A Practical Approach for Design of Marine Propellers With Systematicpropeller Series

March 17, 2018 | Author: Merrel Ross | Category: Propeller, Naval Architecture, Mathematical Optimization, Prediction, Fluid Dynamics


Comments



Description

Brodogradnja – Shipbuilding 2/2011 (lipanj / june 2011.) Članak / Paper 714 / 2011 2011-01-31 ZNANOST / SCIENCE Serkan EKINCI A Practical Approach for Design of Marine Propellers with Systematic Propeller Series Author’s Address (Adresa autora): Yildiz Technical University, Department of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering, 34349 Besiktas, Istanbul, Turkey E-mail: [email protected] Received (Primljeno): 2011-01-31 Accepted (Prihvaćeno: 2011-03-29 Open for discussion (Otvoreno za raspravu): 2012-06-30 Original scientific paper Although there have been important developments in marine propellers since their first use in 1850, the main concept has been conserved. Parallel to the developments in the computer technologies in the past 50 years, methods based on the circulation theory are often used for the design and analysis of propellers. Due to the ability to predict the propulsion performance with just a few design parameters, the use of systematic propeller series based on open water model experiments is still widespread. The design with standard propeller series is usually made with diagrams developed from model experiments. Reading errors during the use of these diagrams are inevitable. In the presented study a practical approach is developed for preventing reading errors and time loss during the design with standard propeller series. A practical approach based on empirical formulas for the design and performance prediction for four-bladed Wageningen B propeller series is presented, and design applications for three propellers with different loading conditions are realized. The results obtained from the presented method are compared with those of open water diagram data and a good agreement between the results is observed. Keywords: propeller design, propeller series, propeller performance, open water diagram Praktični pristup projektiranju brodskih vijaka korištenjem sistematskih serija vijaka Izvorni znanstveni rad Iako je od začetaka korištenja brodskih vijaka 1850. godine došlo do njihovog značajnog razvoja, osnovni princip je istovjetan i danas. Usporedno s razvojem računalnih tehnologija zadnjih 50 godina, metode temeljene na cirkulacijskoj teoriji se često koriste za projekt i analizu vijaka. Uslijed mogućnosti da se propulzijska svojstva vijka predvide poznavajući samo nekoliko osnovnih projektnih parametara, korištenje sistematskih serija vijaka temeljeno na modelskim ispitivanjima slobodne vožnje je i dalje u širokoj uporabi. Projekt vijka prema standardnim serijama vijaka obično se provodi pomoću dijagrama koji su razvijeni temeljem modelskih ispitivanja. Greške pri očitanjima vrijednosti iz dijagrama su neizbježne. U ovoj je studiji razvijen praktični pristup za sprečavanje grešaka očitanja i gubitka vremena tijekom projektiranja uz pomoć standardnih serija vijaka. Praktični pristup temeljen na empirijskim formulama za projektiranje i prognozu propulzijskih svojstava za četverokrilne vijke Wageningenške B serije je prikazan, te su prikazane primjene za tri vijka sa različitim stanjima opterećenja. Rezultati dobiveni primjenom ove metode uspoređeni su sa onima dobivenim iz dijagrama slobodne vožnje te je uočeno dobro poklapanje rezultata. Ključne riječi: projekt vijka, serija vijaka, propulzijska svojstva, dijagram slobodne vožnje 1 also named screw propellers. for the design and analysis of propellers [1-11]. The aim in the propeller design is to obtain the optimum propeller which applies to minimum power requirements and against maximum efficiency conditions at an adequate revolution number.c. BEM (boundary element method)) based on circulation theory. Gutsche and Schroeder controllable pitch propeller series. These series consist of propellers whose blade number (Z). usually the open water experiment diagrams of systematic model propeller