JABATAN PENDIDIKAN NEGERI JOHORJOHOR ENGLISH LANGUAGE INTER CLASS DEBATE COMPETITION 2016 FOR SECONDARY SCHOOLS (FORM 1-3) RULES AND GUIDELINES JOHOR 1 Copyright of: ENGLISH LANGUAGE INTER CLASS DEBATE COMPETITION RULES AND GUIDELINES PART 1 1.0 Name & Background 1.1 The competition shall be known as Johor English Language Inter Class Debate Competition. 1.2 The competition serves as a platform for students in Johor to compete in a debating competition that is based on the international standard of the World Schools Debating Championship with some adjustments. 2.0 Format 2.1 A team must consist of 3 main debaters and 1 reserve. 2.2 The proposing team is known as the Government while the opposing team is known as the Opposition. 2.3 Allocation of time and speaking order: TURN GOVERNMENT TUR OPPOSITION TIME N 1 1st Debater 2 1st Debater 4 minutes 3 2nd Debater 4 2nd Debater 4 minutes 5 3rd Debater 6 3rd Debater 4 minutes 8 Reply Speech 7 Reply Speech 2 minutes 1st / 2nd Government 1st / 2nd Opposition 2.4 Third debaters from both teams shall not introduce any new arguments. Their role is to rebut the opponent and to defend the position of the team. 2.5 While a debater is speaking, the opposing team can offer ‘Point(s) of Information’ (formal interjections). The debater may accept or decline it/them. 2.6 After all debaters have spoken once, the 1 st or 2nd debater of each team gives a reply speech with the Opposition reply speech being delivered first followed by the Government. 2 3. 4. For district level.1 A panel of 3 adjudicators will be appointed for all the rounds at all levels except for the class level competition.4 Every member of a participating team should come from the same school at district level only. 3. 4. 3. 4.2 A class must have 2 teams. the team will be disqualified.1 If there is evidence prior to.2 All adjudicators must undergo a pre-tournament briefing / training programme.1 The competition is open to all students from Form 1 to 3 in Johor 3. Adjudicators shall decide the winner of the debate independently.The winner moves to the inter class competition.4. 3. 4. 4. during or after the competition contrary to the declared status.7 The Speaker of the House will collect the scoresheets and the result slip from the Chief Adjudicator to be submitted to the tab master. Scores awarded by adjudicators are not to be added together to decide the winner.7 The debate shall be judged according to the Guidelines for Adjudicators provided in Part 2 of this paper.For the inter school competition A school is allowed to send only one team to participate in the competition.0 Adjudication 4.1 Representatives to the state level come from the same school. 3 .8 Once the scoresheets have been handed in.3 The active speaking members from each team should consist of more than one race from the same school / district. 4.3. the adjudicators shall meet and confer on the Best Debater and to brief the Chief Adjudicator on the oral adjudication. 3. 4.Only 21st Century schools in Johor will participate in the inter school and inter District competitions .The English teacher can be the only adjudicator.0 Eligibility 3.4 All adjudicators should be briefed on the rules of adjudication before the competition.3 All appointed adjudicators should not adjudicate the team from their own class /schools / districts . 4.6 Each debate will be won by the team which scores a majority of votes from the adjudicators in the panel. 2.5 Points will be allocated according to the scoresheet. exceptions should be made if the student population consists of a particular ethnic group as the demographic in that school. then by the total team scores. 5. Ballots are the votes of the adjudicators where winning by a unanimous decision is better than winning by a split decision.1. After the first round. short and explain the result to the debaters and audience. i.1 District level organisers should conduct a two-day competition involving an impromptu round. v. viii.1. all competitions should run according to the process given below: 5. In competitions involving 8 teams. At the end of the competition.1 Debate Process 5.1. Second round onwards shall be conducted using a power- matching system. On the contrary.1. xii. losing by a split decision is better than losing by a unanimous decision. Teams shall be ranked first by the number of wins.1. iii. The Grand Final should be an impromtu round.3 The competition should be conducted by having 2 or 3 preliminary rounds on the first day and knockout rounds on the second day.4 The rounds shall be decided based on. 4. 4.2 In cases where there are 8 teams or more. team ranked 2nd shall meet team ranked 4th. team ranked 2nd shall meet the team ranked 4th. ix. In particular. and the team ranked 5th shall meet team ranked 6th. The ranking continues and match-ups are drawn until all preliminary rounds are over. xi.1. In competitions involving 6 teams. ii. x. Power-matching is drawing winners of the first round to be matched against other winners and vice-versa. and comment on significant matters of the debate. all the participating teams will receive the full results.1 Wherever possible. vi. 5. 