Republic of the PhilippinesDEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Regional Office No. VIII CATARMAN II District CATARMAN II CENTRAL INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) FOR MASTER TEACHERS June 2016-2017 Name of Employee: Position: School: ROWENA V. MARINO MT-I Catarman II Central Name of Rater: Position: Date of Review: TO BE FILLED UP DURING PLANNING MAJOR FINAL OUTPUTS KEY RESULT AREAS OBJECTIVES (KRAs) Write lesson plans/logs based on the standards-based curriculum guides daily. Facilitate learning through the use of written/computerized lesson plans, modules, teaching guides, and other learning resources with the adequate and updated instructional materials. Teaching Learning Process (20%) Initiate discipline of students including classroom rules, guidelines and individual and group task. TIMELINE WEIGHT PER KRA 5% 5% 5% PERFORMANCE INDICATORS 5 4 3 2 1 5 4 3 2 1 5 4 3 2 200 or more updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way 150-199 updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way 90-149 updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way 60-89 updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way 1-59 updated lesson plans/logs prepared in SMART way 10 instructional materials used/produced are appropriate, adequate and updated 8 instructional materials used/produced are appropriate, adequate and updated 6 instructional materials used/produced are appropriate, adequate and updated 4 instructional materials used/produced are appropriate, adequate and updated 2 instructional materials used/produced are appropriate, adequate and updated (Supported with write-up and documentation) 100% of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed 85%-99% of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed 70%-84% of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed 55%-69% of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed Teaching Learning Process (20%) Initiate discipline of students including classroom rules, guidelines and individual and group task. Monitor attendance, diversity appreciation, safe, positive and motivating environment, over-all physical atmosphere, cleanliness, and orderliness of classrooms including proper waste disposal. 5% 5% 1 54% and below of the indicators in classroom walk-through are observed 5 100% of the pupils monthly attendance and are monitored and submitted every last day of the month 4 85%-99% of the pupils monthly attendance and are monitored and submitted every last day of the month 3 70%-84% of the pupils monthly attendance and are monitored and submitted every last day of the month 2 55%-69% of the pupils monthly attendance and are monitored and submitted every last day of the month 1 54% and below of the pupils monthly attendance and are monitored and submitted every last day of the month Indicators: 1. Test Questions with TOS Monitor, evaluate and maintain pupil’s/student’s progress through 2. Class Record (with dates of quizzes, assignments, projects, portfolio, etc.) *Assessment for Learning (Formative) 3. Rating sheets 4. List of pupil’s/student’s output like projects, activities done/performed, etc. 3% *Assessment as Learning 5 All indicators were prepared and submitted two weeks before the scheduled due time (Reflective) *Assessment of Learning (Summative) *Periodic Test 4 3 2 1 5 4 3 2 1 3 indicators were prepared and submitted one week before the scheduled time 2 indicators were prepared and submitted on the scheduled date 1 indicator was prepared and submitted on the scheduled date no indicator was prepared and submitted on the scheduled date. 100% pupils/students were given remediation/enrichment successfully 85%-99% pupils/students were given remediation/enrichment successfully 70%-84% pupils/students were given remediation/enrichment successfully 55%-69% pupils/students were given remediation/enrichment successfully 54% and below pupils/students were given remediation/enrichment successfully 5 100% of the pupils/students records were prepared and submitted before the scheduled time without error 4 85%-99% of the pupils/students records were prepared and submitted on or before the scheduled time without error 3 70%-84% of the pupils/students records were prepared and submitted on or before the scheduled time with minimal error Conduct remediation/enrichment programs to improve performance indicators Maintain pupil’s/students school records 3% 3% Maintain pupil’s/students school records Attain the required GSA for Grade level and learning areas Attain 75% MPS per subject area in the National Achievement Test 3% 3% 3% Students' Learning Outcomes (30%) 2 55%-69% of the pupils/students records were prepared and submitted one week after the due time 1 54% and below of the pupils/students records were prepared and submitted two weeks before the due time 5 85% and above of the pupils proficiency level have mastered the required learning competency. 4 82-84% of the pupils proficiency level have mastered the required learning competency 3 79%-81% of the pupils proficiency level have mastered the required learning competency 2 76%-78% of the pupils proficiency level have mastered the required learning competency 1 75% of the pupils proficiency level have mastered the required learning competency 5 4 3 2 1 Attained 75% and above NAT MPS per subject area Attained 65%-74% of NAT MPS per subject area. Attained 55%-64% of NAT MPS per subject area. Attained 44%-54% of NAT MPS per subject area. Attained 45% or below of NAT MPS per subject area. 5 initiated at least one successful instructional program to 100% of the teachers with full documentation. 4 Initiate improvements in instructional programs 3% 3 2 1 5 4 Lead in the preparation of instructional materials. 