Report on the CSO Consultations on the EITI Implementation in the Philippines1Background The Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) is a globally developed standard that promotes revenue transparency in extractive industries. It promotes a robust yet flexible methodology for monitoring and reconciling private sector payments and government revenues at the country level. Each implementing country creates its own EITI process that is directed by participants from the government, the private sector, and civil society. The EITI standard has two main elements: (a) Companies publish what they pay and governments publish what they receive in an EITI report; and (b) The process is overseen by a multi‐stakeholder group of governments, companies, and civil society. (EITI 2012) The Government of the Philippines (GoP) recently expressed interest in joining the EITI through Executive Order No. 79‐‐ Institutionalizing and Implementing Reforms in the Philippines Mining Sector. In this regard, Bantay Kita has been working with the GoP to accomplish the requirements for signing up in EITI.2 Bantay Kita, a coalition of civil society organizations (CSOs), nongovernment organizations (NGOs), and academic institutions in the Philippines, advocates transparency and consultations regarding the implementation of EITI in the Philippines. Bantay Kita acknowledges the support of 11.11.11 and the Department of Budget and Management for the first EITI training workshop. Bantay Kita is also grateful for the support of partner organizations Revenue Watch Institute, EITI Indonesia, Indonesia Parliamentary Center and Luta Hamutuk Institute of Timor Leste for serving as resource persons in the first EITI training workshop. Bantay Kita also acknowledges the support of AUSAID, the British Embassy and the Department of Budget and Management for the regional consultations. Bantay Kita is grateful for the following individuals and organizations for helping organize the regional consultations: Mr. Byron Abadeza, Mr. Gerry Arances, Mr. Allan Barnacha, Ms. Beverly Besmanos, Mr. Rodney Galicha, Mr. Chadwick Llanos, Mr. Ian Rivera, Ms. Perpevina Tio, Mr. Loi Manalansan, Ms. Regine Quilas, PRRM‐Nueva Viscaya, ATM, Mindanawon, AFRIM, TAN, Visayan State University, AER and GITIB. 2 For a country to be a candidate in EITI, the government is required to (1) issue an unequivocal public statement of its intention to implement the EITI; (2) commit to work with civil society and companies on the implementation of the EITI; (3) appoint a senior individual to lead the implementation of the EITI; (4) establish a multi‐stakeholder group to oversee the implementation of the EITI; and (5) the multi‐stakeholder group, in consultation with key EITI stakeholders, should agree and publish a fully costed work plan, containing measurable targets and a timetable for implementation and incorporating an assessment of capacity constraints. 1 This report was prepared by Cielo Magno, National Coordinator of Bantay Kita, based on the results of the 1 accountability in extractive industries in the country. It considers the EITI as one mechanism that can contribute to good governance by: (a) reducing the risk of corruption, (b) promoting corporate social responsibility, and (c) holding companies and governments accountable through the disclosure of taxes, fees and royalties paid to the government. Bantay Kita sees the EITI as a good opportunity to engage the government and other stakeholders to support Bantay Kita’s advocacy of transparency and accountability, as well as other policy reforms advocated by its member organizations. As already mentioned, the GoP has already issued an unequivocal public statement of its intention to implement the EITI through EO No. 79. President Aquino has also appointed Sec. Elisea Gozun as the senior official to lead the implementation of the EITI. The government has formed an interim Multi Stakeholder Group (MSG) composed of five representatives from the government, the extractive industry, and civil society, where Bantay Kita sits as the representative for the latter. This interim MSG has already drafted a fully costed work plan, as well as terms of reference for members of the MSG. The next step is to finalize the composition of the MSG by giving industry and civil society players full autonomy in selecting their representatives to the group. To this end, Bantay Kita conducted a training workshop and five regional EITI consultation workshops to: (1) inform different organizations (academic institutions, NGOs, peoples’ organizations (POs) and other community‐based organizations) concerned with the extractive industries about EITI, and (2) define the process and criteria for the selection of official civil society representatives to the MSG of EITI‐Philippines. Objectives The training workshop and the regional EITI consultation workshops had four objectives: 1. To inform different organizations (academic institutions, NGOs, POs and other community‐based organizations) concerned with the extractive industry about EITI, with particular focus on: a. What is EITI? b. What are the steps involved in the process of applying for EITI?, and c. Experiences to date of other countries that have already implemented EITI. 2. To formulate the CSO agenda on EITI through a workshop, after reflecting on the experiences of other countries with EITI. 3. To define the process and criteria for the selection of official civil society representatives to the MSG of EITI‐Philippines, through a workshop where the needs and demands of EITI and the characteristics of individuals necessary to meet these demands will be analyzed; and 4. To establish a stronger network of civil society players that will support EITI by expanding the membership and network of Bantay Kita. 2 Activities The training workshop and five regional consultations were conducted based on the following schedule: Date October 18‐19, 2012 November 26‐27, 2012 November 29‐30, 2012 Participants NCR, Nueva Viscaya, Leyte, Cebu, Davao, Zamboanga Pines View Hotel, Baguio La Union, Cagayan, Isabela, Quirino, Nueva Vizcaya, Baguio City/CAR UP Hotel, Quezon City Zambales, Nueva Ecija, Palawan, Romblon, Mindoro, Legaspi, Rapu‐Rapu, Marinduque Las Casitas, Davao City Agusan del Sur, Davao del Norte, Davao del Sur, Davao City, Tagum, South Cotabato, Kidapawan, Iligan, Compostela Valley, Bukidnon, Mardale Hotel, Pagadian Zamboanga del Sur, Misamis City, Zamboanga Occidentalidental, Zamboanga Sibugay, Zamboanga del Norte Cebu City, Cebu Leyte, Samar, Cebu, Negros Venue UP Hotel, Quezon City November 3‐4, 2012 November 6‐7, 2012 November 11‐12, 2012 The following was the program of the training and regional workshops/consultations. Annex A contains the actual program of the training workshop and the regional consultation workshops and Annex B contains the handout copy of power point presentations presented in the trainings. Time Session DAY 01 08.00 to 09.00 Registration of Participants AM Distribution of Workshop Kits Objective 09.00 to 09.15 Welcome To level off expectations among the AM participants Presentation of objectives of the regional consultation 3 09.15 to 09.30 Introduction of Participants AM 09.30 to 10.00 Bantay Kita and its Advocacy To have an overview of Bantay Kita’s AM Framework (PWYP Chain for Change) advocacy framework 10.15 to 11.15 Discussion: What is EITI? AM To know basic information about EITI such as its history, structure, criteria and process To better understand EITI as a mechanism for transparency and accountability 11.15 to 12.00 NN Open Forum 12.00 to 01.00 PM 01.00 to 01.30 PM Discussion: Philippines EITI Context in Lunch Break the To situate EITI from the bigger context of reforming the Philippines’ extractive sector 01.30 to 02.30 PM Discussion: Other Country Experiences To better understand the role of CSO in the on EITI EITI process To know about the opportunities and challenges faced by CSOs in other countries To learn from the experience of other countries on the actual implementation of EITI 02.30 to 03.15 PM Open Forum 03.15 to 03.30 PM Afternoon Break 03.30 to 04.00 PM Synthesis (Day 01) DAY 02 09.00 to 09.15 Recap (Day 01) AM 09.15 to 10.30 Discussion: Defining the Philippine To discuss the CSO agenda for EITI AM Agenda in EITI 10.30 to 10.45 Morning Break AM 10.45 to 12.00 NN Discussion: Defining the Criteria and To define and establish set of criteria and Process for the Selection of Official Civil process in selecting CSO Representatives to Society Representatives to the MSG of the MSG PH‐EITI The Mr. Francis Capistrano of the interim secretariat of EITI‐Philippines presented the draft Terms of Reference (TOR) and work plan in the first training workshop in UP Hotel. 4 Speakers from Timor Leste and Indonesia were also invited to share their actual experiences with EITI. Participants Invitations to participate in the regional consultations were sent through Bantay Kita’s existing networks. Announcements were also made in Bantay Kita’s Facebook account and in different e‐groups. The participants of the first training workshop on EITI were requested to help in organizing the regional consultations. The following lists the Participants/Organizations that attended the first EITI training workshop and the five regional workshops. Copies of actual attendance sheets are attached in Annex C. Almost all the organizations that attended the workshop expressed interest in participating in EITI. The others expressed positive opinion about EITI but will have to consult their organizations whether they will participate in EITI or not. First Training Workshop The speakers in the first training workshop are Filomeno Sta. Ana (Action for Economic Reforms), Cielo Magno (Bantay Kita), Roslita Arsyad (Revenue Watch Institute), Jaybee Garganera (Alyansa Tigil Mina), Maryati Abdullah (PWYP Indonesia), Gita Soerjoatmodjo (Indonesian Parliamentary Center), Mericio Juvinal Dos Reis (Luta Hamutuk Institute) and Erica Westenberg (RWI). The following are the participants of the first EITI training workshop in UP Hotel: NAME Maricel Hilario‐Patino Roldan Gonzales Leon Dulce MA. Lydia Ligahon Datu Alfredo Tabonan Ian Rivera Chadwick Llanos Caridad Cenas Nove Jun Calawigan Nancy Badilla Abelardo Moya Rodne Galicha Byron Abadeza Vincent Lazatin Jose Melvin Lamanilao Ronald Allan Barnacha Perpy Tio ORGANIZATION Ateneo Institute of Anthropology GITIB, INC Kalikasan‐People’s Network for the Environment FDC Eastern Visayas, PMCJ Eastern Visayas Ubo‐Manobo leader Our Rivers, Our Life Project USREPD/Social Action Center of Cebu KALASAQ Haribon Foundation Save Manicani Movement Mindanao Peacebuilding Institute (MPI) Foundation. Inc Alyansa Tigil Mina Transparency and Accountability Network Transparency and Accountability Network Pagtatanggol Batas Pangkapatiran Foundation Philippine Rural Reconstruction Movement Mindanawon of Ateneo de Davao 5 Beverly Besmanos Tess Tabada Emy Perez Famela Listana Ingrid Gorre Jay Batongbacal Pepito Frias Leilani Galvez Richard Afidchao Gerry Arances Regional Consultations Alternate Forum for Research in Mindanao (AFRIM) Institute for Strategic Research and Development of Visayan State University Affiliated Network for Social Accountability‐EAP Affiliated Network for Social Accountability‐EAP SAMDHANA; Leonen, Gatmaytan, Royo and Associates UP College of Law Philrights Social Watch TAWID SOS‐YB network The invitation of participants in Baguio City was coordinated with Philippine Rural Reconstruction Movement (PRRM) Nueva Viscaya. Baguio City Regional Workshop Venue: Pines View Hotel Speakers: Mr. Ronald Allan Barnacha, Mr. Rodne Galicha, Mr. Loi