Buaya v. Polo, 169 SCRA 471 (1989) People v. Lagon, 185 SCRA 442 (1990) Palana v.People, 534 SCRA 296 (2007) Trenas v. People, G.R. No. 195002, January 25, 2012 Uy v. C.A., 276 SCRA 367 (1997) Campanano, Jr. Vs. Datuin, 536 SCRA 471 (2007) People v. Taroy, G.R. #192466, Sept. 12, 2011 People v. Gutierrez, 36 SCRA 172 (1970) People v. Pilotin, 65 SCRA 635 (1975) Mondiguing v. Abaci, G.R. No. 4131 3. November 6, 1975, 68 SCRA 14. People v. Sola, G.R. No. L-56158-64 March 17, 1981** Valdepenas v. People, 16 SCRA 871 (1966) Miranda v. Tuliao, 486 SCRA 377 + Figueroa v. People, 558 SCRA 63 (2008) Heirs of Honrales v. Honrales, 629 SCRA 423 (2010) Philippine Rabbit Bus Lines, Inc. V. People, 427 SCRA 456 (2004) Alonso, et al vs. Cebu Country Club, Inc., et al., G.R. No. Lacson v. Executive Secretary, 301 SCRA 298 (1999) + Magno v. People, 647 SCRA 362 (2011) People v. Mateo, 433 SCRA 640 (2004) People v. Abon, 545 SCRA 606 (2007) People v. Rocha, 531 SCRA 761 (2007) People v. Salome, 500 SCRA 659, Aug. 31, 2006 Tabujara III vs. People, 570 SCRA 229 (2008) Magestrado vs. People, 527 SCRA 125 (2007)+ Constantino v. Sandiganbayan, 533 SCRA 205 (2007) Villegas v. CA, 271 SCRA 148 (1997); People v. Ayochok, 629 SCRA 324 (2010) People v. Barro Sr., 338 SCRA 212 (2000); People v. Asis, 629 SCRA 250 (2010) Merciales v. C.A., 379 SCRA 345 (2002)** Mupas v. People, G.R. No. 189365, Oct. 12, 2011 Bangayan v. Go-Bangayan, G.R. No. 172777/172792, Oct. 19, 2011 Uy v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. Nos. 105965-70. March 20, Fabian vs. Desierto, 295 SCRA 470, September 16, 1998 Macalalag vs. Ombudsman, 424 SCRA 741 (2004) Office of the Ombudsman vs. Court of Appeals, Golangco vs. Fung, 504 SCRA 321 (2006) Perez vs. Office of the Ombudsman Ombudsman vs. Heirs of Margarita Ventura, 605 SCRA 1(2009) Rodriguez v. Sandiganbayan, 424 SCRA 236 (2004) Bariaga v. Sandiganbayan, 457 SCRA 301 (2005) Organo v. Sandiganbayan, 320 SCRA 684 (1994) Inding v. Sandiganbayan, 434 SCRA 388 (2004) Lacson v. Executive Secretary, supra Magno v. People, supra Ivler v. Mondest’o-San Pedro, 635 SCRA 191 (2010) People vs. Asis, 629 SCRA 250 (2010) People v. Velasco, 340 SCRA 207 (2000) ** People v. Molina, G.R Nos. 141129-33, December 14, 2001; Ong vs. Genio, 609 SCRA 188, Dec. 23 2009 Ramirez vs. Court of Appeals 71 SCRA 231 (1976) In Re: Writ of Habeas Corpus for Reynaldo de Villa that a person has exhibited an actual expectation of privacy and. 341 SCRA 25 (2000)** Why are the marijuana plants inadmissible in evidence. Katz v. to J. Diokno. 389 U. People v. (2) no showing of urgency/necessity for immediate seizure of marijuana plants. What is adopted here. Marti. Why is the exclusionary rule adopted? “It is the only practical means of enforcing the constitutional injunction against unreasonable search and seizure. 