CEPT University JAMSHEDPUR CITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN Appraisal Report Overall Observations 1.The CDP (4th version1) for JUA2 broadly incorporates the requirements specified under JNNURM tool kit. A systematic presentation of the existing situation, identification of problems and linked investment plans has been made. 2. The Vision: Based on the discussions with various stakeholders, public representatives and officers the document adopts the city vision as summarized below in terms of following attributes: Jamshedpur should develop as an environment friendly city with excellent infrastructure and sustainable development. Jamshedpur City to develop as slum free and pollution free city. Jamshedpur City to have equitable distribution of urban infrastructure and amenities. Jamshedpur to have multi sector economic approach. Jamshedpur to make sustainable use of resources for better future. Jamshedpur to be promoted as a tourist hub. To have planned residential layouts with provision of social and physical infrastructure. To have efficient public transport and better connectivity. To have good and modern urban Governance. 3. The city development plan states a sectoral vision and corresponding investment plan to achieve its motto to provide good connectivity and equitable distribution of physical and social infrastructure. The City, its needs and its plans: 4. Consultations: Revised report provides details of consultative process. The stakeholders include representatives of local authorities, citizens, government departments, NGOs, business/industry Associations, welfare committees/associations, JUSCO, gram vikas trust and professional bodies. Summary of stakeholder interactions (Annexure B) provides separate section on JUSCOs suggestions. However, the consultations with public in general appears very limited. 5. Urban Governance: Jamshedpur urban agglomeration consists of multiple authoritiesone municipality, 3 notified area committees and 8 village panchayats, industrial development First meeting held at CEPT, Ahmedabad with consultants in September 2006, Second meeting held with consultants and representatives from Jharkhand Urban Development Department and local authorities JNAC and MNAC at CEPT in November 2006. Third meeting held at Ranchi and Jamshedpur with the representatives of Jharkhand Urban Development Department, District Collector Jamshedpur, and Special officers of JNAC, MNAC, ANAC and Jugsalai Municipality and the consultants in December 2006. The study area considered is JUA comprising of Jamshedpur Notified Area, Mango Notified Area, Adityapur Notified Area, Jugsalai Municipality and adjacent census blocks (which are part of Jamshedpur Revenue Block) of Ghorbandha, Chotagovindpur, Gadhra, Sarjamdah, Haldubani, Kitadih, Bagbera and Parsudih. 2 1 23 Sq. agricultural equipment.21 lakh in 2011 and 2021 respectively. the broad landuse classification has been presented in tabular format according to UDPFI guidelines supported by primary site visits. which will undertake urban renewal schemes. a detailed reconnaissance and evaluation of satellite photographs indicates that there are some constraints for the expansion of the city in North and South leading to expansion of predominantly industrial development in westward direction and predominantly residential development in eastward direction increasing the gap between residential and work places.Km of which about 35% is under industrial use and 20% under residential use with present average density of 90 persons per hectare. Chapter 9. As informed by UD department. Investments of Rs. The city continues to attract many more large and medium scale industries in these sectors. Demography: The population of the city has grown from 6. TINPLATE.8 lakh households (2. due to non-availability of detailed landuse plan for the areas covered under JUA. Land Use: The presentation of existing situation is cursory. In absence of any development plan or master plan.4 lakh during 19912001 period recording 36% decadal growth rate.4%. The total area of the proposed JUA is 149. The SEZ is expected to be developed (in an area of about 90 acres & 90 years lease) on BOT by JUSCO along with M/s Gammon India Ltd.authority and private development orgnisation (JUSCO). Telcon works. However.6 lakh properties). The infrastructure within the JUSCO3 controlled area the city is properly laid out and adequate in terms of requirements of Tata steel company township. Its industrial base includes largest steel works in the private sector in the country (TISCO) and the other major industries. HCL. 6. equitable distribution of infrastructure and preparation of master plan.projects external to JNNURM). 102. The housing facility and commercial complex spread over 200 and 20 acres respectively will be taken up by AIADA and IL&FS. The city has already initiated the process of developing a special economic zone for automobile and auto companies with related housing and commercial facilities at Adityanagar. As mentioned in the report. These projects have not been included in JNNURM funding (Ref. 9. the city will have to from a unified administrative body. With growth rate of 36. Infrastructure 10. improve employment opportunities. prepare master plans and identify developmental projects. The growth rate is available only for last two decades for the three notified areas and the growth rate of last decade is applied to all the local authorities in the JUA.89 to 9. UCIL. In order to achieve uniform socioeconomic growth. Tata Agrico etc. Government of Jharkhand during the meetings a separate report is under preparation for formation of unified agency. other areas of JUA do not have adequate civic infrastructure and even the records for 3 Jamshedpur Utility and Service Company . the city estimates the population to be 14. In terms of infrastructure.INCAB. Urban Economy: The city has a sound industrial base and considerable percentage of the population is engaged in industrial activities. Given the rapid pace of development there is a need for initiating formulation of unified administration agency.7 and 20. 