20797282 Design of Water Treatment Plant

r ~"'.~IIIIIIIItQIIP'''''''''llqliill1"mllftllllJl'l'*~''''IIIIJPP~IIIIIIfIP"III QDI.IIIIIIIIIIIJI"II~ CIVIL ENQINEERING STUDIES . d !I Ii ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING i Ii PROJECT REPORT ON G " , J 8 DESIGN OF WATER TREATMENT PLANT ~ACULTY ADVISOR 4 d ii I= .. 111 . ;:..,. !!II PREPARED BY 1 II , t . i I i I I i I i JAIN. NIKHIL.R. , . ~ ii .. ~ 4 . ii !!II I I I . DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING Sardar Vallabhbhai RegionalCollege of Engineering c" Technology Surat-395007. [G ujarat) . . . 1 i = 5' !!II I ~18I1IIJ.1I""""IIIIIIIIJ.~II111IIih.Ila8l11l1l111111bDml1odDballll"'Cllldlllblld llllJb. .. = = DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING SARDAR VALLABHBHAI REGIONAL COLLEGE .OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY SURAT - 395007 CERTIFICA TE This is to certify that the project,entitled "Design of Water Treatment has been preparedby $-,./A. IJC~~./;/. 71. Roll. No 26. Plant", a final year student of Civil Engineering, during the year 1998-99, as a partial fulfillment of the requ irement for the award of Bachelor of Engineering Degree in Civil Engineering of SOUTH GUJARAT UNIVERSITY, SURAT. His work has been found to be satisfactory. . ---------. GUIDED BY: ~~'-' . of B. K. Samtani) ( Dr. B. K. K'atti) Acknowledgment Right from the procurement of material to the cleaning of conceptual difficultie s, we cannot withhold our sincerest thanks to Prof. B.K.Samtani, Civil Engineeri ng department, SVRCET, Surat, without whose invaluable guidance and cooperation the project would not have been accomplished. we would also like to thank Dr. B. K. Katti, Prof. and Head, Civil Engg. Departm ent, whose support and encouragement are transparent in the work it self. Lastly, we would like to thank Mr. SUNIL MISTRY (Navsari) for preparing the repo rt. I" DEEPAK V.M. (15) DESAI DHARMESHM. DHAMI VIJAY M. DINTYALA SRINADH DIWANJI NIBHRVTA R. G. CHANDRAM OHAN GAJJAR TEJAL S. GAlJRAV PARASHAR (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (21) (22) (23) (24) (25) (26) (27) GHADIYALI MINESH S. GHOSH lITPAL GOPALAKRISHNAN R. JAIN NIKHIL R. JAJlJ PRADEEP R. 2.CONTENTS Sr.1 5.5 6.1.1 6.2.4 6.3 7.3 6.0 INTRODUCTION BASIC DATA FOR THE DESIGN OF WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM 3.0 SALIENT FEATURES OF WATER TREATMENT PLANT POPU LATION FORECASTING CALCULATION OF WATER DEMAND Calculation of different drafts D esign capacity of various components Physical and chemical standards of water Co mparison of given data and standard data Suggested units of treatment plant DESI GN OF UNITS Collection units Design of intake well Design of pen stock Design of gravity main Design of jack well Design of pumping system Design of rising main Treatment units Design of aeration unit Design of chemical house and calculatio n of chemical dose Design of mechanical rapid mix unit Design of cIarifiocculato r Design of rapid gravity filter Disinfection unit Storage tank CONCLUSION REFER ENCES: Title .2 5.4 5.0 4.0 2.2 6.3 5.No.2. 0 5.0 6.3 6.1.2.2.1.2.1 6.5 6.1 6.4 6.5 6.6 6.6 6.1. 1.2 6.0 5.1.1. 2 6. It is assumed that all kinds of tr eatment processors are necessary and an elaborate design. Industrial. etc. there conservation and optimum utilization is of paramount imp ortance. the well planned water su pply scheme. generally called solids). upon the source. with an estima ted 40% of urban population. is perhaps one of the most imp ortant undertaking.-. identification of sources of water supply. The population in India is likely to be Hundred crores by the turn of this century. will have to be in accordance with the rising population.) become indispensable. The designed w ater treatment plant has a perennial river as the basic source of water the type of treatment to be given depends upon the given quality of water available and the quality of water to be served. Indeed. solids. for the public works Dept. Providing safe and adequate quantities of the same for all rural and urban communities. However such an extensive survey being not po ssible in the designed water treatment plant. Absolute pure w ater is never found in nature. in varying degree of concentration depending. undubiously is a basic human need. and dissolved impurities (organic and inorganic in nature. becomes unfit for intended use proves to be detrimental for life.. odour and taste generators. The water supplied should be 'Potable' and 'Wholesome'. Hence t reatment of water to mitigate and lor absolute removal of these impurities (whic h could be. is a prime and vital element of a country's social infrastructures as on this peg hangs the health and wellbeing of it's people. for Domestic. Public uses. toxic substances. colloi dal. Firefighting. Untreated or improperly treated water.= lUG (fr INTRODUCTION Water. 1 . but invariable contains certain suspended. etc. This goes on to say that a very large demand of wat er supply. pathogenic microorganisms. Hence. The design of water treatment plant for Mandvi situated in district Surat of Guj arat has been done. Mandvi is located on the bank of river Tapti.. The latitude a nd longitude of the town corresponding 21. ..61 N.118E respectively. . There are many industries like diamon d industries and chemical industries in the town so. 73. The popula tion of the given year 2031 will be 61400. treated water supply for do mestic and industrial uses are very essential. 61 N 73. 5.4 kms) on Tapti valley railway (c) On the right bank of Tapti. 14. (b) Nearest rail way station is Mandvi station (9 mile. 2. 4. 1. Design Considerations Design period (years) Average rate of water supply (Ipcd) Industrial demand (MLD ) Quality of raw water I) Ph Values 30 135 0. Latitude (Lat.Surat (Table No.1) No." [I_ (ir BASIC DATA FOR THE DESIGN OF WATER SUPPL V SVSTEEM The given problem includes the design of water treatment plant and distribution system and also the preparation of its Technical Report and Engg. (Table No. 3. 2. 2.5 .2) Sr. 3. 2.No.2 kms) away from Kim railway station of western railway. The following Table g ives the basic necessary data required for the design of water treatment plant. 1.6 7. Drawings showi ng the required details of collection and treatment units. 4. Name of the place District Location (a) About 27 mi le (43.18 E Description .) Longitude (Lon) 21.Mandvi .. . in mts.5 110 3. 14. I Highest G. 13. 7.L. in (m) I Lowest G. L.S. 11. I Invert level of raw material gravity intake pipe (R.) I Ground level at . (No. of river (R.l100ml) 50 550 200 2.L. Turbidity (mg/L) Total Hardness (mg/L) [as CaC03] Chlorides (mg/L) Iron (mg/L) M anganese (mg/L) Carbonates (mg/L) M. in mts. ) 24200 9. o f river (m) I I 34 28 22 32 3 .L. (R.L.) a) b ) Jack well site Location of aeration unit 28 29 07 12 15 22 27 6. 12.N.P. 8.II) III) IV) V) VI) VII) VIII) 5. in (m) I Bed level of river (m) I H.) I Source supply: A river with sufficien t perennial flow to satisfy the required demand.L.5 3.F. in mts.5 I Population of past four decades (In thousand) Year 1961 Year 1971 Year 1981 Ye ar 1991 I F. 10. I Length of raw water rising main (mts. M. 9 4 . Dia.4 : 8.. R.89 : 13.D.33 : 30 2. L. Dia. Of penstock (mm) Bell mouth strainer 01 No.L. of top of well (m) time (min) Collection Works :1 : 5.L. Design period (Y ears) 3.D.) 3.~r::tr SALIENT FEATURESOF WATER TREATMENT PLANT 3.. Ht of intake well . (m) :2 : 0.) Maximum daily draft (M. of bottom well (m) 5 R. of bell mouth strainer 2.L.5 :4 : 24 : 28 :10 . Dia. Detention Penstock ~ No.2 Intake Works Intake Well No. Average daily draft (M.1. Of well (m) 3. ~ General Populationof the town (In thousand) Year 1991 Year 2031 :22 : 61. of units 2. of penstockwell :2 : 400 2. 