series are used. high speed camera techniques. vortex-lattice.f. The most known and used propeller series is the Wageningen (Troost) series. Although there have been significant developments in both the propeller design and the propulsion systems in this long period of time. In the past ten years. fixed pitch propellers. Japanese AU series. above mentioned. and PIV techniques [12-17]. the Gawn (Froude) series. Besides this series. Wageningen nozzle propeller series. KCA series. Lindgren series (Ma-series). any changes in the main concept of screw propellers was observed. Usually two methods are used in the propeller design.g 1 Introduction In ship hydrodynamics. three new developments have appeared in the design and analysis of propellers.b. In the first stage of propeller design. These are CFD methods (RANS solvers). due to the developments in the computer technology. NewtonRader series.d. When examining the studies about propeller design for the past ten years. pitch ratio (P/D). great improvements were seen in the second method.Nomenclature AE/A0 CTH D J KQ KT n P PD Q T RT VA VKN w Z Blade area ratio Trust loading coefficient Propeller diameter (m) Advance coefficient Torque coefficient Thrust coefficient Propeller rate of rotation per minute (RPM) Propeller pitch (m) Delivered power (kW) Propeller torque (kNm) Thrust (kN) Total resistance (kN) Advance speed (m/s) Ship speed (knot) Taylor wake fraction Number of propeller blades Open water efficiency Pitch ratio Density of water (kg/m3) Constant number Equation coefficients ηο P/D ρ k a. KCD series. The screw propellers. propeller blade area ratio (AE/A0). After 1950. have still secured their position as the best suitable propulsion system since that time. it is seen that advantage of the improvements in the computer technology has been utilized. Tanaka and Yoshida in [19] developed a computer program for propeller designers which transforms the dimensionless tables obtained from 2 . It is seen that these propellers will be used for longer periods of time due to their high efficiency and suitable use. blade section shape and blade section thickness are varied systematically. The first is to use diagrams obtained from open water propeller experiments for systematic propeller series. lifting surface. have an important place among the propulsion systems to propel a ship.e. JD-CPP propeller series are also mentioned in literature through various studies [18]. The second is to use mathematical methods (lifting line. which showed up in the 19th century. In this study a practical design approach is presented by using the Wageningen B series propellers for a case where the delivered power (PD). A similar study was made by Suen and Kouh in [28]. The variable parameters relating these series are the propeller blade number (Z). Besides the propeller design. Matulja and Dejhalla in [25] realized the selection of the optimum screw propeller geometry with artificial neural networks. in [26] used the artificial neural network method for the prediction of thrust and torque values of the Wageningen B series propeller. [30]. In this study.al. the blade area ratio (AE/A0). Roddy et. optimization of accurate blade geometry in terms of cavitation and strength. 2 Propeller design with standard propeller series In the initial ship design stage.al. optimization of blade geometry depending on induced pressure forces and the blade numbers. the thrust and torque coefficients under a constraint determined according to cavitation. The results of the study are presented by van Lammeren et. The experimental data of this series were firstly reported by Troost [29]. Unlike the classical lifting line methods. in [24] applied in their study a method derived from the adjoint equation of the finite element method to two propeller design problems. In a similar study a computer program has been developed by Koronowicz et. A detailed regression analysis was made for the performance characteristics obtained from the Wageningen B propeller series by Oosterveld and van Oossanen [31]. Celik and