Difference Between Similar Terms and ObjectsSearch Miscellaneous Religion Islam Culture Politics Ideology Political Institutions Leaders Career & Education Fashion & Beauty Entertainment Sports Legal Geography Technology Software internet Hardware Protocols & Formats Communication Web Applications Industrial Household Equipments Career and Certifications Objects Gadgets SmartPhones Tablets Gaming Food Processed Foods Vegetables & Fruits Auto Science Health Disease Drugs Diet & Fitness Nature Animals Birds Chemistry Biology Physics Mathematics & Statistics Language Words Grammar Business Finance Accounting Product & Services Investment Management Planning & Activities Organizations Structure & Systems Economics Marketing Difference between Dayabhaga and Mitakshara in Hindu Law • Categorized under Religion | Difference between Dayabhaga and Mitakshara in Hindu Law Introduction . the Mithila. Under Dayabhaga School when the father is alive the sons do not have coparcenary rights but acquire it on the death of the father. He has a say in the disposition of the family property and can oppose any unauthorized disposition of ancestral or family property . The Dayabhaga and The Mitakshara are the two schools of lawthat govern the law of succession of the Hindu Undivided Family under Indian Law. An adult son can demand partition during his father’s lifetime or his three immediate ancestors. The term-. The differences between the Dayabhaga and the Mitakshara schools of law may be categorized under the following:- I] Joint Family: – According to the Mitakshara law school a joint family refers only to the male member of a family and extends to include his son. on the Yajnavalkya Smriti. . They collectively have co- ownership/Coparcenary in the Joint Family. a grandson and a great grand -son. grandson and great-grandson.Thus a son by birth acquires an interest in the ancestral property of the joint family. In the Dayabhaga the share of each Coparcener is defined and can be disposed. Under the Dayabhaga law school the son has no automatic ownership right by birth but acquires it on the demise of his father. 2] Coparcenary/Co-ownership:-Under the Mitakshara law school all the members of the Joint family enjoy coparcenary rights during the father’s lifetime.Introduction The term “Dayabhaga” is derived from a similarly named text written by Jimutavahana. In the Mitakshara school the father’s power over the property is qualified by the equal rights by birth enjoyed by a son. The Mitakshara School of law is subdivided into the Benares. In the Mitakshara School the coparcener’s share is not defined and cannot be disposed. In all other parts of India the Mitakshara School of law is observed. “Mitakshara” is derived from the name of a commentary written by Vijnaneswara. The Dayabhaga School of law is observed in Bengal and Assam.This is not possible under the Dayabhaga school as the father has overall and uncontrolled power over the family property till death. the Maharashtra and the Dravida schools. She however has the right to a share in any partition affected between her husband and her sons. So partition in this system involves the physical separation of the joint property into the separate shares of the coparceners and assigning to each of the coparceners the specific portion of the property. 4] Rights of Woman: – In the Mitakshara system the wife cannot demand partition. Among the two the Dayabhaga is more likely to last in modern times with the growth of individualism. Share t his: 32 . So partition in this system involves in ascertaining and defining the share of the coparcener i. The Dayabhaga system is more liberal. Conclusion: – The Mitakshara system is Conservative. the mother is entitled to a share of her deceased son as well as share in her own right when there is a partition between the remaining sons.3] Partition: – While both the Mitakshara and the Dayabhaga schools hold that the true test of partition is in the intention to separate the manifestation of this intention is different in each of the schools. individual enterprise and economic compulsions. the mother is entitled to a share equal to that of a son. Under the Dayabhaga this right does not exist for the women because the sons cannot demand partition as the father is the absolute owner. In both the systems. In the numerical division of the property. In the Dayabhaga system each of the coparcener has a definite share in the joint family property even though the family is joint and undivided and the possession is common. in any partition among the sons. However sometimes a member can become a parasite. Similarly when a son dies before partition leaving the mother as his heir. In the Mitakshara system none of the members of the coparceners can claim a definite physical share of the joint property. It provides good security in times of difficulties as a member can rely on the joint family.e. In the case of the Mitakshara School the intention involves holding the property in defined definite shares while in the Dayabhaga School there has to be a physical separation of the property into specific portions and assigning of separate share to each coparcener. average: 4.net : Custom Search Search Help us improve. Share it with your friends/family. Rate this post! (4 votes.Related Difference Between Christian Gravity and Hindu Gravity Christian Gravity vs Hindu Gravity The words “Christian gravity” and “Hindu gravity” are two labels for two different but continuing concepts or discussions about the Difference between Hindu law and July 14. Difference Between Jr and II Difference Between Father and Dad Difference Between Joint Tenants and Tenants In Common Difference Between Step-siblings and Half Sibilings Difference Between Joint Tenants and Tenants in Common Difference Between Mormons and Christians Difference Between Joint and Sole custody .B and JD September 16.00 out of 5) Email This Post : If you like this article or our site. Please spread the word. 2010 In "Miscellaneous" Search DifferenceBetween. 2015 In "Islam" Difference Between L.L. 2012 Muslim law In "Religion" October 5. You agree that we have no liability for any damages.net/miscellaneous/religion-miscellaneous/difference- between-dayabhaga-and-mitakshara-in-hindu-law/ >.wikipedia. and updated on August 25. "WITH ALL FAULTS". or injury." DifferenceBetween. 2015 < http://www. User assumes all risk of use. and are not intended to substitute for professional advice.net.net are general information.org/wiki/Chalukya_dynasty Articles on DifferenceBetween. August 25. Mitakshara .Cite Shah S. 2015 References : [0]https://en.differencebetween. damage. See more about : Dayabhaga. "Difference between Dayabhaga and Mitakshara in Hindu Law. The information is "AS IS". Leave a Response Written by : Shah S.
Report "Difference Between Dayabhaga and Mitakshara in Hindu Law _ Difference Between"