23Potential applications of chitosan in oral mucosal delivery S. Şenel Hacettepe University, Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, 06100-Ankara, Turkey *Correspondence: 
[email protected]   The accessibility of the oral cavity makes application of drugs easy and acceptable to the patient, while permitting easy removal in the event  of adverse reactions. Drugs penetrating the oral mucosa can be delivered systemically via direct entry into the systemic circulation thus avoiding  the hepatic frst-pass effect and degradation in the gastrointestinal tract. Due to the low permeability of the oral mucosa, new strategies are needed  to improve the delivery of drugs across the mucosa. In order to improve the availability of drugs across the oral mucosa, mucoadhesive systems  are applied to prolong the retention time of the delivery system on the mucosa. Furthermore, availability can be improved by using permeation  enhancers. Chitosan with its favorable properties such as bioadhesivity, biodegradability, biocompatibility and permeation enhancing activity,  offers great advantages over other polymers that are used for oral mucosal delivery. A wide choice of chitosan delivery systems such as solutions,  gels, sponges, flms, fbers, tablets and micro-/nanoparticles have been shown to be capable of delivering drugs into the oral cavity as well as  across the oral mucosa. In this review, applications of chitosan for oral mucosal delivery will be reviewed and the possibilities and limitations  discussed.  Key words: Chitosan – Oral mucosa – Oral mucositis – Dental delivery.  J. DRUG DEL. SCI. TECH., 20 (1) 23-32 2010     For  drugs  which  are  usually  ineffective  when  administered  via  the  oral  route  due  to  hydrophilic  and  enzymatic  degradation  in  the  gastrointestinal tract, delivery through various mucosal routes such  as nasal, oral mucosal, rectal, vaginal, etc. has been widely applied  as an alternative delivery route. Over the last decade, the delivery of  drugs across the oral mucosa, especially buccal mucosa has gained  more  importance,  and  there  has  been  a  signifcant  increase  in  the  number of the buccal products [1] which are on the market. There are  many advantages of oral mucosa which make it an attractive site for  delivery. Firstly, it provides direct entry into the systemic circulation  hence  avoiding  the  hepatic  frst-pass  effect  and  degradation  in  the  gastrointestinal tract. It is a readily accessible area, and allows self  application. The delivery can be terminated at any desired time. It is  not gender specifc, and patient compliance is reported to be very good.  However, there are also some disadvantages associated with this route  of drug delivery, mainly the low permeability and a smaller absorptive  surface area in comparison to the absorptive surface area of the small  intestines.  Furthermore,  salivation  and  resulting  swallowing  would  effectively remove the drug from the preferred absorptive region.      In order to overcome these limitations, new approaches are being  explored dealing with permeation enhancers, mucoadhesion, etc. for  better delivery which enables the delivery system to remain on the  application site longer and improve availability by also enhancing the  permeability of the oral mucosa. Due to its favorable properties such  as bioadhesion and penetration-enhancing effect, besides its bioactive  properties,  in  recent  years,  chitosan  has  become  a  very  promising  compound in the development of oral mucosal systems.      After a short introduction to oral mucosa and delivery, this review  will focus more on chitosan and its applications in oral mucosal deliv- ery and treatment. For further information on oral mucosal delivery,  the reader is asked to refer to the recently published review articles  [1-4]. I. STRUCTURE AND PERMEABILITY PROPERTIES  OF THE ORAL MUCOSA     The anatomy and functions of the oral mucosa have been extensively  reviewed in previous papers [5, 6], hence in this section the structure  of the oral mucosa and its properties will be described briefy only to  facilitate understanding how drugs, after applied to the oral mucosa,  cross the mucosa to reach to the blood capillaries.      The soft tissues lining the human oral cavity are covered with a  stratifying  squamous  epithelium.  In  regions  subject  to  mechanical  forces associated with mastication (gingiva and hard palate), there is  a keratinizing epithelium which is similar to that of the epidermis of  the skin. The mucosa in these regions is known as masticatory mucosa.  The mucosal lining of the foor of the mouth (sublingual) and buccal  regions,  which  must  be  fexible  so  as  to  accommodate  chewing  or  speech, is termed the lining mucosa and is covered with a nonkeratiniz- ing epithelium like the epithelium covering the esophagus or uterine  cervix. Specialized mucosa is found on the top surface of tongue and  is of lesser importance to drug permeation [5]. The masticatory mu- cosa represents approximately 25%, the specialized mucosa (dorsum  of tongue) approximately 15%, and the lining mucosa approximately  60% of the total surface area of the oral lining [7]. Both the structure  and the relative area of the different types of mucosa would infuence  the penetration of substances across the oral lining.     The basic drug transport mechanism for oral epithelium is the same  as for other epithelia in the body. There are two major routes involved:  transcellular (intracellular) route and paracellular (intercellular). The  major pathway across the stratifed epithelium of large molecules is  via the paracellular spaces, and there is a barrier to penetration as a  result of modifcations to the intercellular substance in the superfcial  layers [8]. In non-keratinized epithelium, as cells reach the upper third  to quarter of the epithelium, membrane coating granules become evi- dent at the superfcial aspect of the cells and appear to fuse with the  plasma membrane so as to extrude their contents into the intercellular  space. This discharge forms a barrier to the permeability of various  compounds.  Furthermore,  different  compounds  may  penetrate  the  epithelium at different rates, depending on the chemical nature of the  molecule and the type of tissue being traversed. Passive diffusion has  been shown to be the primary mechanism of transport of the drugs  across the buccal mucosa whereas carrier-mediated transport has been  reported to have a small role [1].    II. ORAL MUCOSAL DELIVERY SYSTEMS     In general, oral mucosal delivery systems are designed to provide  either unidirectional or multidirectional drug release. For unidirectional  release, they may be applied topically on the mucosa as a reservoir that  can release material either into the oral cavity (Figure 1a) or across the  mucosa (Figure 1b). In the frst case, there is no requirement for the  24 agents to penetrate the oral lining, and this may not even be desirable  whereas in the latter case, the drug is desired to penetrate across the  oral mucosa and reach the blood circulation. Agents can also be ap- plied topically so as to treat local mucosal conditions that might range  from mucositis and the common mouth ulcer to rarer lesions, such as  the blistering or vesicular-bullous diseases (Fig. 1c). In this modality,  the target of drug action is likely to be the deeper proliferative cells  of the oral epithelium or the infammatory process in the underlying  connective tissue. In either case, the compound will have to penetrate  the superfcial barrier layers of the oral epithelium.      For  rapid  oral  mucosal  delivery,  the  drug  may  be  presented  as  lozenges,  flms,  sprays  or  compressed  tablets  having  a  fairly  rapid  in-mouth  disintegration  time  (15  min  or  less). Where  prolonged  or  reservoir action is required, the dosage form is usually bioadhesive  and the drug is release-controlled for slow absorption through the oral  mucosa or slow release into the oral cavity.  1. Bioadhesion     The ability to maintain the delivery system at a particular site for  an extended period of time is benefcial both for local disease treat- ment and also for systemic drug bioavailability. Bioadhesive polymers  have been widely used to maintain an intimate and prolonged contact  of the formulation with the oral mucosa [3, 9]. The term bioadhesion  is defned as attachment of a synthetic or natural macromolecule to  mucus and/or an epithelial surface [10]. When adhesion occurs in a  biological setting it is often termed “bioadhesion”, furthermore if this  adhesion occurs on mucosal membranes it is termed “mucoadhesion”  [11]. In general the expressions “bioadhesion” and “mucoadhesion”  are often used interchangeably. Nagai was among the frst to pioneer  the bioadhesive drug delivery system in the early 1980s [12]. The frst  product developed by his group contains a steroidal anti-infammatory  agent, triamcinolone acetonide, and is still on the market for the treat- ment of aphthous stomatitis (AFTACH by Teijin Pharma Ltd, Japan)  [13].  