2011** (Computer in government office search) Why is this a reasonable search? -no actual subjective expectation of privacy -no separate enclosed office not shared with anyone -no claim about use of passwords or means to exclude other employees -normally has visitors in the public assistance office allowed to use the PC -there is office policy. What is the test for constitutional protection of “people. -violations against it can only be invoked against the State. .Stonehill v. October 18. abadoning the Moncado doctrine: exclusion of evidence unlawfully obtained. Whether the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution protects telephone conversations conducted in a phone booth and secretly recorded from introduction as evidence against a person? Yes. See: Polo v. even though they are located in an unfenced lot? (1) Because no warrant was secured. 20 SCRA 383 (1967).S. First.R. that the expectation be one that society is prepared to recognize as reasonable. Does it matter whether evidence is procured by State agents or private individuals. G. 193 SCRA 57 (1991). Harlan) The subjective and objective prongs of the reasonableness inquiry. David. No. 347 (1967). it is still admissible in evidence. “Computer Use Policy” (no expectation of privacy. 181881. U. on-the-spot inspections may be done) equivalent to workplace privacy policy -the computer is government property -there is a letter prompting the investigation People v.” (Justice Learned Hand) What is a fishing expedition indicative of? Absence of probable cause. for purposes of the exclusionary rule? Yes. even if they had an ample time of one day to secure it from a judge.S. What is the Moncado doctrine? That even if search and seizure is unconstitutional. -Bill of Rights does not govern relationships between individuals. second. not places” against unreasonable search and seizure? (Accdg. Valdez. -rule on unreasonable search and seizure cannot be extended to private individuals. use of passwords does not produce reasonable expectation. waiver of privacy rights. (3) that the cannabis plants were in an unfenced lot did not justify warrantless search and seizure.. Querubin.Why is there no search in this case? -here. May saturation drives be conducted without search warrants? Yes. C. 476 U. Chief of Staff 133 SCRA 800 (1984) Eb.. 181 SCRA 623 (1990). -the fact that vessel security officer is armed and tasked to maintain peace and order doesn’t render him a State agent.S 27 (2001) – Thermal Imaging device California v.A.S 207 (1986) –Aerial “naked eye” observation Dow Chemicals v. -It was carried out without government intervention. entrusted cargo to NBI. 533 U. U. Ciraolo. the private individual’s search was by virtue of standing operating procedure as precautionary measure. He does not discharge a government function to enforce the law. -mere presence of NBI agent did not convert reasonable search of private individual into a warrantless search and seizure proscribed by the Constitution -merely to look/observe that which is in plain sight is not search -THERE IS NO TRESPASS by police officers People v. 384 SCRA 525 (2002) Why is there no search in this case? -the baggage was searched by the vessel security personnel. People v. United States. Valde. 