Manalansan NAME ORGANIZATION PROVINCE / REGION Melvin Macusi Amnesty International La Union / Region 1 Rommel Ursua Cagayan Water Association Cagayan / Region 2 Pedro Anacio, Sr. Katutubong Samahan ng Quirino Quirino / Region 2 Hermie Sarmiento Tribal Ass. Working for IP Dev’t. – Quirino / Region 2 Quirino; KALASAQ; NCIP Francisco Tabaniag Tribal Ass. Working for IP Dev’t. – Quirino / Region 2 Quirino; TANID Marierose Save Quirino Quirino / Region 2 Guimbangan Kim Hagada Save Quirino Quirino / Region 2 Nathan Jay A. Cariazo NV Peoples’ Coordinating Council Nueva Vizcaya / Region 2 Chrizelle Jean V. Save Nueva Vizcaya Nueva Vizcaya / Region 2 Barut Jefferson T. Agaloos Phil. Rural Reconstruction Youth Nueva Vizcaya / Region 2 Ass. Ronald Allan A. PRRM NV Nueva Vizcaya / Region 2 Barnacha Michael Ngaloy Tribal Ass. Working for IP Dev’t. – Nueva Vizcaya / Region 2 NV Salvador Ramo Tebtebba Baguio City / CAR Rosbin T. Martin Alliance of Buguey for Community Cagayan Valley 6 Rochelle S. Garma Rosario A. Fuerte Babielyn Yaanon Corpuz Ngawa Development Advocates (ALBUCODA) Gonzaga Alliance for Environmental Protection and Preservation (GAEPP) Federation of Environmental Advocates in Cagayan (FEAC) Amianan Salakniban MADIPO Cagayan Valley Cagayan Valley Baguio Benguet For the NCR (National Capital Region) regional consultation, participants were from Zambales, Nueva Ecija, Romblon, Bicol, Sorsogon, Marinduque, Palawan and Mindoro. NCR Regional Consultation Venue: UP Hotel Speakers: Mr. Rodne Galicha, Prof. Dante Gatmaytan, Ms. Cielo Magno, Mr. Gerry Arances, Mr. Byron Abadeza, Mr. Jaybee Garganera Participant Organization Region/Province Makabagong Zambales (MBZ) / Concerned Citizens of Sta. Cruz (CCOS) Zambales Dr. Ben Molina Cresencia Gomez AMA Nueva Ecija Victor Colili Palawan NGO Network Inc. Palawan Walter Marquez KAAGAPAY Mindoro Acris Canillo KAAGAPAY Mindoro Artiso Mandawa AGDAW Palawan Rolando Tan SAM/Sibuyan Isle Sibuyan, Romblon REFAM Romblon/ Romblon State Dr. Merian Mani University Romblon Generoso Udanga TRAVESIA Romblon Romblon Marius Aguas ALAMIN Mindoro Jasper Francisco 4‐H Mindoro Edsel Ercader 4‐H Mindoro Beth Manggol MACEC Marinduque Edmund Ola MACEC/PEC Marinduque Phoebe R. Perez SAM/ Sibuyan Isle Sibuyan Isle Arnaldo Perez SAM/ Sibuyan Isle Sibuyan Isle Juan N. Bautista Social Action Center‐Legaspi Legaspi Dennis Daz BLGU Caracara Rapu Rapu, Albay Maila E. Quiring Coastal Core, Inc. Bicol Rolando Tan Sibuyan Isle Inc Romblon 7 The invitations for the regional consultation in Davao were coordinated with Alternate Forum for Research in Mindanao (AFRIM) and Mindanawon of Ateneo de Davao University. Davao Regional Consultation Venue: Las Casitas Hotel Speakers: Ms. Beverly Besmanos, Ms. Perpevina Tio, Ms. Cielo Magno, Mr. Rodne Galicha, Mr. Loi Manalansan, Mr. Jose Melvin Lamanilao Participant Organization Province/Region Romalyn Rico KAMASKI Bayugan, Agusan del Sur Rinquel Rico KAMASKI Bayugan, Agusan del Sur Assisi Development Flor Gandamon Foundation Davao City Sumpaw ng Inangsabong Datu Romeo Dansigan Mansaka Inc (SIMI) Tagum City Brgy. Sibulan, Toril Davao Fermin Aguan Brgy. Council of Sibulan City Brgy. Sibulan, Toril Davao Romy Abe Brgy. Council of Sibulan City Grace Awitan PASAKK Inc Bunawan, Agusan del Sur Susan Maturan PASAKK Inc Bunawan, Agusan del Sur Missionaries of Jesus, Malita Tagakaulo Mission, Diocese of Digos Malita, Davao del Sur Fr. Joey Evangelista Missionaries of Jesus, Malita Tagakaulo Mission, Diocese of Digos Malita, Davao del Sur Marites Gonzalo Ester Rulona Tri‐People Concern Inc Davao City Strauss Fernandez Amnesty International Davao City Mindanao Peacebuilding Jeremy Simmons Institute Foundation Inc Davao City Nonoy Cabezares SILDAP/Noble Endeavors Compostela Valley Manuel Domes Forum Civil Peace Service Davao City 5. Datu Jimboy Catawanan Soled Ki Bukidnon Karen Lei Talidano MSPC‐YS Davao del Sur Lourd Ronald Bocboc BDYA/MSPC‐YS Agusan Norte Stephen Fuentes Ecoweb Inc Iligan City The invitation of participants in Zamboanga was coordinated with GITIB Resource Center for Sustainable Development. 8 Pagadian City Regional Consultation Venue: Mardale Hotel Speakers: Mr. Loi Manalansan, Ms. Cielo Magno, Mr. Ian Rivera Participant Organization Mr. Daniel Castillo DCMI Mr. Placido Candia MRP/MRND Ms. Febie Marquez Masidlakon Mr. Ronnel Cabilan Gitib, Inc. Ms. Porferia Acuram PIEMSUGG/Mag’engat Ms. Carmencita Andoy Ecology Awareness Team Ms. Faye Reyes ECOLINKS Partido Lakas ng Rev. Wilson Marquez Masa(PLM) Ms. Mohaiya Pua PAGKAKA Ms. Juana S. Castillon MB‐PUKUT Mr. Bonifacio Laborada Social Action/SOS Vitali United Church of Christ in Rev. Diosdado Marquez the Philippines‐WMC Freedom from Debt Ms. Lourdes Anabieza Coalition‐WMR Mr. Joseph Desusa Makabayan Philippines Mr. Melvin Cabural Concerned Youth Network Philippine Movement for Ms. Lucita Gonzales Climate Justice‐WestMin Ms. Chona Sulani Concerned Youth Network Mr. Bong Balimbingan Jr. Ummah fi Salam Concerned Advocates Saving Terrestrial Linking Coastal Ecosystem Mr. Nelson Cuaresma (Coastline) Phils. Inc Rev. Michael Gubot PACT‐SUR Ms. Saida Lapasaran UFS Province Zamboanga del Norte Zamboanga del Sur Zamboanga del Sur Misamis Occidental Misamis Occidental Misamis Occidental Zamboanga del Sur Zamboanga del Sur Zamboanga del Sur Zamboanga del Norte Zamboanga City Zamboanga del Sur Misamis Occidental Zamboanga del Sur Zamboanga del Sur Misamis Occidental Zamboanga del Sur Zamboanga del Sur Misamis Occidental Zamboanga del Sur Zamboanga del Sur The invitation of participants for the Visayas Regional consultation was coordinated with Institute for Strategic Research and Development of Visayan State University and Social Action Center of Cebu. 9 Visayas Regional Consultation Venue: Valleyfront Hotel, Cebu City Speakers: Mr. Rodne Galicha, Mr. Gerry Arances, Mr. Chadwick Llanos Participant Organization Province/Region Salvie Einosas Fleurdelis Centre4Peace, Inc. Negros Occidental Donato A. Flordeliza, Jr. Greenwatch Phils., Inc. Negros Occidental A Carcar City Environmental Rufina N. Mangyao Group (CLARAI) Carcar, Cebu Lorena Navallasca PROCESS FDTON PANAY, INC. Antique Lucita Geronimo SANLAKAS Talisay, Cebu Haide Amigable KPML Lapu‐Lapu, Cebu Philip Adula SANLAKAS Eastern Samar Nancy Badilla Save Manicani Movement Eastern Samar Hermie Oraya Youth 4 Rights Eastern Samar Save‐ Leyte/MASIPAG/Greenpeace Phils. Leyte Juanito Modina Laureen D. Dumaguing Eastern Visayas Network Eastern Samar Licerio John Baruc Youth 4 Rights Cebu Anatolio Polinar VSU (forester) Leyte Agustin Docena Eastern Visayas Network Eastern Samar Ronald Salas DSAC Maasin Southern Leyte College of Management and Prof. Ernesto Bulayog Economics, VSU Leyte Maria Lucia B. Merencillo USREP‐D Sibonga Cebu Gina Patalinghug USREP‐D Sibonga Cebu The network of Alyansa Tigil Mina (ATM) and Transparency and Accountability Network (TAN) were also tapped in inviting participants to the EITI consultation workshops. Workshop Results The EITI workshop participants were very open to the information about EITI. Valid concerns were raised on the scope of the EITI, the composition of the Board, the implementation of EITI at the sub‐national level, the value of EITI to communities and access to information. The following section summarizes some of the issues and concerns raised during the workshops. Issues/Concerns There were some concerns that if the Philippines limits itself to minimum compliance to EITI, EITI would have an insignificant effect in reforming the extractive industry in the Philippines. This will only create an impression that compliance with EITI absolves the industry of any wrong doing or that it no longer 10 has to comply with other laws and regulations. Thus, the participants recommend that the Philippine government commit to go beyond minimum compliance in EITI. Concerns were raised on the possibility that participation in EITI will be equated to “responsible mining.” Some communities worry that EITI is "an invitation for mining companies to come to the Philippines." This will then have a negative effect on their struggle to stop mining in their communities. Speakers explained that EITI can complement their campaign by providing them access to data that can reinforce their arguments. Communities argue that the government has to ensure that there will be genuine access to information. The communities see the concept of governance reform (transparency and accountability) in the extractive industry as a new paradigm for that resource extraction. Historically, the debate on mining in the Philippines has given central emphasis on human rights and the environment . The value chain presentation was very helpful in introducing this new paradigm. Community‐based organizations raised the issue of how they can directly participate and benefit from EITI. Implementation of sub‐national EITI was greatly encouraged by the communities. This will give them space to directly participate in extractive industry governance. Communities also believe that sub‐national EITI will contribute to stronger regulation of small‐scale mining, quarrying and greater transparency and accountability of national and local governments and mining companies at the community level. Some workshop participants were also elected local officials. They demand that a similar process of information dissemination and consultation with local governments be initiated by concerned agencies of the government. They also stress the need to have a clear process of selecting the LGU (local government unit) representative in the MSG. The participants expressed concern about the lack of mechanisms within EITI to penalize companies which fail to comply with the reporting requirements of EITI. Similarly, the participants wondered what penalties will be imposed on companies that violate Philippine laws. The participants raised some concerns on how effective EITI will be in ensuring access to information about mining operations in the country. The participants urged the passage of Freedom of Information bill to strengthen the implementation of EITI in the Philippines. Some concerns were raised about the sustainability of the EITI initiative in the Philippines, considering that EITI is a voluntary initiative. The participants 11 EITI Reporting suggested that a law be enacted to institutionalize and expand the scope of EITI in the Philippines. To make EITI reports effective and useful, the following information are suggested: Individual site report 12 EITI reports should be disaggregated per site per company per operation/site. EITI reports should include all forms of payment to government (national and local) and communities (royalties and payment and contribution for social development). The EITI reports should include transfers from government to companies. These include incentives given by government to companies. Disclosure on the volume of ore extracted from site and on the type of minerals that are extracted per site including associated minerals and the related price. Disclosure of production data and mineral reserves. EITI reports should include information on the total economic contribution of the extractive industry in the country, including employment contribution to be disaggregated by type of employment, by age, gender and nationality. Companies included in the report should provide some information on the wage of their workers to show if there are income disparities between local and expats, if any. Inventory and total economic valuation of the contribution of the operation to the local economy. Background on the owners of the company should be included in the report. The report should