FS BiH TownHall Sarajevo APP

March 19, 2018 | Author: dex | Category: Bosnia And Herzegovina, Sarajevo, Cultural Heritage, European Union, Dome


Comments



Description

TOWN HALL Sarajevo Bosnia and HerzegovinaINTEGRATED REHABILITATION PROJECT PLAN / SURVEY OF THE ARCHITECTURAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL HERITAGE (IRPP/SAAH) Regional Programme for Cultural and Natural Heritage in South East Europe 2003 - 2008 FEASIBILITY STUDY Document adopted by the Commission to Preserve National Monuments, Sarajevo, on 28 November 2007 TOWN HALL Sarajevo Bosnia and Herzegovina . in cooperation with Zaila Uzunović. the present Feasibility Study (FS) was prepared by the following local expert: Damir Hadžić. expert of the Institute for the Protection of Cultural. the Project Leader Dr John Bold and expert Mr. headed by Mirela Mulalić Handan. Historical and Natural Heritage. and Azra Hadžić. Project Co-ordinator.FOREWORD In the framework of the European Commission/Council of Europe Joint Programme on the Integrated Rehabilitation Project Plan /Survey of the Architectural and Archaeological Heritage (IRPP/SAAH). . the author of the Preliminary Technical Assessment. David Johnson. Architect. The Feasibility Study (FS) was adopted on 28 November 2007 by the Commission to Preserve National Monuments (Bosnia and Herzegovina). . conservation and restoration knowledge of students and young professionals is improved .Feasibility Study – IRPP/SAAH 1 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Introductory page Site map Name of the project: Location: Management: Objectives: Town Hall in Sarajevo Reconstruction of the Town Hall Bosnia and Herzegovina.citizens of Bosnia and Herzegovina (4 000 000) . City of Sarajevo. Bosnia and Herzegovina .National and University Library of BiH is reestablished in the Town Hall building . Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina.new cultural events are launched .protecting Bosnia and Herzegovina cultural memory at risk.contribution to capacity and institution building in BiH . preserving the identity of BiH .minimum of 25 persons are employed 8 885 000 8 855 000 7 185 000 28 November 2007 Target groups: Results: Overall cost (€): Project cost (€): Contribution required for The Feasibility Study -1 (€): City Hall – Sarajevo – Bosnia and Herzegovina ___________________________________________________________________________ . Municipality of the Old Town of Sarajevo Commission to Preserve National Monuments. Sarajevo Canton.local development is improved .improving cultural life and tourism in the region .raising awareness of cultural and historical heritage and its importance .monument of regional importance is rehabilitated .local experts (80) .students and young professionals (200) .employees (minimum of 25) .national monument is rehabilitated .inhabitants of the City of Sarajevo (750 000) .City Administration seat returned to its original premises .stopping further dilapidation of building parts that may cause permanent destruction of building parts and decorations on the building .tourists/visitors to the City of Sarajevo (1 million per year) . ___________________________________________________________________________ City Hall – Sarajevo – Bosnia and Herzegovina 28 November 2007 . playing a crucial role in the preservation and celebration of city and national identity. a function it fulfilled until it was gutted during the war in 1992. Sarajevo is a monument of outstanding significance and historical resonance. create jobs and encourage tourism. it is the largest and most representative building of the AustroHungarian period in Sarajevo as well as the most beautiful and important example of the pseudoMoorish style in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The building served as Town Hall until 1949 when it became the National and University Library. Built in 1894.Feasibility Study – IRPP/SAAH 2 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ The Town Hall. with space for public events. The rehabilitation of this symbol of the city will restore beneficial public use. The project is being led by the City administration with the support of the municipality and numerous national and international partners. The building has been stabilised and reconstruction is now intended with a view to restoring it to public use as a library and a museum of reconstruction. prominently located on the bank of the Miljacka River on the border of the commercial and business district of the city. Detailed description of the work 12. Level of risk . Significance 6. Executive Summary 3.Experience of similar actions in 2006 8. Vulnerability 7. Conservation philosophy 9. Regional/local socio-economic context 3.Extent of damage 8. Other bodies in a position to contribute to the project implementation and the decisions of the Commission II CONTEXT OF THE PROJECT 1. Main activities of the Commission 5. Structure of the Commission 4. Expected sources of funding 3. Applicability of the project to the EU standards and norms 7. Implementation of the work IV COST ANALYSES 1. Bank details 3. Estimated costs 2. Location 2. Objectives 2.Feasibility Study – IRPP/SAAH 3 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ CONTENTS I MANAGEMENT OF THE PROJECT 1. Summary description of the building/site 4. Sectorial context 4. Level of interventions 10. Cost benefit analysis of the project V DOCUMENTARY SOURCES ___________________________________________________________________________ City Hall – Sarajevo – Bosnia and Herzegovina 28 November 2007 . Capacity to manage and implement actions . Summary historic development of the building/site 5. Description of the social effects 13. Identity 2. Priorities for intervention 11. List of the management board 6. Statutory protection III PHYSICAL AND SOCIAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT 1. the institutions dealing with the protection of the cultural and ___________________________________________________________________________ City Hall – Sarajevo – Bosnia and Herzegovina 28 November 2007 . The Commission is headquartered in Sarajevo. 33/02). Bank details Account name Account number Sort code IBAN code (optional) Bank name Address of bank Name of signatory/ies Position of signatory/ies EUR 935 9621 0000 SWIFT CODE:CBBSBA22 CENTRALNA BANKA BIH Marsala Tita 25.ba www. which may be filed by any interested natural or legal person. The procedure for designating a given property as a National Monument is initiated by a petition or motion. Structure of the Commission The Commission to Preserve National Monuments is an institution of the State of Bosnia and Herzegovina established pursuant to Annex 8 of the General Framework Agreement for Peace in Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Decision of the Presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina on the Commission to Preserve National Monuments (Official Gazette of BiH Nos. the Commission issues decisions designating movable and immovable property as National Monuments. MANAGEMENT OF THE PROJECT Identity Full legal name (business name): Abbreviation . Main activities of the Commission Jurisdiction of the Commission Pursuant to its authority as stipulated by Annex 8 of the General Framework Agreement for Peace in BiH.ba 2. +387 33 278100 Mirela Mulalić Handan Executive Officer of the Commission to Preserve National Monuments 3. 71000 Sarajevo tel. applying the Criteria on the Designation of National Monuments (Official Gazette of BiH No.com. 4.aneks8komisija.hereinafter: Legal status VAT registration number: Official address Postal address Contact person Telephone number Fax number E-mail Internet site Commission to Preserve National Monuments of BIH The Commission State institution (non-profit institution) 01079962 Obala Kulina Bana 1 71000 SARAJEVO Mirela Mulalić Handan + 387 33 276 760 + 387 33 276 768 [email protected] Study – IRPP/SAAH 4 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ I 1. The work of the Commission is financed from the budget of the institutions of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Obala Kulina bana 1 (the Labour Union building). The Commission has drawn up standard petition forms by property type and has lodged them with all the municipalities of BiH.net. 1/02 and 10/02). which is staffed by qualified personnel in the fields of ___________________________________________________________________________ City Hall – Sarajevo – Bosnia and Herzegovina 28 November 2007 . The institutions responsible for the protection of the heritage provide expertise on reconstruction projects and expert supervision of reconstruction work. the Presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina issued a decision appointing the following persons as members of the Commission: Prof Dr Zeynep Ahunbay (architecture expert). Amra Hadžimuhamedović (MSc architecture). The Entity governments.) that a monument is endangered.Feasibility Study – IRPP/SAAH 5 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ historical heritage. cantons. The Commission also issues decisions on designation as a National Monument in the absence of specific application for each of the individual properties on the Provisional List of National Monuments of Bosnia and Herzegovina (Official Gazette of BiH No. List of the management board Members of the Commission Pursuant to Annex 8 of the General Framework Agreement for Peace in BiH and the Decision on the Commission. 9/02). at its 119th session (21 December 2001). and lack of maintenance or other forms of destruction. 5. 2/02 and 27/02. Everyone. the Commission notifies the relevant Entity or other authorities (governments. and proposes measures for its protection in accordance with the law. and the competent municipal court is notified for the purposes of registration in the Land Register. and are enforced pursuant to the law on the Enforcement of Decisions of the Commission to Preserve National Monuments (Official Gazette of FBiH Nos. Prof Dr Dubravko Lovrenović (historian). Internal organisation of the Commission The professional and administrative affairs of the Commission are performed by the Commission's Secretariat. the Commission monitors and considers the state of affairs and activities relating to National Monuments endangered by illegal construction. the Commission is also authorised to perform activities of international co-operation in the field of culturalhistorical heritage protection. 