253 SCRA 699 (1996) Why are the documents and papers inadmissible between husband and wife? -marital privilege (must have consent before testifying against the other) Villanueva v. the NBI made no search and seizure. People v. 48 SCRA 349 (1972).S. -after the search by personnel. upon opening the box. U. he took samples to the NBI. Zulueta v. supra Kyllo v. 462 U.S. Bongcarawan. 476 U. De Villa. supra Burgos v. he called Philippine Coast Guard..S 227 (1986) – Aerial search using device United States v. Marti. who found shabu. Place.S 696 (1983) – Sniff Dog . supra Katz c.. Guanzon v. CA. No. Ruiz.. Malaloan v. 145 SCRA 687 (1984). United States.2d 1112 People v. 37 SCRA 823 (1971) (see Oscar Herrera’s digest p. Maxicorp. CA. Chua Ho San. 115 Wn. 2010 Roan v. supra California v. IAC. Estrada. 26.R. supra People v. 232 SCRA 249 (1994)**. 283 SCRA 159 (1997)**. G. No. supra. 752 (1969). L-69809 October 16. Umanito. Ruiz. 147 SCRA 509 (1987). 613 SCRA 98 (2010) Bache v. 308 SCRA 432 (1999). Makalintal. 438 SCRA (2004). Asuncion. 1998.R No.S. CA. supra Kho vs.S 293 (1966) “Plant” California v. G. Gomez. Canton. 2002 Gaanan vs. 265 SCRA 325 Malacat v. 571 SCRA 18 (2008) Kho v. Ruiz. 306 SCRA 70 Bache v. #172607 Oct. Aruta. Aruta. Cf. February 4. 800P. Boland.. 257 SCRA 430 (1996). supra People v. 288 SCRA 626 (1998) Manalili v.2d (1990).R. 2010 Kho v. Nolasco v. Cuizon. Asuncion. Boland. C. People v. No. People v. 2009 Bache v. 1998 People v. supra Illinois v. G. 2003 Office of the Court Administrator v. Coca.Hoffa v. Chief of Staff. G. Greenwood. Pano. 120915 April 3. supra. . Diokno.R.R. supra Burgos vs. 296 SCRA 383 (1998). Umanito. 395 U. 1986 People v. 486 U. 120915 April 3. PICOP v. Tuan. supra Roan vs. Sy Tiong Gue. 176066. Stonehill v.R. Inc.Cola v. Nolasco v.R. G. Ruiz. supra Mustang Lumber v. No. Estrada. G. Mamaril. Pano. 188 SCRA 288 (1990) People vs. 892) People v. G. 462 U. Chief of Staff. Gates. Gonzales. 291 SCRA 400 (1998). Molina G. Aruta. 176066. 280 SRCA 400 (1997). 420 SCRA 662 (2004) Tan v. supra Washington vs. CA. 613 (1983). 307 SCRA 253 (1999).R. Burgos v. April 16. Makalintal. Tuan. Chimel v. February 19. Posadas v. Makalintal. supra People v.S. People v. Nos. August 11. 269 SCRA 402 (1997). 2001** People v. 148825. December 277. supra People v. Valdez. 139 SCRA 152 (1985). Microsoft Corporation v. supra PICOP v.S 35 (1988) – Garbage search Washington vs. G. People v. No. No. August 11. supra People v. 136066-67. Asuncion. California. People v. 297 SCRA 376 (1998). Estrada. Padilla.A. supra PICOP v. Binad Chua. Greenwood. Gonzales. CA.R. People v. supra People v. CA. (nevermind) People v. supra People v. 385 U. Bache vs. CA. G. 133917.R. #172607. Barron. 2007 People v. S. Arizona v. Hill. G. 508 U. No. 136292. No. No. Von Bulow. California. No. Marti. October 2. Mago. 366 (1993) Florida v. Hicks. vs. vs. January 30. 124 Ohio St. 477 F. 472 (1971). 237 SCRA 424 (1994). No. Dec. + People v. People v. Bongcarawan.3d 1184 (9th Cir. 529 U. + People v. Arca. Finley. CA. Vinecario. + Obra v. Lo Ho Wing. 27. 2d 995 + (not yet printed) . Lacerna. 