40 :1 :5 :1 : 0. No.L.12 : 10 :1 : 550 : 23. (m) 3 Depth of water :1 : 6. Of bottom tray (m) 4 Dia. (m) : 0.0 :5 5 2. Dia. (mm) 3 Invert level (m) ~ slope Jack well No.40 :29.88 : 1:86 2 . of trays . Dia. Tread of each tray (m) Dia.15 : 3. Rise of each tray (m) 6.5 : 1. of pumps : 60 :1 3. of aeration unit (m) (top) (Bottom) : 31. Detention time (min) Rising main and pumping units Rising : ~ Dia.of central rising main pipe (m) 8 No. of units '" Dia.3 Aeration unit ~ Treatment works R. Of top tray (m) 3.45 :1 2 Velocity of flow (m/s) Pumping unit: Capacity of eachpump(HP) 2. of units Dia.4 : 0.of each tray decreasing by(m) 5.I Gravity main No. 6 : 2. Dia. of units 2.16 :0. (m) 3. Depth of water flow (m ) 5. Depth of wat er (m) Clariflocculatoi :1 : 1. Breadth (m) 4. of units 2. Velocity of flow (m/s) 6 :1 : 10.37 Flocculator : 1.Chemical storage house : 20 : 12 : 3.6 : 0. Dia. of Inlet pipes (m) 4.0 . Height (m) Chemical Dissolving Tank 1.0 1. No. Length (m) 2. Depth (m) Flash Mixer :1 :3 :2 : 1. No. Detention time (min) 4.5 : 1. Breadth (m) 3. Length (m) 3.5 1 No. (m) 3. of Tank 2.45 : 3.5 : 2. Height (m) 5. Dia. Length (m) 7 1 14. Thickness of sand bed (m) 5. No. (m) 3. No. ChlorinerequiredIday (kg) 2.6 : 0.6 x 6. of units 2. of units 2.5 :1 :1 : 23 : 4. No. (mm) (c) Length (cm) (d) Spacing (cm) 8.Wash water tank : 86 : 90 : 2. Dia.9 : 20 :16 : 13 :1 :2 :58.48 : 8. CylinderrequiredIday (no.8 : 0.4 Storage Units Underground Reservoir 1. Laterals: (a) No's (b) Dia.4 : 4. Dia. m) 3. of manifold (m) 7. Thickness of gravel bed (m) 6.) : 18. Surface area (Sq.> . Dia. of units 2.Clarifire : 1.662 :2 3. No. Slope of bottom Rapid Sand Filter 1.7 :8% Disinfection House 1. Depth of water (m) 4. D imension of unit (m x m) 4. Overall depth of tank (m) 5 . of orifice (mm) 10. of orifices 9. ( m) 3. Capacity (Cu. Height (m) 4. of units 2. m) -14 : 4. No.3. . .5 :1 : 12 : 4..3 : 450 8 . Depth (m) Elevated Service Reservoir 1. Breadth (m) 4. Dia. t.. The time lag between :esgn and c ompletion should be also taken into account.. social a"d administrative sph eres.1 Desian Period . 4. . so that expenditure far ahead of _:. However in our case the design peri od has been ~"'1sidered as 30 years per given data. .:. ty is avoided. 9 .~ due regard to all the factors governing the future growth and :e/elopment of th e city in the industrial.. educational. Special factors causing sudden immigration or ~ux of population should als o be foreseen to the extent possible.::~carrying out extension when required. -~e 30 years period may how ever be modified in regard to specific :C"'lponents of the project particularly the conveying mains and trunk ~a "'ISof the distribution system depending on the ir useful life or the facility .~ lUG (ir POPULATION FORECASTING 4.'a:er supply project may be designed normally to meet the requirements : 6'" a 30 years period after there completion.2 General Considerations POlJulation Forecast ~e population to be served during such period will have to be estimated . It should not :'"C'1arily exceed 2 years and 5 years even in exceptional circumstances. commercial. Calculation Of Population With Different Methods (TableNO.89 2. of decades.04 /100 x 65744.45 25 46. of decade P2031 = 65744. 4.52 4.1. = Population in dh decade. col.84 60.52 03 07 14.4.0 2. col. = No. 3.12 44.17 10 .86) = 94698.24 35.33 = 41361. = Average inc rease (refer table 2.86 + ( 44. 4) = 36521+ 4840.67 13. 1 1. Pn Pn IG N =Po(1+IG/100)n = Population in the dh de cade. Table 4.67 132. 1) Sr. 5 ) = No. Year Population (thousand) 3 7.78 6.48 1.33 Geometrical Increase Method Using the relation Pn Where.04 -1.45 -21. = Percentage increase ( Ref.52 4.48 Increase (thousand) 4 Increase In creament % al increase 5 (thousand) 6 Decreas ein% increase 7 2 1961 4. Po Pn n c P2031 = Pn + nc = Initial population.1. No. = Population any decade . 1971 12 15 22 1981 1991 Total Average Arithmetical Increase Method Using the relation Po Where. this method is more suitable for.33+ 1239. - . 5) .49+ ( 4840.11/100 x 51490 = 30751 = 40865 = 51490 = 61330 4. Col.78/100 x 22000 30751 + 32.3 Description Of The Various Methods Arithmetic Increase Method ~'"'lSmethodis basedupon assumptionthat the populatio nincreasesat a ~stant ~e_ rate and rate of growth slowly decreases. = 46319. 6) .39/100 x 30751 40865 + 26/100 x 40865 51490 + 19. Po Pn = Populationin any decade. Table 4.5) Decrease Rate Of Growth Method Year 2001 2011 2021 2031 Expected population 22000 + 39. Col. = Average rate of incremental in crease per decade (Ref.Incremental Increase Method Using the relation Pn Where. .1. In our case also :..opulationis increasingat a constantrate with slight decreasein growth -=-.32 P2031 = 40239. Table 4.1. S: results by this method is although good but not as accurate as desired. very big and older cities whereas in so = case it is relatively smaller and new town. = Populationin n decade. r = Po + ( r + i )n = Average rate of increase in p opulation per decade (Ref. 11 . The aver age increase in the population is determined by the arithmetical increase method and to this is added the average of the net incremental increase. Incremental In crease Method This method is an improvement over the above two methods. once for each future decade.creasing or decreasing rate rather than constant rate. Decrease in percentage increase i s worked out average thus giving . 12 ..Geometrical Increase Method In this method the per decade growth rate is assumed to be constant and which is average of earlier growth rate.."ethod which makes use of the decrease in the percentage increases is "l ore suitable. This method consists of deduction of average decrease in percentag e increase from the latest percentage increase.. The forecasting is done on the basis that the percentage increases per decade willremain same. Thu s this . ""'lus this gives weightage to t he previous data as well as the latest trends. likely to grow with a progres sively i. This method would apply to cities with unlimited scope for expansion. This method would apply to cities.portanceto whole data. Decreasing Rate Of Growth Method As in our case the city is reaching towards saturation as obvio us from the graph and it can be seen that rate of growth is also decreasing. 13 . The city shall grow as per the logistic curve. Graphical Comparison Method ~is involves the extension of the population time cu rve into the future :)ased on a comparison of a similar curve for comparable cities and ~odified to the extent dictated by the factors governing such predictions. which will plot as a straight lin e on the arithmetic paper with the time intervals plotted against population in percentage of solution. Simple Graphical Method Since the result obtained by this method is dependent up on "'luch reliable. the '1telligence of the designer. this method is of empirical nature and not Also this method gives very approximate results. Thus this method is useful only to verify the data obtained by some other method.Logical Curve Method This is suitable in cases where the rate of increase of dec rease of population with the time and the population growth is likely to reach a saturation limit ultimately because of special local factors. Simple Graphical Method Since the result obtained by this method is dependent up on "'luch reliable. .. which will plot as a straight line on the arithmet ic paper with the time intervals plotted against population in percentage of sol ution.. The city shall gr ow as per the logistic curve. the 'r'1telligenceof the designer. this method is of empirical nature and not Also this method gives very approximate results.. 