disclose the contract of companies to the government and the Memorandum of Agreement with communities. The EITI exercise should eventually result in the review of these contracts. Individual site report should also include payment to subcontractors. Disclosure of company “good will,” “donation” and “political contributions.” EITI reports should include the Environmental Compliance Certificate (ECC) of the operating company and the state of compliance of the company. Data in the report should be available and accessible in the EITI‐Philippines website in excel format. Individual site report should include the impact of the operation on flora, fauna, water quality, air, timber and land. EITI reports should include information on human rights issues associated with the extractive operation in the site. EITI audit reports should cover at least the past 5/10 years of the company operation. Information on mineral resources EITI reports should include updated information on the current inventory/total mineral resources of the country. EITI reports should include comprehensive maps of these mineral resources. Industry background Industry scope of EITI The first Philippine EITI report should include the 33 large‐scale operating metallic mining sites and key mining operations particularly Tampakan, Oceana Gold and TVI. It should also include oil and gas operations in the country. The implementation of EITI at the national level should be complemented by the preparation and capacity building of regions/provinces to implement sub‐national EITI. Sub‐national EITI will include discussions on large‐scale mining, small‐ scale mining, and quarrying (e.g. cement production in Cebu, magnetite quarrying). EITI reporting should eventually include the exploration stage of extractive industries. EITI mechanisms should also exact transparency and accountability in offshore mining, non‐metallic mines, cement industries, downstream mining industries, geothermal and hydro‐energy, extraction of water resources, forestry/logging, large plantations (e.g. bananas, pineapple, and palm oil), biofuel. Background information on funds flow (flow of payments from companies to agencies). Background information on process flow (flow of ore from site to processing). Background on pricing of ore. Background on the destination of minerals exported from the Philippines and an audit on the quantity and value of exported minerals. Total social and economic contribution of the industry (aggregated and disaggregated data). EITI scope with respect to the industry value chain Initial reports can be limited to financial disclosure, disclosure of all relevant information as enumerated in the “EITI Reporting” section, and contract and MOA disclosure and review. Eventually, it is envisioned that EITI be o A venue to review the validity of the free prior and informed consent (FPIC) process, IP contracts with mining companies and royalties. 13 o A venue to conduct independent comprehensive cost and benefit assessments (social impact assessments) of sites that will be open for exploration. o A venue to review compliance of companies with contracts. o A venue to track the expenditure of proceeds/revenues from extractive industries. Decision‐making in EITI It is common knowledge that the government and the industries have long, established relationships. It is the recognition of this relationship that leads the International EITI Board to adopt consensus building as a mechanism for decision‐ making in the EITI Board. In this regard the civil society groups demand that consensus building be the only mechanism for decision‐making in the multi‐ stakeholder group of the EITI Philippines. Institutionalization of EITI CSO Organizational Structure for EITI Bantay Kita will serve as the secretariat of CSOs for EITI Process of Selection of CSO MSG representatives Nomination Nomination for CSO Representatives should be open at least 15 days before the National Congress Bantay Kita Secretariat shall call for the nomination and shall make the nomination form available online. Bantay Kita Secretariat shall update the network on the list of nominees a week after the call for nomination Who can nominate: Organizations that are affiliated with the Bantay Kita network and those who participated in the consultation process and expressed willingness to 14 A law should be passed to ensure the institutionalization of EITI. The national government should commit to support and promote the implementation of EITI at the sub‐national level. The passage of the Freedom of Information bill is at the heart of making EITI successful in the Philippines. participate in EITI can nominate individuals to represent the civil society organizations in the MSG. Bantay Kita Secretariat shall inform individuals who have been nominated that they have been nominated and if they are accepting the nomination, the requirements for candidacy to become a CSO representative to the MSG. Requirement for nominees Nominees should have two recommendation letters from communities or organizations Acceptance letter expressing commitment to devote time in fulfilling the role of CSO representative in the MSG (express commitment to attend all MSG/EITI activities; to come prepared in MSG meetings), explaining the nominee’s expertise and disclosure of all forms of association, past and present, with the extractive industry concerned. Curriculum Vitae Screening process After the nomination process, a screening committee3 will be formed to determine who among the nominees are qualified, based on the criteria for selection of MSG representatives. Nominees will be ranked based on a scoring mechanism. The screening committee shall be composed of two representatives from the Bantay Kita Board, and three representatives from Luzon Visayas and Mindanao organizations who are randomly selected. All minutes/documentation of EITI process shall be disseminated to all organizations Five CSO Representatives in the EITI‐PH MSG will be selected through a consensus building process in the CSO National Congress. Five other CSO members will also take part in the MSG as substitutes or back‐ups. Composition of CSO representatives in the MSG: The organizations that are participating in EITI shall try to form a team of CSO representatives that: Has balanced technical expertise in the relevant industries Is gender‐balanced Shows intergenerational representation Has a broad geographical representation Has balanced representation from community‐based organizations and NGOs. The minimum is to have at least one grassroots representation from the mining‐affected community 3 In a board meeting of Bantay Kita trustees last December 17, 2012, because of time constraints, the board will serve as the screening committee. If a member of the board is nominated to be part of the MSG, he/she will not be part of the screening committee. 15 Has MSG representatives with fixed term limits, though they may be re‐elected. Allows for impeachment of a member of the MSG, with due process Individual criteria: The nominee must not have any affiliation, any direct or indirect engagement, or conflict of interest with the extractive industries whether past or present Has not received any compensation from mining entities (e.g. in kind, cash, grants or projects). In the event that a person who was nominated received some grant from the mining company, the person has to defend and justify his/her previous relationship with the extractive company Has negotiating skills/ public relations skills Committed to the principles of PWYP value chain Integrity/history of advocacy Should be a member of organization(s) with legal personality or affiliation to credible alliances and organizations Should be affiliated or sponsored by organizations who participated in the Bantay Kita consultations on EITI. 16 Annex A: Programs of the training workshop and the regional consultation workshops 17 EITI Training Workshop October 18‐19, 2012 University Hotel, University of the Philippines Diliman Time 8:00‐8:30am 8:30‐8:45am 8:45‐9:15am 9:15‐9:30 am 9:30 ‐10:30 am Session Day 1 Arrival, Registration of Participants and Distribution of TOT Kit Welcome, Rationale and Objective of the TOT Introduction of Participants (participants will introduce themselves (name, organization, expected output) Bantay Kita and the Advocacy framework of Bantay Kita (PWYP Chain for Change) Discussion: What is EITI? To level off expectations among the participants Overview of Bantay Kita’s advocacy framework To know the basic information about EITI such as its history, structure, criteria and process To better understand EITI as a mechanism for transparency and accountability AM Snacks Open forum Lunch Discussion: EITI context in the Philippines To situate EITI from the bigger context of reforming the Philippines extractive sector Open Forum To learn from the experience of Indonesia on the actual implementation of EITI To better understand the role of CSO in EITI process To know about the opportunities and challenges faced by CSO in Indonesia PM Snacks Open Forum Jaybee Garganera, National Coordinator, Alyansa Tigil Mina Maryati Abdullah National Coordinator, PWYP Indonesia Gita Soerjoatmodjo, Indonesia Parliamentary Center BK Secretariat Men Sta. Ana, Chairperson, BK Cielo Magno Coordinator, BK Roslita Arsyad Revenue Watch Institute Objective Speaker/Facilitator 10:30‐11:00am 11:00‐11:45 am 11:45am ‐ 1:00pm 1:00 ‐1:30 pm 1:30 – 2:00pm 2:00‐2:30pm 2:30‐3:00pm Feedback from the Participants Discussion: EITI in Indonesia Discussion: CSO perspective in implementing EITI in Indonesia 3:00‐3:20pm 3:20‐4:00pm 4:00‐4:30pm Synthesis: Day 1 Sessions Beverly Besmanos, AFRIM 18 8:30‐9:00pm 9:00‐10:00am Recap: Day 1 Sessions Intenational Experiences on EITI Day 2 To learn about other country experiences on EITI, different EITI models, current trends/challenges To learn from the experience of Timor Leste in implementing EITI with regard to the creation of Petroleum Trust Fund To get an overview of the proposed changes in the EITI rules for 2013 AM Snacks Open Forum Lunch Discussion on CSO agenda within EITI PM Snacks ‐ to define and establish set of criteria and process in selecting CSO Representatives in the Multi‐stakeholder Group ‐ to discuss and solicit comments on the draft TOR and Work plan of PH‐EITI Roslita Arsyad Erica Westenberg Revenue Watch Institute Mericio Juvinal Dos Reis Luta Hamutuk Institute, Timor Leste CSO Representative, International EITI Board 10:00‐10:45 am EITI in Timor Leste and the Petroleum Fund Recent discussions/proposed amendments on EITI rules 10:45‐11:15am 11:15 – 12:00nn 12:00 ‐1:00pm 1:00 – 2:00 pm 2:00 – 2:30 pm 2:30‐3:30 pm 3:30‐ 4:30pm 4:30‐5:00pm Discussion/workshop: Defining the Philippine Agenda in EITI Discussion/workshop: Defining the criteria and process in selecting CSO Representatives in the PH‐EITI Multi‐stakeholder Group (MSG) Discussion on the draft TOR and Work plan of PH‐EITI Synthesis and Closing Program Facilitator: Perpivina Tio Mindanawon Facilitator: Perpy Tio Mindanawon Francis Capistrano Department of Budget and Management Dr. Tess Tabada Visayas State University 19 EITI Regional Consultation Pines View Hotel, Baguio City November 15‐16, 2012 Day 1 Time 8:00‐9:00 am 9:00‐9:15 am 9:15‐9:30 am 9:30‐10:00 am 10:00‐10:15 am 10:15‐11:15 am Session Arrival, registration of participants and distribution of workshop kit Welcome, rationale and objective of the regional consultation Introduction of participants (participants will introduce themselves (name, organization, expected output) Bantay Kita and the advocacy framework of Bantay Kita (PWYP Chain for Change) Discussion: What is EITI? Objective Person in‐charge BK Secretariat To level off expectations among the participants To have an overview of Bantay Kita’s advocacy framework AM Snacks To know the basic information about EITI such as its history, structure, criteria and process To better understand EITI as a mechanism for transparency and accountability Open forum Lunch To situate EITI from the bigger context of reforming the Philippines extractive sector To better understand the role of CSO in EITI process To know about the opportunities and challenges faced by CSOs in other countries To learn from the experience of other country on the actual implementation of EITI PM Snacks Open Forum Rodne Galicha, ATM Loi Manalansan, Bantay Kita Loi Manalansan, Bantay Kita 11:15‐12:00 nn 12:00 nn‐1:00 pm 1:00‐1:30 pm 1:30‐2:30 pm Discussion: EITI context in the Philippines Discussion: Other country experiences on EITI Rodne Galicha, ATM Loi Manalansan, Bantay Kita 2:30‐2:45 pm 2:45‐4:00 pm 4:00‐4:15 pm Synthesis: Day 1 Sessions Rodne Galicha, ATM 20 Day 2 9:00‐9:15 am 9:15‐10:30 am Recap: Day 1 Sessions Discussion/workshop: Defining the Philippine Agenda in EITI Discussion on CSO agenda within EITI Ronald Allan Barnacha, PRRM 10:30‐10:45 am 10:45‐11:45 am 11:45‐12:15 pm 12:15 pm‐1:00 pm Discussion/workshop: Defining the criteria and process in selecting CSO Representatives in the PH‐EITI Multi‐ stakeholder Group (MSG) Synthesis and Closing Program AM Snacks To define and establish set of criteria and process in selecting CSO Representatives in the Multi‐stakeholder Group Lunch Loi Manalansan, Bantay Kita Loi Manalansan, Bantay Kita 21 Time 8:00‐9:00 am 9:00‐9:15 am 9:15‐9:30 am 9:30‐10:00 am 10:00‐10:15 am 10:15‐11:00 am 11:00‐12:00 nn 12:00 nn‐1:00 pm 1:00‐2:00 pm 2:00‐3:00 pm 3:00‐3:15 pm 3:15‐4:15 pm 4:15‐4:30 pm 4:30 – 5:30 pm EITI Regional Consultation UP Hotel, University of the Philippines Diliman November 29‐30, 2012 Session Objective Speaker Day 1 Arrival: Registration of participants and BK Secretariat distribution of workshop kit Welcome Remarks: rationale and objective To level off expectations among the participants Cielo Magno of the regional consultation Bantay Kita Introduction of participants (participants Loi Manalansan, will introduce themselves (name, Bantay Kita organization, expected output) Discussion: EITI context in the Philippines To situate EITI from the bigger context of Rodne Galicha, reforming the Philippines extractive sector ATM AM Snacks Bantay Kita and the advocacy framework of To have an overview of Bantay Kita’s advocacy Gerry Arances Bantay Kita (PWYP Chain for Change) framework Open forum Lunch Discussion: What is EITI? To know the basic information about EITI such Byron Abadeza, as its history, structure, criteria and process TAN To better understand EITI as a mechanism for transparency and accountability Discussion: Other country experiences on To better understand the role of CSO in EITI Cielo Magno, EITI process Bantay Kita To know about the opportunities and challenges faced by CSOs in other countries To learn from the experience of other country on the actual implementation of EITI PM Snacks Open Forum Background on where we are in terms of Cielo Magno, EITI candidacy Bantay Kita Special topic on local governments and EITI Prof. Dante Gatmaytan UP College of Law 22 9:00‐9:30 am 9:30‐11:30 am 11:00‐12:00 nn 12:00 nn‐1:00 pm 1:00‐2:00 pm Recap: Day 1 Sessions Discussion: EITI context in the Philippines Day 2 To situate EITI from the bigger context of reforming the Philippines extractive sector Open forum Lunch Discussion on CSO agenda within EITI Jaybee Garganera, ATM Discussion/workshop: Defining the Philippine Agenda in EITI Cielo Magno, Bantay Kita 2:00‐3:30 pm 3:30‐3:45 pm Discussion/workshop: Defining the criteria and process in selecting CSO Representatives in the PH‐EITI Multi‐ stakeholder Group (MSG) Synthesis and Closing Program To define and establish set of criteria and process in selecting CSO Representatives in the Multi‐stakeholder Group Cielo Magno, Bantay Kita 23 Time 8:00‐9:00 am 9:00‐9:15 am 9:15‐9:30 am 9:30‐10:30 am 10:30‐10:40 am 10:40‐11:30 am 11:30‐12:00 nn 12:30 nn‐1:30 pm 1:30‐2:15 pm 2:15‐2:45 pm 2:45‐3:45 am EITI Regional Consultation Las Casitas Hotel, Davao City December 3‐4, 2012 Session Objective Arrival, registration of participants and distribution of workshop kit Welcome, rationale and objective of the To level off expectations among the participants regional consultation Introduction of participants (participants will introduce themselves (name, organization, expected output) Bantay Kita and the advocacy framework of To have an overview of Bantay Kita’s advocacy Bantay Kita (PWYP Chain for Change) framework AM Snacks Discussion: What is EITI? To know the basic information about EITI such as its history, structure, criteria and process To better understand EITI as a mechanism for transparency and accountability Open forum Lunch Discussion: EITI context in the Philippines To situate EITI from the bigger context of reforming the Philippines extractive sector Discussion: Other country experiences on To better understand the role of CSO in EITI EITI process To know about the opportunities and challenges faced by CSOs in other countries To learn from the experience of other country on the actual implementation of EITI Discussion/workshop: Defining the Discussion on CSO agenda within EITI Philippine Agenda in EITI Person in‐charge BK Secretariat Cielo Magno, Bantay Kita Bon Besmanos, AFRIM Melvin Lamanilao, PBPF Perpevina Tio, Mindanawon‐Ateneo de Davao University Rodne Galicha, ATM Cielo Magno, Bantay Kita Melvin Lamanilao, PBPF 3:45‐4:30 am 4:30‐5:00 pm Discussion/workshop: Defining the criteria and process in selecting CSO Representatives in the PH‐EITI Multi‐ stakeholder Group (MSG) Synthesis and Closing To formulate the criteria and process of selecting Melvin Lamanilao, the CSO representatives in the EITI‐PH MSG PBPF Bon Besmanos, AFRIM 24 EITI Regional Consultation Pagadian City December 6‐7, 2012 Time Session Objective 9:00‐9:30 am Arrival, registration of participants and distribution of workshop kit 9:30‐9:45 am Welcome, rationale and objective of the To level off expectations among the participants regional consultation 9:45‐10:15 am Introduction of participants (participants will introduce themselves (name, organization, expected output) 10:15‐10:25 am AM Snacks 10:25‐11:00 am Bantay Kita and the advocacy framework of To have an overview of Bantay Kita’s advocacy Bantay Kita (PWYP Chain for Change) framework 11:00‐11:30 am Discussion: What is EITI? To know the basic information about EITI such as its history, structure, criteria and process To better understand EITI as a mechanism for transparency and accountability 11:30 am‐12:15 pm Open Forum 12:15‐1:15 pm Lunch 1:15‐1:45 pm Discussion: Other country experiences on To better understand the role of CSO in EITI EITI process To know about the opportunities and challenges faced by CSOs in other countries To learn from the experience of other country on the actual implementation of EITI 1:45‐2:45 pm Discussion/workshop: Defining the Discussion on CSO agenda within EITI Philippine Agenda in EITI Speaker BK Secretariat Loi Manalansan, Bantay Kita Ian Rivera, Gitib Inc. Loi Manalansan, Bantay Kita Loi Manalansan, Bantay Kita Cielo Magno, Bantay Kita Ian Rivera, Gitib Inc. 2:45‐3:00 pm 3:00‐4:30 pm 4:00‐4:15 pm Discussion/workshop: Defining the criteria and process in selecting CSO Representatives in the PH‐EITI Multi‐ stakeholder Group (MSG) Synthesis AM Snacks To define and establish set of criteria and process in selecting CSO Representatives in the Multi‐stakeholder Group Loi Manalansan, Bantay Kita Loi Manalansan, Bantay Kita 25 Time 8:00‐9:00 am 9:00‐9:15 am 9:15‐9:30 am 9:30‐10:30 am 10:30‐10:40 am 10:40‐11:30 am 11:30‐12:00 nn 12:30 nn‐1:30 pm 1:30‐2:15 pm 2:15‐2:45 pm 2:45‐3:45 am EITI Regional Consultation Cebu City December 12‐13, 2012 Session Objective Arrival, registration of participants and distribution of workshop kit Welcome, rationale and objective of the To level off expectations among the participants regional consultation Introduction of participants (participants will introduce themselves (name, organization, expected output) Bantay Kita and the advocacy framework of To have an overview of Bantay Kita’s advocacy Bantay Kita (PWYP Chain for Change) framework AM Snacks Discussion: What is EITI? To know the basic information about EITI such as its history, structure, criteria and process To better understand EITI as a mechanism for transparency and accountability Open forum Lunch Discussion: EITI context in the Philippines To situate EITI from the bigger context of reforming the Philippines extractive sector Discussion: Other country experiences on To better understand the role of CSO in EITI EITI process To know about the opportunities and challenges faced by CSOs in other countries To learn from the experience of other country on the actual implementation of EITI Discussion/workshop: Defining the Discussion on CSO agenda within EITI Philippine Agenda in EITI Resource Person BK Secretariat BK Secretariat BK Secretariat Mr. Gerry Arances Mr. Chawick Llanos Mr. Rodne Galicha Mr. Chawick Llanos Mr. Gerry Arances & Mr. Rodne Galicha 3:45‐4:30 am Discussion/workshop: Defining the criteria and process in selecting CSO Representatives in the PH‐EITI Multi‐ stakeholder Group (MSG) To formulate the criteria and process of selecting Mr. Gerry Arances & Mr. Rodne the CSO representatives in the EITI‐PH MSG Galicha 26 Annex B: Powerpoint Presentations Publish What You Pay 1 2 What are our natural resources? Without full information on the quantity, quality and location of a country’s natural resources, citizens will not be able to make informed decisions over whether and how resources should be extracted and whether they are getting a fair deal for these. 12 When the dust settles 11 Always Assess There should be regular assessments by all parties including civil society to ensure that longer-term frameworks are correct and still relevant. Civil society can play a valuable role by publicly raising concerns where frameworks and agreements are evidently no longer fit for purpose. Although it is far down the line, it is important to consider how an extractive project – and the economy that sprang around it – is effectively dismantled and decommissioned to create the least damage to the local community. Publish What You Learn Was it worth it? What is the natural resource legal framework? Whether through consultation or advocacy, civil society should – where possible – seek to influence these legal frameworks (Petroleum Bills, Mining codes etc) to ensure that transparency and accountability is integrated into the natural resource management process from the start. 10 9 Publish Why You Pay and How You Extract Publish What You Pay Publish What You Earn and How You Spend There should be an independent impact assessment made to evaluate whether the money generated was correctly spent and contributed to development and the improvement of the lives of citizens. 3 To extract or not to extract? CSOs can help ensure that communities are fully informed as to the consequences, effects and benefits of an extractive project. Impact assessments should be carried out in a transparent and independent manner and made accessible to the local communities and compensation should be planned for any anticipated detrimental effects. Did the money get there? Once revenue has been allocated, civil society can monitor whether the money reached its agreed destination and advocate for rectification if the money goes missing en route. 