218 (1973) People vs.3d 966 (2006) U. January 15. Canton. People v. 392 U. 216 SCRA 431 (1992). 321 (1987) Horton v. People v. 65 SCRA 336 (1975). J. People vs. Carney.R. Musa. 321 SCRA 459 (1999). 496 U. Roldan v. CA. 3d 163 (2009) People v. Court of Appeals.S. Valdez. supra Malacat v. supra Delaware v. supra Esquillo v.S. Bolasa. 459 F. Malasigul. 629 SCRA 370 (2010) People v. Sitz. Schneckcloth v Bustamonte. 2002 State v.S. 1997 Valmonte v. 648 (1979). 480 U. + Coolidge v. July 11. 241 SCRA 277 (1995). Evaristo.U. Gonzales. De Villa. 2007 Polo v. supra + + People v.R. 474 F. 266 (2000) People v. 48 (1937). 65 Phil. 323 SCRA 754 (2000) People vs. 302 SCRA 490 (1990). Of State Police v. 689 (1938). Aniag vs. 386 (1985) Papa v. supra Journal Articles: U. 356 SCRA 683 (2001) + People v. Vinecario. supra People v.. 2002. 2002. 440 U. Terry v. Binad Chua. White. 234 (1966).S. L. 325 Caballes v. 420 SCRA 280 (2004). 198 SCRA 401 (1991) People v. People v. 116720. Cuizon.3d 250 State vs. + Harris v. Alvarez v. 221 (1936). 136292. Agbot. 403 U. Caballes v.S. People vs. CA. Salanguit. US.S. 471 U. 262 SCRA 255 (1996) People v.S. 178 SCRA (1989). 106 SCRA 325 (1981). 301 SCRA 668 (1999). 128 (1990) People v. Solayao. + People v. 412 U. Ohio. California V. 63 Phil. Asuncion v. 390 U. Balingan. 22 SCRA 857 (1968). People. Malmstedt. Locsin. 217 SCRA 597 (1993). 496 U. Michigan Dept. 317 SCRA 594 (1999). Encinada. Roan v. Smith. 148825. Escano. US. Court of Appeals.R.R. People v. G. 64 Phil. 496 U. 193 SCRA 122 (1990).S. 341 SCRA 24 (2000). David. January 15. 143944.S 1 (1968). 267 132 (1925). COMELEC.R. Minnesota v. Doria. CFI. Ziegler.S.S. 265 SCRA 325 Garcia v. Prouse. 420 SCRA 280 (2004) Caroll v. vs. 475 A. 444 Alabama v.S.. 2002.S. G. G. G. New Hampshire. Dickerson. 278 SCRA 561 (1997) People v.S. Lacbanes. 338 Wong Sun v.S. Casimiro. 126 S. supra Bache v.S. No.R. + PICOP v. April 22. 471 + + Nix vs. G. Villaluz. People vs. G. 80 Phil. De Gracia. 439 U. Magoncia v. 42 Phil. supra Rakes v. 270 SCRA 193 (1997). 128 SCRA 388 (1984). 233 SCRA 716 (1994). Ruiz. No. 206. Gesmundo. Ct. 253 SCRA 699 (1996) People v. 308 U. 182010. supra People vs. 2008 .. MHP Garments v. 2010 (dissent of Bersamin) Uy Kheytin v. 219 SCRA 743 (1993). 162808. 467 U.See: Zulueta v C. supra People v. Bayona. 397 SCRA 674 (2003).S. 129. Esquillo vs. 71 SCRA 356 (1976). 371 U. Arts. Stuart. U. Asuncion. Williams. Huang Zhen Hua. Bringham City v. 130. People. 439 SCRA 350 (2004) People v. Code. 128 (1978).S. 170 (1948).R. Palacio. 89”2 (1920). Gesmundo. Diokno. Villareal. Rev. People v. supra Stonehill v. 128. Galvante v. Illinois. Collector v. Pen.A. 431 People v. U. 236 SCRA 227 (1994). CA. Lapitaje. Gesmundo. August 25.S. 1943 (2006) Nardone v. Mata v.S. 2001** + People v. February 19. People. 144 SCRA 1 (1985). G.R. 194 SCRA 292 (1991). 133917. Burgos. Lumayok. 23. + Padilla v. Chua. Sequiῆo. Roberts v. Hernandez. People v. 280 SCRA 285 (1997) Okabe vs. A. 429 SCRA 685 (2004) AAA vs. 126 SCRA 463 (1983). + Umil v. People. et al. 625 SCRA 523 (2010) Allado v. 159 SCRA 599 (1988). 