2. Penetration enhancement     Another approach to overcome the barrier properties of the buccal  mucosa for drugs is the incorporation of chemical compounds into the  formulations [14]. Substances that help to promote drug permeation  through the buccal epithelium are referred to as penetration enhancers,  permeation promoters, absorption enhancers [15]. Ideally chemicals  used  as  penetration  enhancers  should  be  safe  and  non-toxic,  non- irritant, pharmacologically and chemically inert and non allergenic.  In addition, the tissue should revert to its normal integrity and bar- rier properties upon removal of the chemical. Penetration enhancers  can  be  divided  into  many  categories  according  to  their  structure,  mechanism of action and the type of drugs whose permeation they  enhance. Penetration enhancers used for buccal delivery, the descrip- tion of which is precluded due to the brevity of the current article,  have been extensively reviewed by several authors [16, 17]. Buccal  penetration enhancement is reported to result from agents being able  to (a) increase the partitioning of drugs into the buccal epithelium, (b)  extract (and not disrupt) intercellular lipids, (c) interact with epithelial  protein domains and/or (d) increase the retention of drugs at the buccal  mucosal surface [16].  III. CHITOSAN      Chitin, which is the most abundant polysaccharide in nature after  cellulose, is the major component of exoskeletons of crustaceans and  insects as well as of cell walls of some microorganisms, bacteria and  fungi.  Chitosan  is  obtained  by  alkaline  deacetylation  of  chitin,  by  removal of acetyl groups from the molecular chain of chitin to give  amino groups (-NH 2 ). It comprises copolymers of glucosamine and  N-acetyl glucosamine. Chitosan differs from cellulose at the C-2 car- bon by having this amine group in place of a hydroxyl group. Hence,  unlike cellulose, chitosan possesses positive ionic charges.      The degree of acetylation represents the proportion of N-acetyl- D-glucosamine  units  with  respect  to  the  total  number  of  units  and  can be used to differentiate between chitin and chitosan. Chitin with  a  degree  of  deacetylation  of  65-70%  or  above  is  generally  known  as chitosan. The degree of deacetylation is an important property of  chitosan which defnes its physicochemical and biological properties  and hence determines its applications. While chitin is insoluble in most  organic solvents, chitosan is readily soluble in dilute acidic solutions  below  pH  6.0.  Its  solubility  and  possession  of  free  amino  groups  which are  active sites for many chemical reactions makes chitosan  more preferable than chitin.      Chitosan  exhibits  a  variety  of  physicochemical  and  biological  properties resulting in numerous applications in felds ranging from  waste and water treatment, agriculture, textiles, cosmetics, nutritional  enhancement and food processing. Due to its biocompatibility, biode- gradability and bioactivity it became a very attractive substance for  diverse applications as a biomaterial in pharmaceutical and medical  felds. As a non-toxic and non-allergenic bioadhesive polymer, chi- tosan has been extensively studied for mucosal delivery of drugs and  vaccines as well as for its bioactive properties such as antimicrobial,  anti-infammatory,  hemostatic,  tumor  inhibition,  antiviral,  tissue  regeneration, wound healing and immunogenic activities [18]. It has  also been shown to enhance the permeation of the compounds across  various mucosae such as buccal, nasal, intestinal and vaginal mucosa  [19-22].     Like its composition, the molecular weight of chitosan varies with  the  raw  material  sources  and  the  method  of  preparation.  It  is  com- mercially available from a number of suppliers in various grades of  purity, molecular weight, and degree of deacetylation. However, there  is still a lack in standardization of chitosan for pharmaceutical and  biomedical applications even though there is a monograph for chitosan  chloride in the European Pharmacopeia (EP 2008) and a monograph  for chitosan is being prepared for the United States Pharmacopoeia  (USP).      The  major  beneft  of  using  chitosan  within  pharmaceutical  ap- plications  is  the  possibility  of  adding  various  chemical  groups,  in  particular  to  the  C-2  position  allowing  for  the  formation  of  novel  conjugates with additional functionalities. Using such modifcations,  Figure 1 - Drug release from oral mucosal delivery systems: a) unidi- rectional-into the oral cavity; b) unidirectional-across the mucosa; and  c) multidirectional-into the oral cavity and oral mucosa. Potential applications of chitosan in oral mucosal delivery S. Senel J. DRUG DEL. SCI. TECH., 20 (1) 23-32 2010 25 the properties of chitosan may be tailored to suit the requirements of  specifc pharmaceutical-technological challenges.      The positive surface charge of chitosan allows it also to interact  with macromolecules like exogenous nucleic acids, negatively charged  mucosal surfaces, or even the plasma membrane. It has been shown  that chitosan and its degradation products are quickly eliminated via  the renal route following intraperitoneal administration to mice, thus  overcoming accumulation in the body [23]. In physiological conditions,  chitosan is thought to be degraded by lysosymes or by chitinases. While  chitin and chitin synthase do not exist in mammals, human chitinase  family members have recently been described. Chitinases are ubiquitous  chitin-fragmenting hydrolases. The frst human chitinase discovered  was chitotriosidase that is specifcally expressed by phagocytes, and  later the identifcation, purifcation, and subsequent cloning of a second  mammalian chitinase was reported [24]. This enzyme is characterized  by an acidic isoelectric point and therefore named acidic mammalian  chitinase (AMCase). In rodents and humans the enzyme is relatively  abundant in the gastrointestinal tract and is found to a lesser extent  in the lung.    Bioadhesive and penetration-enhancing  properties of chitosan     Chitosan has been proposed as a bioadhesive polymer for use in  oral mucosal drug delivery [11]. The bioadhesive property of chitosan  is mediated by ionic interaction between the positively charged chi- tosan amino groups in chitosan and the negatively charged sialic acid  residues in mucus [9, 25]. A wide variety of bioadhesives have been  tested  in  the  tissue  culture  model  and  the  effect  of  mucin  was  also  examined. Whilst many gels were found to adhere for 1-5 h, chitosan  was shown to remain longer than a day [26]. Histologically, excellent  tissue wetting properties were observed in the presence of chitosan.  The absence of mucin, the control of gel hydration and swelling and  wetting characteristics were identifed as key factors for prolonged  adhesion.      Many  studies  have  been  reported  on  the  penetration-enhancing  effect of chitosan across the buccal mucosa [2, 20, 27]. It has been  shown that the interaction between various types of bioadhesive poly- mers and epithelial cells also has a direct infuence on permeability of  the tissue [28]. In this way, the penetration of large and hydrophilic  molecules across an epithelial barrier may be enhanced. Similarly, the  enhancing effect of chitosan on buccal permeability can be explained  by the bioadhesive nature of chitosan, which increases the retention  of the drug at its application site. Furthermore, as chitosan has been  shown to be capable of disrupting lipid micelles in the intestine [29],  the  permeabilizing  effect  may  also  be  attributed  to  its  interference  with the lipid organization in the buccal epithelium, however, such a  mechanism has not been proven.      The bioadhesive and penetration-enhancing properties of chitosan  and its derivatives have been investigated in numerous in vivo and in  vitro models [30]. In vitro permeation studies are performed in diffusion  cells using excised tissues such as porcine and bovine [1, 31]. Buccal  cell cultures have also been used for in vitro permeation and bioadhe- sion studies [32-34]. A lectin-binding inhibition technique, involving  an  avidin-biotin  complex  and  a  colorimetric  detection  system  was  developed to investigate the binding of chitosan to buccal epithelial  cells, without having to alter their physicochemical properties by the  addition  of  marker  entities  [35].  