33/02). The Law on the Implementation of Decisions of the Commission to Preserve National Monuments lays down the responsibilities of. inexpert reconstruction. in particular the competent authorities of the Entities. In addition to issuing decisions designating National Monuments. display and reconstruction of national monuments. Pursuant to the Decision of the Presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina. which accords National Monuments the highest degree of protection. regional planning ministry. must refrain from any action that might endanger the national monument or jeopardise its protection and reconstruction. and relationships between. Entity ministries are responsible for spatial planning issue permits for the protection. municipal authorities. heritage protection institutes and municipal authorities in charge of urban planning and land registry matters. religious communities and other institutions. Prof Dr Ljiljana Ševo (art historian) and Tina Wik (architect). and urban and municipal authorities. organisations or institutes responsible for heritage management. are notified of the Commission’s decisions in order to carry out the measures stipulated. the departments. the appropriate ministries. In specific cases. and Official Gazette of RS No. including filing criminal charges with the relevant authorities pursuant to the provisions of the Criminal Proceedings Law. etc. The Commission's decisions are final. institutes for the protection of monuments. Responsibility for the enforcement of the Commission's decisions lies with the Entity governments and the ministries responsible for regional planning. as Programme Co-ordinator for Bosnia and Herzegovina. The European Cultural Convention makes recommendations for the development of mechanisms for cultural co-operation and respect for cultural diversity. 3) Preliminary Technical Assessments. On the basis of its operations to date. Applicability of the project to the EU standards and norms Integrated Rehabilitation Project Plan/Survey of the Architectural and Archaeological Heritage (IRPP/SAAH) The Council of Europe. groups of buildings and sites. the Commission's Executive Officer. 1. the extent of heritage documentation and the institutional framework for protection. In the course of these activities. which are regarded as properties of particular importance to European heritage. with the technical co-operation and professional assistance of Council of Europe experts. the preliminary stages were submitted to the ministries responsible for regional planning and culture in the Entities and Brčko District and the heritage protection institutions for completion and data collation. Bulgaria. and as priorities requiring urgent protection measures. and Mirela Mulalić Handan. The Regional Programme includes Albania. Amra Hadžimuhamedović. The assessment offers a brief overview of the state of the heritage in BiH from the point of view of physical and legal protection. Bosnia and Herzegovina is represented by the Commission to Preserve National Monuments. Montenegro. working in association with the European Commission. on which this project is based. The work of the Secretariat is managed and organised by an executive official. ___________________________________________________________________________ City Hall – Sarajevo – Bosnia and Herzegovina 28 November 2007 . education. Work began on the project in 2003. the Commission to Preserve National Monuments has drawn up an assessment of the state of the architectural and archaeological heritage and a Prioritised Intervention List. Bosnia and Herzegovina. The adoption and application of the results of the Regional Cultural and Natural Heritage Programme brings the countries of South-Eastern Europe closer to membership of the European Union. The Prioritised Intervention List (PIL) for BiH includes 19 national monuments. financial affairs and technical co-ordination. management.Feasibility Study – IRPP/SAAH 6 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ archaeological heritage. architectural heritage. as Project Co-ordinator for this project. 6. and 4) Feasibility Studies. 2) Prioritised Intervention List. legal affairs. The Integrated Rehabilitation Project Plan/Survey of the Architectural and Archaeological Heritage (IRPP/SAAH) is one of three components of the Regional Programme. has drawn up a Regional Cultural and Natural Heritage Programme for South-Eastern Europe. The aim of the Integrated Rehabilitation Project Plan is to bring heritage protection and conservation in the countries concerned closer to the norms and standards applicable in European Union countries. Serbia and “the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia”. The Integrated Rehabilitation Project Plan consists of four stages: 1) national assessment of the state of the architectural and archaeological heritage. peace-keeping and development of democratic society in the South-Eastern European countries. The Regional Cultural and Natural Heritage Programme is regarded as contributing to the stability. townscape heritage and cultural landscapes. among which are historic buildings. All posts are filled by selection from applicants responding to a public advertisement. which co-ordinates and manages the activities involved in implementing the programme. documentation and inventory of the heritage of Bosnia and Herzegovina. respectively. Croatia Kosovo/UNMIK. The provision of adequate mechanisms for cultural heritage protection in the countries of South-Eastern Europe is also a contribution to the preservation of the European heritage and identity. Romania. movable heritage items. The Council of Europe has appointed Commission member. The Commission used the following criteria for national monuments to be included on the PIL: . Excavation. a temporary wooden construction to protect the wall remains of the mosque in situ. Foča – Phase I: Preservation of Fragments. Grant: $24 100. recording and preservation of fragments. cleaning. Public Affairs Officer. U. (Gerald McLoughlin. Nicholas Church. Foča – Phase I of preliminary and research works. Capacity to manage and implement actions Experience of similar actions in 2006. Partner: United States of America. recording.S.S. Putting a temporary fence around the building yard of the architectural ensemble. . (Gerald McLoughlin. a Preliminary Technical Assessment for each monument on the PIL and a Feasibility Study for selected monuments from the PIL. Preliminary and research works on rehabilitation: cleaning the site of rubbish and litter.S. selection. Partner: United States of America. Mehmed Pasha Kukavica Mosque. 28 November 2007 Project 2: Project 3: ___________________________________________________________________________ City Hall – Sarajevo – Bosnia and Herzegovina . Embassy in Sarajevo). Protecting the remains of the architectural ensemble from further deterioration. 3. The Council of Europe has published the results of the completed stages of the project for each of the participating countries – Integrated Rehabilitation Project Plan / Survey of the Architectural and Archaeological Heritage.the monument is of outstanding value. (Gerald McLoughlin. U. Stolac. Public Affairs Officer. Public Affairs Officer.Feasibility Study – IRPP/SAAH 7 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ The Town Hall in Sarajevo is included on the Priority Intervention List.the monument is a rare or unique example of a certain type or style. Duration: 2006. Feasibility Studies (FS) for the properties on the Prioritised Intervention List should facilitate foreign investment and research opportunities for the development of private-public sector partnerships. and adopt a budget for the implementation of the Project. Grant: $24 700. The Presidency of BiH adopted the results to date of the Integrated Rehabilitation Project Plan. Preliminary Technical Assessments (PTAs) have been carried out for all national monuments on the PIL by local experts from the Commission and other institutions in charge of heritage protection and in co-operation with Council of Europe experts.the monument is of major importance for the reconstruction of civic trust and the implementation of the peace accord in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Trijebanj. construction of a wooden cover. Duration: 2006. . a temporary wooden construction to protect the wall remains in situ. St. It recommended that the Council of Ministers of BiH provide the conditions for integrating the Project into sustainable development strategies and programmes. 2. putting a temporary fence around the building yard. U. Duration: 2006/2007. Embassy in Sarajevo). 7. Partner: United States of America.threats caused by human or natural factors mean that the monument is at risk of losing its most important features or of being lost altogether. inventorying and conserving of fragments. Project 1: Aladža Mosque. cleaning fragments of the mosque. construction of a wooden cover. . Embassy in Sarajevo). Grant: $25 000. . This ministry is responsible for the implementation of legal measures for the protection of national monuments proclaimed by the Commission to Preserve National Monuments of BiH. production of publications and video records. Banja Luka – Preliminary and research works for reconstruction: excavation. Other bodies in a position to contribute to the project implementation and the decisions of the Commission are: Government of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina (Entity level institution). rehabilitate and maintain the national monument. clearing 17 overgrown national monuments. Duration: 2006/2007. The Government of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina shall be responsible for providing the resources for drawing up and implementing the necessary technical documentation for the rehabilitation of the national monument.Feasibility Study – IRPP/SAAH 8 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Project 4: Ferhadija Mosque. Partner: European Commission. Project 5: Project 6: 8. Activities: production and erection of notice boards. reconnaissance. The institute is responsible for expert supervision. The government is responsible for ensuring the legal. conserve. evaluation and structural analyses of fragments and revision of existing project. Public Affairs Officer. historical and natural heritage into the tourism sector of the region of Herzegovina. installation of benches and rubbish bins at 35 national monuments. Vozuća. (Gerald McLoughlin. Partner: United States of America.S. Sarajevo (Canton level institution).Sarajevo Canton has earmarked €200 000 for drawing up project documentation and rehabilitation of the Town Hall in Sarajevo. Cantonal Institute for the Protection of Cultural-Historical and Natural Heritage. Monastery church. historical