4 5 How to ensure the best possible deal? How to monitor the project? Civil society has a crucial role here in providing oversight and acting as a watchdog. Projects need to be monitored by government and industry but also through independent mechanisms and civil society, to ensure that any change in circumstance or contractual breaches can be rectified, whether through legal recourse for human rights abuses or via extra compensation or other means. Licences and contracts – which will determine whether a deal is fair– must be awarded in a transparent manner. To ensure that contracts are awarded in the interests of the whole citizenry, bidding should be competitive and public and contracts should be published. 6 What payments are companies making? We need to advocate for companies to publish what they pay, so that citizens can find out how much their country is receiving for their natural resources and hold their government to account. The divulgation of company payments will also help ensure that companies do not avoid certain payments through accounting sleights of hand. 7 Did the money reach the state coffers? To ensure that money is not siphoned off or “lost”, governments need to be transparent and report their natural resource revenues (whatever level of government these were destined to). Civil society should be able to track payments and revenues for each project and ensure the amounts companies pay and governments receive match. 8 Where should the money go? Civil society has a role to play in pushing for budget transparency – and advocate on budget prioritisation and allocation – to ensure that money is allocated transparently and equitably. 02/01/2013 Introducing EITI Bantay Kita Workshop Manila, October 17 2012 Roslita Arsyad, Asia Pacific Regional Associate Overall Objective Gain an understanding of key elements of EITI, and of the role of civil society. 1 02/01/2013 Specific Objectives 1. Benefits of revenue transparency 2. Steps of EITI 3. Next steps Purpose of EITI Purpose To present and share information about the purpose of the EITI, including its rules. 2 02/01/2013 EITI Basics EITI Rules EITI Rules • 12 principles • 6 criteria • 21 requirements Like… A constitution Laws Regulations 3 02/01/2013 EITI Criteria 1. Publication of payments and revenues 2. independent audit 3. independent administrator 4. all companies 5. civil society is an active participant. 6. the work plan Actors in EITI National Multi‐stakeholder Group (MSG) 4 02/01/2013 Growth in EITI Benefits of EITI: 560 Million Opportunities Purpose To present and discuss the potential benefits of the EITI process 5 02/01/2013 What you can do with 560 millions... 1200 1000 800 $ millions 600 400 200 0 Recovered by NEITI Liberia's budget UK primary education Nigeria on agriculture Tanzania on Peru on road health maintenance (ntl govt) Benefits of EITI: Government • Commitment to transparency and fight against corruption • Improves revenue collection and management • Improves sovereign ratings • Improves reputation 6 02/01/2013 Benefits of EITI: Industry • Lessens risks • Strengthens investment climate • Stability of returns • Demonstrates corporate social responsibility (CSR) Benefits of EITI: Civil Society • Increases information in the public domain • Gives civil society a voice • Mechanisms to appeal for assistance and action 7 02/01/2013 The EITI Process Purpose To present and share information about the phases of the EITI process. 1.Signup Requirements 1‐5 EITI 6 Stages 8 02/01/2013 1.Sign‐up Requirements 1‐5 EITI 6 Stages Sign‐Up Phase • • Statement of intent Commitment to work with civil society and industries Senior leader Multi‐stakeholder group Costed work plan • • • (Requirement 1‐5, EITI Rules) 9 02/01/2013 Ground Rules for CSO Participation “Free, full, independent, active and effective participation of civil society” •Right to appoint own representatives •Transparent selection •Independence •Active in design, monitoring and implementation Civil Society should… • Get organized • Establish objectives and positions • Secure expertise • Engage government officials • Evaluate country work plan • Select MSG representatives • Examine any MOUs, other agreements 10 02/01/2013 Know your objectives and get help • Key decisions made early in the process • Agree on common positions and stick together • Seek advice (Revenue Watch, PWYP, Global Witness etc.) Form a coalition • Build on members’ strengths • Avoid “divide and conquer tactics” • Broad geographical coverage. • Regular meetings and communication Hand‐out: Regulations of the EITI Coalition: Azerbaijan 11 02/01/2013 Influence the Country Work Plan • Work plan addresses capacity constraints? • Funds allocated to capacity development? • Secretariat funded? • Measurable, time‐bound targets and activities? • Est. scope and list all companies working in sector> (more….) Influence the Country Work Plan • Funds for travel to meetings? • Funds for translation of report? • Funds for consultations and dissemination events? • Review and plan to address legal impediments? 12 02/01/2013 EITI Reporting Process Preparation Work plan Receipts CSO Reconciliation Draft Dissemination Templates TOR, MOU Final Report CO’ Gov s Payments Disclosure Dual Roles of Civil Society MSG Members 13 02/01/2013 Role of Civil Society Civil society must work with other stakeholders to: • Define the MSG TORs and EITI workplan • Determine the scope of the EITI process • Define TOR for, and select EITI administrator • Monitor EITI report preparation • Analyse EITI reports and making recommendations • Disseminate results and generate debate …and do their day jobs Common Challenges • Selection of representation in MSG • Technical knowledge • Lack of time • Being outvoted • Threats • Coordination between civil society MSG members • Coordination with other civil society groups 14 02/01/2013 Possible Solutions • Select your MSG representatives freely (R4c) based on agreed criteria • Decisions by consensus • Appeal to international bodies if threats arise (R2d, 6g and 6i) • Establish coordination mechanisms Good practices for staying in touch • Preparation meetings / briefs – Between civil society on MSG and wider coalition to discuss the MSG agenda and get input • MSG meeting minutes by email , listserve or on website • Debrief meetings after MSG meetings 15 02/01/2013 Governance of the EITI Purpose To present and share information about country and international governance of the EITI, and explore advantages of an EITI law International Governance of the EITI Handout: List of EITI Board members Source: EITI Factsheet 16 02/01/2013 Country Governance Next Steps Purpose To explore different options and identify next steps to strengthen civil society engagement in the country’s EITI process 17 02/01/2013 Options What’s our focus? • EITI work plan • Draft TOR for the MSG or Administrator • Civil society coalition for the EITI, including regulations to govern its operations • Briefing note to government about obstacles to EITI implementation • Civil society positions on key EITI scoping issues • Civil society coordination and communication strategy • Protection Strategy • …. Sources of Information • www.eiti.org • www.revenuewatch.org • www.publishwhatyoupay.org • Examples of Country implementation – Liberia http://www.leiti.org.lr/ – Mongolia http://eitimongolia.mn/ – Norway: http://www.regjeringen.no/nb/sub/eiti/ 18 02/01/2013 Key Publications • EITI Rules including the Validation Guide (EITI Secretariat, February 2011) • EITI Beyond the Basics (RWI, 2009) • EITI Reports: Data and Analysis (RWI, 2011) Maraming Salamat Thank you 19 1/2/2013 Bantay‐Kita EITI ToT Oct. 18, 2012 ATM BRIEFING ON REVENUE TRANSPARENCY IN THE MINING INDUSTRY Outline 1. ATM engagement before 2010 on revenue transparency in mining 2. ATM reading of revenue transparency in mining 3. ATM and Bantay‐Kita 4. ATM positions on EITI and PWYP 1 1/2/2013 ATM engagements before 2010 1. PWYP Asean Conference (2007) 2. Study sessions on revenue transparency in mining 3. Seminar on Tracking Financials of Mining Companies (2008) 4. Case studies by ATM members and partners 5. ATM position paper in 2007 ATM reading on revenue transparency in mining 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Both PWYP and EITI, at their current design, focus on REVENUE TRANSPARENCY as its main track of work. The bias for responsible redistribution of resource extraction revenue is inadequate the Philippines, to address the main advocacy points of ATM. does not address the environmental justice and environmental rights concerns EITI at its best, is very much like Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), although there is a huge emphasis on transparency on the revenue side of the extractive industry. In the first place, we do not have any "resource revenue" yet to talk about in the Philippines, so EITI might not be making too many monitoring work. Both mechanisms (PWYP and EITI) presumes that mining industry is already accepted (or inevitable) 2 1/2/2013 ATM Reading on revenue transparency in mining There are unclear mechanisms for sanctions or booting our countries/companies who do no comply with EITI. 8. It is unclear how the communities (affected by mining) will benefit from EITI or PWYP. From the perspective of communities, protection of their assets (ancestral lands, fishing grounds, forest areas, cultural heritage) are not taken seriously as factors in the extractive equation. 9. It is unclear if EITI can facilitate major policy reform, and in fact, we don’t need nor have to wait for EITI to push for major policy reforms, such as access to information laws. 10. There are however, some potential avenues where EITI maybe considered in terms of the broad expectation for transparency and accountability work 7. ATM and Bantay‐Kita 1. Philippine workshop on EITI/PWYP in 2009 2. Initial basis of unity 3. AER as coordinating organization 4. Research project (2010‐2011) 5. Preparing for an eventual EITI in the Philippines 6. 2010 ATM Policy Paper to Aquino Administration 3 1/2/2013 ATM positions on EITI/PWYP 1. Not a major focus of work, but is a crucial component of the advocacy 2. Convening Bantay‐Kita as a strategic engagement 3. Efforts on EITI must be engaged... 