Dicker.tephinet Case Study Information Form.2011!12!2

March 20, 2018 | Author: Megat Fakhri Sarah Safia | Category: Foodborne Illness, Portable Document Format, Epidemiology, Outbreak, Sensitivity And Specificity


Comments



Description

Page 1TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM Long Title An Outbreak of Gastroenteritis Following a Church Supper Short Title, if any “Oswego” Version (Year) Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY), if any 2007 401-N07 Tags / Keywords       Outbreak investigation Steps Epidemic curve Food-specific attack rates Foodborne Staphylococcus Brief Description S. aureus outbreak among church picnic attendees, 1940; the classic, straightforward outbreak investigation in a defined population Objectives  Define the terms “cluster,” “outbreak,” and “epidemic;”  List the steps in the investigation of an outbreak;  Draw, interpret, and describe the value of an epidemic curve;  Calculate and compare food-specific attack rates to identify possible vehicles;  List reasons for investigating an outbreak that has apparently ended. Setting — Country Setting — Year United States 1940 Case Study Source Institution Case Study Year Written CDC (EIS) 1940 Authors of Original Version Updaters, Editor(s) Wendell Ames, Stafford Wheeler Alex Langmuir, Richard Dicker File Name of Student / Participant’s Guide File Name of Instructor’s Guide xOswego.participant.401-N07.pdf xOswego.instructor.401-N07.pdf File Names of Other Required Files for Students File Names of Optional Files for Instructors, Students xOswego.Ref - Compendium.2006b.pdf xOswego.Ref - Gross.Oswqgo Revisited.PHR 1976.pdf xOswego.Ref - MMWR Supp 2006.pdf Submitted to TEPHINET by Submission to TEPHINET on (Date) Richard C. Dicker Dec. 23, 2011 Page 2 TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM Long Title An Epidemic Disease in South Carolina Short Title, if any Version (Year) Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY), if any 2010 471-510 Tags / Keywords       Outbreak investigation Descriptive epidemiology Generate hypotheses Unknown disease Graphing non-ID Brief Description Based on Goldberger's studies of pellagra in the Southeastern United States in the 1910s; uses descriptive epidemiology and biologic categories of disease; presented as an unidentified illness (no clinical info) to focus thinking on epidemiologic features. Good as either introductory (descriptive epi) or wrap-up (epidemiologic reasoning) exercise. Objectives  Apply the principles of descriptive epidemiology (time, place, person) in the investigation of a disease outbreak;  Characterize the epidemiology of a disease with appropriate tables, graphs, and charts, and generate hypotheses related to etiology. Setting — Country Setting — Year United States 1910s Case Study Source Institution Case Study Year Written CDC (EIS) 1947 Authors of Original Version Updaters, Editor(s) Alex Langmuir Richard Dicker File Name of Student / Participant’s Guide File Name of Instructor’s Guide xUnkDis_SC.participant.471-510.part1.pdf xUnkDis_SC.instructor.471-510.pdf File Names of Other Required Files for Students File Names of Optional Files for Instructors, Students xUnkDis_SC.participant.471-510.part2.pdf xUnkDis_SC.Ref - Fact Sheet.doc xUnkDis_SC.Ref - Harkness.PHR 1996.pdf xUnkDis_SC.Ref - Marks.2003.pdf xUnkDis_SC.Ref - Rajakumar.2000.pdf xUnkDis_SC.Ref - Schultz.AJE1977.pdf xUnkDis_SC.Ref - WHO 2000.pdf Submitted to TEPHINET by Submission to TEPHINET on (Date) Richard C. Dicker Dec. 23, 2011 Page 3 TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM Long Title An Outbreak of Jaundice in a Rural County Short Title, if any “West Branch Hepatitis”, “Ogemaw County” Version (Year) Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY), if any 2011 701-X11 Tags / Keywords        Outbreak investigation Case definition Epidemic curve Attack rates Time, place, person Hepatitis A Foodborne Brief Description Community outbreak of hepatitis A associated with glazed pastries, 1968; an outbreak investigation in a community. Objectives      Define the term “epidemic,” Create a case definition and explain its importance in an outbreak investigation, Draw and interpret an epidemic curve, Calculate an attack rate, Characterize an outbreak by time, place, and person. Setting — Country Setting — Year United States 1968 Case Study Source Institution Case Study Year Written CDC (EIS) 1970 Authors of Original Version Updaters, Editor(s) Virgil Peavy, Fred Hoesly Richard Dicker File Name of Student / Participant’s Guide File Name of Instructor’s Guide xWest Branch Hep.participant.701-X11.pdf xWest Branch Hep.instructor.701-X11.pdf File Names of Other Required Files for Students File Names of Optional Files for Instructors, Students xWest Branch.ref Schoenbaum.AJE 1976.pdf Submitted to TEPHINET by Submission to TEPHINET on (Date) Richard C. Dicker Dec. 23, 2011 Page 4 TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM Long Title Epidemic Measles in a Divided City Short Title, if any “Texarkana” Version (Year) Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY), if any 2005 711-505 Tags / Keywords      Outbreak investigation Case definition Vaccine efficacy Attack rates Measles Brief Description Measles outbreak in a community on the border of two states — the Arkansas side with required school immunization and high immunization rates, the Texas side without required immunization and low immunized rates, 1970. Objectives  Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using a sensitive and/or specific case definition in an epidemic investigation;  Calculate vaccine efficacy and discuss its interpretation; and  Discuss the advantages and limitations of selecting a specific age as the recommended target date for administering vaccinations. Setting — Country Setting — Year United States 1970 Case Study Source Institution Case Study Year Written CDC (EIS) 1971 Authors of Original Version Updaters, Editor(s) Philip Landrigan, Lyle Conrad, John Witte Richard Dicker File Name of Student / Participant’s Guide File Name of Instructor’s Guide xTexarkana.participant.711-505.pdf xTexarkana.instructor.711-505.pdf File Names of Other Required Files for Students File Names of Optional Files for Instructors, Students xTexarkana.Ref - Landrigan.JAMA 1972.pdf Submitted to TEPHINET by Submission to TEPHINET on (Date) Richard C. Dicker Dec. 23, 2011 Instructor. 23.Ref . interpretation of measures of association.Doll and Hill original pub.  List some of the biases that might have affected these studies. Howard Ory Nancy Binkin.pdf xSmoking. criteria of causation Objectives  Define case-control and cohort studies and the advantages and disadvantages of each.RichardDollInterview. if any Version (Year) Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY).731-611. 1950's. Students xSmoke. addresses study design. measures of impact.pdf xSmoke.pdf File Names of Other Required Files for Students File Names of Optional Files for Instructors.pdf Submitted to TEPHINET by Submission to TEPHINET on (Date) Richard C.Ref .Student.  Calculate and interpret an odds ratio and a rate ratio. David Erickson. Godfrey Oakley. 2011 . Dicker Dec. Julie Magri. Richard Dicker File Name of Student / Participant’s Guide File Name of Instructor’s Guide xSmoking.BMJ Stampfer editorial on Doll and Hill followup. Setting — Country Setting — Year United Kingdom 1950s Case Study Source Institution Case Study Year Written CDC (EIS) 1973 Authors of Original Version Updaters.  Describe person-time.731-611. Editor(s) Clark Heath.pdf xSmoke.  