and natural heritage. display. cleaning and recording of fragments. Duration: 2006/2007. Partner 2: Ministry of Culture. technical. and building and craft works on the national monuments located in the Sarajevo Canton. The Institute is responsible for expert supervision. Federation BiH. Embassy in Sarajevo). Ministry of Physical Planning of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina (Entity level institution).The City of Sarajevo (City Administration) is the owner of the building and leader in the rehabilitation of the Town Hall. identification of the cultural. administrative and financial measures necessary to protect. Duration: 2006/2007. Partner 1: German Government. Grant: $100 000. production of programme. building and craft works on the national monument as it is proclaimed by the Decision of the Commission to Preserve National Monuments. Grant 1: €37 210 (50% of total). presentation and integration of the cultural. Zavidovići – Drawing up project and carrying out conservation and reconstruction works. It has earmarked € 200 000 for drawing up project ___________________________________________________________________________ City Hall – Sarajevo – Bosnia and Herzegovina 28 November 2007 . Institute for the Protection of Cultural-Historical and Natural Heritage of the Federation of BiH (Entity level institution). U. Programme for the ongoing protection. Grant: €223 804. These funds are part of a joint action taken by the City of Sarajevo and the Municipality of the Old Town of Sarajevo . scientific. organisation and holding of an international workshop. Grant 2: €50 000. it will contribute to the preservation of the cultural memory and spirit of the city as part of the historical core of Sarajevo. donated €750 000 for the initial works on the reconstruction of the Town Hall – National Library in Sarajevo.000. the Commission will call for tenders in accordance with the Law on Public Procurement that defines categories and procedures in line with EU standards and norms.3 The reconstruction of this building will contribute to raising awareness about cultural heritage and the importance of the cultural and historical heritage of Bosnia and Herzegovina. These funds are a part of a joint action taken by the City of Sarajevo and the Municipality of the Old Town of Sarajevo Government of the Republic of Austria In 1996. Spanish Government On 7 June 2007.reconstruction and revitalisation of an important monument in the region.Feasibility Study – IRPP/SAAH 9 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ documentation and rehabilitation of the Town Hall in Sarajevo. 1. CONTEXT OF THE PROJECT Objectives 1.2 This project will stop further dilapidation that may cause permanent loss of some parts of the building and loss of important decorations on the façade of the building. contributes to cultural events and improving tourism in the region. donated €1 000 000 for the reconstruction of the Town Hall façade. ___________________________________________________________________________ City Hall – Sarajevo – Bosnia and Herzegovina 28 November 2007 . €2 250 000 were used to continue the works on reconstructing horizontal constructions and the reconstruction of the assembly hall. Government of the Republic of Hungary On 5 July 2007.4 The revitalisation of the Town Hall. II 1.1 Reconstruction of the Town Hall in Sarajevo has multiple meaning: . donated € 100. provided funds that were used to continue repair works on the Town Hall. as the leader of the Town Hall reconstruction. The preparation of project documentation is underway and its submission is expected early in September 2007. . and the City of Sarajevo donated €17. . 1. as part of the historical core of the City of Sarajevo. carried out preparation activities for drafting an international tender and drawing up project documentation for repair and reconstruction of the Town Hall. the most important example of the pseudo-Moorish style in Bosnia and Herzegovina.Municipality of the Old Town of Sarajevo has provided €50 000 for drawing up project documentation and rehabilitation of the Town Hall in Sarajevo.000 € to protect the Town Hall façade. The money was used for carrying out the most necessary works aimed at saving the structure surviving after the destruction. European Commission In 1999.it will ensure the continuity of use and reconstruction of the Town Hall as the original seat of the City Administration. Technical management of the project The City Administration of Sarajevo. For the execution of work stages. 1. These funds are a part of a joint action taken by the City of Sarajevo and the Municipality of the Old Town of Sarajevo . religious communities and so on. entrepreneurs and the municipality. Historical and Natural Heritage of Bosnia and Herzegovina had gathered by November 1995. bearing in mind the importance and function of the Town Hall and its historical surroundings. if we consider the development of certain tourist sectors. Be that as it may. partly on reports from individual organisations. Regional/local socio-economic context From its origins the Town Hall. This type of contribution may form additional funds for necessary maintenance works and presentation of the cultural and historical heritage of the City of Sarajevo and Bosnia and Herzegovina. With regard to the current state of development of the municipality and a lack of significant plans (development strategy of the municipality) for analysing economic potentials and economic profit generation systems. This data is partly based on on-site inspections. 2. According to the still incomplete data that the Institute for the Protection of the Cultural.Feasibility Study – IRPP/SAAH 10 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1. 3. gatherings. (15th to 19th centuries). museums. contrary to the provisions of international law and those of the Criminal Codes applicable in Bosnia and Herzegovina and the countries that came into being following the dissolution of Yugoslavia. Cultural-historical heritage of the Old Town Municipality. as part of the city. as in the organisation of the festival Baščaršijske noći. The existing capacities of the Old Town Municipality offer a possibility for tourism development directed at various marketing segments: 1. The activities of the accompanying businesses. an increase in the number of tourist visits will contribute to the increase of income and more work for hotels. even though incomplete.5 The project contributes to strengthening capacities and institutions of Bosnia and Herzegovina through the reconstruction of an administrative and public building within the urban centre of the city as the first building of the Sarajevo Town Hall. the state and its people. the worst destruction was of properties from the Ottoman period. will also increase. Group or individual tourist visits to the Town Hall building can be organised. including the use of the library and the area planned for hosting various events. The reconstruction of the Town Hall is a symbol of resistance to destruction and primitivism. In that sense. 3. 2. represents the memory of the place and documents a period of time. visits to the museum of reconstruction. the numbers in the report. tourism should be viewed as a source of income for companies. restaurants. concerts organised on the square in front of the Town Hall. such as local stores. 2 771 architectural heritage properties had been demolished or damaged: 713 of them had been totally destroyed and 554 had been gutted by fire and were unusable. Classified chronologically and stylistically. destruction and reconstruction. The economic potential lies in the development of tourism in different segments. Sectorial context The architectural heritage of Bosnia and Herzegovina was systematically destroyed during the 1992-95 war. souvenir shops and shops that sell other domestic products. organisation of gatherings and presentations. Various. as well as the sale of appropriate souvenirs and books about its history. The social significance of the building lies in the fact that a number of premises will be returned to the National and University Library for public use. indicate the almost total state of devastation of Bosnia and Herzegovina’s heritage. ___________________________________________________________________________ City Hall – Sarajevo – Bosnia and Herzegovina 28 November 2007 . stores and other facilities located in the neighbourhood. Baščaršija. followed by those of the Austro-Hungarian period. This building is a symbol of the city and has a symbolic meaning that was created after its destruction and the attempt to destroy the cultural identity of the city. primarily the Town Hall and its centre. Additional activities that my be carried out during the tourist season in relation to the rich history of the city. and presentations that point out the Town Hall building and its surrounding. create significant conditions for the development of cultural tourism. performances. tourism related activities. Post Office building in Sarajevo. including a lightning conductor installation Repair of the steel dome and false ceiling. held from 4 to 10 July 2006. which has been adopted by the Entities (Republika Srpska. at state level. Statutory protection The Commission to Preserve National Monuments adopted a decision to designate the Historical Building – Town Hall in Sarajevo as a national monument of Bosnia and Herzegovina at its 27th session. The Dayton Peace Agreement defines. the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the District of Brčko and the local and regional authorities defined in an annex) and provides national monuments with the highest degree of protection. technical. Annex 8 relates to the heritage and the importance of its reconstruction for the implementation of a stable peace. works on the reconstruction of the missing parts and the works on the presentation of the national monument. administrative and financial measures necessary to protect. (categorisation of the Regional Plan of Bosnia and Herzegovina until 2002). inner stairs and external stone stairs 28 November 2007 - - ___________________________________________________________________________ City Hall – Sarajevo – Bosnia and Herzegovina . in separate annexes. including reconstruction of the glass cover of the dome Reconstruction works in the assembly hall The Government of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina is responsible for ensuring the preparation of appropriate project documentation. Republika Srpska and the District of Brčko). conserve. To ensure the ongoing protection of the National Monument. scientific. domes. falling