4. A platform to productive (and critically) engaged the industry and MGB 5. A space for reform (especially at the local level) 6. Not engage in regional (ASEAN) formation 4 an Indonesian CSO’s Experience Maryati Abdullah, Coordinator of PWYP Indonesia, CSO’s Representative on MSG of EITI- Indonesia EITI in Indonesia Step by step endorsing and commitment of Government Presidential Decree on Revenue Transparency [26/2012] Implemented by the Transparency Team [Steering Committee team & Implementation Team] Supporting by the EITI Secretariat [Hosted by Coordinating Ministry of Economic Affair] Supporting by the National Budget and additional budget from MDTF (managed by WB) Indonesia as candidate country and will be validated in April 2013 EITI in the Value Chain for Extractive Industries Advocacy context Alba, Eleodora Mayorga. WorldBank, 2009. EITI is a part of Extractive Industries Governance Reform CSO representatives in MSG ¨ Publish What You Pay Indonesia (PWYP Indonesia) Election Committee n Candidates from inside and outside PWYP Indonesia n Criteria n Process n MSG in EITI Implementation MSG oversees EITI implementation ¨ MSG agrees on work plan ¨ MSG agrees on a definition of materiality and the reporting templates ¨ MSG agrees on EITI report reconciler and auditor ¨ MSG ensure EITI report is comprehensible and publicly accessible ¨ MSG oversees the validation process ¨ Dealing with EITI in MSG Save ‘definition’ and scope in the legal framework Leveling (National-subnational, company by company/by unit production) Building concencus: representativeness (equal issue), taking decition process, etc (TOR of MSG) Agrees on Workplan & Budget Scope & Reporting Template Scope (contract period, kind of extractive company) Kind of revenues payment Materiality of Revenue (minimum value/volume) Level of disaggregation Time period Accounting standard Who should report what EITI Reporting Template Scope ¤57 oil and gas Product Sharing Contracts ¤17 mineral production units ¤54 coal production units ¨ Revenue Stream ¤Directorate General of Oil and Gas, Ministry of Energi dan Nat.Resources ¤Directorate General of Minerals and Coals, Ministry of Energy and Nat. Resources ¤the Executive Agency for Upstream Oil and Gas Business Development (BPMIGAS) ¤Directorate of Non-Tax Revenue, Ministry of Finance ¨ Lesson learn & challenge ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ The devil is in the details Putting pieces of the puzzle Finding needles in the haystack Constructive engagement A team effort knowledge management Passing the baton ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ Preventing the leak & corruption Reforming the governance of extractive Changing the policy Part of the OGP Initiative FOI acceleration Strengthening with the other global standard Thank You 1/2/2013 ADVOCATING EITI an Indonesian CSO experience Indonesian Parliamentary Center (IPC) Extractive Industries in Indonesia A resource rich country both in hydrocarbons and mining. Oil Declining - Indonesia had 4.4 billion barrels of oil proven reserves at the end of 2009, and Oil and gas exports accounted for 16.3% of total exports. in the last 10 years (copper, nickel, gold, coal, bauxite, silver, and tin). Mining Expanding 1 1/2/2013 EITI in Indonesia Understanding Promoting Institutionalizing Implementing Understanding EITI (2001-2003) Promoting EITI (2003-2007) Institutionalizing EITI (2007-2010) Implementing EITI (2010-now) Understanding EITI (2001-2003) Global civil society movement since 1999 Criticism at the World Bank since 2000 Extractive Industry Review (EIR) Report (2001-2003) The launch of EITI and its conference (2002-2003) Representatives from government, companies operating and CSOs 2 1/2/2013 Promoting EITI (2003-2007) Supreme Audit Agency uncovered cases of potential violations in the calculation of profit sharing and the debiting of cost recovery claims proposed by Production Sharing Contract (PSC) contractors (2003-2005) President Yudhoyono assumed office (2004) – EITI: 100-first-day agenda. CSO report on corruption loopholes in extractive industry revenue stream (2005) High-level visit from Peter Eigen EITI Chair (2007) Institutionalizing EITI (2007-2010) PWYP Indonesia was established (2007) A EITI presidential regulation is initiated (2007) CSO produced academic paper for the draft (2007) FOI Law was enacted (2008) CSO reports on discrepancies in government revenue, over-reported cost recovery, backlogs of unpaid coal royalties and variance in policies for mineral royalties; researching policies and practices of Environmental Financial Assurances; setting up revenue management mechanisms in the sub-national level (2009) 3 1/2/2013 Implementing EITI (2010-now) Presidential Regulation no 26 of 2010 Multi Stakeholder Group (MSG) CSO engagement with Parliament, the media, ASEAN as well as with CSOs in Southeast Asian countries (2010-now) EITI MSG in Indonesia EITI Steering Team Head: Coordinating Minister of Economic Affairs Members: Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources, Minister of Finance, Minister of Home Affairs, Head of Agency for Finance and Development Supervision and CSO Representative 4 1/2/2013 EITI MSG in Indonesia EITI Implementing Team Head: Deputy of Energy and Mineral Resources from Coordinating Ministry of Economic Affairs Deputy Head I: Director General of Budget from Ministry of Finance Deputy Head II: Secretary General from Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources Members: Coordinating Ministry for Economic Affairs, Department of Finance, Department of Energy and Mineral Resources, Department of Home Affairs, Agency for Finance and Development Supervision, Head of the Executive Agency for Upstream Oil and Gas Business Development or BP Migas, General Director of National Oil and Gas Company Pertamina, Representatives from Indonesian Petroleum Association, Indonesian Mining Association and Indonesian Coal Mining Association, Regional Secretaries of Riau, East Kalimantan and East Java provinces and CSO representatives Indonesian Experience in Advocating EITI Regional Advocacy Sub National Advocacy National Advocacy 5 1/2/2013 Indonesian experience in Advocating EITI Publish What You Pay Indonesia A coalition from CSOs all over Indonesia, including resource-rich provinces Complementing concerns and expertise A strategic platform President MSG regulation drafting process Lessons Learned Leverage Multi-Layered Multi Stakeholder Advocacy Champions Knowledge Management 6 1/2/2013 thank you Gita Widya Laksmini Soerjoatmodjo IPC Project Officer for IKAT US – A Southeast Asian Partnership for Better Governance in the Extractive Industries
[email protected] /
[email protected] 7 1/2/2013 Advocating Transparency and Accountability in the Extractive Industry MERICIO AKARA Manila, 18-19 October 2012 Timor Leste • Area of 15,007 km2. • Population are 1.066,582 people (census 2010). • Timor Leste has 13 districts, 65 sub-districts and 442 villages. • Climate: tropical; hot, humid; distinct rainy and dry seasons. • Natural resources: gold, petroleum, natural gas, manganese and marble. Location of Timor Leste: Southeastern Asia, northwest of Australia in the Lesser Sunda Islands at the eastern end of the Indonesian archipelago (NTT). Note: Timor Leste includes the eastern half of the island of Timor, the Oecusse (Ambeno) district on the northwest portion of the island of Timor, and the islands of Atauro and Jaco. 1 1/2/2013 TL’s Oil and Gas Potential in the Exclusive Area (Sovereign Area) TL’s Onshore Potential 2 1/2/2013 TL’s Sovereign Sea 3 1/2/2013 TL’s Oil and Gas Potential in the Joint Petroleum Development Area (Timor Leste & Australia) North Map inside JPDA has Indicated Potential Resources as per previous studies Day Dawn Lead C Lead B Lead A LEGEND Oil Well Suspended Oil Well Cowrie Kelp Updip Pascal Solaris Cobol Kelp Deep Arsia Rhum Pavonis Othelo Casio Mull Abandoned Oil Well Oil Well with Gas Shows Ascraeus Trumpet Emilia Elysium Skye Oil and Gas Well Suspended Gas Well Gas Well with Oils Show Dry Hole w/ Oil & Gas Show Dry Hole with Oil Show Dry Hole Gas Well Cerek Itik Gelatik Kowak Julang Undan Limavady Mandar West Bann Strabone Neagh Nuri Jurassic Prospects Jurassic Leads Permian Prospects Deep Water Leads PSC Areas Undrilled Wells Wowo wiwi Alpha Caladi Dara Putar Itik Roko Argus 1 Portrush Derry Kowari Quakka Port Stewart Bandicoot Bushmills Greater Wallaroo Bettong Planigale Sugna Antechinus Index Map Dili JPDA Darwin 4 1/2/2013 Joint Petroleum Development Area (JPDA) KITAN (JPDA 06-105) Petroleum Revenues flow and Transparency Mechanism 5 1/2/2013 Petroleum Revenue Flows Licensing Rounds & Application Fees Petroleum Fund PSC’s With IOC’s Royalties & Petroleum Tax Petroleum Revenue Budget Macro-economic assessment Local Content Downstream MoU Seeps for Power, etc. Independent Investment Projects Economic Impact o All information related to revenues from oil and gas is available to the public as guaranteed by Timor Leste Petroleum Fund Law. Key Institutions, actors involved in extractive industries 1. ANP: National Petroleum Authority 2. BPA: Banking & Payments Authority/ Central Bank 3. MNR/SERN: Ministry of Natural Resources/ State Secretary of Natural Resources 4. CCPF: Consultative Council of the Petroleum Fund 5. MOF: Ministry of Finance 6. NDPR: National Directorate of Petroleum Revenue 6 1/2/2013 Managing Timor Leste’s Petroleum Industry Legal framework Sharing of benefits between Timor Leste and Oil Companies Timor Leste management of benefits o o Petroleum Act. Production Sharing Contract (PSC). o o Production Sharing Contract (PSC). Petroleum Taxation Act. Petroleum Fund At the end of September 2012, Timor Leste petroleum fund account has reached about US$ 10.8 billion. The $10.8 billion only comes from one oil field called Bayu Undang. As been calculated that from 2012 Timor Leste will get new revenue from a new oil field called KITAN - an area inside Joint Development Petroleum Area with Australia which in total will be about USD 4 billion. 7 1/2/2013 National Situation & Challenges • Despite the fact that Timor Leste has an abundant supply of oil and gas revenues, its citizens are among the world’s poorest • East Timor has a low life expectancy, high illiteracy and widespread food insecurity • Access to health care, education, transport, markets and information is limited • The country is ranked 147 out of 187 countries in the Human Development Index (HDI) 2011 • About 50% of the population in Timor Leste lives below the basic needs poverty line of $1.25 per person per day (HDI 2011) • From 2.500 full term live births 348 babies were born malnutrition • approximately, half of all children were underweight in 2007 and the mortality rate among children under five was 98 out of 1,000 in 2004 • Fertility rates are among the highest in the world with an average of 7.7 children per woman • The rare attendance of skilled midwives during childbirths contributes to a high maternity mortality rate with 660 per 100,000 births MDG Report for Timor Leste (UNDP) 2009 8 1/2/2013 • Most of the Timorese population depends on agriculture for their livelihood • However, agriculture makes up only third of non-oil GDP only, which indicates the existence of low agricultural productivity • One reason among others is the limited access to markets due to deficient infrastructure in common geographically dispersed settlements • When Indonesian military and militias withdrew in 1999 they destroyed up to 70% of infrastructure • Revenues for reconstruction are still urgently needed today but Governments’ efforts to provide transparent and accountable service delivery have not been satisfactory. • Timor Leste’s GNI per capita is US$3,005. • Timor-Leste’s HDI value for 2011 is 0.495 (low human development category). • Corruption Index value for 211 is 2.4 (high corruption). • Positioning the Country at 143 out of 182 countries. 9 1/2/2013 WHY EITI? CSO’s Roles in Developing EITI-MSG in Timor Leste ?????? • “…EITI is a global standard that can be use for improved transparency & accountability for the huge revenue generated by oil , gas and mineral industry to avoiding “resource curse” and improving their use in reducing poverty and generating economic growth…”. • “…is a ‘world first’ in which Government, CSO & Companies are all directly involved in the development & governance of the initiative…” 10 1/2/2013 Benefits for civil society of EITI • Better information on what companies are paying and governments receiving – absence of information often leads to civil society groups assuming the worst. • Managing expectations – oil doesn’t mean instant wealth for all. Good info on revenues ensures people understand what is, and is not, going to be received. • This helps people to become involved in realistic debate on how the money should be spent. Civil society engagement in EITI • CSO often form EITI Coalitions. • These increase their negotiating power with government and companies. • CSO are involved in designing and steering the EITI process in all countries. • CSO are usually involved in selecting an audit company to reconcile payments and revenue data. • CSO are vital in explaining to ordinary people why oil and Gas revenues are important and how they should be managed. 