Review the criteria for causation.Ref . if any 2011 731-611 Tags / Keywords      study design Case-control study Prospective cohort study Bias Rate ratio      Odds ratio Attributable risk percent Causation Analytic epidemiology non-ID Brief Description Based on the classic studies (both case-control study and cohort study of physician mortality) of Doll and Hill.pdf xSmoke.BMJ Doll and Hill followup.Page 5 TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM Long Title Cigarette Smoking and Lung Cancer Short Title.Ref . Page 6 TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM Long Title An Outbreak of Enteritis During a Pilgrimage to Mecca Short Title. 23.801-611. Create and understand the uses of a case definition. if any 2011 801-611 Tags / Keywords       Outbreak investigation Case definition Epidemic curve Food-specific attack rates Foodborne C. 1979.pdf File Names of Other Required Files for Students File Names of Optional Files for Instructors. perfringens Brief Description C. 2011 . List the steps in investigating an acute outbreak. Editor(s) Fred Hoesly.Participant. Virgil Peavy Richard Dicker File Name of Student / Participant’s Guide File Name of Instructor’s Guide xMecca. if any “Mecca” Version (Year) Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY). Setting — Country Setting — Year Saudi Arabia 1979 Case Study Source Institution Case Study Year Written CDC (EIS) 1980 Authors of Original Version Updaters. Dicker Dec.pdf xMecca. Draw an epidemic curve.Instructor. Calculate food-specific attack rates. Students Submitted to TEPHINET by Submission to TEPHINET on (Date) Richard C. a very straightforward outbreak investigation in a defined population with only 3 foods. Objectives      Define the term epidemic. perfringens outbreak among members of the Kuwaiti medical mission during the pilgrimage to Mecca.801-611. person-time denominators Objectives     Define and calculate a proportionate mortality ratio (PMR) and standardized mortality ratio (SMR) Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the retrospective cohort study design. 23. Setting — Country Setting — Year United States 1974 Case Study Source Institution Case Study Year Written CDC (EIS) 1977 Authors of Original Version Updaters.773-X11.Instructor.pdf File Names of Other Required Files for Students File Names of Optional Files for Instructors. 2011 . Students xVinyl chloride. Dicker Dec.NYAcadSci 1976.Page 7 TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM Long Title Vinyl Chloride Exposure and Angiosarcoma of the Liver Short Title. if any “Vinyl Chloride”. addresses proportionate mortality ratio.pdf xVinyl chloride. “Vinyl Chloride and Cancer” Version (Year) Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY).pdf Submitted to TEPHINET by Submission to TEPHINET on (Date) Richard C.Participant.773-X11. Describe and calculate person-years at risk. standardized mortality ratio. 1974.Ref . if any 2011 773-X11 Tags / Keywords       Cluster Occupational proportionate mortality ratio (PMR) standardized mortality ratio (SMR) retrospective cohort study person-years Brief Description Four cases of hepatic angiosarcoma among polyvinyl chloride workers. Discuss the key issues involved in selecting an appropriate study population. Richard Waxweiler Richard Dicker File Name of Student / Participant’s Guide File Name of Instructor’s Guide xVinyl chloride.Waxweiler. Editor(s) Henry Falk. Ref . Students xOCs OvCa.811-X11. 1980-1982 Objectives     List the elements needed for Informed Consent in an epidemiologic study Outline the sequence of an epidemiologic analysis Discuss the biases of particular concern in case-control studies and ways to minimize their influence Describe why and when to use crude and adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals.pdf xOCs OvCa. Editor(s) Richard Dicker.Ref . Peter Layde Richard Dicker.JAMA 1983 orig article.Ref .Page 8 TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM Long Title Oral Contraceptive Use and Ovarian Cancer Short Title.Lancet 2008 comment.Lancet 2008 editorial. Julie Magri File Name of Student / Participant’s Guide File Name of Instructor’s Guide xOCs OvCa.Instructor.participant.811-X11.pdf File Names of Other Required Files for Students File Names of Optional Files for Instructors. if any “OCs and Ovarian Cancer” Version (Year) Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY).Lancet 2008 analysis. 2011 . if any 2011 811-X11 Tags / Keywords     data analysis bias case-control study Mantel-Haenszel adjusted odds ratios     confidence interval effect modification confounding non-ID Brief Description One of the first studies to address the association between oral contraceptive use and ovarian cancer.pdf Submitted to TEPHINET by Submission to TEPHINET on (Date) Richard C.pdf xOCs OvCa.pdf xOCs OvCa. and how to interpret them  Define and recognize effect modification and confounding Setting — Country Setting — Year United States 1980–1981 Case Study Source Institution Case Study Year Written CDC (EIS) 1981 Authors of Original Version Updaters. Dicker Dec. 23. conducted by CDC using a multicenter case-control study design.pdf xOCs OvCa.Ref . 2011 . perform each step.  Describe the components of a case definition. Wayne Brown Richard Dicker File Name of Student / Participant’s Guide File Name of Instructor’s Guide xEbola.  Describe the key tasks involved in investigating an epidemic of unknown cause. Students xEbola.pdf File Names of Other Required Files for Students File Names of Optional Files for Instructors.812-N10. a practical outbreak investigation Objectives  List the criteria for deciding whether a field investigation is warranted. if any “Ebola” Version (Year) Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY). 1976. and  Given the appropriate data. place. if any 2010 812-N10 Tags / Keywords      Outbreak investigation Unknown cause.pdf Submitted to TEPHINET by Submission to TEPHINET on (Date) Richard C. in Zaire (now DRC). 812-N10. perform descriptive epidemiology and explain the importance of this step.pdf xEbola. Editor(s) David Heymann.instructor. person Attack rates     Modes of transmission Epidemic curve Stratified analysis Incubation period Brief Description Investigation of the first recognized outbreak of Ebola hemorrhagic fever.Ref -Nat History. steps Case definition Time. and.Page 9 TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM Long Title An Outbreak of Hemorrhagic Fever in Africa Short Title. 23.participant. and develop a case definition for a new disease. Dicker Dec. given a real outbreak. Setting — Country Setting — Year Zaire (now Democratic Republic of Congo) 1976 Case Study Source Institution Case Study Year Written CDC (EIS) 1981 Authors of Original Version Updaters. Calculate sample size requirements for a community survey.participant. Editor(s) Clark Heath Tom Gomez. if any “PBBs in Michigan” Version (Year) Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY). Discuss different options for studying the human health effects following an environmental exposure. Dori Reissman.813-D11. and the subsequent concerns about human health. Dicker Dec. if any 2011 813-D11 Tags / Keywords      Environmental exposure Sample size Sampling Survey Agency roles     Registry Descriptive epidemiology Graphing non-ID Brief Description Based on the exposure of farm animals to feed contaminated with polybrominated biphenyl in 1973.Page 10 TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM Long Title A Mixed Bag in Michigan Short Title. Richard Dicker File Name of Student / Participant’s Guide File Name of Instructor’s Guide xPBBs.instructor.813-D11. 23.pdf File Names of Other Required Files for Students File Names of Optional Files for Instructors. 