Guner in [22] suggested an improved lifting line method by modelling the flow deformation behind the propeller with free vortex systems. the advance speed (VA) and the revolution number (n) is known. it is necessary to predict the performance of the considered propeller.propeller series experiments into numerical graphics with great accuracy. A set of propellers suitable for a wide loading range is developed by the use of polynomials representing the open water diagrams of the Wageningen B propeller series. He compared his findings with the results obtained from vortex-lattice method. the diagrams and empirical formulas can also be used for the propeller performance prediction. for the design calculations for a propeller which is analyzed in the real velocity environment [20]. maximization of the propeller efficiency. Later this study was expanded by including viscous corrections for different Reynolds numbers [18]. Until the mid 1980s different reports about the Wageningen B propeller series were published. In his study Olsen in [23] developed a method to calculate the propeller efficiency with the help of energy coefficients including the propeller loss.al. A multipurpose optimization method is made by Benini in [21] for the Wageningen B propeller series using an algorithm for maximizing both. For this purpose the commonly preferred open water series with low cavitation risk is the Wageningen B screw propeller series. and the pitch ratio (P/D). The set of propellers consists of four-bladed propellers and is developed in such a manner that the whole range of the blade area ratios (AE/A0) and pitch ratios (P/D) of the Wageningen B series are included. Chen and Shih in [27] realized the propeller design by the use of the Wageningen B series propellers by considering the vibration and efficiency characteristics using genetic algorithm. The propeller design and performance characteristics are presented by means of empirical formulas and diagrams to propeller designers as a practical tool for the use in the preliminary design stage. K Q = ∑ C n ( J ) S n ( P / D) tn (A E / A0 ) un ( Z ) vn 47 (1) K T = ∑ C n ( J ) Sn ( P / D) tn (A E / A0 ) un ( Z ) vn n =1 n =1 39 (2) The dimensionless propeller characteristics are expressed as below: 3 . calculations considered are the scale effects in the velocity field where the propeller is operating. Later some corrections were made on the series by taking the scale effects into account. corrections in the velocity field due to the rudder. Hsin et. They presented the open water propeller characteristics of the Wageningen B series for the Reynolds number at 2 × 106 as polynomial functions as given in (1) and (2). The effects of the Reynolds number are not included in the calculations.al. Propeller design method: Initial design variable requirements of the propeller are given below: Delivered power. such as of Burrill in [32]. Because the open water experiments are made in fresh water.Thrust coefficient: KT = T ρ n2 D4 (3) (4) (5) Q ρ n2 D5 vA Advance coefficient: J = nD Torque coefficient: K Q = Open water propeller efficiency: η o = KT J K Q 2π 8 KT π J2 (6) (7) Propeller thrust loading coefficient: CTH = The Wageningen B propeller series is a general purpose series. and η0 curves and expressions for the design of new propellers are given for different blade area ratios in the order of PD. PD in kW Propeller rate of rotation. the advance speed (VA). Namely. the diameter (D) and the performance characteristics (J. The torque requirement of a propeller can be expressed as a function of the advance coefficient V J = A and extracting the diameter (D) from this formula. This series is expressed with open water diagrams obtained from model tests where the KT-KQ-J curves are showed for propellers with constant blade number (Z) and constant blade area ratio (AE/A0) but variable pitch ratios (P/D). ηo) are investigated among probable solutions. 