11 1/2/2013 Case study – Timor Leste • Civil society groups formed a Core Group for Transparency in 2005. Over 8 organizations now. At the same time, Transparency Based Groups involved NGO Forum in EITI process. • Negotiated with government and companies 20052006 on the form EITI would take. MoU was signed by all groups, end of 2007 • Coalition members sit on steering group that oversees EITI in Timor Leste since 2007 to date • CSO also help select the audit company which reconciles payments and revenue data. Case study – Timor Leste – cont’ • Coalition gets funds from supporters and donors based on it annual work plan. • Its staff and members carry out EITI activities: ▫ NGO Forum organize an election assembly to select SCO Representative at TL-EITI Multi Stake Holders ▫ Public awareness and media campaigns, conference etc to promote EITI and to lobby for more information and transparency. ▫ Capacity building training for NGOs, Parliament Members and media on the oil sector and the importance of transparency. ▫ Analyzing EITI reports and VALIDATION PROCESS? 12 1/2/2013 How to engage CSO at the Regional Level? • Develop networking with CSO members from other countries. Ex. Creating Working Group for Oil transparency. • Creating link with PWYP, RWI etc, in order to get more update information on Extractive Industry issues from around the globe. • Exchanging experiences with other CSO members in Asia Pacific. Ex. Promoting Capacity building training together on EITI. PROMOTING OIL TRANSPARANCY, BUDGET TRANSPARANCY & COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION IN TIMOR LESTE Promoting Governance, Accountability, Transparency and Integrity to expand the citizens engagement in natural resource management 13 1/2/2013 Example 1: Ensuring Transparency and Accountability in the Petroleum Fund, EITI and State Budget. Community Briefing at the village level Example 2: Promote Social Accountability in Extractive Industry. Training for focal point, students and local authorities 14 1/2/2013 Example 3: State budget and petroleum fund awareness dialogue (Seminar). National Seminar 15 1/2/2013 Example 4: Monitoring and advocacy on the Service Delivery. Roads rehabilitation Clean water project Bridge project School condition Example 5: Submit the policy brief on government’s policy in EI sector and annual state budget proposal to National Parliament. 16 1/2/2013 National level and engagement in the regional ASEAN campaign • Promote EITI at the regional level • Coordination and facilitation of regional advocacy. • Annual partner meeting. • Workshop series on the ASEAN Extractive Industries. • etc. VISIT TIMOR LESTE 2013!! Thank you! Obrigado! Visit the EITI website & Luta Hamutuk at: www.eitransparency.org www.lutahamutukinstitute.org 17 1/2/2013 EITI Report Innovations 19 October 2012 Manila, Philippines EITI Requirement 9(h) “Multi‐stakeholder groups are encouraged to explore opportunities to include additional information in their EITI Reports that will increase the comprehensiveness of EITI reporting and public understanding of revenues and encourage high standards of transparency and accountability in public life, government operations and in business.” EITI Rules, 2011 Edition 1 1/2/2013 Innovative additions to EITI reports 1. Getting a Good Deal • • • • • State participation in companies Payments from government to companies Lists of licenses and license holders Company‐by‐company production data Physical flows 3. Managing Volatile Resources • • • Sub‐national reporting Front‐line revenue allocations Revenues allocated to development funds 2. Ensuring Revenue Transparency • • • • • Relevant background information Data from independent sources Midstream revenues Revenues from sub‐contractors Spot checks and verification 4. Investing for Sustainable Development • • Information on revenue use Social payments 5. Other innovations • • • • Coverage of unique sectors Reporting templates Company and government contacts Evaluates participation 1. Getting a good deal • What is the relationship between the state and individual oil and mining companies? • Is the government getting a fair share of extractive industry revenues? • What percentage of total production do government revenues represent? • • • • • State participation in companies Payments from government to companies Lists of licenses and license holders Company‐by‐company production data Physical flows 2 1/2/2013 *State participation in companies 1.1 Cameroon, DRC, Gabon, Ghana, Kyrgyzstan, Mali, Mauritania, Mongolia, Mozambique, Nigeria, Norway, Republic of Congo, Tanzania, Togo, and Zambia report revenues the state earns as a partner or shareholder in extractive companies and explain the relationships between companies and the state State as shareholder State as public entity DRC 2008‐09 1.2 Payments from government to companies Cameroon 2006‐08 Cameroon describes contractual relationships in which the state may be required to pay companies . Cote d’Ivoire’s SOE makes payments to companies to cover operating expenses in its capacity as shareholder, though no payments are reported . Norway includes cash outflows from the central bank to the SOE to cover field costs “Negative mining rents” flow from Cameroon’s SOE to private enterprises 3 1/2/2013 1.3 *Lists of licenses and license holders Gabon 2006‐08 Burkina Faso, Cote d’Ivoire, Nigeria, Republic of Congo, Tanzania, Timor Leste, Togo, and Zambia list production sites and who operates them Gabon and Yemen provide maps of mining and oil concessions Cote d’Ivoire 2006‐07 Rep. of Congo 2009 1.4 Company‐by‐company production data Burkina Faso, Iraq, Mali, Mozambique, Republic of Congo, Togo, and Zambia include company‐by‐company production volumes Burkina Faso 2008‐09 Mali 2009 4 1/2/2013 *Physical flows Cote d’Ivoire, Iraq, Nigeria, and Yemen report the volume and value of physical flows . 1.5 Azerbaijan, Cameroon, Mozambique, and Republic of Congo report only the volume of physical flows Nigeria 2006‐08 Iraq 2009 2. Ensuring revenue transparency • How important are extractive revenues to the national economy? • How much does the government make from other industries associated with petroleum and mineral extraction? • How accurate is company and government data? • • • • • Relevant background information Data from independent sources Midstream revenues Revenues from sub‐contractors Spot checks and verification 5 1/2/2013 *Relevant background information . EI revenues' role in national Describes all economy (% of major GDP, exports, Data on commodites etc.) reserves Information on References individual legislation Describes projects, major covering investment in mines/oilfields, extractive sectors etc. sectors 2.1 Current Describes national Future growth of production production sectors data estimates Description of Describes Includes maps of deposits, privatisation of role of licenses, etc EI sectors SOE Describes phases and modes of exploitation Compares (exploration current data vs. extraction, to past EITI large‐scale vs. reports artisanal, etc.) Albania Burkina Faso CAR Cote d'Ivoire DRC Gabon Iraq Kyrgyzstan Mauritania Mongolia Mozambique Niger Nigeria Norway Peru Rep. of Congo Sierra Leone Tanzania Togo Timor Leste x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x *Relevant background information . 2.1 Burkina Faso, Gabon, Iraq, Mauritania, Mongolia, Mozambique, Niger, Republic of Congo, Tanzania, Yemen, and Zambia include extensive background information on their extractive industry sectors. Gabon 6 1/2/2013 Data from independent sources 2.2 Norway links to state accounts Sierra Leone cites government and IMF data Timor Leste includes Petroleum Fund reporting Zambia’s 2008 report includes production data from the national statistics office and price data from the London Metal Exchange Norway *Midstream revenues Sierra Leone 2.3 Sierra Leone includes revenues from port operations and gold and diamond dealers/exporters Madagascar includes fees for use of transport infrastructure among its revenue streams (though no payments were received) Togo included payments from the national rail company, some of which come from transporting minerals Gabon Sierra Leone 2006‐07 7 1/2/2013 Revenues from sub‐contractors Mali includes entities involved in construction, mining operations, and infrastructure development Togo includes revenues from construction and engineering companies involved in the extractive industries Mali 2009 2.4 Spot checks and verification Ghana cross‐checks company claims Peru verifies sub‐national disbursements Nigeria requires spot checks of physical flows and pricing mechanisms Ghana 2009 2.5 . Nigeria 1999‐2004 8 1/2/2013 3. Managing volatile resources • Where do extractive revenues go once they’ve been received by the government? • What portion of extractive revenues does the government invest in the future? • Sub‐national reporting • Front‐line revenue allocations • Revenues allocated to development funds *Sub‐national reporting Ghana, Mongolia, Nigeria, Peru, and Sierra Leone include data on revenue transfers between central and local governments 3.1 Peru 2008‐10 9 1/2/2013 3.2 *Front‐line revenue allocations Cameroon reports on transfers made to ministries and public administration before funds go through budget Cote d’Ivoire’s in‐kind gas payments to SOE are used for electricity generation Mongolia shows how some revenue streams go to regional budgets and company “donations” fund specific projects Examples of front‐line allocations In‐kind oil/gas goes directly to refinery Company‐funded infrastructure projects Funds go directly to local governments SOE dividends are reinvested Oil/Mining Revenues Timor Leste’s revenues go directly to the Petroleum Fund Nigeria reports that a portion of in‐kind revenues is used to cover operating expenses of companies where the state is a shareholder Kyrgyzstan notes that allocations to the Social Fund and other social expenditures do not go through the state budget Kazakhstan’s dividends do not go to state budget Peru reports that a portion of taxes and royalties go directly to regional governments Treasury/ National Budget Tanzania includes levies that go directly to local governments 3.3 *Revenues allocated to development funds Ghana, Iraq, Kyrgyzstan, Liberia, Nigeria, Peru, Sierra Leone, and Timor Leste report payments to development funds Timor Leste 2009 Kyrgyzstan 2009 10 1/2/2013 4. Investing for sustainable development • Is the government using mining and petroleum funds to accomplish its development priorities? • Are extractive revenues really benefitting local communities? • Are companies following through on promises of community development? • Information on revenue use • Social payments *Information on revenue use 4.1 Ghana shows budgeted and actual spending by local governments Peru shows the beneficiaries of specific revenue streams Ghana 2009 11 1/2/2013 *Social payments Burkina Faso (“Prélèvement Communautaire de Solidarité”), Kazakhstan (“environmental fees”), Kyrgyzstan (“environmental charges” and social fund contributions) Liberia (“contributions to community”), Mongolia (“donations”), Peru (payments to local communities), Republic of Congo (“projets sociaux”), Togo (voluntary company payments), Yemen (“social development bonus”), and Zambia (“environmental protection fund” and “social payments”) report social payments. 4.2 Mongolia 2009 Zambia 2008 5. Other innovations • Which natural resource sectors contribute most to government revenues? • Where can civil society activists and journalists go to follow up on questions raised by EITI reports? • Which companies and government agencies were most willing to participate in EITI reporting? • • • • Coverage of unique sectors Reporting templates Company and government contacts Evaluates participation 12 1/2/2013 Coverage of unique sectors In addition to mining and petroleum revenues Liberia includes forestry and agriculture Togo includes the mineral water sector 5.1 Liberia 2010 Togo 2010 5.2 Reporting templates Burkina Faso, Ghana, Peru, Mali, Norway, Republic of Congo, Tanzania, and Zambia include copies of reporting templates in their EITI reports Ghana 2009 Tanzania 2008‐09 13 1/2/2013 Company and government contacts Burkina Faso, Madagascar, Mali, Mongolia, Republic of Congo, Sierra Leone, Tanzania, and Zambia list contacts in companies and government agencies 5.3 Mongolia 2009 Rep. of Congo 2010 Evaluates participation Mongolia rates performance and transparency Republic of Congo’s 2007‐09 report shows which pieces of information each company supplied 5.4 Mongolia 2009 14 1/2/2013 Discussion Which innovations would you find most useful? Are there any that you will consider advocating for in your own country? 5.4 Wrap‐up 5.4 Please share any interesting innovations you may find. Erica Westenberg