From  the  wide  range  of  polymer  solutions screened, chitosan was found to give the greatest inhibition  of lectin binding to the surface of buccal cells, while methylcellulose,  gelatin, Carbopol 934P and polycarbophil also produced a substantial  reduction. Another technique has been described by Kockisch et al.  [36] to evaluate polymer adhesion to human buccal cells following  exposure  to  aqueous  polymer  dispersion,  both  in  vitro  and  in  vivo.  Adhering polymer was visualized by staining with 0.1% (w/v) of either  Alcian blue (60 min) or Eosin (10 min) solution, uncomplexed dye  being removed by 0.25 M sucrose washings. The extent of polymer  adhesion was quantifed by measuring the relative staining intensity  of control and polymer-treated cells by image analysis. Chitosan was  found to adhere to human buccal cells and following in vivo admin- istration as a mouthwash it was shown to stay on the human buccal  mucosa for at least 1 h.      Various derivatives such as trimethylated chitosan [37], mono-N- carboxymethyl chitosan [38], chitosan-EDTA conjugates [39], thiolated  chitosan [40] have been developed to improve its mucoadhesive and/ or permeation enhancing properties as well as to enhance its solubility.  It was shown that the mucoadhesive properties were also affected by  the charge of the polymer [41].     The  mucoadhesive  and  penetration  enhancement  properties  of  5-methyl-pyrrolidinone chitosan, two low-molecular-weight chitosans  and a partially reacetylated chitosan were studied ex vivo using por- cine buccal mucosa. Acyclovir, as the model drug, was added to the  polymer solutions at 5% (w/w) concentration. Methyl-pyrrolidinone  chitosan was shown to exert the best mucoadhesive and penetration  enhancement properties and the penetration of acyclovir was found to  decrease by partial depolymerization of chitosan and disappear after  partial reacetylation [22].      It has been shown that the mucoadhesion and penetration-enhancing  properties of N-trimethyl chitosans (TMCs) depend on the degree of  quaternization and molecular weight [42]. The mucoadhesive properties  were found to increase with increasing degree of quaternization [42].  Similarly, the effect of partially substituted N,O-[N,N-diethylaminome- thyl (diethyldimethylene ammonium)n]methyl chitosans, containing  different  percentages  of  pendant  quaternary  ammonium  groups,  on  the permeation of rhodamine 123 (Rh-123), (hydrophobic marker of  the transcellular absorption route), and of fuorescein sodium (NaFlu),  (polar marker of the paracellular route), was investigated across the  excised porcine cheek epithelium. These chitosan derivatives, having  varying degrees of substitution were shown to enhance the paracellular  drug penetration across the buccal epithelium which was remarkably  higher than that of trimethylated chitosan whereas the transcellular  transport was substantially accelerated only by the most substituted  derivative [43]. IV. APPLICATIONS IN DRUG DELIVERY     Due to its bioadhesive property, permeation-enhancing property  and biocompatibility, chitosan is an excellent candidate for delivering  therapeutic compounds especially when prolonged release is desired.  Chitosan  and  its  derivatives  in  various  forms  such  as  gels,  flms,  sponges, tablets, micro-/nanoparticles have been used for the delivery  of drugs into the oral cavity as well as across the oral mucosa. The ex  vivo and in vivo studies published in the last decade on applications  of chitosan are summarized in Table I. In the following sections, the  application of chitosan as a delivery system will be reviewed focusing  more on formulation technologies.  1. Applications in the treatment of oral mucositis     In general, the use of bioadhesive gels reduces the frequency of  application and the amount of drug administered and can also improve  patient compliance and acceptance. Hence many studies have been  reported  on  gel  formulations  of  chitosan  and  derivatives  for  drug  delivery.      Chitosan in gel form has been studied by several groups in the treat- ment of oral mucositis, which is a particularly painful and debilitating  consequence of cancer therapy and occurs as a result of damage to the  oral mucosa by radiation or chemotherapy. For the mucositis patient, the  occlusion and lubrication of the chitosan gel is expected to reduce the  discomfort of the infammatory and ulcerative conditions. Associated  with atrophy and ulceration of the oral mucosa is an increased risk of  infection, particularly when there is immunosuppression. Therefore,  chitosan is an excellent candidate for the treatment of oral mucositis,  Potential applications of chitosan in oral mucosal delivery S. Senel J. DRUG DEL. SCI. TECH., 20 (1) 23-32 2010 26 Table I - Applications of chitosan and its derivatives in oral mucosal drug delivery and treatment. Dosage form Drug Chitosan type Other  additives Activity Treatment Model Ref. Gel TGF-b Chitosan-H  (DD: 80%, MW:  1400 kDa, Dainishiseika Col- our and Chem. MGF, Japan) - Penetration  enhancer  Buccal drug  delivery  Wound healing Ex vivo (por- cine mucosa) 20 Gel Hydrocortisone Chitosan-H  (DD: 80%, MW:  1400kDa) - Penetration  enhancer  Buccal drug  delivery Antiinflamma- tory Ex vivo (por- cine mucosa) 26 Tablet Nicotine Protasan CL212 (DD: 73%,  MW: 272kDa) Carbopol  974P  Magnesium  hydroxide  Buccal drug  delivery Smoking ces- sation Human 30 Gel Nystatin Chitosan-H  (DD: 80%, MW:  1400kDa)  Protasan CL 213 (DD:  84%,  MW: 272kDa,  Pronova,Norway) - Antifungal  Buccal and  gingival drug  delivery  Oral mucositis Hamster Human 43 Film Ginsenoside  Rb1 Chitosan glycerol (Wako  Pure Chemical Industries,  Osaka, Japan) Sodium  alginate Buccal drug  delivery Oral  mucositis Hamster 44 Film patch AZMX (Astra- Zeneca) Chitosan (MW: 400 kDa) PVA,  PEO,  PVP sodium tauro- cholate Gingival drug  delivery Model study Dogs 47 Tablet contain- ing chitosan  microspheres Chlorhexidine diacetate Chitosan (DD: 75-85%,  Aldrich,USA) Mannitol  Sodium  alginate Saccharine Buccal  drug  delivery Antifungal Human 53 Blend film Ornidazole Carboxymethyl-chitosan  (MW: 199.6 kDa, substituent  degree of carboxymethyled: 0.93) PVA Buccal drug  delivery Antimicrobial Rat Rabbit 59 Gel Denbufylline Palmitoyl glycol chitosan  SGDC  Carbopol 974 Buccal drug  delivery Model study Rabbit 69 Disc Bromocriptine  mesylate/ pluronic F-127  solid dispersion Chitosan Carbopol  974P Buccal drug  delivery Pathologic  hyperprol- actinemia Human 73 Patch Miconazole Chitosan NaCMC,  PVA, HEC,  HPMC, PVP Buccal, gingival  drug delivery Antifungal Human 78 Film Taurine Chitosan-H  (DD: 80%, MW:  1400kDa) Collagenous  membrane Wound healing Periodontal  regeneration Beagle dogs 63 Gel Demineralized  bone matrix Protasan UP CL213  (DD: 84%, MW 252 kDa)  Collagenous  membrane Tissue regenera- tion Periodontal  regeneration Human 64 Scaffold Plasmid and  virus encoding  TGF-ß1 gene Chitosan (DD: 85%, Sigma,  USA) Collagen Tissue regenera- tion  Gene delivery Periodontal  regeneration BALB/c 65 Sponge Platelet-derived  growth factor- BB (PDGF-BB) - - Bone healing Periodontal  regeneration Rat 79 DD: degree of deacetylation; HEC (hydroxyethyl cellulose); HPMC (hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose); MW: molecular weight; NaCMC: sodium carboxyme- thyl cellulose (NaCMC);  polyethyleneoxide (PEO)  PVA (polyvinyl alcohol); PVP (polyvinyl pyrrolidone); SGDC: sodium glycodeoxycholate;TGF-b:  transforming growth factor offering not only delivery of therapeutic compounds but also exerting  antimicrobial activity as well as the ability to stimulate cell prolifera- tion and tissue organization.      In a previous study [20], transforming growth factor-b (TGF-b),  which  was  chosen  as  a  candidate  compound  that  might  protect  or  promote the healing of the mucosal lining by having a direct effect on  epithelial proliferation in patients with oral mucositis, was incorporated  into chitosan gel [20]. To exert an effect after topical application, it  Potential applications of chitosan in oral mucosal delivery S. Senel J. DRUG DEL. SCI. TECH., 20 (1) 23-32 2010 27 is essential that the compound reaches the proliferative (basal) com- partment of the epithelium. Our results showed a six- to seven-fold  enhancement  of  permeability  by  chitosan  for  TGF-b  to  which  the  oral mucosa was reported to be rather impermeable. Tissue section- ing  technique  enabled  the  compound  to  be  quantitated  in  different  strata at different time points, which provided information as to the  effectiveness of delivery of the bioactive peptide to the proliferating  cell compartments. The quantity of the drug in the superfcial layers  of the epithelium was found to increase in the presence of chitosan,  and also more TGF-b reached the deeper layer. The hydrophilicity of  the compound also seemed to have an effect, for there was relatively  greater penetration of TGF-b into the deeper tissue layers as compared  to our previous study using hydrocortisone, which is a water insoluble  compound [27].     