Definitions of Globalization - A Comprehensive Overview and a Proposed Definition

May 22, 2018 | Author: Vinay Palle | Category: Globalization, Capitalism, Economics, Reality, Market (Economics)


Comments



Description

Program on the Geopolitical Implications of Globalization and Transnational SecurityDefinitions of Globalization: A Comprehensive Overview and a Proposed Definition Dr. Nayef R.F. Al-Rodhan Senior Scholar in Geostrategy and Director of the Program on the Geopolitical Implications of Globalization and Transnational Security Geneva Centre for Security Policy Ambassador Gérard Stoudmann Director Geneva Centre for Security Policy June 19, 2006 To comment, please email Ms. Bethany Webster at [email protected]. All copyrights are reserved by the authors. Avenue de la Paix 7bis P.O. Box 1295 CH-1211 Geneva 1 Telephone Telefax www.gcsp.ch +41 22 906 83 17 +41 22 906 16 49 [email protected] Dr. Nayef R.F. Al-Rodhan Ambassador Gérard Stoudmann Definitions of Globalization: A Comprehensive Overview and a Proposed Definition Abstract Many authors have attempted, with relative success, to define globalization in a variety of ways. Some claim that it cannot be done, others claim that it would constrain the meaning to do so, and still others have defied these two beliefs and have constructed a working definition. Despite differing opinions about developing a definition, all authors agree on one thing: that defining this term is anything but easy. This paper will attempt to provide a comprehensive overview of the existing definitions of globalization and introduce our proposed definition: “Globalization is a process that encompasses the causes, course, and consequences of transnational and transcultural integration of human and non-human activities.” All copyrights are reserved by the authors. 2 cultural background. President of the Third World Network 2 in Malaysia. Nayef R. and discourses of power. The definitions presented here reflect some of those viewpoints. as well as the limitations involved in trying to do so: does this hinder discussions about globalization? Does the fact that globalization requires constant defining inhibit or undermine true academic debate about the geopolitical implications of this process before that debate even begins? All copyrights are reserved by the authors. and cultures. of distances getting shorter. with somebody on the other side of the world. referred to globalization as colonization. as the definitions that we present here indicate. Concurrently. a revolution. beyond the scope of this paper to assess the extent to which each of the statements captures reality. it cannot be expounded upon with certainty and be applicable to all people and in all situations. things moving closer. stated that globalization: “is the process of world shrinkage. globalization spans a multitude of disciplines. cultural stability. Swedish journalist Thomas Larsson.F. allows for a variety of viewpoints. the transmission of knowledge. be they economic. Al-Rodhan Ambassador Gérard Stoudmann Definitions of Globalization: A Comprehensive Overview and a Proposed Definition Introduction Globalization is not a single concept that can be defined and encompassed within a set time frame. development and stability. Martin Khor. or political. It is. One question remains regarding the potential difficulty of trying to define this concept. and ethnic and religious affiliation provide the background that determines how globalization is interpreted. Despite these challenges. Globalization involves economic integration. to mutual benefit. Rather. An individual’s political ideology. nor is it a process that can be defined clearly with a beginning and an end. and others referring to regression. By its nature. the transfer of policies across borders. however. 3 . it is a global process. as Vidya S. Furthermore. social. with some connotations referring to progress.” 3 These two different interpretations reflect different perspectives rooted in different world positions. and “an establishment of the global market free from sociopolitical control. In 1995. Kumar rightly points out in his article “A Critical Methodology of Globalization: Politics of the 21st Century?”. A. This. It pertains to the increasing ease with which somebody on one side of the world can interact.Dr. social status. colonialism. The impact of globalization is vast. integration and cooperation. relations.” 1 Globalization encompasses all of these things. geographic location. this term brings with it a multitude of hidden agendas. of course. a concept. and destabilization. It is a concept that has been defined variously over the years. It is also vital that these definitions be presented against the reality of the global situation. in his book The Race to the Top: The Real Story of Globalization (2001). we look at issues surrounding the difficulties of defining globalization and discuss the benefits of doing so within the larger debate. communities. the reproduction. sociologists. the new competitive environment that accelerates these processes. we suggest reviewing the definitions that are available in an attempt to truly understand this concept. new migratory movements from South to North.” 6 His article focuses on the debate regarding the definition of such a term and what relation this has to reality.Dr. which is not what we intend to do in this article. while others are broad and inclusive. We have compiled a comprehensive list of definitions of globalization in order to provide a survey of what some academics. So how should one go about defining globalization? Some academics have determined that it is a useless task. theorists. Despite this benefit. and leaders claim globalization actually is. For example. politicians. Each approach has its strengths and weaknesses: more-general definitions tend to be allencompassing but more abstract. the new international division of labor. this can also stall the debate about the implications of this type of globalization because a discussion about negative and positive connotations could lend itself to a paper and subsequent discussion all on its own without delving into deeper ramifications. while more-specific definitions are better justified but narrower in scope. Nayef R. trade agreements. it is at once apparent that some are rather narrow and exclusive. Rather. however. This definition could be used as a basis for a working paper on a number of subjects.” 4 This definition does not have positive or negative connotations but is vague and inclusive. Nor does it try to justify why one definition might be better than another. Robert Cox provides a good example of this approach: “the characteristics of the globalization trend include the internationalizing of production.F. a detailed definition would be suited to this type of discussion. This definition is a bit too vague. Kumar argues that “the debate about what to do about globalization is still very much a debate about what globalization is. Alternatively. and the internationalizing of the state… making states into agencies of the globalizing world. In reviewing current definitions. and just about any other issue that deals with overcoming traditional boundaries. as it may only be applicable to those that agree with this definition. This means that he also needs to be cautious in claiming that some definitions come closer to reality than others. which we were able to use to develop our own definition. Al-Rodhan Ambassador Gérard Stoudmann Definitions of Globalization: A Comprehensive Overview and a Proposed Definition This paper does not propose a definition that will be useful and acceptable to everyone. Methodology This study provides a thorough overview of existing definitions of globalization. As mentioned earlier. including technology. this can also be limiting. and we also propose a definition that we think might be broad enough to address most aspects of the process. 4 . All copyrights are reserved by the authors. Kenichi Ohmae stated in 1992 that “globalization means the onset of the borderless world.” 5 This definition is more detailed and contributes more to the discussion. for discussions on the detailed implications of globalization. Due to the complexity of the concept. No matter what definition you adhere to.Dr. and the consequences of these integrations. Many of the definitions presented here are useful in a number of cases and disciplines. the spread of bacteria and non-human diseases such as bird flu. and political aspects of human life (along with many others) that are a part of the human and social sphere. economic. we found agreement with George Ritzer. Globalization is not an endpoint to be discussed and then forgotten. Like the concept of globalization itself. This intermingling has transpired through activities that are both human and non-human in nature. but are not limited to. and consequences of transnational and transcultural integration of human and non-human activities. globalization is complex and multifaceted. any definition that comes close to reflecting the reality of globalization must also be complex and multifaceted. and based on our knowledge of globalization as it is understood today. most scholars realize the significance a definition can have. research projects. However. on whether one gains or loses from it. 5 . it is clear that the literature does not come any closer to an understanding of what globalization actually is. It is a result of the transnational and transcultural integrations that have occurred globally throughout human history. Human activities encompass the linguistic. cultural. the course. it was vital to utilize a broad perspective in order for it to be brief yet as comprehensive as possible. They appear in chronological order. Rather. In general. and economies for hundreds of years. among other things. and discussions usually remain focused on a single aspect of globalization in order to be able to provide some concrete solutions and recommendations. the definitions presented here are broad and may be perceived in a variety of ways. It is also important to include non-human activities. Nayef R. course. articles. as well as natural disasters such as All copyrights are reserved by the authors. which limits their scope (which is the purpose of their usage).” wrote: “[a]ttitudes toward globalization depend. but others remain focused on one point or another. we propose the following definition: “Globalization is a process that encompasses the causes. it is a process. It encompasses the causes.” 