Bio Generics & India

March 23, 2018 | Author: gupta1704 | Category: Biopharmaceutical, Generic Drug, Pharmaceutical Drug, Biotechnology, Medicinal Chemistry


Comments



Description

Biogenerics & India1 Contents • Biologics • Market Outlook • Leading Products • Pipeline • Biotechnology & India • • • • • • Biogenerics • • • • • Introduction Market Issues Patent Status Development Portfolio Biogenerics Factors Advantages Target Biogenerics Indian Manufacturers & Pipeline • Regulatory – Scenario US, EU & India 2 Biologics - Background  Global biologics market is estimated to be ~$ 53 billion (excluding vaccines) constituting ~9% of global pharmaceutical market. ~125 biologics currently marketed. The research and development costs associated with biologics are high because biologics are structurally complex and difficult to manufacture. Genentech, estimated that it has invested $6.4 billion in research over the last 28 years. These high costs are then passed on to consumers, who often foot bills for biologic treatments ranging anywhere from $10,000 to $25,000 a year. In some rare cases, costs can exceed $170,000 per year.     3 Biologics constituted ~9.4% of the total biopharmaceutical market Sales Estimates – 2005 $ 32.80 $32.80 US $ 549 $549 $ 52.84 $ 12.18 $12.18 $3.43 $ 3.83 $4.43 $ 4.43 EU Japan ROW •US is the largest market for biologics with >60% of global biotherapeutic sales, ROW constitutes ~8% 4 But the growth of biotech has continuously outpaced that of pharmaceuticals 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 YoY Growth in % Pharmaceuticals Biologics •23% of total industry growth in 2004 came from biotech products 5 Ref:: IMS Industry in Figures 2005; Stratycon Estimates Erythropoietin is the leading class of biologic constituting ~22% of biologic market (excl. vaccines) 12.0 10.9 Erythropoietins TNF 2005 Global Sales $ bio. 10.0 Insulin & analogs Cancer Antibodies 8.0 7.6 7.2 6.8 Interferon Beta G-CSF 6.0 Human Growth Hormone 4.0 3.8 3.8 2.3 2.2 2.1 1.3 1.1 1.0 Rec. Coagulation Factors Interferon Alpha Enzyme Replacement Antiviral Antibody Follicle Stimulating Hormones 2.0 0.0 6 Leading Biotech Products Product neulasta /neupogen mabthera/ rituxan procrit/ eprex aranesp enbrel remicade epogen neorecormon, epogin Compound PEG/FILGRASTI M Rituximab Epoetin alfa Darbepoietin alfa Etanercept Infliximab Epoetin alfa Epoetin beta Company AMGEN ROCHE/GENE NTECH j&j AMGEN AMGEN j&j AMGEN ROCHE 2005 ww Sales ($ bio.)* 3.50 3.33 3.32 3.27 2.57 2.54 2.46 1.81 Growth (Y0Y) % 31.5% 22.0% -7.0% 32.0% 42.0% 18.0% -6.0% 8.0% herceptin avonex TOTAL OF TOP 10 Trastuzumab Interferon beta-1a ROCHE BIOGEN IDEC 1.72 1.54 26.07 48.0% 8.90% 7 Monoclonal antibodies, gene therapy are constitute major proportion of biologic pipeline apart from vaccines Others Interleukins Immune based therapy Growth Factors Interferons Antisense Cellular therapy Recombinant Hormones/Proteins Gene Therapy Vaccines mAbs 62 8 9 16 18 20 21 43 46 62 # of Biologic in Development by Category 160 0 50 100 150 200 •>400 biologics in development constituting ~19% of all developments are biotech products 8 BioGenerics The biogenerics market is tipped to reach $16bn (€11.9bn) by 2011. Regulated markets are taking the next step for biosimilars. ROW countries could act as a launch pad taking products subsequently to regulated markets. The 'biogeneric' analysis problem, 2007 9 Differences between Chemical Entities and Biogenerics Chemical entities Well-defined, easy-to-characterize molecular structures with impurity profiles that depend on their synthetic route of manufacture   Biogenerics Routine chemical analysis are not sufficient to compare a biogeneric to its originator product   The demonstration of approvability In vivo safety and efficacy are for biogeneric differs from the unrelated to product origin standard generics approach as it is based on a comparability exercise rather than on demonstration of bioequivalence Need to establish on a case by case basis.  10 A tentative classification of biological therapeutics Class Example Biotech products recombinant DNA technology; controlled expression of genes coding for biologically active proteins in prokaryotes and eukaryotes including transformed mammalian cells; hybridoma and monoclonal antibody methods vaccines sera; immunoglobulins; coagulation plasma; albumin; interleukins extracted (nonbiological Vaccines Blood derivatives factors; Other products from native engineered) sources insulin; heparin and derivatives; amino acids; antibiotics obtained through fermentation; hyaluronic acid 11 Biogeneric - Market Outlook  13 of the leading biologics achieved mega-blockbuster status (i.e., exceeded $2 billion in global sales).  