2011 .pdf xPBBs. Setting — Country Setting — Year United States 1973 Case Study Source Institution Case Study Year Written CDC (EIS) 1981 Authors of Original Version Updaters. Objectives     Describe the role of each government agency involved in a contaminated food situation. Discuss the reasons for and limitations of a registry following an environmental exposure. Students Submitted to TEPHINET by Submission to TEPHINET on (Date) Richard C. pdf xTSS.Schlech.pdf xTSS.pdf Submitted to TEPHINET by Submission to TEPHINET on (Date) Richard C. and  Discuss the issues involved in appropriate selection of controls in case-control studies. Objectives  Describe the concepts.Page 11 TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM Long Title Tampons and Toxic Shock Syndrome Short Title.pdf File Names of Other Required Files for Students File Names of Optional Files for Instructors. applications. Dicker Dec. Case study focuses on matching.Ref . Editor(s) Richard Dicker. if any 2004 831-704 Tags / Keywords     Matching Case-control study Data analysis Control selection    Odds ratio Bias Confounding Brief Description The initial outbreak investigations of toxic shock syndrome in 1980 using a series of matched case-control studies.instructor.  Analyze matched case-control data. Ruth Berkelman Richard Dicker File Name of Student / Participant’s Guide File Name of Instructor’s Guide xTSS.Ref .831-704. 23. secondarily on surveillance.JAMA 1982. 2011 . Setting — Country Setting — Year United States 1980 Case Study Source Institution Case Study Year Written CDC (EIS) 1983 Authors of Original Version Updaters.NEJM 1980.Shands. if any Version (Year) Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY). and limitations of matching in case-control studies.831-704.participant. Students xTSS. UNC.pdf Submitted to TEPHINET by Submission to TEPHINET on (Date) Richard C.instructor. Brief Description Hypothetical health department anticipating the release of the first HIV antibody test in 1985.ERIC.  Describe the relationship between prevalence and predictive value. if any 2011 871-111 Tags / Keywords      Screening Sensitivity Specificity Predictive value positive Predictive-value negative.student. 2011 . Editor(s) Lyle Peterson. if any “Screening for HIV” Version (Year) Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY). specificity.871-111.  Discuss the trade-offs between sensitivity and specificity. predictive-value of a positive test. Objectives  Define and perform calculations of sensitivity.Ref .Dx.pdf xScreeningHIV. Richard Dicker Richard Dicker. Guthrie Birkhead.  List the principles of a good screening program. Julie Magri File Name of Student / Participant’s Guide File Name of Instructor’s Guide xScreeningHIV. Students xScreeningHIV.pdf File Names of Other Required Files for Students File Names of Optional Files for Instructors.871-111. Case study focuses on screening issues. Screen Tests. and predictive-value of a negative test. 23. Dicker Dec.Page 12 TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM Long Title Screening for Antibodies to the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Short Title. Setting — Country Setting — Year United States 1985 Case Study Source Institution Case Study Year Written CDC (EIS) 1987 Authors of Original Version Updaters. Ref .  List the principles of a good screening program.  Discuss the trade-offs between sensitivity and specificity. specificity. crossing state lines. Richard Dicker Richard Dicker. a nice wrap-up study.pdf Submitted to TEPHINET by Submission to TEPHINET on (Date) Richard C.pdf xThyrotox. predictive-value of a positive test.instructor. Dicker Dec. Editor(s) Frederic Shaw.873-703. Julie Magri File Name of Student / Participant’s Guide File Name of Instructor’s Guide xThyrotox. if any 2003 873-703 Tags / Keywords     Outbreak investigation Unknown cause Agency roles Case definition    Causation Foodborne non-ID Brief Description Outbreak with unknown etiology and mode of transmission.S.participant.Page 13 TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM Long Title An Epidemic of Thyrotoxicosis Short Title. 23.NEJM 1987. and predictive-value of a negative test.Hedberg. if any Version (Year) Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY). focus.pdf File Names of Other Required Files for Students File Names of Optional Files for Instructors. Objectives  Define and perform calculations of sensitivity.873-703.  Describe the relationship between prevalence and predictive value. Setting — Country Setting — Year United States 1985 Case Study Source Institution Case Study Year Written CDC (EIS) 1987 Authors of Original Version Updaters. Students xThyrotox. but domestic U. 2011 . 1985. prevalence Case-fatality rate Surveillance Case report form Case definition      Sensitivity Polio Descriptive epidemiology Generate hypotheses Cross-sectional survey Brief Description Development of a surveillance system for polio and lameness in a fictitious African country in 1991 Objectives      Define incidence. 23. Setting — Country Setting — Year Ababo (fictional African country) About 1991 Case Study Source Institution Case Study Year Written CDC (EIS) 1989 Authors of Original Version Updaters.Page 14 TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM Long Title Paralytic Illness in Ababo Short Title. prevalence. Define sensitivity of a surveillance system.pdf File Names of Other Required Files for Students File Names of Optional Files for Instructors. Dicker Dec. 2011 . Editor(s) Nancy Binkin Richard Dicker File Name of Student / Participant’s Guide File Name of Instructor’s Guide xAbabo.891-N11.instructor. and the effect of different case definitions on sensitivity. if any 2011 891-N11 Tags / Keywords      incidence.pdf xAbabo.participant. and case-fatality rate. List the factors that can account for a change in the reported incidence of a disease. List the types of information that should be collected on a surveillance case report form. if any “Ababo” Version (Year) Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY). Students Submitted to TEPHINET by Submission to TEPHINET on (Date) Richard C.891-N11. Define surveillance and identify the key features of a surveillance system. 901-N11. odds ratio Attributable risk percent Causation non-ID Brief Description National epidemic of a new syndrome in 1989 quickly traced to a commercial product. if any “EMS” Version (Year) Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY).instructor. 2011 .  List and evaluate the criteria for causation. Richard Dicker Richard Dicker. Editor(s) Leslie Swygert. Dicker Dec. 23. 901-N11.  Calculate and interpret a relative risk.  Discuss development of case definitions.pdf xEMS.  Discuss some of the biases that might have affected these studies. criteria for causation.  Describe the elements of design and the advantages and disadvantages of case-control versus cohort studies. and attributable risk percent. Students Submitted to TEPHINET by Submission to TEPHINET on (Date) Richard C.participant. Philip Brachman File Name of Student / Participant’s Guide File Name of Instructor’s Guide xEMS.Page 15 TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM Long Title l-Tryptophan and Eosinophilia-Myalgia Syndrome Short Title. Case study addresses surveillance. if any 2011 901-N11 Tags / Keywords      Surveillance Unknown disease Case definition Case-control study\ Cohort study      Bias Risk ratio. bias. odds ratio. Objectives  Discuss issues related to rapid establishment of national surveillance for a newly recognized and little understood disorder. Setting — Country Setting — Year United States 1989 Case Study Source Institution Case Study Year Written CDC (EIS) 1990 Authors of Original Version Updaters.pdf File Names of Other Required Files for Students File Names of Optional Files for Instructors.. Students xBurundi. Bernard Morniere.  