7. TELCO. locomotive parts etc. The estimate for 2006 is 12.7 Lakh people and 2. besides the manufacturers of automobiles. there is wide difference in the level of infrastructure provision within different areas of the city. 8.27 crores have been proposed under JNNURM for the same. Existing situation. The investment needs have estimated for JNNURM period and been spread over a period of seven years i. 49.the same are not available. 50. 12. 33. . The estimates for amount to be spent beyond JNNURM plan period have not been worked out. 14. number of connections. JUA has only two sewage treatment plants and these are under jurisdiction of JUSCO and have combined capacity of 60 MLD covering about 15% of total JUA area. Storage-overhead tanks (Rs. The length of water distribution system and consumer metering system needs to be reconfirmed at the DPR stage. 17. The water sector investment requirements are mainly to cater to the future needs.Data on the length of existing distribution network. The sector development proposals include refurbishment of existing system and system augmentation by provision of water treatment facilities of about 166 MLD. Kharkai river.222. to meet the demand are very common and dependence on groundwater is growing at alarming rate.03 Crores to be spent over 7 years. .6 Crores). The components include network building (Rs. Sitarampur dam and Dimna lake.7 Crores).6 MLD. water supply network for entire area and water metering for all consumers. 79. 622. STP 169 MLD total capacity (Rs. 16.07 Crores).2 Crores). WTP (Rs.5 Crores). As the estimates do not provide the reference to the source of unit rates. the estimates could be verified to match the existing market rates or schedule of rates at the time of detailed project report preparation or detailed examination may be made during DPR appraisal. Almost 60% of the sewage remains untreated. tankers etc. . . needs and investment plans have been summarized below. 307. Intermediate pumping stations (rs. 15. In PHED controlled areas the supply is far below requirements and use of hand pumps. The main sources of surface water supply are Subarnarekha river. Wastewater Management: This is one of the least developed infrastructure in JUA. water charges is not presented.60. The plan proposes Rs.83 Crores). 1 Crore) and public toilets and road overlays (Rs. The coverage area of water supply in JUA is below 50% (25% by piped water supply) with average availability of 60 lpcd.5 Crores. The components include existing system refurbishment (26.e upto 2013 and the systems proposed can be augmented as required to meet the future requirements of projected population of 2031 in JUA. 208.73 Crores). 50 Crores) and consumer metering system (Rs. Duration of water availability ranges from 1 to 8 hours in different areas. Water Supply: The current water supply is managed by JUSCO within their areas mainly in JNAC and by PHED in areas outside JNAC.Treatment facilities are partly available. 13. The proposal to meet the demand till 2014 is Rs. 207.8 MLD water is made available by these sources. Numbers of sewerage connections and length of sewers need to be confirmed at the DPR stage. septic tanks or disposed off in Subarnarekha and Kharkai rivers via the drains. industrial water distribution (Rs. Organised sewage system is available only in areas under JUSCO.).27 Crores. PHED carries out chlorination and sedimentation before supply. Most of the sewage is disposed into soak pits. 11. bore wells. Water mains and distribution system (Rs. Unmet demand is 48. The proposals have been made for developing landfill site which would last till 2013. About 349 MT is generated every day and this will rise to 749 MT per day in 2031. 2000 it is required to identify landfill site to last for 15-20 years and it is recommended that a detailed study for site area requirement and location.35 Crores Landfill management and development – Rs.1 Ha). besides this there are about 11 major nallas which facilitate drainage of storm-water from the area. 878. A sum of Rs. 19. river bridges. Public transport system is very poor leading to excessive use of six seaters. sewerage network and road network in new developments are to be synchronized as they are dependent on development of road network. The SWD plan is proposed at a cost of Rs.161. mainly in the areas serviced by JUSCO. street lighting are provided only in select locations in JUA. RTO and JUSCO have installed traffic signals at main junctions in the city which is not adequate. auto rickshaws. two wheelers. new roads(including ring road). xiv) and the same needs to be addressed in a long run. Solid Waste Management: The city has a organized waste collection and transportation only in the area controlled by JUSCO through its own team of conservancy workers. The waste in dumped at two sites (total area of 4. traffic improvements and bus transit system.25 Crores towards road widening. Also. 20 Crores 21. pg. the issue of industrial slag which is right now being unscientifically dumped resulting into mounds of slag has been broughtout by stakeholders during consultations (Annexure B . however other roads in the JUA are in poor condition due to lack of maintenance of proper drainage network along the roads. 