3 A practical design approach to marine propellers for 4-bladed Wageningen B series In this section empirical expressions and diagrams are presented for the practical design and performance analysis of four-bladed propellers by the use of the Wageningen B screw series. J. P/D: 0. a set of propellers is generated designing the propellers by changing systematically the advance speed (VA) and the blade area ratio (AE/A0) of the main propeller including all the four-bladed Wageningen B propellers (AE/A0: 0. Then the P/D. KQ.5-1. n in rps Vehicle speed.4). The Wageningen B series propellers are extensively used for the design and analysis of fixed pitch propellers. KQ. n and VA.4-1. VS in m/s Taylor wake fraction. KT. w Number of blades. Z The necessary blade surface area required to minimize the risk of cavitation can be determined using an appropriate cavitation criteria. the blade number (Z) and the blade area ratio (AE/A0) are known and the pitch ratio (P/D). the number of propeller revolutions (n). The set of propellers is generated by the design method given as below. substituting it in the expression nD KQ = Q and finally rearranging the equation the expression below can be obtained: ρ n2 D5 4 . this must be considered in the design calculations.0. KT. The delivered power (PD). KQ and ηo values of the optimum propeller are read-off.372 380 2.5 4. PD (kW) Advance speed.5 step size. For this condition the propeller design is based only on the value of “k”.5 2.5-22.4.KQ = PD n 2 5 J = k . are known.8 0. VA (m/s) Propeller rate of rotation per minute. KT. the torque requirement curve KQ-J obtained according to Equation (8) is drawn over the Wageningen B open water diagram.4 0. 0.2 AE/A0=0. The intersection points of this curve which express the torque requirement of the propeller and the KQ curves of different P/D values on the open water diagram describe the possible design solutions. the propeller design is carried out as follows. A computer code based on polynomials of the Wageningen B series is used in the applications of the design method.55.7 Pitch ratio (P/D) 1. And. with 0.0 1. in total 39 values) to cover the whole P/D range (0. 0.5 3.5 knots.6 AE/A0=0.0 0.6 0. is read-off. KQ and ηo values due to k are presented in relation to k in Figures 1-5. 1.4 AE/A0=0.5 1. which represents the most efficient propeller among the different solutions satisfying the requirements.5-1. The set of propellers is generated by considering the PD and n values of the main propeller constant and by changing the advance speed VA (2.55 AE/A0=0.J 5 5 2πρV A (8) (9) PD n 2 k= =constant 5 2πρV A For the cases where the design variables (PD. P/D.70. The main propeller data used for generating the set of propellers for each AE/A0 (0.5 k0. KT.0 3. n. P/D. The optimum efficiency curve is obtained by drawing vertical lines from the intersection points to the efficiency curves.4 1. J. VA). 0. so the main propeller data are used to generate different values of “k” including all probable propeller cases of 4-bladed Wageningen B series.85 1 AE/A0=1.2 Figure 1 Variation of non dimensional pitch ratio (P/D) in relation to k Slika 1 Promjena bezdimenzionalnog omjera uspona i promjera vijka (P/D) u odnosu na k 5 . RPM Propeller diameter.70 1. D (m) Number of blades.85. Z Blade area ratio. AE/A0 648 4.12 4 0.0) are given in Table 1. Later the J.0 4. And the maximum point of this curve. the “k” expression (9). Firstly. Table 1 Main propeller design input data Tablica 1 Glavni ulazni podaci za projekt vijka Delivered power.4) of the Wageningen B series.0 2. 2 0.1 0.2 Figure 2 Variation of advance coefficient (J) in relation to k Slika 2 Promjena koeficijenta napredovanja (J) u odnosu na k 0.85 Thrust coefficient (K T) 0.5 2 2.5 1 1.2 AE/A0=0.5 4 4.5 2 2.4 1 AE/A0=0.85 0.2 0 0.21 0.13 0.19 0.5 k0.55 AE/A0=0.5 k0.0 0.4 AE/A0=0.4 AE/A0=0.3 0.55 Torque coefficient (10K Q) 0.14 0.55 AE/A0=0.2 Figure 4 Variation of torque coefficient (KQ) in relation to k Slika 4 Promjena koeficijenta momenta uvijanja (KQ) u odnosu na k 6 .5 3 3.4 0.8 AE/A0=0.7 Advance coefficient ( J ) 0.17 0.5 k0.5 4 4.2 Figure 3 Variation of thrust coefficient (KT) in relation to k Slika 3 Promjena koeficijenta poriva (KT) u odnosu na k 0.2 AE/A0=0.18 0.85 AE/A0=1.6 AE/A0=1.1.5 1 1.0 0.5 1 1.0 AE/A0=0.16 0.5 AE/A0=0.22 0.5 4 4.5 2 2.5 3 3.4 AE/A0=0.7 AE/A0=0.5 3 3.7 AE/A0=1.15 0. 