5.1. team ranked number 1 shall meet team ranked number 2 for the second round in competitions involving four teams.0 Procedure of Debate 5. 5. After preliminary rounds are over. 4. team ranked 5rd shall meet team ranked 7th and team ranked 6th shall meet team ranked 8th. After teams have been ranked. xiii. it is advisable to conduct at least three preliminary rounds. a team with the highest number of wins.10. followed by the number of ballots gathered. the team ranked 1 st after round one shall be matched against team ranked 3 rd. and so on.9 The oral adjudication should be constructive. First round shall be done by a random draw. The match-ups shall be decided after ranking each team immediately after a round. iv. then by the total team score shall be ranked 1st.1. team ranked 1 st shall meet team ranked 3rd. vii. then by the number of ballots.1. teams shall be ranked to decide qualifying into the knockout stage. 4 .11 Certificates of achievement and participation will be awarded to respective teams. it should outline the key reasons why the winning team won. and team ranked 4th meeting team ranked 5th.2.2.1. impromptu semi-finals shall be conducted with team ranked 1 st meeting team ranked 4th and team ranked 2nd meeting team ranked 3rd. 5.1.2.1.1.3.2.3. the team will be DISQUALIFIED.1 For competitions involving 4 teams. 5.3.1.2. 5. 5.1 The motions for the impromptu debates will be given and sides are drawn at the start of the quarantine session.1 Each debate will be chaired by a Speaker of the House who will be addressed as Mister or Madam Speaker.1.1. 5. 5.2 Teams will then be quarantined in their quarantine rooms for ONE hour to prepare for the debate (only Inter School level).2 The knockout stage shall be conducted as follows. No electronic gadgets are allowed.4 Teams are allowed to use their own printed reference materials in the quarantine room.1. without any valid reason. A walk-over will be awarded to the team that is present.2 For competitions involving at least 6 teams. 5.6 If any one team fails to show up 5 minutes after the scheduled time.2 The Role of the Speaker of the House 5. The quarantine officers must be in the room with the team. The team members should not be in contact with any unauthorised personnel. a Grand Final shall be conducted with team ranked 1st meeting team ranked 2nd after two preliminary rounds. 5.1. team ranked 3rd meeting team ranked 6th.1.3 Debates Using the Impromptu Motions 5. 5 .1.2.1.1. 5. Teams found using electronic gadgets will be DISQUALIFIED from the competition.7 If there is prompting / help / assistance / communication from any individual other than the debaters during the quarantine time and debate competition. 5.8 Clarification of the motion should be provided for the impromptu motions. the winner of the first quarter-final shall meet the winner of the fourth quarter-final (winner of 1 st vs 8th meets winner of 4th vs 5th) in an impromptu semi-finals.1.1. an impromptu quarter- final shall be conducted with team ranked 1 st meeting team ranked 8th. 5. 5. 5.4 After the quarter-finals.5 Teams are required to be seated at the debate venue(s) 5 minutes before the debate commences. team ranked 2nd meeting team ranked 7th. 5.5 The Grand Final shall also be an impromptu round.3.3 Only team members competing (3 main debaters and 1 reserve) will be allowed in the quarantine room. 5. the team will be DISQUALIFIED.3 For competitions involving at least 10 teams. at intervals of one minute.2.For the inter class and class level each debater is given 4 minutes.4 The Speaker of the House MUST refrain from making any comment concerning the debate or debaters during the debate.(Inter School level only ) . the Timekeeper will announce the time taken by each debater. 5.2. 5. 5.3 Before inviting debaters to present their speeches. 5. 5. the Timekeeper will ring the bell once at the 3 rd minute to signal that the debater has 1 minute left.5 The Speaker of the House must ensure that the adjudicators be given enough time to fill in their marks and wait for the signal from the Chief Adjudicator before the next debater is called. 5. At the end of the 8th minute.2.3.1 The Timekeeper must ensure that each debater is given 8 minutes to deliver his or her speech. 5.4 During the Reply Speech. the bell will be rung twice. the bell will be rung twice to signal the end of the debate. 5.3.2 The Timekeeper will ring the bell once after the 1 st minute and at the end of the 7th minute to signal the time allocated for Point(s) of Information. 5. 