13 . Graphical Comparison Method ~is involves the extension of the population time curve into the future :)ased on a comparison of a similar curve for comparable cities and "'-'odifiedt o the extent dictated by the factors governing such predictions.sefulonl y to verify the data obtained by some other method..Logical Curve Method This is suitable in cases where the rate of increase of dec rease of population with the time and the population growth is likely to reach a saturation limit ultimately because of special local factors. Thus this method is . 4 X 10-3MLD = 0.-= lUe (jj= CALCULATION OF WATER DEMAND 5.289 MLD = 0.11 MLD (Coin cident draft < maximum hourly draft) 14 . . commercial.6 MLD Fire Requirement : It can be assumed that city is a residential town (low rise buildings) Water for fire = 100 P x 10-3MLD = 100 61.5 x 8.78 MLD (i) Average daily draft = 8. .1 Calculation Of Different Drafts = 61400 = 135 LPCD Expected population after 30 years Average rate of water supply (Including domestic.889 (ii) (iii) Maximum daily draft Coincident draft = 1. 889 = 13.289 + 0. public and wastes) Water required for above purposes for whole town Industrial demand = 61400 x 135 = 8..33 + 0.33 = maximum daily draft + fire demand = 13.78 = 14..6 = 8. 8. 11.5 1 5.889 = 17.778 MLD (iv) Lift pump = 2 x average daily demand = 17. 15. 9.2 1500 600 1000 400 1. .778 MLD 5.1 0. 1. 16. . 5.0 Unobjection able 7.05 5 .2 (i) (ii) (iii) Desian CaDacitv For Various ComDonents = 13.3 Phvsical And Chomical Standards Of Water Sr.T.U.33 MLD Intake structure daily draft Pipe main = maximum daily draft = 13. scale) Color (units on platinum cobal t scale) Taste and odour Acceptable 2.5 500 200 200 200 1. PH Total dissolved solids (mg/L) Total hardness (mg/L as CaC03) Chlorides (mg/L as C1) 8ulphates (mg/L as 804) Fluorides (mg/L as F) Nitrates (mg/L as N03) Calc ium (mg/L as Capacity) Magnesium (mg/L Mg) Iron (mg/L Fe) Manganese mg/L as MnO Copper (mg/L Cu) Zinc (mg/L as Zn) 15 .5 1.5 to 9.5 5. 2.0 Cause for Rejection 10 25 Unobjection able 6. 3.0 to 8.0 0.33 MLD Filters and other units at treatment plant = 2 x Average daily demand =2x8. 6. . 13.. No. 7. .. 10. 14. Characteristics Turbidity (units on J.5 45 200 150 1.0 4. . 12..5. .0 45 75 30 0.05 0. 16 .05 0.001 0. 20. Figures in excess of those mention ed under 'Acceptable' render the water not acceptable. 21.05 0. 23. .2 0. 25.002 1. Phenolic Compounds (mg/L as phenol) Anionic Detergents (mg/L as MBAS) Mineral oi l (mg/L) TOXIC MATERIALS Arsenic (mg/L as As) Cadmium (mg/L as Cd) Chromium (mg/ L as Hexavalent Cr) Cyanides (mg/L as Cn) Lead (mg/L as Pb) Selenium (mg/L as Se ) Mercury (mg/L as Hg) Polynuclear (mg/L) RADIO ACTIVITY Aromatic 0.01 0.01 0.01 0. It is possible that some mine and spring waters may exceed these radioactivity l imits and in such cases it is necessary to analyze the individual radio nuclides in order to assess the acceptability for public consumption.001 0. 19.001 0. The figures indicated under the column 'Acceptable' are the limits upon which wa ter is generally acceptable to the consumers.05 0.05 0. but still may be tolerate d in the absence of alternative and better source upon the limits indicated unde r column 'Cause for Rejection' above which the supply will have to be rejected.3 0.1 0. 26.01 0.05 0. 18. 24. GROSS Alpha Activity in pico Curie 3 (pCi/L) 30 3 29.1 0.2 Hydrocarbons 0. Gross Beta Activity (pCi/L) 30 Notes : . 22.01 0.17. .05 0.0 0. 27.2 28. 5.100) 110 3.5 200 200 0. 60 70 Total (mg/L) Hardness 550 200 2.1 0.45 Softening Chlorides(mg/L) Iron (mg/L) Manganese (mg/L) Aeration Aeration Carbonate (mg/L) MPN (no. 5.2) Sr.0 3. 4.4 ComDarison Of Given Data And Standard Data (Table No.5 Softening Chlorination 8. 17 . Particulars pH Turbidity Actual 705 50 Standard Difference Means 7 to 8. No.4 3. 47. 5.5 3.5 Not for Treatment necessary Clarifier & rapid sand filter 3.5 0.05 350 50 2.5 2.5 O. 2. 1.K. 5 Suaaested Units Of Treatment Plant J ue to previous analysis following units are required to be designed for .5. Storage unit: fa) Underground storage tank b) Elevated storage .Iat ertreatment plant.... ~ematic diagram of each of the unit is shown.:. ~) Intake Structure : (a) Intake well (b) Gravity main (c) Ja ck well (d) Rising main (e) Pump 2I Treatment unit: (a) Aeration unit (b) Coagul ant dose (c) Lime soda dose (d) Chemical dissolving tank (e) Chemical house 'f) Flash mixer (g) Clariflocculator (h) Rapid sand filter (i) Chlorination unit .. 18 . ... .'. Movabl e and Floating Intakes: Used where wide variation in surface elevation with slop ing blanks. lake or river (including the possibility of wide fluctuation in water level). navigation requirements. usually by gravity to a well or sump. such as ice. the water is pumped to the mains or treatment plants. From the well. The prevalence of floatin g materials. Submerged Intakes: Entirely under the water. and the conduct conveying the water. logs and vegetation. The source of supply. strainer or grating through which the water ent ers. depth of water. Intakes sho uld also be so located and designed that possibility of interference with the su pply is minimized and where uncertainty of continuous serviceability exists. int akes should be duplicated.1 Collection units 6. The location with respect to the sources of pollution. 19 . the eff ect of currents.1 (a) Design Of Intake Well Intake Well Intakes consists of the opening. character of bottom. floods and storms upon the structure and in scouring the bottom .-=lu0 ~ DESIGN OF UNITS 6. whether impounding reservoir. The character of the intake su rrounding. Types of Intakes : · · · · Wet Intakes: Water is up to source of supply.1. Dry Intakes: No water inside it ot her than in the intake pipe. The following must be considered in designing and locating the intak es. Depth Velocity of flow Number of units Free board 4 to 10m 0. Distance from pumping station. 5 to10 m(maximum 15m) 3. 2. . Currents that might threate n the safety of the intake structure. Design Criter ia Detention time Diameter 5 to 10 min. Ice storm. 4. . Ice flows and other difficulties. 20 . The intake structure used intake our design is wet-type. (b) 1.L. Minimum R. .Location Of Intakes : . Formation of shoals and bars. Navigation channels should be avoided.9 m/s 1 to 3 (maxi mum 4) 5m (c) Design Assumptions =27m =28m Given F. Possibil ities of damage by moving objects and hazards. Floods. . . Given invert level of gravity main = 24 m Detention time = 10 min. . 5. The location of the best quality of water available. Fetch of the wing a nd other conditions affection the weight of waves. . .S.L. . . . Power avai lability and reliability.6 to 0. Accessibility. 6. W.L. Trash racks o f screens are provided to protect the entry sizeable things which can create tro uble in the pen stock. 2.F.33 MLD 13600 x 24 = 0.2 Design Of Pen stock And Bell Mouth Strainer (a) Pen stock This are the pipes provided in intake well to allow water from water body to int ake well.J4 23. W.L..K.) provide 1 intake well of diameter 5.1543 m3/sec.57 m3 Cross-sectional area of intake well = 92.42 m == 5.1543 x 0 x 60 = 92. Summary Number of intake wells Diameter of intake well Height of well R.5m 4.5 m (e) 1.14 In x = 5. At each level more than one pen stock is provided to take account of any obstruction during its operations. (b) Design Criteria Velocity through pen stock Diameter of each pen stock Number of pen stock for ea ch intake well 21 = 0.Design Calculation Flowof water required Volume of well = 13.42 < 10 m (O. so as to take accou nt of seasonal variation in water level (as H. = less than 1 m ...1.). These pen stocks are regulate d by valves provided at the top of intake wells. These pen stocks are provided at different levels.L. of bottom of well 1 unit 5.. L.0 m/sec. 4.57 14 = 23.L.6 =2 t01. = 0.0m 24m 6.14 m2 diameter of intake well (d) = . 3. -) '17 ..' . MANHOLE .L..J:N R ... . . -... L. .... .55) MT .-.-.2B M T F. :NT!-\I-<C \VrLL .--------. .~ ...". R... .. .. . ..-I.S..( -----. ".--:0=M1" .L...L. 3MT Lw.----. .-GRJ\VIIY MAIN (0.. 