7949 PEEK-A-BOO LOUNGE OF BRADENTON, INC., et al, Appellants, v. MANATEE COUNTY, FLORIDA, Appellee., 2010 WL 1847670, *1847670+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Mar 2010) Appellants' Initial Brief (NO. 09-16438-J) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7950 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. Jose Aersio ALVAREZ, Appellant-Defendant., 2009 WL 6503656, *6503656+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Dec 2009) Brief for Appellant, Criminal Case (NO. 09-12008-BB) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 7951 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jimmy Joel BEASLEY, Defendant-Appellant., 2009 WL 5635111, *5635111+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Aug 03, 2009) Initial Brief of Appellant, Jimmy Joel Beasley (NO. 09-11528-DD) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7952 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Paul F. LITTLE, aka Max Hardcore, aka Max Steiner, and Max World Entertainment, Inc., Defendants-Appellants., 2009 WL 506653, *506653+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Jan 20, 2009) Brief of Defendants-Appellants Paul F. Little and Max World Entertainment, Inc. (NO. 08-15964-D) " 7953 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles J. GREEN, Defendant-Appellant., 2007 WL 5209846, *5209846+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Aug 20, 2007) Brief of United States of America Criminal Case (NO. 07-10741-HH) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7954 STADIUM BOOK AND VIDEO, INC. and Aapg, Inc., Appellants, v. MIAMIDADE COUNTY, Florida, Appellee., 2007 WL 4452052, *4452052+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Mar 25, 2007) Appellants' Reply Brief (NO. 06-14790-CC, 06-14792-CC) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7955 STADIUM BOOK CLUB AND VIDEO, INC. and AAPG, INC., PlaintiffsAppellants, v. MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, Defendant-Appellee., 2007 WL 4452051, *4452051+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Mar 08, 2007) Brief for Defendant-Appellee (NO. 06-14790-CC, 06-14792-CC) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 7956 STADIUM BOOK CLUB AND VIDEO, INC. and Aapg, Inc., PlaintiffsAppellants, v. MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, Defendant-Appellee., 2007 WL 4452053, *4452053+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Mar 08, 2007) Brief for Defendant-Appellee (NO. 06-14790-CC, 06-14792-CC) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 7957 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent/Appellee, v. Tyree WILSON, Defendant/Appellant., 2007 WL 4452010, *4452010+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Mar 2007) Brief of Defendant/Appellant (NO. 06-14859-JJ) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7958 STADIUM BOOK AND VIDEO, INC. and AAPG, Inc., Appellants, v. MIAMIDADE COUNTY, Florida, Appellee., 2007 WL 4452050, *4452050+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Jan 23, 2007) Appellants' Brief (NO. 06-14790-CC, 06-14792-CC) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7959 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent/Appellee., v. Charles Jonas GREEN, Defendant/Appellant., 2007 WL 5209845, *5209845+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. 2007) Brief of Defendant/Appellant (NO. 07-10741-HH) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7960 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent/Appellee., v. Charles Jonas GREEN, Defendant/Appellant., 2007 WL 5209847, *5209847+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. 2007) Reply Brief of Defendant/Appellant (NO. 07-10741-HH) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 7961 Alton Rumley DUBOSE, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee., 2006 WL 3035753, *3035753+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Aug 22, 2006) Principal Brief of Appellant (NO. 06-13851-D) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 7962 Sherri WILLIAMS, B.J. Bailey, Alice Jean Cope, Jane Doe, Deborah L. Cooper, Benny Cooper, Jane Poe and Jane Roe, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Troy KING, In his official capacity as the Attorney General of the State of Alabama, DefendantAppellees., 2006 WL 2364885, *2364885+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Jun 16, 2006) Reply Brief of Plaintiffs-Appellants (NO. 06-11892-J) " 7963 Sherri WILLIAMS, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Troy KING, Attorney General for the State of Alabama, in his official capacity; Robert E. Owens, District Attorney for Shelby County, in his official capacity; Shelby County District Attorney's Office, Defendants-Appellees., 2006 WL 2364884, *2364884+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Jun 02, 2006) Brief of Defendants-Appellees (NO. 06-11892-J) " 7964 Sherri WILLIAMS, B.J. Bailey, Alice Jean Cope, Jane Doe, Deborah L. Cooper, Benny Cooper, Jane Poe and Jane Roe, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Troy KING, In his official capacity as the Attorney General of the State of Alabama, DefendantAppellees., 2006 WL 2364883, *2364883+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. May 05, 2006) Brief of Plaintiffs-Appellants (NO. 06-11892-J) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 7965 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. Martha SANCHEZ-RESTREPO, Appellant-Defendant., 2005 WL 4662718, *4662718+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Oct 08, 2005) Brief for Appellant (NO. 05-11734-HH) 7966 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. Jose Aersio ALVAREZ, Appellant-Defendant., 2005 WL 4781704, *4781704+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Sep 28, 2005) Brief for Appellant (NO. 05-13367-II) 7967 Sandra CANO, formerly known as Mary Doe, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Arthur BOLTON, Attorney General of the State of Georgia Through His Official Successor in Office, Thurbert E. Baker; Lewis R. Slaton, as District Attorney of Fulton County, Georgia Through His Official Successor In Office, Paul L. Howard, Jr.; and Herbert T. Jenkins, as Chief of Police of the City of Atlanta Through His Official Successor in Office, Richard Pennington,, 2005 WL 4662655, *4662655+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Jul 29, 2005) Brief of Appellant Sandra Cano (NO. 05-11641-HH) 7968 Robert WEXLER, Congressman Addie Greene, Commissioner, Burt Aaronson, Commissioner, Tony Fransetta, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Theresa LEPORE, Supervisor of Elections for Palm Beach County, Florida, Kay Clem, Supervisor of Elections for Indian River County, Florida and President of the Florida Association of Supervisors of Elections, Glenda E. Hood, Secretary of State of Florida , Defendants-Appellees., 2005 WL 4815045, *4815045+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Jun 27, 2005) Reply Brief of Plaintiffs-Appellants (NO. 04-16280) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7969 Saleem BASHIR, Appellant, v. Edell DAVIS, Individually, and in His Official © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Capacity as Deputy Sheriff for Rockdale County; John/Jane Doe, Individually and in His/Her Official Capacity as Deputy Sheriff and/or Agents of Rockdale County, Georgia, Appellees., 2005 WL 4663228, *4663228+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. May 23, 2005) Brief of Appellant (NO. 05-12020-II) 7970 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. Moise MARTINEZ, AppellantDefendant., 2005 WL 4582191, *4582191 (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Feb 28, 2005) Brief for Appellant Criminal Case (a) Cover Page (NO. 04-16339EE) 7971 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. ALCIBIADES NEMECIO SIERRA JESSIE, Appellant-Defendant., 2005 WL 2174586, *2174586 (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Feb 24, 2005) Brief for Appellant Criminal Case (a) Cover Page (NO. 04-15946-EE) 7972 John DOE I, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Guy TUNNELL, et al., DefendantsAppellees., 2004 WL 3557192, *3557192+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Jul 27, 2004) Appellants' Reply Brief (NO. 03-10279, 04-10279) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7973 Ronald THAETER and Timothy Moran, Appellants, v. THE PALM BEACH COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, and Sheriff Ed Bieluch, Individually and in His Capacity as Sheriff of Palm Beach Sheriffs Office, Appellee., 2004 WL 4996669, *4996669+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Jul 01, 2004) Reply Brief of Appellants Ronald Thaeter and Timothy Moran (NO. 03-13177-DD03-13197-) 7974 Ronald THAETER and Timothy Moran, Appellants, v. THE PALM BEACH COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, and Sheriff ED Bieluch, Individually and in His Capacity as Sheriff of Palm Beach Sheriffs Office, Appellee., 2004 WL 4996729, *4996729+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Jul 01, 2004) Reply Brief of Appellants Ronald Thaeter and Timothy Moran (NO. 03-13177-DD03-13197-) 7975 John DOE I, John Doe II, John Doe III, John Doe IV, John Doe V,John Doe VI, John Doe VII, John Doe VIII, John Doe IX, John Doe X and Jane Doe, individually, and as members of certain specified classes on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. James T. MOORE, in his offcial capacity as Commissioner of the Florida Department of Law Enforcement; James V. Grosby, Jr., in his official capacity as Secretary the orida, 2004 WL 3559243, *3559243+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Apr 29, 2004) Brief and Addendum of Plaintiffs Doe (NO. 03-10279) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7976 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Portofino SINISTRA et al., Defendants-Appellants., 2004 WL 3510067, *3510067+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Feb 17, 2004) Brief of United States of America Criminal Case (NO. 03-12351-BB03-12352-) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 7977 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. Aris SEGURA-VALENCIA, Appeellant-Defendant., 2003 WL 24147439, *24147439+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Sep 26, 2003) Brief for Appellant (NO. 03-12351-BB03-12352-) 7978 ELLENTON VIDEO, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellant, v. CITY OF DAYTON A BEACH, a Florida municipal corporation, Appellee., 2003 WL 23832642, *23832642 (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Sep 02, 2003) Appellant's © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Reply Brief (NO. 03-12965-B) 7979 Kirby BYRNES, Appellant-Defendant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee., 2003 WL 23287215, *23287215+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Aug 13, 2003) Brief for Appellant Criminal Case (a) Cover Page (NO. 03-12074-DD) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 7980 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Josieph Page MESSIER, Defendant-Appellant., 2003 WL 24158612, *24158612+ (Appellate Brief) (11th Cir. Mar 2003) Initial Brief of Appellant Joseph Page Messier (NO. 03-14901-B) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7981 SHIRE LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SANDOZ INC., Defendant-Appellant., 2009 WL 1699625, *1699625+ (Appellate Brief) (Fed.Cir. May 18, 2009) Brief of Amicus Curiae William Mitchell College of Law Intellectual Property Institute in Support of Sandoz, Inc. (NO. 2009-1180) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 7982 John DOE, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Respondent., 2008 WL 2857943, *2857943+ (Appellate Brief) (Fed.Cir. Jul 14, 2008) Reply Brief for Petitioner (NO. 2008-3139) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 7983 SKF USA, INC., Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, Defendant-Appellant, UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Defendant-Appellant, TIMKEN U.S. CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant, UNITED STATES, Robert C. Bonner, Commissioner, United States Customs and Border Protection, and Daniel R. Pearson, Chairman, United States International Trade Commission, Defendants., 2007 WL 4692987, *4692987+ (Appellate Brief) (Fed.Cir. Dec 17, 2007) Brief of Defendant-Appellant United States Customs and Border Protection (NO. 2008-0007, 2008-1005, 2008-1006, 2008-1008) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7984 SKF USA, INC., Plaintiff-Cross Appellant, v. UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, Defendant-Appellant, United States International Trade Commission, Defendant-Appellant, Timken U.S. Corporation, Defendant-Appellant, United States, Robert C. Bonner, Commissioner, United States Customs and Border Protection, and Daniel R. Pearson, Chairman, United States International Trade Commission, Defendants., 2007 WL 5172814, *5172814+ (Appellate Brief) (Fed.Cir. Dec 17, 2007) Brief of Defendant-Appellant Timken US Corporation (NO. 2007-1005, 2007-1006, 2007-1007, 2007-1008) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7985 SKF USA, INC., Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, Defendant-Appellant, UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Defendant-Appellant, TIMKEN U.S. CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant, UNITED STATES, Robert C. Bonner, Commissioner, United States Customs and Border Protection, and Daniel R. Pearson, Chairman, United States International Trade Commission, Defendants., 2007 WL 5417250, *5417250+ (Appellate Brief) (Fed.Cir. Dec 17, 2007) Brief of Defendant-Appellant United States Customs and Border © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Protection (NO. 0007, 1006, 1008, 2008-1005) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7986 MICHAEL SIMON DESIGN, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellant., 2007 WL 708313, *708313+ (Appellate Brief) (Fed.Cir. Feb 22, 2007) Brief for Appellant, United States (NO. 2007-1028) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 7987 Jane DOE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES, Donald Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense, and Tricare Management Activity (formerly known as Office of Civilian Health and Medical Programs of the Uniformed Services), DefendantsAppellants., 2003 WL 24305385, *24305385+ (Appellate Brief) (Fed.Cir. Dec 15, 2003) Corrected Reply Brief for Appellant (NO. 03-1350) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 7988 Jane DOE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES, Donald Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense, and Tricare Management Activity (formerly known as Office of Civilian Health and Medical Programs of the Uniformed Services), DefendantsAppellants., 2003 WL 24305386, *24305386+ (Appellate Brief) (Fed.Cir. Nov 17, 2003) Reply Brief for Appellant (NO. 03-1350) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 7989 Jane DOE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES, Donald Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense, and Tricare Management Activity (formerly known as Office of Civilian Health and Medical Programs of the Uniformed Services), DefendantAppellant., 2003 WL 24305384, *24305384+ (Appellate Brief) (Fed.Cir. Oct 30, 2003) Corrected - Appellee's Brief (NO. 03-1350) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7990 Byron HOWARD, Leon Adams, Jerry M. Agan, Sr., Jill M. Anglin, Jery W. Baker, David Bates, Jere Beery, Robert B. Bell, Gil Berg, Michael Bodnar, Philip Ray Booker, Harold D. Bragg,Connie J. Buckley, Louis Carmen, Warren Carter, John Chassereau, James T. Cook, Margi Crook, Jack Crowley, James Devereaux, Joe H. Faulk, Gerald P. Finan, Ray Gibson, D. T. Graviss, Michael Golightly, David Haire. Paul Hamaker, Johnny Hannah, Michael R. Hasse, O. R. Hatcher, Mary Gatfield,, 2003 WL 24028386, *24028386+ (Appellate Brief) (Fed.Cir. Sep 10, 2003) Reply Brief for Appellants (NO. 03-1338) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7991 BYRON HOWARD, Leon Adams, Jerry M. Agan, Sr., Jill M. Anglin, Jery W. Baker, David Bates, Jere Beery, Robert B. Bell, Gil Berg, Michael Bodnar, Philip Ray Booker, Harold D. Bragg,CONNIE J. Buckley, Louis Carmen, Warren Carter, John Chassereau, James T. Cook, Margi Crook, Jack Crowley, James Devereaux, Joe H. Faulk, Gerald P. Finan, Ray Gibson, D.T. Graviss, Michael Golightly, David Haire, Paul Hamaker, Johnny Hannah, Michael R. Hasse, O.R. Hatcher, Mary Hatfield, Richard, 2003 WL 24032156, *24032156+ (Appellate Brief) (Fed.Cir. Sep 10, 2003) Reply Brief for Appeliants (NO. 03-1338) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7992 Maureen M. BRITELL, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellant., 2003 WL 24305349, *24305349+ (Appellate Brief) (Fed.Cir. Jul 24, 2003) Reply Brief for Appellant (NO. 03-1282) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7993 Wendy E. WAGNER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. FEDERAL ELECTION © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. COMMISSION, Defendant., 2013 WL 3355402, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (D.C.Cir. Jul 03, 2013) Brief for Plaintiffs (NO. 13-5162) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 7994 Francis A. GILARDI; Philip M. Gilardi; Fresh Unlimited Incorporated, doing business as Fresh way Foods; Freshway Logistics Incorporated; PlaintiffsAppellants, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; Kathleen Sebelius, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services; United States Department of the Treasury; Jacob J. Lew, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States, 2013 WL 2900143, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (D.C.Cir. Jun 14, 2013) Brief of Amicus Curiae Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc. in Support of Appellees and for Affirmance of the District Court (NO. 13-5069) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7995 Francis A. GILARDI, Jr., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, et al., DefendantsAppellees., 2013 WL 2900151, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (D.C.Cir. Jun 14, 2013) Brief In Support of Appellees and Affirmance by Amici Curiae Americans United for Separation of Church and State; American Civil Liberties Union; Anti-Defamation League; Catholics for Choice; Central ... (NO. 13-5069) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 7996 Francis A. GILARDI, Jr., Philip M. Gilardi; Fresh Unlimited Incorporated, doing business as Freshway Foods; and Freshway Logistics Incorporated, Plaintiffs Appellants, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; Kathleen Sebelius, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services; United States Department of the Treasury; Jacob J. Lew, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department, 2013 WL 1882225, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (D.C.Cir. May 06, 2013) Brief for Liberty, Life, and Law Foundation as Amicus Curiae In Support of Plaintiffs-Appellants and Urging Reversal (NO. 13-5069) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 7997 Wendy E. WAGNER, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, Defendant-Appellee., 2013 WL 937816, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (D.C.Cir. Mar 11, 2013) Reply Brief for Plaintiffs-Appellants (Corrected) (NO. 12-5365) 7998 Wendy E. WAGNER, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, Defendant-Appellee., 2013 WL 832160, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (D.C.Cir. Mar 06, 2013) Reply Brief for Plaintiffs-Appellants (NO. 12-5365) 7999 MORTGAGE BANKERS ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Hilda L. SOLIS, Secretary of Labor, et al., Defendants-Appellees, Jerome Nickols, et al. Intervenors-Appellees., 2013 WL 587540, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (D.C.Cir. Feb 15, 2013) Brief for Intervenors-Appellees Jerome Nickols, Et Al. Public Copy - Sealed Material Deleted (NO. 12-5246) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 8000 Ali Hamza Suliman Ahmad Al BAHLUL, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES, © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Respondent., 2013 WL 241769, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (D.C.Cir. Jan 22, 2013) Supplemental Reply Brief of Petitioner (NO. 11-1324) 8001 MORTGAGE BANKERS ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Hilda L. SOLIS, Secretary of Labor, et al., Defendants-Appellees, Jerome Nickols, et al., Intervenors-Appellees., 2013 WL 210124, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (D.C.Cir. Jan 18, 2013) Brief for Intervenors-Appellees Jerome Nickols, et al. (NO. 12-5246) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 8002 Wendy E. WAGNER, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, Defendant-Appellee., 2013 WL 179918, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (D.C.Cir. Jan 16, 2013) Brief for Plaintiffs-Appellants (NO. 12-5365) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8003 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas FIELDS, Defendant-Appellant., 2012 WL 170530, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (D.C.Cir. Jan 20, 2012) Reply Brief for Appellant Thomas Fields (NO. 09-3137) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8004 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas FIELDS, Defendant-Appellant., 2011 WL 5190126, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (D.C.Cir. Nov 01, 2011) Brief for Appellant Thomas Fields (NO. 09-3137) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8005 Stephen LAROQUE, et al., Appellants, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General of the United States, et al., Appellees., 2011 WL 1193669, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (D.C.Cir. Mar 17, 2011) Reply Brief for Appellants (NO. 10-5433) 8006 Stephen LAROQUE, et al., Appellants, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General of the United States, et al., Appellees., 2011 WL 1003235, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (D.C.Cir. Mar 07, 2011) Brief for Intervenors-Appellees (NO. 10-5433) 8007 Dick Anthony HELLER, Absalom Jordan, William Carter, And Mark Snyder, Appellants, v. THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and Adrian M. Fenty, Mayor, District Of Columbia, Appellees., 2010 WL 5108968, *5108968+ (Appellate Brief) (D.C.Cir. Aug 11, 2010) Brief for Appellants (NO. 10-7036) 8008 Stephen LAROQUE, Et Al., Appellants, v. Eric H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of the United States, Et Al., Appellees., 2010 WL 5877079, *5877079+ (Appellate Brief) (D.C.Cir. Feb 04, 2010) Brief for Appellants (NO. 10-5433) 8009 Fadi AL MAQALEH, et al., Petitioners-Appellees, v. Robert GATES, et al., Respondents-Appellants. Amin Al Bakri, et al., Petitioners-Appellees, v. Barack Obama, et al., Respondents-Appellants. Redha Al-Najar, et al., PetitionersAppellees, v. Robert Gates, et al., Respondents-Appellants., 2009 WL 6043975, *6043975+ (Appellate Brief) (D.C.Cir. Nov 06, 2009) Brief of Amici Curiae Professors of International Human Rights Law and Related Subjects in Support of Petitioners-Appellees (NO. 09-5265, 09-5266, 09-5277) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 8010 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bruce SCHIFFER, Defendant-Appellant., 2008 WL 4449294, *4449294+ (Appellate Brief) (D.C.Cir. Feb 06, 2008) Brief for Appellant Bruce Schiffer (NO. 06-3138) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8011 Charles G. WOODARD, Appellant, v. JOHN HOWARD PAVILLION REVIEW BOARD, Et Al., Appellees., 2007 WL 1700317, *1700317+ (Appellate Brief) (D.C.Cir. Jun 04, 2007) Brief For Appellant Charles G. Woodard (NO. 06-7091) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8012 Charles G. WOODARD, Appellant, v. John Howard PAVILLION Review Board, et al., Appellees., 2007 WL 2262971, *2262971+ (Appellate Brief) (D.C.Cir. Jun 04, 2007) Brief For Appellant Charles G. Woodard (NO. 06-7091) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8013 Charles G. WOODARD, Appellant, v. JOHN HOWARD PAVILLION REVIEW BOARD, Et Al., Appellees., 2007 WL 2323475, *2323475+ (Appellate Brief) (D.C.Cir. Jun 04, 2007) Brief For Appellant Charles G. Woodard (NO. 06-7091) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8014 ABIGAIL ALLIANCE FOR BETTER ACCESS TO DEVELOPMENTAL DRUGS and Washington Legal Foundation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Andrew C. VON ESCHENBACH, M.D., in his official capacity as Commissioner, Food and Drug Administration, and Michael O. Leavitt, in his official capacity as Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services, DefendantsAppellees., 2007 WL 415084, *415084+ (Appellate Brief) (D.C.Cir. Feb 01, 2007) Corrected En Banc Brief for the Appellees (NO. 04-5350) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8015 Jane DOES I-III, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., Defendants-Appellants., 2006 WL 3532947, *3532947+ (Appellate Brief) (D.C.Cir. Nov 27, 2006) Brief of Appellees (NO. 05-7190) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8016 ABIGAIL ALLIANCE FOR BETTER ACCESS TO DEVELOPMENTAL DRUGS, et al., Appellants, v. Lester M. CRAWFORD, et al., Appellees., 2005 WL 1900323, *1900323+ (Appellate Brief) (D.C.Cir. Aug 01, 2005) Brief for Appellee (NO. 04-5350) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 8017 ABIGAIL ALLIANCE FOR BETTER ACCESS TO DEVELOPMENTAL DRUGS, et al., Appellants, v. Lester M. CRAWFORD, et al., Appellees., 2005 WL 1826286, *1826286+ (Appellate Brief) (D.C.Cir. Jun 30, 2005) Brief of Appellants (NO. 04-5350) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8018 Michael G. HOROWITZ, Appellant/Cross-appellee, v. PEACE CORPS, Appellee/Cross-appellant., 2005 WL 1596206, *1596206+ (Appellate Brief) (D.C.Cir. Jun 17, 2005) Brief for Appellee/Cross-Appellant (NO. 04-5279)) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8019 Lakhdar BOUMEDIENE, et al., Appellants, v. George W. BUSH, et al, Appellees. Ridouane Khalid, Appellant, v. George W. Bush, Jr., et al, Appellees., 2005 WL 1410197, *1410197+ (Appellate Brief) (D.C.Cir. Jun 06, 2005) Corrected Joint Brief of Appellants (NO. 05-5062, 05-5063) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 8020 Wen Ho LEE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al., Defendants-Appellees, Jeff Gerth, James Risen, H. Josef Hebert, Bob Drogin, and Pierre Thomas, Appellants., 2005 WL 319711, *319711+ (Appellate Brief) (D.C.Cir. Jan 25, 2005) Brief of Amici Curiae Newsgathering Organizations and Reporters' Groups in Support of Appellants Urging Reversal (NO. 04-5301(L)) 8021 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Randy L. STEVENS Aviation Electronics Mate Airman (E-3) U. S. Navy, Appellant., 2013 WL 6537226, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Armed Forces Dec 11, 2013) Supplement to Petition for Grant of Review (NO. 14-0241) 8022 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Technical Sergeant (E-6) David J.a. GUTIERREZ, USAF, Appellant., 2013 WL 6218387, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Armed Forces Nov 25, 2013) Final Brief on Behalf of the United States (NO. 13-0522) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8023 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Private (E-) Jonathan J. BLAIR, United States Army, Appellant., 2013 WL 5876158, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Armed Forces Oct 30, 2013) Supplement to Petition for Grant of Review (NO. 14-0066) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8024 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. David J.A. GUTIERREZ, Technical Sergeant (E-6), United States Air Force, Appellant., 2013 WL 5785866, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Armed Forces Oct 24, 2013) Brief on Behalf of Appellant (NO. 13-0522) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8025 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Specialist (E-4) Sean G. ZEPEDA, United States Army, Appellant., 2013 WL 5636097, *1 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Armed Forces Oct 15, 2013) Supplement to Petition for Grant of Review (NO. 14-0079) 8026 Airman First Class (E-3)) L.R.M., USAF, Petitioner, v. Lieutenant COLONEL (0-5) Joshua E. Kastenberg, USAF, Respondent; Airman First Class (E-3)) Nicholas E. Daniels, USAF, Real Party in Interest., 2013 WL 2182273, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Armed Forces May 08, 2013) Amicus Curiae Brief of the Air Force Appellate Government Division (NO. 13-5006) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8027 United States, Appellee, v. Erika D. CHATMAN Lance Corporal (E-3) U.S. Marine Corps, Appellant., 2013 WL 1887217, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Armed Forces May 06, 2013) Supplement to Petition for Grant of Review (NO. 13-0476) 8028 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Daniel W. NORTHERN, Jr., Airman Basic (E-1), USAF, Appellant., 2013 WL 1686839, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Armed Forces Apr 15, 2013) Supplement to Petition for Grant of Review (NO. 13-0433) 8029 UNITED STATES, Appellant, v. Justin R. WHITAKER Machinery Technician Third Class (E-4) U.S. Coast Guard, Appellee., 2013 WL 1102932, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Armed Forces Mar 07, 2013) Brief on Behalf of Appellee (NO. 13-5004) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 8030 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Richard T. PEARCE Chief Warrant Officer (CWO)-3 United States Marine Corps, Appellant., 2013 WL 269082, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Armed Forces Jan 22, 2013) Supplement to Petition for Grant of Review (NO. 13-0241) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8031 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Sergeant (E-5) Jamil V. WILLIAMS, United States Army, Appellant., 2012 WL 6736765, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Armed Forces Dec 20, 2012) Final Brief on Behalf of Appellant (NO. 12-0331) 8032 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Staff SERGEANT (E-6) Van D. Goings, United States Army, Appellant., 2012 WL 3789192, *1 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Armed Forces Aug 30, 2012) Reply Brief on Behalf of Appellant (NO. 11-0547) 8033 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Staff Sergeant (E-6) ) Ivan D. GOINGS United States Army, Appellant., 2012 WL 3649026, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Armed Forces Aug 20, 2012) Brief on Behalf of Appellee (NO. 11-0547) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8034 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Staff SERGEANT (E-6) Ivan D. GOINGS United States Army, Appellant., 2012 WL 3946798, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Armed Forces Aug 20, 2012) Brief on Behalf of Appellee (NO. 11-0547) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8035 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Chief Warrant Officer Two Patrick J. ROSINI, United States Army, Appellant., 2011 WL 494121, *494121+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Armed Forces 2011) Supplement to Petition for Grant of Review (NO. 11-0305) 8036 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Calvin E. EAKEN, III Fire Control Technician Second Class U.S. Navy, Appellant., 2009 WL 111192, *111192+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Armed Forces Jan 09, 2009) Supplement To Petition for Grant of Review (NO. 09-0239) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8037 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Staff Sergeant Ivan D. GOINGS, United States Army, Appellant., 2008 WL 8855976, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Armed Forces Jun 20, 2008) Final Brief on Behalf of Appellant (NO. 11-0547) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8038 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Matthew M. MAGALHAES Private First Class (E-2) United States Marine Corps, Appellant., 2008 WL 2352624, *2352624+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Armed Forces May 28, 2008) Answer on Behalf of the Government (NO. 08-0496) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8039 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Staff Sergeant David M. TILLERY, United States Army, Appellant., 2007 WL 3128262, *3128262+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Armed Forces Oct 15, 2007) Brief on Behalf of Appellee (NO. 07-0776) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8040 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Mark A. HURST Staff Sergeant (E-6) U.S. Marine Corps, Appellant., 2007 WL 1877573, *1877573+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Armed Forces Jun 20, 2007) Answer out of Time (NO. 07-0452) 8041 UNITED STATES, Appellant, v. Terrel L. LEWIS, Private First Class (E-3), United States Army, Appellee., 2007 WL 712127, *712127+ (Appellate Brief) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. (U.S. Armed Forces Mar 02, 2007) Brief on Behalf of Amicus Curiae Georgetown University Law Center Appellate Litigation Program in Support of Appellee (NO. 07-5002) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 8042 UNITED STATES, Appellant, v. Private First Class (E-3) Terrel L. LEWIS, United States Army, Appellee., 2007 WL 97596, *97596+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Armed Forces Jan 10, 2007) Index to Brief on Behalf of Appellant (NO. 07-5002) 8043 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Alvin L. CLEMENS, Boatswain's Mate First Class (E-6) U.S. Navy, Appellant., 2007 WL 1835623, *1835623+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Armed Forces 2007) Supplement to Petition for Grant of Review (NO. 07-0610) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8044 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Senior Airman (E-4) Robert A. JOHNS, USAF, Appellant., 2007 WL 2468646, *2468646+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Armed Forces 2007) Supplement to Petition for Grant of Review (NO. 07-0718) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8045 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Angel M. ORELLANA XXX XX XXXX Corporal (E-4) U.S. Marine Corps, Appellant., 2006 WL 914068, *914068+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Armed Forces Mar 06, 2006) Answer on Behalf of the Government (NO. 06-0304) " HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 8046 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Specialist (E-4) Yxchel J. CASTILLO, United States Army, Appellant., 2006 WL 913781, *913781+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Armed Forces Feb 15, 2006) Brief on Behalf of Appellee (NO. 06-0183) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8047 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Michael E. BROWN, Electronics Technician Second Class (E-5) U.S. Navy, Appellant., 2006 WL 913601, *913601 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Armed Forces Jan 17, 2006) Supplement to Petition for Grant of Review (NO. 06-0100) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8048 UNITED STATES, Appellee v. Sergeant (E-5) Robert L. HEALY, United States Army, Appellant, 2005 WL 3953904, *3953904+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Armed Forces Dec 28, 2005) Brief on Behalf of Appellee (NO. 06-0078) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8049 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Airman Basic (E-1) Raymond M. AMADOR XXX-XX-XXXX, USAF, Appellant., 2005 WL 3263781, *3263781 (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Armed Forces Sep 28, 2005) Answer to Assignment of Errors (NO. 05-0715) 8050 UNITED STATES, Respondent, v. Technical Sergeant (E-6) Emmitt W. Schoolcraft USAF, Petitioner., 2005 WL 2141434, *2141434+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Armed Forces Jun 22, 2005) Answer to Supplement to Petition for Grant of Review (NO. 05-0428) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8051 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Technical Sergeant Emmitt W. SCHOOLCRAFT, USAF, Appellant., 2005 WL 2141384, *2141384+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Armed Forces May 23, 2005) Supplement to Petition for Grant of Review (NO. 05-0428) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 8052 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Staff Sergeant Frederick L. Johnson, United States Army, Appellant., 2005 WL 2141382, *2141382+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Armed Forces Feb 22, 2005) Brief on Behalf of Appellee (NO. 05-0411) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8053 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. First Lieutenant (0-2) Gerardo B. GAMEZ USAF, Appellant., 2005 WL 2141479, *2141479+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Armed Forces 2005) Supplement to Petition for Grant of Review (NO. 05-0516) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8054 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Ocean T. ROSE, Lance Corporal (E-3) U.S. Marine Corps, Appellant., 2005 WL 3750866, *3750866+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Armed Forces 2005) Appellant's Reply Brief (NO. 05-0521) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8055 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Senior Airman (E-4) Robert W. YOUNG, Jr. XXX-XX-XXXX USAF, Appellant., 2004 WL 3761745, *3761745+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Armed Forces Apr 19, 2004) Answer to Assignment of Errors (NO. 06-0263) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8056 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Major (O-4) Robert L. MASON, Jr. XXXXX-XXXX, USAF, Appellant., 2004 WL 3769167, *3769167+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Armed Forces Jan 14, 2004) Final Brief in Support of Specified Issue (NO. 02-0849) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8057 UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. Technical Sergeant (E-6) Eric P. MARCUM XXX-XX-XXXX, USAF, Appellant., 2003 WL 24308709, *24308709+ (Appellate Brief) (U.S. Armed Forces Aug 25, 2003) Answer in Opposition to Motion for Grant of Review of Supplemental Issue (NO. 02-0944) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8058 1568 MONTGOMERY HIGHWAY, INC., v. CITY OF HOOVER, Alabama., 2008 WL 3491103, *3491103+ (Appellate Brief) (Ala. Jun 26, 2008) Reply Brief (NO. 1070531) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8059 1568 MONTGOMERY HIGHWAY, Appellant-Petitioner, v. CITY OF HOOVER, ALABAMA, Appellee-Respondent., 2008 WL 6481238, *6481238+ (Appellate Brief) (Ala. Jun 12, 2008) Joint Brief of Appellees (NO. 1070531) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8060 1568 MONTGOMERY HIGHWAY, INC., v. CITY OF HOOVER, Alabama., 2008 WL 3491098, *3491098+ (Appellate Brief) (Ala. May 15, 2008) Brief of the Appellant (NO. 1070531) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8061 Ex Parte A.B. (In re: C.D. V. A.D.)., 2006 WL 6313370, *6313370+ (Appellate Brief) (Ala. Mar 16, 2006) Respondent C.D.'s Brief in Opposition to Petition (NO. 1050514) 8062 Ex Parte A. B. Re: C. D., Plaintiff. v. A. B. et al., Defendants., 2005 WL 6314089, *6314089+ (Appellate Brief) (Ala. 2005) Petitioner A.B.'s Reply Brief in Support of Petition for Writ of Mandamus (NO. 1050514) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8063 TOWN OF CEDAR BLUFF, Alabama and Mayor Bob Davis, Appellants, v. CITIZENS CARING FOR CHILDREN AND CARL GREEN, Appellees., 2004 © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. WL 5458363, *5458363 (Appellate Brief) (Ala. Jul 13, 2004) Brief for the Appellees, Citizens Caring for Children and Carl Green (NO. 1030785, 2030478) 8064 THE STATE OF ALASKA, and the Municipality of Anchorage, Appellant, v. Julie A. SCHMIDT, Gayle Schuh, Julie M. Vollick, Susan L. Bernard, Fred W. Traber, and Laurence Snider, Appellees., 2012 WL 4668223, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Alaska Jul 30, 2012) Reply Brief of Appellant (NO. S-14521) 8065 THE STATE OF ALASKA, and the Municipality of Anchorage, Appellants, v. Julie SCHMIDT, Gayle Schuh, Julie Vollick, Susan Bernard, Fred Traber, and Laurence Snider, Appellees., 2012 WL 3763719, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Alaska May 14, 2012) Brief of Appellees (NO. S-14521) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8066 Michael MCCRARY, Appellant, v. IVANOF BAY VILLAGE and Edgar Shangin, Appellees., 2010 WL 6351949, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Alaska Dec 14, 2010) Brief of Appellant (NO. S-13972) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8067 OFFICE OF PUBLIC ADVOCACY, Appellant, v. ALASKA COURT SYSTEM, Randall Guy Gordanier, Jr., and Siv Betti Jonsson, Appellees., 2008 WL 5585565, *5585565+ (Appellate Brief) (Alaska Nov 19, 2008) Brief of the American Bar Association As Amicus Curiae in Support of Appellee Siv Jonsson (NO. S-12999) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8068 CITY OF SKAGWAY, Appellant, v. Terry ROBERTSON, and David A. Lee, Appellees., 2005 WL 3125979, *3125979+ (Appellate Brief) (Alaska Jun 30, 2005) Terry Robertson's Combined Cross Appellant's and Appellee's Brief (NO. S-11702, S-11741) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8069 State of Alaska, Defendant-Appellant, Cross-Appellee, v. PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF ALASKA, Jan Whitefield, M.D., Plaintiffs-Appellees, Cross-Appellants., 2004 WL 3680587, *3680587+ (Appellate Brief) (Alaska Jun 21, 2004) Brief Amicus Curiae of the Alaska State Legislature in Support of Defendant-Appellant, Cross-Appellee (NO. S-11365, S-11386) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8070 Earl BATES, Appellant, v. STATE OF ALASKA, Appellee., 2009 WL 5855329, *5855329+ (Appellate Brief) (Alaska App. Oct 06, 2009) Brief of Appellant (NO. A-10350) 8071 Andreas S. KIRCHNER, Appellant, v. State of Alaska, Appellee., 2006 WL 3917688, *3917688+ (Appellate Brief) (Alaska App. Aug 16, 2006) Brief of Appellee (NO. A-9545) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8072 James SURRELLS, Appellant, v. State of Alaska, Appellee., 2006 WL 3917632, *3917632+ (Appellate Brief) (Alaska App. Jun 22, 2006) Brief of Appellee (NO. A-9458) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8073 Todd PORTERFIELD, Appellant, v. State of Alaska, Appellee., 2006 WL 3320616, *3320616+ (Appellate Brief) (Alaska App. Feb 21, 2006) Brief of Appellee (NO. A-9033) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8074 Galacia HIRATSUKA, Appellant, v. State of Alaska, Appellee., 2006 WL 3320661, *3320661+ (Appellate Brief) (Alaska App. Jan 19, 2006) Brief of © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Appellee (NO. A-9147) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8075 Henry DOUGLAS and Troy Smart, Appellants, v. State of Alaska, Appellee., 2006 WL 3309794, *3309794+ (Appellate Brief) (Alaska App. Jan 13, 2006) Brief of Appellee (NO. A-8934, A-9025) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8076 Maria L. LINEKER, Appellant, v. State of Alaska, Appellee., 2006 WL 3309838, *3309838+ (Appellate Brief) (Alaska App. Jan 06, 2006) Opening Brief of Appellant (NO. A-8967) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8077 STATE OF ARIZONA, Appellee, v. Steven John PARKER, Appellant., 2011 WL 7714769, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Ariz. Aug 22, 2011) Appellant's Opening Brief (NO. CR10-0196-AP) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 8078 STATE OF ARIZONA, Appellee, v. Dale Shawn HAUSNER, Appellant., 2009 WL 8582279, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Ariz. 2009) Appellee's Answering Brief (NO. CR-09-0077-AP) 8079 State of Arizona, Appellee, v. Kelly FISCHER, Appellant., 2007 WL 4203447, *4203447+ (Appellate Brief) (Ariz.App. Div. 1 Oct 22, 2007) Appellant's Reply Brief (NO. 1CA-CR06-0682) " HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 8080 STATE OF ARIZONA, Appellee, v. Tracie Renee GEESLIN, Appellant., 2006 WL 4870967, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Ariz.App. Div. 1 2006) Appellee's Answering Brief (NO. 1CA-CR06-0316) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8081 STATE OF ARIZONA, Appellee, v. Ian Michael DAWKINS, Appellant., 2008 WL 3491189, *3491189+ (Appellate Brief) (Ariz.App. Div. 2 Jul 28, 2008) Appellant's Reply Brief (NO. 2CA-CR2007-0212) 8082 John MOIX, Appellant, v. Libby MOIX, Appellee., 2013 WL 6211590, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Ark. Aug 15, 2013) Appellant's Reply Brief (NO. 13-76) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8083 J.T. TALBERT, Jr., Appellant, v. State of Arkansas, Appellee., 2006 WL 4392729, *4392729+ (Appellate Brief) (Ark. Aug 18, 2006) Response to Appellee's Brief (NO. CR06-689) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8084 DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES and Child Welfare Agency Review Board, Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. Matthew Lee HOWARD, Craig Stoopes Anne Shelley and William Wagner, Appellees/Cross-Appellants., 2006 WL 2134565, *2134565+ (Appellate Brief) (Ark. Feb 21, 2006) Cross-Appellants' Reply Brief (NO. 05-814) 8085 DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, et al., Appellants, v. Matthew HOWARD, et a., Appellees., 2006 WL 2134558, *2134558+ (Appellate Brief) (Ark. Feb 06, 2006) Brief of Amici Curiae Family Research Council and Family Council in Support of Appellants (NO. 05-814) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8086 DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, et al, Appellants, v. Matthew HOWARD, et al, Appellees., 2006 WL 2134561, *2134561+ (Appellate Brief) (Ark. Feb 06, 2006) Appellants' Reply and Response to Cross Appellants (NO. 05-814) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 8087 DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES and Child Welfare Agency Review Board, Appellants, v. Matthew Lee HOWARD, Craig Stoopes, Anne Shelley and William Wagner, Appellees., 2006 WL 2134559, *2134559+ (Appellate Brief) (Ark. Feb 02, 2006) Brief Amicus Curiae of the Child Welfare League of America, the Evan B. Donaldson Adoption Institute, and Arkansas Advocates for Children & Families in Support of Appellees (NO. 05-814) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8088 DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, et al., Appellants, v. Matthew HOWARD, et al., Appellees., 2006 WL 2134560, *2134560+ (Appellate Brief) (Ark. Jan 12, 2006) Brief of Amici Curiae Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc.; Children of Lesbians & Gays Everywhere; Family Pride; Human Rights Campaign; Human Rights Campaign Foundation; National Gay & ... (NO. 05-814) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8089 DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES and Child Welfare Agency Review Board, Appellants, v. Matthew Lee HOWARD, Craig Stoopes, Anne Shelley and William Wagner, Appellees., 2006 WL 2134563, *2134563+ (Appellate Brief) (Ark. Jan 12, 2006) Brief Amicus Curiae of the Child Welfare League of America and the Evan B. Donaldson Adoption Institute in Support of Appellees (NO. 05-814) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8090 DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES CHILD WELFARE AGENCY REVIEW BOARD, Appellant, v. Matthew Lee HOWARD Craig Stoopes Anne Shelley, Appellees., 2006 WL 2134564, *2134564+ (Appellate Brief) (Ark. Jan 12, 2006) Brief of Amici Curiae Arkansas Affiliate Office of the National Conference for Community and Justice Bishop Larry E. Maze Professor John M.A. DiPippa Professor Adjoa A. Aiyetoro (NO. 05-814) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8091 DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES and Child Welfare Agency Review Board, Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. Matthew Lee HOWARD, Craig Stoopes Anne Shelley and William Wagner, Appellees/Cross-Appellants., 2005 WL 4542848, *4542848+ (Appellate Brief) (Ark. Dec 21, 2005) Appellees/ Cross-Appellants' Supplemental Abstract and Brief (NO. 05-814) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8092 Sammy O. SMITH, Appellant, v. State of Arkansas, Appellee., 2005 WL 3825967, *3825967+ (Appellate Brief) (Ark. May 12, 2005) Appellant's Opening Brief and Addendum (NO. CR05-27) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8093 Eric Justin FLOWERS, Appellant, v. STATE OF ARKANSAS, Appellee., 2005 WL 6486848, *6486848+ (Appellate Brief) (Ark.App. Feb 20, 2005) Brief of the Appellant (NO. CACR05-00021) 8094 James BURKS, Appellant, v. STATE OF ARKANSAS, Appellee., 2004 WL 5843694, *5843694+ (Appellate Brief) (Ark.App. Nov 09, 2004) Appellant's Abstract and Opening Brief and Addendum (NO. CACR03-1276) 8095 Tommy L. HILBURN, Appellant, v. STATE OF ARKANSAS, Appellee., 2004 WL 5843273, *5843273 (Appellate Brief) (Ark.App. Oct 29, 2004) Appellant's © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Reply Brief (NO. CACR04-295) 8096 Tommy L. HILBURN, Appellant, v. STATE OF ARKANSAS, Appellee., 2004 WL 5843271, *5843271+ (Appellate Brief) (Ark.App. Oct 28, 2004) Appellant's Reply Brief (NO. CACR04-295) 8097 In Re Sergio C. GARCIA On Admission., 2012 WL 3569741, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Jul 27, 2012) Application for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae and Brief of Amici Curiae National Center for Lesbian Rights and Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc. IN Support of Admission of Sergio C. ... (NO. S202512) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8098 In re Marriage CASES Judicial Council Coordination Proceeding No. 4365., 2012 WL 707534, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. 2012) Application to File Brief Amici Curiae; Brief Amici Curiae of Douglas W. Kmiec, Helen M. Alvare, George W. Dent, Jr., Stephen G. Calabresi; Steven B. Presser; and Lynn D. Wardle, Professors of Law in ... (NO. S147999) 8099 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Huber Joel MENDOZA, Defendant and Appellant., 2011 WL 6431437, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Nov 28, 2011) Appellant's Opening Brief (NO. S143743) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8100 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Ramiro GONZALES, Defendant and Appellant., 2011 WL 5858972, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Oct 26, 2011) Answer Brief On the Merits (NO. S191240) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8101 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Dora BUENROSTRO, Defendant and Appellant., 2011 WL 4440784, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Sep 01, 2011) Appellant's Reply Brief (NO. S073823) 8102 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Sergio D. NELSON, Defendant and Appellant., 2010 WL 5587056, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Dec 08, 2010) Appellant's Reply Brief (NO. S048763) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 8103 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Charles F. ROUNTREE, Defendant and Appellant., 2010 WL 5145858, *5145858+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Nov 22, 2010) Appellant's Reply Brief (NO. S048543) 8104 In re Kenneth Earl GAY, On Habeas Corpus., 2010 WL 5085292, *5085292+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Nov 17, 2010) Brief of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland as Amicus Curiae in Support of Petitioner Kenneth Earl Gay (NO. S130263) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8105 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Ronald Bruce MENDOZA, Defendant and Appellant., 2010 WL 360938, *360938+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Jan 06, 2010) Appellant's Reply Brief (NO. S065467) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 8106 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al., Petitioners, v. Mark B. HORTON, as State Registrar of Vital Statistics, etc., et al., Respondents, Dennis © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Hollingsworth, et al., Interveners., 2009 WL 491810, *491810+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Jan 21, 2009) Consolidated Answer of Petitioners City and County of San Francisco, et al to Amicus Curiae Briefs in Support of Intervenors (NO. S168078) 8107 Karen L. STRAUSS, et al., Petitioners, v. Mark B. HORTON, as State Registrar of Vital Statistics, etc., et al., Respondents, Dennis Hollingsworth, et al., Interveners., 2009 WL 2587857, *2587857 (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Jan 16, 2009) Application for Permission to File Amicus Curiae Brief and Amicus Curiae Brief of Constitutional and Civil Rights Law Professors in Support of Petition for Extraordinary Relief (NO. S168047) 8108 Karen L. STRAUSS, et al., Petitioners, v. Mark B. HORTON, State Registrar of Vital Statistics, etc, et al., Respondents; Dennis Hollingsworth, et al., Intervenors. Robin Tyler, et al., Petitioners, v. The State of California, et al., Respondents; Dennis Hollingsworth, et al., Intervenors. City and County of San Francisco, et al., Petitioners, v. Mark B. Horton, et al., Respondents; Dennis Hollingsworth, et al., Intervenors., 2009 WL 491802, *491802+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Jan 16, 2009) Application to File Amicus Curiae Brief and Brief of Amicus Curiae Human Rights Watch et al. in Support of Petitioners (NO. S168047, S168066, S168078) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8109 Karen L. STRAUSS, et al., Petitioners, v. Mark B. HORTON, as State Registrar of Vital Statistics, et al., Respondents; Dennis Hollingsworth, et al., Interveners., 2009 WL 491806, *491806+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Jan 16, 2009) Application for Leave to File Amicus Curiae Brief and Brief of Amici Curiae Professors of Family Law in Support of Petitioners (NO. S168047) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8110 Karen L. STRAUSS, et al., v. Mark B. HORTON, et al., 2009 WL 393214, *393214+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Jan 15, 2009) Brief of Amicus Curiae Jewish Family Service of Los Angeles in Support of Petitioners in the Proposition 8 Cases (NO. S168047) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8111 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Glen ROGERS, Defendant and Appellant., 2009 WL 393224, *393224 (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Jan 12, 2009) Appellant's Reply Brief (NO. S080840) 8112 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ), Plaintiff and respondent, v. Robert Mark EDWARDS, Defendant and appellant., 2008 WL 5517205, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Nov 12, 2008) Appellant's Reply Brief (NO. S073316) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 8113 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and respondent, v. Gregory O. TATE, Defendant and appellant., 2008 WL 5517204, *5517204 (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Nov 07, 2008) Appellant's Reply Brief (NO. S031641) 8114 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and respondent, v. Andre Stephen ALEXANDER, Defendant and appellant., 2008 WL 4736264, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Sep 16, 2008) Appellant's Supplemental Reply Brief (NO. S053228) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 8115 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Miguel Angel MARTINEZ, Defendant and Appellant., 2008 WL 715629, *715629+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Jan 11, 2008) Appellant's Reply Brief (NO. S075699) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 8116 In re MARRIAGE CASES Judicial Council Coordination Proceeding No. 4365., 2007 WL 4632425, *4632425+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Nov 14, 2007) Respondents' Consolidated Answer to Amicus Curiae Briefs (NO. S147999) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8117 In Re MARRIAGE CASES., 2007 WL 4589259, *4589259+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Nov 13, 2007) City and County of San Francisco's Consolidated Answer to Amicus Curiae Briefs (NO. S147999) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8118 In re MARRIAGE CASES., 2007 WL 3167052, *3167052+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Oct 04, 2007) Brief Amicus Curiae of The American Center for Law & Justice In Support of Respondent Proposition 22 Legal Defense And Education Fund (NO. S147999) " 8119 In re MARRIAGE CASES., 2007 WL 3307687, *3307687+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Oct 04, 2007) Proposed Brief of Amicus Curiae in Support of Parties Challenging the Marriage Exclusion (NO. S147999) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8120 In re MARRIAGE CASES., 2007 WL 3307690, *3307690+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Oct 04, 2007) Brief Amicus Curiae of the Council for Secular Humanism and the Center for Inquiry in Support of the City and County of San Francisco, Urging Reversal of the Decision of the Court of Appeals (NO. S147999) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8121 In re MARRIAGE CASES., 2007 WL 3307694, *3307694+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Oct 04, 2007) Brief Amicus Curiae of California Ethnic Religious Organizations for Marriage (""Cerom'') in Support of Appellees (NO. S147999) " 8122 In re MARRIAGE CASES., 2007 WL 3307697, *3307697+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Oct 04, 2007) Brief of Amicus Curiae Equal Justice Society in Support of Parties Challenging the Marriage Exclusion (NO. S147999) " 8123 Coordination Proceeding Special Title (Rule 1550(B)) In ReMARRIAGE CASES., 2007 WL 4632420, *4632420+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Oct 04, 2007) Application to File Amicus Curiae Brief and Amicus Curiae Brief of the American Psychoanalytic Association, the American Anthropological Association, and the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights of ... (NO. S147999) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8124 In re MARRIAGE CASES., 2007 WL 4632423, *4632423+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Oct 04, 2007) Application for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae in Support of Respondents Challenging the Marriage Exclusion and (proposed) Amicus Brief (NO. S147999) " 8125 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Appellant/ defendant, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent/ plaintiff., 2007 WL 4632424, *4632424+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Oct 04, 2007) Application for Leave to File Amicus © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Curiae Brief; Amicus Curiae Brief in Support of State of California and the Attorney General (NO. S147999) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8126 In re MARRIAGE CASES., 2007 WL 2905415, *2905415+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Aug 31, 2007) Respondents' Consolidated Supplemental Reply Brief (NO. S147999) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8127 Coordination Proceeding Special Title (Rule 1550(b)) In Re MARRIAGE CASES., 2007 WL 2807456, *2807456+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Aug 23, 2007) City and County of San Francisco's Consolidated Reply Brief (NO. S147999) 8128 In re MARRIAGE CASES, Judicial Council Coordination Proceeding No. 4365., 2007 WL 2732886, *2732886+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Aug 17, 2007) Respondents' Consolidated Reply Brief on the Merits (NO. S147999) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8129 In re MARRIAGE CASES. Judicial Council Coordination Proceeding No. 4365., 2007 WL 2733221, *2733221+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Aug 17, 2007) Respondents' Supplemental Brief (NO. S147999) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8130 COORDINATION PROCEEDING SPECIAL TITLE (RULE 1550(B)). In Re Marriage Cases., 2007 WL 2733224, *2733224+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Aug 17, 2007) City and County of San Francisco's Supplemental Brief (NO. S147999) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8131 In re MARRIAGE CASES., 2007 WL 2085970, *2085970+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Jun 20, 2007) Brief of Amicus Curiae Judicial Watch, Inc. in Support of the State of California and Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger (NO. S147999) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8132 In re MARRIAGE CASES., 2007 WL 2085971, *2085971+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Jun 20, 2007) Brief Amicus Curiae of the Knights of Columbus in Support of the State Defendants (NO. S147999) " HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 8133 In re MARRIAGE CASES., 2007 WL 2905411, *2905411+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Jun 14, 2007) Proposition 22 Legal Defense and Education Fund Answer to Petitioners' Opening Briefs On the Substantive Issues (NO. S147999) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8134 In re MARRIAGE CASES., 2007 WL 2905412, *2905412+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Jun 14, 2007) Answer Brief of Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger and State Registrar of Vital Statistics Teresita Trinidad on the Merits (NO. S147999) 8135 In re MARRIAGE CASES., 2007 WL 2905413, *2905413+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Jun 14, 2007) Answer Brief of State of California and the Attorney General to Opening Briefs on the Merits (NO. S147999) " HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.) 8136 In re MARRIAGE CASES., 2007 WL 2085967, *2085967+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Jun 07, 2007) Answer Brief of Campaign for California Families on the Merits (NO. S147999) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 8137 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Andre Gerald WILSON, Defendant and Appellant., 2007 WL 1849720, *1849720+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. May 29, 2007) Appellant's Reply Brief (NO. S070327) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 8138 Coordination Proceeding Special Title (Rule 1550(b)) In Re Marriage Cases., 2007 WL 1335193, *1335193+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Apr 03, 2007) Petitioner City and County of San Francisco's Opening Brief on the Merits (NO. S147999) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8139 Gregory CLINTON, et al., Plaintiffs-Petitioners, and Respondents, v. State of California, et al., Defendants-Respondents, and Appellants., 2007 WL 1335195, *1335195+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Apr 02, 2007) Opening Brief on the Merits (NO. S147999) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8140 NORTH COAST WOMEN'S CARE MEDICAL GROUP, INC., et al., Petitioners, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, Respondent. Guadalupe T. Benitez, Real Party in Interest., 2006 WL 4098607, *4098607+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Dec 21, 2006) Answer Brief on the Merits (NO. S142892) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8141 SILICON VALLEY TAXPAYERS ASSN., INC., et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. SANTA CLARA COUNTY OPEN SPACE AUTHORITY, Defendant and Respondent., 2006 WL 3293739, *3293739+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Sep 01, 2006) Combined Answer of Respondent Santa Clara County Open Space Authority to All Amicus Briefs Supporting Appellants (NO. S136468) " 8142 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Juan Manuel LOPEZ, Defendant and Appellant., 2006 WL 3244920, *3244920+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Jul 31, 2006) Appellant's Reply Brief (NO. S073597) 8143 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Jack Emmit WILLIAMS, Defendant and Appellant., 2006 WL 5150371, *5150371 (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Jun 21, 2006) Opening Brief for Appellant Jack E. Williams Volume II of II Penalty Phase Issues Pages 344-637 (NO. S073205) 8144 People of the State of California, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Christopher Adam GEIER, Defendant and Appellant., 2006 WL 3096395, *3096395+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Apr 20, 2006) Appellant's Reply Brief (NO. S050082) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 8145 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Samuel ZAMUDIO, Defendant and Appellant., 2005 WL 3971144, *3971144+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Nov 15, 2005) Appellant's Reply Brief (NO. S074414) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 8146 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Royal CLARK, Defendant and Appellant., 2005 WL 5974252, *5974252+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Oct 25, 2005) Appellant's Reply Brief (NO. S045078) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8147 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Bernard Lee HAMILTON, Defendant and Appellant., 2005 WL 3142576, *3142576+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Jul 27, 2005) Appellant's Reply Brief (NO. S052288) 8148 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Paul Gregory WATSON, Defendant and Appellant., 2005 WL 2236898, *2236898+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Jun 20, 2005) Appellant's Reply Brief (NO. S024471) 8149 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Keone WALLACE, Defendant and Appellant., 2005 WL 2236900, *2236900+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Jun 17, 2005) Appellant's Reply Brief (NO. S033360) 8150 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. John Irvin LEWIS, II, Defendant and Appellant., 2005 WL 1636293, *1636293+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. May 24, 2005) Appellant's Reply Brief (NO. S031603) 8151 John B., Petitioner and Defendant, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, County of Los Angeles, Respondent. Bridget B., Plaintiff and Real Party in Interest., 2005 WL 1031440, *1031440+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Mar 22, 2005) Petitioner's Reply Brief on the Merits (NO. S128248) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8152 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. James David TULK, Defendant and Appellant., 2005 WL 1031410, *1031410+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Mar 16, 2005) Appellant's Reply Brief (NO. S029301) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 8153 KRISTINE Renee H., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. LISA Ann R., Defendant and Respondent; Kristine Renee H., Petitioner, v. The Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Respondent; Lisa Ann R., Real Party in Interest., 2005 WL 847614, *847614 (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Jan 31, 2005) Respondent's Answer Brief on the Merits (NO. S126945) 8154 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Regis Deon THOMAS, Defendant and Appellant., 2005 WL 731471, *731471 (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Jan 18, 2005) Appellant's Opening Brief (NO. S048337) 8155 Bill LOCKYER, Petitioner, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al., Respondents. Barbara Lewis, et al, Petitioners, v. Nancy Alfaro, Respondent., 2004 WL 3256402, *3256402 (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Dec 10, 2004) Respondents' Opposition Brief to Petitioners' Motion for Attorneys Fees Under CCP |1021.5 (NO. S122923) 8156 Elisa MARIA B., Petitioner, v. EL DORADO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, Respondent, Emily B., et al. Real Parties in Interest., 2004 WL 2981959, *2981959+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Nov 15, 2004) Opening Brief of Real Party © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. in Interest Emily B. (NO. S125912) 8157 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Vincent HOFSHEIER, Defendant and Appellant., 2004 WL 2863078, *2863078+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Oct 25, 2004) Reply Brief on the Merits (NO. S124636) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8158 B. Birgit KOEBKE, et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. BERNARDO HEIGHTS COUNTRY CLUB, Defendant and Respondent., 2004 WL 2110803, *2110803+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Jul 19, 2004) Appellants' Opening Brief on the Merits (NO. S124179) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8159 Eugene EVANS, et al., Petitioners, v. CITY OF BERKELEY, Respondent., 2003 WL 23270257, *23270257+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Oct 02, 2003) Petitioners' Consolidated Answer Brief in Response to Briefs Filed by Amici City and County of San Francisco, et al.; Bay Area Lawyers for Individual Freedom, et al.; Anti-Defamation League, et al.; ... (NO. S112621) 8160 Eugene EVANS, et al., Petitioners, v. CITY OF BERKELEY, Respondent., 2003 WL 23270255, *23270255+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal. Aug 20, 2003) Brief of Amici Curiae California State Club Association and National Club Association in Support of Petitioners (NO. S112621) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8161 Re: Estate of Philip Timothy WILSON, Deceased. Antipas Johnlang KONOU, Petitioner and Appellant, v. Stephen M. WILSON, et al., Objectors and Respondents., 2012 WL 2847966, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal.App. 1 Dist. Jun 11, 2012) Appellant's Opening Brief (NO. A133952) 8162 SIERRA CLUB, Plaintiff, Respondent, and Cross-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF SOLANO, et al., Defendants, Appellants, and Cross-Respondents, Potrero Hills Landfill, Real Party in Interest, Appellant, and Cross-Respondent, BLT Enterprises of Sacramento, et al., Intervenors, Appellants, and CrossRespondents. Northern California Recycling Association, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. County of Solano, Defendant and Appellant. Sustainability, Parks, Recycling and, 2011 WL 2546987, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal.App. 1 Dist. May 25, 2011) Opening Brief of Respondent and Cross-Appellant Sustainability, Parks, Recycling and Wildlife Legal Defense Fund (NO. A120682, A130682, A130734, A130735) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8163 David BEEBE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. David GUNDERSON, et al., Defendants and Respondents., 2009 WL 2919887, *2919887+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal.App. 1 Dist. Aug 10, 2009) Appellant's Reply Brief (NO. A122283) 8164 David BEEBE, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. David GUNDERSON, et al., Defendants/ Respondents., 2009 WL 2187690, *2187690+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal.App. 1 Dist. Jul 02, 2009) Respondents' Brief (NO. A122283) 8165 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Edward Lee LEARN, Defendant and Appellant., 2007 WL 4934648, *4934648+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal.App. 1 Dist. Jun 04, 2007) Appellant's Supplemental Brief (NO. A109084) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8166 Coordination Proceeding, Special Title Rule 1550(b)¨ Marriage Cases, City and © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. County of San Francisco, et al., Respondents, v. State of California, et al., Appellants., 2006 WL 937634, *937634+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal.App. 1 Dist. Feb 10, 2006) State Appellants' Response to Amicus Curiae Briefs (NO. A110449) 8167 Robin TYLER, et al., Respondents, v. State of California, et al., Appellants., 2006 WL 937635, *937635+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal.App. 1 Dist. Feb 10, 2006) Respondent Intervenor's Answer to Amici Curiae Briefs (NO. A110450) 8168 Lancy WOO, et al., Respondents, v. State of California, et al., Appellants., 2006 WL 937636, *937636+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal.App. 1 Dist. Feb 10, 2006) Respondents' Answer to Amici Curiae Briefs (NO. A110451) 8169 CAMPAIGN FOR CALIFORNIA FAMILIES, et al., Appellants, v. Gavin NEWSOM, et al., Respondents., 2005 WL 3955028, *3955028+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal.App. 1 Dist. Dec 16, 2005) Respondent Intervenors' Answer Brief (NO. A110652) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8170 Robin TYLER, et al., Respondents, v. State of California, et al., Appellants., 2005 WL 3967318, *3967318+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal.App. 1 Dist. Nov 21, 2005) Respondent Intervenor Equality California's Answer Brief (NO. A110450) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8171 Lancy WOO, et al., Respondents, v. State of California, et al., Appellants., 2005 WL 3967323, *3967323+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal.App. 1 Dist. Nov 10, 2005) Respondents' Corrected Answering Brief (NO. A110451) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8172 In re MARRIAGE CASES Judicial Council Coordination Proceeding No. 4365; City and County of San Francisco, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. State of California, Defendant/Appellant,, 2005 WL 3967315, *3967315+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal.App. 1 Dist. Nov 09, 2005) Respondent's Brief (NO. A110449) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8173 Lancy WOO, et al., Respondents, v. State of California, et al., Appellants., 2005 WL 3967320, *3967320+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal.App. 1 Dist. Nov 09, 2005) Respondents' Answering Brief (NO. A110451) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8174 Coordination Proceeding Special Title (Rulel550(b)) Marriage Cases, Proposition 22 Legal Defense and Education Fund, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. City and County of San Francisco, et al, Defendants and Respondents, Del Martin, et al., Intervenor-Defendants/Respondents., 2005 WL 3955027, *3955027+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal.App. 1 Dist. Oct 21, 2005) Appellant Proposition 22 Legal Defense and Education Fund's Opening Brief (NO. A110651) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8175 Coordination Proceeding Special Title (Rule 1550(b)) Marriage Cases, Gregory Clinton, et al., Respondents, v. State of California, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, in his capacity as Governor of the State of California, a California resident, and Does 1 through 50, inclusive, Appellants., 2005 WL 3263579, *3263579+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal.App. 1 Dist. Sep 20, 2005) Appellants' Opening Brief (NO. A110463) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8176 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Edward Lee LEARN, Defendant and Appellant., 2005 WL 6059722, *6059722+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal.App. 1 Dist. Jun 01, 2005) Appellant's Opening Brief (NO. A109084) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8177 CORAL CONSTRUCTION, INC., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. John L. MARTIN, City and County of San Francisco, et al., Defendants/Respondents., 2003 WL 23153310, *23153310+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal.App. 1 Dist. Jul 30, 2003) Respondents' Brief (NO. A101842) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8178 K.M., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. E.G., Defendant and Respondent., 2003 WL 23153285, *23153285 (Appellate Brief) (Cal.App. 1 Dist. Jul 10, 2003) Appellant's Opening Brief (NO. A101754) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8179 John DOE 1 et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. FRANCISCAN FRIARS OF CALIFORNIA, Defendant/Appellant., 2010 WL 887038, *887038+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal.App. 2 Dist. Mar 04, 2010) Respondents' Brief Regarding Appeal By Samuel Cabot et al. (NO. B215775) 8180 Craig JENSEN and Sally Jensen, Appellants and Plaintiffs, v. Franchise Tax BOARD, Respondent and Defendant., 2009 WL 1833794, *1833794+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal.App. 2 Dist. Jun 08, 2009) Appellants' Reply Brief (NO. B211815) 8181 Steven KALSKI, Appellant and Respondent, v. Michael D. ANTONOVICH, in his official capacity as Mayor of County of Los Angeles Board of Supervisors, also known as Los Angeles County, a legal subdivision of the State of California, Board of Supervisors; Joseph F. Gentile, in his official capacity as Chairman of Los Angeles County Employee Relations Commission, also known as County of Los Angeles, a legal subdivision of the State of California, Employee Relations, 2009 WL 1172941, *1172941+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal.App. 2 Dist. Apr 07, 2009) Appellant's Opposition and Reply Brief in Appeal from Los Angeles County, Superior Court Judge, Honorable James C. Chalfant's Judgment Designated Portions, Designated Interlocutory Rulings and ... (NO. B208252) 8182 Lee CAPLIN et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. Reed RYAN et al., Defendants and Appellants., 2009 WL 899862, *899862+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal.App. 2 Dist. Mar 24, 2009) Respondents' Brief (NO. B207869) 8183 Craig JENSEN and Sally Jensen, Appellants and Plaintiffs, v. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD, Respondent and Defendant., 2009 WL 1034025, *1034025+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal.App. 2 Dist. Mar 02, 2009) Appellants' Opening Brief (NO. B211815) 8184 Steven KALSKI, Appellant and Respondent, v. Michael D. ANTONOVICH, in his official capacity as Mayor of County of Los Angeles Board of Supervisors, also known as Los Angeles County, a legal subdivision of the State of California, Board of Supervisors; Joseph F. Gentile, in his official capacity as Chairman of Los Angeles County Employee Relations Commission, also known as County of Los Angeles, a legal subdivision of the State of California, Employee Relations, 2008 WL 4898154, *4898154+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal.App. 2 Dist. Oct 10, 2008) Appellant's Opening Brief (NO. B208252) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 8185 Abbott LABORATORIES, Abbott Laboratories, Inc., CMM Transportation, Inc., North Shore Properties, Inc., and Perclose, Inc., Appellants, v. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD, an Agency of the State of California, Appellee., 2008 WL 4188806, *4188806+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal.App. 2 Dist. Aug 07, 2008) Appellants' Reply Brief (NO. B204210) 8186 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. David INSELMAN, Defendant and Appellant., 2008 WL 3910810, *3910810+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal.App. 2 Dist. Jul 07, 2008) Respondent's Brief (NO. B204751) 8187 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. David INSELMAN, Defendant and Appellant., 2008 WL 1803602, *1803602+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal.App. 2 Dist. Mar 03, 2008) Appellant's Opening Brief (NO. B204751) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8188 Eunice VIOLA; Michael Viola; Viola Incorporated; Muzeyyen Balaban-Zilke; Michael Giammateo; Moira Giammateo; and Vicki Magee, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF MANAGED HEALTH CARE; Daniel Zingale, an Individual; and Does 1 Through 20, Defendants and Respondents., 2004 WL 2542770, *2542770+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal.App. 2 Dist. Sep 02, 2004) Appellants' Opening Brief (NO. B174455) HN: 3,5 (S.Ct.) 8189 Connie ARMIJO, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Jamie MILES, M.D.; Laburite Medical Office, Inc.; Sherman Oaks Hospital and Health Center; and does 1 through 100, Inclusive, Defendants and Respondents., 2003 WL 23193092, *23193092+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal.App. 2 Dist. Nov 25, 2003) Appellant's Opening Brief (NO. B166050) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8190 CAMPAIGN FOR CALIFORNIA FAMILIES, Appellant, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of California; and Kevin Shelley, in his official capacity as Secretary of State of the State of California, William J. Jefferds, in his official capacity as Director of General Services; Geoff Brandt, in his official capacity as acting state printer of the office of state publishing, and Equality California, Respondeats., 2005 WL 520049, *520049+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal.App. 3 Dist. Jan 17, 2005) Opening Brief of Appellant (NO. C048303) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8191 In re the Marriage of Barth Jeffrey BARTH, Appellant, v. Andrea BARTH, Respondent, ORANGE CO. DEPT. OF CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES, Intervenor., 2012 WL 3525961, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal.App. 4 Dist. Jul 19, 2012) Appellant's Reply Brief (NO. G045142) 8192 In re the Marriage of BAUER. Randall Bauer, Appellant, v. Rebecca Bauer, Respondent., 2011 WL 286602, *286602+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal.App. 4 Dist. Jan 03, 2011) Amended Appellant's Opening Brief (NO. G043361) 8193 In re Adoption of Baby GIRL C., Stacey D., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. BENJAMIN M., Defendant and Respondent., 2010 WL 5650166, *5650166+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal.App. 4 Dist. Dec 17, 2010) Application for Leave to File © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Amici Curiae Brief in Support of Plaintiff/Appellant Stacey D. (NO. G043887) 8194 In re the Marriage of BAUER. Randall Bauer, Appellant, v. Rebecca Bauer, Respondent., 2010 WL 4874256, *4874256+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal.App. 4 Dist. Nov 03, 2010) Appellant's Opening Brief (NO. G043361) 8195 A&E TELEVISION NETWORKS, a New York corporation; MPH Entertainment, Inc., a California corporation, Defendants and Appellants, v. Miles WHITAKER, Plaintiff and Respondent., 2008 WL 5547305, *5547305+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal.App. 4 Dist. Nov 17, 2008) Appellants' Opening Brief (NO. G040880) 8196 Christos CATSOURAS, Lesli Catsouras, Danielle Catsouras, Christina Catsouras, and Kira Catsouras, Plaintiffs / Appellants, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, Thomas O'Donnell, and Aaron Reich, Defendants / Respondents., 2008 WL 6137791, *6137791+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal.App. 4 Dist. Aug 25, 2008) Appellants' Opening Brief on Consolidated Cases (with Rule 8.208 Certificate) (NO. G039916, G040330) 8197 Darrin ELLIS, Petitioner, Appellant, v. David James ARRIAGA, Respondent., 2007 WL 2414861, *2414861+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal.App. 4 Dist. Jul 20, 2007) Appellant's Opening Brief (NO. G038437) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8198 B. Birgit KOEBKE, et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. BERNARDO HEIGHTS COUNTRY CLUB, Defendant and Respondent., 2003 WL 23155046, *23155046+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal.App. 4 Dist. Sep 18, 2003) Appellants' Reply Brief (NO. D041058) 8199 THE PEOPLE FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Dwight HAUER, Defendant/Appellant., 2013 WL 1193427, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal.App. 6 Dist. Mar 08, 2013) Appellant's Brief (NO. H039091) 8200 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Samir Assir ELMACHTOUB, Defendant and Appellant., 2012 WL 6700085, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Cal.App. 6 Dist. Dec 10, 2012) Appellant's Opening Brief (NO. H038439) 8201 Mary H. KORTNER as Administratrix of the Estate of Caroline Kendall Kortner, v. Craig L. MARTISE., 2013 WL 1127224, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Conn. 2013) Reply Brief of the Plaintiff-Appellant and Brief on Cross Appeal of the Plaintiff-Appellee Mary H. Kortner, Administratrix (NO. SC18793) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8202 Luis PATINO, v. BIRKEN MANUFACTURING COMPANY., 2008 WL 8749534, *1 (Appellate Brief) (Conn. 2008) Brief of Amici Curiae Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc., Connecticut Legal Rights Project and Connecticut Women's Education and Legal Fund in Support of Plaintiff-Appellee with Attached ... (NO. SC18441) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8203 Elizabeth KERRIGAN, et al, v. COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC HEALTH, et al., 2007 WL 4725452, *4725452+ (Appellate Brief) (Conn. Apr 25, 2007) Brief of Family Research Council as Amicus Curiae (NO. 17716) " HN: 1 © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. (S.Ct.) 8204 Elizabeth KERRIGAN, et al., v. COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC HEALTH, et al., 2007 WL 4723916, *4723916+ (Appellate Brief) (Conn. Feb 27, 2007) Reply Brief of the Plaintiffs-Appellants (NO. 17716) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 8205 Elizabeth KERRIGAN et al., Plaintiff-Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC HEALTH et al., Defendant-Appellees., 2007 WL 4725470, *4725470+ (Appellate Brief) (Conn. Feb 21, 2007) Brief of Defendant-Appellees With Appendix (NO. SC17716) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8206 Elizabeth KERRIGAN, Joanne Mock, Jeffrey Busch, Stephen Davis, Suazanne Artis, Geraldine Artis, Barbara Levine-Ritterman, Robin Levine-ritterman, John Anderson, Garrett Stack, Janet Peck, Carol Conklin, J.E. Martin, Denise Howard, Damaris Navarro, Gloria Searson, v. STATE OF CONNECTICUT, Department of Public Health, J. Robert Galvin, In His Official Capacity As Commissioner of the Department of Public Health, Dorothy C. Bean, In Her Official Capacity As Deputy, 2007 WL 4725454, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Conn. Jan 11, 2007) Brief of Amicus Curiae Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc. (NO. 17716) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8207 Elizabeth KERRIGAN, et al., v. COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC HEALTH, et al., 2007 WL 4725444, *4725444+ (Appellate Brief) (Conn. Jan 11, 2007) Brief of Amici Curiae (NO. 17716) " HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.) 8208 Elizabeth KERRIGAN, et al, v. COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC HEALTH, et al., 2007 WL 4725447, *4725447+ (Appellate Brief) (Conn. Jan 11, 2007) Amici Curiae Brief of the Family Law Practitioners and the Professors of Family Law (NO. SC17716) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8209 Elizabeth KERRIGAN, et al., v. COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC HEALTH, et al., 2007 WL 4725451, *4725451+ (Appellate Brief) (Conn. Jan 11, 2007) Joint Brief of Amici Curiae (I) Human Rights Campaign; (Ii) Human Rights Campaign Foundation; (Iii) Equal Justice Society; (Iv) National Center for Lesbian Rights; (V) National Gay and Lesbian Task ... (NO. 17716) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8210 Elizabeth KERRIGAN, et al., v. COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC HEALTH, et al., 2006 WL 5247960, *5247960+ (Appellate Brief) (Conn. Dec 12, 2006) Brief of Amici Curiae with Appendix (NO. SC17716) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8211 Elizabeth KERRIGAN, et al., v. COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC HEALTH, et al., 2006 WL 5247529, *5247529+ (Appellate Brief) (Conn. Nov 22, 2006) Brief of the Plaintiffs-Appellants With Separate Appendix (NO. SC17716) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8212 STATE OF CONNECTICUT, v. Van Clifton MCKENZIE-ADAMS., 2006 WL 5459348, *5459348+ (Appellate Brief) (Conn. Sep 01, 2006) Amici Curiae Brief of Connecticut State Board of Education and Richard Blumenthal, Attorney General (NO. SC17451) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8213 STATE OF CONNECTICUT, v. Van Clifton MCKENZIE-ADAMS., 2006 WL 5462277, *5462277+ (Appellate Brief) (Conn. Feb 02, 2006) Reply Brief of © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Defendant-Appellant (NO. 17451) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8214 Claudia A. FULLERTON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Administrator, UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION ACT, Defendant-Appellant, Carmen COCCHIOLA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Administrator, UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION ACT, Defendant-Appellant., 2006 WL 5507045, *5507045+ (Appellate Brief) (Conn. Feb 02, 2006) Brief and Appendix of Amici Curiae State of Connecticut Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities and Office of Protection and Advocacy for Persons with Disabilities in Support of the ... (NO. 17601) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8215 Claudia A. FULLERTON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Administrator, UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION ACT, Defendant-Appellant. Carmen COCCHIOLA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Administrator, UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION ACT, Defendant-Appellant., 2006 WL 5507046, *5507046+ (Appellate Brief) (Conn. Jan 09, 2006) Reply Brief of Defendant-Appellant Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ACT With Attached Appendix (NO. 17601) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8216 STATE OF CONNECTICUT, v. Van Clifton MCKENZIE-ADAMS., 2005 WL 6079506, *6079506+ (Appellate Brief) (Conn. Dec 30, 2005) Brief of the State of Connecticut-Appellee With Attached Appendix (NO. 17451) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8217 STATE OF CONNECTICUT, v. Van Clifton MCKENZIE-ADAMS., 2005 WL 6079505, *6079505+ (Appellate Brief) (Conn. Jun 24, 2005) Brief of Defendant-Appellant (NO. 17451) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8218 Douglas MARTEL, Plaintiff, v. CLERK, METROPOLITAN DISTRICT COMMISSION, et al., Defendants., 2004 WL 5134298, *5134298 (Appellate Brief) (Conn. Dec 20, 2004) Brief with Attached Appendix of DefendantsAppellees, Metropolitan District Commission, Anthony V. Milano, Robert E. Moore, George H. Sparks, Cornelius Geldof, and Robert A. Kerkes (NO. 17373) 8219 Susan MORGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ruth BUBAR. Robert Carini and Lora A. Castronova, Defendants-Appellants., 2008 WL 6759728, *6759728+ (Appellate Brief) (Conn.App. Sep 15, 2008) Brief of the Defendants-Appellants with Separate Appendix (NO. 28151) 8220 Kelly FREELOVE, v. COMMISSIONER OF MOTOR VEHICLES., 2007 WL 5378937, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Conn.App. Jun 13, 2007) Brief of PlaintiffAppellant (NO. AC28686) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 8221 Frederick PLUMMER, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee., 2008 WL 7825510, *7825510+ (Appellate Brief) (D.C. Dec 29, 2008) Supplemental Reply Brief for Appellant (NO. 04-CF-857) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8222 Ali PLEASANT-BEY, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee., 2008 WL 8086458, *8086458+ (Appellate Brief) (D.C. Dec 16, 2008) Brief for Appellant (NO. 07-CF-706) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 8223 Manuel BROWN, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee., 2008 WL 6998036, *6998036+ (Appellate Brief) (D.C. Oct 24, 2008) Brief for Amicus Curiae Public Defender Service (NO. 02-CF-1313) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8224 Joseph C. HOWERTON, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee., 2008 WL 5692831, *5692831+ (Appellate Brief) (D.C. Sep 30, 2008) Supplemental Brief for Amicus Curiae Public Defender Service (NO. 04-CF-1058, 06-CO-599) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8225 Joseph C. HOWERTON, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee., 2008 WL 5758120, *5758120+ (Appellate Brief) (D.C. Sep 30, 2008) Supplemental Brief for Amicus Curiae Public Defender Service (NO. 04-CF-1058, 06-CO-599) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8226 Marvin LITTLE, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee., 2008 WL 8162198, *8162198+ (Appellate Brief) (D.C. Sep 30, 2008) Supplemental Brief for Amicus Curiae Public Defender Service (NO. 06-CF-140) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8227 Frederick PLUMMER, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee., 2008 WL 7825508, *7825508+ (Appellate Brief) (D.C. Aug 28, 2008) Supplemental Brief for Appellant (NO. 04-CF-857) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8228 Marvin C. LITTLE, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee., 2008 WL 8162197, *8162197+ (Appellate Brief) (D.C. Aug 13, 2008) Reply/ Supplemental Brief for Appellant (NO. 06-CF-140) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8229 Carl CHASE, Appellant, v. PUBLIC DEFENDER SERVICE, et al, Appellee., 2007 WL 5766112, *5766112 (Appellate Brief) (D.C. Mar 16, 2007) Brief for Appellant Carl Chase (NO. 06-CV-001281) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8230 Darrell R. DENSON, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee., 2006 WL 5939798, *5939798+ (Appellate Brief) (D.C. Apr 11, 2006) First Amended Brief of Appellant (NO. 04-CF-1167) 8231 Darrell R. DENSON, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee., 2006 WL 5939797, *5939797+ (Appellate Brief) (D.C. Mar 29, 2006) Brief for Appellee (NO. 04-CF-1167) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8232 Darrell R. DENSON, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee., 2006 WL 5939799, *5939799+ (Appellate Brief) (D.C. Jan 12, 2006) Brief of Appellant (NO. 04-CF-1167) 8233 Darrell R. DENSON, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee., 2006 WL 5939774, *5939774+ (Appellate Brief) (D.C. Jan 10, 2006) Brief of Appellant (NO. 04-CF-1167) 8234 STANDARD DISTRIBUTING, INC., Employer Below/Appellant, Appellant, v. Charles J. HALL, Jr., Claimant Below/Appellee, Appellee., 2005 WL 2886255, *2886255+ (Appellate Brief) (Del.Supr. Sep 19, 2005) Appellant Standard Distributing, Inc.'s Reply Brief on Appeal (NO. 1572005) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 8235 John Doe No. 1, Movant below-Appellant, v. Patrick CAHILL and Julia Cahill, Plaintiffs below-Appellees., 2005 WL 2397212, *2397212+ (Appellate Brief) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. (Del.Supr. Jul 28, 2005) Opening Brief of Appellant John Doe No. 1 (NO. 2662005) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8236 Donald Dean KASISCHKE, Petitioner, v. The State of Florida, Respondent., 2007 WL 1567763, *1567763+ (Appellate Brief) (Fla. May 14, 2007) Initial Brief of Petitioner on the Merits (NO. SC07-128) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8237 Duane Edwin SUTTON, Keith Norwood Smith, John R. Beikirich, Edward Allen Singleton, Jerry Wade Rhoades, George Samuel Demarco, Petitioners, v. State of Florida, Respondent., 2005 WL 623451, *623451+ (Appellate Brief) (Fla. Feb 14, 2005) Consolidated Initial Brief of Petitioners on the Merits (NO. SC04-1954, SC04-1955, SC04-1956, SC04-1957, SC04-1958, SC04-1959) HN: 3,5 (S.Ct.) 8238 Rush LIMBAUGH, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent., 2004 WL 3218267, *3218267+ (Appellate Brief) (Fla. 2004) Brief of Amicus Curiae American Civil Liberties Union of Florida, Inc. and in Support of the Petitioner (NO. SC04-2219) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8239 DUANE EDWIN SUTTON, Keith Norwood Smith, John R. Beikirich, Edward Allen Singleton, Jerry Wade Rhoades, George Samuel Demarco, Petitioners, v. State of Floride, Respondent., 2004 WL 3243806, *3243806+ (Appellate Brief) (Fla. 2004) Consolidated Initial Brief of Petitioners On the Merits (NO. SC04-1954, SC04-1955, SC04-1956, SC04-1957, SC04-1958, SC04-1959) HN: 3,5 (S.Ct.) 8240 Lawrence LOGAN, Petitioner, v. State of Florida, Respondent., 2003 WL 23314474, *23314474 (Appellate Brief) (Fla. 2003) Reply Brief of Petitioner on the Merits (NO. SC03-1155) 8241 James Edwin WATSON, Appellant, v. STATE OF GEORGIA, Appellee., 2013 WL 1194991, *1 (Appellate Brief) (Ga. Mar 17, 2013) Brief of Appellee (NO. S13A0784) 8242 ATLANTA OCULOPLASTIC SURGERY, P.C. d/b/a Oculus, Appellant/ Defendant, v. Betty NESTLEHUTT and Bruce Nestlehutt, Appellees/Plaintiffs., 2009 WL 6690446, *6690446+ (Appellate Brief) (Ga. Aug 18, 2009) Appellees' Response to Amicus Brief of Emory Healthcare (NO. S09A1432) 8243 Arvin Ritchey MASON, and Claudia Mason, Appellants, v. THE HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., and the Flecto Company, Inc., Appellees., 2007 WL 5542070, *5542070 (Appellate Brief) (Ga. Oct 26, 2007) Reply Brief of Appellants (NO. S07A1486) " 8244 Dean Mark GOTTSCHALK, Appellant, v. Karen Ann GOTTSCHALK, Appellee., 2011 WL 11539364, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Ga.App. Feb 09, 2011) Appellant's Amended Brief (NO. A11A0696) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8245 Dean Mark GOTTSCHALK, Plaintiff, v. Karen Ann GOTTSCHALK, Defendant., 2011 WL 11539360, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Ga.App. Jan 12, 2011) Appellant's Brief (NO. A11A0565) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8246 In Re Elizabeth HADAWAY, 1669 Downing Circle, Macon, GA 31206, Appellant., 2007 WL 4867259, *4867259+ (Appellate Brief) (Ga.App. Jul 11, © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 2007) Brief of Amici Curiae Child Welfare League of America, North American Council On Adoptable Children, Guardians Ad Litem, and Lambda Legal Defense & Education Fund In Support of Appellant (NO. A07A1626) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8247 In Re Elizabeth HADAWAY, 1669 Downing Circle, Macon, GA 31206, Appellant., 2007 WL 4867255, *4867255 (Appellate Brief) (Ga.App. May 23, 2007) Brief of Appellant (NO. A07A1626) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8248 State of Hawai'i, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pame Ann Mary Leilani ROMANO, Defendant-Appellant., 2009 WL 2760776, *2760776 (Appellate Brief) (Hawai'i App. Jul 14, 2009) Answering Brief of the State of Hawai'i and Certificate of Service (NO. 29622) 8249 OFFICE OF HAWAIIAN AFFAIRS, Rowena Akana, Haunani Apoliona, Dante Carpenter, Donald Cataluna, Linda Dela Cruz, Colette Machado, Boyd Mossman, Oswald Stender, and John John Waihe'e, IV, in their official capacities as members of the Board of Trustees of the Office of Hawaiian Affairs, Pia Thomas Aluli, Jonathan Kamakawiwo'ole Osorio, Charles Ka'ai'ai, and Keoki Maka Kamaka Ki'ili, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF HAWAII,, 2004 WL 6065614, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Hawai'i App. Jan 26, 2004) Appeal from the 1) Opinion of the Court; Notice of Entry, Filed 12/05/02 2)final Judgment On Counts I, II and III of Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint Filed 07/14/95 in Favor of All Defendants ... (NO. 25570) 8250 JANE (2013-25) DOE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. STATE OF IDAHO, Respondent., 2013 WL 6120461, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Idaho Nov 06, 2013) Appellant's Brief (NO. 41463-2013) 8251 STATE OF IDAHO, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Nikolas Lee SHERMAN, Defendant/Appellant., 2013 WL 4038813, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Idaho Jul 31, 2013) Appellant's Brief (NO. 40995) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8252 STATE OF IDAHO, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Eric James SCOTT, DefendantAppellant., 2013 WL 2147446, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Idaho May 06, 2013) Appellant's Opening Brief (NO. 40789-2013) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8253 STATE OF IDAHO, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Randy BROWN, DefendantAppellant., 2010 WL 3497996, *3497996 (Appellate Brief) (Idaho Aug 23, 2010) Brief of Appellant (NO. 37109, 37110) " 8254 STATE OF IDAHO, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Jack K. COOK, DefendantAppellant., 2007 WL 3011693, *3011693+ (Appellate Brief) (Idaho Sep 18, 2007) Brief of Appellant (NO. 33775) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8255 State of Idaho, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ernesto CRUZ, Defendant-Respondent., 2006 WL 3912637, *3912637+ (Appellate Brief) (Idaho Dec 15, 2006) Brief of Respondent (NO. 31880) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8256 State of Idaho, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Jesse J. IBARRA, Defendant-Appellant., 2006 WL 1981506, *1981506 (Appellate Brief) (Idaho Jun 08, 2006) Appellant's Reply Brief (NO. 31255) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 8257 Shawn L. MCGRIFF, Respondent, v. Theron W. MCGRIFF, Appellant., 2003 WL 25709035, *25709035+ (Appellate Brief) (Idaho Oct 24, 2003) Appellant's Brief (NO. 99469) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8258 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert WOODRUM, Defendant-Appellee., 2005 WL 5436326, *5436326+ (Appellate Brief) (Ill. Sep 21, 2005) Brief and Argument for Defendant-Appellee (NO. 99984) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8259 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joanne Y. PHILLIPS, Defendant-Appellee., 2005 WL 3937413, *3937413+ (Appellate Brief) (Ill. May 03, 2005) Brief and Argument for Defendant-Appellee (NO. 99568) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 8260 In Re the Parentage of: JOHN M., a Minor, Javier Valdivia, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Maria Mathias Izaguirre, Defendant-Appellant, Dennis Dean Malkowski, Defendant-Appellee, Lisa Madigan, Attorney General of the State of Illinois, Intervenor-Appellant., 2004 WL 3221811, *3221811+ (Appellate Brief) (Ill. Feb 26, 2004) Brief of Defendant-Appellant Maria Malkowski (NO. 97227, 97327) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8261 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alejandro ALVARADO, Defendant-Appellant., 2009 WL 8596090, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Ill.App. 1 Dist. Dec 21, 2009) Brief and Argument for Defendant-Appellant (NO. 1-08-2957) 8262 Bei Bei SHUAI., Appellant, v. STATE OF INDIANA, Appellee., 2011 WL 5858288, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Ind.App. Oct 17, 2011) Brief Submitted in Support of Appellant Bei Bei Shuai by Amici Indiana National Organization for Women, Law Students for Reproductive Justice, National Women's Law Center, and Sistersong Women of ... (NO. 49A02-1107-CR-00590) " HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 8263 Bei Bei SHUAI, Appellant, v. STATE OF INDIANA, Appellee., 2011 WL 3892888, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Ind.App. Jul 28, 2011) Brief Submitted in Support of Appellant Bei Bei Shuai by Amici Indiana National Organization for Women, Law Students for Reproductive Justice, National Women's Law Center, and Sistersong Women of ... (NO. 49A02-1106-CR-00486) " HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 8264 Jeff HOWELL, Appellant (Defendant Below), v. STATE OF INDIANA, Appellee (Plaintiff Below)., 2009 WL 2996184, *2996184+ (Appellate Brief) (Ind.App. Aug 19, 2009) Brief of Appellee (NO. 49A02-0903-CR-281) 8265 Fredrick A. ZITLAW, Appellant (Defendant Below), v. STATE OF INDIANA, Appellee., 2008 WL 1994264, *1994264+ (Appellate Brief) (Ind.App. Mar 17, 2008) Brief of Amicus Curiae ACLU of Indiana (NO. 29A05-0701-CR-35)) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8266 Brittany HORN, individually, and Brittany Horn, as parent Brittany Horn, as parent and Natural Guardian of Libby Ann Scott, deceased and Libby Ann Scott, deceased, Appellants/Plaintiffs Below, v. Kristi L. HENDRICKSON and Eric W. © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Scott, Appellees/Defendants Below., 2004 WL 3550574, *3550574+ (Appellate Brief) (Ind.App. Jun 08, 2004) Brief of Appellee/Defendant Below, Kristi L. Hendrickson (NO. 82A05-0402-CV-00083) 8267 Charlotte RANDOLPH, individually and as friend and mother of Kwabene Randolph and Richard Rupcich, Administartor of the Estate of Kwabene Randolph, Appellants/Respondant, v. THE METHODIST HOSPITALS, INC.; Michael A. Linton, M.D. David D. Chube, M.D. Edgar Dizon, M.D. St. Mary Medical Center, Inc., Appellees/Petitioners., 2003 WL 25266657, *25266657+ (Appellate Brief) (Ind.App. Oct 03, 2003) Appellees Linton, Chube, Dizon and St. Mary Medical Center's Response to Petition to Transfer (NO. 45A03-0210-CV-371) " 8268 CLINIC FOR WOMEN, INC., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Carl J. BRIZZI, et al., Defendants-Appellees., 2003 WL 24017306, *24017306+ (Appellate Brief) (Ind.App. Jul 11, 2003) Appellants' Brief (NO. 49A05-0305-CV-259) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8269 IOWA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH, Respondent - Appellant., v. Heather Martin GARTNER and Melissa Gartner, individually and as next friends of Mackenzie Jean Gartner, a minor child, Petitioners - Appellees., 2012 WL 10008153, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Iowa Jun 25, 2012) Brief of Petitioners Appellees and Request for Oral Argument (NO. 12-0243) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8270 Mitchell COUNTY, Plaintiff -Appellee, v. Matthew Hoover ZIMMERMAN, Defendant - Appellant., 2011 WL 9684318, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Iowa Jun 15, 2011) Appellant's Final Brief and Request for Oral Argument (NO. 10-1932) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8271 Katherine VARNUM, et al., Plaintiffs/Appellees, v. Timothy J. BRIEN, Polk County Recorder, Defendant/Appellant., 2008 WL 5156763, *5156763+ (Appellate Brief) (Iowa Jun 10, 2008) Final Amended Reply Brief of Defendant-Appellant (NO. 07-1499) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8272 Katherine VARNUM, et al., Plaintiffs/Appellees, v. Timothy J. BRIEN, Polk County Recorder Defendant/Appellant., 2008 WL 5156762, *5156762+ (Appellate Brief) (Iowa Jun 02, 2008) Final Brief of Defendant-Appellant (NO. 07-1499) 8273 Katherine VARNUM, et al., Plaintiffs - Appellees, v. Timothy J. BRIEN, Polk County Recorder, Defendant - Appellant., 2008 WL 5156764, *5156764+ (Appellate Brief) (Iowa Jun 02, 2008) Final Reply Brief of Plaintiffs-Appellees (NO. 07-1499) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8274 AMES RENTAL PROPERTY ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF AMES, Defendant-Appellee., 2005 WL 6088875, *6088875+ (Appellate Brief) (Iowa Dec 22, 2005) Brief for Appellant (NO. 05-0463) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8275 State of Iowa, 99AG44000, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Adam Donald MUSSER, Defendant-Appellant., 2005 WL 5250479, *5250479+ (Appellate Brief) (Iowa Jun 27, 2005) Appellee's Brief and Conditional Notice of Oral Argument © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. (NO. 04-0719) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8276 State of Iowa, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Adam Donald MUSSER, DefendantAppellant., 2005 WL 5250478, *5250478+ (Appellate Brief) (Iowa Jun 24, 2005) Appellant's Brief and Argument and Request for Oral Argument (NO. 04-0719) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8277 State of Iowa, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Adam Donald MUSSER, DefendantAppellant., 2005 WL 5250480, *5250480+ (Appellate Brief) (Iowa Jun 21, 2005) Appellant's Brief and Argument and Request for Oral Argument (NO. 04-0808) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8278 State of Iowa, 99AG44000, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Adam Donald MUSSER, Defendant-Appellant., 2005 WL 5250481, *5250481+ (Appellate Brief) (Iowa Jun 21, 2005) Appellee's Brief and Conditional Notice of Oral Argument (NO. 04-0808) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8279 State of Iowa, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Adam Donald MUSSER, DefendantAppellant., 2005 WL 5250482, *5250482+ (Appellate Brief) (Iowa Jun 21, 2005) Appellant's Brief and Argument and Request for Oral Argument (NO. 04-0809) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8280 State of Iowa, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Adam Donald MUSSER, DefendantAppellant., 2005 WL 5250484, *5250484+ (Appellate Brief) (Iowa Jun 21, 2005) Appellant's Brief and Argument and Request for Oral Argument (NO. 04-0810) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8281 State of Iowa, 99AG44000, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Adam Donald MUSSER, Defendant-Appellant., 2005 WL 5250485, *5250485+ (Appellate Brief) (Iowa Jun 21, 2005) Appellee's Brief and Conditional Notice of Oral Argument (NO. 04-0810) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8282 State of Iowa, 99AG44000, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Adam Donald MUSSER, Defendant-Appellant., 2005 WL 5250483, *5250483+ (Appellate Brief) (Iowa Jun 20, 2005) Appellee's Brief and Conditional Notice of Oral Argument (NO. 04-0809) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8283 Dwayne ALONS, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR WOODBURY COUNTY, Defendant-Appellee., 2004 WL 4912311, *4912311+ (Appellate Brief) (Iowa May 28, 2004) Plaintiffs-Appellants' Brief (NO. 03-1982) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8284 STATE OF KANSAS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Scott P. ROEDER, DefendantAppellant., 2013 WL 788182, *1 (Appellate Brief) (Kan. Jan 14, 2013) Reply Brief of Appellee, Pro Se Supplement (NO. 10-104520-S) 8285 STATE OF KANSAS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Scott P. ROEDER, DefendantAppellant., 2012 WL 1078431, *1 (Appellate Brief) (Kan. Mar 01, 2012) Brief of Amici Curiae National Abortion Federation, American Civil Liberties Union, & ACLU of Kansas & Western Missouri (NO. 10-104520-S) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8286 THE STATE OF KANSAS, Plaintiff/ Appellee, v. Joshua COMAN, Defendant/ Appellant., 2010 WL 4314510, *4314510+ (Appellate Brief) (Kan. Oct 07, 2010) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Defendant-Appellant's Supplemental Brief (NO. 08-100494-A) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8287 Amy C. MILLER and Kevin Miller, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. Carolyn N. JOHNSON, M.D., Defendant/Appellee., 2009 WL 3344323, *3344323+ (Appellate Brief) (Kan. Sep 25, 2009) Kansas Association for Justice Brief of Amicus Curiae (NO. 08-99818-AS) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 8288 Amy C. MILLER and Kevin Miller, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. Carolyn N. JOHNSON, M.D., Defendant/Appellee., 2009 WL 3344325, *3344325+ (Appellate Brief) (Kan. Sep 25, 2009) Brief of Amici Curiae Professors William Rich and James M. Concannon (NO. 08-99818-AS) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 8289 State of Kansas, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gavin D. SCOTT, Defendant-Appellant., 2007 WL 2891930, *2891930+ (Appellate Brief) (Kan. Aug 03, 2007) Amicus Brief (NO. 99-83801-S) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8290 STATE OF KANSAS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Matthew R. LIMON, DefendantAppellant., 2004 WL 1958979, *1958979+ (Appellate Brief) (Kan. Aug 09, 2004) Brief of Amici Curiae (NO. 00-85898-S) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8291 STATE OF KANSAS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Matthew R. LIMON, DefendantAppellant., 2004 WL 1646973, *1646973+ (Appellate Brief) (Kan. Jun 24, 2004) Defendant-Appellant's Supplemental Brief on Review (NO. 00-85898-S) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8292 STATE OF KANSAS, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. Matthew A. LIMON, Defendant/ Appellant., 2004 WL 1646974, *1646974+ (Appellate Brief) (Kan. Jun 18, 2004) Supplemental Brief of Appellee (NO. 00-85898-S) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8293 STATE OF KANSAS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donald L. DAVIS, DefendantAppellant., 2013 WL 6709519, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Kan.App. Dec 09, 2013) Brief of Appellant (NO. 13-109871-A) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8294 STATE OF KANSAS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard B. YOUNG, DefendantAppellant., 2013 WL 6159353, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Kan.App. Oct 23, 2013) Supplemental Brief of Appellant (NO. 09-102121-A) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8295 STATE OF KANSAS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Christopher Thomas FRANCO, Defendant-Appellant., 2013 WL 5293618, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Kan.App. Aug 15, 2013) Reply Brief of Appellant (NO. 12-107814-A) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8296 STATE OF KANSAS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Christopher Thomas FRANCO, Defendant-Appellant., 2013 WL 3858638, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Kan.App. Jul 05, 2013) Brief of Appellee (NO. 12-107814-A) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8297 STATE OF KANSAS, Plaintiff-, Appellee, v. Charles L. EDWARDS, Defendant-Appellant., 2012 WL 2913934, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Kan.App. Jun 19, 2012) Reply Brief of Appellant Charles L. Edwards (NO. 11-106435-A) 8298 STATE OF KANSAS, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. Charles L. EDWARDS, Defendant/ Appellant., 2012 WL 2390698, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Kan.App. Jun 15, 2012) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Brief of Appellee (NO. 11-106435-A) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8299 STATE OF KANSAS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles L. EDWARDS, DefendantAppellant., 2012 WL 760240, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Kan.App. Feb 02, 2012) Brief of Appellant Charles L. Edwards (NO. 11-106435-A) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8300 In the Interest of L.J.W. d/o/b XX/XX/02., 2010 WL 5626362, *5626362+ (Appellate Brief) (Kan.App. Dec 22, 2010) Brief of Appellant (NO. 10-105045-A) 8301 STATE OF KANSAS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marlin WILLIAMS, DefendantAppellant., 2010 WL 2565146, *2565146+ (Appellate Brief) (Kan.App. Jun 07, 2010) Brief of Appellant (NO. 09-102036-A) 8302 THE STATE OF KANSAS, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. Joshua B. COMAN, Defendant/Appellant., 2008 WL 6013728, *6013728+ (Appellate Brief) (Kan.App. Sep 02, 2008) Brief of Appellant (NO. 08-100494-A) 8303 State of Kansas, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. Bradley W. SCHRADER, Defendant/ Appellant., 2007 WL 2251607, *2251607+ (Appellate Brief) (Kan.App. Jun 04, 2007) Appellee's Brief (NO. 06-97206-A) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 8304 State of Kansas, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Scott ANDERSON, Defendant/Appellee., 2006 WL 3087866, *3087866+ (Appellate Brief) (Kan.App. Sep 11, 2006) Brief of Appellee (NO. 06-96129-A) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8305 State of Kansas, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Nathan TOLL, Defendant-Appellee., 2006 WL 2631066, *2631066+ (Appellate Brief) (Kan.App. Jul 21, 2006) Brief of Appellee (NO. 05-95713-A) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8306 State of Kansas, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony L. IRBY, Defendant-Appellant., 2006 WL 2644117, *2644117+ (Appellate Brief) (Kan.App. Jul 20, 2006) Brief of Appellee (NO. 05-95349-A) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8307 State of Kansas, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Matthew R. LIMON, DefendantAppellant., 2006 WL 2301164, *2301164 (Appellate Brief) (Kan.App. Jun 15, 2006) Brief of Appellant (NO. 06-96013-A) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 8308 In the Matter of the Marriage of Denis Dwight KNIGHT, Plaintiff/appellee, Dawn C. KNIGHT, Respondent/Appellant., 2006 WL 1557421, *1557421+ (Appellate Brief) (Kan.App. May 02, 2006) The Brief of the Appellant%n1%n (NO. 06-96010-A) " 8309 State of Kansas, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan Pedro FONSECA, DefendantAppellant., 2005 WL 3121309, *3121309+ (Appellate Brief) (Kan.App. Oct 06, 2005) Brief of Appellee (NO. 05-93908-A) 8310 Jerry P. CROOK, Petitioner/Appellant, v. State of Kansas, Respondent/Appellee., 2005 WL 2480137, *2480137+ (Appellate Brief) (Kan.App. Aug 12, 2005) Brief of the Appellant (NO. 05-93759-A) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8311 Jerry P. CROOK, Petitioner/Appellant, v. State of Kansas, Respondent/Appellee., 2005 WL 2480135, *2480135+ (Appellate Brief) (Kan.App. Jul 11, 2005) Brief of the Appellant Jerry P. Crooks (NO. 05-93759-A) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8312 State of Kansas Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marshall A. TILLMAN Defendant- © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Appellant., 2005 WL 2397914, *2397914+ (Appellate Brief) (Kan.App. Feb 16, 2005) Appellant's Brief (NO. 04-92850-A) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8313 STATE OF KANSAS, plaintiff/Appellee, v. Elston H. TAYLOR, Jr., Defendant/ Appellant., 2004 WL 5482427, *5482427+ (Appellate Brief) (Kan.App. Jul 12, 2004) Brief (NO. 03-90896-A) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 8314 State of Kansas, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Elston H. TAYLOR, Jr., DefendantAppellant., 2004 WL 1159160, *1159160+ (Appellate Brief) (Kan.App. Apr 06, 2004) Brief of Appellant (NO. 03-90896-A) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8315 Thomas Clyde BOWLING, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, Appellee., 2010 WL 1229179, *1229179+ (Appellate Brief) (Ky. Mar 26, 2010) Brief for Appellant Thomas Clyde Bowling (NO. 2008-SC-000901-MR) 8316 Ina COCHRAN, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, Appellee., 2009 WL 4762227, *4762227+ (Appellate Brief) (Ky. Mar 11, 2009) Brief for Amici Curiae of Columbia Law School Human Rights Clinic and Sexuality and Gender Clinics, et al. (NO. 2008-SC-000095) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8317 Ina COCHRAN, Movant, v. COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, Respondent., 2009 WL 4762221, *4762221+ (Appellate Brief) (Ky. Feb 09, 2009) Brief for Movant, Ina Cochran (NO. 2008-SC-000095) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8318 CAM I, INC., d/b/a Preston Video, et al, Movants-Appellants. LOUISVILLE/ JEFFERSON COUNTY METRO GOVERNMENT, Respondent-Appellee., 2008 WL 5732051, *5732051 (Appellate Brief) (Ky. Sep 17, 2008) Reply Brief of Movants-Appellants (NO. 2007-SC-000812) 8319 CAM I, INC., d/b/a Preston Video, et al, Movants-Appellants. LOUISVILLE / Jefferson County Metro Government, Respondent-Appellee., 2008 WL 5732049, *5732049+ (Appellate Brief) (Ky. Jun 30, 2008) Brief of Movants-Appellants and Appendices A - Q in Support Thereof (NO. 2007-SC-000812-D) " 8320 COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, Movant/Appellant, v. Edward Green JAMESON, Respondent/Appellee., 2005 WL 5406464, *5406464+ (Appellate Brief) (Ky. Dec 16, 2005) Brief for Appellee (NO. 2004-SC-000983-D) 8321 Beoria Abraham SIMMONS, II, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, Appellee., 2005 WL 6952653, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Ky. Mar 07, 2005) Brief for Appellant (NO. 1989-SC-736, 2004-SC-57) 8322 Leif HALVORSEN, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, Appellee., 2005 WL 6220763, *6220763+ (Appellate Brief) (Ky. Jan 24, 2005) Brief for Appellant, Leif Halvorsen (NO. 2004-SC-0017-MR, 83-CR-000152) 8323 Angela MAXWELL, Appellant, v. Robert MAXWELL, Appellee., 2012 WL 9162283, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Ky.App. Apr 12, 2012) Brief for Appellant Angela Maxwell (NO. 2012-CA-000334-ME) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 8324 STATE OF LOUISIANA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Henry Joseph ANDERSON, Defendant-Appellant., 2007 WL 5174442, *5174442+ (Appellate Brief) (La. Jun 25, 2007) Appellant's Brief on Appeal (NO. 2006-KA-2987) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8325 FORUM FOR EQUALITY PAC, et al, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CITY OF NEW ORLEANS, et al, Defendants-Appellants., 2004 WL 5865943, *5865943+ (Appellate Brief) (La.App. 4 Cir. Aug 26, 2004) Intervenors/Appellants' Brief (NO. 2004-CA-1521) 8326 COMMONWEALTH, Appellee, v. Isaac WALLACE, Appellant., 2011 WL 1289980, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Mass. Mar 2011) Defendant's Reply Brief (NO. SJC-09925) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8327 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, Appellant, v. Richard RUNYAN, Appellee., 2009 WL 3423333, *3423333+ (Appellate Brief) (Mass. Aug 25, 2009) Brief Amicus Curiae of Second Amendment Foundation, Inc. and Gun Owners Action League in Support of Appellee (NO. SJC-10480) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8328 Ernest B. MURPHY, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. BOSTON HERALD, INC. and David Wedge, Defendants/Appellants., 2006 WL 4055202, *4055202+ (Appellate Brief) (Mass. Dec 04, 2006) Brief of Plaintiff/Appellee Ernest B. Murphy (NO. SJC-09782) 8329 Johanna SCHULMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Thomas REILLY, in his Official Capacity as Attorney General and William F. Galvin, in his Official Capacity as Secretary of the Commonwealth, Defendants-Appellees, Hon Raymond Flynn, Hon Philip Travis, Richard Guerriero, Jossie Owens, Roberto Miranda, Richard Richardson, Bronwyn Loring, C. Joseph Doyle, Kris Mineau, Lura Mineau, Thomas Shields and Madelyn Shields, Defendants-Interveners., 2006 WL 1547842, *1547842+ (Appellate Brief) (Mass. Apr 07, 2006) Brief of the Defendants-Interveners (NO. SJC-09684) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8330 Robert P. WEINBERG, D.O, Appellant, v. Board of Registration in Medicine, Appellee., 2004 WL 3330142, *3330142+ (Appellate Brief) (Mass. May 17, 2004) Brief on Behalf of Appellant (NO. SJC-00491) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8331 REQUEST FOR AN ADVISORY OPINION A-107., 2004 WL 433502, *433502+ (Appellate Brief) (Mass. Jan 12, 2004) Brief of Civil Rights Amici Curiae, United States Representative John Lewis; The American Civil Liberties Union Foundation; The American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts; The Asian-American ... (NO. SJC-09163) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8332 In the Matter of A REQUEST FOR AN ADVISORY OPINION FROM THE PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE., 2004 WL 433508, *433508+ (Appellate Brief) (Mass. Jan 12, 2004) Brief of Interested Party/Amicus Curiae Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders (NO. SJC-09163) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8333 REQUEST FOR AN ADVISORY OPINION A-107., 2004 WL 433512, *433512+ (Appellate Brief) (Mass. Jan 12, 2004) Brief Amici Curiae of Alliance Defense Fund and Center for Marriage Law (NO. SJC-09163) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 8334 REQUEST FOR AMICUS BRIEFS ADDRESSING WHETHER SENATE NO. 2175, ""An Act Relative to Civil Unions,"" Which Grants Same-Sex Couples All the Legal Rights and Obligations of Marriage, Complies with the Equal Protection and Due Process Requirements of the Constitution of the Commonwealth and Articles I, 6, 7, 10, 12 and 16 of the Declaration of Rights., 2004 WL 433513, *433513+ (Appellate Brief) (Mass. Jan 12, 2004) Amicus Brief in Support of Recognizing Gay Marriage and Arguing that Perpetuating a Bifurcated Marital System Violates the Massachusetts State Constitution's Requirement to Provide Equal Protection ... (NO. SJC-09163) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8335 REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION (A-107)., 2003 WL 23317672, *23317672+ (Appellate Brief) (Mass. Dec 21, 2003) Brief of Amici Curiae Human Rights Campaign; National Gay and Lesbian Task Force; Massachusetts Lesbian and Gay Bar Association; Massachusetts Gay and Lesbian Political Caucus; Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual ... (NO. SJC-09163) 8336 STUDENT 6, A Minor, By His Father and Best Friend, et al., PlaintiffsAppellants, v. MASSACHUSETTS BOARD OF EDUCATION, et al., Defendants-Appellees., 2003 WL 23282413, *23282413+ (Appellate Brief) (Mass. Nov 05, 2003) Brief Amicus Curiae of the American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts in Support of Plaintiffs (NO. SJC-09046) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8337 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, Appellee, v. David CLARK, Defendant-Appellant., 2013 WL 5590198, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Mass.App.Ct. Sep 23, 2013) Brief and Record Appendix of David Clark (NO. 2013-P-1281) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8338 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, Appellee, v. Matthew WEST, Defendant-Appellant., 2012 WL 3589833, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Mass.App.Ct. Aug 06, 2012) Brief and Supplemental Record Appendix for the Commonwealth On Appeal from a Judgment of the Boston Municipal Court Roxbury Division (NO. 2011-P-2076) 8339 COMMONWEALTH, Appellant, v. Joseph PERELLA, Defendant-Appellee., 2011 WL 4565856, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Mass.App.Ct. Aug 24, 2011) Commonwealth's Brief and Appendix (NO. 2011-P-0669) 8340 COMMONWEALTH, Appellee, v. Troy ADAMS, Appellant., 2011 WL 494243, *494243+ (Appellate Brief) (Mass.App.Ct. Jan 25, 2011) Defendant's Reply Brief (NO. 2010-P-0305) 8341 Henry L. GUARINO, v. Richard B. KENNEDY and Antoinette Kennedy., 2011 WL 158654, *158654+ (Appellate Brief) (Mass.App.Ct. Jan 03, 2011) Brief and Record Appendix for the Defendant on Appeal from a Judgment of the Suffolk Superior Court (NO. 2010-P-1657) 8342 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. John CAREY, Defendant/Appellant., 2010 WL 2752542, *2752542+ (Appellate Brief) (Mass.App.Ct. Jun 24, 2010) Reply Brief of Defendant/Appellant John Carey © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. (NO. 2009-P-1832) 8343 COMMONWEALTH, Appellee, v. John CAREY, Appellant., 2010 WL 2598078, *2598078+ (Appellate Brief) (Mass.App.Ct. Jun 09, 2010) Brief and Supplemental Record Appendix for the Commonwealth (NO. 2009-P-1832) 8344 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. John CAREY, Defendant/Appellant., 2010 WL 1477694, *1477694+ (Appellate Brief) (Mass.App.Ct. Mar 30, 2010) Brief and Record-Appendix of Defendant/ Appellant John Carey (NO. 2009-P-1832) 8345 Ernest ORTIZ, Plaintiff, pro se, v. COMMISSIONER MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE (In his official capacity), Catherine J. Ortiz, Defendants., 2008 WL 449912, *449912+ (Appellate Brief) (Mass.App.Ct. Jan 03, 2008) Reply Brief for Appellant (NO. 2007-P-1390) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 8346 Ernest ORTIZ, Appellant, pro se, v. COMMISSIONER MASSACHSUETTS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE (In his official capacity), Appellee, Catherine J. Ortiz, Appellee., 2007 WL 4101442, *4101442+ (Appellate Brief) (Mass.App.Ct. Oct 17, 2007) Brief and Record Appendix for the Appellant (NO. 2007-P-1390) 8347 David GANONG, Appellant, v. Joan Elaine GANONG, Appellee., 2005 WL 3335047, *3335047+ (Appellate Brief) (Mass.App.Ct. Oct 18, 2005) Brief and Record Appendix for the Appellant (NO. 05-P-1281) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8348 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, Appellee, v. Kevin O'MALLEY, Defendant-Appellant., 2004 WL 4996548, *4996548+ (Appellate Brief) (Mass.App.Ct. Jan 2004) Brief for the Commonwealth on Appeal from a Judgment of the Roxbury District Court (NO. 03-P-1189) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8349 Frank M. CONAWAY, et al., Appellants, v. Gitanjali DEANE, et al., Appellees., 2006 WL 3905926, *3905926+ (Appellate Brief) (Md. Nov 22, 2006) Reply Brief of Appellants (NO. 44) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8350 FRANK CONAWAY, et al., Appellants, v. GINTANJALI DEANE & LISA POLYAK, et al., Appellees., 2006 WL 3381873, *3381873+ (Appellate Brief) (Md. Oct 27, 2006) Brief Amici Curiae of Equality Maryland, Inc.; Families with Pride; Gay Fathers Coalition; Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Transgender Community Center of Baltimore and Central Maryland; Maryland Lesbian ... (NO. 44) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8351 Frank M. CONAWAY, et al., Defendants-Appellants., v. Gitanjali DEANE & Lisa Polyak, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees., 2006 WL 3381871, *3381871+ (Appellate Brief) (Md. Oct 23, 2006) Petition and Brief Amicus Curiae Naacp Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. (NO. 44) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8352 FRANK CONAWAY, et al., Petitioners, v. GITANJALI DEANE & LISA POLYAK, et al., Respondents., 2006 WL 3381872, *3381872 (Appellate Brief) (Md. Oct 23, 2006) Brief of Amici Curiae Organization of American Historians; Bar Association of Baltimore City; Maryland Latino Coalition for Justice; Maryland Now; National Lawyer's Guild- Maryland; Public © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Justice ... (NO. 44) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8353 FRANK CONAWAY, et al., Appellants, v. Gintanjali DEANE & Lisa Polyak, et al., Appellees., 2006 WL 3096520, *3096520+ (Appellate Brief) (Md. Oct 19, 2006) Brief Amici Curiae of Equality Maryland, Inc.; Families with Pride; Gay Fathers Coalition; Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Transgender Community Center of Baltimore and Central Maryland; Maryland Lesbian ... (NO. 44) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8354 Frank M. CONAWAY, et al., Appellants, v. Gitanjali DEANE & Lisa Polyak, et al., Appellees., 2006 WL 3096522, *3096522+ (Appellate Brief) (Md. Oct 19, 2006) Brief of Amici Curiae Maryland Law Professors (NO. 44) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8355 Frank CONAWAY, in his official capacity as Baltimore City Circuit Court Clerk; Rosalyn Pugh, in her official capacity as Prince George's County Circuit Court Clerk; Evelyn Arnold, in her official capacity as St. Mary's County Circuit Court Clerk; and Michael Baker, in his official capacity as Dorchester County Circuit Court Clerk, Defendants-Appellants, v. Gitanjali DEANE & Lisa Polyak; Alvin Williams & Nigel Simon; Takia Foskey & Joanne Rabb; Jodi Kelber-Kaye &, 2006 WL 3096526, *3096526+ (Appellate Brief) (Md. Oct 19, 2006) Brief Addressing Proper Application of Maryland's Rational Review Standards Submitted by Amici Curiae the Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law, the Maryland Disability Law Center, Maryland Adapt, the ... (NO. 44) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8356 Frank CONAWAY, et. al., Appellants, v. Gitanjali DEANE, et. al., Appellees., 2006 WL 2725659, *2725659+ (Appellate Brief) (Md. Sep 08, 2006) Brief of Amici Curiae Association of Maryland Families and Liberty Counsel and Support of Appellants (NO. 44) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8357 Frank CONAWAY, et al., Defendants-Appellants, v. Gitanjali DEANE, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees., 2006 WL 2725661, *2725661+ (Appellate Brief) (Md. Sep 08, 2006) Brief of Amicus Curiae of the National Legal. Foundation, in support of the Appellants urging reversal (NO. 44) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8358 Frank M. CONAWAY, et al., Appellants, v. Gitanjali DEANE, et al., Appellees., 2006 WL 2679782, *2679782+ (Appellate Brief) (Md. Sep 05, 2006) Brief of Appellants (NO. 44) " HN: 3,5 (S.Ct.) 8359 Frank M. CONAWAY, et al., Appellants, v. Gitanjali DEANE, et al., Appellees., 2006 WL 6667669, *6667669+ (Appellate Brief) (Md. Sep 05, 2006) Brief of Appellants (NO. 44) " HN: 3,5 (S.Ct.) 8360 Todd Tyrone TAYLOR, Appellant, v. STATE OF MARYLAND, Appellee., 2012 WL 8676060, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Md.App. Sep 19, 2012) Brief and Appendix of Appellee and Response to Court's Order Dated July 19, 2012 (NO. 229) 8361 Jessica PORT, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Virginia Anne COWAN, Appellee/ Cross-Appellant., 2011 WL 7306076, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Md.App. Oct 14, © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 2011) Brief of Appellee/Cross-Appellant (NO. 02135) 8362 Jessica PORT, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. Virginia Anne COWAN, Appellee/ Cross-Appellant., 2011 WL 7658789, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Md.App. Sep 15, 2011) Brief of Appellant and Record Extract (NO. 02135) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8363 James A. LAMBERT, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE OF MARYLAND, Appellee., 2011 WL 5289708, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Md.App. Jun 24, 2011) Brief of Appellant (NO. 2542) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8364 STATE RETIREMENT AND PENSION SYSTEM, Appellant, v. Oebora PHILLIPS, Appellee., 2011 WL 2549536, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Md.App. Mar 01, 2011) Brief of Appellee Debora Phillips (NO. 01515) 8365 George MATHEWS a/k/a George Matthews, Appellant, v. STATE OF MARYLAND, Appellee., 2010 WL 5096447, *5096447+ (Appellate Brief) (Md.App. Aug 18, 2010) Brief of Appellee (NO. 649) 8366 Eliana MANN, et al., Appellants, v. MERIT SYSTEM PROTECTION BOARD OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND., 2010 WL 4489797, *4489797 (Appellate Brief) (Md.App. Feb 16, 2010) Reply Brief of Appellant (NO. 00042) 8367 Frank CONAWAY, in his official capacity as Baltimore City Circuit Court Clerk; Rosalyn Pugh, in her official capacity as Prince George's County Circuit Court Clerk; Evelyn Arnold, in her official capacity as St. Mary's County Circuit Court Clerk; Dennis Weaver, in his official capacity as Washington County Circuit Court Clerk; Michael Baker, in his official capacity as Dorchester County Circuit Court Clerk, Defendants-Appellants, v. Gitanjali DEANE and Lisa, 2006 WL 5263472, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Md.App. Jun 23, 2006) Brief Amicus Curiae of the Maryland Catholic Conference In Support of Defendants-Appellants (NO. 2499) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8368 Gitanjali DEANE & Lisa Polyak; Alvin Williams & Nigel Simon; Takia Foskey & Joanne Rabb; Jodi Kelber-Kaye & Stacy Kargman-Kaye; Donna Myers & Maria Barquero; John Lestitian; Charles Blackburn & Glen Dehn; Steven Palmer & Ryan Killough; Patrick Wojahn & David Kolesar; and Mikkole Mozelle & Phelicia Kebreau, Appellees, v. FRANK CONAWAY, in his official capacity as Baltimore City Circuit Court Clerk; Rosalyn Pugh, in her official capacity as Prince George's County, 2006 WL 2151056, *2151056+ (Appellate Brief) (Md.App. Jun 22, 2006) Brief of the American Center for Law & Justice, Northeast, Inc. as Amicus Curiae in Support of Defendant-Appellant (NO. 2499) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8369 Gitanjali DEANE & Lisa Polyak; Alvin Williams & Nigel Simon; Takia Foskey & Joanne Rabb; Jodi Kelber-kaye & Stacy Kargman-kaye; Donna Myers & Maria Barquero; John Lestitian; Charles Blackburn & Glen Dehn; Steven Palmer & Ryan Killough; Patrick Wojahn & David Kolesar; and Mikkole Mozelle & Phelicia Kebreau, Appellees, v. Frank CONAWAY, in his official capacity as Baltimore City Circuit Court Clerk; Rosalyn Pugh, in her official capacity as Prince George' County, 2006 WL 5263470, *5263470+ (Appellate Brief) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. (Md.App. Jun 22, 2006) Brief of the American Center for Law & Justice, Northeast, INC. As Amicus Curiae In Support of Defendant-Appellant (NO. 2499) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8370 Frank CONAWAY, et al., Defendants-Appellants, v. Gitanjali DEANE, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees., 2005 WL 6018222, *6018222 (Appellate Brief) (Md.App. Jun 30, 2005) Petition and Brief Amicus Curiae of the Knights of Columbus In Support of Defendants-Appellants (NO. 02499) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8371 KARL ULF WILHELM HEDBERG, Appellant, v. ANNICA MADELAINE DETTHOW, Appellee., 2005 WL 5329399, *5329399+ (Appellate Brief) (Md.App. Apr 04, 2005) Appellant's Reply Brief (NO. 1789) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8372 Karl ulf Wilhelm HEDBERG, Appellant, v. Annica Madelaine DETTHOW, Appellee., 2005 WL 5978686, *5978686+ (Appellate Brief) (Md.App. Apr 04, 2005) Appellant's Reply Brief (NO. 1789) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8373 KARL ULF WILHELM HEDBERG, Appellant, v. ANNICA MADELAINE DETTHOW, Appellee., 2005 WL 5329400, *5329400+ (Appellate Brief) (Md.App. Mar 18, 2005) Appellee's Opposition Brief (NO. 1789) " 8374 Karl Ulf Wilhelm HEDBERG, Appellant, v. Annica Madelaine DETTHOW, Appellee., 2005 WL 483027, *483027+ (Appellate Brief) (Md.App. Feb 10, 2005) Brief and Record Extract (NO. 1789) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8375 KARL ULF WILHELM HEDBERG, Appellant, v. ANNICA MADELAINE DETTHOW, Appellee., 2005 WL 5329398, *5329398+ (Appellate Brief) (Md.App. Feb 01, 2005) Brief and Record Extract (NO. 1789) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8376 Linda D. BRAGER, Appellant, v. Paul E. BRAGER, Appellee., 2003 WL 23534384, *23534384+ (Appellate Brief) (Md.App. Jul 25, 2003) Reply Brief of Appellant (NO. 1715) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 8377 In re: A.M.B., Petitioner/Appellant., 2010 WL 3972077, *3972077+ (Appellate Brief) (Me. Feb 19, 2010) Brief of Appellant A.M.B. Appendix Included (NO. CUM-09-634) 8378 Kimberly IDALSKI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. David Allen SCHWEDT, Defendant, State Farm Mutual Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellee., 2010 WL 4084013, *4084013+ (Appellate Brief) (Mich. Jul 01, 2010) DefendantAppellee's Supplemental Brief (NO. 139960) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 8379 NATIONAL PRIDE AT WORK, INC., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Jennifer GRANHOLM, in her official capacity as Governor of the State of Michigan, Defendant-Appellant, City of Kalamazoo, a municipal corporation, DefendantAppellee, Michael A. Cox, in his official capacity, as Attorney General for the State of Michigan, Intervening Defendant-Appellee., 2007 WL 3168655, *3168655+ (Appellate Brief) (Mich. Aug 15, 2007) Brief of Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc., Human Rights Campaign, Human Rights Campaign Foundation, Triangle Foundation, Michigan Equality, the Women Lawyers Association of Michigan, and ... (NO. 133429) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 8380 Teri ROHDE, Brendon Quilter, Mary Quilter, Walter Mackey, Barbara Mackey, Gary Gibson, Ellen Gibson, Ted Jungkuntz, Loise Jungkuntz, David Sponseller, Mary Sponseller, Mike Gladieux, Martha Gladieux, Helen Rysse, and Terry Trombley, John and Therese Williams, Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. ANN ARBOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS a/k/a The Public Schools of the City of Ann Arbor, Board of Education, Ann Arbor Public Schools, Karen Cross, in her official capacity as President of the, 2005 WL 4864421, *4864421 (Appellate Brief) (Mich. Jul 11, 2005) Plaintiffs/Appellants' Reply to Appellee, Ann Arbor Public Schools' response in Opposition to the Application for Leave to Appeal to the Michigan Supreme Court Pursuant to ¢YMCR ... (NO. 128768) " 8381 Teri ROHDE, Brendon Quilter, Mary Quilter, Walter Mackey, Barbara Mackey, Gary Gibson, Ellen Gibson, Ted Jungkuntz, Loise Jungkuntz, David Sponseller, Mary Sponseller, Mike Gladieux, Martha Gladieux, Helen Rysse, and Terry Trombley, John and Therese Williams, Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. ANN ARBOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS a/k/a The Public Schools of the City of Ann Arbor, Board of Education, Ann Arbor Public Schools, Karen Cross, in her official capacity as President of the, 2005 WL 4864422, *4864422 (Appellate Brief) (Mich. Jul 11, 2005) Plaintiffs/Appellants' Reply to Appellee, Ann Arbor Education Association's Response in Opposition to the Application for Leave to Appeal to the Michigan Supreme Court Pursuant to ¢YMCR ... (NO. 128768) 8382 Teri ROHDE, Brendon Quilter, Mary Quilter, Walter Mackey, Barbara Mackey, Gary Gibson, Ellen Gibson, Ted Jungkuntz, Loise Jungkuntz, David Sponseller, Mary Sponseller, Mike Gladieux, Martha Gladieux, Helen Rysse, and Terry Trombley, John and Therese Williams, Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. ANN ARBOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS a/k/a The Public Schools of the City of Ann Arbor, Board of Education, Ann Arbor Public Schools, Karen Cross, in her official capacity as President of the, 2005 WL 6342636, *6342636 (Appellate Brief) (Mich.App. Jul 11, 2005) Plaintiffs/Appellants' Reply to Appellee, Ann Arbor Education Association's Response in Opposition to the Application for Leave to Appeal to the Michigan Supreme Court Pursuant to MCR 7.302(B)(1)-(3) (NO. 253565) 8383 Teri ROHDE, Brendon Quilter, Mary Quilter, Walter Mackey, Barbara Mackey, Gary Gibson, Ellen Gibson, Ted Jungkuntz, Loise Jungkuntz, David Sponseller, Mary Sponseller, Mike Gladieux, Martha Gladieux, Helen Rysse, and Terry Trombley, John and Therese Williams, Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. ANN ARBOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS a/k/a The Public Schools of the City of Ann Arbor, Board of Education, Ann Arbor Public Schools, Karen Cross, in her official capacity as President of the, 2005 WL 6342641, *6342641+ (Appellate Brief) (Mich.App. Jan 24, 2005) Appellants' Answer to Appellees' Motions to Strike (NO. 253565) 8384 STATE OF MINNESOTA, Appellant, v. Christopher Thomas WENTHE, Respondent/Cross-Appellant., 2013 WL 6169449, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Minn. Mar 25, 2013) Principal and Response Brief and Addendum of Respondent/ Cross-Appellant Fr. Christopher Thomas Wenthe (NO. A12-0263) HN: 5 © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. (S.Ct.) 8385 STATE OF MINNESOTA, Appellant, v. Daniel James RICK, Respondent., 2013 WL 5590600, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Minn. Feb 04, 2013) Brief of Amici Curiae, American Civil Liberties Union, American Civil Liberties Union of Minnesota, Center for Hiv Law and Policy, Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund and Outfront Minnesota (NO. A12-0058) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8386 STATE OF MINNESOTA, Appellant, v. Daniel James RICK, Respondent., 2013 WL 5590596, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Minn. Jan 28, 2013) Respondent's Brief & Appendix (NO. A12-0058) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8387 STATE OF MINNESOTA, Appellant, v. Daniel James RICK, Respondent., 2012 WL 9320927, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Minn. Dec 27, 2012) Appellant's Brief and Appendix (NO. A12-0058) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8388 Robert MCCAUGHTRY, et al., Appellant, v. CITY OF RED WING, Respondent., 2010 WL 9517489, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Minn. Mar 04, 2010) Brief of Amicus Curiae, American Civil Liberties Union of Minnesota (NO. A10-0332) 8389 STATE OF MINNESOTA, Respondent, v. Robert Daniel GASSIER, Jr., Appellant., 2009 WL 6850323, *6850323+ (Appellate Brief) (Minn. Dec 01, 2009) Brief of Amicus Curiae The Innocence Project of Minnesota (NO. A09-1534) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8390 State of Minnesota, Appellant, v. Peter John JONES, Respondent., 2006 WL 4457647, *4457647+ (Appellate Brief) (Minn. Jan 23, 2006) Respondent's Brief and Appendix (NO. A05-365) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8391 STATE OF MINNESOTA, Respondent, v. Christopher Thomas WENTHE, Appellant., 2012 WL 6965288, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Minn.App. Aug 15, 2012) Appellant's Reply Brief (NO. A12-0263) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8392 STATE OF MINNESOTA, Respondent, v. Christopher Thomas WENTHE, Appellant., 2012 WL 6965286, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Minn.App. Jun 13, 2012) Appellant's Brief and Addendum (NO. A12-0263) 8393 Amy and Sarah MONSON, Appellants, v. Rochester Athletic CLUB and John D. Remick, Appellees., 2008 WL 5551420, *5551420+ (Appellate Brief) (Minn.App. Mar 17, 2008) Brief of Appellants (NO. A07-2433) 8394 George Marita OBARA, Petitioner, v. MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, Respondent., 2008 WL 5551424, *5551424+ (Appellate Brief) (Minn.App. Feb 19, 2008) Petitioner's Brief and Appendix (NO. A08-85) 8395 STATE OF MINNESOTA, Respondent, v. Larry Edwin CRAIG, Appellant., 2008 WL 206295, *206295+ (Appellate Brief) (Minn.App. Jan 15, 2008) Brief of Amici Curiae American civil Liberities Union and American civil Liberites Union of Minnesota (NO. A07-1949) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8396 Rennie T. GIBBS, Appellant, v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee., 2010 WL 8231376, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Miss. Dec 12, 2010) Brief Submitted On © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Behalf of Jackson Area National Organization for Women, Law Students for Reproductive Justice, Legal Momentum, the National Women's Law Center, and Sistersong Women of Color ... (NO. 2010-M-819-SCT) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8397 Jolee A. BURRUS, Appellant, v. Ronald A. BURRUS, Appellee., 2006 WL 3938155, *3938155+ (Appellate Brief) (Miss. Mar 29, 2006) Appellant's Reply Brief (NO. 05-CA-00356) 8398 STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent, v. Gene Morris JEFFREY, Appellant., 2013 WL 1906718, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Mo. Apr 18, 2013) Appellant's Reply Brief (NO. SC93172) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8399 STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent, v. Gene Morris JEFFREY, Appellant., 2013 WL 1762083, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Mo. Apr 08, 2013) Respondent's Brief (NO. SC93172) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8400 Kelly D. GLOSSIP, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND HIGHWAY PATROL EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Defendant-Respondent., 2013 WL 554115, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Mo. Jan 28, 2013) Reply Brief of Appellant (NO. SC92583) 8401 Kelly D. GLOSSIP, Appellant, v. MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND HIGHWAY PATROL EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Respondent., 2013 WL 364570, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Mo. Jan 11, 2013) Verdict (NO. SC92583) 8402 Kelly D. GLOSSIP, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND HIGHWAY PATROL EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Defendant-Respondent., 2012 WL 6825480, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Mo. Nov 05, 2012) Brief of Appellant (NO. SC92583) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8403 Kelly D. GLOSSIP, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND HIGHWAY PATROL EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Respondent., 2012 WL 6825482, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Mo. Nov 05, 2012) Brief of Missouri Law Professors as Amici Curiae in Support of Appellant (NO. SC92583) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8404 Kelly D. GLOSSIP, Appellant, v. MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND HIGHWAY PATROL EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Respondent., 2012 WL 10159357, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Mo. Nov 05, 2012) Brief of Mayor Francis Slay, Congressman Lacy Clay, and Certain Current and Former Members of the Missouri General Assembly as Amicus Curiae in Support of Appellant Kelly D. Glossip (NO. SC92583) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8405 Joseph WILLIAMS, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Col. Jerry LEE and Col. James Keathley, Defendants/Respondents., 2010 WL 4359392, *4359392+ (Appellate Brief) (Mo. Sep 09, 2010) Appellant's Brief (NO. 90988) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8406 James KLOTZ and Mary Klotz, Appellants/Cross-Respondents, v. Michael © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. SHAPIRO, MD and Metro Heart Group of St. Louis, Inc, Respondents/ Cross-Appellants., 2009 WL 5250940, *5250940+ (Appellate Brief) (Mo. Aug 01, 2009) Brief of Amicus Curiae Missouri Coalition for Quality Care in Support of Appellants (NO. 90107) HN: 2,5 (S.Ct.) 8407 DAVIDSON INSURANCE AGENCY, LTD., et al, Plaintiffs, Justin Rutledge and Sharon Kay Johnson, Appellants, v. WEST PLAINS R-7 SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al, Respondents., 2006 WL 2029728, *2029728 (Appellate Brief) (Mo. Apr 27, 2006) Appellants' Brief (NO. SC87281) 8408 In the Interest of: K.A.W. and K.A.W., 2004 WL 3094180, *3094180+ (Appellate Brief) (Mo. 2004) Appellant's Brief (NO. SC085683) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8409 State Ex Rel., W. Stephen Geeding, County Prosecutor In and for McDonald County, Missouri, Respondent - Petitioner below, v. Robert W. CRUMP, Jr., a/ k/a Rob Crump, d/b/a Midnight Video South, Appellant - Respondent below, Pine Designs, Inc.,, 2003 WL 23976806, *23976806+ (Appellate Brief) (Mo. Nov 2003) Appellant's Brief (NO. SC85249) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8410 Kelly D. GLOSSIP, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION and Highway Patrol Employees' Retirement System, Defendant-Respondent., 2013 WL 3973389, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Mo.App. E.D. Jul 18, 2013) Brief of Promo as Amicus Curiae On Behalf of Appellant Kelly D. Glossip (NO. SC92583) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8411 Gary F. TOELKE, Sheriff, et al., Defendants/Appellants, v. John DOE, Plantiff/ Respondent., 2012 WL 3662221, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Mo.App. E.D. Aug 10, 2012) Brief of Respondent John Doe (NO. SC92380) 8412 William MARGOLIES, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Col. Tim FITCH, et al, Defendant/ Respondent., 2011 WL 1161416, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Mo.App. E.D. Mar 04, 2011) Appellant's Brief (NO. ED95316) 8413 Joseph WILLIAMS, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Col. Jerry LEE and Col. James Keathley, Defendants/Respondents., 2010 WL 530485, *530485+ (Appellate Brief) (Mo.App. E.D. Jan 19, 2010) Appellant's Brief (NO. ED93827) 8414 Jane DOE, Respondent, v. James F. KEATHLEY, et al., Appellant., 2008 WL 5558373, *5558373+ (Appellate Brief) (Mo.App. E.D. Dec 23, 2008) Respondent's Brief (NO. ED91817) 8415 Rachel DICKENS, Appellant, v. Reece Lee GOULD, by his Next Friend, David Ray Gould, and David Ray Gould Individually, Respondents., 2003 WL 24237590, *24237590+ (Appellate Brief) (Mo.App. E.D. Dec 18, 2003) Brief of Appellant, Rachel Dickens (NO. ED83187) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8416 Rachel DICKENS, Appellant, v. Reece Lee GOULD, by his Next Friend, David Ray Gould, and David Ray Gould Individually, Respondents., 2003 WL 24237588, *24237588+ (Appellate Brief) (Mo.App. E.D. Dec 02, 2003) Brief of Appellant, Rachel Dickens (NO. ED83187) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8417 STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Robert Thomas YARLOTT, Defendant and Appellant., 2012 WL 6572008, *1 (Appellate Brief) (Mont. Dec © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 07, 2012) Brief of Appellee (NO. DA12-0014) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 8418 Jan DONALDSON and Mary Anne Guggenheim, Mary Leslie and Stacey Haugland, Gary Stallings and Rick Wagner, Kellie Gibson and Denise Boettcher, John Michael Long and Richard Parker, and Nancy Owens and MJ Williams, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. STATE OF MONTANA, Defendant and Appellee., 2011 WL 5893867, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Mont. Nov 21, 2011) Brief of Amici Curiae Montana Religious Leaders (NO. DA11-0451) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8419 Jan DONALDSON and Mary Anne Guggenheim, Mary Leslie and Stacey Haugland, Gary Stallings and Rick Wagner, Kellie Gibson and Denise Boettcher, John Michael Long and Richard Parker, and Nancy Owens and MJ Williams, Plaintiffs and, Appellants, v. STATE OF MONTANA, Defendant and Appellee., 2011 WL 5893850, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Mont. Nov 14, 2011) Appellants' Opening Brief (NO. DA11-0451) 8420 Robert BAXTER, Steven Stoelb, Stephen Speckart, M.D., C. Paul Loehnen, M.D., Lar Autio, M.D., George Risi, Jr., M.D., and Compassion & Choices, Plaintiffs and Appellees, v. STATE OF MONTANA and Steve Bullock, Defendants and Appellants., 2009 WL 2033378, *2033378+ (Appellate Brief) (Mont. Jul 01, 2009) Brief of the Montana Human Rights Network, the Billings Association of Humanists, and the Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc. As Amici Curiae Supporting Appellees (NO. DA09-0051) " 8421 State of Montana, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Renee Nichole TEETER, Defendant and Appellant., 2008 WL 5342824, *5342824+ (Appellate Brief) (Mont. 2008) Brief of Appellant (NO. DA08-401) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8422 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, v. Samuel Kris HUNT., 2013 WL 2389990, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (N.C. May 08, 2013) Defendant-Appellee's New Brief (NO. 195PA11-2) 8423 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, v. Samuel Kris HUNT., 2012 WL 3526868, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (N.C. Aug 02, 2012) State's Petition for Discretionary Review (NO. 195PA112-01) 8424 Carol Monsour PURYEAR, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. Betty Carlton PURYEAR (formerly Devin), Defendant/Appellant., 2014 WL 197147, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (N.C.App. Jan 08, 2014) Plaintiff-Appellee's Brief (NO. COA13-1014) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8425 Cynthia S. SHACKELFORD, Plaintiff, v. Anne LUNDQUIST, Defendant., 2013 WL 6932644, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (N.C.App. Dec 31, 2013) PlaintiffAppellee's Brief (NO. COA13-960) 8426 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, v. Gregory PARKS., 2013 WL 6845495, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (N.C.App. Dec 19, 2013) Defendant-Appellant's Brief (NO. 13COA1283) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8427 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, v. Robert Leroy WILLIAMS., 2013 WL 6710855, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (N.C.App. Dec 13, 2013) Brief of DefendantAppellant (NO. COA13-1280) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 8428 Carol Monsour PURYEAR, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Betty Carlton PURYEAR (Formerly Devin), Defendant-Appellant., 2013 WL 6076921, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (N.C.App. Nov 08, 2013) Defendant-Appellant's Brief (NO. COA13-1014) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8429 Cynthia S. SHACKELFORD, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anne LUNDQUIST, Defendant-Appellant., 2013 WL 5974205, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (N.C.App. Oct 28, 2013) Defendant-Appellant's Brief (NO. COA13-960) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8430 Veronica FILIPOWSKI, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Melissa OLIVER (LIEU), Defendant-Appellant., 2011 WL 6286502, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (N.C.App. Nov 21, 2011) Plaintiff-Appellee's Brief (NO. COA11-996) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8431 Veronica FILIPOWSKI, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Melissa OLIVER (Lieu), Defendant-Appellant., 2011 WL 8251936, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (N.C.App. Nov 21, 2011) Plaintiff-Appellee's Brief (NO. COA11-0996) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8432 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, v. Samuel Kris HUNT., 2011 WL 5116953, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (N.C.App. Oct 21, 2011) Defendant-Appellee's New Brief (NO. 195PA11) 8433 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Larry David DAVIS, II., 2011 WL 5075558, *1 (Appellate Brief) (N.C.App. Oct 10, 2011) Defendant-Appellant's Reply Brief (Rule 28(h), N.C.R. App. PR. (NO. COA11-591) 8434 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, v. Samuel Kris HUNT., 2011 WL 4566484, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (N.C.App. Sep 26, 2011) New Brief for the State (Appellant) Filed: 26 September 2011 (NO. 195PA11) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8435 Joseph CARSANARO, Plaintiff, v. John Trevor COLVIN, Defendant., 2011 WL 1294373, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (N.C.App. Mar 25, 2011) Plaintiff's Appellee's Brief (NO. COA11-43) " 8436 In re RELEASE OF THE SILK PLANT FOREST CITIZEN REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT AND APPENDICES, Petitioner, v. Michael N. BARKER, Richard E. Best, Robert G. Cozart, John Grismer, Bryan Macy, Michael C. Rowe, Michael Sharpe, Michael Poe, Randy Patterson, Et. Al., Respondents/Appellants., 2011 WL 1035912, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (N.C.App. Mar 10, 2011) Brief of Respondents/Appellants (NO. COA10-1516) 8437 Joseph CARSANARO, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. John Trevor COLVIN, Defendant/ Appellant., 2011 WL 804878, *804878+ (Appellate Brief) (N.C.App. Feb 25, 2011) Defendant-Appellant's Brief on Cross-Appeal (NO. COA11-43) 8438 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, v. Samuel Kris HUNT., 2010 WL 3427522, *3427522+ (Appellate Brief) (N.C.App. Aug 16, 2010) Brief for the State (NO. COA10-666) 8439 Kelly C. PERKINS, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. Beth ANDERSON, Defendant/ Appellant Jeffrey L. Miller, Attorney/Appellant., 2010 WL 719707, *719707+ (Appellate Brief) (N.C.App. Feb 17, 2010) Brief of Defendant-Appellant Beth Anderson (NO. COA09-1630) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 8440 State of North Carolina, v. Kelly MANGINO., 2009 WL 1257498, *1257498+ (Appellate Brief) (N.C.App. Apr 23, 2009) Defendant-Appellee's Brief (NO. COA08-1555) 8441 Robert N. MOORES, Petitioner-Appellee, v. GREENSBORO MINIMUM HOUSING STANDARDS COMMISSION and City of Greensboro, RespondentsAppellants., 2009 WL 854398, *854398+ (Appellate Brief) (N.C.App. Mar 13, 2009) Petitioner-Appellee's Brief (NO. COA08-1557) 8442 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, v. Wilbert Donnell QUICK., 2008 WL 4574306, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (N.C.App. Apr 14, 2008) Defendant Appellant's Brief (NO. COA08-143) 8443 REBEKAH CHANTAY REVELS, Plaintiff, v. MISS NORTH CAROLINA PAGEANT ORGANIZATION, INC. Defendant; Rebekah Chantay Revels, Plaintiff, v. Miss America Organization, Miss North Carolina Pageant Organization, Inc., Alan Clouse, Billy Duncan, Charlene Hay, Doug Huff, Tom Roberts, David Clegg, Beverly Adams, and Candace Russell, Defendants., 2005 WL 2171085, *2171085+ (Appellate Brief) (N.C.App. Aug 08, 2005) Brief of Plaintiff Appellant (NO. COA05-618) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8444 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, v. Wilbert Donnell QUICK., 2004 WL 5633977, *5633977+ (Appellate Brief) (N.C.App. Jul 19, 2004) Brief for the State (NO. COA04-365) 8445 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, v. Benson Maurice MOORE., 2004 WL 5633978, *5633978+ (Appellate Brief) (N.C.App. Jul 19, 2004) DefendantAppellant's Reply Brief (NO. COA03-1421) 8446 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, v. TERESA DARLENE POPE., 2004 WL 5633961, *5633961+ (Appellate Brief) (N.C.App. Jun 23, 2004) Brief for the State (NO. COA04-251) 8447 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, v. Teresa Darlene POPE, Defendant., 2004 WL 1047246, *1047246+ (Appellate Brief) (N.C.App. Apr 21, 2004) DefendantAppellant's Brief (NO. COA04-251) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8448 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, v. Benson Maurice MOORE., 2004 WL 5633777, *5633777+ (Appellate Brief) (N.C.App. Jan 23, 2004) Brief for the State (NO. COA03-1421) 8449 MKB MANAGEMENT CORP, d/b/a Red River Women's Clinic, Kathryn L. Eggleston, M.D., Plaintiffs and Appellees, v. Birch BURDICK, in his official capacity as State Attorney for Cass County, Terry Dwelle, M.D., in his official capacity as the chief administrator of the North Dakota Dep, Defendants, Terry DWELLE, M.D., in his official capacity as the chief administrator of the North Dakota Department of Health, Appellant., 2013 WL 6332675, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (N.D. Nov 15, 2013) Brief of Plaintiffs and Appellees MKB Management Corp, d/b/a red river women's clinic and kathryn 1. eggleston, M.D. (NO. 20130259) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8450 MKB MANAGEMENT CORP, d/b/a/ Red River Women's Clinic, Tammi Kromenaker, and Kathryn L. Eggleston, M.D., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Birch © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. BURDICK, in his official capacity as State Attorney for Cass County, and Terry Dwelle, M.D., in his official capacity as the chief administrator of the North Dakota Department of Health, Defendants-Appellants., 2013 WL 6710866, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (N.D. Nov 12, 2013) Brief of Amicus Curiae Steven R. Morrison, Professor of Constitutional Law, North Dakota Women's Network, and North Dakota Council On Abused Women's Services in Support of Appellees MKB Management ... (NO. 20130259) 8451 In the Matter of Christopher James MIDGETT, The State of North Dakota, Petitioner and Appellee, v. Christopher James MIDGETT, Respondent and Appellant., 2009 WL 1023551, *1023551+ (Appellate Brief) (N.D. Feb 13, 2009) Brief for Appellee (NO. 20080255) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8452 Werner RUMMER, formerly known as Werner Kunkel, Petitioner/Appellant, v. State of North Dakota, Respondent/Appellee., 2005 WL 4733514, *4733514+ (Appellate Brief) (N.D. Dec 28, 2005) Brief of Appellant (NO. 20050341) 8453 Milliard Shawn DAMRON, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Valerie DAMRON, Defendant and Appellant., 2003 WL 23695772, *23695772+ (Appellate Brief) (N.D. Aug 22, 2003) Corrected Reply Brief of Appellant (NO. 20030135) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8454 Bonnie NICHOLS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margie NICHOLS, DefendantAppellee., 2013 WL 6845537, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Neb. Dec 16, 2013) Appellant's Opening Brief (NO. S13-841) " HN: 3,5 (S.Ct.) 8455 STATE OF NEBRASKA, Appellee, v. Todd D. SENTERS, Appellant., 2004 WL 5478831, *5478831+ (Appellate Brief) (Neb. Aug 13, 2004) Brief of Appellee (NO. S-03-0945) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8456 STATE OF NEBRASKA, Appellee, v. Todd A. RUNG, Appellant., 2009 WL 926348, *926348+ (Appellate Brief) (Neb.App. Mar 06, 2009) Brief of Appellee (NO. A-08-878) 8457 STATE OF NEBRASKA, Appellee, v. Todd A. RUNG, Appellant., 2009 WL 246392, *246392+ (Appellate Brief) (Neb.App. Jan 05, 2009) Brief of Appellant (NO. A-08-878) 8458 STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, v. Janet MACELMAN., 2006 WL 6640557, *6640557+ (Appellate Brief) (N.H. Apr 12, 2006) Brief for the State of New Hampshire (NO. 2005-0375) 8459 STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, v. Steven KIDDER., 2003 WL 25662460, *25662460+ (Appellate Brief) (N.H. 2003) Brief for the Defendant (NO. 2003-0362) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8460 Mark LEWIS and Dennis Winslow; Saundra Heath and Clarita Alicia Toby; Craig Hutchison and Chris Lodewyks; Maureen Kilian and Cindy Meneghin; Sarah and Suyin Lael; Marilyn Maneely and Diane Marini; and Karen and Marcye Nicholson-McFadden, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Gwendolyn L. HARRIS, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the New Jersey Department of Human Services; Clifton R. Lacy, in his official capacity as the Commissioner of the New, 2006 WL 6850904, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (N.J. Oct 21, 2006) Brief © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Amicus Curiae and Appendix on Behalf of the National Black Justice Coalition (NO. 58389) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8461 Mark LEWIS, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Gwendolyn L. HARRIS, et al., Defendants-Respondents., 2006 WL 6850900, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (N.J. Oct 20, 2006) Brief of Amici Curiae American Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey, American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund, Hispanic Bar Association of New ... (NO. 58389) " HN: 3,5 (S.Ct.) 8462 Mark LEWIS and Dennis Winslow; Saundra Heath and Clarita Alicia Toby; Craig Hutchison and Chris Lodewyks; Maureen Kilian and Cindy Meneghin; Sarah and Suyin Lael; Marilyn Maneely and Diane Marini; and Karen and Marcye Nicholoson-McFadden, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Gwendolyn L. HARRIS, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the New Jersey Department of Human Services; Clifton R. Lacy, in his official capacity as the commissioner of the New, 2006 WL 6850896, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (N.J. Oct 06, 2006) Brief of Legal Momentum as Amicus Curiae in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellants (NO. 58389) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8463 Mark LEWIS, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Gwendolyn L. HARRIS, et al., Defendants-Appellees., 2006 WL 6850898, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (N.J. Jan 30, 2006) Reply Brief of Plaintiffs-Appellants (NO. 58389) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8464 Mark LEWIS and Denis Winslow; Saundra Heath and Clarita Alicia Toby;* Craig Hutchison and Chris Lodewyks; Maureen Kilian and Cindy Meneghin; Sarah and Suyin Lael; Marilyn Mane*ely and Diane Marini; and Karen and Marcye Nicholson-McFadden, Plaintiffs, v. Gwendolyn L. HARRIS, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the New Jersey Department of Human Services; Clifton R. Lacy, in his official capacity as the Commissioner of the New Jersey Department of, 2006 WL 6850901, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (N.J. Jan 09, 2006) Brief and Appendix of Amici Curiae, Clergy of New Jersey in Support of Defendants-Respondents (NO. 58389) 8465 Mark LEWIS, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Gwendolyn L. HARRIS, et al., Defendants-Respondents., 2006 WL 6850899, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (N.J. Jan 06, 2006) Brief and Appendix of Defendants-Respondents (NO. 389, 58) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8466 Mark LEWIS, and Dennis Winslow; Saundra Heath and Clarita Alicia Toby; Craig Hutchinson and Chris Lodewyks; Maureen Kilian and Cindy Meneghin; Sarah and Suyin Lael; Marilyn Maneely and Diane Marini; and Karen and Marcye Nicholson-McFadden, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Gwendolyn L. HARRIS, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the New Jersey Department of Human Services; Clifton R. Lacy, in his official capacity as the Commissioner of the New, 2005 WL 6735461, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (N.J. Dec 21, 2005) Brief of Monmouth Plastics, Corp., and John M. Bonforte Sr. As Amici Curiae in Support of Defendants-Respondents (NO. 05-58389) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8467 Mark LEWIS, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Gwendolyn L. HARRIS, et al., © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Defendants-Respondents., 2005 WL 6735465, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (N.J. Nov 14, 2005) Brief Amici Curiae of New Jersey Religious Leaders and of National and Regional Religious Organizations (NO. 58389) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8468 Mark LEWIS, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Gwendolyn L. HARRIS, et al., Defendants-Respondents., 2005 WL 6735473, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (N.J. Nov 11, 2005) Brief of Amicus Curiae the National Legal Foundation in Support of Defendants-Respondents (NO. 58389) 8469 Mark LEWIS and Dennis Winslow; Saundra Heath and Clarita Alicia Toby; Craig Hutchinson and Chris Lodewyks; Maureen Kilian and Cindy Meneghin; Sarah and Suyin Lael; Marilyn Maneely and Diane Marini; and Karen and Marcye Nicholson-McFadden, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Gwendolyn L. HARRIS, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the New Jersey Department of Human Services; Clifton R. Lacy, in his official capacity as the Commissioner of the New, 2005 WL 6735463, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (N.J. Oct 25, 2005) Brief of Amici Curiae Human Rights Campaign, Human Rights Campaign Foundation, Children of Lesbians and Gays Everywhere (Colage), Family Pride Coalition, Freedom to Marry, Gay & Lesbian Advocates & ... (NO. 58389) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8470 Mark LEWIS and Dennis Winslow; Saundra Heath and Clarita Alicia Toby; Craig Hutchison and Chris Lodewyks; Maureen Kilian and Cindy Meneghin; Sarah and Suyin Lael; Marilyn Maneely and Diane Marini; and Karen and Marcye Nicholson McFadden, Plaintiffs-Appellants., v. Gwendolyn L. HARRIS, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the New Jersey Department of Human Services; Clifton R. Lacy, in his official capacity as the Commissioner of the New, 2005 WL 6735462, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (N.J. Oct 21, 2005) Brief of Madeline Marzano-Lesnevich as Amicus Curiae in Support of PlaintiffsAppellants (NO. 58389) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8471 Mark LEWIS, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Gwendolyn L. HARRIS, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the New Jersey Department of Human Services, et al., Defendants-Respondents., 2005 WL 6735470, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (N.J. Oct 21, 2005) Brief of Asian Equality, Equality Federation, People for the American Way Foundation and Vermont Freedom to Marry Task Force as Amici Curiae in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellants (NO. 58389) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8472 Mark LEWIS, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Gwendolyn L. HARRIS, et al., Defendants-Respondents., 2005 WL 6960567, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (N.J. Oct 06, 2005) Brief of the Professors of the History of Marriage, Families, and the Law as Amici Curiae in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellants (NO. 58389) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8473 Mark LEWIS, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Gwendolyn HARRIS, et al., Defendants-Respondents., 2005 WL 6735467, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (N.J. Sep 12, 2005) Brief Amicus Curiae of Alliance for Marriage, Inc. in Support of Defendants-Respondents (NO. 58389) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 8474 Mark LEWIS and Dennis Winslow; Saundra Heath and Clarita Alicia Toby; Craig Hutchison and Chris Lodewyks; Maureen Killian and Cindy Meneghin; Sarah and Suyin Lael; Marilyn Maneely and Diane Marini; and Karen and Marcye Nicholson-McFadden, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Gwendolyn HARRIS, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the New Jersey Department of Human Services; Clifton R. Lacy, in his official capacity as the Commissioner of the New, 2005 WL 6735471, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (N.J. Sep 2005) Brief Amicus Curiae of the Family Leader Foundation (NO. 58389) 8475 COTTAGE EMPORIUM, INC., T/A Rainbow Liquors, Gopal Panday, Kavita Panday, the Lighthouse Institute for Evangelism dba the Lighthouse Mission, Reverend Kevin Brown, Cgr Holding Corp., L.L.C., Carlos Rivera, M.D., and John Doe Plaintiffs A-Z, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. BROADWAY ARTS CENTER, L.L.C., a New Jersey Limited Liability Company, City of Long Branch, a Municipal Corporation of the State of New Jersey, Mayor and Council for the City of Long Branch, State of New, 2008 WL 8988033, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (N.J.Super.A.D. Jan 31, 2008) Brief & Appendix Volume I (PAl-PAlll) On Behalf of Appellants (NO. A-000048-07T2) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8476 Mark LEWIS and Dennis Winslow; Saundra Heath and Clarita Alicia Toby; Craig Hutchison and Chris Lodewyks; Maureen Kilian and Cindy Meneghin; Sarah and Suyin Lael; Marilyn Maneely and Diane Marini; and Karen and Marcye Nicholoson-McFadden, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Gwendolyn L. HARRIS, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the New Jersey Department of Human Services; Clifton R. Lacy, in his official capacity as the Commissioner of the New, 2004 WL 5234680, *5234680+ (Appellate Brief) (N.J.Super.A.D. Nov 08, 2004) Brief of Legal Momentum As Amicus Curiae in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellants (NO. A-2244-03T5) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8477 Mark LEWIS and Dennis Winslow; Saundra Heath and Clarita Alicia Toby; Craig Hutchinson and Chris Lodewyks; Maureen Kilian and Cindy Meneghin; Sarah and Suyin Lael; Marilyn Maneely and Diane Marini; and Karen and Marcye Nicholson-McFadden, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Gwendolyn L. HARRIS, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the New Jersey Department of Human Services; Clifton R. Lacy, in his official capacity as the Commissioner of the New, 2004 WL 5234684, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (N.J.Super.A.D. Oct 29, 2004) Brief of Amici Curiae Human Rights Campaign, Human Rights Campaign Foundation, Children of Lesbians and Gays Everywhere (Colage), Family Pride Coalition, Freedom to Marry, Gay & Lesbian Advocates & ... (NO. A-2244-03T5) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8478 Mark LEWIS, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Gwendolyn L. HARRIS, et al., Defendants-Respondents., 2004 WL 5234683, *5234683+ (Appellate Brief) (N.J.Super.A.D. Sep 23, 2004) Brief Amici Curiae of the New Jersey Coalition to Preserve and Protect Marriage, the New Jersey Family Policy Council, the New Jersey Catholic Conference, and Mr. and Mrs. David C. Heslington (NO. A-2244-03T5) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8479 Mark LEWIS, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Gwendolyn L. HARRIS, et al., © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Defendants-Respondents., 2004 WL 5234687, *5234687+ (Appellate Brief) (N.J.Super.A.D. Sep 23, 2004) Brief Amici Curiae of the New Jersey Coalition to Preserve and Protect Marriage, the New Jersey Family Policy Council, the New Jersey Catholic Conference, and Mr. and Mrs. David C. Heslington (NO. A-2244-03T5) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8480 Mark LEWIS and Dennis Winslow; Saundra Heath and Clarita Alicia Toby; Craig Hutchison and Chris Lodewyks; Maureen Kilian and Cindy Meneghin; Sarah and Suyin Lael; Marilyn Maneely and Diane Marini; and Karen and Marcye Nicholson-McFadden, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Gwendolyn L. HARRIS, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the New Jersey Department of Human Services; Clifton R. Lacy, in his official capacity as the Commissioner of the New, 2004 WL 5234681, *5234681+ (Appellate Brief) (N.J.Super.A.D. Sep 21, 2004) Reply Brief of Plaintiffs-Appellants (NO. A-2244-03T5) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8481 Mark LEWIS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Gwendolyn L. HARRIS, et al., Defendants., 2004 WL 5234689, *5234689+ (Appellate Brief) (N.J.Super.A.D. Sep 13, 2004) Brief of Amici Curiae American Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey, American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund, Hispanic Bar Association of New ... (NO. A2244-03T5) " HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 8482 Mark LEWIS, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Gwendolyn L. HARRIS, et al., Defendants-Respondents., 2004 WL 5234679, *5234679+ (Appellate Brief) (N.J.Super.A.D. Sep 02, 2004) Brief and Appendix of DefendantsRespondents (NO. A-2244-03T5) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8483 Mark LEWIS and Dennis Winslow; Saundra Heath and Clarita Alicia Toby; Craig Hutchison and Chris Lodewyks; Maureen Kilian and Cindy Meneghin; Sarah and Suyin Lael; Marilyn Maneely and Diane Marini; and Karen and Marcye Nicholson-McFadden, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Gwendolyn L. HARRIS, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the New Jersey Department of Human Services; Clifton R. Lacy, in his official capacity as the Commissioner of the New, 2004 WL 5234678, *5234678+ (Appellate Brief) (N.J.Super.A.D. Jun 04, 2004) Plaintiffs-Appellants' Brief (NO. A-2244-03T5) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8484 Joseph KINSELLA, Plaintiff, v. NYT TELEVISION; The New York Times Company; Discovery Communications Inc.; Jersey Shore Medical Center; Meridian Health System; John Does 1-10; ABC Business Entities 1-10, Defendants. Michael Castro; Julio Trinidad Costa, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. NYT Television; The New York Times Company; Discovery Communications Inc.; Jersey Shore Medical Center; Meridian Health System; John Does, 2004 WL 5456185, *5456185+ (Appellate Brief) (N.J.Super.A.D. Mar 11, 2004) Plaintiffs-Respondents' Brief Concerning the TV Show Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Appeals (NO. A001862-03T2) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8485 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Plaintiff-Petitioner, v. Cynthia MARTINEZ, a/k/a © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Cynthia Navarette, Defendant-Respondent., 2007 WL 5120947, *5120947+ (Appellate Brief) (N.M. Mar 09, 2007) Brief Amici Curiae of National Women's Law Center, et al. In Support of Respondent (NO. 29775) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8486 Carmen VALDEZ, Individually and as Mother and Natural Guardian of Ceasar Marti and Ariel Marti, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK and Jose Torres, Defendants-Respondents., 2011 WL 5920358, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (N.Y. Jul 18, 2011) Brief of Amici Curiae New York City Bar Association, American Civil Liberties Union, Empire Justice Center, Inc., My Sisters' Place, Inc., New York Legal Assistance Group, New York State Coalition ... (NO. 2011-0153) 8487 CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF ALBANY, et al., PlaintiffsAppellants, v. Gregory V. SERIO, Superintendent, New York State Department of Insurance, Defendant-Respondent., 2006 WL 4448096, *4448096+ (Appellate Brief) (N.Y. Jul 06, 2006) Brief for Amici Curiae American Jewish Committee; Anti-Defamation League; Center for Reproductive Rights; Coalition of Labor Union Women; Community Healthcare Network; Family Planning Advocates of ... " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8488 Daniel HERNANDEZ and Nevin Cohen, Lauren Abrams and Donna FreemanTweed, Michael Elsasser and Douglas Robinson, Mary Jo Kennedy and Jo-Ann Shain, and Daniel Reyes and Curtis Woolbright, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Victor R. ROBLES, in His Official Capacity as City Clerk of the City of New York, Defendant-Respondent., 2006 WL 1930150, *1930150+ (Appellate Brief) (N.Y. May 04, 2006) Brief for the Amicus Curiae New York State Conservative Party HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8489 Sylvia SAMUELS and Diane Gallagher, Heather McDonnell and Carol Snyder, Amy Tripi and Jeanne Vitale, Wade Nichols and Harng Shen, Michael Hahn and Paul Muhonen, Daniel J. O'Donnell and John Banta, Cynthia Bink and Ann Pachner, Kathleen Tuggle and Tonja Alvis, Regina Cicchetti and Susan Zimmer, Alice J. Muniz and Oneida Garcia, Ellen Dreher and Laura Collins, John Wessel and William O'Connor, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. THE NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH and the State of, 2006 WL 1930165, *1930165+ (Appellate Brief) (N.Y. May 01, 2006) Reply Brief for Plaintiffs-Appellants " 8490 Daniel HERNANDEZ and Nevin Cohen, Lauren Abrams and Donna FreemanTweed, Michael Elsasser and Douglas Robinson, Mary Jo Kennedy and Jo-Ann Shain, and Daniel Reyes and Curtis Woolbright, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Victor L. ROBLES, in his official capacity as City Clerk of the City of New York, Defendant-Respondent., 2006 WL 1930142, *1930142+ (Appellate Brief) (N.Y. Apr 30, 2006) Reply Brief for Plaintiffs-Appellants " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8491 Jason SEYMOUR and Jason Hungerford; Susan Martin and Kristine Shaw; Margot Chiuten and Shawna Black; James Pelton and Jason Thornton; Patricia Flery and Elizabeth Cohen; Patricia Butler and Marjorie Parker; Sandra Fentiman © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. and Alice Kenly; Todd Heron and Ronald Campbell; Lisa Bushlow and Nina Panzer; Teresa Niedzialek and Nancy Chapman; anne Bell and Elisabeth Lindsay; Brenda Marston and Sarah Simpkins; John Houston and Dave Hebron; Deborah Vogel and Silvia, 2006 WL 1930172, *1930172+ (Appellate Brief) (N.Y. Apr 28, 2006) Plaintiffs - Appellants' Reply Brief " 8492 Daniel HERNANDEZ and Nevin Cohen, Lauren Abrams and Donna FreemanTweed, Michael Elsasser and Douglas Robinson, Mary Jo Kennedy and Jo-Ann Shain, and Daniel Reyes and Curtis Woolbright, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Victor L. ROBLES, in his official capacity as City Clerk of the City of New York, Defendant-Respondent., 2006 WL 1930152, *1930152+ (Appellate Brief) (N.Y. Apr 22, 2006) Amicus Brief of Concerned Women for America and New York Family Policy Council " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8493 Sylvia SAMUELS and Diane Gallagher, Heather McDonnell and Carol Snyder, Amy Tripi and Jeanne Vitale, Wade Nichols and Harng Shen, Michael Hahn and Paul Muhonen, Daniel J. O'Donnell and John Banta, Cynthia Bink and Ann Pachner, Kathleen Tuggle and Tonja Alvis, Regina Cicchetti and Susan Zimmer, Alice J. Muniz and Oneida Garcia, Ellen Dreher and Laura Collins, John Wessel and William O'Connor, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. THE NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH and the State of, 2006 WL 1930163, *1930163+ (Appellate Brief) (N.Y. Apr 22, 2006) Amicus Brief of Concerned Women for America and New York Family Policy Council " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8494 Daniel HERNANDEZ and Nevin Cohen, Lauren Abrams and Donna FreemanTweed, Michael Elsasser and Douglas Robinson, Mary Jo Kennedy and Jo-Ann Shain, and Daniel Reyes and Curtis Woolbright, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Victor L. ROBLES, in his official capacity as City Clerk of the City of New York, Defendant-Respondent; Sylvia SAMUELS and Diane Gallagher, Heather McDonnell and Carol Snyder, Amy Tripi and Jeanne Vitale, Wade Nichols and Haring Shen, Michael Hahn and Paul, 2006 WL 1930154, *1930154+ (Appellate Brief) (N.Y. Apr 20, 2006) Brief of Professors of History and Family Law as Amici Curiae in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellants HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 8495 Sylvia SAMUELS and Diane Gallagher, Heather McDonnell and Carol Snyder, Amy Tripi and Jeanne Vitale, Wade Nichols and Harng Shen, Michael Hahn and Paul Muhonen, Daniel J. O'Donnell and John Banta, Cynthia Bink and Ann Pachner, Kathleen Tuggle and Tonja Alvis, Regina Cicchetti and Susan Zimmer, Alice J. Muniz and Oneida Garcia, Ellen Dreher and Laura Collins, John Wessel and William O'Connor, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. THE NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH and the State of, 2006 WL 1930160, *1930160+ (Appellate Brief) (N.Y. Apr 19, 2006) Brief for Amicus Curiae Naacp Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. In Support of Plaintiffs-Appellants " 8496 Daniel HERNANDEZ and Nevin Cohen, Lauren Abrams and Donna FreemanTweed, Michael Elsasser and Douglas Robinson, Mary Jo Kennedy and Jo-Ann Shain, and Daniel Reyes and Curtis Woolbright, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Victor L. ROBLES, in his official capacity as City Clerk of the City of New York, © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Defendant-Respondent; Sylvia Samuels and Diane Gallagher, Heather McDonnell and Carol Snyder, Amy Tripi and Jeanne Vitale, Wade Nichols and Harng Shen, Michael Hahn and Paul Muhonen,, 2006 WL 1930155, *1930155+ (Appellate Brief) (N.Y. Apr 18, 2006) Brief of Civil Rights Groups AntiDefamation League, Asian American Justice Center, Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund, Asian Equality, Equality Federation, National Center for Lesbian ... " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8497 Daniel HERNANDEZ and Nevin Cohen, Lauren Abrams and Donna FreemanTweed, Michael Elsasser and Douglas Robinson, Mary Jo Kennedy and Jo-Ann Shain, and Daniel Reyes and Curtis Woolbright, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Victor L. ROBLES, in his official capacity as City Clerk of the City of New York, Defendant-Respondent; Sylvia Samuels and Diane Gallagher, Heather McDonnell and Carol Snyder, Amy Tripi and Jeanne Vitale, Wade Nichols and Haring Shen, Michael Hahn and Paul, 2006 WL 1930138, *1930138+ (Appellate Brief) (N.Y. Apr 14, 2006) Brief of Amici Curiae Parents, Families & Friends of Lesbians and Gays, Inc., Family Pride Coalition, Human Rights Campaign, Human Rights Campaign Foundation, and the New York City Gay & Lesbian ... HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8498 Daniel HERNANDEZ and Nevin Cohen, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Victor L. ROBLES, in his official capacity as City Clerk of the City of New York, Defendant-Respondent; Sylvia Samuels and Diane Gallagher, et al., PlaintiffsAppellants, v. The New York State Department of Health and the State of New York, Defendants-Respondents; In the Matter of the Application of Elissa Kane, et al., Petitioners-Appellants, For a Judgment Pursuant to, 2006 WL 1930143, *1930143+ (Appellate Brief) (N.Y. Apr 12, 2006) Brief of Amici Curiae new York Law Professors Alicia Ouellette, Stephen Clark, Hon. Stewart F. Hancock, Jr., Hon. Howard A. Levine,%n*%n Burt Neuborne, David D. Siegel, Katheryn D. Katz, Nan D. ... " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8499 Daniel HERNANDEZ and Nevin Cohen, Lauren Abrams and Donna FreemanTweed, Michael Elsasser and Douglas Robinson, Mary Jo Kennedy and Jo-Ann Shain, and Daniel Reyes and Curtis Woolbright, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Victor L. ROBLES, in his official capacity as City Clerk of the City of New York, Defendant-Respondent; Sylvia Samuels and Diane Gallagher, Heather McDonnell and Carol Snyder, Amy Tripi and Jeanne Vitale, Wade Nichols and Haring Shen, Michael Hahn and Paul, 2006 WL 1930149, *1930149+ (Appellate Brief) (N.Y. Apr 12, 2006) Brief of Amici Curiae " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8500 Daniel HERNANDEZ and Nevin Cohen, Lauren Abrams and Donna FreemanTweed, Michael Elsasser and Douglas Robinson, Mary Joe Kennedy and Jo-Ann Shain, and Daniel Reyes and Curtis Woolbright, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Victor L. ROBLES, in his official capacity as City Clerk of the City of New York, Defendant-Respondent., 2006 WL 1930151, *1930151+ (Appellate Brief) (N.Y. Apr 12, 2006) Brief of the City Action Coalition as Amicus Curiae in Support of Defendant-Respondent " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8501 Sylvia SAMUELS, Diane Gallagher, Heather McDonnell, Carol Snyder, Amy © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Tripi, Jeanne Vitale, Wade Nichols, Haring Shen, Michael Hahn, Paul Muhonen, Daniel J. O'Donnell, John Banta, Cynthia Bink, ann Pachner, Kathleen Tuggle, Tonja Alvis, Regina Cicchetti, Susan Zimmer, Alice J. Muniz, Oneida Garcia, Ellen Dreher, Laura Collins, John Wessel, William O'Connor, Michelle CherrySlack, and Montel Cherry-Slack, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. THE NEW YORK STATE, 2006 WL 1930157, *1930157+ (Appellate Brief) (N.Y. Apr 12, 2006) Brief of Amicus Curiae United Families International 8502 Daniel HERNANDEZ and Nevin Cohen, Lauren Abrams and Donna FreemanTweed, Michael Elsasser and Douglas Robinson, Mary Jo Kennedy and Jo-Ann Shain, and Daniel Reyes and Curtis Woolbright, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Victor L. ROBLES, in his official capacity as City Clerk of the City of New York, Respondent-Appellee; Sylvia Samuels and Diane Gallagher, Heather McDonnell and Carol Snyder, Amy Tripi and Jeanne Vitale, Wade Nichols and Haring Shen Michael Hahn and Paul Muhonen,, 2006 WL 1930144, *1930144+ (Appellate Brief) (N.Y. Apr 11, 2006) Brief of the Association of the Bar of the City of New York, the Asian American Bar Association of New York, American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers--New york Chapter, the Legal Aid Society of the ... " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8503 Daniel HERNANDEZ and Nevin Cohen, Lauren Abrams and Donna FreemanTweed, Michael Elsasser and Douglas Robinson, Mary Jo Kennedy and Jo-Ann Shain, and Daniel Reyes and Curtis Woolbright, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Victor L. ROBLES, in his official capacity as City Clerk of the City of New York, Defendant-Respondent; Sylvia Samuels and Diane Gallagher, Heather McDonnell and Carol Snyder, Amy Tripi and Jeanne Vitale, Wade Nichols and Harng Shen, Michael Hahn and Paul Muhonen,, 2006 WL 1930146, *1930146+ (Appellate Brief) (N.Y. Apr 11, 2006) Amici Curiae Brief of Women's Organizations in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellants " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8504 Daniel HERNANDEZ and Nevin Cohen, Lauren Abrams and Donna FreemanTweed, Michael Elsasser and Douglas Robinson, Mary Jo Kennedy and Jo-Ann Shain, and Daniel Reyes and Curtis Woolbright, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. Victor L. ROBLES, in his official capacity as City Clerk of the City of New York, Defendant - Respondent; Sylvia Samuels, Diane Gallagher, Heather McDonnell, Carol Snyder, May Tripi, Jeanne Vitale, Wade Nichols, Harng Shen, Michael Hahn, Paul Muhonen, Daniel J., 2006 WL 1930148, *1930148+ (Appellate Brief) (N.Y. Apr 11, 2006) Brief of the Empire State Pride Agenda, et al. as Amici Curiae in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellants Addressing New York Public Policy Recognizing and Protecting the Relationships of Same-Sex Couples HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8505 Daniel HERNANDEZ and Nevin Cohen, Lauren Abrams and Donna FreemanTweed, Michael Elsasser and Douglas Robinson, Mary Jo Kennedy and Jo-Ann Shain, and-Daniel Reyes and Curtis Woolbright, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Victor L. ROBLES, in his official capacity as City Clerk of the City of New York, Defendant-Respondent. Sylvia Samuels and Diane Gallagher, Heather McDonnell and Caroi. Snyder, Amy Tripi and Jeanne Vitale, Wade Nichols and © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Harng Shen, Michael Hahn and Paul Muhonen,, 2006 WL 1930145, *1930145+ (Appellate Brief) (N.Y. Apr 10, 2006) Brief for Amicus Curiae in Support of Appellants 8506 Sylvia SAMUELS, Diane Gallagher, Heather McDonnell, Carol Snyder, Amy Tripi, Jeanne Vitale, Wade Nichols, Harng Shen, Michael Hahn, Paul Muhonen, Daniel J. O'donnell, John Banta, Cynthia Bink, Ann Pachner, Kathleen Tuggle, Tonja Alvis, Regina Cicchetti, Susan Zimmer, Alice J. Muniz, Oneida Garcia, Ellen Dreher, Laura Collins, John Wessel, William O'Connor, Michelle CherrySlack, and Montel Cherry-Slack, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. THE NEW YORK STATE, 2006 WL 1930167, *1930167+ (Appellate Brief) (N.Y. Apr 03, 2006) Brief for Respondents State of New York and Department of Health and for Attorney General As Intervenor in Hernandez " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8507 In the Matter of Elissa KANE, Lynne Lekakis, Robert Barnes and George Jurgsatis, Petitioner-Appellants, v. John MARSOLAIS, Albany City Clerk, and the New York State Health Department, Respondents., 2006 WL 1930169, *1930169+ (Appellate Brief) (N.Y. Apr 03, 2006) Brief on Behalf of Respondent John Marsolais HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8508 Daniel HERNANDEZ and Nevin Cohen, Lauren Abrams and Donna FreemanTweed, Michael Elsasser and Douglas Robinson, Mary Jo Kennedy and Jo-Ann Shain, and Daniel Reyes and Curtis Woolbright, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Victor L. ROBLES, in his official capacity as City Clerk of the City of New York, Defendant-Respondent., 2006 WL 1930141, *1930141+ (Appellate Brief) (N.Y. Mar 30, 2006) Respondent's Brief " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8509 Daniel HERNANDEZ and Nevin Cohen, Lauren Abrams and Donna FreemanTweed, Michael Elsasser and Douglas Robinson, Mary Jo Kennedy and Jo-Ann Shain, and Daniel Reyes And Curtis Woolbright, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Victor L. ROBLES, in his official capacity as City Clerk of the City of New York, Defendant-Respondent., 2006 WL 1930153, *1930153+ (Appellate Brief) (N.Y. Mar 13, 2006) Brief of The New York State Catholic Conference as Amicus Curiae in Support of Defendant-Respondent " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8510 Jason SEYMOUR and Jason Hungerford; Susan Martin and Kristine Shaw; Margot chiuten and Shawna Black; James Pelton and Jason Thornton; Patricia Flery and Elizabeth Cohen; Patricia Butler and Marjorie Parker; Sandra Fentiman and Alice Kenly; Todd Heron and Ronald Campbell; Lisa Bushlow and Nina Panzer; Teresa Niedzialek and Nancy Chapman; Anne Bell and Elisabeth Lindsay; Brenda Marston and Sarah Simpkins; John Houston and Dave Hebron; Deborah Vogel and Silvia, 2006 WL 1930171, *1930171+ (Appellate Brief) (N.Y. Mar 11, 2006) Plaintiffs - Appellants' Brief " 8511 Sylvia SAMUELS and Diane Gallagher, Heather McDonnell and Carol Snyder, Amy Tripi and Jeanne Vitale, Wade Nichols and Harng Shen, Michael Hahn and Paul Muhonen, Daniel J. O'Donnell and John Banta, Cynthia Bink and Ann Pachner, Kathleen Tuggle and Tonja Alvis, Regina Cicchetti and Susan Zimmer, Alice J. Muniz and Oneida Garcia, Ellen Dreher and Laura Collins, John Wessel and William O'Connor, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. THE NEW YORK STATE © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH and the State of, 2006 WL 1930168, *1930168+ (Appellate Brief) (N.Y. Mar 03, 2006) Brief for Plaintiffs-Appellants " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8512 In the Matter of Elissa KANE, Lynne Lekakis, Robert Barnes and George Jurgsatis, Petitioners-Appellants, v. John MARSOLAIS, Albany City Clerk, and the New York State Health Department, Respondents., 2006 WL 1930170, *1930170+ (Appellate Brief) (N.Y. Mar 02, 2006) Brief for PetitionersAppellants " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8513 Daniel HERNANDEZ and Nevin Cohen, Lauren Abrams and Donna FreemanTweed, Michael Elsasser and Douglas Robinson, Mary Jo Kennedy and Jo-Ann Shain, and Daniel Reyes and Curtis Woolbright, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Victor L. ROBLES, in his official capacity as City Clerk of the City of New York, Defendant-Respondent., 2006 WL 1930140, *1930140+ (Appellate Brief) (N.Y. Feb 06, 2006) Brief for Plaintiffs-Appellants " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8514 Sylvia SAMUELS, Diane Gallagher, Heather McDonnell, Carol Snyder, Amy Tripi, Jeanne Vitale, Wade Nichols, Harng Shen, Michael Hahn, Paul Muhonen, Daniel J. O'Donnell, John Banta, Cynthia Bink, Ann Pachner, Kathleen Tuggle, Tonja Alvis, Regina Cicchetti, Susan Zimmer, Alice J. Muniz, Oneida Garcia, Ellen Dreher, Laura Collins, John Wessel, William O'Connor, Michelle CherrySlack, and Montel Cherry-Slack, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. THE NEW YORK STATE, 2006 WL 1930162, *1930162+ (Appellate Brief) (N.Y. 2006) Brief of Amici Curiae Religious Organizations, New York Congregations and Clergy, and Other New York Faith-Based Communities in Support of PlaintiffsAppellants " 8515 In the Matter of the Application of the RED HOOK/GOWANUS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. THE NEW YORK CITY BOARD OF STANDARDS and Appeal and the City of New York, Respondents-Respondents, 160 Imlay Street Real Estate LLC, Respondent-Respondent., 2005 WL 3938560, *3938560+ (Appellate Brief) (N.Y. Aug 22, 2005) Reply Brief for PetitionerAppellant (NO. 2005-0168) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8516 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. Abdel HAMILTON, Defendant-Appellant., 2005 WL 1841188, *1841188 (Appellate Brief) (N.Y. Mar 09, 2005) Reply Brief for Defendant-Appellant 8517 Petition of Michael V. BLUMENTHAL and John J. Hoey, as Co-Executors of the Estate of Robert K. Marceca, Deceased, Petitioners-Respondents, v. For a Decree Revoking Letters Testamentary and Letters of Trusteeship issued to Daniel KINGSFORD, Directing an Accounting and Return of Assets, and other Relief, Respondent-Appellant., 2006 WL 5063972, *5063972+ (Appellate Brief) (N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept. Apr 07, 2006) Reply Brief for Respondent-Appellant (NO. 9023) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8518 Petition of Michael V. BLUMENTHAL, and John J. Hoey, as Co-Executors of the Estate of Robert K. Marceca, Deceased, Petitionters-Respondents, FOR A DECREE REVOKING LETTERS TESTAMENTARY and Letters of Trusteeship © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. issued to Daniel Kingsford, Directing an Accounting and Return of Assets, and other Relief, Respondent-Appellant., 2006 WL 4475481, *4475481+ (Appellate Brief) (N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept. Mar 29, 2006) Brief for Petitioners-Respondents (NO. 2006-09023) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8519 Walter E. CARVER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. The State of New York, The New York State Department of Taxation & Finance and Robert L. Megna, Commissioner of the New York State Department of Taxation & Finance, The New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance and David A. Hansell, Commissioner of the New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance, and The New York State Division of Lottery and Gordon Medencia, Director of the New York State, 2010 WL 9911887, *1 (Appellate Brief) (N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept. Jun 14, 2010) Appellant'S Brief (NO. 2009-05414) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8520 Frank A. KLEPETKO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Phil REISMAN, Thomas M. Donovan, Cyndee Royle, Henry Freeman, the Journal News and Gannett Co., Inc., Owner and Publisher of the Journal News, Defendants-Respondents., 2006 WL 4939584, *4939584+ (Appellate Brief) (N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept. Dec 18, 2006) Brief of Defendants-Respondents (NO. 2006-02034) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8521 Satwant Singh GARCHA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THE CITY OF BEACON, Mr. R. Sassi - Chief of Police (Beacon Police Department), Mr. Donald F. Williams Jr. (Detective - Beacon Police Department), Defendants-Respondents., 2006 WL 4790814, *4790814+ (Appellate Brief) (N.Y.A.D. 2 Dept. Sep 13, 2006) Respondents' Brief (NO. 2005-09867) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8522 Robert HEBEL, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Jason WEST, in his official capacity as Mayor of New Paltz, Respondent-Appellant, Robert HEBEL, PetitionerRespondent-Appellant, v. VILLAGE OF NEW PALTZ, Jason West, in his official capacity, and Michael Zierler, in his official capacity, RespondentsAppellants-Respondents, Rebecca ROTZLER, in her official capacity, Julia Walsh, in her official capacity, Respondents., 2005 WL 5716276, *5716276+ (Appellate Brief) (N.Y.A.D. 3 Dept. Jun 15, 2005) Corrected Reply Brief of Appellants Village of New Paltz, Jason West and Michael Zierler (NO. 97432, 97433) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8523 Cindy L. GOODRICH, Appellant, v. DIRECTOR, OHIO DEPARTMENT OF JOB AND FAMILY SERVICES, et al., Appellees., 2012 WL 2160167, *1 (Appellate Brief) (Ohio May 29, 2012) Memorandum in Support of Jurisdiction of Appellant Cindy L. Goodrich (NO. 12-0921) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8524 CITY OF CLEVELAND ex rel. Cleveland Taxpayers for the Ohio Constitution, et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF CLEVELAND, Appellee., 2010 WL 5382644, *5382644+ (Appellate Brief) (Ohio Dec 15, 2010) Memorandum of Amicus Curiae Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc. in Opposition to Jurisdiction (NO. 10-1983) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8525 Rose KAMINSKI, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. METAL & WIRE PRODUCTS © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant., 2008 WL 5326904, *5326904+ (Appellate Brief) (Ohio Dec 12, 2008) Merit Brief of Appellee Rose Kaminski (NO. 2008-0857) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 8526 Elizabeth BURNETT, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MOTORISTS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant., 2007 WL 4712214, *4712214+ (Appellate Brief) (Ohio Dec 10, 2007) Brief of Amicus Curiae, Ohio Association of Justice In Support of Plaintiff-Appellee, Elizabeth Burnett (NO. 07-0954) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8527 Melisa ARBINO, Plaintiff-Appellant (Petitioner), v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, et al., Defendants-Appellees (Respondents)., 2006 WL 3912799, *3912799+ (Appellate Brief) (Ohio Dec 18, 2006) Brief of Defendants-Appellees (Respondents) Johnson & Johnson, Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development, LLC (NO. 2006-1212) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 8528 Marlene LEININGER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pioneer National LATEX, et al., Defendant-Appellant., 2006 WL 3912818, *3912818+ (Appellate Brief) (Ohio Dec 06, 2006) Merit Brief of Amicus Curiae Ohio Management Lawyers Association in Support of Appellants Pioneer National Latex, Melissa McCormic, and Jerry Meyer (NO. 2006-1304) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 8529 STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Martin L. KOLISER, Jr., DefendantAppellant., 2004 WL 2059319, *2059319+ (Appellate Brief) (Ohio Aug 25, 2004) Merit Brief of Appellant Martin L. Koliser, Jr. (NO. 2003-2165) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 8530 State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Sean TALTY, Appellant., 2004 WL 5284056, *5284056+ (Appellate Brief) (Ohio Jan 20, 2004) Brief of Amicus Curiae The American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio Foundation in Support of Appellant Sean Talty (NO. 2003-1344) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8531 State of Ohio, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sean TALTY, Defendant-Appellant., 2004 WL 5284053, *5284053+ (Appellate Brief) (Ohio Jan 16, 2004) Merit Brief of Appellant Sean Talty (NO. 2003-1344) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8532 David ZAJC, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. HYCOMP, INC., et al., DefendantsAppellants., 2003 WL 25712777, *25712777+ (Appellate Brief) (Ohio Feb 01, 2003) Merit Brief of Amicus Curiae Ohio Management Lawyers Association in Support of Appellants Hycomp, Inc. and Eugene F. Gargas (NO. 2007-1358) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 8533 Christopher DUDKOWSKI, Petitioner-Appellant, v. STATE OF OHIO, Respondent-Appellee., 2009 WL 6977382, *6977382+ (Appellate Brief) (Ohio App. 8 Dist. Aug 28, 2009) Appellants Brief and Assignments of Error (NO. 93221) 8534 STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Corwin WILLIS, Defendant-Appellant., 2009 WL 6692759, *6692759 (Appellate Brief) (Ohio App. 8 Dist. Jul 01, 2009) Appellant's Brief and Assignments of Error (NO. 93237) 8535 Jerry K. MAJEWSKI, Petitioner-Appellant, v. STATE OF OHIO, Respondent- © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Appellee., 2009 WL 6975141, *6975141+ (Appellate Brief) (Ohio App. 8 Dist. Mar 27, 2009) Appellant's Brief and Assignments of Error (NO. 92372, 92400) 8536 Mario B. MIRELES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. STATE OF OHIO, Respondent Appellee., 2008 WL 8224103, *8224103+ (Appellate Brief) (Ohio App. 8 Dist. Dec 11, 2008) Appellant's Brief and Assignments of Error (NO. 92302) 8537 Robert GILDERSLEEVE (91515) James Stevens (91516) John Brown (91517) Michael Topeka (91518) Robert Bohammon (91519) John W. Evans (91521) Shawn Maver (91522) Demetrius Reddick (91523) Ralph Wells (91524) Willie Moncrief (91525) Arnold Harris (91526) Edward Schneider (91527) Charles M. Jones (91528) Wesley Patterson (91529) Mark Douglas Patterson (91530) Robert Zamora (91531) Dwayne Orr (91532), Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. STATE OF OHIO,, 2008 WL 8437166, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Ohio App. 8 Dist. Sep 15, 2008) Appellant's Brief and Assignments of Error (NO. 91515) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8538 State of Ohio, The City of Maple Heights, Appellant, v. Thelma EPHRAIM, Appellee., 2008 WL 5237577, *5237577+ (Appellate Brief) (Ohio App. 8 Dist. Mar 20, 2008) Brief of Appellant (NO. CA-07-090237) 8539 STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Garrison BROWN, DefendantAppellant., 2008 WL 8117141, *8117141 (Appellate Brief) (Ohio App. 8 Dist. Feb 21, 2008) Appellants Brief and Assignments of Error (NO. 90798) 8540 State of Ohio, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thavian HUDDLESTON, DefendantAppellant., 2008 WL 5042357, *5042357 (Appellate Brief) (Ohio App. 8 Dist. Feb 01, 2008) Brief of Appellant (NO. 90494) 8541 STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James PEAK, Defendant-Appellant., 2007 WL 5633349, *5633349 (Appellate Brief) (Ohio App. 8 Dist. Dec 04, 2007) Appellant's Assignments of Error and Merit Brief (NO. 90255) 8542 STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Maurice MCCULLEN, DefendantAppellant., 2007 WL 5516507, *5516507+ (Appellate Brief) (Ohio App. 8 Dist. Nov 28, 2007) Appellant's Assignments of Error and Merit Brief (NO. 90214) 8543 STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rodney SADDLER, DefendantAppellant., 2007 WL 5516506, *5516506 (Appellate Brief) (Ohio App. 8 Dist. Nov 16, 2007) Appellant's Brief and Assignments of Error (NO. CA90197) 8544 STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Erik WARE, Defendant-Appellant., 2007 WL 5445505, *5445505 (Appellate Brief) (Ohio App. 8 Dist. Oct 31, 2007) Appellant's Assignments of Error and Merit Brief (NO. 90051) 8545 State of Ohio, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wilfredo CARABALLO, DefendantAppellant., 2007 WL 5787648, *5787648 (Appellate Brief) (Ohio App. 8 Dist. Sep 10, 2007) Appellant's Brief and Assignments of Error (NO. CA89757) 8546 STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Deangelo BRUCE, Defendant- © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Appellant., 2007 WL 5231936, *5231936 (Appellate Brief) (Ohio App. 8 Dist. Jun 29, 2007) Appellant's Assignments of Error and Merit Brief (NO. 89641) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8547 STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Zachary FREER, Defendant-Appellant., 2007 WL 6045727, *6045727 (Appellate Brief) (Ohio App. 8 Dist. Jun 18, 2007) Appellant's Assignments of Error and Merit Brief (NO. 89392) 8548 STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Oscar QUINONES, DefendantAppellant., 2007 WL 5068124, *5068124 (Appellate Brief) (Ohio App. 8 Dist. May 18, 2007) Appellant's Assignments of Error and Merit Brief (NO. 89332) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8549 STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alex LUCERNO, DefendantAppellant., 2007 WL 4759098, *4759098 (Appellate Brief) (Ohio App. 8 Dist. Feb 23, 2007) Appellant's Brief and Assignments of Error (NO. CA89039) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8550 STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Andre PIERCE, Defendant-Appellant., 2006 WL 6186068, *6186068 (Appellate Brief) (Ohio App. 8 Dist. Nov 13, 2006) Appellant's Brief and Assignments of Error (NO. 88470) 8551 CITY OF PARMA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jonathan D. FONTE, DefendantAppellant., 2006 WL 3938231, *3938231+ (Appellate Brief) (Ohio App. 8 Dist. Sep 12, 2006) Brief of Defendant-Appellant, Jonathan D. Fonte (NO. CA06-088019, CA06-088275, CA06-088434) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8552 State of Ohio, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Shigali JONES, Defendant-Appellant., 2005 WL 4904097, *4904097 (Appellate Brief) (Ohio App. 8 Dist. Oct 17, 2005) Appellant's Brief and Assignments of Error (NO. CA86251) 8553 STATE OF OHIO, Appellee, v. Berkley C. NIXON, Appellant., 2005 WL 5965625, *5965625+ (Appellate Brief) (Ohio App. 9 Dist. Aug 30, 2005) Brief of Appellee - State of Ohio (NO. 22667) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8554 CITY OF AKRON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gloria GARDNER, DefendantAppellee., 2004 WL 5496423, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Ohio App. 9 Dist. Aug 13, 2004) Answer Brief of Appellee Gloria Gardner (NO. 22062) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8555 (1) OKLAHOMA COALITION FOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE, on behalf of itself and its Members; and (2) Nova Health Systems, d/b/a Reproductive Services, on behalf of itself, its Staff, and its Patients, Plaintiffs/Appellees, v. (3) Terry L. CLINE, in his Official Capacity as Oklahoma Commissioner of Health; and, (4) Lyle Kelsey, in his Official Capacity as Executive Director of the Oklahoma State Board of Medical Licensure and Supervision; and, (5) Catherine, 2012 WL 5883324, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Okla. Oct 29, 2012) Appellees' Answer Brief (NO. 110765) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8556 In the Matter of the Application of Steven Charles HARVEY to change his name, Petitioner/Appellant., 2012 WL 3072254, *1 (Appellate Brief) (Okla. Mar 29, 2012) Brief of Appellant Steven Charles Harvey (NO. 110048) 8557 C. O'DARLING, Appellant/Petitioner, v. S. O'DARLING, Appellee/Respondent., © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 2009 WL 4051551, *4051551+ (Appellate Brief) (Okla. Sep 24, 2009) The State of Oklahoma's Brief in Response to Brief in Chief of Appellant (NO. 106732) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8558 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, Petitioner on Review, v. Tiffany Lee SAVATANO, Defendant-Appellant, Respondent on Review., 2012 WL 3569903, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Or. Jul 30, 2012) Amended Brief of Amicus Curiae Aclu Foundation of Oregon, Inc. (NO. S059973) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8559 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, Petitioner on Review, v. Tiffany Lee SAVASTANO, Defendant-Appellant, Respondent on Review., 2012 WL 3234995, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Or. Jul 23, 2012) Brief of Amicus Curiae Aclu Foundation of Oregon, Inc. (NO. S141053) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8560 State of Oregon, Plaintiff-Appellant, Cross-Respondent, Respondent on Review, v. Veronica RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Respondent, Cross-Appellant, Petitioner on Review., 2008 WL 5415644, *5415644+ (Appellate Brief) (Or. Sep 16, 2008) Brief on the Merits of Respondent on Review, State of Oregon (NO. CAA131050, SCS055720) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8561 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Appellant, Cross-Respondent, Respondent on Review, v. Veronica RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Respondent, Cross-Appellant, Petitioner on Review., 2008 WL 8069894, *8069894+ (Appellate Brief) (Or. Sep 16, 2008) Brief on the Merits of Respondent on Review, State of Oregon (NO. SCS055720) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8562 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Appellant, cross-Respondent, respondent on review, v. Darryl Anthony BUCK, Defendant-Respondent, cross-Appellant, petitioner on review., 2008 WL 4525137, *4525137+ (Appellate Brief) (Or. Sep 2008) Brief On the Merits of Respondent On Review On Review, State of Oregon (NO. SCS055721) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8563 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Appellant, Cross-Respondent, Respondent on Review, v. VERONICA RODRIGUEZ, Defendant-Respondent, Cross-Appellant, Petitioner on Review., 2008 WL 4525136, *4525136+ (Appellate Brief) (Or. 2008) Brief On the Merits of Respondent On Review, State of Oregon (NO. SCS055720) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8564 Hector MACPHERSON; Bannockburn Farms, Inc.; Clackamas County Farm Bureau; Linn County Farm Bureau; Washington County Farm Bureau; Marion County Farm Bureau; Yamhill County Farm Bureau; David T. Adams; Mark Tipperman; James D. Gilbert; Northwoods Nursery Inc.; David A. Vanasche; Keith Fishback; Fishback Nursery, Inc.; Jack Chapin and 1000 Friends of Oregon, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, Risk Management Division, by, 2006 WL 6821151, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Or. Jan 04, 2006) Brief of Amicus Curiae Aclu Foundation of Oregon, Inc. December 2005 (NO. S52875) " 8565 Mary LI and Rebecca Kennedy; Stephen Knox, M.D. and Eric Warshaw, M.D.; Kelly Burke and Dolores Doyle; Donna Potter and Pamela Moen; Dominick Vetri and Douglas Dewitt; Sally Sheklow and Enid Lefton; Walter Frankel and Curtis © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Keifer; Julie Williams and Coleen Belisle; Basic Rights Oregon; and American Civil Liberties Union of Oregon, Plaintiffs-Respondents, Cross-Appellants, MULTNOMAH COUNTY, Intervenor-Plaintiff-Respondent, Cross-Appellant, v., 2004 WL 6065831, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Or. Oct 25, 2004) State Defendants'-Appellants', Cross-Respondents' Answering Brief on the Merits (NO. S51612) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8566 Mary LI and Rebecca Kennedy; Stephen Knox, M.D. and Eric Warshaw, M.D.; Kelly Burke and Dolores Doyle; Donna Potter and Pamela Moen; Dominick Vetri and Douglas Dewitt; Sally Sheklow and Enid Lefton; Irene Farrera and Nina Korican; Walter Frankel and Curtis Kiefer; Julie Williams and Coleen Belisle; Basic Rights Oregon; and American Civil Liberties Union of Oregon, PlaintiffsRespondents, Cross-Appellants, Multnomah County, IntervenorPlaintiff-Respondent,, 2004 WL 6079889, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Or. Oct 25, 2004) Plaintiffs-Respondents and Cross-Appellants' Combined Answering Brief on the Merits (NO. SCS51612) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 8567 Mary LI and Rebecca Kennedy; Stephen Knox, M.D. And Eric Warshaw, M.D.; Kelly Burke and Dolores Doyle; Donna Potter and Pamela Moen; Dominick Vetri and Douglas Dewitt; Sally Sheklow and Enid Lefton; Irene Farrera and Nina Korican; Walter Frankel and Curtis Kiefer; Julie Williams and Coleen Belisle; Basic Rights Oregon; and American Civil Liberties Union of Oregon, PlaintiffsRespondents, Cross-Appellants, Multnomah County, IntervenorPlaintiff-Respondent,, 2004 WL 6065840, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Or. Oct 19, 2004) Brief On the Merits of Amicus Curiae Legal Momentum (Formerly now Legal Defense and Education FUND), National Association of Women Lawyers, National Council of Jewish Women, National Organization for ... (NO. S51612) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8568 Mary LI and Rebecca Kennedy; Stephen Knox, M.D., and Eric Warshaw, M.D.; Kelly Burke and Dolores Doyle; Donna Potter and Pamela Moen; Dominick Vetri and Douglas Dewitt; Sally Sheklow and Enid Lefton; Irene Farrera and Nina Korican; Walter Frankel and Curtis Kiefer; Julie Williams and Coleen Belisle; Basic Rights Oregon; and American Civil Liberties Union of Oregon, PlaintiffsRespondents, Cross-Appellants, Multnomah County, IntervenorPlaintiff-Respondent,, 2004 WL 6079900, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Or. Oct 19, 2004) Brief of Amici Curiae Vermont Freedom to Marry Task Force; Vermonters for Civil Unions Legislative Defense Fund; Pride at Work, AFLCIO; Parents, Families and Friends of Lesbians and Gays (PFLAG); ... (NO. A51612) 8569 Mary LI and Rebecca Kennedy; Stephen Knox, M.D., and Eric Warshaw, M.D.; Kelly Burke and Dolores Doyle; Donna Potter and Pamela Moen; Dominick Vetri and Douglas Dewitt; Sally Sheklow and Enid Lefton; Irene Farrera and Nina Korican; Walter Frankel and Curtis Kiefer; Julie Williams and Coleen Belisle; Basic Rights Oregon; and American Civil Liberties Union of Oregon, PlaintiffsRespondents/Cross-Appellants, Multnomah County,, 2004 WL 6079901, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Or. Oct 19, 2004) Brief of Amici Curiae Oregon Gay and © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Lesbian Law Association Equity Foundation, Inc. Love Makes a Family, Inc. Rural Organizing Project; Inc. Cascade Aids Project Parents and Friends of Lesbians and ... (NO. A51612) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8570 Mary LI and Rebecca Kennedy; Stephen Knox, M.D., and Eric Warshaw, M.D.; Kelly Burke and Dolores Doyle; Donna Potter and Pamela Moen; Dominick Vetri and Douglas Dewitt; Sally Sheklow and Enid Lefton; Irene Farrera and Nina Korican; Walter Frankel and Curtis Kiefer; Julie Williams and Coleen Belisle; Basic Rights Oregon, an Oregon not-for-profit corporation; and American Civil Liberties Union of Oregon, an Oregon not-for-profit corporation,, 2004 WL 6079909, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Or. Oct 15, 2004) Brief of Amicus Curiae Alliance for Marriage in Support of Intervenor-Defendants-Appellants, Cross-Respondents Defense of Marriage Coalition, et al. (NO. S51612) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8571 Mary LI and Rebecca Kennedy; Stephen Knox, M.D., and Eric Warshaw, M.D.; Kelly Burke and Dolores Doyle; Donna Potter and Pamela Moen; Dominick Vetri and Douglas Dewitt; Sally Sheklow and Enid Lefton; Irene Farrera and Nina Korican; Walter Frankel and Curtis Kiefer; Julie Williams and Coleen Belisle; Basic Rights Oregon, an Oregon not-for-profit corporation, PlaintiffsRespondents, Cross-Appellants, MULTNOMAH COUNTY, a political subdivision of the state of, 2004 WL 6065838, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Or. Oct 14, 2004) Brief Amicus Curiae of United Families International in Support of Intervenor-Defendants-Appellants, Cross-Respondents Defense of Marriage Coalition, et al., (NO. S51612) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8572 Mary LI and Rebecca Kennedy Stephen Knox, M.D. and Eric Warshaw, M.D.; Kelly Burke and Dolores Doyle; Donna Potter and Pamela Moen; Dominick Vetri and Douglas Dewitt; Sally Sheklow and Enid Lefton; Irene Farrera and Nina Korican; Walter Frankel and Curtis Keifer; Julie Williams and Coleen Belisle; Basic Rights Oregon; and American Civil Liberties Union of Oregon, PlaintiffRespondents, Cross-Appellants, MULTNOMAH COUNTY, IntervenorPlaintiff-Respondent,, 2004 WL 6065839, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Or. Oct 13, 2004) Brief Amicus Curiae of Stronger Families for Oregon (NO. SCS51612) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8573 Mary LI and Rebecca Kennedy; Stephen Knox, M.D., and Eric Warshaw, M.D.; Kelly Burke and Dolores Vetri and Douglas Dewitt; Sally Sheklow and Enid Lefton; Irene Farrera and Nina Korican; Walter Frankel and Curtis Keifer; Julie Williams and Coleen Belisle; Basic Rights Oregon; and American Civil Liberties Union of Oregon Plaintiffs-Respondents, Cross-Appellants, and Petitioner on Review, Multnomah County, Intervenor-Plaintiff-Respondent, Cross-Appellant, v., 2004 WL 6079904, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Or. Oct 2004) Brief of Civil Rights and Historians Amici Curiae (NO. SCS51612) " 8574 Mary LI and Rebecca Kennedy; Stephen Knox, M.D., and Eric Warshaw, M.D.; Kelly Burke and Dolores Doyle; Donna Potter and Pamela Moen; Dominick Vetri and Douglas Dewitt; Sally Sheklow and Enid Lefton; Irene Farrera and Nina Korican; Walter Frankel and Curtis Kiefer; Julie Williams and Coleen Belisle; © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Basic Rights Oregon, an Oregon not-for-profit corporation; and American Civil Liberties Union of Oregon, an Oregon not-for-profit corporation, Farrera, 2004 WL 6079897, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Or. Sep 20, 2004) IntervenorDefendants-Appellants, Cross-Respondents Defense of Marriage Coalition, et al.'s Opening Brief (NO. A51612) 8575 Mary LI and Rebecca Kennedy; Stephen Knox, M.D. and Eric Warshaw, M.D.; Kelly Burke and Dolores Doyle; Donna Potter and Pamela Moen; Dominick Vetri and Douglas Dewitt; Sally Sheklow and Enid Lefton; Irene Farrera and Nina Korican; Walter Frankel and Curtis Kiefer; Julie Williams and Coleen Belisle; Basic Rights Oregon; and American Civil Liberties Union of Oregon, Multnomah, Plaintiffs-Respondents, Cross-Appellants, Multnomah County,, 2004 WL 6079899, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Or. Sep 20, 2004) Plaintiffs-Respondents and Cross-Appellants' Opening Brief on Cross-Appeal and Appendix (NO. A51612) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8576 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Charles Robert CIANCANELLI, Defendant-Petitioner., 2003 WL 25942585, *25942585+ (Appellate Brief) (Or. Aug 08, 2003) Amicus Curiae Portland Area Privacy Alliance Reply to Respondent's Brief on the Merits (NO. S49707) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8577 CITY OF NYSSA, Plaintiff-Respondent, Respondent on Review, v. Sally A. DUFLOTH, Defendant-Appellant, Petitioner on Review. City of Nyssa, PlaintiffRespondent, Respondent on Review, v. Duane L. Smith, Defendant-Appellant, Petitioner on Review., 2003 WL 25942607, *25942607+ (Appellate Brief) (Or. Jul 22, 2003) Amicus Curiae Brief on the Merits of Association of Club Executives (NO. S49963) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8578 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, Respondent on Review, v. Charles Robert CIANCANELLI, Defendant-Appellant, Petitioner on Review., 2003 WL 25942589, *25942589+ (Appellate Brief) (Or. 2003) Petitioner's Reply Brief (NO. S49707) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8579 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Philip David LANG III, Defendant-Appellant., 2012 WL 10129537, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Or.App. Dec 24, 2012) Appellant's Opening Brief and Excerpt of Record (NO. A151160) 8580 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Ian Zehta MILLER, DefendantAppellant., 2012 WL 10133086, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Or.App. Dec 20, 2012) Appellant's Opening Brief and Excerpt of Record (NO. A150495, A150496) 8581 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Harl Allen SPANN, DefendantAppellant., 2012 WL 9338194, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Or.App. Sep 14, 2012) Appellant's Opening Brief and Excerpt of Record (NO. A150229) 8582 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Kevin Jacob LAUGHLIN, Defendant-Appellant., 2010 WL 8318756, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Or.App. Oct 11, 2010) Appellant's Opening Brief (NO. A144631) 8583 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Kevin Shannon JONES, © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Defendant-Appellant., 2010 WL 7279071, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Or.App. Jun 01, 2010) Appellant's Opening Brief (NO. A142958) 8584 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Raul OROPEZA-JUAREZ, Defendant-Appellant., 2010 WL 7164990, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Or.App. May 26, 2010) Appellant's Opening Brief (NO. A141990) 8585 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Dewane PERRY, DefendantAppellant., 2010 WL 6529773, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Or.App. May 03, 2010) Appellant's Opening Brief (NO. A142459) 8586 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Quandary NELSON, aka Quandry Nelson, aka Quandray Jamon Nelson, Defendant-Appellant., 2009 WL 8147509, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Or.App. Jul 2009) Appellant's Reply Brief (NO. A136989) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8587 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Brent Alan Van BUREN, Defendant-Appellant., 2009 WL 6769386, *6769386+ (Appellate Brief) (Or.App. Jun 02, 2009) Appellant's Opening Brief (NO. A139097) 8588 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Michael STANTON, DefendantAppellant., 2009 WL 6769395, *6769395+ (Appellate Brief) (Or.App. Jun 01, 2009) Appellant's Opening Brief (NO. A139647) 8589 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Carmen Teresa HOTTLE, Defendant-Appellant., 2009 WL 6835841, *6835841+ (Appellate Brief) (Or.App. May 19, 2009) Appellant's Opening Brief (NO. A139112) 8590 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Hector Fernando CANALESROBLES, Defendant-Appellant., 2009 WL 6450871, *6450871+ (Appellate Brief) (Or.App. May 18, 2009) Appellant's Opening Brief (NO. A138477) 8591 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Michael Kevin GRAHAM, Defendant-Appellant., 2009 WL 6502687, *6502687+ (Appellate Brief) (Or.App. Apr 28, 2009) Appellant's Opening Brief (NO. A138321) 8592 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Jon Louis BUSH, DefendantAppellant., 2009 WL 6387434, *6387434+ (Appellate Brief) (Or.App. Apr 24, 2009) Appellant's Opening Brief (NO. A139808) 8593 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Alejandro Martinez PEREZ, aka Alejandro Martinez-Perez, aka Alejandro Perez Martinez, aka Alejandro PerezMartinez, Defendant-Appellant., 2009 WL 6482476, *6482476+ (Appellate Brief) (Or.App. Mar 27, 2009) Appellant's Opening Brief (NO. A139182, A139184) 8594 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Jose Edgar Salvador CERVANTES, Defendant-Appellant., 2009 WL 6388616, *6388616+ (Appellate Brief) (Or.App. Mar 25, 2009) Appellant's Opening Brief (NO. A137048) 8595 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Carlos Dewayne NASH, Defendant-Appellant., 2009 WL 6890582, *6890582+ (Appellate Brief) (Or.App. Mar 19, 2009) Appellant's Opening Brief (NO. A138297) 8596 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Jessica Mae MORASCH, © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Defendant-Appellant., 2009 WL 6502740, *6502740 (Appellate Brief) (Or.App. Feb 02, 2009) Appellant's Brief (NO. A138650) 8597 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Sheila Jean FISHER, DefendantAppellant., 2009 WL 6451421, *6451421+ (Appellate Brief) (Or.App. Jan 2009) Appellant's Brief (NO. A137580) 8598 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Phillip Isaac MARTIN, Defendant-Respondent., 2009 WL 6482733, *6482733+ (Appellate Brief) (Or.App. 2009) Appellant's Brief (NO. A136769, A136790) 8599 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Randy Alin SUTTON, Defendant-Appellant., 2008 WL 7801394, *7801394+ (Appellate Brief) (Or.App. Nov 25, 2008) Appellant's Brief (NO. A138975) 8600 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Douglas Leroy PITT, DefendantAppellant., 2008 WL 8100295, *8100295+ (Appellate Brief) (Or.App. Nov 04, 2008) Appellant's Amended Brief (NO. A137399) 8601 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Brent YUNGHANS, DefendantAppellant., 2008 WL 7314314, *7314314+ (Appellate Brief) (Or.App. Oct 07, 2008) Appellant's Brief (NO. A137267) 8602 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Brian Martin WEANT, Defendant-Appellant., 2008 WL 7680048, *7680048+ (Appellate Brief) (Or.App. Oct 02, 2008) Appellant's Brief (NO. A136279) 8603 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Douglas Leroy PITT, DefendantAppellant., 2008 WL 7573198, *7573198+ (Appellate Brief) (Or.App. Sep 2008) Appellant's Brief (NO. A137547) 8604 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Brandon John LARSON, Defendant-Appellant., 2008 WL 7573236, *7573236+ (Appellate Brief) (Or.App. Sep 2008) Appellant's Brief (NO. A137817) 8605 State of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Richard Hans NORLAND, DefendantAppellant., 2008 WL 8088503, *8088503 (Appellate Brief) (Or.App. Aug 29, 2008) Appellants Amended Opening Brief (NO. A131234) 8606 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Devin Jacob DANIELS, Defendant-Appellant., 2008 WL 7609098, *7609098+ (Appellate Brief) (Or.App. Aug 11, 2008) Appellant's Brief (NO. A136901) 8607 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. John William SCHEIRMAN, Defendant-Appellant., 2008 WL 7118345, *7118345+ (Appellate Brief) (Or.App. Jul 30, 2008) Appellant's Brief (NO. A137400) 8608 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. David Jesse DRINKARD, Defendant-Appellant., 2008 WL 7748005, *7748005+ (Appellate Brief) (Or.App. Jul 21, 2008) Appellant's Brief (NO. A136039) 8609 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Curtis Wendell BEVAN, Defendant-Appellant., 2008 WL 8017493, *8017493+ (Appellate Brief) (Or.App. Jul 01, 2008) Appellant's Brief (NO. A135890) 8610 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Constance Elaine DENBY, © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Defendant-Appellant., 2008 WL 7531510, *7531510+ (Appellate Brief) (Or.App. Jul 2008) Appellant's Brief (NO. A136971) 8611 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Noreen Jean BILLINGS, Defendant-Appellant., 2008 WL 7748013, *7748013+ (Appellate Brief) (Or.App. Jun 23, 2008) Appellant's Brief (NO. A136390) 8612 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Jered Levi NEALEIGH, aka, Jared Levi Nealeigh, Defendant-Appellant., 2008 WL 7314292, *7314292+ (Appellate Brief) (Or.App. Jun 10, 2008) Appellant's Brief (NO. A136606) 8613 State of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Jon Linden GRANT, DefendantAppellant., 2008 WL 7182255, *7182255+ (Appellate Brief) (Or.App. Jun 09, 2008) Appellant's Brief (NO. A136663) 8614 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Clarence William WETHERALD, Jr., Defendant-Appellant., 2008 WL 7514607, *7514607+ (Appellate Brief) (Or.App. Jun 2008) Appellant's Brief (NO. A136450) 8615 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Claude Andrew THOMAS III, Defendant-Appellant., 2008 WL 7453937, *7453937+ (Appellate Brief) (Or.App. May 28, 2008) Appellant's Brief (NO. A136100) 8616 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Stephen Lee STOTESBURY, Defendant-Appellant., 2008 WL 7291010, *7291010+ (Appellate Brief) (Or.App. May 2008) Appellant's Brief (NO. A136700) 8617 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Pamela Marie MURPHY, Defendant-Appellant., 2008 WL 7801172, *7801172+ (Appellate Brief) (Or.App. Feb 28, 2008) Appellant's Brief (NO. A135618) 8618 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Brenda Kay MERRITT, Defendant-Appellant., 2008 WL 6741760, *6741760+ (Appellate Brief) (Or.App. Feb 2008) Appellant's Brief (NO. A134329) 8619 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. William Gibson-Doug KOSKELA, Defendant-Appellant., 2008 WL 6970724, *6970724+ (Appellate Brief) (Or.App. Feb 2008) Appellant's Brief (NO. A135570) 8620 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. M. Tony FRANKLIN, Defendant-Appellant., 2008 WL 6970736, *6970736+ (Appellate Brief) (Or.App. Jan 2008) Appellant's Brief (NO. A135721) 8621 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Jarrod Michael SWISHER, Defendant-Appellant., 2008 WL 7801138, *7801138+ (Appellate Brief) (Or.App. 2008) Appellant's Brief (NO. A132661) 8622 State of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Joe Henry McMILLAN Jr, DefendantAppellant., 2007 WL 6734333, *6734333+ (Appellate Brief) (Or.App. Dec 20, 2007) Appellant's Brief (NO. A135572) 8623 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Nathan Ray COLLINS, Defendant-Appellant., 2007 WL 6870225, *6870225+ (Appellate Brief) (Or.App. Dec 2007) Appellant's Brief (NO. A135430) 8624 State of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Jesus Priscli CAMACHO-ALVAREZ, © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Defendant-Appellant., 2007 WL 6898459, *6898459+ (Appellate Brief) (Or.App. Dec 2007) Appellant's Brief (NO. A134796) 8625 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. David COOPER, DefendantAppellant., 2007 WL 6840251, *6840251+ (Appellate Brief) (Or.App. Nov 06, 2007) Appellant's Brief (NO. A135376) 8626 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Lyle Mark MOORE, DefendantAppellant., 2007 WL 6334641, *6334641+ (Appellate Brief) (Or.App. Oct 08, 2007) Appellant's Brief (NO. A134090) 8627 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. George TURNEANU, Defendant-Appellant., 2007 WL 6852284, *6852284+ (Appellate Brief) (Or.App. Oct 2007) Appellant's Brief (NO. A134152) 8628 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Heidi GOLDSMITH, DefendantAppellant., 2007 WL 6864607, *6864607+ (Appellate Brief) (Or.App. Aug 2007) Appellant's Brief (NO. A133207) 8629 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Danty James CRAWFORD, Defendant-Appellant., 2007 WL 6823455, *6823455+ (Appellate Brief) (Or.App. Jul 2007) Appellant's Brief (NO. A132307) 8630 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Trace Lee PEDERSON, Defendant-Appellant., 2007 WL 6885384, *6885384+ (Appellate Brief) (Or.App. Jul 2007) Appellant's Brief (NO. A132248) 8631 State of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. John Charles RODRIGUEZ, DefendantAppellant., 2007 WL 6469033, *6469033+ (Appellate Brief) (Or.App. Jun 2007) Appellant's Brief (NO. A132837) 8632 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Terrell Alexander GUY, Defendant-Appellant., 2007 WL 6434325, *6434325+ (Appellate Brief) (Or.App. May 23, 2007) Appellant's Brief (NO. A132775) 8633 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Jerome Richard PALMER, Defendant-Appellant., 2007 WL 6434426, *6434426+ (Appellate Brief) (Or.App. Mar 26, 2007) Appellant's Brief (NO. A133072) 8634 State of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Felipe PEREIDA-ALBA, DefendantAppellant., 2007 WL 6371474, *6371474+ (Appellate Brief) (Or.App. Mar 09, 2007) Appellant's Brief (NO. A130594) 8635 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Lekishia Renea WILLIAMS, Aka Lekishia R. Williams, aka Lekishia R. Williams, aka Lekishia Renee Williams, aka Lekishia Wilyams, aka Lekishia Williams, aka Lekeishia Renee Williams, aka Cophia Lorraine Phelps, Defendant-Appellant., 2007 WL 6434319, *6434319+ (Appellate Brief) (Or.App. Mar 07, 2007) Appellant's Brief (NO. A131158) 8636 State of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Scott Lee ATKINS, DefendantAppellant., 2007 WL 6371495, *6371495+ (Appellate Brief) (Or.App. Mar 06, 2007) Appellant's Brief (NO. A131191) 8637 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Jose Guadalupe PARRA Ibarra, © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. aka Jose Guadalupe Parra-Ibarra, Defendant-Appellant., 2007 WL 7950045, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Or.App. Jan 25, 2007) Appellant's Brief (NO. A131232) 8638 State of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Michael Jerald KELLER, aka Michael J. Keller, Defendant-Appellant., 2007 WL 6371510, *6371510+ (Appellate Brief) (Or.App. Jan 10, 2007) Appellant's Brief (NO. A131340) 8639 State of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Clifford Paul HOWARD, DefendantAppellant., 2006 WL 6131267, *6131267+ (Appellate Brief) (Or.App. Nov 03, 2006) Appellant's Brief (NO. A128971) 8640 THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, by Lynne Wilson, General Counsel, William McGill, F. Darlene Albaugh, Heather Kolanich, Wayne Davenport, Frederick Smith, Jamie McPoyle, Brianna Miller, Valerie Brown, Janet Layton, Korri Brown, AL Reitz, Lisa Lang, Brad Group, and Randall Sovinsky, Appellants, v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Department of Community and Economic Development, Office of Open Records and Terry Mutchler, Executive Director of the Office of, 2010 WL 8757992, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Pa. Dec 23, 2010) Brief of Amici Curiae Council 13, American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO, District Council 47, American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO, ... (NO. 59MAP2010) 8641 Robert C. JUBELIRER, Senator and President pro tempore of the Pennsylvania Senate, and John M. Perzel, Representative and Speaker of the Pennsylvania House of Representatives, Appellants, v. Edward G. RENDELL, Governor of Pennsylvania; Robert P. Casey, Jr., State Treasurer of Pennsylvania; Michael J. Masch, Secretary of Budget and Administration of Pennsylvania; Estelle Richman, Secretary of Public Welfare of Pennsylvania; Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare; Allen D., 2006 WL 6640959, *6640959+ (Appellate Brief) (Pa. Dec 13, 2006) Brief of Amici Curiae American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania, the Coalition of Labor Union Women, Pennsylvania Now, Inc., the Women's Law Project, and Women's Way in Support of Appellees (NO. 102MAP2006) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 8642 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellant, v. Don R. ICKES, Appellee., 2004 WL 2458740, *2458740+ (Appellate Brief) (Pa. Jun 26, 2004) Brief for Appellee (NO. 13WAP2004) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8643 BERWICK AREA LANDLORD ASSOCIATION, INC., PENNSYLVANIA RESIDENTIAL OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellants, v. BOROUGH OF BERWICK, Appellee., 2011 WL 10526058, *1 (Appellate Brief) (Pa.Cmwlth. Aug 22, 2011) Appellants' Brief (NO. 766CD2011) 8644 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH - OF THE COMMONWEALTH SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION, v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH, Commission on Human Relations, Deborah Henson, James Keith Beer, Mark S. Friedman, Ray Ann Lockard, Mark S. Stein, Bruce Venarde, Shandra D. Williams, Appellants., 2004 WL 2446256, *2446256+ (Appellate Brief) (Pa.Cmwlth. Jun 07, 2004) Brief of Appellee (NO. 0168CD2004) " © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 8645 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH OF THE COMMONWEALTH SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION, Appellee, v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH, Commission on Human Relations, Deborah Henson, James Keith Beer, Mark S. Friedman, Ray Ann Lockard, Mark S. Stein, Bruce Venarde and Shandra D. Williams, Appellants., 2004 WL 2446254, *2446254+ (Appellate Brief) (Pa.Cmwlth. 