within the first protection category. This is one of the annexes that establishes refugees’ right to return and lays down conditions to ensure security in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Heritage management’s main strength lies in the institutional legislative framework for heritage protection. and the Baths and the Neretva Hotel in Mostar). support of decorations on the roof gable. which date back to the AustroHungarian period. were destroyed. The Town Hall and National Library in Sarajevo and four other monuments from that period (the Town Hall in Bosanski Novi. as well as structural and construction repair works. a technical review of previously implemented works needs to be organised: Stabilisation of the structural system of masonry constructions Reconstruction of the roof. with the approval of the Federation ministry responsible for physical planning and expert supervision of the responsible heritage protection authority at the level of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina Before carrying out works on the building. the following protection measures are defined: The Government of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina is responsible for ensuring the legal. the obligations at the different administrative levels (state level: the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina. To ensure the ongoing protection of the national monument the following measures are hereby stipulated: Only conservation and restoration works are permitted. the floor in the ground floor. The Commission’s decisions are final and are enforced in accordance with the Law on the Enforcement of Decisions of the Commission to Preserve National Monuments.Feasibility Study – IRPP/SAAH 11 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 16 buildings of national importance. based on research works conducted. which will include: Structural repair and stabilisation of basement walls and pillars. restore. and the Entity levels: the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina. 4. set up in accordance with Annex 8 of the General Framework Agreement for Peace in Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Decision of the Presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina on the Commission to Preserve National Monuments (BiH Official Gazette Nos. 1/02 and 10/02). and the national monument. The Commission to Preserve National Monuments is an institution of the state of Bosnia and Herzegovina. as a result of a big administrative reform in Turkey. The need for a modern town hall arose within the planned development of the “national capital”. City of Sarajevo. old land survey Surface of the building: gross 10 450 square metres /net 6 945. administrative.Feasibility Study – IRPP/SAAH 12 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ - Façade restoration Restoration of the interior and its adaptation according to the purpose. 2 metre high metal protective fence around it III 1. in the district of Baščaršija. Executive summary Being under Turkish rule at the end of the 19th century. 97. In 1789. Its location is a part of the historical centre of Sarajevo (within the complex of Baščaršija) erected during the Ottoman period. one of the main city streets on its south-eastern side. Bosnia and Herzegovina. The fragments that are too damaged to be reintegrated will be conserved and properly displayed in the museum of Town Hall reconstruction No parking is allowed in the contact zone of the national monuments and no access to vehicles The building will have a solid.00 square metres Map reference Sarajevo. the City Administration was formed. Town Hall. the then mayor of Sarajevo underlined that need. attempts were made to implement the programme for the new town hall on some location where an outstanding building could be built. public or cultural Restoration of plaster and painted decorations - The original appearance in regard to architectural details. Cadastral reference/land unit: Cadastral data: c. It is situated on the border of the commercial and business district and adjacent to the main city road. wall colour. Europe Latitude: 43. land registry excerpt XCVIII/19.50 Altitude: 525 metres 2. Sarajevo got its first municipal administration – Beledija and Assembly of the City Administration. Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Old Town Municipality. All preserved fragments shall be examined and reintegrated. Sarajevo Canton. Mustajbeg Fadilpašić. ___________________________________________________________________________ City Hall – Sarajevo – Bosnia and Herzegovina 28 November 2007 . encircled by roads on all sides: Obala Kulina bana. in the eastern part of downtown Sarajevo. PHYSICAL AND SOCIAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT Location Administrative location: Bosnia and Herzegovina. and the treatment of openings and façades is to be preserved and restored during conservation and restoration works The original materials are to be used during conservation and restoration works. Description of location: The Town Hall building was built on the bank of the Miljacka River. at the time of establishing the Austro-Hungarian rule in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Around 1890. Telali on the north-eastern and the Brodac Street on its west side.p. The approval was issued for the location on the right bank of the Miljacka River.85 Longitude: 18. the original methods of material processing are to be applied and the original bonding elements used to the highest degree possible. The layout of the Town Hall building is of a triangular shape. The walls of all levels. to a large extent. using traditional materials (stone. It was completed in 1894. spacious hexagonal hall. are made of brick 75. From the domed porch one enters a quadrangular area with nine domed fields. As A. was defined in Paržik’s project and worked out in detail by Ć. There are angle towers in the form of prisms at the corners of the triangle. Kallay. most outstanding premises of the Town Hall. brick and wood) and steel supports. This is the most valuable space in the building with the height of the entire building and a glazed dome on the top. who (according to the historian Hamdija Kreševljaković) objected to the project. structurally developed from the triangular base. The culmination of its representative quality was achieved by richly decorated elements of the Islamic architecture of North Africa and Spain. as ___________________________________________________________________________ City Hall – Sarajevo – Bosnia and Herzegovina 28 November 2007 . The location determined the basic layout of the Town Hall – an equilateral triangle. Iveković continued to work on the project. with brick domes stretching over two storeys and connecting a monumental stone staircase. Ćiril M. At the same time he designed the Town Hall building located to the east of the Beledija (ideally matching axes of the entry to the Beledija and the western entry to the Town Hall). A three-pronged staircase leads from the assembly hall to the gallery that stands on the pillars with decoratively executed capitals and arches. In sculptural terms. Iveković. The preliminary design was completed in 1891 and offered to Minister B. The ceiling structure above the basement is made of brick vaults. There are projecting bays on all sides of the building. other premises are developed through four floors above the basement. with the external parapet cladding made of stone. The selection of decoration elements may be Wittek’s greatest contribution to the construction of the building. The building has a basement. M. to face the river. and a smaller meeting hall located at the opposite side. From the gallery one enters the main. The basement level is set on stone foundations. It is made of an access staircase with a porch. ground floor. with minor alterations made to Wittek’s design. mezzanine and two upper floors. main façade being particularly pronounced and very representative. The distinctive quality of the building is. with the southern and north-eastern façade being 56 metres long and the north-western façade 52 metres long. Alexander Wittek was charged with preparing a new project. he went to Cairo on two occasions to study buildings built in that style. All the halls are at a height of two floors. The layout of the building is an almost symmetrical equilateral triangle. made of the stylistic features of relief and painted decoration. A glazed covering and false ceiling complete the interior. The ceiling structures in the peripheral tracts are built as wooden structures with wooden floors. such as the big hall. The improvement of the quay along the Miljacka River was quite certain at that time. above which there is a loggia. and at the central entrance they are built with brick domes. Since he made the project in the pseudo-Moorsih style. which. Wittek fell ill and died in 1894. This area leads to the central. two smaller halls. Since the designer did not accept the objections of the Austro-Hungarian Minister Kallay. The style of the building is a mixture of historicism of the pseudo-Moorish origin. except the basement. in terms of space and composition. Summary description of the building/site The original Town Hall building was designed and executed as a massive structural system.60 and 45 cm thick. with the bay on the southern. on which he worked in 1892 and 1893. the painted elements of the interior and exterior. 