7 In reviewing all of these definitions. if one is developed at all.” In the development of our own definition of globalization. Al-Rodhan Ambassador Gérard Stoudmann Definitions of Globalization: A Comprehensive Overview and a Proposed Definition Results The results of our overview appear in a table later in this paper. who. in his article “The Globalization of Nothing. which incorporate. Therefore. It is understandable that a definition developed for a particular paper. In our opinion.F. We gathered definitions from both academic and resource guides in an attempt to look for patterns and similarities. would focus on the aspect in question in order to provide a benchmark for the remainder of the paper. a current that has been impacting communities. cultures. When embraced in the context of our definition. tend to lean toward the economic roots of the concept. abundance does not necessarily indicate that with each new definition there has been marked improvement. However. 8 The past decades have allowed for the creativity of humankind to develop the definitions that appear in this paper. individual. So what conclusions might we draw from this overview? To what extent have the definitions helped us understand more fully the concept of globalization? Why should one engage in such a study? Globalization is evolutionary.Dr. it is safe to assume that the majority of definitions will encompass such aspects. it is a process that influences each of us in a number of ways. However. whether politically. this does indicate that notions of globalization. as a majority of our authors have written definitions that are lengthy. and. or socially. globalization can be understood in a way that allows for a greater appreciation of.F. Al-Rodhan Ambassador Gérard Stoudmann Definitions of Globalization: A Comprehensive Overview and a Proposed Definition tornadoes. however. They are rarely confined to one or two lines. This becomes more evident when assessing the various All copyrights are reserved by the authors. rather. as well as global. This is illustrative of the complex nature of globalization: in attempting to determine how the impact of globalization is most felt. In addition. economically. one frequently finds oneself debating aspects that are also multidimensional. movement towards furthering. Nayef R. This overview illustrates that many of the definitions refer to questions of economics: of the 114 definitions presented here. This appears to be universal. it is important to recognize that globalization is not a force that needs to be stopped. Since the debate over globalization stems largely from the act of defining the concept. an elaborate definition is more often the norm in addressing this issue. and hurricanes. Discussion This overview of current definitions of globalization can arguably leave one feeling more confused in the discourse than before. 6 . Many of these definitions do. both to our benefit and also to our detriment. security and stability. The abundance of definitions is clearly an indication of the varying opinions that have developed regarding this concept since it first appeared in Webster’s dictionary in 1961. 67 of them make some reference to the economic dimension either through market expansion or the selling of goods and services. Therefore. tsunamis. it is important to see the progression of where the definitions have come from and how different connotations have emerged. As all of these issues impact human and global security. it is our opinion that a truly comprehensive definition must address them. it is a fluid process that is constantly changing with the development of human society. Similarly. rather. the definitions tend to be multifaceted and complex. include other dimensions: quite often they involve political and social aspects as well. consequently. earthquakes. at least in our representation. By exploring the various explanations and thoughts behind the idea that has come to be called globalization. that in order to have a worthwhile debate on globalization.Dr. Al-Rodhan Ambassador Gérard Stoudmann Definitions of Globalization: A Comprehensive Overview and a Proposed Definition attempts at defining this idea.F. One could reflect on the impact of globalization for days without having a clear understanding of what in reality the term means.’” 9 This captures the complexity of globalization without actually defining it. “globalization is a ‘world of things’ that have ‘different speeds. In this task. This invites a definition of globalization as: ‘an historical process which engenders a significant shift in the spatial reach of networks and systems of social relations to transcontinental or interregional patterns of human organization. Anthony McGrew’s elaboration of this concept illustrates this point: “globalization [is] a process which generates flows and connections. The definition is a clear indication of what the author’s perspective is on where globalization has come from and. points of origin and termination. continents and civilizations. activity and the exercise of power.’” 10 The challenge of defining globalization is not going to disappear or lose importance anytime in the near future. a definition must be agreed upon at the outset? In a way. what it will mean in geopolitical terms in the future. this is the case. It allows for a balanced view of globalization in a way that can allow for a better understanding of where the term is All copyrights are reserved by the authors. the core of the discourse must be determined by the author. By analyzing what has been offered in attempts to express the meaning of such a complex idea. If nothing else. nations. and there are those that indicate that globalization is a trend. It implies that further elaboration would not be particularly useful. or societies. By looking at the ways in which the definition has changed over the past 45 years. By only having an abstract concept and nothing concrete. it forces the issue to be simplified in one or two sentences. axes. this overview of definitions has made it clear that globalization is many things to many different people. but between global regions. and varied relationships to institutional structures in different regions. then. This paper argues that the perspective of the person who defines globalization shapes any definition thereof. one can ascertain that the future will not give way to a simpler or a more refined means of arriving at a clearer conceptualization of the process. there is no reference point. Nayef R. As Arjun Appadurai noted in 1996. The fluidity of this concept makes concrete recommendations for a definition difficult. we are able to see how the concept has been identified over the course of the approximately thirty years represented in Table 1. There are definitions presented in our table that are timeless. more importantly. 7 . The future of globalization is one that no academic would venture to try to predict. Does this mean. not simply across nation-states and national territorial boundaries. there would be no need for a paper of this nature. Perhaps.” 11 The debate surrounding globalization is a large part of its lifeblood. Conclusion The remaining questions center around the value that defining this concept adds to the globalization debate. In a sense. it is vague and obscure as its reaches are wide and constantly shifting. But the attempt. even if it feels like an everlasting and futile task. As globalization exists at different times and means different things to different facets of society and the international system. it can never fully be defined to the satisfaction of all who are impacted by its implications. Nayef R. the definitions do permit a comprehensive understanding of globalization that is extensive enough to allow us to see what lies at the core of the thoughts of those thinking about the concept in modern discourse. nor would there be the resources to pull together so many definitions. does contribute to the debate and does stimulate discussion about globalization. globalization is the debate about it. It could be argued that the discussion that stems from the definition issue is in fact a vital part of the discourse itself. which in turn sheds further light on the globalization process and its many-sided impact on stability. the meaning of the concept is self-evident. The matter of defining globalization can be deemed useless because of its shifting nature. Despite this difficulty. Being unable to come up with a Webster’s-dictionary-style definition is part of what makes it an interesting point of departure for further discussion and study. 8 . Sociologist Cesare Poppi contributes a thought in this regard: “The literature stemming from the debate on globalization has grown in the last decade beyond any individual’s capability of extracting a workable definition of the concept. and the debate is globalization. Searching for a definition thus does help renew focus on the policy challenges and responses needed. Without one.F. more than any other concept. All copyrights are reserved by the authors. in another. its ambiguity. its influence from the perspective from which one views it. Poppi is correct: globalization is the debate. the other is inconceivable.Dr. Al-Rodhan Ambassador Gérard Stoudmann Definitions of Globalization: A Comprehensive Overview and a Proposed Definition rooted and where it might be headed in future research and policy work. Without it. p. Vol.” Arjun Appadurai. 1) … “‘the degree of interdependence and integration between national economies. 87) “…globalization means the onset of the borderless world…” ”…refers both to the compression of the world and the intensification of consciousness of the world as a whole. 2000. 20. 64. 1974). 8.” “ …all those processes by which the peoples of the world are incorporated into a single world society. Knowledge and Society (London: Sage. J. in M. The Consequences of Modernity (Cambridge: Polity Press. 