2004) Brief for Appellants (NO. 0168CD2004) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8646 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee, v. Rayan HENRY, Appellant., 2012 WL 3078882, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Pa.Super. Mar 12, 2012) Brief for Appellant (NO. 1513MDA2011) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8647 J.C.B., Appellant, v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, Appellee., 2011 WL 7052521, *1 (Appellate Brief) (Pa.Super. Oct 25, 2011) Brief for Appellant (NO. 109WDA2011) 8648 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, v. Eric VONSCHLICHTEN, Appellant., 2011 WL 7646676, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Pa.Super. 2011) Brief for Appellant (NO. 1416EDA2011) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8649 Karen Y. MINISCI, v. Louis L. MINISCI., 2007 WL 4117730, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Pa.Super. 2007) Brief for Appellant (NO. 621MDA2007) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8650 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee, v. Joshua Corey BROMLEY, Appellant., 2006 WL 3038330, *3038330+ (Appellate Brief) (Pa.Super. 2006) Brief for Appellant (NO. 00312EDA06) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 8651 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee, v. Joseph Henry Paul DAVIDSON, Appellant., 2004 WL 2138041, *2138041+ (Appellate Brief) (Pa.Super. Jun 21, 2004) Brief of Appellant (NO. 00779EDA03) HN: 2,3 (S.Ct.) 8652 STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, v. David RUSSELL., 2003 WL 25653145, *25653145+ (Appellate Brief) (R.I. 2003) Joint Brief-in-Chief of the Office of the Public Defender the Criminal Defense Clinic Roger Williams University School of Law the Rhode Island Association of Criminal Defense Attorneys as Amici Curiae (NO. 03-0353-) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8653 Stacy W. HOWARD., Appellant, v. Pamela O. CARTEE, Respondent., 2009 WL 6845127, *6845127+ (Appellate Brief) (S.C.App. Mar 17, 2009) Appellant's Brief in Reply to Initial Brie of Respondent 8654 THE STATE, Respondent, v. Kimberlee U. HUFFSTETLER, Appellant., 2009 WL 1161606, *1161606+ (Appellate Brief) (S.C.App. Mar 09, 2009) Final Brief of Appellant 8655 James MARKO, Defendant and Appellant, v. Allison MARKO, Plaintiff and Appellee., 2011 WL 8993451, *1 (Appellate Brief) (S.D. Oct 07, 2011) Brief of Appellant (NO. 26087) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8656 DEJA VU OF NASHVILLE, INC., d/b/a Deja VU, Meroney Entertainment, Inc., d/b/a Ken's Gold Club, D.F. Group, Inc. d/b/a Anthony's Showplace, and Stephanie's Cabaret of Tennessee, LLC d/b/a Stephanie's Cabaret, Jane Doe I and Jane Doe II, Appellants, v. Metropolitan GOVERNMENT for Nashville and © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Davidson County and Metropolitan Sexually Oriented Business Licensing Board, Appellees., 2009 WL 1019917, *1019917+ (Appellate Brief) (Tenn.Ct.App. Mar 20, 2009) Appellants' Reply Brief (NO. M2008-01393-COA-R3-C) 8657 Angel CHANDLER, Appellant-Respondent, v. Joseph Marion BARKER, Appellee-Petitioner., 2008 WL 5517010, *5517010+ (Appellate Brief) (Tenn.Ct.App. Dec 29, 2008) Brief of Appellant-Respondent Angel Chandler (NO. W2008-02255-COA-R03-) 8658 DEJA VU OF NASHVILLE, INC., d/b/a Deja Vu, Meroney Entertainment, Inc., d/b/a Ken's Gold Club, D.F. Group, Inc. d/b/a Anthony's Showplace, and Stephanie's Cabaret of Tennessee, LLC d/b/a Stephanie's Cabaret, Jane Doe I and Jane Doe II, Appellants, v. METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT FOR NASHVILLE and Davidson County and Metropolitan Sexually Oriented Business Licensing Board, Appellees., 2008 WL 5460302, *5460302+ (Appellate Brief) (Tenn.Ct.App. Dec 16, 2008) Appellants' Brief (NO. M2008-01393-COA-R3-C) 8659 Ashish PATEL, Anverali Satani, Nazira Momin, Minaz Chamadia, and Vijay Lakshmi Yogi, Petitioners / Cross-Respondents, v. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATION, et al., Respondents / Cross-Petitioners., 2013 WL 5235065, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Tex. Sep 13, 2013) Petitioners' Brief on the Merits (NO. 12-0657) 8660 In the Matter of the Marriage of J.B. and H.B. J.B., Petitioner, v. The State of Texas, Respondent., 2013 WL 4763644, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Tex. Sep 03, 2013) Brief Amici Curiae of American Civil Liberties Union of Texas and Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc. in Support of Petitioner and Urging Reversal of the Court of Appeals (NO. 11-0024) 8661 In the Matter of the Marriage of J.B. and H.B., 2013 WL 3948566, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Tex. Jul 29, 2013) Supplemental Response Brief Addressing Recent U.S. Supreme Court Decisions (NO. 11-0024) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8662 In the matter of the MARRIAGE OF J.B. AND H.B., 2013 WL 4521017, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Tex. Jul 29, 2013) Supplemental Response Brief Addressing Recent U.S. Supreme Court Decisions (NO. 11-0114) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8663 State of Texas, Petitioner, v. Angelique S. NAYLOR and Sabina Daly, Respondents., 2013 WL 3809959, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Tex. Jul 18, 2013) Petitioner's Supplemental Brief Addressing Recent U.S. Supreme Court Decisions (NO. 11-0114) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8664 In re STATE OF TEXAS, Relator., 2013 WL 3831713, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Tex. Jul 18, 2013) Relator's Supplemental Brief Addressing Recent U.S. Supreme Court Decisions (NO. 11-0222) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8665 In the Matter of the Marriage of J.B. and H.B., 2011 WL 9530586, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Tex. Dec 06, 2011) Brief Amici Curiae of Texas State Representative Warren Chisum and the Honorable Todd Staples in Support of the State of Texas (NO. 11-0024) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8666 State of Texas, Petitioner, v. Angelique S. NAYLOR and Sabina Daly, © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Respondents., 2011 WL 9530606, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Tex. Dec 06, 2011) Brief Amici Curiae of Texas State Representative Warren Chisum and the Honorable Todd Staples in Support of the State of Texas (NO. 11-0114) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8667 In the Matter of the Marriage of J.B. and H.B., J.B., Petitioner, v. The State of Texas, Respondent., 2011 WL 9530585, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Tex. Oct 10, 2011) Petitioner's Reply to State's Brief on the Merits (NO. 11-0024) " HN: 3,5 (S.Ct.) 8668 In the Matter of the Marriage of J.B. and H.B., 2011 WL 9530584, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Tex. May 11, 2011) Brief Amici Curiae of Texas State Representative Warren Chisum and the Honorable Todd Staples in Support of the State of Texas (NO. 11-0024) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8669 State of Texas, Petitioner, v. Angelique NAYLOR and Sabina Daly, Respondents., 2011 WL 9530604, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Tex. May 11, 2011) Brief Amici Curiae of Texas State Representative Warren Chisum and the Honorable Todd Staples in Support of the Petition for Review of the State of Texas (NO. 11-0114) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8670 Mark Alexander FLEMING, Petitioner, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Respondent., 2013 WL 5943937, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Tex.Crim.App. Oct 28, 2013) Amicus Brief on the Merits from the 35th Judicial District Attorney's Office (NO. PD-1250-12) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8671 Mark Alexander FLEMING, Petitioner, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Respondent., 2013 WL 1772083, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Tex.Crim.App. Apr 11, 2013) Appellant's Reply Brief (NO. PD-1250-12) " HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.) 8672 Mark FLEMING, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee., 2013 WL 1416259, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Tex.Crim.App. Mar 29, 2013) State's Reply to Appellant's Brief on the Merits (NO. PD-1250-12) " HN: 1,2 (S.Ct.) 8673 Gregg Carl BAIRD, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, 2012 WL 3600392, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Tex.Crim.App. Jul 02, 2012) Brief for Appellant (NO. PD-0159-12) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8674 Mark Alexander FLEMING, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee., 2011 WL 1299679, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Tex.Crim.App. Mar 28, 2011) Appellant's Reply Brief (NO. PD-1529-10) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8675 Ex parte Max MOUSSAZADEH., 2010 WL 5868125, *5868125+ (Appellate Brief) (Tex.Crim.App. Jan 31, 2010) State's Brief (NO. AP-76439) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8676 Gregory RUSSEAU, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee., 2008 WL 3994747, *3994747+ (Appellate Brief) (Tex.Crim.App. 2008) Brief of Appellant (NO. 74466) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8677 In the Interest of Brian Keith KINNETT., 2007 WL 1920644, *1920644+ (Appellate Brief) (Tex.Crim.App. Jun 07, 2007) Applicant Brian Keith Kinnett's Brief (NO. AP-75611) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 8678 Noah ESPADA, Appellant, v. The State of Texas, Appellee., 2006 WL 2643721, *2643721+ (Appellate Brief) (Tex.Crim.App. Aug 08, 2006) Brief for Appellant (NO. AP-75219) 8679 Vic A. GARDNER, Appellant, v. Greg ABBOTT, Attorney General of Texas, in his Official Capacity, The State of Texas, and Glen Elliott, Individually, Appellees., 2013 WL 2457632, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Tex.App.-Austin May 20, 2013) Brief Amicus Curiae of Lambda Legal Defense and Educationfund, Inc. in Support of Plaintiff-Appellant and Urging Reversal (NO. 03-12-00680-CV) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8680 Vic A. GARDNER, Appellant, v. Greg ABBOTT, Attorney General of Texas, the State of Texas; and Glen Elliott, Individually Appellees., 2013 WL 1345602, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Tex.App.-Austin Mar 15, 2013) Brief of Appellant (NO. 03-12-00680-CV) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8681 In Re David Michael FLINT. David Michael FLINT, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS., 2012 WL 2468793, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Tex.App.-Austin May 23, 2012) Brief for Applicant (NO. 03-10-00852-) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8682 Thomas Dale DELAY, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee., 2012 WL 315340, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Tex.App.-Austin Jan 11, 2012) Appellant's Reply Brief (NO. 03-11-0087-) 8683 Ashish PATEL, Anverali Satani, Nazira Momin, Tahereh Rokhti, Minaz Chamadia, and Vijay Lakshmi Yogi, Appellants / Cross-Appellees, v. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING and Regulation, et al., Appellees / CrossAppellants., 2011 WL 3602224, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Tex.App.-Austin Jul 22, 2011) Appellants' Brief (NO. 03-11-00057-CV) 8684 STATE OF TEXAS, v. Angelique NAYLOR and Sabina Daly., 2010 WL 4360130, *4360130+ (Appellate Brief) (Tex.App.-Austin Sep 30, 2010) Appellee Angelique Naylor's Brief (NO. 03-10-00237-CV) 8685 Ex parte David Lee VICTORICK, Appellant., 2014 WL 197291, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Tex.App.-Beaumont Jan 13, 2014) Appellant's Brief (NO. 09-13-00551-) 8686 In re: Estate of Thomas Trevino ARAGUZ, III, Deceased., 2012 WL 3028470, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi Jun 28, 2012) Brief of Appellee Heather Delgado (NO. 1311490CV) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8687 In re: ESTATE OF THOMAS TREVINO ARAGUZ, III, Deceased., 2012 WL 1344122, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi Mar 02, 2012) Brief of Appellant, Nikki Araguz (NO. 13-11-00490-CV) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8688 Juan MUNGIA, as Surviving Spouse of Concepcion Mungia Deceased, and Jose Segura, Individually, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Detar Hospital NAVARRO, Dr. Peter Paul Rojas, and Ronda Masciarelli, Rn, Defendants-Appellees., 2008 WL 5027603, *5027603+ (Appellate Brief) (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi Sep 15, 2008) Brief of Plaintiffs-Appellants (NO. 13-08-382-CV) 8689 Beatrice VILLARREAL, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee., 2008 WL 3013130, *3013130+ (Appellate Brief) (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi May © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 06, 2008) Supplemental Brief for the State (NO. 13-05-123-) 8690 THE STATE OF TEXAS, v. Beatrice VIALLAREAL., 2008 WL 5396338, *5396338 (Appellate Brief) (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi Apr 22, 2008) Appellant's Supplemental Brief (NO. 13-05-123CR, TR04-6197-4) 8691 Amber LOVILL, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee., 2008 WL 575985, *575985+ (Appellate Brief) (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi Jan 18, 2008) Brief for the State (NO. 13-07-668-) 8692 In the Matter of the Marriage of J.B. and H.B., 2010 WL 1367403, *1367403+ (Appellate Brief) (Tex.App.-Dallas Feb 08, 2010) Appellee J.B.'s Brief (NO. 05-09-01170-CV, 05-09-01208-CV) 8693 In the Matter of the Marriage of J.B. and H.B., 2010 WL 1367402, *1367402+ (Appellate Brief) (Tex.App.-Dallas Jan 05, 2010) Brief of the State of Texas (NO. 05-09-01170-CV) 8694 Jerry GUMPERT and Martin Coyne, Appellants, v. ABF FREIGHT SYSTEM, INC., Barry Sircy, Tommy Walker, Robert Graves, George Warren, Perry Wayne Middlebrook, Richard Crawford, Richard Fiser, Dan Noonkester, Richard Martinez, Richard Passmore, and Leonard Esner, Appellees., 2008 WL 5083558, *5083558+ (Appellate Brief) (Tex.App.-Dallas Aug 12, 2008) ABF Freight System, Inc.'s Appellee Brief (NO. 05-07-01717-CV) 8695 Thomas J. ""JIM"" Trulock, Appellant, v. THE CITY OF DUNCANVILLE, Appellee., 2008 WL 4223049, *4223049+ (Appellate Brief) (Tex.App.-Dallas Jul 17, 2008) Appellant's Reply Brief (NO. 05-08-343-CV) 8696 Thomas J. ""JIM"" TRULOCK, Appellant, v. THE CITY OF DUNCANVILLE, Appellee., 2008 WL 2645705, *2645705+ (Appellate Brief) (Tex.App.-Dallas 2008) Appellant's Brief (NO. 05-08-343-CV) 8697 Jerry GUMPERT and Martin Coyne, Appellants, v. ABF FREIGHT SYSTEM, INC., Barry Sircy, Tommy Walker Robert Graves, George Warren, Perry Wayne Middlebrook, Richard Crawford, Richard Fiser, Daniel Noonkester, Richard Martinez, Richard Passmore and Leonard Esner, Jr., Appellees., 2007 WL 5793501, *5793501+ (Appellate Brief) (Tex.App.-Dallas Aug 07, 2007) Appellee Brief of Individual Appellees (NO. 05-07-01717-CV) 8698 Carlos Diaz De LEON, Daniel Marquez, Kimo Sylva, and Gabriel Morales, Appellant, v. THE CITY OF EL PASO, TEXAS and Israel Rodriguez-Aceves, Appellees., 2011 WL 2837992, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Tex.App.-El Paso May 20, 2011) Appellees' Brief (NO. 08-10-00348-CV) 8699 CITY OF FORT WORTH, Appellant, v. Cecilia JACOBS, Appellee., 2012 WL 3590665, *1 (Appellate Brief) (Tex.App.-Fort Worth Aug 03, 2012) Reply Brief of Appellant City of Fort Worth (NO. 02-12-00143-CV) 8700 Judge Carlos CORTEZ, v. Coyt RANDAL (Randy) Johnston, the Dallas Morning News, ALM Media, LLC d/b/a the Texas Lawyer, and Judge Marty Lowy, Appellees., 2012 WL 392947, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Tex.App.-Texarkana Jan 20, 2012) Appellant's Brief (NO. 06-11-00089-CV) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 8701 V.E. Joahanne THOMAS-SMITH, Appellant, v. James E. MACKIN, Appellee., 2006 WL 211185, *211185+ (Appellate Brief) (Tex.App.-Hous. (14 Dist.) Jan 09, 2006) Reply Brief of Appellant (NO. 14-05-00852-CV) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8702 Wolfgang Hirczy DE MINO, Appellant, v. Edward P. SHERIDAN, Donald J. Foss, in His Official Capacity as Provost of the University of Houston, Appellees., 2005 WL 3270687, *3270687+ (Appellate Brief) (Tex.App.-Hous. (14 Dist.) Oct 18, 2005) Appellant's Reply Brief (NO. 14-05-00210-CV) 8703 In Re: Judicial Conduct Commission Inquiry Concerning a Judge Hon. Walter K. STEED., 2005 WL 5867231, *5867231+ (Appellate Brief) (Utah Jun 16, 2005) Brief of Appellant Judge Walter K. Steed (NO. 20050127-SC) 8704 STATE OF UTAH, Plaintiff/ Appellant, v. Frank C. COBLE, Defendant/ Appellee., 2009 WL 6900128, *6900128+ (Appellate Brief) (Utah App. Nov 12, 2009) Reply Brief of Appellant (NO. 20080866-CA) 8705 STATE OF UTAH, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Frank C. COBLE, Defendant/ Appellee., 2009 WL 6900127, *6900127+ (Appellate Brief) (Utah App. Sep 08, 2009) Brief of Appellee (NO. 20080866-CA) 8706 14TH STREET GYM, INC., a Nevada Corporation, Plaintiffappellant, v. SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION, a Municipal corporation, Defendant/Appellee., 2007 WL 5444383, *5444383+ (Appellate Brief) (Utah App. Apr 05, 2007) Brief of Appellee Salt Lake City Corporation (NO. 2006113-CA) 8707 14TH STREET GYM, INC., a Nevada Corporation, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION, a Municipal corporation, Defendant/Appellee., 2007 WL 7244587, *7244587+ (Appellate Brief) (Utah App. Apr 05, 2007) Brief of Appellee Salt Lake City Corporation (NO. 20061113-CA) 8708 14TH GYM, INC., a Nevada Corp., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. SALT LAKE CITY CORP., a Municipal corp., Defendant/Appellee., 2007 WL 5444381, *5444381+ (Appellate Brief) (Utah App. Mar 13, 2007) Brief of Appellant 14th ST GYM (NO. 20061113-CA) 8709 14TH GYM, INC., a Nevada Corp., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. SALT LAKE CITY CORP., a Municipal corp., Defendant/Appellee., 2007 WL 7244586, *7244586+ (Appellate Brief) (Utah App. Mar 13, 2007) Brief of Appellant 14th St Gym (NO. 20061113-CA) 8710 D.A.R., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. STATE OF UTAH; Olene Walker, Governor, State of Utah; Mark Shurtleff, Attorney General, State of Utah, Defendants/ Appellees., 2005 WL 5897082, *5897082+ (Appellate Brief) (Utah App. Sep 29, 2005) Reply Brief of Appellant (NO. 20050560-CA) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8711 D. A. R., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. STATE OF UTAH; Jon M. Huntsman, Governor, State of Utah; Mark Shurtleff, Attorney General, State of Utah; and David Yocom, Salt Lake County District Attorney, Defendants/Appellees., 2005 WL 5897083, *5897083+ (Appellate Brief) (Utah App. Sep 07, 2005) Brief of Appellees (NO. 20050560-CA) " 8712 D.A.R., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. STATE OF UTAH; Olene Walker, Governor, © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. State of Utah; Mark Shurtleff, Attorney General, State of Utah, Defendants/ Appellees., 2005 WL 5896973, *5896973+ (Appellate Brief) (Utah App. Aug 09, 2005) Brief of Appellant (NO. 20050560-CA) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8713 L.F., a Minor, Appellant, v. William D. BREIT, et al., Appellees., 2012 WL 6729642, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Va. Aug 14, 2012) Brief of Appellee William D. Breit (NO. 120158) 8714 Beverley MASON, Appellant, v. William D. BREIT, et al., Appellees., 2012 WL 6729648, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Va. Aug 14, 2012) Brief of Appellee William D. Breit (NO. 120159) 8715 Terri Hackley MCCABE, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Appellee., 2007 WL 4223584, *4223584+ (Appellate Brief) (Va. Jan 24, 2007) Brief of Appellant (NO. 061909) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8716 William S. MCDONALD, a/k/a William S. MacDonald, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Appellee., 2007 WL 2296012, *2296012+ (Appellate Brief) (Va. Jan 08, 2007) Brief of the Commonwealth of Virginia (NO. 061456) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8717 William S. MCDONALD, a.k.a. William S. MacDonald, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Appellee., 2006 WL 4701780, *4701780+ (Appellate Brief) (Va. Dec 12, 2006) Opening Brief of Appellant (NO. 061456) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8718 William S. MCDONALD, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Appellee., 2006 WL 4701781, *4701781+ (Appellate Brief) (Va. Dec 12, 2006) Brief of Amicus Curiae Professor Erwin Chemerinsky in Support of Appellant (NO. 061456) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8719 Katherine Anne Fisher DAVENPORT, Cameron Fredric Fisher Davenport, W. Scott Davenport, Timothy M. Fisher, Hillary Anne Dalton-Moffit, Mark M. Dalton, Bruce H. Moffit, John Doe, Jane Doe, and Jean Doe, Appellants, v. Deborah LITTLE-BOWSER, in her official capacity as State Registrar of Vital Records, and Robert B. Stroube, M.D., M.P.H., in his official capacity as State Health Commissioner, Appellees., 2004 WL 3589299, *3589299+ (Appellate Brief) (Va. Dec 22, 2004) Amicus Brief of Family Research Council in Support of Appellees (NO. 041180) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8720 Katherine Anne Fisher DAVENPORT, et al., Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. Deborah LITTLE-BOWSER, et al., Defendants - Appellees., 2004 WL 3589298, *3589298+ (Appellate Brief) (Va. Oct 27, 2004) Opening Brief of Appellants (NO. 041180) " 8721 Katherine Anne Fisher DAVENPORT, et al., Appellants, v. Deborah M. LITTLE-BOWSER, et al., Appellees., 2004 WL 3589300, *3589300+ (Appellate Brief) (Va. Oct 25, 2004) Brief of Amicus Curiae Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc. (NO. 041180) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8722 Muguet S. MARTIN, Appellant, v. KRISTOPHER JOSEPH ZIHERL, Appellee., 2004 WL 3507250, *3507250+ (Appellate Brief) (Va. Aug 30, 2004) Brief of the Commonwealth of Virginia as Amicus Curiae in Support of Neither Party © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. (NO. 04-0804) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8723 Muguet S. MARTIN, Appellant, v. Kristopher Joseph ZIHERL, Appellee., 2004 WL 3507251, *3507251+ (Appellate Brief) (Va. Aug 30, 2004) Brief of Appellee (NO. 040804) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8724 Muguet S. MARTIN, Appellant, v. Kristopher Joseph ZIHERL, Appellee,, 2004 WL 3507252, *3507252+ (Appellate Brief) (Va. Aug 30, 2004) Brief of Amicus Curiae American Civil Liberties Union of Virginia, Inc. in Support of Appellant (NO. 040804) 8725 Muguet S. MARTIN, Appellant, v. Kristopher Joseph ZIHERL, Appellee., 2004 WL 3589274, *3589274+ (Appellate Brief) (Va. Aug 30, 2004) Brief of Appellee (NO. 040804) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8726 Muguet S. MARTIN, Appellant, v. Kristopher Joseph ZIHERL, Appellee., 2004 WL 3589276, *3589276+ (Appellate Brief) (Va. Aug 30, 2004) Brief of Amicus Curiae American Civil Liberties Union of Virginia, Inc. In Support of Appellant (NO. 040804) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8727 Muguet S. MARTIN, Appellant, v. Kristopher Joseph ZIHERL, Appellee., 2004 WL 3589277, *3589277+ (Appellate Brief) (Va. Aug 30, 2004) Brief of the Commonwealth of Virginia as Amicus Curiae in Support of Neither Party (NO. 040804) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8728 Muguet S. MARTIN, Appellant, v. Kristopher Joseph ZIHERL, Appellee., 2004 WL 3507249, *3507249+ (Appellate Brief) (Va. Aug 03, 2004) Opening Brief of Appellant (NO. 040804) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8729 Muguet S. MARTIN, Appellant, v. Kristopher Joseph ZIHERL, Appellee., 2004 WL 3589275, *3589275+ (Appellate Brief) (Va. Aug 03, 2004) Opening Brief of Appellant (NO. 040804) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8730 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Appellant, v. Kevin Lamont HICKS, Appellee., 2004 WL 3589131, *3589131+ (Appellate Brief) (Va. Jan 23, 2004) Brief of Amici Curiae Richmond Tenants Organization Charlottesville Public Housing Association of Residents Enphront (NO. 011728) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8731 William D. BREIT, Appellant, v. Lillian Fay MASON-BREIT and Beverley Mason, Appellees., 2011 WL 8027721, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Va.App. May 02, 2011) Brief of Appellee Beverley Mason (NO. 0337-11-1) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8732 Andy Joe TJAN, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Appellee., 2005 WL 5222449, *5222449+ (Appellate Brief) (Va.App. Feb 28, 2005) Brief of the Commonwealth of Virginia. (NO. 3221-03-1) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8733 Andy Joe TJAN, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Appellee., 2005 WL 5222384, *5222384+ (Appellate Brief) (Va.App. Jan 18, 2005) Brief of Appellant and Addendum (NO. 3221-03-1) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8734 Lisa MILLER-JENKINS, Appellant, v. Janet MILLER-JENKINS, Appellee., 2007 WL 5161202, *5161202+ (Appellate Brief) (Vt. Dec 06, 2007) Reply Brief (NO. 2007-271) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 8735 Lisa MILLER-JENKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Janet MILLER-JENKINS, Defendant-Appellee., 2007 WL 5161201, *5161201+ (Appellate Brief) (Vt. Nov 16, 2007) Brief of the Appellee (NO. 2007-271) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8736 In re the Termination of M.S.R. (D.O.B. XX/XX/00) and T.S.R. (D.O.B. XX/ XX/00) D.S.H.S., State of Washington, Respondent, v. Nyakat LUAK, Appellant., 2011 WL 4562940, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Wash. Sep 26, 2011) Amici Curiae Brief of Kidsvoice, the National Center for Youth Law, First Star, the National Association of Counsel for Children, Children's Law Center of California, the Children's Advocacy ... (NO. 85729-6) 8737 STATE OF WASHINGTON, Petitioner, v. Matthew HIRSCHFELDER, Respondent., 2009 WL 6082953, *6082953+ (Appellate Brief) (Wash. Feb 20, 2009) State's Motion for Review of Decision Terminating Review (NO. 82744-3) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8738 STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. Matthew HIRSCHFELDER, Petitioner., 2008 WL 7645144, *7645144+ (Appellate Brief) (Wash. Aug 25, 2008) Respondent's Brief in Response to Washington Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers' Amicus Curiae Brief (NO. 82744-3) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8739 STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. Matthew HIRSCHFELDER, Appellant., 2008 WL 7645146, *7645146+ (Appellate Brief) (Wash. Aug 01, 2008) Washington Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers Amicus Curiae Brief (NO. 82744-3) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8740 In re the Marriage of: Michael Steven KING, Respondent, v. Brenda Leone KING, Appellant, State of Washington, involved party., 2007 WL 1920926, *1920926+ (Appellate Brief) (Wash. May 02, 2007) Amicus Curiae Brief of International Law Scholars in Support of Appellant (NO. 79978-4) 8741 In re the Marriage of: Michael Steven KING, Respondent, v. Brenda Leone KING, Appellant, State of Washington, involved party., 2007 WL 6546351, *6546351+ (Appellate Brief) (Wash. May 02, 2007) Corrected Amicus Curiae Brief of International Law Scholars in Support of Appellant (NO. 79978-4) 8742 Bellevue John DOE 11and Seattle John Does 6 & 9, Appellants/ Cross-Respondents, BELLEVUE JOHN DOES 1-10, Federal Way John Does 1-5 and Jane Does 1-2, and Seattle John Does 1-5, 7-8, & 10-17, and Seattle Jane Doe 1 and John Doe, Plaintiffs/Cross-Respondents, v. BELLEVUE SCHOOL DISTRICT #405, Federal Way School District #210, and Seattle School District #1, Respondents, THE SEATTLE TIMES COMPANY, Respondent/ Cross-Appellant., 2006 WL 6296920, *6296920+ (Appellate Brief) (Wash. Apr 25, 2006) Answer of Respondent Seattle Times Company to Petition of Seattle John Doe #9 (NO. 786038) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8743 Heather ANDERSEN, et al., Respondents, v. KING COUNTY, el al, Appellants, v. State of Washington, Appellant, Senator Val Stevens, et al., Intervenor Appellants; Cecelia Castle, et al., Respondents, v. State of Washington, © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Appellant., 2005 WL 1841351, *1841351+ (Appellate Brief) (Wash. May 24, 2005) Intervenor's Supplemental Response Brief (NO. 75934-1, 75956-1) 8744 Heather ANDERSEN and Leslie Christian, et al., Respondents, v. KING COUNTY, et al. State of Washington Senator Val Stevens, et al., Appellants; Celia Castle and Brenda Bauer, et al., Plaintiffs, v. State of Washington, Defendant., 2005 WL 1841350, *1841350+ (Appellate Brief) (Wash. May 23, 2005) King County's Response to Supplemental Brief of Respondents Castle, et al. (NO. 75934-1, 75956-1) 8745 Heather ANDERSEN and Leslie Christian, et al., Respondents, v. KING COUNTY, et al., Appellants, Celia Castle and Brenda Bauer et al., Plainiffs, v. State of Washington, Defendant., 2005 WL 1695239, *1695239+ (Appellate Brief) (Wash. Apr 13, 2005) Supplemental Brief Of Respondents Castle, ET AL (NO. 75934-1) 8746 Heather ANDERSEN and Leslie Christian et al., Respondents, v. King COUNTY et al., Appellants., 2005 WL 901992, *901992+ (Appellate Brief) (Wash. Feb 23, 2005) Answer of Respondents Heather Andersen and Leslie Christian Etal. to Briefs of Amici Curiae (NO. 75934-1) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8747 Heather ANDERSEN and Leslie Christian, et al. Respondents, v. KING COUNTY, et al. Appellants; Celia Castle and Brenda Bauer et al., Plaintiffs, v. State of Washington, Defendant., 2005 WL 723808, *723808+ (Appellate Brief) (Wash. Feb 15, 2005) Corrected Brief of Respondents Castle, et al. (NO. 75934-1) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8748 Heather ANDERSEN and Leslie Christian, et al., Respondents, v. KING COUNTY, et al., Appellants; Celia Castle and Brenda Bauer et al., Respondents, v. State of Washington, Appellant., 2005 WL 723811, *723811+ (Appellate Brief) (Wash. Feb 14, 2005) Amici Curiae Brief of Loren Miller Bar Association, Latina/O Bar Association of Washington, South Asian Bar Association of Washington, Asian Bar Association of Washington, Hate Free Zone of ... (NO. 75934-1) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8749 Heather ANDERSEN and Leslie Christian el al., Respondents, v. KING COUNTY el al., Appellants; Celia Castle and Brenda Bauer et al., Respondents, v. State of Washington, Appellant., 2005 WL 723812, *723812+ (Appellate Brief) (Wash. Feb 14, 2005) Amici Curiae Brief of Labor Organizations American Federation of Teachers, Washington; Asian Pacific American Labor Alliance, Seattle Chapter; Coalition of Labor Union Women, Puget Sound Chapter; ... (NO. 75934-1) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8750 Heather ANDERSEN and Leslie Christian, et al., Respondents, v. KING COUNTY, et al., Appellants; Gelia Castle and Brenda Bauer et al., Respondents, v. State of Washington, Appellant., 2005 WL 723813, *723813+ (Appellate Brief) (Wash. Feb 14, 2005) Brief of Amici Curiae Multifaith Works Religious Coalition for Equality, and Washington Faith Communities (NO. 75934-1) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 8751 HEATHER ANDERSEN, el at, Respondents, v. KING COUNTY, et al., Appellants. Cecelia Castle, et al., Respondents, v. State of Washington, Appellant., 2005 WL 901978, *901978+ (Appellate Brief) (Wash. Feb 14, 2005) Brief Amicus Curiae of United Families International In Support of Appellants (NO. 75934-1, 75956-1) 8752 Heather ANDERSEN and Leslie Christian et al., Respondents, v. KING COUNTY et al., Appellants. Celia Castle and Brenda Bauer et al., Respondents, v. State of Washington, Appellant., 2005 WL 901979, *901979+ (Appellate Brief) (Wash. Feb 14, 2005) Amici Curiae Brief of the Libertarian Party of Washington State; Log Cabin Republicans of Washington (NO. 75934-1) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8753 Heather ANDERSON, et al., Respondents, v. KING COUNTY, et al., Appellants, v. State of Washington, Appellant, v. Senator Val Stevens, et al., Intervener Appellants; Celia Castle, et al., Respondents, v. State of Washington, Appellant., 2005 WL 901980, *901980+ (Appellate Brief) (Wash. Feb 14, 2005) Brief of Amicus Curiae American Center for Law & Justice (NO. 75934-1) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8754 Heather ANDERSEN and Leslie Christian, et al., Respondents, v. KING COUNTY, et al., Appellants, v. State of Washington, Appellant, Senator Val Stevens, et al., Appellants (Intervenors)., 2005 WL 901983, *901983+ (Appellate Brief) (Wash. Feb 14, 2005) Brief of Amicus Curiae Families Northwest (NO. 75934-1) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8755 Heather ANDERSON and Leslie Christian, et al. Respondents, v. KING COUNTY, et al, Appellants; Celia Castle and Brenda Bauer, et al., Plaintiffs, v. State of Washington, Defendant., 2005 WL 901984, *901984+ (Appellate Brief) (Wash. Feb 14, 2005) Brief of Amicus Curiae Concerned Women for America (NO. 75934-1) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8756 Heather ANDERSEN and Leslie Christian, et al., Respondents, v. KING COUNTY, et al., State Of Washington, Senator Val Stevens, et al., Appellants., 2005 WL 901987, *901987+ (Appellate Brief) (Wash. Feb 14, 2005) Brief Amicus Curiae of Family Research Council in Support of Appellants, Urging Reversal (NO. 75934-1) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 8757 Heather ANDERSEN and Leslie Christian et al., Respondents, v. KING COUNTY et al., Appellants. Celia Castle and Brenda Bauer et al., Respondents, v. State of Washington, Appellant., 2005 WL 6522700, *6522700+ (Appellate Brief) (Wash. Feb 07, 2005) Amici Curiae Brief of Legal Marriage Alliance of Washington, Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders, and Vermont Freedom to Marry Task Force (NO. 75934-1, 75956-1) 8758 Heather ANDERSEN and Leslie Christian, et al., Respondents, v. KING COUNTY, et al. State Of Washington Senator Val Stevens, et al., Appellants; Celia Castle and Brenda Bauer, et al., Plaintiffs, v. State of Washington, Defendant., 2005 WL 723814, *723814+ (Appellate Brief) (Wash. Jan 11, 2005) Reply Brief of Appellant King County (NO. 75934-1, 75956-1) " HN: © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 1,3 (S.Ct.) 8759 Heather ANDERSEN and Leslie Christian, et al. Respondents, v. KING COUNTY, et al.State of Washington senator Val Stevens, et al., Appellants, Celia Castle and Brenda Bauer, et al. Plaintiffs, v. State of Washington, Defendant., 2005 WL 723825, *723825+ (Appellate Brief) (Wash. Jan 11, 2005) Reply Brief of Appellant King County (NO. 75934-1, 75956-1) " HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 8760 Heather ANDERSEN, et al., Respondents, v. KING COUNTY, et al., Appellants, v. State of Washington, Appellant, Senator Val Stevens, et al., Intervenor Appellants; Cecelia Castle, et al., Respondents, v. State of Washington, Appellant., 2005 WL 723815, *723815+ (Appellate Brief) (Wash. Jan 10, 2005) Reply Brief of Appellant State of Washington (NO. 75934-1, 75956-1) " HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 8761 Heather ANDERSEN and Leslie Christian, et al., Respondents, v. King COUNTY, et al., Appellants, v. State of Washington, Appellant, Senator Val Stevens, et al., Appellants (Intervenors)., 2005 WL 723826, *723826+ (Appellate Brief) (Wash. Jan 10, 2005) Intervenor's Reply Brief (NO. 75934-1) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8762 Heather ANDERSEN, et al., Respondents, v. KING COUNTY, et al., Appellants, v. State of Washington, Appellant, Senator Val Stevens, et al., Intervenor Appellants. Cecelia Castle, et al, Respondents, v. State of Washington, Appellant., 2005 WL 723827, *723827+ (Appellate Brief) (Wash. Jan 10, 2005) Reply Brief of Appellant State of Washington (NO. 75934-1, 75956-1) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8763 IN RE the PARENTAGE OF L.B., child Sue Ellen Carvin, Appellant/ Respondent, v. Page BRITAIN, Respondent/Petitioner., 2005 WL 723840, *723840+ (Appellate Brief) (Wash. Jan 10, 2005) Amicus Curiae Brief (NO. 75626-1) 8764 Heather ANDERSEN and Leslie Christian et al, Respondents, v. KING COUNTY et al., Appellants; Celia Castle and Brenda Bauer et al., Respondents, v. State of Washington, Appellant., 2005 WL 723807, *723807+ (Appellate Brief) (Wash. 2005) Brief of Amici Curiae Pride Foundation; Seattle Men's Chorus/Seattle Women's Chorus; Seamec; Tacoma United for Fairness; Equal Rights Washington; Inland Northwest Equality; Outkitsap; Spokame Aids ... (NO. 75934-1) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8765 Heather ANDERSEN and Leslie Christian, et al., Respondents, v. KING COUNTY, et al. State of Washington Senator Val Stevens, et al., Appellants, Celia Castle and Brenda Bauer, et al., Plaintiffs, v. State of Washington, Defendant., 2005 WL 901990, *901990+ (Appellate Brief) (Wash. 2005) King County's Answer to Brief of Amici Curiae (NO. 75934-1) " HN: 3,5 (S.Ct.) 8766 Heather ANDERSEN and Leslie Christian, et al. Respondents, v. KING COUNTY, et al. Appellants, Celia Castle and Brenda Bauer, et al., Plaintiffs, v. © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. State of Washington, Defendant., 2004 WL 3155215, *3155215+ (Appellate Brief) (Wash. Nov 29, 2004) Brief of Respondents Castle, et Al. (NO. 75934-1) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8767 Heather ANDERSEN and Leslie Christian. et al, Respondents, v. KING COUNTY, et al. Appellant, v. State of Washigton, Appellant, v. Senator Val Stevens, et al Appellant (Intervenor)., 2004 WL 3155214, *3155214+ (Appellate Brief) (Wash. Nov 24, 2004) Brief of Respondents (NO. 75934-1) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8768 Heather ANDERSEN and Leslie Christian, et al., Respondents, v. KING COUNTY, et al., Appellants, v. State of Washington, Appellant, Senator Val Stevens, et al., Appellants (Intervenors)., 2004 WL 3029909, *3029909+ (Appellate Brief) (Wash. Oct 18, 2004) Brief of Intervenors (NO. 75934-1) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8769 Heather ANDERSEN and Leslie Christian, et al, Respondents, v. KING COUNTY, et al. State of Washington Senator Val Stevens, et al., Appellants., 2004 WL 3029908, *3029908+ (Appellate Brief) (Wash. Oct 15, 2004) Brief of Appellant King County (NO. 75934-1, 75956-1) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8770 State of Washington, Respondent, v. Ronald LUTHER, Appellant., 2003 WL 24302732, *24302732+ (Appellate Brief) (Wash. Dec 29, 2003) Appellant's Opening Brief (NO. 76849-8) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8771 John D. CARLISLE (deceased), Delbert D. Carlisle, individually and as personal representative of his estate; and Delbert D. Carlisle and Myrna L. Carlisle, individually, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. GROUP HEALTH COOPERATIVE OF PUGET SOUND, Defendant/Respondent., 2003 WL 24118188, *24118188 (Appellate Brief) (Wash. Jul 07, 2003) Appellants' Reply Brief (NO. 73736-3) 8772 State of Washington, Respondent, v. Ronald LUTHER, Appellant., 2003 WL 25719473, *25719473+ (Appellate Brief) (Wash.App. Dec 29, 2003) Appellant's Opening Brief (NO. 52391-1-I) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8773 STATE OF WISCONSIN, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. James W. SMITH, Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner., 2009 WL 9136475, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Wis. Apr 30, 2009) Brief and Appendix of Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner (NO. 2008AP1011) 8774 In Re Termination of Parental Rights to Zachary B., Nathaniel B. and Michael B., Persons Under the Age of 18; Monroe County Dept. of Human Services, Petitioner-Respondent-Petitioner, v. Kelli B., Respondent-Appellant., 2003 WL 24028666, *24028666+ (Appellate Brief) (Wis. Sep 01, 2003) RespondentAppellant's Brief and Supplemental Appendix (NO. 03-0060, 03-0061, 03-0062) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 8775 FARM-TO-CONSUMER LEGAL DEFENSE FUND, Grassway Organics Farm Store LLC, Grassway Organics Association, Kay Craig, d/b/a Grassway Farm and Wayne Craig, d/b/a Grassway Farm, Plaintiffs-Co-Appellants, v. WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, Trade and Consumer © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Protection, Defendant-Respondent. FARM-TO-CONSUMER LEGAL DEFENSE FUND, Mark Zinniker, Petra Zinniker, Nourished By Nature LLC, Phillip Burns, Gayle Loiselle, and Robert Karp, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v., 2012 WL 1860271, *1 (Appellate Brief) (Wis.App. IV Dist. May 11, 2012) Amended Brief and Appendix of the Defendant-Respondent (NO. 2011AP2264) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8776 STATE OF WISCONSIN, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Micah D. STERN, Defendant-Appellant., 2012 WL 1642436, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Wis.App. II Dist. Apr 27, 2012) Brief and Appendix of Defendant-Appellant (NO. 2012AP285-) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8777 STATE OF WISCONSIN, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Laurie A. BLUM, DefendantAppellant., 2012 WL 705155, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Wis.App. II Dist. Feb 20, 2012) Reply Brief of Defendant- Appellant (NO. 2011AP1741-) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8778 FARM-TO-CONSUMER LEGAL DEFENSE FUND, Grassway Organics Farm Store LLC, Grassway Organics Association, Kay Craig, d/b/a Grassway Farm and Wayne Craig, d/b/a Grassway Farm, Plaintiffs-Co-Appellants, v. WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, TRADE and Consumer Protection, Defendant-Respondent. FARM-TO-CONSUMER LEGAL DEFENSE FUND, Mark Zinniker, Petra Zinniker, Nourished by Nature LLC, Phillip Burns, Gayle Loiselle, and Robert Karp, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v., 2012 WL 627444, *1 (Appellate Brief) (Wis.App. IV Dist. Feb 14, 2012) Brief and Appendix of the Defendant-Respondent (NO. 2011AP2264) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8779 FARM-TO-CONSUMER LEGAL DEFENSE FUND, Grassway Organics Farm Store LLC, Grassway Organics Association, Kay Craig, d/b/a Grassway Farm, and Wayne Craig, d/b/a Grassway Farm, Plaintiffs/Co-Appellants, v. WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, Trade and Consumer Protection, Defendant-Respondent. FARM-TO-CONSUMER LEGAL DEFENSE FUND, Mark Zinniker, Petra Zinniker, Nourished by Nature, LLC, Philip Burns, Gayle Loiselle, and Robert Karp, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v., 2012 WL 392685, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Wis.App. IV Dist. Jan 11, 2012) Merit Brief of FarmTo-Consumer Legal Defense Fund, Mark Zinniker, Petra Zinniker, Nourished by Nature, LLC, Philip Burns, Gayle Loiselle, and Robert Karp (NO. 2011AP2264) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8780 In re the commitment of Hung Nam TRAN: State of Wisconsin, PetitionerRespondent, v. Hung Nam TRAN, Respondent-Appellant., 2010 WL 9071732, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Wis.App. II Dist. Apr 15, 2010) Brief and Appendix of Appellant (NO. 2008AP340, 2010AP329) 8781 State of WISCONSIN, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Jaegen J. THOMAS, DefendantAppellant., 2009 WL 2821091, *2821091+ (Appellate Brief) (Wis.App. I Dist. Aug 11, 2009) Reply Brief of Defendant-Appellant (NO. 2009AP426-) 8782 STATE OF WISCONSIN, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Dennis S. PRYES, Defendant-Appellant., 2009 WL 8156832, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Wis.App. II Dist. Apr 07, 2009) The Brief of the Plaintiff-Respondent (NO. 2009AP2-) " © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8783 STATE OF WISCONSIN, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Dennis S. PRYES, Defendant-Appellant., 2009 WL 8156831, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Wis.App. II Dist. Feb 04, 2009) Brief of Defendant-Appellant (NO. 2009AP2) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8784 STATE OF WISCONSIN, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. James W. SMITH, Defendant-Appellant., 2008 WL 8227145, *8227145+ (Appellate Brief) (Wis.App. III Dist. Oct 20, 2008) State of Wisconsin's, Brief and Appendix (NO. 2008AP1011-) 8785 Norman C. GREEN, Jr, Plaintiff - Appellant - Cross Respondent, v. Gerald A. BERGE, et al, Defendantn - Respondent, Mark Carpenter, Defendant Respondent - Cross Appellant., 2008 WL 8431020, *1+ (Appellate Brief) (Wis.App. IV Dist. Jan 17, 2008) Combined: Reply Brief of Appellant, with His Response Brief to Cross-Respondent - Appellant (NO. 2007AP431) 8786 State of WISCONSIN, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Steven L. BEECRAFT, Defendant-Appellant., 2006 WL 6143028, *6143028+ (Appellate Brief) (Wis.App. IV Dist. Jul 25, 2006) Brief and Appendix of Defendant-Appellant (NO. 2006AP982) 8787 STATE OF WISCONSIN, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Joachim E. DRESSLER, Defendant-Appellant, Pro se., 2005 WL 6074408, *6074408+ (Appellate Brief) (Wis.App. II Dist. Sep 02, 2005) Reply Brief of Defendant-Appellant (NO. 2004AP1497) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8788 STATE OF WISCONSIN, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Joachim E. DRESSLER, Defendant-Appellant., 2005 WL 6074407, *1 (Appellate Brief) (Wis.App. II Dist. Jul 15, 2005) Brief and Appendix of Plaintiff- Respondent (NO. 2004AP1497-) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8789 STATE OF WISCONSIN, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Joachim E. DRESSLER, Defendant-Appellant, Pro se., 2005 WL 6074406, *6074406 (Appellate Brief) (Wis.App. II Dist. Apr 20, 2005) Brief of Defendant-Appellant (NO. 2004AP1497) " 8790 In re Termination of Parental Rights to Princess P., A Person Under the Age of 18: State of Wisconsin, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Pamela P., RespondentAppellant., 2003 WL 23837850, *23837850+ (Appellate Brief) (Wis.App. I Dist. Nov 19, 2003) Appellant's Brief and Appendix (NO. 03-2169) " HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 8791 State of WISCONSIN, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. William G. HENRIKSEN, Defendant-Appellant., 2003 WL 24217358, *24217358+ (Appellate Brief) (Wis.App. III Dist. May 06, 2003) Defendant-Appellant's Brief and Appendix (NO. 04-0705-) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8792 In the Matter of the Guardianship of: MEO, minor child: KO, Appellant (Respondent), v. LDH and BJH, Appellees (Petitioners), The State of Wyoming, Appellee (Intervenor)., 2005 WL 4781252, *4781252+ (Appellate Brief) (Wyo. Dec 01, 2005) Brief of Appellee (Intervenor) State of Wyoming (NO. C-05-11) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8793 Philip and Freddie WILSON, Appellants (Plaintiffs), v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF TETON, a political subdivision of the State of Wyoming, Appellee (Defendant)., 2005 WL 5434172, *5434172+ (Appellate Brief) (Wyo. Oct 17, 2005) Brief of Appellants Philip and Freddie Wilson (NO. 05-213) Joint Appendices 8794 United States of America v. Windsor, 2013 WL 275686, *1+ (Joint Appendix) (U.S. Jan 22, 2013) Joint Appendix (NO. 12-307) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8795 Hollingsworth v. Perry, 2013 WL 1802128, *1+ (Joint Appendix) (U.S. Jan 22, 2013) JOINT APPENDIX, VOL. I (NO. 12-144) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8796 Flores-Villar v. United States of America, 2010 WL 2515870, *1+ (Joint Appendix) (U.S. Jun 18, 2010) Joint Appendix (NO. 09-5801) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8797 Christian Legal Society Chapter of University of California, Hastings College of the Law v. Martinez, 2010 WL 363298, *1 (Joint Appendix) (U.S. Jan 26, 2010) JOINT APPENDIX, VOL. II (NO. 08-1371) " 8798 State of Hawaii v. Office of Hawaiian Affairs, 2008 WL 5155273, *1 (Joint Appendix) (U.S. Dec 04, 2008) Joint Appendix (NO. 07-1372) 8799 Hammon v. State of Indiana, 2005 WL 3617526, *1+ (Joint Appendix) (U.S. Dec 23, 2005) (NO. 05-5705) Trial Court Documents (U.S.A.) Trial Pleadings 8800 Paul HARD; Plaintiff, v. Robert BENTLEY, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Alabama; Luther Johnson Strange, III in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Alabama; Catherine M. Donald in her official capacity as the State Registrar of Vital Statistics; Steven L. Reed in his official capacity as Probate Judge for the County of Montgomery; Richard I. Lohr, II, Administrator of the Estate of David Fancher; Defendants., 2013 WL 7044987, *1 (Trial Pleading) (M.D.Ala. Dec 16, 2013) Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief (NO. 2:13CV00922) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8801 Walter Allen MCCLURE, Plaintiff, v. GEICO INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant., 2005 WL 4132422, *4132422 (Trial Pleading) (N.D.Ala. Sep 21, 2005) Complaint for Declaratory Judgment (NO. 05CV01971) 8802 Joseph CONNOLLY; Terrel L. Pochert; Suzanne Cummins; Holly N. Mitchell; Clark Rowley; David Chaney; R. Mason Hite IV; and, Christopher L. Devine; Each for Themselves and all others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. Janice K. BREWER, in her Official Capacity as Governor of Arizona; Thomas C. Horne, in his Official Capacity as Attorney General of Arizona; Michael K. Jeanes, in his © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Official Capacity as Clerk of the Superior Court of Maricopa County, Arizona;, 2014 WL 46565, *1+ (Trial Pleading) (D.Ariz. Jan 06, 2014) Complaint for Permanent Injunction and Declaratory Judgment (NO. 2:14CV00024) " HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 8803 Martin R. ARANAS, Irma Rodriguez, and Jane Deleon, Plaintiffs, v. Janet NAPOLITANO, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security; Department of Homeland Security; Alejandro Mayorkas, Director, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services; and United States Citizenship & Immigration Services, Defendants., 2012 WL 2864065, *1+ (Trial Pleading) (C.D.Cal. Jul 12, 2012) Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief (NO. SACV121137JVSMLGX) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8804 LOG CABIN REPUBLICANS, a nonprofit corporation, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Donald H. Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense, in his Official Capacity, Defendants., 2006 WL 2314141, *2314141+ (Trial Pleading) (C.D.Cal. Apr 28, 2006) First Amended Complaint for Declaratory Judgment and Injunctive Relief for Violations of the United States Constitution (NO. CV04-8425, GPS) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8805 Thomas TEAGARDEN, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, Bakersfield Police Department, Sherman Rooks, Brent Stratton, Kyle Ursery, and Does 1 to 100, Inclusive, Defendants., 2007 WL 6970001, *6970001 (Trial Pleading) (E.D.Cal. Jan 24, 2007) First Amended Complaint Demand for Jury Trial (NO. 107-CV-00054-AWI-TAG) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8806 Neil Pio FERNANDES. Andres Eloy Contreras-Arellano, Plaintiffs, v. Janet NAPOLITANO. Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security; Department of Homeland Security; Alejandro Mayorkas, Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services; and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Defendants., 2013 WL 1103200, *1+ (Trial Pleading) (N.D.Cal. Mar 18, 2013) Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief (NO. C 13 1203 JCS) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8807 Michael D. ALMY, Anthony J. Loverde, and Jason D. Knight, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE; Robert M. Gates, Secretary of Defense; Department of the Air Force; Michael B. Donley, Secretary, Department of the Air Force; Department of the Navy; and Ray Mabus, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Defendants., 2010 WL 5071826, *5071826+ (Trial Pleading) (N.D.Cal. Dec 13, 2010) Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief for Violations of the United States Constitution and Administrative Procedures Act (NO. CV105627) 8808 Kristin M. PERRY, et al., Plaintiffs, City and county of San Francisco, PlaintiffIntervenor, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, in his official capacity as Governor of California, et al., Defendants, Proposition 8 Official Proponents Dennis Hollingsworth, et al., Defendant-Intervenors., 2009 WL 2912746, *2912746 (Trial Pleading) (N.D.Cal. Sep 04, 2009) The Administration's Answer to City and County of San Francisco's Complaint in Intervention for Declaratory, Injunctive or Other Relief (NO. 09-CV-02292VRW) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 8809 Margaret Melinda SPRAGUE, Plaintiff, v. THE MEDICAL BOARD OF CALIFORNIA STEVE ALEXANDER, Ronald H. Wender MD, Ronald M. Moy MD, Joan L. Jerzak, Arnold L. Zepel, Marl L. Kalish MD, Steven Zeigen, Deputy Attorney General, Defendants., 2007 WL 4612748, *4612748 (Trial Pleading) (S.D.Cal. Sep 05, 2007) First Amended Complaint for: Violation of Civil Rights (42 USC 1983) Americans with Disabilities act (42USC 12117) for Declaratory Relief (28 USC 2201) Damages General and punitive and such other and ... (NO. 07CV1561BTM-LP) 8810 54 Sheriffs: John B. COOKE, Sheriff of Weld County, Colorado; Terry Maketa, Sheriff of EL Paso County, Colorado; Justin Smith, Sheriff of Larimer County, Colorado; David A. Weaver, Sheriff of Douglas County, Colorado; Bruce W. Hartman, Sheriff of Gilpin County, Colorado; Ken Putnam, Sheriff of Cheyenne County, Colorado; Dennis Spruell, Sheriff of Montezuma County, Colorado; Tim Jantz, Sheriff of Moffat County, Colorado; Jerry Martin, Sheriff of Dolores County,, 2013 WL 2149997, *1 (Trial Pleading) (D.Colo. May 17, 2013) Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief (NO. 1:13CV01300) 8811 VIP OF BERLIN, LLC, a Connecticut Limited Liability Company, Plaintiff, v. THE TOWN OF BERLIN, Connecticut, a Municipal Corporation; and Herman Middlebrooks, Jr. in his official capacity as Town Manager for the Town of Berlin, Connecticut, Defendants., 2006 WL 3888717, *3888717 (Trial Pleading) (D.Conn. Nov 29, 2006) Amended Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief (NO. 306CV01811(SRU)) 8812 Michael S. GOGOLA Plaintiff, pro se, v. James ZINGALE, Chairman, Executive Director Florida Department of Revenue, in his official capacity and, Florida Department of Revenue and, United states district Court Middle District of Florida, The Honorable Patricia C. Fawsett, Chief Judge, Defendants., 2004 WL 3334744, *3334744 (Trial Pleading) (M.D.Fla. Sep 29, 2004) Amended Verified Complaint (NO. 204-CV-417) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8813 Michael S. GOGOLA, Plaintiff, pro se, v. James ZINGALE, Chairman, Executive Director Florida Department of Revenue, in his official capacity and, Florida Department of Revenue and, United States District Court Middle District of Florida, The Honorable Patricia C. Fawsett, Chief Judge, Defendants., 2004 WL 3334743, *3334743 (Trial Pleading) (M.D.Fla. Aug 11, 2004) Verified Complaint (NO. 204-CV-417-FTM-29DNF) 8814 Michael S. GOGOLA, Plaintiff, pro se, v. James ZINGALE, Chairman, Executive Director Florida Department of Revenue, in his official capacity and, Florida Department of Revenue and, United States District Court Middle District of Florida, The Honorable Patricia C. Fawsett, Chief Judge, Defendants., 2004 WL 3334710, *3334710 (Trial Pleading) (M.D.Fla. Jun 25, 2004) Amended Verified Complaint (NO. 204-CV-417) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8815 Michael S. GOGOLA, Plaintiff, pro se, v. James ZINGALE, Chairman, Executive Director Florida Department of Revenue, in his official capacity and, Florida Department of Revenue and, United States District Court Middle District of Florida, The Honorable Patricia C. Fawsett, Chief Judge, Defendants., 2004 © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. WL 3334746, *3334746 (Trial Pleading) (M.D.Fla. Jun 25, 2004) Amended Verified Complaint (NO. 204-CV-417) 8816 Todd J. HOLLIS, Plaintiff, v. Tasha C. CUNNINGHAM, individually, And the Cavelle Company, Inc., Defendants., 2008 WL 2472887, *2472887 (Trial Pleading) (S.D.Fla. Jun 05, 2008) Defendants' Amended Answer and Defenses to the Amended Complaint (NO. 07-23112-CIV-ALTONAG) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8817 Todd J. HOLLIS, Plaintiff, v. Tasha C. CUNNINGHAM, individually, And the Cavelle Company, Inc., Defendants., 2008 WL 1275592, *1275592 (Trial Pleading) (S.D.Fla. Mar 31, 2008) Defendants' Answer and Defenses to the Amended Complaint and Cunningham's Counterclaim Against Todd J. Hollis (NO. 07-23112-CIV-ALTONAG) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8818 FLAVA WORKS, INC., a Florida corporation doing business as Cocodorm.com, and Angel Barrios, Plaintiffs / Petitioners, v. CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, a Florida municipal corporation; and City of Miami Code Enforcement Board, Defendants / Respondents., 2007 WL 3313642, *3313642 (Trial Pleading) (S.D.Fla. Sep 11, 2007) Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief and Supplemental Claim for Petition for Writ of Certiorari (NO. 07-22370) 8819 STARSHIP ENTERPRISES OF ATLANTA, INC., Plaintiff, v. FULTON COUNTY, a political subdivision of the state of Georgia, Karen C. Handel, Fulton County Commission Chairperson, in her official capacity, Lynne Riley, Emma I. Darnell, William Edwards, Robb Pitts, and Nancy A. Boxill, Fulton County Commissioners, in their official capacities, Tom Lowe, Fulton County Commissioner, in his individual and official capacity, Steven COVER, Director, Fulton County Department of, 2005 WL 3881423, *3881423 (Trial Pleading) (N.D.Ga. Feb 20, 2005) First Amendment to Complaint (NO. 105-CV-0238-JOF) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8820 AUGUSTA VIDEO, INC., a Georgia corporation, Plaintiff, v. AUGUSTA, GEORGIA, a political subdivision of the State of Georgia, and the AugustaRichmond County Commission, Defendants., 2004 WL 2158491, *2158491+ (Trial Pleading) (S.D.Ga. Mar 16, 2004) Third Amended Complaint for Declaratory Judgment, Permanent Injunction and Damages (NO. CV102-94) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8821 AUGUSTA VIDEO, INC., a Georgia corporation, Plaintiff, v. AUGUSTA, GEORGIA, a political subdivision of the State of Georgia, and the AugustaRichmond County Commission, Defendants., 2002 WL 32659216, *32659216+ (Trial Pleading) (S.D.Ga. 2002) Amended Complaint for Declaratory Judgment, Permanent Injunction and Damages (NO. CV-102-94) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8822 Billy Ray FARMER, III and Diane Farmer, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA., 2012 WL 3126772, *1 (Trial Pleading) (E.D.La. Jul 27, 2012) Complaint for Damages, Federal Tort Claims Act (NO. 12CV01960) 8823 Anthony ARNONE, John Baker, Charles Breazeale, Donald Crochet, Bruce © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Hardgrave, Glenn Cullotta, John Hardy, Dennis Pitre, Thomas Perrault, Steve Williams, Chad Richardson, Walter Jones, Joe Cassard, Louis Riddle, Derrick Jarreau, Jesse Grantham, David Fleming, John Newchurch, Timothy Childers, Gerald Harmon, and Darrell Baranco, v. HENRY WHITEHORN IN HIS CAPACITY AS SUPERINTENDENT OF THE LOUISIANA STATE POLICE, and Elmer Litchfield in his Capacity as Sheriff of East, 2004 WL 2777021, *2777021 (Trial Pleading) (M.D.La. Oct 25, 2004) Complaint (NO. 04-758-B-M3) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8824 Christine GAMMONS, on behalf of herself and Richard Almond, Danissa Brown, and Dasean Toure, minor children, Plaintiffs, v. MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT; Jane Wallis Gumble, individually and in her capacity as Director of the Massachusetts Department of Housing and Community Development; Metropolitan Boston Housing Partnership; Julia Kehoe, individually and in her capacity as Executive Director of the Metropolitan Boston Housing, 2007 WL 736413, *736413 (Trial Pleading) (D.Mass. Jan 22, 2007) Verified Civil Rights Complaint for Damages and Injunctive Relief and Jury Trial Demand (NO. 107-CV-10110-PBS) 8825 Thomas COOK; Megan Dresch; Laura Galaburda; Jack Glover; David Hall; Monica Hill; Jenny Lynn Kopfstein; Jennifer McGinn; Justin Peacock; James E. Pietrangelo II; Derek Sparks; Stacy Vasquez, Plaintiffs, v. Donald H. RUMSFELD, Secretary of Defense; Tom Ridge, Secretary of Homeland Security; United States of America, Defendants., 2004 WL 3095874, *3095874 (Trial Pleading) (D.Mass. Dec 06, 2004) Complaint (NO. 04CV12546GAO) 8826 James DONALDSON, Plaintiff, v. TOWN OF WAKEFIELD; American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, (""Afscme""), Council 93, AFL-CIO and Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Defendant., 2003 WL 23885507, *23885507 (Trial Pleading) (D.Mass. Dec 16, 2003) Defendant's Response to Compaint and Jury Claim (NO. 02CV12058MLW) 8827 James DONALDSON, Plaintiff, v. TOWN OF WAKEFIELD; American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Council 93 AFL-CIO; and Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Defendants., 2003 WL 23885476, *23885476 (Trial Pleading) (D.Mass. Oct 23, 2003) Complaint and Jury Claim (NO. 02CV12058MLW) 8828 April DEBOER, et al., Plaintiff, v. Richard SNYDER, et al., Defendants., 2013 WL 5569371, *1 (Trial Pleading) (E.D.Mich. Sep 17, 2013) Defendant Brown's Reply Brief in Support of Summary Judgment for Plaintiffs (NO. 212CV10285BAFMJH) 8829 Arthur GALLAGHER, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF CLAYTON, Mayor Linda Goldstein, City Manager Craig Owens, Parks Director Patty Deforrest, Police Chief Thomas J. Byrne, each in his or her official capacity only, Defendants., 2011 WL 901201, *1+ (Trial Pleading) (E.D.Mo. Mar 02, 2011) Complaint for Declaratory Relief and/or Preliminary and Permanent Injunctions, and Damages Civil Rights - 42 U.S.C. 1983 and 1988, and State Law Claim © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Challenging City of Clayton's Ban on Outdoor ... (NO. 11CV00392) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8830 ENLIGHTENED READING, INC., a Missouri Corporation, d/b/a Erotic City and Elb Properties, Inc., a Missouri Corporation, and Ronald Boone, and Rhonda Boone, Plaintiffs, v. JACKSON COUNTY, Missouri, an unincorporated government entity, Defendant., 2008 WL 4679704, *4679704 (Trial Pleading) (W.D.Mo. Aug 02, 2008) First Amended Complaint for Declaratory Relief, Permannt Injunction, and Attorneys Fee (NO. 408CV00209) 8831 ENLIGHTENED READING, INC., a Missouri Corporation, d/b/a Erotic City and ELB Properties, Inc., a Missouri Corporation, and Ronald Boone, and Rhonda Boone, and Richard Wilkinson, and Howard Fincher, Guardian and Conservator for minor child, Plaintiffs, v. JACKSON COUNTY, Missouri, an unincorporated government entity, Defendant., 2008 WL 1983612, *1983612 (Trial Pleading) (W.D.Mo. Mar 21, 2008) Complaint for Declaratory Relief, Permanent Injunction, and Attorneys' Fees (NO. 408CV00209) 8832 BELTON GIFTS, L.L.C., a Missouri Limited Liability Company, d/b/a Priscilla's and L.C. Properties, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. THE CITY OF BELTON, MISSOURI, an unincorporated Municipality, Defendant., 2005 WL 1828045, *1828045+ (Trial Pleading) (W.D.Mo. Jun 14, 2005) Complaint for Declaratory Relief, Preliminary Injunction, Permanent Injunction, Damages and Attorneys' Fees (NO. 05-0548-CV-W-REL) 8833 Caitlin RYERSON, Plaintiff, v. State of New Jersey, County of Morris, Town of Dover, Borough of Lincoln Park, Township of Montville, Township of Mount Olive, Rockaway Township, Township of Washington (County of Morris), Richard Ricco, Edward O'Rourke, Stephen Zoeller, Charles Tremblay, Jessica Groblewski, March Lerner, Susan Gilligan, Sergeant Michael Rogers, Lieutenant Cathi Fenske, Detective Charles Brady, John Czohla, Michael Rubbinnacio, Joseph Devine, Robert, 2006 WL 2921933, *2921933+ (Trial Pleading) (D.N.J. Aug 07, 2006) Amended Complaint and Jury Demand (NO. 06-CV-01214-(JAG)) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8834 James M. MALONEY, Plaintiff, v. Kathleen M. RICE, individually and in her official capacity as District Attorney of the County of Nassau, Defendant., 2010 WL 4089058, *4089058+ (Trial Pleading) (E.D.N.Y. Sep 17, 2010) Second Amended Verified Complaint (NO. 030786, ADS) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8835 James M. MALONEY, Plaintiff, v. Eliot SPITZER, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of New York, George Pataki, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of New York, and Denis Dillon, in his official capacity as District Attorney of the County of Nassau, and their successors, Defendants., 2005 WL 2892348, *2892348+ (Trial Pleading) (E.D.N.Y. Sep 03, 2005) Amended Verified Complaint (NO. 030786, ADS) 8836 MBS INVESTMENTS, L.L.C., a Kansas limited liability company; and Ohio Gifts, L.L.C., a Kansas limited liability company Plaintiff, v. Orange TOWNSHIP, Ohio, an incorporated municipality, 168 East Orange Road Lewis © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Center, Ohio 43035 Defendant., 2005 WL 696023, *696023+ (Trial Pleading) (S.D.Ohio Feb 23, 2005) Complaint for Declaratory Relief, Preliminary Injunction, Permanent Injunction, Damages and Attorney Fees (NO. C205164) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8837 Richie F. LEVINE, (Plaintiff), v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, Megan's Law Section, (Defendant), United States Department of Justice (Defendant), New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services (Defendant)., 2007 WL 2858687, *2858687+ (Trial Pleading) (M.D.Pa. Aug 07, 2007) Complaint (NO. 407-CV-1453) 8838 Katherine BRADACS and Tracie Goodwin, Plaintiffs, v. Nimrata ("Nikki") Randhawa HALEY, in her official capacity as Governor of South Carolina; Alan M. Wilson, in his official Capacity as Attorney General, Defendants., 2013 WL 6079390, *1 (Trial Pleading) (D.S.C. Nov 14, 2013) Answer of Defendants (NO. 3:13-CV-02351-JFA) 8839 Katherine BRADACS and Tracie Goodwin, Plaintiffs, v. Nimrata ("Nikki") Randhawa HALEY, in her official capacity as Governor of South Carolina; Alan M. Wilson, in his official capacity as Attorney General of South Carolina, Defendants., 2013 WL 4603857, *1 (Trial Pleading) (D.S.C. Aug 28, 2013) Verified Complaint for Declaratory, Injunctive, and Other Relief (NO. 3:13-CV-02351-JFA) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8840 Ms. Sara Lee GOFF, d/b/a Sara's Secret / Condoms to Go, and Lexus Group, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Mr. Jeffery BICKERSTAFF, In his official capacity as the Chief Building Inspector for The City of Murphy, Texas Mr. Mike Gaiter, In his official capacity as the Building Inspection Administrator for The City of Garland, Texas Mr. Denny Denman, In his official capacity as the Chief Building Inspector for the City of Rowlett, Texas, Defendants., 2008 WL 7323745, *7323745+ (Trial Pleading) (N.D.Tex. Oct 09, 2008) Plaintiff Sara Lee Goff's First Amended Original Complaint Seekingdeclaratory Relief, Preliminary Injunctive Relief, Permanent Injunctive Relief, Damages, and Attorney Fees (NO. 308-CV-1660-L) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8841 ADUST VIDEO, INC., a Texas Corporation, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF RICHARDSON, Texas, an Incorporated Municipality, Defendant., 2007 WL 2666395, *2666395+ (Trial Pleading) (N.D.Tex. Jul 23, 2007) First Amended Complaint for Declaratory Relief, Preliminary Injunction, Permanent Injunction, Damages and Attorneys' Fees (NO. 306-CV-1491-P) 8842 ADUST VIDEO, INC., a Texas corporation, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF RICHARDSON, Texas, an incorporated municipality, Defendant., 2006 WL 5344665, *5344665+ (Trial Pleading) (N.D.Tex. Aug 17, 2006) Complaint for Declaratory Relief, Preliminary Injunction, Permanent Injunction, Damages and Attorneys' Fees (NO. 3-06CV1491-P) 8843 SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE, L.P., Plaintiff, v. ARTHUR A. COLLINS, INC., Defendant., 2005 WL 1802875, *1+ (Trial Pleading) (N.D.Tex. Jul 14, 2005) Plaintiffs' Post-Hearing Brief Regarding Claim Construction © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. (NO. 304-CV-0669-BECF, 3:04-CV-00669) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 8844 Andrea C. SPENCER, Kelly Spears, Carol Hill, Avia Rice, Leigh N. Scroggins, Georgette Taylor, Tresha Jackson, and Melissa Quintanilla, v. Greg ABBOTT Attorney General of Texas Bill Moore County Attorney Johnson County Texas Tom Cowan, Chief of Police City of Burleson, Texas Bob L. Alford, Sheriff Johnson County, Texas Each in their Official Capacities Only Defendants., 2004 WL 2232446, *2232446+ (Trial Pleading) (N.D.Tex. Feb 11, 2004) Complaint (NO. 304-CV0287-L) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8845 Michael Durwood GRIFFITH, v. Douglas DRETKE, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Institutional Division., 2004 WL 4976864, *4976864 (Trial Pleading) (S.D.Tex. Oct 07, 2004) Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus of Person in State Custody (NO. 03-MC-380) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8846 Shannon ZAHRN, Catherine Zahrn, Alexius Augustine, and Andrew Simpson, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Rick PERRY, in his official capacity as Governor of Texas; Greg Abbott, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Texas; and Dana DeBeauvoir, in her official capacity as County Clerk of Travis County, Texas, Defendants., 2013 WL 5846697, *1+ (Trial Pleading) (W.D.Tex. Oct 31, 2013) Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief (NO. 1:13-CV-00955) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8847 Terrence l. DANIELS, Plaintiff, v. Amy ORLANDO, in her official capacity, as District Attorney for Dona Ana County, New Mexico Third Judicial District, Defendant., 2011 WL 9287709, *1 (Trial Pleading) (W.D.Tex. Oct 24, 2011) Emergency Petition for Injunctive Relief Introduction (NO. EP11CV0433) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8848 Kody BROWN, Meri Brown, Janelle Brown, Christine Brown, Robyn Sullivan, Plaintiffs, v. Gary R. HERBERT, in his official capacity as Governor of Utah; Mark Shurtleff, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Utah; Jeffrey R. Buhman, in his official capacity as County Attorney for Utah County, Defendants., 2011 WL 2739555, *1+ (Trial Pleading) (D.Utah Jul 13, 2011) Civil Rights Complaint (NO. 2:11CV00652) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8849 THE FUNDAMENTALIST CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS, an Association of Individuals, Plaintiff, v. Bruce R. WISAN, Special Fiduciary of the United Effort Plan Trust; Mark Shur-Tleff, Attorney General for the State of Utah; Terry Goddard, Attorney General for the State of Arizona; and Denise Posse Lindberg, Judge of the Third Judicial District Court of Salt Lake County, State of Utah, Defendants., 2008 WL 7311190, *7311190 (Trial Pleading) (D.Utah Nov 05, 2008) First Amended Complaint and Request for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief (NO. 208-CV-772-DB) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8850 Kathleen MILLIGAN-HITT and Kathryn R. Roberts, Plaintiffs, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF SHERIDAN COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT NUMBER 2, Craig Dougherty, individually and in his official capacity as Superintendent, and Terry Burgess, in his official capacity as Assistant Superintendent, Defendants., 2005 WL 3273387, *3273387 (Trial Pleading) (D.Wyo. Oct 24, 2005) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Complaint Amended by Interlineation (NO. 05-CV-0017-B) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8851 Kathleen MILLIGAN-HITT and Kathryn R. Roberts, Plaintiffs, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF SHERIDAN COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT NUMBER 2, Craig Dougherty, in his official capacity as Superintendent, and Terry Burgess, in his official capacity as Assistant Superintendent, Defendants., 2005 WL 320436, *320436 (Trial Pleading) (D.Wyo. Jan 14, 2005) Complaint (NO. 03CV017B) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8852 Steven KALSKI, Petitioner, v. Michael D. ANTONOVICH, in his official capacity as Mayor of County of Los Angeles Board of Supervisors, also known as Los Angeles County, a legal subdivision of the State of California, Board of Supervisors, Respondent, Joseph F. Gentile, in his official capacity as Chairman of Los Angeles County Employee Relations Commission, also known as County of Los Angeles, a legal subdivision of the State of California, Employee Relations, 2007 WL 5765669, *5765669 (Trial Pleading) (Cal.Super. May 25, 2007) First Amended Petitions Forwrit of Mandate (CA Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1094.5 and 1085) (NO. BS105860) 8853 Jeff L. THIGPEN, Individually and as Register of Deeds of Guilford County; the Reverend Randall J. Keeney, Individually and as Rector of Saint Barnabas Episcopal Church; the Reverend Julie Peeples, Individually and as Pastor of the Congregational United Church of Christ; the Reverend Doctor Daniel G. Koen Individually and as an Ordained Pastor of the Lutheran Church Missouri Synod; Mary Jamis; Starr Johnson; Frank L. Benedetti; Thomas G. Trowbridge; Carolyn S., 2011 WL 7787785, *1 (Trial Pleading) (N.C.Super. Dec 08, 2011) Complaint (NO. 11CVS12041) Expert Testimony 8854 Karen GOLINSKI, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, and John Berry, Director of the United States Office of Personnel Management, in his official capacity, Defendants; The Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group Of The U.S. House of Representatives, DefendantIntervenor., 2011 WL 7472742, *1 (Expert Report and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. Aug 05, 2011) Declaration of Gary Segura in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' and Defendant-Intervenor's Motions to Dismiss (NO. 310-CV-0257-JSW) 8855 Joanne PEDERSEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, et al., Defendants., 2011 WL 2934955, *1 (Expert Report and Affidavit) (D.Conn. May 17, 2011) Expert Affidavit of Gary Segura, Ph.D. (NO. 310-CV-01750-VLB) 8856 Edith Schlain WINDSOR, in her capacity as Executor of the estate of Thea Clara Spyer, Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant., 2011 WL 3205313, *1 (Expert Report and Affidavit) (S.D.N.Y. May 17, 2011) Expert Affidavit of Gary Segura, Ph.D. (NO. 10-CV-8435, BSJ) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 8857 James W. GREEN, an individual, and American Civil Liberties Union of Oklahoma, a non-profit corporation, Plaintiffs, v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF HASKELL, and Sam Cole, Haskell County Commissioner, Chairman, in his official capacity, Defendants., 2006 WL 6897065, *1 (Expert Report and Affidavit) (E.D.Okla. Apr 10, 2006) Expert Report and Declaration of Paul Finkelman, Ph.D. (NO. CIV-05-406-WH) 8858 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, v. State of California., 2004 WL 5791067, *1 (Expert Report and Affidavit) (Cal.Super. Dec 30, 2004) Declaration of Randall Kennedy in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 429-539) Trial Deposition and Discovery 8859 Kristin M. PERRY, Sandra B. Stier, Paul T. Katami, and Jeffrey J. Zarrillo, Plaintiffs, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, in his official capacity as Governor of California; Edmund G. Brown, Jr., in his official capacity as Attorney General of California; Mark B. Horton, in his official capacity as Director of the California Department of Public Health and State Registrar of Vital Statistics; Linette Scott, in her official capacity as Deputy Director of Health, 2009 WL 5605490, *1 (Trial Deposition and Discovery) (N.D.Cal. Sep 23, 2009) Plaintiffs' Responses to Defendant-Intervenors Proposition 8 Proponents' First Set of Interrogatories (NO. 09-CV-2292VRW) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) Trial Motions, Memoranda and Affidavits 8860 PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTHEAST, INC., on behalf of its patients, physicians, and staff; Reproductive Health Services, on behalf of its patients, physicians, and staff; and June A Yers, Rn, Plaintiffs, v. Robert BENTLEY, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Alabama; Luther Strange, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Alabama; Ellen Brooks, in her official capacity as District Attorney of Montgomery County, Alabama; Brandon K., 2013 WL 3465938, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Ala. Jun 11, 2013) Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (NO. 2:13-CV-405-WHT) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8861 