In  another  study,  we  prepared  gel  and  flm  formulations  using  chitosans  at  different  molecular  weights  and  in  different  solvents  [44]. Nystatin, which is considered as a prophylactic agent for oral  mucositis was incorporated into the formulations. The in vitro release of  nystatin from the formulations was found to decrease with the increas- ing molecular weight of chitosan. The effect of the formulations was  investigated in vivo in hamsters with chemotherapy (5-fuorouracil)- induced mucositis. Mucositis scores in groups treated with nystatin  incorporated into gel and suspension formulations were signifcantly  lower (p < 0.05) than those treated with the chitosan gel alone. Survival  of animals in the treated groups was higher than that in the control  group.  The  retention  time  and  distribution  of  the  gels  in  the  oral  cavity were investigated in healthy volunteers. A faster distribution  of nystatin in the oral cavity was obtained using the nystatin suspen- sion compared to the chitosan gels, but the nystatin saliva level also  decreased rapidly. Drug concentration above the minimum inhibitory  concentration  (MIC)  value  for  Candida  albicans  (0.14  μg/mL)  was  maintained for longer periods of time at the application site (90 min)  in the oral cavity.      Similarly, Watanabe et al. [45] studied the effect of ginsenoside  Rb1 isolated from ginseng on 5-fuorouracil-induced oral mucositis  in hamsters. Ginsenoside Rb1 was incorporated into chitosan-sodium  alginate flm. The flms were attached to the oral mucosa, and then the  healing process was examined by measuring the area of mucositis,  myeloperoxidase  (MPO)  activity  and  microscopic  aspects.  G-Rb1- containing flms were shown to improve recovery which was found  to be dose-dependent whereas flms without ginsenoside Rb1 were  shown to have no effect in comparison to the control group.      In a study in which the functional (mucoadhesion, viscosity) and  bioactive (anti-infective, antioxidant and tissue repairing) properties of  various chitosans were assessed, and compared to those of hyaluronic  acid  to  fnd  the  best  candidate  for  the  treatment  of  oral  mucositis,  high molecular weight chitosan ascorbate was found to be the most  effective among the other chitosans studied [46].   2. Applications in dental medicine     In dentistry, various applications of chitosan have been proposed  in which the physical, mechanical, chemical properties of this mate- rial have been used. These studies were reviewed in a previous paper  published by the author [47]. Recently, there has been increased interest  in application of chitosan for its bioactive properties such as wound  healing, antimicrobial and tissue regeneration, in addition to the drug  delivery system in gel, flm, sponge, fber and particulate forms. In this  section, after reporting on recent studies on chitosan-based systems  for delivery in dental medicine, which are generally for local delivery,  application of chitosan in tissue regeneration will be reviewed.  2.1. Local drug delivery      Chitosan blends with hydrophilic polymers including polyviny- lalcohol (PVA), polyethyleneoxide (PEO) and polyvinylpyrrolidone  (PVP),  were  investigated  as  candidates  for  oral  gingival  delivery  systems  [48].  The  bioavailabilty  conferred  by  the  chitosan  blend  delivery systems, as  concluded from  dog  studies, was shown to be  comparable to that based on chitosan alone, especially for those blends  involving  high-molecular-weight  hydrophilic  polymers.  The  study  also indicated that chitosan blends were superior in other properties  compared to chitosan alone. These included improved comfort and  reduced irritation, ease of processing, improved flm quality, improved  fexibility, and enhanced dissolution.      Bupivacaine-loaded chitosan beads were prepared, and the in vitro  drug release was studied in different media [49]. Maximum release of  bupivacaine was obtained between 100 and 120 h, depending on the  presence of lysozyme in the release medium, the enzyme facilitating  the release process. A constant release rate of the drug, between 11  and 15 mg/h, was observed for 30 h. In order to prolong bupivacaine  release, the drug-loaded chitosan beads were coated with a poly (DL- lactide-co-glycolide) flm. The resulting device allowed the drug to  be released in a sustained form; a constant release rate between 28.5  and 29.5 mg/h was obtained for 3 days, and the maximum release of  bupivacaine took place at day 9. The developed system was suggested  for use in the treatment of dental pain in the buccal cavity.     Film dosage form was developed for sustained delivery of a syn- thetic favonoid derivative, iprifavone into the periodontal pocket [50].  For this purpose, monolayer composite systems made of iprifavone- loaded  poly(d,l-lactide-co-glycolide)  (PLGA)  micromatrices  in  a  chitosan flm form were obtained by emulsifcation/casting/evaporation  technique. Multilayer flms, made of three layers of polymers (chitosan/ PLGA/chitosan), were also prepared and compared to monolayer flms  for their “in vitro” characteristics. Signifcant differences in swelling,  degradation and drug release were observed depending on flm structure  and composition. The composite micromatricial flms were shown to  be a suitable dosage form to prolong iprifavone release for 20 days.      Topical delivery is the most widely accepted approach to prolong  drug concentrations of an antimicrobial agent in the oral cavity. As  most antifungals do not possess the inherent ability to bind to the oral  mucosa, this is best achieved through improved formulations. Besides  bioadhesive properties, chitosan has been shown to inhibit the adhesion  of Candida albicans to human buccal cells and exert antifungal activity  [51]. The antifungal agent, chlorhexidine gluconate (Chx), which has  also been shown to reduce C. albicans adhesion to oral mucosal cells,  was incorporated into chitosan gels (at 0.1 or 0.2% concentration) or  flm, and in vitro drug release and the antifungal activity of the gels and  flms in the presence and absence of Chx was studied [52]. Prolonged  release was observed with flm formulations. The highest antifungal  activity was obtained with 2% chitosan gel containing 0.1% Chx.      The  antimicrobial  activity  of  similar  chitosan  formulations  in  gel and flm forms was investigated against a periodontal pathogen,  Porphyromonas gingivalis [53]. The viscosity, bioadhesive properties  and antimicrobial activity of chitosans at different molecular weights  and deacetylation degrees were assessed in the absence or presence  of Chx which was incorporated into the formulations at 0.1 and 0.2%  concentrations. The fow property of the gels was found to be suit- able for topical application on the oral mucosa and to syringe into the  periodontal  pocket. The  bioadhesive  properties  of  the  formulations  were  shown  ex  vivo  using  freshly  excised  porcine  buccal  mucosa.  Bioadhesion  was  found  to  be  not  affected  by  the  incorporation  of  Chx. Chitosan is shown to have an antimicrobial activity against P.  gingivalis, and this was found to be higher with high-molecular-weight  chitosan.  The  combination  of  chitosan  with  Chx  showed  a  higher  activity when compared to that of Chx alone, which would provide  Chx application at lower concentrations thus avoiding its undesired  side effects. Chitosan-based flms and gels are suggested as promising  delivery systems for local therapy of periodontal diseases with their  bioadhesive property and antimicrobial activity.      Buccal  tablets  based  on  Chx-containing  chitosan  microspheres  were  developed  against  buccal  infections  [54].  The  antimicrobial  Potential applications of chitosan in oral mucosal delivery S. Senel J. DRUG DEL. SCI. TECH., 20 (1) 23-32 2010 28 activity  of  the  microparticles  was  investigated,  and  the  incorpora- tion of Chx into chitosan microparticles was shown to improve the  antimicrobial  activity,  particularly  the  highest  against  C.  albicans.  Drug-free chitosan microparticles were shown to exert antimicrobial  activity as well due to the polymer itself. Buccal tablets were prepared  by direct compression of the microparticles with mannitol alone or  with  sodium  alginate.  Following  in  vivo  administration,  the  tablets  were  shown  to  maintain  prolonged  release  of  the  drug  in  the  oral  cavity. In the control group, the mouth was rinsed with a commercial  mouthwash (Dentosan) containing 0.2% (w/v) Chx. For the chitosan  treated group, the drug was detected even after 3 h, whereas in the  control group,  the  salivary  drug  concentrations  were  very  low,  and  no drug was detected after 2 h.      