0236 -0.284 0.658 -0. torque coefficient (KQ) and propeller efficiency (ηo) are given as the function of “k” in the graphics above.2 0.5 3 3. it can also be executed by reducing the reading errors to a minimum with the use of (10).0056 b -0.4116 -9.614 11.0331 0.4 0.8 AE/A0=0.818 -5. The values of the coefficients in (10) with the blade area ratio (AE/A0) are given in Table 2.166 0. these equations and graphics can also be interpreted as useful and timesaving tools for the prediction of the performance characteristics of an existing 4-bladed propeller.6823 -0. The expressions of the curves fitted to the points so as to ignore the effects of oscillations are determined by using the least square method (LSM).003 a 0. For the intermediate values of the blade area ratio the interpolation methods can be used.2 (ak + bk 4 / 5 + ck 3 / 5 + dk 2 / 5 + ek 1 / 5 + f ) + g Here. 5 2πρV A (10) Table 2 Coefficients of the F(k) equation with blade area ratio (AE/A0) Tablica 2 Koeficijenti iz jednadžbe F(k) sa određenom vrijednosti omjera površina krila(AE/A0) F(k) P/D J KT 10KQ η0 F(k) P/D J KT 10KQ η0 a 0.3615 3. thrust coefficient (KT).1477 -4.2659 0 -0.3287 0.7324 0.25914 -5.5607 -4.6654 0.7 AE/A0=0.3042 g 4.0535 1.7157 -0. In addition to propeller design.6709 -10. T) can be obtained by (J) and (KT) expressions given in (3).7278 0.1959 e 15.846 7.4465 f -11.9103 0.3023 -0.9246 7 .5 k0.(5).53 -7.5636 0.402 1.4778 0 -0.7135 3. advance coefficient (J).6128 -0.0339 0 0.157 f -12.5 4 4.0794 AE/A0=0.0437 0.5572 -4.556 0. n.0 Open water efficiency ( η0) 0.1875 7. The other propeller parameters (D. F(k).0085 e 14. these can be also expressed in a general polynomial form (10).9475 g 4.0182 0 0.5 2 2.013 AE/A0=0.0053 -0.0747 0. VA values of “k” can be carried out with the graphics.0205 -0.3058 -0.4 0.494 -9.1721 -0.55 AE/A0=0.0.55 c d 3.7 AE/A0=0.2 Figure 5 Variation of open water efficiency (ηο) in relation to k Slika 5 Promjena korisnosti u slobodnoj vožnji (ηο) u odnosu na k Since the pitch ratio (P/D).1156 6.4 c d 3. F (k ) = k 0.0345 1.0795 -0.1 0. function of pitch ratio (P/D).3 0. While the design of a propeller with the given PD.878 0.6 0.6798 -7.5 0.2633 1. k = PD n 2 .7354 -0.2038 1.0036 -0.0009 b -0.85 AE/A0=1.0469 0.5 1 1. advance coefficient (J) etc.9072 0.636 2. 5 0.312 3.1437 -6.0154 b -0.4106 0.0574 AE/A0=0. Table 3 Design variables of the propellers Tablica 3 Projektne varijable vijaka Propeller rate of rotation per minute (RPM) Delivered power (kW) Ship speed (knot) Taylor wake fraction Number of propeller blades (Z) Blade area ratio (AE/A0) Propeller 1 100 6090 17.9566 2.0283 b -0.7555 -2.4603 0.7 Propeller 3 300 6090 17.5054 -0. Various loading conditions were provided by changing only the revolution number of the propeller to data as given in Table 3.0837 0.006 -0.3214 0.9928 0.5775 -7.1183 0.9324 g 3.85 c d 2.866 -0.3695 -9.4573 0 -0.1517 -0.0542 -0.0042 b -0.0 c d 1.9103 -0.4905 0.0112 0.15 4 0.603 -0.3758 0 -0. with the use of the open water curves of the Wageningen B screw series and the above presented empirical formulas.15 4 0.1208 g 4.1301 0.0428 0.029 0.7324 -0.002 -0.0879 -7.997 9.0197 -0.1227 -8.5175 -0.2659 0 0.70 c d 3. and it is seen that the order of the error values is in an acceptable range.9192 f -11. the propeller designs were realized.7864 The practical design approach presented in this work allows the design of a four-bladed Wageningen B screw series propeller or the performance prediction of an existing propeller based on just only the “k” value given as in (9) and the blade area ratio.5816 1. KT.2892 0. The present approach is considered as a practical tool for propeller designers for use during the preliminary design stage as diagrams and empirical formulas.F(k) P/D J KT 10KQ η0 F(k) P/D J KT 10KQ η0 F(k) P/D J KT 10KQ η0 a 0.4161 -0.0022 3.0011 a 0.3924 7.1054 -0.175 3.6202 -0.5 0.3993 e 6. From the design variables of these three propellers. KQ. J