Describe the sampling method used in WHO-EPI surveys. Objectives  Discuss methods for estimating vaccination coverage.bullwho00089-0084.pdf Submitted to TEPHINET by Submission to TEPHINET on (Date) Richard C. Editor(s) Robert Chen. several years into an apparently successful vaccination program.instructor. Dicker Dec.pdf File Names of Other Required Files for Students File Names of Optional Files for Instructors. Setting — Country Setting — Year Burundi 1988 Case Study Source Institution Case Study Year Written CDC (EIS) 1991 Authors of Original Version Updaters. 23. if any 2011 911-111 Tags / Keywords     Vaccination coverage Sampling WHO EPI Survey  Vaccine efficacy  Case definition  Measles Brief Description An outbreak of measles occurred in health sector Muyinga (Burundi). if any “Measles in Burundi” Version (Year) Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY).911-111. This case study addresses estimation of vaccine coverage and vaccine efficacy in the field .pdf xBurundi. and  Calculate and interpret vaccine efficacy. 2011 .Ref .911-111. Richard Dicker Richard Dicker File Name of Student / Participant’s Guide File Name of Instructor’s Guide xBurundi.Page 16 TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM Long Title A Measles Outbreak in a Highly Vaccinated Population Short Title.student.  Describe the difference between a convenience sample and a probability sample. pdf File Names of Other Required Files for Students File Names of Optional Files for Instructors. Dicker Dec.Ref .921-211.participant.  Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of different survey methods for assessing the health needs of a displaced population.pdf xRefugee.pdf xKampucheanRefugee.pdf Submitted to TEPHINET by Submission to TEPHINET on (Date) Richard C.MSF. Setting — Country Setting — Year Thailand 1979 Case Study Source Institution Case Study Year Written CDC (EIS) 1992 Authors of Original Version Updaters.921-211.MSF.instructor. Objectives  List health problems common among refugee populations. if any Version (Year) Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY).Rapid_Health_Assess. Students xRefugee.Refugee Health 1997. 2011 .  Calculate crude and age-specific mortality and morbidity rates. if any 2011 921-211 Tags / Keywords     Refugees Surveillance Sampling Survey  Age-specific mortality morbidity rate  Anthropometric data  Nutrition Brief Description Development of surveillance system to identify health problems among Kampuchean (Cambodian) refugees in 1979 and target interventions accordingly. Editor(s) Jeanette Stehr-Green Richard Dicker File Name of Student / Participant’s Guide File Name of Instructor’s Guide xKampucheanRefugee.Page 17 TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM Long Title Rapid Assessment of Health Status and Preventive Medicine Needs of Kampuchean Refugees in Thailand Short Title. and  Use anthropometric data to determine nutritional status of the population.Ref .  Identify sources of health information on persons living in refugee camps. 23. pdf File Names of Other Required Files for Students File Names of Optional Files for Instructors. Julie Magri File Name of Student / Participant’s Guide File Name of Instructor’s Guide xSurveillance E coli. List the categories of information that should be included in a surveillance instrument. Summarize and interpret surveillance data.pdf Submitted to TEPHINET by Submission to TEPHINET on (Date) Richard C. Dicker Dec. coli O157:H7 should be added to Oregon’s reportable disease list. and the difficulties in dealing with an outbreak apparently linked to raw milk.pdf xSurveillance E coli. if any Version (Year) Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY).Page 18 TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM Long Title Surveillance for E.Participant. Setting — Country Setting — Year United States 1993 Case Study Source Institution Case Study Year Written CDC (EIS) 1994 Authors of Original Version Updaters. Students xSurveillance E coli.Instructor.Ref . 2011 . Editor(s) Julie Crom.941-707. if any 2007 941-707 Tags / Keywords  Surveillance  Notifiable disease  Case report form  Descriptive epidemiology  Decision-making  “One Health” Brief Description Focuses on whether E. Recognize difficulties in balancing public health concerns with consumer and industry considerations in emerging issues. Richard Dicker Richard Dicker.Keene JID 1997.941-707. 1993 Objectives     Discuss the process and criteria for placing a disease or condition on a state or national notifiable disease list. coli O157:H7 — Information for Action Short Title. 23. Use EPI INFO to perform basic descriptive analysis and cross-tabulations of epidemiologic data. Dicker Dec. and describe the value of an epidemic curve.pdf File Names of Other Required Files for Students File Names of Optional Files for Instructors. Draw.941-211.Page 19 TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM Long Title Outbreak of Group A Pharyngitis in Louisiana Short Title. Case study requires use of Epi Info and two small data files. outbreak. List five types of information to include in an outbreak questionnaire. if any Version (Year) Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY). and epidemic. Create a case definition and explain its importance in an outbreak investigation. List the steps of an outbreak investigation.pdf Submitted to TEPHINET by Submission to TEPHINET on (Date) Richard C. Setting — Country Setting — Year United States 1991 Case Study Source Institution Case Study Year Written CDC (EIS) 1994 Authors of Original Version Updaters.participant. if any 2011 942-211 Tags / Keywords      Outbreak investigation Outbreak steps Case definition Questionnaire Epidemic curve      Food-specific attack rates Epi Info Data analysis Transmission Decision-making Brief Description Investigation of an outbreak of Streptococcal pharyngitis traced to foodborne transmission at a school banquet. Calculate food-specific attack rates and risk ratios.mdb xPharyngitis. 2011 .942-211. Editor(s) Jeanette Stehr-Green.instructor.Ref . Objectives        Define the terms cluster. interpret. Students xPharyngitis. Richard Dicker Richard Dicker File Name of Student / Participant’s Guide File Name of Instructor’s Guide xPharyngitis. 23.pdf xPharyngitis.Farley JID 1993. List the steps of an outbreak investigation. List the components of a case definition. 23.JAMA.pdf Submitted to TEPHINET by Submission to TEPHINET on (Date) Richard C.O'Brien Selanikio.Ref . if any Version (Year) Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY).editorial.pdf File Names of Other Required Files for Students File Names of Optional Files for Instructors.Page 20 TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM Long Title Acute Renal Failure and a Long Night in Haiti Short Title. Discuss the role of epidemiologic evidence in public health decision-making.Ref .pdf xARF Haiti.JAMA.pdf xARF Haiti. eventually traced to paracetamol contaminated with diethylene glycol.971-111. Linda Dicker Richard Dicker File Name of Student / Participant’s Guide File Name of Instructor’s Guide xARF Haiti. Editor(s) Richard Dicker. Students xARF Haiti.971-111.participant.instructor. Objectives     Describe the questions and decisions to be addressed before departing on a field investigation. Dicker Dec. Setting — Country Setting — Year Haiti 1996 Case Study Source Institution Case Study Year Written CDC (EIS) 1997 Authors of Original Version Updaters. 2011 .Woolf. if any 2011 971-111 Tags / Keywords  Outbreak investigation  Outbreak steps  Case definition  Decision-making  Diethylene glycol  Non-ID Brief Description An outbreak of acute renal failure deaths among children in Haiti. participant. Dicker Dec.instructor.MMWR. 23. Editor(s) Richard Dicker Richard Dicker File Name of Student / Participant’s Guide File Name of Instructor’s Guide xWashCo Fair.Ref . Setting — Country Setting — Year United States 1999 Case Study Source Institution Case Study Year Written CDC (EIS) 2000 Authors of Original Version Updaters. coli and Campylobacter traced to unregulated fairground water supply.000-805. another straightforward outbreak investigation. if any Version (Year) Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY).pdf xWashCo Fair. 1999. 