1. Asian EFL Journal. The Borderless World: Power and Strategy in the Global Marketplace (London: HarperCollins. Global Shift: The Internationalization of Economic Activity (London: Guilford Press. as cited in R. as cited in I. Issue 3.). Albrow and E. 9 . 8. Global Culture: Nationalism. p.). J. “Corporate Power and the Globalization Process”. Intra-Firm Trade (Paris: OECD. p. 9. 14.” “The critical point is that both sides of the coin of global cultural process today are products of the infinitely varied mutual contest of sameness and difference on a stage characterized by radical disjunctures between different sorts of global flows and the uncertain landscapes created in and through these disjunctures. Globalization and the Nation-State (London: Macmillan Press. p. as cited in R. Brinkman and J. Publication No. Martin Albrow. Roland Robertson. Globalization: Social Theory and Global Culture (London: Sage. 1998). 1993). Globalization and the Nation-State (London: Macmillan Press. 2002. p. Globalization and International Relations Theory (New York: Oxford University Press. 29. Al-Rodhan Ambassador Gérard Stoudmann Definitions of Globalization: A Comprehensive Overview and a Proposed Definition Table 1: Definitions of Globalization 1 (in chronological order) SOURCE Immanuel Wallerstein. Holton. Brinkman. 7. Anthony Giddens. p. September 2004. David Harvey.’” (p. 38. as cited in RAWOO Netherlands Development Assistance Research Council. pp. p. 1992). 1999). “…globalization is ‘qualitatively different’ from internationalization… it represents ‘a more advanced and complex form of internationalization which implies a degree of functional integration between internationally dispersed economic activities. “Introduction”. 1992). 87. OECD. 15. “Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy”. citations were taken from original sources. King (eds. The Condition of Postmodernity (Oxford: Blackwell. Holton. Globalization and Modernity (London: Sage. 1992). J. Vol. p.Dr. 6. 730-752. DEFINITION “globalization represents the triumph of a capitalist world economy tied together by a global division of labour. “Coping with Globalization: The Need for Research Concerning the Local Response to Globalization in Developing Countries”. pp.’” (p. Kenichi Ohmae.F. Globalization. International Journal of Social Economics. 1990). Holton. as cited in R. “How American Culture Correlates the Process of Globalization”. 1998). 1990). in M. as cited in R.” “…the compression of time and space. as cited in Chi-yu Chang. All copyrights are reserved by the authors. 1998). 11. Featherstone (ed. Peter Dicken. p. 308.” “…understood as the phenomenon by which markets and production in different countries are becoming increasingly interdependent due to the dynamics of trade in goods and services and the flows of capital and technology. p. 8. No. 1989). The Modern World System: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century (New York: Academic Press. p. 730-731.” “Globalization can thus be defined as the intensification of worldwide social relations which link distant localities in such a way that local happenings are shaped by events occurring many miles away and vice versa. p. Nayef R. Globalization and the Nation-State (London: Macmillan Press. 1990). Clark.” 1 Whenever possible. 1999). political.). 383. as cited in “Culture Communities: Some Other Viewpoints”. regional or national.). 30-54. 15. 8. Scholte. an ideal visualization. “Editorial: Challenging ‘Globalization’ Discourses”. Heterogeneous cultures become incorporated and integrated into a dominant culture which eventually covers the whole world. 6-29. “The Geographies and Politics of Globalization”. pp. 1995. as cited in R. May 26-28. Vol. p. Vol. The Globalization of World Politics. Undoing Culture. Scholte. 3. as cited in J. 10-11. 8. in J. 379-400. 379-400. Lausanne. 158. The Globalization of World Politics. 23. 4. p. p. a stylized way of thinking about complex international developments. social and cultural relations across borders.” All copyrights are reserved by the authors. Progress in Human Geography. Nayef R. 15. “The Globalization of World Politics”.” “The process of globalization suggests simultaneously two images of culture. pp. p. 3. 11. in J. 1999). “The Globalization of World Politics”. “Globalization Folklore: Problems of Myth and Ideology in the Discourse on Globalization”. No. An Introduction to International Relations (New York: Oxford University Press. but is rather an input in the form of rhetorical and discursive constructs. Robert Spich. Rosabeth Moss Kanter. “The world is becoming a global shopping mall in which ideas and products are available everywhere at the same time. Mike Featherstone. Vol. in J. 1999). No. A. p. Postmodernism and Identity (London: Sage. 10 . Vol. the globe. Baylis and S. an idea set. 1995). Walck and D. Kelly. Journal of Organizational Change Management. “Challenging the Juggernaut of Globalization: A Manifesto for Academic Praxis”. as cited in P. 1. 1999. No. paper for the International Symposium on Sources of Innovation in Multilateralism. 1995. Globalization and the Nation-State (London: Macmillan Press. The first image entails the extension outwards of a particular culture to its limit. new migratory movements from South to North. Smith (eds. Scholte. 8. Journal of Organizational Change Management. Journal of Organizational Change Management. Globalization. pp. Holton. “Multilateralism and the Democratization of World Order”. Vol. pp. Vol. A. whether local.” “[I]t is a mind set.). 1994. Issues in Global Education.” “Globalization is what we in the Third World have for several centuries called colonization.Dr. C. a popular metaphor and. as cited in P. Things formerly held apart are now brought into contact and juxtaposition. Bilimoria. An Introduction to International Relations (New York: Oxford University Press. “Globalization Folklore: Problems of Myth and Ideology in the Discourse on Globalization”. No. World Class: Thriving Locally in the Global Economy (New York: Simon and Schuster. 1995). Whose World Order? Uneven Globalization and the End of the Cold War (Boulder: Westview Press. as cited in J. Smith (eds. 2000. “The Geographies and Politics of Globalization”. Issue No.F.” “…globalization as an ideological construct devised to satisfy capitalism’s need for new markets and labour sources and propelled by the uncritical ‘sycophancy’ of the international academic business community. 7. Newsletter of the American Forum for Global Education.” “…the intensification of economic. David Steingard and Dale Fitzgibbons. p. “The Globalization of World Politics”. Baylis and S. as cited in J. Martin Khor.” “…globalization is not an output of the ‘real’ forces of markets and technologies. 383. 1995). Kelly. Journal of Organizational Change Management. 1995. No. Al-Rodhan Ambassador Gérard Stoudmann Definitions of Globalization: A Comprehensive Overview and a Proposed Definition Robert Cox. 6-7.” “Globalization is a conceptualization of the international political economy which suggests and believes essentially that all economic activity. p. “The characteristics of the globalization trend include the internationalizing of production. An Introduction to International Relations (New York: Oxford University Press. 3-5.” Hans-Henrik Holm and Georg Sorensen (eds. pp. practices and ideologies which some groups are imposing on others for political and economic gain. A. Baylis and S. p. Smith (eds. pp. 6-29. 4. Progress in Human Geography. 1998). must be conducted within a perspective and attitude that constantly is global and worldwide in its scope. 4. 1995.). 1995. J. No. the new competitive environment that accelerates these processes. and the internationalizing of the state…making states into agencies of the globalizing world. 3. the new international division of labor. pp. 15. Robert Spich. 8. 23. pp. p. 4. finally. The second image points to the compression of cultures. 1999. The Globalization of World Politics. . 379-400. “The Policy Challenges of Globalisation and Regionalisation”. 88.org/en/docs/dp_113. 385. “How Does Globalization Really Work”. 1999). Kelly.html. as cited in K. The Global Age.). pp.” All copyrights are reserved by the authors.. James H. 1999). p. Charles Oman. The actions of individual economic actors. 1996. human activities. p. p. p. March 1996). It finds expression in the increased movement of tangible and intangible goods and services.’ It ‘has aggravated many of the region's most chronic problems--such as the pronounced degree of economic exploitation and social inequality that have characterized Latin America since it came under European colonial domination in the sixteenth century. Department of Geography and Environmental Engineering. 4. 1996. usually in the pursuit of profit. Discussion Paper 113 (Geneva: UNCTAD. pp. often spurred by the pressures of competition. Malcolm Waters. in S. p. Global markets are dominant. Baltimore. It can be and often is facilitated by a lowering of government impediments to that movement. unpublished MS. [m]aking or being made global (i) by the active dissemination of practices. Clark. Vol. Globalization and International Relations Theory (New York: Oxford University Press. “Globalization Myths: Some Historical Reflections on Integration. but it is also one that robs us of hope.” David Harvey. 1996. Industrialization and Growth in the World Economy”. 11 . OECD Development Centre. 1999. and a microeconomic phenomenon.” “The historical transformation constituted by the sum of particular forms and instances of. and Inequality in Latin America (Boulder: Westview Press. “The Global Context of Contemporary Latin American Affairs”. Harris.). 2. to depend on economic agents in other countries. in J. Paul Hirst and Grahame Thompson. see http://www. including ownership rights. 279 and 80. Harris (eds. see http://www. Globalization and International Relations Theory (New York: Oxford University Press. firms. and/or by technological progress. 1995). Mittelman. Progress in Human Geography. 