Mucoadhesive microspheres for the controlled release of triclosan  in oral care formulations, specifcally dental pastes were prepared us- ing  chitosan,  Gantrez  MS-955,  Carbopol  974P,  polycarbophil  [55].  Triclosan was rapidly released into a sodium lauryl sulfate-containing  buffer  from  all  except  for  the  chitosan  microspheres.  The  loading  effciency was found to be highest with the chitosan microspheres.  For microspheres that were manufactured from Gantrez, Carbopol or  polycarbophil, the release was found to be zero-order kinetics whereas  with  chitosan,  the  release  profle  was  shown  to  ft  the  Baker  and  Lonsdale model. Chitosan microspheres were suggested as promising  candidates for the sustained release of triclosan in the oral cavity.     The  antibacterial  and  plaque-reducing  action  of  water-soluble  chitosan has been shown when used as a mouth rinse reagent [56]. A  chitosan-containing chewing gum formulation was developed, which  could effectively suppress the growth of oral bacteria in saliva [57,  58]. Fifty healthy subjects, ranging in age from 19 to 32 years, were  recruited  and  allowed  chew  the  gum  for  5  min  and  then  rested  for  5 min. Each subject chewed a total of eight pieces of gum, which was  either supplemented with or without chitosan, for a total of 80 min.  The  amount  of  oral  bacteria  was  found  to  signifcantly  decrease  in  the chitosan group. In particular, the number of mutans streptococci  was  maintained  at  about  a  20%  level  in  comparison  to  that  before  gum chewing, even at 1 h after gum chewing. It was suggested that  a supplementation of chitosan to gum would be an effective method  for controlling the number of cariogenic bacteria in situations where  it is diffcult to brush one’s teeth, such as when an individual is away  from home all day or participating in outdoor training.      Chitosan has been used for delivery into oral cavity of the essential  oils, which exert antibacterial/antifungal activity. Encapsulation with  chitosan  was  suggested  to  provide  protection  of  the  essential  oils,  avoiding oxidation reactions, and also a sustained delivery [59].     The flms composed of poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) and carboxyme- thyl-chitosan (CMCS) were prepared as local drug delivery system  by blending/casting method, and loaded with ornidazole (OD), which  is  an  effective  compound  in  the  treatment  of  susceptible  protozoal  infections and prophylaxis of anaerobic bacterial infections [60]. The  blend flms were shown to exert pH-responsive swelling behavior, and  moderate drug release action, and also exhibit a little antimicrobial  activity  against  Escherichia  coli  and  Streptococcus  aureus  strains.  Those  characteristics  of  CMCS/PVA  blend  flms  were  reported  to  be governed by the weight ratio of CMCS and PVA. Increasing the  content  of  PVA  in  blend  flm  was  shown  to  decrease  swelling  and  decelerate the drug release whereas increasing the content of CMCS  was shown to enhance the antimicrobial activity. The biocompatibility  and bioactivity of the blend flm was also assessed using rabbit blood  and Wistar rats. No hemolysis, no toxicity to rat periodontia and no  cytotoxicity to the rat muscle were observed. After subcutaneously  implanting the blend drug flms in Wistar rats, the systems maintained  good retention at the application site and a high drug concentration  over a long period of time (5 days) which was longer than the period  of in vitro drug released (160 min). Results of the in vitro and in vivo  studies  showed  that  CMCS/PVA  blend  drug  flm  was  an  excellent  candidate  for  local  drug  delivery  system.  It  was  suggested  that  the  PVA/CMCS drug flm would be absorbed over a long period of time  and that the wound would eventually be cicatrized by new forming  tissues.  2.2. Periodontal regeneration     Periodontal  disease,  which  is  characterized  by  infammation  of  periodontal tissues, eventually leads to degeneration of the periodon- tium. If periodontal disease is left untreated, tooth loss can occur. The  main aim of periodontal therapy is to repair the damaged periodontal  supporting tissues as a result of the infammatory disease process [61].  Recent  studies  have  suggested  that  chitosan  and  its  derivatives  are  promising candidates as a supporting material for tissue engineering  applications owing to their porous structure, gel-forming properties,  ease of chemical modifcation, high affnity to in vivo macromolecules  [62].      The  effect  of  chitosan  on  osteoblast  and  fbroblast  cell  attach- ment  was  studied  in  vitro  [63].  Mouse  MC3T3-E1  osteoblasts  and  3T3 fbroblasts were grown in the presence of serum on acid soluble  and water soluble chitosans. Cell attachment and immunofuorescent  analyses  were  performed  at  various  time  points  to  analyze  initial  phenotypic profles. Our results suggested that chitosan supports the  initial  attachment  and  spreading  of  osteoblasts  preferentially  over  fbroblasts, and that manipulation of the biopolymer can alter the level  of attachment and spreading.      An amino acid, taurine, which is considered to be benefcial for  regulating the infammation process, was incorporated into the chi- tosan flm and the synergistic effects of taurine and chitosan in the  experimental defects at the vestibular bone of maxillary canine teeth  in dogs were investigated [64]. Cellular activity was observed both in  the mitochondria of fbroblasts and macrophages. These ultrastructural  alterations were thought to be the sign of the disturbed balance between  the generated oxidants and antioxidant defense mechanisms. Taurine  appeared  to  enhance  the  acceleration  effect  of  chitosan  on  wound  healing at early periods. This effect may be considered benefcial in  tissue repair in destructive diseases like periodontitis.     The effect of chitosan on periodontal regeneration was investigated  in twenty chronic periodontitis patients [65]. Following initial therapy,  the patients were treated either with chitosan gel (1% w/v); chitosan gel  + demineralized bone matrix or chitosan gel+collagenous membrane.  A  fap  was  applied  for  control  purposes.  Clinical  and  radiographic  measurements were recorded at baseline, day 90 and day 180 after  surgery. Signifcant bone healing was observed when compared with  baseline  indicating  that  chitosan  gel  alone  or  its  combination  with  demineralized bone matrix/collagenous membrane is promising for  periodontal regeneration.     The effects of many growth factors on periodontal tissue cells have  been assessed for their involvement in periodontal tissue engineering  using chitosan-based delivery systems [61]. Porous chitosan/collagen  scaffolds were prepared through a freeze-drying process, and loaded  with  plasmid  and  adenoviral  vector  encoding  human  transforming  growth factor-b1 (TGF-b1) [66], and were assessed in vitro by analy- sis of microscopic structure, porosity, and cytocompatibility. Human  periodontal ligament cells (HPLCs) were seeded in this scaffold, and  gene transfection was traced by green fuorescent protein (GFP). The  expression of type I and type III collagen was detected with RTPCR,  and then these scaffolds were implanted subcutaneously into athymic  mice. Results indicated that the pore diameter of the gene-combined  scaffolds was smaller than that of pure chitosan/collagen scaffold. After  implanted in vivo, EGFP-transfected HPLCs not only proliferated but  also recruited surrounding tissue to grow in the scaffold, demonstrating  the potential of chitosan/collagen scaffold combined Ad-TGF-b1 as a  good substrate candidate in periodontal tissue engineering.      Strong and macroporous scaffolds were developed via absorbable  fbers, biopolymer chitosan, and mannitol porogen [67]. MC3T3-E1  Potential applications of chitosan in oral mucosal delivery S. Senel J. DRUG DEL. SCI. TECH., 20 (1) 23-32 2010 29 osteoblast-like cells were cultured on the specimens and inside the  calcium phosphate cement (CPC) composite paste carrier. The scaffold  strength was found to be more than doubled via reinforcement. The  cement injectability was increased from about 60% to nearly 100%.  Cell attachment and proliferation on the new composite matched those  of biocompatible controls. Cells were able to infltrate into the macro- pores and anchor to the bone mineral-like nano-apatite crystals. For  growth factor delivery, CPC powder:liquid ratio and chitosan content  was reported to provide the means to tailor the rate of protein release  from CPC carrier.     