2011 . Describe the features of an appropriate case definition. Objectives     List the reasons to investigate an outbreak.pdf File Names of Other Required Files for Students File Names of Optional Files for Instructors. Students xWashCo Fair.Page 21 TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM Long Title No Fair Warning: An Outbreak Following the 1999 Washington County Fair Short Title.000-805.pdf Submitted to TEPHINET by Submission to TEPHINET on (Date) Richard C. and Construct an epidemic curve. List and discuss each step in the investigation of an outbreak. if any 2005 000-805 Tags / Keywords      Outbreak investigation Reasons to investigate Outbreak steps Case definition Epidemic curve      E. coli Waterborne Generate hypotheses Choosing controls Brief Description Large outbreak of both E. 2011.Ref 2 . Objectives   Define surveillance and identify the key features of a surveillance system.DiabetesDiseaseSurv.pdf xSurv NYC.   List the types of information that should be collected on a surveillance case report form.U.021-310.3030G Case Report Form.AJE.S.Ref 5 .Ref 8 .Ref 3 .Ref 7 .post-911 surveillance form. Dicker Dec.instructor.Page 22 TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM Long Title Public Health Surveillance in New York City — Then and Now Short Title. Setting — Country Setting — Year United States 2001 Case Study Source Institution Case Study Year Written CDC (EIS) 2002 Authors of Original Version Updaters.pdf xSurv NYC. 2001. Describe the differences between notifiable disease surveillance and syndromic surveillance. 23.completeness.pdf xSurv NYC.doc xSurv NYC. Apply criteria for deciding which diseases should be included in a notifiable disease surveillance system. if any 2010 021-310 Tags / Keywords     Surveillance Case report form Notifiable disease Syndromic Brief Description Addresses basic elements of the traditional reportable disease list. 2011 .021-310. Nationallynotifiable.Doyle.pdf xSurv NYC.Case Report Form examples.pdf xSurv NYC. Students xSurv NYC.pdf File Names of Other Required Files for Students File Names of Optional Files for Instructors. Editor(s) Richard Dicker Richard Dicker File Name of Student / Participant’s Guide File Name of Instructor’s Guide xSurv NYC.Reingold.pdf xSurv NYC. if any Version (Year) Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY).participant. as well as syndromic surveillance established after the World Trade Center attacks on September 11.Ref 6 .Ref 1 .Global PH Surv Regs.pdf xSurv NYC.syndromic.Ref 4 .pdf Submitted to TEPHINET by Submission to TEPHINET on (Date) Richard C. Page 23 . Perform in-depth interviews of selected case-patients to generate hypotheses about the source of an outbreak and mode of transmission.2002. eventually linked to consumption of alfalfa sprouts.instructor. coli Alfalfa sprouts Foodborne Brief Description Based on two outbreak investigations undertaken in Michigan and Virginia in 1997. Editor(s) Jeanette Stehr-Green File Name of Student / Participant’s Guide File Name of Instructor’s Guide xEcoli Multistate.2002. List three ways to select a comparison group for a study and the advantages and disadvantages of each method. Discuss the relative merits of an intervention based on changes in product processing (or design) versus changes in consumer or producer behaviors. Objectives       Describe the unique role the laboratory can play in the detection and investigation of a foodborne disease outbreak. coli O157:H7 Infection Short Title. Dicker Dec. Students Submitted to TEPHINET by Submission to TEPHINET on (Date) Richard C. List detailed product information that will facilitate a traceback procedure. if any Version (Year) Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY).pdf File Names of Other Required Files for Students File Names of Optional Files for Instructors. Determine the most efficient epidemiologic study design to test a hypothesis (including the case definition and appropriate comparison group). 23.Page 24 TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM Long Title A Multistate Outbreak of E.pdf xEcoli Multistate.student. if any 2002 N/A Tags / Keywords     Outbreak investigation PFGE Hypothesis-generating interview Control selection     Traceback E. 2011 . Setting — Country Setting — Year United States 1997 Case Study Source Institution Case Study Year Written CDC (Food Safety Initiative) 2002 Authors of Original Version Updaters. Communicate information on an outbreak or outbreak investigation and write a press release. and control of foodborne botulism.instructor. Given the leading hypothesis(es) in an outbreak. Given details on the origin. Objectives        Describe outbreak situations in which acute control measures should be undertaken. identify critical points for the control of contamination and microbial survival and growth.Ref . and preparation of an implicated food item. Describe the occurrence.pdf BotulismArgentina. if any 2002 N/A Tags / Keywords  Outbreak investigation  Press release  Questionnaire     Food-specific attack rates Control measures Botulism Foodborne Brief Description Based on an investigation of an outbreak of botulism among bus drivers in Buenos Aires in 1998. if any Version (Year) Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY). Describe measures that can be used to monitor the success of an intervention.Page 25 TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM Long Title Botulism in Argentina Short Title.pdf Submitted to TEPHINET by Submission to TEPHINET on (Date) Richard C. Setting — Country Setting — Year Argentina 1998 Case Study Source Institution Case Study Year Written CDC (Food Safety Initiative) 2002 Authors of Original Version Updaters.pdf File Names of Other Required Files for Students File Names of Optional Files for Instructors. Students xBotulismArgentina. develop a questionnaire. Editor(s) Jeanette Stehr-Green File Name of Student / Participant’s Guide File Name of Instructor’s Guide xBotulismArgentina.2002.JAMA 1999.2002.Villar. Discuss possible barriers to implementation of specific interventions following an outbreak investigation.2002. 2011 . signs and symptoms. distribution. Dicker Dec.student. 23. specimens Laboratory Case definition      Questionnaire Generating hypotheses Norovirus Foodhandler Foodborne Brief Description Based on an investigation of an outbreak of norovirus gastroenteritis among students at the University of Texas in 1998.2002. Describe the advantages and disadvantages of different ways of administering questionnaires (e.student. in person). Objectives       List categories and examples of questions that should be asked of key informants who have reported a suspected outbreak of foodborne disease.pdf Submitted to TEPHINET by Submission to TEPHINET on (Date) . if any 2002 N/A Tags / Keywords     Outbreak investigation Interview. if any Version (Year) Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY).: selfadministered. List key areas of focus in interviewing foodhandlers and observing kitchen practices in a foodborne disease outbreak.g.pdf File Names of Other Required Files for Students File Names of Optional Files for Instructors.Daniels. Students xGastroenteritisUTexas. Editor(s) Jeanette Stehr-Green File Name of Student / Participant’s Guide File Name of Instructor’s Guide xGastroenteritisUTexas. List four criteria for establishing investigation priorities when food poisoning is suspected. List three common pitfalls in the collection of clinical specimens for the investigation of suspected foodborne diseases.2002.pdf xGastroenteritisUTexas. Setting — Country Setting — Year United States 1998 Case Study Source Institution Case Study Year Written CDC (Food Safety Initiative) 2002 Authors of Original Version Updaters. eventually traced to a foodhandler who worked in one of the campus cafeterias. by telephone.Page 26 TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM Long Title Gastroenteritis at a University in Texas Short Title.JID 2000. Determine the most efficient epidemiologic study design to test a hypothesis (including the case definition and the appropriate comparison group.Ref .instruct. 