3% 3 2 1 initiated at least one successful instructional program and involved 84%-99% of the teachers with documentation. initiated at least one successful instructional program and involved 63%-83% of the teachers with documentation. initiated at least one successful instructional program and involved 52%-62% of the teachers with documentation. no evidence of initiating instructional program. lead 100% of the teachers in preparing innovative instructional materials within a year with documentation. lead 84%-99%% of the teachers in preparing innovative instructional materials within a year with documentation. lead 68%-83% of the teachers in preparing innovative instructional materials within a year with documentation. lead 52%-67% of the teachers in preparing innovative instructional materials within a year with documentation. no evidence of leading in preparation of instructional program. full full full full full full full 5 Serve as demonstrator teacher, facilitator or resource speaker at the school level and or provided mentoring services to demonstration teachers. 4 3% 3 2 1 5 4 Interpret test results and utilize. 3% 3 2 1 5 Initiate projects and programs that will enhance the curriculum and its delivery to achieve 75% NAT performance. 4 3% 3 2 1 Provision of Quality Basic Education 5 4 Observe teachers every quarter. 5% 3 2 1 Excellent execution of the lesson plan and excellent mentoring services provided to the demonstration teacher Very Satisfactory execution of the lesson plan and Very Satisfactory mentoring services provided to the demonstration teacher Satisfactory execution of the lesson plan and Satisfactory mentoring services provided to the demonstration teacher Fair execution of the lesson plan and Fair mentoring services provided to the demonstration teacher. Poor execution of the lesson plan and Poor mentoring services provided to the demonstration teacher 100% of the test results were analyzed and interpreted per grading period and submitted before the scheduled time. 84%-99% of the test results were analyzed and interpreted per grading period and submitted before the scheduled time. 68%-83% of the test results were analyzed and interpreted per grading period and submitted before the scheduled time. 52%-67 of the test results were analyzed and interpreted per grading period and submitted before the scheduled time. 51%-below of the test results were analyzed and interpreted per grading period and submitted before the scheduled time. Initiated a full blown project and program that enhance the curriculum and achieve 75% in NAT Performance. Initiated a full blown project and program that enhance the curriculum and achieve 65%-74% in NAT Performance. Initiated a full blown project and program that enhance the curriculum and achieve 55%-64% in NAT Performance. Initiated a full blown project and program that enhance the curriculum and achieve 54%-below in NAT Performance. the project or program did not materialized 100% of the teachers were observed quarterly and submitted the observation checklist form at the end of the quarter. 84%-99% of the teachers were observed quarterly and submitted the observation checklist form at the end of the quarter. 68%-83% of the teachers were observed quarterly and submitted the observation checklist form at the end of the quarter. 52%-67 of the teachers were observed quarterly and submitted the observation checklist form at the end of the quarter. 51%-below of the teachers were observed quarterly and submitted the observation checklist form at the end of the quarter. 5 Conduct mentoring/coaching activities and prepare instructional material available. 4 5% 3 2 1 Instructional Supervision (20%) 5 4 Guided co-teachers in the performance of duties and responsibilities. 5% 3 2 1 5 4 Check lesson plans of teachers in the assigned grade/subject area. 5% 3 2 1 Conduct regular/periodic meetings/conferences Community Involvement (15%) PTA 5% Conducted mentoring/coaching activities to 100% of the teachers and prepared innovative instructional materials fully documented. Conducted mentoring/coaching activities to 84%-99%% of the teachers and prepared innovative instructional materials fully documented. Conducted mentoring/coaching activities to 68%-83% of the teachers and prepared innovative instructional materials fully documented. Conducted mentoring/coaching activities to 52%-67% of the teachers and prepared innovative instructional materials fully documented. no evidence of mentoring/coaching conducted 100% of the teachers were guided and provided with the necessary technical assistance in the carry-over of their duties and functions. 84%-99% of the teachers were guided and provided with the necessary technical assistance in the carryover of their duties and functions. 68%-83% of the teachers were guided and provided with the necessary technical assistance in the carryover of their duties and functions. 52%-67 of the teachers were guided and provided with the necessary technical assistance in the carryover of their duties and functions. 51%-below of the teachers were guided and provided with the necessary technical assistance in the carryover of their duties and functions. 100% of the teachers lesson plan/log were properly checked and submitted the observation log every end of the month. 84%-99% of the teachers lesson plan/log were properly checked and submitted the observation log every end of the month. 68%-83% of the teachers lesson plan/log were properly checked and submitted the observation log every end of the month. 52%-67 of the teachers lesson plan/log were properly checked and submitted the observation log every end of the month. 51%-below of the teachers lesson plan/log were properly checked and submitted the observation log every end of the month. 