Those biologics that lose patent protection open an emerging opportunity for biogenerics.  Taking a global perspective, we see that a branded biologic priced at $10,000 a year may cost just $2,000 to manufacture in the U.S. or Europe.  The high prices of biologic therapies make it imperative that generic or off-patent products be marketed as options for consumers after patent and exclusivity protections for manufacturers have expired.  Europe is leading the biogeneric charge; seven biosimilars have launched there and four more were recently approved. 12 Biogeneric - Market Outlook  Worldwide interest in biogenerics is gaining momentum and is expected to reach $5.8 billion by 2012.  By 2013, at least 10 branded biologics with total sales of $15 billion will be generic and prime targets for genericization.  But first such stumbling blocks as safety, access to innovators' key intermediates, process controls, availability and access to bulk materials, specifically designed and adapted analytical procedures and validation studies must be addressed.  Also, biosimilars cannot currently be marketed in the US because there is no pathway for them to reach the market. 13 Issues surrounding Biogenerics Newer products Regulatory hurdles Technical & Issues Innovator woes quality issues 14 Selected biologics with expired patent Product Filgrastim Engerix-B Neupogen Novolin Protropin Activase Epogen, Procrit Nutropin Humatrope Avonex Intron A Humulin Compound GM-CSF Hepatitis B Vaccine G-CSF Human Insulin Growth hormone t-PA EPO-α Growth Hormone Growth Hormone Interferon b1a Interferon a2b Human Insulin GSK Company Amgen Amgen NovoNordisk Genetech Genentech/BI Amgen/J&J/Sankyo Genentech Eli Lilly Biogen Schering Plough Eli Lilly Expired 2007 2006 2006 2005 2005 2005 2004 2003 2003 2003 2002 2001 15 Biologic Drugs Losing Patent Protection 16 Markets in which Biogenerics are currently marketed Others 20% Major EU 13% Canada/ US 13% Pacific (ex Japan) 27% Eastern Europre/Baltic (e.g Lithuania) 27% Others 5% Major EU 42% Eastern Europre/Baltic (e.g Lithuania) 3% Pacific (ex Japan) 2% Markets in which pipeline biosimilars are being targeted towards 17 Canada/ US 48% Leading Generic Companies & their biogenerics portfolio Company Teva/Sicor/B TG Sandoz Pliva (+Mayne) Stada BioPartners/ LGLS BioGenerix GeneMedix Dragon Biocon Scino Pharma Scigen Wockhardt DRL Shantha Biotech Total M D M 12 9 6 D M D 7 M 9 M 3 M D M D D M D D M M D M M D D M D D M D D D 6 D D D D D D D M D M D D M M M D M EPO D CSF M Insulin HGH M M INF M tPA mAB Total 4 1 3 3 5 2 4 1 7 5 5 4 3 5 1852 D: Developing, M: Marketing Indian Biotechnology Market  The Indian biotech market has doubled in size in the past two years, reaching a value of US$ 2.08 billion in 2006-07, compared to US$ 1.45 billion in 2005-06.  The Indian market currently accounts for a little over 1.1 per cent of the global biotech market. Off the 50 odd biotech products 13 are available in India & 7 biotech drugs are indigenously developed and produced by Indian Companies.  Bio-Industry Bio-Agri Bio-Services 268 225 96 35 Bio-Informatics Bio-Pharma 1453 Biotech Industry Revenues - 2006-07(US$ million) 19 Biogenerics - India  Companies in Indian generics universe have gross margins closer to 50%. This means that an Indian generics company could enter the market, manufacture the same product, and be content to sell it at $4,000-5,000, a 50–60% discount. For example, last year Dr. Reddy’s launched a Biogeneric version of Roche’s Rituxan/Mabthera in the Indian market at Rs. 20,000 per vial, or approximately $505, a 50% discount to Roche’s price in India.  With additional entrants and lower-cost manufacturing, prices could be driven down further. For example, Wockhardt recently invested $38 million to build a facility capable of manufacturing 15% of the worldwide supply of biologics. Major brands of Erythropoietin products have become key targets for biogenerics, after accounting for 18.7% ($12bn) of global pharmaceutical sales in 2006. Amgen's Aransep held 55% of the EPO market in 2006, typifying the rapid growth of long-acting products. 20  "All the biotech products produced by Indian companies are generic in nature. India has a huge market potential for Biogenerics”.  