1995).unctad. notably in transportation and communications.’” “‘Globalisation’ is the growth.” “‘Globalization’ is a myth suitable for a world without illusions. 3.’” M. “The Geographies and Politics of Globalization”. as cited in Truman State University (Marc Becker). The John Hopkins University. 35. as cited in P. 2006. “…process in which the production and financial structures of countries are becoming interlinked by an increasing number of cross-border transactions to create an international division of labour in which national wealth creation comes. as cited in I. Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers. L. for it is held that Western social democracy and socialism of the Soviet bloc are both finished. Paul Bairoch and Richard Kozul-Wright. p. 6. Globalization and Postcolonial Theory in the Age of Endless War”. p. or societies. of economic activity across national and regional political boundaries. 3. Power.” “…globalization is a ‘world of things’ that have ‘different speeds. 48. drive it. Cultural Critique. 1996). and often of people. points of origin and termination. 3. No. and the ultimate stage of economic integration where such dependence has reached its spatial limit. via trade and investment. Albrow.globalizacija. 62. Modernity at Large: The Cultural Dimensions of Globalization (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Chowdhury. Arjun Appadurai. via migration. “A ‘rubric for a varied phenomena. see http://www2. 23.pdf.F. “Globalization in Question”. Globalization (London: Routledge.en. “Interrogating ‘Newness’. Halebsky and R.Dr. values.‘” “A social process in which the constraints of geography on social and cultural arrangements recede and in which people become increasingly aware that they are receding. p.com/doc_en/e0013glo. and they face no threat from any viable contrary political project. banks. or a premise in shaping.edu/~marc/resources/terms. web resource accessed March 21. Policy Brief No. No. people. Winter 2006. Globalization in Question. technology and other human products throughout the globe (ii) when global practices and so on exercise an increasing influence over people’s lives (iii) when the globe serves as a focus for. The International Economy and The Possibilities of Governance (Cambridge: Polity Press. p. p.htm. Globalization: Critical Reflections (Boulder. 11. MD. 1996).” “…a spatial fix for capitalism and an ideological tool with which to attack socialists. 1996). Nayef R. “’Globalization refers in general to the worldwide integration of humanity and the compression of both the temporal and spatial dimensions of planetwide human interaction. p. and varied relationships to institutional structures in different regions. Clark. 5. Capital. as cited in I. nations.truman. p. a process of economic outreach. 126-161. axes. Globalisation is thus a centrifugal process. or more precisely the accelerated growth. Al-Rodhan Ambassador Gérard Stoudmann Definitions of Globalization: A Comprehensive Overview and a Proposed Definition Richard L. H. 137. Mittelman (ed. increasingly. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies. 1997). p.com/doc_en/e0013glo. Cesare Poppi. Vol. Memedovic et al. “Globalization and the South”. pp. “Labour in the Global Economy: Challenges. and also through the more rapid and widespread diffusion of technology. p. Wilkin (eds. labor and environmental protection laws. 10.htm (Chapter 3). it is largely unfettered by ethical or moral considerations. Nayef R.htm. p. pp. 10.it/english/actrav/telearn/global/ilo/globe/kirs h. p. Issue 2. Kumar.).” “[G]lobalization must be understood as the condition whereby localizing strategies become systematically connected to global concerns…Thus. the emergence of new. in Alan Scott (ed. 4-5. 2000). globalization appears as a dialectical (and therefore contradictory) process: what is being globalized is the tendency to stress ‘locality’ and ‘difference’.F. Globalization and International Relations Theory (New York: Oxford University Press. Issue 2.” “…an ensemble of developments that make the world a single place. Vol.” “…an emergent concept.” All copyrights are reserved by the authors. Vol. p. Fredric Jameson. 1996. 1996). A. It has quite different consequences on one side of the world from the other. p. Bulletin No. “Globalization vs.). The Cultures of Globalization (Durham: Duke University Press. 45. Martin’s Press. 87-111. Gijsbert Van Liemt. It is not just about fragmentation: I see it more as a shake-out of institutions in which new forms of unity go along with new forms of fragmentation.itcilo. in C. as cited in V. The Limits of Globalization: Cases and Arguments (London: Routledge. Miyoshi (eds. local differences. “A Critical Methodology st of Globalization: Politics of the 21 Century?”. 12 .). 87-111. S. “Globalisation and Collective Identities”. pp.globalizacija. factories and products around the planet at ever more rapid rates of speed in search of cheaper labor and raw materials and governments willing to ignore or abandon consumer.” Jan Aart Scholte. (eds.org/external/pubs/WEOMAY/Weocon. Globalization and the South (Houndmills. 1996/7. Thomas and P. Richard Kilminster. C. p. Vol. “A Critical Methodology of Globalization: Politics of st the 21 Century?”. As economic process…the assimilation or integration of markets. International Forum on Globalization. in F. “Globalization as an Emergent Concept”. The Globalisation of Crime. 16. 44. International Monetary Fund. 1998). as cited in V. Thomas. changing the meaning and importance of distance and national identity in world affairs. as cited in M. and the expansion of a world-wide media and technology culture with the promise of popular democratization. which was created spontaneously to reflect people’s experiences of the properties of an accelerating phase of the level of social integration compromising the bonds between nation states.). of labor.imf. Adjustment and Policy Responses in the European Union and Less Developed Countries (Dordrecht and Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 1998). 272. 2001. A. Renwick (eds. 5. Identities in International Relations (New York: St. p. “Anthony Giddens on Globalization: Excerpts from a Keynote Address at the UNRISD Conference on Globalization and Citizenship”. As an ideology. S. individually syncretic. “Globalisation is not a single set of processes and does not lead in a single direction. “Notes on Globalization as a Philosophical Issue”. Ethnicity and Globalization”. Al-Rodhan Ambassador Gérard Stoudmann Definitions of Globalization: A Comprehensive Overview and a Proposed Definition Mark Ritchie. 6. in the World Economic and Financial Surveys. 9. globalization names the explosion of a plurality of mutually intersecting. Kumar. in J. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies. Understanding Transitional Relationships in Context (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Basingstoke: Macmillan. Krause and N. 97. p. It produces solidarities in some places and destroys them in others. 95. as cited in I. 10. see http://www. see http://www. Findlay. “World Economic Outlook. 15-43.htm. p. 1997).” “…refers broadly to the process whereby power is located in global social formations and expressed through global networks rather than through territorially-based states.” “…the growing interdependence of national economies. 1997. p. 1999). In other words. it is a wholly contradictory process. Clark. 15. Jameson and M. 1997).” “Globalization refers to the growing economic interdependence of countries worldwide through the increasing volume and variety of cross-border transactions in goods and services and of international capital flows. UNRISD (United Nations Research Institute for Social Development) News.). 15.). hitherto suppressed identities. “World Literature and Global Theory: Comparative Literature for the New Millennium”. Symploke. 285. Globalization of Labour Markets: Challenges. Summer 2003. in O. Summer 2003. pp. yet ‘locality’ and ‘difference’ presuppose the very development of worldwide dynamics of institutional communication and legitimation. “Meeting the Challenges of Globalization in the Advanced Economies”.Dr. “Wider Horizons with Larger Details: Subjectivity. 169. Globalism”. “I will define globalization as the process of corporations moving their money. Adjustment and Policy Responses in the EU”. The Limits of Globalization: Cases and Arguments (London: Routledge.” “As cultural process. in Alan Scott (ed. as cited in Vilashini Cooppan. see http://www. of nations. Anthony Giddens. A Survey by the Staff of the International Monetary Fund”. Issue 1-2. Riggs.” “Globalization. 327. An Introduction to International Relations (New York: Oxford University Press. Herman E. http://www2.in a way that is enabling individuals. International trade (governed by comparative advantage) becomes interregional trade (governed by absolute advantage). Issue 2. is not only. and full national treatment for foreign investors (and nationals working abroad) so that. p. p. Smith (eds.” “[T]he inexorable integration of markets. 2004). 2. see.edu/~fredr/glotexts. Politics. The Third Way.” “…the widening. activity and the exercise of power. and homogenizing and pluralizing cultural identities. 1999.F. From a humanist perspective. or even primarily. transnational media organizations (TMCs). ”The Globalization of World Politics”. The Renewal of Democracy (Cambridge: Polity Press. but about the transformation of time and space in our lives.). deeper and cheaper than ever before. The main engines of globalization are the transnational corporations (TNCs). p. but also by easy or uncontrolled migration. “Globalization Versus Internationalization: Some Implications”. Global Transformations. corporations and nation-states to reach around the world farther. 1999). services. 87-111. nongovernmental organizations (NGOs).” “…a world in which societies. 