3. so that Paržik positioned the main façade of the Town Hall. His models were the mosque and madrasah of Hasan II in Cairo. The steel dome above the assembly hall was made of the same materials.Feasibility Study – IRPP/SAAH 13 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ The architect Karlo Karlo Paržik (1857-1942) designed the building of Beledija (detention) which marked the beginning of the development of the construction block towards the west. The structure of the assembly hall is made of stone pillars and stone load-bearing arches. which is marked by elements of neo-Moorish architecture. at a height of two floors. The style models are the so-called Mezoarabic and Moorish art of Spain and North Africa. lighting and decoration of the dome. and they represent excellent realisations of that style in Bosnia and Herzegovina. In 1897 this line was extended all the way to the Šeherćehaja's Bridge. on twisted half-pillars of the angle towers. The construction began in 1892 (started by architect Wittek) and ended in 1894. decoration using relief ceramics. and on the flat ceilings of the most outstanding halls of the Town Hall building. the polichromy of the façade with the alternating red and yellow stripes. and the house dubbed ‘Inat kuća’ exists to the present day. The decoration of the building’s façade shows the style elements taken from the Mameluk period in Cairo (1250-1517).e. in the pseudo-Moorish style. there is a stained glass window made of arabesque-like star-shaped motifs. when it was destroyed. ___________________________________________________________________________ City Hall – Sarajevo – Bosnia and Herzegovina 28 November 2007 . transennas. Partially taken over from the Fatimid period are the designs of balconies. This was done as he requested. etc. which is made of multicoloured glass of intensive colour and geometric forms of arabesque motifs. the existence of a town/city hall meant a higher level of political self-governance. There is another stained glass window standing above the landing of the main staircase. First floor – formal hall and meeting rooms. at the opposite side of the Town Hall building. Reflections of this style are also observable on the external façade. the wall surfaces above the landing of the main staircase. The hans had been pulled down. The fanciful arabesque-like and Moorish ornaments are painted on the domed ceilings and arcades in the halls of the first floor. decorated with polychromatic ornaments and gilding. The building had this cultural function until 1992. Below the glazed ceiling of the dome. The building was inaugurated on 20 April 1896. Significance In the history of western European cities. That is. Some elements of the artistic arrangement of relief and painted decoration were taken from the area of North Africa. The Town Hall of Sarajevo was built on the model of and with all the elements used for the construction of buildings of that kind in western European architecture and contains the usual architectural elements: Ground floor. The extension of the tramline along the bank to the new Town Hall building depended on the completion of the quay improvement works. Tower. on the finishing roof cornice and elsewhere. which fill the distyle and rosette above it. the ceilings of the loggia on the first floor. onto the other bank of the Miljacka River. when it was relinquished to the National and University Library. loggia for the courtroom. the use of multicoloured stained glass windows. and the way of painting flat ceilings. above the central hall. The Town Hall building was used by the Town Administration until 1949 (the period of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia). Summary historic development of the building/site The Town Hall building was built on a site where two hans and one private house had been situated. which was placed on the crown of the central dome of the Sarajevo Town Hall building. above all. when Baron Ivan Apel formally handed over the building to the Town Administration (with the District Court being housed in one part of it together with the Bosnian and Herzegovinian Parliament). 5.Feasibility Study – IRPP/SAAH 14 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ well as the wall decorations are designed in the spirit of historicism. Inspired by the Hispanic-Arabic mudejar style. the use of stalactite relief. from the Fatimid period. typical of the spacious areas in the Islamic art. where there are stalactite and honey-combed fields. with the most magnificent portions in the domed parts of the assembly hall. brick by brick. i. relief and painted decorations were executed in the interior. 4. balcony or projecting loggia. and the owner of the private house requested that the house be transferred for a purse of gold coins. These elements are seen in the stylisation of horseshoe arches. connected in the so-called endless ornamentation. of vertical proportion. and the visit of Emperor Franz Joseph to the town administration. which was a symbol of the most monumental building – the domed mosque. i. the building was viewed in that way. Newspapers and magazines carried texts and photographs of it. with good reason. is seen as monumental. that is not big. In any case. The same idea is developed within the project of the Town Hall building. seen through the decoration. the spatial qualities that the inhabitants will view as their own property. science and art. we come to the assembly hall – the framed space of the building. It is a sufficient reason to give to the building. Alexander Witter.e. The Town Hall as the National and University Library had a great value for the entire region. which was placed in it in l908. and its copying. Since its early days the Town Hall building was a symbol of the city. Its appearance and close surroundings were an interesting motif to photograph and immortalise the moments of the newly installed street lighting. new electric tram. the architect who worked on the project and building of the Town Hall went to Cairo on two occasions to learn more about buildings constructed in this style. The access to the central area – the interior of the mosque – is made through the porch and entryway to the overall complex. This type of space. humanitarian aid. That is the transposition of the Islamic decoration and architecture. Over the entire century of its existence. area framed by the envelope of the building. in the way a European architect of that time understood and applied it (in the romantic and national spirit). Although the Town Hall building with its appearance and dimensions “interrupted” the picture of the fragmented construction style typical of the downtown of the Ottoman time. so that the administration became slowly replaced by culture. and heralded the future changes in the complete image of the town. when Bosnia and Herzegovina became an equal member of the community of the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy. but a completely new topic.Feasibility Study – IRPP/SAAH 15 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ The Town Hall is the spatially largest and most impressive building from the Austro-Hungarian time in Sarajevo. first automobiles in the town. Unlike the majority of public buildings in Sarajevo. the Moorish architecture or pseudo-oriental expression. It was a part of the ensemble of buildings with different activities pursued in it – praying. That is the so-called oriental style. By entering the porch and going through the door. has always been something that a Bosnian has been familiar with. The Town Hall housed the bust of Emperor Franz Joseph made by Frangeš Mihanović. richly decorated. which project a picture of the pseudoMoorish style mostly as an art and decoration repertory developed on façades. and with the accompanying graveyard. which were pictured in front of the Town Hall. The space. The architecture of eclecticism in Bosnia and Herzegovina did not produce original designs vis-à-vis the architecture of the central European cities. The Mosque was the most monumental building of Ottoman architecture in Bosnia. It is also the most beautiful and most important example of the pseudoMoorish style in Bosnia and Herzegovina. That was the year of the annexation. which creates the magnificent effect. the application of the pseudoMoorish style on the building marked the tendency for compliance with the tradition and culture. the building of the Town Hall is characterised by the expression of that style. he took the mosque and madrasah of Hasan II in Cairo as his models. Architects believed that they were creating a local “Bosnian style” and in that spirit they represented Bosnia at the European exhibitions. meant to be the seat of the town government. spatial and even structural plan too. studying. this ___________________________________________________________________________ City Hall – Sarajevo – Bosnia and Herzegovina 28 November 2007 . Its function gradually began to focus on the spiritual aspirations of Bosnia and Herzegovina. The building was closed and rainwater prevented from penetrating. 7. Conservation philosophy The reconstruction of the Town Hall in Sarajevo as a national monument implies the reconstruction of the destroyed structure using the methods of restoration and reconstruction. 8. to the extent these methods are unavoidable. whether of natural or human origin. as they were of a temporary nature. the preparation of all project plans is focused on restoration and conservation as the primary approach to the reconstruction of the building. The new function of the building includes its original function – the seat of the City Administration – and the purpose that is of vital national interest – the National and University Library in its former premises. Apart from these functions. and also exposed to destruction of the already conducted works on the building. there is a plan for the building to have some public function: to house a museum and be a place where public manifestations are organised. one of the most successful and most beautiful results of the application of the pseudo-Moorish style on a public building in Bosnia and Herzegovina at the time of eclecticism.Feasibility Study – IRPP/SAAH 16 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ building is a monument of spirituality of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Vulnerability The condition of the monuments is poor. To that end it is necessary to carry out internal adaptation of the building in order to adjust it to the installations of modern technology. from weathering factors (exterior of the building) to some extent. mainly on the destroyed parts of the façade and interior. ___________________________________________________________________________ City Hall – Sarajevo – Bosnia and Herzegovina 28 November 2007 . are more or less of a temporary nature. which created the necessary conditions for further works. may be acceptable” The Town Hall building was hit by many heavy and inflammable missiles in the night of 25-26 August 1992 and was then burnt and collapsed in the fire. Level of risk In view of the fact that the protection measures. which has a reason to survive only if it is given its previous function. The symbolic meaning of the Town Hall became even more pronounced after the destruction. Its reconstruction is a symbol of the resistance to the powers of destruction. in compliance with the provisions of international charters and conventions: The Riga Charter on Authenticity and Historical Reconstruction in Relationship to Cultural Heritage (ICCROM. All elements whose physical condition is convenient for conservation should be treated in this way. 2000) provides the following justification for the rehabilitation of the Town Hall in Sarajevo: . 