Off the 50 odd biotech drugs 13 are available in India and seven biotech drugs are indigenously developed and produced by the Indian companies. Typically the market potential in India for biogenerics has been in the range of 0.1 percent (EPO) to 0.2 percent of (Insulin) of the global market value based on the type and class of molecule. India has over 130 home grown biopharmaceutical companies, many of which are fully integrated. The global market for Indian Biopharmaceutical companies have touched $ 1.5 Billion in revenues (2006) with CAGR of 27%.    Indian biogeneric companies on the threshold of globalization, 2007 (biospectrum) 21 Factors Driving Development of a Biogenerics Market  Multiple Patent expiries for biologics launched in the late 1980s/ early 1990s. Considerable market size for these biologic products. Technological advancements enabling ‘replication’ of biologic products. Consumer interest in lower cost alternative to expensive branded biologics.    Biogenerics are becoming technologically feasible and economically necessary, therefore are gaining Regulatory and Political attention 22 Key advantages  At present India is one of the major contributors in the world biogeneric market along with the china. Some of the that India has upon other countries in biogenerics are-   Highest number of US FDA approved plants outside the US. Compliance with GCP guidelines is an rise with Indian Companies.     Highly qualified human resource availability. Low capital and operational cost. Pharma sector highly competitive in bioprocessing skills. Excellent genomic research opportunity. 23 Measures that are fueling rapid growth   Increase in partly public-funded biotechnology incubators and parks. Increase in the private venture capital, fiscal incentives and tax benefits for R&D and exports. Streamlining of regulatory pathway and reduction in the approval time by various regulatory agencies. Active role of Indian Pharmacopoeia in issuing product specific monographs. Increased penetration of private health insurance. Increase in the burden of diseases (especially lifestyle diseases). Increase in per capita pharmaceutical spend. Modernization and integration of patents and other intellectualproperty offices with adoption of electronic filing system. 24       Protein Classes in which biogenerics are in development •Biogeneric Development has extended into protein classes with high market potential. Interferon Gamma PTHGM-CSF Coagulation 3% 5% 5% Factors 7% Interferon Alpha 10% Interferon Beta 10% Human Growth Hormone 12% Insulin Interleukin EGF 3% 3% 2% IGF 2% FGF 2% G-CSF 20% Erythropoietin 16% Biogeneric companies do not focus on providing merely copies of existing drugs, they try to improve manufacturing processes. 25 Target Biologics Market Share & Patent Status Biologic Leading Brand Company Launch Year Patent Expiry Worldwid e Sales 2006 (USD bn) sales 2010 (USD Mn) EU Market US EU Erythropoietin Epoitin alpha and beta G-CSF Interferon alpha Eprex/Procri t, Epogen, Epogin/Neo Recormon Neupogen Intron, Roferon Avonex, Rebif, Betaferon J&J, Amgen, Roche Amgen Schering Plough, Roche Biogen Idec, Serono 1988 (alpha), 1990 (beta) 1991 1987 2014 (alpha), n/a (beta) 2008 Expired 20082013 (1a) Expired( 1b) Expired (alpa & beta) Expired Expired 2012 (1a) Expired (1b) 13 701 5.6 2.3 605 188 (EU+U S) Interferon beta 1996 (1a) 1993(1b) 3.7 131 Genotropin, Human growth Norditropin, hormone Humantrope and others Pfizer, Novo Nordisk, Lilly and Others 1988 Expired Expired 1.9 442 (EU+U S) 26 Biogeneric Manufacturers and Their Products Company Barr Biocon Launched Biosimilars EPO scheduled for launch in Eastern Europe Insugen (Insulin in India and China), Erypro (EPO) G-CSF, Nimotruzmab, BIOMAb EGFR (cancer) (rHGH) Valtropin None G-CSF (Filgastrim) None In the Pipeline G-CSF (Filgastrim), Insulin, and HGH Insulin, glargine and HGH Biopartners Cipla Dr. Reddy’s Glenmark Alpheon (INF-α) and EPO Autoimmune, cancer and cardiovascular Nine (9) development GBR 500 (mAb for MS), GBR600 (antithrombotic) and mAbs for adhesion molecular inhibitors Six (6) development programs PEG-EPO and other PEGylated proteins Intas Biopharma Prolong Pharmaceuticals Neukine (G-CSF), Erykine (EPO) and Intalfa (INF-alpha2b) None 27 Biogeneric Manufacturers and Their Products Company Ranbaxy Sandoz Launched Biosimilars Nugraf (Filgrastim), Macrogen (Molgramostim from Zenotech) Omnitrope (HGH), Binocrit (EPO) In the Pipeline mAbs in oncology and neurology