1999). Economics and Culture (Stanford: Stanford University Press. p. Gessner and A. May 13. Elements of globalization include transborder capital. not simply across nation-states and national territorial boundaries. Summer 2003. p. Straus and Giroux. formation of world opinion.htm#MODELSKI. This invites a definition of globalization as: ‘an historical process which engenders a significant shift in the spatial reach of networks and systems of social relations to transcontinental or interregional patterns of human organization. David Goldblatt and Jonathan Perraton. there are no foreigners. labour and capital thereby creating a single market in inputs and outputs. Why Globalization Works (London: Yale University Press. Jan Aart Scholte. Emerging Legal Certainty: Empirical Studies on the Globalization of Law (Ashgate: Dartmouth Publishing Company. A. “…globalization is a process along four dimensions: economic globalization. pp.htm#TEHRANIAN. “Globalization refers to global economic integration of many formerly national economies into one global economy. Anthony Giddens. p. and data flows. David Henderson. the financial to the spiritual. “Globalization Texts. pp. economically speaking.org/globaliz/econ/herman2. 10. University of Hawaii. “A Critical Methodology of Globalization: Politics of st the 21 Century?”. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies. Concepts and Terms”. see http://www2. Anthony McGrew. The MAI Affair: A Story and Its Lessons (London: The Royal Institute of International Affairs. and alternative government organizations (AGOs). 1998. management. Baylis and S. images. Budak (eds.Dr. come closer together. cultures. democratization.” Thomas Friedman. Nayef R. politics and economics have. S. as cited in V. 13 . 3. pp. in V. globalization entails both positive and negative consequences: it is both narrowing and widening the income gaps among and within nations.” “[G]lobalization [is] a process which generates flows and connections. 7-8. 14. 30-31. This was rounded off with the assertion that changes along one of these dimensions (such as economic globalization) elicited changes among the other dimensions. Anthony G. but it has significantly accelerated since the demise of the Soviet Union in 1991. and in a way that is also producing a powerful backlash from those brutalized or left behind by this new system… Globalization means the spread of free-market capitalism to virtually every country in the world. Kumar. 1999). David Held. at any rate. so that human lives are increasingly played out in the world as a single place.” “Globalization refers to processes whereby social relations acquire relatively distanceless and borderless qualities. Daly. and political globalization.hawaii. It is the effective erasure of national boundaries for economic purposes. “Global Legal Interaction and Present-Day Patterns of Globalization”. Ray Kiely and Phil Marfleet. 1999). compiled by Fred W.edu/~fredr/glotexts.htm.’” Majid Tehranian.” All copyrights are reserved by the authors. 1998). in some sense. May 13. faster. 1998). nation-states and technologies to a degree never witnessed before . Globalisation and the Third World (London: Routledge. in J. but between global regions.globalpolicy. “Globalization Texts. The Globalization of World Politics. as I shall conceive of it in what follows. Wolf. Vol. mainly by free trade and free capital mobility. news. “…free movement of goods. as cited in M. 1998. intergovernmental organizations (IGOs). 14. The Lexus and the Olive Tree (New York: Farrar. continents and civilizations.” “Globalization is a process that has been going on for the past 5000 years. University of Hawaii.). Concepts and Terms”. McGrew. 1998). Global Policy Forum. see http://www. labor.hawaii. C. Al-Rodhan Ambassador Gérard Stoudmann Definitions of Globalization: A Comprehensive Overview and a Proposed Definition George Modelski. 98. compiled by Fred W. from the cultural to the criminal. intensifying and diminishing political domination. What was many becomes one. Riggs. deepening and speeding up of worldwide interconnectedness in all aspects of contemporary social life. about economic interdependence. 30. Quanto Financial Technology. 2003.). Baylis and S. as cited in G. p. pp. Hayek and Keynes)”. p. October 10.net/brendan. 2000. A. “Glossary”. in ways which involve some interdependence. Nayef R. Brendan Richards. “Glossary – G”. An Introduction to International Relations (New York: Oxford University Press. September 26. “…a phenomenon by which economic agents in any given part of the world are much more affected by events elsewhere in the world. 115. This term combines two aspects of the work: internationalization (enabling the product to be used without language or culture barriers) and localization (translating and enabling the product for a specific locale). Scholte.” “‘Globalization project’: an emerging vision of the world and its resources as a globally organized and managed free trade / free enterprise economy pursued by a largely unaccountable political and economic elite. No. 1/2. Stuart Hall. Gaburro and E. ”The Globalization of World Politics”.com/doc_en/e0013glo. p. (n. a loss in the degree of control exercised locally… and in culture. Transformation and Resistance (Princeton: Princeton University Press. Fall 2000. O’Boyle.however the word is understood .” Ulrich Beck.virgin. Elliott. 2 ed. the dominant form of globalization means a historical transformation: in the economy. Issue No. 1-16. p. NGOs and the Multilateral System”. Pavis Lecture. “Freedom and the Market (An Analysis of the Anti-globalisation Movement from the Perspective of the Theoretical Foundation of the Evaluation of the Dynamics of Capitalism by Palanyi. pp.gu.edu. banks. 86.org. cities and transport spread over the surface of earth. 46. Smith (eds. Jan Aart Scholte. manufacturing. Mittelman. “Software Internationalisation Glossary of Unicode Terms”.htm.d. McMichael. “De-territorialization – or… the growth of ‘supraterritorial’ relations between people. Al-Rodhan Ambassador Gérard Stoudmann Definitions of Globalization: A Comprehensive Overview and a Proposed Definition Emanuel Richter.” “Globalization . “Norms for Evaluating Economic Globalization”. Background to Globalisation (Bombay: Center for Education and Documentation. The Globalisation Syndrome.html. 2000. 2000). 14. p. see http://www.globalizacija. labouring and farming populations. 348. see http://freespace. 79-105. p.equanto. “The Cosmopolitan Perspective: Sociology of the Second Age of Modernity”. 1. 12 “Die Globalisierung…global networking that has welded together previously disparate and isolated communities on this planet into mutual dependence and unity of ‘one world. A Global nd Perspective.Dr. of livelihoods and modes of existence. pp. in politics. 14 .’” (translated from German) “Tendency of integration of national capital markets. 15. October 19. Development and Social Change. “The Multicultural Question”.htm. The Globalization of World Politics. Globalization – A Critical Introduction (London: Macmillan Press. Anne Krueger.au/Events/JBL/JBL00. fields and forests. 20002005. 6-7.cis. “Trading Phobias: Governments.” “…it is a hegemonizing process in the proper Gramscian sense. 1999). a devaluation of a collectivity’s achievements… Globalization is emerging as a political response to the expansion of market power… [It] is a domain of knowledge.” “A process in which activities are organised on a global not national scale. (London: Pine Forge Press.richards/glossary/glossa ry. Nikitin and John E. see http://www. governments.” “As experienced from below.htm. The Seventeenth Annual John Bonython Lecture. pp. January/March 2000. March 2000. British Journal of Sociology. 95-118.au/~davidt/cit3611/glossary. James H. Vol. and marketing software products that are intended for worldwide distribution. 2000). The Forum for Social Economics. 51.htm. p.” Media Studies Learning Web. see http://www. 3.com/glossary/g. Australia. Vol. and which are often instantaneous around the world.). 2000. “The process of developing. Melbourne. J. International Journal of Social Economics. as cited in J. P.implies the weakening of state sovereignty and state structures. 2000).” Pavel V.F. 2000). see http://www.” All copyrights are reserved by the authors. Jha Avinash.” “…integration of national economies leading to the notion of a borderless global or planetary economy… an interwoven net of factories. Griffith University. Walton Hall Campus of the Open University in Milton 13 Keynes.” “…globalization is… the establishment of the global market free from sociopolitical control.cit. 9. Global Political Economy (Princeton: Princeton University Press. The Coming of Globalization: Its Evolution and Contemporary Consequences (Houndmills. 2001.org/economicpolicy/globalization/.to use Robertson’s term. p.” “…a process of cross-cultural interaction. “China Globalization. (London: Routledge. Vilashini Cooppan.ucs.). technological and political forces.com/doc_en/e0013glo. political and cultural structures and processes arising from the changing character of the production. to mutual benefit. Malcolm Waters.” “Globalization is the latest stage in a long accumulation of technological advance which has given human beings the ability to conduct their affairs across the world without reference to nationality.” “…the integration of markets on a worldwide scale and could eventually mean worldwide standards or practices for product quality.mun. Nayef R. January 14. it must relativize itself. social. 9. The World Bank Group. political. 15 . p. (London: Routledge. Baylis and S. time of day or physical environment.edu/ant2100/GlossaryCultAnt. 364. 2001). Robert Gilpin. colonization and cultural replication.globalizacija. 2. 2001).pdf. However. see http://www. Smith (eds. and design. pp. 2001).worldbank.com/doc_en/e0013glo. Symploke. MOST Annual Report 2001. Issue 1-2. and the IMF”.anthro.ht m. exchange.unesco. “The Globalization of World Politics”. social. cultural. service. Globalization. An Introduction to International Relations (New York: Oxford University Press. 14-15. Wayne State University.globalizacija. see http://www. United Nations Educational. see http://www.org/most/most_ar_part1c.” “[T]he key idea by which we understand the transition of human society into the third millennium. 