Debra REEVES-HOWARD, Plaintiff, v. SOUTHERN UNION STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE, et al., Defendants., 2008 WL 4733033, *4733033 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Ala. Sep 19, 2008) Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (NO. 307CV00967) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8862 Debra REEVES-HOWARD, Plaintiff, v. SOUTHERN UNION STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE, et al., Defendants., 2008 WL 4733032, *4733032 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Ala. Aug 28, 2008) Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (NO. 307CV00967) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 8863 Kenneth Wayne JAMAR, an individual, Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants., 2008 WL 7242428, *7242428 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Ala. Oct 24, 2008) Plaintiff's Response to HPD Officers' Motions to Dismiss (NO. CV-08-S-1145-CLS) 8864 Shalotta SHARP, Plaintiff, v. SUMTER COUNTY, Alabama; Christobel J. Smith, the Tax Collector of Sumter County, Alabama, Defendants., 2007 WL 4347477, *4347477 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Ala. Mar 05, 2007) Memorandum Brief in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (NO. CV-07-BE-0278-W) 8865 Andre LAWSON, Plaintiff, v. Sheriff Chris CURRY, in his personal and official capacity; Captain Mikul Smitherman, in his personal and official capacity, Defendants., 2006 WL 5104638, *5104638 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Ala. Sep 15, 2006) Plaintiff's Brief in Opposition to the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (NO. CV06-BE-0858-S) 8866 Sherri WILLIAMS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Troy KING, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of Alabama, Defendant., 2005 WL 3244157, *3244157+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Ala. Oct 14, 2005) Defendant's Brief in Reply to Plaintiffs' Opposition to State's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 598-CV-1938-CLS) 8867 Sherri WILLIAMS, B.J. Bailey, Dan Bailey, Benny G. Cooper, Deborah L. Cooper, Jane Roe, Alice Jean Cope and Jane Doe, Plaintiffs, v. TROY KING, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of the State of Alabama, Defendant., 2005 WL 2912701, *2912701+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Ala. Sep 16, 2005) Plaintiffs' Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment and in Oppostition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. CV-98-S-1938-NE) 8868 Sherri WILLIAMS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Troy KING, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of Alabama, Defendant., 2005 WL 2674145, *2674145+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Ala. Sep 06, 2005) Defendant' Brief in Response to Plaintiffs' Amended Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendant's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 598-CV-1938-CLS) 8869 Sherri WILLIAMS, B.J. Bailey, Dan Bailey, Benny G. Cooper, Deborah L. Cooper, Jane Roe, Alice Jean Cope and Jane Doe, Plaintiffs, v. Troy KING, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of the State of Alabama, Defendant., 2005 WL 2335537, *2335537+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Ala. Aug 02, 2005) Amended Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. CV-98-S-1938-NE) 8870 Sherri WILLIAMS, B.J. Bailey, Dan Bailey, Benny G. Cooper, Deborah L. Cooper, Jane Roe, Alice Jean Cope and Jane Doe, Plaintiffs, v. Troy KING, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of the State of Alabama, Defendant., 2005 WL 2335534, *2335534+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. (N.D.Ala. Jul 29, 2005) Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. CV-98-S-1938-NE) 8871 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Frederick A. REYNOLDS, Defendant., 2006 WL 6394259, *6394259 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Alaska Nov 30, 2006) Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss Counts One, Two and Three of Indictment (NO. 106-CR-0004-01-JWS) 8872 Sunita PATEL, Plaintiff, v. MARICOPA COUNTY; Joseph Arpaio, individually and in his official capacity as Maricopa County Sheriff; David Hendershott, individually and in his official capacity as Chief Deputy of the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office; Brian Sands, Individually and in his official capacity as Executive Chief of the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office; David Trombi, individually and in his official capacity as Patrol Bureau Resource Chief of the, 2012 WL 1672811, *1 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Ariz. Feb 21, 2012) Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (NO. 11-CV-1489(PHX)(NVW)) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8873 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. J Ames T. SCHMIT, Defendant., 2010 WL 7362923, *1 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Ariz. Oct 29, 2010) Motion to Dismiss: Overbreadth and Vagueness (NO. 07CR01714) 8874 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. James T. SCHMIT, Defendant., 2010 WL 7362920, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Ariz. Oct 28, 2010) Defendant Schmit's Motion to Dismiss Indictment: Obscenity Counts: Due Process & First Amendment (NO. 07CR01714) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8875 Tracy COLLINS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Janice K. BREWER, in her official capacity as Governor of the State of Arizona, et al., Defendants., 2010 WL 2300437, *2300437+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Ariz. May 27, 2010) Plaintiffs' Reply in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction (NO. CV09-2402-PHX-JWS) 8876 Tracy COLLINS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Janice K. BREWER, in her official capacity as Governor of the State of Arizona, et al., Defendants., 2010 WL 1459048, *1459048+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Ariz. Apr 01, 2010) Plaintiffs' Motion and Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Preliminary (NO. CV09-2402-PHX-JWS) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8877 Tracy COLLINS, Keith B. Humphrey Joseph R. Diaz, Judith Mcdaniel Beverly Seckinger, Stephen Russell, Deanna Pfleger, Corey Seemiller, Carrie Sperling and Leslie Kemp, Plaintiffs, v. Janice K. BREWER, in her official capacity as Governor of the State of Arizona, David Raber, in his official capacity as Interim Director of the Arizona Department of Administration and Personnel Board, Kathy Peckardt, in her official capacity as Director of Human Resources for the, 2010 WL 723471, *723471+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. (D.Ariz. Feb 22, 2010) Reply Supporting Motion to Dismiss (NO. 209-CV-02402-JWS) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8878 Tracy COLLINS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Janice K. BREWER, in her official capacity as Governor of the State of Arizona, et al., Defendants., 2010 WL 545311, *545311+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Ariz. Feb 11, 2010) Plaintiffs' Response to Motion to Dismiss (NO. CV09-2402-PHX-JWS) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8879 Tracy COLLINS, Keith B. Humphrey Joseph R. Diaz, Judith Mcdaniel Beverly Seckinger, Stephen Russell, Deanna Pfleger, Corey Seemiller, Carrie Sperling and Leslie Kemp, Plaintiffs, v. Janice K. BREWER, in her official capacity as Governor of the State of Arizona, David Raber, in his official capacity as Interim Director of the Arizona Department of Administration and Personnel Board, Kathy Peckardt, in her official capacity as Director of Human Resources for the, 2010 WL 544391, *544391 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Ariz. Jan 25, 2010) Motion to Dismiss (NO. 209-CV-02402-JWS) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8880 Maria M. GONZALEZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. State of Arizona, et al, Defendants., 2007 WL 4555912, *4555912 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Ariz. Dec 19, 2007) Gonzalez Plaintiffs' Response to State Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(B)(1) (NO. CV06-1268-PHX-ROS(L, CV-06-1362-PCT-JAT(C, CV-06-1575-PHX-EHC(C) 8881 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. FIVE STAR VIDEO, LC; Five Star Video Outlet, LC; Christopher Warren Ankeney; Kenneth James Graham; Jeff Mike Productions, Inc.; And Mike Leonard Norton, Defendants., 2006 WL 6559341, *6559341+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Ariz. Oct 17, 2006) Government's Consolidated Memorandum of Law in Response to the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Based on the First, Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments (NO. CR-06-0515-PHX-PGR) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8882 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. FIVE STAR VIDEO, LC; Five Star Video Outlet, LC; Christopher Ankeney; Kenneth Graham; Jeff Mike Productions, INC.; and Mike Norton, Defendants., 2006 WL 6559339, *6559339+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Ariz. Sep 08, 2006) Defendant Jeff Mike Productions, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss on the Basis that the Federal Obscenity Statutes Violate the Constitutional Due Process Guarantee and Memorandum in Support (NO. CR06-0515PHX-PGR) " HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 8883 Christian Legal Society Chapter at Arizona State University College of Law, Plaintiff, v. Dr. Michael M. CROW, et al., Defendants., 2005 WL 2509071, *2509071 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Ariz. Aug 11, 2005) Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and for Declaratory and Permanent Injunctive Relief and Memorandum of Points and Authorities and Defendants' Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment on ... (NO. 04-CV-2572PHXNVW) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 8884 Patricia DODSON, Plaintiff, v. UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES, By and Through the University of Arkansas System, Board of Trustees, et al, Defendants., 2008 WL 7241510, *7241510+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Ark. Dec 22, 2008) Brief in Support of Response to Motion to Dismiss (NO. 408CV03925JMM) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8885 Harold GLENN, Plaintiff, v. Michael BACHAND, et al., Defendants., 2005 WL 2486021, *2486021 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Ark. Jul 12, 2005) Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss of Separate Defendant Dale Arnold (NO. 205CV00132WRW) 8886 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Arwah JABER., 2006 WL 6588528, *6588528 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.Ark. Jun 01, 2006) Defendant's Motion in Limine with Offer of Proof and Memorandum in Support (NO. 05-50030JLH) 8887 William G. KOCOL, and Timothy A. Gajewski, Plaintiffs, v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and CBP Officer Frank Burnett in his Individual Capacity, Defendants., 2013 WL 7045843, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (C.D.Cal. Dec 13, 2013) Opposition to Federal Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint (NO. 213CV03511ABCPJW) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8888 William G. KOCOL, and Timothy A. Gajewski, Plaintiffs, v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and CBP Officer Frank Burnett in his Individual Capacity, Defendants., 2013 WL 5728896, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (C.D.Cal. Sep 16, 2013) Opposition to Federal Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint (NO. CV1303511ABCPJWX) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8889 Tracey COOPER-HARRIS and Maggie Cooper-Harris, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants, BIPARTISAN LEGAL ADVISORY GROUP OF THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, IntervenorDefendant., 2013 WL 5477053, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (C.D.Cal. Apr 22, 2013) Intervenor-Defendant's Reply to Federal Defendants' Response to Cross Motions for Summary Judgment (NO. 212CV00887CBMAJWX) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8890 Tracey COOPER-HARRIS and Maggie Cooper-Harris, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; Eric H. Holder, Jr., in his Official Capacity as Attorney General; and Eric K. Shinseki, in his Official Capacity as Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Defendants, BIPARTISAN LEGAL ADVISORY GROUP OF THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Intervenor-Defendant., 2013 WL 5476913, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (C.D.Cal. Apr 08, 2013) Plaintiffs' Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment and Opposition to Intervenor-Defendant's Cross Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. CV12-887 CBM) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8891 Tracey COOPER-HARRIS and Maggie Cooper-Harris, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants, BIPARTISAN LEGAL ADVISORY © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. GROUP OF THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, IntervenorDefendant., 2013 WL 5476912, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (C.D.Cal. Mar 18, 2013) Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Cross Motion of Intervenor-Defendant for Summary Judgment (NO. 212CV00887CBMAJWX) " 8892 Tracey COOPER-HARRIS and Maggie Cooper-Harris, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants, BIPARTISAN LEGAL ADVISORY GROUP OF THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, IntervenorDefendant., 2013 WL 5477094, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (C.D.Cal. Mar 18, 2013) Opposition of Intervenor-Defendant to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 212CV00887CBMAJWX) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8893 Tracey COOPER-HARRIS and Maggie Cooper-Harris, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; Eric H. Holder, Jr., in his Official Capacity as Attorney General; and Eric K. Shinseki, in his Official Capacity as Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Defendants, BIPARTISAN LEGAL ADVISORY GROUP OF THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Intervenor-Defendant., 2013 WL 5476914, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (C.D.Cal. Mar 04, 2013) Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 212CV887CBMAJWX) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8894 Tracey COOPER-HARRIS and Maggie Cooper-Harris, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; Eric H. Holder, Jr., in his Official Capacity as Attorney General; and Eric K. Shinseki, in his Official Capacity as Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Defendants, BIPARTISAN LEGAL ADVISORY GROUP OF THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Intervenor-Defendant., 2013 WL 5476917, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (C.D.Cal. Feb 20, 2013) Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 212CV887CBMAJWX) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8895 HIGHLAND PARK PATIENT COLLECTIVE, INC., a California Patient Collective, Plaintiff, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; Eric Holder, Attorney General of the United States; Michele M. Leonhart, Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration; Andre Birotte Jr., U.S. Attorney for the Central District of California, Defendants., 2013 WL 592065, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (C.D.Cal. Feb 15, 2013) Defendants' Reply in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (NO. CV129958RGKFFMX) 8896 HIGHLAND PARK PATIENT COLLECTIVE, Inc., a California Patient Collective, Plaintiff, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, et al., Defendant., 2013 WL 592063, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (C.D.Cal. Feb 11, 2013) Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (NO. CV12-9958 RGK(JEMX)) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 8897 HIGHLAND PARK PATIENT COLLECTIVE, INC., A California Patient Collective, Plaintiff, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; Eric Holder, Attorney General of the United States; Michelle M. Leonhart, Administrator of © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. the Drug Enforcement Administration; Andre Birotte Jr., U.S. Attorney for the Central District of California, Defendants., 2012 WL 6621125, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (C.D.Cal. Nov 28, 2012) Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application for Temporary Restraining Order and Order to Show Cause Re Temporary Restraining Order (NO. 12-9958 RGK (FFMX)) 8898 HIGHLAND PARK PATIENT COLLECTIVE INC. A California Corporation, Plaintiff, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; Eric Holder Attorney General of the United STATES; Michele M. Leonhart, Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration; U.S. Department of Justice; Andre Birotte Jr., U.S. Attorney for the Central District of California, Defendants., 2012 WL 6621124, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (C.D.Cal. Nov 12, 2012) Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Application for Temporary Restraining Order and Order to Show Cause and Motion to Grant Preliminary Injunction (NO. CV12-9958 RGK (FFMX)) " 8899 Martin R. ARANAS, Irma Rodriguez, and Jane Deleon, Plaintiffs, v. Janet NAPOLITANO, Et Al., Defendants, THE BIPARTISAN LEGAL ADVISORY GROUP of the U.S. House of Representatives, Intervenor-Defendant., 2012 WL 5894978, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (C.D.Cal. Oct 22, 2012) Memorandum of Intervenor-defendant the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives in Support of Motion to Dismiss (NO. 812CV01137CBMAJWX) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8900 Martin R. ARANAS, Et Al., Plaintiffs, v. Janet NAPOLITANO, Et Al., Defendants, BIPARTISAN LEGAL ADVISORY GROUP of the U.s. House of Representatives, Intervenor-defendant., 2012 WL 5894981, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (C.D.Cal. Oct 15, 2012) Intervenor-Defendant's Response to Defendants' Procedural Motion to Dismiss and Partial Motion to Dismiss (NO. 812CV01137CBMAJWX) 8901 Martin ARANAS, Et Al., Plaintiffs, v. Janet NAPOLITANO, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Et Al., Defendants., 2012 WL 5894980, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (C.D.Cal. Oct 09, 2012) Defendants' Opposition to the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group's Motion to Dismiss (NO. 812CV1137CBMAJWX) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8902 Martin R. ARANAS, Irma Rodriguez, and Jane Deleon, Plaintiffs, v. Janet NAPOLITANO, Et Al., Defendants., 2012 WL 5894921, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (C.D.Cal. Sep 14, 2012) Memorandum of Proposed Intervenor-Defendant the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives in Support of Motion to Dismiss and in Opposition to Motion for ... (NO. 812CV01137CBMAJWX) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8903 Martin ARANAS, Et Al., Plaintiffs, v. Janet NAPOLITANO, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Et Al., Defendants., 2012 WL 5894922, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (C.D.Cal. Sep 14, 2012) Defendants' Opposition to to Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction (NO. © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 12CV1137CBMAJWX) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8904 Martin R. ARANAS, Irma Rodriguez, and Jane Deleon, Plaintiffs, v. Janet NAPOLITANO, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security; Department of Homeland Security; Alejandro Mayorkas, Director, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services; and United States Citizenship & Immigration Services, Defendants., 2012 WL 5894924, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (C.D.Cal. Aug 23, 2012) Notice of Motion and Motion for Preliminary Injunction (NO. SACV1201137CBMAJWX) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8905 LOG CABIN REPUBLICANS, a nonprofit corporation, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Robert M. Gates, Secretary of Defense, in his official capacity, Defendants., 2010 WL 4205300, *4205300+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (C.D.Cal. Sep 24, 2010) Response of Plaintiff Log Cabin Republicans to Defendants' Objections to Proposed Judgment and Permanent Injunction (NO. CV04-8425VAP, EX) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 8906 LOG CABIN REPUBLICANS, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Robert M. Gates, Secretary of Defense, Defendants., 2010 WL 2913450, *2913450+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (C.D.Cal. Jun 24, 2010) Reply in Support of Defendants' Motion in Limine Regarding Plaintiff's Expert Witnesses (NO. CV04-8425VAP, EX) 8907 LOG CABIN REPUBLICANS, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Robert M. Gates, Secretary of Defense, Defendants., 2010 WL 2913451, *2913451+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (C.D.Cal. Jun 24, 2010) Reply in Support of Defendants' Motion in Limine to Exclude Lay Witness Testimony (NO. CV04-8425VAP, EX) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 8908 LOG CABIN REPUBLICANS, a nonprofit corporation, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Robert M. Gates (substituted for Donald H. Rumsfeld pursuant to FRCP 25(d)), Secretary of Defense, in his official capacity, Defendants., 2010 WL 2913449, *2913449+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (C.D.Cal. Jun 23, 2010) Plaintiff Log Cabin Republicans' Supplemental Brief on Application of Witt Standard of Review (NO. CV04-8425VAP, EX) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8909 LOG CABIN REPUBLICANS, a nonprofit corporation, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Robert M. Gates, Secretary of Defense, in his official capacity, Defendants., 2010 WL 2913447, *2913447+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (C.D.Cal. Jun 22, 2010) Plaintiff Log Cabin Republicans' Opposition to Defendants' Motion in Limine to Exclude Lay Witness Testimony (NO. CV04-8425VAP, EX) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8910 LOG CABIN REPUBLICANS, a nonprofit corporation, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Robert M. Gates, Secretary of Defense, in his official capacity, Defendants., 2010 WL 2913448, *2913448+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (C.D.Cal. Jun 22, 2010) Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Motion in Limine Regarding Plaintiff's Expert Witnesses (NO. © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. CV04-8425-VAP, EX) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8911 LOG CABIN REPUBLICANS, a nonprofit corporation, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Robert M. Gates, Secretary of Defense, in his official capacity, Defendants., 2010 WL 2913446, *2913446+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (C.D.Cal. Jun 21, 2010) Plaintiff Log Cabin Republicans' Memorandum of Contentions of Fact and Law (NO. EDCV04-8425VAP, EX) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8912 LOG CABIN REPUBLICANS, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Robert M. Gates, Secretary of Defense, Defendants., 2010 WL 2913445, *2913445+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (C.D.Cal. Jun 09, 2010) Defendants' Supplemental Brief on Standard of Review (NO. CV04-8425VAP, EX) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8913 LOG CABIN REPUBLICANS, a nonprofit corporation, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Robert M. Gates, Secretary of Defense, in his official capacity, Defendants., 2010 WL 4930405, *4930405+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (C.D.Cal. May 03, 2010) Plaintiff's Second Supplemental (Post-Hearing) Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. CV04-8425VAP(EX)) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8914 LOG CABIN REPUBLICANS, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Robert M. Gates, Secretary of Defense, Defendants., 2010 WL 2171541, *2171541+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (C.D.Cal. Apr 12, 2010) Defendants' Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. CV04-8425VAP, EX) 8915 LOG CABIN REPUBLICANS, a non-profit corporation, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Robert M. Gates, Secretary of Defense, in his official capacity, Defendants., 2010 WL 2171540, *2171540+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (C.D.Cal. Apr 05, 2010) Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. CV04-8425VAP, EX) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8916 LOG CABIN REPUBLICANS, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Robert M. Gates, Secretary of Defense, Defendants., 2010 WL 2171537, *2171537+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (C.D.Cal. Mar 29, 2010) Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. CV04-8425VAP, EX) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8917 Log Cabin REPUBLICANS, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Robert Gates, Secretary of Defense, Defendants., 2009 WL 4244201, *4244201+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (C.D.Cal. Oct 16, 2009) Defendants' Motion to Certify Order for Interlocutory Appeal and Stay of Proceedings Pending Resolution of Motion and Appeal (NO. CV04-8425VAP, EX) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8918 Captain Pamela BARNETT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Barack Hussein OBAMA, et al., Defendants., 2009 WL 3495955, *3495955+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Affidavit) (C.D.Cal. Oct 01, 2009) Plaintiffs' Sur-Reply: the Ninth Amendment, etc. (NO. SACV09-00082-DOC) " 8919 Arthur SMELT and Christopher Hammer, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, State of California, and Does 1 through 1,000, Defendants., 2009 WL 2610458, *2610458+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (C.D.Cal. Aug 17, 2009) Reply Memorandum in Support of Defendant United States of America's Motion to Dismiss (NO. MLGX, SACV09-00286DOC) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8920 Arthur SMELT and Christopher Hammer, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, State of California, and Does 1 through 1,000, Defendants., 2009 WL 1683906, *1683906+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (C.D.Cal. Jun 11, 2009) Defendant United States of America's Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof (NO. MLGX, SACV09-00286DOC) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8921 LOG CABIN REPUBLICANS, a non-profit corporation, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Robert M. Gates (substituted for Donald H. Rumsfeld pursuant to FRCP 25(d)), Secretary of Defendans, in his official capacity, Defendants., 2009 WL 3246027, *3246027+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (C.D.Cal. Feb 27, 2009) Plaintiff's Supplemental Brief Re: Substantive Due Process Pursuant to January 29, 2009 Minute Order (NO. 204CV08425) 8922 LOG CABIN REPUBLICANS, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Robert M. Gates, Secretary of Defense, in this official capacity, Defendants., 2009 WL 3246026, *3246026+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (C.D.Cal. Feb 17, 2009) Defendants' Supplemental Brief Addressing the Issue of Substantive Due Process (NO. 204CV08425) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 8923 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Lorenzo GONZALEZ, Defendant., 2008 WL 6932237, *6932237+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (C.D.Cal. Dec 08, 2008) Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Indictment Because 18 U.S.C. 922()(1) is Unconstitutional; Memorandum of Points and Authorities (NO. CR08-115-RHW) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8924 LOG CABIN REPUBLICANS, a non-profit corporation, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Robert M. Gates (substituted for Donald H. Rumsfeld pursuant to FRCP 25 (d)), Secretary of Defense, in his official capacity, Defendants., 2008 WL 2873173, *2873173+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (C.D.Cal. May 30, 2008) Log Cabin Republicans' (1) Ex Parte Application for Order Vacating Stay; (2) Memorandum of Points and Authorities; and (3) Declaration of Patrick Hunnius (NO. 204CV08425) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8925 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Ira ISAACS, Defendant., 2008 WL 2383182, *2383182+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (C.D.Cal. Jan 23, 2008) Parties Joint Consolidated Filing Containing Pretrial Motions and Memoranda of Law (NO. CR-07-732-GHK) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 8926 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Ira ISAACS, Defendant., 2007 WL 6885434, *6885434+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (C.D.Cal. Dec 11, 2007) Notice of Motion for Order Dismissing Indictment; Memorandum of Points and Authorities (NO. CR07-732GHK) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8927 Charlene NGUON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Ben WOLF, et al., Defendants., 2006 WL 4862091, *4862091+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (C.D.Cal. Oct 16, 2006) Plaintiffs' Brief Re: Federal Constitutional Privacy Rights (NO. MLGX, SACV-05-868JVS) 8928 Charlene NGUON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Ben WOLF, et al., Defendants., 2006 WL 4862084, *4862084+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (C.D.Cal. Sep 25, 2006) Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. MLGX, SACV-05-868JVS) 8929 LOG CABIN REPUBLICANS, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Donald H. Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense, Defendants., 2006 WL 2314147, *2314147+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (C.D.Cal. Jul 12, 2006) Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss (NO. CV04-8425GPS, EX) 8930 Charlene NGUON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Ben WOLF, et al., Defendants., 2005 WL 5846486, *5846486 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (C.D.Cal. Dec 11, 2005) Plaintiffs' Brief Re: Guarantee of Privacy Under the California Constitution (NO. MLGX, SACV-05-868JVS) 8931 David PICKUP, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Edmund G. BROWN Jr., Governor of the State of California, in His Official Capacity, et al., Defendants., 2012 WL 5983756, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Cal. Nov 09, 2012) Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction (NO. 2:12-CV-02497) 8932 Sacramento Nonprofit COLLECTIVE, dba El Camino Wellness Center, a mutual benefit non-profit collective; Ryan Landers, an individual, Plaintiffs, v. Eric HOLDER, Attorney General of the United States; Michelle Leonhart, Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration; Benjamin B. Wagner, U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of California, Defendants., 2012 WL 1580710, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Cal. Feb 24, 2012) Defendants' Reply In Support of Motion to Dismiss (NO. 11-02939 (GEB)) 8933 Sacramento Nonprofit COLLECTIVE, dba El Camino Wellness Center, a mutual benefit non-profit collective; Ryan Landers, an individual, Plaintiffs/Petitioners, v. Eric HOLDER, Attorney General of the United States; Michelle Leonhart, Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration; HON. Benjamin B. Wagner, U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of California, Defendants/ Respondents., 2012 WL 1580711, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Cal. Feb 10, 2012) Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (NO. 11-02939 © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. GEB) 8934 Ivan PENA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Wilfredo CID, Defendant., 2009 WL 4090932, *4090932+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Cal. Sep 18, 2009) Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss ÝFed. R. Civ. P. 56¨ (NO. 209-CV-01185-FCD-KJM) 8935 Deanna SYKES, et al., Plaintiffs, v. John MCGINNESS, et al., Defendants., 2009 WL 3030883, *3030883+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Cal. Aug 06, 2009) Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 209CV01235) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8936 Erma J. ALANIZ, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT M. PEPPERCORN, M.D., INC. and Robert M. Peppercorn, Defendant., 2007 WL 2973383, *2973383 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Cal. Aug 31, 2007) Reply to Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Motion in Limine Number 1 (NO. 05-CV-02576-MCE-DAD) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8937 THE UNITED STATE OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 11550 MUSHROOM TRAIL, Grass Valley, Nevada County, California, Bearing APN: 53-130-31 Including All Appurtenances and Improvements Thereto, Defendant., 2006 WL 1200770, *1200770 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Cal. Mar 26, 2006) Claimant's Response to Government's in Limine Motion Regarding Dr. Fry (NO. CIVS-04-2470LKK/KJM) 8938 SAN FRANCISCO VETERAN POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION, Larry Barsetti, Rainerio Granados, Arthur Ritchie, and Randall Low, Plaintiffs, v. THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, the Mayor of San Francisco, Edwin Lee, in his Official capacity, the Chief of the San Francisco Police Department, Greg Suhr, in his official capacity, and Does 1-10, Defendants., 2013 WL 6989066, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. Dec 27, 2013) Notice of Motion and Motion for Preliminary Injunction; Memorandum of Points & Authorities in Support (NO. 3:13-CV-05351-WHA) 8939 Marvin ASHLEY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MCKESSON CORPORATION, et al., Defendants., 2013 WL 6178240, *1 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. Aug 15, 2013) Memorandum of GlaxoSmithKline LLC in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand (NO. 413-CV-03173-SBA) 8940 Linda DUDLEY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MCKESSON CORPORATION, et al., Defendants., 2013 WL 6178298, *1 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. Aug 15, 2013) Memorandum of GlaxoSmithKline LLC in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand (NO. 313-CV-03168-SC) 8941 Oscar TORRES, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MCKESSON CORPORATION, et al., Defendants., 2013 WL 6178338, *1 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. Aug 15, 2013) Memorandum of GlaxoSmithKline LLC in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand (NO. 313-CV-03160-JCS) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 8942 Dorothy JONES, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MCKESSON CORPORATION, et al., Defendants., 2013 WL 6178352, *1 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. Aug 15, 2013) Memorandum of GlaxoSmithKline LLC in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand (NO. 313-CV-03170-JST) 8943 Eugene PARKS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MCKESSON CORPORATION, et al., Defendants., 2013 WL 6178363, *1 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. Aug 15, 2013) Memorandum of GlaxoSmithKline LLC in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand (NO. 313-CV-03162-SC) 8944 Steven BROCK, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MCKESSON CORPORATION, et al., Defendants., 2013 WL 6178381, *1 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. Aug 15, 2013) Memorandum of GlaxoSmithKline LLC in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand (NO. 313-CV-03149-SI) 8945 Rosalynn ALAIMALO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MCKESSON CORPORATION, et al., Defendants., 2013 WL 6178397, *1 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. Aug 15, 2013) Memorandum of GlaxoSmithKline LLC in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand (NO. 313-CV-03146-MMC) 8946 Mitch HIGHTOWER, Oxane "Gypsy" Taub, George Davis, Russell Mills, and on behalf of all persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, David Chiu in his official capacity only as President of the Board of Supervisors of the City and County of San Francisco, Scott Wiener in his official capacity only as a member of the Board of Supervisors of the City and County of San Francisco, and Angela Calvillo, in her official capacity only as Clerk of, 2012 WL 6852593, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. Dec 20, 2012) Defendants City and County of San Francisco et. al's Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (NO. C 12 5841 EMC) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8947 Mitch HIGHTOWER, Oxane "GYPSY" Taub, George Davis, Russell Mills, and on behalf of all persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, David Chiu in his official capacity only as President of the Board of Supervisors of the City and County of San Francisco, Scott Wiener in his official capacity only as a member of the Board of Supervisors of the City and County of San Francisco, and Angela Calvillo, in her official capacity only as Clerk of, 2012 WL 6216586, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. Dec 13, 2012) Defendants City and County of San Francisco, et al.'s Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion to Dismiss (NO. C 12 5841 EMC) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8948 Karen GOLINSKI, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, and JOHN BERRY, Director of the United States Office of Personnel Management, in his official capacity, Defendants., 2011 WL 5478955, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. Nov 01, 2011) Plaintiff's Reply to Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group's Superseding Opposition to Her Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 3:10-CV-0257-JSW) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 8949 Uelian De ABADIA-PEIXOTO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et al., Defendants., 2011 WL 7938774, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. Nov 01, 2011) Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (NO. CV 11-4001 RS) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8950 Karen GOLINSKI, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, et al., Defendants., 2011 WL 5119769, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. Oct 14, 2011) Superseding Opposition of the U.S. House of Representatives to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 3:10-CV-0257-JSW) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8951 Karen GOLINSKI, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, and John Berry, Director of the United States Office of Personnel Management, in his official capacity, Defendants., 2011 WL 3383519, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. Jul 22, 2011) Plaintiff's Reply to Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group's Opposition to Her Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 3:10-CV-0257-JSW) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8952 Karen GOLINSKI, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, et al., Defendants., 2011 WL 2941530, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. Jul 15, 2011) Intervenor-Defendant the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the U.S. House of Representatives' Reply Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of its Motion to Dismiss (NO. 3:10-CV-0257-JSW) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8953 Karen GOLINSKI, Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, et al., Defendants., 2011 WL 11026057, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. Jul 01, 2011) Defendants' Brief in Opposition to Motions to Dismiss (NO. C 3:10-00257-JSW) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8954 Karen GOLINSKI, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, and John Berry, Director of the United States Office of Personnel Management, in his official capacity, Defendants., 2011 WL 2551977, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. Jun 24, 2011) Plaintiff's Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Opposition to Defendants' and Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group's Motions to Dismiss (NO. 3:10-CV-0257-JSW) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8955 Karen GOLINSKI, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, et al., Defendants., 2011 WL 2284303, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. Jun 03, 2011) Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of The Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the U.S. House of Representatives' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint (NO. 3:10-CV-0257-JSW) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8956 Kristin M. PERRY, et al., Plaintiffs, and City And County of San Francisco, Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. Edmund G. BROWN, Jr., et al., Defendants. and © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Proposition 8 Official Proponents Dennis Hollingsworth, et al., DefendantIntervenors., 2011 WL 2098278, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. May 13, 2011) Plaintiffs' Opposition to Proponents' Motion to Vacate Judgment (NO. 09-CV-2292 JW) 8957 Kristin M. PERRY, Sandra B. Stier, Paul T. Katami, and Jeffrey J. Zarrillo, Plaintiffs, City and County of San Francisco, Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. Edmund G. BROWN Jr., in his official capacity as Governor of California; Kamala D. HArris, in her official capacity as Attorney General of California; Mark B. Horton, in his official capacity as Director of the California Department of Public Health and State Registrar of Vital Statistics; Linette Scott, in her official, 2011 WL 5428817, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. May 12, 2011) Plaintiff-Intervenor City and County of San Francisco's Opposition to Defendant-Intervenors' Motion to Vacate Judgment (NO. 09-CV-2292 JW) 8958 Karen GOLINSKI, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, and John Berry, Director of the United States Office of Personnel Management, in his official capacity, Defendants., 2010 WL 5065245, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. Nov 29, 2010) Plaintiff's Reply in Support of Her Supplemental Brief Pursuant to the October 15 Order (NO. 310-CV-0257-JSW) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8959 Karen GOLINSKI, Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT and John Berry, Defendants., 2010 WL 4806218, *4806218+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. Nov 19, 2010) Defendants' Supplemental Brief in Response to Court's Order of October 15, 2010 (NO. C410-00257-JSW) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8960 Karen GOLINSKI, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, and John Berry, Director of the United States Office of Personnel Management, in his official capacity, Defendants., 2010 WL 4530146, *4530146+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. Nov 08, 2010) Plaintiff Golinski's Supplemental Brief Pursuant to October 15 Order (NO. 310-CV-0257-JSW) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8961 Kristin M. PERRY, et al., Plaintiffs, City and County of San Francisco, PlaintiffIntervenor, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., Defendants, Proposition 8 Official Proponents Dennis Hollingsworth, et al., Defendant-Intervenors., 2010 WL 2464547, *2464547+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. Jun 15, 2010) Plaintiffs' and Plaintiff-Intervenor's Response to Court's Questions for Closing Arguments (NO. 09-CV-2292VRW) 8962 Kristin M. PERRY, Sandra B. Stier, Paul T. Katami, and Jeffrey J. Zarrillo, Plaintiffs, City and County of San Francisco, Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, in his official capacity as Governor of California; Edmund G. Brown, JR., in his official capacity as Attorney General of California; Mark B. Horton, in his official capacity as Director of the California Department of Public Health and State Registrar of Vital Statistics; Linette Scott, in her, 2010 WL 2464548, *2464548 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Jun 15, 2010) Defendant-Intervenors Dennis Hollingsworth, Gail J. Knight, Martin F. Gutierrez, Mark A. Jansson, and Protectmarriage.com's Answers to Questions for Closing Arguments (NO. 09-CV-2292VRW) 8963 Kristin M. PERRY, Sandra B. Stier, Paul T. Katami, and Jeffrey J. Zarrillo, Plaintiffs, City and County of San Francisco, Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, in his official capacity as Governor of California; Edmund G. Brown, Jr., in his official capacity as Attorney General of California; Mark B. Horton, in his official capacity as Director of the California Department of Public Health and State Registrar of Vital Statistics; Linette Scott, in her, 2010 WL 742342, *742342+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. Feb 26, 2010) Defendant-Intervenors' Response to Amicus Submissions (NO. 09-CV-2292VRW) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8964 Kristin M. PERRY, Sandra B. Stier, Paul T. Katami, and Jeffrey J. Zarrillo, Plaintiffs, City and County of San Francisco, Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, in his official capacity as Governor of California; Edmund G. Brown, JR., in his official capacity as Attorney General of California; Mark B. Horton, in his official capacity as Director of the California Department of Public Health and State Registrar of Vital Statistics; Linette Scott, in her, 2010 WL 742343, *742343+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. Feb 26, 2010) Defendant-Intervenors' Trial Memorandum (Including Citations) (NO. 09-CV-2292VRW) " HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 8965 Kristin M. PERRY, et al., Plaintiffs, City and County of San Francisco, PlaintiffIntervenor, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., Defendants, Proposition 8 Official Proponents Dennis Hollingsworth, et al., Defendant-Intervenors., 2010 WL 391010, *391010+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. Feb 03, 2010) Brief of Amici Curiae American Civil Liberties Union, Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc., and National Center for Lesbian Rights (NO. 09-CV-2292VRW) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8966 Kristin M. PERRY, et al., Plaintiffs, City and County of San Francisco, PlaintiffIntervenor, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., Defendants, Proposition 8 Official Proponents Dennis Hollingsworth, et al., Defendant-Intervenors., 2010 WL 474971, *474971+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. Feb 03, 2010) Brief of Amicus Curiae Justice Donald B. King, Retired, in Support of Plaintiffs (NO. 09-CV-2292VRW) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8967 Kristin M. PERRY, et al., Plaintiffs, City and County of San Francisco, PlaintiffIntervenor, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., Defendants, Proposition 8 Official Proponents Dennis Hollingsworth, et al., Defendant-Intervenors., 2010 WL 474969, *474969+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. Jan 29, 2010) Brief of Amici Curiae Bay Area La Wyers for Individual Freedom (""Balif'') et al. in Support of Plaintiffs (NO. 09-CV-2292VRW) " 8968 Kristin M. PERRY, et al., Plaintiffs, City and County of San Francisco, PlaintiffIntervenor, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., Defendants, Proposition 8 Official Proponents Dennis Hollingsworth, et al., Defendant-Intervenors., 2009 © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. WL 4718815, *4718815+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. Dec 07, 2009) Plaintiffs' and Plaintiff-Intervenor's Trial Memorandum (NO. 09-CV-2292VRW) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8969 Kristin M. PERRY, Sandra B. Stier, Paul T. Katami, and Jeffrey J. Zarrillo, Plaintiffs, City and County of San Francisco, Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, in his official capacity as Governor of California; Edmund G. Brown, Jr., in his official capacity as Attorney General of California; Mark B. Horton, in his official capacity as Director of the California Department of Public Health and State Registrar of Vital Statistics; Linette Scott, in her, 2009 WL 4718817, *4718817+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. Dec 07, 2009) Defendant-Intervenors' Trial Memorandum (NO. 09-CV-2292VRW) " HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 8970 Kristin M. PERRY, Sandra B. Stier, Paul T. Katami, and Jeffrey J. Zarrillo, Plaintiffs, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, in his official capacity as Governor of California; Edmund G. Brown, Jr., in his official capacity as Attorney General of California; Mark B. Horton, in his official capacity as Director of the California Department of Public Health and State Registrar of Vital Statistics; Linette Scott, in her official capacity as Deputy Director of Health, 2009 WL 3169924, *3169924+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. Sep 23, 2009) Plaintiffs' and Plaintiff-Intervenor's Joint Opposition to Defendant-Intervenors' Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 09-CV-2292VRW) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8971 Kristin M. PERRY, Sandra B. Stier, Paul T. Katami, and Jeffrey J. Zarrillo, Plaintiffs, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, in his official capacity as Governor of California; Edmund G. Brown, Jr., in his official capacity as Attorney General of California; Mark B. Horton, in his official capacity as Director of the California Department of Public Health and State Registrar of Vital Statistics; Linette Scott, in her official capacity as Deputy Director of Health, 2009 WL 2588302, *2588302+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. Aug 14, 2009) Reply in Support of Motion to Intervene as Party Plaintiffs (NO. 09-CV-2292VRW) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 8972 Kristin M. PERRY, Sandra B. Stier, Paul T. Katami, and Jeffrey J. Zarrillo, Plaintiffs, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, in his official Authorities capacity as Governor of California; Edmund G. Brown, Jr., in his official capacity as Attorney General of California; Mark B. Horton, in his official capacity as Director of the California Department of Public Health and State Registrar of Vital Statistics; Linette Scott, in her official capacity as Deputy, 2009 WL 1995823, *1995823+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. Jul 08, 2009) Notice of Motion and Motion to Intervene as Party Plaintiffs; Memorandum of Points and Authorities (NO. 09-CV-2292VRW) 8973 Kristin M. PERRY, Sandra B. Stier, Paul T. Katami, and Jeffrey J. Zarrillo, Plaintiffs, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, in his official capacity as Governor of California; Edmund G. Brown, Jr., in his official capacity as Attorney General of California; Mark B. Horton, in his official capacity as Director of the © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. California Department of Public Health and State Registrar of Vital Statistics; Linette Scott, in her official capacity as Deputy Director of Health, 2009 WL 1834252, *1834252+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. Jun 18, 2009) Plaintiffs' Reply in Support of Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (NO. 09-CV-2292VRW) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8974 Kristin M. PERRY, Sandra B. Stier, Paul T. Katami, and Jeffrey J. Zarrillo, Plaintiffs, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, in his official capacity as Governor of California; Edmund G. Brown, Jr., in his official capacity as Attorney General of California; Mark B. Horton, in his official capacity as Director of the California Department of Public Health and State Registrar of Vital Statistics; Linette Scott, in her official capacity as Deputy Director of Health, 2009 WL 1642771, *1642771+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. Jun 11, 2009) The Administration's Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction (NO. 09-CV-02292VRW) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8975 Kristin M. PERRY, Sandra B. Stier, Paul T. Katami, and Jeffrey J. Zarrillo, Plaintiffs, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, in his official capacity as Governor of California; Edmund G. Brown, Jr., in his official capacity as Attorney General of California; Mark B. Horton, in his official capacity as Director of the California Department of Public Health and State Registrar of Vital Statistics; Linette Scott, in her official capacity as Deputy Director of Health, 2009 WL 1748381, *1748381+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. Jun 11, 2009) Proposed Intervenors' Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction (NO. 09-CV-2292VRW) " HN: 3,5 (S.Ct.) 8976 Kristin M. PERRY, Sandra B. Stier, Paul T. Katami, and Jeffrey J. Zarrillo, Plaintiffs, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, in his official capacity as Governor of California; Edmund G. Brown, Jr., in his official capacity as Attorney General of California; Mark B. Horton, in his official capacity as Director of the California Department of Public Health and State Registrar of Vital Statistics; Linette Scott, in her official capacity as Deputy Director of Health, 2009 WL 1499308, *1499308+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. May 27, 2009) Plaintiffs' Notice of Motion and Motion for a Preliminary Injunction, and Memorandum of Points Band Authorities in Support of Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (NO. 09-CV-2292VRW) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8977 Valerie GEORGE, as Administrator and Personal Representative of the Estate of Ryan George; Valerie George and Tajmah Beauchamp, as Legal Representatives for Jaida George and Ryan George, Jr.; Valerie George, Individually; Donald George; and Tajmah Beauchamp, Individually, Plaintiffs, v. SONOMA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; Bill Cogbill; County of Sonoma; California Forensic Medical Group, Inc; James Luders, M.D.; Michael E. Dagey, R.N.; Sutter Health; Sutter Medical, 2008 WL 7048153, *7048153+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. Nov 13, 2008) Memorandum in Opposition to (1) Motion to Dismiss By Defendants County of Sonoma, Sonoma County Sheriff's Department, and Bill Cogbill; and (2) Motion to © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Dismiss By Defendants California Forensic ... (NO. 308CV02675) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8978 Angela OSTINI and Dennis Ostini, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF BURLINGAME, a municipal corporation; Burlingame Police Chief Jack L. Van Etten, in his official capacity; Burlingame Police Officer Jarel Peters; Burlingame Police Sergeant Downs; Does 1-25, inclusive, Defendants., 2007 WL 6971076, *6971076+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. May 03, 2007) Defendant Burlingame's Reply to Plaintiffs' Opposition to Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint (NO. C071011WHA) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 8979 Angela OSTINI & Dennis Ostini, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF BURLINGAME, a municipal corporation; Burlingame Police Chief Jack L. Van Etten in his official capacity; Burlingame Police Officer Jarel Peters; Burlingame Police Sergeant Downs; Does 1-25, inclusive, Defendants., 2007 WL 6971075, *6971075+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. Apr 26, 2007) Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to FRCP 12 (b)(6) (NO. C071011WHA) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8980 COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ, CALIFORNIA; City of Santa Cruz, California; Valerie Corral; Eladio V. Acosta; Jennifer Lee Hentz; Harold F. Margolin; Levi Castro; Dorothy Gibbs; James Daniel Baehr; Michael Cheslosky and Wo/men's Alliance for Medical Marijuana, Plaintiffs, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General of the United States; Karen P. Tandy, Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration; John P. Walters, Director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy; and 30, 2007 WL 1495827, *1495827 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. Apr 18, 2007) Supplemental Brief in Support of Plaintiffs' Opposition to Offcial-Capacity Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (NO. 03-CV-1802JF) 8981 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Richard WONG, Defendant., 2006 WL 6829854, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. Sep 12, 2006) Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Indictment; Memorandum of Law in Support (NO. CR 05-0375 SI) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8982 Michael BUTLER and Richard Butler, as individuals and on behalf of the people of the state of California, Plaintiffs, v. ADOPTION MEDIA, LLC, Adoption Profiles, LLC, Adoption.com, True North, Inc., Aracaju, Inc., Dale R. Gwilliam, Nathan W. Gwilliam, and Does 1 through 100, Defendants., 2006 WL 1785963, *1785963+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. May 24, 2006) Plaintiffs' Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 (NO. C-04-0135PJH) 8983 Michael BUTLER and Richard Butler, as individuals and on behalf of the people of the state of California, Plaintiffs, v. ADOPTION MEDIA, LLC, Adoption Profiles, LLC, Adoption.com, True North, Inc., Aracaju, Inc., Dale R. Gwilliam, Nathan W. Gwilliam, and Does 1 through 100, Defendants., 2006 WL 1417242, *1417242+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. Apr 19, 2006) Plaintiffs' Notice of Motion and Motion for Summary Judgment Pursuant to © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 (NO. C-04-0135PJH) 8984 COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Alberto GONZALES, Attorney General of the United States; Karen P. Tandy, Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration; John P. Walters, Director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy; and 30 Unknown Drug Enforcement Administration Agents, Defendants., 2006 WL 1417204, *1417204+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. Apr 12, 2006) Reply in Support of Official-Capacity Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (NO. C03-1802JFMC02-7012J) 8985 County of Santa CRUZ, California; City of Santa Cruz, California; Valerie Corral; Eladio V. Acosta; Jennifer Lee Hentz; Harold F. Margolin; Levi Castro; Dorothy Gibbs; James Daniel Baehr; Michael Cheslosky and Wo/Men's Alliance for Medical Marijuana, Plaintiffs, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorneys General of the United States; Karen P. Tandy, Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration; John P. Walters, Director of the Office of National Drug Control, 2006 WL 1044859, *1044859+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. Mar 27, 2006) Plaintiffs' Opposition to Official-Capacity Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (NO. 03-CV-1802JF) 8986 CHRISTIAN LEGAL SOCIETY CHAPTER OF UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, Hastings College of the Law, a/k/a Hastings Christian Fellowship, a student organization at the University of California, Hastings College of the Law, Plaintiff, v. Mary Kay KANE, in her official capacity as Chancellor and Dean of the University of California, Hastings College of the Law; Judy Chapman, in her official capacity as Director of Student Services for University of California, Hastings, 2005 WL 3145949, *3145949+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. Oct 21, 2005) Hastings Outlaw's Notice of Cross-Motion and Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment; Memorandum of Points and Authorities (NO. C044484JSW) 8987 Lawrence PODESTA, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF SAN LEANDRO; San Leandro Police Department; Troy Young; Ron Clark, et al. Defendants., 2005 WL 2868864, *2868864 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Cal. Sep 20, 2005) Plaintiff's Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Opposition to Defendants City of San Leandro Troy Young and Ron Clark's Motion to Dismiss or Alternatively for A more Definite Statement (NO. CIV05-02615SBA) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 8988 Tilikum, KATINA, Corky, Kasatka, and Ulises, five orcas Plaintiffs, v. SEAWORLD PARKS & ENTERTAINMENT, INC., and Seaworld, LLC, Defendants., 2012 WL 1506068, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.Cal. Jan 23, 2012) Seaworld's Reply to Peta's Opposition to Seaworld's Motion to Dismiss The Complaint (NO. 11-CV-2476 JM WMC) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8989 TILIKUM, Katina, Corky, Kasatka, and Ulises, five orcas, Plaintiffs, v. SeaWorld Parks & Entertainment, Inc. and SeaWorld, LLC, Defendants., 2012 © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. WL 1506067, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.Cal. Jan 13, 2012) Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (NO. 11-CV-2476 JM WMC) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 8990 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. James Dean STACY, Defendant., 2010 WL 3998682, *3998682 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.Cal. Sep 02, 2010) Statement of Facts and Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Defendant's Motions (NO. 09CR3695-BTM) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 8991 CALIFORNIA EDUCATION COMMITTEE, LLC and Priscilla Schreiber, Plaintiffs, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of California; Edmund G. Brown, Jr., in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California; Jack O'Connell in his official capacity as California Superintendent of Public Instruction; and Does 1 through 20 inclusive, Defendants., 2008 WL 7257241, *7257241+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.Cal. Jan 18, 2008) ÝProposed¨ Memorandum of Points and Authorities of Amici Curiae Equality California and Gay-Straight Alliance Network in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (NO. 07-CV-02246-BTM-WMC) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 8992 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Miguel ANgel SALAZARCARRERA, Defendant., 2005 WL 6398222, *6398222 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.Cal. Nov 28, 2005) Statement of Facts and Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Motions (NO. 05CR1713-WQH) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8993 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Alfonso GOMEZ-ESCOBAR, Defendant., 2005 WL 5851161, *5851161 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.Cal. Jul 18, 2005) Statement of Facts and Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Defendant's First Amended Motions in Limine (NO. 05CR0150-JAH) 8994 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Ernesto ESTRADAALVARADO, Defendant., 2004 WL 5414209, *5414209 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.Cal. Apr 15, 2004) Statement of Facts and Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Defendant's Motion (NO. 04CR0889-JAH) 8995 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Pablo CHAVEZ-TORRES, Defendant., 2003 WL 25629686, *25629686 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.Cal. Mar 12, 2003) Statement of Facts and Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Defendant's Motion (NO. 04CR0068-DMS) 8996 Homer FLUTE, Robert Simpson, Jr., Thompson Flute, Jr., and Dorothy Wood, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES, The Department of the Interior, and the Bureau of Indian Affairs, Defendants., 2013 WL 5402415, *1 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Colo. Sep 16, 2013) Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Motion to © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Dismiss (NO. 13-CV-1836-PAB-CBS) 8997 Giacomo KRATTER, Plaintiff, v. DEFENDANT CATHOLIC HEATH INITIATIVES COLORADO, doing business as Centura Health-Summit Medical Center and St. Anthony Summit Medical Center, a Colorado corporation, Steadman Hawkins Clinc, Professional, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, Mary I. Bryan, and Thomas R. Hackett, M.C., Defendants., 2010 WL 3863127, *3863127 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Colo. Jul 19, 2010) Plaintiff's Motion in Limine to Exclude Defendants from Introdcuing Testimony Concerning the Sexual Experience of Plaintiff or Other Witnesses (NO. 08-CV-02709-REB-BNB) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8998 Nima DAIVARI, Plaintiff, v. DENVER POLICE DEPARTMENT, Gerald R. Whitman, Chief of Police, Denver Police Department, Richard Boehnlein, Officer Denver Department, and John Doe, Officer, Denver Police Department, Defendants., 2008 WL 7183166, *7183166+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Colo. Jun 23, 2008) Defendants' Reply to Plaintiff's Response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (NO. 08-CV-00534-ZLW-BNB) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 8999 Nima DAIVARI, Plaintiff, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, Gerald R. Whitman, Chief of Police, Denver Police Department, Richard Boehnlein, Officer, Denver Police Department, and JOHN DOE, Officer, Denver Police Department, Defendants., 2008 WL 7183165, *7183165+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Colo. Jun 05, 2008) Plaintiff's Response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (NO. 08-CV-00534-ZLW-BNB) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 9000 Dale ASMUSSEN, Plaintiff, v. WELD COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT RE3-J, Marvin Wade, in his individual capacity, and Cyndi Lovell, in her individual capacity, Defendants., 2005 WL 2836564, *2836564 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Colo. Sep 16, 2005) Defendants' Reply in Support of Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (NO. 04-CV-1025-ZLW-BNB) 9001 Dale ASMUSSEN, Plaintiff, v. WELD COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT RE3-J, Marvin Wade, in his individual capacity, and Cyndi Lovell, in her individual capacity, Defendants., 2005 WL 2836554, *2836554 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Colo. Aug 22, 2005) Response to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 04-CV-1025-ZLW-BNB) 9002 Joanne PEDERSEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, et al., Defendants., 2011 WL 4668146, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Conn. Oct 05, 2011) Intervenor-defendants Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of Its Motion to Dismiss (NO. 3:10-CV-1750 (VLB)) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 9003 Joanne PEDERSEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, et al., Defendants., 2011 WL 4668150, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Conn. Oct 05, 2011) Intervenor-defendant's © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Sur-reply in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 3:10-CV-1750 (VLB)) 9004 Joanne PEDERSEN & Ann Meitzen, Gerald V. Passaro II, Lynda Deforge & Raquel Ardin, Janet Geller & Joanne Marquis, Suzanne & Geraldine Artis, Bradley Kleinerman & James Gehre, and Damon Savoy & John Weiss, Plaintiffs, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Timothy F. Geithner, in his official capacity as the Secretary of the Treasury, and Hilda L. Solis, in her official capacity as the Secretary of Labor, Michael J. Astrue, in his official capacity as the Commissioner of the, 2011 WL 4102012, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Conn. Sep 14, 2011) Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 3:10 CV 1750 (VLB)) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9005 Joanne PEDERSEN & Ann Meitzen, Gerald V. Passaro II, Lynda Deforge & Raquel Ardin, Janet Geller & Joanne Marquis, Suzanne & Geraldine Artis, Bradley Kleinerman & James Gehre, and Damon Savoy & John Weiss, Plaintiffs, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Timothy F. Geithner, in his official capacity as the Secretary of the Treasury, and Hilda L. Solis, in her official capacity as the Secretary of Labor, Michael J. Astrue, in his official capacity as the Commissioner of the, 2011 WL 4102018, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Conn. Sep 14, 2011) Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss (NO. 3:10 CV 1750 (VLB)) 9006 Joanne PEDERSEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, et al., Defendants., 2011 WL 4102023, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Conn. Sep 14, 2011) Defendants' Memorandum of Law in Response to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment and Intervenor's Motion to Dismiss (NO. 3:10-CV-01750-VLB) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9007 Joanne PEDERSEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, et al., Defendants., 2011 WL 3627043, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Conn. Aug 15, 2011) Memorandum of Law of Intervenor-Defendant the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives in Support of its Motion to Dismiss (NO. 3:10-CV-01750 (VLB)) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9008 Joanne PEDERSEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, et al., Defendants., 2011 WL 3627047, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Conn. Aug 15, 2011) Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 3:10-CV-01750 (VLB)) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 9009 Joanne PEDERSEN & Ann Meitzen, Gerald V. Passaro II, Lynda Deforge & Raquel Ardin, Janet Geller & Joanne Marquis, Suzanne & Geraldine Artis, Bradley Kleinerman & James Gehre, and Damon Savoy & John Weiss, Plaintiffs, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Timothy F. Geithner, in his official capacity as the Secretary of the Treasury, and Hilda L. Solis, in her official capacity as the Secretary of Labor, Michael J. Astrue, in his official © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. capacity as the Commissioner of the, 2011 WL 2934938, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Conn. Jul 15, 2011) Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 3:10 CV 1750 (VLB)) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 9010 KEEPERS, INC., d/b/a Keepers, f/k/a Sidepockets, Inc., a Connecticut Corporation; and After Dark LLC., d/b/a Romantix Adult Emporium, a Connecticut Limited Liability Company, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF MILFORD, CONNECTICUT, a Municipal Corporation, Defendant., 2009 WL 4274693, *4274693+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Conn. Aug 17, 2009) Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (NO. 303-CV-02134-AWT, 307-CV-01231-AWT) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 9011 Donna BONENFANT, Plaintiff, v. Maria KEWER, Joseph D'Alesio, James Maher and Scott Hartley, Defendants., 2006 WL 5125489, *5125489 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Conn. Dec 04, 2006) Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 305CV01508, PCD) 9012 Mel THOMPSON, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF CONNECTICUT, Et Al, Defendants., 2006 WL 1813718, *1813718+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Conn. May 30, 2006) Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiffs Objection to Defendants Motion to Dismiss (NO. 305-CV-01493-CFD) 9013 Susan ROE, Jr. ppa Atty. Lynn Jenkins, Guardian Ad Litem, v. PHILIP GIORDANO & THE CITY OF WATERBURY, Connecticut., 2005 WL 2603496, *2603496 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Conn. Aug 18, 2005) Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 303CV571, SRU) 9014 SIDEPOCKETS, INC., d/b/a Keepers, a Connecticut Corporation, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF MILFORD, Connecticut, a Municipal Corporation, Defendant., 2005 WL 5958490, *5958490+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Conn. Jan 25, 2005) Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 303CV0213437) 9015 Robert A. BURT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Donald H. RUMSFELD, in his official capacity as United States Secretary of Defense, Defendant., 2004 WL 3957198, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Conn. May 20, 2004) Reply Memorandum of Law in Further Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 3:03-CV-1777 (JCH)) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 9016 GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. WATSON ENTERPRISES, INC., Defendant., 2004 WL 3044040, *3044040 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Conn. May 14, 2004) Memorandum of Law In Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the Complaint (NO. 304-CV-00120, WWE) 9017 Lawrence TOWNSEND, Plaintiff, v. Judge Alan H. NEVAS, et al., Defendant., 2004 WL 3041767, *3041767 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Conn. May 07, 2004) Objection and Memorandum in Opposition by © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Defendant Joseph I. Lieberman to Plaintiff's Application for Prejudgment Remedy (NO. 304CV00296(JCH)) 9018 Wendy WAGNER, et al, Plaintiffs, v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, Defendant., 2012 WL 1580689, *1 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.D.C. Jan 31, 2012) Plaintiffs' Statement of Points and Authorities in Support of Their Motion for Preliminary Injunction (NO. 11-CV-1841(JEB)) 9019 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:, v. David WILSON., 2011 WL 1458205, *1 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.D.C. Feb 28, 2011) Mr. Wilson's Memorandum in Aid of Sentencing (NO. 05CR00100) 9020 Joan M. KVECH, Plaintiff, v. Eric H. HOLDER, Jr., et al., Attorney General of the United States, Defendant., 2010 WL 3416350, *3416350+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.D.C. Jun 28, 2010) Defendant's Memorandum of Points & Authorities in Support of the Motion to Dismiss the Complaint (NO. 110-CV-00545-HHK) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 9021 Elizabeth COLTON, Plaintiff, v. Hillary Rodham CLINTON, in her official capacity as Secretary of State, Defendant., 2010 WL 2519143, *2519143 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.D.C. Feb 22, 2010) Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment and Plaintiff's Rule 56(f) Motion for Discovery (NO. 09-CV-1772) 9022 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. John STAGLIANO, John Stagliano, Inc., Evil Angel Productions, Inc., Defendants., 2008 WL 8086754, *8086754+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.D.C. Oct 31, 2008) Defendant Evil Angel Productions, Inc.'s Reply Memorandum in Support of its Motion to Dismiss the Indictment (NO. 08-093, RJL) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 9023 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. John STAGLIANO, John Support. Stagliano, Inc., and Evil Angel Productions, Inc., Defendants., 2008 WL 8086753, *8086753+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.D.C. Oct 30, 2008) Defendant John Stagliano's Reply to Governments Omnibus Opposition to Motion to Dismiss; Memorandum of Law in Support (NO. 08-093RJL) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 9024 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. John STAGLIANO John Stagliano, Inc. Evil Angel Productions, Inc., Defendants., 2008 WL 8086751, *8086751+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.D.C. Sep 15, 2008) Government's Omnibus Opposition to Defendants' Motions to Dismiss the Indictment and Memorandum of Law in Support Thereof (NO. 08-093, RJL) 9025 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. John STAGLIANO, John Stagliano, Inc., and Evil Angel Productions, Inc., 2008 WL 8086746, *8086746+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.D.C. Jul 31, 2008) Defendant Evil Angel Productions, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Indictment (NO. 108-CR-00093-RJL) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 9026 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. John STAGLIANO, et al., © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Defendants., 2008 WL 8086748, *8086748+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.D.C. Jul 31, 2008) Defendant John Stagliano, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Indictment (NO. 108-CR-00093-RJL) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 9027 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. John STAGLIANO, John Stagliano, Inc., and Evil Angel Productions, Inc., Defendants., 2008 WL 8086749, *8086749+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.D.C. Jul 31, 2008) Defendant John Stagliano's Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of: I Motion to Dismiss All Counts of the Indictment II Motion for Open Public Trial III Motion to Join All Other ... (NO. 08-093, JRL) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 9028 Marc J. MILLICAN, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant., 2008 WL 3049743, *3049743+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.D.C. May 16, 2008) Plaintiff's Reply to Defendant's Opposition to the Cross-motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 106CV0158229) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 9029 Marc J. MILLICAN, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant., 2008 WL 2150347, *2150347 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.D.C. Apr 18, 2008) Defendant's Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment and Response to Plaintiff's Cross Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 106CV01582) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9030 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Deborah Jeane PALFREY, Defendant., 2007 WL 6758002, *6758002 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.D.C. Oct 09, 2007) Defendant's Reply to Government's Opposition to First Omnibus Motion and Second Motion to Bar Assistant United States Attorneys (NO. 07-046-GK) 9031 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Deborah Jeane PALFREY, Defendant., 2007 WL 6065048, *6065048+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.D.C. Jun 15, 2007) Defendant Deborah Jeane Palfrey's Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Her Motion to Dismiss for Unconstitutional Application of the Local Prostitution Statutes (NO. 07-46, GK) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9032 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Deborah Jeane PALFREY, also known as ""Jeane Palfrey,"" also known as ""Julia,"" also known as ""Pamela Martin,"" Defendant., 2007 WL 2125241, *2125241+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.D.C. 2007) Government's Omnibus Response in Opposition to the Defendant's Motions to Dismiss All or Part of the Indictment, and for a Bill of Particulars (Documents 61, 63-68) (NO. 07-046, GK) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 9033 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. 