3 m/s = 6 to 12 mm = 2 x diameter of holes Velocity of flow Hole diameter Area of strainer (b) Assumptions = 0. 2.3619 m == m 0. 3.7 Area of Bell mouth strainer= 2 x area holes 22 . Summary Number of pen stock 1well At each level Diameter of pen stock 2 units 1m 0.4 (d) 1.7853cm2 4 = Area of pen stock = 0.(c) Design Calculation =1 =2 = 0.7853 x N 0.4 m Design Of Bell Mouth Strainer: (a) Design Criteria = 0.1543/0.2 to 0.1029 m2 Number of intake well Number of pen stocks at each level Velocity CIS area of ea ch pen stock Diameter = 0.1543 = = 0.75 m/sec.25 x 2 N = 3929. (assumed) = 0.75 x 2 = 0.25 m/s = 10 mm Velocity of flow Hole diameter (c) Calculation 1t d2 Area of each hole Area of collection 0. 1543/0. 2. Summary Number of pen stock / well At each level Diameter of pen stock 2 units 1 m 0.4 (d) 1.7853 x N 0.1029 m2 Number of intake well Number of pen stocks at each level Velocity C / S area of each pen stock Diameter = 0.2 to 0.4 m Design Of Bell Mouth Strainer: (a) Design Criteria = 0.7853cm2 4 = Area of pen stock = 0.25 x 2 Area of Bell mouth strainer = 2 x area holes 22 .3619 m == m 0.25 m/s = 10 mm Velocity of flow Hole diameter (c) Calculation 1t d2 Area of each hole Area of collection 0.75x2 = 0.75 m/sec.(c) Design Calculation =1 =2 = 0.3 m/s = 6 to 12 mm = 2 x diameter of holes Velocity of flow Hole diameter Area of strainer (b) Assumptions = 0.1543 = = 0. (assumed) =0. 3. 7 m/s (assumed) = 0.7 x 0. Even when a fall is available. the diameter o f a single pipe through which water flows by gravity should be such that all the head available to cause flow is consumed by friction.6 to 0. a pumping or force main. Once this is decided the m aterial of the conduit is to be selected keeping in view the local cost and the nature of the terrain to be traversed. To secure the greatest economy.9 m for bell mouth strainer. Gravity pipelines should be laid below the hydraulic gradient.1543 I (0.7853 = 6171.64 Provide diameter of 0.7 m/s Diameters of gravity main Velocity of water Number of gravity main = number of i ntake well Assumption velocity (c) Design Calculation R. (b) Design Criteria = 0.C.C. The available fall from t he intake well to the jack well and the ground profile in between should general ly help to decide if a free flow conduit is feasible.3 to 1 m = 0.3 Design Of Gravity Main (a) Gravity Main The gravity main connects the intake well to the jack well and water flows though it by gravity.= 2 x 3929. independently or in combination with a gravity main could also be considered. Conduit velocity Area of conduit required Diameter of the conduit = 0.98 Diameter of Bell-mouth strainer = 88. 6.7) = 0.9 m/s =1 = 0.2204 m2 = 0.55 m 23 . Circular pipe is used.5297 m == 0 .1. 1 V= R 2138112n 8n2V2 R413 (0. Summary Number of gravity intake Diameter of gravity intake Invert level at inta ke well Invert level at jack well 1 unit 0. 24 . The jack well is generally lo cated away from the shore line. This unit is more useful when number of intake wells are more than one. so that water is collected in one unit and then effected.0.55/4)413 = 1.013)2 X (0.55m 24m 23.88 m (d) 1.L.116 R.116 = 23.L.59 x 10-4 8 = 1 : 862 Headloss = 100 / 862 = 0. inspection ma intenance is made easy. of gravity main at jack well = 24 . 4.88 m 6.1.7)2 (0.Using Manning's formula. of gravity main = 27 . 2.4 Design Of Jack Well (a) Jack Well This structure serves as a collection of the sump well for the incoming water fr om the intake well from where the water is pumped through the rising main to the various treatment units..3 =24m R. so that the installation of pumps. 3. .5)( 10 =5min.12 m =0. =0.5m 1m . of bottom of jack well R. of bottom o f jack well when full = 6.5 x detention time of intake well.l.12m O. Diameter of well < 20m. (c) Suction head < 10m. = Assumingsuctionhead Bottomclearance Top clearance 8 m. = 1.88 m = 22.(b) Design Criteria . 6.25 tE 6.(3 to 15 min.l. = 0.15m 22.88 m 29.5 m.88 m (d) Summary Diameter of jack well R. Detentiontime = 0. 4. Maximum depth of water that can be stored in condition when water is minimumin r ive 26 22.88 + 7 = 29.14 m = 22.}.l. of bottom of jack well R.1543x10x60 = 92.88 m 2. .88 =3.67 m2 Capacity of well C / S area of well Diameter of well R.58 m3 = 92.58/3. .l. Design Calculation Detention time =5m. top of jack well Suction depth Top clearance Bottom clearance r:c3.0 m.12 = 29. ~ . ...:~ . J' ...._..I :. I_~"".-'Ii :: :: ~. . I :-0:..." _ 4' "_"_...45) €>B ....' I I I REGULAI\NG' .>-~-r'. . .I_J _'.._ _. .: . -_" I PIAn RISING _ MAIN ( 0.. : to._l~:./.. . I' I I.". " :'~~... k'.~. VALVE~ :'-1' .: .. . --...... T . _ " : . _.: .." "iT .. q.iY~ cu\VrLL AND PUMPJ-JOU£f .. 4.' ~-:--.:.s R. ..":1. ~. . -".I1l' ~{ !iG . . ~'L.. '.co R!:G ULATt"'GVALVE GRAVITY MAt/'oJ MT .. ..2.: . .' li.L.'j: V" . " I~ ..'. 0':~"'. .. . . 5.1.5 Design Of Pumping System (a) Pumps in the water treatmentplant, pumps are used to boost the water from thejack well to the aerationunits. The followingpoi ntsare to be stressedupon. The suction pumpingshould be as short and straight as possible. It should not be greaterthan 10m,for centrifugalpump. If head is more . i +n ""' ..v... i '' ~ +h, ,... i "' i n~ , n + Lhan 10 m V g ter Is converte d , n I I, ILV yg poU r g, '''' LIIU,", I n pI te VI LA v atlng ''"' water head, vapour head is created and pump ceases to function. . . . . The suction pipe should be of such size that the velocity should be about 2m / s ec. . The delivery pipe should be of such size that the velocity should be about 2.5m. /sec. The fonowing four to/pes of pumps are generally used. . . . Buoyancy operated pumps impuise operated pumps Positive displac.ementpumps Veloc ity adoptions pumps . The following criteria govern pump selection. . · Type of duty required. Present and projected demand and pattern and change in de mand. The details of head and flow rate required. Selecting the operating speed of the pump and suitable drive. . · o The efficiency of the pumps and consequent influence on power consumption and the running costs. (b) Diameter Of Rising Main Q = 0.1543m3/sec. Economical diameter = 0.97 --.fato 1.22 --.fa = 0.97 "';0.1543to 1.22 .../0.1543 =0.38 to 0.48 m Provide D = 0.45 m (c) . Design Criteria Suction head should not be greater than 10m. Velocity of f low length Top clearance = 0.7 to 1.5 mts =0.5 m =1m Bottomclearance (d) Design Calculation Frictionallosses in rising main Assumingvelocity = 0.9 mtsec. F = 0.02 FPv2 hf=2gd Head loss = 0.02 x -190x (0.9)2 2 x 9.81 x 0.45 = 0.348 =0.35 Total head of pumping = hs + hd + hf + minor losses = 2.12+4.88+.35+1 =8.35 Assuming two pumps in parallel W.O.H. 1000 x 0.1543 x 8.35 W.H.P. = . = =17.17HP S.H.P. = 75 W.H.P. 75 (e) : n Summary = 17.17 0.75 =22.90 HP Provide 1 - 25 HP pump in parallel Diameter of pipe I0.45 m , 2.7 -y: 6.1.6 Design Of Rising Main (a) General These are the pressure pipes used to convey the water from the jack well to the treatment units. The design of rising main is dependent on resistance to flow, available head, al lowable velocities of flow, sediment transport, quality of water and relative co st. Various types of pipes used are cast iron, steel, reinforced cement concrete, pr e stressed concrete, asbestos cement, polyethylene rigid PVC, ductile iron fibre glass pipe, glass reinforced plastic, fibre reinforced plastic. The determinati on of the suitability in all respects of the pipe of joints for any work is a ma tter of decision by the engineer concerned on the basis of requirements for the scheme. (b) Design Criteria Velocity =0.9 to 1.5 m/sec. Diameter < 0.9 m. (c) Design Calculation = 0.97J a to 1.22.