Six (6) development programs including GCSF (Filgrastim) mAbs and PEGylated therapeutic proteins Filgrastim Insulin, EPO and interleukins Insulin Glargine Shanta Biotechnics Stada Teva Wockhardt Shaferon (INF-alpha2b, Shankinase (streptokinase) and Shanpoietin (EPO) EPO-Zeta (approved) G-CSF (Filagstrim),Teva-Tropin (HGH), INF-alpha2b Wepo (EPO), Wosulin (insulin) INF-alpha2b, G-CSF These companies have already introduced as many as seven biotech drugs (Hepatitis B vaccine, Streptokinase, Insulin, G-CSF, Erythropoietin, Human 28 Growth Hormone and Interferon alpha 2b) under many brands. Sustain Biogenerics Market  Developing a specific bio-generic regulatory framework. With the introduction of TRIPS agreement from January 1, 2005, Indian bio-generic companies should not concentrate on generating mere copies of the existing drugs, but try to improve manufacturing procedures, which may themselves bring new patents. Modifying the patent framework to suit the bio-generic products. Improving the approaches of generic suppliers from directly copying the drugs to generating novel targets (especially, applicable to bio-generic companies in Indian and other developing countries). Policies from the originators Customer receptivity towards biogeneric products 29      Core competencies that biosimilar companies need to survive Marketing Clinical Trial Design Traditional Generics World Patent Law Regulatory Expertise Low Cost Manufacture Biologics manufacture Detailing to Specialists Pharmacovigilance 30 Biogenerics -Regulatory EU has guidelines in place for approval of biosimilars, US and Japan lag behind in the process. 31 US Approval Process for Biologics  There are two distinct regulatory pathways for biologics are associated with a different set of barriers for approval of biosimilars. Approval Process for Biologics Biologic License Application (BLA) Governed by Public Health Service Act (PHSA) Approval pathway for the majority of biologics (e.g. epoetins, interferons, colony stimulating factors) No abbreviated pathway for approval of Generics New Drug Application (NDA) Governed by Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) Approval pathway for human growth hormone and insulin products Hatch-Waxman provisions provide an abbreviated new drug application (ANDA) pathway for generic small molecule drugs No existing statutory framework for approval of biosimilars Section 505(b)(2) provides an abbreviated pathway for biosimilar approval 32 EU Approval Process for Biosimilars  Europe has a unified regulatory process for approval of Biosimilar: European Medicines Agency (EMEA) Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) •Reviews marketing authorization applications for biologics •Awards either a ‘positive’ or ‘negative’ opinion based on evaluation of quality, safety and efficacy measures EMEA has authority to recommend approval of biosimilars European Commission (EC) •After a product receives a positive opinion, the EC will grant marketing authorization valid for the European Union Final decision-maker for marketing approval of biosimilars 33 Regulations on Biogenerics in India   Institutional BioSafety Committee (IBSC) Review Committee on Genetic Manipulation (RCGM)  Genetic Engineering Approval Committee (GEAC) 34 Indigenous product development, manufacture & marketing of pharmaceutical products derived from LMOs but the end product is not an LMO. Report of the task force on Recombinant Pharma, 2005 35 ro P l co to -I Risk Group III & above Risk Group Application I & II IBSC RCGM (Approves pre-clinical studies) Pre-clinical trial conducted IBSC RCGM (Approves pre-clinical studies) Pre-clinical trial conducted RCGM (Recommends human CT) GEAC examines information on containment facilities & data on clinical trials Environmental Clearance under Rule 1989 of EPA based on risk & benefit analysis and inform DCGI RCGM (Recommends human CT to DCGI & forwards views on containment facilities to GEAC) DCGI (Approves Human CT) Human CT Conducted DCGI (Approves Human CT) Human CT Conducted DCGI (Approves manufacture & market authorization under Drug & Cosmetic rules based on the clinical trials data) 36 Post Release Monitoring DCGI (Approves manufacture & market authorization under Drug & Cosmetic rules based on the clinical trials data) DCGI – Post Release Monitoring DCGI – Trends In Biopharmaceuticals 37 ou kY han T * Information presented here is available in public domain. 38
Copyright © 2024 DOKUMEN.SITE Inc.