2 ed.Dr. with somebody on the other side of the world.” “…it is nothing but ‘recolonisation’ in a new garb. and transformation. “Globalization can be defined as a set of economic.” Jain Neeraj. pricing. see http://www. “…the intensification of worldwide social relations which. nd nd “Globalization can be defined as the increasing interaction among and integration of diverse human societies in all important dimensions of their activities--economic. 2001.” All copyrights are reserved by the authors. 2001.” “Globalization is the direct consequence of the expansion of European culture across the planet via settlement. “The integration of the world economy. Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).htm.” “[I]t is the process of world shrinkage. Globalisation or Recolonisation (Pune: Elgar. p. “World Literature and Global Theory: Comparative Literature for the New Millennium”. Robert Sexty. The Globalization of World Politics.wayne. 15-43. 2001). “Canadian Business in the New Stakeholder Economy Glossary”. pp.org/external/np/speeches/2001/011401. p. of distances getting shorter. 2001). The Race to the Top: The Real Story of Globalization (US: Cato Institute. Jan Aart Scholte. Faculty of Business Administration.htm. Basingstoke: Palgrave. 6. p. technological. so that human lives are increasingly played out in the world as a single place. Al-Rodhan Ambassador Gérard Stoudmann Definitions of Globalization: A Comprehensive Overview and a Proposed Definition Eduardo Aninat. see http://www. 1.” “…globalization refers to processes whereby many social relations become relatively delinked from territorial geography. Anthropology Department. 2 ed. government authority.htm .F. 6-7. Globalization. 2001.” Memorial University of Newfoundland.” Richard Langhorne. 2001). Malcolm Waters. April 4. in J.htm. The Foundation for Globalization Cooperation’s Second Globalization Forum. see http://www. pp. speech by the Deputy Managing Director of the IMF. it does not imply that every corner of the planet must become Westernized and capitalist but rather that every set of social arrangements must establish its position in relation to the capitalist West . 2001. consumption and trade of goods and assets that comprise the base of the international political economy. It is also bound up intrinsically with the pattern of capitalist development as it has ramified through political and cultural arenas. see http://www1. p. things moving closer.ca/~rsexty/business1000/glossary/G. It pertains to the increasing ease with which somebody on one side of the world can interact. and religious. 2001).imf. 15. Vol.” “Globalization – the growing integration of economies and societies around the world. link distant localities in such a way that distant events and powers penetrate local events. through economic. Thomas Larsson. in P. “Glossary”.htm. this has been the great challenge of pluralism: the breakdown of taken-for-granted traditions and the opening up of multiple options for beliefs. finally. especially developing countries.” (italics in original) “…a process of intensifying social relations on a worldwide scale that results in an increasing disjunction between space and time. p. Chowdhury. p. Globalization and Postcolonial Theory in the Age of Endless War”. p.globalizacija. The term sometimes also refers to the movement of people (labor) and knowledge (technology) across international borders. technology. “3. I do not think it unduly confusing to use the same word to mean three different things. Huntington (eds. The International Monetary Fund. to describe the strictly political phenomenon of falling government-imposed barriers to international flows of goods.). second. “1. “Globalization: Threat or Opportunity”.htm. 21 September 2003. p. growth of transnational corporations and their growing dominance over national economies. 2002).” “…development of global financial markets. Since I contend that globalization in the first sense is due primarily to globalization in the second sense.umich. July 2002. au fond.org/feature/criminalbehavior.” (italics in original) Bena Internet Publishing Services. 62. 2001. and that globalization in the second sense is primarily due to globalization in the third sense. David Harvey. see http://www. Journal of Democracy. 275. Critical Critique. All copyrights are reserved by the authors. Robert O. such as an increased role for large corporations (MNCs) in the world economy and increased intervention into domestic policies and affairs by international institutions such as the IMF.org/external/np/exr/ib/2000/041200. “Democracy in Real Time”. George Soros. services. 2002. and trade between nations. to describe the much broader political phenomenon of the global spread of marketoriented policies in both the domestic and international spheres.” “…three distinct but interrelated senses: First. Wolf. and prosecution of criminals. see http://www.edu/~alandear/glossary/g.html. 2002. Keohane. Why Globalization Works (London: Yale University Press. “Globalization and Global Trends in Criminal Behavior”. see http://wwwpersonal. and capital. Al-Rodhan Ambassador Gérard Stoudmann Definitions of Globalization: A Comprehensive Overview and a Proposed Definition Alan Deardorff. 16. detection. Power and Governance in a Partially Globalized World (London: Routledge. March 2002. of the perduring challenge of modernization. Berger and S. p. the term sometimes refers to the domination of world economic affairs and commerce by the United States. the result of human innovation and technological progress. No. Zaki Laïdi. 14-15.htm#II. Among countries outside the United States. Also used to encompass a variety of other changes that were perceived to occur at about the same time. It is not a distortion to say that this amounts to the great challenge of enhanced freedom for both individuals and collectivities. Spaces of Hope (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. There are also broader cultural. to describe the economic phenomenon of increasing integration of markets across political boundaries (whether due to political or technological causes). Brink Lindsey. Winter 2006. ideas. No. political and environmental dimensions of globalization that are not covered here.Dr.” “Economic ‘globalization’ is a historical process. “2. n. values and lifestyles.com/ewinters/Glossary. 3. 1. 16 . see http://www.bwwsociety. 15. pp. WTO. a continuation. “…globalization describes a trend of increasing transnational flows and increasingly thick networks of interdependence. 2002). 144. p. cooperation.com/doc_en/e0013glo. The increasing world-wide integration of markets for goods. p.imf.” “Globalization can be defined as a process by means of which most of the world's developed countries and some of the developing countries aim to improve inter alia the free flow of information. 68-79.13. On the cultural level. money. “Glossary of International Economics”. Bi-monthly Journal. “Introduction: The Cultural Dynamics of Globalization”. services and capital that attracted special attention in the late 1990s. It refers to the increasing integration of economies around the world. 2002). “Interrogating ‘Newness’.bena.” Peter Berger. p. see http://www.F. particularly through trade and financial flows. 69.” (italics in original) “…if the word ‘globalization’ signifies anything about our recent historical geography..” “…globalization is. 13. and. 2002). On Globalization. Nayef R.. albeit in an intensified and accelerated form.html. 54. as cited in K. Many Globalizations: Cultural Diversity in the Contemporary World (Oxford: Oxford University Press. Inc. and World Bank.” “…a process of creating a product or service that will be successful in many countries without modification. it is most likely to be a new phase of exactly the same underlying process of the capitalist production of space. Vol. as cited in M. Against the Dead Hand: The Uncertain Struggle for Global Capitalism (New York: John Wiley & Sons. Jacob van der Westhuizen. Biblioteque: World Wide Society (BWW). 2004). University of Michigan. exchange. nl/cheps/documenten/thesisbeerkens. Collins and C. p. The Humanities in Ruins”. “Culture and Globalization. see http://schools. “Used for transnational influences on culture. see http://lib.c fm.S. labor. CR: The New Centennial Review. see http://www.stm. labour. multiculturalism. and cosmopolitanism. 2003. conflicted. especially in the area of telecommunications. and capital. 2005. norms. University of California. growth of international investment (foreign investment) and international migration.” “The term ‘globalisation’ has been widely used to describe the increasing internationalisation of financial markets and of markets for goods and services. April 15. diffusion and expansion of transnational flows of people. No. solidarity) become disembedded from their spatial context (mainly the nation-state) due to the acceleration. 2004. Poverty and Inequality (Brookings Institution. “Global Opportunities and Institutional Embeddedness.F. 91-115. 11. flexibilisation.html. and a conception of that world as a fluid.utwente. in S. interconnected. Higher Education Consortia in Europe and Southeast Asia”. 2003. ideology. 30.. No. Al-Rodhan Ambassador Gérard Stoudmann Definitions of Globalization: A Comprehensive Overview and a Proposed Definition Giuseppe Gaburro and Edward O’Boyle. Collins and C. “Editors’ Summary”.).” “Globalization is the moment of mass migration.ucr. see http://minneapolisfed.” “The world is shrinking thanks to advancing technology. Riverside Library. All copyrights are reserved by the authors. OECD Handbook on Economic Globalisation Indicators (OECD. Globalisation refers above all to a dynamic and multidimensional process of economic integration whereby national resources become more and more internationally mobile while national economies become increasingly interdependent. Vol. Media Services. markets. finance. 2004.edu/depts/acquisitions/YBP%20NSP%20GLO SSARY%20EXTERNAL%20revised6-02. The Canadian Government. 94. 2003.cbe. xiv. 1/2. politics. Vol. Modernism/Modernity.” (italics in original) “…the movement across international borders of goods and factors of production. Globalization”. No. University of Twente. Graham. see http://www. They carry out their economic affairs as if the boundaries which define the nation-state do not exist. “The term ‘globalization’ describes the increased mobility of goods. technology and capital throughout the world. U. Vol. images and information. Geopolitics. culture. “Channels From Globalization to Inequality: Productivity World Versus Factor World”. Calgary Board of Education.” Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. “Norms for Evaluating Economic Globalization”. economics. 3. H.gc. Beerkens. pp. its pace has increased with the advent of new technologies.” “The process of making something worldwide in scope or application. massification. “By economic globalization we mean the practice of economic agents (business enterprises. J. services.html. International Journal of Social Economics. especially illustrating global patterns or trends. 2004). Graham (eds. etc.Dr. or. Nayef R. services.bbc. M. Although globalization is not a new development. Globalization. pp. see http://canadianeconomy. 2005.ca/english/economy/globalizati on. 2004-2005. and finance companies) working in different countries and serving the world market without a prevailing national base. values. BBC News.pdf.co. p. 97. and increased creation of technology among countries. 3. see http://news.” Melba Cuddy-Keane.” “The generalized expansion of international economic activity which includes increased international trade. M. Depending on what you read. 2004.. the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank often generate large demonstrations. “The world-wide interconnectedness between nation-states becomes supplemented by globalisation as a process in which basic social arrangements (like power. p. 539-558. “Modernism. and they grow not because they are supported or protected by the nation-state but through their own efforts.edu/press/books/chapter_1/brookings tradeforum2004. p. and dynamic whole.ab. as cited in S. politics. “Financial Terms E-J”. 17 . products.p df. January 17.” “Cultural globalization is distinguished by a consciousness of dwelling in the world. 553. Globalization is the increasing world-wide integration of markets for goods. G. Meetings of bodies such as G8. this increasingly interconnected global marketplace is either the best or the worst thing to happen.” William Easterly. banks. p. Brookings Trade Forum. “Essay Contest Glossary”. 2. citizenship. These agents change their location between national territories on the basis of opportunities for growth and profit. 10. pp.php.uk/1/hi/programmes/working_lunch/guid es/glossary/1496844. Imre Szeman. rights. 95-118.org/econed/essay/topics/glossary05.brookings. J. “Approval Plan Glossary”.” OECD. 2005).ca/logistics/g. identity. the use of a common language for scientific communication. These global networks are creating a shrinking world where local differences and national boundaries are being subsumed into global identities.stile. No. “Glossary” from J. Webster’s Online Dictionary. superior global sites are those that enrich the cultural elements appropriately in each locale. knowledge. globalization of production. and scientific trends that directly affect higher education and are largely inevitable in the contemporary world.htm. Nayef R.org/glossary_search.org/nccq/glossary. “Generally defined as the network of connections of organisations and peoples are across national.e. see http://www.Dr. 2. it refers to the whole problem of making any product or service global. 2006. Globalization includes the process by which site development. “Globalization and the University: Realities in an Unequal World”. The Business of Tourism Management (Prentice Hall Publisher. 14 Pascal Lamy. control balances of trade and exchange rates. in particular. update processes. or the ‘global assembly line. geographic and cultural borders and boundaries. Within the field of tourism.wto.). “Glossary of Web Site Globalization Terminology”.” “Globalization can be defined as a historical stage of accelerated expansion of market capitalism. Globalization Research Center. consultants.html.websters-onlinedictionary. products and services across borders.uk/cbs/staff/beech/BOTM/Glos sary. ideas.” “[T]he broad economic.cas.usf. with simultaneous release in all markets. 2006. see http://colours.’ This has given transnational corporations power beyond nation-states.html.” “It refers to international exchange or sharing of labour force. for full text see http://www. Colours of Resistance. Occasional Papers on Globalization. globalisation is also viewed in terms of the revolutions in telecommunications. 2006. Altbach. 2005). set regulations. and workflow are engineered to provide a comprehensive framework for cost-effective multilingual site development and maintenance .ac. 2005. 2006. production. and the imperatives of society’s mass demand for higher education…” “In the translation/localization business marketplace. etc.” “Growth to a global or worldwide scale. and capital. the expansion of production by a firm to many countries around the world.” All copyrights are reserved by the authors.htm. It has also been defined as a process by which nationality becomes increasingly irrelevant in global production and consumption. or manage domestic economic policy. Sometimes achieved by neutralizing the cultural elements.coventry. “The increasing integration of world markets for goods.kwymca. 17 16 web Agricultural Trade Policies and Issues. see http://www. services.org/faq/definitions. It has also weakened the ability of workers to fight for better wages and working conditions from fear that employers may relocate to other areas. Open Internet Lexicon. Vol. see http://www.agtrade. Web site globalization means more than just making one web site respond to the different language and regional requirements of the browser.F. 1. 18 .openinternetlexicon. see http://www." Philip G. 2006.html. web resource accessed March 21. Coventry University. and has weakened any nation's ability to control corporate practices and flows of capital.pdf. 15 “Globalization is a term used to refer to the expansion of economies beyond national borders.org/English/news_e/sppl_e/sppl16_e.incorporating overseas offices. These phenomena include information technology in its various manifestations. like the one experienced in the 19th century with the industrial revolution. speech made on January 30.mahost.edu/globalresearch/PDFs/Altbach. It is a fundamental transformation in societies because of the recent technological revolution which has led to a recombining of the economic and social forces on a new territorial dimension.com/Glossary/GlobalGlossa ry. web resource accessed March 21. finance and transport that are key factors currently influencing the nature and pace of growth of tourism in developing nations. see http://www. Al-Rodhan Ambassador Gérard Stoudmann Definitions of Globalization: A Comprehensive Overview and a Proposed Definition Coventry Business School.cfm. University of South Florida.htm. resource accessed March 21. web resource accessed March 21. see http://www.” Young Men’s Christian Association (YMCA). translators. i. technological.org/definition/english/gl/globalisation. Chadwick (eds. 2006. Beech and S. January 13.. “Humanising Globalization”. E Marketing. web resource accessed May 24.no/terminology.investorwiz. rather than individual continents or landscapes.hsewebdepot. environmental interdependence of different places around the world.htm. “Glossary”.html. see http://wps.g.” “Globalisation is a more advanced form of internationalisation that implies a degree of functional integration between internationally dispersed economic activities. web resource accessed March 21. 2006. 2006. web resource accessed March 21. see http://hhhknights. “Glossary: Economic Systems and Development”. 19 . Nayef R.hants. with strange bedfellows on all sides). 2006. political. Pearson Education. HSE Web Depot.takebackwisconsin.ht m.” “A set of processes leading to the integration of economic.HTML. and social systems across geographical boundaries.” “The increasing economic.edu/academics/global/CONCEPTS. 2006. Al-Rodhan Ambassador Gérard Stoudmann Definitions of Globalization: A Comprehensive Overview and a Proposed Definition Take Back Wisconsin. cultural. see http://www. Norwegian Language Technology. see http://portal.” web “…the movement toward markets or policies that transcend national borders. It describes the idea that the world is becoming a single global market. web resource accessed March 21. see http://www. multidimensional process of worldwide change. 18 “A relatively new word that is commonly used to describe the ongoing.emarketing.” “People around the globe are more connected to each other than ever before.html.” SILK. Ripon College. web resource accessed March 21. (All aspects. political. including its nature. 25 24 23 22 “Development of extensive worldwide patterns of economic relationships between nations. see http://www.com/glossary. 2006. see http://www. web resource accessed March 21.htm.F. All copyrights are reserved by the authors. web resource accessed March 21. web resource accessed May 24. It describes the idea that cultures are blending and mixing and where cultural icons and values from dominant Northern cultures are being adopted in the South.org/imstool/GEMI.’" “Tendency toward a worldwide investment and business environment. “Glossary”.ie/resources/glossary.” “Globalization refers to [t]he widening.htm. web resource accessed March 21. It is synonymous with Internationalisation. deepening and speeding up of worldwide interconnectedness in all aspects of contemporary life.htm. 2006. USA.htm.com/wps/media/objects/213/218150/glo ssary.php. Prentice Hall.wcit. causes and effects are hotly disputed. 2006. 21 20 19 “Referring to the world economy and the world markets.prenhall.uk/folders/gcse_revision_ guide/glossary/page_1.ripon. 2006. web resource accessed May 24. see http://www. “Important Concepts in Global Studies”.bridgemary.” Bridgemary Community Sports College. Killenn. It describes the idea that time and space have been shrunk as a result of modern telecommunications technologies which allow almost instantaneous communication between people almost anywhere on the planet.sch. see http://www.uk/recruitmentcandidates/recruitment-glossary. cultural.com/geo/4/agterms. International communication is commonplace. Texas. Nike and McDonalds. “Terminology”. see http://www. resource accessed March 21. 