N-[1-hydroxy-3-(trimethylammonium)propyl]chitosan  chloride  (HTCC) was prepared, and the antibacterial activity of chitosan and  HTCC against oral pathogens, their proliferation activity and effects  on the ultrastructure of human periodontal ligament cells (HPDLCs)  were investigated [68]. Their results indicated that four oral strains  were  susceptible  to  chitosan  and  HTCC  with  minimum  inhibitory  concentrations (MICs) ranging from 0.25 to 2.5 mg/mL. Chitosan at  2000, 1000, 100, and 50 μg/mL concentrations was shown to stimulate  the proliferation of human periodontal ligament cells (HPDLCs). On  the contrary, HTCC inhibited the proliferation at the same concentra- tions but accelerated the proliferation of HPDLCs at relatively low  concentrations (10, 3, 1.5, 1, and 0.3 l g/mL). 3. Applications for systemic delivery     There are numerous applications of chitosan in oral mucosal de- livery for systemic delivery as well [69]. Various dosage forms have  been developed for the delivery of drugs across oral mucosa to treat  various diseases.      A non-covalently cross-linked palmitoyl glycol chitosan (GCP)  hydrogel was assessed as an erodible controlled-release system for the  buccal delivery of hydrophilic macromolecules [70]. Samples of GCP  with different degrees of hydrophobicity were synthesized and porous  hydrogels were prepared by freeze-drying an aqueous dispersion of the  polymer in the presence or absence of either a model macromolecule  fuorescein isothiocyanatedextran (FITC-dextran, MW 4400) and/or  amphiphilic derivatives Gelucire 50/13 or vitamin E d-a-tocopherol  polyethylene glycol succinate. The hydration and erosion of the gels  were governed by the hydrophobicity of the gel and the presence of  the amphiphilic additives. GCP gels could be loaded with up to 27.5%  (w/w)  of  FITC-dextran  by  freeze-drying  a  dispersion  of  GCP  in  a  solution  of  FITC-dextran. The  gels  were  bioadhesive  but  less  than  that of hydroxypropylmethylcellulose, Carbopol 974NF. Furthermore,  these hydrogels were incorporated with a model hydrophobic drug,  denbufylline and sodium glycodeoxycholate (GDC) was also added  as a penetration enhancer [71]. The buccal absorption of denbufylline  was investigated in the rabbit model. Carbopol 974NF (CP), denbufyl- line and GDC tablets were used as control. Denbufylline was found  to reduce the porosity, erosion and hydration of the gels while GDC  increased the hydration and erosion. All gels were mucoadhesive but  less so than the control CP tablets. Denbufylline was detected in 0.5  h after dosing with the GCP formulation, and delivery was sustained  for at least 5 h after dosing whereas with the CP tablets, drug delivery  was not sustained, and drug was detected in 1 h after dosing.      5-methylpyrrolidinone  chitosan  (MPC)  flms  were  prepared  as  carriers  for  the  buccal  delivery  of  protein  drugs  [72].  Myoglobin  (MHb) was chosen as the model protein. The results obtained show that  the modulation of MHb release was achieved only through chitosan  cross-linking; the best results in release rate control were obtained by  cross-linking performed at pH 6.5. Good bioadhesion properties were  maintained even with high cross-linking degrees; the swelling index of  MHb-loaded flms at different cross-linking degrees assessed at pH 7.4  and pH 6.4 were comparable to those of placebo flms. It was reported  that protein release could be controlled without affecting bioadhesion  by setting suitable tripolyphosphate cross-linking conditions for MPC  flms.     Films based on chitosan hydrochloride (HCS) and polyacrylic acid  sodium salt (PAA) were prepared for the delivery of acyclovir [73].  A commercial cream containing acyclovir and an aqueous acyclovir  suspension  were  used  as  references.  The  addition  of  PAA  to  HCS  produced a decrease in flm hydration. The addition of PAA to HCS  was found to decrease the drug release. All chitosan-based flms were  shown to enhance the permeation of acyclovir across porcine cheek  epithelium  when  compared  to  the  suspension  and  the  commercial  cream. The penetration enhancement properties were affected by the  mixing ratio of the two polymers.     The  clinical  effectiveness  of  a  chitosan-based  bioadhesive  unidirectional  buccal  bromocriptine  mysylate/pluronic  F127discs  was  investigated  in  hyperprolactinemic  patients  [74]. A  total  of  42  patients were randomly divided into two groups. Group A comprised  21  patients  who  used  unidirectional  buccoadhesive  bromocriptine  methylate discs once daily for 1 month. Group B included 21 patients  who used vaginoadhesive bromocriptine methylate discs once daily  for  1  month.  Serum  prolactin  (PRL)  levels  were  measured  before  and after therapy in all cases. A signifcant reduction in serum PRL  levels was observed after 1 month of therapy in both groups showing  no signifcant difference between the groups. Buccal adhesive discs  were reported to have advantages over the vaginal disc such as being  gender nonspecifc, avoiding manipulating the vagina, which could be  inconvenient to some patients, being not dependent on cyclic estrogen  levels, and may easily be used during menstruation.      A new highly porous, fexible device was developed for buccal  peptide administration by a very simple and mild casting/freeze-drying  procedure, which consisted of a mucoadhesive chitosan layer containing  insulin and an impermeable protective layer made of ethylcellulose [75].  This structure was expected to provide unidirectional drug release to  the mucosa and avoid loss of drug due to washout with saliva. Insulin  release was reported to be modulated by varying certain formulation  variables (chitosan salt type and molecular weight, chitosan, solution  pH, insulin dose). It was suggested that electrostatic interaction could  occur between chitosan amino groups and the insulin carboxylic groups.  The affnity of chitosan sponges to mucin surfaces was related to the  swelling and solubility properties of the different salts of chitosan.     Antisense oligonucleotide-loaded chitosan nanoparticles were pre- pared and the release of oligonucleotide from chitosan-tripolyphosphate  (TPP)/oligonucleotide nanoparticles investigated [76]. The interaction  between chitosan and oligonucleotide was confrmed by using capil- lary zone electrophoresis (CZE). The release of oligonucleotides from  nanoparticles was found to be dependent on loading methods and pH  conditions.  Chitosan/oligomer-TPP  nanoparticles  were  reported  to  show the lowest release percent of oligonucleotides with 41.3% at pH  7.0 among the loading methods. The released oligonucleotides from  chitosan/ oligonucleotide nanoparticles were suffciently stable for 12  h in the 20% saliva solution. The sustained release of oligonucleotide  from chitosan nanoparticles was suggested to be suitable for the local  therapeutic application in periodontal diseases.      Buccal bioadhesive tablet formulations of nicotine hydrogen tar- tarate (NHT) for nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) were developed  using chitosan and carbomer at different ratios [31]. The release of NHT  from the tablets increased with the increasing amount of chitosan while  the bioadhesion decreased. In vivo studies were performed on healthy  non-smoker  volunteers  in  comparison  to  a  commercially  available  transdermal patch. When compared to the transdermal patch, similar  plasma nicotine levels were obtained with the developed buccal tablet  but in a signifcantly shorter time (Cmax for buccal tablet: 3 h, and for  Cmax for transdermal patch: 11.5 h). The developed buccal formula- tion was very promising for relieving acute craving and is suggested  for use in combination with the transdermal patch for NRT.      A matrix for buccal drug delivery composed of a different chitosan  salts and poloxamer 407 was prepared by lyophilization of the blend  and then compression into discs [77]. An experimental design (32)  Potential applications of chitosan in oral mucosal delivery S. Senel J. DRUG DEL. SCI. TECH., 20 (1) 23-32 2010 30 was  used  to  study  the  infuence  of  the  type  of  chitosan  salt  and  of  the relative amount of poloxamer on drug release capacity, swelling,  erosion,  and  mucoadhesiveness  of  matrices.  It  was  shown  that  the  matrix properties depended signifcantly on both the relative amount  of poloxamer and chitosan salt type. The rank orders of chitosan salts  for the four processes assessed were reported as follows: drug release:  chitosan acetate > chitosan citrate > chitosan lactate; swelling: chitosan  lactate > chitosan acetate = chitosan citrate; erosion: chitosan citrate  > chitosan lactate > chitosan acetate; mucoadhesion: chitosan lactate  > chitosan acetate = chitosan citrate. Mucoadhesion was particularly  promoted when poloxamer 407 was present at about 30% (w/w). The  matrix composed of chitosan lactate and poloxamer 407 was reported  to show the best characteristics for buccal administration.  *     Chitosan is clearly an attractive bioadhesive polymer which has  great potential for improving the delivery of drugs into the oral cavity  as well as across the oral mucosa especially due to its biodegradabil- ity, biocompatibility and low toxicity. With its chemical versatility, it  provides an excellent opportunity to tailor delivery systems with the  desired properties. Furthermore, chitosan itself has bioactive proper- ties, for this reason it offers benefts in treatment as well. On the other  hand, standardization of chitosan and its derivatives remains the major  issue to be solved to optimize the possibility of its commercialization.  Nevertheless,  this  is  not  a  diffcult  obstacle  to  overcome,  and  with  the  promising  results  obtained  in  human  studies,  chitosan  appears  to have great potential in applications for oral mucosal delivery and  treatment.  REFERENCES   1.  Pather S.I., Rathbone M.J., Senel S. - Current status and the  future  of  buccal  drug  delivery  systems.  -  Expert  Opin.  Drug  Deliv., 5, 531-542, 2008.   2.  Rossi S., Sandri G., Caramella C. - Buccal drug delivery: a chal- lenge already won? - Drug Discovery Today, 2, 59-65, 2005.   3.  Sudhakar Y., Kuotsu K., Bandyopadhyay A.K. - Buccal bioad- hesive drug delivery, a promising option for orally less efficient  drugs. - J. Control. Rel., 114, 15-40, 2006.   4.  Pather S.I., Rathbone M.J., Senel S. - Oral transmucosal drug  delivery. - In: Modified Release Drug Delivery Technology, M.J.  Rathbone, J. Hadgraft, M.S. Roberts, M.E. Lane Eds., Informa  Healthcare, New York, 2008, pp. 54-73.   5.  Squier C.A., Senel S., Wertz P. - Oral (buccal) mucosal drug  delivery, promises and probabilities. - STP Pharma Prat., 10,  47-54, 2000.   6.  Senel S., Kremer M., Nagy K., Squier C. - Delivery of bioac- tive peptides and proteins across oral (buccal) mucosa. - Curr.  Pharm. Biotechnol., 2, 175-186, 2001.   7.  Collins L.M., Dawes C. - The surface area of the adult human  mouth and thickness of the salivary film covering the teeth and  oral mucosa. - J. Dent. Res., 66, 1300-1302, 1987.   8.  Hoogstraate A.J., Senel S., Cullander C., Verhoef J.C., Jung- inger H.E., Bodde H.E. - Effects of bile salts on transport rates  and routes of FITC-labelled compounds across porsine buccal  epithelium in vitro. - J. Control. Rel., 40, 211-221, 1996.   9.  Lee J.W., Park J.H., Robinson J.R. - Bioadhesive-based dos- age forms: the next generation. - J. Pharm. Sci., 89, 850-866,  2000.   10.  Longer M., Robinson J. - Fundamental aspects of bioadhesion.  - Pharm. Int., 7, 114-117, 1986.   11.  Andrews G.P., Laverty T.P., Jones D.S. - Mucoadhesive polymeric  platforms for controlled drug delivery. - Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm.,  71, 505-518, 2009.   12.  Ishida M., Machida Y., Nambu N., Nagai T. - New mucosal dos- age form of insulin. - Chem. Pharm. Bull. (Tokyo), 29, 810-816,  1981.   13.  www.teijin-pharma.co.jp/english/index.html.  -  Consulted  July  29, 2009.   14.  Senel  S.,  Hincal  A.A.  -  Drug  permeation  enhancement  via  buccal route: possibilities and limitations. - J. Control. Rel., 72,  133-144, 2001.   15.  Chattaraj S.C., Walker R.B. - Penetration enhancer classifica- tion.  -  In:  Percutaneous  Penetration  Enhancers,  E.W.  Smith,  H.I. Maibach Eds., CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1995, pp. 5-20.   16.  Nicolazzo  J.A.,  Reed  B.L.,  Finnin  B.C.  -  Buccal  penetration  enhancers,  how  do  they  really  work?  -  J.  Control.  Rel.,  105,  1-15, 2005.   17.  Harmik S., Alka A., Farhan J.A., Roop K.K. - Critical evaluation  of permeation enhancers for oral mucosal drug delivery. - Drug  Dev. Ind. Pharm., Aug. 7, 2009.   18.  Senel S., McClure S.J. - Potential applications of chitosan in  veterinary  medicine.  -  Adv.  Drug  Deliv.  Rev.,  56,  1467-1480,  2004.   19.  Illum L., Farraj N.F., Davis S.S. - Chitosan as a novel nasal de- livery system for peptide drugs. - Pharm. Res., 11, 1186-1189,  1994.   20.  Senel S., Kremer M.J., Kas S., Wertz P.W., Hincal A.A., Squier  C.A.  -  Enhancing  effect  of  chitosan  on  peptide  drug  delivery  across buccal mucosa. - Biomaterials, 21, 2067-2071, 2000.   21.  Thanou  M.,  Verhoef  J.C.,  Junginger  H.E.  -  Chitosan  and  its  derivatives as intestinal absorption enhancers. - Adv. Drug Deliv.  Rev., 50, Suppl. 1, S91-101, 2001.   22.  Sandri G., Rossi S., Ferrari F., Bonferoni M.C., Muzzarelli C.,  Caramella C. - Assessment of chitosan derivatives as buccal  and vaginal penetration enhancers. - Eur. J. Pharm. Sci., 21,  351-359, 2004.   23.  Onishi H., Machida Y. - Biodegradation and distribution of water- soluble chitosan in mice. - Biomaterials, 20, 175-182, 1999.   24.  Boot  R.,  Bloommaart  E.,  Swart  E., Vlugt  K.,  Bijl  N.,  Moe  C.,  Place A., Aerts J. - Identification of a novel acidic mammalian  chitinase distinct from chitotriosidase. - J. Biological Chemistry,  276, 6770-6776, 2001.   25.  Peppas N.A., Huang Y. - Nanoscale technology of mucoadhesive  interactions. - Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., 56, 1675-1687, 2004.   26.  Needleman I.G., Smales F.C. - In vitro assessment of bioadhe- sion  for  periodontal  and  buccal  drug  delivery.  -  Biomaterials,  16, 617-624, 1995.   27.  Senel S., Kremer M.J., Kas H.S., Wertz P.W., Hincal A.A., Squier  A.C. - Effect of chitosan in enhancing drug delivery across buccal  mucosa. - In: Advances in Chitin Science, Vol. IV, M.G. Peter,  A. Domard, R.A.A. Muzzarelli Eds., Universitat Potsdam, 2000,  pp. 254-258.   28.  Luessen  H.L.,  de  Leeuw  B.J.,  Langemeyer  M.W.,  de  Boer  A.B., Verhoef J.C., Junginger H.E. - Mucoadhesive polymers  in  peroral  peptide  drug  delivery.  VI.  Carbomer  and  chitosan  improve the intestinal absorption of the peptide drug buserelin  in vivo. - Pharm. Res., 13, 1668-1672, 1996.   29.  Furda I. - Reduction of absorbtion of dietary lipids and cholesterol  by chitosan and its derivatives and special formulations. - In:  Chitosan  Per  os:  From  Dietary  Supplement  to  Drug  Carrier,  R.A. Muzzarelli Ed., Atec, Grottommare, 2000, pp. 41-63.   30.  Smart  J.D.  - The  basics  and  underlying  mechanisms  of  mu- coadhesion. - Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., 57, 1556-1568, 2005.   31.  Ikinci  G.,  Senel  S., Tokgozoglu  L., Wilson  C.G.,  Sumnu  M.  -  Development  and  in  vitro/in  vivo  evaluations  of  bioadhesive  buccal tablets for nicotine replacement therapy. - Pharmazie,  61, 203-207, 2006.   32.  Nielsen H.M., Rassing M.R. - TR146 cells grown on filters as  a model of human buccal epithelium. IV. Permeability of water,  mannitol,  testosterone  and  beta-adrenoceptor  antagonists.  Comparison to human, monkey and porcine buccal mucosa. -  Int. J. Pharm., 194, 155-167, 2000.   33.  Portero A., Remunan-Lopez C., Nielsen H.M. - The potential of  chitosan in enhancing peptide and protein absorption across  the TR146 cell culture model, an in vitro model of the buccal  epithelium. - Pharm. Res., 19, 169-74, 2002.   34.  www.mattek.com/pages/products/epioral.   35.  Patel  D.,  Smith  A.W.,  Grist  N.,  Barnett  P.,  Smart  J.D.  -  An  in  vitro mucosal model predictive of bioadhesive agents in the oral  Potential applications of chitosan in oral mucosal delivery S. Senel J. DRUG DEL. SCI. TECH., 20 (1) 23-32 2010 31 cavity. - J. Control. Rel., 61, 175-183, 1999.   36.  Kockisch S., Rees G.D., Young A.S., Tsibouklis J., Smart J.D.  -  A  direct-staining  method  to  evaluate  the  mucoadhesion  of  polymers from aqueous dispersion. - J. Control. Rel., 77, 1-6,  2001.   37.  Thanou M., Florea B.I., Langemeyer M.W., Verhoef J.C., Jung- inger H.E. - N-trimethylated chitosan chloride (TMC) improves  the intestinal permeation of the peptide drug buserelin in vitro  (Caco-2  cells)  and  in  vivo  (rats).  -  Pharm.  Res.,  17,  27-31,  2000.   38.  Thanou  M.,  Nihot  M.T.,  Jansen  M.,  Verhoef  J.C.,  Junginger  H.E. - Mono-N-carboxymethyl chitosan (MCC), a polyampholytic  chitosan derivative, enhances the intestinal absorption of low  molecular weight heparin across intestinal epithelia in vitro and  in vivo. - J. Pharm. Sci., 90, 38-46, 2001.   39.  Bernkop-Schnurch A., Krajicek M.E. - Mucoadhesive polymers  as platforms for peroral peptide delivery and absorption: syn- thesis and evaluation of different chitosan-EDTA conjugates. - J.  Control. Rel., 50, 215-223, 1998.   40.  Bernkop-Schnurch A., Hornof M., Guggi D. - Thiolated chitosans.  - Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm., 57, 9-17, 2004.   41.  Bernkop-Schnurch A., Freudl J. - Comparative in vitro study of  different chitosan-complexing agent conjugates. - Pharmazie,  54, 369-71, 1999.   