100 crores have been proposed for: o o o Cost towards equipments (not clear whether it includes cost towards improved collection and transportation system) – Rs. On a general note pavement condition of radial arterial roads is good. For other areas there is no infrastructure for collection. transport hub. transportation and treatment. - . 20.24 crores.18. Biomedical waste generation and its management could be addressed at DPR stage for integrated waste management. 45 Crores Treatment Plant and Machinery – Rs. However. due to significant silting and obstructions in these nallas and other secondary drains the natural flow is hampered leading to backflow of water from the river system and flooding during monsoon season. treatment facility based on waste quantity and quality and detailed plan for collection and transportation be carried out at DPR stage. system augmentation through laying of new network. Organized street parking. It is pertinent to note that water supply distribution network. About 40 km of the roads have provision of storm water drains out of which about 75% are in kutcha form. storage. manholes and traps and preparation of drainage master plan and rain water harvesting systems. Urban transport: The length of roads maintained by notified area committees is about 255 km and has an average width of 6 m (except JUSCO area). Storm Water: Subarnarekha and Kharkai are the major rivers flowing through JUA. The proposal includes existing system refurbishment to reduce silting. However as per the requirements of MSW (management and handling) Rules. The proposals are for an investment of Rs. Investment plan of Rs 30 Crores is proposed which includes river front protection. During the review period the income was inconsistent due to irregular flow . 29. rehabilitation and community facilities. sluice gates on nallas. higher education.75 crores 26. Other Proposals (External to JNNURM): Indicative of expected share of Jamshedpur in the regional development. construction labourers or home based small business. land reserved for crucial purposes. 250 Crores for regional airport warehousing and container facility. The detailed plan could include setting up of pollution monitoring stations to meet the said objective of preparing inventory of pollution. The municipal tax inflow is almost negligible which has resulted in limited financial resource options. provision of ghats and water sports centre. The inflow of funds is mainly through Government grants. Urban Environment. The city has number of natural water bodies. However. Tourism and Heritage: (Chapter 7) 24.Rs.5 crores includes provision of water taps. The population living in the slums is 12% in JUA. The City Development Plan proposes providing basic infrastructure services and rehabilitation (not clear whether land acquisition is included in investment plan.Urban Poor (Housing and Services) 22.Rs 750 Crores for freeways and high speed corridors .An amount of Rs. as well as large green open spaces which are in the state of negligence and getting polluted by effluents. During the past five years there has been no steady trend in revenue income and has been fluctuating with sudden rise to 275. rope way for promotion of tourism in Dimna lake area. Large number of slums are located along riverbed and other environmentally sensitive areas. .65 lakhs for Jugsalai municipality and three notified area committees against the expenditure of 87. 0.5 Crores has been allocated for formation of regional planning board. grants and subsidies from central and stat governments. The chapter does not put forward any important heritage element or historical significance of the city. Overall revenue income in year 2005-06 was Rs. health.ref page 89. 27.5 %. Urban Amenities 25. sports facilities is concentrated at one part of JUA and mainly in the areas maintained by JUSCO leading to disproportionate accessibility. The plan proposes to develop inventory of level of air and water pollution in the city and revitalization of water bodies and green open spaces. Capital income of the existing ULBs comprise of loans.07 lakhs.5 lakhs in 2003-04 the reasons for which are not discussed. Proposed investment of 141. The plan proposes to provide amenities to all and enhance clusters in different parts of JUA at a cost of 106. 28. . and garbage. Most of the recreational. A majority of working population in slums is factory workers. The proposal needs substantial detailing at DPR stage. the largest slum population exists in Adityapur and is around 33. public toilets. Urban Finance: the financial profile of urban local bodies is not structured and mostly all the ULBs have been operating at recurring loss over the years. water connection.90). 23. Various heads under different streams of revenue and expenses are very broadly dealt with.111. ANAC. Jugsalai Municipality. e-governance. property title certification.AIADA in ANAC. MNAC.PWD. PHED for other areas of JNAC. Other areas Census Blocks no piped water supply 4. Jugsalai Municipality and other census blocks – ULBs. Bridges Street lights 4 Includes townships of Tata companies and parts of JNAC area. Other areas of JNAC. 2. 