5.3. At the end of the 4 th minute.2 The Speaker of the House is responsible for the smooth running of the debate and inviting the respective debaters to present their speeches in order of their roles. adjudicators and debaters.3.5 After each speech. The Speaker of the House will read out the rules of the debate and then proceed to introduce the timekeeper.3 A maximum time of 3 minutes will be given to both teams to prepare for the Reply Speech. 6 . Placards must be used by the timekeeper to indicate the remaining time left.3 The Role of the Timekeeper.3.2.4 The Speaker of the House and Timekeeper should be students. 5. 2 It also covers pronunciation.2 If an argument is weak.4 If a debater declares is unable to make his/her speech after a debate has begun. adjudicators should not be influenced by their own personal beliefs or specialised knowledge. 1. rhythm.0 Content 2. with 40 for Content. speeches are marked within the accepted range and adjudicators must not go outside that range. fluency.1 Language 3.1 Content is the argument used by a debater. even if the other team does not expose its weakness. 3.3 In order to encourage consistency of marks.1 Each debater's substantive speech is marked out of 100. including the use of figures of speech. with 20 for Content. it should be marked accordingly. 3.2 Manner 7 . 40 for Style (20 for Language and 20 for Manner) and 20 for Strategy.Annex 1).0 Marks 1.PART 2 Guidelines for Adjudicators A. 1. appropriate and apt to the occasion. regardless of the quality of the speech. but any expression which is not clearly understood should not merit high marks in the Language section. 2. 3. 2. 3.1 Language refers to using appropriate expressions containing correct sentence structures and grammar. In such a situation. may merit positive marks for Language. (See the Marking Standard . divorced from the speaking style. 1. any good language expression. 2. adjudicators should not be looking for Queen’s English in our debaters.0 Style Style comprises Language and Manner.3 On the other hand. Marking Standard 1. 20 for Style (10 for Language and 10 for Manner) and 10 for Strategy.1. 1.1.2 The reply speech is marked out of 50.3 In deciding the strength or weakness of an argument. another member of the team who was announced by the speaker of the house as being an active speaker in that debate may speak in his/her place. intonation and clarity of speech. etc.5 Adjudicators must not use any other marking standard or categories of marks. 3.1. English being a second language here. idioms.. adjudicators shall award the speech the lowest possible score within the Marking Standard. the range of possible meanings is limited to those that allow for a reasonable debate. 8 . 3. This means: 1. notepads or other forms of debaters notes should not affect the mark a debater is given.1 Whether a debater understands what the issues of the debate are. it has an obvious meaning). 4. folders.0 Strategy 4.3 If there is no obvious meaning to the motion. Definitions and Cases 1.1.1 On receiving a motion.1.e. meaningful gestures and eye contact) and with the use of specific terminology. any other definition would not be reasonable.2 In general.0 The Government must present a reasonable definition of a motion. This can be noted in many ways. the Government must ensure that the definition is one the average reasonable person would accept. 1. Choosing a meaning that does not allow the Opposition room for debate would not be a reasonable definition. the Government must define the motion accordingly.2. the use of palm-cards. Truisms and tautologies leave the Opposition no room for debate and are clearly illegitimate.2. both teams should ask: ‘What is the issue that the two teams are expected to debate? What would an average reasonable person reading the motion think that it is about?’ 1. debaters should not read their speeches.2 A debater who answers the critical issues with weak responses should get poor marks for Content but good marks for Strategy.2 If the motion poses a clear issue for debate (i. lecterns. Be tolerant of different ways in presenting arguments. 3.1 Manner is the way a debater speaks. body language (movement.3 However. 4. 1. 4. B.1 Strategy covers two concepts: 4. accent.2. poise. 3.2 The structure and timing of a debater’s speech. When the motion has an obvious meaning (one which the average reasonable person would realise). but should use notes that they refer to only from time to time.4 When defining words in the motion so as (i) to allow the obvious meaning to be debated or (ii) when there is no obvious meaning to give effect to a possible meaning which would allow for a reasonable debate. 0 When suggesting parameters to the debate. the team that manages to provide reasons as to why their definition and cases are the most reasonable. or proposing particular models or criteria to adjudicate it by. put up an alternative.1 A case sums up the team arguments and states why its side of the motion is correct. 