42.  Sandri  G.,  Rossi  S.,  Bonferoni  M.C.,  Ferrari  F.,  Zambito Y.,  Di  Colo  G.,  Caramella  C.  -  Buccal  penetration  enhancement  properties of N-trimethyl chitosan: Influence of quaternization  degree on absorption of a high molecular weight molecule. - Int.  J. Pharm., 297, 146-155, 2005.   43.  Zambito Y., Uccello-Barretta G., Zaino C., Balzano F., Di Colo  G.  -  Novel  transmucosal  absorption  enhancers  obtained  by  aminoalkylation of chitosan. - Eur. J. Pharm. Sci., 29, 460-469,  2006.   44.  Aksungur P., Sungur A., Unal S., Iskit A.B., Squier C.A., Senel  S. - Chitosan delivery systems for the treatment of oral mucosi- tis: in vitro and in vivo studies. - J. Control. Rel., 98, 269-279,  2004.   45.  Watanabe S., Suemaru K., Yamaguchi T., Hidaka N., Sakanaka  M., Araki H. - Effect of oral mucosal adhesive films containing  ginsenoside  Rb1  on  5-fluorouracil-induced  oral  mucositis  in  hamsters. - Eur. J. Pharmacol., 616, 281-286, 2009.   46.  Puccio  A.,  Rossi  S.,  Ferrari  F.,  Bonferoni  M.C.,  Sandri  G.,  Dacarro  C.,  Grisoli  P.,  Caramella  C.  -  Chitosan  as  bioactive  polymer for the treatment of mucositis in cancer patients. - In:  9 th   International  Conference  of  the  European  Chitin  Society,  Venice, Italy, 2009, pp. 48-49.   47.  Senel  S.,  Kas  H.S.,  Squier  A.C.  -  Application  of  chitosan  in  dental drug delivery and therapy. - In: Chitosan Per os: From  Dietary Supplement to Drug Carrier, R.A. Muzzarelli Ed., Atec,  Grottommare, 2000, pp. 241-256.   48.  Khoo C.G., Frantzich S., Rosinski A., Sjostrom M., Hoogstraate  J.  -  Oral  gingival  delivery  systems  from  chitosan  blends  with  hydrophilic  polymers.  -  Eur.  J.  Pharm.  Biopharm.,  55,  47-56,  2003.   49.  Bernardo  M.V.,  Blanco  M.D.,  Sastre  R.L.,  Teijon  C.,  Teijon  J.M.  -  Sustained  release  of  bupivacaine  from  devices  based  on chitosan. - Farmaco, 58, 1187-1191, 2003.   50.  Perugini P., Genta I., Conti B., Modena T., Pavanetto F. - Peri- odontal delivery of ipriflavone: new chitosan/PLGA film delivery  system for a lipophilic drug. - Int. J. Pharm., 252, 1-9, 2003.   51.  Knapczyk J., Macura A.B., Pawlik B. - Simple tests demonstrat- ing the antimycotic effect of chitosan. - Int. J. Pharm., 80, 33-38,  1992.   52.  Senel S., Ikinci G., Kas S., Yousefi-Rad A., Sargon M.F., Hincal  A.A. - Chitosan films and hydrogels of chlorhexidine gluconate  for oral mucosal delivery. - Int. J. Pharm., 193, 197-203, 2000.   53.  Ikinci G., Senel S., Akincibay H., Kas S., Ercis S., Wilson C.G.,  Hincal A.A. - Effect of chitosan on a periodontal pathogen Por- phyromonas gingivalis. - Int. J. Pharm., 235, 121-127, 2002.   54.  Giunchedi P., Juliano C., Gavini E., Cossu M., Sorrenti M. - For- mulation and in vivo evaluation of chlorhexidine buccal tablets  prepared  using  drug-loaded  chitosan  microspheres.  -  Eur.  J.  Pharm. Biopharm., 53, 233-239, 2002.   55.  Kockisch S., Rees G.D., Tsibouklis J., Smart J.D. - Mucoadhesive,  triclosan-loaded polymer microspheres for application to the oral  cavity: preparation and controlled release characteristics. - Eur.  J. Pharm. Biopharm., 59, 207-216, 2005.   56.  Bae K., Jun S., Lee S., Paik D., Kim J. - Effect of water-soluble  reduced chitosan on Streptococcus mutans, plaque regrowth  and biofilm vitality. - Clin. Oral Invest., 10, 102-107, 2006.   57.  Hayashi Y., Ohara N., Ganno T., Ishizaki H., Yanagiguchi K. -  Chitosan-containing  gum  chewing  accelerates  antibacterial  effect  with  an  increase  in  salivary  secretion.  -  J.  Dent.,  35,  871-874, 2007.   58.  Hayashi  Y.,  Ohara  N.,  Ganno  T.,  Yamaguchi  K.,  Ishizaki  T.,  Nakamura T., Sato M. - Chewing chitosan-containing gum ef- fectively inhibits the growth of cariogenic bacteria. - Arch. Oral  Biol., 52, 290-294, 2007.   59.  Pedro A.S., Cabral-Albuquerque E., Ferreira D., Sarmento B.  - Chitosan: an option for development of essential oil delivery  systems  for  oral  cavity  care?  -  Carbohydrate  Polymers,  76,  501-508, 2009.   60.  Wang L., Chen X., Zhong D., Xu Q. - Study on poly(vinyl alco- hol)/carboxymethyl-chitsaon blend film as local drug delivery  system. - J. Material Sci., 18, 1125-1133, 2007.   61.  Moioli E.K., Clark P.A., Xin X., Lal S., Mao J.J. - Matrices and  scaffolds for drug delivery in dental, oral and craniofacial tissue  engineering. - Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., 59, 308-324, 2007.   62.  Kim I.Y., Seo S.J., Moon H.S., Yoo M.K., Park I.Y., Kim B.C.,  Cho C.S. - Chitosan and its derivatives for tissue engineering  applications. - Biotechnol. Adv., 26, 1-21, 2008.   63.  Fakhry A., Schneider G.B., Zaharias R., Senel S. - Chitosan  supports  the  initial  attachment  and  spreading  of  osteoblasts  preferentially  over  fibroblasts.  -  Biomaterials,  25,  2075-2079,  2004.   64.  Ozmeric N., Ozcan G., Haytac C.M., Alaaddinoglu E.E., Sargon  M.F., Senel S. - Chitosan film enriched with an antioxidant agent,  taurine,  in  fenestration  defects.  -  J.  Biomed.  Mater.  Res.,  51,  500-503, 2000.   65.  Boynuegri  D.,  Ozcan  G.,  Senel  S.,  Uc  D.,  Uraz  A.,  Ogus  E.,  Cakilci  B.,  Karaduman  B.  -  Clinical  and  radiographic  evalua- tions of chitosan gel in periodontal intraosseous defects: a pilot  study. - J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater., 90, 461-466,  2009.   66.  Zhang Y., Cheng X., Wang J., Wang Y., Shi B., Huang C., Yang X.,  Liu T. - Novel chitosan/collagen scaffold containing transforming  growth factor-beta1 DNA  for periodontal tissue engineering. -  Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 344, 362-369, 2006.   67.  Xu H.H., Weir M.D., Simon C.G. - Injectable and strong nano- apatite scaffolds for cell/growth factor delivery and bone regen- eration. - Dent. Mater., 24, 1212-1222, 2008.   68.  Ji Q.X., Zhong de Y., Lu R., Zhang W.Q., Deng J., Chen X.G. -  In vitro evaluation of the biomedical properties of chitosan and  quaternized chitosan for dental applications. - Carbohydr. Res.,  344, 1297-1302, 2009.   69.  Salamat-Miller  N.,  Chittchang  M.,  Johnston T.P.  - The  use  of  mucoadhesive  polymers  in  buccal  drug  delivery.  -  Adv.  Drug  Deliv. Rev., 57, 1666-1691, 2005.   70.  Martin L., Wilson C.G., Koosha F., Tetley L., Gray A.I., Senel  S., Uchegbu I.F. - The release of model macromolecules may  be controlled by the hydrophobicity of palmitoyl glycol chitosan  hydrogels. - J. Control. Rel., 80, 87-100, 2002.   71.  Martin  L., Wilson  C.G.,  Koosha  F.,  Uchegbu  I.F.  -  Sustained  buccal  delivery  of  the  hydrophobic  drug  denbufylline  using  physically cross-linked palmitoyl glycol chitosan hydrogels. - Eur.  J. Pharm. Biopharm., 55, 35-45, 2003.   72.  Colonna C., Genta I., Perugini P., Pavanetto F., Modena T., Valli  M.,  Muzzarelli  C.,  Conti  B.  -  5-methyl-pyrrolidinone  chitosan  films as carriers for buccal administration of proteins. - AAPS  PharmSciTech, 7, 70, 2006.   73.  Rossi S., Sandri G., Ferrari F., Bonferoni M.C., Caramella C. -  Buccal delivery of acyclovir from films based on chitosan and  polyacrylic acid. - Pharm. Dev. Technol., 8, 199-208, 2003.   74.  Darwish A.M., El-Sayed A.M., El-Harras S.A., Khaled K.A., Ismail  M.A. - Clinical efficacy of novel unidirectional buccoadhesive  vs.  vaginoadhesive  bromocriptine  mesylate  discs  for  treating  Potential applications of chitosan in oral mucosal delivery S. Senel J. DRUG DEL. SCI. TECH., 20 (1) 23-32 2010 32 pathologic hyperprolactinemia. - Fertil. Steril., 90, 1864-1868,  2008.   75.  Portero  A., Teijeiro-Osorio  D.,  Alonso  M.J.,  Remunan-Lopez  C. - Development of chitosan sponges for buccal administration  of insulin. - Carbohydrate Polymers, 68, 617-625, 2007.   76.  Dung T.H.,  Lee  S.R.,  Han  S.D.,  Kim  S.J.,  Ju Y.M.,  Kim  M.S.,  Yoo  H.  -  Chitosan-TPP  nanoparticle  as  a  release  system  of  antisense oligonucleotide in the oral environment. - J. Nanosci.  Nanotechnol., 7, 3695-3699, 2007.   77.  Cafaggi S., Leardi R., Parodi B., Caviglioli G., Russo E., Bignardi  G. - Preparation and evaluation of a chitosan salt-poloxamer  407  based  matrix  for  buccal  drug  delivery.  -  J.  Control.  Rel.,  102, 159-169, 2005.   78.  Nafee N.A., Ismail F.A., Boraie N.A., Mortada L.M. - Mucoad- hesive  buccal  patches  of  miconazole  nitrate:  in  vitro/in  vivo  performance and effect of ageing. - Int. J. Pharm., 264, 1-14,  2003.   79.  Yoon J.P., Yong M.L., Si N.P., Seung Y.S., Chong P.C., Seung  J.L. - Platelet derived growth factor releasing chitosan sponge  for periodontal bone regeneration. - Biomaterials, 21, 153-159,  2000. MANUSCRIPT Received  3  August  2009,  accepted  for  publication  24  September  2009. Potential applications of chitosan in oral mucosal delivery S. Senel J. DRUG DEL. SCI. TECH., 20 (1) 23-32 2010