and η0) are presented in Table 4.0323 0 0.0608 6.3057 0. The design results of the three propellers with different loading conditions are compared with those of KT and KQ polynomials for the 4-bladed Wageningen B screw series developed in [31].5196 -0.1537 0.1394 e 10.0296 -0.0182 0 -0.3935 AE/A0=1.541 0. three propeller designs for medium.327 -9. The obtained propeller design and performance results (P/D.0192 1.161 1.1721 0.001 -2.5 0.7 Propeller 2 200 6090 17.7859 e 14.8802 g 3.3805 -0.0005 0.1005 -3.002 a 0.0263 0 0.3818 -6.8503 3. low and high thrust loading cases were realized.4478 -0.462 11.1747 -0.1506 -0.2735 0.2669 -0.5028 -4.2119 f -6.5878 0.53597 2.5607 -4. 4 Design applications For verification and to show usability of the presented approach.0016 0.6688 0.0723 0.0664 -4.7 8 .166 0.0029 0.0089 -0.3806 f -9.2046 AE/A0=0.2266 -0.1633 0.15 4 0.1719 1. Further.E.1490 0. [5] GUNER. References [1] LERBS. P.7687 0.1497 0.. SNAME Trans. Vol.E.63 (1955)..6396 Present Method 1.2630 0.: “Moderately Loaded Propellers with a Finite Numbers of Blades and an Arbitrary Distribution of Circulation”.W. H.: “A Coupled Lifting Surface Analysis Technique for Marine Propulsors in Steady Flow”.0032 5. [4] SZANTYR. E.: “A Design Method for Heavily Loaded Marine Propellers”.6024 % Error 1.8367 0.1129 4. (1997).90223 Open Water Diagram 0.573 2. this method can be applied in a rapid and accurate manner by the use of the given diagrams and empirical formulas as an alternative method to design with Bp-delta diagrams. TAYLOR. D.41 2. the conventional design method using propeller series based on model experiments remains the most applied method.D. Vol.5440 0. 2 (1961). [6] GREELEY. 90 (1982). The primary advantage of this method is the practice of the design with a few design variables and the availability of the performance prediction. A further aim is to present in the future similar diagrams and empirical expressions for practical propeller design approaches for different propeller conditions for various given design variables.7300 3. 9 .1480 0. J.. MORGAN.1486 0.2392 0. The presented method can be expanded to the remaining Wageningen B series (propellers other than the 4-bladed ones) or to other propeller series.5580 0. the advance coefficient (VA) and the propeller revolution number (n) are known. England (1994).1883 5 Results Although the propeller designs can be made with computer programs based on circulation theory. Proceedings of Propeller/Shafting 1997 Symposium. RINA Trans.2616 0.7265 3. BLACK.10025 Open Water Diagram 1. J..6762 % Error 0. McHUGH. and a good agreement has been found.7355 Present Method 0.4660 0.36263 0. The Naval Architect (1987).4338 4.E. SNAME Trans.7946 4.5550 CTH=1.B. KERWIN.: “Numerical methods for propeller design and analysis in steady flow”.6050 0. M.2078 0.21875 0.K. No. Vol.7650 0. Vol.: “The Calculation of Marine Propellers Based on Lifting Surface Theory”. In this study the design applications for three propellers with different thrust loading conditions are taken into account for the presented method.P. 116 (1974). Additionally.0000 0. G.2637 0. The results obtained from this method are compared with those of the open water diagrams.S. Journal of Ship Research.C.D.4727 2.6780 CTH=0.: “A Rational Approach to the Design of Propulsors behind Axisymmetric Bodies”.1470 0.0227 0.: “An interactive program for design of ship propellers”.J.6703 1.971 0.4010 CTH=1. J.4281 Propeller 3 k=0. [7] PIEN.4555 0.9049 2.0000 6. In this study a practical design approach is presented for the four-bladed Wageningen B series propellers for the cases where the delivered power (PD). [3] GLOVER.1980 0.2602 Propeller 2 k=0. [2] ECKHARDT M. S.8100 0.483 0. thesis.3183 0. University of Newcastle upon Tyne. SNAME Trans.2519 0.28326 0. W.5099 0..: “A propeller design method”. 