803 CAPITOL STREET VALLEJO, CALIFORNIA 94590 et al., Defendants., 2006 WL 4286234, *4286234+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.D.C. Dec 18, 2006) Claimant's Reply to Plaintiff's Opposition to Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint for Forfeiture-in-Rem (NO. 106-CV-01710-GK) 9034 Allen H. SINSHEIMER, Plaintiff, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. SECURITY, et al. Defendants., 2006 WL 1706728, *1706728 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.D.C. Jan 24, 2006) Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 04-1768, RCL) 9035 Allen H. SINSHEIMER, Plaintiff, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al., Defendants., 2006 WL 354597, *354597 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.D.C. Jan 24, 2006) Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 04-1768, RCL) 9036 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. 803 CAPITOL STREET VALLEJO, CALIFORNIA 94590 ET AL., Defendants., 2006 WL 4286232, *4286232+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.D.C. 2006) Claimant's Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint for Forfeiturein-Rem (NO. 106-CV-01710-GK) 9037 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. 803 CAPITOL STREET VALLEJO, California 94590 and 1441 Vaquero Glen Escondido, California 92026, Defendants., 2006 WL 4286235, *4286235+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.D.C. 2006) Claimant's Motion to Strike Verified Complaint for Forfeiture in Rem (NO. 106-CV-01710) 9038 STEINBUCH, Plaintiff, v. CULTER, Defendant., 2005 WL 2861306, *2861306 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.D.C. Sep 15, 2005) Memoradnum in Opposition to Defendant's ""Motion to Dismiss'' (NO. 0105-CV-00970, PLF) 9039 Raymond L. LOEWEN, Petitioner, THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent., 2005 WL 3556322, *3556322+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.D.C. Apr 08, 2005) Reply to United States' Opposition to Petitioner's Motion to Vacate and Remand Arbitration Award (NO. 104-CV-02151, RWR) 9040 Robert STEINBUCH, Plaintiff, v. Jessica CUTLER, Defendant., 2005 WL 2861307, *2861307+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.D.C. 2005) Reply Memorandum in Further Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the Complaint (NO. L05-CV-00970(PLF)) 9041 Salim Ahmed HAMDAN, Military Commission Detainee, Camp Echo, Guantanamo Bay Naval Base, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, Petitioner, v. Donald H. RUMSFELD, United States Secretary of Defense; John D. Altenburg, Jr., Appointing Authority for Military Commissions, Department of Defense; Brigadier General Thomas L. Hemingway, Legal Advisor to the Appointing Authority for Military Commissions; Brigadier General Jay Hood, Commander Joint Task Force, Guantanamo, Camp Echo,, 2004 WL 3753207, *3753207 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.D.C. Sep 30, 2004) Petitioner's Consolidated Reply to Respondents' Return and Opposition to Cross Motion to Dismiss (NO. 104-CV-01519-JR) " 9042 SALIM AHMED HAMDAN, Military Commission Detainee, Camp Echo, Guantanamo Bay Naval Base, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, Petitioner, v. Donald H. RUMSFELD, United States Secretary of Defense; John D. Altenburg, Jr., © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Appointing Authority for Military Commissions, Department of Defense; Brigadier General Thomas L. Hemmingway, Legal Advisor to the Appointing Authority for Military Commissions; Brigadier General Jay Hood, Commander Joint Task Force, Camp Echo, Guantanamo Bay, 2004 WL 3753209, *3753209+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.D.C. Sep 29, 2004) Memorandum of Law on Behalf of 271 United Kingdom and European Parliamentarians as Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioner (NO. 104-CV-1519-JR) " 9043 Lamar JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. Paul A. QUANDER, Director, Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency, et al., Defendants., 2004 WL 3262555, *3262555 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.D.C. Sep 27, 2004) Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (NO. 04-0448, RBW) " 9044 Lamar JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. Paul A. QUANDER, Director, Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency, et al., Defendants., 2004 WL 5578801, *5578801 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.D.C. Sep 27, 2004) Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law In Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (NO. 104CV00448) " 9045 Ray ANDREWS and Gaylee Andrews, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Food and Drug Administration, and Tommy G. Thompson, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Defendants., 2004 WL 3708513, *3708513+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.D.C. Jun 03, 2004) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (NO. 104CV00307, JR) 9046 ABIGAIL ALLIANCE FOR BETTER ACCESS TO DEVELOPMENTAL DRUGS, WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION, Plaintiffs, v. Mark B. MCCLELLAN, Commissioner, Food and Drug Administration, Tommy G. THOMPSON, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Defendants., 2003 WL 23145549, *23145549+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.D.C. Oct 2003) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative for Summary Judgement (NO. 103CV01601, RMU) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 9047 Sergeant Kathleen RIDDELL, Plaintiff, v. Thomas P. GORDON, individually and in his official capacity; Sherry Freebery, individually and in her official capacity; Colonel John L. Cunningham, Retired, individually; Colonel David F. McAllister, individually and in his official capacity: and New Castle County, a municipal corporation, Defendants., 2008 WL 595694, *595694+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Del. Feb 07, 2008) Plaintiff's Answering Brief in Opposition to Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (NO. 104CV0120129) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 9048 Peter E. WICHER, Plaintiff, v. OSCEOLA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, Robert E. Hansell, Sheriff of Osceola County, Joseph Esposito, and John Does 1-5, Defendants., 2011 WL 863090, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Fla. Jan 28, 2011) Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Osceola County Sheriff's Office and Robert E. Hansell's Motion to Dismiss, and Incorporated Memorandum of Law (NO. 610-CV-01072-ACC-GJK) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 9049 J.R., a minor, by Judy Ross, his next friend, mother and natural guardian, Plaintiff, v. THE SCHOOL BOARD OF SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA, a subdivision of the State of Florida, and Kathleen Mary Garrett, individually, Defendants., 2009 WL 4379817, *4379817 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Fla. Jun 05, 2009) Defendant Kathleen Mary Garrett's Motion in Limine (NO. 607-CV-01313-JA-KRS) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 9050 C.S., a minor, by Sheree Spataro, his next friend, mother and natural guardian, Plaintiff, v. THE SCHOOL BOARD OF SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA, a subdivision of the State of Florida, and Kathleen Mary Garrett, individually, Defendants., 2009 WL 4379833, *4379833 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Fla. Jun 05, 2009) Defendant Kathleen Mary Garrett's Motion in Limine (NO. 607-CV-1465-JA-KRS) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 9051 D.N., by Sheila Newbon, her next friend, parent and natural guardian, Plaintiff, v. THE SCHOOL BOARD OF SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA, A subdivision of the State of Florida and Kathleen Mary Garrett, Defendants., 2009 WL 4379837, *4379837 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Fla. Jun 05, 2009) Defendant Kathleen Mary Garrett's Motion in Limine (NO. 607-CV-1494-ORL-28GJ) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 9052 E.C., a minor, by Edward Cruz, his next friend, parent and natural guardian, Plaintiff, v. SEMINOLE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD and Kathleen Mary Garrett, Defendants., 2009 WL 4379862, *4379862 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Fla. Jun 05, 2009) Defendant Kathleen Mary Garrett's Motion in Limine (NO. 607-CV-1529-GAP-UAM) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 9053 W.C., by James L. Coffield, his next friend, parent and natural guardian, Plaintiff, v. SEMINOLE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD and Kathleen Mary Garrett Defendants., 2009 WL 4384673, *4384673 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Fla. Apr 29, 2009) Defendant Kathleen Mary Garrett's Motion in Limine (NO. 607-CV-00835-JA-GJK) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 9054 G.C., a minor, by Denise Marie Cosco, his next friend, mother and natural guardian Plaintiff, v. SEMINOLE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD and Kathleen Mary Garrett, Defendants., 2009 WL 4384560, *4384560 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Fla. Apr 22, 2009) Defendant Kathleen Mary Garrett's Motion in Limine (NO. 607-CV-808-ORL-28-GJ) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 9055 R.G., a minor, by Patricia Mary Guse, his next friend, mother and natural guardian Plaintiff, v. SEMINOLE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD and Kathleen Mary Garrett Defendants., 2009 WL 4384617, *4384617 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Fla. Apr 06, 2009) Defendant Kathleen Mary Garrett's Motion in Limine (NO. 607-CV-834-ORL-28-GJ) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 9056 T.W., a minor, by Tracy M. Wilson, his next friend, mother and natural guardian, Plaintiff, v. SEMINOLE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD and Kathleen Mary Garrett, Defendants., 2009 WL 4383876, *4383876 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Fla. Mar 09, 2009) Defendant Kathleen Mary Garrett's Motion in Limine (NO. 607-CV-00155-JA-DAB) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 9057 Elizabeth BOOK, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF DAYTONA BEACH, FLORIDA, Defendant., 2008 WL 7191513, *7191513 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Fla. Nov 29, 2008) Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (NO. 608-CV-1180-ORL-28DA) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9058 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Paul F. LITTLE and Maxworld Entertainment., 2008 WL 2809549, *2809549+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Fla. Jan 04, 2008) Government's Response and Memorandum to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (NO. 807-CR-00170-SCB-MSS) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 9059 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Paul F. LITTLE and Maxworld Entertainment., 2007 WL 4401065, *4401065+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Fla. Nov 07, 2007) Government's Response and Memorandum to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (NO. 807-CR-00170-SCB-MSS) 9060 UNITED STATES, Plaintiff, v. Wesley SNIPES, Defendant., 2007 WL 4102192, *4102192 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Fla. Nov 05, 2007) Snipes' Motion to Exclude Exemplars Taken in Violation of the Fifth Amendment (NO. 506-CR-00022-WTH-GRJ) 9061 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Paul F. LITTLE, aka Max Hardcore, aka Max Steiner, and Max World Entertainment, Inc., Defendants., 2007 WL 4401064, *4401064+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Fla. Oct 24, 2007) Defendants Max World Entertainment, Inc. and Paul Little's Motion to Dismiss Indictment (NO. 07-CR-00170-SCB-MSS) 9062 SMOKERS VIDEO II, INC., a Florida corporation, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF JACKSONVILLE BEACH, a Florida municipal corporation, and K. R. Montgomery, Individually, Defendant., 2006 WL 3853014, *3853014 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Fla. Nov 22, 2006) Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (NO. 306-CV-1031-J-32M) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 9063 SMOKERS VIDEO II, INC., a Florida corporation, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF JACKSONVILLE BEACH, a Florida municipal corporation, and K. R. Montgomery, Individually, Defendant., 2006 WL 3853015, *3853015 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Fla. Nov 22, 2006) Emergency Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Memorandum of Law (NO. 306-CV-1031-J-32M) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 9064 WACKO'S TOO, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF JACKSONVILLE, a Florida municipal corporation, Defendant., 2005 WL 3612754, *3612754 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Fla. Nov 07, 2005) Plaintiffs' © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 304-CV-01307-TJC-M) 9065 Scott SLOMCENSKI, Plaintiff, v. CHERISH, INC., successor by merger of Webcapades, Inc., Scott Mitchell, Kristi Mitchell, Kate Dennison, and Michelle Pendenza, Defendants., 2005 WL 3139125, *3139125 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Fla. Oct 31, 2005) Defendants', Scott Mitchell, Kristi Mitchell, Kate Dennison and Michelle Pendeza's Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (NO. 805-CV-01591-SDM-TBM) 9066 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA artificial entity proprietary capacity, plaintiff, v. Jonathan KAPLOWITZ Aggrieved Unrepresented Man, Defendant., 2005 WL 2680883, *2680883 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Fla. Sep 16, 2005) Verified Motion to Dismiss - Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12 (NO. 605-CV-1212-ORL-31-K) 9067 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA artificial entity proprietary capacity, plaintiff, v. Jonathan KAPLOWITZ Aggrieved Unrepresented Man, Defendant., 2005 WL 2680882, *2680882 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Fla. Sep 12, 2005) Petition for Declaratory Judgment (NO. 605-CV-1212-ORL-31-K) 9068 75 RETAIL ENTERPRISES, INC., a Florida Corporation DBA X-Mart Adult Supercenter, and Evgueni Soulaguine, Plaintiffs, v. Brad KING, in his official capacity as State Attorney in and for the Fifth Judicial Circuit, Florida, and Bill Farmer, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Sumter County, Florida, Defendants., 2005 WL 923495, *923495+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Fla. Mar 28, 2005) Sheriff Farmer's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint (NO. 505-CV-129-OC-10GRJ) 9069 75 RETAIL ENTERPRISES, INC., a Florida Corporation, d/b/a X-Mart Adult Supercenter and Evgueni Soulaguine, Plaintiffs, v. Brad KING, in his official capacity as State Attorney in and for the Fifth Judicial Circuit, Florida and Bill Farmer, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Sumter County, Florida, Defendants., 2005 WL 923496, *923496+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Fla. Mar 28, 2005) Defendant Brad King's Motion to Dismiss Count II of Plaintiffs' Complaint and Partial Motion to Dismiss Counts I and II of Plaintiffs' Complaint (NO. 505-CV-129-WTH/GRJ) 9070 75 RETAIL ENTERPRISES, INC., a Florida Corporation, d/b/a X-Mart Adult Supercenter and Evgueni Soulaguine, Plaintiffs, v. Brad KING, in his official capacity as State Attorney in and for the Fifth Judicial Circuit, Florida and Bill Farmer, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Sumter County, Florida, Defendants., 2005 WL 923494, *923494+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Fla. Mar 23, 2005) Defendant Brad King's Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Emergency Motion for Issuance of Preliminary Injunction (NO. 505-CV-129-WTH/GRJ) 9071 75 RETAIL ENTERPRISES, INC., a Florida Corporation DBA X-Mart Adult © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Supercenter, and Evgueni Soulaguine, Plaintiffs, v. Brad KING, in his official capacity as State Attorney in and for the Fifth Judicial Circuit, Florida, and Bill Farmer, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Sumter County, Florida, Defendants., 2005 WL 923492, *923492+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Fla. Mar 22, 2005) Sheriff Farmer's Response to Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction (NO. 505-CV-129-OC-10GRJ) 9072 Michael S. GOGOLA, Plaintiff, pro se, v. James ZINGALE, Chairman, Executive Director Florida Department of Revenue, in his official capacity and, Florida Department of Revenue, Defendants., 2004 WL 3334747, *3334747+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Fla. Dec 09, 2004) Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (NO. 204-CV-417) " HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 9073 Rev. Namcu WILSON, et. al., Plaintiffs, v. Richard L. AKE, et al., Defendants., 2004 WL 3334723, *3334723+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Fla. Nov 16, 2004) Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law in Opposition to the United States Attorney General's Motion to Dismiss (NO. 804-CV-1680-T-30TBM) 9074 Rev. Nancy WILSON, et. al., Plaintiffs, v. Richard L. AKE, et al., Defendants., 2004 WL 3334724, *3334724+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Fla. Nov 16, 2004) Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law in Opposition to the United States Attorney General's Motion to Dismiss (NO. CILVIL804-CV-1680-T-) 9075 PHyllis Elaine HUNT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Richard L. AKE, et al., Defendants., 2004 WL 3334728, *3334728+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Fla. Nov 16, 2004) Plaintiffs' Memorandum pf Law in Opposition to the United States Attorney General's Motion to Dismiss (NO. 804-CV-1852-T-30TBM) 9076 Phyllis Elaine HUNT and Vilia Corvison, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Richard L. AKE, in his official capacity as Clerk of the Circuit and County Courts, Hillsborough County, Florida, et al., Defendants., 2004 WL 3334727, *3334727+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Fla. Nov 01, 2004) Memorandum in Support of Federal Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (NO. 804-CV-1852-T-30TBM) 9077 Michael S. GOGOLA, Plaintiff, pro se, v. James ZINGALE, et al, Defendants., 2004 WL 3334745, *3334745+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Fla. Oct 25, 2004) Plaintiff's Cross Motion to Deny Motion to Dismiss (NO. 204-CV-417) 9078 Michael S. GOGOLA, Plaintiff, pro se, v. James ZINGALE, et al, Defendants., 2004 WL 3334709, *3334709+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Fla. Oct 22, 2004) Plaintiff's Cross Motion to Deny Motion to Dismiss (NO. 204-CV-417) 9079 Rev. Nancy WILSON and Dr. Paula Schoenwether, Plaintiffs, v. Richard L. AKE, in his official capacity as Clerk of the Circuit and County Courts, © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Hillsborough County, Florida, et al., Defendants., 2004 WL 3334722, *3334722+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Fla. Sep 27, 2004) Memorandum in Support of Federal Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (NO. 804-CV-1680-T-30TBM) 9080 M.I., a minor, by his parents and next friends D.I. and T.I. Plaintiff, v. PINELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, Defendant., 2004 WL 2736228, *2736228 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Fla. Jul 20, 2004) Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (NO. 804-CV-01100-T-23MAP) 9081 P.A., a minor, by his parent and next friend K.A., Plaintiff, v. PINELLAS COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, Defendant., 2004 WL 2736345, *2736345 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Fla. Jul 20, 2004) Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (NO. 804-CV-01101-T-23MAP) 9082 75 RETAIL ENTERPRISES, INC. a Florida corporation d/b/a X-Mart Adult Supercenter, and Evgueni Soulaguine, Plaintiffs, v. Brad KING, in his official capacity as State Attorney in and for the Fifth Judicial Circuit, Florida and Bill Farmer, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Sumter County, Florida, Defendants., 2004 WL 3314333, *3314333+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Fla. Mar 04, 2004) Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law In Support of Preliminary Injunction and Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief (NO. 505-CV-129-OC-106RJ) 9083 Cathy STANTON, Laura Pinfield, Norma Mitchell, Kayla Sosnow, Shirley Mason, T.A. Wyner, Jamie Hooper, Marilyn S. Hooper, Jan Larson Frandsen, Individually, and as Mother of Her Minor Child, Athela Frandsen, Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF BREVARD, Florida, Defendant., 2004 WL 2036966, *2036966+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Fla. Feb 18, 2004) Plaintiffs' Response to Defendant's Motion to Strike First Amended Complaint or, in the Alternative, Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint (NO. 603-CV-1279-ORL-19DA) 9084 Pamela MCCOLLOCH, Plaintiff, v. ORANGE LAKE COUNTRY CLUB, INC. d/b/a Orange Lake Resort and Country Club and Orange Lake Country Club Realty, Inc., Defendants., 2003 WL 23729216, *23729216 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Fla. Sep 17, 2003) Plaintiff's Response to Denise Murray's Motion for Protective Order & Memorandum in Support (NO. 602-CV-1403-ORL-28JG) 9085 Pamela MCCOLLOCH, Plaintiff, v. ORANGE LAKE COUNTRY CLUB, INC., Orange Lake Country Club Realty, Inc., Defendants., 2003 WL 23729213, *23729213 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Fla. Sep 05, 2003) Denise Murray's Motion for Protective Order and Incorporated Memorandum of Law (NO. 602-CV-1403-ORL-28JG) 9086 STATE OF FLORIDA, by and through Bill McCollum, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, et © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. al., Defendants., 2010 WL 2663348, *2663348+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Fla. Jun 16, 2010) Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (NO. 310-CV-91-RV/EMT) 9087 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Cullen Lorenzo ROLLINS, Jr., a/ k/a Cullen L. Rollins a/k/a ""Frog"" Defendant., 2005 WL 6075529, *6075529+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Fla. Oct 06, 2005) Motion for Appointment Pursuant to the Criminal Justice Act Panel (NO. 404CR3-01) " HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 9088 Jason HOSLER and Sandra Hosler, his wife, Plaintiffs, v. ALCON LABORATORIES, INC., a Texas corporation and Tom Bradbury, An Individual Pharmaceutical Sales Representative for Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Defendants., 2012 WL 4504101, *1 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.Fla. Aug 29, 2012) Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant Alcon Laboratories, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint (NO. 1260025CIVROSENBAUM) 9089 Jason HOSLER and Sandra Hosler, his wife, Plaintiffs, v. ALCON LABORATORIES, INC., a Texas corporation and Tom Bradbury, An Individual Pharmaceutical Sales Representative for Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Defendants., 2012 WL 4504103, *1 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.Fla. Aug 29, 2012) Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant Bradbury's Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint (NO. 1260025CIVROSENBAUM) 9090 Justin ROSENTHAL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS, INC., a Florida Corporation, and Sioux Honey Association, Cooperative, an Iowa cooperative association, Defendants., 2012 WL 3869668, *1 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.Fla. Jul 12, 2012) Defendant Sioux Honey Association, Cooperative's Motion to Dismiss and Incorporated Memorandum of Law (NO. 1:12-CV-21987-PAS) 9091 ABC CHARTERS, INC., a Florida Corporation; Marazul Charters, Inc., a Florida Corporation; Xael Charters, Inc., a Florida Corporation; Damuji Services Inc., a Florida Corporation; Wilson International Services, Inc.; a Florida Corporation; Cuba Travel Services, Inc.; a California Corporation; Celimar Travel Services, Inc., a Florida Corporation; Paradise International Inc, a Florida Corporation; Cojimar Express Services, Inc., a Florida Corporation; Cuba, 2008 WL 7291862, *7291862 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.Fla. Jun 30, 2008) Plaintiffs' Memorandum In Support of Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and/or Preliminary Injunction (NO. 08-21865CIV-GOLD/MCA) " 9092 GAY-STRAIGHT ALLIANCE OF OKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL, an unincorporated association and Yasmin Gonzalez, through her parent and next friend Frankie Michelle Gonzalez, Plaintiffs, v. SCHOOL BOARD OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY and Toni Wiersma, individually and in her official capacity as principal of Okeechobee High School, Defendants., 2007 WL 617214, *617214 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.Fla. Jan 29, © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 2007) Response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint (NO. 06-14320-CIV-MOORE/L) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9093 GAY-STRAIGHT ALLIANCE OF OKEECHOBEE HIGH SCHOOL, an unincorporated association and Yasmin Gonzalez, through her parent and next friend Frankie Michelle Gonzalez, Plaintiffs, v. SCHOOL BOARD OF OKEECHOBEE COUNTY and Toni Wiersma, individually and in her official capacity as principal of Okeechobee High School, Defendants., 2007 WL 617242, *617242 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.Fla. Jan 11, 2007) Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Accompanying Memorandum of Law (NO. 06-14320-CIV-MOORE/L) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9094 STADIUM BOOK & VIDEO, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, Defendant., 2005 WL 6186537, *6186537 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.Fla. Oct 04, 2005) Defendant Miami-Dade Count's Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment and Incorporated Memorandum of Law (NO. 104CV20537) 9095 F.D.R. ""Fluffy"" SULLIVAN and Pedro ""Rock"" Barrios, et al., Plaintiffs, v. John Ellis BUSH, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Florida, et al., Defendants., 2004 WL 3342952, *3342952+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.Fla. Dec 03, 2004) Reply Memorandum in Support of United States Attorney General's Second Motion to Dismiss (NO. 04-21118-CIV-GRAHAM/) 9096 Stewart GREENBERG, Plaintiff, v. James ZINGALE, Chairman, Executive Director Florida Department of Revenue, in his official capacity and, Florida Department of Revenue, Defendants., 2004 WL 3343016, *3343016+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.Fla. Nov 17, 2004) Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (NO. 04-80443-CIV-RYSKAMP) " HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 9097 F.D.R. ""FLUFFY"" SULLIVAN, et al. Plaintiffs, v. John Ellts BUSH, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Florida; et al. Defendants., 2004 WL 3342984, *3342984+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.Fla. Nov 15, 2004) Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law in Opposition to the United States Attorney General's Second Motion to Dismiss (NO. 04CV21118-CIV-GRAHAM) 9098 JOBA, INC., a Florida Corporation, Plaintiff, v. VOICECOM TELECOMMUNICATIONS, LLC, a Deleware Corporation, Defendant., 2004 WL 3674991, *3674991 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.Fla. Oct 12, 2004) Dorra, Shaw & Dugan's Motion for Protective Order and Motion to Quash with Memorandum of Support Incorporated Herein (NO. 04-80940) 9099 F.D.R. ""Fluffy"" SULLIVAN and Pedro ""Rock"" Barrios, et al., Plaintiffs, v. John Ellis BUSH, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Florida, et al., Defendants., 2004 WL 3342951, *3342951+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.Fla. Oct 04, 2004) United States Attorney General's © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Second Motion to Dismiss (NO. 04-21118-CIV-GRAHAM/) 9100 F.D.R. ""Fluffy"" SULLIVAN and Pedro ""Rock"" Barrios, et al., Plaintiffs, v. John Ellis BUSH, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Florida, et al., Defendants., 2004 WL 3343027, *3343027+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.Fla. Aug 27, 2004) Federal Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (NO. 04-21118-CIV-GRAHAM/) 9101 VIDEO WAREHOUSE, INC., Plaintiff, v. MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, Defendant., 2004 WL 2869725, *2869725+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.Fla. Jun 23, 2004) Plaintiff's Response and Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant Miami-Dade County's Motion to Dismiss Complaint (NO. 04-21156-CIV-GOLD/SI) 9102 STADIUM BOOK & VIDEO, INC., Plaintiff, v. MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, Defendant., 2004 WL 2869809, *2869809+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.Fla. May 25, 2004) Plaintiff's Response and Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant Miami-Dade County's Motion to Dismiss Complaint (NO. 04-20537-CIV-JORDAN/) 9103 AAPG, INC., d/b/a Megaplexxx, Plaintiff, v. MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, Defendant., 2004 WL 2869825, *2869825+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.Fla. May 24, 2004) Plaintiff's Response and Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant Miami-Dade County's Motion to Dismiss Complaint (NO. 04-20553-CIV-JORDAN/) 9104 Luz Adriana Sanchez GOMEZ a/k/a Luz Adriana Sanchez Gomez Smith, an individual, Plaintiff, v. William Jennings SMITH, an individual, Defendant., 2004 WL 1681826, *1681826 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.Fla. Mar 05, 2004) Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Motion for Order of Disciplinary Suspension %ADof%BD Plaintiff's Attorneys (NO. 03-60801-CIV-HUCK/TU) 9105 Luzmila LOPEZ, Plaintiff, v. UNITED ELDER CARE SERVICES, INC., Defendant., 2003 WL 23693292, *23693292 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.Fla. Aug 18, 2003) Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions (NO. 02-80217-CIV-HURLEY/) 9106 A.A., by and through his parent, E.L, and E.L. and C.L., Plaintiffs, v. HOUSTON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant., 2006 WL 825139, *825139 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Ga. Feb 16, 2006) Brief of Defendant Houston County School District in Support of Motion to Dismiss and for Judgment on the Record (NO. 505-CV-107) 9107 Wendy WHITAKER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Sonny PERDUE, et al., Defendants., 2009 WL 3642840, *3642840 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Ga. Oct 30, 2009) Defendants Perdue, Baker and Dean's Response to Plaintiffs' Motions for Summary Judgment (NO. 406-CV-140-CC) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9108 Vandiver Elizabeth GLENN, f/k/a Glenn Morrison, Plaintiff, v. Sewell R. © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. BRUMBY, Glenn Richardson, Casey Cagle, Eric Johnson and Robyn J. Underwood, all in their official capacities, Defendants., 2009 WL 5109752, *5109752+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Ga. Oct 12, 2009) Defendant Sewell Brumby's Memorandum of Law in Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 108CV02360) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9109 Wendy WHITAKER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Sonny PERDUE, et al., Defendants., 2009 WL 3198337, *3198337 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Ga. Sep 30, 2009) Defendants Perdue, Baker and Dean's Brief in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 406-CV-140-CC) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 9110 Wendy WHITAKER, et. al., Plaintiffs, v. Sonny PERDUE, et. al., Defendants., 2009 WL 3198333, *3198333+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Ga. Sep 28, 2009) Plaintiffs' Brief in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment and for a Permanent Injunction to Enjoin Enforcement of the ""School Bus Stop'' Provision of O.C.G.A. | 42-1-15(B) (NO. 406-CV-140-CC) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 9111 Vandiver Elizabeth GLENN, f/k/a Glenn Morrison, Plaintiff, v. Sewell R. BRUMBY, Glenn Richardson, Casey Cagle, Eric Johnson, and Robyn J. Underwood, all in their official capacities, Defendants., 2009 WL 3459016, *3459016+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Ga. Sep 21, 2009) Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment Against Defendant Sewell R. Brumby (NO. 108-CV-2360) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9112 GEORGIACARRY.ORG, INC. and Rebecca Breed, Plaintiff, v. Kipling L. MCVAY in her official Capacity as Probate Judge for Cherokee County, Georgia, Defendant., 2007 WL 4741027, *4741027+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Ga. Oct 15, 2007) Defendant's Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) (NO. 107-CV-2128) 9113 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Phillip Eugene JENKINS., 2006 WL 6354009, *6354009+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Ga. Dec 15, 2006) Supplemental Motion to Dismiss Indictment (NO. 106-CR-430-WSD-GGB) HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 9114 Wendy WHITAKER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Sonny PERDUE, et al., Defendants., 2006 WL 2592834, *2592834 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Ga. Aug 17, 2006) Plaintiffs' Response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (NO. 406-140-CC) " 9115 Wendy WHITAKER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Sonny PERDUE, et al., Defendants., 2006 WL 2378216, *2378216+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Ga. Jul 07, 2006) Pre-Hearing Brief in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction (NO. 406-140-CC) " 9116 John DOE, Plaintiff, v. Thurbert E. BAKER, Attorney General, State of Georgia, and Patrick Head, District Attorney, Cobb County, Georgia, Defendants., 2005 © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. WL 3658403, *3658403 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Ga. Nov 10, 2005) Complaint (NO. 105-CV-2265-TWT) 9117 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Roger CHRISTIE, Defendant., 2013 WL 1831263, *1 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Hawai'i Feb 25, 2013) Defendant Roger Christie's Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss Indictment, Filed on December 3, 2012 (docket No. 468); Certificate of Service (NO. 10-00384 LEK) 9118 Natasha N. JACKSON, Janin Kleid, and Gary Bradley, Plaintiffs, v. Neil S. ABERCROMBIE, Governor, State of Hawai'i, and Loretta J. Fuddy, Director of Health, State of Hawai'i, Defendants, and HAWAII FAMILY FORUM, Defendant-Intervenor., 2012 WL 10096226, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Hawai'i Jul 10, 2012) Defendant Loretta J. Fuddy, Director of Health, State of Hawai'i's Consolidated Memorandum in Opposition and Reply to 1) to Defendant Governor Neil S. Abercrombie's Countermotion for Partial Summary ... (NO. 111CV00734ACKKSC) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9119 Natasha N. JACKSON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Neil S. ABERCROMBIE, Governor, State of Hawai'i, and Loretta J. Fuddy, Director, Department of Health, State of Hawai'i, Defendants, and HAWAII FAMILY FORUM, Defendant-Intervenor., 2012 WL 10096235, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Hawai'i Jul 10, 2012) Defendant-Intervenor's Combined Opposition to Defendant Abercrombie's Countermotion (ECF No. 92) and Reply in Support of Defendant-Intervenor's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 67); Certificate ... (NO. 111CV00734ACKKSC) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9120 Natasha N. JACKSON, Janin Kleid, and Gary Bradley, Plaintiffs, v. Neil S. ABERCROMBIE, Governor, State of Hawai'i, and Loretta J. Fuddy, Director of Health, State of Hawai'i, Defendants, and HAWAII FAMILY FORUM, Defendant-Intervenor., 2012 WL 10096222, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Hawai'i Jun 29, 2012) Defendant Loretta J. Fuddy, Director of Health, State of Hawai'i's Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment Re Count Two: Violation of Plaintiffs' Right to Equal Protection (NO. 111CV00734ACKKSC) 9121 Natasha N. JACKSON, Janin Jackson, and Gary Bradley, Plaintiffs, v. Neil S. ABERCROMBIE, Governor, State of Hawai'i, and Loretta J. Fuddy, Director, Department of Health, State of Hawai'i, Defendants, and HAWAII FAMILY FORUM, Defendant-Intervenor., 2012 WL 10096240, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Hawai'i Jun 29, 2012) Plaintiffs' Opposition to the Motions for Summary Judgment of Defendant Director Fuddy and Defendant-Intervenor Hawaii Family Forum; Certificate of Compliance; Certificate of Service (NO. 111CV00734ACKKSC) " HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 9122 Natasha N. JACKSON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Neil S. ABERCROMBIE, Governor, State of Hawai'i, and Loretta J. Fuddy, Director, Department of Health, State of Hawai'i, Defendants, and HAWAII FAMILY FORUM, Defendant-Intervenor., 2012 WL 10096241, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Hawai'i Jun 29, 2012) Defendant-Intervenor's Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Summary Judgment (ECF. No. 65); Certificate of Compliance; Certificate of Service (NO. 111CV00734ACKKSC) 9123 Natasha N. JACKSON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Neil S. ABERCROMBIE, Governor, State of Hawai'i, and Loretta J. Fuddy, Director, Department of Health, State of Hawai'i, Defendants, and HAWAII FAMILY FORUM, Defendant-Intervenor., 2012 WL 10096223, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Hawai'i Jun 15, 2012) Defendant-Intervenor's Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment; Certificate of Compliance; Certificate of Service (NO. 111CV00734ACKKSC) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 9124 Natasha N. JACKSON, Janin Jackson, and Gary Bradley, Plaintiffs, v. Neil S. ABERCROMBIE, Governor, State of Hawai'i, and Loretta J. Fuddy, Director, Department of Health, State of Hawai'i, Defendants, and HAWAII FAMILY FORUM, Defendant-Intervenor., 2012 WL 10096225, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Hawai'i Jun 15, 2012) Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment Re Count Two: Violation of Plaintiffs' Right to Equal Protection (NO. 111CV00734ACKKSC) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9125 Natasha N. JACKSON, Janin Kleid, and Gary Bradley, Plaintiffs, v. Neil S. ABERCROMBIE, Governor, State of Hawai'i, and Loretta J. Fuddy, Director of Health, State of Hawai'i, Defendants, and HAWAII FAMILY FORUM, Defendant-Intervenor., 2012 WL 10096230, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Hawai'i Jun 15, 2012) Memorandum in Support of Motion (NO. 111CV00734ACKKSC) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9126 FEHRENBACH, v. DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE et al., 2010 WL 3292506, *3292506+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Idaho Aug 11, 2010) Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Application for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (NO. 110CV00402) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9127 Ronda NULL, Plaintiff, v. Pam GARDNER, Circuit Clerk of Tazewell County, Illinois, in Her Individual and Official Capacities, and Tazewell County, Illinois, an Illinois Local Governmental Entity, Defendants., 2009 WL 3242216, *3242216 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (C.D.Ill. Apr 10, 2009) Plaintiff's Response to Motion to Dismiss of Defendant, Pam Gardner, Circuit Clerk (NO. 109CV01065) 9128 Ronda NULL, Plaintiff, v. Pam GARDNER, Circuit Clerk of Tazewell County, Illinois, in Her Individual and Official Capacities, and Tazewell County, Illinois, an Illinois Local Governmental Entity, Defendants., 2009 WL 3245822, *3245822+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (C.D.Ill. Mar 11, 2009) Defendant Pam Gardner Circuit Clerk of Tazewell County's Memorandum of Law in Support of Its Motion to Dismiss (NO. 109CV01065) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9129 Ronda NULL, Plaintiff, v. Pam GARDNER, Circuit Clerk of Tazewell County, Illinois, in Her Individual and Official Capacities, and Tazewell County, Illinois, © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. an Illinois Local Governmental Entity, Defendants., 2009 WL 3245823, *3245823+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (C.D.Ill. Mar 11, 2009) Defendant Tazewell County Illinois' Memorandum of Law in Support of Its Motion to Dismiss (NO. 109CV01065) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9130 Laurie RIST, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF PEORIA, Illinois, a Political Subdivision of the State of Illinois, Sonnie Williams, Assistant Corporation Counsel of the City of Peoria, in her Individual and Official Capacities, Neil Williamson, Sheriff of Sangamon County, Illinois, a Political Subdivision of the State of Illinois, Sangamon County, Illinois, a Political Subdivision of the State of Illinois, Defendants., 2006 WL 1642837, *1642837+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (C.D.Ill. Apr 17, 2006) Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment - Due Process (NO. 05-1013) 9131 Laurie RIST, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF PEORIA, Illinois, a Political Subdivision of the State of Illinois, Sonnie Williams, Assistant Corporation Counsel of the City of Peoria, in her Individual and Official Capacities, Neil Williamson, Sheriff of Sangamon County, Illinois, a Political Subdivision of the State of Illinois, Sangamon County, Illinois, a Political Subdivision of the State of Illinois, Defendants., 2006 WL 1642833, *1642833 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (C.D.Ill. Apr 04, 2006) Plaintiff's Memorandum in Support of her Motion to Deny Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment or Alternatively, to Continue Hearing (NO. 05-1013) 9132 Vernita GRAY and Patricia Ewert, Plaintiffs, Lisa MADIGAN, Attorney General of the State of Illinois, Intervenor, v. David Orr, in his official capacity as Cook County Clerk, Defendant., 2013 WL 6585592, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Ill. Nov 25, 2013) Illinois Attorney General's Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (NO. 13-CV-8449) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9133 Vernita GRAY and Patricia Ewert, Plaintiffs, v. David ORR, in his official capacity as Cook County Clerk, Defendant., 2013 WL 6585593, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Ill. Nov 22, 2013) Memorandum in Support of Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (NO. 113-CV-8449) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9134 Jane DOE II, et al, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF HARVEY, et al., Defendants., 2013 WL 1758236, *1 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Ill. Apr 12, 2013) Cook County State's Attorney's Office Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Compel (NO. 12-CV-2069) 9135 Rhonda EZELL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, Defendant., 2010 WL 4251364, *4251364+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Ill. Aug 16, 2010) Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction (NO. 110CV05135) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9136 Rhonda EZELL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, Defendant., 2010 WL 4251368, *4251368+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Ill. Aug 16, 2010) Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Plaintiffs' © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Motion for Preliminary Injunction (NO. 110CV05135) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9137 Sheldon B. NAGELBERG, as father and best friend of Brett N., a minor, Plaintiff, v. COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 303 and Board of Educ. Of District 303, et. al., Defendants., 2008 WL 7254461, *7254461 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Ill. Sep 30, 2008) Reply to Plaintiff's Response to Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (NO. 108CV03092) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9138 Otis McDONALD, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, Defendant., 2008 WL 3334070, *3334070 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Ill. Jul 31, 2008) Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 08-CV-3645) " 9139 Gayle SCHOR, Kristine Mulcahy, Angela Shue, Joseph Fosco and others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. Mayor Richard DALEY, Officer Ramon Solidum, Unknown Officers, and the City of Chicago, Defendants., 2008 WL 7255825, *7255825 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Ill. Jul 15, 2008) Motion to Reconsider (NO. 7C7119) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 9140 Ruby BELL, et al, individually and on behalf of all similarly situated persons, Plaintiffs, v. Michael LEAVITT, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, Defendants., 2006 WL 2770158, *2770158 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Ill. Aug 31, 2006) Reply Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs' Amended Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (NO. 06C3520) 9141 Noble STREET Gay Straight Alliance, Heather Hall, by and through her mother Rosa Hall, and Jorge Mena, Plaintiffs, v. NOBLE NETWORK OF CHARTER SCHOOLS, Noble Street Charter High School, and William Olsen, Michael Milkie, Daniel W. Vittum, Jr., and Ron Manderscheid, in their individual and official capacities, Defendants., 2006 WL 1403383, *1403383+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Ill. Apr 25, 2006) Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for A Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (NO. 06C2145) 9142 Cheryl ALCORN, Plaintiff, v. BOARD OF SCHOOL TRUSTEES OF THE LOGANSPORT COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION and Superintendent Julie Lauck, individually and in her official capacity as Superintendent of the Logansport Community School Corporation, Defendants., 2009 WL 3023286, *3023286 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Ind. Aug 04, 2009) Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 308CV00241) 9143 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Sun Cha THOMPSON, James C. Choi, Bok Young, a/k/a/ Penny Young, Niculae Tudor, and OK Sun Mun, Defendants., 2006 WL 5159847, *5159847+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Ind. Sep 07, 2006) Defendant Thompson's Reply in Support of her Motion to Dismiss the Mann Act Counts (NO. 206CR50RL) 9144 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Sun Cha THOMPSON, James C. Choi, © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Bok Young, a/k/a Penny Young, Niculae Tudor, and OK Sun Mun., 2006 WL 5159846, *5159846+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Ind. Aug 31, 2006) Government's Response to Defendant Thompson's Motion to Dismiss the Mann Act Counts (NO. 206CR50) 9145 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Sun Cha THOMPSON, James C. Choi, Bok Young, a/k/a/ Penny Young, Niculae Tudor, and ok Sun Mun, Defendants., 2006 WL 5159865, *5159865+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Ind. Jul 14, 2006) Memorandum in Support of Defendant Thompson's Due Process and Equal Protection Motions to Dismiss Mann Act Counts (Counts 9-12) of the Indictment (NO. 206CR50RL) 9146 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Sun Cha THOMPSON, James C. Choi, Bok Young, a/k/a/ Penny Young, Niculae Tudor, and Ok Sun Mun, Defendants., 2006 WL 5159853, *5159853+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Ind. Jun 30, 2006) Defendant Thompson's Due Process and Equal Protection Motions to Dismiss Mann Act Counts (Counts 9-12) of the Indictment (NO. 206CR50RL) 9147 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Jerome GARDNER, Defendant., 2006 WL 6467025, *6467025 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Ind. Jun 08, 2006) Sentencing Memorandum (NO. 205CR25) 9148 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Kenneth JONES, Defendant., 2011 WL 2731976, *1 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.Ind. May 11, 2011) Defendant Kenneth Jones's Sentencing Memorandum (NO. 10CR00003) 9149 BIG HAT BOOKS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PROSECUTORS: ADAMS, et al., Defendants., 2008 WL 2433177, *2433177+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.Ind. Jun 06, 2008) Memorandum in Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 108-CV-0596-SEB-TAB) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 9150 Tonya COFFMAN, Plaintiff, v. INDIANAPOLIS FIRE DEPARTMENT, and Mickey Radez, Charles I. Miller, and Al Stovall, Defendants., 2005 WL 3790696, *3790696 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.Ind. 2005) Brief in Support of Plaintiff's Response to Defendants' Motion for Partial Dismissal for Failure to State A Claim (NO. 105-CV-0199-RLY-VSS) 9151 Nancy HODGKINS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Bart PETERSON, et al., Defendants, v. STATE OF INDIANA, Intervenor., 2004 WL 2771371, *2771371 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.Ind. Jun 14, 2004) Plaintiffs' Reply Memorandum in Support of their Motion for Preliminary Injunction (NO. 104-CV-569JDT/TAB) " 9152 Nancy HODGKINS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Bart PETERSON, et al., Defendants., 2004 WL 2771347, *2771347 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.Ind. May 28, 2004) Local Defendants' Brief in Opposition to Motion for Preliminary Injunction (NO. CAUSE104-CV-569-JDT) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 9153 Nancy HODGKINS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Bart PETERSON, et al., Defendants., 2004 WL 2771317, *2771317+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. (S.D.Ind. Apr 28, 2004) Plaintiffs' Memorandum in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction (NO. 104-CV-569JDT) 9154 DOCTOR JOHN'S, INC., an Iowa Corporation, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF SIOUX CITY, Iowa, Defendant., 2006 WL 1467991, *1467991 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Iowa Apr 12, 2006) Defendant's Brief in Response to Plaintiff's Second Motion for Summary Judgment and in Support of Defendant's Second Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. C03-4121MWB) 9155 ABILENE RETAIL # 30, INC., Plaintiff, v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF DICKINSON COUNTY KANSAS, et al., Defendants., 2005 WL 2861816, *2861816+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Kan. Sep 13, 2005) Memorandum of Law Opposing Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 204-CV-02330-JWL-JPO) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 9156 Jim HYDE, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF DAYTON, et al., Defendants., 2009 WL 4679827, *4679827+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Ky. Jul 16, 2009) Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 208CV00073) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9157 729 INC. et al., Plaintiffs, v. KENTON COUNTY FISCAL COURT, Defendant., 2004 WL 3098208, *3098208+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Ky. Oct 21, 2004) Plaintiffs' Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (NO. 04-212-DLB) 9158 729 INC. et al., Plaintiffs, v. KENTON COUNTY FISCAL COURT, Defendant., 2004 WL 3098206, *3098206+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Ky. Oct 12, 2004) Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injuncition (NO. 04-212-OLB) 9159 SIGMON COAL CO., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant., 2004 WL 3959849, *3959849+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Ky. Mar 12, 2004) Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint or for Summary Judgment, Or, in the Alternative, to Stay Proceedings; and Opposition to ... (NO. 603-574-D) 9160 SIGMON COAL CO., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant., 2004 WL 3959850, *3959850+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Ky. Mar 12, 2004) Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint or for Summary Judgment, OR, in the Alternative, to Stay Proceedings; and Opposition to ... (NO. 603-574-D) 9161 729 INC. et al., Plaintiffs, v. KENTON COUNTY FISCAL COURT, Defendant., 2004 WL 3098216, *3098216+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Ky. 2004) Plaintiffs' Revised Memorandum in Support of Motion for Temporary Restraining Order Including Table of Contents and Authorities (NO. 04-212-DLB) 9162 Gregory BOURKE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Steve BESHEAR, et al., Defendants., © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 2014 WL 221586, *1 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.Ky. Jan 13, 2014) Defendants Steve Beshear, in His Official Capacity as Governor of Kentucky, and Jack Conway, in His Official Capacity as Attorney General of Kentucky's Response to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary ... (NO. 3:13-CV-750 (JGH)) 9163 Gregory BOURKE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Steve BESHEAR, et al., Defendants., 2013 WL 6762140, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.Ky. Dec 16, 2013) Plaintiffs' Memorandum in Support of Their Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 3:13-CV-750-JGH) 9164 Teresa CLARK and Carolyn Johnson, Plaintiffs, v. David JONES, Judge Executive Elect, in his Individual and Official Capacities; and Ohio County Fiscal Court, Defendants., 2008 WL 7319030, *7319030 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.Ky. Apr 10, 2008) Reply Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 407CV-22(M)) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9165 Robert Lewis BAAR, Plaintiff, v. JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS, et al., Defendants., 2006 WL 1443650, *1443650 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.Ky. Apr 26, 2006) Reply in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (NO. 306-CV-075-H) 9166 Robert Lewis BAAR, Plaintiff, v. JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS, et al., Defendants., 2006 WL 1443648, *1443648 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.Ky. Apr 14, 2006) Plaintiff's Response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (NO. 306CV-75H) 9167 MONDONA RAFIZADEH CYRUS II PARTNERSHIP, and Bahar Development, Inc., v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Trustee (successor-by-merger to Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, N.A.), by and through its Master and Special Servicer, Orix Capital Markets, L.L.C., 2007 WL 4534398, *4534398 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.La. Nov 29, 2007) Memorandum in Support of Trustee's Motion to Intervene (NO. 07-5194) 9168 Dr. Dominique RYON and Dr. Benedicte Mauguiere, v. Elsie BURKHALTER, et al., 2008 WL 3917381, *3917381 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.La. Jun 11, 2008) Amended Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs' Request for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief (NO. 308CV00333) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9169 Dr. Dominique RYON and Dr. Benedicte Mauguiere, v. Elsie BURKHALTER, et al., 2008 WL 3917382, *3917382 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.La. Jun 11, 2008) Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs' Request for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief (NO. 308CV00333) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9170 MAJ Shannon L. MCLAUGHLIN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Leon E. PANETTA, in his official capacity as Secretary of Defense; et al., Defendants., 2011 WL 7783444, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Mass. Nov 21, 2011) Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law in Support of Their Motion for Summary © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Judgment (NO. 1:11-CV-11905-RGS) 9171 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; Kathleen Sebelius, in her official capacity as the Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services; United States Department of Veterans Affairs; Eric K. Shinseki, in his official capacity as the Secretary of the United States Department of Veterans Affairs; and the United States of America, Defendants., 2010 WL 2147938, *2147938+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Mass. May 19, 2010) Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of Commonwealth's Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 109-CV-11156-JLT) 9172 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services; United States Department of Veterans Affairs; Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of the United States Department of Veterans Affairs; and the United States of America, Defendants., 2010 WL 1935803, *1935803+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Mass. Apr 30, 2010) Consolidated Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Further Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 109-11156-JLT) 9173 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; Kathleen Sebelius, in her official capacity as the Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services; United States Department of Veterans Affairs; Eric K. Shinseki, in his official capacity as the Secretary of the United States Department of Veterans Affairs; and the United States of America, Defendants., 2010 WL 1285463, *1285463+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Mass. Mar 25, 2010) Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Complaint and in Support of Commonwealth's Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 109-CV-11156-JLT) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 9174 NANCY GILL & MARCELLE LETOURNEAU, et al., Plaintiffs, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, et al., Defendants., 2010 WL 3863145, *3863145+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Mass. Mar 24, 2010) Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (Leave to File Granted on March 24, 2010) (NO. 109-CV-10309JLT) " HN: 3,5 (S.Ct.) 9175 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; Kathleen Sebelius, in her official capacity as the Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services; United States Department of Veterans Affairs; Eric K. Shinseki, in his official capacity as the Secretary of the United States Department of Veterans Affairs; and the United States of America, Defendants., 2010 WL 581804, *581804+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Mass. Feb 18, 2010) Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Complaint and in Support of Commonwealth's Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 109-CV-11156-JLT) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 9176 NANCY GILL & MARCELLE LETOURNEAU, et al., Plaintiffs, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, et al., Defendants., 2010 WL 2826242, *2826242+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Mass. Feb 16, 2010) Plaintiffs' Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of Their Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 109-CV-10309JLT) 9177 Nancy GILL & Marcelle Letourneau, et al., Plaintiffs, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, et al., Defendants., 2010 WL 441534, *441534+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Mass. Jan 29, 2010) Reply in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 109CV10309) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 9178 Nancy GILL & Marcelle Letourneau, et al., Plaintiffs, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, et al., Defendants., 2010 WL 441535, *441535+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Mass. Jan 29, 2010) Reply in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 109CV10309) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 9179 Elaine JOYCE, Plaintiff, v. TOWN OF DENNIS, Dennis Pines Golf Course, Dennis Highlands, Robert Canevazzi, Michael Cummings, Dennis Penner, and Russell Champoux, Defendants., 2009 WL 4642534, *4642534 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Mass. Nov 18, 2009) Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 108CV10277) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 9180 NANCY GILL & MARCELLE LETOURNEAU, et al., Plaintiffs, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, et al., Defendants., 2009 WL 5803679, *5803679+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Mass. Nov 17, 2009) Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 109CV10309) " HN: 3,5 (S.Ct.) 9181 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services; United States Department of Veterans Affairs; Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of the United States Department of Veterans Affairs; and the United States of America, Defendants., 2009 WL 3794375, *3794375+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Mass. Oct 30, 2009) Memorandum of Points and Authorities on Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (NO. 109-11156-JLT) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 9182 Nancy GILL & Marcelle Letourneau, et al., Plaintiffs, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, et al., Defendants., 2009 WL 5803678, *5803678+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Mass. Sep 18, 2009) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (NO. 109CV10309) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 9183 Elaine JOYCE, Plaintiff, v. TOWN OF DENNIS, Dennis Pines Golf Course, Dennis Highlands, Robert Canevazzi, Michael Cummings, Dennis Penner, and Russell Champoux, Defendants., 2009 WL 4642533, *4642533 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Mass. Aug 17, 2009) Plaintiff's Memorandum in Support of Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (NO. 108CV10277) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 9184 Wen Y. CHIANG, Plaintiff, v. Lynn SKYREICH (director of National Visa Center) Condoleeaaz Rice (Secretary Of State) Michael Chernoff (Secretary Of Homeland Security), Defendants., 2007 WL 4607424, *4607424 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Mass. Aug 15, 2007) Plaintiff's Memorandum in Support of Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (NO. 07-10451NMG) 9185 Christine GAMMONS et al., Plaintiffs, v. MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING and Community Development, et al., Defendants., 2007 WL 6988912, *6988912 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Mass. Mar 06, 2007) Opposition of Metropolitan Boston Housing Partnership, Julia Kehoe, Birgitta Damon, Melinda Koenig and Jim Bianchi to Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction (NO. 107CV10110) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9186 Thomas COOK, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Donald H. RUMSFELD, et al. Secretary of Defense, Defendants., 2006 WL 4130195, *4130195 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Mass. Jun 01, 2006) Plaintiff Pietrangelo's Reply to Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration (NO. 04CV12546GAO) 9187 Thomas COOK; Megan Dresch; Laura Galaburda; Jack Glover; David Hall; Monica Hill; Jenny Lynn Kopfstein; Jennifer McGinn; Justin Peacock; James E. Pietrangelo II; Derek Sparks; Stacy Vasquez, Plaintiffs, v. Donald H. RUMSFELD, Secretary of Defense; Michael Chertoff, Secretary of Homeland Security; United States of America, Defendants., 2005 WL 5280903, *5280903+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Mass. May 31, 2005) Surreply in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (NO. 04-12546GAO) 9188 THOMAS COOK; Megan Dresch; Laura Galaburda; Jack Glover; David Hall; Monica Hill; Jenny Lynn Kopfstein; Jennifer McGinn; Justin Peacock; James E. Pietrangelo II; Derek Sparks; Stacy Vasquez, Plaintiffs, v. Donald H. RUMSFELD, Secretary of Defense; Michael Chertoff, Secretary of Homeland Security; United States of America, Defendants., 2005 WL 5280902, *5280902+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Mass. Apr 12, 2005) Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (NO. 04-12546GAO) 9189 Thomas COOK; Megan Dresch; Laura Galaburda; Jack Glover; David Hall; Monica Hill; Jenny Lynn Kopfstein; Jennifer McGinn; Justin Peacock; James E. Pietrangelo II; Derek Sparks; Stacy Vasquez, Plaintiffs, v. Donald H. © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. RUMSFELD, Secretary of Defense; Michael Chertoff, Secretary of Homeland Security; United States of America, Defendants., 2005 WL 5280901, *5280901+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Mass. Mar 28, 2005) Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (NO. 04-12546GAO) 9190 Thomas COOK; Megan Dresch; Laura Galaburda; Jack Glover; David Hall; Monica Hill; Jenny Lynn Kopfstein; Jennifer McGinn; Justin Peacock; James E. Pietrangelo II; Derek Sparks; Stacy Vasquez, Plaintiffs, v. Donald H. RUMSFELD, Secretary of Defense; Tom Ridge, Secretary of Homeland Security; United States of America, Defendants., 2005 WL 5280904, *5280904+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Mass. Feb 07, 2005) Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (NO. 04-12546GAO) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 9191 Harrison EGBIREMOLEN, Petitioner, v. Louis D. CROCETTI, Jr., District Director United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Defendant., 2004 WL 3665335, *3665335+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Md. Jan 09, 2004) Brief in Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment (NO. WDQ-03-2291) 9192 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. William DOUGLAS., 2010 WL 5579830, *5579830 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Me. Sep 07, 2010) Sentencing Memorandum (NO. 209CR00202) 9193 April DEBOER, individually and as parent and next friend of N.D.-R, R.D.-R., and J.D.-R, minors, and Jayne Rowse, individually and as parent and next friend of N.D.-R, R.D.-R., and J.D.-R, minors, Plaintiffs, v. Richard SNYDER, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Michigan, and Bill Schuette, in his official capacity as Michigan Attorney General, Defendant., 2012 WL 9494116, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Mich. Mar 19, 2012) Plaintiffs' Responsive Brief in Opposition to Defendants Motion to Dismiss (NO. 12-10285) 9194 UNITED STATES, ex rel. Ronnie & Darken Hereford, Sui Juris In Propria Persona, Plaintiffs, v. OFFICER STIDEA BADGE 402 AND DETROIT, Chief of Police and City of Detroit and People for the State of Michigan, Incorporated and Detroit Auto Recovery, Inc. and John Doe, Driver #83 and Unknown Agents, Jointly and Severally, Defendants., 2010 WL 5594176, *1 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Mich. Nov 17, 2010) Ronnie and Darleen Hereford Reconsideration and Motion for a New and Fair Trial (NO. 10-14122) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 9195 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Michael KELLER, Defendant., 2009 WL 5209371, *5209371 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Mich. Oct 28, 2009) Defendant's Amended Motion to Dismiss the Indictment (NO. 09-20303) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9196 MASON, et al., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. GRANHOLM, et al., jointly and severally, Defendants., 2008 WL 2882590, *2882590 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Mich. Jul © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 21, 2008) Plaintiffs' Response to Defendants Granholm, Michigan Department of Corrections, Caruso, Zang, Stovall, Davis, Yukins, DeSantis, Howell, Talley, Tollzein, Merrow and Madden's Motion for Partial ... (NO. 05-73943) 9197 MASON, et al., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. GRANHOLM, et al., jointly and severally, Defendants., 2006 WL 2592768, *2592768+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Mich. Aug 23, 2006) Plaintiffs' Response to Defendants Granholm, Caruso, Zang, Stovall, Davis, Yukins, Langley, Desantis, Howell, Talley, Tollzein, Merrow and Madden's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (NO. 05-73943) 9198 John DOE I-VII, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. COL. Peter Munoz, in his official capacity as Director of the Michigan State Police, Defendants., 2006 WL 5168062, *5168062 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Mich. Aug 22, 2006) Defendant's Response to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 206-CV-10214) 9199 John DOE I-VII, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. COL. PETER MUNOZ, in his official capacity as Director of the Michigan State Police, Defendants., 2006 WL 2701690, *2701690 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Mich. Aug 17, 2006) Defendant Colonel Peter Munoz's Motion to Dismiss or Alternatively for Summary Judgment (NO. 206-CV-10214) 9200 John DOE I-VII, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. COL. TADARIAL STURDIVANT, in his official capacity as Director of the Michigan State Police, Defendants., 2006 WL 2701689, *2701689 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Mich. Aug 14, 2006) Defendant Colonel Tadarial Sturdivant's Motion to Dismiss or Alternatively for Summary Judgment (NO. 206-CV-10214) 9201 Robert N. ECKERT, Plaintiff, v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, Defendant., 2006 WL 1736065, *1736065 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Mich. May 10, 2006) Plaintiff's Reply to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (NO. 206-CV-11888) 9202 Penny PHELPS, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF BAY CITY, Colin Hintz, Mary Bleau, Michael Buda, Kurt Legner, Robert Katt, Christopher Hennessey, Charles Brunner, Mary Jane Gorney, and Marie Kurzer, Defendants., 2006 WL 1035767, *1035767 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Mich. Mar 17, 2006) Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 05-10059) 9203 James BRAY, Michelle Dingman, & Dale Seymour, Plaintiffs, v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, Defendant., 2004 WL 3680382, *3680382+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Mich. Oct 20, 2004) Defendant's Reply Brief (NO. 04-72046) 9204 James E. BRAY Michelle Dingman Dale Seymour, Plaintiffs, v. DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, Defendant., 2004 WL 3680381, *3680381+ (Trial © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Mich. Oct 05, 2004) Plaintiff's Response Brief in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss or, Alternatively for Summary Judgment (NO. 04-72046) 9205 Plaintiff Nasir - UDDIN. M. Qureshi as perpro, v. CITY OF DEARBORN, Councilman, John b. O Reilly: Ex. Councilman, Douglas Thomas;Councilman, Mark Shooshanian; Councilman, Gino Polidori; Councilwomen, Nancy Hubbard; Councilwomen Suzanne Sareini; Ex. Councilwomen, Joyce Olkowski; Ex. Police Chief, RonDeziel; Ex, Director of Building & Saffety, Louis Duncan; police Lieutenant. Tim Strutz; Building Supervisor, Deschamps; Inspector, Jim Hamel; Inspector, 2004 WL 5472165, *5472165+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Mich. Jan 16, 2004) Plaintiff Nasir-Uddin Qureshi Motion for Summary Judgement (NO. 02-70474) 9206 Elizabeth HANSEN, Constance Hansen, and Ralph Martin, Plaintiffs, v. ANN ARBOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS, Henry Caudle, individually and in his official capacity as Principal, Pioneer High School, Lara Erickson, individually and in her official capacity as Assistant Principal, Pioneer High School, Sunnie Korzdorfer, individually and in her official capacity as teacher, Pioneer High School, Parker Pennington, IV, individually and in his official capacity as teacher,, 2003 WL 23570706, *23570706+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Mich. Jun 30, 2003) Brief in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 02-CV-72802-DT) 9207 Elizabeth HANSEN, Constance Hansen and Ralph Martin, Plaintiffs, v. ANN ARBOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS, Henry Caudle, individually and in his official capacity as Principal, Pioneer High School, Lara Erickson, individually and in her official capacity as Assistant Principal, Pioneer High School, Sunnie Korzdorfer, individually and in her official capacity as teacher, Pioneer High School, Parker Pennington, IV, individually and in his official capacity as teacher,, 2003 WL 24297088, *24297088+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Mich. Jun 30, 2003) Brief in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 02-CV-72802-DT) 9208 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Curtis Lavelle HARRIS, Defendant., 2011 WL 1878464, *1 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Minn. Feb 28, 2011) Sentencing Memorandum in Support of Application of the Fair Sentencing Act (NO. 09CR00226) 9209 Elizabeth RAASCH-GILMAN, Plaintiff, v. RAMSEY COUNTY, Defendant., 2009 WL 4563560, *4563560 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Minn. Mar 20, 2009) Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Remand for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction, to Certify Remand as Nonappealable, and to Award Costs and Attorney Fees (NO. 09CV594ADM/JJG) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9210 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Willie FIELDS., 2010 WL 6510083, *1 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Miss. Sep 14, 2010) Sentencing Memorandum in Support of Application of Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 (NO. 09CR00030) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 9211 Brian THOMPSON et al., Plaintiffs, v. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SHIP SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant., 2006 WL 1193453, *1193453 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.Miss. Mar 08, 2006) Memorandum of Authorities in Support of Plaintiffs Objections to the February 22, 2006 Order of Magistrate Judge Walker Granting Motion to Compel and Denying Motion to Stay (NO. 101-CV-111-LG-RHW) 9212 CLARK, v. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SHIP SYSTEMS, INC., 2006 WL 5206580, *5206580 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.Miss. Mar 08, 2006) Memorandum of Authorities in Support of Plaintiffs' Objections to the February 22, 2006 Order of Magistrate Judge Walker Granting Motion to Compel and Denying Motion to Stay (NO. 06CV00776) 9213 BUCKHALTER, v. INGALLS SHIPBUILDING, et al., 2006 WL 5209190, *5209190 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.Miss. Mar 08, 2006) Memorandum of Authorities in Support of Plaintiffs' Objections to the February 22, 2006 Order of Magistrate Judge Walker Granting Motion to Compel and Denying Motion to Stay (NO. 06CV00771) 9214 CLARK, v. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SHIP SYSTEMS, INC., 2005 WL 5995747, *5995747 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.Miss. Sep 06, 2005) Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Strike (NO. 06CV00776) 9215 Brian THOMPSON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SHIP SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant., 2005 WL 2571922, *2571922 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.Miss. Aug 29, 2005) Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Strike (NO. 101CV-111-LG-RHW) 9216 Arthur GALLAGHER, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF CLAYTON, Missouri, et al., Defendants., 2011 WL 2471462, *1 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Mo. Jun 17, 2011) Plaintiff's Reply to Defendants' Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction, and Plaintiff's Memorandum in Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (NO. 4:11-CV-00392CAS) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 9217 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Robert Thomas LOGAN, Jr., Defendant., 2004 WL 5370273, *5370273 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Mo. Aug 27, 2004) Defendant's Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss Superseding Indictment (NO. 402CR351CAS(DDN)) 9218 Shirley L. PHELPS-ROPER, Plaintiff, v. Chris KOSTER, et. al., Defendants., 2010 WL 3443018, *3443018+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.Mo. Feb 18, 2010) Suggestions in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 206-CV-04156-FJG) 9219 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Chad C. ROTHACHER, Defendant., 2006 WL 6285360, *6285360 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Mont. May 19, 2006) Defendant's Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss (NO. CR06-05-BU-DWM) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 9220 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Chad C. ROTHACHER, Defendant., 2006 WL 6285359, *6285359 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Mont. May 15, 2006) Defendant's Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss (NO. CR06-05-BU-DWM) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9221 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Tony Louis TAYLOR., 2007 WL 6876085, *1 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.N.C. Nov 27, 2007) Sentencing Memorandum (NO. 06-CR-279-1-D) 9222 Marcie FISHER-BORNE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. John W. SMITH, et al., Defendants., 2013 WL 6798072, *1 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.N.C. Nov 15, 2013) Reply Brief in Support of the State Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (NO. 12CV00589) 9223 Marcie FISHER-BORNE, for herself and as guardian ad litem for M.F.