4. but runs the risk of the Opposition being able to more easily counter that case (by disproving that one argument and/ or by raising other arguments that disprove the motion. the Government must ensure such parameters.1). the Government must ensure that the detailed solution given (the Government ‘model’ or ‘plan’) is a reasonable one. 7.3 Examples are facts. as defined). models or criteria are themselves reasonable. 5. such that the average reasonable person would accept it is applicable to the debate. supported by arguments and examples.0 The definition must match the level of abstraction (or specificity) of the motion. so that the debate is as specific or general as the motion itself.0 If the Government definition is unreasonable.0 In all cases. 3. the Opposition may: 5. a Government that runs a restrictive case (such as limiting itself to a single argument) acts legitimately and cannot be challenged for doing so. 6.1 The Government ability to set reasonable parameters to a debate does not provide a license to restrict the motion arbitrarily. Specific motions should be defined specifically and general motions generally. reasonable definition and a case based on this).0 Motions expressed as general principles must be proven true as general principles. but argue that ‘even if’ it is reasonable. the Government case is flawed (as in 5. They must be ones that the average reasonable person would accept as applicable to the debate.2 Arguments are reasons or rationales why the team case is correct. each team has to present a case.0 Whereas an unduly restrictive definition (such as limiting a general motion to a single example) is illegitimate and can be challenged or broadened.2. 6. 4. 5. A single example will neither prove nor disprove a general principle. 6. If a debater claims 9 .4 Challenge the definition (as in 5. 8. 5. 5.2 When the motion requires the Government to propose a solution to a problem and the Government has to set out the details of its proposed solution to prove its effectiveness.2 Challenge it (argue that the definition is unreasonable. practical and beneficial shall win the debate. 6.0 Once the definition is settled. Finding arguments that explain the majority of relevant examples will be more important. Therefore debates shall not be evaluated based on their definitions alone.2).1 Accept it anyway (and debate the Government case regardless). occurrences and the like that show the team arguments are correct. 4. events.3 Broaden the debate back to the words in the motion (if the Government has unreasonably restricted the motion and is arguing a narrower version of it). that a definition or a case is unreasonable. outline the Government case. 5. If it challenges the definition.3 Is not tautological or truistic. 2. 7. The first speaker may introduce as many points that he/she feels can be adequately explained given the time limitations. C.3 Time-setting is the setting of a debate of general application in a particular time.0 The role of the first debater of a Government is to define the topic.0 In responding to the Government case.1 Is reasonably close to the plain meaning of the topic. the first opposition must propose a new definition that conforms to 2.0 Squirrelling. announce the case division between the debaters. and not concentrate solely on attacking the case presented by the Government. or merely attack the case presented by the Government. and 2.0 or 3.0 The first opposition may challenge the definition only if it does not conform to 2. Adjudicators should balance reasons and rebuttals in determining which team wins. 3. past or future. it must in fact produce that case through its speeches.0 The Government may define the topic in any way provided that the definition: 2.0 and 3.0 (B) above. and present his or her part of the Government case.0 If the first opposition does not challenge the definition. announce the case division. establish the issues for the debate. If it chooses to produce a positive case of its own. the Opposition may produce a positive choice of its own.0 The role of the first debater of an opposition side is to respond to the Government case. 3. 2. 10 . 6.0 (B) and oppose that new definition. The Roles of Debaters 1.2 Allows the opposition team reasonable room to debate. 4. place-setting and time-setting are not permitted. 3.2 Place-setting is the setting of a debate of general application in a particular place. then they should state reasons to support that claim. 3. and present his or her part of the Opposition case. outline the Opposition case.4 Is otherwise a reasonable definition. 2. the Opposition is taken to have accepted the definition and the Opposition may not challenge the definition in any other speech unless the Government significantly alters the definition in their subsequent speeches.1 Squirrelling is the distortion of the definition to enable a team to argue a pre-prepared argument that it wishes to debate regardless of the motion actually set. respond to the opposition case. 13.0 The role of the second debater of a Government is to deal with the definition if it has been challenged. 