[0 = 0.38 to 0.48 m = 0.45 m Economical diameter, D Provide diameter V Summary = alA = 0.97 m/sec. Diameter of pipe I 0.45 m 28 defloridization. In the case of ground water and surface water storage which are well protected. The method of treatment to be employ ed depends on the characteristics of the raw water and the desired standards of water quality. Conventional treatment including prechlorination. The unit operations and unit processes in water treatment constit ute aeration flocculation (rapid and slow mixing) and clarification. flocculation and sed imentation. Based on the data given in second chapter. in an economical manner. rapid gravity or pressure filtration and chlorination may be necessary. only disinfection by chlorination is adopted befor e supply. softening. aeration. aesthetically attractive and palatable. water conditioning and disinfection and may take ma ny different combinations to suit the above requirements. the evaluation of its q uality should not be confined to the end of the treatment facilities but should be extended to the point of consumer's use. the following treatment units and acc essory units are designed to meet the quality and quantity requirement of the pr oject: 29 . Where ground water contains excessive dissolved carbon dioxide and odorous gases . where the water has turbidity below 10 JTU (Jackson Candle Turbidity Units) and is free from odour and color. filtration.2 Treatment Units The aim of water treatment is to produce and maintain water that is hygienically safe. Albeit t he treatment of water would achieve the desired quality. rapid gravity filtration and postchlorination are adopted for highly polluted surface waters laden with algae or microscopic organisms. aeration followed by flocculation and sedimentation.6. Also for taste and odour removal.g. 30 e.2.g. The limitati on of aeration are that the water is rendered more corrosive after aeration when the dissolved oxygen contents is increased though in earlier circumstances it m ay otherwise due to removal of aggressive C02.g. In water treatment. in certain forms. H2S and other volatile substances causing taste and odour. To precipitate impurities like iron and man ganese. underground sources devoid of or deficient in oxygen.-Aeration unit Coagulant dose Lime soda dose Chemical dissolving tank Chemical h ouse Flash mixer Clariflocculator Rapid sand filter Chlorination unit The detail design of the ab ove units are discussed in subsequent sections. water from . aeration is not largely effective but can be used in combination with chlorine or activated carbon to reduce their doses. water from deepe r layers of an impounding reservoir. 6. water from some underground sources.1 Design Of Aeration Unit Aeration Unit Aeration is necessary to promote the exchange of gases between the water and the atmosphere. Expulsion of C02. e. e. aer ation is practiced for three purposes : To add oxygen to water for imparting fre shness. 4 m =50cm = 4 to 9 = 0. = 17 m2 =5m = 0.75 m c/c =2m = 0. Cascade aerators.0. Design Criteria For Cascade Aerators Number of trays Spacing of trays Height of the structure Space requirement Design Calculation Qmax Provide area at tray Dia meter of bottom most tray Rise of each tray Tread of each tray = 0.The concentration of gases in a liquid generally obeys Henry's Law which states that the concentration of each gas in water is directly proportional to the part ial pressure. T he saturation concentration of a gas decreases with temperature and dissolved sa lts in water. The three types of aerators are : Waterfall or multiple tray aerators.3 to 0. Aeration tends to accelerate the gas exchange.015 .1543 m3/sec. Diffused a ir aerators. or concentration of gas in the atmosphere in contact with water.045 m2/m3 /hr 31 . r R.:) MT : I .{Jt...OO) R CA~CA[)E CASC.Ct ~ . ~> ~ -. L..) L R. :roe ~C.:) ~ " R..R..~) (3qSJ <:'ASCI'obE ~ ~(5# 2Cf -OD .1.l(.-1" . Of: ~r<J MT5 AE RA\IQ\J UN\-r ~ . i.AbE 3.2(h8~ R'L: 29.'L(30t'c. (A.L.. It 0) .CASCADE. . IN MTS PIA M ETE-R CAse ADt.-. ( .C-ASCADE f4 ~ . . ~. 1N LE'T =-G : I Rl SING MAIN (0. . transport facilities. 1. weather conditions.00 m Design Of Chemical House And Calculation Of Che mical Dose The space for storing the chemicals required for the subsequent treat ment of water consists of determining space required for storing the most common ly used coagulant alum.20 29. (m) 31. 3. lime. No.Summary Sr.L.40 R.L. Chemical house should be designed to be free from moisture. The size of unit also depends upon the locatio n. etc. These shou ld be sufficient space for handling and measuring chemicals and other related op erations.00 30.60 30. of ground at site = 29. chlorine. Alum Dose: Coagulation The terms coagulation and flocculation are used rather indiscriminat ely to describe the process of removal of turbidity caused by fine suspension co lloids and organic colors. 5.80 29. It should be located near to the treatment plant and chemicals should be stored in such size of bags that can be handled easily. distance of production units and availability of chemicals. etc. for the minimum period of three mon ths and generally for six months. Cascade First Second Third Fourth Fifth Diameter of tray (m) 1 2 3 4 5 R. sap. 2. 32 . 4. then total area required = 80 m2. Per day alum required for worst seas on for intermediate stage = 50 x 10-6x 555.58 kg/day For six months (180 days) = 666.58 x 180 = 119984. Lime-Soda Pro cess: Softening A water is said to be hard. resulting in particle destabilization. when it does not form leather readil y with soap.2 m2. The hardness of water is due to the presence of calcium and magnesi um ions in most of the cases.40 kg Number o f bags whence 1 bag is containing 50 kg = 2400 If 15 days in each heap = 160 hea ps If area of one heap be 0. this is achieved by the addition of appropriate chemical and rapid intense mixing for o btaining uniform dispersion of the chemical. respectively. 20mg/L. Design Criteria For Alum Dose Alum required in particular season is given below: Monsoon Winter Summer = 50 mg/L = 20 mg/L = 5 mg/L Alum required Let the average dose of alum required be 50 mg/L.Coagulation describes the effect produced by the addition of a chemical to a col loidal dispersion. 5 mg/L i n monsoon.48 X 103x 24 = 666. winter and summer. The coagulant dose in the field should be judiciously controlled in the light of the jar test values. The method generally used are lime-soda 33 . Alum is used as coagulant. Operationally. 5 mg/L of magnesium requires Hence. = 61.process. = (69.6 + 8. reduce the hardness to v alues less then40 mg/L. however. = 56/24 mg/L of CaO. Softening with these chemicals is used particularly for water with high initial hardness ( > 500 mg/L) and suitable for water containing turbidity. col or and iron salts. = (56/24) x 3. as follows. Lime And Soda Requ ired Lime required for alkalinity Molecular weight of CaC03 = 40 + 12 + 48 = 100 = 40 + 16 = 56. the total pure lime required = 56 m g/L of CaO. 3+ . Hence. CaO 100 mg/L of CaC03alkalinity requires 110 mg/L of CaC03 requires = 56 mg/L of CaO = (56/100) x 110 = 61.5 = 8. hydrated lime required Soda (Na2C03) : Soda is required fir non-carbo nate hardness.8 x 74)/56 = 92.23 mg/L. Design Criteria For Lime-Soda Process It should be possible to remove 30 mg/L ca rbonate hardness and 200 mg/L total hardness by this process.8 mg/L Also 56 kg of pure lime (CaO) is equivalent to 74 kg of hydrated li me.6 mg/L of CaO Lime Required For Magnesium 24 mg/L of magnesium requires 1 mg/L of magnesium re quires 3. Lime-soda softening cannot.2 = 69.2 mg/L of CaO. 0 m 35 .8 heap s provide dimension Chemical Dissolving Tanks : Total quantity of alum.86 kg One bag contains 50 kg.5 x 180 x 24 x 103) =221329. = 3148 = 209.23 x 555.16 m2 = 3.44 day =387 bags =25.26/180 =19394.100 mg/L of NCH requires 161.4 +221329. number of heaps If area of one heap is 0.2 = 59 m2 = 65.0 m x 3.26 m2 = 20 x 12 = 240 m2 = 20mx 12m = 119984.97 m2 = 80 + 59 + 41.6 =65. lime and soda Area required Dimensions = 5.59 mg/L of Na2C03 Total quantity of lime =(92. 