-B., a minor, et al., Plaintiffs, v. John W. SMITH, in his official capacity as the Director of the North Carolina Administrative Office of the Courts, et al., Defendants., 2013 WL 6046921, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.N.C. Oct 15, 2013) Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint (NO. 12-CV-00589) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9224 CLOVERLEAF GOLF COURSE, INC, Relator, v. BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP; Bayer Cropscience LP d/b/a Bayer Environmental Science; Bayer Cropscience AG; Bayer AG, Defendant., 2011 WL 7909273, *1 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.N.C. Oct 28, 2011) Bayer Cropscience LP's Reply Brief in Support of Its Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(B)(1) and for Failure to State a Cause of Action Pursuant to ... (NO. 1:11-CV-00572-UA-WWD) 9225 TRISM, INC., a North Carolina Corporation d/b/a/ ""Bedtyme Stories,"" Donna L. Eaton, an individual, and Jayne Owens, an individual, Plaintiff, v. Roy COOPER, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of the State of North Carolina, Defendant., 2006 WL 826370, *826370+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.N.C. Feb 24, 2006) Memorandum in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (NO. 106-CV-25-H) 9226 MKB MANAGEMENT CORP., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Birch BURDICK, et al., Defendants., 2013 WL 5768596, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.N.D. Oct 15, 2013) Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 1:13-CV-071) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 9227 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Rapheal Jamell MURPHY, Defendant., 2010 WL 8399558, *1 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.N.D. Dec 09, 2010) Defendant's Sentencing Memorandum (NO. 09CR00089) 9228 John DOE and Jane Doe 1 through 36, et al, Plaintiffs, v. STATE OF NEBRASKA, et al., Defendants. John Doe, Plaintiff, v. State of Nebraska, et al., Defendants. John Doe, Plaintiff, v. Nebraska State Patrol, et al., Defendants., 2010 WL 3334774, *3334774 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. (D.Neb. Apr 30, 2010) Brief in Support of Plaintiffs' Objection to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 409-CV-3266, 410-CV-3005, 809-CV-456) 9229 John DOE and Jane Doe 1 through 36, et al, Plaintiffs, v. STATE OF NEBRASKA, et al., Defendants. John Doe, Plaintiff, v. State of Nebraska, et al., Defendants. John Doe, Plaintiff, v. Nebraska State Patrol, et al., Defendants., 2010 WL 3334788, *3334788 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Neb. Apr 30, 2010) Brief in Support of Plaintiffs' Objection to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 409-CV-3266, 410-CV-3005, 809-CV-456) 9230 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Daniel N. LLOYD, Defendant., 2004 WL 5522149, *5522149 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Neb. Nov 28, 2004) Defendant's Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss or Strike Indictment (NO. 804CR353) 9231 CITIZENS FOR EQUAL PROTECTION, etc., et al., Plaintiffs, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL JON BRUNING, in his official capacity, Governor Michael O. Johanns, in his official capacity, Defendants., 2003 WL 23790793, *23790793+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Neb. Sep 22, 2003) Defendants' Reply Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss (NO. 403CV3155) 9232 CITIZENS FOR EQUAL PROTECTION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. BRUNING, et al., Defendants., 2003 WL 23790789, *23790789+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Neb. Aug 29, 2003) Plaintiffs' Brief in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss (NO. 403CV3155) 9233 Beverly SEVCIK, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Governor Brian SANDOVAL, acting in his official capacity, et al., Defendants., 2012 WL 5870914, *1 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Nev. Sep 10, 2012) Defendant Governor Brian Sandoval's Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 12CV00578) 9234 Beverly SEVCIK and Mary Baranovich; Antioco Carrillo and Theodore Small; Karen Goody and Karen Vibe; Flecther Whitwell and Greg Flamer; Mikyla Miller and Katrina Miller; Adele Terranova and Tara Newberry; Caren CafferataJenkins and Caren Cafferata-Jenkins; and Megan Lanz and Sara Geiger, Plaintiffs, v. Brian SANDOVAL, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Nevada; Diana Alba, in her official capacity as Clerk for Clark County; Amy Harvey, in her official, 2012 WL 5871002, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Nev. Jun 11, 2012) Defendant Glover's Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss (NO. 12CV00578) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9235 Beverly SEVCIK and Mary Baranovich; Antioco Carrillo and Theodore Small; Karen Goody and Karen Vibe; Fletcher Whitwell and Greg Flamer; Mikyla Miller and Katrina Miller; Adele Terranova and Tara Newberry; Caren CafferataJenkins and Farrell Cafferata-Jenkins; and Megan Lanz and Sara Geiger, Plaintiffs, v. Brian SANDOVAL, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Nevada; Diana Alba, in her official capacity as Clerk for Clark County; Amy Harvey, in her official, 2012 WL 5871003, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Affidavit) (D.Nev. Jun 04, 2012) Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (NO. 12CV00578) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9236 Carrie WHITWORTH, individually, Plaintiff, v. Jutta CHAMBERS, individually, Dawn Jett, Individually; City of Henderson Police Department, a governmental entity; and City of Henderson, a governmental entity;, Defendant., 2010 WL 1978437, *1978437 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Nev. Mar 16, 2010) Defendants Jutta Chambers, Dawn Jett, and City of Henderson's Motion to Dismiss the First, Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth, Seventh, Tenth, Twelfth, and Thirteenth Causes of Action (NO. 210CV00142) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 9237 Milinda ELLIS, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. ALESSI TRUSTEE CORPORATION; David Anthony Aless; and Aless & Koenig, LLC; and Does 1 throughæ, Defendants. ARROWCREEK HOMEOWNDERS ASSOCIATION; Associated Management, Inc.; Aless Trustee Corporation; Alessi & Koenig, LLC, Countercaimants, v. Melinda ELLIS, and Does I through XX, Counter-Defendants. David Anthony ALESSI, Alessi & Koenig, LLC, Alesi Trustee, 2010 WL 741297, *741297 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Nev. Jan 14, 2010) Third-Party Defendants' Reply to Third-Party Defendants' Opposition to Motion to Dismiss (NO. 309CV00428) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9238 Harley Z. KULKIN; Deanna S. Kulkin, Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF NYE, a Political Subdivision of the State of Nevada and doing business as the Nye County Planning Department for the Palrump Regional Planning District and the Nye County Sheriffs Office; Ron Williams, individually and as Nye County Manager; Cheryl Beeman, individually and as Acting Director of Nye County Planning Department; Nye County Board of County Commissioners; Roberta Midge Carver, individually and, 2009 WL 4835993, *4835993+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Nev. Aug 24, 2009) Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment on Bifurcated Fire Issues (NO. 207-CV-01027JCM-PAL) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9239 Harley Z. KULKIN; Deanna S. Kulkin, Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF NYE, a Political Subdivision of the State of Nevada and doing business as the Nye County Planning Department for the Pahrump Regional Planning District and the Nye County Sheriffs Office; Ron Williams, individually and as Nye County Manager; Cheryl Beeman, individually and as Acting Director of Nye County Planning Department; Nye County Board of County Commissioners; Roberta Midge Carver, individually and, 2009 WL 4835994, *4835994+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Nev. Aug 24, 2009) Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment on Bifurcated Boundary Line Adjustment Issue (NO. 207-CV-01027JCM-PAL) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9240 Vincent A. MARRERO, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF CLARK, a Political Subdivision of the State of Nevada and doing business as the Clark County Department of Family Services and the Court Appointed Special Advocate's © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. office; Ann Rubin, individually and as Assistant Director of Clark County Department of Family Services; Jackie Hall, individually and as a manager of Clark County Department of Family Services; Lisa Howell, individually and as a supervisor of Clark, 2007 WL 6999243, *6999243 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Nev. Dec 28, 2007) Opposition to Defendants Shelia Parks, Cheryl Meyers and Maria Santoro's Motion to Motion to Dismiss (NO. 207-CV-01156-JCM-GWF) 9241 Tom LOUX, Plaintiff, v. State of Nevada, ex rel., Its Department of Welfare Division of Child and Family Sevices, State of Nevada, ex rel. Its Department of Information Technology, Madeline Marie, in her individual capacity, Defendants., 2004 WL 3702205, *3702205 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Nev. Sep 27, 2004) Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. CV-N-03-0240-LRH-(VP) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 9242 STATE TROOPER FRATERNAL ASSOCIATION, New Jersey State Police Non-Commissioned Officers Association, and Seven New Jersey State Police Troopers, Identities A Withheld (New Jersey State Troopers 1-7), Plaintiffs, v. State of New Jersey, State of New Jersey - Division of State Police, Superintendent of State Police, in his official capacity only, Defendants., 2009 WL 4900025, *4900025+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.N.J. Oct 17, 2009) Plaintiffs' Brief In Support Of Their Application For Preliminary Injunctive Relief, Motion To Amend, And For Sanctions & Contempt (NO. 08-3820, MLC) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 9243 INTERACTIVE MEDIA ENTERTAINMENT AND GAMING ASSOCIATION, L.L.C., a limited liability corporation of the State of New Jersey, Plaintiff, v. Alberto GONZALES, Attorney General of the United States, the Federal Trade Commission and the Federal Reserve System, Defendants., 2007 WL 4677332, *4677332+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.N.J. Sep 10, 2007) Plaintiff's Response to Defendants Motion to Dismiss Complaint and Reply to Defendant's Response to Motion for Issuance of Temporary Restraining Order (NO. 07-2625, MLC) 9244 INTERACTIVE MEDIA ENTERTAINMENT AND GAMING ASSOCIATION, L.L.C., a limited liability corporation of the State of New Jersey, Plaintiff, v. Alberto GONZALES, Attorney General of the United States, the Federal Trade Commission and the Federal Reserve System, Defendants., 2007 WL 4677333, *4677333+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.N.J. Sep 10, 2007) Plaintiff's Response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Complaint and Reply to Defendant's Response to Motion for Issuance of Temporary Restraining Order (NO. 07-2625, MLC) 9245 INTERACTIVE MEDIA ENTERTAINMENT AND GAMING ASSOCIATION L.L.C., a limited liability corporation of the State of New Jersey, Plaintiff, v. Alberto GONZALES, Attorney General of the United States, the Federal Trade Commission, and the Federal Reserve System, Defendants., 2007 WL 4677337, *4677337+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.N.J. Aug 21, 2007) Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Order and Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Cross-Motion to Dismiss (NO. 07-2625, MLC) 9246 INTERACTIVE MEDIA ENTERTAINMENT AND GAMING ASSOCIATION, L.L.C., a limited liability corporation of the State of New Jersey, Plaintiff, v. Alberto GONZALES, Attorney General of the United States, the Federal Trade Commission, and the Federal Reserve System, Defendants., 2007 WL 4677338, *4677338+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.N.J. Aug 21, 2007) Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Cross-Motion to Dismiss (NO. 07-2625, MLC) 9247 INTERACTIVE MEDIA ENTERTAINMENT AND GAMING ASSOCIATION, L.L.C., a limited liability corporation of the State of New Jersey, Plaintiff, v. Alberto GONZALES, Attorney General of the United States, the Federal Trade Commission and the Federal Reserve System, Defendants., 2007 WL 4677336, *4677336+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.N.J. Jul 10, 2007) Plaintiff's Brief in Support of Issuance of Temporary Restraining Order (NO. 07-2625, MLC) 9248 CHERRY HILL TOWERS, L.L.C., Plaintiff, v. TOWNSHIP OF CHERRY HILL, Cherry Hill Department of Code Enforcement, and Anthony Saccomanno, Defendant., 2005 WL 2511580, *2511580+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.N.J. Aug 31, 2005) Brief in Support of Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. -LAW03-CV-4744) 9249 832 CORPORATION, INC, et al., Plaintiffs, v. GLOUCESTER TOWNSHIP, Defendant., 2005 WL 2510818, *2510818+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.N.J. Aug 22, 2005) Plaintiffs' Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and Reply to Defendant's Response to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 04-CV-1140) 9250 832 CORPORATION, INC., 225 Corporation, Inc., and John Adams Club, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. TOWNSHIP OF GLOUCESTER, Defendants., 2005 WL 2510806, *2510806+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.N.J. Aug 15, 2005) Brief in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment and in Support of the Defendant's Cross-otion for Summary Judgment (NO. 04-CV-1140, JEI) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 9251 UNITED STATES, v. Oscar RAY., 2011 WL 1458310, *1 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.N.Y. Mar 30, 2011) Sentencing Memorandum and Position Paper with Respect to Sentencing Factors (NO. 07CR00874) 9252 Annie TUMMINO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Andrew C. von ESCHENBACH, as Commissioner of Food and Drugs, Defendant., 2007 WL 4784001, *4784001 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.N.Y. Jun 30, 2007) Reply Memorandum of Law in Further Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the Fifth Amended Complaint, or, in the Alternative, for Summary © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Judgment, and in Further Support of Defendant's Motion to ... (NO. 05-CV-366, ERK/VVP) 9253 Annie TUMMINO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Andrew C. von ESCHENBACH, as Commissioner of Food and Drugs, Defendant., 2007 WL 4783997, *4783997+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.N.Y. May 26, 2007) Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the Fifth Amended Complaint, or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment (NO. 05-CV-366, ERK/VVP) 9254 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Glenn MARCUS, Defendant., 2006 WL 6361854, *6361854+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.N.Y. May 15, 2006) Government's Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant's Pretrial Motion (NO. 05-457, ARR) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 9255 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Glenn MARCUS., 2006 WL 6361852, *6361852+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.N.Y. May 01, 2006) (NO. 05CR0457, ARR) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 9256 USA, v. McFARLANE et al., 2005 WL 5680245, *5680245+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.N.Y. Jun 20, 2005) Memorandum in Support of Defendant Hall's Motion to Suppress and Exclude Defendant's Statement Due to the Government's Failure to Contact the Defendant's Consulate as Ordered Prior to Interrogating ... (NO. 103-CR-910-ALL) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 9257 Maher ARAR, Plaintiff, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General of the United States; Larry D. Thompson, formerly Deputy Attorney General; Tom Ridge, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security; James W. Ziglar, formerly Commissioner of the Immigration and Naturalization Service; J. Scott Blackman, formerly Regional Director of the Eastern Regional Office of the Immigration and Naturalization Service; Paula Corrigan, Regional Director of the Bureau of, 2005 WL 6140580, *6140580+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.N.Y. Mar 23, 2005) Notice of Motion to Dismiss the Claims Against Attorney General John Ashcroft in his Individual Capacity (NO. 104CV00249) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 9258 Ibrahim TURKMEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. John ASHCROFT, et al., Defendants., 2005 WL 3947810, *3947810+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.N.Y. Jan 10, 2005) Plaintiffs' Memorandum in Opposition to Defendants' Partial Motion to Dismiss the Third Amended Complaint (NO. 02CV2307, JG) 9259 NASSAU COUNTY EMPLOYEE ""L"" (fictitious name), Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF NASSAU, Thomas R. Suozzi, Individually and as County Executive, Peter Sylver, Individually and as Deputy County Executive, Peter J. Schmitt, Individually and as a Legislator of the County of Nassau, Nassau County Legislature, and John P. Donnelly, Individually and as Director of Human Resources, Defendants., 2004 WL 2410196, *2410196+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.N.Y. Aug 31, 2004) Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendant Schmitt's Motion to Dismiss the Complaint (NO. CV- © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 04-1014, SJF) 9260 NASSAU COUNTY EMPLOYEE ""L"" (fictitious name), Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF NASSAU, Thomas R. Suozzi, Individually and as County Executive, Peter Sylver, Individually and as Deputy County Executive, Peter J. Schmitt, Individually and as a Legislator of the County of Nassau, Nassau County Legislature, and John P. Donnelly, Individually and as Director of Human Resources, Defendants., 2004 WL 2410203, *2410203+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.N.Y. Aug 31, 2004) Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Motion of Defendant Peter J. Schmitt to Dismiss Complaint Under Rule 12(b) of the Fed. R. Civ. P. (NO. CV04-1014, SJF) 9261 NASSAU COUNTY EMPLOYEE ""L"" (fictitious name), Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF NASSAU, Thomas R. Suozzi, Individually and as County Executive, Peter Sylver, Individually and as Deputy County Executive, Peter J. Schmitt, Individually and as a Legislator of the County of Nassau, Nassau County Legislature, and John P. Donnelly, Individually and as Director of Human Resources, Defendants., 2004 WL 2410214, *2410214+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.N.Y. Aug 31, 2004) Reply Memorandum of Law in Further Support of Defendant Schmitt's Motion to Dismiss the Complaint (NO. CV-04-1014, SJF) 9262 Edith Schlain WINDSOR, in her capacity as Executor of the estate of Thea Clara Spyer, Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant., 2011 WL 4428693, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.N.Y. Sep 15, 2011) Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 10 CIV. 8435 (BSJ) () " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9263 Edith Schlain WINDSOR, in her capacity as executor of the estate of Thea Clara Spyer, Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant., 2011 WL 4428691, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.N.Y. Sep 09, 2011) Reply Memorandum of Law of Intervenor-Defendant the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives in Support of Its Motion to Dismiss (NO. 10-CV-8435 (BSJ)(JCF) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9264 Edith Schlain WINDSOR, et al., Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant., 2011 WL 3754396, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.N.Y. Aug 19, 2011) Defendant United States' Memorandum of Law in Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and Intervenor's Motion to Dismiss (NO. 10-CV-8435 (BSJ)(JCF) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9265 EDITH SCHLAIN WINDSOR, et al., Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant., 2011 WL 3754404, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.N.Y. Aug 19, 2011) Defendant United States' Memorandum of Law in Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and Intervenor's Motion to Dismiss (NO. 10-CV-8435 (BSJ)(JCF) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 9266 Edith Schlain WINDSOR, in her capacity as Executor of the estate of Thea Clara Spyer, Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant., 2011 WL 3754422, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.N.Y. Aug 19, 2011) Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law in Opposition to DefendantIntervenor's Motion to Dismiss (NO. 10 CIV. 8435 (BSJ) () HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 9267 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Edward GARDNER, Defendant., 2011 WL 7563322, *1 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.N.Y. Aug 10, 2011) Defendant Edward Gardner's Supplemental Memorandum of Law to Address Issues Raised At the August 3 2011 Sentencing Hearing (NO. 07CR01229) 9268 Edith Schlain WINDSOR, in her capacity as executor of the estate of Thea Clara Spyer, Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant., 2011 WL 3515722, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.N.Y. Aug 01, 2011) Memorandum of Law in Support of Intervenor-Defendant's Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 10-CV-8435 (BSJ)(JCF) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 9269 Edith Schlain WINDSOR, in her capacity as executor of the estate of Thea Clara Spyer, Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant., 2011 WL 3515738, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.N.Y. Aug 01, 2011) Memorandum of Law of Intervenor-Defendant the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives in Support of Its Motion to Dismiss (NO. 10-CV-8435 (BSJ)(JCF) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9270 Edith Schlain WINDSOR, in her capacity as Executor of the Estate of Thea Clara Spyer, Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant., 2011 WL 3098311, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.N.Y. Jul 26, 2011) Brief for the State of New York as Amicus Curiae in Support of the Plaintiff (NO. 1:10-CV-8435-BSJ-JCF) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9271 Edith Schlain WINDSOR, in her capacity as Executor of the estate of Thea Clara Spyer, Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant., 2011 WL 3165327, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.N.Y. Jun 24, 2011) Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 10 CIV. 8435 (BSJ) () " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 9272 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Terrance FORTE, et al, including Lavon Barrett, Defendant., 2010 WL 9581695, *1 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.N.Y. Dec 29, 2010) Sentencing Memorandum (NO. 09 CR. 765 (RMB)) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 9273 Ella Louise SMITH, Plaintiff, v. REGIONAL PLAN ASSOCIATION, INC., Robert Yaro, Thomas Wright, and James Finch, Defendants., 2010 WL 5889602, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.N.Y. Dec 20, 2010) Reply Memorandum in Further Support of Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint (NO. 10CV05857) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 9274 Howard K. STERN, Plaintiff, v. Rita COSBY and Hachette Book Group USA, Inc., d/b/a Grand Central Publishing, and John or Jane Doe, Defendants., 2009 WL 3334583, *3334583+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.N.Y. Oct 08, 2009) Defendant Rita Cosby's Memorandum of Law in Support of Summary Judgment (NO. 078536, DC) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 9275 MENTAL HYGIENE LEGAL SERVICE, Plaintiff, v. David PATERSON, In His Official Capacity As Governor of The State of New York, Andrew Cuomo,in His Official Capacity As Attorney General of The State of New York, Michael Hogan, In His Official Capacity As Commissioner of The New York State Office of Mental Health, Diana Jones Ritter, In Her Official Capacity As Commissioner of The New York State Office of Mental Retardation And Developmental Disabilities, And Brian, 2009 WL 1635555, *1635555+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.N.Y. Mar 13, 2009) Reply Memorndum of Law In Support of Plaintiff Mental Hygiene Legal Service's Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 107CV02935) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9276 Howard K. STERN, Plaintiff, v. Rita COSBY, Hachette Book Group USA, Inc., d/b/a Grand Central Publishing, and Jane and John Doe, Defendants., 2009 WL 2512044, *2512044+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.N.Y. Mar 13, 2009) Memorandum of Law of Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc. as Amicus Curiae (NO. 107-CV-08536-DC) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 9277 Ken WIWA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ROYAL DUTCH PETROLEUM COMPANY, et al., Defendants; Ken Wiwa, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Brian Anderson, Defendant., 2009 WL 3481746, *3481746+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.N.Y. Feb 09, 2009) Plaintiffs' Reply to Defendants' Memorandum of Law on Issues of International Law (NO. 968386, KMW) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 9278 Howard K. STERN, Plaintiff, v. Rita COSBY and Hachette Book Group USA, Inc., d/b/a Grand Central Publishing, and John or Jane Doe, Defendants., 2008 WL 6692389, *6692389+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.N.Y. Dec 19, 2008) Defendant Rita Cosby's Memorandum of Law in Support of Summary Judgment (NO. 078536, DC) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 9279 Ken WIWA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ROYAL DUTCH PETROLEUM COMPANY, et al., Defendants; Ken Wiwa, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Brian Anderson, Defendant., 2008 WL 7047515, *7047515+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.N.Y. Jan 09, 2008) Plaintiffs' Reply to Defendants' Memorandum of Law on Issues of International Law (NO. 968386, KMW) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 9280 Jehed DIAMOND, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. George E. PATAKI, et al., Defendants; Joseph Betesh, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. George E. Pataki, et al., Defendants., 2005 WL 3281223, *3281223 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.N.Y. Oct 03, 2005) Plaintiffs' Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of Preliminary Injunction and Class Certification (NO. 05CIV4607, SHS) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 9281 Joseph BETESH, on behalf o himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. George E. PATAKI, et al; Jehed Diamond, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. George E. Pataki, et al., Defendants., 2005 WL 2872248, *2872248 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.N.Y. Sep 26, 2005) Plaintiffs' Reply Memoradum of Law (NO. 054607, SHS) 9282 NEW YORK STATE RIFLE AND PISTOL ASSOCIATION, INC., et al, Plaintiffs, v. Andrew M. CUOMO, et al, Defendants., 2013 WL 1703505, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.N.Y. Apr 15, 2013) Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (NO. 1:13-CV-00291-WMS) 9283 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Quentin LEEPER, Defendant., 2011 WL 1458422, *1 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.N.Y. Jan 03, 2011) Defendant's Supplemental Sentencing Memorandum in Support of the Application of the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 (NO. 08CR00069) 9284 UNITES STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Lumni ZHUTA, Defendant., 2010 WL 6510266, *1 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.N.Y. Aug 30, 2010) Lumni Zhuta's Reply Memorandum: Motion to Dismiss (NO. 09CR00357) 9285 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Lumni ZHUTA, Defendant., 2010 WL 6510265, *1 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.N.Y. Aug 27, 2010) Lumni Zhuta's Reply Memorandum: Motion to Dismiss (NO. 09CR00357) 9286 Joseph La PERNA, Plaintiff, v. SETH RIEWALDT, et al., Defendants., 2009 WL 4994055, *4994055+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Ohio Jun 20, 2009) Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 507-CV-02728) 9287 Brian BENICK, Plaintiff, v. KNOX COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT, Defendant., 2012 WL 6086829, *1 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.Ohio Oct 16, 2012) Defendants Knox County Health Department's Motion for Summary Judgment (Fed. R.Civ.P.56(c)) (NO. 11CV00855) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 9288 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. David BIGI, Defendant., 2010 WL 6549514, *1 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.Ohio Dec 11, 2010) Third Motion to Reconsider: Obtaining Records By De-Facto Search Warrants (NO. 09CR00153) 9289 MIDWEST TOWING & RECOVERY, INC., Plaintiff, v. CITY OF LANCASTER, et al., Defendants., 2010 WL 4250641, *4250641 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.Ohio Jul 16, 2010) Reply Memorandum of Defendants City of Lancaster, Michael J. Courtney and Dave Bailey in Support of Their Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (NO. 209CV1142) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 9290 John DOE, Plaintiff, v. C. Patrick CROWLEY, et al., Defendants., 2009 WL © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 5213940, *5213940+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.Ohio Apr 28, 2009) Corrected Brief of Plaintiff (NO. 109CV108) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 9291 BROWN, v. CITY OF UPPER ARLINGTON., 2008 WL 7318961, *7318961 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.Ohio Sep 10, 2008) Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (NO. 08CV00849) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9292 M.S., Plaintiff, v. Nancy H. ROGERS, Attorney General of Ohio, Defendant., 2008 WL 7318865, *7318865 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.Ohio Aug 01, 2008) Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief (NO. 108-CV-427) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 9293 James W. BALLINGER, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF LEBANON, et al, Defendants., 2007 WL 4741818, *4741818 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.Ohio Nov 19, 2007) Answer to Motion (NO. 107CV00256) 9294 Darrell ESTEP, Plaintiff, v. J. Kenneth BLACKWELL, in his official capacity as Secretary of State for the State of Ohio., 2006 WL 1173557, *1173557 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.Ohio Mar 06, 2006) Plaintiff's Supplemental Memorandum in Support of Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction (NO. 106-CV-104) 9295 John DOE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. State of Ohio, et al., Defendants., 2003 WL 25683557, *25683557 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.Ohio Sep 08, 2003) Defendants' Reply Memorandum in Support of Their Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. C2-91-464) 9296 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Grant Andrew STOUT, Defendant., 2010 WL 3052461, *3052461 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Okla. Jun 02, 2010) Defendant's Reply to Government's Response to Motion to Quash Statements and Evidence Due to Illegal Arrest (NO. 10-CR-050-JHP) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 9297 Mary BISHOP and Sharon Baldwin, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants., 2009 WL 5900743, *5900743 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Okla. Nov 16, 2009) Reply Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss by United States of America (NO. 404CV00848) 9298 Mary BISHOP and Sharon Baldwin, Individuals; Susan G. Barton and Gay E. Philltps, Individuals, Plaintiffs, v. THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA, ex rel. Drew Edmondson, in His Official Capacity as Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma, et al, Defendants., 2004 WL 3340696, *3340696+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Okla. Dec 15, 2004) Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and Brief in Support (NO. 04-CV848K(J)) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 9299 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Reginald A. LANCASTER, Defendant., 2011 WL 4963173, *1 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.Okla. Feb 08, 2011) Sentencing Memorandum (NO. 10CR00072) 9300 Heather FINSTUEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Drew EDMONDSON, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Oklahoma, et al., Defendants., 2006 WL 497485, *497485+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.Okla. Jan 03, 2006) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Plaintiffs' Brief in Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. CIV-04-1152C) 9301 Heather FINSTUEN, Anne Magro, and their minor daughters, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Drew EDMONDSON, in his Official Capacity as Attorney General of Oklahoma, Brad Henry, in his official capacity as Governor of Oklahoma, and Dr. Mike Crutcher, in his official capacity as Commissioner of Health of Oklahoma, Defendants., 2006 WL 497486, *497486+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.Okla. Jan 03, 2006) Defendants' Response to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. CIV-04-1152-C) 9302 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Christopher CARLSON, Defendant., 2013 WL 4731569, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Or. Apr 30, 2013) Post-Hearing Memorandum in Support of Motion to Suppress Evidence (NO. 3:12-CR-00124-SI) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 9303 Cecilia GOUVEIA, Plaintiff, v. James SEARS, Teresa Vandusen, and Marion County, Oregon, Defendants., 2007 WL 4759982, *4759982 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Or. Sep 2007) Plaintiff's Trial Mem Orandum (NO. CV05-1102-HO) 9304 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Girson ORTEGA., 2011 WL 1631343, *1 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Pa. Jan 07, 2011) Sentencing Memorandum Requesting Application of the New Mandatory Minimum Sentences Pursuant to the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 (NO. 09CR00209) 9305 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Jose DELGADO., 2011 WL 1631345, *1 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Pa. Jan 07, 2011) Sentencing Memorandum Requesting Application of the New Mandatory Minimum Sentences Pursuant to the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 (NO. 509CR00209) 9306 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Arturo Jaimes PIMENTEL., 2010 WL 6509953, *1 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Pa. Sep 27, 2010) Sentencing Memorandum of Defendant Arturo Jaimes Pimentel (NO. 09CR00488) 9307 John DZIEWA, individually and as Parent and natural guardian of Joshua Dziewa, a minor, and Lori Dziewa, Parent and natural guardian of Joshua Dziewa, a minor, Plaintiffs, v. PENNSYLVANIA INTERSCHOLASTIC ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, INC., Defendant., 2009 WL 4968124, *4968124+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Pa. Feb 17, 2009) Brief in Support pf Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (NO. 208-CV-05792-PBT) 9308 John DZIEWA, individually and as Parent and natural guardian of Joshua Dziewa, a minor, and Lori Dziewa, Parent and natural guardian of Joshua Dziewa, a minor., Plaintiffs, v. PENNSYLVANIA INTERSCHOLASTIC ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, INC., Defendant., 2008 WL 7313059, *7313059+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Pa. Dec 23, 2008) Defendant's Supplemental Brief in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction (NO. 208-CV-05792-PBT) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 9309 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Steven ROBERTS and Daniel Mangini, Defendants., 2007 WL 6884119, *6884119+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Pa. Jul 20, 2007) Defendants' Joint Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Submitted in Support of Motion for Reconsideration of Request for Clarification or Modification of the Terms of Supervised Release (NO. -02, 04-CR-0037-01) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 9310 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Steven ROBERTS and Daniel Mangini, Defendants., 2007 WL 6884118, *6884118+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Pa. Jan 04, 2007) Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendants' Joint Motion for Reconsideration of their Request for Clarification or Modification of the Terms of Supervised Release (NO. -02, 04-CR-0037-01) " HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 9311 AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, Defendant., 2006 WL 3069094, *3069094+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Pa. Sep 15, 2006) Plaintiffs' Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and, in the Alternative, for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings (NO. 98-CV-5591, LAR) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 9312 Patrick PEREIRA, Plaintiff, v. DISKIN MOTORS, INC. d/b/a Carousel Hyundai and James E. Diskin, Jr., Defendants., 2004 WL 2697209, *2697209+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Pa. Jun 09, 2004) Defendants Diskin Motors, Inc. d/b/a Carousel Hyundai's and James E. Diskin, Jr.'s Reply to Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (NO. 04-CV-791) 9313 Louis MICKENS-THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. Benjamin A. MARTINEZ, Chairman, Pennsylvania Board Of Probation and Parole, in his official capacity; Larry POLGAR, District Director, Allentown District Office, Pennsylvania Board Of Probation and Parole, in his official capacity; Joseph Smith, Scranton District Office Pennsylvania Board Of Probation and Parole, in his official capacity; Raymond J. Dadigan, Central Regional Director, Pennsylvania Board Of Probation and, 2004 WL 2695006, *2695006+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Pa. May 04, 2004) Supplemental Memorandum of law of Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (NO. 204-CV-01615RB) 9314 Louis MICKENS-THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. Benjamin A. MARTINEZ, Chairman, Pennsylvania Board Of Probation and Parole, in his official capacity; Larry Polgar, District Director, Allentown District Office, Pennsylvania Board Of Probation and Parole, in his official capacity; Joseph Smith, Scranton District Office Pennsylvania Board Of Probation and Parole, in his official capacity; Raymond J. Dadigan, Central Regional Director, Pennsylvania Board Of Probation and, 2004 WL 5316378, *5316378+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Pa. May 04, 2004) Supplemental Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (NO. 204-CV-01615RB) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 9315 Louis MICKENS-THOMAS, v. Donald VAUGHN, et al., 2004 WL 5543024, *5543024+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Pa. Apr 13, 2004) Memorandum in Support of Motion to Enforce Habeas Corpus Judgment or in the Alternative in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction (NO. 99-6161) 9316 Stephen B. BURBANK, Anita L. Allen-Castellitto, Regina Austin, C. Edwin Baker, Eric Feldman, Douglas Frenkel, Frank Goodman, Seth F. Kreimer, Anne E. Kringel, Friedrich Kubler, Alan M. Lerner, Howard Lesnick, Bruce H. Mann, Stephen Morse, Wendell Prichett, Edward Rubin, Louis S. Rulli, Catherine T. Struve, Dina Lynn Schlossberg, Kim Lane Scheppele, Clyde W. Summers, Erica Flores, Terri Keeley, Ellen London, Loren Stewart, Bryan Tallevi, Carlos Uriarte, Thaomee Xiong,, 2004 WL 2717784, *2717784+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Pa. Feb 02, 2004) Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 03-5497) 9317 WHITEWOOD, et al., Plaintiffs, v. WOLF, et al., Defendants., 2013 WL 6627427, *1 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Pa. Dec 02, 2013) Plaintiffs' Memorandum in Opposition to the Motion of Defendants Secretary of Health Michael Wolf and Secretary of Revenue Dan Meuser for Certification and Amendment of Order Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § ... (NO. 13-1861-JEJ) 9318 Deb WHITEWOOD, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Thomas W. CORBETT, in his official capacity as Governor of Pennsylvania, et al., Defendants., 2013 WL 6046850, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Pa. Nov 01, 2013) Defendant Petrille's Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint for Failure to State a Claim under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), and Failure to Join Parties under Fed. R. Civ. P. ... (NO. 13-CV-01861-JEJ) 9319 Deb WHITEWOOD and Susan Whitewood, Fredia Hurdle and Lynn Hurdle, Edwin Hill and David Palmer, Heather Poehler and Kath Poehler, Fernando Chang-Muy and Len Rieser, Dawn Plummer and Diana Polson, Angela Gillem and Gail Lloyd, Helena Miller and Dara Raspberry, Ron Gebhardtsbauer and Greg Wright, Marla Cattermole and Julia Lobur, Maureen Hennessey, and A.W. and K.W., minor children, by and through their parents and next friends, Deb Whitewood and Susan Whitewood,, 2013 WL 6046863, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Pa. Nov 01, 2013) Reply Brief of Defendant Secretary of Health Michael Wolf in Support of His Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) and (6) (NO. 13-1861-JEJ) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 9320 WHITEWOOD, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CORBETT, et al., Defendants., 2013 WL 6046848, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Pa. Oct 21, 2013) Plaintiffs' Brief in Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss of Defendant Donald Petrille, Jr. (NO. 13-1861-JEJ) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9321 WHITEWOOD, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CORBETT, et al., Defendants., 2013 WL 6046880, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Pa. Oct 21, © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 2013) Plaintiffs' Brief in Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss of Defendants Thomas W. Corbett and Michael Wolf (NO. 13-1861-JEJ) 9322 Deb WHITEWOOD, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Thomas W. CORBETT, in his official capacity as Governor of Pennsylvania, et al., Defendants., 2013 WL 6046787, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Pa. Oct 07, 2013) Defendant Petrille's Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint for Failure to State a Claim under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), and Failure to Join Parties under Fed. R. Civ. P. ... (NO. 13-CV-01861-JEJ) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9323 Daniel RODGERS, Plaintiff, v. HAZLETON AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT; Robert W. Childs, M.D.; Elaine Maddon Curry; Brian Early; Steve Hahn and Carmella Yenkevich, Defendants., 2009 WL 5060616, *5060616 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Pa. Dec 17, 2009) Defendants' Brief in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 308-CV-1107) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 9324 Pedro LOZANO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF HAZLETON, Defendant., 2007 WL 4773483, *4773483 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Pa. May 17, 2007) Brief of Amici Curiae Pennsylvania Immigration Resource Center, New Jersey Immigration Policy Network, American Friends Service Committee, Human Rights Project of the Urban Justice Center, New Jersey ... (NO. 306-CV-01586-JMM) 9325 Patrick J. PRIBULA, Robert Micheletti and James G. Zarra, Plaintiffs, v. WYOMING AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT, Raymond Bernardi, Anthony Sobeski, Antoinette Valenti, John Lanunziata, Nick Deangelo,John Bolin, Jerry Wall, and John Marianacci, Defendants., 2007 WL 4773678, *4773678 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Pa. Apr 04, 2007) Plaintiffs' Brief in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (NO. 306-CV-2039) 9326 Jennifer E. HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. Maureen (""Rene"") T. PORTLAND, in her individual and official capacities, Timothy M. Curley, in his individual and official capacities, and the Pennsylvania State University, Defendants., 2006 WL 842444, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Pa. Mar 06, 2006) Brief of Plaintiff Jennifer E. Harris in Opposition to Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (NO. 05-2648) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 9327 Jennifer E. HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. Maureen (""Rene"") T. PORTLAND, in her individual and official capacities, Timothy M. Curley, in his individual and official capacities, and The Pennsylvania State University, Defendants., 2006 WL 1021344, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Pa. Mar 06, 2006) Brief of Plaintiff Jennifer E. Harris in Opposition to Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (NO. 05-2648) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9328 Jennifer E. HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. MAUREEN (""RENE"") T. Portland, Timothy M. Curley, and Judge Conner The Pennsylvania State University, Defendants., 2006 WL 1214416, *1214416+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Pa. Feb 09, 2006) Brief in Support of Defendant Maureen T. Portland's © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Motion to Dismiss (NO. 105-CV-02648) 9329 Jennifer E. HARRIS, Plaintiff, v. Maureen (""Rene"") T. PORTLAND, Timothy M. Curley, and the Pennsylvania State University, Defendants., 2006 WL 502080, *502080+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (M.D.Pa. Feb 09, 2006) Brief in Support of Defendant Maureen T. Portland's Motion to Dismiss (NO. 105-CV-02648) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 9330 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Randall Forrest COCHRAN., 2013 WL 7086554, *1 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.Pa. Aug 29, 2013) Sentencing Memorandum (NO. 12-68) 9331 Peter W. THOMPSON, Plaintiff, v. Kenneth M. ROSS, Timothy P. Miller, Morgan Stanley Smith Barney f/d/b/a Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., and Sharil. Kaczmarek, Defendants., 2010 WL 4546354, *4546354 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.Pa. Jul 06, 2010) Plaintiff's Brief in Opposition to Defendants' Collective Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss (NO. 210-CV-00479-TFM) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 9332 DUHRING RESOURCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, PENNSYLVANIA OIL and Gas Association, Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. THE FOREST SERVICE, et al., Defendants, ALLEGHENY DEFENSE PROJECT, Defendant-Intervenor., 2009 WL 3223988, *3223988+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.Pa. Jul 27, 2009) Memorandum in Support of Duhring Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 107CV00314) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9333 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Karen FLETCHER, Defendant., 2007 WL 3114080, *3114080 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.Pa. Jul 19, 2007) Defendant Fletcher's Reply to Government's Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Indictment (NO. 206-CR-00329-JFC) 9334 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Karen FLETCHER., 2007 WL 3114078, *3114078 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.Pa. Jun 26, 2007) Government's Response to Defendant's Motion to Declare Obscenity Statute Unconstitutional as Applied to Text, or in the Alternative, to Dismiss Indictment for Failure to Allege a Crime (NO. 06-329) 9335 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Karen FLETCHER., 2007 WL 3114085, *3114085 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.Pa. Jun 26, 2007) Government's Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Based on Strict Scrutiny (NO. 06-329) 9336 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Karen FLETCHER, Defendant., 2007 WL 3114083, *3114083 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.Pa. Apr 26, 2007) Defendant Fletcher's Motion to Dismiss Based on Strict Scrutiny (NO. 206-CR-00329-JFC) 9337 Brian MACHESKY, Plaintiff, v. THE BOROUGH OF WAYNESBURG, the Waynesburg Police Department, Chief Hawfield, and Lieutenant Bates, Defendants., 2007 WL 4775440, *4775440 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.Pa. Apr 23, 2007) Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss (NO. 07-9) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 9338 Traci KING, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF NEW KENSINGTON, Frank Link and Charles F. Korman, Defendants., 2006 WL 5304265, *5304265 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.Pa. Nov 15, 2006) Reply Brief to Plaintiff's Brief in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss (NO. 06-1015) 9339 Traci KING, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF NEW KENSINGTON, Frank Link and Charles F. Korman, Defendants., 2006 WL 5304267, *5304267+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.Pa. Nov 01, 2006) Plaintiffs' Brief in Opposition to Defendants' Rule 12 Motion to Dismiss (NO. 06-1015) 9340 Joseph W. FERDERBAR, Administrator of the Estate of Linda Ferderbar, Deceased, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY, Northwest Regional Communications, Allegheny County 9-1-1 f/k/a Northwest Regional Communications, Daniel Nussbaum, Danielle Tush, Brian Craig, Leonard Deutsch, Ryan Ging, Susan Zurcher and Phillip Cestra, Defendants., 2005 WL 3938219, *3938219 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.Pa. 2005) Brief in Support of Motion of Defendant Northwest Regional Communications to Dismiss and/or for More Definite Statement (NO. 205-CV-01518-WLS) 9341 M.C., a minor by and through his parents Pam Crawford and Mark Crawford, Plaintiff, v. Dr. Ian AARONSON, Dr. James Amrhein, Dr. Yaw AppiagyeiDankah, Kim Adylette, Mary Searcy, Meredith Williams, Candice "Candi" Davis, and Doe #1, Doe #2, and Doe #3, Unknown South Carolina Department of Social Services Employees, Defendants., 2013 WL 4397525, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.S.C. Aug 08, 2013) Plaintiff's Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant Meredith Williams' Motion to Dismiss (NO. 2:13-CV-01303-DCN) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 9342 M.C., a minor by and through his parents Pam Crawford and Mark Crawford, Plaintiff, v. Dr. Ian AARONSON, Dr. James Amrhein, Dr. Yaw AppiagyeiDankah, Kim Adylette, Mary Searcy, Meredith Williams, Candice "Candi" Davis, and Doe #1, Doe #2, and Doe #3, Unknown South Carolina Department of Social Services Employees, Defendants., 2013 WL 3761227, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.S.C. Jul 12, 2013) Plaintiff's Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant Kim Aydlette's Motion to Dismiss (NO. 2:13-CV-01303-DCN) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 9343 M.C., a minor by and through his parents Pam Crawford and Mark Crawford, Plaintiff, v. Dr. Ian AARONSON, Dr. James Amrhein, Dr. Yaw AppiagyeiDankah, Kim Adylette, Mary Searcy, Meredith Williams, Candice "Candi" Davis, and Doe #1, Doe #2, and Doe #3, Unknown South Carolina Department of Social Services Employees, Defendants., 2013 WL 3761229, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.S.C. Jul 12, 2013) Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendants Dr. Ian Aaronson's and Dr. Yaw Appiagyei-Dankah's Motion to Dismiss (NO. 2:13-CV-01303-DCN) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 9344 UNITED STATES OF AMER, v. Garland S. SLADE., 2010 WL 8815650, *1 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Tenn. Oct 01, 2010) Reply to © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Government's Response to Defendant's § 3582(c) Motion to Modify Sentence (NO. 2:03-CR-73) 9345 Robert W. LOWE, II, Plaintiff, v. Jimmy CLIFT, William Johnson, Hamilton County, Tennessee, Mary Sullivan Moore, and Sheriff John Cupp, Defendants., 2006 WL 5378516, *5378516 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Tenn. 2006) Memorandum (NO. 106-CV-076) 9346 Jeffrey Steven MYRES, Plaintiff, v. Daniel HOOTON, Individually and in his official capacity, Thomas Buttry, individually and in his official capacity, and The City Of Chattanooga, a Tennessee Municipal Corporation, Defendants., 2005 WL 1364135, *1364135+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Tenn. Jan 03, 2005) Plaintiff's Memorandum in Opposition to Defendants Buttry and City of Chattanooga's Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 103-CV-104) 9347 Jeffrey Steven MYRES, Plaintiff, v. Daniel HOOTON, Individually and in his official capacity, Thomas Buttry, individually and in his official capacity, and the City of Chattanooga, a Tennessee Municipal Corporation, Defendants., 2005 WL 6039147, *6039147+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Tenn. Jan 03, 2005) Plaintiff's Memorandum in Opposition to Defendants Buttry and City of Chattanooga's Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 103-CV-104) 9348 Sheila DUNLAP, v. Jerry HENDRICK, et al., 2007 WL 4825835, *4825835+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Tex. Oct 25, 2007) Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and Brief (NO. 206-CV-510) 9349 Walter SESSION, et al., v. Rick PERRY, et al., 2005 WL 1025383, *1025383 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Tex. Jan 14, 2005) Reply Brief of the Jackson Plaintiffs and the Democratic Congressional Intervenors on Remand (NO. 203-CV-354) 9350 Darren M. HEIZER, Plaintiff, v. 1. State of Texas; and 2. Denton County, Texas; and 3. Gayle L. Heizer, Defendants., 2004 WL 3355438, *3355438 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Tex. Feb 06, 2004) Plantiff's Response to ""Defendant Denton County's Motion to Dismiss for Plaintiff's Failure to State a Claim, Plea to the Jurisdiction, Plea in Abatement, And/or Motion for More definite statement'' (NO. 403-CV-480) 9351 James D'CRUZ; Andrew Payne; National Rifle Association of America, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. THE BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives; Kenneth E. Melson, in His Official Capacity as Acting Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives; Eric Holder, in his Official Capacity as Attorney General of the United States, Defendants., 2011 WL 1056153, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Tex. Jan 28, 2011) Brief in Support of Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment, and in Support of Plaintiffs' Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment Oral Argument ... (NO. © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 510-CV-00140-C) 9352 LEXUS GROUP, INC., Movant, v. Mr. Jeffery BICKERSTAFF, In his official capacity as the Chief Building Inspector for The City of Murphy, Texas Mr. Mike Gaiter, In his official capacity as the Building Inspection Administrator for The City of Garland, Texas Mr. Denny Denman, In his official capacity as the Chief Building Inspector for The City of Garland, Texas, Respondents., 2008 WL 7323755, *7323755+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Tex. Nov 21, 2008) Movant Lexus Group's Sur-Reply to City of Murphy and Rowlett's Response to Lexus Group's First Amended Motion for Temporary and Mandatory Injunction or Restraining Order Requiring Defendant's to ... (NO. 308-CV-1660-L) 9353 LEXUS GROUP, INC., Movant, v. Mr. Jeffery BICKERSTAFF, In his official capacity as the Chief Building Inspector for The City of Murphy, Texas Mr. Mike Gaiter, In his official capacity as the Building Inspection Administrator for The City of Garland, Texas Mr. Denny Denman, In his official capacity as the Chief Building Inspector for the City of Rowlett, Texas, Respondents., 2008 WL 7323753, *7323753+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Tex. Nov 04, 2008) Movant Lexus Group's First Amended Brief in Support of Motion for Temporary and Mandatory Injunction or Restraining Order Requiring Defendant's to Issue, Instanter, A Certificate of Occupancy (NO. 308-CV-1660-L) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9354 LEXUS GROUP, INC., Movant, v. Mr. Jeffery BICKERSTAFF, In his official capacity as the Chief Building Inspector for The City of Murphy, Texas Mr. Mike Gaiter, In his official capacity as the Building Inspection Administrator for The City of Garland, Texas Mr. Denny Denman, In his official capacity as the Chief Building Inspector for the City of Rowlett, Texas, Respondents., 2008 WL 7323747, *7323747+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Tex. Oct 15, 2008) Movant Lexus Group's First Motion for Temporary and Mandatory Injunction or Restraining Order Requiring Defendant's to Issue, Instanter, a Certificate of Occupancy (NO. 308-CV-1660-L) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9355 NOIR BROTHERS RESTAURANTS, INC., a Texas Corporation, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF DALLAS, Texas an Incorporated Municipality, Defendant., 2007 WL 2967434, *2967434+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Tex. Aug 06, 2007) Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and Motion to Dismiss and Brief in Support (NO. 306-CV-1885-P) 9356 VILLAS AT PARKSIDE PARTNERS d/b/a Villas at Parkside, et al., Plaintiffs, v. THE CITY OF FARMERS BRANCH, Defendant., 2007 WL 4810219, *4810219+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Tex. May 15, 2007) Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law in Support of Their Application for a Temporary Restraining Order (NO. 306-CA-2376-L, 306-CV-2371-L, 307-CV-0061-L) 9357 VILLAS AT PARKSIDE PARTNERS d/b/a Villas at Parkside, et al., Plaintiffs, © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. v. THE CITY OF FARMERS BRANCH, Defendant., 2007 WL 4810212, *4810212 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Tex. May 08, 2007) Plaintiffs' Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant City of Farmers Branch's Motion to Dismiss (NO. 306-CA-2376-L, 306-CV-2371-L, 307-CV-0061-L) 9358 SIESTA VILLAGE MARKET, LLC, et al., v. Rick PERRY, Governor of Texas, et al., Defendants., 2006 WL 6405921, *6405921 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Tex. Jun 12, 2006) Defendants' Response to Samco, Inc.'s Motion to Intervene as a Party Defendant and Brief in Support Thereof (NO. 3-06CV-0585D) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9359 James W. LOOSE, Plaintiff, v. State of TEXAS and Tarrant County, Texas and Sheri W. Loose, Defendants., 2004 WL 2654947, *2654947 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Tex. Feb 23, 2004) Response, with Briefs, to ""Defendant State of Texas' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Consolidated Amended Complaint for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction'' (NO. 403-CV-266-Y) 9360 EMPACADORA DE CARNES DE FRESNILLO, S.A. de C.V., Beltex Corporation, and Dallas Crown, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. Tim CURRY, District Attorney, Tarrant County, Texas, et al Defendants., 2003 WL 24278834, *24278834+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Tex. Dec 04, 2003) Defendant Curry's Brief in Reply to Plaintiffs' Response to Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 4-02-CV-0804-Y) 9361 EMPACADORA DE CARNES DE FRESNILLO, S.A. De C.V., Beltex Corporation, and Dallas Crown, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. Tim CURRY, District Attorney, Tarrant County, Texas, Defendant., 2003 WL 24278832, *24278832+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Tex. Dec 01, 2003) Plaintiffs' Response to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and Reply to Defendant's Response to Plaintiffs' Motion (NO. 4-02CV0804-Y) 9362 Yvonne CAUDILLO by next friend, Brenda Caudillo; Mirah Epstein Curzer by next friend, Howard Curzer; and Lubbock High School Gay Straight Alliance, an unincorporated association; Plaintiffs, v. LUBBOCK INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT; Wayne Havens, in his official capacity as Acting Superintendent of Lubbock Independent School District; Dr. Jack Clemmons, individually; Fred Hardin, in his official capacity as Assistant Superintendent for Secondary Schools of, 2003 WL 23890087, *23890087+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Tex. Nov 09, 2003) Plaintiffs' Brief in Response to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 5-03CV0165-C) 9363 Yvonne CAUDILLO by next friend Brenda Caudillo; Mirah Epstein Curzer by next friend Howard Curzer; and Lubbock High School Gay Straight Alliance, an unincorporated association, Plaintiffs, v. LUBBOCK INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT; Wayne Havens, in his official capacity as Acting Superintendent of Lubbock Independent School District; Dr. Jack Clemmons, individually; Fred Hardin, in his official capacity as Assistant Superintendent for Secondary Schools of, 2003 WL 23890062, *23890062+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. (N.D.Tex. Nov 07, 2003) Defendants' Lubbock Independent School District, Wayne Havens, Fred Hardin and Dr. Jack Clemmons' Brief in Support of Response and Objections to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment and Brief (NO. 5-03CV0165-C) 9364 Yvonne CAUDILLO by next friend, Brenda Caudillo; Mirah Epstein Curzer by next friend, Howard Curzer; and Lubbock High School Gay Straight Alliance, an unincorporated association; Plaintiffs, v. LUBBOCK INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT; Wayne Havens, in his official capacity as Acting Superintendent of Lubbock Independent School District; Dr. Jack Clemmons, individually; Fred Hardin, in his official capacity as Assistant Superintendent for Secondary Schools of, 2003 WL 23889965, *23889965+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Tex. Oct 20, 2003) Plaintiffs' Brief in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 5-03CV0165-C) 9365 Yvonne CAUDILLO by next friend Brenda Caudillo; Mirah Epstein Curzer by next friend Howard Curzer; and Lubbock High School Gay Straight Alliance, an unincorporated association, Plaintiffs, v. LUBBOCK INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT; Wayne Havens, in his official capacity as Acting Superintendent of Lubbock Independent School District; Dr. Jack Clemmons, individually; Fred Hardin, in his official capacity as Assistant Superintendent for Secondary Schools of, 2003 WL 23889977, *23889977+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Tex. Oct 20, 2003) Defendants', Lubbock Independent School District, Wayne Havens, In His Official Capacity as Acting Superintendent of Schools, and Fred Hardin, In His Official Capacity as Assistant Superintendent for ... (NO. 5-03CV0165-C) 9366 Yvonne CAUDILLO by next friend Brenda Caudillo; Mirah Epstein Curzer by next friend Howard Curzer; and Lubbock High School Gay Straight Alliance, an unincorporated association, Plaintiffs, v. LUBBOCK INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT; Wayne Havens, in his official capacity as Acting Superintendent of Lubbock Independent School District; Dr. Jack Clemmons, individually; Fred Hardin, in his official capacity as Assistant Superintendent for Secondary Schools of, 2003 WL 23889873, *23889873+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Tex. Aug 06, 2003) Defendant, Jack Clemmons, Ed.D.'s Brief in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 5-03CV0165-C) 9367 JORNALEROS DE LAS PALMAS, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF LEAGUE CITY, and Michael W. Jez in his official capacity as Chief of Police of League City, and Rick Perry, individually and in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Texas, Defendants., 2011 WL 7938576, *1 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.Tex. Oct 04, 2011) Plaintiff's Response to Defendant Governor Rick Perry's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) (NO. 4:1 1-CV-02703) 9368 Fannie GARCIA, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF LAREDO, TEXAS, a Home Rule City; Carlos Maldonado, Chief of the City of Laredo, Texas Police Department, Individually, and in his Official Capacity; Cynthia Collazo, Deputy City Manager of the City of Laredo, Texas, Individually and in her Official Capacity; Gilbert © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Navarro, Former Interim/ Acting Chief of the Police Department of the City of Laredo, Texas, Individually and in his Official Capacity; Gilbert Magana, Investigator,, 2011 WL 9559709, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.Tex. Apr 11, 2011) Plaintiff, Fannie Garcia's Amended Response in Opposition to Defendants' Motion and Supplemental Motions for Summary Judgment (Dockets 40,481 Incorporation of Exhibits Previously Filed in Support of ... (NO. 5:10CV30) 9369 Michael Durwood GRIFFITH, Petitioner, v. Doug DRETKE, Director Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Respondent., 2005 WL 4748131, *4748131+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.Tex. Jan 21, 2005) Respondent Dretke's Answer and Motion for Summary Judgment With Brief in Support (NO. 404-CV-04109) 9370 Cleopatra De LEON, Nicole Dimetman Victor Holmes, and Mark Phariss, Plaintiffs, v. Rick PERRY, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Texas; Greg Abbott, in his official capacity as Texas Attorney General; Gerard Rickhoff, in his official capacity as Bexar County Clerk; and David Lakey, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Texas Department of State Health Services, Defendants., 2013 WL 6980908, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.Tex. Dec 23, 2013) State Defendants' Response in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (NO. 5:13-CV-982-OLG) 9371 Cleopatra De LEON, Nicole Dimetman, Victor Holmes, and Mark Phariss, Plaintiffs, v. Rick PERRY, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Texas, Greg Abbott, in his official capacity as Texas Attorney General, Gerard Rickhoff, in his official capacity as Bexar County Clerk, and David Lakey, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Texas Department of State Health Services, Defendants., 2013 WL 6980897, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.Tex. Nov 27, 2013) Plaintiffs' Opposed Motion for Preliminary Injunction Enjoining Defendants from Enforcing Texas' SameSex Marriage Ban (NO. 5:13-CV-982-OLG) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 9372 PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS SURGICAL HEALTH SERVICES, and on behalf of its patients and physicians, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Gregory ABBOTT, Attorney General of Texas, in his official capacity, et al., Defendants., 2013 WL 5780412, *1 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.Tex. Oct 01, 2013) Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Memorandum of Law in Support Thereof (NO. 1:13CV00862) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 9373 Steven C. HOUSSIERE, Plaintiffs, v. Karol Sue ARNETTE, and Greg Abbott, Texas Attorney General, Defendants., 2010 WL 4650720, *4650720 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.Tex. Aug 20, 2010) Defendant Greg Abbott's Reply Brief to his Motion to Dismiss (NO. 110-CV-00535-SS) 9374 Steven C. HOUSSIERE, Complainant, v. Karol Sue ARNETTE and Greg Abbott, Texas Attorney General, Defendants., 2010 WL 4650723, *4650723 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.Tex. Aug 13, 2010) Complainant's © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Respnonse and Opposition to Defendants' Motion for More Definate Statement and Motion to Dismiss, and Complainant's First Motion to Amend Complainant's Origianl Petition for Declaratory ... (NO. A10CA535) 9375 Yvonne MEADOWS, et vir., Larry Meadows, Plaintiffs, v. Janie BRAXDALE and Lake Travis Independent School District, Defendants., 2009 WL 5071923, *5071923 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.Tex. Jul 27, 2009) Plaintiffs' Response to Defendant Lake Travis Isd's Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 108-CV-819-SS) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 9376 Robert E. HEBERT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Robert W. SHEPARD, Chairman of the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, et al., Defendants., 2008 WL 7318421, *7318421 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.Tex. Nov 07, 2008) The Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board Defendants' and the State of Texas' Joint Response to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. A08CA024SS) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 9377 ROARK & HARDEE L.P. d/b/a the Warehouse Saloon and Billiards, Bill Hardee, Pub Draught, Inc. d/b/a Lovejoys Tap Room and Brewery, Joseph (Chip) Tait, GMC Investment, Inc. d/b/a Ego's, Canary Roost, Inc., Canary Hut, Inc., Gail E. Johnson, Keep Austin Free Pac, Tony Sirgo, and Edward Check, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF AUSTIN, Defendant., 2006 WL 5981246, *5981246+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.Tex. Sep 07, 2006) NonJohnson Plaintiffs' Supplemental Post-Trial Brief (NO. A-05-CA-837SS) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9378 Roark & HARDEE L.P. d/b/a the Warehouse Saloon and Billiards, Bill Hardee, Pub Draught, Inc. d/b/a Lovejoys Tap Room and Brewery, Joseph (Chip) Tait, GMC Investment, Inc. d/b/a Ego's, Canary Roost, Inc., Canary Hut, Inc., Gail E. Johnson, Keep Austin Free Pac, Tony Sirgo, and Edward Check, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF AUSTIN, Defendant., 2006 WL 5981247, *5981247 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.Tex. Sep 07, 2006) The Johnson Plaintiffs' Supplemental Post-Trial Brief (NO. A-05-CA-837-SS) 9379 Sylvia ALMAGUER, Plaintiff, v. Martha CHACON, et al., Defendants., 2006 WL 2306311, *2306311 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.Tex. Jun 19, 2006) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) and Motion For Summary Judgment Based on Qualified Immunity to Plaintiff's First Amended Original Complaint (NO. DR-04-CV-23) 9380 Derek KITCHEN, individually; Moudi Sbeity, individually; Karen Archer, individually, Kate Call, individually; Laurie Wood, individually; and Kody Partridge, individually, Plaintiffs, v. Gary R. HERBERT, in his official capacity as Governor of Utah; John Swallow, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Utah; and Sherrie Swensen, in her official capacity as Clerk of Salt Lake County, Defendants., 2013 WL 6330845, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Utah Nov 22, 2013) Plaintiffs' Opposition to Motion of the Governor and Attorney General for Summary Judgment (NO. 2:13-CV-00217-RJS) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 9381 Derek KITCHEN, individually; Moudi Sbeity, individually; Karen Archer, individually; Kate Call, individually; Laurie Wood, individually; and Kody Partridge, individually, Plaintiffs, v. Gary R. HERBERT, in his official capacity as Governor of Utah; John Swallow, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Utah; and Sherrie Swensen, in her official capacity as Clerk of Salt Lake County, Defendants., 2013 WL 6330847, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Utah Nov 22, 2013) Response of the Governor and Attorney General in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 2:13-CV-00217-RJS) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 9382 Derek KITCHEN, individually; Moudi Sbeity, individually; Karen Archer, individually, Kate Call, individually; Laurie Wood, individually; and Kody Partridge, individually, Plaintiffs, v. Gary R. HERBERT, in his official capacity as Governor of Utah; John Swallow, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Utah; and Sherrie Swensen, in her official capacity as Clerk of Salt Lake County, Defendants., 2013 WL 5761262, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Utah Oct 11, 2013) Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 2:13-CV-00217-RJS) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 9383 Kody BROWN, Meri Brown, Janelle Brown, Christine Brown, Robyn Sullivan, Plaintiffs, v. Jeffrey R. BUHMAN, in his official capacity as County Attorney for Utah County, Defendants., 2012 WL 10172971, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Utah Sep 28, 2012) Defendant's Reply to Plaintiffs' Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 2:11CV00652) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 9384 Kody BROWN, Meri Brown, Janelle Brown, Christine Brown, Robyn Sullivan, Plaintiffs, v. Gary R. HERBERT, in his official capacity as Governor of Utah; Mark Shurtleff, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Utah; Jeffrey R. Buhman, in his official capacity as County Attorney for Utah County, Defendants., 2012 WL 10172970, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Utah Sep 14, 2012) Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 2:11-CV-00652-CW) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 9385 Kody BROWN, Meri Brown, Janelle Brown, Christine Brown, Robyn Sullivan, Plaintiffs, v. Gary R. HERBERT, in his official capacity as Governor of Utah; Mark Shurtleff, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Utah; Jeffrey R. Buhman, in his official capacity as County Attorney for Utah County, Defendants., 2012 WL 10172960, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Utah Aug 31, 2012) Plaintiffs' Reply Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion For Summary Judgment (NO. 2:11-CV-00652-CW) 9386 Kody BROWN, Meri Brown, Janelle Brown, Christine Brown, Robyn Sullivan, Plaintiffs, v. Gary R. HERBERT, in his official capacity as Governor of Utah; Mark Shurtleff, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Utah; Jeffrey R. Buhman, in his official capacity as County Attorney for Utah County, Defendants., 2012 WL 10172967, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Affidavit) (D.Utah May 31, 2012) Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 2:11-CV-00652-CW) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9387 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Salvador Joseph GONZALES, Defendant., 2011 WL 7100282, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Utah Jun 13, 2011) Supplemental Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss on Second Amendment Grounds (NO. 10CR00967) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9388 Kim SEEGMILLER and Sharon Johnson, Plaintiffs, v. LAVERKIN CITY INC., Doug Wilson, Heath D. Johnson, Washington County, and John Does I-XX., Defendants., 2006 WL 4047522, *4047522+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Utah Dec 04, 2006) Plaintiff Sharon Johnson's Memorandum in Opposition to Defendants' LaVerkin City and Doug Wilson Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 205-CV-00639DS) 9389 Kim SEEGMILLER and Sharon Johnson, Plaintiffs, v. LAVERKIN CITY INC., Doug Wilson, Heath D. Johnson, Washington County, and John Does I-XX., Defendants., 2006 WL 4047521, *4047521+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Utah Nov 2006) Plaintiff Sharon Johnson's Memorandum in Opposition to Defendants' Laverkin City and Doug Wilson Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 205-CV-00639DS) 9390 Kim SEEGMILLER and Sharon Johnson, Plaintiffs, v. LAVERKIN CITY INC., Doug Wilson, Heath D. Johnson, Washington County, and John Does I-XX., Defendants., 2006 WL 3738568, *3738568+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Utah Sep 13, 2006) Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff Sharron Johnson's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (NO. 205-CV-00639DS) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 9391 Silvan WARNICK, Individually and as Natural Parent and Guardian Ad Litem of Andrea Warnick, a Minor; Alanna Warnick; Cory Warnick and Megan Warnick Plaintiffs. v. Dan BRIGGS, individually and as an agent of West Jordan City ; Elaine Tottem, an agent of the State of Utah, Division of Child & Family Services (DCFS) in her individual and not official capacity; Detective Charles Kirby, individually and as an agent of West Jordan City; Holly Curtis, individually and as an, 2005 WL 1921127, *1921127 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Utah Mar 28, 2005) Joint Memorandum of Plaintiffs' Opposing State Defendant's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (NO. 204-CV-360DAK) 9392 Silvan WARNICK, Individually and as Natural Parent and Guardian Ad Litem of Andrea Warnick, a minor; Alanna Warnick; Cory Warnick and Megan Warnick, Plaintiffs, v. Dan BRIGGS, individually and as an agent of West Jordan City ; Elaine Tottem, an agent of the State of Utah, Division of Child & Family Services (DCFS) in her individual and not official capacity, Detective Charles Kirby, individually and as an agent of West Jordan City; Holly Curtis, individually and as an, 2005 WL 1988593, *1988593 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Utah Mar 28, 2005) Joint Memorandum of © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Plaintiff' Opposing State Defendant's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (NO. 204-CV-360DAK) 9393 J. BRONSON, G. Lee Cook and D. Cook, Plaintiffs, v. Sherrie SWENSEN, Salt Lake County Clerk, Defendant., 2004 WL 3462304, *3462304+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Utah Jun 29, 2004) Reply & Response Memorandum Re: Motions for Summary Judgment (NO. 0204-CV-0021TS) 9394 DOCTOR JOHN'S, INC, a Utah Corporation and John Haltom, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF ROY, Utah; G. Blake Wahlen, in his official capacity as City Manager; Tammy Nelson, in her official capacity as Development Services Manager; Defendants., 2004 WL 3482749, *3482749 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Utah Jun 16, 2004) Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (NO. 0103-CV-81PC) 9395 J. BRONSON, G. Lee Cook and D. Cook, Plaintiffs, v. Sherrie SWENSEN, in her official capacity as Salt Lake County Clerk, Defendant., 2004 WL 3462299, *3462299+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Utah May 24, 2004) Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment and in Support of Defendant's Cross Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 02-04CV-00021) 9396 J. BRONSON, G. Lee Cook and D. Cook, Plaintiffs, v. Sherrie SWENSEN, Salt Lake County Clerk, Defendant., 2004 WL 3462287, *3462287+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Utah Apr 27, 2004) Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 0204-CV-0021TS) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 9397 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Jaime Noel AYALA ARRIAZA, Defendant., 2009 WL 3874591, *3874591 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Va. Jun 25, 2009) Defendant's Supplemental Brief in Support of Motion to Suppress (NO. 109CR190) 9398 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Leftery N. TSOUROUTIS a/k/a ""Terry Tsouroutis""., 2007 WL 4893440, *4893440+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.Va. Dec 10, 2007) Government's Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (NO. 307CR00008) 9399 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Leftery N. TSOUROUTIS, Defendant., 2007 WL 4893439, *4893439 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.Va. Dec 04, 2007) Motion to Dismiss (NO. 307CR00008) 9400 Phillip L. WATSON, Plaintiff, v. PARAMONT MFG, LLC., et al., Defendants., 2006 WL 1830186, *1830186+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.Va. May 31, 2006) Defendants' Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of Motions to Dismiss Amended Complaint (NO. 105CV00080) 9401 Jeffrey