23. 2011 . Dicker Dec.Page 27 Richard C. Describe the occurrence.Herwaldt. Editor(s) Jeanette Stehr-Green File Name of Student / Participant’s Guide File Name of Instructor’s Guide xCyclosporiasis. 23. Students xCyclosporiasis. Describe the two most common types of epidemiologic studies routinely used to investigate outbreaks. Consider potential sources of error in designing or carrying out an epidemiologic study.Ann IM 1999. Canada (and Guatemala) 1996 Case Study Source Institution Case Study Year Written CDC (Food Safety Initiative) 2004 Authors of Original Version Updaters.Ref2 . initially thought linked to strawberries.NEJM 1997.instructor. signs and symptoms.2004-08.pdf Submitted to TEPHINET by Submission to TEPHINET on (Date) Richard C. ultimately traced to raspberries from Guatemala. Dicker Dec.2004-08.pdf File Names of Other Required Files for Students File Names of Optional Files for Instructors. Interpret the results of an epidemiologic study.Herwaldt.Ref1 . List considerations in implementing control measures before confirmation of the source of an outbreak. Apply the criteria for causation to the results of an outbreak investigation. Setting — Country Setting — Year United States. 2011 . and control of cyclosporiasis.student.Page 28 TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM Long Title A Multistate Outbreak of Cyclosporiasis Short Title.pdf xCyclosporiasis. Objectives        Use the modes of transmission and incubation period for a disease to focus the search for the source of an outbreak. if any 2004 N/A Tags / Keywords     Outbreak investigation Modes of transmission Incubation period Epidemiologic study      Causation Control measures Bias Cyclospora Foodborne Brief Description Local outbreak of cyclosporiasis was harbinger of multistate outbreak in 1996-1997. if any Version (Year) Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY).pdf xCyclosporiasis. Create and interpret a graph.Indar-Harrinauth CID 2001. Setting — Country Setting — Year Trinidad and Tobago 1998–1999 Case Study Source Institution Case Study Year Written CDC (Food Safety Initiative) 2004 Authors of Original Version Updaters. Describe how Salmonella serotyping can be used in public health practice. and person (e. Given a disease. Editor(s) Jeanette Stehr-Green File Name of Student / Participant’s Guide File Name of Instructor’s Guide xSalmonella Carib. place.2004. leading to a case-control study of risk factors for salmonellosis.pdf Submitted to TEPHINET by Submission to TEPHINET on (Date) Richard C. Students xSalmonella Carib. and to control measures. if any Version (Year) Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY).pdf File Names of Other Required Files for Students File Names of Optional Files for Instructors. Interpret the measure of association for a case-control study.instructor.Ref . if any 2004 N/A Tags / Keywords     Serotyping Surveillance Laboratory Incidence      Time. Characterize a health problem by time. Objectives         Describe the signs and symptoms..g. 2011 . means of diagnosis.2004. place. Discuss how the inclusion of the laboratory in the surveillance of a disease impacts the characteristics of the surveillance system and the usefulness of the data. perform the descriptive epidemiology). Calculate the incidence of a disease if given the number of cases and population size.Page 29 TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM Long Title Salmonella in the Caribbean Short Title. 23. describe the desired characteristics of a surveillance system for that disease.pdf xSalmonella Carib.student. and person (descriptive epidemiology) Graphs Control measures Eggs Foodborne Brief Description Focus on laboratory-based surveillance of Salmonella in Trinidad and Tobago in 1998–1999. and control of salmonellosis . Dicker Dec. Calculate crude and age-specific mortality rates.pdf File Names of Other Required Files for Students File Names of Optional Files for Instructors. and nutrition data to identify and prioritize specific health problems in a displaced population and plan interventions. Use morbidity. and geographic distribution of the population. Editor(s) Michael Toole File Name of Student / Participant’s Guide File Name of Instructor’s Guide X. mortality. Objectives        List the health problems common among displaced populations.972-705.Eng. Identify sources of health information on persons living in displaced-person camps.instructor. Dicker Dec.Riverina. if any 2005 972-705 Tags / Keywords      Displaced persons Refugees Mortality rates Morbidity Nutrition data     Survey Sampling Anthropometric data Priority setting Brief Description Conduct of a rapid health assessment / cluster survey (including anthropometric measures) of an internally displaced population in a fictional African country. Setting — Country Setting — Year Riverina (fictional country in Africa) Mid-1990s Case Study Source Institution Case Study Year Written CDC (Global Health) 1997 Authors of Original Version Updaters.Page 30 TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM Long Title Riverina Short Title. if any Version (Year) Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY). Plan a community survey based on objectives.Eng.pdf X. 2011 . Analyze and interpret survey data on nutritional status in order to plan appropriate nutrition programs. 23. resources. Students Submitted to TEPHINET by Submission to TEPHINET on (Date) Richard C. Use anthropometric data to determine nutritional status of a population.student.972-705.Riverina. Objectives       Describe the key principles of public health surveillance.053-D11. Define incidence and prevalence of a disease and calculate the incidence rate. Setting — Country Setting — Year Kyrgyzstan 2003 Case Study Source Institution Case Study Year Written CDC (Global Health) 2005 Authors of Original Version Updaters. 23.Page 31 TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM Long Title Brucellosis in Kyrgyzstan Short Title.participant. Editor(s) Julia Ershova Richard Dicker File Name of Student / Participant’s Guide File Name of Instructor’s Guide xBrucellosis_Kyrgyz.053-D11. if any 2011 053-D11 Tags / Keywords  Public health surveillance  Reportable disease  Case definition  Brucellosis  “One Health” Brief Description Examination of the brucellosis public health surveillance system and analysis of data from that system.instructor. Describe criteria for including a disease in a national surveillance system. 2011 . if any Version (Year) Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY). Students Submitted to TEPHINET by Submission to TEPHINET on (Date) Richard C. Dicker Dec. Describe the data flow of a surveillance system.pdf xBrucellosis_Kyrgyz.pdf File Names of Other Required Files for Students File Names of Optional Files for Instructors. Summarize and interpret surveillance data. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of disease’s case definition. Describe some of the decisions that must be made before going to the field to conduct a field investigation. 