60 (1952).Table 4 Comparison of the propellers design results Tablica 4 Usporedba rezultata za projektirane vijke P/D D J KT 10KQ η0 Propeller 1 k=0.1960 0. the prediction of the performance characteristics that is not possible with Bp-delta diagrams for an existing propeller can also be available by the present approach. Virginia. [8] KERWIN.4854 1.210 Open Water Present Diagram Method 0.1480 0.5540 % Error 0.2170 0. Ph. T. (2004). Vol. [27] CHEN. G. 60 (1943-44). Vol. M. No. M.. Journal of Marine Science and Technology. 10 .: “Neural Network Predictions of the 4-Quadrant Wageningen B-Screw Series”.: “The Wageningen BScrew Series”.. L.3. KOUH. Vol. 41-51 (2005). p.. EKINCI. HAJILOUY. ZAWISLAK. No. Trans. van. M. p.[9] LEE. Vol. [10] GHASSEMI. p. OSSANNEN. Vol. GUNER. Supp. [29] TROOST. 31.B. p.: “Performance of Podded Propulsors”. [21] BENINI. (2001). 17. 22. Vol. NECIES. 1. [13] KULCZYK. SIIKONEN.H.D. Vol.A. J. Y..C. Vol.. SHIH. (2009).: “An Improved Lifting Line Model for the Design of Marine Propellers” Marine Technology and SNAME News. E..W. [25] MATULJA. G.: “Application of the Adjoint Method to the Propeller Designs”.C. B. p. 315-335. J. [23] OLSEN. [19] TANAKA H.S. 5. 556-563. T. 12. Vol. Vol.. [28] SUEN. A. Vol.: “Marine Propellers and Propulsion”. M.S. p. Journal of Computational Mechanics. No. J. Journal of Hydrodynamics Ser. A. T. 91-102.E. p. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering. Marine Technology and SNAME News... B.E. Scientia Iranica Transaction B-Mechanical Engineering. 1. S. 119-129 (2007). Y. p. p. S. [32] BURRILL. 100-113 (2006). (1969).: “New Developments and Propeller Design”. HESS.: “Neural Network Prediction of an Optimum Ship Screw Propeller”. J.: “An Approach to the Design of Ducted Propeller”. F. MANEN. 7.54 (1938). DEJHALLA. [16] TUKKER. 16 No. No. J... [26] RODDY.S. 5.A. 149-158 (2009).43. No. No. 2. FARHANIEH. Vol.1.: “An Approach to Transformation of Non-Dimensional Diagrams into Nomograms and its Application to New Propeller Design System”. 9th International Conference on Hydrodynamics.. R. D. p. W. Trans N. p. Vol. SNAME Trans. [31] OOSTERVELD. ISP. p. 237-246 (2000). Ocean Engineering.: “Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Marine Propeller Cavitation”. 401-416 (2004)..: “The Effect of Wake Flow and Skew Angle on the Ship Propeller Performance”. 406-417 ( 2010).F.: “Basic Design of Series Propeller with Vibration Consideration by Genetic Algorithm”. 525-533 (2009). Ocean Engineering.I. Published by Elsevier. Vol.40.. CHAJA. 6. (2006). Scientia Iranica Transaction B-Mechanical Engineering. Marine Technology III Book Series: Marine and Maritime. KUIPER. p. PRADS Symposium. P. Vol. Book Series: Marine and Maritime. OOSTERVELD. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering. China.. 8. van. [20] KORONOWICZ.1.C.: “Energy Coefficients for a Propeller Series”.: “Analysis of Screw Propeller DTMB 4119 using the FLUENT System”. (2010).S. [15] CELIK.. Shanghai.22.4.C.. Vol. RAUTAHEIMO. Marine Technology V.P.: “Open Water Tests Series with Modern Propeller Forms”. P. p.8. S. SKRABURSKI. [24] HSIN. 129-136 (2007). 501-506 (2010). L. No.E.: ”A BEM for the Modeling of Unsteady Propeller Sheet Cavitation Inside a Cavitation Tunnel”. No.: “Calculation of Marine Propeller Performance Characteristics”.Y. van: “Further Computer Analysed Data of the Wageningen B-Screw Series”. [30] LAMMAREN. 36 No. Twenty-Third Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics.. 229-238 (2003). M. Scıentıa Iranıca Transactıon B-Mechanıcal Engıneerıng.: “A Computer System for the Complete Design of Ship Propellers”. No. (2007).: “Multiobjective Design Optimization of B-Screw Series Propellers Using Evolutionary Algorithms”. Second Edition.S. H. M. 829-830 (2008).W. [11] BAL. p. No. [17] KUIPER. 3. P. FALLER. 4. A. L. Annals of DAAAM and Proceedings. 251 (1975).: “High Speed Video Observations and Erosive Cavitation”. YOSHIDA. C.16. p. 37. (2003). 2.: “Genetic Algorithms for Optimal Series Propeller Design”. SZANTYR. [14] ARAZGALDI R. J. [22] CELIK. S. KINNAS. F. Vol. [18] CARLTON. [12] SANCHEZ-CAJA. 3-4.E . GUNER. H. W. J. 49-59 (2008). COMPIT’06. GUNER.: “Simulation of Incompressible Viscous Flow Around a Ducted Propeller Using a RANS Equation Solver”.. D. No. J. R.
Copyright © 2024 DOKUMEN.SITE Inc.