5 100% of the target objectives were achieved, accomplishment with set agreements were fully documented. 4 84%-99% of the target objectives were achieved, accomplishment with set agreements were fully documented. 3 68%-83% of the target objectives were achieved, accomplishment with set agreements were fully documented. 2 52%-67% of the target objectives were achieved, accomplishment with set agreements were fully documented. 1 51%-below of the target objectives were achieved, accomplishment with set agreements were fully documented. Community Involvement (15%) Visit parents of pupils/students needing academic monitoring/follow up Undertake/initiate projects/events/activities with external funding/sponsorship Conducted action research 5% 5% 5 100% of the parents of the students needing academic monitoring was followed up supported with documents. 4 84%-99% of the parents of the students needing academic monitoring was followed up supported with documents. 3 68%-83% of the parents of the students needing academic monitoring was followed up supported with documents. 2 52%-67 of the parents of the students needing academic monitoring was followed up supported with documents. 1 51%-below of the parents of the students needing academic monitoring was followed up supported with documents. 5 4 3 2 1 100% of project accomplishment completed were achieved with documentation. 84%-99% of project accomplishment partially achieved with documentation. 68%-83% of project accomplishment partially achieved with documentation. 52%-67 of project accomplishment partially achieved with documentation. 51%-below of project accomplishment partially achieved with documentation. 5 Conducted a completed action research and have presented in at least in the Division Level Research Conference/Summit 4 Conducted a completed action research and have presented in at least in the District Level Research Conference/Summit 3 Conducted a completed action research but have not presented the result in any level of research conference/summit 5% 2 1 5 Take charge of the school reading program, remedial and/or enrichment program. 4% Professional Growth and Development (15%) Participate in the planning and implementation of training programs in school, district and division level. 3% Proposed an action research. Conceptualize an action research Led at least 5 teachers in conducting enrichment program to improve proficiency level of at least 4 pupils to at least one step higher in every quarter. 4 Led at least 5 teachers in conducting enrichment program to improve proficiency level of at least 2 pupils/students to at least one step higher in every quarter. 3 Led at least 3 teachers in conducting enrichment program to improve proficiency level of at least 3 pupils to at least one step higher in every quarter. 2 Led at least 3 teachers in conducting enrichment program to improve proficiency level of at least 1 pupils/students to at least one step higher in every quarter. 1 No evidence of conducting remedial program 5 Participated in the planning of at least 1 training program conducted in the division level and submitted the consolidated outputs before the scheduled time. Growth and Development (15%) 4 Participate in the planning and implementation of training programs in school, district and division level. 3% 3 2 1 5 Participated in the planning of at least 2 training programs conducted in the district level and submitted the consolidated outputs before the scheduled time. Participated in the planning of at least 1 training program conducted in the district level and submitted the consolidated outputs before the scheduled time. Participated in the planning of at least 2 training program conducted in the school level and submitted the consolidated outputs before the scheduled time No evidence of participation in planning training programs Attended 3 or more seminars, workshops trainings and echoed to teachers in an excellent way with documentation 4 Attended 2 seminars, workshops trainings and echoed to teachers in an excellent way with documentation 3 Attended 3 or more seminars, workshops trainings but failed to echo to teachers. 2 1 5 Attended 2 seminars, workshops trainings but failed to echo to teachers. No trainings attended Attained 5 indicators with documents 1. Published at least one (1) article in professional magazines/ periodicals related to field of specialization. 4 Attained 4 indicators with documents 2. Served as resource person/ consultant in seminar/ workshop/ training related to field of specialization. 3 Attained 3 indicators with documents 3. Conducted action research the findings/ results of which were utilized within the rating period. 2 Attained 2 indicators with documents 4. Designed evaluation and monitoring program for the district/ division. 1 Attained 1 indicator with documents Participate in seminars, workshops, trainings within a year (Division, Regional and National) 3% Attain five of the following: Plus Factor (5%) 5% 5. Teacher-In-Charge of a school for one rating period TOTAL (Excluding Plus Factor) 100% OVER - ALL RATING OF ASSESSMENT Plus Factor 5% ADJECTIVAL RATING Adjectival Rating Scale Outstanding 4.500 5.000 Very Satisfactory 3.500 4.499 Satisfactory 2.500 3.499 Unsatisfactory 1.500 2.499 Poor 1.000 1.499 Ratee: ROWENA V MARINO TEACHERS AMADOR B. LAGRIMAS PRINCIPAL II TOB FILLED UP DURING EVALUATION ACTUAL RESULTS Q E RATING SCORE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 T 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12 #N/A Rater: AMADOR B. LAGRIMAS School Head Transmutation Table 1.000 1.500 2.500 3.500 4.500 1.499 2.499 3.499 4.499 5.000 Poor Unsatisfactory Satisfactory Very Satisfactory Outstanding