97 = 180.5x103x 24 x 180 x = 157400. Total area Provide room d imension = 235. Number of bags required If 15 bags in each heap. chlorine cylinders etc.2 m2.97 m2 Number of bags If 15 bags in each heap Total area of heap Total area for all che micals Add 30 % for chlorine storage.2 x 209. Total quantity of soda required = 4426 = 295 = 295xO.25 kg.59 x 10-6 555.86 = 41. = 0.6 mg/L of NCH requires = 106 mg/L of Na2C03 = ( 106/100) x 161.86 heaps.86 +157400 = 498714. 5 Design Of Mechanical Rapid Mix Unit Flash Mixer Rapid mixing is and operation by which the coagulant is rapidly and uniformly dispersed throughout the volume of water to create a more or less homogeneous single or multiphase system. Size of chemical solution tanks 4.48 x 8 x 60 = 18470 Lit = 1 8.Size of chemical dissolving 3x3 5.Chemical Solution tanks: Total quantity of alum. Per day alum required Hydrated lime required Soda required tanks 666. 2. 3. The ch emical coagulant is normally introduced at some point of 36 .5 x 1.58 k/j 92.5 x 1.5 x 3.2m) and 0. lime and soda required per day = 2770. 4.5 1. This helps in the formation of micro floes and results in proper utilization of chemical coagulant preventing localization of connection and premature formation of hydroxides which lead to less effective utilization of the coagulant.63 x 20 =55412 Lit/day = 38.5 x 3.23 mql 65.59 'M/A.47 m3 Assuming depth of tank (1.3m free board Dimension of solution tank Summary = 4.63 kg/day Hence solution required per day = 2770.48 Lit/min Quantity of solution for 8 hours = 38. The turbulence and resultant intensity of mixingis based on the rate of power input to the water.I I LIIO Y' .m/day = 0. They are mixed by the impeller r otating at high speeds.l11.. T " 110 h In+ens ~' LILY ' "f VI . Velocity of flow Depth Power Required Imeeller 8eeed . This is defined as the rate of change of velocity per unit distanc e normal to a section. . ' f".~ ..041 'r<J/vi"1000 = 100 to 250 rpm .. hIIi gh . m" anI Iv ""' OCi+u YOI ILY gradient 'G'.. Flash mixture is one of the most popula r methods in which the chemicals are dispersed. Iis d0 pendent ~ I I '" UpO II th LII " " e tvllll-'VIQ .... ... Design Criteria For Mechanical Rapid Mix Unit Detention time =30 to 60 sec..h u1ence "nI +h" ..d miv l IVI IQ pl iliA ng to create the desired intense turbulence are gravitational and pneumatic. T II " 10 he SV u"c " OfI vnol P"u.vi I III All " n. = 1 to 3 m cu... Loss of head = 4 to 9 m/sec..vater U. . -I J"+0 ':! v.. =200 . .2 to 0. O .3:1 = 120 rem .O Mixing device be capable of creating a velocity gradient = 300m/sec/m depth Rati o of impeller diameter to tank diameter = 0...4 : 1 D I' a +in uv VI .4to.II '"' ".5:1 = 0. = 1. nf t ank h""!g I It to rfi amo tor \.=O. -I I (C) Design Calculation = 13331.52 m3/day = Design flow Detention time Ratio of tank height to diameter Ratio of impeller di ameter to tank diameter Rotational speed of impeller Assume temperature 30 sec. I . 2 m from the wall.629 m3 D Height Volume = 1. 2.99 m2 = % XVT = % x 1.6m I Summary 11. 38 .47 KW 3. Dimensions of flat blade and impeller: = 0.23 m free board) PowerRequired Numberof Blade(0.5 m) Diameter of inlet and outlet 4. Power Requirement: Power spend =5.5 m = 2m2 Provide 4 numbers of length 1.6 m 2. I Height of Tank (0.--- .47 x i 03 As = 1. 4.47 t<JN 8 4 250 I 16. 3. 120 rpm 2.37 + (0.08 m/sec.08 Diameterof impeller Velocity of tip impeller Area of blade Power spent Provide 8 blades of 0. VR = 1.5mx 0.8 (Flat blad e).65 m = 4.6m = 2. 5.5 m and proj ecting 0.8 x i 000 XAs x % x 4. Dimension of tank: = 4. 5. Detention Time Speed of Impeller 30 sec.1.5m) Number of baffles (length 1. = As =:h x CDx rox As x VR3 Let CD 5.5 x 0.23 m free board) Total height of tank = 2. Provide inlet and outlet pipes of 250 mm diameter. 7. . 5 m = 30 to 60 min. The area of the opening being large eno ugh to maintain a very low velocity. (b) Design Criteria: (Flocculator) = 3 to 4.6 m/s Velocity gradient (G) Dimension less factor Gt Power consumption Outlet velocity 39 = 10 to 75 = 104to 105 = 10 to 36 KW/mld = 0. The water mixed with chemical is fed in the flocculator compa rtment fitted with paddles rotating at low speeds thus forming floes. All these units consists of 2 or 4 flocculating paddles placed equidistantly. The flocculating paddles may be of ro tor-stator type. The cla rification unit outside the flocculation compartment is served by inwardly rakin g rotating blades.8 m/sec. in the annular setting zone the floc embedding the suspended particles settle to the bottom and the clear effluent overflows into the peripheral launder. Under quiescent conditions.2 to 0. The flocculated water passes out from the bottom of the flocculation tank to the clarifying zone through a wide opening.2 to 0.25 m/sec. = 10 to 25 % of cis of tank Depth of tank Detention time Velocity of flow Total area of paddles Range of peripheral velocities of blades = 0.15 to 0. Th ese paddles rotate on their vertical axis. Rotating in opposite direction above the vertical axis. = 0. .Design Of Clariflocculator Clariflocculator The coagulation and sedimentation pr ocesses are effectively incorporated in a single unit in the clariflocculator. S ometimes clarifier and clariflocculator are designed as separate units. 16m Dp = diameter of inlet pipes = 0.2:1 (v:h) = 1 revolution in 45 to 80 minutes Velocity of water at outlet chamber = not more than 40 m/sec.5 m =300 m3/m2/day = 25 % = 1 in 12 or 8% for mechanically cleaned tank.2m of 10. = 1.Design Criteria: (Clarifier) Surface overflow rate Depth of water Weir loading S torage of sludge Floor slope Slope for sludge hopper Scraper velocity =40 m3/m2/day = 3 to 4. Design Of Flocculator : wall Volume o f flocculator = 566.41 m3 Providing a water depth Plan area of flocculator = 3. (c) Assumptions =2% = 566.-.45 m D Provides a tank diameter =10.41/3.5 m = 283. = 30 S-1 Average outflow from clariflocculator Water lost in desludging Design average pe riod Detention period Average value of velocity wadient Design Of Influent Pipe Assuming V = 1 m/sec. Dia = 0.97 m2 D = diameter of flocculator = 10.82 m3/hr = 30 min.5 = 80.2 m 40 .82 x 30 160 = 283.447 m Provide an influent pipes of 450 diameter. Ap = % x 1.2 .89 x 10-3X (1tf4x 10. Area = 555. Of vertical shaft = 9.75) 3.2-0.08 Power input Cd P = % (Cd x P x Ap X (V-U)3 = 1.5] x 100 Provide Ap Ap = [10.1% ok Let velocity of water below the partition wall between the flocculator and clari fier be 0.51m2 Depth below partition wall = 0.8 x 995 x Ap x (0.875m 41 .22x 3.5 m2 = 10.7 m width One shaft will support 5 p addles The paddles will rotate at an rpm of 4 V 0.48/0. v = Velocity of water tip of blade = 0 .3 m/sec.8 = 995 kg/m3(25°c) V = Velocity of tip of blade = 0.08 .2 = 0.4-0.5ht (10.4 = 0..96m == 1m = distance of paddle from C1.016m Provide 25% for storage of s ludge = 0.Dimension Of Paddles: = G2X !l v x vol = 302x 0.1 m/sec.5) = 229.5] x 100 Which is acceptable (within 10 to 25 %) Provide 5 no of paddles of 3 m height and 0.1)3 = 9.25 x 35 = 0.25 x 0.4 m/sec.0.3 x 60 x 60 = 0.47/ P (10. 229.51/x x 10.4 r r = 2 x x x r x x/60 = 2 x x x r x 4/60 = 0.11 % <10 to 25 % = 10.75) 3.47 m2 Ratio of paddles to cis of flocculator [9. 48 x 24/40 = 333. 5. L. 10.48 x 24/72.29m2 Oct= Dia. Summary (Clariflocculator) 1. 9.----Provide 8% slope for bottom Total depth of tank at partition wall = 0. 6.(10. of India.26m = 555.2m 5 1m 4 Distance of paddle from C.49m3/day/m According to manual of Govt. of paddles (3 m height and 0.016 + 0.7m 23m . 8.2)2] Oct = 333. 4. 3.7 m width) Distance of shaft from C. If it is a well clarifier. It can exceed upto 1500m3/day/m.69m ==4.26 = 184.29 = 22. of Clariflocculator P/4 [Oct2 . of vertical shaft 1m Slope of bottom (%) Total dept h of partition wall Diameter of clariflocculator 8 4. 