2000. People v. People v. 169.A. 139301. Tudtud. Jayson. Cojuangco v. Wisconsin v. 301 SCRA 475 (1999).R. + People v. Molina. 48 Phil. Court of Appeals. 254 SCRA 307 Webb vs. Del Rosario. People v. Sequino. Sandiganbayan. 2009 People v. 128822. Pasudag. People v. Doria. Demetriou. De Leon. 159 SCRA 599 (1988). Soliven v. Veloso. People v. People v. 144 SCRA 1 (1985). 301 SCRA 668 (1999) + Cadua v. People v. Villanueva. PDF. 341 SCRA 25. 287 SCRA 581 (1998). + Lim v. 412 SCRA 142 (2003). People v. C. Grey. 144 SCRA 1 (1986).3/8/05 davis. + People v. 187 SCRA 311 (1990) + Umil v. Terry v. Dec. 302 SCRA 455 (1999) People v.Sanchez v.S. 282 SCRA 166 (1997). Montilla. Abe Valdez. Pangandaman v. 2001. People v. 247 SCRA 652 + Ho vs. NIB. 217 SCRA 663 (1993). No. 2007. 626 SCRA 633 (2010) + People v. Babst v. May 4. 264 SCRA 79 (1996). Burgos. 2004 People v. Del Rosario. Valdez.] Babst. Davis. Placer v. 312 SCRA 703 (1999). People v. MTJ-06-1628. People v. No. 2002. September 29. Rodriguez.R. 129296. Mendez. People vs. 285 SCRA 703 (1998). Felix. People v. Genio. Pangandaman v. G. September 25. 609 SCRA 188. 300 SCRA 367 (1998). Ohio 392 U. Casar. C. Huang Zhen Hua. 202 SCRA 251 (1991) + Go vs. 232 SCRA 192 (1994). 147671. Mahinay. Burgos. Ramos. 264 SCRA 79 (1996). CA. 163 SCRA 332 (1988). Inting. No. NIB. 269 SCRA 402 (1997) People v. No. 341 SCRA 645 (2000). 227 SCRA 627 (1993). Vasquez. People v. 132 SCRA 31 (1984) . 1 (1968).A. People v. G. 187 SCRA 788 (1990).. 206 SCRA 138 (1992) + Larranaga v. 323 SCRA 589 (2000). Racho. People v. People v. Court of Appeals. 139 SCRA 1 (1985). Makasiar.M. November 21.A. Cf. 305 SCRA 740 (1999).R. Carbonell. Wisconsin C. C. Gutierrez. Casar.Santiago v. District 1. Ramos. Ong vs. 132 SCRA 316 (1984). G. G. Diokno. v. No.R. Zuela. Defensor. 524 SCRA 496 (2007) + Tabujara III vs. No. People v. Albior. 396 SCRA 657 (2003). 570 SCRA 229 (2008) + Gutierrez v.A. 305 SCRA 740 (1999) People v. 304 SCRA 140 (1999). June 8. 186 SCRA 184 (1990). People v. People v. 26 SCRA 310 (1968). Obrero. 320 SCRA 140 (1999).Talag vs. People v. People v. 104 S. Duero. 486 SCRA 377 (2006) Luna v. Cf. Samulde.People v. 141 SCRA 289 (1980). Reyes.R. 306 SCRA 522 (1999) People v. Figueroa. 7. People v. But cf. New York. 144 SCRA 517 (1986). People v.S. People v. Bacor. New York v. 626 SCRA 633 (2010) . 139 SCRA 349 ( 1985). 307 SCRA 1 (1999). Nicandro. People v. 613 SCRA 233 (2010) Yano vs. Cruz. 329 SCRA 684 (2000). Domantay. 401 U. 104 SCRA 379 (1981). 388 U.R. People v. 135 SCRA 465 (1985). 222 (1971). No. Wade. Pardico. 245 SCRA 677 (1995) Moncupa v. G. 2004 ** Harris v. 2008 Ilagan v. People v. Mojello. Racho. Duero. Burgos. 328 SCRA 385 (2000). People v. Obrero. People v. 430 SCRA 428 (2004) De Joya vs. CA. 269 SCRA 371 (1997). People v.S. 104 SCRA 379 (1981). Continente. 141 SCRA 233 (1986). People v. People v. Oct. Alojado. March 9. Labtan. People v. 320 SCRA 383 (1999). Velasco v. 2012** Rubrico vs. Jara. People v. People vs. People v. 144 SCRA 1 (1986). Sanchez. Tuliao. 