23. if any Version (Year) Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY). Setting — Country Setting — Year Uzbekistan 2004 Case Study Source Institution Case Study Year Written CDC (Global Health) 2005 Authors of Original Version Updaters. Develop and apply a case definition in a field investigation. Straightforward outbreak investigation case study with only 24 attendees and 8 foods. Editor(s) Richard Dicker Richard Dicker File Name of Student / Participant’s Guide File Name of Instructor’s Guide XBot in UZ.instructor.Page 32 TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM Long Title A Cluster of Botulism Cases in Uzbekistan Short Title.student. 2011 .pdf XBot in UZ. Dicker Dec. if any 2011 054-D11 Tags / Keywords  Outbreak investigation  Bioterrorism agents  Outbreak steps  Case definition  Line listing  Food-specific attack rates Brief Description Investigation of a cluster of botulism cases among guests who attended a social gathering at a home in Uzbekistan on December 31.pdf File Names of Other Required Files for Students File Names of Optional Files for Instructors. Students Submitted to TEPHINET by Submission to TEPHINET on (Date) Richard C. Optional: Describe some of the features that are consistent with an intentional or an unintentional exposure that results in an outbreak.054-D11. Objectives      Assess whether an increase in the number of apparent cases represents an outbreak. Calculate and compare exposure-specific attack rates to identify possible vehicles. 2003.054-D11. but addresses botulism as a possible bioterrorism agent. Editor(s) Richard Dicker Richard Dicker File Name of Student / Participant’s Guide File Name of Instructor’s Guide xWarehouseWorkers.pdf File Names of Other Required Files for Students File Names of Optional Files for Instructors.participant. 2011 .Page 33 TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM Long Title An Outbreak of Gastroenteritis Among Warehouse Workers Short Title. 23. Objectives       Develop a case definition for an outbreak of gastroenteritis. if any Version (Year) Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY).instructor.055-710. Dicker Dec.pdf xWarehouseWorkers. Discuss why an epidemiologic study with a comparison group is useful in the investigation of an outbreak. Discuss the types of studies one might conduct in an outbreak setting. Conduct a stratified analysis to address possible confounding. Calculate appropriate measures of association for the type of study selected. Students Submitted to TEPHINET by Submission to TEPHINET on (Date) Richard C. Straightforward outbreak investigation case study.055-710. and Properly interpret a test of statistical significance and confidence interval. if any 2010 055-710 Tags / Keywords  Outbreak investigation  Case definition  Questionnaire  Risk ratio  Stratified analysis  Foodborne Brief Description Investigation of an outbreak of gastroenteritis among workers who ate catered food while taking inventory of a warehouse. Setting — Country Setting — Year United States 2003 Case Study Source Institution Case Study Year Written CDC (Global Health) 2005 Authors of Original Version Updaters. CID 2004.Hennessy Rotz.pdf xBotulism_in_Georgia.Varma CID 2004. and person. place. Colleen Shane. and person of botulism surveillance data from Republic of Georgia. Editor(s) Richard Dicker. Interpret surveillance data. if any 2008 071-908 Tags / Keywords     Public health surveillance Descriptive epidemiology Sensitivity Botulism Brief Description Analysis by time.pdf xBotGeorgia Ref 10.participant. 1980 – 2002.pdf File Names of Other Required Files for Students File Names of Optional Files for Instructors. Setting — Country Setting — Year Georgia 2003 Case Study Source Institution Case Study Year Written CDC (Global Health) 2007 Authors of Original Version Updaters. Students xBotGeorgia Ref 5.071-908. Naile Malakmadze. Dicker Dec.Varma EID 2004. if any Version (Year) Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY). Analyze surveillance data by time. 23.pdf xBotGeorgia Ref 6.pdf Submitted to TEPHINET by Submission to TEPHINET on (Date) Richard C. the participant should be able to: Describe the key principles of public health surveillance. Discuss the uses of surveillance. Objectives      After completing this case study.071-908.Page 34 TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM Long Title Botulism in the Republic of Georgia Short Title. place. 2011 .Sobel CID 2005.instructor.pdf xBotGeorgia Ref 7. and Eric Guenther File Name of Student / Participant’s Guide File Name of Instructor’s Guide xBotulism_in_Georgia. describe the clinical features. if any 2010 N/A Tags / Keywords     Community survey Sampling Waterborne Cryptosporidium Brief Description Investigation of a large.pdf Submitted to TEPHINET by Submission to TEPHINET on (Date) Richard C.student. Objectives After completing this case study. list activities that should be included in the evaluation of a public water system associated with an outbreak.Hayes NEJM 1989.Ref . 23. Setting — Country Setting — Year United States (Georgia) 1987 Case Study Source Institution Case Study Year Written CDC (Waterborne) 2010 Authors of Original Version Updaters. 7. Dicker Dec. epidemiology.pdf File Names of Other Required Files for Students File Names of Optional Files for Instructors. define turbidity and total coliform count and discuss how each are used to indicate drinking water quality. 6.2010-09. if any Version (Year) Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY).pdf xCryptospordiosis GA. 2. and 8. discuss the typical steps used in the treatment of surface water at a community water treatment plant.2010-09.instructor. 4. Editor(s) Jeanette Stehr-Green File Name of Student / Participant’s Guide File Name of Instructor’s Guide xCryptospordiosis GA. and control of cryptosporidiosis. help plan a community survey to determine the prevalence and distribution of a health problem. interpret a dose-response analysis for an exposure and development of a disease. the student should be able to 1. 3. Students xCryptoGA. discuss epidemiologic clues indicative of a waterborne disease outbreak as opposed to a foodborne disease outbreak. describe a boil-water advisory and discuss problems that might be encountered in issuing such an advisory. 5. 2011 . community-wide outbreak of cryptosporidiosis in Georgia in 1987 that resulted from contamination of a public water supply that met all standards in effect at the time.Page 35 TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM Long Title Cryptosporidiosis in Georgia Short Title. pdf File Names of Other Required Files for Students File Names of Optional Files for Instructors. if any 2010 N/A Tags / Keywords  Swimming pool  Norovirus Brief Description Investigation of cluster of cases of vomiting and diarrhea among children who had attended a birthday party at an indoor swim club in Vermont in 2004.student. if any Version (Year) Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY). and P values. Objectives After completing this case study.MMWR 2004. describe the steps for management of fecal incidents in treated recreational water venues.Ref2 . interpret test results for chlorine and pH with respect to swimming pool water quality. the student should be able to 1. 6. outline components of swimming pool design and operation that help prevent the transmission of pathogenic agents.pdf xNorovirus Vermont.2010-11. relative risks.pdff Submitted to TEPHINET by Submission to TEPHINET on (Date) Richard C. 3. Setting — Country Setting — Year United States (Vermont) 2004 Case Study Source Institution Case Study Year Written CDC (Waterborne) 2010 Authors of Original Version Updaters. 