1. Jugsalai Municipality and other census blocks – Electricity Sewerage Storm Water Drainage Solid Waste Management Roads. . MNAC. These include accounting reforms. MNAC. Other areas of JNAC. JUSCO for some portions4 of JNAC for Water treatment Plant and piped water supply 2.Not quantified the coverage by JUSCO in JNAC 5 As mentioned in section 5. Service Delivery: From the limited information on institutional set-up available in the CDP. ANAC. 2. 1. JUSCO for some portions3 of JNAC.6. Jugsalai Municipality and other census blocks sewage disposed into soak pits and septic tanks or open drains. Mandatory as well as optional reforms (Rs. JUSCO for some portions3 of JNAC. MNAC. computerization of property tax. 30. Jugsalai Municipality and other census blocks storm water disposed through natural open drains. Jugsalai Municipality 3. JUSCO for some portions3 of JNAC for organized collection and transportation and insanitary dumping.2. Not elaborated further in the report about specific roles. 2. State highways5. MNAC. Other areas of JNAC. JUSCO for some portions3 of JNAC for sewage network and sewage treatment plants 2. pg. Jugsalai Municipality and other census blocks sewage disposed into soak pits and septic tanks or open drains 1.of specific grants. the institutional framework for provision of all basic services is as follows. enactment of rent control. Other areas of JNAC. ANAC. 1. JUSCO for some portions3 of JNAC – about 40 Km roads have drains of which above 75% are kutcha form. GIS etc. Remaining areas of JNAC implementation by PHED and funding by ULBs. 1. 230 crores) have been proposed to be implemented by 2009 to improve urban finance. ANAC. ANAC. NHAI. MNAC. ANAC. 31. Service Water Supply Planning & Execution O&M Design 1. public disclosure laws. Other areas of JNAC. development control regulations. 71. 2. Establishment and works (not detailed) are the major avenues for capital expenditure. Water Treatment Plants. Out of this. Investment Sustainability 32. in light of the structure of proposed Unified agency (separate report under preparation by GoJ) and their expected revenue streams. it is assumed that the basis for property tax and other tax collections has been prepared in consultation with and consensus of local authorities based on their practical knowledge of the city profile and administration. The major issues due to which past data could not be used as indicator of future collection and expenses • Absence of proper data on land registration.00 2679.27 100.25 141. the ULB will have to raise total of over 800 crores. Additional investment external to JNNURM of Rs. own revenue sources as per FOP account for Rs. In order to have the above level of investments (30% by ULB).75 230.replacement. In the existing setup there is involvement of multiple agencies not generating revenues as per normal standards of other local authorities.24 878. O&M.27 622.5 30. entire FOP has been based on comparative cities in India and correlation of factors with population and geography and certain assumptions on tax collection rate and efficiency. 36.JNNURM Projects external to JNNURM Grand TOTAL Rs.00 161. This excludes the requirements of Tata nagar. property ownership • Property tax not levied in many areas • No precedence of assigned revenues(from state government) • Accounting systems not tuned to routine requirements • Establishments will be new hence new expenditure head 34.03 307.5 Crores has been proposed for which the implementation structure has not been recommended and shall have to be developed at detailed project appraisal level.143 .81 33. 1000.repairs.50 3679.31 1000. Based on a detailed need identification exercise the CDP proposes investments worth Rs 2679.00 106. Proposal under JNNURM to meet the needs up to year 2014 Components Socio-economic growth Urban infrastructure Water Supply Waste Water Solid waste management Storm Water Drainage Traffic and Transportation Housing for Urban Poor Environment Protection and heritage Amenities and Recreational Facilities Urban Renewal Total. The FOP is very indicative and may have to be revised at later date at the time of formation of unified agency. In light of this. 35.department and local body responsible for installation. As discussed during the meeting with representatives of UD department and local authorities at Jamshedpur.31 Crores. In Crores 102. 41. 40. while is a commitment from the Government needs clarification in terms of details. The Institutional arrangement. Government grants and subsidies! 37. . Aspects related to environment and those addressing the needs of the poor need to be dealt with in a more focused and significant manner. The plan is recommended for approval. the balance will have to be raised through other means. The plan broadly responds to the guidelines of JNNURM and is useful developing the next step in terms of detailed project development and definition of reform implementation actions. whose capacities is limited. 42. Finances of TATA Nagar which is the main city in the agglomeration needs review and the investment package should be justified financially. The next report (the plan) to be finalised within a period of two years) should include an analysis of the population growth in the agglomeration inclusive of the principle city of TATA Nagar. 39. The plan proposes private sector participation. Recommendation 38.crores only for a period of seven years. inclusive of TATA Nagar than just the municipal bodies. Hence. Based on the FOP it is evident that proposed Investment Plan is not financially sustainable.