2006. see http://www.” “[noun] Globalisation is the process of preparing software for use in any language and cultural environment either by designing it to be usable in this way or by adding facilities to existing software to facilitate subsequent localization.” Stanlake Search.” and Harker Heights High School.scottishenterprise. is considered as 'our home' and that some human activities can have a negative effect on people and environments far from their source or have an negative effect on the planet as a whole (UNESCO). page is published by Julie Kay Smithson. Goods and services produced in one part of the world are increasingly available in all parts of the world. while at the same time unique ethnic differences are being strengthened and local identities are being exerted.Dr. It describes that idea that the planet as a whole. 2006. 26 “…an industry or corporation acting on a global scale with manufacturing bases in several countries. web resource accessed March 21.co.bibliotekivest.com/sedotcom_home/help/help-glossary.htm.org/tradeis/glossary. This phenomenon has been titled ‘globalisation. 2006. see http://www. and the integration of national capital markets. Washington Council on International Trade.nsf/WEBDocs/ Glossary. Investor Wiz. E.com/Documents/Glossary. International travel is more frequent. demographic. Scottish Enterprise. 2006.stanlake. Information and money flow more quickly than ever. 30. The Forum for Social Economics. legislation. letters.html for further information.). see http://colours. Lausanne. “Coping with Globalization: The Need for Research Concerning the Local Response to Globalization in Developing Countries”. p. 1/2. 115. 13 In 2001. See http://www. or any materials which will help in the cause to Take Back Wisconsin. Centre for the Study of Higher Education. Issue 2. see http://www. We aim to present the results on recent issues in a way that is understandable to a general audience. p.com/. The Globalization of World Politics. 1992). pp.ca/yorkint/global/conference/canada/pape rs/Simon-Marginson. 2 See http://www. 15. 1997). 62. “The Globalization of Nothing”. Our goal is to reflect current Internet and Web usage in many countries. 95118. in Alan Scott (ed. 327. 4.” Please see http://www. Gessner and A. Larsson. “‘Globalization’ means the enhancement of the worldwide or pan-European spheres of action. Monash University. 2003. Al-Rodhan Ambassador Gérard Stoudmann Definitions of Globalization: A Comprehensive Overview and a Proposed Definition Simon Marginson. 1-16. in Alan Scott (ed. 300. as cited in V. 5 R.org. 1 20 . “Freedom and the Market (An Analysis of the Anti-globalisation Movement from the Perspective of the Theoretical Foundation of the Evaluation of the Dynamics of Capitalism by Palanyi.yorku. It has potentially transformative effects within nations. 1996). Nayef R. 10. Hayek and Keynes)”. Summer-Fall 2003. 17 From their webpage: “The purpose of Agtrade. p. Vol. Globalization and Postcolonial Theory in the Age of Endless War”. 15 From their website. An Introduction to International Relations (New York: Oxford University Press. Anthony G. University of Melbourne. 2003. 9 A. as cited in K.com/index. 2. May 26-28. “Definitions of Globalization: A Comprehensive Overview and A Proposed Definition”. 2000. p.). 2003. 4 This quote is part of our definitions table.). p.” The site is maintained by the Department of Agriculture Economics and Rural Sociology at Penn State University in cooperation with the International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium (IATRC).open. 137. No. Australia. SAIS Review.). available at http://www. as well as remaking the common environment in which they are suited and they relate to each other. 10. Budak (eds. 14. Vol. E.Dr. All copyrights are reserved by the authors. p. 2006. 1.mahost.takebackwisconsin. Cox. C. Al-Rodhan and Gérard Stoudmann.openinternetlexicon. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies. 1998). Ethnicity. “Global Legal Interaction and Present-Day Patterns of Globalization”. as cited in G.” Please see http://www. Kumar. pp. see http://www. Gaburro and E.ch/e/publications/Globalisation/index. in J. 87-111. in V. 7 G.F. July 1. and to allow the public to ‘share’ in this information. Geneva Centre for Security Policy. International Journal of Social Economics. Winter 2006. Emerging Legal Certainty: Empirical Studies on the Globalization of Law (Ashgate: Dartmouth Publishing Company.agtrade. 9. see http://www. Vol. the citation that appears here is active as of the date of publication.org/.uk/socialsciences/sociology. pp. pp. as cited in RAWOO Netherlands Development Assistance Research Council. p. However. The public and organizations within the state are encouraged to submit any valuable articles.pdf. 190. Nayef R. “The Multicultural Question”. “Norms for Evaluating Economic Globalization”. Appadurai.twnside. p. Ritzer.gcsp. 8 R. p. p.htm. 2006. 16 The definition that appears on this site was adopted from “Workinfonet. 12 Quanto Financial Technology is “an international venture with the goal to create the premier center of competence in Financial Software in Romania. S. multiracial politics in the movement against global capitalism. 11 C. Kumar. Cultural Critique.” References P. and Globalization”. 1999). Baylis and S. as cited in J. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies. McGrew.not for profit . Fall 2000. 23. 2001). p. No.website. correspondence. Kilminster. Publication No. A.com/. 14.” “Globalization is a process that encompasses the causes. 20. For more information. The purpose is to provide a ‘Portal Depository’ of collected materials from around the state. Elliott.” For more information. The Race to the Top: The Real Story of Globalization (U. V. 3 T.sg/. 10 Appears in our definitions table. Chowdhury. pp. 87-111. course. a paper by the same name. 257. Smith (eds. “Wider Horizons with Larger Details: Subjectivity. 189-200. paper for International Symposium on Sources of Innovation in Multilateralism. p. “The Globalization of World Politics”. Vol. pp. and consequences of transnational and transcultural integration of human and non-human activities. “Interrogating ‘Newness’.” which is inaccessible at this time. Monash Centre for Research in International Education. 126-161. No. 1997).ac. but it originally appeared in Kenichi Ohmae. With Some Reference to the Case of Australia”. S.F. A. The Borderless World: Power and Strategy in the Global Marketplace (London: HarperCollins. “A Critical st Methodology of Globalization: Politics of the 21 Century?”. n. The dictionary will be open for all who are building multilingual web sites or single-language web sites. 6 st V. “Multilateralism and the Democratization of World Order”. p. A. 14 “The Open Internet Lexicon (OIL) is an initiative to build a dictionary of Web terms (words and short phrases) in many languages. Scholte. news releases. The Limits of Globalization: Cases and Arguments (London: Routledge.” For further information. O’Boyle.org is to educate the interested public about current agricultural trade policy issues.org/. Nikitin and J. “Colours of Resistance (COR) is a grassroots network of people who consciously work to develop anti-racist. “A Critical Methodology of Globalization: Politics of the 21 Century?”. was published by the Pavis Centre. 1994. The Limits of Globalization: Cases and Arguments (London: Routledge.equanto.: Cato Institute. “Globalization as an Emergent Concept”.S. 87. 18 From their webpage: “Take Back Wisconsin is an independent . Issue 2. 98. Modernity at Large: The Cultural Dimensions of Globalization (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Poppi. “Notes on Globalization and Higher Education. Our business is focused on the recruitment needs of buy and sell-side firms in the financial markets and the technology / IT sector. funded by the Scottish executive. The sector-specific part is concentrated to a digital resource on the internet about speech technology.is a new creation within library functions.no/about_us. consular groups and individuals.wcit.gemi. health & safety performance. this is “Scotland’s main economic development agency.investorwiz. 21 . 21 E Marketing is a company that “develop[s] online marketing programs that work hand-in-hand with [a company’s] offline marketing to give [your company] customer focussed. 26 “SILK . Al-Rodhan Ambassador Gérard Stoudmann Definitions of Globalization: A Comprehensive Overview and a Proposed Definition As explained on their webpage.html.” For further information.” For further information.stanlake.” For more information. public sector and state government representatives.co. books on speech technology and general IT and delivery of services to the companies connected to the speech technology milieu at Tvildemoen in Voss. Nayef R. 20 According to their webpage.com/sedotcom_home/about_se. 25 Washington Council on International Trade is a “private. We are both a sector-specific library and a public library.html.com/index. 23 Investor Wiz is a webpage that offers a “fountain of information for novice investors.F.org/.bibliotekivest.prenhall.scottishenterprise.ie/index. 24 HSE stands for Health.” Available at http://www. see http://vig.org/.htm.Dr.uk/stanlake-profile/index.” Please see http://www. please see http://www. which states: “Business helping business improve environmental. please see http://portal.” Please see http://www.htm?siblingtoggle=1.com/. academia. in addition to be a research library.htm for further information. 19 All copyrights are reserved by the authors. Safety and Environment and is part of the Global Environmental Management Initiative (GEMI). 22 “Stanlake Search was founded in 1990 as a specialist search and selection consultancy. effective solutions that attracts the attention of your market and.emarketing. keeps it. non-profit. non-partisan association comprised of private sector businesses.” Please see http://www. shareholder value and corporate citizenship.” See http://www. more importantly. Prentice Hall is “the world’s leading publisher of academic and reference books.
Copyright © 2024 DOKUMEN.SITE Inc.