144 SCRA 516 (1986). Arizona. People v. 305 SCRA 236 (1999). Panada v. 269 SCRA 95 (1997). Morada. People v. 141 SCRA 289 (1986). Veneracion. Ct. 309 SCRA 148 (1999). Enrile. Manalo. Gallardo. Decierdo. Ramos. 286 SCRA 207 (1998). CA. 180906. Marquez.Arroyo. 332 SCRA 190 (2000). Galit. Muleta. Gumabon v. People v. Cf. People v. No. 335 SCRA 299 (2000). United States v. Quidato Jr. Plaza. Gamboa v. 106 SCRA 159 (1981). 307 SCRA 362 (1999). Obrero. Quarles. Jr. 297 SCRA 1 (1998). 328 SCRA 417 (2000). No. People v. June 19. Miranda v. of National Defense v. 339 SCRA 1 (2000). Pavillare. 37 SCRA 429 (1971).. Continente. 1988. Tan. People v. Galit. Enrile. 384 U. 612 SCRA 347 (2010) Razon. 218 (1967). Caguioa. 336 SCRA 632 (2000). 481 SCRA 376 (2006) Miranda vs. People v. June 27. 323 SCRA 218 (2000). 436 (1966). Andan. People v.R. Navla v. Macapagal. 339 SCRA 1 (2000). 332 SCRA 190 (2000). 141 SCRA 289 (1986) People v. Director of Prisons. People v. G. Jara. G. 184467. Tagitis. Rondero. People v. Alimpoos v. People v. 2626 (1984). 149 SCRA 496 (1987). 135 SCRA 465 (1985).. 332 SCRA 190 (2000).S. Canoy”. 612 SCRA 685 (2010) People v. 145566. Sapal. Nicandro. Sec. People v. Vs. 590 (1975). Chief of Police. Bagcal v. . 80 Phil. Brown v.S. 187 SCRA 311 (1990) Umil v. 422 U. Villaraza. Sayo v.Umil v. 859 (1948). Ramos. 202 SCRA 251 (1991). Ramos. 120 SCRA 525 (1983). Illinois. March 17. September 29. Catral. Teehankee v. 486 SCRA 377 (2006) Cortes v. 129670. Tuppal. Manallo. 396 SCRA 443 (2003). Nitcha. 217 SCRA 663 (1993).A. G. Donato. No. 77 Phil. G. 41 SCRA 1 (1971). L-23599. No. San Diego. Sandiganbayan. 4 SCRA 184 (1971).. Miranda v. 198 SCRA 130 (1991). People v. Pasciolan. 2010 . People v. No. Feburary 1.R. 147785 (resolution of the Supreme Court En banc dated May 5. 756 (1946). Serapio v. 2000. 55 (1946). People v. 1967 (EB) Defensor-Santiago v. Director of Prisons. 240 SCRA 283 (1995) People v. No. Enage. 395 SCRA 72 (2003). G. Judge. Leviste vs C. 252 SCRA 613 (1995). Enrile v. Vasquez. Narisima. Abaῆo. Bernabe. Siazon v. 2 SCRA 888 (1961) (EB) Villaseῆor v. 21 SCRA 321 (1967). Lavides v.R. Abaῆo.R. 76 Phil. Cortes v. 279 SCRA 1 (1997).R. Villaseῆor v. Court of Appeals. Tuliao. 189122.Feliciano v. 400 SCRA 129 (2003). Ocampo v. Mamolo v. Dela Camara v. People v. 26 SCRA 522 (1988). 279 SCRA 1 (1997). G. Perez. Catral. People v. People v. Sandiganbayan. People v. Villaflor v. Fernandez. January 20. Tubongbanua. 663 SCRA 272 (Jan. Berialies. People v. 146458. G. Inc. 2003. vs. Jr.. 142773.R. 179 SCRA 740 (1989) People v. Viver. Donato. 322 SCRA 160 (2000) Socrates v. Lagon. People. January 24. Galigao. No. 527 SCRA 125 (2007) Trinidad v. September 2. 12 Phil. Rocaberte v. Delim. U. Molero. supra ** People v. No. 591 SCRA 466 (2009) Teehankee v. Fernandez. Balitaan v. Losano. 314 SCRA SCRA 460 (1999). People. Buayaban.R. January 14. CA. Socrates v. 125 SCRA 607 (1987) People v. People v. Jabson. Vs. 395 SCRA 366 (2003). Guevarra. People. Pardilla. 121 SCRA 733 (1983). 124736. 102007. Pardilla. April 11. People v. CA. Purisima. 162 SCRA 191 (1988) People v. Lizada. CA. Lantion. Janiola. 