6. The architectural and artistic value of the building is its distinctiveness. In view of the significance of the building and its legal treatment. such as closing the building and its protection. lost through disaster. The library holdings and physical structure of the building suffered incalculable damage in a moment. with the possibility of influence by the weathering elements on the building façade that is richly decorated. which was an attempt to destroy the cultural identity of the state and its people. The restoration of all elements should be based on the analysis of the original documentation and research done on the building itself. the building is still at risk. The physical structure is currently repaired to the degree of structural stabilisation.“reconstruction of cultural heritage. fresh emphasis has been placed on the demand to preserve the original substance of the monument. Otherwise. in particular as providing evidence of history.) reads as follows: "The process of restoration is a highly specialized operation. “More and more clearly. this building is a monument of spirituality of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Principle 2. By the destruction of the library and scientific holdings. by virtue of its authenticity. Article 9 of the Venice Charter (ICOMOS. both past and present. Its aim is to preserve and reveal the aesthetic and historic value of the monument and is based on respect for original material and authentic documents". so that the administration became slowly replaced by culture. The reconstruction requires sorting. peoples combine pride in monuments of their own history with interest in monuments of other countries and with respect for cultural achievements.Feasibility Study – IRPP/SAAH 17 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ - “when the monument concerned has outstanding artistic. the Town Hall lost its function as the central scientific library of Bosnia and Herzegovina. peaceful co-existence between peoples “. 1975): "The past as embodied in the architectural heritage provides the sort of environment indispensable to a balanced and complete life. 1998) sends out a message: ___________________________________________________________________________ City Hall – Sarajevo – Bosnia and Herzegovina 28 November 2007 . conservation and reintegration of the fragments. By this is meant that substance which. Newspapers and magazines carried texts and photographs of it thus documenting a period of time.” Anasthylosis will be the prevailing method used in the reconstruction of the Town Hall in Sarajevo. plays a constructive role in assuring equitable. part of man's awareness of his own continuity will be destroyed". science and art. has grown through the ages. Universal Declaration of Human Rights (Stockholm. especially the monuments of every people and each ethnic and social group. confirms the origins of the monument and its historical evolution up to the present day. cleaning. Interventions on the Town Hall building will be carried out using the same or identical materials documented over the time in the historical data about the building. In any case. Worldwide exchange of knowledge and experience on characteristic features. European Charter of the Architectural Heritage (Council of Europe. and the beauty of the cultural heritage. in all those components which make it worthy of being recognized as a monument. of the peoples represented by these monuments. It is also the most beautiful and most important example of the pseudo-Moorish style in Bosnia and Herzegovina. historical evidence. symbolic or environmental (whether urban or rural) significance for regional history and cultures” As the National and University Library the Town Hall was important for the entire region. The function of the Town Hall gradually began to focus on the spiritual aspirations of Bosnia and Herzegovina. 1965. and which. 1982) provides justification for rehabilitation as follows: “Since men have been influenced by the wartime destruction and by reconstruction work after the war to regard monuments with increasing interest. The Declaration of Dresden (ICOMOS. "This heritage should be passed on to future generations in its authentic state and in all its variety as an essential part of the memory of the human race. as well as in the analyses of the building material." Since its early days the Town Hall building was a memory of a place. The Town Hall is the spatially largest and most impressive building from the Austro-Hungarian time in Sarajevo. Priorities for intervention Urgent protection works on the building are necessary – roof and protection works to prevent further dilapidation of the façade – protection edgings and gutters. Repair of the steel dome and false ceiling. ___________________________________________________________________________ City Hall – Sarajevo – Bosnia and Herzegovina 28 November 2007 . staircases. Destroyed fragments were sorted and placed outside the building.individually and collectively -. Reconstruction of the roof with the installation of a lightning conductor. The symbolic meaning of the Town Hall emerged after its destruction as an attempt to destroy the cultural identity of the state and its people and its reconstruction is a symbol of resistance to the powers of destruction.must share just as all share the wealth of the memory. Information board with details about the monument was put up. which means restoring a damaged or destroyed property to its condition prior to the destruction. Phase 2 – structural stabilisation and protection of the building Works continued on the reconstruction of horizontal structures and the assembly hall in 2002-04: . using the same or identical materials that were used prior to its damaging or destruction. since the structural system is adapted to new purposes and fittings. external works. floors. Supporting the heavily damaged structure of the assembly hall with load-bearing scaffolding. including vaulted and brick structures. closing of the building Research works on the façade – research of the existing materials and sculpted elements on the façade Preparing main projects for a functional reconstruction of the Town Hall (these projects will define in detail the repair. Repair of the structural system of masonry walls. walls. in the search for a sustainable development at the service of Mankind".Two destroyed fields were fully reconstructed. 10. 11. the same technique of building. a large number of pillars (angle and free-standing pillars) on the ground and upper floors were replaced. within the fenced area around it. internal repairs. 9. as much as possible. including the reconstruction of the glazed covering. Detailed description of the work Phase 1 – structural stabilisation and protection of the building The structural stabilisation works were carried out in 1996-97 Fence was built around the building. This method is necessarily combined with reconstruction.Due to the extent of damage. together with the load-bearing arches on the ground floor. restoration and colour treatment of the façade.Feasibility Study – IRPP/SAAH 18 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ - "These are responsibilities that all -. Level of interventions The intervention on the Town Hall can be subsumed under the general term of rehabilitation. ceilings and necessary fittings). . and. This programme must: o o o outline a sustainable approach to future management. computer system. it is necessary to prepare a Management Plan that should include a long-term maintenance programme for the building. ventilation and air-conditioning . Phase 3 – Preparing the restoration and repair project for the building A contract was signed for the preparation of project documentation for the reconstruction of the Town Hall on 31 January 2007.780.Feasibility Study – IRPP/SAAH 19 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ . The cost of project preparation amounts to €342. to prepare project documentation for the reconstruction of the Town Hall within 8 months. The company URBING doo Sarajevo was selected by international tender. Phase 6 – works on arranging the remaining fragments and their presentation in the museum of Town Hall reconstruction that will be accommodated in the building Phase 7 – Maintenance and management programme In the frame of providing long-term maintenance of the building and integrating it into the development of the city.Carrying out restoration and repair works . central heating. sewage. low and high voltage. office of the Mayor.Preparing and revising project documentation for the restoration .Carrying out restoration works on the building . which incorporates the protection of the building increase public awareness of the building integrate the building into the tourist sector 28 November 2007 ___________________________________________________________________________ City Hall – Sarajevo – Bosnia and Herzegovina .Restoration/reconstruction of decorations .Preparing and inviting tenders for contractors and selection of most favourable contractors .Testing samples of the existing stone that were integrated in the assembly hall of the Town Hall.Technical supervision of the works Phase 5 – Restoration of the façade and interior of the building .Preservation of fragments and research works .Inviting tenders and selecting a company to prepare project documentation for reconstruction and repair works on the building for the following projects: • • • • • • • • • • The project of architectural reconstruction The project of structural reconstruction – extension of the projects after conducting phases I and II of reconstruction included The project of façade restoration The project of reconstructing plaster decoration The project for painted decoration The project for the interior – planning reconstruction of authentic interiors of the 2nd floor (gallery.Preparing and inviting tenders for contractors and selection of most favourable contractors .Technical supervision of the works. . councillors and other staff) and planning all other interior appearances of planned premises The project of barrier-free access for disabled people The project of electrical fittings – transformer station. fire alarm and external lighting The project of machine installations – local boiler-room. ventilation and air-conditioning The project of water supply and sewage – waterworks.Carrying out works on installing electrical fittings and a lightning conductor .Carrying out works on waterworks and sewage installations .Carrying out works on heating. rainwater drainage Phase 4 – Restoration works on the building . ICCROM. Contributing to raising awareness on heritage importance. Contributing to reconciliation and return process. 