HILL, Plaintiff, v. PARAMONT MFG, LLC., et al., Defendants., 2006 WL 1830190, *1830190+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.Va. May 31, 2006) Defendants' Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of Motions to Dismiss Amended Complaint (NO. 105CV00082) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 9402 Freda Michelle JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. PARAMONT MFG, LLC., et al., Defendants., 2006 WL 1830213, *1830213+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.Va. May 31, 2006) Defendants' Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of Motions to Dismiss Amended Complaint (NO. 105CV00079) 9403 WHITE RIVER AMUSEMENT PUB, INC., Plaintiff, v. TOWN OF HARTFORD, Vermont; the Selectboard of Hartford, Vermont; Hunter Rieseberg, as the Town Manager of Hartford, Vermont; Todd Steadman, as Chairman, Selectboard of the Town of Hartford, Vermont; Leonard Berliner, Gayle Ottmann, Ray Erasoli, and Richard Ballou, as Members of the Selectboard, Town of Hartford, Vermont; and Joseph Estey, as Chief of Police of Hartford, Vermont, Defendants., 2004 WL 5537355, *5537355+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Vt. Mar 31, 2004) Defendants' Memorandum of Law in Support of Their Joint Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 102CV00320) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9404 Kimberly L. COLLIER, Plaintiff, v. Michael T. HARUM and Gregory L. Meinzer, Defendants., 2008 WL 7321100, *7321100 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Wash. Jan 24, 2008) Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. CV07-0164-RHW) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9405 Elyse KANE, a single person, and Elyse Kane, d/b/a Kane Construction and Consulting, a sole proprietorship, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF BAINBRIDGE ISLAND, Defendants., 2011 WL 3812787, *1 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.Wash. Jul 27, 2011) Defendant City of Bainbridge Island's Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 10CV05731) 9406 Major Margaret WITT, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, et al., Defendants., 2010 WL 3921977, *3921977+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.Wash. Aug 31, 2010) Plaintiff's Trial Memorandum (NO. C06-5195RBL) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9407 Major Margaret WITT, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, et al., Defendants., 2010 WL 3921973, *3921973+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.Wash. Aug 09, 2010) Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. C06-5195RBL) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9408 Major Margaret WITT, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, et al., Defendants., 2010 WL 3921974, *3921974 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.Wash. Aug 09, 2010) Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. C06-5195RBL) 9409 Gretchen W. CARLSON, M.D., Plaintiff, v. WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH; Mary C. Selecky, Secretary, Department of Health, in her official capacity; and Tim Slavin, Investigator, Department of Health, in his official and in his individual capacity, Defendants., 2008 WL © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 7356351, *7356351+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.Wash. Jul 14, 2008) Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 07-CV-00681-RAJ) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 9410 Major Margaret WITT, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, et al., Defendants., 2006 WL 5711425, *5711425+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.Wash. Jun 09, 2006) Defendants' Reply in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (NO. C06-5195RBL) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 9411 Major Margaret WITT, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE; et al., Defendants., 2006 WL 5711424, *5711424+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.Wash. Jun 05, 2006) Plaintiff's Brief in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (NO. C06-5195) " HN: 1,2,5 (S.Ct.) 9412 Major Margaret WITT, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE; et al., Defendants., 2006 WL 5711423, *5711423+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.Wash. May 12, 2006) Plaintiff's Reply Brief in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction (NO. C06-5195RBL) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 9413 Major Margaret WITT, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, et al., Defendants., 2006 WL 5711422, *5711422+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.Wash. May 08, 2006) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (NO. C06-5195RBL) " HN: 1,3,4 (S.Ct.) 9414 Major Margaret WITT, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, et al., Defendants., 2006 WL 5711427, *5711427+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.Wash. Apr 24, 2006) Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Memorandum in Support of Motion (NO. C06-5195RBL) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 9415 BRENDA CROCKETT, et al, Plaintiffs, v. SECOND CHANCE, INC., et al, Defendants., 2004 WL 2994911, *2994911 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.Wash. Feb 2004) Plaintiffs' Response to Defendant Braddock's Motion to Dismiss (NO. CV030163Z) 9416 Glenn BURTON, Jr., Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN CYANAMID et al, Defendants., 2010 WL 4219442, *4219442 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Wis. Sep 30, 2010) Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Against the Defendants Sherwin-Williams, American Cyanamid, Armstrong Containers, E.I. Dupont De Nemours, and N.L. Industries (NO. 07-C-0303) " 9417 Ernest GIBSON, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN CYANAMID et al, Defendants., 2010 WL 4219459, *4219459 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Wis. Sep 20, 2010) Memorandum of Law in Opposition to the Motions for Summary Judgment by the Defendants Sherwin-Williams, American Cyanamid, Armstrong Containers, E.I. Dupont De Nemours, and N.L. © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Industries (NO. 07-C-0864) " 9418 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. William DOYLE, Defendant., 2006 WL 6349828, *6349828 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (E.D.Wis. Oct 19, 2006) Motion to Dismiss Count One: Unconstitutionality of |2423(b) (NO. 06-CR-224) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9419 John SIEFERT, Plaintiff, v. James C. ALEXANDER, Larry Bussan, Ginger Alden, Donald Leo Bach, Jennifer Morales, John R. Dawson, David A. Hansher, Gregory A. Peterson, William Vander Loop, Michael R. Miller, James M. Haney, Defendants., 2008 WL 5653959, *5653959 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (W.D.Wis. May 15, 2008) Brief in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (NO. 08-C-0126-C) 9420 Jeanne E. HOOKER and Robert M. Bates, Plaintiffs, v. GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY, Scott Sheftz (in name only) Tonya M. Emmett a/k/a Tonya Sheftz (in name only), Bridget Glover, individually, Southern General Insurance Company, Annette Bennett, individually, Defendants., 2006 WL 499084, *499084+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.W.Va. Jan 12, 2006) Reply to Plaintiffs' Memorandum in Opposition to Pending Motions (NO. 305-CV-106) 9421 Jeanne E. HOOKER and Robert M. Bates, Plaintiffs, v. GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY, Scott Sheftz (in name only) Tonya M. Emmett a/k/a Tonya Sheftz (in name only), Bridget Glover, individually, Southern General Insurance Company, Annette Bennett, individually, Defendants., 2006 WL 499085, *499085+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.W.Va. Jan 12, 2006) Reply to Plaintiffs' Memorandum in Opposition to Pending Motions (NO. 305-CV-106) 9422 Jeanne E. HOOKER and Robert M. Bates, Plaintiffs, v. Scott SHEFTZ (in Name Only) Tonya M. Emmett one in the same person as Tony Sheftz, (in Name Only) Bridgett Glover individually, Southern General Insurance Company, Annette Bennett individually, and Geico Insurance Company, Defendants., 2005 WL 3818042, *3818042 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.W.Va. Dec 30, 2005) Plaintiffs Memorandum in Opposition to Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings by the Defendants Scott Sheftz (In Name Only)Tonya M. Emmett one in the same person as Tony Sheftz Geico Insurance Company ... (NO. 305-CV-106) 9423 Jeanne E. HOOKER and Robert M. Bates, Plaintiffs, v. Scott SHEFTZ (In Name Only) Tonya M. Emmett one in the same person as Tony Sheftz,(In Name Only) Bridgett Glover individually, Southern General Insurance Company, Annette Bennett individually, and Geico Insurance Company, Defendants., 2005 WL 3818043, *3818043 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.W.Va. Dec 30, 2005) Plaintiffs Memorandum in Opposition to Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings by the Defendants Scott Sheftz (in Name Only)Tonya M. Emmett one in the same person as Tony Sheftz Geico Insurance Company ... (NO. 305-CV-106) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 9424 Casie Jo MCGEE and Sarah Elizabeth Adkins; Justin Murdock and William Glavaris; and Nancy Elizabeth Michael and Jane Louise Fenton, individually and as next friends of A.S.M., a minor child;, Plaintiffs, v. Karen S. COLE, in her official capacity as Cabel County Clerk; and Vera J. McCormick, in her official capacity as Kanawha County Clerk;, Defendants, and State of West Virginia, ex rel. Patrick Morrissey, Attorney General, Intervenor., 2013 WL 6915859, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.W.Va. Dec 30, 2013) Brief in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 3:13-CV-24068) " HN: 2 (S.Ct.) 9425 Casie Jo MCGEE and Sarah Elizabeth Adkins, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Karen S. COLE, et al., Defendants., 2013 WL 6762146, *1 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.W.Va. Dec 10, 2013) Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant McCormick's Motion to Dismiss (NO. 3:13-CV-24068) 9426 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Thomas Creighton SHRADER, Defendant., 2010 WL 2848168, *2848168 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.W.Va. Jun 25, 2010) Memorandum in Support of Crime Victim, DS's, Objection to Issuance of Subpoena, Motion to Quash Subpoena and Request for Hearing (NO. 109-CR-00270) 9427 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Carl Evan TOOLEY, II., 2010 WL 2848160, *2848160 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.W.Va. Jan 06, 2010) Response of the United States of America to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (NO. 309-00194) 9428 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Mark A. STATEN., 2009 WL 7114980, *7114980 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.W.Va. Dec 21, 2009) Response of the United States of America to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Indictment (NO. 209-00235) " 9429 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Benjamin Tod CARTER., 2009 WL 3811899, *3811899 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.W.Va. May 06, 2009) Response of the United States of America to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and Memorandum Filed in Support Thereof (NO. 209-CR-00055) 9430 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. George William BUMM, III., 2008 WL 7087966, *7087966 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.W.Va. Dec 22, 2008) Response of the United States of America to Defendant's Supplemental Memorandum (NO. 208-CR-00158) 9431 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Marcus DIXON., 2008 WL 6807744, *6807744 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.W.Va. Aug 28, 2008) Defendant's Sentencing Memorandum (NO. 308-CR-00032) 9432 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Adrian DAVIE., 2007 WL 6879808, *6879808+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.W.Va. Nov 21, 2007) Defendant's Supplemental Sentencing Memorandum (NO. 307-00051) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9433 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Adrian DAVIE., 2007 WL 6879807, © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. *6879807 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.W.Va. Nov 20, 2007) Defendant's Sentencing Memorandum (NO. 307-00051) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9434 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Barry TUNSTALLE., 2007 WL 4808972, *4808972 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.W.Va. 2007) Defendant's Sentencing Memorandum (NO. 507-CR-00014) 9435 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Larry BLEVINS., 2007 WL 4808990, *4808990 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (S.D.W.Va. 2007) Larry Blevins' Supplemental Sentencing Memorandum on Why the Amended Crack Sentencing Guidelines Violate Substantive Due Process (NO. 507-CR-00017) 9436 Kathleen MILLIGAN-HITT and Kathryn R. Roberts, Plaintiffs, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF SHERIDAN COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT NUMBER 2, Craig Dougherty, individually and in his official capacity as Superintendent, and Terry Burgess, in his official capacity as Assistant Superintendent., Defendants., 2006 WL 417131, *417131+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Wyo. Jan 27, 2006) Brief in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment of Craig Dougherty, Individually (NO. 05-CV-0017-B) 9437 Kathleen Milligan-HITT and Kathryn R. Roberts, Plaintiffs, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF SHERIDAN COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT NUMBER 2, Craig Dougherty, in his official capacity as Superintendent, and Terry Burgess, in his official capacity as Assistant Superintendent, Defendants., 2005 WL 2605491, *2605491+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Wyo. Aug 24, 2005) Defendants' Brief in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 05CV017B) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 9438 Mohammed Shajahan ALI, Plaintiff, v. Matthew T. GREGORY, individually and in his capacity as Attorney General of the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and Melvin Grey, individually and in his capacity as Director of Immigration for the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, Defendant., 2009 WL 5055042, *5055042 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.N.Mar.I. Jul 09, 2009) Motion for Summary Judgment, or in the Alternative for A Preliminary Injunction (NO. 07-0018) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9439 Maritza CASIANO-CAINS, Plaintiff, v. COLLEGE OF PUBLIC PERFORMANCE PRODUCERS, et als, Defendants., 2013 WL 2155760, *1 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Puerto Rico May 17, 2013) Complaint for Declaratory Judgement; Preliminary and Permanent Injunction, and Damages (NO. 13-CV-1110 (DRD)) 9440 PUERTO RICO TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff, v. SAN JUAN CABLE LLC d/b/a Onelink Communications, Defendant., 2012 WL 3137163, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Puerto Rico Mar 09, 2012) Defendant's Reply in Further Support of Its Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint (NO. 11CV02135) 9441 VICTOR OMAR PORTUGUES SANTA, Plaintiff, v. B. FERNANDEZ & HNOS., INC., et al., Defendants., 2006 WL 1502897, *1502897+ (Trial Motion, © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Puerto Rico Apr 27, 2006) Reply to Plaintiff's Opposition to Motion to Dismiss Claims Under Rule 12(b)(6) Absence of Valid Claims for Being Regarded as Homosexual Under Puerto Rico Law (Doc. No. 47) (NO. 05-1527) 9442 VICTOR OMAR PORTUGUES SANTA, Plaintiff, v. B. FERNANDEZ & HNOS., INC.; ABC Insurance Company, AB Insurance Company, Defendants., 2006 WL 1502896, *1502896+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (D.Puerto Rico Apr 13, 2006) Plaintiff V%21ictor Omar Portugu%21es' Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Claims Under 12(b)(6) Absence of Valid Claim for Being Regarded as Homosexual Under Puerto Rico Law (Docket No. 40) (NO. 05-1527, JP) 9443 In re: ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF PORTLAND IN OREGON, and Successors, a Corporation Sole, dba the Archdiocese of Portland in Oregon, Debtor., 2005 WL 3344622, *3344622 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Bankr.D.Or. Oct 21, 2005) Debtor's Responses and Objections to Topic Listing for Pattern and Practice Witnesses (Non-Levada) (NO. 04-37154-ELP11) 9444 In re: OREGON ARENA CORPORATION, Debtor., 2004 WL 3086032, *3086032 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Bankr.D.Or. Jul 09, 2004) Trail Blazers Inc.'s Reply to Memorandum of Noteholders on Obligation in use Agreement that Owner Services be First Class (NO. 304-31605-ELP11) 9445 Alberto R. GONZALES, Petitioner, v. Leroy CARHART, et al., Respondents., 2006 WL 4111183, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (U.S.Tax Ct. May 22, 2006) Brief Amicus Curiae of Judicial Watch, Inc. in Support of Petitioner (NO. 05-380) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 9446 CITY OF HOOVER, Alabama, a Municipal Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. 1568 MONTGOMERY HWY, INC., a Corporation, Defendant., 2007 WL 7665111, *1 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Ala.Cir.Ct. Nov 30, 2007) Motion to Alter, Amend, or Vacate Judgment And For A New Trial on Certain Issues (NO. CV0500223) 9447 State of Alabama, v. Craig NEWTON., 2006 WL 6628385, *6628385+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Ala.Cir.Ct. Jan 18, 2006) Defendant Craig Newton's Objection to Death Penalty (NO. CC-2001-49) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 9448 CITY OF HOOVER, ALABAMA, a Municipal Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. 1568 MONTGOMERY HWY, INC., a Corporation, Defendant., 2005 WL 6567922, *6567922 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Ala.Cir.Ct. Aug 26, 2005) Defendant's Reply Brief in Support of Its Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. CV0500223RSV) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9449 CITY OF HOOVER, ALABAMA, a Municipal Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. 1568 MONTGOMERY HWY, INC., a Corporation, Defendant., 2005 WL 6588673, *6588673 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Ala.Cir.Ct. Aug 26, 2005) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Defendant's Reply Brief in Support of Its Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. CV0500223) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9450 CITY OF HOOVER, ALABAMA, v. 1568 MONTGOMERY HWY, INC., 2005 WL 6567917, *6567917+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Ala.Cir.Ct. Aug 02, 2005) Amended Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 2005-223) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 9451 Julie A. SCHMIDT, Gayle Schuh, Julie M. Vollick, Susan L. Bernard, Fred W. Traber, and Laurence Snider, Plaintiffs v. THE STATE OF ALASKA, and the Municipality of Anchorage, Defendants., 2011 WL 8956197, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Alaska Super. Aug 09, 2011) Reply in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Opposition to Defendant State of Alaska's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 3AN-10-9519 CI) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9452 Julie A. SCHMIDT, Gayle Schuh, Julie M. Vollick, Susan L. Bernard, Fred W. Traber, and Laurence Snider, Plaintiffs v. THE STATE OF ALASKA, and The Municipality of Anchorage, Defendants., 2011 WL 8956194, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Alaska Super. Jul 11, 2011) Memorandum in Support of the State of Alaska's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (NO. 3 AN10-9519 CI) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9453 Julie A. SCHMIDT, Gayle Schuh, Julie M. Vollick, Susan L. Bernard, Fred W. Traber, and Laurence Snider, Plaintiffs v. THE STATE OF ALASKA, and The Municipality of Anchorage, Defendants., 2011 WL 8956193, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Alaska Super. May 11, 2011) Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (NO. 3AN-10-9519 CI) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9454 AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF ALASKA, Jane Doe, and Jane Roe, Plaintiffs, v. State of Alaska; David W. Marquez, Attorney General for the State of Alaska, in his official capacity, Defendants., 2006 WL 6457040, *6457040+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Alaska Super. Jun 29, 2006) Plaintiffs' Consolidated Reply in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment, or, in the Alternative, Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion for ... (NO. 1JU-06-793CI) 9455 State of Arizona, Plaintiff, v. Dale Shawn HAUSNER, Defendant., 2007 WL 5128558, *5128558 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Ariz.Super. Aug 24, 2007) Motion to Preclude Death Penalty as a Violation of International Law (NO. CR2006-012721-001DT, CR2006-048493-002DT, CR2007-006031-001DT) " 9456 Sheila COLE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. THE ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, et al., Defendants, Family Council Action Committee, et at., Intervenors., 2010 WL 6451877, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Ark.Cir. Mar 01, 2010) Intervenors' Response to Plaintiffs' Motion © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. for Summary Judgment (NO. CV2008-14284) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 9457 Sheila COLE, et. al., Plaintiffs, v. THE ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, et. al., Defendants, Family Council Action Committee, et. al., Intervenor-Defendants., 2010 WL 6451878, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Ark.Cir. Mar 01, 2010) State Defendants' Response to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. CV2008-14284) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 9458 Sheila COLE, on her own behalf, and by, for and on behalf of her granddaughter W.H.; Stephanie Huffman and Wendy Rickman; Frank Pennisi and Matt Harrison; Meredith Scroggin and Benny Scroggin, on their own behalves, and by, for and on behalf of their two children, N.S. and L.S.; Susan Duell-Mitchell and Chris Mitchell, on their own behalves, and by, for and on behalf of their two children, N.J.M. and N.C.M.; and Curtis Chatham and Shane Frazier, Plaintiffs, v., 2010 WL 6451881, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Ark.Cir. Feb 10, 2010) Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law in Support of Their Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. CV2008-14284) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9459 Sheila COLE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. THE ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, et al., Defendants; Family Council Action Committee, et al., Intervenors., 2010 WL 6451882, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Ark.Cir. Feb 10, 2010) Memorandum of Law in Support of Intervenors' Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion to Dismiss (NO. CV2008-14284) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 9460 Malinda TRAUDT, by and through her guardian ad litem, Shelly White, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF DANA POINT and Does I to 100, inclusive, Defendants., 2010 WL 8745856, *1 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Cal.Super. Jul 06, 2010) Opposition to Defendant's Demurrer to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof (NO. 30-2010-00373287) 9461 Armando CAMACHO, Plaintiff, v. WESTERN DIGITAL, a Delaware Corporation, and Does 1 through 20, inclusive, Defendants., 2008 WL 7003278, *7003278+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Cal.Super. Mar 18, 2008) Plaintiff Armando Camacho's Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Compel Further Responses to Deposition Testimony; Plaintiff's Request for Sanctions from Defendant and Defendant's Counsel in the ... (NO. RG07332981) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 9462 Steven KALSKI, Petitioner, v. Michael D. ANTONOVICH, in his official capacity as Mayor of County of Los Angeles Board of Supervisors, also known as Los Angeles County, a legal subdivision of the State of California, Board of Supervisors, Respondent, et al., 2008 WL 5010363, *5010363+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Cal.Super. Jan 11, 2008) Reply to Respondent's Brief in Opposition to Petition for Writ of Mandate (By Hausman for Antonovich and Auerbach) (NO. BS105860) 9463 Senator William J. KNIGHT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. et al., Defendants, EQUALITY CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendant-Intervenors. Randy THOMASSON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER , et al., Defendants, EQUALITY CALIFORNIA, Defendant-Intervenor., 2004 WL 5631283, *5631283+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Cal.Super. Jun 13, 2004) Defendant-Intervenors' Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Reply to Oppositions to Motions for Summary Judgment, or in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication of All Causes of Action in ... (NO. 03AS05284) 9464 Barbara E. HENSON, Kaylynn M. Lagamma, Susan A. Osorio, and Connie L. Trujillo, Plaintiffs, CITY OF COLORADO SPRINGS, Colorado, Defendant., 2005 WL 6145028, *6145028+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Colo.Dist.Ct. Dec 13, 2005) Defenadants Reply to Plaintiffs' Response to Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 05CV416) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9465 Barbara E. HENSON, Kaylynn M. Lagamma, Susan A. Osorio, and Connie L. Trujillo, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF COLORADO SPRINGS, Colorado, Defendant., 2005 WL 6145029, *6145029+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Colo.Dist.Ct. Nov 09, 2005) Plaintiffs' Response to Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 05CV0416) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 9466 Theresa LANTZ, v. William B. COLEMAN., 2009 WL 6446355, *6446355 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Conn.Super. Jun 15, 2009) Brief of Amici Curiae (NO. HHD-CV-08-4034912-S) 9467 Theresa LANTZ, v. William B. COLEMAN., 2009 WL 6446353, *6446353 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Conn.Super. Jun 01, 2009) PostTrial Brief of Defendant William Coleman (NO. HHD-CV-08-4034912-S) 9468 Elizabeth KERRIGAN, et. al., v. State of Connecticut, et. al., 2005 WL 6225564, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Conn.Super. Nov 23, 2005) Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendants State of Connecticut, Department of Public Health, and J. Robert Galvin and in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. CV04-4001813-S) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 9469 Elizabeth KERRIGAN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. State of Connecticut, Department of Public Health, et al., Defendants., 2005 WL 6225563, *6225563+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Conn.Super. Nov 23, 2005) Brief of Amicus Curiae Family Research Council in Support of Defendants (NO. NNHCV-04-4001813-S) 9470 Elizabeth KERRIGAN & Joanne Mock, Janet Peck & Carol Conklin, Geraldine Artis & Suzanne Artis, Jeffrey Busch & Stephen Davis, J.E. Martin & Denise Howard, John Anderson & Garrett Stack, Barbara Levine-Ritterman & Robin Levine-Ritterman, Damaris Navarro & Gloria Searson, v. State of Connecticut, Department: of Public Health, J. Robert Galvin, in his/her official capacity as Commissioner of the Department Of Public Health, and Dorothy C. Bean, in, 2005 WL 6225562, *6225562+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Conn.Super. Jul 28, 2005) Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiffs' © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. NNH-CV04-4001813) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9471 Elizabeth KERRIGAN, et al., v. State of Connecticut, Department of Public Health, et al., 2005 WL 6225561, *6225561+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Conn.Super. Jan 20, 2005) Plaintiffs' Reply to Defendants' Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment and Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment%n1%n (NO. NNHCV04-4001813) " HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 9472 State of Georgia, v. Antron Dewayne FAIR, Defendant., 2009 WL 6621827, *6621827 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Ga.Super. Apr 23, 2009) Motion to Declare Lethal Injection Unconstitutional (NO. 08CR63815) 9473 STATE OF GEORGIA, Plaintiff, v. Marcin SOSNIAK, Defendant., 2008 WL 9471093, *1 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Ga.Super. May 27, 2008) Motion to Declare Lethal Injection Unconstitutional (NO. 07CR0484) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 9474 James DARBY and Patrick Bova, et al., Plaintiffs, v. David ORR, in his official capacity as Cook County Clerk, Defendant; Tanya Lazaro and Elizabeth "liz" Matos, et al., Plaintiffs, v. David Orr, in his official capacity as Cook County Clerk, Defendant; State of Illinois, ex rel. Lisa Madigan, Attorney General of the State of Illinois, Intervenor, Christie Webb, in her official capacity as Tazewell County Clerk, and Kerry Hirtzel, in his official capacity as, 2012 WL 3841691, *1 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Ill.Cir.Ct. Aug 20, 2012) Plaintiffs' Opposition to Illinois Family Institute's Petition for Leave to Intervene (NO. 12 CH 19719, 12CH 19718) 9475 James DARBY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. David ORR, in his official capacity as Cook County Clerk, Defendant, & Tanya Lazaro, et al, Plaintiffs, v. David Orr, in his official capacity as Cook County Clerk, Defendant., 2012 WL 3841698, *1 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Ill.Cir.Ct. Jul 20, 2012) Proposed Intervenors' Memorandum In Support of Their Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaints Under 735 ILCS 5/2-615(a) (NO. 12CH19718) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 9476 MORR-FITZ, INC., an Illinois Corporation d/b/a Fitzgerald Pharmacy, Licensed and Practicing in the State of Illinois as Pharmacy; L. Doyle, Inc., a Illinois Corporation d/b/a Eggelston Pharmacy, Licensed and Practicing in the State of Illinois as a Pharmacy; Kosirog Pharmacy, Inc., an Illinois Corporation d/b/a Kosirog Rexall Pharmacy, Licensed and Practicing in the State of Illinois as a Pharmacy; Luke Vander Bleek; and Glenn Kosirog, Plaintiffs, v., 2009 WL 1633333, *1633333 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Ill.Cir.Ct. Mar 09, 2009) Plaintiff's Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and Incorporated Memorandum of Law (NO. 2005-CH-000495) 9477 Katherine VARNUM, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Timothy J. BRIEN, in his official capacities as the Polk County Recorder and Polk County Registrar, Defendant., 2007 WL 2461129, *2461129 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Iowa Dist. Apr 24, 2007) Reply in Support of All Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Judgment (NO. CV5965) 9478 Katherine VARNUM, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Timothy J. BRIEN, in his official capacities as the Polk County Recorder and Polk County Registrar, Defendant., 2007 WL 2809777, *2809777+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Iowa Dist. Apr 06, 2007) Iowa Legislators' Brief as Amici Curiae Supporting Defendant (NO. CV5965) " HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 9479 Katherine VARNUM, Patricia Hyde; Dawn Barbouroske, Jennifer Barbouroske; Jason Morgan, Charles Swaggerty; David Twombley, Lawrence Hoch; William M. Musser, Otter Dreaming; Ingrid Olson and Reva Evans, Plaintiffs, v. Timothy J. BRIEN, in his official capacities as the Polk County Recorder and Polk County Registrar, Defendant., 2007 WL 2809774, *2809774+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Iowa Dist. Mar 30, 2007) Reply Brief in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendant's Resistance to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. CV5965) 9480 Katherine VARNUM, et al. Plaintiffs, v. Timothy J. BRIEN, in his official capacities as the Polk County Recorder and Polk County Registrar, Defendant., 2007 WL 2461125, *2461125+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Iowa Dist. Jan 30, 2007) All Plaintiffs' Resistance to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. CV5965) 9481 Katherine VARNUM, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Timothy J. BRIEN, in his official capacities as the Polk County Recorder and Polk County Registrar, Defendant., 2007 WL 2461128, *2461128+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Iowa Dist. Jan 30, 2007) Memorandum of Authorities in Support of All Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment and in Support of All Plaintiffs' Resistance to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. CV5965) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 9482 Katherine VARNUM, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Timothy J. BRIEN, in his official capacities as the Polk County Recorder and Polk County Registrar, Defendants., 2007 WL 2461126, *2461126 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Iowa Dist. Jan 26, 2007) Brief of Amici Curiae Professors of Law and History (NO. CV5965) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9483 Katherine VARNUM, Patricia Hyde; Dawn Barbouroske, Jennifer Barbouroske; Jason Morgan, Charles Swaggerty; David Twombley, Lawrence Hoch; William M. Musser, Otter Dreaming; Ingrid Olson and Reva Evans, Plaintiffs, v. Timothy J. BRIEN, in his official capacities as the Polk County Recorder and Polk County Registrar, Defendant., 2006 WL 4803839, *4803839+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Iowa Dist. Dec 01, 2006) Brief of Defendant Timothy J. Brien (NO. CV5965) 9484 Katherine VARNUM, Patricia Hyde Varnum; Dawn Barbouroske and Jennifer Barbouroske, individually and as next friends of McKinley and Breeanna Barbouroske, minor children; Jason Morgan, Charles Swaggerty; David Twombley, Lawrence Hoch; William M. Musser, Otter Dreaming; Ingrid Olson, and Reva Evans, individually, and as next friend of Jamison Olson, a minor child, © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Plaintiffs, v. Timothy J. BRIEN, in his official capacities as the Polk County Recorder and Polk County, 2000 WL 35574253, *35574253+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Iowa Dist. 2000) Brief Amicus Curiae of Iowa Faith Leaders, Communities and Scholars (NO. CVCV005965) 9485 Sandra and Roberta COTE-WHITACRE, Amy Zimmerman and Tanya Wexler, Mark Pearsall and Paul Trubey, Katrina and Kristin Gossman, Judith and Lee McNeil-Beckwith, Wendy Becker and Mary Norton, Michael Thorne and James Theberge, and Edward Butler and Leslie Schoof, Plaintiffs, v. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH, Christine C. Ferguson, in her capacity as Commissioner of the Department of Public Health; Registry of Vital Records and Statistics, and Stanley E. Nyberg, in his capacity, 2004 WL 5324744, *5324744 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Mass.Super. Jun 23, 2004) Motion for Preliminary Injunction (NO. 04-2656-G) " 9486 Mary E. RITCHIE, Plaintiff, v. MASSACHUSETTS STATE POLICE, John DiFava, Colonel, Richard Lauria, and Joanne Nason, Defendants., 2000 WL 35508250, *35508250 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Mass.Super. 2000) Defendant Richard Lauria's Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. MICV2000-04604) 9487 Petition of: BETHEL WORLD OUTREACH CHURCH, For Judicial Review of the Decision of the County Council for Montgomery County, Maryland, v. In the Case of COMPREHENSIVE WATER SUPPLY and Sewerage System Plan Map Amendment No. WSCCR 01A-GWC-03. Bethel World Outreach Church, Petitioner, v. Montgomery County Council and Montgomery County, Maryland, Respondents., 2007 WL 7121278, *7121278 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Md.Cir.Ct. Dec 17, 2007) Bethel's Opposition to Respondents' Motion to Dismiss, or, in the Alternative for Summary Judgment (NO. 268735-V, 270717-V) 9488 Petition of: BETHEL WORLD OUTREACH CHURCH for Judicial Review of the Decision of the County Council for Montgomery County, Maryland, v. In the Case of COMPREHENSIVE WATER SUPPLY and Sewerage System Plan Map Amendment No. WSCCR 01A-GWC-03. Bethel World Outreach Church, Petitioner, v. Montgomery County Council and Montgomery County, Maryland, Respondents., 2007 WL 7121279, *7121279 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Md.Cir.Ct. Dec 04, 2007) Bethel's Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 268735-V, 270717-V) 9489 AMERICAN FINANCIAL SERVICES ASSOCIATION, et at., Plaintiffs, v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY, Maryland, Defendant., 2006 WL 4693281, *4693281+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Md.Cir.Ct. Jun 15, 2006) Montgomery County, Maryland's Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 269105-V) 9490 Gitanjali DEANE and Lisa Polyak, et al., Plaintiffs, v. FRANK CONAWAY, et al., Defendants., 2005 WL 6195202, *6195202+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Md.Cir.Ct. Jul 12, 2005) Defendants' Response to Plaitiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 24-C-04-005390) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 9491 Gitanjali DEANE and Lisa Polyak, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Frank CONAWAY, et al., Defendants., 2004 WL 5623268, *5623268 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Md.Cir.Ct. 2004) Memorandum In Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 24-C-04-005390) 9492 GITANJALI DEANE & LISA POLYAK; Alvin Williams & Nigel Simon; Takia Foskey & Joanne Rabb; Jodi Kelber-kaye & Stacey Kargman-kaye; Donna Myers & Maria Barquero; John Lestitian; Charles Blackburn & Glen Dehn; Steven Palmer & Ryan Killough; Patrick Wojahn & David Kolesar; and Mikkole Mozelle & Phelicia Kebreau, Plaintiffs, v. Frank CONAWAY, in his official capacity as Baltimore City Circuit Court Clerk; Osalyn Pugh, in her official capacity as Prince George's County, 2004 WL 5623269, *5623269+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Md.Cir.Ct. 2004) Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 24-C-04-005390) 9493 Ralph OMELI, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF ANN ARBOR, and Alvin Nunn, Defendants., 2006 WL 4394350, *4394350 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Mich.Cir.Ct. Nov 30, 2006) Brief in Suport of Defendants' Motion for Summary Disposition (NO. 06-682CK) 9494 NATIONAL PRIDE AT WORK, INC., a non-profit organization on behalf of its Michigan Members; Becky Allen; Dorothea Agnostopoulos; Adnan Ayoub; Meghan Bellanger; Judith Block; Mary M. Brisbois; Wade Carlson; Courtney D. Chapin; Michael Chapman; Michelle Corwin; Lori Curry; Joseph Darby; Scott Dennis; Jim Etzkorn; Jill Fuller; Susan Halsey-ceragh; Peter Hammer; Debra Harrah; Ty Hiither; Jolinda Jach; Terry Korreck; Craig Kukuk; Gary Lindsay; Kevin McMann; A.T., 2005 WL 6221777, *6221777+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Mich.Cir.Ct. Jul 14, 2005) Defendant Governor Jennifer Granholm's Response in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Amended Motion for Summary Disposition (NO. 05368-CZ) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 9495 NATIONAL PRIDE AT WORK, INC., a non-profit organization on behalf of its Michigan Members; Becky Allen; Dorothea Agnostopoulos; Adnan Ayoub; Meghan Bellanger; Judith Block; Mary M. Brisbois; Wade Carlson; Courtney D. Chapin; Michael Chapman; Michelle Corwin; Lori Curry; Joseph Darby; Scott Dennis; Jim Etzkorn; Jill Fuller; Susan Halsey-Ceragh; Peter Hammer; Debra Harrah; Ty Hiither; Jolinda Jach; Terry Korreck; Craig Kukuk; Gary Lindsay; Kevin McMann; A., 2005 WL 6221781, *6221781 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Mich.Cir.Ct. Jun 09, 2005) Brief of Plaintiffs in Support of Motion for Summary Disposition (NO. 05368-CZ) HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 9496 NATIONAL PRIDE AT WORK, INC., a non-profit organization on behalf of its Michigan Members; Becky Allen; Dorothea Agnostopoulos; Adnan Ayoub; Meghan Bellanger; Judith Block; Mary M. Brisbois; Wade Carlson; Courtney D. Chapin; Michael Chapman; Michelle Corwin; Lori Curry; Joseph Darby; Scott Dennis; Jim Etzkorn; Jill Fuller; Susan Halsey-Ceragh; Peter Hammer; Debra Harrah; Ty Hiither; Jolinda Jach; Terry Korreck; Craig Kukuk; Gary Lindsay; Kevin McMann; A., 2005 WL 6221782, *6221782 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Mich.Cir.Ct. Apr 28, 2005) Brief of Plaintiffs in Support of © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Motion for Summary Disposition (NO. 05368-CZ) 9497 Douglas BENSON, Duane Gajewski, Jessica Dykhuis, Lindzi Campbell, Sean Campbell, Thomas Trisko and John Rittman, Plaintiff, v. Jill ALVERSON, in her official capacity as the Hennepin County Local Registrar and State of Minnesota, Defendants., 2010 WL 6189972, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Minn.Dist.Ct. Dec 01, 2010) Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law in Opposition to the State and County's Motions to Dismiss (NO. 27CV1011697) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9498 State of Minnesota, Plaintiff, v. Larry Edwin CRAIG, Defendant., 2007 WL 2892650, *2892650 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Minn.Dist.Ct. Oct 04, 2007) Memorandum of Law of Amici Curiae American Civil Liberties Union and American Civil Liberties Union of Minnesota in Support of Defendant (NO. 27-CR-07-043231) 9499 Johnny VALENTINE, Plaintiff, v. Jerry FITCH, Sr., Defendant., 2005 WL 6144998, *6144998 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Miss.Cir. Jun 07, 2005) Defendant's Reply Memorandum of Authorities to Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Motion for Judgement Notwithstanding Jury Verdict, Motion for New Trial and Motion for Remittitur (NO. M99-380) 9500 Joseph CARSANARO, Plaintiff, v. John Trevor COLVIN, Defendant., 2010 WL 9929927, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.C.Super. Dec 22, 2010) Defendant's Memorandum in Support of Motions to Dismiss (NO. 10CVS00963) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9501 Lee Brewer GARRETT, Plaintiff, v. Linda Jean WILSON, Defendant., 2005 WL 6698776, *1 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.C.Super. Aug 22, 2005) Motions to Dismiss (NO. 05CVS2317) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9502 Rebekah Chantay REVELS, Plaintiff, v. MISS NORTH CAROLINA PAGEANT ORGANIZATION, INC., Defendant. Rebekah Chantay REVELS, Plaintiff, v. MISS AMERICA ORGANIZATION, Miss North Carolina Pageant Organization, Inc., Alan Clouse, Billy Duncan, Charlene Hay, Doug Huff, Tom Roberts, David Clegg, Beverly Adams, and Candace Russell, Defendants., 2002 WL 34512491, *34512491+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.C.Super. 2002) Motion to Vacate Arbitration Award (NO. 02-CVS-11625) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9503 Reuben LARSON, Plaintiff, v. Gail HAGERTY, Zachery Pelham, and Wayne Stenehjem, Defendants., 2007 WL 6373499, *6373499+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.D.Dist. Oct 04, 2007) Answer Brief to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Complaint (NO. 07-C-866) 9504 NEVADA ASSOCIAITON SERVICES, INC, Rmi Management, LLC; Angius & Terry Collections, LLC;, Plaintiffs, v. STATE OF NEVADA, Department of Business and Industry, Financial Institutions Division; George E Burns, in his individual and official capacity as Commissioner of State of Nevada, Department of Business and Industry, Financial Institutions Division, Defendants., 2011 WL © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 10818040, *1 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Nev.Dist.Ct. Mar 25, 2011) Motion to Dismiss (NO. 10A630298) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9505 BORCHERS FAMILY TRUST ; Mike Borchers and Chris Borchers, Plaintiffs, v. CLARK COUNTY, Defendant. Clark COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Nevada, Counterclaimant, v. BORCHERS FAMILY TRUST; Mike Borchers and Chris Borchers and Doe Defendants I-X, Counterdefendants., 2010 WL 8706226, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Nev.Dist.Ct. Jun 23, 2010) Clark County's Motion for Summary Judgment of Chronic Nuisance (NO. 09A579671) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9506 Lance UENO and Betty Ueno, Plaintiffs, v. Richard Edward ORTIZ, an individual; K-T Contract Services, Inc., a corporation; Coach USA; Does I through X, Roes I through V, inclusive, Defendants., 2003 WL 24255339, *24255339 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Nev.Dist.Ct. Aug 27, 2003) Plaintiff's Motion in Limine #5: to Exclude Evidence or Testimony Concerning Plaintiff's Lifestyle or Sexual Habits (NO. A425998) 9507 STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Plaintiff, v. Dharun RAVI, Defendant., 2011 WL 7656977, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.J.Super.L. Oct 11, 2011) Brief of Victim, M.B. in Support of Motion for a Protective Order (NO. 11-04-00596) 9508 Karen CAGGIANO, Plaintiffs, v. Armando B. FONTOURA, Essex County Sheriff, individually and in his official capacity, The State of New Jersey, The County of Essex, Office of the Sheriff of Essex County a/k/a Essex County Sheriff's Office, Robert Le Francis, individually and in his official capacity, and Ron Tutela, individually and in his official capacity, Defendants., 2004 WL 3686318, *3686318+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.J.Super.L. Jan 15, 2004) Defendants' Reply Brief in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order (NO. UNN-L-001608-00) 9509 Karen CAGGIANO, Plaintiff, v. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, the County of Essex, Office of the Sheriff of Essex County a/k/a Essex County Sheriff's Office, Armando B. Fontoura, individually and in his official capacity, Robert Le Frances, individually and in his official capacity, and Ron Tutella, individually and in his official capacity, Defendants., 2004 WL 3686320, *3686320+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.J.Super.L. Jan 15, 2004) Brief of Defendants County of Essex and Armando B. Fontoura in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for a Protective Order (NO. UNN-L-1608-00) 9510 Karen CAGGIANO, Plaintiff, v. Armando B. FONTOURA, Essex County Sheriff, individually and in his official capacity, the State of New Jersey, the County of Essex, Office of the Sheriff of Essex County a/k/a Essex County Sheriff's Office, Robert Le Francis, individually and in his official capacity, and Ron Tutella, individually and in his official capacity, Defendants., 2004 WL 3686317, *3686317+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.J.Super.L. Jan 07, 2004) Plaintiff's Brief in Support of Motion for Protective Order Pursuant to R. 4:10-3 (NO. UNN-L-1608-00) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 9511 Karen CAGGIANO, Plaintiff, v. Armando B. FONTOURA, Essex County Sheriff, individually and in his official capacity, the State of New Jersey, the County of Essex, Office of the Sheriff of Essex County a/k/a Essex County Sheriff's Office, Robert Le Francis, individually and in his official capacity, and Ron Tutella, individually and in his official capacity, Defendants., 2004 WL 3686322, *3686322+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.J.Super.L. Jan 07, 2004) Plaintiff's Brief in Support of Motion for Protective Order Pursuant to R. 4:10-3 (NO. UNN-L-1608-00) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 9512 Rose GRIEGO and Kimberly Kiel; Miriam Rand and Ona Lara Porter; A.D. Joplin and Greg Gomez; Therese Councilor and Tanya Struble; Monica Leaming and Cecilia Taulbee; and Jen Roper and Angelique Neuman, Plaintiffs, v. Maggie Toulouse OLIVER, in her official capacity as Clerk of Bernalillo County; Geraldine Salazar, in her official capacity as Clerk of Santa Fe County; and the State of New Mexico, Defendants., 2013 WL 4879279, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.M. Dist. Aug 21, 2013) Memorandum of Plaintiffs Roper and Neuman in Support of Motion for Temporary Restraining Order or, in the Alternative, an Expedited Hearing for Preliminary Injunction (NO. D202CV201302757) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9513 ELANE PHOTOGRAPHY, LLC, Plaintiff, v. Vanessa WILLOCK, Defendant., 2009 WL 8752007, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.M. Dist. Aug 27, 2009) Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defedant's Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. D202CV200806632) 9514 ELANE PHOTOGRAPHY, LLC., Plaintiff, v. Vanessa WILLOCK, Defendant., 2009 WL 8752025, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.M. Dist. Jul 10, 2009) Defendant Vanessa Willock's Memorandum Brief in Support of Her Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. D202CV200806632) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9515 Frank A. KLEPETKO, plaintiff, v. Phil REISMAN, Thomas M. Donovan, Cyndee Royle, Henry Freeman, the Journal News and Gannett Co., Inc., Owner and Publisher of the Journal News, Defendants., 2005 WL 6081096, *6081096+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.Y.Sup. Dec 21, 2005) Memorandum of Law of Defendants Phil Reisman, Thomas M. Donovan, Cyndee Royle, Henry Freeman, the Journal News and Gannett Co., Inc., in Support of Their Motion to Dismiss (NO. 2005-21247) " 9516 Daniel HERNANDEZ and Nevin Cohen, Lauren Abrams and Donna FreemanTweed, Michael Elsasser and Douglas Robinson, Mary Jo Kennedy and Jo-Ann Shain, and Daniel Reyes and Curtis Woolbright, Plaintiffs, v. Victor ROBLES, in his official capacity as City Clerk of the City of New York, Defendant., 2005 WL 6221893, *6221893+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.Y.Sup. Feb 07, 2005) Amended Memorandum of Law in Further Support of Defendant's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 103434/04) 9517 Daniel HERNANDEZ and Nevin Cohen, Lauren Abrams and Donna FreemanTweed, Michael Elsasser and Douglas Robinson, Mary Jo Kennedy and Jo-Ann © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Shain, and Daniel Reyes and Curtis Woolbright, Plaintiffs, v. Victor ROBLES, in his official capacity as City Clerk of the City of New York, Defendant., 2005 WL 6428626, *6428626+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.Y.Sup. Feb 07, 2005) Amended Memorandum of Law in Further Support of Defendant's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 103434/04) 9518 Daniel HERNANDEZ and Nevin Cohen, Lauren Abrams and Donna FreemanTweed, Michael Elsasser and Douglas Ronbinson, Mary Jo Kennedy and Jo-Ann Shain, and Daniel Reyes and Curtis Woolbright, Plaintiffs, v. Victor L. ROBLES, in his official capacity as City Clerk, Defendant., 2005 WL 6428627, *6428627+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.Y.Sup. Feb 07, 2005) Memorandum of Law on Behalf of Amici in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment and in Support of Defendant's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 103434/04) 9519 Daniel HERNANDEZ and Nevin Cohen, Lauren Abrams and Donna FreemanTweed, Michael Elsasser and Douglas Robinson, Mary Jo Kennedy and Jo-Ann Shain, and Daniel Reyes and Curtis Woolbright, Plaintiffs, v. Victor L. ROBLES, in his official capacity as City Clerk of the City of New York, Defendant., 2005 WL 6428628, *6428628+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.Y.Sup. Feb 07, 2005) Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law in Response to Memorandum of Law on Behalf of Amici (NO. 103434/2004) 9520 In the Matter of the Application of Elissa KANE, Lynne Lekakis, Robert Barnes, and George Jurgsatis, Petitioners, v. John MARSOLAIS, Albany City Clerk, and the New York State Health Department, Respondents., 2004 WL 5393088, *5393088+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.Y.Sup. Aug 27, 2004) Memorandum of Law in Support of the Answer and Motion to Dismiss of the New York State Department of Health (NO. 3473-04) 9521 In the Matter of Elissa KANE, Lynne Lekakis, Robert Barnes and George Jurgsatis, Petitioners, v. John MARSOLAIS, Albany City Clerk, and the New York State Health Department, Respondent., 2004 WL 5393090, *5393090 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.Y.Sup. Jun 16, 2004) Memorandum of Law (NO. 2004-3473) 9522 Walter E. CARVER, Petitioner, v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK, The New York State Department of Taxation & Finance and Robert L. Megna, Commissioner of the New York State Department of Taxation & Finance, The New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance and David A. Hansell, Commissioner of the New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance, and The New York State Division of Lottery and Gordon Medencia, Director of the New York State, 2008 WL 8850711, *1 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (N.Y.Sur. Dec 04, 2008) Petitioner's Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Cross-Motion to Dismiss Petition (NO. 12355/08) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 9523 Tremaine EVANS, Petitioner-Defendant, v. STATE OF OHIO, RespondentPlaintiff., 2008 WL 2752351, *2752351 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Affidavit) (Ohio Com.Pl. Mar 05, 2008) Brief In Support of Petition to Contest Application of the Adam Walsh Act (NO. CV-08-646797) 9524 State of Ohio, Plaintiff, v. Michael G. COLEMAN, Defendant., 2005 WL 6068720, *6068720+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Ohio Com.Pl. Sep 06, 2005) Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence Evidentiary Hearing Requested Statement of Essential Factual Findings Requested (NO. 2005CR491) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 9525 Jeffrey R. WILSON, Plaintiff, v. Alexander HARVEY, et al., Defendants., 2004 WL 5629482, *5629482 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Ohio Com.Pl. Jul 06, 2004) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint Agaiinst all Defendants (NO. CV04529021) 9526 Juan MARTINEZ and Byron Beck; Dan O'neil and Steve Kenison; Rupert Kinnard and Scott Stapley; Mark Acito and Floyd Sklaver; Becky Hanson and Kathy Flynn; Cristina Caravaca and Sandra Naranjo; Michelle Snyder and Heidi Thorstad; Diane Groff and Liz Cahill; Tim Smith and Kent Kulby; Kelly Burke and Dolores Doyle; Daniel E.H. Bryant; and Glenna Shepherd, Plaintiffs, v. Theodore R. KULONGOSKI, Governor of the State of Oregon; and State of Oregon, Defendants, DEFENSE OF, 2005 WL 6341845, *6341845+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Or.Cir. Jul 15, 2005) Plaintiffs' Consolidated Response to Defendants' and Intervenor-Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment (NO. 05C-11023) 9527 Mary LI and Rebecca Kennedy; Stephen Knox, M.D., and Eric Warshaw, M.D.; Kelly Burke and Dolores Doyle; Donna Potter and Pamela Moen; Dominick Vetri and Douglas Dewitt; Sally Sheklow and Enid Lefton; Irene Farrera and Nina Korican; Walter Frankel and Curtis Kiefer; Julie Williams and Coleen Belisle; Basic Rights Oregon; and American Civil Liberties Union of Oregon, Plaintiffs, Multnomah County, Intervenor-Plaintiff, v. STATE OF OREGON; Theodore, 2004 WL 3764114, *3764114 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Or.Cir. Apr 12, 2004) Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 0403-03057) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9528 Mary LI and Rebecca Kennedy; Stephen Knox, M.D., and Eric Warshaw, M.D.; Kelly Burke and Dolores Doyle; Donna Potter and Pamela Moen; Dominick Vetri and Douglas Dewitt; Sally Sheklow and Enid Lefton; Irene Farrera and Nina Korican; Walter Frankel and Curtis Kiefer; Julie Williams and Coleen Belisle; Basic Rights Oregon; and American Civil Liberties Union of Oregon, Plaintiffs, Multnomah County, Intervenor-Plaintiff, v. STATE OF OREGON; Theodore, 2004 WL 3764116, *3764116+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Or.Cir. Apr 12, 2004) Plaintiffs' Opposition to Intervenors-Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (NO. 0403-03057) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 9529 Mary LI and Rebecca Kennedy; Stephen Knox, M.D., and Eric Warshaw, M.D.; Kelly Burke and Dolores Doyle; Donna Potter and Pamela Moen; Dominick Vetri and Douglas Dewitt; Sally Sheklow and Enid Lefton; Irene Farrera and Nina Korican; Walter Frankel and Curtis Kiefer; Julie Williams and Coleen Belisle; © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Basic Rights Oregon, an Oregon not-for-profit corporation; and American Civil Liberties Union of Oregon, an Oregon not-for-profit corporation, Plaintiffs,, 2004 WL 3764118, *3764118+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Or.Cir. Apr 12, 2004) Intervenor-Defendant Defense of Marriage Coalition's Response to Plaintiffs' and Intervenor-Plaintiffs' Motions for Partial Summary Judgment (NO. 0403-03057) 9530 Vic A. GARDNER, Plaintiff, v. Greg ABBOTT, Attorney General of Texas, the State of Texas, and Glen Elliott, Individually, Defendants., 2012 WL 6935820, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Tex.Dist. May 18, 2012) Plaintiff's Response to Defendants' Summary Judgment Motion and Brief in Support and Plaintiff's Response to Defendants' Second PLEA to the Jurisdiction (NO. D1GN09003804) " HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 9531 The State of Texas, v. Gustavo D. LOPEZ., 2007 WL 7012639, *7012639 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Tex.Dist. Oct 24, 2007) Notice of Motion and Motion to Suppress and Exclude Defendant's Statement (NO. 1085785, 1085826, 1085827) 9532 Lisa Miller - JENKINS, Plaintiff, v. Janet Miller - JENKINS, Defendant., 2007 WL 7622734, *1 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Vt.Super. Apr 20, 2007) Defendant's Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law (NO. F4541103) 9533 Lisa MILLER-JENKINS, Plaintiff, v. Janet MILLER-JENKINS, Defendant., 2006 WL 6865076, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Vt.Super. Nov 17, 2006) Defendant's Supplemental Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for Sanctions (NO. F4541103) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 9534 Lisa MILLER-JENKINS, Plaintiff, v. Janet MILLER-JENKINS, Defendant., 2004 WL 6041708, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Vt.Super. Sep 15, 2004) Defendant's Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Withdraw Waiver to Challenge Presumption of Parentage (NO. F4541103) 9535 Patricia BLACKFORD, an individual; Martin Blackford, an individual; and the marital community composed of Patricia Blackford and Martin Blackford, Plaintiffs, v. Dorothy SHAFFER, an individual; and the marital community composed of Dorothy Shaffer and John Doe Shaffer, Defendants., 2006 WL 4451192, *4451192 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Wash.Super. Jan 17, 2006) Plaintiffs' Response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Martin Blackford's Claim for Loss of Consortium (NO. 05-2-23091-6KNT) 9536 Heather ANDERSEN and Leslie Christian; Peter Ilgenfritz and David Shull; Johanna Bender and Sherri Kokx; Janet Helson and Betty Lundquist; David Serkin-poole and Michael Serkin-poole; Vegahni Subramaniam and Vaijayanthimala Nagarajan, Plaintiffs, v. KING COUNTY; Ron Sims, King County Executive; and Dean Logan, King County Director of Records, Elections, and Licensing Services Division, Defendants, v. STATE OF WASHINGTON, Third party, 2004 WL 5577856, *5577856+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Affidavit) (Wash.Super. Jul 20, 2004) Response to Briefs of Amicus Curiae Multifaith Works and Loren Miller Bar Association, Latino/a Bar of Washington, Kanoon South Asian Bar Association of Washington, Asian Bar Association of ... (NO. 04-2-04964-4SEA) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) 9537 Heather ANDERSEN and Leslie Christian; et al., Plaintiffs, v. KING COUNTY; et al., Defendants and third-Party plaintiffs, v. STATE OF WASHINGTON, Third party defendant, Senator Val STEVENS, et al., Intervenor defendants., 2004 WL 5577858, *5577858+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Wash.Super. Jul 12, 2004) Plaintiffs' Reply On Their Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 04-2-04964-4SEA) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 9538 Heather ANDERSEN And Leslie Christian; Peter Ilgenfritz and David Shull; Johanna Bender and Sherri Kokx; Janet Helson and Betty Lundquist; David Serkin-Poole and Michael Serkin-poole; Vegavahini Subramaniam and Vaijayanthimala Nagarajan, Plaintiffs, v. King COUNTY; Ron Sims, King County Executive; and Dean Logan, King County Director of Records, Elections, and Licensing Services Division;, Defendants., v. STATE OF WASHINGTON, Third party, 2004 WL 5577862, *1+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Wash.Super. Jun 24, 2004) Intervenors' Response to Plaintiffs' Summary Judgment Motion and Cross-motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 04-2-04964-4 SEA) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 9539 Heather ANDERSEN et al., Plaintiffs, v. KING COUNTY, et al., Defendants, KING COUNTY, et al., Third Party Plaintiffs, v. STATE OF WASHINITON, Third Party Defendant., 2004 WL 5577861, *5577861+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Wash.Super. Jun 24, 2004) Brief of Amici Curiae Multifaith Works and Other Religious Groups and Clergy (NO. 04-2-04964-4SEA) " HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9540 Heather ANDERSEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. KING COUNTY, et al., Defendants., 2004 WL 5577863, *5577863+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Wash.Super. Jun 18, 2004) State of Washington's Answer to Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 04-2-04964-4SEA) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 9541 Heather ANDERSEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. King COUNTY et al., Defendants., 2004 WL 5577864, *5577864+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Wash.Super. Jun 17, 2004) King County's Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment Cross-motion for (NO. 04-2-04964-4SEA) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 9542 Heather ANDERSEN et al., Plaintiffs, v. Ron SIMS, et al., Defendants, Ron SIMS, et al., Third-Party plaintiffs, v. STATE OF WASHINGTON, Third party defendant., 2004 WL 5577866, *5577866+ (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Wash.Super. May 07, 2004) Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (NO. 04-2-04964-4SEA) " HN: 1,3,5 (S.Ct.) 9543 Danny HAYES, a married person, and Toni Schwerzler, a single person, Plaintiffs, v. THE STATE OF WASHINGTON; the Department of Labor and Industries; and Paul Trause, in his capacity as Director, Department of Labor and © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Industries, Defendants., 2004 WL 6009512, *1 (Trial Motion, Memorandum and Affidavit) (Wash.Super. Feb 11, 2004) Plaintiffs' Memorandum in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss Complaint (NO. 032016826) " HN: 3 (S.Ct.) Trial Transcripts 9544 Steven KALSKI, Plaintiff, v. Michael D. ANTONOVICH, et al., Defendants., 2008 WL 8141231, *8141231 (Trial Transcript) (Cal.Super. Apr 01, 2008) Hearing on Plaintiff Kalski's Petition for A Writ of Mandate (NO. BS105860) Trial Filings 9545 Kristin M. PERRY, Sandra B. Stier, Paul T. Katami, and Jeffrey J. Zarrillo, Plaintiffs, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, in his official capacity as Governor of California; Edmund G. Brown, Jr., in his official capacity as Attorney General of California; Mark B. Horton, in his official capacity as Director of the California Department of Public Health and State Registrar of Vital Statistics; Linette Scott, in her official capacity as Deputy Director of Health, 2009 WL 2588308, *2588308 (Trial Filing) (N.D.Cal. Aug 17, 2009) Plaintiffs' Supplemental Case Management Statement (NO. 09-CV-2292VRW) HN: 1,3 (S.Ct.) 9546 Kristin M. PERRY, Sandra B. Stier, Paul T. Katami, and Jeffrey J. Zarrillo, Plaintiffs, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, in his official capacity as Governor of California; Edmund G. Brown, Jr., in his official capacity as Attorney General of California; Mark B. Horton, in his official capacity as Director of the California Department of Public Health and State Registrar of Vital Statistics; Linette Scott, in her official capacity as Deputy Director of Health, 2009 WL 2588309, *2588309+ (Trial Filing) (N.D.Cal. Aug 17, 2009) ÝProposed¨ Case Management Statement (NO. 09-CV-2292VRW) 9547 Kristin M. PERRY, Sandra B. Stier, Paul T. Katami, and Jeffrey J. Zarrillo, Plaintiffs, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER, in his official capacity as Governor of California; Edmund G. Brown, Jr., in his official capacity as Attorney General of California; Mark B. Horton, in his official capacity as Director of the California Department of Public Health and State Registrar of Vital Statistics; Linette Scott, in her official capacity as Deputy Director of Health, 2009 WL 2588310, *2588310+ (Trial Filing) (N.D.Cal. Aug 17, 2009) DefendantsIntervenors Proposition 8 Proponents and Projectmarriage.com's Supplemental Case Management Statement (NO. 09-CV-2292VRW) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9548 Patricia MARTINEZ, v. MONROE COMMUNITY COLLEGE and Sherry Ralston., 2004 WL 5651609, *5651609+ (Trial Filing) (N.Y.Sup. Mar 03, 2004) (NO. 433-2005) " HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) Jury Instructions © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 9549 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. James T. SCHMIT, Defendant., 2011 WL 3740360, *1 (Jury Instruction) (D.Ariz. Feb 17, 2011) Defendant's Requested Jury Instructions (NO. 07CR01714) 9550 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. John STAGLIANO, et al., Defendants., 2010 WL 3536844, *3536844+ (Jury Instruction) (D.D.C. May 28, 2010) Defendants' Joint Proposed Jury Instructions (NO. 108-CR-00093-RJL) 9551 Cecilia GOUVEIA, Plaintiff, v. James SEARS, Teresa Vandusen Marion County Oregon, Defendants., 2005 WL 6003630, *6003630 (Jury Instruction) (D.Or. 2005) Plaintiff's Reques Ted Jury Ins Tructions (NO. 05-CV-1102-HO) 9552 Kathleen MILLIGAN-HITT and Kathryn R. Roberts, Plaintiffs, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF SHERIDAN COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT NUMBER 2, Craig Dougherty, in his official capacity as Superintendent, and Terry Burgess, in his official capacity as Assistant Superintendent, Defendants., 2006 WL 1168550, *1168550+ (Jury Instruction) (D.Wyo. Mar 27, 2006) Defendants' Proposed Jury Instructions (NO. 05CV017B) 9553 Kathleen MILLIGAN-HITT and Kathryn R. Roberts, Plaintiffs, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF SHERIDAN COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT NUMBER 2, Craig Dougherty, individually and in his official capacity as Superintendent, and Terry Burgess, in his official capacity as Assistant Superintendent, Defendants., 2006 WL 1168553, *1168553 (Jury Instruction) (D.Wyo. Mar 27, 2006) Plaintiffs' Proposed Jury Instructions and Special Verdict Form (NO. 05-CV-0017-B) Positive Cases (Australia) Referred to by 9554 Pape v Federal Commissioner of Taxation, 2009 WL 1915040, 238 CLR 1, [2009] ALMD 4207, [2009] ALMD 4208, [2009] ALMD 4209, [2009] ALMD 4210, [2009] ALMD 4211, [2009] ALMD 4369, [2009] ALMD 4451, [2009] ALMD 4612, 257 ALR 1, 83 ALJR 765, 2009 ATC 20-116, 72 ATR 580, [2009] HCA 23 (HCA Apr 03, 2009) (NO. S35/2009) 9555 Clayton v The Queen, 2006 WL 3594312, [2007] ALMD 2436, 231 ALR 500, 81 ALJR 439, 168 A Crim R 174, [2006] HCA 58 (HCA Dec 13, 2006) (NO. M156/2005, M157/2005, M158/2005) 9556 Bounds v The Queen, 2006 WL 2006258, [2006] ALMD 6687, 228 ALR 190, 80 ALJR 1380, [2006] HCA 39 (HCA Jul 20, 2006) (NO. P54/2005) 9557 Vasiljkovic v Commonwealth, 2006 WL 2147712, 227 CLR 614, [2006] ALMD 8006, [2006] ALMD 8008, [2006] ALMD 8222, [2006] ALMD 8223, [2006] ALMD 8224, 228 ALR 447, 80 ALJR 1399, [2006] HCA 40 (HCA Jun 15, 2006) (NO. C3/2006) 9558 Dalton v NSW Crime Commission, 2006 WL 1230272, 227 CLR 490, [2006] © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. ALMD 4398, 226 ALR 570, 80 ALJR 860, [2006] HCA 17 (HCA May 10, 2006) (NO. S334/2005) 9559 Re&nbsp;Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs; Ex parte Ame, 2005 WL 1819966, 222 CLR 439, [2005] ALMD 6852, [2005] ALMD 6866, [2005] ALMD 6869, 218 ALR 483, 79 ALJR 1309, 85 ALD 285, [2005] HCA 36 (HCA Aug 04, 2005) (NO. M146/2004) 9560 Baker v The Queen, 2004 WL 2189525, 223 CLR 513, [2004] ALMD 7083, [2004] ALMD 7216, 210 ALR 1, 78 ALJR 1483, [2004] HCA 45 (HCA Oct 01, 2004) (NO. S395/2003) 9561 Re Colonel Aird; Ex parte Alpert, 2004 WL 1987157, 220 CLR 308, [2004] ALMD 6539, 209 ALR 311, 78 ALJR 1451, [2004] HCA 44 (HCA Sep 09, 2004) (NO. B60/2003) 9562 Behrooz v Secretary, Department of Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs, 2004 WL 1747385, 219 CLR 486, [2004] ALMD 5935, [2004] ALMD 5936, 208 ALR 271, 78 ALJR 1056, 79 ALD 176, [2004] HCA 36 (HCA Aug 06, 2004) (NO. A255/2003) 9563 Al-Kateb v Godwin, 2004 WL 1747386, 219 CLR 562, [2004] ALMD 5934, [2004] ALMD 5951, [2004] ALMD 5952, [2004] ALMD 5954, [2004] ALMD 6400, 208 ALR 124, 78 ALJR 1099, 79 ALD 233, [2004] HCA 37 (HCA Aug 06, 2004) (NO. A253/2003) Secondary Sources (Australia) 9564 Treating Like Alike: The Principle of Non-Discrimination As A Tool to Mandate the Equal Treatment of Refugees and Beneficiaries of Complementary Protection, 34 Melbourne University Law Review 181 (2010) 9565 National Litigation and International Law: Repercussions for Australia's Protection of Marine Resources, 33 Melbourne University Law Review 163 (2009) 9566 Open Chambers: High Court Associates and Supreme Court Clerks Compared, 31 Melbourne University Law Review 646+ (2007) 9567 Damned Whores and the Border Police: Sex Workers and Refugee Status in Australia, 31 Melbourne University Law Review 938 (2007) 9568 An Exploration of the Conceptual Basis of Privacy and the Implications for the Future of Australian Privacy Law, 29 Melbourne University Law Review 131 (2005) Positive & Neutral Cases (Canada) Referred to in 9569 Smith v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship & Immigration), 86 Imm. L.R. (3d) 114, 358 F.T.R. 189 (Eng.), 2009 CarswellNat 3800, 2009 CarswellNat 3801, 183 A.C.W.S. (3d) 210, 2009 FC 1194, 2009 CF 1194, [2011] 1 F.C.R. 36 (F.C. Nov © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. 20, 2009) 9570 Mussani v. College of Physicians & Surgeons (Ontario), 248 D.L.R. (4th) 632, 193 O.A.C. 23, 2004 CarswellOnt 5433, 74 O.R. (3d) 1, 125 C.R.R. (2d) 340, [2004] O.J. No. 5176, 22 Admin. L.R. (4th) 53 (Ont. C.A. Dec 29, 2004) Secondary Sources (Canada) 9571 Annual Review of Civil Litigation, [D] I. OVERVIEW When can a... (2013) 9572 Why Canada's Prohibition of Polygamy Is Constitutionally Valid and Sound Social Policy, 25 Canadian Journal of Family Law 165+ (2009) 9573 Franchir Les Limites de la Salle de Classe : Une Expérience de Droit Comparé en Droit de la Famille, 24 Canadian Journal of Family Law 65 (2008) 9574 Regulating the Queer Family: The Assisted Human Reproduction Act, 24 Canadian Journal of Family Law 101+ (2008) 9575 Judicial Redefinition of Marriage, 21 Canadian Journal of Family Law 11+ (2004) 9576 The Limits of Consent and the Law of Assault, 24 Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 205 (2011) 9577 The Place of Religion in Constitutional Goods, 22 Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 205+ (2009) 9578 Of Baby Jesus and the Easter Bunny: Does Christianity Still Have a Place in the Educational Marketplace of Ideas in the United States?, 16 Education & Law Journal (Canada) 61 (2006) HN: 5 (S.Ct.) 9579 Constitutional Interpretation in a Globalized World, 6 Journal of Parliamentary and Political Law 449+ (2012) 9580 Israel as a Mixed Jurisdiction, 57 McGill L.J. 781, 790 (2012) 9581 The Impossibility of a Critically Objective Criminal Law, 56 McGill L.J. 349, 394 (2011) 9582 Laws of Desire: The Political Morality of Public Sex, 54 McGill L.J. 355, 383+ (2009) 9583 Unsettling Sexual Citizenship Brenda Cossman, Sexual Citizens: The Legal and Cultural Regulation of Sex and Belonging. Stanford, Cal.: Stanford University Press, 2007. Pp. 244 (Cloth $55 (U.S.), 53 McGill L.J. 535, 571 (2008) 9584 Where Law and Pedagogy Meet in the Transsystemic Contracts Classroom, 50 McGill L.J. 789, 808 (2005) 9585 Doin' the Transsystemic: Legal Systems and Legal Traditions, 50 McGill L.J. 863, 898 (2005) 9586 Sexual Orientation and the Charter: The Achievement of Formal Legal Equality (1985-2005) and Its Limits, 49 McGill L.J. 1143, 1180 (2004) 9587 Comparative Constitutional Law and the "Judicial Role in Times of Terror", 28 National Journal of Constitutional Law 61 (2010) 9588 Marriage (P)reference - Equality, Dignity and Individual Voices, 17 National © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Journal of Constitutional Law 213 (2005) 9589 The Protea and the Maple Leaf: The Impact of the Charter on South African Constitutionalism, 17 National Journal of Constitutional Law 353 (2005) 9590 Waiting for Globalization: An Empirical Study of the McLachlin Court's Foreign Judicial Citations, 41 Ottawa L. Rev. 209, 243 (2010) 9591 Bountiful Voices, 47 Osgoode Hall L.J. 183, 234+ (2009) 9592 American Citations and the McLachlin Court: An Empirical Study, 47 Osgoode Hall L.J. 83, 129 (2009) 9593 The "Proof" of Foreign Normative Facts Which Influence Domestic Rules, 43 Osgoode Hall L.J. 269, 288+ (2005) 9594 Why Privacy Still Matters: The Case against Prophylactic Video Surveillance in For-Profit Long-Term Care Homes, 32 Queen's L.J. 224, 277 (2006) 9595 Regards Sur le Droit Des États-Unis en 2006 La Vie Humaine, de la Conception à la Mort, 9 Rev. common l. francais 287, 343 (2007) 9596 The Dialogic Saga of Same-Sex Marriage: EGALE, Halpern, and the Relationship Between Suspended Declarations and Productive Political Discourse About Rights, 62 U. Toronto Fac. L. Rev. 149, 170+ (2004) 9597 Policing Morality: Constitutional Law and the Criminalization of Incest, 61 U. Toronto L.J. 737, 759+ (2011) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9598 Dignity, Liberty, Equality: A Fundamental Rights Triangle of Constitutionalism, 59 U. Toronto L.J. 417, 468+ (2009) 9599 The Role of Emotions in the Rule of Law, 57 U. Toronto L.J. 781, 794 (2007) 9600 Affirmative Action in Higher Education: What Canada Can Take from the American Experience, 23 Windsor Y.B. Access to Just. 193, 208+ (2005) Secondary Sources (Hong Kong) 9601 Personal Data Privacy in the Digital Age, 43 Hong Kong Law Journal 801+ (2013) 9602 A Principled Approach Towards Judicial Review: Lessons from W v Registrar of Marriages, 41 Hong Kong Law Journal 49 (2011) 9603 The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research, Peter Cane and Herbert M. Kritzer (Eds) (Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press, 2010, 1000 pp, Hardcover, HK$1,688) ISBN 978 019 954247 5, 41 Hong Kong Law Journal 883+ (2011) 9604 W v Registrar of Marriages: From Transsexual Marriage to Same-sex Marriage?, 40 Hong Kong Law Journal 549+ (2010) 9605 Respecting Privacy and Affirming Equality: The Dual Significance of Leung v Secretary for Justice for Hong Kong's Gay Community, 36 Hong Kong Law Journal 143 (2006) 9606 Leung v Secretary for Justice: Privacy, Equality and the Hypersexualised Homosexual Stereotype, 35 Hong Kong Law Journal 545+ (2005) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Secondary Sources (International) 9607 Cybercrime and Security APP 4A-19, Appendix 4A-19. Interactive Media & Gaming-Third Circuit Upholds Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (2013) 9608 Hope, Fear and Loathing, and the Post-Sebelius Disequilibrium: Assessing the Relationship between Parties, Congress, and Courts in Tea Party America, 2 Brit. J. Am. Legal Stud. 27, 58 (2013) 9609 Why Liberal Neutrality Prohibits Same-Sex Marriage: Rawls, Political Liberalism, and the Family, 1 Brit. J. Am. Legal Stud. 411, 413+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9610 The Long Shadow of Racial Profiling, 1 Brit. J. Am. Legal Stud. 77, 79+ (2012) HN: 1 (S.Ct.) 9611 Sexual Misconduct with Congregants or Parishioners: Crafting a Model Statute, 1 Brit. J. Am. Legal Stud. 189, 205+ (2012) HN: 1,5 (S.Ct.) 9612 The Conflicted Constitution: The Textual Absolutism of Justices Black and Thomas versus the Balanced Restraint of Justices Frankfurter and Breyer, 1 Brit. J. Am. Legal Stud. 217, 230+ (2012) HN: 2 (S.Ct.) Positive Cases (New Zealand) Referred to by .... Chief Executive of the Department of Labour v Yadegary, [2009] 2 NZLR 495, [2008] NZCA 295, [2008] BCL 860, 31 TCL 32/6 (CA Aug 13, 2008) (NO. CA199/07) (Text not available on WESTLAW) .... Hosking v Runting, [2005] 1 NZLR 1, [2004] BCL 395, (2004) 7 HRNZ 301, (2004) 11 NZBLQ 82, (2004) 3 NZIPJ 290, 27 TCL 11/7, NZCLD, 5th Series 6257 (CA Mar 25, 2004) (NO. CA101/03) (Text not available on WESTLAW) Secondary Sources (New Zealand) 9615 The Common Law Mind of George Barton, 43 Vict. U. Wellington L. Rev. 163, 171 (2012) 9616 The Democratic Challenge of Incorporation: International Human Rights Treaties and National Constitutions, 38 Vict. U. Wellington L. Rev. 217, 235 (2007) 9617 Using Human Rights Treaties to Resolve Ambiguity: The Advent of A RightsConscious Charming Betsy Canon, 38 Vict. U. Wellington L. Rev. 237, 246+ (2007) 9618 The Importance of Being Quasi-Democratic - The Domestication of International Human Rights in American and Arab Politics, 38 Vict. U. Wellington L. Rev. 317, 323+ (2007) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Secondary Sources (Singapore) 9619 Constitutionalising Capital Crimes: Judicial Virtue or "Originalism' Sin?, 2011 Singapore Journal of Legal Studies 281 (2011) HN: 4 (S.Ct.) 9620 "It Is a Little Known Legal Fact": Originalism, Customary Human Rights Law and Constitutional Interpretation Yong Vui Kong v. Public Prosecutor, 2010 Singapore Journal of Legal Studies 558 (2010) 9621 "Don't Ever Take a Fence Down until You Know the Reason It Was Put up" Singapore Communitarianism and the Case for Conserving 377A, 2008 Singapore Journal of Legal Studies 347+ (2008) 9622 The Private Life after Douglas v. Hello!, 2003 Singapore Journal of Legal Studies 311+ (2003) Secondary Sources (United Kingdom) 9623 An Isolated Nation with Global-Minded Citizens: Bottom-Up Transnational Constitutionalism in Taiwan, 4 Nat'l Taiwan U. L. Rev. 203, 233+ (2009) 9624 International Human Rights Law and Domestic Constitutional Law: Internationalisation of Constitutional Law in Hong Kong, 4 Nat'l Taiwan U. L. Rev. 237, 253+ (2009) 9625 Normative Evaluation on Judicial Governance in Korea: Focusing Standing Issue, 4 Nat'l Taiwan U. L. Rev. 163, 180+ (2009) © 2014 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.