18. the less time will be spent by each debater in presenting a new part of the team case and the more time will be spent responding to the other team arguments. 11. including a response to the other team overall case and a summary of the debater’s own team case. 24. 21. a Government must prove the topic true in the significant majority of cases. but merely that its case is true in the majority of cases or as a general government.0 Where the topic is expressed as an absolute. with the Opposition reply first and the Government reply last.0 If the second government does not challenge a redefinition of the debate made by the first opposition. new examples to explain points that were made previously or to explain a rebuttal is not considered a new argument. but not in every single conceivable instance. 17.0 A reply debater may be either the first or second debater of the team.8.0 The reply debaters are in reverse order. 11 . but may not otherwise introduce a new argument. but merely that its case is true in the majority of cases or as a general. respond to the Government case. 22. 10. 16.0 Hence the more a debate progresses.0 The role of reply speeches is to sum up the debate from the team viewpoint. and respond to the other team case. the more each debater must spend time dealing with what has been said by previous debaters.0 A Government does not have to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. 19. and continue with the Opposition case as outlined by the first debater.0 A reply debater may respond to an existing argument by raising a new example that illustrates that argument. an Opposition must do more than present a single instance where the topic is not true and prove that it is not true for at least a majority of cases. 20.0 The role of both third debaters is to deal with the definition if it is still in issue.0 The third debater of either team may have a small part of the team case to present. not the third. 12.0 An Opposition does not have to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. but his is not obligatory as the third debater’s primary role is to respond to what has gone before in the debate. the Government is taken to have accepted the Opposition redefinition and no further challenges to the definition may be made.0 Neither reply debater may introduce a new part of the team case.0 The more a debate progresses. 23. and continue with the Government case as outlined by the first debater. 14.0 Where the topic is expressed as an absolute. 9.0 The role of the second debater of an Opposition is to deal with the definition if it is still in issue. 15.0 Third debaters should not bring new arguments. 9. each team member should offer between 2 and 4 points of information per speech. 5.0 An Opposition.25. and should not offer them within a short time of a previous point of information having been offered.0 An Opposition cannot merely rebut a Government without having a position or case that is supported by arguments to fulfil their role. 26.0 The offering of points of information should be included in the mark for the debater offering points. Annex One : The Marking Standard 1. 10. D.0 Between the first and seventh minutes of a debater’s substantive speech. Substantive Speeches (out of 100) 12 .0 Members of the opposing team should not offer an excessive number of points of information to the point that they are barracking. 8.0 As a general rule. 4. As a general rule. 4. and no longer than 15 seconds.1 Point of information is an important part of the clash between the teams.0 A debater has the absolute right to refuse to accept a point of information. and enable debaters to remain a part of the debate even when they are not making a speech. However. 6.0 The purpose of a point of information is to make a short point or ask a short question of the debater. a debater should accept at least 2 points of information in his or her speech. 2.0 The response by a debater to a point of information should be included in the mark for that debater’s speech.0 A point of information should be brief. and may be in the form of a question. 4. beyond disproving that the Government arguments are flawed as rebuttals must present a case that proves harms on the Government case or more benefits on their case.0 However. or to accept it only at the end of the next sentence. provided that they have been offered at reasonable times in the debater’s speech.0 Point of information need not be addressed through the person chairing the debate. 3. a debater who accepts a significantly greater number of points of information risks losing control of his or her speech. 