2.L.3 + 3.5 + 0. of flocculator Paddles rotation (RPM) 30min 450mm 3.875 = 4. 11. Detention Period Diameter of influent pipes Overall depth of flocculator Diamet er of tank No. 7.99m ==23m = 1t X Oct Length of weir = 1tx 23 Weir loading = 72.5m 10.7m Design Of Clarifier Assuming a surface overflow rate of 40m3/m2/day Surface of clariflocculator = 555. CL"'~IF'e~ DR..VCATOR D I<.-.. .<:\.:--z-R. ~'f T .\. !.'2.lvE M~Ctf"NI~"': II'4AL I<...1 f MT ~iAT\(:)NAR'f t'oI\O"\llNG FLoCC...lIt--\ ) CLA RI f:LOCCULAOR T . 5m3/m2/hr = 100m2 .2. · · · Min. The transport step may be accomplished by straining gravity.6.7 . .45 to 0. . setting.5 (a) Design Of Rapid Gravity Filter Rapid Sand Filter The rapid sand filter comprises of a bed of sand serving as a single medium gran ular matrix supported on gravel overlying an under drainage system. Once the particle s come closer to the surface an attachment step is required to retain it on the surface instead of letting it flow down the filter. In the first step the impurity particles mu st be brought from the bulkof the liquid within the pores close to the surface o f the medium of the previously deposited solids on the medium. overall depth of filter unit including a free board of 0. occurs primarily within the filter bed and is referred to as depth filt ration. Conceptually the removal of particles takes place in two distinct slips as transport and as attachment step.7 Uniformityco-efficientfor sand 43 = 1. (a) Design Criteria: (Rapid Sand Filter) Rate of filtration Max surface area of one bed = 5 to 7. hydrodynamics and diffusion and it may be aided by flocculation in the interstices of the filter. The removal of particles within a deep granular medium filter such as rapid sand filter. the distinct ive features of rapiq sand filtration as compared to slow sand filtration includ e careful pre-treatment of raw water to effective flocculate the colloidal parti cles.3 to 1.5m = 2.6m Effectiv e size of sand = 0. . impaction interception. use of higher filtration rates and coarser but more uniform filter media t o utilize greater depths of filter media to trap influent solids without excessi ve head loss and back washing of filter bed by reversing the flow direction to c lear the entire depth of river. 6m x 6. each with a dimension 8. = 5m3/m2/hr = 1.48m3/hr =2% = 30min.33:1 = cent ral manifold with laterals. .65/5 = 115. Plan area Length x width L = 58m2 = L x 1. .6 to 0.25L = 58 =6. (b) Standing depth of water over the filter = 1 to 2m Free board is not less than 0. .73m2 ==116 Using 2 units.65m3/hr = 578.55 to 2.7 percent by weight Silica content should not be less than 90% Specific gravity Minimum number of units Depth of sand = 2. Ignition loss should not exceed 0.02) x 24/23.8m Provide 2 filter units. . 5m Problem Statement = 555. 44 .8m.48 x (1 + 0. = 13mm Net filtered water Quantity of backwash water used Time lost during backwash Des ign rate of filtration Length . .48m3/hr = 555.65 =2 = 0..width ratio Under drainage system Size of perfor ations (c) Design Calculation Solution: required flow of water Design flow for filter Plan area for filter = 555.75 Wearing loss is not greater than 3% .25 to 1.5 = 578. . 6 x 6.6)3 x 2.4cm2 45 J . 8 = 4 X 10-4(poor response) < average degree of pre-treatment h = 2.54 R (log d) = 12 (10 to 14) The units of Land dare cm and mm.5m (terminal head loss) Q = 5 x 2m3/m2/hr(assuming 100% over load of filter) d = 0. respectively.5/1 = 4 x 10-4x 293223 L>46m provide depth of sand bed = 60cm Estimation Of Gravel And Size Gradation: Assum ing size gradation of 2 mm at to 40 mm at bottom using empirical formula : P Whe re. R = 2. Q.17544m2 = 1754.2 5 21.5 9. Size Depth(cm) Increment 2 9.1 10 30. d.6mm(meandia.5 40 49 9 Provide 50 cm depth of gravel.mm.2 9 .) 10 x (0.2 20 40 9. m and m.Estimation Of Sand Depth : It is checked against breakthrough of floc. Design Of Under Drainage System : Plan area of each filter = 8.3 12. hand 1 are in m3/m2/hr.48m2 Total area of perforation = 3 x 10-3 x 58. respectively. Assume. Using Hud son Formula: Q x d x h/L = 8 x 293223 11 Where.48 = 0.8 = 58. . Total area of perforation = n x 1t/4 x (1..6 x 100/20 D = ...90 m 1 Let n be total no.76cm Providing a commercially available diameter of 100 cm.4 = 5263.90 x 100/1. Assuming spacing for late rals Number of laterals = 43 on either side = 20cm = 8.2 = 10526.83cm == 90mm Number of perforations /Iaterals = 86 units Length of one lateral = % width of filter % dia.3)2 = 1754.-Total cross section area of laterals = 3 x area of perforation = 3 x 1754. of manifold = %x6.8-%x = 2. n = 1321.J10526.J61.2 X 4ht = 8.4 .25cm clc Provide 16 perforations of 13 mm diameter at 180 cm clc.4 x 4hc = 115.2cm2 Area of central manifold = 2 x area of lateral = 2 x 5263.6 = 181. of perforation of 13mm dia. .37 ==16 Spacing of perforations = 2. of perforation /Iateral = 1322/86 = 15.4cm2 Diameter of central manifold = ..76 == 1322 No. 46 . 5 deep in each filter. of trough = 6.8 = 263.8 =3.78=:4 discharge per unit trough = 0.8 m for wash water trough which will run parallel to the longer dimensio n of the filter unit. For a width of 0.4(h)312 = 0.5 x 3 x 8.5m3/m2/min.1462 h Freeboard = 1.41 = 0. 16m3 47 .4 m wide x 0.376 x 0.1m Provide 4 troughs of 0.48 = 2105.6 x 6.Computation of wash water Troughs: Wash water rate Wash water discharge for one filter = 36m3/m2/hr = 36 x 58.8/1.5848/4 = 0.5848m3/sec.376 b h312 0.1462m3/sec. Total quantity of air required per unit bed = 1. Total Depth Of Filter Box: Depth of filter box = depth of under drain + gravel + sand + water depth + free board = 900 + 500 + 600 + 2200 + 300 = 4500mm Design Of Filter Air Wash : Assume rate at which air is supplied Duration of air wash = 1.28m3/hr = 0. No. Assuming a spaci ng of 1.4 m the water depth at upper end is given by Q = 1. =3min. . I I ..I ... . .I. I I I I..._ _ _ ..o~S \N[)\C. I' . . . . .. I i I I · I : I ... . ~ _ . I ' ...HE"Ab L.. ~ I I : . .. ..1 .ATbA.. . .. ~.'-.-'.: I I I ' I I I::. ._ i . -. .. . " I. ' . ". I I I .. . _ _ J _.. I I I I I ~ I I I t I I I I I I "._ _ _ '-. '"""""' --- .1 .~.MT I' t. 1 Ic:t 17 -. I I I...12...-' .'. I' : . : ... 'I I I T . I I 'I... and hence it becomes necessary to 'disinfect' the water to kill th e pathogenic bacteria. 5. However. the foregoing treatment methods do not ensure 100% removal of pathoge nic bacteria. 9. In addition to this.8m 60cm SOcm 13mm 100cm 20cm 86 90mm 16 4 0. Disinfection should not only remove the existing bacteria from water but also en sure their immediate killing even afterwards. Duration of air wash 15. 16m. Total quantity of air required pe r unit bed 6. The ch emical which is used as a disinfectant must.2. plain sedimentation. 6. sedimentati on. thus affording some protection again st recontamination.(d) 1. Number of perforations 11. Size of trough 13. coagulation.5m 4500mm 3min. 7. Total de pth of filter box 14. therefore be able to give the "resi dual sterilising effect" for a long period. 2.6 (a) Disinfection Chlorination Unit Treatment method such as aeration. Summary Number of units Size of unit Depth of sand bed Depth of gravel Diameter of perfo ration Diameter of central manifold Spacing for laterals Number of laterals Diam eter of laterals 2 8. 263. 3.4 x 0. filtration. Number of troughs 12. it should be 48 . 4.:! 10.6 x 6. in the distribution system. would render the water chemically and aesthetically acceptable with some reduction in the pathogenic bacterial content . 8. 