4.pdf xNorovirusVT.2010-11. Editor(s) Jeanette Stehr-Green File Name of Student / Participant’s Guide File Name of Instructor’s Guide xNorovirus Vermont.Page 36 TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM Long Title Norovirus in Vermont Short Title.instructor. 2. and 8. 23. Students xNorovirusVT. discuss considerations in working with businesses that might be identified as a possible source of an outbreak. 7.Ref1 . list categories and examples of questions that should be asked of key informants who report a suspected infectious disease outbreak. including attack rates. identify activities that increase a person’s risk for exposure to pathogens in recreational water. interpret results from a cohort study. 5. Dicker Dec.Podewils Epi Infect 2007. discuss the action of chlorine to disinfect water and factors that influence its effectiveness. 2011 . pdf File Names of Other Required Files for Students File Names of Optional Files for Instructors.Ref1 . Editor(s) Jeanette Stehr-Green File Name of Student / Participant’s Guide File Name of Instructor’s Guide xTyphoid Tajik. the student should be able to 1.Ref2 . 23. define surface water and groundwater.pdf Submitted to TEPHINET by Submission to TEPHINET on (Date) Richard C.Mermin JID 1999. Setting — Country Setting — Year Tajikistan 1997 Case Study Source Institution Case Study Year Written CDC (Waterborne) 2010 Authors of Original Version Updaters. list the steps in collecting water samples from a point-of-use water tap.student. Students xTyphoid Tajik. Dicker Dec. 5. describe point-of-use water disinfection and give examples of proven approaches.2010-11.pdf xTyphoid Tajik. if any Version (Year) Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY). and displaced populations. and control of typhoid fever. interpret the results of a matched case-control study. 3. Objectives After completing this case study.MMWR 1998. 7.2010-11. and 8. discuss the steps typically used to develop hypotheses on the source of an infectious disease outbreak. deteriorating infrastructure. if any 2010 N/A Tags / Keywords  Case definition  Hypothesis generation  Water supply  Control measures  Typhoid fever Brief Description Investigation of an outbreak of several thousand cases of Typhoid fever in Dushanbe. list health problems common in countries with economic hardships. 2. epidemiology. Tajikistan in 1997 that resulted from inadequately maintained public water supply. describe the clinical features. 6. list activities that should be included in the evaluation of a public water system associated with an outbreak.Page 37 TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM Long Title Typhoid in Tajikistan Short Title. 2011 .pdf xTyphoid Tajik.instructor. 4. 23. India Short Title.Page 38 TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM Long Title An Outbreak of Cholera in Parbatia. Editor(s) Yvan Hutin File Name of Student / Participant’s Guide File Name of Instructor’s Guide N/A File Names of Other Required Files for Students File Names of Optional Files for Instructors. if any N/A Tags / Keywords  Outbreak investigation     Brief Description Objectives Setting — Country Setting — Year India Case Study Source Institution Case Study Year Written India MAE-FETP 2005? Authors of Original Version Updaters. if any Version (Year) Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY). Students Submitted to TEPHINET by Submission to TEPHINET on (Date) Richard C. 2011 . Dicker Dec. Orissa. Editor(s) Yvan Hutin File Name of Student / Participant’s Guide File Name of Instructor’s Guide N/A File Names of Other Required Files for Students File Names of Optional Files for Instructors. Orissa Short Title.Page 39 TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM Long Title An Outbreak of Acute Hepatitis in Baripada. Students Submitted to TEPHINET by Submission to TEPHINET on (Date) Richard C. if any Version (Year) Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY). Dicker Dec. 2011 . 23. if any N/A Tags / Keywords  Outbreak investigation     Brief Description Objectives Setting — Country Setting — Year India Case Study Source Institution Case Study Year Written India MAE-FETP 2005? Authors of Original Version Updaters. Students Submitted to TEPHINET by Submission to TEPHINET on (Date) Richard C. India Short Title. Editor(s) Yvan Hutin File Name of Student / Participant’s Guide File Name of Instructor’s Guide N/A File Names of Other Required Files for Students File Names of Optional Files for Instructors. Dicker Dec.Page 40 TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM Long Title Causes of Hepatitis B in Kerala. if any Version (Year) Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY). 2011 . 23. if any N/A Tags / Keywords      Brief Description Objectives Setting — Country Setting — Year India Case Study Source Institution Case Study Year Written India MAE-FETP 2005? Authors of Original Version Updaters. Dicker Dec. 2011 .Page 41 TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM Long Title Using Bed Nets Against Malaria in West Bengal Short Title. 23. if any N/A Tags / Keywords      Brief Description Objectives Setting — Country Setting — Year India Case Study Source Institution Case Study Year Written India MAE-FETP 2006? Authors of Original Version Updaters. if any Version (Year) Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY). Students Submitted to TEPHINET by Submission to TEPHINET on (Date) Richard C. Editor(s) Yvan Hutin File Name of Student / Participant’s Guide File Name of Instructor’s Guide N/A File Names of Other Required Files for Students File Names of Optional Files for Instructors. if any N/A Tags / Keywords      Brief Description Objectives Setting — Country Setting — Year India Case Study Source Institution Case Study Year Written India MAE-FETP 2005? Authors of Original Version Updaters. if any Version (Year) Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY). Students Submitted to TEPHINET by Submission to TEPHINET on (Date) Richard C.Page 42 TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM Long Title Analyzing Malaria Surveillance Data in Darjeeling Short Title. 2011 . 23. Editor(s) Yvan Hutin File Name of Student / Participant’s Guide File Name of Instructor’s Guide N/A File Names of Other Required Files for Students File Names of Optional Files for Instructors. Dicker Dec. Students Submitted to TEPHINET by Submission to TEPHINET on (Date) Richard C. Editor(s) Yvan Hutin File Name of Student / Participant’s Guide File Name of Instructor’s Guide N/A File Names of Other Required Files for Students File Names of Optional Files for Instructors. if any Version (Year) Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY). 2011 . if any N/A Tags / Keywords      Brief Description Objectives Setting — Country Setting — Year India Case Study Source Institution Case Study Year Written India MAE-FETP 2006? Authors of Original Version Updaters. Dicker Dec. 23.Page 43 TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM Long Title Evaluating Public Health Surveillance in the Context of a Chikungunya Outbreak Short Title. Page 44 TEPHINET CASE STUDY INFORMATION FORM Long Title Oswego Masala: Constructing and Epidemic Curve Short Title. 2011 . Editor(s) Yvan Hutin File Name of Student / Participant’s Guide File Name of Instructor’s Guide N/A File Names of Other Required Files for Students File Names of Optional Files for Instructors. Students Submitted to TEPHINET by Submission to TEPHINET on (Date) Richard C. 23. Dicker Dec. if any Version (Year) Version CDC Code (YYX-MYY). if any N/A Tags / Keywords      Brief Description Objectives Setting — Country Setting — Year India Case Study Source Institution Case Study Year Written India MAE-FETP 2008 Authors of Original Version Updaters. Page 45 . Page 46 .
Copyright © 2024 DOKUMEN.SITE Inc.