2012) People v. Matilde v. No. 66 SCRA 38 (1975). Madali. 417 SCRA 371 (2003) Patula v. People v. People v. G. 68 SCRA 456 (1975). No. 76 SCRA 42 (1977) Republic v. 539 SCRA 415 (2007)** People vs. 144 SCRA 397 (1986). 127122.R. Sandiganbayan. Ladrillo. Vasquez v. Nos.S. 171 SCRA 277 (1989). People v. 183 SCRA 511 (1990). 553 SCRA 643. G. Masapol. CFI. 185 SCRA 442 (1990) Malaloan v. resolution dated September 29. 115 SCRA 729 (1982). Madayag. Ilarde. 27 Phil. 253 SCRA 773 (1996) People v.R. Javier Dichao. G. 402 SCRA 133 (2003). Nos.Sandiganbayan. 2003. 2012) supra People v. Consing Jr. 455 SCRA 736 (2005) . 140 SCRA 425 (1985)**. Bayotas. G. Sunga. v. January 28. G. 417 SCRA 449 (2003). Lualhati. 312 SCRA 684 (1999).Secretary of Justice v. 164457. 236 SCRA 239.. 349 SCRA 104 (2001) Roberts v CA. Ocapan.R. People. 150 SCRA 607 (1987) People v. CA. Gallo. Draculan v.R. 2012 People v. 349 SCRA 194 (2001). 581 SCRA 431 (2009) ** People v. Llanto. People v. 2003** People v. Sandiganbayan. 320 SCRA 61 (1999). 86 SCRA 542 (1978) People v. People v. July 20. 414 SCRA 84 (2003) People v. G. 232 SCRA 249 (1994) People v. 663 SCRA 272 (Jan. 421 (1914). 500 SCRA 727 (2006) Matalan v. No.Batangas. 140 SCRA 425 (1985). Degamo. 140961-63. Magestrado v. Almeda v. 350 SCRA 387 (2001) Dreamwork Construction. 92 SCRA 591 (1979) ** Malto v. 2007 Lazarte.R. Office of the Ombudsman. September 21. Lopez. Villaluz. No. People v. Perez. 193 SCRA 152 (1991). 262 (1908). Valdez. 1999. People v. 254 SCRA 307 (1996) People v. 1994** Manantan v.R. 2003 People v. 400 SCRA 48 (2003) People v. Chan Toco. 143468-71. supra. G. Valdez. People v. Cruz v. 194 SCRA 145 (1991). . CA. 287 SCRA 581 (1998). Undersecretary of Justice. People v. 625 SCRA 523 (2010) Brocka v. Ty v. City Fiscal. 206 SCRA 138 (1992). Court of Appeals. COMELEC. Grey. 151 SCRA 462 (1987).Sales v. 232 SCRA 192 (1994). Velasco v. See: Ombudsman & DOJ MOA.M. 396 SCRA 703 (2003). 247 SCRA 652 (1995). 206 SCRA 138 (1992) Allado v. supra Go v CA. Mogul. Enrile. 232 SCRA 192 (1994) Doromal V. Larranaga v. 192 SCRA 183 (1990) Ty v. 2005 Rodil v. April 19. Paderanga v. Allado v. 297 SCRA 679 (1998). 93 SCRA 462 (1979). CA. Diokno. January 17. Almeda. Beriales. Pangasinan. Villon. supra. supra Leviste vs. Paderanga v. Diokno. Casaclang. RTJ-04-1879. CA. 2012 Leviste vs. 182 SCRA 388 (1990). People vs. Court of Appeals. supra Crespo v. 177 SCRA 354 (1989). Sandiganbayan. Dungog v. Go vs. NBI. v. supra Primicias v. Go vs. Sandiganbayan. Velasquez v. 137 SCRA 597 (1985). Alameda. NBI. Sandiganbayan. Sales v. 253 SCRA 773 (1996). Alonzo vs. No. 626 SCRA 575 (2010) Dimatullac v. 638 SCRA 671 (2010) Roberts v. Concepcion. Doromal v. 176 SCRA 287 (1989). CA. Garcia. 294 SCRA 396 (1998). A. Sandiganbayan. 70 SCRA 361 (1976). De Leon. 369 SCRA 293 (2001) Baytan v. 104 SCRA 362 (1981). 196 SCRA 86(1991). Sandiganbayan. supra Webb v. 254 SCRA 307 (1996). . Drilon. Sandiganbayan. Courts of Appeals. Guingona Jr. Go vs. 159 SCRA 145 (1988). 206 SCRA 138 (1992) Socrates v. Balgos v. Drilon.