7. members of the other team may offer points of information. Point of Information 1.2 Hence a debater should offer points of information both before and after he or she has given his or her substantive speech. a debater is obliged to accept some points of information. 14.5 6.5 Weak 30-32 12-13 6 6 6 In marking reply speeches it might be easier to mark them out of 100 and then halve each mark. 13.5 for content.5 for style and 7. say. Ministry of Education together with The Malaysian Institute of Debate and Public Speaking (MIDP) and the National Debate Experts Panel shall oversee the accreditation process and ensure that the quality of training and series of questions have been set to improve the skills of Adjudicators based on the Tan Sri Datuk Wira Abdul Rahman Arshad Challenge Trophy English Language Debate Competition Format.5 7. Reply Speeches (out of 50) STANDARD OVERALL CONTENT STYLE STRATEGY (50) (20) (20) (10) LANGUAGE MANNER (10) (10) Excellent 38-40 15-16 8 8 8 Good 36-37 14-15 7. for a total of 35. That will leave you with half-mark steps.5.5 6. Annex Two : Adjudicator Accreditation And Qualification Guidelines Adjudicator Accreditation And Grading The Division of Co-Curriculum and Arts.5 for strategy. STANDARD OVERALL CONTENT STYLE STRATEGY (100) (40) (40) (20) LANGUAGE MANNER (20) (20) Excellent 76-80 31-32 15-16 15-16 15-16 Good 71-75 29-30 14-15 14-15 14-15 Average 70 28 14 14 14 Satisfactory 65-69 26-27 13-14 13-14 13-14 Weak 60-64 24-25 12-13 12-13 12-13 2.5 Average 35 14 7 7 7 Satisfactory 33-34 13-14 6.5 7. 13 . Thus a reply speech could be given. but that is not a problem. Adjudicator will be graded and given a certificate from MIDP which will then serve as an indicator of qualification to judge any debate competition. high school as well as varsity level. Grade Indicators Grade A Grade B Grade C Grade D Grade E >80% >70% >60% >50% 49% < Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Qualified to Qualified to Qualified to Qualified to be a Not qualified Judge an be Chief be Chief panel adjudicator International Adjudicator Adjudicator for a district/ local Tournament. their qualification will be downgraded by one grade. If adjudicators who are in grade A or B do not adjudicate in at least one tournament in a year. b. a. Accredited adjudicators may adjudicate in any tournament that is of an international national or regional level but it must follow an internationally recognised format.This shall be conducted using the best practices based on the World Schools Debating Championship Standard. This includes The World Schools Debating Championship and Asian Schools Debating Championship. Distribution of Marks Adjudications Test 1 Adjudications Test 2 30% 70% Objective Questions on the Rules Written/Oral adjudication of a video or live debate 0. Qualification The qualification of Adjudicators with Grade A and Grade B will expire within 2 years if they do not adjudicate in at least one tournament. their qualification will expire within a year if they do not adjudicate in at least one tournament a year. in National in State level Tournament Qualified to Level Tournament be Chief Tournament Adjudicators 0. For adjudicators who are in Grade C and below. 14 . 15 . JABATAN PENDIDIKAN NEGERI JOHOR JOHOR ENGLISH LANGUAGE INTER CLASS DEBATE COMPETITION ADJUDICATION FORMS FOR SECONDARY SCHOOLS 16 . REPLY: OPP. JOHOR INTER CLASS ENGLISH LANGUAGE DEBATE SCORING SHEET Round: _____ Room: ______ Name of Adjudicator: __________________________ Motion:___________________________________________________________ STYLE (40) SPEAK STYLE (40) SPEAK CONTE STRATE ER CONTE STRATE ER GOVERNME TIME NT LANGUA MANN GY SCORE OPPOSITION TIME NT LANGU MANN GY SCORE NT (40) GE ER (20) (40) AGE ER (20) (20) (20) (100) (20) (20) (100) First First Debater Debater Second Second Debater Debater Third Third Debater Debater STYLE (20) STYLE (20) SPEAK CONTE SPEAK CONTE STRATE STRATE GOVERNME ER NT ER TIME NT LANGUA MANN GY OPPOSITION TIME LANGU MANN GY NT SCORE SCORE (20) GE ER (10) AGE ER (10) (50) (20) (50) (10) (10) (10) (10) GOV. REPLY: TOTAL TEAM SCORES TOTAL TEAM SCORES Winner: __________________________ Please circle the winning side (Government/Opposition) Margin(Winning Team – Losing Team)___________________________ Adjudicator’s Signature:_____________________________________ 17 . Government Timekeeper’s Name Timekeeper’s Signature Date 18 . JOHOR ENGLISH LANGUAGE INTER CLASS DEBATE COMPETITION FOR SECONDARY SCHOOL TIMING ROLE TIME First Government First Opposition Second Government Second Opposition Third Government Third Opposition Reply – Opposition Reply . JABATAN PENDIDIKAN NEGERI JOHOR RESULTS JOHOR ENGLISH LANGUAGE INTER CLASS DEBATE COMPETITION FOR SECONDARY SCHOOLS YEAR : __________ 19 . RESULT (Adjudicator’s vote) WINNING TEAM TEAM: GOVERNMENT / OPPOSITION Chief Adjudicator’s Signature : _____________________________ ( ) 20 .
Report "Johor Inter Class Debate Rules and Guides"