[email protected] 15 Annex C: Attendance Sheets ~ ~. ~ Department of Budget and Management Malacanang, Manila Bantav Kita ·~ ~taYKita West Avenue, Quezon City ATTENDANCE Purpose of Meetir Place of Meeting Date/ Time of Me, ing SHEET : EITITrainors Training : University Hotel, Dlllman, Quezon City : 18-19 October, 2012 ---I. PART CIPANTS 10"( f' ' OFFICE/ DESIGNATION -A B~L A ~A\I t -\\n~G?m O%\ce('"" 2. ~et<l-Y ~N\Mo~ 3.Iti:bLEJ 't;10 4.NANCj . 8!f fd=1z\N1 - ~ Of=f'(c::t:fl. Ai ~~~~tt$,~©~41~~~ ~~~~~f:V!.I~'~~· \1.J(i;\'(S 'LJjl. [I~ C 61~ I ~1/JAt,~~~T~at1ir ~~~-~~~~o:::~ 5./~tn· 7.MAA\CE/8. cfMb12-:-~&o 6. Mfl1A- /hM. Y7A- rWI~ P. ~ILARID -rA1t~O L-~~ ·~tfJ2-- I~, 1)(fleC1Z!)( A.DPU-A-lA~odf fJJa1tA I I;Ut1#l, ~b~tl /I~ 9. fa -<{<stA~ ---------- RW l 10.~~~_ 12.~~ ~'Ja-J __ !lit jgl' { C2 4&/-= 14.~!rW At ~ ~~ 15. pet! T Ft--IM 13. I ~-!Jv I ~y(h~ I Plf/t-U/f:ff Department of Budget and Management Ma lacananq, Ma nila Bantav Kita West Avenue, Quezon City ATTENDANCE SHEET Purpose of Meetim Place of Meeting Date/ Time of Mee ng : EITI Trainors Training : University Hotel, Diliman, Quezon City : 18-19 October, 2012 "--------- PART]I :IPANTS OFFICE/ DESIGNATION 1. 2. 3. 'J&/G.c:;s~v _~ Vov-vJw.-., / _ '~ruwl~ qKuffu [U(O Ri·/k , 4. Mv' {trJL .~ 5. 6. 7, J:~M,-QJ<Y \~ -t-?vv0l e --~?4---- eev. r C1 _ ~ lVV\,~ r: /l 0 }IJ [ tv[jk fJ/tw ()Y\ -lirT1j}Ji]) _-:..It._ 8. _ Wc, 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. _ _ _ _ _ _ Department of BUdget and Management Malacanang, Manila . Bantay Kita ~ ~taYKjta West Avenue, Quezon City ATTENDANCE Purpose of Meetin Place of Meeting Date/ Time of Mee ng SHEET : EITI Trainors Training : University Hotel, Diliman, Quezon City : 18-19 October, 2012 ~--- PART] :IPANTS ~CIet-y I T" OFFICE/ DESIGNATION AFf(ltYI Milt/Oil SIGNATURE I 1. 1!E~N1.1rr.JOC, 2. 3. 4. J~ lIAW'M/-I't~ OFFICER. fJf:1<P'I t. r ---) e ~/b-+r1 _ PI/.GeTOt!. Jflf JUII fh'q~i I 12~ _~ 5. 6. IA0 C IYfljiJ -lV£~ OUR 1'\J6l$ UJ(ll/1fl?_ rp~ --=---- If)t/tI~/j-'-s/ 7. 8. A f: ~ ~ f\__ .C/~ } ~Pf) __ __ ~ ~ 10. 11. -.-:. J~1r 12. e!M:6wlCK 13. I f!hi 'IO~$ht:V h(~ 1l4,Jg j AlA - 'f)IA. t:.~L:> ... _ tLA-Nq5 USREP-b MWdZ(P~ ~A ~+--I; _ .l:~ . f A)2lLM Department of Budget and Management Malacarianq, Manila Bantay Kita West Avenue, Quezon City ATTENDANCE Purpose of Meetin: Place of Meeting Datej Time ofMee ng SHEET : ElTI Trainors Training : University Hotel, Diliman, Quezon City : 18-19 October, 2012 I 1. 2. PART] :IPANTS OFFICE/ DESIGNATION RDi~A-U?Isu.t lfO/J }A, b~~ ~ • Pfl,em -'f'J'V - qJi-.tRPM~ _---------,~~ NTL(/(IrSMJ iN[ J)U1.L1 4 v 11 . /lA (:,ff'v1(JA 16N (;Df~1 A171 3. 4. 5. l-eli!W/ ~2- gOum"Wk7CM I~ ~lt-fUf?kfIJ.P- U~ {-4t./r5#9/&L--~--------------- RO~Ztr.A I ~$yAt> 6.G~ 7. 8. _,e~ ~ 'J..J ~ Q L.~:.....--~ \W<iMJ112 ~ tI'Iil0f b> ~ C~ ~CCt'/1l- ~,dJ4DC ~~ l-at;, ~ 1[( ~ rtftz::J J. I. 13. /f1;ffJ;eo7) 14. II vlIT il JI: 50 ,-. . UfJo ~V) If 0&/t1 (r vrntCLt) ~T~ fDS"-YB ~ Department of Budget and Management Malacananq, Manila ~ ~taYKjta Bantay Kita West Avenue. Quezon City ATTENDANCE SHEET Purpose of Meeting Place of Meeting Date/ Time of Meel Ig : EITI Trainors Training : University Hotel, Diliman, Quezon City : 18-19 October, 2012 PARTI IPANTS 1.1l4~ ~ 2. 3. ~lN6 OFFICE/ DESIGNATION SIGNATURE 7. o. r.~/ f;p;;f7i~ uew Gr~ &,Utl4\! 4.~/-~ 5. 6. 7. f~ _ _ _ 8. 9. _ _ 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. _ _ _ _ _ _ Department of Budget and Management tv1a lacananq, t\~anila Bantay Kita \!\Iest ,A:'-lenue, Cluezon City ATTENDANCE Purpose of Meetirn Place of Meeting Date/ Time of Mee' ug SHEET - Baguio : EITI Regional Consultation : Pines View Hotel : 26-27 November, 2012 I 1. 2. 3. PART) .IPANTS OFFICE/ DESIGNATION SIGNATURE ME L\J l~ ~ A-c U ~ I JAK~~ AV\A\1lZ.s1-'j \V\itW-VlQ,l" - 6r0u.pUxYt_J_,_-----="---lJ._ Mk;J;ltL, -, /e7Mb;%"'M~ . JVP _ ~-AW:W! ,. J V/~ J--=-{/6¥Jb---'----'----'-.~____=_=_ 4./~F<1 5.~ ~ l~g.)~ ~ rc?~ I«L~h~/fP~ \p4? 7 Jt-:~Cb 0i{1. , 1fA,<fJ/'/)(~ 5'e..£a.-~~ 6.6-L~ o 0 r! / 7.ftvN~eJ}YoSe. 8 . .w6 ~ J. A 9. 10. 11. 12. {·GtJiMh~1 MV1J S'!VJ;;: Tbld/ 6W ~~ L«fJ J I rz.oa,vfl ~ ResARlb k I Gv.vrnl1 r 7 GAf£ff' [FF-k-O ~ I~ 0 A- fuBRT£"d I t O· 1'0N1 Cl~,iJlvJ'~ --=--~--+- \ h't( ~Ut V\1 0\ LdtJ~ ~ Jtm rtW~ j.. ,j i?tW D1" ~nt1>~, __ ~_~_R_~_l'_'/J_cA_Ovf--,,--U_'V_ _~ ., :S~'1 13. UF-l.b.~O 14. ~ 15. .i~A.fo..{ r1, I 4'1.50 I A.J\f.PCC- Jl.-rtrl atP~ _ -L-7.•.••. 1K\-'---~-\-1 f -\ I fz!iJ;LtJ 1( MAq!) ,/tl- Department of BUdget and Management rv1alacahang, Manila Santay Kita \/'iest Avenue, Ouezon Cit:v' ATTENDANCE Purpose of Meeting Place of Meeting Date/ Time of Meet tg SHEET - Baguio : EITI Regional Consultation : Pines View Hotel : 26-27 November, 2012 PARTI~ (PANTS OFFICE/ DESIGNATION 7. 8. 9. _ _ _ 10. 11. 12. 13. _ _ _ _ 14. _ 15. _ Department of Budget and Management Malacananq, Manila ~p. @)antayKita SHEET Bantay Kita 'INest f!..vEmue. Quezon City ATTENDANCE Purpose of Meeth ~ Place of Meeting Date/ Time of Me' ting : EITIRegional Consultation - NCR : University Hotel, Dillman, Quezon City : 29-30 November, 2012 '------ PAR1 Cl PANTS {$. I OFFICE/ DESIGNATION SIGNATURE 1. %;eyz ts aMiNt;;-z ~/vt.() \ < l(AAbAPi11 / c;& l~ffA7 ~~cflt Ge\l\ 2. 3. 4. p. ~k..ll~V hVlAN~~~_ :;A i.» i\ LV 4 H JOt%f~~ p- _~.;:;.-.~_-+-_ 5. 'BDSf3./ l ' 6. V I tf\liL 7. ~ 8. Gtn- (1.-- I \ lL, "rn ~(\~~0'------\-~'-"=-_-"--_ fiO~~· 10. fZo~~ 11. ~-~ ---4-- ~17~ '&:i \ 1 :-' ~ C' 12.]=])V\~r.,J3 'LV\- ~ 13. d,,~ ~. ~~Th) h6~~h~ 14._~Y--,,-_ 15. t " \ '\ \ Mf:lZl ItN f\AA-fJ I :.~~. . Department of Budget .~ and Management ~ :t MalacarJang. Manila Bantay Kita 'I/'/est A.venue. Quezon CiW ATTENDANCE Purpose of Meeti ,~ Place of Meeting Date/ Time of ME Iting SHEET : EITI Regional Consultation - NCR : University Hotel, Diliman, Quezon City : 29-30 November, 2012 PAR1 _CI_P_A_NT_S I OFFICE/ DESIGNATION __ 1.tf'Etf~p~ , ~aOA--;Jtt4 \ 2. DIGNATURE 7!LA-t/i0/A-lv~//2 _. UMtM g M ~ ,4&4-- \ tfL~/(jL~~ ~{'~~ 5. 6. _ _ 7. 8. 9. _ _ _ 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. _ _ _ _ _ 15. _ _I Department of BUdget and Management I BantayKita West Avenue. Quezon City . Malacanang. Manila ATTENDANCE SHEET Purpose of Meeting Place of Meeting Date/Time of Meeting : EITIRegional Consultation : Las Casitas Inn, Davao City : 3-4 December, 2012 PARTICIPANTS 1. 1) I tJ (I.. {)II/r {)G M, 2. 6 f8;tIJ 3. ~JJ 4. t/ ~ I OFFICE/ DESIGNATION Prt;,[~ Cnyt:&k/rl J'kt7[ I SIGNATURE '-+-I~--- n f'J m/?nr,..t·{L/ff~r;.e) /tJc ,. M .. 1V1177J~,1-N A-dm;/1 C;Pff. - P./rtlf/<I. l? ~~d f>.' p. f7~Y l~p..,Cr Rc t>C\ ¥ A-0J E:V 't ~ff' G-} A/..;- CPf£~IA..L / ; 5. C7.qh1av , 6. J-- twU7t!} t:z::o~rJA..£",-;::ifb4N r t:.7kPF /lvtn~l'1'V G.. ~ ~1fA) ~ fZ-1'00 7. fi-( f!l1, \/lA 8. 9 .. ! ~.rJd 0 . L~V'4toL Y!JOt.kUL Y"ttf'fJG .•Y J / rooy IJ 11~v..Vttj TW4"t~f\ -: D. D61A€f1 r-o,r~yl) VvlM,,-kff SOLED K\ ~ 10. (;O\Mt'l.f'Mr\ 11.JH11,~!9 ~- Ca+Ui'-'...lgV\ Cl Id ?re S\<~-\- 12, 13. J~T<yf!II{ofU Jo G. [van eir/zI)MJ hI 14. 15. ,~ T ~()fJ2f?to _ tZk.r L- ~t11v~ ft1,ht{,,,~. ge~;Mo/ ~~1. {2u, lvfr;cb -M ':3vtlc~/cJ i4..rD~11 J/IAh'fvt T~t!klWlo %S06n 1f)- :P~(1 ~ {f71; ~t5 pev-!'';{ f"J1 ~Jm' y;ru;;- I P Department of Budget and Management ... ~"':)-~.. > .~":F" • Malacananq, Manila ~B /~-. -' antayklta .' ". ~ ... Bantay Kita West Avenue. Quezon City ATTENDANCE SHEET Purpose of Meeting Place of Meeting Date/Time of Meeting : EITIRegional Consultation : Las Casitas Inn, Davao City : 3-4 December, 2012 PARTICIPANTS 1. f2-0Mq) OFFICE/ DESIGNATION Bot) LOM\lkl O· t),k1\J>5Gkl" \ JTA ~ [S\\~tl") Sl~~~~ J 2. 3. 4. 5. '\J1V-;J7W !1-- . ~~(J7( dTfJw~ ~Det E~V\I\ Ar~h-DAVAO f{Rf[~ vYi ~G- i~ I V i"\l PJI" v-A G~-t; , ~ Ai7V) r.fFZItV/ ) f'lZoG'RArll OFFKE R. l..QA \., T6S;,a~'tN ptJ~ I le ,~~ f&E£M MO~ 6. J!,r::Ve1eL'/ 7. 8. 9. ~PlJ'1n C,· f..11/n rl0jvM fef..r'j C· f1'w Jlo C'\. \ 0\ \'VS DI,N) 0 JJ I *htonJtcL M I fIj()~C)N ~~ ~~ ~ .~ 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. k CI-bJlo '1vv~ ~/V';o "- ~ ~ ~ t;/L_ _ _ _ T -, Department of BUdget and Management Malacanang. Manila Bantay Kita West Avenue. Quezon City ATTENDANCE SHEET Purpose of Meeting Place of Meeting Date j Time of Meeting : EITI Regional Consultation - Pagadian : Mardale Hotel and Convention Center, Pagadian City -----: 6-7 December, 2012 PARTICIPANTS 1. OFFICE/ DESIGNATION JobJ~ ,-.fl!lQ/t gjM 63;{;I_ M()~ 1a}{)Jr1- D /d t 'I ( 2. Jctfh,:d() fl' M (I. ~~ -'.' . !if( (, "f ~ P ifhd z. c. ~r6 I w 3. 4. J~ (j\HJ.DfVil, j3~P£fd;tc. A MILVcI....:..1}\!....:.-_ l1~fa~ ~C1 1St: ~ ID10 - \][f~ 5. 6. 7. f&hl(tltAp l.A. ~{rho (UrPA- twt:· '~..,.&n~~ D~-or C' Qt(t\'l~O " ,.J Ff118J- W~ bc(V\\ u.,.reut 8. ~ 9. !\\./sN@t£.?/s --±tf_- W_' "'--l-tZ=---__ ~\)n~ C'~"\~Mf· CA.41/;/;oAJ Cy~ 14t!J- Pltfl(lAf 10 JIAk1lA 11: ~~I %,0. 1.kfl1/bv.~tlil --=,;:1--, ..f=d+-i""""-h-I , .,-+. ~jJlJEL (_ ~\1-fSI.l C;~\, kimvOC/(c'( f offi~ I- 12. fiV ~~ A - tJ.1~ ~<I\~'t ~ 13. TIctJ ~,\J.t;~ 61'1 lIP; J~C, 14.jl2lJ~l!1d&AllJA-})~/J~lLE~ 15. R-ev· Vt'05;ciadA> -G- Mvtr~!A,QL - Um~tflL:P=~ VCUf - WfVl C- Department of Budget and Management Malacanang. Manila BantayKita \Nest Avenue. Quezon City ATTENDANCE SHEET / » Purpose of Meeting Place of Meeting - -- ~Date/ Time of Meeting - : EITI Regional Consultation - Pagadian : Mardale Hotel and Convention Center, Pagadian City ----~ : 6-7 December, 2012 - PARTICIPANTS 1. OFFICE/ DESIGNATION fu1Dh01~ or S· P lA 0, ~ ~b~ - ~~Ir~~ 11t0. 2. ~~ 3. 4. T CM ru1!M) ""-~()'f COJ~Jv\UV ~.r ~. t\':\ - M<.CJtO\D ~(j)1~ C J ; 7 WMt. NCATA. G~~t: Of ~\~ Rev. M~~ . ~. v u C;U~t U - I rher 'VV-t!l --+( -+\\+-\ +1 - .1.:-\ -- -}~v'lv.eV\,() V 5. ~ W t~ fL-fV\ f\fu~~(~~~\ ~Y~"611M '/\Yfi 6.P~~ 7. ~ ~m M, L~p~s(AY~v\ Sav\dG\ OfficVi 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. '. Annex D: Photos Bantay Kita EITI Training Workshop University Hotel, University of the Philippines Diliman October 18‐19, 2012 Baguio Regional EITI Consultation Workshop Pines View Hotel, Baguio City November 15‐16, 2012 EITI Regional Consultation UP Hotel, University of the Philippines Diliman November 29‐30, 2012 EITI Regional Consultation Las Casitas Hotel, Davao City December 3‐4, 2012 EITI Regional Consultation Pagadian City December 6-7, 2012 EITI Regional Consultation Cebu City December 12‐13, 2012