'YPICAl CHLORINA70R . SOLUTION I TflEAT EJ> WATeR 70 13€ LINE FEED DIAGRAM OF A.J SC. YLINCEPTO CI~TRI~IJTION MAIN ~ ~ o 1 tJ $\-IUT oP'f: YALVE VALliE ~ o I-( WEIGHING .sCALE .5oLUTION INSTALJ.HeCK ~ Pl1~p .....).cI. OVER r:/. CHLORINE GAS L.f:)/N To t:>AA/fIJ STRoNG CJ.IQUID C1.1 c..ATloN I I I I I . m.895 Num ber of cylinders used per day (d) 1 2 Summary Chlorine required per day Number o f cylinder required per day 18. unobjectionable to taste. Design Caculations Rate of chlorine required.16k g Number of cylinder (one cylinder contain 16 kg) = 3359. = 1.33 x 106x 1.4mg/L (rainy season) = 1mg/L (winter season) = 0. (b) Design Criteria (chlorination) Chlorine dose . to disinfect water be 2 p.harmless. ' Chlorine' satisfies the above said more than any other disinfectant and hence is widely used. ecomomical and measurable by simple tests.4 x 10-6 = 18.16 x 2/16 = 419.3 General Storaae Tank Distribution reservoirs also called service reservoirs are the storage "eservoir s which store the treated water for supplying the same during emergencies and al so help in absorbing the hourly fluctuations in water demand.6mg/L (summer season) · · (c) Residual chlorine Contact period = 0.662 x 180 = 3359. Per day = 13. Depending upon the ir elevation with respect to the ground they 49 .662kg 2 of 16kg =2 cylinders of 16kg 6. Chlorine required.p.1 to 0.2 mg/L (minimum) = 20 to 30min.662kg For 6 months = 18. .4 to 0 . (b) Design Criteria (U..R. In absence of availability of the data of hourly d emand of \AJaterhe capacity of reservoir is usually 114 1/3 t to of the daily av erage supply.R.S. normally the capacity of this type of reservoir depends upon the capacity of the pumps and hours of pumping during a day. If the pumps work for 24 minutes then the capacity of this reservoir may be between 30 minutes to 1 hour....6m (c) Design Calculations Assuming that all pumps are working for. The balancing storage capacity of a reservoir can be worked out from th e data of hourly consumption of water for the town/city by either the mass curve method or analytical method.hours Capacity of underground reservoir = 6hr capacity of average demand = Qavg.. Storage Capacity Ideally the total storage capacity of a distribution reservoir is the summation of (i) balancing reserve (ii) breakdown reserve and (iii) fire reserve.are classified as under ground reservoir and elevated reservoir both of these re servoirs designed for this project. From this. . x detentiontime = 18 MLD x 4 x 106x 10-3/24 = 4500 m3 50 .S. Underground Storage Reservoir (U.) (i) (ii) Detention time Freeboard = 1 to 4hr = 0.S. the water is pumped to E...) : (a) General The reservoir is used for storing the filtered water which is now fit for drinki ng.R. 3m =4m = "450 x 4 In X4 d = 11.5m 6 14 m x 14 m x 4.3m and Diameter = 11.1 4. the pressure requirements of the distribution system n ecessitates the construction of ESR.5 m (d) 1.5 m 4 hr Elevated Service Reservoir (ESR) : (a) General Where the areas to be supplied with treated water are at higher elevations than the treatment plant site. Provide 1 ESR of overall height = 4. (b) Design Calcu lations = 450 m3 Free board Overall depth Diameter Assumingcapacityof ESR= 1/10 of underground storage =0.5m Provide 6 compartments of 14 m x 14 m x 4. 3. 5.-. 2. 4. The treated water from the underground rese rvoirs is pumped to the ESR and than supplied to the consumers.96m 51 . Assuming 6 compartments Let depth = 4m = Area Area of each compartment Dimension Free board 1125 m2 = 190 m2 = 14 m x 14 m = 0. Summary Capacit y of reservoir Total depth Compartments Size Detention time 4500 m..96m . 2.. Summary Number of tanks Depth of tank Diameter of tank 1 4.96m 52 .. 3.3m 11. (b) 1. I I. .. I..I' .. h--d~~. .:!=-~:?< :1°'lC .3 f_ I' . . COLUMN BERMS -. I r 1/"'fT . . M.... I -I. .. ...-'YA-LIIE .:" ". OUT LeT PIPE ]!t._0_4.fL.. ..I ... ~I i'" 5 c:ccion .oWI PIPe PIPe --j........ this exercise will help us when we may come across some such design in future. 53 . Although this p roject and its data is totally hypothetical. The design has been done for a predic ated population of 61400 expected after 30 (2001 to 2031) years.=lUe (iF CONCLUSION The designed project deals with the design of a conventional water treatment pla nt having a perennial river as the source. The above treatment of the water makes it possible to safe guard the health of t he people.. S. Garg S.rJfr REFERENCES 1. Govt. New Delhi.C.Bhole. Steel E. Ministry of works & housing. 5. New York. New York. 1981. A. 1967..E. 3. 1985. l'Water Clarificati on process: Practical Design Hudson H. inc. Pub. of India.G.W. l'Water S upply & Sewerage" McGraw Hill Ltd. 1981. New York.: Dhanpat Rai & Sons. New Delhi. & Mcggee T. 19 94.M. 4. & Evaluation" Van Norstrand Reinhold Co. 7.. (I) Journal . TwartA. 54 . "Water supply and sanitary engineering". New Delhi. 6. 8. Jr. 1994. 1984. Fair G. "Low cost package water treatment plant for rural areas"l. 2.. l'Water Supply" Arnold Inter national Student Edition (AISE). Great Britain. "Manual on Water Supply & Treatment".J. "Water and waste water engineering" (vol. "Water supply engineering" Khanna pub.E.1&2) john Wiley & sons. Birdie J.EN 19 95.K. . . p r . ~~-.~--- .-----.:: ..-. . .. .-......=-. ...~---..~ ~ ~~ ~...r" ~-~ -~~ -'~ «_JW:~~T'" . 'II ---- . l... .. . . .. Documents Similar To 20797282 Design of Water Treatment PlantSkip carouselcarousel previouscarousel nextWater Treatment Plant Project PptWater TreatmentWater TreatmentChapter%205DESIGN OF WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM,ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERINGwater treatment plantWaste Water Treatment Plant Design WPCF and ASCEDesign of Filtration Tank~FINAL FINAL FINALWater Treatment Plant DesignDesign of WTPDesign of Water Treatment PlantComplete Water Supply Treatment PlantDesign of Water Treatment Plants CourseWater Treatment PlantWATER TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY (TAS 3010) LECTURE NOTES 9a -Water Intake, Screening, Aeration, CoagulationWastewater Treatment Plant Design HandbookWater Treatment Manual DesignProject Report on waste water treatmentWtp Hydraulics 1Water Treatment Design of Water Treatment SystemsBooks on Water and Wastewater Treatment Plant DesignWater Treatmentwater distributionWaste Water Treatment Plants Planning Design and Operation Second Edition by Syed R QasimWater Waste Water Treatment Waste Water Treatment - Seminar Reportraw water intake, screening, and aeration in water supply projectWater Treatment Plant P&ID ReferenceWater Treatment Plant Design CriteriaMore From Vasanthakumar VenkatesanSkip carouselcarousel previouscarousel next0901 b 803800359 a 59_2013_not_tam_grp_iv_201374 Liquid Hand SoapAddress Surfactant6_2013_Sci_asst_Gr_II0901 b 803800359 a 520797282 Design of Water Treatment PlantChemistry Degree StandardPeo PolevijaykumarBE(EEE)CommandsSmellvijaykumarBE(EEE)Code ChinaNew Microsoft Office Excel Worksheet (2)Address Pla MachinecpuzChennaiBest Books About Water PurificationLow Cost Emergency Water Purification Technologies: Integrated Water Security Seriesby Chittaranjan Ray and Ravi JainChemistry of Advanced Environmental Purification Processes of Water: Fundamentals and Applicationsby Erik SogaardAdsorption Processes for Water Treatmentby Samuel D. Faust and Osman M. AlyIndian Hygiene and Public Healthby C. L. Dunn and D. D. PandyaWater Purification For Survival: A Guide for Purification and Conservation of Waterby M. UsmanDemineralization by Ion Exchange: In Water Treatment and Chemical Processing of Other Liquidsby Samuel B. ApplebaumFooter MenuBack To TopAboutAbout ScribdPressOur blogJoin our team!Contact UsJoin todayInvite FriendsGiftsLegalTermsPrivacyCopyrightSupportHelp / FAQAccessibilityPurchase helpAdChoicesPublishersSocial MediaCopyright © 2018 Scribd Inc. .Browse Books.Site Directory.Site Language: English中文EspañolالعربيةPortuguês日本語DeutschFrançaisTurkceРусский языкTiếng việtJęzyk polskiBahasa indonesiaSign up to vote on this titleUsefulNot usefulYou're Reading a Free PreviewDownloadClose DialogAre you sure?This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?CANCELOK