6. 4. The consultations and training by external experts are also envisaged (CoE. 3. Creating a substantial number of jobs for people involved in the implementation of the project. methods on reconstruction and will directly involve students and young professionals on the site. Awareness raising activities: Continuing the activities to raise awareness of the importance of the Bosnia and Herzegovina heritage in the reconciliation process and the entire post-war reconstruction of the cultural and historical heritage of Bosnia and Herzegovina. 2. Capacity building of students and young professionals: Experts from the Commission to Preserve National Monuments will conduct training sessions on the importance of the heritage. Contributing to raising funds for the maintenance of the property. establishing contacts and contributing to building trust between different ethnic groups. Description of the social effects The implementation of the project will have the direct effects of: 1. methods used when conducting a technical survey of properties. UNESCO). 5. Contributing to the capacity building of students and young architects and civil-engineers in conservation and reconstruction. 12. ___________________________________________________________________________ City Hall – Sarajevo – Bosnia and Herzegovina 28 November 2007 . types of building materials. 2.Feasibility Study – IRPP/SAAH 20 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ o promote cultural. traditional building methods. Parallel events – capacity and awareness building 1. Contributing to the employment of local building companies and labourers. historical and educational values. In that way the building and its significance would be brought closer to the public. Completed in 1997 – structural stabilisation and protection of the building Phase 2 Completed in 2004 structural stabilisation and protection of the building Phase 3 Completed in 2007 – drawing up the repair and reconstruction project for the building Phase 4 Announced for the beginning of 2008 – Rehabilitation works on the building Phase 5 Restoration works on the building façade Phase 6 Arranging the remaining fragments and their presentation Phase 7 Programme of maintenance and management Parallel events Building capacities in the sphere of conservation and restoration Awarenessraising activities 1 ŽGP Sarajevo and Mineral Ljubljana (with Kamen Dent Mostar) URBING doo Sarajevo Employed contractors (supervision by an architect-conservator) Employed contractors (supervision by an architect-conservator) Employed contractors (supervision by an architect-conservator) Team for the Management Plan Experts in architectural conservation.Feasibility Study – IRPP/SAAH 21 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 13. Target group: Students and young professionals Co-ordinator for promotional activities ___________________________________________________________________________ City Hall – Sarajevo – Bosnia and Herzegovina 28 November 2007 . Implementation of the work Semester 1 2 3 4 5 Year 1 6 7 8 Semester 2 9 10 11 Year 2 12 1 2 3 Implementing body ŽGP Sarajevo Activity Phase 1. Feasibility Study – IRPP/SAAH 22 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Activity Phase 4 Announced for the beginning of 2008 – Rehabilitation works on the building Phase 5 Restoration works on the building façade Phase 6 Arranging the remaining fragments and their presentation Phase 7 Programme of maintenance and management Parallel events Building capacities in the sphere of conservation and restoration Awarenessraising activities Semester 1 1 2 3 4 5 Year 2 6 7 Semester 2 8 9 10 11 Year 3 12 1 2 3 Implementing body Employed contractors (supervision by an architect-conservator) Employed contractors (supervision by an architect-conservator) Employed contractors (supervision by an architect-conservator) Team for the Management Plan Experts in architectural conservation. Target group: Students and young professionals Co-ordinator for promotional activities ___________________________________________________________________________ City Hall – Sarajevo – Bosnia and Herzegovina 28 November 2007 . conservation and reconstruction Co-ordinator for promotional activities Administrator/finance officer 1. 6.Feasibility Study – IRPP/SAAH 23 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Activity Phase 4 Announced for the beginning of 2008 – Rehabilitation works on the building Phase 5 Restoration works on the building façade Phase 6 Arranging the remaining fragments and their presentation Phase 7 Programme of maintenance and management Parallel events Building capacities in the sphere of conservation and restoration Awarenessraising activities Semester 1 1 2 3 4 5 Year 3 6 7 Semester 2 8 9 10 11 Year 4 12 1 2 3 Implementing body Employed contractors (supervision by an architect-conservator) Employed contractors (supervision by an architect-conservator) Employed contractors (supervision by an architect-conservator) Team for the Management Plan Experts in architectural conservation. setting the individual timelines and content of each stage. Requires an architect specialising in heritage protection and management with at least ten years’ experience. 4. 8. Target group: Students and young professionals Co-ordinator for promotional activities Note: the specifications of the reconstruction works on the building set out are for guideline purposes only. An exact description of the items and the cost thereof will be possible only after the technical documentation has been drawn up. Project co-ordinator Architects-conservators Art historian Painters-conservators Surveyors Experts in preservation. The Project co-ordinator will be responsible for drawing up detailed work plans. 3. and will bear overall responsibility for the programme. 5. ___________________________________________________________________________ City Hall – Sarajevo – Bosnia and Herzegovina 28 November 2007 . organisation and management of the implementation of the project over its duration (14 months). The team will consist of the following experts: 1. 2. 7. adoption of methodological approaches. The experts in preservation. the adoption of methodological approaches. advising on drafting the reconstruction works’ project with regard to decorations and wall paintings. 6. 4. . recording and drawing the fragments. An art historian with at least five years’ experience (6 months). 3. assisting in drawing up the geodetic bases. ICCROM. must have at least five years’ experience (8 months). Team for the Management Plan: . traditional building methods. conducting conservation and restoration works for painted decorations and providing supervision. The co-ordinator for promotional activities will work on awareness-raising activities. co-ordinating lectures to primary and secondary school pupils. The architect-conservator will be responsible for conducting the rehabilitation phases and for the technical supervision of the reconstruction works. organisation and coordination of activities. One painter-conservator with at least ten years’ experience (8 months). types of building materials. . Three paintersconservators required for carrying out restoration of wall paintings with at least five years’ experience (6 months). analysing the condition of decorated fragments and proposing measures for their conservation and reconstruction. the content of each stage. defining the structure and content of the Management Plan and its presentation.architect-conservator. etc. The co-ordinator for promotional activities will work periodically during the project. conservation and reconstruction (Commission to Preserve National Monuments) will conduct training sessions on the importance of the heritage. The consultations and training by external experts are also envisaged (CoE. The architect-conservator will prepare the maintenance programme and monitoring plan for ___________________________________________________________________________ City Hall – Sarajevo – Bosnia and Herzegovina 28 November 2007 . providing information on the importance of heritage and invitations to take part in the project. 8.ecological engineer. 7. 5 surveyors will be assisted by students (4 months). the technical survey of the existing foundations and in drawing up the reconstruction project. The architect will be responsible for drawing up detailed work plans. advising on the reconstruction of wall paintings. UNESCO). organising exhibitions of the pupils’ works followed by a cultural entertainment programme and organising sales of exhibited children’s works. .Feasibility Study – IRPP/SAAH 24 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 2. . The art historian will work on analysing the historic and artistic values of the building and recommending reconstruction methods for the decorations and artistic expression. The administrator/finance officer will carry out administrative and financial tasks associated with the project and will be responsible for the secretarial services. 5. The painter-conservator will work on ascertaining the condition of remains for their reintegration. correspondence.architect. Two architect-conservators will assist the work of the main conservator and will work as sites architects. setting individual timelines. This work will be carried out on the premises of the Commission to Preserve National Monuments in Sarajevo (14 months). Training sessions will be held periodically at all stages. Requires one architect-conservator with at least ten years’ experience (10 months). and will bear overall responsibility for the Plan. The surveyors will work preserving fragments: measuring. .urban planner. the methods used when conducting a technical survey of properties and reconstruction methods for students and young professionals (from heritage institutes.economist. architecture and other faculties).tourism specialist. The urban planner will analyse the planning policy. define traffic and parking in relation to accessibility to the building and its protection from traffic. The Commission will undertake a public call for tenders to carry out the works. Their inclusion is foreseen in activities relating to the preservation of fragments. oversee the presentation and interpretation of the building. ___________________________________________________________________________ City Hall – Sarajevo – Bosnia and Herzegovina 28 November 2007 . the municipality and the institutions of the Federation of BiH. IV 1. entrances. manage tourist visits. reconstruction and reconstruction works on historical buildings. The contract will be signed with companies that submit the best offers regarding price and experience in conservation. An exact description of the items and the cost thereof will be possible only after the technical documentation has been drawn up. The project should create interest in the importance of cultural heritage and its protection. The economist will prepare detailed cost and benefit analyses of all measures and interventions proposed under the Management Plan. The ecological engineer will prepare an assessment of the environmental impacts. including the layout and landscaping of the river bank with defined protection zones and contact zones around the building. and define the action plan. controlling and monitoring measures and a detailed action plan. COST ANALYSES Estimated costs Note: the specifications of the repair. assistance in drawing up the reconstruction project and helping in reconstruction works. draw up a programme for sustainable development of tourism taking into account the protection of the building. Sculptors are to be contracted for making decorations of stone surfaces. For the project to be successfully implemented. and prepare an action plan. and prepare an action plan. co-operation with the City Administration (as the owner). thus contributing to their capacity building. establish a scheme of financial levels and resources. and of the drinking fountain and stairs of the building. pillar capitals and bases. preservation and promotion. The tourism specialist will evaluate the tourism value of the area. define the development budget and financial sources. technical assistance in surveying and recording.Feasibility Study – IRPP/SAAH 25 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ the building and will define the action plan. the potential and needs of the area and the links to other attractions and facilities within it. define measures for new development and its control. The project should also include as many of the students and young professionals in the field of cultural heritage preservation as possible. preparation for the survey and recording. the existing functions and potential of the environment in which the building is located. Canton and City of Sarajevo is vital. rehabilitation and renovation works on the building set out below are guidelines only. According to the Law on Public Procurements for categories valued at more than €250 000 an international call for tenders must be launched. a programme for moderating. define the use of properties and new developments within the environment in line with protecting the building and the needs of development and tourism. Carrying out installation works: waterworks and sewage Phase 5 – Restoration of the façade and interior of the building A) TOTAL (excl. ventilation and air-conditioning installations .2% total (excl.Carrying out works on heating.25 1.68 2.250 000 750 000 1 000 000 150 000 200 000 200 000 50 000 8 885 000 50 000 8 855 000 European Commission Government of the Republic of Austria Spanish Government Government of the Republic of Hungary Government of the Sarajevo Canton City of Sarajevo (City Administration) Old Town Municipality TOTAL CONTRIBUTIONS Direct revenue from the raising awareness action OVERALL TOTAL 11. office supplies and running costs. 3 ) Phase 6 – Arranging remaining fragments and their presentation Phase 7 – Management Plan B) TOTAL Parallel event – Building capacities in the sphere of conservation and reconstruction Parallel event – Awareness raising activities C) TOTAL Parallel events Implementation costs (co-ordination.Carrying out the works of placing electric installations and a lightning conductor .25 2. travel costs) .56 96.66 ___________________________________________________________________________ City Hall – Sarajevo – Bosnia and Herzegovina 28 November 2007 . Initial phase) TOTAL Cost (€) 1.00 2.Feasibility Study – IRPP/SAAH 26 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Summary phases Phase 1 – completed in 1997 Phase 2 – completed in 2004 Phase 3 – completed in 2007 Phase 4 – Restoration works on the building .86 100 000 7 185 000 Implemented Implemented Donated Donated Donated Donated Donated Estimated 2. administration/finance. Phases 1.00 350 000 4 490 000 1 130 000 1 005 000 380 000 1 880 000 8 885 000 10 000 15 000 25 000 20 000 5 000 25 000 50 000 100 000 2.500.12 80. 2.56 100 0.250.25 0. Expected sources of funding Conditions Amount (€) Applicant's financial contribution Commission contribution for FS Percentage of the total (%) 1. Conservation. Commission to Preserve National Monuments. Bejtić. workers and other members of the community can benefit from such investments.aneks8komisija.Feasibility Study – IRPP/SAAH 27 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 3. konzervacije.000. One positive effect of the reconstruction is the impact on the land values of nearby properties.ba) with supplementing documentation: • • A copy of the cadastral plan Photographic documentation Bibliography 1960 1962 1966 1969 1975 T. as opposed to other development projects. Kruševac: Sarajevo pod austro-ugarskom upravom 1878 – 1918 (Sarajevo under the Austro-Hungarian Rule 1878-1918). Through awareness-raising activities we expect a direct benefit to the project of €30. Bejtić: Gradska vijećnica.com. Grants or donations either from individuals or private trusts for the reconstruction of the monument might be treated as a particular form of primary benefit. Primary transactions will set off secondary spillover or external effects. retailing. Stara Sarajevska čaršija. as measured by net income. Another form of benefit is an increase in the tax base. According to the analysis of the National Trust of Heritage in the USA. restauracije i revitalizacije Sarajevske čaršije (Regulation Plan for the Repair. which devolves to the municipality. Sarajevo A. such secondary benefits all need to be considered in the analysis of economic values. in so far as it collects the property tax. merchandise. Mali urbanizam Sarajeva (Town Hall. transportation and other sectors of the local economy. Program za urbanističko ure enje ((The Old Sarajevo Čaršija. Restoration and Revitalisation of the Sarajevo Čaršija). both for individuals and the government. Perhaps the easiest way to identify them is to determine which are related to the renewed attraction of the monument. A Little Urban Study of Sarajevo) – Oslobo enje 21 January H. creating employment for local building companies and labourers and increasing production of building materials. Sarajevo Regulacioni plan sanacije. 60% of the conservation works’ price benefits the labour market. V DOCUMENTARY SOURCES The decision to designate the Historical Building – Town Hall in Sarajevo as a national monument. A Programme for Urban Planning Arrangements). publisher – Assembly of the City of Sarajevo ___________________________________________________________________________ City Hall – Sarajevo – Bosnia and Herzegovina 28 November 2007 . and those taxpayers. many of which may have significant consequences. Sarajevo A. If such effects can be exclusively attributed to the reconstruction of the monument. Kreševljaković: Sarajevo za vrijeme austro-ugarske uprave 1878 – 1918 (Sarajevo at the Time of the Austro-Hungarian Rule). These spillover effects are expected to create more employment and income. at the 27th session held from 4 to 10 July 2006 (www. such as food. One can also expect the stimulation of net private investment. Cost benefit analysis of the project We can expect both primary and secondary economic benefits from the reconstruction works. Such investment in the community is desirable to widen the economic base. Krzović: Arhitektura BiH 1878 – 1918 (Architecture in Bosnia and Herzegovina 1878-1918). Regional Programme for Cultural and Natural Heritage in South East Europe (2003 – 2006) . Sarajevo Mach 1999 Vijećnica Sarajevo. Sarajevo) 1999 2006 2006 ___________________________________________________________________________ City Hall – Sarajevo – Bosnia and Herzegovina 28 November 2007 . 110 godina. Sarajevo Hrasnica. publisher – the City of Sarajevo A Survey of Preliminary Technical Assessment of the state of the Town Hall in Sarajevo. Historical and Natural Heritage. Development of Bosnian Style). Sarajevo The project entitled “Town Hall” Sarajevo. Arhitekt Pošpišil i njegovo djelo (Architect Pošpišil and His Work) Kurto. engineer of architecture (associate for architectural heritage in the Cantonal Institute for the Protection of Cultural. Kurto: Arhitektura Bosne i Hercegovine. Institute for Soil Technology and Foundation Engineering at the Faculty of Architecture in Sarajevo. Mehmed. Cantonal Institute for the Protection of Cultural. Arhitekt Karlo Paržik (Architect Karlo Paržik) N.Integrated Rehabilitation Project Plan / Survey of the Architectural and Archaeological Heritage (2003 – 2006) (IRPP/SAAH). Historical and Natural Heritage. Razvoj bosanskog stila (Architecture of Bosnia and Herzegovina. 110 Years). (Town Hall Sarajevo. prepared by Zaila Uzunović.Feasibility Study – IRPP/SAAH 28 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 1987 1988 1988 1998 I. preliminary report on technical examinations of the brick walls. N. CARDS 2004. associate for architectural heritage. 2001. The Delegation of the European Commission in Bosnia and Herzegovina. expert of the Institute for the Protection of Cultural-Historical and Natural Heritage of FBiH. Architect. Sarajevo. Paris. Sarajevo. Cantonal Institute for the Protection of Cultural-Historical and Natural Heritage. and Zaila Uzunović.Feasibility Study – IRPP/SAAH 29 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Enclosed: Town Hall in Sarajevo: Condition of the building Ground floor layout of the building Historical photographs of the building Photographs of the building interior – documentation of the Cantonal Institute for the Protection of Cultural-Historical and Natural Heritage. Prepared by: Damir Hadžić. Project Co-ordinator. Council of Europe Development Bank. Sarajevo Photographs of the building – Damir Hadžić The methodology used for the preparation of the FS-Part 1 is based on the Feasibility Report on the Project – Historical Heritage. BIH. author of the Preliminary Technical Assessment and Azra Hadžić. July 2007 ___________________________________________________________________________ City Hall – Sarajevo – Bosnia and Herzegovina 28 November 2007 . and the Guideline – EU Support for Regional Economic Development in Bosnia and Herzegovina. BiH in consultation with the expert of the Commission to Preserve National Monuments Mirela Mulalić Handan.
Copyright © 2024 DOKUMEN.SITE Inc.